A Study on the Visual Perception of Cultural Value Characteristics of Traditional Southern Fujian Architecture Based on Eye Tracking
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The Inclusion of Different Cultural Groups: there has been limited research involving diverse cultural groups.
- The Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in Southern Fujian Architecture: the use of eye-tracking technology to study Southern Fujian regional architectural heritage remains underexplored.
- Specialized Studies on the Cognition of Cultural Characteristics: there has been no focused research on the cognition of cultural characteristic information inherent in Southern Fujian’s regional architectural heritage.
- What are the cultural value characteristics of Southern Fujian’s regional architectural heritage? Which cultural value attributes are effectively recognized?
- What carriers of cultural value characteristics in the scene are easily noticed?
- What are the differences in the behavioral cognition of different cultural groups to the characteristics of architectural and cultural value?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Objects and Cultural Characteristics of Architecture in the Southern Fujian Region
2.2. Selection of Experimental Materials
- Avoid spatial similarity: the images of each building should be taken from different scenes to ensure the diversity of architectural styles.
- The representativeness of the scene: the selected photos should be able to reflect the typical characteristics of the ancient house of red brick in Southern Fujian.
- The typicality of scene information and spatial location: the image should be able to contain two or more iconic features of Southern Fujian red brick ancient houses.
2.3. The Experimenter Selected
2.4. Experimental Procedure
2.5. Selection of Eye Movement Indicators
2.6. AOI Area Definition
3. Experimental Data Analysis
3.1. Characteristics of Visual Behavior of Architectural Heritage When Viewing Different Scenes by Different Groups of Participants
- Group A participants primarily focused on the swallow-tailed ridge above the roof and the central paintings.
- Group B participants concentrated their gaze more on the building itself, particularly on the painted ancestral hall door, the wooden plaque above the door, and the stone-carved couplets flanking the entrance. Additionally, Group B also observed other stone-carved couplets near the main door, which were largely overlooked by Group A.
3.2. Characteristics of Visual Behavior of Architectural Heritage When Viewing Different Architectural Elements by Various Groups of Participants
3.3. Concerns About Cultural Information at the Scene
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Categorization of Cultural Value Elements: We classified the elements of cultural value in Southern Fujian architectural heritage into two categories: patterns and shapes and calligraphy and writing. The architectural cultural carriers in the patterns and shapes category are reflective of the natural conditions and local customs of Southern Fujian. In contrast, those in the calligraphy and text category embody information pertaining to the status, aesthetic preferences, and cultural achievements of the architectural owner.
- Variations in Visual Behavior: Significant differences were observed in the visual behavior of participants with varying cultural backgrounds when observing architectural heritage. Those lacking the local cultural background of Southern Fujian inhabitants demonstrated a greater focus on architectural elements within the patterns and shapes category, which encompasses intricate designs, elaborate shapes, and vibrant colors. Their interest in the calligraphy and text category was pervasive, and their gaze was readily influenced by surrounding objects that were not directly related to the architectural features, resulting in a more dispersed distribution of fixations. In contrast, participants familiar with the local cultural background of Southern Fujian demonstrated a greater interest in the calligraphy and text category, with a more concentrated gaze and less influence from surrounding objects. Irrespective of their cultural background, elements within the patterns and shapes category were observed to effectively attract the attention of participants, whereas elements within the calligraphy and text category were found to hold greater appeal for participants with a local cultural background.
- Comprehension of Cultural Information: The eye-tracking experiment demonstrated that the elements within the calligraphy and text category of Southern Fujian traditional architecture contained substantial cultural information, which necessitated a greater investment of time to extract. A deeper understanding of local traditional cultural backgrounds allows for a more comprehensive comprehension of the information in question.
- Influence of Local Cultural Background: People with a local cultural background are also more likely to identify elements that are closely related to the themes and cultural connotations expressed by the building. In the course of our experiments, participants were more likely to connect with the cultural atmosphere created by traditional buildings. This shows that traditional architecture has a subtle impact on the aesthetic preferences and cultural tastes of local audiences, highlighting the importance of an audience’s cultural background in environmental perception.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, Y.; Dong, W. Determining Minimum Intervention in the Preservation of Heritage Buildings. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Aoki, N. The Study on the Social Value of the Architectural Heritage Preservation. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, Nanjing, China, 24–26 June 2011; pp. 2766–2769. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M.; Aoki, N.; Xu, S.B. Study on the Architectural Heritage Value from the View of Cultural Economics. AMR 2011, 243–249, 6489–6493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokilehto, T.; Cameron, C.; Parent, M.; Petzet, M. World Heritage List. What Is OUV? Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties; Monuments and Sites; Bäßler: Berlin, Germany, 2008; ISBN 978-3-930388-51-6. [Google Scholar]
- Muhealddin, B.; Abdulrahman, H.; Ali, A. Application of Architecture Principles in Reviving Historical Buildings. J. Eng. Res. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, C.; Li, J. Spatial Evolution Path of Gulangyu Island Historical International Community: From the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory. Herit. Sci. 2021, 9, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, Y.; Chiou, S.-C. Study on the Wind Environment of the Architecture Communities: Traditional Typical Min Nan Human Settlements’ Case. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 2013, 467076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X. The Intelligent Space Design of Architecture in Southern Fujian Local-Style Dwelling. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Design (ICID 2020), Xi’an, China, 11–13 December 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 164–171. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, J.; Chiou, S. Architectural Features and Preservation of Ancient Residential Complexes of the Changs in Xiangan, Xiamen. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2015, 40, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X. Analysis on the Auspicious Decoration Representation and Culture Implication of the Civilian House in Southern Fujian. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Management, Education and Social Science (ICMESS 2017), Qingdao, China, 23–25 June 2017; Liu, C., Cheung, K.S., Eds.; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2017; Volume 72, pp. 390–393. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, X.; Lian, X.; Guo, H. The Application of Minnan Architectural Pattern Elements in Ceramic Cultural Creation under the Background of Big Data. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Big Data & Artificial Intelligence & Software Engineering (ICBASE), Bangkok, Thailand, 30 October–1 November 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, F. Research on the Color of Ancient Residential Architecture in Southern Fujian and Its Inspiration for Modern Urban Color Application. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Civil, Structure and Environmental Engineering, Guangzhou, China, 12–13 March 2016; Wang, H., Zhou, S., Wang, Z., Eds.; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2016; Volume 65, pp. 160–163. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.; Liu, Q. Research on Earthquake Damage Prediction of Stone Structure in Southern Fujian Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Materials Science, Hulun Buir, China, 28–30 August 2020; IoP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 585, p. 012083. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, X.; Chang, Y.; Chai, X.-J. Study on the Structure Form of Masonry Wall in Southern Fujian. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanics, Building Material and Civil Engineering (MBMCE 2015), Guilin, China, 15–16 August 2015; Destech Publications, Inc.: Lancaster, UK, 2015; pp. 593–597. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Z.; Mustafa, M.; Mohd Isa, M.H. Regional Architecture Building Identity: The Mediating Role of Authentic Pride. Buildings 2024, 14, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klaib, A.F.; Alsrehin, N.O.; Melhem, W.Y.; Bashtawi, H.O.; Magableh, A.A. Eye Tracking Algorithms, Techniques, Tools, and Applications with an Emphasis on Machine Learning and Internet of Things Technologies. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2021, 166, 114037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, D.A. A Method of Measuring Eye Movemnent Using a Scieral Search Coil in a Magnetic Field. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Electron. 1963, 10, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimmel, D.L.; Mammo, D.; Newsome, W.T. Tracking the Eye Non-Invasively: Simultaneous Comparison of the Scleral Search Coil and Optical Tracking Techniques in the Macaque Monkey. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samadi, M.R.H.; Cooke, N. EEG Signal Processing for Eye Tracking. In Proceedings of the 22nd European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2014, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–5 September 2014; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 2030–2034. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, A.; Calderon, C.M.; Yeboah, A.M.; Dalton, K.; Irving, E.; Niechwiej-Szwedo, E. Investigation of Camera-Free Eye-Tracking Glasses Compared to a Video-Based System. Sensors 2023, 23, 7753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blascheck, T.; Kurzhals, K.; Raschke, M.; Burch, M.; Weiskopf, D.; Ertl, T. Visualization of Eye Tracking Data: A Taxonomy and Survey. Comput. Graph. Forum 2017, 36, 260–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, F.; Li, Y.; Schroeter, R.; Friedrich, J.; Wang, J. Using Eye-Tracking to Help Design HUD-Based Safety Indicators for Lane Changes. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct, Oldenburg, Germany, 24 September 2017; ACM: Oldenburg Germany, 2017; pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar]
- Loslever, P.; Simon, P.; Rousseau, F.; Popieul, J.C. Using Space Windowing for a Preliminary Analysis of Complex Time Data in Human Component System Studies. Examples with Eye-Tracking in Advertising and Car/Head Movements in Driving. Inf. Sci. 2008, 178, 3645–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomsen, S.R.; Fulton, K. Adolescents’ Attention to Responsibility Messages in Magazine Alcohol Advertisements: An Eye-Tracking Approach. J. Adolesc. Health 2007, 41, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieters, R.; Wedel, M. Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects. J. Mark. 2004, 68, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Ge, X.; Tian, Y.; Ge, L.; Shi, H.; Wan, H.; Xu, J. Designing Gaze-Based Interactions for Teleoperation: Eye Stick and Eye Click. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2023, 40, 2500–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundstedt, V. Gazing at Games: Using Eye Tracking to Control Virtual Characters. In Proceedings of the ACM Siggraph 2010 Courses, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 26–30 July 2010; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 1–160. [Google Scholar]
- Lund, H. Eye Tracking in Library and Information Science: A Literature Review. Libr. Hi Tech 2016, 34, 585–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhanom, I.B.; MacNeilage, P.; Folmer, E. Eye Tracking in Virtual Reality: A Broad Review of Applications and Challenges. Virtual Real. 2023, 27, 1481–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donmez, M. A Systematic Literature Review for the Use of Eye-Tracking in Special Education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 6515–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.Z.; Mountstephens, J.; Teo, J. Emotion Recognition Using Eye-Tracking: Taxonomy, Review and Current Challenges. Sensors 2020, 20, 2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conklin, K.; Pellicer-Sanchez, A. Using Eye-Tracking in Applied Linguistics and Second Language Research. Second Lang. Res. 2016, 32, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, M.; Fan, L.; Xu, G.; Su, H. Leveraging Eye-Tracking Technologies to Promote Aviation Safety—A Review of Key Aspects, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Saf. Sci. 2023, 168, 106295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, M.; Xie, Y.; Fujii, Y.; Furuya, N. Analyzing Spatial Visual Characteristics in Japanese Stroll Gardens Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: Case Study of Saiho-Ji Garden. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2024, 23, 140–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dupont, L.; Ooms, K.; Duchowski, A.T.; Antrop, M.; Van Eetvelde, V. Investigating the Visual Exploration of the Rural-Urban Gradient Using Eye-Tracking. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2017, 17, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Leng, J. Evaluation of Public Space in Traditional Villages Based on Eye Tracking Technology. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2024, 23, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Byun, G.; Ha, M. Exploring the Association between Environmental Factors and Fear of Crime in Residential Streets: An Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2023, 23, 1518–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.H.; Lee, C.N. A Study on the Priorities of Urban Street Environment Components—Focusing on An Analysis of AOI (Area of Interest) Setup through An Eye-Tracking Experiment. Korean Inst. Inter. Des. J. 2016, 25, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Yang, W.; Wang, D.; He, Y. Insights into Public Visual Behaviors through Eye-Tracking Tests: A Study Based on National Park System Pilot Area Landscapes. Land 2021, 10, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, S.; Hou, R.; Zhang, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C. Visual Behavior Characteristics of Historical Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reitstätter, L.; Brinkmann, H.; Santini, T.; Specker, E.; Dare, Z.; Bakondi, F.; Miscená, A.; Kasneci, E.; Leder, H.; Rosenberg, R. The Display Makes a Difference: A Mobile Eye Tracking Study on the Perception of Art before and after a Museum’s Rearrangement. J. Eye Mov. Res. 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhao, S.; Zuo, H. Integrating Eye-Movement Analysis and the Semantic Differential Method to Analyze the Visual Effect of a Traditional Commercial Block in Hefei, China. Front. Archit. Res. 2021, 10, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Liu, H. Toward a Reliable Collection of Eye-Tracking Data for Image Quality Research: Challenges, Solutions, and Applications. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2017, 26, 2424–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahtik, J. Using Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Eye-Tracking Analysis to Evaluate Photographs. J. Graph. Eng. Des. 2023, 14, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchowski, A.T. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice; Springer: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 978-1-85233-666-0. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Haddad, S.; Sears, M.; Alruwaythi, O.; Goodrum, P.M. Complexity, Performance, and Search Efficiency: An Eye-Tracking Study on Assembly-Based Tasks among Construction Workers (Pipefitters). Buildings 2022, 12, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzo, G.L.; Biesanz, J.C.; Human, L.J. What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood: Physical Attractiveness and Accuracy in First Impressions of Personality. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21, 1777–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Xia, L.; Wu, Y. Investigating the Visual Behavior Characteristics of Architectural Heritage Using Eye-Tracking. Buildings 2022, 12, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doğan, H.A. Implementation of Eye Tracking Technology on Cultural Heritage Research and Practice. IU-CG 2019, 2019, 016–021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kızılkan, G.; Yeşildal, Ö. Tarihi Dokuda Çağdaş Kültür Yapısının Görsel Etki Değerlendirmesi: Odunpazarı Modern Müze Örneklem Alanı. İdealkent 2021, 12, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollander, J.B.; Sussman, A.; Purdy Levering, A.; Foster-Karim, C. Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Human Responses to Traditional Neighborhood Designs. Plan. Pract. Res. 2020, 35, 485–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueda, Y.; Komiya, A. Cultural Adaptation of Visual Attention: Calibration of the Oculomotor Control System in Accordance with Cultural Scenes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zheng, X.S.; Wu, M.; Dong, R.; Peng, K. Culture Influence on Aesthetic Perception of Chinese and Western Paintings: Evidence from Eye Movement Patterns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction, Tianjin, China, 17 August 2013; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- Ksander, J.C.; Paige, L.E.; Johndro, H.A.; Gutchess, A.H. Cultural Specialization of Visual Cortex. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2018, 13, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Element | Meaning | Picture |
---|---|---|
Swallow-tail ridge | The swallow-tail ridge is the main ridge of the building curved into the tail of the swallow, hence the name “swallow-tail ridge”. | |
Saddle-shaped ridge | The saddle-shaped ridge serves as a ridge decoration, with various patterns symbolizing different meanings. For instance, motifs like bats are meant to bring good fortune, while clouds symbolize wishes for a happy and prosperous life. | |
Stone carvings (patterns and calligraphic texts) | Stone carving skills in Southern Fujian are excellent. In the building, the common patterns of stone carvings are dragons and phoenixes, reflecting people’s prayers for good luck. | |
Wood carvings (patterns and calligraphic texts) | Most traditional buildings in Southern Fujian are constructed using wooden structures. Southern Fujian wood carvings are notable for their distinctive local characteristics and are widely used in various building parts. | |
Painting | Color painting is a crucial element of traditional architectural decoration, characterized by heavy brushwork, a decorative style, and ink-dyeing techniques. In Southern Fujian architecture, the combination of painting and wood carving creates a “combination of carving and coloring”. | |
Red bricks | Red bricks are highly characteristic elements in the architectural decoration of Southern Fujian. Patterns drawn or carved in relief on the red tiles often feature auspicious symbols or folklore scenes. | |
Hollow brick masonry | Hollow brick masonry is a unique form of brick-art in Southern Fujian’s architecture. This intricate masonry technique creates exquisite geometric patterns, demonstrating the region’s ingenuity in architectural decoration and symbolizing aspirations and prayers for a better life. | |
Colored sculptures (patterns and calligraphic texts) | Jiaotou pottery represents a unique ceramic application in Southern Fujian’s architectural decoration. This technique reflects the history of cultural exchanges between Southern Fujian and Southeast Asia. |
Group | Stats | Categories | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-local cultural group (Group A) | Gender | Male | 12 | 60 |
Female | 8 | 40 | ||
Age | 20–30 years old | 11 | 55 | |
20–40 years old | 6 | 30 | ||
40–50 years old | 3 | 15 | ||
Over 50 years old | 0 | 0 | ||
Education | High school and below | 7 | 35 | |
Undergraduate | 5 | 25 | ||
Master’s degree | 7 | 35 | ||
Doctoral degree | 1 | 5 | ||
The period in Southern Fujian | Within a year | 13 | 65 | |
1–3 years | 1 | 5 | ||
3–5 years | 5 | 25 | ||
5+ years | 1 | 5 | ||
Local cultural group (Group B) | Gender | Male | 12 | 60 |
Female | 8 | 40 | ||
Age | 20–30 years old | 8 | 40 | |
20–40 years old | 3 | 15 | ||
40–50 years old | 4 | 20 | ||
50+ | 5 | 25 | ||
Education | College degree and below | 10 | 50 | |
Undergraduate course | 3 | 15 | ||
Master’s degree | 6 | 30 | ||
Doctoral degree | 1 | 5 | ||
The period in Southern Fujian | Within a year | 0 | 0 | |
1–3 years | 0 | 0 | ||
3–5 years | 0 | 0 | ||
5+ years | 20 | 100 |
Metrics | Acronyms | Meaning |
---|---|---|
First fixation duration | FFD | Duration of gaze when the experimenter’s eyes first entered the AOI |
Fixation counts | FC | The number of gaze points represents the number in a selected AOI |
Fixation duration | FD | Total time spent by testers observing an AOI |
Average fixation duration | AFD | Average time observed per gaze |
Fixation duration per area | FDQA | Gaze duration per unit area |
Scene | Element | FFD Group A | FFD Group B | AFD Group A | AFD Group B | FC Group A | FC Group B |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Distant-view 1 | White space | 291.48 | 156.34 | 272.69 | 117.64 | 6.44 | 8.11 |
Paintings | 147.08 | 235.10 | 231.03 | 215.80 | 4.22 | 7.22 | |
Red bricks | 133.63 | 112.53 | 270.43 | 348.66 | 1.11 | 0.78 | |
Wood carvings | 254.61 | 259.97 | 294.11 | 324.01 | 2.00 | 1.89 | |
Wood carvings (text) | 182.68 | 247.01 | 358.58 | 452.60 | 0.56 | 0.89 | |
Stone carvings | 66.36 | 138.31 | 298.63 | 312.84 | 0.89 | 2.22 | |
Stone carvings (text) | 11.32 | 93.51 | 228.08 | 285.56 | 0.44 | 2.67 | |
Sky | 191.79 | 68.17 | 270.88 | 187.93 | 2.78 | 1.33 | |
Swallow-tail ridge | 372.30 | 234.22 | 398.29 | 179.39 | 5.67 | 7.11 | |
Distant-view 2 | White space | 210.69 | 234.16 | 219.56 | 150.40 | 14.30 | 18.33 |
Saddle-shaped ridge | 157.37 | 274.62 | 165.21 | 275.67 | 7.80 | 8.89 | |
Red bricks | 272.01 | 235.62 | 301.82 | 246.29 | 5.64 | 4.96 | |
Sky | 225.27 | 221.20 | 129.42 | 68.01 | 5.30 | 5.67 | |
Distant-view 3 | White space | 202.15 | 180.27 | 161.11 | 99.33 | 16.20 | 21.22 |
Red bricks | 224.91 | 200.99 | 250.09 | 293.15 | 4.40 | 5.67 | |
Saddle-shaped ridge | 393.23 | 304.18 | 285.30 | 363.48 | 5.80 | 5.44 | |
Sky | 161.05 | 250.84 | 372.85 | 294.68 | 2.80 | 3.22 | |
Distant-view 4 | White space | 143.09 | 269.92 | 133.16 | 93.58 | 14 | 17.66 |
Red bricks | 109.54 | 302.39 | 532.58 | 296.20 | 1.76 | 1.44 | |
Saddle-shaped ridge | 169.24 | 273.08 | 468.93 | 650.71 | 3.7 | 3.88 | |
Sky | 287.10 | 311.73 | 159.59 | 181.84 | 6.1 | 5.55 | |
Swallow-tail ridge | 184.21 | 265.57 | 282.07 | 283.38 | 5.2 | 4.33 |
Scene | Element | Levin’s Test for Variance Equality | Mean Equality t-Test | Difference 95% Confidence Interval | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | Salience | t | Significance | Lower Bound | Upper Limit | |||
Distant-view 1. | Paintings | FFD | 2.35 | 0.15 | −1.45 | 0.166 | −216.48 | 40.44 |
FC | 0.11 | 0.74 | −3.37 | 0.004 | −6.88 | −1.57 | ||
AFD | 0.13 | 0.72 | −0.28 | 0.781 | −137.53 | 105.10 | ||
Red bricks | FFD | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.756 | −120.69 | 162.90 | |
FC | 0.26 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.468 | −0.62 | 1.28 | ||
AFD | 0.88 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.968 | −213.36 | 221.77 | ||
Wood carvings | FFD | 0.02 | 0.89 | −0.05 | 0.963 | −247.60 | 236.89 | |
FC | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.902 | −1.77 | 2.00 | ||
AFD | 0.04 | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.873 | −223.40 | 260.51 | ||
Wood carvings(text) | FFD | 0.13 | 0.73 | −3.05 | 0.008 | −222.26 | −39.83 | |
FC | 2.52 | 0.13 | −1.41 | 0.176 | −1.39 | 0.28 | ||
AFD | 0.05 | 0.82 | −3.40 | 0.004 | −192.59 | −44.58 | ||
Stone carvings | FFD | 2.10 | 0.17 | −3.53 | 0.003 | −155.31 | −38.70 | |
FC | 0.04 | 0.84 | −3.91 | 0.001 | −2.74 | −0.81 | ||
AFD | 1.24 | 0.28 | −1.59 | 0.131 | −295.73 | 42.10 | ||
Stone carvings(text) | FFD | 3.24 | 0.09 | −3.42 | 0.004 | −118.90 | −27.90 | |
FC | 7.72 | 0.01 | −3.72 | 0.002 | −2.62 | −0.72 | ||
AFD | 0.00 | 0.98 | −2.45 | 0.026 | −267.26 | −19.39 | ||
Swallow-tail ridge | FFD | 2.36 | 0.14 | 3.07 | 0.007 | 44.61 | 244.63 | |
FC | 0.84 | 0.37 | −0.75 | 0.462 | −5.51 | 2.62 | ||
AFD | 0.21 | 0.65 | 4.33 | 0.001 | 85.72 | 249.98 | ||
Distant-view 2 | Red bricks | FFD | 1.406 | 0.25 | 1.448 | 0.164 | −64.3231 | 352.8995 |
FC | 0.935 | 0.346 | 0.875 | 0.393 | −0.696 | 1.696 | ||
AFD | 0.46 | 0.506 | 1.285 | 0.214 | −77.1991 | 322.7985 | ||
Saddle-shaped ridge | FFD | 0.639 | 0.434 | −4.244 | 0.001 | −154.674 | −52.5057 | |
FC | 3.653 | 0.071 | 0.323 | 0.750 | −2.893 | 3.948 | ||
AFD | 0.03 | 0.865 | −4.317 | 0.002 | −177.366 | −61.5376 | ||
Distant-view 3 | Red bricks | FFD | 7.348 | 0.015 | 0.9 | 0.385 | −69.0797 | 166.8908 |
FC | 0.068 | 0.797 | −0.52 | 0.61 | −3.947 | 2.391 | ||
AFD | 5.541 | 0.032 | −1.765 | 0.108 | −107.656 | 12.50304 | ||
Saddle-shaped ridge | FFD | 1.068 | 0.315 | 2.345 | 0.031 | 17.44814 | 317.4919 | |
FC | 0.012 | 0.913 | 0.731 | 0.474 | −1.687 | 3.487 | ||
AFD | 10.577 | 0.004 | 0.985 | 0.347 | −66.351 | 172.6824 | ||
Distant-view 4 | Red bricks | FFD | 0.381 | 0.545 | −2.143 | 0.047 | −298.541 | −2.33634 |
FC | 4.179 | 0.057 | −0.6 | 0.556 | −1.354 | 0.754 | ||
AFD | 0.334 | 0.571 | −2.344 | 0.031 | −281.529 | −14.7979 | ||
Saddle-shaped ridge | FFD | 1.623 | 0.22 | −3.097 | 0.007 | −152.967 | −29.0061 | |
FC | 1.646 | 0.217 | 0.365 | 0.72 | −1.487 | 2.109 | ||
AFD | 0.569 | 0.461 | −3.801 | 0.001 | −321.178 | −91.9098 | ||
Swallow-tail ridge | FFD | 0.273 | 0.608 | −0.393 | 0.699 | −218.82 | 150.1556 | |
FC | 0.154 | 0.7 | 1.443 | 0.167 | −0.869 | 4.624 | ||
AFD | 0.497 | 0.49 | 0.709 | 0.488 | −82.5178 | 165.992 |
Picture | Element |
---|---|
Close-up 1 | Wood carvings, Stone carvings, Wood carvings (text), Stone carvings (text), Paintings, Swallow-tail ridge |
Close-up 2 | Hollow brick masonry, Colored sculptures, Swallow-tail ridge, Red bricks, Saddle-shaped ridge |
Close-up 3 | Wood carvings, Hollow brick masonry, Stone carvings, Colored sculptures, Colored sculptures (text), Swallow-tail ridge |
Close-up 4 | Hollow brick masonry, Stone carvings, Colored sculptures, Colored sculptures (text), Paintings, Swallow-tail ridge, Saddle-shaped ridge, Red bricks |
Close-up 5 | Hollow brick masonry, Stone carvings (text), Colored sculptures, Colored sculptures (text), Paintings |
Close-up 6 | Stone carvings, Stone carvings (text), Colored sculptures, Colored sculptures (text), Paintings, Red bricks |
Close-up 7 | Stone carvings, Stone carvings (text), Colored sculptures, Paintings |
Close-up 8 | Hollow brick masonry, Colored sculptures, Wood carvings, Stone carvings, Stone carvings (text) |
Element | Relative Area | Part 1 | Part 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FC | FD | FDPA | AFD | FC | FD | FDPA | AFD | ||
White space | 78.05 | 1656 | 327,979 | 4202 | 198.1 | 1432 | 317,092 | 4063 | 221.4 |
Painting | 9.82 | 498 | 171,604 | 17,467 | 344.6 | 335 | 101,263 | 10,307 | 302.3 |
Wood carving | 13.82 | 442 | 134,464 | 9729 | 304.2 | 505.98 | 161,363 | 11,676 | 318.9 |
Wood carving (text) | 1 | 33 | 10,703 | 10,704 | 324.4 | 74 | 16,967 | 16,967 | 229.3 |
Stone carving | 5.12 | 152 | 43,300 | 8452 | 284.9 | 204 | 38,234 | 7463 | 187.4 |
Stone carving (text) | 2.79 | 89 | 35,010 | 12,537 | 393.4 | 245 | 82,163 | 29,423 | 335.4 |
Sky | 11.6 | 104 | 20,571 | 1773 | 197.8 | 136 | 27,460 | 2368 | 201.9 |
Swallow-tail ridge | 9.83 | 477 | 117,914 | 11,993 | 247.2 | 268 | 81,888 | 8329 | 305.6 |
Red bricks | 2.48 | 148 | 35,341 | 14,272 | 238.8 | 97 | 26,367 | 10,649 | 271.8 |
Saddle-shaped ridge | 3.76 | 165 | 46,755 | 12,436 | 283.4 | 249 | 48,191 | 12,818 | 193.5 |
Hollow brick masonry | 12.16 | 642.5 | 197,845 | 16,272 | 307.9 | 528 | 165,559 | 13,616 | 313.6 |
Colored sculptures | 21.52 | 1136 | 360,206 | 16,735 | 317.1 | 707 | 201,386 | 9356 | 284.8 |
Colored sculpture (text) | 5.9 | 247 | 83,763 | 14,904 | 379.6 | 343 | 123,863 | 21,010 | 361.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Deng, J.; Chen, J.; Lei, Y. A Study on the Visual Perception of Cultural Value Characteristics of Traditional Southern Fujian Architecture Based on Eye Tracking. Buildings 2024, 14, 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113529
Deng J, Chen J, Lei Y. A Study on the Visual Perception of Cultural Value Characteristics of Traditional Southern Fujian Architecture Based on Eye Tracking. Buildings. 2024; 14(11):3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113529
Chicago/Turabian StyleDeng, Jianxun, Junlong Chen, and Ying Lei. 2024. "A Study on the Visual Perception of Cultural Value Characteristics of Traditional Southern Fujian Architecture Based on Eye Tracking" Buildings 14, no. 11: 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113529
APA StyleDeng, J., Chen, J., & Lei, Y. (2024). A Study on the Visual Perception of Cultural Value Characteristics of Traditional Southern Fujian Architecture Based on Eye Tracking. Buildings, 14(11), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113529