Next Article in Journal
Stochastic Response of Composite Post Insulators under Seismic Excitation
Next Article in Special Issue
An Inclusive Park Design Based on a Research Process: A Case Study of Thammasat Water Sport Center, Pathum Thani, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Finite Element Method Simulation and Experimental Investigation on the Temperature Control System with Groundwater Circulation in Bridge Deck Pavement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Heritage: An In-Depth Performance Evaluation of Kenadsa’s Office Building through User Perceptions and Behaviors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Buildings
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/buildings14061538
buildings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing Utilization and Comfort in a Village Scenic Park: Implications for Rural Revitalization

by
Wenying Yao
1,2,
Tao Zhang
3,*,
Hiroatsu Fukuda
2,
Mengying Wang
4 and
Jinli Yang
1
1
City College, Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs, Weihai 264504, China
2
Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan
3
Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
4
Department of Architecture, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2024, 14(6), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061538
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 12 May 2024 / Accepted: 23 May 2024 / Published: 25 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Centric Space Design: Occupant Comfort, Wellbeing, and Post-occupancy Evaluation of Multi-Scale Built Environment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Scenic parks in rural areas occupy crucial positions, serving as vital hubs for the daily lives of villagers and important leisure destinations for tourists. This research is dedicated to assessing the significance of the scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village from the perspectives of both villagers and tourists. Employing a comprehensive research approach, this study examines the current state of the scenic park and its ability to meet the requirements of villagers and tourists. Villagers, mainly elderly individuals with low levels of education, rely heavily on green spaces for leisure and social interaction. In contrast, younger tourists and villagers require spaces that offer more comfort and aesthetic appeal. This study highlights the possibility of designing rural scenic parks to meet the basic needs of both tourists and villagers. In addition, mixed-use designs and public participation designs are suggested to promote the use of rural parks, potentially creating an attractive community environment that attracts new villagers and more tourists. Although this study is limited to a single case, it lays the groundwork for further research in other rural areas. This research contributes to the sustainable development of rural revitalization.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

It is widely recognized that rural areas are generally considered to offer better greenery than urban areas. Many villages have their own public green spaces and these spaces not only provide comfortable environments for communication among villagers but also have significant positive effects on well-being [1,2,3,4]. Given that the cost of transportation between rural areas is higher than within rural areas themselves, social interactions in rural areas tend to occur within the villages themselves [5]. This reliance on rural green spaces and public activity centers is crucial to rural life.
To escape the intense pressures of urban life, many people prefer rural areas as destinations for relaxation and leisure [6,7,8]. For rural revitalization villages with a focus on tourism, public green spaces play a pivotal role in attracting tourists [9], enticing villagers to return [10], or attracting immigrants [2,11]. Rural tourism has tremendous development opportunities and potential [12], and public green spaces also influence tourists’ choices [13], impressions, and memories. They can help attract villagers [14] and contribute to the success of rural revitalization [15]. Interactions between tourists and local residents strengthen relationships with destinations [16] and lead to repeat visits. In some cases, they may even result in tourists relocating and becoming local residents, which can enhance local vitality. In the current context of rural revitalization, such scenarios are conducive to its success.
Additionally, comfortable rural green spaces facilitate reduced reliance on air conditioning and related equipment, contributing to achieving low-carbon goals [17]. By providing shaded areas, natural ventilation, and ambient temperatures, they create comfortable settings, reducing the need for energy-intensive cooling systems. As people opt for these refreshing and tranquil spaces, it leads to decreased energy consumption, aligns with low-carbon initiatives, and promotes sustainable lifestyles.
In the current rural revitalization designs in China, there is a predominant focus on constructing distinctive and culturally rich buildings. The emphasis is on ensuring that these buildings possess unique features and cultural significance. When it comes to design considerations, landscape elements are given lower priority compared to the aesthetics of architectural features. Various regions have introduced guidelines and manuals for rural housing design and standards. Many typical rural areas tend to overlook the design and provision of public spaces and green areas [18,19].
However, there is currently a lack of specific regulations and guidelines for public green spaces in rural areas. In 2018, the People’s Republic of China issued the national standard GB/T 37072-2018 [20], titled ‘Evaluation for the Construction of Beautiful Villages’. This standard includes criteria for evaluating the rural public environment but does not provide detailed specifications for the design of public green spaces.
Urban landscapes are frequently discussed, and pocket parks in cities are also commonly addressed. Research has also indicated that parks play a significant role in promoting health [21,22,23], social well-being [24,25,26,27], community communication [28], community activities [29], and low-carbon conservation [30,31]. With the development of digital technology, research on intelligence has emerged internationally, such as the integration of smart cyberparks, which has enhanced the functionality of parks [32,33]. Additionally, national parks are often discussed, as they contribute to economic development [34,35], nature conservation [36,37], and other aspects.
Research related to rural landscapes often concentrates on topics such as land use changes [38,39,40,41,42], the need to enhance low-carbon awareness and behavior [43,44], ecological impacts [45,46], and the influence of changes in agricultural landscapes [47,48,49]. Villages with rich cultural heritage [50,51,52,53] are also frequently discussed, including topics such as heritage preservation [54] and utilizing heritage for rural revitalization [55].
However, it is important to note that most villages are very ordinary and face the reality of construction cost constraints. In particular, some villages are facing challenges related to landscape degradation and the deterioration of public green spaces due to a decrease in younger populations [56] and inadequate construction funds [57,58,59]. These aspects of daily life also merit attention. While a considerable amount of research has been conducted on general rural issues in China, these studies have focused primarily on improving land utilization rates [60,61,62], improving the energy efficiency and thermal comfort of rural housing [63,64,65,66], and addressing key issues in rural revitalization [67]. However, there is relatively little research that focuses on specific rural parks. Although these studies provide a macroscopic perspective on rural spatial planning, design, and rural revitalization strategies, they are somewhat lacking in terms of specific measures and strategies for improving and designing rural public parks, especially in ways that meet the needs of villagers and attract tourists.
In the rural revitalization process, these villages also require the redesign of their public green spaces. In this context, it is crucial to consider how these designs should be approached and what criteria can meet the minimum requirements of villagers while also being attractive to tourists.
Furthermore, the aforementioned studies often focus on a singular aspect, but rural areas constitute complex social organizations [50] that require multifaceted considerations and validations. Therefore, comprehensive research on various factors is necessary.
Given the intricate social fabric that defines rural areas, addressing the diverse needs of these communities during the rural revitalization process requires a comprehensive reimagining of public green spaces. The classification of parks is typically conducted on a macro scale, posing challenges when applied to the small scale of rural parks. Generally, rural parks are funded and constructed by the government, which also differentiates these parks based on different objectives during the construction process, thereby shaping their design and functionality to meet specific needs. To address the complexity of rural social organizations, our research categorizes rural parks into three types (Table 1) based on field surveys: policy promotion, scenic, and utilitarian. This classification reflects the actual use by community members, although it may limit the multifunctionality of parks to some extent, as observed in practice.
Policy promotion parks emphasize revolutionary and historical culture, often marked by significant signage. Due to the lack of greenery and seating, villagers usually choose to leave after viewing policy announcements. In addition, because policies are released irregularly, villagers typically gather to observe shortly after new policies are released. The users of utilitarian parks are typically villagers engaged in agricultural activities, especially during the harvesting season when the utilization rate is the highest. Given the need to dry crops, there is usually no greenery and seats in this area, and people typically leave after finishing their farm work. Scenic parks prioritize greenery appreciation and relaxation, where users can also engage in physical exercise or cultural activities and others. Scenic parks are the most frequently visited parks by both tourists and villagers and serve as excellent spaces for communication and interaction. And scenic parks are also the most discussed category.
The objective of this study is to analyze and survey the existing scenic park in an ordinary rural village, employing a comprehensive research approach, with the aim of exploring the proportions of various elements of the scenic park. This research will serve as a reference for the construction of public green spaces in rural areas. This study provides original insights based on the context of the shortage of funds for village construction. It is important to consider multiple aspects of rural revitalization to meet the needs of villagers while also attracting tourists. Furthermore, our study classifies rural parks in the study area, contributing to a better understanding of rural parks. By adopting a comprehensive approach to rural development, our study aims to provide insights into effective intervention strategies for sustainable rural landscape management and revitalization.

1.2. Research Aim

For rural villages engaged in tourism-driven rural revitalization [68,69,70], the scenic park serves as both a community activity center and a venue for internal cultural exchange and relaxation for villagers and tourists alike. Satisfaction [71] with the space becomes a critical factor in park use. Satisfaction typically encompasses factors such as the convenience of the location, whether the content meets expectations and the comfort of the environment. And the utilization rate significantly influences the promotion of cultural exchange. This, in turn, further impacts the outcomes of rural revitalization and the sustainable development of the village.
This research is specifically dedicated to a nuanced examination of scenic parks in rural areas, with a primary focus on Weihai. Using Wawuzhuang Village as a representative case study, the aim is to delve into the intricacies of the scenic park and understand its impact on both villagers and tourists in the specific regional context of Weihai. Using a combination of established research methods (Figure 1), ANP weights, Likert scales, spatial syntax, environmental simulation (ENVI-met (ver5.5.1)), and RayMan (ver1.2) software, this study aims to meticulously evaluate the satisfaction, accessibility, and comfort of the scenic park. This research will serve as a localized exploration, providing valuable insights into the unique role scenic parks play in the rural landscape.
The findings will enhance the understanding of the dynamics of scenic parks in Weihai and provide insights applicable to similar settings in other cities, guiding sustainable design, development, and policy formulation in the broader context of rural revitalization. These findings will support evidence-based decision-making to optimize the design, management, and use of scenic parks in line with the village’s overarching goals of leveraging cultural capital, attracting tourists, and cultivating a vibrant, resilient community.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Research Area

This research specifically focuses on a scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village, Weihai City (Figure 2). Weihai City has been recognized by the UN-Habitat as a livable city with significant tourism potential [72].
Wawuzhuang village is about 14 km from the airport by road (see Figure 3). According to data obtained from Mrs. Zhou [74], the village comprises 180 households with a total population of 402 individuals. The village has adopted an artistic approach to rural revitalization, notably transforming a former granary into the Bikeguan Art Museum, which primarily exhibits various forms of comic art and has been selected as a new type of public cultural space in Weihai. The scenic park selected as the research subject—is located near the art museum. The village aims to use the art museum as a means to entice villagers to return or to attract new residents, thereby enhancing the overall landscape of the village and increasing the income of its residents. In 2023, the number of visitors varied between 160 and 360 each month, according to the museum operator, Mr. Yan [75].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Satisfaction Survey

In the satisfaction assessment, the Likert scale [15] coupled with the weighted scoring [77] was utilized. A pilot survey for the general public was conducted online (Table 2) in August 2023, and the weights of three elements of rural scenic parks were determined through the analytic network process (ANP). Additionally, ratings were obtained for these three elements using a 5-point Likert scale. These three elements were lawn and shade trees, seating, and paving. They are crucial components that significantly influence the quality and functionality of the scenic park.
During the satisfaction survey of scenic parks, identical questionnaires were distributed to both residents and visitors (Table 3) in two separate sessions: September 2023 and May 2024. Before filling out the questionnaire, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand their usage of the park and to ascertain if they were the appropriate respondents for the survey. After confirming their suitability, they were then asked to rate three elements of the park. The on-site surveys solicited participants to assess each element using a 5-point Likert scale. Finally, in conjunction with the assigned weights, we derived the overall satisfaction of users with the research subject. Given that the majority of villagers are elderly and have lower levels of education, surveys targeting the village residents were conducted through onsite distribution and observation methods [78]. Visitors and new villagers, on the other hand, are primarily young individuals; thus, online questionnaires were administered. The visitors and villagers participating in the questionnaire survey were randomly selected; 67 valid questionnaires from visitors and 89 from villagers were collected.
Participants in this study were comprehensively briefed on the objectives, potential utilization of the interview, and questionnaire findings, and explicit consent was obtained for the subsequent analysis. The amalgamation of these varied data sources not only enriched the understanding of rural scenic park dynamics but also contributed to the advancements of rural scenic park design, planning, and development strategies.

2.2.2. Accessibility Analysis

This study utilizes the spatial syntax [79] theory-based analysis software Depthmap X [80,81] to investigate the accessibility of the scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village. Depthmap is widely used for analyzing spatial structures, especially in studies related to transportation accessibility. After disentangling the housing and road systems (Figure 4) in Wawuzhuang Village, the road system was then integrated into Depthmap for accessibility analysis. Higher integration indicates easier spatial accessibility [82,83]. Easy access is an important factor in increasing utilization [84].
The aim is to measure the accessibility of the scenic park, calculating its ability to attract the villagers and visitors as a destination. This reflects the centrality of the space within the entire Wawuzhuang Village. This result can allow us to gain a comprehensive understanding of the role of the scenic park in the community. The findings provide a scientific basis for future planning and design.
Furthermore, using Google Maps (Figure 5) to observe the changes in the location of the rural scenic park [7] contributes to understanding the geographic distribution of the park within the village.

2.2.3. Comfort Analysis

The urban heat environment is frequently discussed, but there is relatively little discussion about rural areas and even less about rural scenic parks. Discussions often focus on southern regions, with less attention given to the northern areas, especially in cold and extremely cold regions [85]. However, due to the cool summer climate in Weihai and the limited use of cooling devices such as air conditioning in rural residences [86], outdoor public green spaces serve as the primary places for villagers to cool down during the summer. In the process of designing rural revitalization villages, it is necessary to consider these lifestyle habits. These habits can be closely integrated with low-carbon practices in the future. The scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village has existed for a long time. Analyzing this existing space can help assess whether the current elements (seating, lawn and shade trees, paving) meet the comfort requirements. This analysis can then provide valuable insights into the design of these spaces in the future or for other villages.
An outdoor environment analysis was conducted using the widely employed ENVI-met (ver5.5.1) and RayMan (ver1.2) software, with the Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) (Table 4) used as the comfort index [14,87,88].
During the field survey, discussions emerged within the village regarding the substitution of the existing brick flooring with wood plank as part of the village’s revitalization initiative. However, this proposal was eventually dismissed due to concerns about preserving the village’s 500-year-old ginkgo trees and limited funding. Consequently, the ENVI-met simulation (Figure 6) was employed to model both the present brick flooring condition and the dismissed wood plank plan.
This analysis focused on a thermal environment on 23 June 2023. Based on site visits and temperature records, a gradual increase in temperature was observed after the summer solstice, starting from 23 June 2023. On that day, the weather was clear. The highest temperature recorded was 36 °C on June 27, with some periods of overcast skies. Subsequently, from June 27 until the start of autumn on August 8, there were no days with temperatures exceeding 35 °C. As a result, 23 June 2023 was selected for the thermal comfort calculation.

3. Results

3.1. Both Villagers and Tourists Are Generally Satisfied with the Scenic Park

The pilot survey conducted online yielded a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.874. The weights of the different elements related to the scenic park obtained through the analytic network process (ANP) are presented in Table 5:
Visitors’ satisfaction with the scenic park is rated at 3.94, with the majority of visitors being under 50 years of age. In contrast, villagers’ satisfaction with the scenic park is rated at 3.43, with the majority of villagers being over 50 years of age (Table 6). This difference may be attributed to the fact that old villagers are tired of rural landscapes and yearn for urban ones [15].
During the satisfaction surveys and interviews, the elderly villagers expressed a desire for more activities within the village. While this request may be related to the village management, it may have an impact on satisfaction scores. Visitors often have brief stopovers and do not center their daily lives around green spaces, resulting in a higher level of acceptance of these areas. Conversely daily, to attract more visitors or encourage them to stay longer in the scenic park, improving the comfort of these areas is essential, with the number of available seats being a modifiable factor.
Visitors have also expressed a desire for the park to incorporate more elements of ginkgo tree culture and artistic features to create a richer cultural atmosphere. They believe that this would encourage them to spend more time in the park and make them more inclined to visit the park for relaxation purposes in the future. The villagers also expressed the need to strengthen cultural connections.

3.2. The Scenic Park Is Located in the Most Accessible Area within the Village

An in-depth spatial analysis of the village’s road network reveals that this scenic park is situated in the most accessible location within the village (Figure 7).
It is evident from Google Maps (Figure 5) that the physical location of the scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village has remained unchanged at least from 2012 to the present. Centered around a 500-year-old ginkgo tree, which in traditional Chinese culture symbolizes longevity, it represents the village’s cultural heritage and serves as a beacon of enduring values. This symbolism likely attracts people seeking blessings for a long life. By incorporating on-site interviews, it can be speculated that the location of this scenic park has likely been constant since the ginkgo trees first flourished.
This static yet timeless ginkgo tree has become an integral part of the village’s culture and identity, serving as a gathering point for people of all ages. Due to the ancient history of the ginkgo tree, it is challenging to verify whether the tree was planted in response to the influx of people to the green space or if the planting of the tree provided shade, attracting people to the green area. It stands as a symbol of resilient connections to the past and cultural endurance within the ever-evolving rural dynamics. The geographical positioning and cultural significance of the ginkgo tree will contribute to attracting more tourists and new residents, enhancing the cultural and tourism revitalization of Wawuzhuang Village.

3.3. The Scenic Park Is also the Best Choice for Cooling down during the Hottest Summer Day

The potential air temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity of the site are presented in Figure 8. The PET values under and around the ginkgo tree are shown in Table 7 and Figure 9.
During the field survey, it was observed that people’s rest and recreation activities mainly revolved around the ginkgo tree. The shade provided by the ginkgo tree played a significant role in environmental improvement.
However, the simulation showed that replacing the existing ground with wood would have a negative impact on the environment, leading to increased temperatures. In the process of urbanization, changes in ground cover can increase ground radiation, resulting in higher local temperatures. This, in turn, affects the overall comfort.
In many rural revitalization cases in Weihai, there is a common trend of using treated wood for aesthetic purposes. Unfortunately, this practice can lead to temperature increases [89] and is challenging to maintain [90], with construction costs. Through on-site visits and discussions, it was observed that the construction cost of wood planks in Weihai ranges from RMB 270 to 700 per square meter, significantly higher than the cost of brick construction, which ranges from RMB 60 to 400 per square meter. In future designs, it is essential to remind designers not to focus solely on short-term aesthetic improvements but also to consider long-term factors such as construction costs, maintenance requirements, and environmental impacts to ensure sustainable rural development.
For quantitative purposes, the current coverage rate of the scenic park in Wawuzhuang is as follows (Table 8).
The 500-year-old ginkgo tree in Wawuzhuang Village is a unique feature not found in every village, but a similar aesthetic can be achieved by planting multiple trees in the area, and due to the pursuit of auspiciousness in traditional Chinese culture, planting trees with auspicious meanings would make it more attractive for people to visit.
The current coverage rate is sufficient to meet the needs of both villagers and tourists. Although residents and tourists have expressed higher expectations, the status quo is considered satisfactory in terms of current satisfaction levels.
Additionally, as some villagers bring their portable seats to green spaces for relaxation, and the survey results indicated that villagers’ satisfaction with seating was slightly lower than with other elements, this suggests that the number of seats should exceed this proportion in future designs.
Combining the above findings with the on-site interviews, it can be observed that the current scenic park situation in Wawuzhuang Village can meet the needs of villagers and tourists. Both villagers and tourists have suggested points for improvement, such as adding more seating and enhancing cultural connections with the nearby art gallery.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Implications for Daily Life

We delve into the perspectives of local villagers and new residents who have a deep and intimate connection with scenic parks. Their insights provide a comprehensive understanding of how these spaces are woven into the fabric of daily life and have cultural significance within the community.
Within the village, new residents with diverse sources of income unrelated to agriculture have been settling in. These new residents vary in terms of their occupations, education levels, incomes, and cultural awareness. Establishing personal relationships between the new residents and original inhabitants takes time and requires appropriate settings. A scenic park is an excellent choice for this integration [5].
The primary users of the scenic park are elderly people who frequently bring their grandchildren to enjoy the area and pass the time. Due to a shortage of public seating, some people bring their own stools, while others sit by the flower beds. Common time periods for usage include after breakfast and before lunch, during the period after lunch until the early evening, but rarely in the evening due to the presence of mosquitoes and insufficient outdoor lighting.
Communication among the local villagers is very frequent. However, interactions with tourists and new villagers are infrequent due to language issues. Below are some villager interviews.
“It’s not that we are opposed to visitors coming to rest; we welcome them. But conversations with tourists are limited due to language barriers. While we might answer their questions as best as we can, communication can be challenging. We primarily speak our local dialect, which many tourists do not understand.”
(Bi, aged 61 and above)
“We do visit the art museum, but we admit that we don’t fully understand art. The COVID-19 pandemic had led to strict controls in the village, and as a result, there had been few visitors. Now that COVID-19 has ended, we hope that more young people will come here in the future.”
(Wang, aged 51–60)
However, it is critical to recognize that villagers’ perceptions of COVID-19’s impact on visitor numbers are inherently subjective. These perceptions are shaped by personal experiences, emotional responses, and potentially exaggerated expectations of village revitalization outcomes. In addition, external factors such as the region’s cold climate and the timing of the study, conducted in 2024 before the peak tourist season, may have also significantly influenced visitor patterns. These elements suggest that the observed trends may vary, highlighting the importance of considering both personal and environmental factors when applying the findings in future research.
However, their enthusiasm and anticipation for new villagers and visitors visiting the scenic park underscore their desire to enhance the village’s vitality through communication and interaction.
Zhao, aged 31–40, who moved into the village, noted the following: “Since moving to the countryside, we’ll surely sit under the gingko tree for a while. The people in the village are very down-to-earth, but we really can’t understand their dialect, making communication quite challenging.” Both new villagers and tourists use the landscape park for relaxation. New villagers also express their intention to engage in brief exercises at the park, believing that it contributes to their physical well-being, despite its limited extent. They feel that more interaction or joint activities with existing villagers would add more meaning to their rural living experience. They also aspire to contribute to the revitalization of the village, as the vibrancy of the rural community would in turn have a positive impact on their daily lives.
Incorporating visitor feedback, the following comments reflect the impressions of tourists who have experienced the scenic park. “Great atmosphere, the ancient ginkgo trees create a wonderful ambiance, allowing us to connect with nature. It’s heartwarming to see elderly people relaxing under the trees with their grandchildren; it offers a taste of the tranquility of rural life.” (Wang, aged 31–40) “The visit provides a brief respite from daily routines. If given the chance, I would love to return to see the ginkgo trees again and capture their beauty in photographs. However, I wish there was more interactive content between the ginkgo tree park and the art museum; it feels like a missed opportunity.” (Ma, aged 21–30)
The scenic park has the potential to foster cultural fusion and stimulate the possibility of spatial reorganization [91] within its surroundings. This suggests that as people from various backgrounds and age groups converge in this communal area, there is an opportunity for diverse cultural influences to intermingle. In particular, in villages involved in tourism-driven rural revitalization, there is a greater variety of people associated with scenic parks. This interaction may lead to a reconfiguration of the way space is used and experienced, influencing the design and dynamics of the green space. The shared experience within the scenic park could contribute to a sense of unity among the community members, resulting in the emergence of new social and cultural connections. There is even a possibility that this will further affect the planning of rural dwellings, which can already be detected in some villages in Weihai.
Furthermore, during the interview process, it became clear that while younger villagers exhibit a more conscious approach toward low-carbon practices, older villagers tend to have limited awareness of low-carbon concepts. However, it is noteworthy that the frugal lifestyles of older villagers are indirectly consistent with the principles of low-carbon living. Undoubtedly, the provision of a comfortable scenic park plays a pivotal role in promoting low-carbon awareness on various fronts. The study’s exploration of low-carbon aspects will be further expanded in subsequent research efforts to delve deeper into these dynamics and bridge the generational gap in low-carbon understanding and practice.

4.2. The Implications for Rural Revitalization

In this study, we categorize rural parks into three types: policy promotion, scenic, and utilitarian based on the field survey. Our analysis focuses on scenic parks, providing valuable insights into the design and policy-making processes of rural revitalization. The design of rural parks should include ample seating and greenery to ensure user comfort, promote cultural exchange, and address site selection with attention to convenience and privacy. During the field survey, it was also found that the suggestions that people had for improving the park were mainly related to cultural connections. It was emphasized that rural parks do not require overly complex features, driven by considerations of cost maintenance. Due to cultural differences and historical backgrounds, rural parks generally do not consider mixed-use configurations, but focus more on leisure and agricultural support functions. However, despite funding limitations that often limit the versatility of rural parks, the adoption of mixed-use configurations could address a broader range of uses, potentially leading to cost savings in actual operations. Although mixed-use is currently uncommon in rural areas, as socioeconomic conditions evolve and cultural perceptions change, villagers’ and tourists’ demand for park facilities is likely to change. Future research and designs could focus on this trend to explore more flexible uses of parks, which could significantly contribute to the sustainable development of rural revitalization.
In our study area, there was no evidence of public participation in park construction during field surveys, likely due to the lack of time or budget. Given that community park design internationally involves a public participation process, we asked participants during interviews if they would like to be involved in the design process. Older respondents expressed a lack of interest, possibly due to a lower level of awareness of public participation. Younger respondents, however, expressed a willingness to participate if given the opportunity, believing that such involvement would likely result in parks that better meet their needs.
This presents new challenges for future rural park construction. Going forward, governments and design firms will need to educate the public about the importance of participation in design processes and develop different participation strategies for residents of different ages and educational backgrounds. For older residents, meetings may need to be organized using simplified language and support tools, while for younger or more tech-savvy individuals, digital tools and social media platforms may generate greater interest. By involving the public in the design and construction of rural parks, the public’s sense of belonging to the park will be enhanced. The parks will be more likely to meet user needs, improve park utilization, and enhance the revitalizing impact of these spaces, thus supporting sustainable development.

5. Conclusions

This study validates the existing scenic park in Wawuzhuang Village and fills a significant research gap by focusing on ordinary rural daily life parks. By adopting a comprehensive research methodology, this study fills the gap in understanding the dynamics of such parks. While the current study was conducted in Weihai, it is important to acknowledge that the findings and methods may not be universally applicable. The specific cultural, environmental, and social contexts of Weihai may differ significantly from other regions. Given the consistent lifestyle habits in rural areas of cold northern regions, we cautiously speculate that our research may serve as a reference for future studies and the construction of similar parks in areas with comparable geographical and cultural contexts. However, further empirical studies are needed to substantiate this speculation and assess the applicability of our findings in different rural settings. This approach will ensure that the benefits observed in Wawuzhuang Village can guide broader rural development strategies without overextending the immediate applicability of the findings.
It was found that the current state of the scenic park can indeed meet the needs of both villagers and tourists. However, there are still factors in the park that can be enhanced. For example, strengthening cultural connections, considering mixed uses, and public participation in the future construction process. This provides a valuable reference model for future design and policy formulation.
Due to economic disparities, there is a significant gap in living standards between rural and urban areas [92], and it is unrealistic to expect rural areas to achieve the same living standards as urban areas in a short period of time. However, through effective design and cost control, rural areas can achieve satisfaction in their living standards.
It is worth noting that this study has limited proposals for improving scenic park functionality, primarily focusing on a typical rural scenic park as a case study. The current research considers cultural elements, scenic park hardware elements (seating, lawn and shade trees, paving), and satisfaction factors. However, due to the traditional culture and lifestyle in rural China, plants with auspicious meanings, ample seating, and cultural connections help to increase the usage rate of scenic parks. Although this may limit the improvement of park functions, these elements are more feasible in most rural parks given the tight construction budgets.
Future research will extend to other villages and explore whether there are additional new elements to gather more comprehensive data. A more in-depth investigation into the influence of parks will be conducted, employing more mesh refinement to examine the spatial impact of parks. This approach will facilitate the understanding of the influence of parks on people’s lifestyles and provide further insights into rural development. It will also be combined with factors such as low-carbon awareness and behaviors to explore the design and construction of scenic parks. The aim is to improve the value of parks in rural areas and achieve sustainable development.
The establishment of a comfortable scenic park demonstrates its ability to influence the daily lives of villagers and can also attract tourists. This influence extends to communication patterns and changes in living habits, contributing to reducing cultural disparities between rural and urban areas. This harmonious fusion of rural and urban elements will significantly contribute to a more effective rural revitalization process, thereby enhancing the holistic development of rural regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Y., T.Z. and H.F.; Data curation, W.Y. and J.Y.; formal analysis, W.Y.; Investigation, W.Y. and M.W.; methodology, W.Y. and T.Z.; supervision, H.F. and M.W.; resources, H.F. and M.W.; writing—original draft, W.Y. and J.Y.; writing—review and editing, W.Y., T.Z., H.F., M.W. and J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (program no. 2023-JC-QN-0622) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Qingdao, China (grant no. 23-21-1-231-zyyd-jch).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our heartfelt thanks to the rural villagers and visitors who generously participated in this study and shared their valuable knowledge and experiences. Without their cooperation and involvement, this research would not have been possible. We also extend our thanks to our academic advisors and colleagues for their guidance and support throughout the research process. Finally, heartfelt gratitude for the generous support provided by the funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Banwell, K.; Kingham, S. Living well in your local neighbourhood: The value of bumping and gathering places. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023, 4, 100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Edge, S.; Davis, C.; Dean, J.; Onilude, Y.; Rishworth, A.; Wilson, K. The role of urban and rural greenspaces in shaping immigrant wellbeing and settlement in place. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023, 4, 100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yung, E.H.K.; Wang, S.; Chau, C.-K. Thermal perceptions of the elderly, use patterns and satisfaction with open space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 185, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, X.; Warner, M.E.; Wethington, E. Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, W.; Zhang, M.; Qing, Y.; Li, Y. Village resettlement and social relations in transition: The case of Suzhou, China. Int. Dev. Plan. Rev. 2019, 41, 269–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suckall, N.; Fraser, E.D.; Cooper, T.; Quinn, C. Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: A case study in the Peak District National Park, England. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Balta, S.; Atik, M. Rural planning guidelines for urban-rural transition zones as a tool for the protection of rural landscape characters and retaining urban sprawl: Antalya case from Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2022, 119, 106144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xie, X.; Wang, R.; Gou, Z. Changes in park visits and the shift towards rural recreation: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. J. Rural. Stud. 2024, 106, 103221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qu, M.; Zollet, S. Neo-endogenous revitalisation: Enhancing community resilience through art tourism and rural entrepreneurship. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 97, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Šťastná, M.; Vaishar, A. Values of rural landscape: The case study Chlum u Třeboně (Bohemia). Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sutherland, L.-A. Horsification: Embodied gentrification in rural landscapes. Geoforum 2021, 126, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vaishar, A.; Šťastná, M. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural tourism in Czechia Preliminary considerations. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheung, P.K.; Jim, C. Subjective outdoor thermal comfort and urban green space usage in humid-subtropical Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2018, 173, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lai, D.; Liu, W.; Gan, T.; Liu, K.; Chen, Q. A review of mitigating strategies to improve the thermal environment and thermal comfort in urban outdoor spaces. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 661, 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Jian, Y.; Fu, H.; Wang, Z.; Xu, M. Vernacular or modern: Transitional preferences of residents living in varied stages of urbanisation regarding rural landscape features. J. Rural. Stud. 2022, 95, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nam, M.; Kim, I.; Hwang, J. Can Local People Help Enhance Tourists’ Destination Loyalty? A Relational Perspective. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2016, 33, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, H.; Chen, Y.; Huang, X. A new framework for analysis of the spatial patterns of 15-minute neighbourhood green space to enhance carbon sequestration performance: A case study in Nanjing, China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 156, 111196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, G.; LiuPing, D.; Jing, L. A study on the cognition of the regional types of rural revitalization from the perspective of land planning. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 1023532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zou, L. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving mechanism of rural production-living-ecological space in Pingtan islands, China. Habitat Int. 2023, 137, 102833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. GB/T 37072-2018; Evaluation for the Construction of Beautiful Villages. State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the China: Beijing, China, 2018.
  21. Hunter, R.; Cleland, C.; Cleary, A.; Droomers, M.; Wheeler, B.; Sinnett, D.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Braubach, M. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Browning, M.H.E.M.; Hanley, J.R.; Bailey, C.R.; Beatley, T.; Gailey, S.; Hipp, J.A.; Larson, L.R.; James, P.; Jennings, V.; Jimenez, M.P.; et al. Quantifying Nature: Introducing NatureScoreTM and NatureDoseTM as Health Analysis and Promotion Tools. Am. J. Health Promot. 2024, 38, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Beatley, T. Biophilic Cities and Healthy Societies. Urban Plan. 2017, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McDonald, R.I.; Aronson, M.F.J.; Beatley, T.; Beller, E.; Bazo, M.; Grossinger, R.; Jessup, K.; Mansur, A.V.; de Oliveira, J.A.P.; Panlasigui, S.; et al. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People Nat. 2023, 5, 84–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beatley, T. Biophilic Cities and Urban Resilience. In Handbook of Biophilic City Planning and Design; Island Press/Center for Resource Economics: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pearce, C.; Tilley, S.; Thompson, C.W. ‘Being there’ is what matters: Methodological and ethical challenges when undertaking research on the outdoor environment with older people during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM Qual. Res. Health 2023, 4, 100348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cherrie, M.P.C.; Shortt, N.K.; Mitchell, R.J.; Taylor, A.M.; Redmond, P.; Thompson, C.W.; Starr, J.M.; Deary, I.J.; Pearce, J.R. Green space and cognitive ageing: A retrospective life course analysis in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 196, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, B.; Hong, B. Pocket park in urban regeneration of China: Policy and perspective. City Environ. Interact. 2023, 19, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kerishnan, P.B.; Maruthaveeran, S. Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks―A review of the evidence. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 58, 126985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, C.; Jia, W.; Wang, K. Valuing carbon saving potential of urban parks in thermal mitigation: Linking accumulative and accessibility perspectives. Urban Clim. 2023, 51, 5101645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shadman, S.; Khalid, P.A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Koyande, A.K.; Islam, A.; Bhuiyan, S.A.; Kok, S.W.; Show, P.-L. The carbon sequestration potential of urban public parks of densely populated cities to improve environmental sustainability. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arvanitidis, P.; Lalenis, K.; Artopoulos, G.; Pallares-Barbera, M. Exploring the Concept of Cyberpark: What the Experts Think. In CyberParks—The Interface Between People, Places and Technology; Costa, C.S., Erjavec, I.Š., Kenna, T., De Lange, M., Ioannidis, K., Maksymiuk, G., De Waal, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Costa, C.S.; Batista, J.S.; Almeida, I.; Menezes, M. Exploring teenagers’ spatial practices and needs in light of new communication technologies. Cities 2020, 98, 102574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hidle, K. How national parks change a rural municipality’s development strategies—The Skjåk case, Norway. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 72, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ritzel, C.; Hoop, D.; Portmann, M.; Wallner, A.; Mack, G. Swiss Parks of National Importance as model regions of sustainable development-An economic success story for farmers? Land Use Policy 2023, 124, 106441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Norman, P.; Pickering, C.M. Discourse about national parks on social media: Insights from Twitter. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2023, 44, 100682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Böhn, D. National park in Germany: Let nature be nature—But which nature? Int. J. Geoheritage Park. 2021, 9, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, H.; Zhu, Z.; He, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wen, Y. Integrated framework of rural landscape research: Based on the global perspective. Landsc. Ecol. 2022, 37, 1161–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, C. Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raymond, C.M.; Bieling, C.; Fagerholm, N.; Martin-Lopez, B.; Plieninger, T. The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio 2016, 45, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yang, W.; Wen, C.; Lin, B. Research on the design and governance of new rural public environment based on regional culture. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Long, H.; Cui, W. Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jefferson, M. Safeguarding rural landscapes in the new era of energy transition to a low carbon future. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 37, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, S.; Dou, W.; Wu, Z.; Hao, Y. Does the financial support to rural areas help to reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China. Energy Econ. 2023, 127, 107057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lõhmus, K.; Liira, J. Old rural parks support higher biodiversity than forest remnants. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2013, 14, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Michalczuk, J.; Michalczuk, M. Rural parks as refugia of cavity nesters in an agricultural landscape: Which habitat features are important for cavity dwellers? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 223, 104407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Skokanova, H.; Netopil, P.; Havlicek, M.; Sarapatka, B. The role of traditional agricultural landscape structures in changes to green infrastructure connectivity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 302, 107071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zimmerer, K.S.; Olivencia, Y.J.; Rodríguez, L.P.; López-Estébanez, N.; Álvarez, F.A.; Olmo, R.M.; Ochoa, C.Y.; Pulpón, R.R.; García, J. Assessing social-ecological connectivity of agricultural landscapes in Spain: Resilience implications amid agricultural intensification trends and urbanization. Agric. Syst. 2022, 203, 103525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, Y.; Yu, P.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Chan, E.H.W. The impact of rice-crayfish field on socio-ecological system in traditional farming areas: Implications for sustainable agricultural landscape transformation. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 434, 139625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Z.; Ren, X.; Zhang, Z. Cultural heritage as rural economic development: Batik production amongst China’s Miao population. J. Rural. Stud. 2021, 81, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Quintana, D.C.; Díaz-Puente, J.M.; Gallego-Moreno, F. Architectural and cultural heritage as a driver of social change in rural areas: 10 years (2009–2019) of management and recovery in Huete, a town of Cuenca, Spain. Land Use Policy 2022, 115, 106017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gocer, O.; Shrestha, P.; Boyacioglu, D.; Gocer, K.; Karahan, E. Rural gentrification of the ancient city of Assos (Behramkale) in Turkey. J. Rural. Stud. 2021, 87, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shen, J.; Chou, R.-J. Rural revitalization of Xiamei: The development experiences of integrating tea tourism with ancient village preservation. J. Rural. Stud. 2022, 90, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fu, J.; Zhou, J.; Deng, Y. Heritage values of ancient vernacular residences in traditional villages in Western Hunan, China: Spatial patterns and influencing factors. Build. Environ. 2021, 188, 107473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ferretti, V.; Gandino, E. Co-designing the solution space for rural regeneration in a new World Heritage site: A Choice Experiments approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 268, 1077–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.; Westlund, H.; Liu, Y. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 68, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aimar, F.; Gullino, P.; Devecchi, M. Towards reconstructing rural landscapes: A case study of Italian Mongardino. J. Rural. Stud. 2021, 88, 446–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gao, J.; Cai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wen, Q.; Marcouiller, D.W.; Chen, J. Understanding the underutilization of rural housing land in China: A multi-level modeling approach. J. Rural. Stud. 2022, 89, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, F.; Wang, J.; Zhou, B.; Wu, M.; He, J.; Bin, J. Shaking table study on rubber-sand mixture cored composite block as low-cost isolation bearing for rural houses. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 76, 107413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bu, X.; Pu, L.; Shen, C.; Xie, X.; Xu, C. Study on the Spatial Restructuring of the Village System at the County Level Oriented toward the Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Case of Jintan District, Jiangsu Province. Land 2020, 9, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, J.; Qu, L.; Li, Y.; Feng, W. Identifying the structure of rural regional system and implications for rural revitalization: A case study of Yanchi County in northern China. Land Use Policy 2023, 124, 1062436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, P.; Ge, D.; Yuan, Z.; Lu, Y. Rural revitalization mechanism based on spatial governance in China: A perspective on development rights. Habitat Int. 2024, 147, 103068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, F.; Wang, S.; Cheng, B.; Wang, W. To inhabit, retain or abandon? Adaptive utilization of energy-efficient sunken buildings by rural households in Shanzhou, China. Energy Build. 2022, 255, 111668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, J.; Lu, J.; Deng, W.; Beccarelli, P.; Lun, I.Y.F. Thermal comfort investigation of rural houses in China: A review. Build. Environ. 2023, 235, 110208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, L. Thermal comfort in interior and semi-open spaces of rural folk houses in hot-humid areas. Build. Environ. 2018, 128, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Guo, H.; Yin, L.; Gao, W.; Yao, W.; Sun, L. Indoor thermal comfort evaluation of traditional dwellings in cold region of China: A case study in Guangfu Ancient City. Energy Build. 2023, 288, 113028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zheng, C.; Tham, J.; Azam, S.M.F. Links and Interaction of Villagers and Rural Revitalization: A Bibliometric Review. J. Namib. Stud. Hist. Politics Cult. 2023, 33, 1631–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, J.; Wu, B. Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dai, M.L.; Fan, D.X.; Wang, R.; Ou, Y.H.; Ma, X.L. Does rural tourism revitalize the countryside? An exploration of the spatial reconstruction through the lens of cultural connotations of rurality. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023, 29, 100801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ahmad, A. The constraints of tourism development for a cultural heritage destination: The case of Kampong Ayer (Water Village) in Brunei Darussalam. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2013, 8, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mlozi, S.; Pesämaa, O. Antecedents of national park knowledge in Tanzania. J. Ecotourism 2019, 18, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. UN-Habitat. UN-Habitat Scroll of Honour Award. Available online: https://unhabitat.org/scroll-of-honour (accessed on 10 April 2024).
  73. Map Technology Review Center of the Ministry of Natural Resources, Map of China. 2019. Available online: http://211.159.153.75/browse.html?picId=%274o28b0625501ad13015501ad2bfc0291%27 (accessed on 10 April 2024).
  74. Zhou, J.; (Gengdu Center, Dashuipo Town, Weihai City, China). Personal communication regarding population and number of households in the village, 2023.
  75. Yan, C.; (Bikeguan Art Museum, Dashuipo Town, Weihai City, China). Personal communication regarding Operational situation, 2023.
  76. Google Inc. Google Earth Images of Wawuzhuang Village (October 2012, October 2016, September 2019, October 2021). 2023. Available online: https://earth.google.com/web/@37.14943894,122.13529333,55.49462381a,1004.63295154d,35y,359.99669978h,0t,0r/data=OgMKATA (accessed on 10 April 2024).
  77. Zhao, X.; Ju, S.; Wang, W.; Su, H.; Wang, L. Intergenerational and gender differences in satisfaction of farmers with rural public space: Insights from traditional village in Northwest China. Appl. Geogr. 2022, 146, 102770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mackay, M.; Perkins, H.C. Making space for community in super-productivist rural settings. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 68, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tannous, H.O.; Major, M.D.; Furlan, R. Accessibility of green spaces in a metropolitan network using space syntax to objectively evaluate the spatial locations of parks and promenades in Doha, State of Qatar. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 58, 126892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ghamsary, E.S.; Karimimoshaver, M.; Akhavan, A.; Goruh, Z.A.; Aram, F.; Mosavi, A. Locating pocket parks: Assessing the effects of land use and accessibility on the public presence. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2023, 18, 100253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahmoud, A.H.; Omar, R.H. Planting design for urban parks: Space syntax as a landscape design assessment tool. Front. Arch. Res. 2015, 4, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Askarizad, R.; Safari, H. Investigating the role of semi-open spaces on the sociability of public libraries using space syntax (Case Studies: Sunrise Mountain and Desert Broom Libraries, Arizona, USA). Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020, 11, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yaseen, F.R.; Mustafa, F.A. Visibility of nature-connectedness in school buildings: An analytical study using biophilic parameters, space syntax, and space/nature syntax. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2023, 14, 101973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Žlender, V.; Thompson, C.W. Accessibility and use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers: A comparative study. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 165, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, J.; Liu, N. The perception, optimization strategies and prospects of outdoor thermal comfort in China: A review. Build. Environ. 2020, 170, 106614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yuan, T.; Hong, B.; Qu, H.; Liu, A.; Zheng, Y. Outdoor thermal comfort in urban and rural open spaces: A comparative study in China’s cold region. Urban Clim. 2023, 49, 101501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, H.; Zhang, T.; Fukuda, H.; Ma, X. The effect of landscape configuration on outdoor thermal environment: A case of urban Plaza in Xi’an, China. Build. Environ. 2023, 231, 110027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fei, F.F.; Wang, Y.; Yao, W.; Gao, W.; Wang, L. Coupling mechanism of water and greenery on summer thermal environment of waterfront space in China’s cold regions. Build. Environ. 2022, 214, 108912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xin, K.; Zhao, J.; Wang, T.; Gao, W.; Zhang, Q. Architectural Simulations on Spatio-Temporal Changes of Settlement Outdoor Thermal Environment in Guanzhong Area, China. Buildings 2022, 12, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ramage, M.H.; Burridge, H.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Fereday, G.; Reynolds, T.; Shah, D.U.; Wu, G.; Yu, L.; Fleming, P.; Densley-Tingley, D.; et al. The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Yuan, Y. Multi-dimensionality and the totality of rural spatial restructuring from the perspective of the rural space system: A case study of traditional villages in the ancient Huizhou region, China. Habitat Int. 2019, 94, 102062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. O’Shaughnessy, M.; Christmann, G.; Richter, R. Introduction. Dynamics of social innovations in rural communities. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 99, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Buildings 14 01538 g001
Figure 1. Framework (drawn by the authors).
Figure 1. Framework (drawn by the authors).
Buildings 14 01538 g001
Buildings 14 01538 g002
Figure 2. Research area marked on a map issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources, China (survey number: GS(2019)1652) [73].
Figure 2. Research area marked on a map issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources, China (survey number: GS(2019)1652) [73].
Buildings 14 01538 g002
Buildings 14 01538 g003
Figure 3. The information of the research subject; (a) the layout of Wawuzhuang Village (Google Earth image—October 2021 [76]); (b) the surroundings of the scenic park (drawn by the authors); (c,d) the photos of the scenic park (photographed by the authors).
Figure 3. The information of the research subject; (a) the layout of Wawuzhuang Village (Google Earth image—October 2021 [76]); (b) the surroundings of the scenic park (drawn by the authors); (c,d) the photos of the scenic park (photographed by the authors).
Buildings 14 01538 g003
Buildings 14 01538 g004
Figure 4. AutoCAD model (drawn by the authors); (a) the dwellings; (b) the road system.
Figure 4. AutoCAD model (drawn by the authors); (a) the dwellings; (b) the road system.
Buildings 14 01538 g004
Buildings 14 01538 g005
Figure 5. Google Earth images of Wawuzhuang Village [76] (a) October 2012, (b) October 2016, (c) September 2019, (d) October 2021.
Figure 5. Google Earth images of Wawuzhuang Village [76] (a) October 2012, (b) October 2016, (c) September 2019, (d) October 2021.
Buildings 14 01538 g005
Buildings 14 01538 g006
Figure 6. Simulation model; (a) the 3D view model; (b) brick flooring; (c) wood plank.
Figure 6. Simulation model; (a) the 3D view model; (b) brick flooring; (c) wood plank.
Buildings 14 01538 g006
Buildings 14 01538 g007
Figure 7. The results of the Depthmap analysis.
Figure 7. The results of the Depthmap analysis.
Buildings 14 01538 g007
Buildings 14 01538 g008
Figure 8. The AT/WS/RH map at 10:00 a.m. (a) Brick flooring; (b) wood plank.
Figure 8. The AT/WS/RH map at 10:00 a.m. (a) Brick flooring; (b) wood plank.
Buildings 14 01538 g008
Buildings 14 01538 g009
Figure 9. Thermal comfort evaluation of PET.
Figure 9. Thermal comfort evaluation of PET.
Buildings 14 01538 g009
Table 1. Classification of rural parks in the study area; (a) policy promotion park, (b) scenic park, (c) utilitarian park.
Table 1. Classification of rural parks in the study area; (a) policy promotion park, (b) scenic park, (c) utilitarian park.
PhotoBasic ConceptMain FormMain User
Buildings 14 01538 i001
(a) Policy promotion park		A space mainly for the village committee to promote various policies.Bulletin board, a small amount of greenery, brick, stone, or cement paving.Village cadres and villagers for short-term use.
Buildings 14 01538 i002
(b) Scenic park		A green space for relaxation, rest, and communication during daily life.Seating, lawn and shade trees, and brick, stone, or cement paving.Villagers, tourists.
Buildings 14 01538 i003
(c) Utilitarian park		A place for the villagers to temporarily store agricultural tools or dry grains.Brick, stone, or cement paving.Villagers engaged in agricultural activities.
All the photos were taken by the team during the field survey.
Table 2. Characteristics of the pilot survey (N = 94).
Table 2. Characteristics of the pilot survey (N = 94).
Individual CharacteristicsPercent(%)Frequency
GenderMale54.2651
Female45.7443
ResidenceCity58.5155
Rural29.7928
Urban–rural integration11.7011
Education levelHigh/vocational below20.2119
High/vocational 37.2335
Bachelor38.3036
Master’s and above4.264
Age group20 and below10.6410
21–3028.7227
31–4034.0432
41–5020.2119
51–604.264
61 and above2.132
Table 3. Characteristics of the satisfaction survey (Nvisitor = 67, Nvillager = 89).
Table 3. Characteristics of the satisfaction survey (Nvisitor = 67, Nvillager = 89).
VisitorVillager
Individual CharacteristicsPercent (%)FrequencyPercent (%)Frequency
GenderMale46.273147.1942
Female53.733652.8147
Education levelHigh/vocational below13.43957.3051
High/vocational 25.371726.9724
Bachelor32.842215.7314
Master and above28.3619--
Age group20 and below16.42114.494
21–3025.37175.625
31–4025.371712.3611
41–5014.931022.4720
51–6010.45728.0925
61 and above7.46526.9724
Table 4. Relationship between thermal sensation and PET.
Table 4. Relationship between thermal sensation and PET.
Thermal SensationPET Range (°C)
Very cold<−16
Cold−16 to −11
Cool−11 to −6
Slightly cool−6 to 11
Neutral11 to 24
Slightly warm24 to 31
Warm31 to 36
Hot36 to 46
Very hot>46
Table 5. Analytic network process results.
Table 5. Analytic network process results.
ItemAverage ValueTTL (Indicator Score)Weight Value
Lawn and shade trees (1–5)3.681.5033.33%
Seating (1–5)3.752.5055.56%
Paving (1–5)3.480.5011.11%
Table 6. Satisfaction of survey respondents.
Table 6. Satisfaction of survey respondents.
Evaluation IndexVisitorVillager
MeanWeightsSatisfaction LevelMeanWeightsSatisfaction Level
Lawn and shade trees (1–5)4.1633.33% 3.9333.33%
Seating (1–5)3.7355.56%3.942.9955.56%3.43
Paving (1–5)4.3111.11% 4.1211.11%
Table 7. Thermal comfort evaluation of PET.
Table 7. Thermal comfort evaluation of PET.
Brick FlooringWood Plank
TimeAround the TreeUnder the TreeAround the TreeUnder the Tree
10:0032.625Warm32.100Warm33.800Warm32.775Warm
11:0025.150Slightly warm24.600Slightly warm26.150Slightly warm25.150Slightly warm
12:0025.575Slightly warm25.075Slightly warm26.625Slightly warm25.650Slightly warm
13:0026.500Slightly warm25.975Slightly warm27.650Slightly warm26.575Slightly warm
14:0026.700Slightly warm26.150Slightly warm27.900Slightly warm26.800Slightly warm
15:0026.100Slightly warm25.475Slightly warm27.225Slightly warm26.125Slightly warm
16:0024.700Slightly warm24.100Slightly warm/Neutral25.800Slightly warm24.725Slightly warm
17:0023.150Neutral22.725Neutral24.050Slightly warm/Neutral23.200Neutral
18:0021.700Neutral21.225Neutral22.500Neutral21.725Neutral
Table 8. The current coverage rate of the scenic park.
Table 8. The current coverage rate of the scenic park.
LawnShade TreesPaving (Brick)SoilSeating
Percentage36.75%18.15%39.86%13.65%3.21%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, W.; Zhang, T.; Fukuda, H.; Wang, M.; Yang, J. Assessing Utilization and Comfort in a Village Scenic Park: Implications for Rural Revitalization. Buildings 2024, 14, 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061538

AMA Style

Yao W, Zhang T, Fukuda H, Wang M, Yang J. Assessing Utilization and Comfort in a Village Scenic Park: Implications for Rural Revitalization. Buildings. 2024; 14(6):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Wenying, Tao Zhang, Hiroatsu Fukuda, Mengying Wang, and Jinli Yang. 2024. "Assessing Utilization and Comfort in a Village Scenic Park: Implications for Rural Revitalization" Buildings 14, no. 6: 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061538

APA Style

Yao, W., Zhang, T., Fukuda, H., Wang, M., & Yang, J. (2024). Assessing Utilization and Comfort in a Village Scenic Park: Implications for Rural Revitalization. Buildings, 14(6), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop