Next Article in Journal
Brucella: Reservoirs and Niches in Animals and Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiology Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: Mutations and Genetic Diversity One Year after Emerging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Functionality of Essential Oils: An Alternative Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture

by
Mahmoud A. O. Dawood
1,2,*,
Mohammed F. El Basuini
3,4,
Amr I. Zaineldin
5,
Sevdan Yilmaz
6,
Md. Tawheed Hasan
7,
Ehsan Ahmadifar
8,
Amel M. El Asely
9,
Hany M. R. Abdel-Latif
10,
Mahmoud Alagawany
11,
Nermeen M. Abu-Elala
12,
Hien Van Doan
13,14,* and
Hani Sewilam
2,15,*
1
Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
2
The Center for Applied Research on the Environment and Sustainability, The American University in Cairo, Cairo 11835, Egypt
3
Faculty of Desert Agriculture, King Salman International University, South Sinai 46618, Egypt
4
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta Uni-versity, Tanta 31527, Egypt
5
Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI-DOKI), Agriculture Research Center, Kafrelsheikh 33511, Egypt
6
Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Turkey
7
Department of Aquaculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh
8
Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol 98615-538, Iran
9
Department of Aquatic Animals Diseases and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha 13511, Egypt
10
Department of Poultry and Fish Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21500, Egypt
11
Poultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
12
Department of Aquatic Animal Medicine and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt
13
Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
14
Innoviative Agriculture Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
15
Department of Engineering Hydrology, RWTH Aachen University, 52078 Aachen, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(2), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020185
Submission received: 19 January 2021 / Revised: 3 February 2021 / Accepted: 5 February 2021 / Published: 9 February 2021

Abstract

:
Using synthetic antibiotics/chemicals for infectious bacterial pathogens and parasitic disease control causes beneficial microbial killing, produces multi-drug resistant pathogens, and residual antibiotic impacts in humans are the major threats to aquaculture sustainability. Applications of herbal products to combat microbial and parasitic diseases are considered as alternative approaches for sustainable aquaculture. Essential oils (EOs) are the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants that possess bioactive compounds like terpens, terpenoids, phenylpropenes, and isothiocyanates with synergistic relationship among these compounds. The hydrophobic compounds of EOs can penetrate the bacterial and parasitic cells and cause cell deformities and organelles dysfunctions. Dietary supplementation of EOs also modulate growth, immunity, and infectious disease resistance in aquatic organisms. Published research reports also demonstrated EOs effectiveness against Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, Gyrodactylus sp., Euclinostomum heterostomum, and other parasites both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, different infectious fish pathogenic bacteria like Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio harveyi, and Streptococcus agalactiae destruction was confirmed by plant originated EOs. However, no research was conducted to confirm the mechanism of action or pathway identification of EOs to combat aquatic parasites and disease-causing microbes. This review aims to explore the effectiveness of EOs against fish parasites and pathogenic bacteria as an environment-friendly phytotherapeutic in the aquaculture industry. Moreover, research gaps and future approaches to use EOs for sustainable aquaculture practice are also postulated.

1. Introduction

Farming of aquatic plants and animals is generally known as aquaculture, and the annual growth of this rapidly expanding food industry is 4.5%, accounting for a value of 243.26 billion USD [1] to meet up the protein demand of ever increasing world population. This important industry is also generating jobs, income, and providing 50% of global fish consumption [2,3]. Due to the increase of consumer demand, aquaculture technique has been shifted from extensive to super-intensive; intensification of aquaculture needs a higher amount of artificial feed supply, water treatment and reuse, and high stocking density resulting in aquatic environmental degradation [4,5,6]. Mounting of stress and quality deterioration of living environment increases the activity and virulence of infectious and opportunistic microbial pathogens [7], decrease immunity and immune-related gene transcription of aquatic animals [8], and elevate uni and multicellular parasitic infestation [9]; finally, initiate infectious diseases outbreak along with the death of cultured species. Gonzales, et al. [10] reported global aquaculture loss of 1.05 to 9.58 billion USD/year due to infectious diseases and parasitic attacks.
To eliminate diseases and parasitic attacks in the aquaculture industry, different synthetic antibiotics, chemical drugs, vaccines, and chemotherapeutics are being used at high rates from year after year [11,12]. Using of these chemical substances cause mass killing of beneficial aquatic bacteria [13], produce multi-drugs resistant pathogens [14], and leaving residues in fish which can be transmitted to human [15,16]. These problems are the most concerning aquaculture sustainability [17,18], and infectious diseases and parasitic infestation treatment with natural substances/compounds are the demanding sustainable aquaculture features [19].
The use of medicinal plants and their derivatives in aquaculture is increasing day by day all over the world because of having biodegradable properties [20,21,22,23,24], availability and ease to cultivate, and do not accumulate in animal tissues as a residue [25,26]. Essential oils (EOs) are the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants and possess bioactive properties to be used as a phytotherapeutic agent for sustainable aquaculture [27,28]. Terpens, terpenoids, phenylpropenes, and isothiocyanates are the key chemical groups identified in EOs [29]. EOs mainly penetrate and act upon the membrane and cytoplasm of bacteria to inhibit their action mechanisms by altering cell morphology and organelles deformities [30,31]. Generally, Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to EOs than Gram-negative due to lipoteichoic acids in cell membranes that might facilitate the penetration of EOs hydrophobic compounds [32]. According to Carson, et al. [33], EO comprises different compounds that have no specific cellular target in parasites. Monoterpenes α-pinene and sabinene of EOs have proved mentionable antiprotozoal activity. Moreover, synergistic effects of different compounds in EOs are another key feature that showed a higher mode of action relative to individual compounds. EOs cause leakage of potassium ions and cytoplasmic content of parasitic cells due to hydrophobicity and cell permeability, which cause cell morphology alteration and cessation of parasitic activity [34]. Staining with fluorocromes SYBR-14 and propidium iodide confirmand the plasma membrane damage in Ichthyophthirius multifiliis by the action of Varronia curassavica derived EOs [35].
Different microbial and parasitic diseases are the major threats to the aquaculture industry. Application of nanoemulsions EOs or other herbal products to combat microbial [36,37] and parasitic [9,25] diseases is considered a new alternative approach for sustainable aquaculture. Extensive research activities were performed for the identification and characterization of EOs effects for the fish and shellfish preservation and shelf life elongation [38,39], modulation of growth, immunity, and infectious disease resistance in commercially cultured fish species [35,40,41], against different pathogenic microbial activity [42,43] and destruction and retardation of fish parasitic activity [9,10]. In the fisheries and aquaculture sector, EOs act as a natural preservative [44], stress-reducing agent [45], herbal anesthetics [46], and oregano herb and medicinal plant as immunomodulators [26] and immunostimulants [47]. However, no study was conducted to identify EOs antiparasitic and antimicrobial properties for sustainable aquaculture.
Although natural EOs have enough potential for sustainable aquaculture, EOs have high volatility and can be decomposed by exposure to heat, humidity, light, and oxygen to lose effectiveness [48]. Application to the EOs in their oil form render it subjected to degradation during processing, storage, and handling [49]. The use of nano-encapsulated EOs becomes a promising trend in the field of EOs applications [50], especially in the aquaculture sectors [51], protecting the volatilization, low stability, low solubility in water, and associated problems of using EOs [52]. Nanoemulsion technology is currently solving the effectiveness disruption problems of EOs in aquaculture. This technology also protects EOs from the digestive enzyme’s actions in the intestine.
The main focus of this article is to identify EOs antimicrobial and antiparasitic properties that can be used for sustainable aquaculture practices. Moreover, EOs effects for aquaculture species growth, immunomodulation, and infection resistances were also postulated. In addition, research gaps and tentative future research activities are also mentioned to effectively use EOs in sustainable fish culture.

2. EOs as Growth, Immunity, and Disease Resistance Enhancer

Several studies have been conducted to identify EOs growth and immunity elevation property; however, no specific research was conducted to identify the action mechanism of EOs for the alteration of these properties [28,53,54,55]. Jang, et al. [56] mentioned the possible reason for growth and feed utilization parameters modulation by EOs is due to elevation of digestive enzymes in the intestines. Moreover, EOs increased the appetite of aquaculture species [57] may be another reason. Antioxidant activity increased due to aromatic rings and the position of hydroxyl ion in EOs [58]. Modulation of the intestinal microbiome by EOs can be considered one of the possible reasons for the modulation of immune-related genes [59]. Significantly, phenolic compounds like thymol and carvacrol modulate innate immunity through two possible ways i) direct action on host tissue ii) influence on the intestinal microbial community [60].
A 60-day experiment was conducted with dietary supplementation with bitter lemon (Citrus limon) [61], and sweet orange peels (C. sinensis) [62] originated EOs in Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). In both cases, EOs elevated innate immune parameters (NBT, WBCs, lysozyme, and myeloperoxidase activity) and decreased serum/blood glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides. C. limon and C. sinensis EOs administrated tilapia demonstrated resistance against Streptococcus iniae and Edwardsiella tarda, respectively. In addition, a similar type of immunomodulation and infection protection of tilapia were also found after C. limon peel EOs supplementation at (1, 2, 5, and 8%) in Labeo victorianus for 28 days [63]. However, growth (WG% and SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) modulation in the former study remained unchanged but in the latter two experiments increased significantly (Table 1). The authors claim active compound of EOs (limonene) concentration in the former experiment was 54.4%, whereas later studies were 94.74 and 81.40, respectively, may be the causal factors of these differences. In Nile tilapia (O. niloticus), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) and geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) [40], and Oregano (Origanum vulgare) [64], supplementation increased growth and feed utilization, and resistance against the action of Aeromonas hydrophila and Vibrio alginolyticus, respectively. C. citratus and P. graveolens supplemented fishes not only improved immunity but also decreased the concentration levels of intestinal coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Aeromonas spp. Moreover, origanum EOs (1 g/kg) improved immunity and vibriosis protection in Tilapia zillii [65].
Eight weeks feeding trial with 0.05% of Oregano (O. heracleoticum) originated EOs showed better growth, body indices (VSI, HSI, and CF), and antioxidant property (SOD and CAT) in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [66]. Carvacrol and thymol are the active substances of oregano EOs; however, in this fish species, O. vulgare originated commercial EOs showed inferior results relative to O. heracleoticum. Silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) was dietary administrated (2 mL/Kg) with Aloysia triphylla EOs [41] and bath treatment (5 and 10 mg/L) with EOs compound, eugenol [67]. Bath treatment was unable to upregulate hematological and immunological parameters, but dietary administration improved healthy blood cells (leukocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil) and protein levels. Most importantly, these two catfish species had increased tolerance against A. hydrophila infection protection after feeding or bath treatment with plant originated EOs.
Eight weeks of feeding with O. vulgare EOs increased both immune and antioxidant properties and resistance against A. hydrophila in Cyprinus carpio [60,64]. EOs increased transcription levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 and down-regulated tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. Moreover, the increment of digestive enzyme activities and enrichment of beneficial bacterial genera in the intestinal microbial community were also found after EOs supplementation (Table 1). Feeding with O. onites instead of O. vulgare, similarly positive immunity and anti-oxidant activity modulation, and infectious disease protection was found in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [68]. Futher, water extract of Ocimum sanctum leaves increased total RBC, WBC, hemoglobin, and other immune and anti-oxidant parameters in L. rohita [69].
Table 1. Effects of herbal essential oils on growth, immunity, and infectious diseases protection in commercial fish species.
Table 1. Effects of herbal essential oils on growth, immunity, and infectious diseases protection in commercial fish species.
Aquatic SpeciesEssential OilDose and DurationInfluenceReferences
Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)Bitter lemon (Citrus limon) 0.5, 0.75, and 1%
for 60 days
-
Growth indices and feed utilization ( Pathogens 10 00185 i001)
-
Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT), white blood cells (WBCs), Blood total protein, lysozyme, and myeloperoxidase activity (↑)
-
Serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides (↓)
-
Resistance against Edwardsiella tarda (↑)
Baba, et al. [61]
O. mossambicusSweet orange
(C. sinensis)
0.1, 0.3, and 0.5%
for 60 days
-
Growth indices and feed utilization (↑)
-
Lysozyme and myeloperoxidase activity, hematological and biochemical variables, i.e., hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Htc), erythrocyte indices, total serum protein, albumin, and globulin (↑)
-
Blood glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride (↓)
-
Resistance against Streptococcus iniae (↑)
Acar, et al. [62]
Labeo victorianusC. limon1, 2, 5, and 8%
for 28 days
-
Red blood cells (RBC), WBC, Htc, mean cell haemoglobin (MCH), haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and neutrophils (↑)
-
Immunoglobulin (IgM), lysozyme activity, and respiratory burst (↑)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Ngugi, et al. [63]
Nile tilapia
(O. niloticus)
Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) and Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens)200 and 400 mg/kg
for 12 weeks
-
Growth indices and feed utilization (↑)
-
Plasma catalase; catalase (CAT), glutathione content, lysozyme activity, and total immunoglobulins; IgM (↑)
-
Malondialdehyde (MDA), total intestinal bacteria, coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Aeromonas spp (↓)
-
Resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila (↑)
Al-Sagheer, et al. [40]
O. niloticusOriganum vulgare5 and 10%
for 8 weeks
-
Growth indices and feed utilization (↑)
-
Antioxidant activities (↑)
-
Resistance against Vibrio alginolyticus (↑)
Abdel-Latif and Khalil [70]
Tilapia zilliiOriganum1 g/kg
for 15 days
-
RBC, WBC, Hb, and differential leukocyte ( Pathogens 10 00185 i001)
-
Plasma proteases, antiproteases, lysozyme, and bactericidal activities (↑)
-
Resistance against V. anguillarum (↑)
Mabrok and Wahdan [65]
Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)O. heracleoticum0.05%
for 8 weeks
-
Growth performance, hepatosomatic index, viscerosomatic index, and condition factor (↑)
-
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and CAT (↑)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Zheng, et al. [66]
Silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen)Aloysia triphylla2.0 mL/kg
for 21 days
-
Total leukocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts (↑)
-
Total blood protein and resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
dos Santos, et al. [41]
R. quelenEugenolBath (5 and 10 mg/L)
-
Hematological and immunological parameters ( Pathogens 10 00185 i001)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Sutili, et al. [67]
Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)O. vulgare0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 g/kg diet
for 8 weeks
-
SOD, CAT, lysozyme activity, phagocytic activity, and index (↑), and malonaldehyde (MDA) (↓)
-
Interleukin- (IL)-1β and IL-10 (↑)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Abdel-Latif, et al. [64]
Koi carp
(C. carpio)
O. vulgare0, 500, 1500, and 4500 mg/kg
for 8 weeks
-
Protease, amylase, and lipase (↑)
-
Lysozyme, Complement C3 & C4, SOD, and glutathione peroxidase (↑) and MDA (↓)
-
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (↓)
-
Vibrio (↓), Propionibacterium, Brevinema, and Corynebacterium_1 (↑)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Zhang, et al. [60]
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)O. onites0.125, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.0 mL/kg
for 90 days
-
Growth indices and feed utilization (↑)
-
SOD, CAT, and Lysozyme activity (↑)
-
Resistance against Lactococcus garvieae (↑)
Diler, et al. [68]
L. rohitaOcimum sanctum0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1%
for 42 days
-
Superoxide anion production, lysozyme activity, plasma IgM, total serum protein, globulin, total RBC, WBC, and haemoglobin (↑)
-
Resistance against A. hydrophila (↑)
Das, et al. [69]
Variation in the treated fish compared to controls: (↑), significantly increases; (↓), significantly decreased; ( Pathogens 10 00185 i001), no significant change.

3. Essential Oils as Antiparasitic Agents

3.1. Acanthocephalas

Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae 

Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae is an acanthocephalan parasite causing significant economic losses in Colossoma macropomum fish in the region of Amazon [71,72]. It was reported that Mentha piperita, Lippia alba, and Zingiber officinale [73] and Piper hispidinervum, Piper hispidum, Piper marginatum, and Piper callosum [74] essential oils showed 100% anthelmintic effect on N. buttnerae. When EO of piper hispidinervum was applied on N. buttnerae parasite in 0.78 mg/L concentration for 15 min, it gave the most effective result in terms of dose and time [74] (Table 2).

3.2. Monogeneans

3.2.1. Anacanthorus spathulatus, Notozothecium janauachensis, and Mymarothecium boegeri

Anacanthorus spathulatus, Notozothecium janauachensis, and Mymarothecium boegeri cause significant infections in species belonging to the Serrasalmidae family as C. macropomum fish being in the first place [75,76]. Anthelmintic effects of Cymbopogon citratus, Pterodon emarginatus, Lippia origanoides, Lippia sidoides, and Lippia alba EOs on these three parasites were researched [77]. Among the EOs, the most effective one was Lippia sidoides; when applied as 320 mg/L for 10 min, it exhibited 100% efficacy against all three parasites [78] (Table 2).

3.2.2. Dactylogyrus spp.

One of the most common parasitic pathogens in cultured freshwater fish is Dactylogyrus spp. [79]. Brasil, et al. [9] researched anthelmintic effects of Lippia alba, Lippia origanoides, and Lippia sidoides EOs on Dactylogyrus minutus and Dactylogyrus extensus parasites; and they detected that when L. Origanoides and L. Sidoides EOs were applied as 100 mg/L for 5 min, they showed 100% efficacy (Table 2).

3.2.3. Cichlidogyrus spp.

Cichlidogyrus is the parasite genus that occurs naturally in cichlid fish and has the most species among gill parasites, with its 131 different species known [80]. Scutogyrus species can also be dominant in the winter season among fish belonging to the Cichlidae family [81]. de Oliveira Hashimoto, et al. [82] reported that Lippia sidoides EO had 100% efficacy against Cichlidogyrus spp. and Scutogyrus longicornis when applied as 160 mg/L for 1 min 58 s while Mentha piperita EO had 100% efficacy when applied as 320 mg/L for 8 min 11 s (Table 2).

3.2.4. Dawestrema spp.

Dawestrema cycloancistrium and Dawestrema cycloancistrioides are two of the most significant parasite types causing death and economic losses in Arapaima gigas fish, which are cultured in the region of Amazon [83,84]. Application of M. piperita EO as 160 and 320 mg/L for 30 min showed 100% efficacy on D. cycloancistrium and D. cycloancistrioides parasites [85] (Table 2).

3.2.5. Gyrodactylus spp.

Gyrodactylus spp. causes economic losses in many cultured fish species. Anthelmintic effects of Hesperozygis ringens, Ocimum gratissimum, and Ocimum americanum [37] and Ocimum americanum [86] EOs on Gyrodactylus spp. were researched. Only O. americanum EO as 50 mg/L for 1 h had the most effective anthelmintic action (98% efficacy) against Gyrodactylus spp. [86] (Table 2).

3.3. Trepomonadea

Hexamita inflata 

Hexamita inflate is a flagellated anaerobic protozoan and free-living in fresh and seawater. Moon, et al. [87] reported that L. angustifolia and L. intermedia EOs as 1 and 0.5% for 30 min exhibited 100% efficacy on H. inflate (Table 2).

3.4. Clinostomidae

Euclinostomum heterostomum 

Euclinostomum heterostomum is parasitic trematodes and very common in Europe, Asia, and Africa [88]. It infects muscular tissues and kidneys of freshwater fish [88,89]. Verbesina alternifolia and Mentha piperita EOs could act on E. Heterostomum in high doses and for a long time [90] (Table 2).

3.5. Oligohymenophorea

Ichthyophthirius multifiliis 

Ichthyophthirius multifiliis is the most famous virulent ciliated protozoan ectoparasite that invades the skin, fins, and gills of fish. de Castro Nizio, et al. [35] indicated that Varronia curassavica EO showed 100% efficacy against I. multifiliis trophont and tomont when applied as 10 mg/L and 50 mg/L for one h, respectively. Hyptis mutabilis (10 mg/L for 30 min) [91] and Melaleuca alternifolia, Lavandula angustifolia, and Mentha piperita (455 µL/L for 1 h) [92] EOs applications were also found to be effective on I. multifiliis (Table 2).
Table 2. Essential oils as antiparasitic agents.
Table 2. Essential oils as antiparasitic agents.
Parasitic PathogensEssential OilConcentrationsElimination Time/Effectiveness Concentration/Elimination PercentageReferences
Neoechinorhynchus buttneraeMentha piperita, Lippia alba, and Zingiber officinale360, 540, 720, 1440, and 2880 mg/L
1 h 20 min–1 h 55 min/540–2880 mg/L of M. piperita/100% anthelmintic
1 h 55 min/2880 mg/L of L. alba/100% anthelmintic
2 h 50 min/2880 mg/L of Z. officinale/100% anthelmintic
Costa, et al. [73]
Neoechinorhynchus buttneraePiper hispidinervum, Piper hispidum, Piper marginatum, and Piper callosum0.19, 0.39, 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/L
15 min/0.78 mg/L of P. hispidinervum/100% anthelmintic
2 h/50 mg/L of P. hispidum/100% anthelmintic
2 h/12.5 mg/L of P. marginatum/100% anthelmintic
2 h/25 mg/L of P. callosum/100% anthelmintic
dos Santos, et al. [74]
Anacanthorus spathulatus, Notozothecium janauachensis, and Mymarothecium boegeriCymbopogon citratus100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg/L
10 min/400 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Gonzales, et al. [10]
A. spathulatus, N. janauachensis, and M. boegeriPterodon emarginatus0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg/L
15 min/400 and 600 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Valentim, et al. [25]
A. spathulatus, N. janauachensis, and M. boegeriLippia origanoides10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 mg/L
30 min/320 and 160 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Soares, et al. [78]
A. spathulatus,
N. janauachensis, and M. boegeri
L. alba160, 320, 640, 1280, and 2560 mg/L
20 min/1280 and 2560 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Soares, et al. [77]
Dactylogyrus minutus and Dactylogyrus extensusL. alba, L. Origanoides, and L. sidoides10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg/L
5 min/100 mg/L of L. origanoides and L. sidoides/100% anthelmintic
Brasil, et al. [9]
Cichlidogyrus tilapiaeOcimum gratissimum40, 160, and 320 mg/L
2 h/320 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Meneses, et al. [93]
Cichlidogyrus tilapiae, Cichlidogyrus thurstonae, Cichlidogyrus halli, and
Scutogyrus longicornis
L. sidoides and Mentha piperita160 and 320 mg/L
1 min and 58 s/160 mg/L of L. sidoides/100% anthelmintic
8 min and 11 s/320 mg/L of M. piperita/100% anthelmintic
de Oliveira Hashimoto, et al. [82]
Dawestrema cycloancistrium and Dawestrema cycloancistrioidesM. piperita80, 160, and 320 mg/L
30 min/160 and 320 mg/L/100% anthelmintic
Malheiros, et al. [85]
Gyrodactylus sp.Hesperozygis ringens and
Ocimum gratissimum
20 and 40 mg/L of H. ringens and 5 and 10 mg/L of O. gratissimum
1 h/10 mg/L of O. gratissimum/50% anthelmintic
1 h/40 mg/L of H. ringens/40% anthelmintic
Bandeira, et al. [37]
Gyrodactylus sp.Ocimum americanum10 and 50 mg/L
1h/50 mg/L/98% anthelmintic
Sutili, et al. [86]
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis trophonts and tomontsVarronia curassavica
(VCUR-001 VCUR-202 VCUR-509 VCUR-601)
10, 25, 50, 75, 100,
and 200 mg/L
1 h/10 mg/L of V. curassavica, VCUR-202/100% antiparasitic for Trophont
1 h/50 mg/L of V. curassavica, VCUR-202/100% antiparasitic for Tomont
de Castro Nizio, et al. [35]
Ichthyophthirius multifiliisHyptis mutabilis10 and 20 mg/L
30 min/10 mg/L/100% antiparasitic
Da Cunha, et al. [91]
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis trophontsMelaleuca alternifolia,
Lavandula angustifolia, and Mentha piperita
57, 114, 227, and 455 µL/L
1 h/455 µL/L/100% antiparasitic
Valladão, et al. [92]
Euclinostomum heterostomumVerbesina alternifolia and Mentha piperita200 to 1000 mg/L
24 h/600 mg/L of V. alternifolia/100% anthelmintic
24 h/1000 mg/L of M. Piperita/50% anthelmintic
Mahdy, et al. [90]
Hexamita inflataL. angustifolia and L. × intermedia Miss Donnington1, 0.5, or 0.1%
30 min/1 and 0.5%/100% antiparasitic
Moon, et al. [87]

4. Essential Oils as Antibacterial Agents: An In Vitro Perspective

4.1. Aeromonas spp.

Aeromonas salmonicida has been known as the causative agent of furunculosis [94]. Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, and Aeromonas veronii are among the most common bacteria that cause motile Aeromonas septicemia in fish [94,95]. In addition, it is known that many different Aeromonas species cause disease in fish.
The antimicrobial effects of essential oils of some herbs on Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. Salmonicida has been investigated (Table 3). Hayatgheib, et al. [96] found that MIC and MBC values of essential oils (EOs) of different herbs on different A. salmonicida subsp. Salmonicida isolates were in the range of 113 to ≥3628 μg/mL, and the most effective (MIC and MBC: ≤520 μg/mL) herb species were Cinnamomum zeylanicum/verum, Origanum vulgare, Origanum compactum, Origanum heracleoticum, Eugenia caryophyllata, and Thymol rich Thyme vulgaris.
In a different study, the antimicrobial effects of Origanum onites, O. vulgare, and Thymbra spicata EOs on 18 different A. salmonicida isolates, and it was reported that EOs of these herbs formed 10 to 30 mm zone depending on the disc diffusion test, and they had moderate inhibitory depending on MIC values (800 μg/mL) [97]. Among Thymus vulgaris, Laurus nobilis, Rosmarinus officinalis, Petroselinum crispum, and Thymus vulgaris EOs showed the highest zone diameter with 30 mm on A. salmonicida [98], while Azadirachta indica nanoemulsion also exhibited similar results [99]. Cinnamomum cassia EO was reported to have a very high inhibitory effect on A. salmonicida subsp. with a 56 mm zone diameter [100].
Tural, et al. [98] reported that among T. vulgaris, L. nobilis, R. officinalis, and P. crispum EOs, T. vulgaris EO had the highest zone diameter on Aeromonas sobria and Aeromonas veronii with 31.5 mm and 36 mm, respectively. It was determined that Origanum acutidens EO formed a zone diameter of 32.7 mm on Aeromonas hydrophila [101].
Cymbopogon nardus [102] and Syzygium aromaticum [103] EOs had a strong inhibitory effect on Aeromonas hydrophila (ATCC 49140) and Aeromonas spp. with MIC values of 0.488–0.977 μg/mL and 0.015–0.031 μg/mL, respectively. It was found that C. cassia, Cinnamomum aromaticum, Cymbopogon citratus, and Origanum vulgare EOs were effective against Aeromonas spp., Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. Salmonicida, A. hydrophila, and A. veronii bv. Sobria (Mean Percent MBC: 0.02% to 0.65%) [100]. It was reported that Mentha arvensis and Mentha piperita EOs generally exhibited weak inhibitory effects on 12 different Aeromonas spp. Isolates (MIC > 1840 μg/mL) while M. arvensis EO shows moderate inhibitory (MIC: 1250 μg/mL) on only one isolate [36].
Majolo, et al. [104] investigated the antimicrobial effects of Lippia alba, Lippia origanoides, and Lippia sidoides EOs on Aeromonas hydrophila and found only the moderate inhibitory (MIC and MBC: 1250 μg/mL) effect of L. sidoides EO.
Among Piper aduncum, Piper callosum, Piper hispidinervum, Piper hispidum, and Piper marginatum EOs on 11 different A. hydrophila isolates, only P. marginatum had a strong inhibitory effect (MIC: 468.8 and 234.4 μg/mL) on three different A. hydrophila isolates [43].
Ocimum gratissimum and Hesperozygis ringens EOs showed a marked activity (MIC and MBC: 400 μg/mL) on A. hydrophila, which is among the pathogens of Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii (MIC and MBC: 400 μg/mL) while they exhibited a moderate inhibitory (≥800 μg/mL) on A. veronii [37].
A strong inhibitory effect of Ocimum basilicum EO with 3 μL/mL and 9 μL/mL MIC values was reported on A. hydrophila and A. veronii, respectively [105]. Among nine different herb EOs, Conobea scoparioides and Lippia origanoides EOs had remarkable activity against A. hydrophila with the low respective MIC and MBC values of 200 μg/mL [106].
It was reported that Eucalyptus globulus, Lavendula angustifolia, Origanum vulgare, and Melaleuca alternifolia nanoemulsions were more effective on A. hydrophila than their EOs, and among four different herbs, O. vulgare essential oil was found as the most effective with 25 μg/mL MIC and MBC, and the nano-emulsion was also found as the most effective with 3.12 μg/mL MIC and 12.5 μg/mL MBC [51]. However, generally moderate and weak inhibitory effects of Ocimum americanum [86], Hesperozygis ringens and Ocimum gratissimum [107], and Lippia alba [108] EOs on different A. hydrophila isolates were also reported.

4.2. Vibrio spp., Listonella anguillarum, and Photobacterium damselae

Historically, vibrionaceae family members are the most severe infectious diseases in marine fish species [109]. The antimicrobial effects of O. vulgare, M. alternifolia, C. citratus, C. verum, and T. vulgaris EOs on Vibrio campbellii, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio vulnificus, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus have been researched, and it was reported that generally moderate and weak inhibitory effects of these EOs on Vibrio spp [110]. Wei and Wee [102] indicated that Cymbopogon nardus EO showed potent inhibitory effects with 0.244 μg/mL and 0.488 μg/mL MIC values on Vibrio spp. and Vibrio damsela, respectively. Similarly, a strong inhibitory effect of Thymus vulgaris EO was reported, respectively, with 320 μg/mL MIC for Vibrio ordalii and Vibrio anguillarum and 80 μg/mL MIC for Vibrio parahaemolyticus [111]. A marked activity of Syzygium aromaticum EO with 0.015 μg/mL MIC values was reported on six different isolates of Vibrio spp. [103].
O. vulgare subsp. Hirtum, O. onites, and O. marjorana EOs had weak or moderate inhibitory effects on Vibrio splendidus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and Listonella anguillarum with zone diameter of 7.3 to 14.3 mm, 7.8 to 13.6 mm, and 9.1 to 14.1 mm, respectively [112]. It was reported that Argania spinosa EO had marked activity with 62.5 μL/mL MIC value on L. Anguillarum [113].
It was reported that E. globulus, L. angustifolia, O. vulgare, and M. alternifolia nanoemulsions were more effective on Photobacterium damselae than their EOs, and among these herbs, O. vulgare EO and nano-emulsion were found as the most effective [51].

4.3. Pseudomonas fluorescens

Pseudomonas fluorescens is a harmful pathogen in a variety of farmed fish. It was reported that Ocimum basilicum EO exhibited a potent inhibitory with 9 μL/mL MIC value on P. fluorescens [105]. C. Nardus [102] and S. aromaticum [103] EOs showed marked activity on Pseudomonas spp. and P. Aeruginosa. Thymus vulgaris EO had a moderate inhibitory effect on Pseudomonas sp. with 640 μg/mL MIC value [111].
Among T. vulgaris, L. nobilis, R. officinalis, and P. crispum EOs, T. vulgaris EO exhibited the highest zone diameter with 26.5 mm on P. fluorescens [98]. T. vulgaris was also found as the most effective with a 13 mm zone diameter on P. Aeruginosa [114].

4.4. Citrobacter spp.

Citrobacter spp. is an opportunistic fish pathogen affecting farmed fish species. Bandeira, et al. [37] reported that O. gratissimum and H. ringens EOs showed a moderate or weak inhibitory (MIC and MBC: >1600 μg/mL) on Citrobacter freundii. Among Achyrocline satureioides, Aniba parviflora, Aniba rosaeodora, Anthemis nobilis, Conobea scoparioides, Cupressus sempervirens, Illicium verum, Lippia origanoides, and Melaleuca alternifolia EOs on C. freundii, only L. origanoides EO exhibited a moderate inhibitory [43].
It was determined that C. freundii showed susceptibility towards the Argania spinosa EO with a zone diameter of 15 mm [113], and C. nardus EO with a MIC value of 0.244 μg/mL [102].

4.5. Raoultella ornithinolytica

Raoultella ornithinolytica was isolated from kidneys and skin lesions of naturally diseased silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen), and Ocimum gratissimum EO showed a moderate inhibitory effect on this pathogen [37].

4.6. Nocardia seriolae

Nocardia seriolae is the causative agent of nocardiosis in cultured fish species [115]. Ismail and Yoshida [116] reported that MIC values of C. Zeylanicum, Thymus vulgaris, Cymbopogon flexuosus, and Melaleuca alternifolia EOs on 80 Nocardia seriolae isolates were in the range of 5 to >5120 μg/mL, and the most effective herb species were C. zeylanicum and T. vulgaris with MICs 5–160 μg/mL, respectively.

4.7. Flavobacterium spp.

Flavobacterium species are widespread in soil habitats and fresh and marine waters and cause economic losses in cultured fish. T. vulgaris EO exhibited a potent inhibitory with 320 μg/mL MIC value on F. psychrophilum [111].
Previous studies have reported that Flavobacterium spp. showed high susceptibility towards the S. aromaticum EO with a MIC value of 0.031 μg/mL [103], and C. nardus EO with a MIC value of 0.977 μg/mL [102]. R. officinalis EO showed a moderate zone diameter with >~18 mm on F. psychrophilum [117]. A remarkable activity of Allium tuberosum EO with 20 μg/mL to 80 μg/mL MIC values was reported on six different isolates of Flavobacterium columnare [118].

4.8. Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is an important Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen for aquaculture species. Gulec, et al. [101] reported that O. acutidens EO formed a zone diameter of 28 mm on S. aureus, Z. officinale, N. Sativa, T. Vulgaris, S. Aromaticum and E. Sativa EOs had no inhibitory effects on S. aureus [114].

4.9. Streptococcus spp., Lactococcus spp., and Vagococcus salmoninarum

Streptococcaceae family species are important Gram-positive pathogens for cultured fish. Among L. alba, L. sidoides, M. piperita, O. gratissimum, and Z. officinale EOs, strong inhibitory effects of L. sidoides EO was reported on Streptococcus agalactiae with 312.5 μg/mL MIC and 416.7 μg/mL MBC values [119]. It was determined that S. agalactiae had high susceptibility towards the O. Basilicum [105], M. piperita [45], C. Nardus [102], and S. Aromaticum [103] with MIC value of 9 μL/mL, 0.125 mg/mL, 0.244 μg/mL, and 0.015 μg/mL, respectively.
Gholipourkanani, et al. [51] determined that among E. globulus, L. angustifolia, O. vulgare, and M. alternifolia nano-emulsions and EOs, O. vulgare EO and/or nano-emulsion were found as the most effective on Streptococcus iniae. Oliveria decumbens EO had a zone of inhibition of 69 mm, and MIC and MBC values of 0.5 mg/mL and 2 mg/mL, respectively, on S. iniae [120].
A remarkable activity of Z. multiflora and R. officinalis EOs were reported, respectively, with 0.06 μL/mL and 0.5 μL/mL MIC, and 0.12 μL/mL and 0.25 μL/mL MBC for S. iniae [121]. Similarly, R. Officinalis, Z. Multiflora, A. Graveolens, and E. Globulus EOs exhibited potent inhibitory effects on S. iniae, and R. Officinalis showed the highest inhibition with a zone of 45 mm, and MIC value of 3.9 μg/mL, and MBC value of 7.8 μg/mL [122].
Cinnamomum verum, Citrus hystrix, Cymbopogon citratus, and Curcuma longa EOs had marked activity against S. iniae with the low respective MIC values of 40, 160, 320, and 160, respectively [123]. Pirbalouti, et al. [124] determined that Thymus daenensis and Myrtus communis EOs formed a zone diameter of 19 mm and 15.67 mm, respectively, on S. iniae.
It was reported that Streptococcus spp. showed high susceptibility towards the S. aromaticum EO with a MIC value of 0.062 [103] and C. nardus EO with a MIC value of 0.488 [102].
Zataria multifora, Thymbra spicata, Bunium persicum, Satureja bachtiarica, and Thymus daenensis EOs exhibited potent inhibitory effects with MIC and MBC values ranged from 4 μL/mL to 16 μL/mL against the L. garvieae [125]. Zataria multiflora, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, and Allium sativum EOs showed a potent inhibitory (MIC: 0.12 to 0.5 µL/mL and MBC: 0.12 to 1 µL/mL) on L. Garvieae [126]. It was determined that Argania spinosa EO with a zone diameter of ~11 mm and MIC values of 125 μL/mL on L. garvieae [113].
Thymus vulgaris EO had marked activity with a zone diameter of 36.7 mm on L. Garvieae [101]. Among T. vulgaris, L. nobilis, R. officinalis, and P. crispum EOs, T. vulgaris EO exhibited the highest zone diameter with 29.5 mm on L. Garvieae [98].
It was found that T. vulgaris EO was more effective on Lactococcus piscium (MIC: 320 μg/mL) than Lactococcus lactis (MIC: 1280) and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bv. diacetylactis (MIC: 1280) [111].
Among Origanum vulgare, Hypericum perforatum, Rosmarinus officinalis, Zingiber officinale, Eugenia caryophyllata, Mentha piperita, Lavandula hybrid, and Nigella sativa EOs, O. vulgare and E. caryophyllata EOs showed remarkable activity against Vagococcus salmoninarum with the low respective MIC values of 125 μL/mL and 250 μL/mL, respectively [42].
Table 3. Essential oils as antibacterial agents: an in vitro perspective.
Table 3. Essential oils as antibacterial agents: an in vitro perspective.
Bacterial PathogensEssential OilConcentrationsEffective Essential Oil/Concentration/Disc/MIC/MBC/PathogenReferences
Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida ATCC 14174
Cinnamomum zeylanicum/verum
Origanum vulgare
Origanum compactum
Origanum heracleoticum
Eugenia caryophyllata
Geraniol rich Thyme vulgaris
Thymol rich Thyme vulgaris
Thymus satureoides
Thujanol rich Thyme vulgaris
Melaleuca alternifolia
Cinnamomum camphora
Linalool rich Thyme vulgaris
Rosemary officinalis
61 to 3628 μg/mL
C. zeylanicum/verum MIC and MBC: 245
O. vulgare MIC and MBC: 226
O. compactum MIC and MBC: 458
O. heracleoticum MIC and MBC: 458
E. caryophyllata MIC and MBC: 520
Hayatgheib, et al. [96]
A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida CAE 235
C. zeylanicum/verum
O. vulgare
O. compactum
O. heracleoticum
E. caryophyllata
Geraniol rich T. vulgaris
Thymol rich T. vulgaris
T. satureoides
Thujanol rich T. vulgaris
M. alternifolia
C. camphora
Linalool rich T. vulgaris
R. officinalis
61 to 3628 μg/mL
C. zeylanicum/verum MIC and MBC: 245
O. vulgare MIC and MBC: 226
O. compactum MIC and MBC: 458
O. heracleoticum MIC and MBC: 458
E. caryophyllata MIC and MBC: 520
Hayatgheib, et al. [96]
A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida CAE 452
C. zeylanicum/verum
O. vulgare
O. compactum
O. heracleoticum
E. caryophyllata
Geraniol rich T. vulgaris
Thymol rich T. vulgaris
T. satureoides
Thujanol rich T. vulgaris
M. alternifolia
C. camphora
Linalool rich T. vulgaris
R. officinaliss
61 to 3628 μg/mL
C. zeylanicum/verum MIC and MBC: 61
O. vulgare MIC and MBC: 113
O. compactum MIC and MBC: 229
O. heracleoticum MIC and MBC: 458
E. caryophyllata MIC and MBC: 520
Thymol rich T. vulgaris MIC and MBC: 440
Hayatgheib, et al. [96]
A. salmonicida subsp. salmonicida CAE 258
C. zeylanicum/verum
O. vulgare
O. compactum
O. heracleoticum
E. caryophyllata
Geraniol rich T. vulgaris
Thymol rich T. vulgaris
T. satureoides
Thujanol rich T. vulgaris
M. alternifolia
C. camphora
Linalool rich T. vulgaris
R. officinalis
61 to 3628 μg/mL
C. zeylanicum/verum MIC and MBC: 490
O. vulgare MIC and MBC: 453
O. compactum MIC and MBC: 458
O. heracleoticum MIC: 458 and MBC: 916
E. caryophyllata MIC: 520 and MBC: 1040
Thymol rich T. vulgaris MIC and MBC: 440
Hayatgheib, et al. [96]
Vibrio campbellii
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
C. citratus
C. verum
T. vulgaris
50 to 3000 μg/mL
O. vulgare MIC and MBC: 800
M. alternifolia MIC: 800 and MBC: 900
C. citratus MIC and MBC: 1500
C. verum MIC: 1000 and MBC: 1200
T. vulgaris MIC: 1900 and MBC: 2000
Domínguez-Borbor, et al. [110]
Vibrio harveyi
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
C. citratus
Cinnamomum verum
Thymus vulgaris
50 to 3000 μg/mL
O. vulgare MIC: 700 and MBC: 800
M. alternifolia MIC and MBC: 800
C. citratus MIC: 1000 and MBC: 1100
C. verum MIC and MBC: 900
T. vulgaris MIC: 2000 and MBC: 2100
Domínguez-Borbor, et al. [110]
Vibrio vulnificus
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
C. citratus
C. verum
T. vulgaris
50 to 3000 μg/mL
O. vulgare MIC: 900 and MBC: 1100
M. alternifolia MIC: 1000 and MBC: 1200
C. citratus MIC: 2000 and MBC: 2200
C. verum MIC: 1000 and MBC: 1100
T. vulgaris MIC and MBC: 1800
Domínguez-Borbor, et al. [110]
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
C. citratus
C. verum
T. vulgaris
50 to 3000 μg/mL
O. vulgare MIC: 800 and MBC: 900
M. alternifolia MIC: 600 and MBC: 900
C. citratus MIC: 1400 and MBC: 1500
C. verum MIC: 1500 and MBC: 1600
T. vulgaris MIC and MBC: 1500
Domínguez-Borbor, et al. [110]
Vagococcus salmoninarum
Origanum vulgare
Hypericu perforatum
Rosmarinus officinalis
Zingiber officinale
Eugenia caryophyllata
Menta piperita
Lavandula hybrida
Nigella sativa
0.195 to 25 final well concentration for agar diffusion assay,
1000–0.01 μL/mL for MIC
O. vulgare 17 to 20.33 mm/1.56 to 25 μL/mL/well and MIC: 125
R. officinalis MIC: 1000
Z. officinale MIC: 500
E. caryophyllata 17.83–18.66 mm/12.5–25 μL/mL/well and MIC 250
M. piperita MIC: 500
L. hybrid MIC: 1000
N. sativa MIC: >1000
Metin and Biçer [42]
Aeromonas spp. isolates (248, 249, 284, 351, 432, 520, 533, 561,
562, 565, 568 and 570)
Mentha arvensis
Mentha piperita
312.5 to 40,000 μg/mL
M. arvensis MIC and MBC 1250 (isolate 520)
M. piperita MIC and MBC 2500 (isolate 570)
Other isolates MIC: >145sa8
Chagas, et al. [36]
Aeromonas hydrophila isolates (248, 249, 284, 432, 520, 533,
562, 568, 569 and 570)
Piper aduncum
Piper callosum
Piper hispidinervum
Piper hispidum
Piper marginatum
117.2 to 30,000 μg/mL
P. marginatum MIC: 468.8 for A. hydrophila (248 and 570)
P. marginatum MIC: 234.4 for A. hydrophila (569)
Others MIC: >937.5
Majolo, et al. [43]
Streptococcus agalactiae
Lippia alba
Lippia sidoides
Mentha piperita
Ocimum gratissimum
Zingiber officinale
312 to 20,000 μg/mL
L. alba MIC and MBC: 1666.7
L. sidoides MIC: 312.5 and MBC: 416.7
M. piperita MIC and MBC: 1250
O. gratissimum MIC and MBC: 2500
Z. officinale MIC:625 and MBC: 833.3
Majolo, et al. [119]
Aeromonas hydrophila
Lippia alba
Lippia origanoides
Lippia sidoides
625 to 20,000 μg/mL
L. alba MIC and MBC: 5000
L. origanoides MIC and MBC: 2500
L. sidoides MIC and MBC: 1250
Majolo, et al. [104]
Aeromonas veronii
Aeromonas hydrophila
Citrobacter freundii
Raoultella ornithinolytica
Ocimum gratissimum
100 to 3200 μg/mL
400 (MIC and MBC) for Rifampicin resistant A. hydrophila
800 (MIC) and 1600 (MBC) for A. hydrophila and A. veronii
1600 (MIC and MBC) for C. freundii
1600 (MIC and MBC) for R. ornithinolytica
Bandeira, et al. [37]
A. veronii
A. hydrophila
C. freundii
R. ornithinolytica
Hesperozygis ringens
100 to 3200 μg/mL
400 (MIC and MBC) for Rifampicin resistant A. hydrophila and A. hydrophila
1600 (MIC) and 3200 (MBC) for C. freundii
3200 (MIC and MBC) for R. ornithinolytica
800 (MIC and MBC) for A. veronii
Bandeira, et al. [37]
A. hydrophila
Achyrocline satureioides
Aniba parviflora
Aniba rosaeodora
Anthemis nobilis
Conobea scoparioides
Cupressus sempervirens
Illicium verum
Lippia origanoides
Melaleuca alternifolia
12.5 to 6400 μg/mL
satureioides MIC and MBC: >6400
parviflora MIC: 800 and MBC: 1600
rosaeodora MIC and MBC: 3200
nobilis MIC and MBC: 6400
scoparioides MIC and MBC: 200
sempervirens MIC and MBC: >6400
verum MIC: 1600 and MBC: 3200
L. origanoides MIC and MBC: 200
M. alternifolia MIC: 3200 and MBC: 6400
Bandeira Jr, et al. [106]
C. freundii
satureioides
parviflora
rosaeodora
nobilis
scoparioides
sempervirens
verum
L. origanoides
M. alternifolia
12.5 to 6400 μg/mL
satureioides MIC and MBC: >6400
parviflora MIC: 3200 and MBC: 6400
rosaeodora MIC and MBC: 3200
nobilis MIC and MBC: >6400
scoparioides MIC and MBC: 3200
sempervirens MIC and MBC: >6400
verum MIC and MBC: >6400
L. origanoides MIC and MBC: 800
M. alternifolia MIC and MBC: >6400
Bandeira Jr, et al. [106]
R. ornithinolytica
satureioides
parviflora
rosaeodora
nobilis
scoparioides
sempervirens
verum
L. origanoides
M. alternifolia
12.5 to 6400 μg/mL
satureioides MIC and MBC: >6400
parviflora MIC and MBC: 3200
rosaeodora MIC and MBC: 3200
nobilis MIC and MBC: >6400
scoparioides MIC and MBC: 3200
sempervirens MIC and MBC: >6400
verum MIC and MBC: >6400
L. origanoides MIC and MBC: 800
M. alternifolia MIC: 6400 and MBC > 6400
Bandeira Jr, et al. [106]
Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Streptococcus agalactiae
Ocimum basilicum
3 and 6 μL/disc
3 to 300 μL/mL MIC
13.5 mm/3 μL/disc and MIC: 3 for Aeromonas hydrophila
22.0 mm/3 μL/disc and MIC: 9 for Aeromonas veronii
15.83 mm/3 μL/disc and MIC: 9 for Pseudomonas fluorescens
10.66 mm/3 μL/disc and MIC: 9 for Streptococcus agalactiae
El-Ekiaby [105]
Streptococcus agalactiae
Mentha piperita
-
MIC: 0.125 mg/mL
de Souza Silva, et al. [45]
Photobacterium damselae
Eucalyptus globulus
Lavendula angustifolia
Origanum vulgare
Melaleuca alternifolia
-
E. globulus MIC: 25 and MBC: 50
Nano-emulsions from E. globulus MIC: 12.5 and MBC: 25
L. angustifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 50
Nano-emulsions from L. angustifolia MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
O. vulgare MIC: 25 and MBC: 25
Nano-emulsions from O. vulgare MIC: 3.12 and MBC: 12.5
M. alternifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from M. alternifolia MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
Gholipourkanani, et al. [51]
Aeromonas hydrophila
E. globulus
L angustifolia
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
-
E. globulus MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from E. globulus MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
L. angustifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from L. angustifolia MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
O. vulgare MIC: 25 and MBC: 25
Nano-emulsions from O. vulgare MIC: 3.12 and MBC: 12.5
M. alternifolia MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
Nano-emulsions from M. alternifolia MIC: 12.5 and MBC: 50
Gholipourkanani, et al. [51]
Streptococcus iniae
E. globulus
L. angustifolia
O. vulgare
M. alternifolia
-
E. globulus MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from E. globulus MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
L. angustifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from L. angustifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
O. vulgare MIC: 25 and MBC: 25
Nano-emulsions from O. vulgare MIC: 3.12 and MBC: 12.5
M. alternifolia MIC: 100 and MBC: 100
Nano-emulsions from M. alternifolia MIC: 50 and MBC: 50
Gholipourkanani, et al. [51]
Yersinia ruckeri (2 isolates)
Thymus vulgaris
Laurus nobilis
Rosmarinus officinalis
Petroselinum crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 31.50 and 29.5 mm
L. nobilis 11.5 mm
R. officinalis 10 mm and 10.5 mm
P. crispum 7 mm and 0 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Lactococcus garvieae
T. vulgaris
L. nobilis
R. officinalis
P. crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 29.5 mm
L. nobilis 18.5 mm
R. officinalis 13 mm
P. crispum 6 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Pseudomonas fluorescens
T. vulgaris
L. nobilis
R. officinalis
P. crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 26.5 mm
L. nobilis 9.5 mm
R. officinalis 10 mm
P. crispum 6.5 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Aeromonas sobria
T. vulgaris
L. nobilis
R. officinalis
P. crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 31.5 mm
L. nobilis 15 mm
R. officinalis 17 mm
P. crispum 7 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Aeromonas salmonicida
T. vulgaris
L. nobilis
R. officinalis
P. crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 30 mm
L. nobilis 13 mm
R. officinalis 14.5 mm
P. crispum 7.5 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Aeromonas veronii
T. vulgaris
L. nobilis
R. officinalis
P. crispum
15 μL/disc
T. vulgaris 36 mm
L. nobilis 18.5 mm
R. officinalis 17.5 mm
P. crispum 7 mm
Tural, et al. [98]
Streptococcus iniae
Oliveria decumbens
15 mg/disc
69 mm/disc and MIC: 0.5 mg/mL and MBC: 2 mg/mL
Vazirzadeh, et al. [120]
Nocardia seriolae
(80 isolates)
Cinnamomum zeylanicum
Thymus vulgaris
Cymbopogon flexuosus
Melaleuca alternifolia
5 to 5120 μg/mL
C. zeylanicum MIC: 5 to 160
T. vulgaris MIC: 10 to 160
C. flexuosus 20 to 640
M. alternifolia 160 to >5120
Ismail and Yoshida [116]
Aeromonas hydrophila
Ocimum americanum
MIC: 6400
Sutili, et al. [86]
Yersinia ruckeri, Aeromonas hydrophila, Listonella anguillarum,
Edwarsiella tarda,
Citrobacter freundii and Lactococcus garvieae
Argania spinosa
0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%,
or 10% disc and 0.06 to 500 μL/mL MIC
13–18.33 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 31.25 for Y. ruckeri
14–17 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 62.5 for A. hydrophila
12.33–17 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 62.5 for L. anguillarum
14–17 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 125 for E. tarda
10–9.66 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 62.5 for C. freundii
11–11.33 mm/7.5–10%/disc and MIC: 125 for L. garvieae
Öntaş, et al. [113]
Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida
Cinnamomum cassia
Cinnamomum zeylanicum
T. vulgaris
Syzygium aromaticum
Melaleuca alternifolia
Rosemarinus officinalis
Ocimum basilicum
C. citratus
Aniba rosaeodora
Salvia officinalis
Lavendula angustifolia
O. vulgare
25 μL of 20% solution/disc
C. cassia 56 mm
C. zeylanicum 27.3 mm
T. vulgaris 42 mm
S. aromaticum 29.3 mm
M. alternifolia 12.7 mm
R. officinalis 10.7 mm
O. basilicum 6.7 mm
C. citratus 44.7 mm
rosaeodora 16.7 mm
S. officinalis 12.7 mm
L. angustifolia 12.7 mm
O. vulgare 46 mm
Starliper, et al. [100]
Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida (10 isolate)
Aeromonas hydrophila (5 isolate)
Aeromonas veronii bv. sobria (9 isolate)
Aeromonas caviae
Aeromonas popoffii (17 isolate)
Aeromonas allosaccharophila (3 isolate)
Aeromonas encheleia (9 isolate)
Aeromonas eucrenophila (11 isolate)
Aeromonas molluscorum (4 isolate)
C. cassia
Cinnamomum aromaticum
Cymbopogon citratus
Origanum vulgare
Thymus vulgaris
Overall mean percent minimum bactericidal concentrations
(MBC)
C. cassia (Lotus): 0.02%
C. aromaticum: 0.03%
C. cassia (Aromaland): 0.04%
C. citratus (Stony Mountain Botanicals): 0.10%
O. vulgare (Now Foods): 0.14%
O. vulgare (Herbal Authority): 0.16%
O. vulgare (Stony Mountain Botanicals): 0.30%
C. citratus (Now Foods): 0.36%
C. citratus (Puritan’s Pride): 0.65%
T. vulgaris, White: 2.11%
T. vulgaris, Linalol: 2.22%
Starliper, et al. [100]
Aeromonas hydrophila (14 isolates)
Hesperozygis ringens
Ocimum gratissimum
100 to 3200 μg/mL
H. ringens MIC and MBC: 800 to 3200 μg/mL
O. gratissimum MIC: 200 to 1600 μg/mL
and MBC: 400 to 1600 μg/mL
Sutili, et al. [107]
A. hydrophila
Lippia alba
the initial concentration of 176,100 μg/mL
MIC: 2862
MBC: 5998
Sutili, et al. [108]
Lactococcus garvieae
Zataria multiflora
Cinnamomum zeylanicum
Allium sativum
1 to 0.007 μL/mL
Z. multiflora MIC: 0.12 and MBC: 0.12
C. zeylanicum MIC: 0.5 and MBC: 0.5
A. sativum MIC: 0.5 and MBC: 1
Soltani, et al. [126]
Streptococcus iniae (2 isolates)
Zataria multiflora
Rosmarinus officinalis
1 to 0.0017 μL/mL
Z. multiflora MIC: 0.06 and MBC: 0.5
R. officinalis MIC: 0.12 and 0.25 and MBC: > 1 for 2 isolates
Soltani, et al. [121]
Staphylococcus aureus
Lactococcus garviae
Yersinia ruckeri
Aeromonas hydrophila
Origanum acutidens
10 μL/disc
28 mm for S. aureus
36.7 mm for L. garviae
28.7 mm for Y. ruckeri
32.7 mm for A. hydrophila
Gulec, et al. [101]
Aeromonas salmonicida
Azadirachta indica (Nano-emulsion)
40 μL/disc
30 mm
Thomas, et al. [99]
Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Z. officinale
N. sativa
T. vulgaris
S. aromaticum
E. sativa
10 μL/disc
S. aromaticum 4.5 mm for S. aureus
Z. officinale 6.7 mm, T. vulgaris 13 mm,
S. aromaticum 2 mm and E. sativa 10.3 mm for P. aeruginosa
Shehata, et al. [114]
Edwardsiella spp. (2 isolate)
Edwardsiella tarda (18)
Vibrio spp. (5 isolate)
Vibrio damsel
Aeromonas spp. (2 isolate)
Escherichia coli (2 isolate)
Flavobacterium spp.
Pseudomonas spp.
Streptococcus spp.
Aeromonas hydrophila (ATCC 49140) Citrobacter freundii (ATCC 8090)
Edwardsiella tarda (ATCC 15947)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 35032), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 13813)
Cymbopogon nardus
-
Overall mean MIC: 0.244 and/or 0.488 µg/mL
Edwardsiella spp. (1 isolate), E. tarda (1 isolate), Aeromonas spp. (1 isolate) and Flavobacterium spp. MIC values: 0.977 µg/mL
Wei and Wee [102]
Lactococcus garvieae
Tanacetum parthenium
Satureja bachtiarica
100 μg/disc and 10 to 1000 μg/mL for MIC
T. parthenium 15 mm/disc and MIC: 824
S. bachtiarica 25 mm/disc and MIC: 126
Fereidouni, et al. [127]
Streptococcus iniae
R. officinalis
Z. multiflora
graveolens
E. globulus
2 mg/disc and 7.8 to 1000 μg/mL MIC and MBC
R. officinalis 45 mm/disc, MIC: 3.9 and MBC: 7.8
Z. multiflora 22 mm/disc, MIC: 62.4 and MBC: 250
graveolens 32 mm/disc, MIC: 7.8 and MBC: 15.6
E. globulus 18 mm/disc, MIC: 250 and MBC: 250
Roomiani, et al. [122]
Listonella anguillarum
Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum (7 different collection sample)
O. onites (2 different collection sample)
O. marjorana
2 μL/disc
O. vulgare subsp. hirtum 9.1 to 14.1 mm
O. onites 9.2 and 13.8 mm
O. marjorana 11.5 mm
Stefanakis, et al. [112]
Vibrio
splendidus
O. vulgare subsp. hirtum (7 different collection sample)
O. onites (2 different collection sample)
O. marjorana
2 μL/disc
O. vulgare subsp. hirtum 7.3 to 14 mm
O. onites 12.6 and 14.3 mm
O. marjorana 9.2 mm
Stefanakis, et al. [112]
Vibrio alginolyticus
O. vulgare subsp. hirtum (7 different collection sample)
O. onites (2 different collection sample)
O. marjorana
2 μL/disc
O. vulgare subsp. hirtum 7.9 to 11.5 mm
O. onites 8.6 and 13.6 mm
O. marjorana 7.8 mm
Stefanakis, et al. [112]
Aeromonas salmonicida (18 isolate)
Origanum onites
Origanum vulgare
Thymbra spicata
Satureja thymbra
20 μL/disc and 10 to 800 μg/mL for MIC
O. onites 14 to 25 mm/disc and MIC: 800
O. vulgare 12 to 26 mm/disc and MIC: 800
T. spicata 10 to 30 mm/disc and MIC: 800
S. thymbra 10 to 30 mm/disc and MIC: 800
Okmen, et al. [97]
Flavobacterium psychrophilum
Rosmarinus officinalis
0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 μL rosemary oil/μL
>~18 mm, 0.1–0.9 μL rosemary oil/disc
Ostrand, et al. [117]
L. garvieae
Rosmarinus officinalis
Zataria multiflora Anethum graveolens Eucalyptus globulus
2 mg/disc and 7.8 to 1000 μg/mL MIC and MBC
R. officinalis 24 mm/disc, MIC: 15.6 and MBC: 31.2
Z. multiflora 32 mm/disc, MIC: 7.8 and MBC: 15.6
graveolens 14.8 mm/disc, MIC: 62.4 and MBC: 125
E. globulus 16 mm/disc, MIC: 250 and MBC: 250
Mahmoodi, et al. [128]
Streptococcus iniae
Thymus daenensis
Myrtus communis
100 μg/disc
T. daenensis 19 mm
M. communis 15.67 mm
Pirbalouti, et al. [124]
L. garvieae
Zataria multifora
Thymbra spicata
Bunium persicum
Satureja bachtiarica
Thymus daenensis
Myrtus communis
4 to 1000 μL/mL for MIC and MBC
Z. multifora MIC: 4 and MBC:8
T. spicata MIC: 8 and MBC:16
B. persicum MIC: 8 and MBC:16
S. bachtiarica MIC: 8 and MBC:16
T. daenensis MIC: 8 and MBC:16
M. communis MIC and MBC: >1000
Goudarzi, et al. [125]
Lactococcus piscium
Streptococcus phocae
Flavobacterium psychrophilum
Vibrio ordalii
Vibrio anguillarum
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Shewanella baltica
Pseudomonas sp.
Kluyvera intermedia
Citrobacter gillenii
Hafnia alvei
Psychrobacter sp.
Lactococcus lactis
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bv.
diacetylactis
Arthrobacter sp.
Thymus vulgaris
2.5 to 1280 μg/mL for MIC
L. piscium MIC: 320
S. phocae MIC: 640
F. psychrophilum MIC: 320
V. ordalii MIC: 320
V. anguillarum MIC: 80
V. parahaemolyticus MIC: 320
S. baltica MIC: 640
Pseudomonas sp. MIC: 640
K. intermedia MIC: 1280
C. gillenii MIC: 1280
H. alvei MIC: 1280
Psychrobacter sp. MIC: 1280
L. lactis MIC: 1280
L. lactis subsp. lactis bv.
diacetylactis MIC: 1280
Arthrobacter sp. MIC: 1280
Navarrete, et al. [111]
Streptococcus iniae
Cinnamomum verum
Citrus hystrix
Cymbopogon citratus
Curcuma longa
10 to 640 μg/mL
C. verum MIC: 40
C. hystrix MIC: 160
C. citratus MIC: 320
C. longa MIC: 160
Rattanachaikunsopon and Phumkhachorn [123]
Flavobacterium
columnare (6 isolate)
Allium tuberosum
280 μg/mLMIC: 20 to 80 Rattanachaikunsopon and Phumkhachorn [118]
Vibrio spp. (6 isolates) Edwardsiella spp. (21 isolates) Aeromonas spp. (2 isolates) Escherichia coli (2 isolates) Flavobacterium spp.
Streptococcus spp.
Pseudomonas spp. Citrobacter freundii (ATCC 8090),
Aeromonas hydrophila (ATCC 49140), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 35032), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC13813), Edwardsiella tarda (ATCC 15947)
Syzygium aromaticum
0.015 to 0.062 μg/mL Overall mean MIC: 0.015 to 0.062 Lee, et al. [103]

5. Research Gaps and Concluding Remarks

Using of herbal compounds in aquaculture is increasing day by day as a means of aquaculture sustainability. Essential oils (EOs) show beneficial effects on growth, immunity, antibacterial and antiparasitic activities in fish culture and are used as anesthetic compounds during fish handling and transportation. The efficiency of EOs depends on plant variables, chemical compositions of bioactive compounds, environmental characteristics of plant origin, and parts of plants from which EOs is extracted. Sometimes plant originated EOs possess a mixture of different compounds, which may produce undesirable side effects on fish and shellfish. Commercial pharmaceutical companies might play significant roles in refining the desirable and undesirable compounds of EOs to achieve better effects in fish culture.
Importantly, EOs molecular mechanisms for fish immunity increment, bacteria, and parasite destruction are also questionable. Future research through cell culture and in vitro identification and characterization of EOs action pathways may solve these questions. In the upcoming days, EOs optimum doses against infectious bacteria and parasites for worldwide commercial fish species should be extensively studied.
Lastly, the synergistic relationship between/among the bioactive compounds of EOs also opens a new research area. Before applying EOs in aquaculture from any new plants, local and international drug regulating agencies (FDA or EU) permission or guidelines should be needed or followed.

Author Contributions

Authors shared equally in this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research work was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit. Fishstatj, a Tool for Fishery Statistics Analysis, Release: 3.04.5, Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series. Global Aquaculture Production: Quantity 1950–2016; Value 1950–2016; Global Capture Production: 1950–2016; 2018-03-16. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  2. Shah, B.R.; Mráz, J. Advances in nanotechnology for sustainable aquaculture and fisheries. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 12, 925–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dawood, M.; Koshio, S. Application of fermentation strategy in aquafeed for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 12, 987–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hasan, T.; Jang, W.J.; Lee, B.-J.; Kim, K.W.; Hur, S.W.; Lim, S.G.; Bai, S.C.; Kong, I.-S. Heat-killed Bacillus sp. SJ-10 probiotic acts as a growth and humoral innate immunity response enhancer in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2019, 88, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hasan, T.; Jang, W.J.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, B.-J.; Hur, S.W.; Lim, S.G.; Kim, K.W.; Han, H.-S.; Kong, I.-S. Effects of Immunostimulants, Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Potentially Immunoreactive Feed Additives on Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus): A Review. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2019, 27, 417–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dawood, M.A.; Metwally, A.E.-S.; El-Sharawy, M.E.; Atta, A.M.; El-Bialy, Z.I.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Paray, B.A. The role of β-glucan in the growth, intestinal morphometry, and immune-related gene and heat shock protein expressions of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under different stocking densities. Aquaculture 2020, 523, 735205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martos-Sitcha, J.A.; Mancera, J.M.; Prunet, P.; Magnoni, L.J. Editorial: Welfare and Stressors in Fish: Challenges Facing Aquaculture. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dawood, M.; Abo-Al-Ela, H.G.; Hassan, T. Modulation of transcriptomic profile in aquatic animals: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics scenarios. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 97, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brasil, E.; Figueredo, A.; Cardoso, L.; Santos, M.; Bertaglia, E.; Furtado, W.; Viana, J.; Carmo, I.; Chaves, F.; Mouriño, J.; et al. In vitro and in vivo antiparasitic action of essential oils of Lippia spp. in Koi Carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed supplemented diets. Braz. J. Veter. Pathol. 2019, 12, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gonzales, A.P.P.F.; Yoshioka, E.T.O.; Mathews, P.D.; Mertins, O.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Videira, M.N.; Tavares-Dias, M. Anthelminthic efficacy of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil (Poaceae) against monogenean parasites of Colossoma macropomum (Serrasalmidae), and blood and histopathological effects. Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paray, B.A.; El-Basuini, M.F.; Alagawany, M.; Albeshr, M.F.; Farah, M.A.; Dawood, M.A.O. Yucca schidigera Usage for Healthy Aquatic Animals: Potential Roles for Sustainability. Animals 2021, 11, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. El-Basuini, M.F.; Shahin, S.A.; Teiba, I.I.; Zaki, M.A.; El-Hais, A.M.; Sewilam, H.; Almeer, R.; Abdelkhalek, N.; Dawood, M.A. The influence of dietary coenzyme Q10 and vitamin C on the growth rate, immunity, oxidative-related genes, and the resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2021, 531, 735862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hasan, T.; Jang, W.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.W.; Lee, B.-J.; Han, H.-S.; Bai, S.C.; Kong, I.-S. Effect of β-glucooligosaccharides as a new prebiotic for dietary supplementation in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dawood, M.A.; Koshio, S. Recent advances in the role of probiotics and prebiotics in carp aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture 2016, 454, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Q.E.; Zhou, X.; Wang, F.-H.; Muurinen, J.; Virta, M.P.; Brandt, K.K.; Zhu, Y. Antibiotic resistome in the livestock and aquaculture industries: Status and solutions. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dawood, M. Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: Important insights for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 642–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shourbela, R.; Khatab, S.; Hassan, M.; van Doan, H.; Dawood, M. The Effect of Stocking Density and Carbon Sources on the Oxidative Status, and Nonspecific Immunity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Reared under Biofloc Conditions. Animals 2021, 11, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dawood, M.A.; Gewaily, M.S.; Monier, M.N.; Younis, E.M.; van Doan, H.; Sewilam, H. The regulatory roles of yucca extract on the growth rate, hepato-renal function, histopathological alterations, and immune-related genes in common carp exposed with acute ammonia stress. Aquaculture 2020, 736287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Dawood, M.; Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; El-Matbouli, M. The nature and consequences of co-infections in tilapia: A review. J. Fish Dis. 2020, 43, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Srichaiyo, N.; Tongsiri, S.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Dawood, M.A.; Jaturasitha, S.; Esteban, M.Á.; Ringø, E.; van Doan, H. The effects gotu kola (Centella asiatica) powder on growth performance, skin mucus, and serum immunity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 16, 100239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Srichaiyo, N.; Tongsiri, S.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Dawood, M.A.; Esteban, M.Á.; Ringø, E.; van Doan, H. The effect of fishwort (Houttuynia cordata) on skin mucosal, serum immunities, and growth performance of Nile tilapia. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 98, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shekarabi, S.P.H.; Omidi, A.H.; Dawood, M.; Adel, M.; Avazeh, A.; Heidari, F. Effect of Black Mulberry (Morus nigra) Powder on Growth Performance, Biochemical Parameters, Blood Carotenoid Concentration, and Fillet Color of Rainbow Trout. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2020, 20, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sarhadi, I.; Alizadeh, E.; Ahmadifar, E.; Adineh, H.; Dawood, M.A. Skin Mucosal, Serum Immunity and Antioxidant Capacity of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Fed Artemisia (Artemisia annua). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2020, 20, 1011–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sadeghi, F.; Ahmadifar, E.; Moghadam, M.S.; Ghiyasi, M.; Dawood, M.; Yılmaz, S. Lemon, Citrus aurantifolia, peel and Bacillus licheniformis protected common carp, Cyprinus carpio, from Aeromonas hydrophila infection by improving the humoral and skin mucosal immunity, and antioxidative responses. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Valentim, D.S.S.; Duarte, J.L.; Oliveira, A.E.M.F.M.; Cruz, R.A.S.; Carvalho, J.C.T.; Conceição, E.C.; Fernandes, C.P.; Tavares-Dias, M. Nanoemulsion from essential oil of Pterodon emarginatus (Fabaceae) shows in vitro efficacy against monogeneans of Colossoma macropomum (Pisces: Serrasalmidae). J. Fish Dis. 2018, 41, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Abdelnour, S.A.; Dawood, M.A.; El-Nesr, S.S.; Dhama, K. Curcumin and its different forms: A review on fish nutrition. Aquaculture 2021, 532, 736030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coimbra, J.L.; Soares, A.C.F.; Garrido, M.D.S.; Sousa, C.D.S.; Ribeiro, F.L.B. Toxicity of plant extracts to Scutellonema bradys. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2006, 41, 1209–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Magouz, F.I.; Mahmoud, S.A.; El-Morsy, R.A.; Paray, B.A.; Soliman, A.A.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Dawood, M.A. Dietary menthol essential oil enhanced the growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, immune-related genes, and resistance against acute ammonia exposure in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential Oils in Food Preservation: Mode of Action, Synergies, and Interactions with Food Matrix Components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Calo, J.R.; Crandall, P.G.; O’Bryan, C.A.; Ricke, S.C. Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems—A review. Food Control 2015, 54, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; de Martino, L.; Coppola, R.; de Feo, V. Effect of Essential Oils on Pathogenic Bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1451–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zanetti, M.; Ternus, Z.; Dalcanton, F.; de Mello, M.; de Oliveira, D.; Araujo, P.; Riella, H.; Fiori, M. Microbiological characterization of pure geraniol and comparison with bactericidal activity of the cinnamic acid in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2015, 7, 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  33. Carson, C.F.; Mee, B.J.; Riley, T.V. Mechanism of Action of Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) Oil on Staphylococcus aureus Determined by Time-Kill, Lysis, Leakage, and Salt Tolerance Assays and Electron Microscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Chavan, P.S.; Tupe, S.G. Antifungal activity and mechanism of action of carvacrol and thymol against vineyard and wine spoilage yeasts. Food Control 2014, 46, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nizio, D.A.D.C.; Fujimoto, R.Y.; Maria, A.N.; Carneiro, P.C.F.; França, C.C.S.; Sousa, N.D.C.; Brito, F.D.A.; Sampaio, T.S.; Arrigoni-Blank, M.D.F.; Blank, A.F. Essential oils of Varronia curassavica accessions have different activity against white spot disease in freshwater fish. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chagas, E.C.; Majolo, C.; Monteiro, P.C.; de Oliveira, M.R.; Gama, P.E.; Bizzo, H.R.; Chaves, F.C.M. Composition of essential oils of Mentha species and their antimicrobial activity against Aeromonas spp. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bandeira, G.; Pês, T.S.; Saccol, E.M.; Sutili, F.J.; Rossi, W.; Murari, A.L.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Pavanato, M.A.; de Vargas, A.C.; Silva, L.D.L.; et al. Potential uses of Ocimum gratissimum and Hesperozygis ringens essential oils in aquaculture. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 97, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raeisi, M.; Hashemi, M.; Aminzare, M.; Ghorbani-Bidkorbeh, F.; Ebrahimi, M.; Jannat, B.; Tepe, B.; Noori, S.M.A. Effects of Sodium Alginate and Chitosan Coating Combined with Three Different Essential Oils on Microbial and Chemical Attributes of Rainbow Trout Fillets. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2020, 29, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nisar, T.; Yang, X.; Alim, A.; Iqbal, M.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Y. Physicochemical responses and microbiological changes of bream (Megalobrama ambycephala) to pectin based coatings enriched with clove essential oil during refrigeration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Sagheer, A.A.; Mahmoud, H.K.; Reda, F.M.; Mahgoub, S.A.; Ayyat, M.S. Supplementation of diets for Oreochromis niloticus with essential oil extracts from lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) and geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) and effects on growth, intestinal microbiota, antioxidant and immune activities. Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. dos Santos, A.C.; Sutili, F.J.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Cunha, M.A.; Brusque, I.C.; Baldisserotto, B.; Zeppenfeld, C.C. Aloysia triphylla essential oil as additive in silver catfish diet: Blood response and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2017, 62, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Metin, S.; Biçer, Z.I. Antibacterial activity of some essential oils againts Vagococcus salmoninarum Vagococcus salmoninarum’a karşı bazı uçucu yağların antibakteriyel aktivitesi. Scope J. 2020, 35, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  43. Majolo, C.; Monteiro, P.C.; Nascimento, A.V.P.D.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Gama, P.E.; Bizzo, H.R.; Chagas, E.C. Essential Oils from Five Brazilian Piper Species as Antimicrobials Against Strains of Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 746–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Djenane, D.; Yangüela, J.; Roncalés, P.; Aïder, M. Use of Essential Oils as Natural Food Preservatives: Effect on the Growth of Salmonella Enteritidis in Liquid Whole Eggs Stored Under Abuse Refrigerated Conditions. J. Food Res. 2013, 2, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silva, L.T.D.S.; Pereira, U.D.P.; de Oliveira, H.M.; Brasil, E.M.; Pereira, S.A.; Chagas, E.C.; Jesus, G.F.A.; Cardoso, L.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Martins, M.L. Hemato-immunological and zootechnical parameters of Nile tilapia fed essential oil of Mentha piperita after challenge with Streptococcus agalactiae. Aquaculture 2019, 506, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hoseini, S.M.; Mirghaed, A.T.; Yousefi, M. Application of herbal anaesthetics in aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 550–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vaseeharan, B.; Thaya, R. Medicinal plant derivatives as immunostimulants: An alternative to chemotherapeutics and antibiotics in aquaculture. Aquac. Int. 2014, 22, 1079–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brum, A.; Pereira, S.A.; Owatari, M.S.; Chagas, E.C.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Martins, M.L. Effect of dietary essential oils of clove basil and ginger on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) following challenge with Streptococcus agalactiae. Aquaculture 2017, 468, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Turek, C.; Stintzing, F.C. Stability of Essential Oils: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Encapsulation strategies to enhance the antibacterial properties of essential oils in food system. Food Control 2021, 123, 107856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gholipourkanani, H.; Buller, N.; Lymbery, A. In vitro antibacterial activity of four nano-encapsulated herbal essential oils against three bacterial fish pathogens. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Heurtault, B.; Saulnier, P.; Pech, B.; Proust, J.-E.; Benoit, J.-P. Physico-chemical stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4283–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dawood, M.A.; Metwally, A.E.-S.; Elkomy, A.H.; Gewaily, M.S.; Abdo, S.E.; Abdel-Razek, M.A.; Soliman, A.A.; Amer, A.A.; Abdel-Razik, N.I.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.; et al. The impact of menthol essential oil against inflammation, immunosuppression, and histopathological alterations induced by chlorpyrifos in Nile tilapia. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 102, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khafaga, A.F.; Naiel, M.A.E.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Dietary Origanum vulgare essential oil attenuates cypermethrin-induced biochemical changes, oxidative stress, histopathological alterations, apoptosis, and reduces DNA damage in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 228, 105624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mohammadi, G.; Rafiee, G.; El-Basuini, M.F.; van Doan, H.; Ahmed, H.A.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Oregano (Origanum vulgare), st John’s-wort (Hypericum perforatum), and lemon balm (Melissa officinalis) extracts improved the growth rate, antioxidative, and immunological responses in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in-fected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 18, 100445. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jang, I.; Ko, Y.; Kang, S.; Lee, C. Effect of a commercial essential oil on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal microflora population in broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2007, 134, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Khafaga, A.F.; Dawood, M.A. Dietary oregano essential oil improved the growth performance via enhancing the intestinal morphometry and hepato-renal functions of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brewer, M.S. Natural Antioxidants: Sources, Compounds, Mechanisms of Action, and Potential Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2011, 10, 221–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmadifar, E.; Yousefi, M.; Karimi, M.; Raieni, R.F.; Dadar, M.; Yilmaz, S.; Dawood, M.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Benefits of Dietary Polyphenols and Polyphenol-Rich Additives to Aquatic Animal Health: An Overview. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, H. Dietary oregano essential oil improved the immune response, activity of digestive enzymes, and intestinal microbiota of the koi carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture 2020, 518, 734781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baba, E.; Acar, Ü.; Öntaş, C.; Kesbiç, O.S.; Yılmaz, S. Evaluation of Citrus limon peels essential oil on growth performance, immune response of Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus challenged with Edwardsiella tarda. Aquaculture 2016, 465, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Acar, U.; Kesbiç, O.S.; Yilmaz, S.; Gültepe, N.; Türker, A. Evaluation of the effects of essential oil extracted from sweet orange peel (Citrus sinensis) on growth rate of tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and possible disease resistance against Streptococcus iniae. Aquaculture 2015, 437, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ngugi, C.C.; Oyoo-Okoth, E.; Muchiri, M. Effects of dietary levels of essential oil (eo) extract from bitter lemon (Citrus limon) fruit peels on growth, biochemical, haemato-immunological parameters and disease resistance in juvenile Labeo victorianus fingerlings challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 2253–2265. [Google Scholar]
  64. Abdel-Latif, H.M.R.; Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Khafaga, A.F.; Dawood, M.A.O. Dietary origanum essential oil improved antioxidative status, immune-related genes, and resistance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio l.) to Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 104, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mabrok, M.A.E.; Wahdan, A. The immune modulatory effect of oregano (Origanum vulgare l.) essential oil on Tilapia zillii following intraperitoneal infection with Vibrio anguillarum. Aquac. Int. 2018, 26, 1147–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zheng, Z.L.; Tan, J.Y.W.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhou, X.H.; Xiang, X.; Wang, K.Y. Evaluation of oregano essential oil (Origanum heracleoticum l.) on growth, antioxidant effect and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in channel cat-fish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquaculture 2009, 292, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sutili, F.J.; Kreutz, L.C.; Noro, M.; Gressler, L.T.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Vargas, A.C.; Baldisserotto, B. The use of eugenol against Aeromonas hydrophila and its effect on hematological and immunological parameters in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Veter. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2014, 157, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Diler, O.; Gormez, O.; Diler, I.; Metin, S. Effect of oregano (Origanum onites l.) essential oil on growth, lysozyme and antioxidant activity and resistance against Lactococcus garvieae in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (walbaum). Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Das, R.; Raman, R.P.; Saha, H.; Singh, R. Effect of Ocimum sanctum linn.(tulsi) extract on the immunity and sur-vival of Labeo rohita (hamilton) infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 1111–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abdel-Latif, H.M.; Khalil, R.H. Evaluation of two phytobiotics, Spirulina platensis and Origanum vulgare extract on growth, serum antioxidant activities and resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to pathogenic Vibrio alginolyticus. Int. J. Fish Aquat. Stud. 2014, 1, 250–255. [Google Scholar]
  71. Jerônimo, G.T.; Pádua, S.B.D.; Belo, M.A.D.A.; Chagas, E.C.; Taboga, S.R.; Maciel, P.O.; Martins, M.L. Neoechi-norhynchus buttnerae (acanthocephala) infection in farmed Colossoma macropomum: A pathological approach. Aquaculture 2017, 469, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Valladão, G.M.R.; Gallani, S.U.; Jerônimo, G.T.; de Seixas, A.T. Challenges in the control of acanthocephalosis in aquaculture: Special emphasis on Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 12, 1360–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Costa, C.M.D.S.; da Cruz, M.G.; Lima, T.B.C.; Ferreira, L.C.; Ventura, A.S.; Brandão, F.R.; Chagas, E.C.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Martins, M.L.; Jerônimo, G.T. Efficacy of the essential oils of Mentha piperita, Lippia alba and Zingiber officinale to control the acanthocephalan Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae in Colossoma macropomum. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 18, 100414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. dos Santos, W.B.; Majolo, C.; dos Santos, D.S.; Rosa, M.C.; Monteiro, P.C.; Rocha, M.J.S.; de Oliveira, M.I.B.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Chagas, E.C. Eficácia in vitro de óleos essenciais de espécies de piperaceae no controle do acantocéfalo neoechinorhynchus buttnerae. Embrapa Amaz. Ocident. Artig. periódico indexado 2018, 12, 460–469. [Google Scholar]
  75. Cohen, S.C.; Kohn, A. A new species of Mymarothecium and new host and geographical records for M. viatorum (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae), parasites of freshwater fishes in Brazil. Folia Parasitol. 2005, 52, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Silva, R.M.; Tavares-Dias, M.; Dias, M.W.R.; Dias, M.K.R.; Marinho, R.D.G.B. Parasitic fauna in hybrid tambacu from fish farms. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2013, 48, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Soares, B.V.; Neves, L.R.; Oliveira, M.S.B.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Dias, M.K.R.; Chagas, E.C.; Tavares-Dias, M. Antiparasitic activity of the essential oil of Lippia alba on ectoparasites of Colossoma macropomum (tambaqui) and its physiological and histopathological effects. Aquaculture 2016, 452, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Soares, B.V.; Cardoso, A.C.F.; Campos, R.R.; Gonçalves, B.B.; Santos, G.G.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Chagas, E.C.; Tavares-Dias, M. Antiparasitic, physiological and histological effects of the essential oil of Lippia origanoides (verbenaceae) in native freshwater fish Colossoma macropomum. Aquaculture 2017, 469, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Woo, P.T.; Gregory, D.W.B. Diseases and Disorders of Finfish in Cage Culture; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  80. Geraerts, M.; Muterezi, B.F.; Vanhove, M.P.; Pariselle, A.; Chocha, M.A.; Vreven, E.; Huyse, T.; Artois, T. Six new species of Cichlidogyrus paperna, 1960 (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) from the gills of cichlids (Teleostei: Cichliformes) from the Lomami river basin (drc: Middle congo). Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lehmann, N.B.; Owatari, M.S.; Furtado, W.E.; Cardoso, L.; Tancredo, K.R.; Jesus, G.F.A.; Lopes, G.R.; Martins, M.L. Parasitological and histopathological diagnosis of a non-native fish (Oreochromis sp.) with a noticeable presence in a natural Brazilian river environment. J. Parasit. Dis. 2019, 44, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. de Oliveira, H.G.S.; Neto, F.M.; Ruiz, M.L.; Acchile, M.; Chagas, E.C.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Martins, M.L. Essential oils of Lippia sidoides and Mentha piperita against monogenean parasites and their influence on the hematology of nile tilapia. Aquaculture 2016, 450, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Mathews, P.D.; Malheiros, A.F.; Vasquez, N.D.; Chavez, M.D. High Infestation by Dawestrema cycloancistrioides in Arapaima gigas Cultured in the Amazon Region, Peru. J. Veter. Med. 2014, 2014, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maciel, P.; Alves, R. Methods for quantifying eggs and oviposition rate of Dawestrema cycloancistrium (monogenea: Dactylogyridae), monogenean parasite of Arapaima gigas (teleostei: Osteoglossidae). J. Helminthol. 2020, 94, E4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Malheiros, D.F.; Maciel, P.O.; Videira, M.N.; Tavares-Dias, M. Toxicity of the essential oil of Mentha piperita in Arapaima gigas (pirarucu) and antiparasitic effects on Dawestrema spp. (Monogenea). Aquaculture 2016, 455, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sutili, F.J.; Murari, A.L.; Silva, L.L.; Gressler, L.T.; Heinzmann, B.M.; de Vargas, A.C.; Schmidt, D.; Baldisserotto, B. The use of Ocimum americanum essential oil against the pathogens Aeromonas hydrophila and gyrodactylus sp. In silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 63, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Moon, T.; Wilkinson, J.M.; Cavanagh, H.M. Antiparasitic activity of two Lavandula essential oils against Giardia duodenalis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Hexamita inflata. Parasitol. Res. 2006, 99, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Purivirojkul, W. Histological Change of Aquatic Animals by Parasitic Infection. Histopathol. Rev. Recent Adv. 2012, 153–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Taher, G. Some studies on metacercarial infection in Oreochromis niloticus in assiut governorate and their role in transmission of some trematodes to dogs. Assiut Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. 2009, 12, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  90. Mahdy, O.A.; Abdel-Maogood, S.Z.; Mohammed, F.F. Effect of Verbesina Alternifolia and Mentha Piperita Oil Extracts on Newly Excysted Metacercaria of Euclinostomum Heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) (Digenea: Clinostomatidae) from Naturally Infected Kidneys of Tilapia Zillii in Egypt. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2017, 47, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. da Cunha, J.A.; Sutili, F.J.; Oliveira, A.M.; Gressler, L.T.; Scheeren, C.D.A.; Silva, L.D.L.; Vaucher, R.D.A.; Baldisserotto, B.; Heinzmann, B.M. The Essential Oil of Hyptis mutabilis in Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Infection and its Effect on Hematological, Biochemical, and Immunological Parameters in Silver Catfish, Rhamdia quelen. J. Parasitol. 2017, 103, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Valladão, G.M.R.; Gallani, S.U.; Ikefuti, C.V.; da Cruz, C.; Levy-Pereira, N.; Rodrigues, M.V.N.; Pilarski, F. Essential oils to control ichthyophthiriasis in pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus (holmberg): Special emphasis on treatment with Melaleuca alternifolia. J. Fish Dis. 2016, 39, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Meneses, J.; Couto, M.D.; Sousa, N.; Cunha, F.D.S.; Abe, H.; Ramos, F.M.; Chagas, E.; Chaves, F.; Martins, M.; Maria, A.; et al. Efficacy of Ocimum gratissimum essential oil against the monogenean Cichlidogyrus tilapiae gill parasite of Nile tilapia. Arq. Bras. Med. Veterinária Zootec. 2018, 70, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Austin, B.; Austin, D.A.; Austin, B.; Austin, D.A. Bacterial Fish Pathogens; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 481. [Google Scholar]
  95. Austin, B.; Austin, D.A. Vibrios. In Bacterial Fish Pathogens; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 499–601. [Google Scholar]
  96. Hayatgheib, N.; Fournel, C.; Calvez, S.; Pouliquen, H.; Moreau, E. In vitro antimicrobial effect of various commercial essential oils and their chemical constituents on Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. Salmonicida. J.Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Okmen, G.; Ugur, A.; Sarac, N.; Arslan, T. In vivo and in vitro antibacterial activities of some essential oils of lamiaceae species on Aeromonas salmonicida isolates from cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 11, 2762–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Tural, S.; Durmaz, Y.; Urçar, E.; Turhan, S. Antibacterial Activity of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), Laurel (Lauris nobilis L.), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) and Parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.) Essential Oils against Some Fish Pathogenic Bacteria. Acta Aquat. Turc. 2019, 15, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Thomas, J.; Jerobin, J.; Seelan, T.S.J.; Thanigaivel, S.; Vijayakumar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Chandrasekaran, N. Studies on pathogenecity of Aeromonas salmonicida in catfish Clarias batrachus and control measures by neem nanoemulsion. Aquaculture 2013, 396, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Starliper, C.E.; Ketola, H.G.; Noyes, A.D.; Schill, W.B.; Henson, F.G.; Chalupnicki, M.A.; Dittman, D.E. An investigation of the bactericidal activity of selected essential oils to aeromonas spp. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Gulec, A.K.; Erecevit, P.; Yuce, E.; Arslan, A.; Bagci, E.; Kirbag, S. Antimicrobial activity of the methanol extracts and essential oil with the composition of endemic Origanum acutidens (lamiaceae). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2014, 17, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wei, L.S.; Wee, W. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Cymbopogon nardus citronella essential oil against systemic bacteria of aquatic animals. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2013, 5, 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  103. Lee, S.; Najiah, M.; Wendy, W.; Nadirah, M. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Syzygium aromaticum flower bud (Clove) against fish systemic bacteria isolated from aquaculture sites. Front. Agric. China 2009, 3, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Majolo, C.; da Rocha, S.I.B.; Chagas, E.C.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Bizzo, H.R. Chemical composition of Lippia spp. Essential oil and antimicrobial activity against Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 2380–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. El-Ekiaby, W.T. Basil oil nanoemulsion formulation and its antimicrobial activity against fish pathogen and enhance disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in cultured Nile tilapia. Egypt. J. Aquac. 2019, 9, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bandeira, G., Jr.; de Freitas Souza, C.; Baldissera, M.D.; Descovi, S.N.; da Silveira, B.P.; Tasca, C.; Mourao, R.H.V.; de Vargas, A.P.C.; Baldisserotto, B. Plant essential oils against bacteria isolated from fish: An in vitro screening and in vivo efficacy of Lippia origanoides/oleos essenciais de plantas contra bacterias isoladas de peixes: Uma triagem in vitro e eficacia in vivo de Lippia origanoides. Cienc. Rural 2019, 49, e20190064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sutili, F.J.; de Lima, S.L.; Gressler, L.T.; Gressler, L.T.; Battisti, E.K.; Heinzmann, B.M.; de Vargas, A.C.; Baldisserotto, B. Plant essential oils against Aeromonas hydrophila: In vitro activity and their use in experimentally infected fish. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sutili, F.J.; Cunha, M.A.; Ziech, R.E.; Krewer, C.C.; Zeppenfeld, C.C.; Heldwein, C.G.; Gressler, L.T.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Vargas, A.C.; Baldisserotto, B. Lippia alba essential oil promotes survival of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) infected with Aeromonas sp. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2015, 87, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Schiewe, M.H.; Trust, T.J.; Crosa, J.H. Vibrio ordalii sp. nov.: A causative agent of vibriosis in fish. Curr. Microbiol. 1981, 6, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Domínguez-Borbor, C.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, A.; Sonnenholzner, S.; Rodríguez, J. Essential oils mediated anti-virulence therapy against vibriosis in Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Navarrete, P.; Toledo, I.; Mardones, P.; Opazo, R.; Espejo, R.; Romero, J. Effect of Thymus vulgaris essential oil on intestinal bacterial microbiota of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) and bacterial isolates. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, e667–e678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Stefanakis, M.K.; Touloupakis, E.; Anastasopoulos, E.; Ghanotakis, D.; Katerinopoulos, H.E.; Makridis, P. Anti-bacterial activity of essential oils from plants of the genus origanum. Food Control 2013, 34, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Öntaş, C.; Baba, E.; Kaplaner, E.; Küçükaydin, S.; Öztürk, M.; Ercan, M.D. Antibacterial activity of citrus limon peel essential oil and Argania spinosa oil against fish pathogenic bacteria. Kafkas Üniversitesi Vet. Fakültesi Derg. 2016, 22, 741–749. [Google Scholar]
  114. Shehata, S.; Mohamed, M.; Abd, E.S.S. Antibacterial activity of essential oils and their effects on Nile tilapia fingerlings performance. J. Med Sci. 2013, 13, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Tanekhy, M.; Matsuda, S.; Itano, T.; Kawakami, H.; Kono, T.; Sakai, M. Expression of cytokine genes in head kidney and spleen cells of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) infected with Nocardia seriolae. Veter. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010, 134, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ismail, T.; Yoshida, T. In vitro activity of some essential oils alone and in combination against the fish pathogen Nocardia seriolae. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 20, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Ostrand, S.L.; Glenn, R.A.; Gannam, A.L.; Hanson, K.C. Inhibitory Effects of Rosemary Oil on the In Vitro Growth of Six Common Finfish Pathogens. North Am. J. Aquac. 2012, 74, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Phumkhachorn, P. Potential of chinese chive oil as a natural antimicrobial for controlling Flavobacterium columnare infection in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Fish. Sci. 2009, 75, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Majolo, C.; Pilarski, F.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Bizzo, H.R.; Chagas, E.C. Antimicrobial activity of some essential oils against Streptococcus agalactiae, an important pathogen for fish farming in Brazil. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2018, 30, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Vazirzadeh, A.; Jalali, S.; Farhadi, A. Antibacterial activity of Oliveria decumbens against Streptococcus iniae in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and its effects on serum and mucosal immunity and antioxidant status. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2019, 94, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Soltani, M.; Ghodratnama, M.; Ebrahimzadeh-Mosavi, H.A.; Nikbakht-Brujeni, G.; Mohamadian, S.; Ghasemian, M. Shirazi thyme (Zataria multiflora Boiss) and Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) essential oils repress expression of saga, a streptolysin s-related gene in Streptococcus iniae. Aquaculture 2014, 430, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Roomiani, L.; Soltani, M.; Akhondzadeh, B.A.; Mahmoodi, A.; Taheri, M.A.; Yadollahi, F. Evaluation of the chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of Rosmarinus officinalis, Zataria multiflora, Anethum graveolens and Eucalyptus globulus against Streptococcus iniae; the cause of zoonotic disease in farmed fish. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2013, 12, 702–716. [Google Scholar]
  123. Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Phumkhachorn, P. Potential of cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) oil to control Streptococcus iniae infection in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish. Sci. 2010, 76, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pirbalouti, G.; Broujeni, N.; Momeni, M.; Poor, M.; Hamedi, B. Antibacterial activity of Iranian medicinal plants against Streptococcus iniae isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Arch. Biol. Sci. 2011, 63, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Goudarzi, M.; Hamedi, B.; Malekpoor, F.; Abdizadeh, R.; Pirbalouti, A.G.; Raissy, M. Sensitivity of Lactococcus garvieae isolated from rainbow trout to some Iranian medicinal herbs. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 3067–3073. [Google Scholar]
  126. Soltani, M.; Mohamadian, S.; Ebrahimzahe-Mousavi, H.A.; Mirzargar, S.; Taheri-Mirghaed, A.; Rouholahi, S.; Ghodratnama, M. Shirazi thyme (Zataria multiflora) essential oil suppresses the expression of the epsd capsule gene in Lactococcus garvieae, the cause of Lactococcosis in farmed fish. Aquaculture 2014, 433, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fereidouni, M.S.; Akhlaghi, M.; Alhosseini, A.K. Antibacterial effects of medicinal plant extracts against Lactococcus garvieae, the etiological agent of rainbow trout Lactococcosis. Int. J. Aquat. Biol. 2013, 1, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  128. Mahmoodi, A.; Roomiani, L.; Soltani, M.; Basti, A.A.; Kamali, A.; Taheri, S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils and extracts from Rosmarinus officinalis, Zataria multiflora, Anethum graveolens and Eucalyptus globulus. Glob. Vet. 2012, 9, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dawood, M.A.O.; El Basuini, M.F.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Yilmaz, S.; Hasan, M.T.; Ahmadifar, E.; El Asely, A.M.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Abu-Elala, N.M.; et al. Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Functionality of Essential Oils: An Alternative Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture. Pathogens 2021, 10, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020185

AMA Style

Dawood MAO, El Basuini MF, Zaineldin AI, Yilmaz S, Hasan MT, Ahmadifar E, El Asely AM, Abdel-Latif HMR, Alagawany M, Abu-Elala NM, et al. Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Functionality of Essential Oils: An Alternative Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture. Pathogens. 2021; 10(2):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dawood, Mahmoud A. O., Mohammed F. El Basuini, Amr I. Zaineldin, Sevdan Yilmaz, Md. Tawheed Hasan, Ehsan Ahmadifar, Amel M. El Asely, Hany M. R. Abdel-Latif, Mahmoud Alagawany, Nermeen M. Abu-Elala, and et al. 2021. "Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Functionality of Essential Oils: An Alternative Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture" Pathogens 10, no. 2: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020185

APA Style

Dawood, M. A. O., El Basuini, M. F., Zaineldin, A. I., Yilmaz, S., Hasan, M. T., Ahmadifar, E., El Asely, A. M., Abdel-Latif, H. M. R., Alagawany, M., Abu-Elala, N. M., Van Doan, H., & Sewilam, H. (2021). Antiparasitic and Antibacterial Functionality of Essential Oils: An Alternative Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture. Pathogens, 10(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop