Next Article in Journal
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ThymoQuinone Formula (TQF) for Treating Outpatient SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Wild Bird Densities and Landscape Variables Predict Spatial Patterns in HPAI Outbreak Risk across The Netherlands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trash to Treasure: How Insect Protein and Waste Containers Can Improve the Environmental Footprint of Mosquito Egg Releases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immunogenicity Analysis of the Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen in Mice

1
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Wuxi 9th Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Wuxi 9th People’s Hospital), Wuxi 214000, China
2
Laboratory of Pathogen Infection and Immunity, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214000, China
3
Wuxi Red Cross Blood Center, Wuxi 214000, China
4
Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2022, 11(5), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050550
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 29 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mosquito-Borne Diseases: Novel Control Strategies)

Abstract

:
Plasmodium falciparum, mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, has received widespread attention owing to its severity. As a novel protein, P. falciparum surface-related antigen (PfSRA) has the structural and functional characteristics to be considered as a malaria vaccine candidate; however, limited information is available on its immunogenicity. Here, we expressed three fragments of recombinant PfSRA in an Escherichia coli system and further analyzed its immunogenicity. The results showed that rPfSRA-immunized mice produced specific antibodies with high endpoint titers (1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000) and affinity antibodies (i.e., rPfSRA-F1a (97.70%), rPfSRA-F2a (69.62%), and rPfSRA-F3a (91.87%)). In addition, the sera of immunized mice recognized both the native PfSRA and recombinant PfSRA, the rPfSRA antibodies inhibited the invasion of P. falciparum into the erythrocytes, and they were dose-dependent in vitro. This study confirmed PfSRA could be immunogenic, especially the F1a at the conserved region N-terminal and provided further support for it as a vaccine candidate against P. falciparum.

1. Introduction

Malaria is a devastating disease caused by Plasmodium, which remains the most serious public health problems worldwide and accounts for approximately 627,000 deaths in 2020 [1]. Six Plasmodium species, namely Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale wallickeri, Plasmodium ovale curtisi, and Plasmodium knowlesi, are known to infect humans [2], among which P. falciparum causes the most severe form of human malaria [3]. In recent years, the resistance of malaria parasites to antimalarial drugs has continued to increase, which has brought great challenges to the prevention and treatment of malaria [4,5]; in addition, the complexity of the Plasmodium life cycle and its genome sequence have hampered the development of malaria vaccines [6,7,8]. RTS,S is currently the only vaccine that has proved to be protective against clinical malaria infections during phase III clinical trials, but the protective effect diminishes over time [9,10]. Therefore, an effective malaria vaccine is still an urgent priority for preventing malaria.
The invasion of erythrocytes by Plasmodium is an attractive process to investigate for advance understanding of the basic biological characteristics, which involves multiple receptor–ligand interactions [11,12]. The binding of malaria parasite ligands to specific erythrocyte surface receptors is known to mediate a series of steps involving the initial attachment of merozoites to erythrocytes, followed by a reorientation and the formation of the junction [13]. One of the current strategies for protection against malaria is to reduce the fraction of the merozoite invasion, with the consequent reduction in the incidence of parasitemia and malaria [14]. P. falciparum invades erythrocytes through redundant independent pathways even in the absence of one or two ligand–receptor interactions [13]. Thus, a multicomponent and multistage vaccine approach may be required to achieve sufficient protection against malaria [15].
The P. falciparum encodes more than 5000 genes [16]; however, the function of minority-encoded proteins by these genes is well established [17]. For example, P. falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5), essential for erythrocyte invasion, is confirmed to have modest immunogenicity in natural P. falciparum infection [18]. As an important indicator of vaccine, more immunogenic Plasmodium proteins should be discovered. P. falciparum surface-related antigen (PfSRA; PlasmoDB ID: PF3D7_1431400), a novel protein, which is observed on the surface of merozoites and gametocytes, is predicted to possess a signal peptide and be exported to the surface of the parasite [19]. This protein possesses coiled-coil signatures, which can form a stable structure to trigger functional antibodies [20,21]. In addition, native PfSRA has been detected in multiple processed fragments through a subtilisin-like parasite protease called PfSUB-1 [22]; of these fragments, the processed 32-kDa fragment exhibits erythrocyte-binding activity [19]. Earlier studies have analyzed genetic diversity of the pfsra gene and found that in contrast to the high degree of conservation of the N-terminal region, the C-terminal showed polymorphisms because of selective pressure [23]. These findings indicate that PfSRA has the structural and functional characteristics to be a new vaccine target.
In this study, the immune response against PfSRA in mice and the inhibitory activity of anti-rPfSRA antibodies on P. falciparum invasion were measured. Considering the large molecular weight of PfSRA for protein expression, recombinant PfSRA-Fragment 1a, recombinant PfSRA-Fragment 2a, and recombinant PfSRA- Fragment 3a (rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, rPfSRA-F3a) were constructed based on the conserved regions of PfSRA in different orthologues that possess coiled-coil signatures, covering the peptides from a previous study [19]. The fragments of rPfSRA-F1a and -F2a were contained within the 70 kDa protelytic fragment, and -F3a was in the 32 kDa protelytic fragment [19]. We showed that mouse anti-PfSRA IgG restricted parasite invasion in vitro and that PfSRA protein could be immunogenic. These findings provide further support for PfSRA as a vaccine candidate against P. falciparum.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization, Expression, and Purification of rPfSRA

According to the structural characteristics of pfsra shown in the PlasmoDB website, pfsra possesses 990 amino acids (aa), in which the first 24 aa are signal peptides, and the last 22 aa are glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors. PfSUB-1 cleavage sites were predicted in the study [19,24,25] (Figure 1A). The pfsra-F1a (aa 214–315, 303 bp), pfsra-F2a (aa 512–590, 234 bp), and pfsra-F3a (aa 789–893, 309 bp) fragments were amplified successfully from the full-length plasmid sequence of pfsra (Figure 1B). The three fragments were designed based on a previous study on synthesized peptides of PfSRA; in addition, the peptide antibodies have demonstrated their potential in growth inhibitory activity as well as in their ability to recognize native proteins [19].
The results from the SDS-PAGE and Western blot showed that the rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a proteins with His-tag were successfully expressed and migrated at approximately ~38, ~35, and ~38 kDa, respectively, under reducing conditions (Figure 2A,B).

2.2. Mouse Sera Recognized Both the rPfSRA and Native PfSRA

The specificity of mice-derived antibody was confirmed by Western blot using the rPfSRA protein. The results indicated that the mice immunized with rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a could produce specific antibodies against the corresponding protein. Moreover, the sera from the PBS-immunized mice (negative control) did not recognize any recombinant protein (Figure 2C).
To explore whether the recombinant protein maintains its native activity, the sera from the immunized mice were used to identify the native PfSRA in the crude protein of P. falciparum. As expected, all antibodies from the immunized mice (rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, rPfSRA-F3a) consistently recognized multiple processed fragments (17, 24, 38, 55 kDa) of the native protein from the blood stages, and anti-rPfSRA-F3a could detect the full-length of PfSRA (Figure 3A–C). Thus, the sera from the immunized mice contained native PfSRA antibody against the crude protein from the 3D7 strain.

2.3. rPfSRA-Induced Humoral Immune Response in Mice

The titers of specific IgG in the protein-immunized mice sera were detected by ELISA after the obtained mice sera were diluted in different proportions. Overall, rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a induced a high immune response in mice with endpoint titers ranging from 1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000 (Figure 4A).
PfSRA-specific IgG (rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a) were detected in the sera after two weeks of the initial immunization, and the immune response was assessed on days 14, 28, 35, and 49 postimmunization; the IgG levels continued to increase until day 49 after the initial immunization. No reactivity was observed in the sera from the PBS-immunized mice (Figure 4B). In addition, IgG antibodies were induced in all mice groups immunized with the recombinant protein. The average avidity index (AIs) of the anti-rPfSRA-F1a, anti-rPfSRA-F2a, and anti-rPfSRA-F3a IgG were 97.70%, 69.62%, and 91.87%, respectively (Figure 4C).

2.4. rPfSRA Did Not Play a Role in Cellular Immune Response

Only the lymphocytes of the rPfSRA-F3a-immunized mice apparently proliferated. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the rPfSRA-F3a-immunized mice and the positive control ConA group (p < 0.05). By contrast, the rPfSRA-F1a and rPfSRA-F2a groups had no significant proliferation of lymphocyte compared with the positive control group (p > 0.05) (Figure 5A). In addition, the results of flow cytometry showed that the levels of CD4+-IFN-γ and CD8+-IFN-γ in the immunized mice did not change significantly (p > 0.05) (Figure 5B,C).

2.5. PfSRA Antibodies Inhibited the Invasion of P. falciparum into the Erythrocyte In Vitro

The 3D7 strain of P. falciparum was used to evaluate the inhibitory effect of anti-PfSRA on the invasion of Plasmodium in vitro [26]. The results showed that anti-rPfSRA exhibited obvious inhibition at a dilution ratio of 1:10, and the inhibitory effect of immunized-mice sera was dose dependent (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). As a positive control, the heparin group showed obvious inhibitory effect compared with preimmune control (p < 0.001). Anti-rPfSRA-F1a (p < 0.001), anti-rPfSRA-F2a (p < 0.01), and anti-rPfSRA-F3a (p < 0.001) antibodies were significantly effective in inhibiting the invasion of P. falciparum, with inhibition rates of 31.14%, 24.28%, and 25.79%, respectively (Figure 6A,B).

3. Discussion

While the malaria parasite has multiple redundant pathways to mediate the invasion of erythrocyte, the biological functions of the molecular basis of the invasion remains elusive [13] and characterizing this mechanism is critical for malaria control. Through the proteolytic process, the protein is extensively modified to ensure that the merozoites successfully invade the erythrocytes [27,28,29]. The subcellular localization of PfSRA is not altered by proteolytic processing, and the fragments or the unprocessed forms enter the erythrocytes during invasion [19]. Given that the unstructured region of PfSRA is difficulty to express, three fragments of PfSRA were used to evaluate immunogenicity. In this study, we demonstrated that PfSRA showed immunogenicity; furthermore, anti-rPfSRA antibody inhibited the invasion of erythrocytes by P. falciparum, providing further evidence of future PfSRA vaccines.
IgG is essential for determining the quality of malaria immunity and inhibiting the growth of parasites [30,31]. To evaluate the immune protection of PfSRA, whether its recombinant complex retained the specificity of the native antigen was first investigated. The results showed that all the sera from the immunized mice could specifically recognize both the corresponding recombinant protein and the native PfSRA, indicating that a highly specific antigen was successfully constructed. Nevertheless, natively processed PfSRA in the recognition of the immunized mice sera differed from a prior study [19], except the full-length band. This condition may be attributed to fragmentation of the protein, or to a difference between the effect of the antibody obtained from rPfSRA and the synthetic peptide.
The ability of PfSRA to induce antibodies in mice was assessed using serially diluted sera, and the humoral immune response mediated by IgG was investigated. The specific IgG was detected in the mice on day 7 after the first immunization, and the IgG level continued to rise until day 49 postimmunization. In addition, the three fragments of PfSRA could induce high levels of specific antibodies, up to an endpoint titer of 1:5,120,000. Antibody affinity characterizes the ability of an antibody to bind with an antigen, which is an important parameter indicating the immune response [32]. Besides, an earlier study of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3 (PfMSP3) suggested that antibody affinity is related to the inhibition of parasite growth [33]. The present data revealed that the three fragments of PfSRA could induce high-affinity antibodies, especially the rPfSRA-F1a fragment, suggesting that the antibodies induced in mice bind tightly to PfSRA. Furthermore, as a protein expressed on the surface of merozoites, the high-affinity antibodies induced by PfSRA indicated their role in inhibiting the growth of Plasmodium. Protective antibodies and T cell-mediated immunity have been identified to be important in controlling the blood-stage infection [34]. However, the results demonstrated that there was no significant difference in lymphocyte proliferation between the groups, involving IFN-γ from CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, indicating that PfSRA appeared to be dispensable for regulating cellular immune response in mice.
Invasion of the erythrocytes is a key step in malaria infection and an important target of a protective immune response. Blood-stage vaccines provide protection mainly by inducing high-titer functional antibodies against the target antigen of Plasmodium and mediate the protective effect by inhibiting the proliferation of parasites at the blood stage or the invasion into the erythrocytes [14]. Importantly, the functional antibodies play a more prominent role than affinity antibodies in mediating the invasion inhibitory effect. Here, we performed in vitro P. falciparum invasion assays and found that the anti-rPfSRA antibody significantly inhibited the P. falciparum invasion of a laboratory 3D7 strain with dose-dependence, especially the anti-rPfSRA-F1a antibody. However, the 32 kDa fragment located in the rPfSRA-F3a fragment exhibited erythrocyte-binding activity during P. falciparum invasion into the erythrocytes [19]. This phenomenon may be due to the fact that the peptides in the previous study could not stand for all erythrocyte-binding domains. The other part of the explanation might be that potentially, antibodies targeting the N-terminal could interfere with the binding of the 32 kDa fragment at the C-terminal to erythrocytes simply by sterical hindrance, as the previous study found that the antibodies of PfMSP183 at the N-terminal blocked the processing-inhibitory activity of anti-PfMSP119 located at the C-terminal [35].
Overall, given the importance of the humoral immune response, invasion inhibition and the conservation of the N-terminal, the present study was encouraging for the F1a fragment at the N-terminal to be a candidate molecule for malaria vaccines.
There were limitations of this study, including the lack of patient plasma samples for further serological screening with immunized mouse sera to assess the antigenicity of PfSRA; in addition, it might be better to measure more cytokines related to cellular and humoral immunity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Construction of Pfsra Plasmid

The nucleotide sequence encoding the full-length of pfsra was obtained from the PlasmoDB website (PF3D7_1431400), synthesized by TianLin Biotech (Wuxi, China) with codon optimization for expression in Escherichia coli (E. coli) system, and cloned into the pET30a vector. The pfsra-F1a, pfsra-F2a, and pfsra-F3a fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the full-length gene, and the primer sequences used are listed in Supplementary Materials Table S1 containing the homology arms and Flag-tag sequences.
PCR amplification was performed using a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) under the following program: denaturation at 98 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and cloned into a pET32a vector. The constructed plasmids were verified by double digestion with BamHⅠ (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and XhoⅠ (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) restriction enzymes, and were sent to TianLin Biotech (Wuxi, China) for sequencing.

4.2. Expression and Purification of rPfSRA

Recombinant plasmids of pfsra were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and then grown in Luria Bertani broth containing ampicillin (50 µg/mL) at 37 °C for 12 h. The culture was induced by 0.1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) when the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.4–0.6, and was allowed to grow for another 8 h at 37 °C. Finally, the culture was harvested by centrifugation at 4000× g for 30 min, and the protein was purified by TianLin Biotech (Wuxi, China).

4.3. Verification of the Purified Protein

The protein expression was verified by SDS-PAGE and the gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for visualization. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF; Immobilon, Darmstadt, Germany). Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBST) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated mouse anti His-Tag mAb (1:5000 dilution; ABclonal, Wuhan, China) overnight at 4 °C. After washing the membrane thrice with TBST, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, NCM biotech, Suzhou, China) was used to visualize the bands. The chemiluminescent signal was detected by the gel imaging analysis system (Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP, Hercules, CA, USA) and analyzed by Image J software (Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP).

4.4. Immunization of Mice

Twenty 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (Cavens, Changzhou, China) were randomly divided into four groups (five mice per group). Mice in experimental groups were immunized with rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a, respectively. Then, 50 µg of rPfSRA in PBS was emulsified with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA; Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA) at a volume ratio of 1:1 with a total volume of 200 µL in the prime boost. The mixture was intraperitoneally injected into the mice. Additionally, incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA; Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA) was administered on day 21 and 42 postimmunization to boost the immunization. Control mice were immunized with CFA/IFA in emulsification with PBS. Blood was collected from each mouse on day 0, 7, 14, 28, 35, and 49 postimmunization by bleeding the tail vein, and sera were isolated for antibody detection by Western blot. The sera were used as primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:1500 in PBS to identify rPfSRA, and then HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (CWBio, Beijing, China) was used as secondary antibody.

4.5. Identification of Native PfSRA

The 3D7 strain of P. falciparum was preserved at the Laboratory of Pathogen Infection and Immunity (Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China). The parasites were grown at 37 °C in a mixed environment of 90% N2, 5% O2, and 5% CO2, and were maintained in RPMI Medium 1640 (Gibco, New York, USA) containing O+ human erythrocytes (4% hematocrit), HEPES (Meilunbio, Dalian, China), NaHCO3 (Meilunbio, Dalian, China), AlbuMax Ⅱ (Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA), hypoxanthine (Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA), and gentamicin (Solarbio, Beijing, China).
The schizonts were purified by 60% percoll (Solarbio, Beijing, China) gradient centrifugation, and lysed in 0.1% saponin (diluted in PBS) for 5 min on ice with intermittent mixing. The lysed material was centrifuged at 15,000× g for 5 min and washed thrice with PBS. Then, the parasite lysate was collected and boiled in a SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer (Meilunbio, Dalian, China) for 7 min [13]. The total protein was separated on SDS-PAGE gel, and native PfSRA in the P. falciparum crude protein was captured by the anti-rPfSRA mice sera at 1:1000 dilution overnight and detected by HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (CWBio, Beijing, China).

4.6. Determination of Antibody Specificity and Avidity

The antibody levels in the mouse serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 50 ng of rPfSRA in a coating buffer (15mM sodium carbonate and 35mM sodium bicarbonate) was coated on 96-well plates (Corning, NY, USA) overnight at 4 °C, and blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBST for 2 h at room temperature. After washing thrice with 0.1% TBST, serially diluted sera (1:10,000–1:5,120,000) were added and the samples were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) was diluted at 1:5000 and added into each reaction well to incubate for 1.5 h at room temperature. Then, 100 µL of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Bey time, Beijing, China) was added into the wells as a substrate for color development. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 µL of 2 M H2SO4 and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm.
The determination of AI was performed similarly to the steps described above. The difference was that after the mice sera incubated, the 96-well plates in the experimental groups were incubated with TBST containing 6 M urea for 10 min, whereas the control group was incubated without urea. Urea played a role in separating the weak binding in the antigen–antibody complexes. According to the OD450, the AI was calculated as follows:
AI (%) = (OD450 of a group with 6 M urea/OD450 of a group without 6 M urea) × 100

4.7. Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay

After the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, the spleen was harvested and ground on a filter bag containing RPMI 1640 (Meilunbio, Dalian, China). The ground solution was filtered through a filter membrane into a 15 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged for 5 min at 1500× g. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were lysed with an erythrocyte lysis buffer (Beyotime, Beijing, China). PBS was added to terminate the reaction of erythrocyte lysis and lymphocytes were collected by centrifugation.
The lymphocytes from the mice immunized with rPfSRA and PBS were grown on 96-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well) and were treated with 10 µL rPfSRA-F1a (5 µg/mL), 10 µL rPfSRA-F2a (5 µg/mL), 10 µL rPfSRA-F3a (5 µg/mL), or 10 µL ConcanavalinA (ConA; 2 µg/mL). The plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. Then, 10 µL of Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8; Yeasen, Shanghai, China) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 2 h, and the absorbance value was measured at 450 nm.

4.8. Measuring the Proportion of IFN-γ-Positive Lymphocytes

The splenocytes from the immunized mice were grown on 12-well plates. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA), ionomycin (Solarbio, Beijing, China), and brefeldin A (Solarbio, Beijing, China) were mixed to stimulate the cell at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 6 h. After centrifugation, the cells were washed with PBS, and stained with CD4-488 (1:200; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and CD8-APC (1:300; BioLegend) for 1 h in the dark. Then, 100 µL of fixative (BioLegend) was added to fix the cells for 20 min at 4 °C in the dark. A membrane washing buffer (BioLegend) was added to wash and resuspend the cells. Cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with IFN-γ-PE (1:200; BioLegend) diluted in a transmembrance washing solution. The analysis of the proportion of IFN-γ among gated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was performed by flow cytometry (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

4.9. Invasion Inhibition Assay In Vitro

An invasion inhibition assay was conducted as previously described [26]. The culture of P. falciparum was synchronized with 5% sorbitol (Meilunbio, Dalian, China) to obtain a highly synchronized ring stage culture. When the malaria parasites were in the late trophozoites or schizonts, the parasites were diluted to 1.5% parasitemia and cultured with 2.5% hematocrit in a 96-well plate (100 µL parasite culture) in the gassed incubation chamber. The sera from immunized mice obtained previously were heated in a water bath at 56 °C for 30 min to inactivate the complement and then was added to the reaction system at a serial dilution ratio. When newly invaded ring-stage parasites were found, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 0.025% glutaraldehyde (Aladdin, Shanghai, China). The parasites were stained with SYBR Green I (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. Erythrocytes were washed with PBS three times and resuspended in 400 µL PBS. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the infected erythrocytes, and at least 100,000 cells were analyzed per sample. The experiment was repeated three times for each sample. The preimmune serum was used as a negative control and heparin severed as a positive control. Invasion (Inv) inhibition rate was calculated as follows [26]:
Inhibition rate (%) = (1 − Inv (experimental group)/Inv (positive group)) × 100

4.10. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 and Microsoft Excel 2016. An unpaired Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance of the differences, and p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

The rPfSRA-F1a located at the conserved region N-terminal showed high immunogenicity and effectively inhibited the invasion of Plasmodium into the erythrocyte. Thus, the F1a fragment may be developed as a vaccine against malaria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11050550/s1. Table S1: List of primer used in this study; Figure S1: Inhibition rate of anti-rPfSRA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Q.-Y.L., B.Y. and Y.C.; data curation: Q.-Y.L., B.Y. and Y.-J.W.; formal analysis: Y.-F.S. and J.J.; funding acquisition: Y.C.; investigation: J.-L.Y., B.Y. and Y.-F.S.; methodology: J.-L.Y. and Q.-Y.L.; project administration: Y.C. and Q.-B.W.; resources: B.Y., Y.-J.W. and J.J.; software: Y.-F.S. and B.W.; supervision: Q.-B.W.; validation: Y.-F.S. and Y.-J.W.; visualization: J.J. and B.W.; writing—original draft: J.-L.Y.; writing—review and editing: J.-L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871681]; Scientific Research Project of Wuxi Municipal Health Commission [Z202006].

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (JNU20210918IRB02). Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. The animal trial was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (JN. No20200530b0301031).

Informed Consent Statement

Human blood was obtained from consenting healthy adult donors, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Primer sequences used in PCR is contained in Supplementary Materials. The primary data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author subject to applicable restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria Report (2021); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2021 (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  2. Ashley, E.A.; Pyae Phyo, A.; Woodrow, C.J. Malaria. Lancet 2018, 391, 1608–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Snow, R.W.; Guerra, C.A.; Noor, A.M.; Myint, H.Y.; Hay, S.I. The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 2005, 434, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roper, C.; Pearce, R.; Nair, S.; Sharp, B.; Nosten, F.; Anderson, T. Intercontinental spread of pyrimethamine-resistant malaria. Science 2004, 305, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Madhav, H.; Hoda, N. An insight into the recent development of the clinical candidates for the treatment of malaria and their target proteins. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 210, 112955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Florens, L.; Washburn, M.P.; Raine, J.D.; Anthony, R.M.; Grainger, M.; Haynes, J.D.; Moch, J.K.; Muster, N.; Sacci, J.B.; Tabb, D.L.; et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature 2002, 419, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gardner, M.J.; Hall, N.; Fung, E.; White, O.; Berriman, M.; Hyman, R.W.; Carlton, J.M.; Pain, A.; Nelson, K.E.; Bowman, S.; et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 2002, 419, 498–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scherf, A.; Lopez-Rubio, J.J.; Riviere, L. Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 62, 445–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Draper, S.J.; Sack, B.K.; King, C.R.; Nielsen, C.M.; Rayner, J.C.; Higgins, M.K.; Long, C.A.; Seder, R.A. Malaria Vaccines: Recent Advances and New Horizons. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rts SCTP. Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: Final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 386, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Weiss, G.E.; Crabb, B.S.; Gilson, P.R. Overlaying Molecular and Temporal Aspects of Malaria Parasite Invasion. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marsh, K.; Kinyanjui, S. Immune effector mechanisms in malaria. Parasite Immunol. 2006, 28, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anand, G.; Reddy, K.S.; Pandey, A.K.; Mian, S.Y.; Singh, H.; Mittal, S.A.; Amlabu, E.; Bassat, Q.; Mayor, A.; Chauhan, V.S.; et al. A novel Plasmodium falciparum rhoptry associated adhesin mediates erythrocyte invasion through the sialic-acid dependent pathway. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Goodman, A.L.; Draper, S.J. Blood-stage malaria vaccines—Recent progress and future challenges. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2010, 104, 189–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Collins, K.A.; Snaith, R.; Cottingham, M.G.; Gilbert, S.C.; Hill, A.V.S. Enhancing protective immunity to malaria with a highly immunogenic virus-like particle vaccine. Sci. Rep. 2017, 19, 46621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Le Roch, K.G.; Zhou, Y.; Blair, P.L.; Grainger, M.; Moch, J.K.; Haynes, J.D.; De La Vega, P.; Holder, A.A.; Batalov, S.; Carucci, D.J.; et al. Discovery of gene function by expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science 2003, 301, 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Gaur, D.; Mayer, D.C.; Miller, L.H. Parasite ligand-host receptor interactions during invasion of erythrocytes by Plasmodium merozoites. Int. J. Parasitol. 2004, 34, 1413–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Payne, R.O.; Silk, S.E.; Elias, S.C.; Miura, K.; Diouf, A.; Galaway, F.; de Graaf, H.; Brendish, N.J.; Poulton, I.D.; Griffiths, O.J.; et al. Human vaccination against RH5 induces neutralizing antimalarial antibodies that inhibit RH5 invasion complex interactions. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e96381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amlabu, E.; Mensah-Brown, H.; Nyarko, P.B.; Akuh, O.A.; Opoku, G.; Ilani, P.; Oyagbenro, R.; Asiedu, K.; Aniweh, Y.; Awandare, G.A. Functional Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen as a Potential Blood-Stage Vaccine Target. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 778–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gustchina, E.; Li, M.; Ghirlando, R.; Schuck, P.; Louis, J.M.; Pierson, J.; Rao, P.; Subramaniam, S.; Gustchina, A.; Clore, G.M.; et al. Complexes of neutralizing and non-neutralizing affinity matured Fabs with a mimetic of the internal trimeric coiled-coil of HIV-1 gp41. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tripet, B.; Kao, D.J.; Jeffers, S.A.; Holmes, K.V.; Hodges, R.S. Template-based coiled-coil antigens elicit neutralizing antibodies to the SARS-coronavirus. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 155, 176–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Silmon de Monerri, N.C.; Flynn, H.R.; Campos, M.G.; Hackett, F.; Koussis, K.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Skehel, J.M.; Blackman, M.J. Global identification of multiple substrates for Plasmodium falciparum SUB1, an essential malarial processing protease. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yang, B.; Liu, H.; Xu, Q.W.; Sun, Y.F.; Xu, S.; Zhang, H.; Tang, J.X.; Zhu, G.D.; Liu, Y.B.; Cao, J.; et al. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Surface-Related Antigen (SRA) in Plasmodium falciparum Imported from Africa to China. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 688606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gilson, P.R.; Nebl, T.; Vukcevic, D.; Moritz, R.L.; Sargeant, T.; Speed, T.P.; Schofield, L.; Crabb, B.S. Identification and stoichiometry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2006, 5, 1286–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Udenfriend, S.; Kodukula, K. Prediction of omega site in nascent precursor of glycosylphosphatidylinositol protein. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 250, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Gao, X.H.; Gunalan, K.; Yap, S.S.; Preiser, P.R. Triggers of key calcium signals during erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium falciparum. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lin, C.S.; Uboldi, A.D.; Epp, C.; Bujard, H.; Tsuboi, T.; Czabotar, P.E.; Cowman, A.F. Multiple Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein 1 Complexes Mediate Merozoite Binding to Human Erythrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 7703–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Blackman, M.J. Proteases in host cell invasion by the malaria parasite. Cell Microbiol. 2004, 6, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pachebat, J.A.; Kadekoppala, M.; Grainger, M.; Dluzewski, A.R.; Gunaratne, R.S.; Scott-Finnigan, T.J.; Ogun, S.A.; Ling, I.T.; Bannister, L.H.; Taylor, H.M.; et al. Extensive proteolytic processing of the malaria parasite merozoite surface protein 7 during biosynthesis and parasite release from erythrocytes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2007, 151, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cohen, S.; Butcher, G.A. Properties of protective malarial antibody. Immunology 1970, 19, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cohen, S.; Mc, G.I.; Carrington, S. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature 1961, 192, 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ferreira, M.U.; Kimura, E.A.; De Souza, J.M.; Katzin, A.M. The isotype composition and avidity of naturally acquired anti-Plasmodium falciparum antibodies: Differential patterns in clinically immune Africans and Amazonian patients. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1996, 55, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Druilhe, P.; Spertini, F.; Soesoe, D.; Corradin, G.; Mejia, P.; Singh, S.; Audran, R.; Bouzidi, A.; Oeuvray, C.; Roussilhon, C. A malaria vaccine that elicits in humans antibodies able to kill Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weidanz, W.P.; Melancon-Kaplan, J.; Cavacini, L.A. Cell-mediated immunity to the asexual blood stages of malarial parasites: Animal models. Immunol. Lett. 1990, 25, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guevara Patiño, J.A.; Holder, A.A.; McBride, J.S.; Blackman, M.J. Antibodies that inhibit malaria merozoite surface protein-1 processing and erythrocyte invasion are blocked by naturally acquired human antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and PCR amplification of PfSRA fragments. (A) Schematic diagram of PfSRA. The PfSRA protein contains 990 aa with a predicted signal peptide (1–24 aa) and a GPI anchor (969–990 aa). The PfSUB-1 cleavage sites are noted with black arrows. PfSRA-F1a fragment (214–315 aa), PfSRA-F2a fragment (512–590 aa), and PfSRA-F3a fragment (789–893 aa) were constructed for expression. (B) Fragmented pfsra amplification results.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and PCR amplification of PfSRA fragments. (A) Schematic diagram of PfSRA. The PfSRA protein contains 990 aa with a predicted signal peptide (1–24 aa) and a GPI anchor (969–990 aa). The PfSUB-1 cleavage sites are noted with black arrows. PfSRA-F1a fragment (214–315 aa), PfSRA-F2a fragment (512–590 aa), and PfSRA-F3a fragment (789–893 aa) were constructed for expression. (B) Fragmented pfsra amplification results.
Pathogens 11 00550 g001
Figure 2. Expression and verification of PfSRA proteins. (A) The recombinant protein purification by SDS-PAGE was verified. rPfSRA-F1a (~38 kDa), rPfSRA-F2a (~35 kDa), and rPfSRA-F3a (~38 kDa). (B) An anti-His antibody was used to verify the protein expression by Western blot. rPfSRA-F1a (~38 kDa), rPfSRA-F2a (~35 kDa), and rPfSRA-F3a (~38 kDa). (C) The specificity of the immunized mice sera was detected by purified protein. The antibodies in sera from rPfSRA-immunized mice detected recombinant proteins, respectively, rPfSRA-F1a (a), rPfSRA-F2a (b), rPfSRA-F3a (c). The sera from PBS-immunized mice could not detect any fragment of rPfSRA (d).
Figure 2. Expression and verification of PfSRA proteins. (A) The recombinant protein purification by SDS-PAGE was verified. rPfSRA-F1a (~38 kDa), rPfSRA-F2a (~35 kDa), and rPfSRA-F3a (~38 kDa). (B) An anti-His antibody was used to verify the protein expression by Western blot. rPfSRA-F1a (~38 kDa), rPfSRA-F2a (~35 kDa), and rPfSRA-F3a (~38 kDa). (C) The specificity of the immunized mice sera was detected by purified protein. The antibodies in sera from rPfSRA-immunized mice detected recombinant proteins, respectively, rPfSRA-F1a (a), rPfSRA-F2a (b), rPfSRA-F3a (c). The sera from PBS-immunized mice could not detect any fragment of rPfSRA (d).
Pathogens 11 00550 g002
Figure 3. Expression of native PfSRA in P. falciparum. The multiple processed fragments of native PfSRA parasite protein were probed with rPfSRA-F1a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55 kDa) (A), rPfSRA-F2a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55 kDa) (B), and rPfSRA-F3a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55, 113 kDa) (C). Uninfected erythrocytes were used as control.
Figure 3. Expression of native PfSRA in P. falciparum. The multiple processed fragments of native PfSRA parasite protein were probed with rPfSRA-F1a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55 kDa) (A), rPfSRA-F2a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55 kDa) (B), and rPfSRA-F3a mice antibodies (17, 24, 38, 55, 113 kDa) (C). Uninfected erythrocytes were used as control.
Pathogens 11 00550 g003
Figure 4. Humoral immune response in mice. (A) IgG antibody titer of anti-rPfSRA serum by ELISA. The x-axis shows the dilutions (dilution ranged from 1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000). (B) IgG levels in the rPfSRA-immunized mice were detected on day 7 postimmunization and the levels continued to rise. The sera of the PBS-immunized mice were set as the negative control. (C) Avidity index of anti-rPfSRA IgG antibodies to rPfSRA.
Figure 4. Humoral immune response in mice. (A) IgG antibody titer of anti-rPfSRA serum by ELISA. The x-axis shows the dilutions (dilution ranged from 1:10,000 to 1:5,120,000). (B) IgG levels in the rPfSRA-immunized mice were detected on day 7 postimmunization and the levels continued to rise. The sera of the PBS-immunized mice were set as the negative control. (C) Avidity index of anti-rPfSRA IgG antibodies to rPfSRA.
Pathogens 11 00550 g004
Figure 5. (A) Lymphocyte proliferation. Significant differences were found between ConA and F3a (** p < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between ConA and F1a (p > 0.05), as well as ConA and F2a (p > 0.05). (B) and (C) showed the proportion of IFN-γ positive lymphocytes by flow cytometry. No significant changes were found in CD8+-IFN-γ and CD4+-IFN-γ (p > 0.05).
Figure 5. (A) Lymphocyte proliferation. Significant differences were found between ConA and F3a (** p < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between ConA and F1a (p > 0.05), as well as ConA and F2a (p > 0.05). (B) and (C) showed the proportion of IFN-γ positive lymphocytes by flow cytometry. No significant changes were found in CD8+-IFN-γ and CD4+-IFN-γ (p > 0.05).
Pathogens 11 00550 g005
Figure 6. Anti-rPfSRA inhibits P. falciparum invasion into the erythrocyte. (A) The flow cytometry plots for one representative image from each treatment group are shown. Data above boxes represent the invasion inhibition rate. (B) Statistical analysis results. Inhibition rates of the pre-immune serum, positive control heparin, rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a groups were 11.63%, 41.73%, 31.14%, 24.28%, and 25.79%, respectively. All the inhibitory effects were statistically significant (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 6. Anti-rPfSRA inhibits P. falciparum invasion into the erythrocyte. (A) The flow cytometry plots for one representative image from each treatment group are shown. Data above boxes represent the invasion inhibition rate. (B) Statistical analysis results. Inhibition rates of the pre-immune serum, positive control heparin, rPfSRA-F1a, rPfSRA-F2a, and rPfSRA-F3a groups were 11.63%, 41.73%, 31.14%, 24.28%, and 25.79%, respectively. All the inhibitory effects were statistically significant (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01).
Pathogens 11 00550 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, J.-L.; Liu, Q.-Y.; Yang, B.; Sun, Y.-F.; Wang, Y.-J.; Jiang, J.; Wang, B.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Q.-B. Immunogenicity Analysis of the Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen in Mice. Pathogens 2022, 11, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050550

AMA Style

Yu J-L, Liu Q-Y, Yang B, Sun Y-F, Wang Y-J, Jiang J, Wang B, Cheng Y, Wang Q-B. Immunogenicity Analysis of the Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen in Mice. Pathogens. 2022; 11(5):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Jia-Li, Qing-Yang Liu, Bo Yang, Yi-Fan Sun, Ya-Ju Wang, Jian Jiang, Bo Wang, Yang Cheng, and Qiu-Bo Wang. 2022. "Immunogenicity Analysis of the Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen in Mice" Pathogens 11, no. 5: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050550

APA Style

Yu, J. -L., Liu, Q. -Y., Yang, B., Sun, Y. -F., Wang, Y. -J., Jiang, J., Wang, B., Cheng, Y., & Wang, Q. -B. (2022). Immunogenicity Analysis of the Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum Surface-Related Antigen in Mice. Pathogens, 11(5), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop