Next Article in Journal
The Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Wild-Living Carnivores in Poland—A Question Concerning Its Host Specificity
Next Article in Special Issue
The Advance of Fusarium Wilt Tropical Race 4 in Musaceae of Latin America and the Caribbean: Current Situation
Previous Article in Journal
Subcutaneous Dirofilariosis of the Eyelid Brought to Poland from the Endemic Territory of Ukraine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fusarium Yellows of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. zingiberi Is Associated with Cultivar-Specific Expression of Defense-Responsive Genes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens12020197
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Screening of Fungicides and Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil and Plant Material

by
Samina Ashiq
*,
Matthew Back
,
Andrew Watson
and
Simon G. Edwards
Agriculture and Environment Department, Harper Adams University, Newport TF10 8NB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(2), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020197
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Fusarium)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The culture media recommended for the isolation and enumeration of the Fusarium spp. lack selectivity for Fusarium graminearum. Five fungicides—Amistar® (250 g·L−1 azoxystrobin), Filan® (500 g·kg−1 boscalid), Comet® 200 (200 g·L−1 pyraclostrobin), Imtrex® (62.5 g·L−1 fluxapyroxad), Poraz® (450 g·L−1 prochloraz)—were investigated for their potential as selective inhibitors in culture media for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil and plant material. Based on the screening, fluxapyroxad was further tested for selective inhibition for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil. Additionally, selective media were compared for the isolation of F. graminearum from plant material. The fungicides tested did not prove to be effective inhibitors for the development of selective media. For the detection of F. graminearum in plant material, Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar was found to be a better medium than Komada’s media, as the former resulted in colonies with darker pigmentation over a shorter incubation time and appeared to have a less inhibitory effect on F. graminearum growth.

1. Introduction

A number of selective media have been developed for the isolation and enumeration of the Fusarium species. The most widely used selective medium for Fusarium is the Nash and Snyder medium [1] which contains pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) as the selective agent. Other PCNB-containing media selective for Fusarium are the Papavizas medium [2], Komada’s medium [3] and Rose Bengal-glycerine-urea medium [4]. Due to concern about the safety of PCNB, other alternative selective inhibitors for Fusarium isolation have been reported such as dichloran in dichloran-chloramphenicol peptone agar [5] or a combination of iprodione and dichloran in Czapek Dox iprodione dichloran agar (CZID) [6] and potato dextrose iprodione dichloran agar [7]. Similarly, Malachite Green agar 2.5 ppm is reported to be a useful selective medium for the Fusarium species as an alternative to PCNB-containing media [8,9].
Fusarium graminearum is a globally important cereal pathogen that causes head blight in wheat, resulting in 50–70% yield losses [10,11]. In 2015/16, Fusarium head blight caused yield losses valued at USD 1.176 billion in the U.S [12]. Additionally, F. graminearum causes economic and health losses due to the production of mycotoxins, deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in cereals [13]. For the determination of the incidence of the disease and other research purposes such as understanding the disease mechanism and looking for better control strategies, it is important to isolate and identify F. graminearum. The isolation of F. graminearum on Nash and Snyder medium requires the subculture of the fungus onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium as the former medium often fails to maintain the morphological characteristics of F. graminearum [14]. Malachite Green agar 2.5 ppm supplemented with carnation leaf pieces is recommended as a semi-selective medium for F. graminearum, F. proliferatum, F. subglutinans and F. verticillioides in maize seeds [15]. A selective medium for F. graminearum was developed using the bacterial toxin, toxoflavin, as the selective agent [16]. This toxin is produced by the rice pathogen Burkholderia glumae and is inhibitory against many fungi including Aspergillus, Colletotrichum and Penicillium. The Fusarium species, particularly F. graminearum, was found to be highly resistant to this toxin. However, due to the high cost of toxoflavin, it is not practical for use in a selective medium.
These media are useful either for identifying Fusarium at the genus level or as a semi-selective media for the Fusarium species. However, in order to isolate F. graminearum from soil and plant debris, a highly selective medium is required because these types of samples have a high abundance of other fungal flora. The selective media currently used for the isolation of Fusarium are based on old fungicide chemistry, while newer fungicides such as strobilurins and succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI) are less effective against F. graminearum [17,18]. Therefore, the purpose this research was to investigate whether these newer fungicides would improve the selectivity of Fusarium media. Consequently, we investigated a range of fungicides as selective inhibitors in culture media for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil. The efficacy of different types of selective media was also compared for the isolation of F. graminearum from wheat debris.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fusarium graminearum Strains

Three strains of F. graminearum (FG2556, FG2498, FG2481) were isolated from Fusarium head blight-infected wheat samples collected in 2016 and were supplied by Dr. Phil Jennings, Fera Science Ltd. (York, UK). All strains were confirmed as F. graminearum using species-specific PCR [19].

2.2. Czapek Dox Propiconazole Dichloran Agar

CZID media [6] was modified to Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar (CZPD) as described by Hofgaard et al. [20]. The CZPD media contained (per L distilled water): 48 g of Czapek Dox agar (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland), 1 mL of 0.2% dichloran (Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) solution in ethanol, 1 mL of 5% chloramphenicol (Sigma, Shanghai, China) solution in ethanol, 1 mL of trace metal solution (1 g ZnSO4·7H2O [Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK] + 0.5 g CuSO4·5H2O [Fisher Scientific] per 100 mL distilled water), 10 mL of filter-sterilised 0.5% chlortetracycline hydrochloride (Sigma, Rimini, Italy) solution and 1 mL of 0.3% Bumper® suspension (containing 750 µg propiconazole). Chlortetracycline and Bumper® solution were added after autoclaving and cooling the media to 55 °C.

2.3. Preliminary Screening of Fungicides

Preliminary work involved the screening of five fungicides, namely azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, fluxapyroxad and prochloraz, for their potential as selective inhibitors in culture media for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil. Soil suspension (0.1%, 1%, 10% w/v), F. graminearum mycelial plugs and conidial suspensions were separately inoculated on PDA amended with these fungicides at concentrations ranging from at 0.001 to 1000 mg·L−1. This was conducted to identify effective concentrations of fungicides that would allow the growth of F. graminearum whilst suppressing the growth of other fungi. Based on the results with amended PDA, fluxapyroxad and pyraclostrobin were selected for further screening and tested at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 100 mg·L−1 in amended CZPD as described above.

2.4. Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil Using CZPD with and without Fluxapyroxad

Based on the preliminary screening, fluxapyroxad was selected for further testing. CZPD media was prepared as described above and another set of CZPD media was amended with fluxapyroxad at a 1 mg·L−1 concentration after autoclaving and cooling the media to 55 °C. A stock solution of F. graminearum (105 spores mL−1) was prepared as described previously [21] and diluted in a 10-fold serial dilution using sterile distilled water and soil suspension. The soil suspension was prepared by adding 5 g of fresh soil (soil collected from Harper Adams University estate, UK) to sterile distilled water to give a final volume of 50 mL and mixed well. Aliquots of the soil suspension and sterile distilled water were used to dilute the conidia stock solution to 104, 103 and 102 spores mL−1. Triplicate plates of CZPD and fluxapyroxad-amended CZPD were spread with 100 µL of the dilutions. Later colony-forming units (cfu) were counted on the plates after 5–8 days of incubation at room temperature (ca. 18 °C). Growth of F. graminearum in plates spread with dilutions from the soil suspension was recorded based on the characteristic reddish pink pigmentation. A subset of ca. 10% of assumed F. graminearum colonies were sub-cultured on PDA media plates and incubated at room temperature (ca. 18 °C) for 14 days. The conidia were harvested as described by Ashiq et al. [21] and confirmed as F. graminearum based on spore morphology [22].

2.5. Comparing Selectivity of Media Using Fusarium graminearum-Infected Wheat Debris

Four types of media were compared for their selective efficacy to isolate F. graminearum from wheat debris. CZPD and CZPD amended with 1 and 5 mg·L−1 fluxapyroxad were prepared as described above, while Komada’s media was prepared as described in Komada [3]. Wheat debris (chaff, straw, rachis) was collected post-harvest from a F. graminearum-inoculated wheat field experiment at the research facilities of Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, UK. The debris were surface sterilised with sodium hypochlorite (1.2% available chlorine) containing 0.05% Tween 20 for 3 min and washed three times with sterile distilled water. Five debris pieces were placed per plate in five plates of each of the four media types. Plates were incubated at room temperature (ca. 18 °C) and F. graminearum growth was observed after 7–14 days. Fusarium graminearum colonies were confirmed as described above.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil Using Fluxapyroxad

Preliminary results from media amended with different concentrations of the five fungicides (azoxystrobin, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, fluxapyroxad, prochloraz) suggested that fluxapyroxad could be a potential inhibitor to isolate F. graminearum from soil (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The mean of values for colony counts of F. graminearum on unamended CZPD and fluxapyroxad-amended CZPD media after 8 days of incubation are presented in Table 1. Colony counts of F. graminearum were similar on the two types of media used. Additionally, the F. graminearum colony count, on both types of media, was similar when conidia were introduced with either the sterile distilled water or soil suspension. However, neither medium proved to be particularly selective as many other soil fungi were able to grow well on both media.

3.2. Selectivity of Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Wheat Debris

When wheat debris was used, there was little difference between CZPD, fluxapyroxad amended-CZPD and Komada’s media in terms of selectivity. Fusarium graminearum colonies became identifiable and produced a dark pigmentation on CZPD (both unamended and amended) after 9–10 days (Figure 3). The colour of F. graminearum colonies on Komada’s media became darker and identifiable after 17–18 days, yet not as dark as observed on CZPD after 10 days. CZPD media also appeared to have a less inhibitory effect on F. graminearum growth.

4. Discussion

The current selective media for the isolation of Fusarium are based on old fungicide chemistry, while F. graminearum lacks sensitivity towards newer fungicides such as strobilurins and SDHI. Hence, it was of interest to investigate whether these newer fungicides would improve the selectivity of Fusarium media. However, the fungicides tested did not prove to be effective inhibitors in culture media for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil. CZPD and fluxapyroxad-amended CZPD allowed the growth of F. graminearum conidia in the soil suspension but they did not suppress other fungi in the soil samples.
An ideal selective medium for a specific group of fungi should promote the growth of all viable propagules of this specific fungal group, facilitate its identification and restrict the growth of unwanted microbiota. Moreover, the stability and toxicity of the added inhibitors are important factors that should be considered for the efficacy and safety of the culture medium [23]. Widely used media such as Nash and Snyder [1] and Komada’s medium [3] contain PCNB as a fungal inhibitor. Although PCNB has been categorised as "not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [24], the US Environmental Protection Agency has classified it as possible human carcinogen (Group C) [25]. Malachite Green is used to replace PCNB in culture media but the carcinogenic properties of Malachite Green are evident in experimental animals [26,27]. Although, Malachite Green has recently been classified in Group 3 as “not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [28], however, previous studies suggest that Malachite Green is a multi-organ toxin [29]. Another drawback of this dye is that it is deactivated upon exposure to light which might affect its antifungal activity [30].
CZID media was recommended by Thrane [31] to be used for the detection of Fusarium in food samples, as the colony morphology of Fusarium on this medium allowed the easier identification of different Fusarium species. The originally published CZID media [6] is here modified to CZPD [20] where iprodione is replaced with propiconazole to make the media more stable and long lasting. Abildgren et al. [6] used 3 mg of iprodione per L of CZID media, whereas in CZPD, 750 µg of propiconazole per L of media is used instead.
In an attempt to improve selectivity, a higher concentration of fluxapyroxad (5 mg·L−1) was also tested when comparing media using the F. graminearum-infected wheat debris. However, no observable differences were seen between the two concentrations of fluxapyroxad (1 mg·L−1 or 5 mg·L−1) and unamended CZPD media. The widely recommended media, Komada’s, was also included for this part of the study. CZPD (both unamended and amended) was better in terms of pigmentation and growth rate, requiring a shorter incubation time of 9-10 days compared to Komada’s media. Moreover, the colonies on CZPD were easily identifiable due to their darker pigmentation. Due to the greater growth rate of F. graminearum on CZPD, the colonies were larger compared to those on Komada’s media, suggesting CZPD has a less inhibitory effect on F. graminearum growth. CZPD medium has been successfully used in our laboratory to isolate F. graminearum from plant material, providing a more reliable assessment than the widely used Komada’s media. However, these media are not sufficiently selective when isolating F. graminearum from complex fungal populations such as soil where many other fungi are able to grow on these media. Therefore, further studies are required to develop a more selective medium for the isolation of F. graminearum from soil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.E. and M.B.; methodology, S.G.E., M.B., A.W. and S.A.; formal analysis, S.A., S.G.E. and M.B.; investigation, S.A.; resources, S.G.E. and M.B; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.; writing—review and editing, A.W., M.B. and S.G.E.; visualization, S.A.; supervision, M.B., A.W. and S.G.E.; project administration, M.B., A.W. and S.G.E.; funding acquisition, S.G.E. and M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant number 678012 (MyToolBox—“Safe Food and Feed through an Integrated ToolBox for Mycotoxin Management”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Phil Jennings of Fera Science Limited, UK, for providing the Fusarium graminearum isolates. We are grateful to Danielle Henderson-Holding for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nash, S.M.; Snyder, W.C. Quantitative estimations by plate counts of propagules of the bean root rot Fusarium in field soils. Phytopathology 1962, 52, 567–572. [Google Scholar]
  2. Papavizas, G.C. Evaluation of various media and anti-microbial agents for isolation of Fusarium from soil. Phytopathology 1967, 57, 848–852. [Google Scholar]
  3. Komada, H. Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil. Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 1975, 8, 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  4. Van Wyk, P.S.; Scholtz, D.J.; Los, O. A selective medium for the isolation of Fusarium spp. from soil debris. Phytophylactica 1986, 18, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews, S.; Pitt, J.I. Selective medium for isolation of Fusarium species and dematiaceous hyphomycetes from cereals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 51, 1235–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Abildgren, M.P.; Lund, F.; Thrane, U.; Elmholt, S. Czapek-Dox agar containing iprodione and dicloran as a selective medium for the isolation of Fusarium species. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1987, 5, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thrane, U.; Filtenborg, O.; Frisvad, J.C.; Lund, F. Improved methods for detection and identification of toxigenic Fusarium species. In Modern Methods in Food Mycology; Samson, R.A., Hocking, A.D., Pitt, J.I., King, A.D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 285–291. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alborch, L.; Bragulat, M.R.; Cabañes, F.J. Comparison of two selective culture media for the detection of Fusarium infection in conventional and transgenic maize kernels. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Castellá, G.; Bragulat, M.R.; Rubiales, M.V.; Cabañes, F.J. Malachite green agar, a new selective medium for Fusarium spp. Mycopathologia 1997, 137, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mielniczuk, E.; Skwaryło-Bednarz, B. Fusarium Head Blight, mycotoxins and strategies for their reduction. Agronomy 2020, 10, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Palazzini, J.; Fumero, V.; Yerkovich, N.; Barros, G.; Cuniberti, M.; Chulze, S. Correlation between Fusarium graminearum and deoxynivalenol during the 2012/13 wheat Fusarium head blight outbreak in Argentina. Cereal Res. Commun. 2015, 43, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wilson, W.; Dahl, B.; Nganje, W. Economic costs of Fusarium Head Blight, scab and deoxynivalenol. World Mycotoxin J. 2018, 11, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. CAST. Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal, and Human Systems; Task Force Report No. 139; Council for Agricultural Science and Technology: Ames, IA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  14. Segalin, M.; Reis, E.M. Semi-selective medium for Fusarium graminearum detection in seed samples. Summa Phytopathol. 2010, 36, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Thompson, R.S.; Aveling, T.A.S.; Prieto, R.B. A new semi-selective medium for Fusarium graminearum, F. proliferatum, F. subglutinans and F. verticillioides in maize seed. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 84, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jung, B.; Lee, S.; Ha, J.; Park, J.-C.; Han, S.-S.; Hwang, I.; Lee, Y.-W.; Lee, J. Development of a selective medium for the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum using toxoflavin produced by the bacterial pathogen Burkholderia glumae. Plant Pathol. J. 2013, 29, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Frąc, M.; Gryta, A.; Oszust, K.; Kotowicz, N. Fast and accurate microplate method (Biolog MT2) for detection of Fusarium fungicides resistance/sensitivity. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Masiello, M.; Somma, S.; Ghionna, V.; Logrieco, A.F.; Moretti, A. In vitro and in field response of different fungicides against Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium species causing ear rot disease of maize. Toxins 2019, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Nicholson, P.; Simpson, D.R.; Weston, G.; Rezanoor, H.N.; Lees, A.K.; Parry, D.W.; Joyce, D. Detection and quantification of Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium graminearum in cereals using PCR assays. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1998, 53, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hofgaard, I.S.; Seehusen, T.; Aamot, H.U.; Riley, H.; Razzaghian, J.; Le, V.H.; Hjelkrem, A.-G.R.; Dill-Macky, R.; Brodal, G. Inoculum potential of Fusarium spp. relates to tillage and straw management in Norwegian fields of spring oats. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ashiq, S.; Edwards, S.G.; Fatukasi, O.; Watson, A.; Back, M.A. In vitro activity of isothiocyanates against Fusarium graminearum. Plant Pathol. 2022, 71, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leslie, J.F.; Summerell, B.A. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bragulat, M.R.; Martinez, E.; Castella, G.; Cabanes, F.J. Selective efficacy of culture media recommended for isolation and enumeration of Fusarium spp. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC monographs volumes 1 to 42. IARC Monogr. Identif. Carcinog. Hazards Hum. 1987, 7, 1–440. [Google Scholar]
  25. US EPA-OPP, United States Environmental Protection Agency (Office of Pesticide Programs). Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential Annual Cancer Report 2018. 2018, pp. 1–40. Available online: https://apublica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/chemicals-evaluated.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  26. Culp, S.J.; Mellick, P.W.; Trotter, R.W.; Greenlees, K.J.; Kodell, R.L.; Beland, F.A. Carcinogenicity of malachite green chloride and leucomalachite green in B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rao, K.V.; Fernandes, C.L. Progressive effects of malachite green at varying concentrations on the development of N-nitrosodiethylamine induced hepatic preneoplastic lesions in rats. Tumori 1996, 82, 280–286. [Google Scholar]
  28. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Gentian violet, leucogentian violet, malachite green, leucomalachite green, and CI Direct Blue 218. Monogr. Identif. Carcinog. Hazards Hum. 2022, 129, 1–178. [Google Scholar]
  29. Srivastava, S.; Sinha, R.; Roy, D. Toxicological effects of malachite green. Aquat. Toxicol. 2004, 66, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vujanovic, V.; Hamel, C.; Jabaji-Hare, S.; St-Arnaud, M. Development of a selective myclobutanil agar (MBA) medium for the isolation of Fusarium species from asparagus fields. Can. J. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thrane, U. Comparison of three selective media for detecting Fusarium species in foods: A collaborative study. Intl. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 29, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathogens 12 00197 g001 550
Figure 1. Different concentrations of fluxapyroxad added to potato dextrose agar (PDA) and tested for their potential as a selective inhibitor for the development of a selective medium for Fusarium graminearum. The growth of F. graminearum from a conidial suspension (104 mL−1), a mycelial plug from culture FG2498 and growth from 10% soil suspension on (from right) PDA-unamended, fungicide a.i at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 mg·L−1 PDA after 5 days of incubation at room temperature (ca. 18 °C).
Figure 1. Different concentrations of fluxapyroxad added to potato dextrose agar (PDA) and tested for their potential as a selective inhibitor for the development of a selective medium for Fusarium graminearum. The growth of F. graminearum from a conidial suspension (104 mL−1), a mycelial plug from culture FG2498 and growth from 10% soil suspension on (from right) PDA-unamended, fungicide a.i at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 mg·L−1 PDA after 5 days of incubation at room temperature (ca. 18 °C).
Pathogens 12 00197 g001
Pathogens 12 00197 g002 550
Figure 2. Different concentrations of fluxapyroxad added to Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar (CZPD). (a) Growth of Fusarium graminearum culture from mycelial plug, (b) growth of F. graminearum from conidial suspension and (c) growth from soil suspension on (from left) CZPD-unamended, fungicide a.i at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mg·L−1 CZPD after 5 days of incubation at room temperature (ca. 18 °C).
Figure 2. Different concentrations of fluxapyroxad added to Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar (CZPD). (a) Growth of Fusarium graminearum culture from mycelial plug, (b) growth of F. graminearum from conidial suspension and (c) growth from soil suspension on (from left) CZPD-unamended, fungicide a.i at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mg·L−1 CZPD after 5 days of incubation at room temperature (ca. 18 °C).
Pathogens 12 00197 g002
Pathogens 12 00197 g003 550
Figure 3. Fusarium graminearum-infected wheat debris on different media after 10 days (from the top: Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar (CZPD); fluxapyroxad 1 mg·L−1 CZPD; fluxapyroxad 5 mg·L−1 CZPD; Komada’s media).
Figure 3. Fusarium graminearum-infected wheat debris on different media after 10 days (from the top: Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar (CZPD); fluxapyroxad 1 mg·L−1 CZPD; fluxapyroxad 5 mg·L−1 CZPD; Komada’s media).
Pathogens 12 00197 g003
Table
Table 1. Colony-forming units of Fusarium graminearum from three dilutions of F. graminearum conidia (104, 103, 102 spores mL−1) in sterile distilled water and soil suspension on Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar with and without fluxapyroxad. Data given are the mean from triplicate plate counts and numbers in parentheses represent the standard error of the mean.
Table 1. Colony-forming units of Fusarium graminearum from three dilutions of F. graminearum conidia (104, 103, 102 spores mL−1) in sterile distilled water and soil suspension on Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar with and without fluxapyroxad. Data given are the mean from triplicate plate counts and numbers in parentheses represent the standard error of the mean.
MediaDiluentColony-Forming Units Plate−1
104103102
Fg aOther bFgOtherFgOther
CZPD cSterile distilled water24 (3) d02 (1)01 (1)0
Soil suspension28 (2)48 (2)7 (2)58 (7)3 (1)55 (5)
fluxapyroxad-CZPD dSterile distilled water32 (4)03 (1)01 (1)0
Soil suspension26 (2)49 (5)10 (2)61 (7)2 (1)70 (3)
aFusarium graminearum. b Other fungal species. c Czapek Dox propiconazole dichloran agar. d CZPD amended with 1 mg·L−1 fluxapyroxad.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ashiq, S.; Back, M.; Watson, A.; Edwards, S.G. Screening of Fungicides and Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil and Plant Material. Pathogens 2023, 12, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020197

AMA Style

Ashiq S, Back M, Watson A, Edwards SG. Screening of Fungicides and Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil and Plant Material. Pathogens. 2023; 12(2):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ashiq, Samina, Matthew Back, Andrew Watson, and Simon G. Edwards. 2023. "Screening of Fungicides and Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil and Plant Material" Pathogens 12, no. 2: 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020197

APA Style

Ashiq, S., Back, M., Watson, A., & Edwards, S. G. (2023). Screening of Fungicides and Comparison of Selective Media for Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from Soil and Plant Material. Pathogens, 12(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop