Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of HPV and Assessing Type-Specific HPV Testing in Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Resistance, Tolerance, Virulence and Bacterial Pathogen Fitness—Current State and Envisioned Solutions for the Near Future
Previous Article in Journal
Ticks and Rickettsiae Associated with Wild Animals Sold in Bush Meat Markets in Cameroon
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Serotypes Isolated from Humans in Northwest Italy, 2012–2021
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Anti-Listeria Activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolated from the Horticultural Environment in New Zealand

Pathogens 2023, 12(2), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020349
by Vathsala Mohan 1,*, Reginald Wibisono 1, Saili Chalke 1, Graham Fletcher 1 and Françoise Leroi 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pathogens 2023, 12(2), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020349
Submission received: 9 January 2023 / Revised: 12 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 19 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Diseases, Bacterial Infections, and Antimicrobial Resistance)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, Thank you for your time and effort in reviewing our manuscript and we really appreciate the valuable inputs which has immensely improved the quality of our manuscript. We have adapted all the inputs and revised the manuscript and highlighted in the text. We have adapted all your inputs and revised the manuscript, kindly please find the attached comment response and the revised manuscript. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have submitted a very well organized study and of interest to the wider scientific community.

Comments:

1. I believe that the abstract is too long. Please restructure to make it easier to read.

2. The last part of the introduction sounds more like the aim of choosing the methodology rather than the aim or the hypothesis of the study. Please restructure.

3. section 2 in material and methods needs more detail. The reader needs to be able to reproduce the method. Was the ISO method used?

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, Thank you for your valuable time and effort in reviewing our manuscript and we really appreciate the valuable inputs which has immensely improved the quality of our manuscript. We have adapted all the inputs and revised the manuscript and highlighted in the text. Please find the attached response form and the manuscript revised.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop