Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Identification of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clones from the Hospital Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mexican Strains of Anaplasma marginale: A First Comparative Genomics and Phylogeographic Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens

by
Adrian Alberto Díaz-Sánchez
1,
Dasiel Obregón
2,
Huarrisson Azevedo Santos
3 and
Belkis Corona-González
4,*
1
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
2
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23890-000, RJ, Brazil
4
Department of Animal Health, National Center for Animal and Plant Health, San José de las Lajas CP 32700, Mayabeque, Cuba
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(5), 633; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050633
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 23 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens)
Ticks are obligate blood-feeding ectoparasites of mammals, birds, and reptiles, which are globally important vectors of pathogens that impact both human and animal health [1]. Ticks are a major group of arthropod vectors second only to mosquitoes in importance as vectors species; they harbor and transmit a wider variety of pathogens than any other blood-sucking arthropod, including bacteria, protozoa, viruses, and helminths [2]. The number of known tick-borne pathogens has increased dramatically since the 1980s, hence this problem is becoming increasingly urgent due to its socioeconomic impact, mainly related to reduced livestock production in countries of the Southern Hemisphere [3]. The spread of tick-borne diseases is increasing due to global climate change, land-use change, human population growth, translocation, and movement of animals [4,5]. The current climate-driven redistribution of ticks and other hematophagous arthropods poses a challenge to public health and veterinary services, due to the emergence and re-emergence of pathogens that threaten humans and animals [6].
The successful prevention and control of tick-borne diseases depend on accurate knowledge of the prevalence and the risk factors associated with pathogen transmission and host infection [7]. Particularly, early diagnosis and management are essential for the control of tick-borne diseases, both at individual and population levels, mainly due to symptoms of these diseases being nonspecific, which can make diagnosis challenging [8]. Researchers in this field are doing great work at understanding the practical aspects of epidemiology, clinical assessment, treatment, laboratory diagnosis, surveillance, and prevention of tick-borne diseases. For instance, the Special Issue titled “Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens” assembles a series of eight selected papers (i.e., one review paper and seven research papers), that attempt to address various fundamental components of tick-borne diseases from different regions around the world.
The One Health approach is currently being proposed as the foundation for the study of pathogens that affect animal health, considering the interconnections between human, animal, and environmental health. This approach incorporates a multidisciplinary perspective, involving different fields such as genomics, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and virulence factor studies that lead to the development of new tools and technologies for detecting and monitoring pathogens in different settings [9]. In this Special Issue, Dantán-González, et al. [10] describes the first comparative genomics and phylogeographic analyses of seven draft genomes of Mexican strains of Anaplasma marginale, the etiologic agent of bovine anaplasmosis. A total of 24 genomes of A. marginale retrieved from the GenBank database were characterized in this study, where genetic diversity and phylogeographic analyses were performed using both msp1a gene and 5′-UTR microsatellite sequences, as well as the construction of a phylogenetic tree with 540 concatenated genes from the core genome. Interestingly, the Mexican strains of A. marginale contained 15 different tandem repeat (TR) sequences in six MSP1a and phylogeographic relationships with strains from North America, South America, and Asia, which confirms their considerable genetic diversity. Pan-genomic analysis between the seven Mexican strains revealed that there are genes that are only present in the local strains.
Bovine babesiosis is one of the most important infectious diseases due to its major economic impact on the cattle industry worldwide, mostly in terms of mortality and morbidity of livestock animals. The global distribution of this disease is dependent on the cattle fever ticks Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Rhipicephalus annulatus, which are responsible for the transmission of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina, the causative agents of bovine babesiosis [11]. To date, since there is not an effective vaccine commercially available, the management strategies against bovine babesiosis have been mostly based on surveillance programs through the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of not only tick infestations but also the pathogens that they transmit [12]. In B. bigemina, the 45 kilodaltons glycoprotein GP-45 is exposed on the surface of the merozoite, it is characterized by a high genetic and antigenic polymorphism, and it is believed to play a role in the invasion of erythrocytes. Initially, GP-45 was proposed as a potential vaccine candidate, since experimental evidence demonstrated that cattle vaccinated with a purified native GP-45 generated partial protection, with a significantly lower percentage of parasitemia, compared with unvaccinated cattle when challenged with a B. bigemina virulent strain [13]. The paper from Mercado-Uriostegui, et al. [14] in this article collection described that the GP-45 protein contains conserved B-cell epitopes that were found in geographically distant isolates of B. bigemina, which induce neutralizing antibodies that block the invasion process to erythrocytes in vitro, suggesting that this protein plays a critical role in the survival of the parasite under field conditions. Accordingly, the conserved GP-45 peptides found in this study could be used to develop new diagnostic methods and vaccine candidates.
In this special issue, another original paper was published by Beristain-Ruiz, et al. [15], who reported the association between the prevalence of several tick-borne pathogens and the infestation by Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato in dogs from Juarez City, in the Northwest Mexico—United States border. In this work, R. sanguineus s.l. was identified as the main tick species naturally parasitizing the sampled dogs. The presence of tick-borne pathogens such as Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma platys, Rickettsia rickettsii was detected in both ticks and dog blood samples, while Anaplasma phagocytophilum was found only in dog blood samples. Notably, these findings represent the first molecular evidence of R. rickettsii infections in domestic dogs from Mexico. On the other hand, the study published by Georges, et al. [16] described the comparison of different diagnostic methods, including the microscopic examination of peripheral blood smears, autologous cell cultures, and reverse line blot hybridization, used for the screening of Anaplasma/Ehrlichia sp. in both roaming and symptomatic dogs from Trinidad. The results showed an acceptable concordance between the autologous cell cultures and reverse line blot hybridization, which suggests that both diagnostic methods can be used to detect E. canis in subclinical and clinical cases of canine ehrlichiosis.
Equine piroplasmosis is the most common tick-borne disease of Equids, affecting horses, donkeys, mules, and zebras [17]. The etiological agents of the disease around the world are the piroplasmids Babesia caballi [18], Theileria equi [19], and Theileria haneyi [20]. This disease is a severe issue for the horse industry and its control is crucial for the international trade of horses. Experimental studies have demonstrated that R. (Boophilus) microplus acts as a biological vector of T. equi in both transstadial and intrastadial transmission modes [21]. In this Special Issue, Peckle, et al. [22] published a study aimed at evaluating the dynamics of T. equi infection in R. (B.) microplus fed on a chronically infected horse through the infection rate and parasitic load in both pooled tick and ixodid organs samples, at different stages of tick life cycle during the experimental infestation. The experimental findings indicated a strong possibility of transstadial transmission of T. equi in R. (B.) microplus, while the adult male tick may play a role in the intrastadial transmission to naïve horses. Interestingly, this study shows high infection rates and a parasitic load of T. equi infection in R. (B.) microplus that increased over the experimental period, which confirms the importance of T. equi chronically infected horses as a source of infection for R. (B.) microplus. In another way, Torres, et al. [23] investigated the serological and molecular occurrence of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi, as well as their genetic diversity in thoroughbred horses from racecourses in Chile. The phylogenetic and haplotype analyses were performed using the B. caballi 48 KDa rhoptry protein (RAP-1) and T. equi 18S rRNA genes sequences, and the results revealed a low genetic diversity among the Chilean strains, which may have come from those reported in Brazil, Israel, or Cuba. This is the first report of B. caballi and T. equi infections in Chilean thoroughbred racing horses.
Tick-borne rickettsial pathogens are amongst the emerging and re-emerging zoonoses of public health importance since continue causing severe illness and death in either healthy adults or children, despite the availability of effective antibacterial therapy [8]. Traditionally rickettsiae members have been considered to be transmitted by ixodid ticks, while the role of argasid ticks as competent vectors of these pathogens remains still unexplored. Chitanga, et al. [24] investigated the presence of Rickettsia spp. in soft tick species Ornithodoros moubata and Ornithodoros porcinus collected from warthog burrows in two national parks of Zambia. In this study, the presence of Rickettsia lusitaniae in O. porcinus tick species was confirmed by DNA nucleotide sequence and phylogenetic analyses based on rickettsial citrate synthase (gltA) and 17kDa common antigen (htrA) genes. This discovery adds to our understanding of the geographic distribution and vector range of rickettsial pathogens in sub-Saharan Africa.
Lyme borreliosis is another zoonotic disease caused by some genospecies of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) complex, which is the most prevalent tick-borne disease in humans in the northern hemisphere. In this Special Issue, Ji, et al. [25] published a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in Ixodidae ticks around Asia. The literature analysis included 91 articles published until March 2021, and the meta-analysis identified data from nine countries including China, Japan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Russia Siberia region, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey, as well as tick species from six genera, namely Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus screened for infection with B. burgdorferi. According to the findings of this study, ticks of the genera Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, and Dermacentor are the most frequent B. burgdorferi vectors in Asia. Despite the literature focused mostly on East Asia, and although data are still scarce, this meta-analysis is the first attempt to explain the B. burgdorferi infection in Asian ixodid ticks, and it serves as a reference for future research.
In conclusion, this Special Issue contains a cutting-edge collection of papers on tick-borne diseases from throughout the world, focusing on ecoepidemiology, surveillance, diagnosis, management of risks, and prevention of TBDs. The published results provide insights with important implications for other researchers in academia, government, and industry working to develop successful strategies for preventing and controlling vector ticks and the pathogens they transmit.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de la Fuente, J.; Estrada-Pena, A.; Venzal, J.M.; Kocan, K.M.; Sonenshine, D.E.J.F.B. Overview: Ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. J. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 6938–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Boulanger, N.; Boyer, P.; Talagrand-Reboul, E.; Hansmann, Y. Ticks and tick-borne diseases. Med. Mal. Infect. 2019, 49, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dantas-Torres, F.; Chomel, B.B.; Otranto, D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: A One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012, 28, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dantas-Torres, F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: The butterfly effect. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rosa, R.; Andreo, V.; Tagliapietra, V.; Barakova, I.; Arnoldi, D.; Hauffe, H.C.; Manica, M.; Rosso, F.; Blanarova, L.; Bona, M.; et al. Effect of climate and land use on the spatio-temporal variability of tick-borne bacteria in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Waltner-Toews, D. Zoonoses, One Health and complexity: Wicked problems and constructive conflict. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Charles, R.A.; Bermudez, S.; Banovic, P.; Alvarez, D.O.; Diaz-Sanchez, A.A.; Corona-Gonzalez, B.; Etter, E.M.C.; Rodriguez Gonzalez, I.; Ghafar, A.; Jabbar, A.; et al. Ticks and tick-borne diseases in Central America and the Caribbean: A One Health perspective. Pathogens 2021, 10, 10101273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Biggs, H.M.; Behravesh, C.B.; Bradley, K.K.; Dahlgren, F.S.; Drexler, N.A.; Dumler, J.S.; Folk, S.M.; Kato, C.Y.; Lash, R.R.; Levin, M.L. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: A practical guide for health care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2016, 65, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lebov, J.; Grieger, K.; Womack, D.; Zaccaro, D.; Whitehead, N.; Kowalcyk, B.; MacDonald, P.D.M. A framework for One Health research. One Health 2017, 3, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dantán-González, E.; Quiroz-Castañeda, R.E.; Aguilar-Díaz, H.; Amaro-Estrada, I.; Martínez-Ocampo, F.; Rodríguez-Camarillo, S. Mexican strains of Anaplasma marginale: A first comparative genomics and phylogeographic analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bock, R.; Jackson, L.; de Vos, A.; Jorgensen, W. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 2004, 129, S247–S269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Esteve-Gasent, M.D.; Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I.; Medina, R.F.; Ellis, D.; Schwartz, A.; Cortés Garcia, B.; Hunt, C.; Tietjen, M.; Bonilla, D.; Thomas, D.; et al. Research on integrated management for cattle fever ticks and Bovine Babesiosis in the United States and Mexico: Current status and opportunities for binational coordination. Pathogens 2020, 9, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McElwain, T.F.; Perryman, L.E.; Musoke, A.J.; McGuire, T.C. Molecular characterization and immunogenicity of neutralization-sensitive Babesia bigemina merozoite surface proteins. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1991, 47, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mercado-Uriostegui, M.A.; Castro-Sánchez, L.A.; Batiha, G.E.; Valdez-Espinoza, U.M.; Falcón-Neri, A.; Ramos-Aragon, J.A.; Hernández-Ortiz, R.; Kawazu, S.-I.; Igarashi, I.; Mosqueda, J. The GP-45 protein, a highly variable antigen from Babesia bigemina, contains conserved B-cell epitopes in geographically distant isolates. Pathogens 2022, 11, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beristain-Ruiz, D.M.; Garza-Hernández, J.A.; Figueroa-Millán, J.V.; Lira-Amaya, J.J.; Quezada-Casasola, A.; Ordoñez-López, S.; Laredo-Tiscareño, S.V.; Alvarado-Robles, B.; Castillo-Luna, O.R.; Floriano-López, A.; et al. Possible association between selected tick-borne pathogen prevalence and Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato Infestation in dogs from Juarez City (Chihuahua), Northwest Mexico-US border. Pathogens 2022, 11, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Georges, K.; Ezeokoli, C.; Isitor, G.; Mutani, A.; Sparagano, O.; Sant, C. A Comparison of peripheral blood smears, autologous cell cultures, and reverse line blot hybridisation in screening for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia in roaming dogs and symptomatic dogs in Trinidad. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wise, L.N.; Pelzel-McCluskey, A.M.; Mealey, R.H.; Knowles, D.P. Equine Piroplasmosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2014, 30, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nutall, G.; Strickland, C. Die parasiten der pferdepiroplasmose resp. der “biliary fever”. Zentralbl. Bakt. Mikrobiol. 1910, 1, 524–525. [Google Scholar]
  19. Laveran, A. Contribution a l’etude de Piroplasma equi. CR Soc. Biol. 1901, 53, 385–388. [Google Scholar]
  20. Knowles, D.P.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Haney, D.; Herndon, D.R.; Fry, L.M.; Munro, J.B.; Sears, K.; Ueti, M.W.; Wise, L.N.; Silva, M.; et al. Discovery of a novel species, Theileria haneyi n. sp., infective to equids, highlights exceptional genomic diversity within the genus Theileria: Implications for apicomplexan parasite surveillance. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018, 48, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ueti, M.W.; Palmer, G.H.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Statdfield, M.; Scoles, G.A.; Knowles, D.P. Ability of the vector tick Boophilus microplus to acquire and transmit Babesia equi following feeding on chronically infected horses with low-level parasitemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 3755–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Peckle, M.; Santos, H.; Pires, M.; Silva, C.; Costa, R.; Vitari, G.; Camilo, T.; Meireles, N.; Paulino, P.; Massard, C. Dynamics of Theileria equi infection in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus during the parasitic phase in a chronically infected horse. Pathogens 2022, 11, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Torres, R.; Hurtado, C.; Pérez-Macchi, S.; Bittencourt, P.; Freschi, C.; de Mello, V.V.; Machado, R.Z.; André, M.R.; Müller, A. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in Chilean thoroughbred racing horses. Pathogens 2021, 10, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chitanga, S.; Chambaro, H.M.; Moonga, L.C.; Hayashida, K.; Yamagishi, J.; Muleya, W.; Changula, K.; Mubemba, B.; Simbotwe, M.; Squarre, D.; et al. Rickettsia lusitaniae in Ornithodoros Porcinus ticks, Zambia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ji, Z.; Jian, M.; Yue, P.; Cao, W.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, M.; et al. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodidae tick around Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díaz-Sánchez, A.A.; Obregón, D.; Santos, H.A.; Corona-González, B. Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens. Pathogens 2023, 12, 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050633

AMA Style

Díaz-Sánchez AA, Obregón D, Santos HA, Corona-González B. Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens. Pathogens. 2023; 12(5):633. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050633

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díaz-Sánchez, Adrian Alberto, Dasiel Obregón, Huarrisson Azevedo Santos, and Belkis Corona-González. 2023. "Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens" Pathogens 12, no. 5: 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050633

APA Style

Díaz-Sánchez, A. A., Obregón, D., Santos, H. A., & Corona-González, B. (2023). Advances in the Epidemiological Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens. Pathogens, 12(5), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050633

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop