Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Model of the Spread of Hantavirus Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Cell Fractionation and the Identification of Host Proteins Involved in Plant–Virus Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Genes in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter Isolates from the Uterus of Healthy Mares
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Viral Interference in Aedes albopictus C6/36 Cells Persistently Infected with Dengue Virus 2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens12091146
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Host and HBV Interactions and Their Potential Impact on Clinical Outcomes

by
Alexis Jose-Abrego
1,2,
Sonia Roman
1,2,
Saul Laguna-Meraz
1,2 and
Arturo Panduro
1,2,*
1
Department of Genomic Medicine in Hepatology, Civil Hospital of Guadalajara, “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Guadalajara 44280, Mexico
2
Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(9), 1146; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091146
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 September 2023 / Published: 8 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Virus Interactions in Viral Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a challenge for global health services, affecting millions and leading thousands to end-stage liver disease each year. This comprehensive review explores the interactions between HBV and the host, examining their impact on clinical outcomes. HBV infection encompasses a spectrum of severity, ranging from acute hepatitis B to chronic hepatitis B, which can potentially progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI), characterized by low HBV DNA levels in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative individuals, can reactivate and cause acute hepatitis B. HBV genotyping has revealed unique geographical patterns and relationships with clinical outcomes. Moreover, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the human host genome have been linked to several clinical outcomes, including cirrhosis, HCC, OBI, hepatitis B reactivation, and spontaneous clearance. The immune response plays a key role in controlling HBV infection by eliminating infected cells and neutralizing HBV in the bloodstream. Furthermore, HBV can modulate host metabolic pathways involved in glucose and lipid metabolism and bile acid absorption, influencing disease progression. HBV clinical outcomes correlate with three levels of viral adaptation. In conclusion, the clinical outcomes of HBV infection could result from complex immune and metabolic interactions between the host and HBV. These outcomes can vary among populations and are influenced by HBV genotypes, host genetics, environmental factors, and lifestyle. Understanding the degrees of HBV adaptation is essential for developing region-specific control and prevention measures.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant challenge for healthcare services worldwide. In 2019, over 296 million people had chronic hepatitis B, and 820,000 died due to hepatitis B complications. [1]. HBV is highly infectious and can be transmitted vertically from mother to child, and horizontally by sexual contact or contaminated materials [2]. While most HBV infections are asymptomatic, almost 90% of children infected and 5% of adults infected may develop chronic hepatitis B [2]. Without proper management, HBV infection can lead to serious liver complications, such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [3].
In contrast to chronic hepatitis B, acute hepatitis B occurs within six months of exposure to the virus and refers to the initial phase of HBV infection [4]. Symptoms of acute hepatitis B include loss of appetite, fatigue, abdominal pain, jaundice, nausea, vomiting, fever, and dark urine [4]. While most individuals with acute HBV infection recover fully within a few months due to an efficient immune response that clears the virus [4], others may experience symptoms ranging from moderate to severe.
Fulminant hepatitis B is the most severe form of acute hepatitis B, affecting roughly 1–2% of patients with hepatitis B [5,6], and when it occurs, it can progress rapidly to life-threatening liver failure. Common complications include encephalopathy, coagulopathy, and multiorgan failure [7], attributed to the host’s exaggerated immune response that rapidly impairs the liver’s primary functions, such as detoxification, protein synthesis, and metabolism [7,8]. Dysfunction of these cellular processes can affect other organs (kidney, lung, heart, and brain), leading to abnormal personality changes, confusion, abnormal bleeding, easy bruising, prolonged bleeding time, and, in severe cases, coma [7,8]. Without specialized medical care, the survival rate of patients with fulminant hepatitis B is poor (~25%), and liver transplantation could be the best hope for survival [8].
On the other hand, occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) is characterized by the presence of low levels of HBV DNA in the liver or peripheral blood of people who test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) [9]. In OBI, the virus can pass undetected within cells without causing significant liver damage [10]. This characteristic favors the long-term survival of both the host and HBV. However, under certain circumstances, such as immune suppression or chemotherapy, OBI can reactivate, leading to acute hepatitis B [11].

2. HBV Genotypes and Human Populations

HBV is classified into ten genotypes (A to J) and more than 40 sub-genotypes based on a genomic divergence of 8% and 4% (intra-genotype variation), respectively [12,13]. HBV sub-genotypes are typically designated using a combination of letters and numbers (for example, A1, A2, B1, B2, etc.). The classification of HBV in genotypes and sub-genotypes has important clinical implications, including their association with disease progression, response to antiviral therapy, and global distribution [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. HBV genotypes A, B, C, and D were discovered simultaneously in 1988, and four years later, genotypes E and F were proposed [12,13]. Subsequently, genotypes G and H were discovered in 2000 and 2002, respectively [14,15]. In 2000, an aberrant genotype with evidence of recombination between genotypes A and C was identified [17]. These HBV sequences were classified as genotype I in 2008 [18]. Finally, genotype J was identified in an 88-year-old patient diagnosed with HCC in 2009 [19]. With the discovery of all HBV genotypes, it was possible to identify that each has a different geographical distribution and show a close relationship with its host populations [20,21]. Genotype A is prevalent in Europe and Eastern–Southern Africa. Sub-genotype A1 is found in southeastern Africa, Brazil, and South Asia. Meanwhile, A2, or Ae, is distributed in Europe and American countries with European ancestry. On the other hand, A3 is prevalent in central African countries near the Atlantic Ocean [26]. Genotypes B and C are commonly found in Asia, including China, Japan, Korea, and Australia. The greatest diversity of sub-genotypes B1–B9 is found in ethnic groups of the Indonesian archipelago. Interestingly, B6 in the North American Arctic suggests a complex evolutionary history [27]. Regarding the sub-genotypes C (C1–C5), most of them are distributed in Southeast Asia. However, C1 and C2 can also be detected in smaller proportions in Canada, the United States, and Northwestern Europe [26]. A study involving over 1000 genomes of HBV genotype D identified 11 sub-genotypes (D1–D11). The primary sub-genotypes are D1–D4. D1 predominates in the Mediterranean, Arab countries, India, Russia, Australia, and New Zealand. D2 prevails in Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America, whereas D3 is detected in Europe, South Africa, the Caribbean Islands, and South America. D4 has been reported mainly in the Caribbean Islands with African ancestry [20,21,28]. Genotype E is predominant in West–Central Africa, while genotype F is widespread in Central and South America. [23]. The main F sub-genotypes are F1-F4, with F1 being predominant in countries near the Pacific Ocean, while F2 is detected in Brazil and Venezuela. F3 prevails in Colombia and Venezuela, and F4 is common in Argentina and Bolivia [23]. Genotype G is mainly detected in the risk group of men who have sex with men (MSM) from Mexico, the United States, France, and the Netherlands [23,24]. Genotype H is endemic mainly to Mexico [25]. Genotypes I and J have also been reported in Southeast Asia [18,19].
According to the region, HBV genotypes have been linked to several distinct clinical outcomes. In Spain, genotype A has a low antiviral response, while genotypes B and C have been associated with HCC in Asia [27,28]. In Native Alaskan populations, the sub-genotype F1 increased the risk of HCC 12-fold compared with genotypes B and D [29]. In Europe and Asia, genotype D has been linked with the worst rates of acute, fulminate, and chronic liver disease compared with genotype A [30]. In Mexico, patients infected with the genotype A2 were more susceptible to drug resistance mutations than non-A genotypes [31]. In a small population residing in the Brazilian Amazon, individuals with genotype D exhibited a 7.44-fold higher risk of developing advanced liver disease than individuals with genotypes A and F [32]. In contrast, most people are asymptomatic to the infection caused by genotype F1b in the Colombian Amazon region [33]. In Mexico, genotype H infection is often asymptomatic without significant clinical or laboratory manifestations of liver disease. Also, genotype H has been associated with low viral loads and OBI, particularly in the indigenous people of Mexico [10,23]. HCC is rare among Mexican patients with genotype H [34], but when found in another region, for example, in Japan [35], it is linked to HCC, suggesting that genotype H has sustained a closer adaptative relationship with the Mexican population. On the other hand, the clinical outcomes and diversity of HBV genotypes could be affected by the recombination and mixing of HBV genotypes [36,37]. Recombination occurs when two distinct HBV genotypes or sub-genotypes infect the same host cell, exchanging genetic material during replication [36]. Meanwhile, HBV mixture refers to the individual presence of more than one HBV genotype in the same host, which can occur due to co-infection or super-infection. Both recombination and HBV mixtures have been associated with several clinical outcomes, such as the development of liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [37,38]. In patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), mixtures of three HBV genotypes increased the risk of significant liver fibrosis 15-fold compared with dual-mixtures or single-genotype infection [39]. In addition, it was found that chronic patients with very high viral loads (>1 million IU/mL) are typical in the presence of HBV genotype mixtures [39]. High viral load levels may be due to the interaction between viral proteins and the genome of different HBV genotypes. A study showed that genotype G can use the core protein of genotype A2 to enhance its viral replication [40].

3. SNPs and HBV Clinical Outcomes

In addition to HBV genotypes, some variations in the patient’s genome, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), have been linked to different clinical outcomes, such as the risk of cirrhosis, HCC, OBI, hepatitis B reactivation, and clearance (Table 1). Cirrhosis-associated SNPs are in genes that participate in extracellular matrix production, immune response, intracellular adhesion, and signaling pathways [41,42,43,44]. A study in China associated SNPs at codons R241-E469 of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) gene with decompensated cirrhosis [41]. Also, the haplotype A874 and A2109 in the gamma interferon (IFN-γ) gene increase the risk of cirrhosis in the Chinese population 1.5-fold [42]. A multivariate analysis found that Korean patients with detectable HBV viral load and the L/L genotype in the transforming growth factor (TGF)-b1 gene are at risk of developing cirrhosis [43]. In another Chinese study, the presence of the rs4796793C-rs2293152G-rs1053004T haplotype in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) significantly increases the risk of cirrhosis [44].
Among the genes that increase susceptibility to HCC in chronic HBV patients are STAT4, complement component (C2), protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit beta (PPP1CB), tumor suppressor protein (p53), MDM2 proto-oncogene (MDM2), DEP domain containing 5 (DEPDC5), X-chromosome long arm band 22.1 (Xq22.1), and CD33 molecule (SIGLEC3 or CD33), which were found in studies conducted in Asian populations only [45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Based on the odds ratio (OR) value, the most important SNPs associated with HCC in HBV Korean patients are rs1042522 in p53 and rs2279744 in MDM2, which increase the risk of HCC 3.59- and 4.27-fold, respectively [51]. Combined, the homozygotes MDM2C/C (p53: rs1042522) and G/G (MDM2: rs2279744) had a 20.78-fold higher risk of HCC than the rest of the genotypes [51].
Several SNPs have been analyzed in OBI cases and controls. However, only variations in HLA have shown a strong association with OBI. A study found that the T allele of HLA-DPA1 (rs3077) increases the risk of OBI 6.12-fold in the Indonesian population [52]. In northwest China, HLA-C*07:01, B*44:03, DRB1*07:01, and DQB1*02:02 were related to OBI with OR values of 4.7, 2.1, 2.0, and 1.9, respectively [53]. After achieving a sustained viral response, some HBV patients may develop reactivation, triggered by immunosuppressive therapy, autoimmune diseases, and organ transplants [54]. It has been reported that 51.9% of patients with chronic hepatitis B can present reactivation after antiviral treatment [55]. HBV reactivation can be silent, but in patients with cirrhosis, it indicates a poor prognosis [55]. Currently, the AA genotype of HLA-DPB2 (rs872956) is associated with HBV reactivation in Japanese patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy (OR: 8.27, n = 42) [56]. In lymphoma patients (n = 14), the SNPs in IL-13 (rs1295686) were associated with the reappearance of HBsAg in Chinese patients [57].
On the other hand, among the genes associated with spontaneous clearance of HBV infection are sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP), Toll-like receptor (TLR), interferon-induced helicase C domain-containing protein 1 (IFIH1), microRNA 219-1, IL, and HLA [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Of these, one of the most studied is the SNPs in NTCP; this protein is a transporter of bile acids in the liver and functions as an entry receptor for HBV. NTCP is encoded by the solute carrier family 10 member 1 (SLC10A1) gene [58]. A study in Taiwan found that the A allele SLC10A1 rs2296651 is associated with HBsAg seronegativity, while the AG or AA alleles are protective factors against HCC [63]. Based on a meta-analysis of nine case-control studies, the A allele of SLC10A1 rs2296651 shows strong evidence of spontaneous clearance [64].
Table 1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with HBV clinical outcomes.
Table 1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with HBV clinical outcomes.
Clinical Outcome and Associated GenesPopulationSNP DatabaseOR95% CIReference
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)Chinars1799969 (A)4.1972.550–7.074[41]
Interferon gamma (IFN-γ)Chinars2430561 (A) + rs1861494 (A)1.4851.065–2.070[42]
Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1Korears1982073 (LL)3.4081.279–9.085[43]
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)Chinars4796793 (GG)2.171.11–4.23[44]
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4)Chinars7574865 (TG)1.171.03–1.34[45]
Complement component 2 (C2)Chinars9267673 (TC)1.371.15–1.63[45]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1Chinars2647073 (CA)1.631.29–2.06[45]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1Chinars3997872 (AT)1.861.32–2.62[45]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQChinars9275319 (GA)1.321.06–1.64[45]
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Protein Phosphatase 1 Catalytic Subunit Beta (PPP1CB)Chinars13025377 (AA)1.541.22–1.95[47]
Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2)Korears2279744 (G)4.272.23–8.20[51]
Tumor protein 53 (p53)Korears1042522 (Pro/Pro)3.591.77–7.31[51]
MDM2 + p53Korears2279744 (G/G) + rs1042522 (Pro/Pro)20.785.25–82.36[51]
DEP Domain Containing 5 (DEPDC5)Chinars1012068 (CC)2.3971.251–4.595[46]
X-chromosome long arm band 22.1 (Xq22.1)Chinars5945919 (AG)2.221.15–4.30[49]
CD33 molecule (SIGLEC3 or CD33)Taiwanrs12459419 (C)1.2561.027–1.535[50]
Occult hepatitis B
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DPA1Indonesiars3077 (CC)6.121.30–28.85[52]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DPA1Indonesiars3077 (T) + rs3135021(G) + rs9277535 (A)4.91.12–21.52[52]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQB1ChinaNA2.151.118–4.161[53]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-HLA-C*07:01ChinaNA2.1461.070–4.306[53]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*44:03ChinaNA4.6931.822–12.086[53]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*07:01ChinaNA1.9191.188–3.101[53]
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQB1*02:02ChinaNA2.0121.303–3.107[53]
HBV reactivation
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DPB2Japanrs872956 (AA)8.2771.540–51.550[56]
Interleukin 13 (IL-13)Taiwanrs1295686 (AA)4.6831.030–19.156[57]
Clearance or protection
Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP)Korears2296651(CT)0.4550.220–0.942[58]
Toll-like receptor (TLR5)Taiwanrs5744174 (T)1.321.03–1.69[59]
Interferon-induced helicase C domain-containing protein 1 (IFIH1)Chinars2111485 (G)0.470.25–0.87[60]
DExD/H-box helicase 58 (DDX58)Chinars3824456 (C) or rs2074160 (A)0.690.49–0.97[60]
Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP)Taiwanrs2296651(AA)0.130.05–0.34[63]
NA: Not available; letters in parentheses indicate allele or genotype; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

4. HBV Life Cycle and Immune Response

The immunological reaction that follows HBV infection is a complex process that includes removing infected cells and neutralizing HBV in the bloodstream using antibodies (Figure 1). During the initial phase of infection, HBV enters hepatocytes (liver cells) through receptor-mediated endocytosis, utilizing the NTCP receptor [65]. Once inside the hepatocyte, the virus undergoes uncoating, releasing its DNA into the cytoplasm. The viral DNA is then transported to the nucleus and converted into covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), which can integrate into the host genome [66]. The HBV genome serves as a template for the transcription of several messenger RNAs (mRNAs), which are transported to the cytoplasm to be translated into proteins. Some of these proteins contribute to assembling new viral particles, while others are targeted for degradation within the proteasome [67,68]. The resulting peptides can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), initiating a signaling cascade that leads to the production of interferons (IFNs) (Figure 2A) [69]. IFNs activate immune response cells such as phagocytes and natural killer cells, while the peptides recognized by histocompatibility complexes class I (MHC-I) activate CD8 T cells [70,71]. These responses trigger the release of cytokines (granzymes, perforin, soluble Fas ligand, SFasL), which induce programmed cell death through cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways (Figure 2A) [72]. Simultaneously, circulating phagocytes capture and destroy HBVs in the bloodstream. In this case, the resulting peptides are presented by MHC-II to CD4 T cells [73]. This interaction stimulates the production of interleukin-21 (IL-21) in CD4 T cells, particularly in follicular helper T cells (TfH) [74]. IL-21 induces the expression of B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1 (BLIMP-1), which is a transcription factor key for plasma cell differentiation. Also, IL-21 promotes the generation of long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow and continues to secrete antibodies for extended periods [75]. Among the most important antibodies produced by plasmatic cells are immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG, which neutralize the hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg); IgG anti-hepatitis B e antigen (IgG anti-HBe), and IgG anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (IgG anti-HBs) (Figure 2B) [76]. In addition to neutralizing the virus, these antibodies are valuable for discerning between acute and chronic hepatitis B infections [77]. HBsAg, anti-HBc, and IgM anti-HBc is a distinctive pattern in patients with acute hepatitis B. However, after six months, the persistence of HBsAg and anti-HBc marks the transition toward chronic hepatitis B, indicating the body’s struggle to clear the virus [77]. This persistence might be attributed, in part, to HBV-mediated antagonistic effects that impair the host’s immune response and hinder the effective elimination of the virus [78]. One of HBV’s most important antagonistic effects is the inhibition of apoptosis through the repression of p53 by HBx [79]. Overall, the immune response plays a crucial role in the outcome of HBV infection, determining whether it is cleared or progresses to chronic infection. Furthermore, the balance between the immune response and the low levels of viral replication could promote the long-term coexistence of HBV and its host.

5. HBV and Metabolism

The liver performs vital metabolic processes in the body, and hepatocytes are the primary target of HBV. Consequently, the HBV genome or viral proteins can inevitably interact at a molecular level with metabolic pathways. Evidence suggests that HBV can directly or indirectly modulate key enzymes involved in glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and bile acid uptake (Figure 3) [80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
An in vitro study showed that hepatitis B x protein (HBx) can up-regulate the expression of long non-coding RNA urothelial carcinoma associated 1 (LncRNA UCA1), which induces the expression of hexokinase [81,82]. In primary rat hepatocytes, phosphofructokinase transcription increased 72 h post-transfection with HBx [83]. A proteomic analysis found that the enzymes glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), pyruvate kinase (PK), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were significantly up-regulated in HepG2 cells after transfection with different HBx genotypes [84]. These enzymes are crucial to carry out glycolysis in the liver. HBx can also affect gluconeogenesis through overexpression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), which catalyze the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate and the hydrolysis of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose, respectively. Overexpression of these enzymes caused hyperglycemia in HBx transgenic mice [85]. In a yeast-based expression system, it was observed that the expression of preS2 mRNA (code HBsAg) may be reduced or suppressed when glucose concentrations reach 2% [86]. These findings suggest that the levels of HBsAg may be difficult to detect under high glucose conditions. HBx can also induce the transcription of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (G6PD) [87,88], which is a key enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The PPP is essential for generating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and ribose-5-phosphate, contributing to redox balance, energy production, and nucleotide biosynthesis [80].
In addition to its impact on glucose metabolism, HBV infection is associated with lipid droplet accumulation in hepatocytes. In cell culture, this phenomenon has been studied through the interaction of HBx with lipogenic genes, such as liver X receptor (LXR), sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), fatty acid synthase (FAS), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARs). In 2008, it was discovered that HBx can directly bind to the LXRα isoform [89]. Once activated, LXR is transported to the nucleus, where it activates the transcription of genes with the sequence AGGTCA [90]. Among them is the SREBP-1c, which acts as a transcription factor for genes responsible for synthesizing fatty acids, such as FAS and PPARs [91]. The FAS cytoplasmic complex converts acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to palmitic acid, utilizing NADPH as a cofactor [91]. Palmitic acid is one of the most prominent fatty acids that contribute to the formation of triglycerides. On the other hand, PPAR upregulation can induce the expression of the enzyme serine-palmitoyl-transferase (SPT), which synthesizes sphingolipids [92]. Sphingolipids serve as structural components of the cell membrane and play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of various organelles, including the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, and lysosomes [92]. Other enzymes induced by PPAR-α include carnitine palmitoyl transferase A1 (CPT1A), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACADM), and peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase (ACOX1). These enzymes play crucial roles in β-oxidation, the process involved in the breakdown of fatty acids into acetyl-CoA molecules. Acetyl-CoA can enter the citric acid cycle or serve as substrates for the FAS complex [93]. Finally, the PPAR-ß/δ isoform can induce the expression of the CD36 receptor and the phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP). CD36 facilitates the uptake of fatty acids and lipoproteins, while PLTP is involved in the transfer of phospholipids between lipoprotein particles [93,94].
HBV can impact bile acid metabolism through its interaction with NTCP, a protein involved in the reabsorption of bile acids. NTCP serves as a receptor for HBV to enter hepatocytes [65,95], and this interaction can disrupt the normal uptake and recycling of bile acids within the liver. As a result, there can be an increase in the levels of bile acids in the serum of patients [96]. This symptom was analyzed in a cohort of patients with hepatitis B, finding that high levels of five bile acids (glycocholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, taurocholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic acid, and glycoursodeoxycholic acid) were associated with the progression of cirrhosis [97]. Among the conjugated bile acids, there is a more significant elevation of taurocholic acid in patients with chronic hepatitis B compared with healthy controls [98]. These findings suggest that serum bile acid levels could be helpful as biochemical markers for fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis B. HBV can modulate hepatocyte metabolism to create a favorable environment for its replication. HBx is the most important protein involved in the regulation of metabolism. The modulation of glucose metabolism creates an environment rich in glucose, energy, and nucleotides. At the same time, the control of lipid metabolism provides the necessary lipids to form new viral envelopes but also promotes the accumulation of lipid droplets in hepatocytes.

6. The Theory of Viral Adaptation

HBV-related viruses have been detected in various animal species, such as fish, amphibians, reptiles, rodents, bats, and primates [99]. The origin of these viruses can be traced back approximately 400 million years [99]. A multidisciplinary archaeological study recently identified traces of HBV genotypes in ten millennia-old human remains [100]. During this time, humans and HBV genotypes were subjected to selective pressures shaping their coevolutionary dynamics. Humans experienced different environmental conditions, infectious diseases, diets, and social interactions [101]. These pressures can influence human genetic diversity, metabolism, immunity, and infection susceptibility [101]. Simultaneously, HBV adapted to the selective pressures imposed by the host, leading to a complex interaction (HBV/human) that could determine its current distribution, epidemiology, and clinical outcomes.
In 2014, different degrees of adaptation were proposed for HBV and humans [102]. This hypothesis suggests that the severity of liver disease tends to be lower as the degree of adaptation increases (Figure 4) [102]. HBV–host adaptations can be grouped into incomplete, semi-complete, and complete [102]. The lowest degree of adaptation is known as “incomplete adaptation”. It is probably caused by a recent interaction between the virus and its host population [103]. Incomplete adaptation can manifest in two ways. Firstly, in cases of fulminant hepatitis, HBV infection triggers a hyperimmune response that severely impairs liver function. This state is considered ineffective for HBV survival because it relies on the host to exist. Fulminant hepatitis represents an extreme form of incomplete adaptation. Another form of incomplete adaptation is acute hepatitis B, where the immune response efficiently eliminates HBV DNA genomes without allowing the virus to develop a favorable intracellular environment for virus/host coexistence [6,7]. Because most acute infections are asymptomatic and self-limiting, people are often unaware that they are infected. The second degree of adaptation is “semi-complete adaptation”, which is observed in patients with chronic hepatitis B [102]. Although this infection does not immediately compromise the host’s life, prolonged exposure can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC [2,104]. Different HBV genotypes, particularly, genotypes B and C, confer a higher risk for HCC [28,29], indicating a potential disruption in the adaptive process regarding metabolic or immunological interactions. Finally, the highest degree of adaptation is exemplified by OBI [102], where patients have low HBV viral load (<200 IU/mL) and absence of HBsAg [9,10]. This state is likely achieved by integrating the HBV genome into host cells, stability of cccDNA, and immune tolerance [105]. It allows for a homeostasis state between the human host and the specific HBV genotype, resulting in asymptomatic infection for many years [102]. This type of adaptation has been observed in the native population of Mexico infected with genotype H [106]. Molecular dating estimates that genotype H has been present in the Mexican population for at least 2070 years [25]. Another virus with a similar adaptation may be the sub-genotype F1b in the Amerindian population of the Amazon basin [107]. These observations suggest that complete adaptation could develop between an endemic HBV genotype and its respective native population in each region [102].
The balance between viral replication and immune control is crucial for HBV to persist within the host without causing excessive liver damage. This balance can be disrupted by several factors, including viral mutations, a patient’s immune status, antiviral medications, exposure to toxins, co-infections, and lifestyle [108]. An additional significant factor to consider is the migration of HBV genotypes. As mentioned above, genotype H is less aggressive in native Mexican populations. However, when it migrates to a new population, such as Japan, it can cause acute hepatitis B [109] or liver cancer [35]. These data suggest the importance of identifying and avoiding the factors that act as adaptive disruptors in populations that have developed a high degree of adaptation between the host and the HBV genotype (Figure 3).
In contrast to HBV, the infection caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered more severe due to its high mortality rate (3.45 deaths per 100,000 people) compared with HBV (0.45 deaths per 100,000 people) [110]. Among the attributable fractions contributing to the incidence of liver cancer, 50% are related to hepatitis C, whereas 15% are related to hepatitis B [111]. Approximately 55–85% of adults with hepatitis C develop the chronic form, whereas less than 5% of adults with hepatitis B develop chronic infection [112]. This difference may indicate that spontaneous clearance is more common in acute HBV than in acute HCV infection. Based on the adaptation theory, it can be inferred from these findings that HCV exhibits a lower degree of adaptation than HBV, likely due to its recent introduction to human populations. A molecular dating study suggests HCV originated in the Old World approximately 3000 years ago [113]. However, HBV is estimated to have circulated in human populations for at least ten millennia [100]. The lower degree of adaptation of HCV to humans may explain why it is more likely to cause serious health problems, such as chronic infection, liver cancer, and death.
In conclusion, the clinical outcomes of HBV infection could result from complex immune and metabolic interactions between the host and HBV. These outcomes can vary among populations and are influenced by several factors, including HBV genotype, the genetic makeup of the population, exposure to toxins, co-infections, comorbidities, antiviral medications, diets, and lifestyle. The different types of HBV infection suggest three distinct degrees of viral adaptation. Understanding the degrees of adaptation in HBV genotypes among different populations is essential to develop the most appropriate control and prevention measures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J.-A., S.R. and A.P.; methodology, A.J.-A. and S.L.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J.-A.; writing—review and editing, A.J.-A., S.R., S.L.-M. and A.P.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Grant Number CONACYT PN-2017-01-5254 to AP and Programa de Fortalecimiento de Institutos, Centros y Laboratorios de Investigación 2021, Universidad de Guadalajara to AP.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; p. 4. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b (accessed on 13 June 2023).
  2. Jeng, W.J.; Papatheodoridis, G.V.; Lok, A.S.F. Hepatitis B. Lancet 2023, 401, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weisberg, I.S.; Brown, R.S., Jr.; Sigal, S.H. Hepatitis B and end-stage liver disease. Clin. Liver Dis. 2007, 11, 893–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schillie, S.; Vellozzi, C.; Reingold, A.; Harris, A.; Haber, P.; Ward, J.W.; Nelson, N.P. Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2018, 67, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, W.M. Acute liver failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1862–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Petrosillo, N.; Ippolito, G.; Solforosi, L.; Varaldo, P.E.; Clementi, M.; Manzin, A. Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of fulminant hepatitis B. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 2975–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ichai, P.; Samuel, D. Management of Fulminant Hepatitis B. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2019, 21, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ostapowicz, G.; Fontana, R.J.; Schiodt, F.V.; Larson, A.; Davern, T.J.; Han, S.H.; McCashland, T.M.; Shakil, A.O.; Hay, J.E.; Hynan, L.; et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pollicino, T.; Raimondo, G. Occult hepatitis B infection. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, 688–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Panduro, A.; Maldonado-Gonzalez, M.; Fierro, N.A.; Roman, S. Distribution of HBV genotypes F and H in Mexico and Central America. Antivir. Ther. 2013, 18, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raimondo, G.; Filomia, R.; Maimone, S. Therapy of occult hepatitis B virus infection and prevention of reactivation. Intervirology 2014, 57, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kafeero, H.M.; Ndagire, D.; Ocama, P.; Kato, C.D.; Wampande, E.; Walusansa, A.; Kajumbula, H.; Kateete, D.; Ssenku, J.E.; Sendagire, H. Mapping hepatitis B virus genotypes on the African continent from 1997 to 2021: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Okamoto, H.; Tsuda, F.; Sakugawa, H.; Sastrosoewignjo, R.I.; Imai, M.; Miyakawa, Y.; Mayumi, M. Typing hepatitis B virus by homology in nucleotide sequence: Comparison of surface antigen subtypes. J. Gen. Virol. 1988, 69 Pt 10, 2575–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Norder, H.; Hammas, B.; Lofdahl, S.; Courouce, A.M.; Magnius, L.O. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of nine different serotypes of hepatitis B surface antigen and genomic classification of the corresponding hepatitis B virus strains. J. Gen. Virol. 1992, 73 Pt 5, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stuyver, L.; De Gendt, S.; Van Geyt, C.; Zoulim, F.; Fried, M.; Schinazi, R.F.; Rossau, R. A new genotype of hepatitis B virus: Complete genome and phylogenetic relatedness. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arauz-Ruiz, P.; Norder, H.; Robertson, B.H.; Magnius, L.O. Genotype H: A new Amerindian genotype of hepatitis B virus revealed in Central America. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 2059–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hannoun, C.; Norder, H.; Lindh, M. An aberrant genotype revealed in recombinant hepatitis B virus strains from Vietnam. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 2267–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olinger, C.M.; Jutavijittum, P.; Hubschen, J.M.; Yousukh, A.; Samountry, B.; Thammavong, T.; Toriyama, K.; Muller, C.P. Possible new hepatitis B virus genotype, southeast Asia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 1777–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tatematsu, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Kurbanov, F.; Sugauchi, F.; Mano, S.; Maeshiro, T.; Nakayoshi, T.; Wakuta, M.; Miyakawa, Y.; Mizokami, M. A genetic variant of hepatitis B virus divergent from known human and ape genotypes isolated from a Japanese patient and provisionally assigned to new genotype J. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 10538–10547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Velkov, S.; Ott, J.J.; Protzer, U.; Michler, T. The Global Hepatitis B Virus Genotype Distribution Approximated from Available Genotyping Data. Genes 2018, 9, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Osiowy, C.; Coffin, C.; Andonov, A. Review of Laboratory Tests used in Monitoring Hepatitis B Response to Pegylated Interferon and Nucleos(t)ide Analog Therapy. Curr. Treat. Options Infect. Dis. 2016, 8, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alvarado-Mora, M.V.; Pinho, J.R. Distribution of HBV genotypes in Latin America. Antivir. Ther. 2013, 18, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Roman, S.; Panduro, A. HBV endemicity in Mexico is associated with HBV genotypes H and G. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 5446–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shah, A.A.; Bodewes, R.; Reijnen, L.; Boelsums, T.; Weller, C.M.; Fanoy, E.B.; Veldhuijzen, I.K. Outbreaks of mumps genotype G viruses in the Netherlands between October 2019 and March 2020: Clusters associated with multiple introductions. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jose-Abrego, A.; Roman, S.; Laguna-Meraz, S.; Rebello-Pinho, J.R.; Justo Arevalo, S.; Panduro, A. Tracing the evolutionary history of hepatitis B virus genotype H endemic to Mexico. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1180931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z. Distribution of hepatitis B virus genotypes and subgenotypes: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e27941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bottecchia, M.; Madejon, A.; Sheldon, J.; Garcia-Samaniego, J.; Barreiro, P.; Soriano, V. Hepatitis B virus genotype A2 harbours an L217R polymorphism which may account for a lower response to adefovir. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 62, 626–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chan, H.L.; Hui, A.Y.; Wong, M.L.; Tse, A.M.; Hung, L.C.; Wong, V.W.; Sung, J.J. Genotype C hepatitis B virus infection is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2004, 53, 1494–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gounder, P.P.; Bulkow, L.R.; Snowball, M.; Negus, S.; Spradling, P.R.; McMahon, B.J. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Alaska Native Children and Young Adults with Hepatitis B Virus: Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J. Pediatr. 2016, 178, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, Y.H. Correlation between hepatitis B virus genotypes and clinical outcomes. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 65, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jose-Abrego, A.; Roman, S.; Rebello-Pinho, J.R.; Gomes-Gouvea, M.; Panduro, A. High Frequency of Antiviral Resistance Mutations in HBV Genotypes A2 and H: Multidrug Resistance Strains in Mexico. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2023, 11, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roca, T.P.; Villar, L.M.; Nogueira Lima, F.S.; Vasconcelos, M.P.A.; Borzacov, L.M.P.; Silva, E.C.E.; Lago, B.V.D.; Silva, M.; Botelho Souza, L.F.; Salcedo, J.M.V.; et al. Genomic Variability of Hepatitis B Virus Circulating in Brazilian Western Amazon. Viruses 2022, 14, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. di Filippo Villa, D.; Cortes-Mancera, F.; Payares, E.; Montes, N.; de la Hoz, F.; Arbelaez, M.P.; Correa, G.; Navas, M.C. Hepatitis D virus and hepatitis B virus infection in Amerindian communities of the Amazonas state, Colombia. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Roman, S.; Panduro, A.; Aguilar-Gutierrez, Y.; Maldonado, M.; Vazquez-Vandyck, M.; Martinez-Lopez, E.; Ruiz-Madrigal, B.; Hernandez-Nazara, Z. A low steady HBsAg seroprevalence is associated with a low incidence of HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in Mexico: A systematic review. Hepatol. Int. 2009, 3, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oba, U.; Koga, Y.; Hoshina, T.; Suminoe, A.; Abe, K.; Hayashida, M.; Taguchi, T.; Hara, T. An adolescent female having hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B virus genotype H with a deletion mutation in the pre-S2 region. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Simmonds, P.; Midgley, S. Recombination in the genesis and evolution of hepatitis B virus genotypes. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 15467–15476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Toan, N.L.; Song, L.H.; Kremsner, P.G.; Duy, D.N.; Binh, V.Q.; Koeberlein, B.; Kaiser, S.; Kandolf, R.; Torresi, J.; Bock, C.T. Impact of the hepatitis B virus genotype and genotype mixtures on the course of liver disease in Vietnam. Hepatology 2006, 43, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghosh, S.; Banerjee, P.; Deny, P.; Mondal, R.K.; Nandi, M.; Roychoudhury, A.; Das, K.; Banerjee, S.; Santra, A.; Zoulim, F.; et al. New HBV subgenotype D9, a novel D/C recombinant, identified in patients with chronic HBeAg-negative infection in Eastern India. J. Viral Hepat. 2013, 20, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jose-Abrego, A.; Roman, S.; Rebello Pinho, J.R.; de Castro, V.F.D.; Panduro, A. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Genotype Mixtures, Viral Load, and Liver Damage in HBV Patients Co-infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 640889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakamoto, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Iijima, S.; Kani, S.; Sugiyama, M.; Murakami, S.; Matsuura, K.; Kusakabe, A.; Shinkai, N.; et al. Mechanism of the dependence of hepatitis B virus genotype G on co-infection with other genotypes for viral replication. J. Viral Hepat. 2013, 20, e27–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.Q.; Hong, X.J.; Bai, X.J. Susceptibility to active decompensated cirrhosis is associated with polymorphisms of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in chronic HBV carriers. J. Viral. Hepat. 2008, 15, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, Y.; Lu, Y.; Xie, L.; Deng, Y.; Li, S.; Qin, X. Interferon gamma polymorphisms and hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis risk in a Chinese population. Cancer Cell Int. 2015, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yu, S.K.; Kwon, O.S.; Jung, H.S.; Bae, K.S.; Kwon, K.A.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, J.H. Influence of transforming growth factor-beta1 gene polymorphism at codon 10 on the development of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B virus carriers. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yan, X.H.; Wu, J.L.; Yu, R.; Ma, X.H.; Li, Q.F.; Xie, R.F. Associations between gene polymorphisms of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and the susceptibility to hepatitis B virus related liver cirrhosis. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2022, 56, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, D.K.; Ma, X.P.; Wu, X.; Peng, L.; Yin, J.; Dan, Y.; Huang, H.X.; Ding, D.L.; Zhang, L.Y.; Shi, Z.; et al. Genetic variations in STAT4, C2, HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQ associated with risk of hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, W.; Ma, N.; Zhao, D.; Gao, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Liu, D. Correlation between the DEPDC5 rs1012068 polymorphism and the risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2019, 43, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mai, H.; Xie, H.; Hou, J.; Chen, H.; Zhou, B.; Hou, J.; Jiang, D. A Genetic Variant of PPP1CB Influences Risk of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Han Chinese: A Pathway Based Analysis. J. Hepatocell. Carcinoma 2021, 8, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zeisel, M.B.; Guerrieri, F.; Levrero, M. Host Epigenetic Alterations and Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiang, J.H.; Gao, Q.; Shen, X.Z.; Yu, Y.; Gu, F.M.; Yan, J.; Pan, J.F.; Jin, F.; Fan, J.; Zhou, J.; et al. An X-chromosomal association study identifies a susceptibility locus at Xq22.1 for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2013, 37, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tsai, T.Y.; Huang, M.T.; Sung, P.S.; Peng, C.Y.; Tao, M.H.; Yang, H.I.; Chang, W.C.; Yang, A.S.; Yu, C.M.; Lin, Y.P.; et al. SIGLEC-3 (CD33) serves as an immune checkpoint receptor for HBV infection. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e141965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yoon, Y.J.; Chang, H.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, J.K.; Park, Y.K.; Kang, D.R.; Park, J.Y.; Myoung, S.M.; Kim, D.Y.; Chon, C.Y.; et al. MDM2 and p53 polymorphisms are associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 1192–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mardian, Y.; Yano, Y.; Wasityastuti, W.; Ratnasari, N.; Liang, Y.; Putri, W.A.; Triyono, T.; Hayashi, Y. Genetic polymorphisms of HLA-DP and isolated anti-HBc are important subsets of occult hepatitis B infection in Indonesian blood donors: A case-control study. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, T.; Shen, C.; Chen, L.; Liu, S.; Ji, Y. Association of human leukocyte antigen polymorphisms with occult hepatitis B virus infection in a Shaanxi Han population. J. Gene Med. 2017, 19, e2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, Y.; Han, S.B. Hepatitis B Reactivation: A Review of Clinical Guidelines. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2021, 55, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Y.; Chen, J.; Meng, Z.; Gao, Y.; Qian, Z.; Liu, F.; et al. Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Increased the Risk of Developing Hepatic Failure and Mortality in Cirrhosis with Acute Exacerbation. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 910549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Matsuda, H.; Hiramatsu, K.; Akazawa, Y.; Nosaka, T.; Saito, Y.; Ozaki, Y.; Hayama, R.; Takahashi, K.; Naito, T.; Ofuji, K.; et al. Genetic polymorphism and decreased expression of HLA class II DP genes are associated with HBV reactivation in patients treated with immunomodulatory agents. J. Med. Virol. 2018, 90, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hsiao, L.T.; Wang, H.Y.; Yang, C.F.; Chiou, T.J.; Gau, J.P.; Yu, Y.B.; Liu, H.L.; Chang, W.C.; Chen, P.M.; Tzeng, C.H.; et al. Human Cytokine Genetic Variants Associated with HBsAg Reverse Seroconversion in Rituximab-Treated Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients. Medicine 2016, 95, e3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, H.W.; Park, H.J.; Jin, B.; Dezhbord, M.; Kim, D.Y.; Han, K.H.; Ryu, W.S.; Kim, S.; Ahn, S.H. Effect of S267F variant of NTCP on the patients with chronic hepatitis B. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, J.F.; Chen, C.H.; Ni, Y.H.; Lin, Y.T.; Chen, H.L.; Hsu, H.Y.; Chang, M.H. Toll-like receptor and hepatitis B virus clearance in chronic infected patients: A long-term prospective cohort study in Taiwan. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yao, Y.; Shen, Y.; Shao, H.; Liu, Y.; Ji, Y.; Du, G.; Ye, X.; Huang, P.; Chen, H. Polymorphisms of RIG-I-like receptor influence HBV clearance in Chinese Han population. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4957–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shen, Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, S.; Wang, W.; Cui, X.; Zhou, X.; Liu, W.; Pan, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Hepatitis B virus persistence in mice reveals IL-21 and IL-33 as regulators of viral clearance. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, L.; Zou, Z.Q.; Wang, K. Clinical Relevance of HLA Gene Variants in HBV Infection. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 9069375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hu, H.H.; Liu, J.; Lin, Y.L.; Luo, W.S.; Chu, Y.J.; Chang, C.L.; Jen, C.L.; Lee, M.H.; Lu, S.N.; Wang, L.Y.; et al. The rs2296651 (S267F) variant on NTCP (SLC10A1) is inversely associated with chronic hepatitis B and progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gut 2016, 65, 1514–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hu, P.; Liu, J.; Zhang, D. Association of NTCP Gene Polymorphisms and Spontaneous Clearance of Hepatitis B Virus in Asia: A Meta-Analysis. Hepat. Mon. 2019, 19, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yan, H.; Zhong, G.; Xu, G.; He, W.; Jing, Z.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Peng, B.; Wang, H.; et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. eLife 2012, 1, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, W.; Summers, J. Integration of hepadnavirus DNA in infected liver: Evidence for a linear precursor. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 9710–9717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xia, Y.; Guo, H. Hepatitis B virus cccDNA: Formation, regulation and therapeutic potential. Antivir. Res. 2020, 180, 104824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kim, J.H.; Kang, S.; Kim, J.; Ahn, B.Y. Hepatitis B virus core protein stimulates the proteasome-mediated degradation of viral X protein. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 7166–7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mogensen, T.H. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 240–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Q.; Sun, B.; Zhuo, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Li, R.; Lin, C.; Jin, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, D. Interferon and interferon-stimulated genes in HBV treatment. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1034968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, Y.; Tan, Q.; Huang, X. Identification of HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope C64–72 from hepatitis B virus core protein. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2012, 13, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, J.Y.; Chae, D.W.; Kim, S.M.; Nam, E.S.; Jang, M.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Yoo, J.Y. Expression of FasL and perforin/granzyme B mRNA in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Viral. Hepat. 2004, 11, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schreiber, S.; Honz, M.; Mamozai, W.; Kurktschiev, P.; Schiemann, M.; Witter, K.; Moore, E.; Zielinski, C.; Sette, A.; Protzer, U.; et al. Characterization of a library of 20 HBV-specific MHC class II-restricted T cell receptors. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2021, 23, 476–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Asao, H. Interleukin-21 in Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Kumar, V.; Karnell, J.L.; Naiman, B.; Gross, P.S.; Rahman, S.; Zerrouki, K.; Hanna, R.; Morehouse, C.; et al. IL-21 drives expansion and plasma cell differentiation of autoreactive CD11chiT-bet+ B cells in SLE. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Schillie, S.; Murphy, T.V.; Sawyer, M.; Ly, K.; Hughes, E.; Jiles, R.; de Perio, M.A.; Reilly, M.; Byrd, K.; Ward, J.W.; et al. CDC guidance for evaluating healthcare personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for administering postexposure management. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2013, 62, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Conners, E.E.; Panagiotakopoulos, L.; Hofmeister, M.G.; Spradling, P.R.; Hagan, L.M.; Harris, A.M.; Rogers-Brown, J.S.; Wester, C.; Nelson, N.P.; Rapposelli, K.; et al. Screening and Testing for Hepatitis B Virus Infection: CDC Recommendations—United States, 2023. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2023, 72, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lin, S.; Zhang, Y.J. Interference of Apoptosis by Hepatitis B Virus. Viruses 2017, 9, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ogden, S.K.; Lee, K.C.; Barton, M.C. Hepatitis B viral transactivator HBx alleviates p53-mediated repression of alpha-fetoprotein gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 27806–27814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shi, Y.X.; Huang, C.J.; Yang, Z.G. Impact of hepatitis B virus infection on hepatic metabolic signaling pathway. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 8161–8167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hu, J.J.; Song, W.; Zhang, S.D.; Shen, X.H.; Qiu, X.M.; Wu, H.Z.; Gong, P.H.; Lu, S.; Zhao, Z.J.; He, M.L.; et al. HBx-upregulated lncRNA UCA1 promotes cell growth and tumorigenesis by recruiting EZH2 and repressing p27Kip1/CDK2 signaling. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, S.; Xue, M.; Chen, W. Long non-coding RNA UCA1 promotes glycolysis by up-regulating hexokinase 2 through the mTOR-STAT3/microRNA143 pathway. Cancer Sci. 2014, 105, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lamontagne, R.J.; Casciano, J.C.; Bouchard, M.J. A broad investigation of the HBV-mediated changes to primary hepatocyte physiology reveals HBV significantly alters metabolic pathways. Metabolism 2018, 83, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sadrolodabaee, L.; Low, T.K.; Feng, H.; Chen, W.N. Role of HBV Replication in Host Cell Metabolism: A Proteomics Analysis. Curr. Proteom. 2013, 10, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shin, H.J.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, S.U.; Moon, H.B.; Park, D.S.; Han, Y.H.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, D.S.; Song, I.S.; Lee, D.H.; et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein regulates hepatic glucose homeostasis via activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 29872–29881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Borchani-Chabchoub, I.; Mokdad-Gargouri, R.; Gargouri, A. Glucose dependent [correction of dependant] negative translational control of the heterologous expression of the preS2 HBV antigen in yeast. Gene 2003, 311, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, B.; Fang, M.; He, Z.; Cui, D.; Jia, S.; Lin, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, T.; Liu, W. Hepatitis B virus stimulates G6PD expression through HBx-mediated Nrf2 activation. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Ou, X.; Wu, Y.; He, Y.; Lin, X.; Lin, X. Small Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen Promotes Hepatic Gluconeogenesis via Enhancing Glucagon/cAMP/Protein Kinase A/CREB Signaling. J. Virol. 2022, 96, e0102022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kim, K.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, H.H.; Cheong, J. Hepatitis B virus X protein induces lipogenic transcription factor SREBP1 and fatty acid synthase through the activation of nuclear receptor LXRalpha. Biochem. J. 2008, 416, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Willy, P.J.; Umesono, K.; Ong, E.S.; Evans, R.M.; Heyman, R.A.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. LXR, a nuclear receptor that defines a distinct retinoid response pathway. Genes. Dev. 1995, 9, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. DeBose-Boyd, R.A.; Ye, J. SREBPs in Lipid Metabolism, Insulin Signaling, and Beyond. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Tanaka, N. PPARs as Metabolic Regulators in the Liver: Lessons from Liver-Specific PPAR-Null Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wakil, S.J.; Abu-Elheiga, L.A. Fatty acid metabolism: Target for metabolic syndrome. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Marechal, L.; Laviolette, M.; Rodrigue-Way, A.; Sow, B.; Brochu, M.; Caron, V.; Tremblay, A. The CD36-PPARgamma Pathway in Metabolic Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zakrzewicz, D.; Geyer, J. Interactions of Na(+)/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide with host cellular proteins upon hepatitis B and D virus infection: Novel potential targets for antiviral therapy. Biol. Chem. 2023, 404, 673–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Park, J.H.; Iwamoto, M.; Yun, J.H.; Uchikubo-Kamo, T.; Son, D.; Jin, Z.; Yoshida, H.; Ohki, M.; Ishimoto, N.; Mizutani, K.; et al. Structural insights into the HBV receptor and bile acid transporter NTCP. Nature 2022, 606, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, X.; Xie, G.; Zhao, A.; Zheng, X.; Huang, F.; Wang, Y.; Yao, C.; Jia, W.; Liu, P. Serum Bile Acids Are Associated with Pathological Progression of Hepatitis B-Induced Cirrhosis. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 1126–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Xun, Z.; Yao, X.; Ou, Q. Emerging roles of bile acids in chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2023, 20, 1087–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lauber, C.; Seitz, S.; Mattei, S.; Suh, A.; Beck, J.; Herstein, J.; Borold, J.; Salzburger, W.; Kaderali, L.; Briggs, J.A.G.; et al. Deciphering the Origin and Evolution of Hepatitis B Viruses by Means of a Family of Non-enveloped Fish Viruses. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 387–399.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kocher, A.; Papac, L.; Barquera, R.; Key, F.M.; Spyrou, M.A.; Hubler, R.; Rohrlach, A.B.; Aron, F.; Stahl, R.; Wissgott, A.; et al. Ten millennia of hepatitis B virus evolution. Science 2021, 374, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Larsen, C.S. The past 12,000 years of behavior, adaptation, population, and evolution shaped who we are today. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2209613120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Roman, S.; Jose-Abrego, A.; Fierro, N.A.; Escobedo-Melendez, G.; Ojeda-Granados, C.; Martinez-Lopez, E.; Panduro, A. Hepatitis B virus infection in Latin America: A genomic medicine approach. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 7181–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Peacock, T.P.; Penrice-Randal, R.; Hiscox, J.A.; Barclay, W.S. SARS-CoV-2 one year on: Evidence for ongoing viral adaptation. J. Gen. Virol. 2021, 102, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liang, T.J. Hepatitis B: The virus and disease. Hepatology 2009, 49, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tu, T.; Budzinska, M.A.; Shackel, N.A.; Urban, S. HBV DNA Integration: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Viruses 2017, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Roman, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Khan, A.; Kurbanov, F.; Kato, H.; Mizokami, M.; Panduro, A. Occult hepatitis B in the genotype H-infected Nahuas and Huichol native Mexican population. J. Med. Virol. 2010, 82, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Jaramillo, C.M.; de La Hoz, F.; Porras, A.; di Filippo, D.; Choconta-Piraquive, L.A.; Payares, E.; Montes, N.; Navas, M.C. Characterization of hepatitis B virus in Amerindian children and mothers from Amazonas State, Colombia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, L.; Wang, K.; Zou, Z.Q. Crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity in hepatitis B virus infection. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 2980–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yamada, N.; Shigefuku, R.; Sugiyama, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Ikeda, H.; Takahashi, H.; Okuse, C.; Suzuki, M.; Itoh, F.; Yotsuyanagi, H.; et al. Acute hepatitis B of genotype H resulting in persistent infection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 3044–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Age-Adjusted Death Rate for Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B during 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/policy/npr/2022/reduce-reported-hepatitis-b-deaths.htm#:~:text=The%20age%2Dadjusted%20hepatitis%20B,the%20target%20rate%20of%200.42 (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  111. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Viral Hepatitis and Liver Cancer. 2012. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/viral-hep-liver-cancer.pdf (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  112. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Hepatitis B and C Testing. 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549981 (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  113. Forni, D.; Cagliani, R.; Pontremoli, C.; Pozzoli, U.; Vertemara, J.; De Gioia, L.; Clerici, M.; Sironi, M. Evolutionary Analysis Provides Insight into the Origin and Adaptation of HCV. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 12 01146 g001
Figure 1. Hepatitis B virus life cycle. (1) The cycle begins with the specific binding of HBV to its receptor, sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP). This binding triggers the process of receptor-mediated endocytosis. (2) Inside the hepatocyte, lysosomes break down the viral envelope and nucleocapsid. (3) Viral DNA is released into the cytoplasm. (4) Subsequently, the viral DNA is transported to the nucleus where it undergoes repair and conversion to a more stable form called covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). (5) cccDNA serves as a template for the synthesis of viral RNA. (6) Then, RNAs are transported to the cytoplasm and the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) to facilitate the production of viral proteins. (7,8) The core protein or nucleoprotein assembles around a circularized RNA within the cytoplasm. (9) After assembly, transcription is carried out by the viral polymerase. (10) Some viral particles are transported back into the nucleus to increase the pool of cccDNA. (11,12) Within the RER, the viral particles are enveloped by a lipid membrane, which carries hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). (13) Finally, the mature virions are released into the bloodstream, accompanied by empty particles that serve as decoys for the immune response.
Figure 1. Hepatitis B virus life cycle. (1) The cycle begins with the specific binding of HBV to its receptor, sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP). This binding triggers the process of receptor-mediated endocytosis. (2) Inside the hepatocyte, lysosomes break down the viral envelope and nucleocapsid. (3) Viral DNA is released into the cytoplasm. (4) Subsequently, the viral DNA is transported to the nucleus where it undergoes repair and conversion to a more stable form called covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). (5) cccDNA serves as a template for the synthesis of viral RNA. (6) Then, RNAs are transported to the cytoplasm and the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) to facilitate the production of viral proteins. (7,8) The core protein or nucleoprotein assembles around a circularized RNA within the cytoplasm. (9) After assembly, transcription is carried out by the viral polymerase. (10) Some viral particles are transported back into the nucleus to increase the pool of cccDNA. (11,12) Within the RER, the viral particles are enveloped by a lipid membrane, which carries hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). (13) Finally, the mature virions are released into the bloodstream, accompanied by empty particles that serve as decoys for the immune response.
Pathogens 12 01146 g001
Pathogens 12 01146 g002
Figure 2. Immune response during HBV infection. (A) Cytokine-mediated hepatocyte death: (1) In this process, HBV cccDNA generates multiple RNA lineages. (2) These RNAs are transported to the cytoplasm to synthesize viral antigens, including core (HBsAg), surface (HBsAg), and e antigens (HBeAg). (3) Proteasomes cleave these antigens, creating peptides recognized by pattern recognition receptors. (5–7) Activation of these receptors triggers interferon transcription and translation pathways. (8–10) Secreted interferons activate resident phagocytes and natural killer cells (NK cells). (4) CD8 lymphocytes (CD8 T cells) can be activated by the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I), specifically human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2) subtype, presenting the peptides produced by the proteasome. (11) Immune cells produce cytokines that initiate apoptosis through cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways. (12) The nuclear pathway starts with perforin release, forming channels in the cell membrane for granzymes to enter the cytoplasm. Granzymes affect mitochondria, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). (13) Elevated ROS levels trigger the release of the SET complex from the endoplasmic reticulum. (14) The SET complex contains endonuclease domains, facilitating DNA cleavage in the nucleus to aid apoptosis. (15) The cytoplasmic pathway is mainly initiated by the interaction between the soluble Fas ligand (SFasL) and Fas surface receptor (Fas) in the serum. This interaction involves recruiting adapter proteins like Fas-associated death domain (FADD). FADD then activates caspase-8, which activates downstream effector caspases, including caspase-3. (16) Caspases target specific proteins, called apoptotic substrates, which lead to cellular dismantling. (B) Viral particle neutralization in the bloodstream: (1) Viruses released from infected hepatocytes are captured and processed by bloodstream phagocytes. (2) Processed peptides are presented by MHC-class II to CD4 T cells, resulting in IL-21 release. (3–5) IL-21 induces B cell differentiation into plasma cells, producing primary antibodies against HBV infection. Abbreviations: IgM anti-HBc: immunoglobulin M antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. IgG anti-HBc: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. IgG anti-HBs: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen. IgG anti-HBe: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B e antigen.
Figure 2. Immune response during HBV infection. (A) Cytokine-mediated hepatocyte death: (1) In this process, HBV cccDNA generates multiple RNA lineages. (2) These RNAs are transported to the cytoplasm to synthesize viral antigens, including core (HBsAg), surface (HBsAg), and e antigens (HBeAg). (3) Proteasomes cleave these antigens, creating peptides recognized by pattern recognition receptors. (5–7) Activation of these receptors triggers interferon transcription and translation pathways. (8–10) Secreted interferons activate resident phagocytes and natural killer cells (NK cells). (4) CD8 lymphocytes (CD8 T cells) can be activated by the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I), specifically human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2) subtype, presenting the peptides produced by the proteasome. (11) Immune cells produce cytokines that initiate apoptosis through cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways. (12) The nuclear pathway starts with perforin release, forming channels in the cell membrane for granzymes to enter the cytoplasm. Granzymes affect mitochondria, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS). (13) Elevated ROS levels trigger the release of the SET complex from the endoplasmic reticulum. (14) The SET complex contains endonuclease domains, facilitating DNA cleavage in the nucleus to aid apoptosis. (15) The cytoplasmic pathway is mainly initiated by the interaction between the soluble Fas ligand (SFasL) and Fas surface receptor (Fas) in the serum. This interaction involves recruiting adapter proteins like Fas-associated death domain (FADD). FADD then activates caspase-8, which activates downstream effector caspases, including caspase-3. (16) Caspases target specific proteins, called apoptotic substrates, which lead to cellular dismantling. (B) Viral particle neutralization in the bloodstream: (1) Viruses released from infected hepatocytes are captured and processed by bloodstream phagocytes. (2) Processed peptides are presented by MHC-class II to CD4 T cells, resulting in IL-21 release. (3–5) IL-21 induces B cell differentiation into plasma cells, producing primary antibodies against HBV infection. Abbreviations: IgM anti-HBc: immunoglobulin M antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. IgG anti-HBc: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. IgG anti-HBs: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen. IgG anti-HBe: immunoglobulin G antibodies against hepatitis B e antigen.
Pathogens 12 01146 g002
Pathogens 12 01146 g003
Figure 3. HBV interaction with host metabolic pathways. Metabolic control orchestrated by hepatitis B protein X (HBx): (1–3) The hepatitis B protein X (HBx) mediates metabolic control by activating genes linked to glycolysis (grey arrows). (7) HBx modifies the expression of long non-coding RNA UCA1, leading to increased expression of hexokinase and upregulation of phosphofructokinase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), pyruvate kinase (PK), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). This enzymatic surge propels enhanced glycolysis, elevating pyruvate production. (8) The resulting pyruvate enters the mitochondria, converting to acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) and entering the Krebs cycle. (9) Citrate undergoes reactions releasing carbon dioxide and generating reduced compounds NADPH and FADH. (10) This process boosts succinyl-CoA conversion to succinate, producing more GDP that converts to ATP. (6) HBx influences gluconeogenesis by up-regulating phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), facilitating the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate and hydrolysis of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose. (4) HBx stimulates transcription of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), pivotal in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). (5) The PPP crucially generates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and ribose-5-phosphate, vital for nucleotide biosynthesis. (11) HBx interacts with the liver X receptor (LXR) and increases the expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c). (12) SREBP-1c, a transcription factor, promotes the expression of genes essential for fatty acid synthesis, including fatty acid synthase (FAS) (15) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). (13) The cytoplasmic FAS complex transforms acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into palmitic acid, using NADPH as a cofactor (14). Palmitic acid contributes to key fatty acids in triglycerides. (18) Overexpressed PPAR induces serine-palmitoyl transferase (SPT) expression, condensing serine and palmitic acid into ceramide within the endoplasmic reticulum, a critical component in sphingolipid synthesis. (16) PPARs initiate phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) synthesis, enabling phospholipid transfer. (17) PPARs induce CD36 receptor expression, aiding fatty acid and lipoprotein uptake. (19) The interaction between HBV and NTCP disrupts bile acid metabolism, elevating serum bile acid levels.
Figure 3. HBV interaction with host metabolic pathways. Metabolic control orchestrated by hepatitis B protein X (HBx): (1–3) The hepatitis B protein X (HBx) mediates metabolic control by activating genes linked to glycolysis (grey arrows). (7) HBx modifies the expression of long non-coding RNA UCA1, leading to increased expression of hexokinase and upregulation of phosphofructokinase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), pyruvate kinase (PK), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). This enzymatic surge propels enhanced glycolysis, elevating pyruvate production. (8) The resulting pyruvate enters the mitochondria, converting to acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) and entering the Krebs cycle. (9) Citrate undergoes reactions releasing carbon dioxide and generating reduced compounds NADPH and FADH. (10) This process boosts succinyl-CoA conversion to succinate, producing more GDP that converts to ATP. (6) HBx influences gluconeogenesis by up-regulating phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), facilitating the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate and hydrolysis of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose. (4) HBx stimulates transcription of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), pivotal in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). (5) The PPP crucially generates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and ribose-5-phosphate, vital for nucleotide biosynthesis. (11) HBx interacts with the liver X receptor (LXR) and increases the expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c). (12) SREBP-1c, a transcription factor, promotes the expression of genes essential for fatty acid synthesis, including fatty acid synthase (FAS) (15) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). (13) The cytoplasmic FAS complex transforms acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA into palmitic acid, using NADPH as a cofactor (14). Palmitic acid contributes to key fatty acids in triglycerides. (18) Overexpressed PPAR induces serine-palmitoyl transferase (SPT) expression, condensing serine and palmitic acid into ceramide within the endoplasmic reticulum, a critical component in sphingolipid synthesis. (16) PPARs initiate phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) synthesis, enabling phospholipid transfer. (17) PPARs induce CD36 receptor expression, aiding fatty acid and lipoprotein uptake. (19) The interaction between HBV and NTCP disrupts bile acid metabolism, elevating serum bile acid levels.
Pathogens 12 01146 g003
Pathogens 12 01146 g004
Figure 4. The theory of viral adaptation and adaptative disruptors. Three degrees of viral adaptation are shown on the left side. Each column indicates the representative clinical outcomes, viral load dynamics during infection, and immune and metabolic interactions. On the right, the potential factors that can break the levels of adaptation are represented.
Figure 4. The theory of viral adaptation and adaptative disruptors. Three degrees of viral adaptation are shown on the left side. Each column indicates the representative clinical outcomes, viral load dynamics during infection, and immune and metabolic interactions. On the right, the potential factors that can break the levels of adaptation are represented.
Pathogens 12 01146 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jose-Abrego, A.; Roman, S.; Laguna-Meraz, S.; Panduro, A. Host and HBV Interactions and Their Potential Impact on Clinical Outcomes. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091146

AMA Style

Jose-Abrego A, Roman S, Laguna-Meraz S, Panduro A. Host and HBV Interactions and Their Potential Impact on Clinical Outcomes. Pathogens. 2023; 12(9):1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jose-Abrego, Alexis, Sonia Roman, Saul Laguna-Meraz, and Arturo Panduro. 2023. "Host and HBV Interactions and Their Potential Impact on Clinical Outcomes" Pathogens 12, no. 9: 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091146

APA Style

Jose-Abrego, A., Roman, S., Laguna-Meraz, S., & Panduro, A. (2023). Host and HBV Interactions and Their Potential Impact on Clinical Outcomes. Pathogens, 12(9), 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12091146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop