Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of UV-C 254 nm Light and a Sporicidal Surface Disinfectant in Inactivating Spores from Clostridioides difficile Ribotypes In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Thifluzamide Treatment on the Production of Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes in Rhizoctonia solani and Phenylpropane Metabolism in Pear Fruit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Insights into Vietnamese Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-9-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Belonging to the High-Risk Clone ST357 Obtained from Bulgarian Intensive Care Unit Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/pathogens13110964
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients

by
Fatima Mujahid
1,
Muhammad Hidayat Rasool
1,*,
Muhammad Shafiq
2,*,
Bilal Aslam
1 and
Mohsin Khurshid
1
1
Institute of Microbiology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
2
Research Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(11), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964
Submission received: 21 August 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 3 November 2024 / Published: 5 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common infectious diseases in hospital settings, and they are frequently caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). The emergence of carbapenem-resistant (Carb-R) E. coli strains poses a significant threat due to their multidrug resistance and virulence. This study aims to characterize the antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of Carb-R UPEC strains isolated from hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 1100 urine samples were collected from patients in Lahore and Faisalabad, Pakistan, between May 2023 and April 2024. The samples were processed to isolate and identify E. coli using standard microbiological techniques and VITEK®2, followed by amplification of the uidA gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method and broth microdilution. Resistance and virulence genes were detected through PCR and DNA sequencing, and sequence typing was performed using MLST. Results: Among the 118 Carb-R UPEC isolates, resistance was most frequently observed against sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (96.6%) and doxycycline (96.6%). All of the isolates remained sensitive to colistin and tigecycline. Sequence types ST405 (35.6%) and ST167 (21.2%) were predominant and carried the blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-5 genes. The distribution of virulence genes and a variety of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides, were observed as specifically linked to certain sequence types. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Uropathogenic E. coli (Carb-R UPEC) strains and highlights the presence of globally high-risk E. coli clones exhibiting extensive drug resistance phenotypes in Pakistani hospitals. The findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and stringent antibiotic stewardship to manage the spread of these highly resistant and virulent strains within hospital settings.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a prevalent infectious disease in both community and hospital settings, affecting individuals of all ages [1,2]. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is recognized as the primary causative agent of UTIs. UPEC has the capability to colonize the human gastrointestinal tract and, under favorable conditions, can infect and establish colonization in the urinogenital tract [3]. The virulence factors and host-related characteristics of UPEC facilitate the development of UTIs. Various virulence factors, including fimbriae with adhesin tips, protectins, toxins, and iron-acquisition systems, have been identified as contributing to UPEC pathogenesis by promoting colonization and infection of the urethra [4,5]. Hospital-acquired UTIs caused by E. coli are a significant concern in healthcare settings. These infections are often associated with invasive procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and the presence of urinary catheters. E. coli strains causing hospital-acquired UTIs can exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics, posing challenges in treatment [2,6]. Surveillance, prevention, and appropriate antibiotic selection based on regional susceptibility data are crucial for effectively managing these infections.
Certain high-risk pandemic sequence types of E. coli, notably ST131, ST648, ST38, ST405, ST1193, ST410, and ST10, are increasingly prevalent in hospital settings, posing a significant public health threat [7,8,9,10]. These clones exhibit high genetic diversity, possess a broad spectrum of virulence factors, and demonstrate multi-drug resistance, enabling them to effectively transmit and cause infections in both community and healthcare environments. Many of these clones produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and other resistance mechanisms, rendering them resistant to critical antibiotics such as carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins. Studies indicate that these high-risk E. coli clones are frequently isolated from urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and other extraintestinal infections, are they are often associated with high mortality rates, particularly in resource-limited countries. They have also been identified in domestic animals and birds, further complicating efforts to control their spread and potential transmission between humans and animals [11]. E. coli sequence type (ST) 167 is globally recognized as the predominant ST among extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and is frequently linked to carbapenem resistance [12]. Studies have demonstrated that Carb-R E. coli ST167 strains carrying the blaNDM-5 gene can infect both humans and animals [13]. Notably, E. coli ST167 carrying the blaNDM-5 gene has been detected in freshwater fish in India [14]. Similarly, ST405 E. coli is identified as the most common Carb-R sequence type, exhibiting a worldwide distribution and representing a multidrug-resistant uropathogenic clone [15,16].
In Pakistan, ST405 (44.4%) and ST131 (29.2%) were identified as the most frequent sequence types among 184 Carb-R clinical strains of E. coli obtained from clinical specimens in Lahore [17]. Another study conducted in the same year reported a 14.4% prevalence of Carb-R Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) from 306 rectal swabs collected from patients at a tertiary care hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, with ST167 and ST405 identified as the dominant sequence types [18]. Despite the increasing recognition of Carb-R E. coli strains, particularly ST405 and ST167, there is a gap in studies investigating their involvement in urinary tract infections (UTIs), especially healthcare-associated UTIs. Furthermore, while studies have highlighted the genetic diversity and virulence potential of these strains, there remains a lack of detailed investigations into the specific virulence factors contributing to their pathogenicity. This study aims to characterize the antimicrobial resistance patterns and virulence attributes of Carb-R uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strains isolated from hospitalized patients and to enhance understanding of the molecular epidemiology of these strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The research proposal was approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC), Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan, with reference number GCUF/ERC/23/16.

2.2. Specimen Collection and Bacterial Identification

A total of 1100 urine samples were collected from the suspected UTI patients admitted to three different tertiary care hospitals of Lahore and Faisalabad from May 2023 to April 2024. Only samples obtained from patients who had been admitted for 48 h or more were included in this study; samples collected from patients with symptoms at the time of admission or within the first 48 h were excluded. Urine samples were obtained based on the assessment of patient symptoms by clinicians as a part of routine diagnostic procedures performed at the healthcare facility. The samples were immediately transported to the laboratory and were inoculated on cystine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar (Oxoid, UK) plates using sterilized wire loop (nichrome) with an internal diameter of 4 mm holding 0.01 mL of urine sample. The plates were incubated at 37 °C and were observed for growth after 24 h. All isolates were further analyzed using the VITEK-2 compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) with the GN (Gram-negative) identification card. The VITEK-2 analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Molecular Confirmation

For the molecular confirmation of E. coli, DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Favorgen Biotech Corporation, Taiwan, China). The purity of the DNA was assessed by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm using NanoDrop ™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Crawley, UK). The E. coli-specific uidA gene was amplified using PCR with the primers and annealing temperature detailed in Table S1. The amplicons were run on agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using a UV transilluminator.

2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of CR-UPEC

The susceptibility of the E. coli isolates to various antimicrobial agents was assessed using both the disk diffusion method and the broth microdilution method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2023 guidelines.
The discs (Oxoid, UK) for the following antimicrobial agents were tested against the E. coli isolates: cefotaxime (CTX), ceftriaxone (CRO), fosfomycin (FOS), nitrofurantoin (F), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), amikacin (AK), gentamicin (CN), doxycycline (DO), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). For the disk diffusion method, sterile Mueller–Hinton agar plates were inoculated with bacterial suspensions adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Antibiotic discs were placed on the inoculated plates using a sterile disc dispenser, ensuring adequate spacing between discs to avoid overlapping zones of inhibition. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. After incubation, the diameters of the zones of inhibition were measured in millimeters (mm) using a calibrated ruler. The results were interpreted according to the CLSI 2023 guidelines, with zone diameter breakpoints used to classify the isolates as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant.
In addition, the broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of a panel of antimicrobial agents including CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, CIP, DO, CT, and TGC. For each antimicrobial agent, serial two-fold dilutions were prepared in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth in 96-well microtiter plates. The bacterial suspension was standardized to a final concentration of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/mL, and 100 µL was added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–20 h. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the antibiotic that inhibited visible bacterial growth. Growth was visually assessed or using a spectrophotometer to measure optical density. The CLSI 2023 guidelines were followed to interpret the results, except for tigecycline for which the US FDA interpretive criteria were used: MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL (susceptible), MIC = 4 µg/mL (intermediate), and MIC ≥ 8 µg/mL (resistant). E. coli (ATCC® 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC® 27853) were used for quality control.

2.5. Screening for Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants in UPEC

Carb-R E. coli isolates were screened for the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes. All Carb-R E. coli isolates were screened for ESBL-encoding genes, including blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV, using specific primers (Table S1). Additionally, these isolates were screened for blaCTX-M variants including blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-2, blaCTX-M-8, blaCTX-M-9, blaCTX-M-10, blaCTX-M-14, and blaCTX-M-15. To identify carbapenemase genes, isolates were screened for blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaSPM, blaGIM, blaSIM, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48. The entire blaNDM gene was amplified using the primers listed in Table S1 to determine the blaNDM variants, and these were then subsequently sequenced. Furthermore, isolates were screened for plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes (PMQRs), including qepA, qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS; sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1 and sul2); aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (AMEs) (aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, and ant(2″)-Ia); 16S methylases (armA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD, rmtE, and rmtF); and tetracycline resistance genes (tetA and tetB).

2.6. Virulence Profiling of CR-UPEC Isolates

All Carb-R E. coli isolates were screened for the presence of virulence genes encoding adhesins (fimH, papC, and papG), iron acquisition (fyuA, iutA, and irp2), immune evasion (traT and capU), and tissue invasion (hlyA and KpsMTII) using specific primers and annealing temperature (Table S1). The PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% w/v) using a 100 bp DNA ladder as a molecular weight marker and were visualized under UV trans-illumination.

2.7. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST)

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on all Carb-R E. coli isolates targeting seven housekeeping genes (adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA). PCR amplification of these genes was followed by Sanger sequencing through Macrogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The obtained sequences were analyzed using the E. coli MLST database. Sequence assembly and alignment were conducted using ChromasPro version 2.1.8 and ClustalW version 2.0 respectively. Each gene locus was assigned an allelic number based on the E. coli MLST database, and the corresponding allelic profiles were used to determine the sequence types (STs) via the EnteroBase database.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained were recorded in a Microsoft Excel 365 spreadsheet. Initial statistical analysis, including calculation of frequencies and percentage, was performed using Microsoft Excel. SPSS Statistics version 27.0 (IBM) was used to perform chi-square tests to compare the prevalence of the resistant phenotypes, resistance genes, and virulence factors among different hospitals and sequence types of E. coli. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. However, since the chi-square test was used repeatedly for multiple analyses, the Bonferroni correction was applied, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.001.

3. Results

In this study, a total of 1100 urine samples were received in our laboratory from three different tertiary care hospitals. Of these, 657 samples (59.7%) tested positive for bacterial or Candida growth. Escherichia coli (339 isolates, 51.6%) was the most prevalent pathogen associated with UTIs among the hospitalized patients. Of the E. coli isolates, 118 (34.8%) were found to be resistant to carbapenems.

3.1. Antimicrobial Resistance

The Carb-R UPEC strains exhibited variable levels of resistance to the antibiotics. The highest resistance was observed against sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and doxycycline (96.6%, 114/118). This was followed by amikacin (87.3%, 103/118) and gentamicin (90.7%, 107/118). In contrast, resistance was lower for nitrofurantoin (12.7%, 15/118) and fosfomycin (7.6%, 9/118). All of the isolates were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone in addition to the carbapenems. However, all of the tested isolates remained susceptible to colistin and tigecycline (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Although variations in resistance were observed among the hospitals, statistically significant resistance was found for fosfomycin (p-value ≤ 0.05). Specifically, only 9 out of 26 isolates (34.6%) from a hospital in Faisalabad, Pakistan, were resistant to fosfomycin, whereas isolates from the two hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan, were all susceptible to this antibiotic (Table 1).

Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs)

The prevalence of ARGs among carbapenem-resistant UPEC isolates revealed that, within the ESBLs, the blaCTX-M genes were the most prevalent. Specifically, the blaCTX-M-15 gene was identified in 97 isolates (82.2%), making it the most common ESBL. This was followed by the blaTEM gene, which was present in 39.8% of the isolates. Regarding carbapenemases, the blaNDM gene was the sole metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) detected, appearing in all isolates. Among these, the blaNDM-5 gene was more frequent, occurring in 86 isolates (72.9%), while the blaNDM-1 gene was found in 32 isolates (27.1%). Additionally, the blaOXA-48 gene, which encodes for oxacillinase, was detected in 14 isolates (11.9%). For aminoglycosides, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) were predominant. The aac(6′)-Ib gene was found in 91 isolates (77.1%), while the aph(3′)-Ib gene was present in 89 isolates (75.4%). Among the 16S rRNA methylases, only the rmtB gene was detected, occurring in 22 isolates (18.6%). The tetB gene was the most common tetracycline resistance gene, detected in 90 isolates (76.3%), followed by tetA, which was found in 45 isolates (38.1%). Among the PMQRs, the qepA was present in 62 isolates (52.5%), whereas qnrB and qnrS were detected in 8 isolates (6.8%) and 10 isolates (8.5%), respectively, and no isolates were found to harbor the qnrA gene. Sulfonamide resistance was primarily associated with the sul1 gene, identified in 104 isolates (88.1%), while the sul 2 gene was present in 25 isolates (21.2%) (Table 1). The ARGs showed variable prevalence across the hospitals, with statistical significance being observed (p-value ≤ 0.05). Notably, the blaSHV, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, blaNDM-5, ant(2″)-Ia, tetA, qnrS, and sul1 genes exhibited significant variability in prevalence (Table 1).

3.2. Prevalence of Virulence Genes

The virulence genes showed varying prevalence among the Carb-R UPEC isolates across the three hospitals. The fimH gene was the most prevalent found in 96.6% of isolates, followed by traT (93.2%) and iutA (89%). The capU gene was the least prevalent (28.8%). Significant differences were observed in the prevalence of several genes: hylA (p = 0.017), fyuA (p = 0.021), papC (p < 0.001), papG (p < 0.001), capU (p = 0.001), and kpsMTII (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 1.

3.3. Sequence Types of the Carb-R EPEC Isolates

Among the 118 Carb-R UPEC isolates, the distribution of sequence types (STs) revealed notable patterns. The most common sequence type was ST405, comprising 42 isolates (35.6%), followed by ST167 with 25 isolates (21.2%) and ST10 with 11 isolates (9.3%).
The resistance patterns of 118 Carb-R E. coli isolates were evaluated across various sequence types (STs), revealing distinct profiles. The ST10 and ST1702 showed 100% susceptibility to amikacin, while all other STs were fully resistant (p < 0.001). Similarly, ST10 was 100% susceptible to gentamicin, with resistance observed in all other STs (p < 0.001). For doxycycline, ST410 isolates displayed complete susceptibility, whereas all other STs were resistant (p < 0.001). Two out of six of the isolates (33.3), corresponding to ST940, were resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, while all other STs showed 100% resistance (p < 0.001). Nitrofurantoin resistance was observed in ST10 (90.9% resistant) and ST101 (55.6% resistant), with other STs exhibiting 100% susceptibility (p < 0.001). Fosfomycin resistance was restricted to ST101 (100% resistant), with other STs showing susceptibility (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes significantly varied among the different STs. For example, blaSHV was present in ST10 (63.6%) and ST101 (88.9%) but was absent in other STs (p < 0.001). Similarly, blaTEM was detected in ST10 and ST940 (100%) but was less common in other STs (p < 0.001); blaCTX-M-15 was identified in ST405, ST101, ST131, ST410, ST1702, and ST2851, with a significantly lower prevalence in ST167 and ST648 (p < 0.001); blaOXA-48 was only observed in ST167 and ST101 (p < 0.001); blaNDM-1 was found in ST10, ST101, ST131, and ST2851 (p < 0.001); whereas blaNDM-5 was present in all STs except ST101 (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
The distribution of virulence factors also significantly varied across different STs. The virulence factor traT was found in ST405, ST167, ST10, ST101, ST940, ST648, ST410, ST1702, and ST2851, but was absent in ST131 (p < 0.001). Notably, hylA was exclusively present in ST167, ST10, ST101, ST648, and ST1702, while capU was only detected in ST10, ST101, ST940, ST410, and ST1702 (Table 2 and Table 3).

4. Discussion

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, posing a significant challenge to healthcare systems. The presence of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales adds complexity to treatment strategies. Escherichia coli is an important pathogen in both clinical and veterinary settings due to several factors related to its pathogenicity, antimicrobial resistance, and environmental persistence [19,20]. The CR E. coli strains have emerged as one of the most problematic antimicrobial-resistant bacteria globally. Surveillance and research on the epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of CR E. coli are needed to understand the distribution of these resistant strains and to prevent their further spread [21]. It is interesting to note that certain sequence types of CR E. coli are increasingly prevalent worldwide. The rising incidence of these STs is alarming due to their potential for rapid dissemination and outbreak formation. STs possess the ability to acquire resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer. Additionally, many of these STs harbor virulence factors that augment their pathogenicity and survival in diverse ecological niches. Factors such as international travel, trade, and migration significantly contribute to the global dissemination of these resistant clones [16,22]. In Pakistan, there are limited data on the molecular epidemiology of E. coli, particularly UPEC strains. This knowledge gap poses a substantial challenge in comprehending and combating the spread of antibiotic-resistant strains within the region. This study aims to investigate antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, detect antimicrobial resistance determinants and virulence genes, and explore the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant uropathogenic E. coli (CR UPEC) strains isolated from hospitalized patients.
Escherichia coli isolates belonging to ST405 have been implicated in the dissemination of genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), primarily CTX-M enzymes, carbapenemases (i.e., blaNDM), and 16S methylases such as armA and rmtB [23,24,25]. ST405 is increasingly recognized as a prevalent extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli clone associated with the global spread of ESBLs and carbapenemases. The reports from various parts of world have linked E. coli ST405 to several outbreaks, highlighting its significant public health threat [26,27,28]. In our study, ST405 was identified as the most prevalent sequence type, accounting for 42 (35.6%) of the uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) isolates. Interestingly, all ST405 isolates carried blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, qepA, and sul1 genes, while none harbored 16S methylases. However, the prevalence of other ESBLs, as well as tetracycline resistance genes (tetA and tetB) and aminoglycoside resistance genes (AMEs), varied among the isolates. ST405 has been increasingly associated with the carriage of blaNDM genes, particularly blaNDM-5, which poses a serious challenge in clinical settings due to its ability to confer resistance to a broad range of beta-lactam antibiotics [29]. In a study from Italy, the isolate belonging to ST405 harboring blaNDM-5 gene was resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, carbapenems, and ciprofloxacin; however, it was susceptible to fosfomycin, amikacin, colistin, and tigecycline [30]. E. coli ST405 usually harbors multiple antibiotic resistance genes, as well as virulence factors, which enhance the survival of strain and adaptability in various environments, facilitating its spread across different regions and populations. Clinical settings such as hospitals provide a conducive environment to the spread of ST405 due to the concentration of antibiotic use and the presence of vulnerable populations. Outbreaks of ST405 have been reported in various parts of the world, highlighting its ability to cause infections in healthcare settings [29,31].
During the past few years, ST167 has also emerged as the most prevalent ST among extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli worldwide. It has often been linked to carbapenem resistance [12]. Studies have shown that carbapenem-resistant E. coli ST167 strains carrying the blaNDM-5 gene can infect both humans and animals [13]. In a report from Switzerland, the clinical isolate of E. coli belonging to ST167 was recovered from a hospitalized patient, which produced blaNDM-35 and harbored sul1, aadA2, and tet(B) [32]. However, in the majority of studies, E. coli ST167 has been found to harbor blaNDM-5, as evidenced in various studies across different countries and regions globally [12,33,34,35,36].
ST10 is an important ST, and it is considered an extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli lineage. It is increasingly significant in human infections and has also been reported as coming from food and environmental sources. Previous studies have shown the predominance of ST10 in clinical and veterinary samples, including domestic and wild animals and poultry. Moreover, ST10 has been a predominant sequence type found in environmental samples in European and Asian countries [37,38]. The isolates corresponding to ST10 are known to carry diverse beta-lactamases genes, especially the blaCTX-M variants, blaNDM, and the blaOXA-48 genes. [37]. In 2023, there was a surge in the occurrence of CR ST10 isolates, with reports from at least four continents, predominantly in Asia, North America, and Europe. Spain had the highest rate of ST10 isolates (34.90%), followed by Germany and France with an occurrence of 21.57% and 16.39%, respectively [10]. Moreover, it was reported that the ST10 strains lacked the fyuA gene [10]. This is consistent with the findings of this study as the ST10 isolates were found to harbor the blaNDM-1 gene and lacked the virulence gene fyuA.
E. coli ST131 has been described as a globally spread lineage, akin to a pandemic, with rapid dissemination across five continents. It contributes to the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli worldwide and is a frequent cause of human infections, particularly urinary tract infections (UTIs) [39]. However, not all E. coli ST131 isolates are resistant to carbapenems. Carbapenem resistance is emerging in some ST131 strains, making it an evolving phenomenon [31]. Despite this, carbapenems have been considered the treatment of choice for E. coli ST131 infections. In this study, ST131 was not the most common sequence type. However, it was found to harbor several notable genes, including blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, and qnrB, and it exhibited resistance to β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam), third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, amikacin, gentamicin, tetracyclines, quinolones, fluoroquinolones, and co-trimoxazole. This may be attributed to the fact that we included only Carb-R E. coli strains for MLST rather than those that are susceptible to carbapenems and that not all ST131 isolates are resistant to carbapenems.
In the last decade, there has been a shift in the predominant sequence types from highly virulent ST131 and ST38 to more antibiotic-resistant types, such as ST410 and ST167 [10]. A survey of Carb-R Enterobacterales across 36 European countries has shown that blaNDM-5 is the most frequently reported carbapenemase in Escherichia coli. Additionally, ST405, along with ST167, ST10, and ST361, were the most prevalent clones in these regions [40]. These findings raise concerns and necessitate further investigations to confirm the extent of the spread and to describe the epidemiological and microbiological characteristics of the identified isolates. Certain Carb-R E. coli STs are increasingly dominant, primarily due to their carriage of multiple antibiotic resistance genes, such as blaNDM. Their ability to acquire and maintain resistance genes, their increased survival in diverse environments, and their effective transmission dynamics contribute to their dominance. This scenario poses a serious public health threat, potentially leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Surveillance of these STs on a global scale is crucial to understanding their epidemiology and implementing effective control measures to mitigate their impact on public health.
While our study provides valuable insights into the genomic epidemiology of uropathogenic E. coli in our region, there are some limitations that present opportunities for future research. Firstly, we did not perform whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis and could also uncover novel resistance determinants or structural variations. Secondly, our study focused on detecting the presence of virulence genes rather than quantifying their expression levels. An analysis of gene expression would offer functional insights into the pathogenicity of these strains, potentially revealing the differences in the virulence factor activity among isolates with similar genetic profiles. These additional analyses would significantly enhance our understanding of the molecular epidemiology and pathogenesis of UPEC in our region.

5. Conclusions

UTIs incur significant costs and diminish the quality of life of patients and may lead toward severe, life-threatening conditions such as urosepsis. The rise of carbapenem-resistant E. coli presents a major challenge, particularly in the context of UTIs. Understanding the genetic traits of E. coli strains associated with UTIs provides crucial insights into the evolution of AMR and the acquisition of virulence genes over time. Our study highlights the emergence and dominance of several STs linked to high levels of antimicrobial resistance. Notably, ST405, ST167, and ST10 are becoming increasingly prevalent, underscoring the complexity of managing resistant E. coli strains. In Pakistan, the lack of comprehensive data on the molecular epidemiology of UPEC strains underscores the urgent need for improved surveillance and research. This research offers valuable insights into the virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes and the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant UPEC strains. The shift from highly virulent to more resistant STs over the past decade highlights the evolving nature of these bacterial strains and the need for ongoing monitoring and intervention. Addressing this public health threat necessitates global collaboration to track the spread of these resistant clones and implement effective infection control measures to mitigate their impact on patient health and healthcare systems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens13110964/s1, Table S1. Primers used in this study. Table S2. Demographics, collection dates, and hospital ward information of the UTI Patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., M.H.R. and M.K.; methodology, F.M.; software, B.A.; validation, F.M., M.H.R. and M.S.; formal analysis, B.A.; investigation, F.M.; resources, B.A.; data curation, F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M., M.S. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.H.R. and B.A; visualization, F.M.; supervision, M.H.R. and M.K.; project administration, M.H.R.; funding acquisition, B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines detailed in the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC), Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan, with reference number GCUF/ERC/23/16 Dated: 20 April 2023.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sohail, M.; Khurshid, M.; Saleem, H.G.; Javed, H.; Khan, A.A. Characteristics and Antibiotic Resistance of Urinary Tract Pathogens Isolated from Punjab, Pakistan. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015, 8, e19272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Toval, F.; Köhler, C.D.; Vogel, U.; Wagenlehner, F.; Mellmann, A.; Fruth, A.; Schmidt, M.A.; Karch, H.; Bielaszewska, M.; Dobrindt, U. Characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from hospital inpatients or outpatients with urinary tract infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abd El Ghany, M.; Sharaf, H.; Al-Agamy, M.H.; Shibl, A.; Hill-Cawthorne, G.A.; Hong, P.Y. Genomic characterization of NDM-1 and 5, and OXA-181 carbapenemases in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Terlizzi, M.E.; Gribaudo, G.; Maffei, M.E. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) Infections: Virulence Factors, Bladder Responses, Antibiotic, and Non-antibiotic Antimicrobial Strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Whelan, S.; Lucey, B.; Finn, K. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: The Molecular Basis for Challenges to Effective Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, D.S.; Lee, S.J.; Choe, H.S. Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection by Escherichia coli in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7656752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Byarugaba, D.K.; Erima, B.; Wokorach, G.; Alafi, S.; Kibuuka, H.; Mworozi, E.; Musinguzi, A.K.; Kiyengo, J.; Najjuka, F.; Wabwire-Mangen, F. Resistome and virulome of high-risk pandemic clones of multidrug-resistant extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) isolated from tertiary healthcare settings in Uganda. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0294424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pitout, J.D.D.; Peirano, G.; Chen, L.; DeVinney, R.; Matsumura, Y. Escherichia coli ST1193: Following in the Footsteps of E. coli ST131. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e0051122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. García-Meniño, I.; García, V.; Lumbreras-Iglesias, P.; Fernández, J.; Mora, A. Fluoroquinolone resistance in complicated urinary tract infections: Association with the increased occurrence and diversity of Escherichia coli of clonal complex 131, together with ST1193. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1351618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, J.; Lv, C.; Li, M.; Rahman, T.; Chang, Y.F.; Guo, X.; Song, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Q.; Ni, P.; et al. Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli exhibit diverse spatiotemporal epidemiological characteristics across the globe. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pöntinen, A.K.; Gladstone, R.A.; Pesonen, H.; Pesonen, M.; Cléon, F.; Parcell, B.J.; Kallonen, T.; Simonsen, G.S.; Croucher, N.J.; McNally, A.; et al. Modulation of multidrug-resistant clone success in Escherichia coli populations: A longitudinal, multi-country, genomic and antibiotic usage cohort study. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, e142–e150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Garcia-Fernandez, A.; Villa, L.; Bibbolino, G.; Bressan, A.; Trancassini, M.; Pietropaolo, V.; Venditti, M.; Antonelli, G.; Carattoli, A. Novel Insights and Features of the NDM-5-Producing Escherichia coli Sequence Type 167 High-Risk Clone. mSphere 2020, 5, e00269-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grönthal, T.; Österblad, M.; Eklund, M.; Jalava, J.; Nykäsenoja, S.; Pekkanen, K.; Rantala, M. Sharing more than friendship—Transmission of NDM-5 ST167 and CTX-M-9 ST69 Escherichia coli between dogs and humans in a family, Finland, 2015. Euro Surveill 2018, 23, 1700497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dwivedi, A.; Kumar, C.B.; Kumar, A.; Soni, M.; Sahu, V.; Awasthi, A.; Rathore, G. Molecular characterization of carbapenem resistant E. coli of fish origin reveals the dissemination of NDM-5 in freshwater aquaculture environment by the high risk clone ST167 and ST361. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 49314–49326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alghoribi, M.F.; Gibreel, T.M.; Farnham, G.; Al Johani, S.M.; Balkhy, H.H.; Upton, M. Antibiotic-resistant ST38, ST131 and ST405 strains are the leading uropathogenic Escherichia coli clones in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 2757–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, P.R.; McKinnon, J.; Liu, M.; Djordjevic, S.P. Multidrug Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli ST405 with a Novel, Composite IS26 Transposon in a Unique Chromosomal Location. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gondal, A.J.; Choudhry, N.; Bukhari, H.; Rizvi, Z.; Yasmin, N. Characterization of Genomic Diversity among Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates and Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles from Pakistan. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Habib, A.; Lo, S.; Villageois-Tran, K.; Petitjean, M.; Malik, S.A.; Armand-Lefèvre, L.; Ruppé, E.; Zahra, R. Dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in the community of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, A.Y.; Ahmad, S.S.; Avais, M.; Ashraf, K. Molecular prevalence with associated risk factors and haemato-serum electrolyte analysis of E. coli O157: H7 in Canine pups with diarrhoea. Pak. Vet. J. 2022, 42, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, X.; Zhu, X.; Xue, Y. Drug resistance and genetic relatedness of Escherichia coli from mink in Northeast China. Pak. Vet. J. 2023, 43, 824–827. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tian, X.; Zheng, X.; Sun, Y.; Fang, R.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Lin, J.; Cao, J.; Zhou, T. Molecular Mechanisms and Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Chinese Patients During 2002–2017. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. von Wintersdorff, C.J.; Penders, J.; van Niekerk, J.M.; Mills, N.D.; Majumder, S.; van Alphen, L.B.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Wolffs, P.F. Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Coque, T.M.; Novais, A.; Carattoli, A.; Poirel, L.; Pitout, J.; Peixe, L.; Baquero, F.; Cantón, R.; Nordmann, P. Dissemination of clonally related Escherichia coli strains expressing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-M-15. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tian, G.B.; Rivera, J.I.; Park, Y.S.; Johnson, L.E.; Hingwe, A.; Adams-Haduch, J.M.; Doi, Y. Sequence type ST405 Escherichia coli isolate producing QepA1, CTX-M-15, and RmtB from Detroit, Michigan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3966–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shin, J.; Kim, D.H.; Ko, K.S. Comparison of CTX-M-14- and CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patients with bacteremia. J. Infect. 2011, 63, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, F.; Ye, K.; Li, X.; Ye, L.; Guo, L.; Wang, L.; Yang, J. Genetic characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli from China, 2015–2017. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Update on Molecular Epidemiology and Treatment Options. Drugs 2019, 79, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bitar, I.; Piazza, A.; Gaiarsa, S.; Villa, L.; Pedroni, P.; Oliva, E.; Nucleo, E.; Pagani, L.; Carattoli, A.; Migliavacca, R. ST405 NDM-5 producing Escherichia coli in Northern Italy: The first two clinical cases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 489–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sumbana, J.J.; Santona, A.; Fiamma, M.; Taviani, E.; Deligios, M.; Zimba, T.; Lucas, G.; Sacarlal, J.; Rubino, S.; Paglietti, B. Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli ST405 Isolate Coharboring blaNDM-5 and blaCTXM-15: A New Threat in Mozambique. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 1633–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corbellini, S.; Scaltriti, E.; Piccinelli, G.; Gurrieri, F.; Mascherpa, M.; Boroni, G.; Amolini, C.; Caruso, A.; De Francesco, M.A. Genomic characterisation of Escherichia coli isolates co-producing NDM-5 and OXA-1 from hospitalised patients with invasive infections. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 28, 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Slown, S.; Walas, N.; Amato, H.K.; Lloyd, T.; Varghese, V.; Bender, M.; Pandori, M.; Graham, J. Clonal Lineages and Virulence Factors of Carbapenem Resistant E. coli in Alameda County, California, 2017–2019. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Poirel, L.; Ortiz de la Rosa, J.M.; Sakaoglu, Z.; Kusaksizoglu, A.; Sadek, M.; Nordmann, P. NDM-35-Producing ST167 Escherichia coli Highly Resistant to β-Lactams Including Cefiderocol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e0031122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peterhans, S.; Stevens, M.J.A.; Nüesch-Inderbinen, M.; Schmitt, S.; Stephan, R.; Zurfluh, K. First report of a bla(NDM-5)-harbouring Escherichia coli ST167 isolated from a wound infection in a dog in Switzerland. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 226–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Cheng, J.; Qin, S.; Xie, W. Characterization of a novel bla (NDM-5)-harboring IncFII plasmid and an mcr-1-bearing IncI2 plasmid in a single Escherichia coli ST167 clinical isolate. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Manyahi, J.; Moyo, S.J.; Kibwana, U.; Goodman, R.N.; Allman, E.; Hubbard, A.T.M.; Blomberg, B.; Langeland, N.; Roberts, A.P. First identification of bla (NDM-5) producing Escherichia coli from neonates and a HIV infected adult in Tanzania. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ragupathi, N.K.D.; Veeraraghavan, B.; Sethuvel, D.P.M.; Anandan, S.; Vasudevan, K.; Neeravi, A.R.; Daniel, J.L.K.; Sathyendra, S.; Iyadurai, R.; Mutreja, A. First Indian report on genome-wide comparison of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from blood stream infections. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0220428. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuga, B.; Sellera, F.P.; Cerdeira, L.; Esposito, F.; Cardoso, B.; Fontana, H.; Moura, Q.; Cardenas-Arias, A.; Sano, E.; Ribas, R.M.; et al. WHO Critical Priority Escherichia coli as One Health Challenge for a Post-Pandemic Scenario: Genomic Surveillance and Analysis of Current Trends in Brazil. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0125621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bojesen, A.M.; Ahmed, U.; Skaarup, H.; Espinosa-Gongora, C. Recurring outbreaks by the same Escherichia coli ST10 clone in a broiler unit during 18 months. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kudinha, T.; Kong, F. Possible step-up in prevalence for Escherichia coli ST131 from fecal to clinical isolates: Inferred virulence potential comparative studies within phylogenetic group B2. J. Biomed. Sci. 2022, 29, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Linkevicius, M.; Bonnin, R.A.; Alm, E.; Svartström, O.; Apfalter, P.; Hartl, R.; Hasman, H.; Roer, L.; Räisänen, K.; Dortet, L.; et al. Rapid cross-border emergence of NDM-5-producing Escherichia coli in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2012 to June 2022. Eurosurveillance 2023, 28, 2300209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 13 00964 g001
Figure 1. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of the Carb-R UPEC strains.
Figure 1. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of the Carb-R UPEC strains.
Pathogens 13 00964 g001
Pathogens 13 00964 g002
Figure 2. Bubble plots of the minimum inhibitory concentration distribution to various antimicrobial agents against Carb-R UPEC.
Figure 2. Bubble plots of the minimum inhibitory concentration distribution to various antimicrobial agents against Carb-R UPEC.
Pathogens 13 00964 g002
Table 1. Hospital-wise distribution of antimicrobial resistance, resistance genes, and virulence genes among CR-UPEC.
Table 1. Hospital-wise distribution of antimicrobial resistance, resistance genes, and virulence genes among CR-UPEC.
Resistance TraitsTotal Isolates
n = 118
n (%)		Hospital A
n = 59
n (%)		Hospital B
n = 33
n (%)		Hospital C
n = 26
n (%)		p-Value
Antimicrobial agents
Amoxicillin-clavulanate118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Piperacillin-tazobactam118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Cefotaxime118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Ceftriaxone118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Imipenem118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Meropenem118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Amikacin103 (87.3)51 (86.4)30 (90.9)22 (84.6)0.742
Gentamicin 107 (90.7)51 (86.4)30 (90.9)26 (100)0.14
Doxycycline114 (96.6)56 (94.9)33 (100)25 (96.2)0.429
Nalidixic acid118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Ciprofloxacin118 (100)59 (100)33 (100)26 (100)-
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim114 (96.6)59 (100)30 (90.9)25 (96.2)0.069
Nitrofurantoin15 (12.7)7 (11.9)3 (9.1)5 (19.2)0.491
Fosfomycin9 (7.6)--9 (34.6)<0.001
Colistin-----
Tigecycline-----
Resistance genes
blaSHV15 (12.7)7 (11.9)-8 (30.8)0.002
blaTEM47 (39.8)25 (42.4)12 (36.4)10 (38.5)0.842
blaCTXM-112 (10.2)8 (13.6)-4 (15.4)0.072
blaCTXM-1597 (82.2)44 (74.6)28 (84.8)25 (96.2)0.051
blaOXA-4814 (11.9)3 (5.1)-11 (42.3)<0.001
blaNDM-132 (27.1)13 (22.0)6 (18.2)13 (50)0.011
blaNDM-586 (72.9)46 (78)27 (81.8)13 (50)0.011
aac(6′)-Ib91 (77.1)45 (76.3)25 (75.8)21 (80.8)0.88
aph(3″)-Ib89 (75.4)43 (72.9)22 (66.7)24 (92.3)0.062
ant(2″)-Ia9 (7.6)--9 (34.6)<0.001
rmtB22 (18.6)12 (20.3)7 (21.2)3 (11.5)0.571
tetA45 (38.1)22 (37.3)7 (21.2)16 (61.5)0.007
tetB90 (76.3)42 (71.2)28 (84.8)20 (76.9)0.334
qnrB8 (6.8)5 (8.5)3 (9.1)-0.296
qnrS10 (8.5)9 (15.3)-1 (3.8)0.026
qepA62 (52.5)29 (49.2)18 (54.5)15 (57.7)0.74
sul1104 (88.1)58 (98.3)30 (90.9)16 (61.5)<0.001
sul225 (21.2)13 (22)3 (9.1)9 (34.6)0.057
Virulence genes
traT110 (93.2)54 (91.5)30 (90.9)26 (100)0.296
iutA105 (89)51 (86.4)28 (84.8)26 (100)0.123
irp281 (68.6)43 (72.9)25 (75.8)13 (50)0.065
hylA54 (45.8)25 (42.4)11 (33.3)18 (69.2)0.017
fyuA98 (83.1)51 (86.4)30 (90.9)17 (65.4)0.021
papC94 (79.7)51 (86.4)30 (90.9)13 (50)<0.001
papG80 (67.8)45 (76.3)27 (81.8)8 (30.8)<0.001
capU34 (28.8)13 (22)6 (18.2)15 (57.7)0.001
fimH114 (96.6)56 (94.9)33 (100)25 (96.2)0.429
kpsMTII93 (78.8)51 (86.4)30 (90.9)12 (46.2)<0.001
The p-values were calculated by comparing the occurrence of different traits among different hospitals.
Table 2. Distribution of resistance traits and virulence factors among various sequence types of CR-UPEC.
Table 2. Distribution of resistance traits and virulence factors among various sequence types of CR-UPEC.
Resistance Traits ST405
(n = 42)		ST167
(n = 25)		ST10
(n = 11)		ST101
(n = 9)		ST131
(n = 8)		ST940
(n = 6)		ST648
(n = 5)		ST410
(n = 4)		ST1702
(n = 4)		ST2851
(n = 4)		p-Value
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Piperacillin-tazobactam42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Cefotaxime42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Ceftriaxone42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Imipenem42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Meropenem42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Amikacin42 (100)25 (100)-9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)-4 (100)<0.001
Gentamicin 42 (100)25 (100)-9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
Doxycycline42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)-4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
Nalidixic acid42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Ciprofloxacin42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)-
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)2 (33.3)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
Nitrofurantoin--10 (90.9)5 (55.6)------<0.001
Fosfomycin---9 (100)------<0.001
Colistin-----------
Tigecycline-----------
Resistance genes
blaSHV--7 (63.6)8 (88.9)------<0.001
blaTEM6 (14.3)4 (16)11 (100.0)6 (66.7)5 (62.5)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)--<0.001
blaCTXM-1--8 (72.7)-----4 (100)-<0.001
blaCTXM-1542 (100)21 (84)3 (27.3)9 (100)8 (100)-2 (40)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
blaOXA-48-4 (16)1 (9.1)9 (100)------<0.001
blaNDM-1--11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)---4 (100)-<0.001
blaNDM-542 (100)25 (100)---6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)-4 (100)<0.001
aac(6′)-Ib42 (100)25 (100)-9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)---1 (25)<0.001
aph(3″)-Ib42 (100)25 (100)-9 (100)8 (100)---4 (100)1 (25)<0.001
ant(2″)-Ia---9 (100)------<0.001
rmtB10 (23.8)-----5 (100)4 (100)-3 (75)<0.001
tetA16 (38.1)14 (56)-9 (100)--2 (40)--4 (100)<0.001
tetB36 (85.7)11 (44)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)-4 (100)-<0.001
qnrB----8 (100)-----<0.001
qnrS-4 (16)---2 (33.3)-4 (100)--<0.001
qepA42 (100)11 (44)-9 (100)------<0.001
sul142 (100)25 (100)10 (90.9)-8 (100)2 (33.3)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
sul2--8 (72.7)9 (100)8 (100)-----<0.001
Virulence factors
traT42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)-6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
iutA42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)-6 (100)-4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
irp242 (100)25 (100)---6 (100)-4 (100)-4 (100)<0.001
shylA-25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)--5 (100)-4 (100)-<0.001
fyuA42 (100)25 (100)---6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
papC42 (100)25 (100)--8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)-4 (100)<0.001
papG42 (100)-11 (100)-8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)4 (100)-4 (100)<0.001
capU--11 (100)9 (100)-6 (100)-4 (100)4 (100)-<0.001
fimH42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)9 (100)8 (100)6 (100)5 (100)-4 (100)4 (100)<0.001
kpsMTII42 (100)25 (100)11 (100)--6 (100)5 (100)--4 (100)<0.001
The table correlates the different traits among sequence types. The p-values were calculated by comparing individual sequence types (STs) with each other. The percentage of STs was calculated with reference to the total number of STs, whereas the percentage of different traits was calculated with reference to the total number of isolates corresponding to each ST.
Table 3. Distribution of the sequence types with antimicrobial resistance genotypes and virulence genes.
Table 3. Distribution of the sequence types with antimicrobial resistance genotypes and virulence genes.
STsCo-Occurrence of Resistance Genes (n)Antimicrobial Resistant Phenotype (n)Co-Occurrence of Virulence Genes
ST405 (n = 42)blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetA, qepA, sul1 (06)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (42)traT, iutA, irp2, fyuA, papC, papG, fimH, kpsMTII
blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, rmtB, tetA, tetB, qepA, sul1 (10)
blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetB, qepA, sul1 (26)
ST167 (n = 25)blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetB, qepA, sul1 (11)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (25)traT, iutA, irp2, hylA, fyuA, papC, fimH, kpsMTII
blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetA, sul1 (06)
blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetA, sul1 (04)
blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetA, qnrS, sul1 (04)
ST10 (n = 11)blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1, blaNDM-1, tetB, sul1, sul2 (07)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, DO, NA, CIP, SXT, F (10)traT, iutA, hylA, papG, capU, fimH, kpsMTII
blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, tetB, sul1 (03)
blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, tetB, sul2 (01)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (01)
ST101 (n = 9)blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, ant(2″)-Ia, tetA, tetB, qepA, sul2 (05)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT, F, FOS (05)traT, iutA, hylA, capU, FimH
blaSHV, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, ant(2″)-Ia, tetA, tetB, qepA, sul2 (03)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT, FOS (04)
blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, ant(2″)-Ia, tetA, tetB, qepA, sul2 (01)
ST131 (n = 8)blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetB, qnrB, sul1 (05)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (08)fyuA, papC, papG, capU, FimH
blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetB, qnrB, sul1, sul2 (03)
ST940 (n = 6)blaTEM, aac(6′)-Ib, blaNDM-5, tetB (04)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP (06)traT, iutA, irp2, fyuA, papC, papG, fimH, kpsMTII
blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, tetB,qnrS, sul1 (02)
ST648 (n = 5)blaTEM, blaNDM-5, rmtB, tetB, sul1 (03)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (05)traT, hylA, fyuA, papC, papG, fimH, kpsMTII
blaTEM, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, rmtB tetA, tetB, sul1 (02)
ST410 (n = 4)blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, rmtB, sul1 (04)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, NA, CIP, SXT (04)traT, iutA, irp2, fyuA, papC, papG, capU
ST1702 (n = 4)blaCTX-M-1, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, aph(3″)-Ib, tetB, sul1 (04)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (04)traT, iutA, hylA, fyuA, capU, FimH
ST2851 (n = 4)blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, rmtB, tetA, sul1 (03)AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, IPM, MEM, AK, CN, DO, NA, CIP, SXT (04)traT, iutA, irp2, fyuA, papC, papG, fimH, kpsMTII
blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5, aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, tetA, sul1 (01)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mujahid, F.; Rasool, M.H.; Shafiq, M.; Aslam, B.; Khurshid, M. Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients. Pathogens 2024, 13, 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964

AMA Style

Mujahid F, Rasool MH, Shafiq M, Aslam B, Khurshid M. Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients. Pathogens. 2024; 13(11):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mujahid, Fatima, Muhammad Hidayat Rasool, Muhammad Shafiq, Bilal Aslam, and Mohsin Khurshid. 2024. "Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients" Pathogens 13, no. 11: 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964

APA Style

Mujahid, F., Rasool, M. H., Shafiq, M., Aslam, B., & Khurshid, M. (2024). Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients. Pathogens, 13(11), 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop