Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens

A special issue of Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817). This special issue belongs to the section "Bacterial Pathogens".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2025 | Viewed by 12498

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Pathogens, entitled "Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens", offers a comprehensive exploration of a pressing global healthcare concern. It is our aim that, within these pages, readers will be able to find a compendium of research articles, reviews, and expert insights dedicated to unraveling the multifaceted challenges posed by infections acquired within healthcare settings, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. This Issue will embark on a journey through the intricate landscape of hospital-acquired infections, shedding light on the epidemiology, transmission dynamics, and risk factors associated with these insidious ailments. Our aim is to provide an in-depth analysis of the alarming rise of MDR pathogens, dissect the genetic mechanisms underlying their resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents and the resulting implications for patient care and into the innovative strategies and cutting-edge technologies employed in the surveillance, prevention, and control of hospital-acquired infections.

Dr. Karolina Akinosoglou
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pathogens is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • MDR pathogens
  • hospital-acquired infection
  • antimicrobial resistance
  • antimicrobial stewardship
  • infection control

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

16 pages, 904 KiB  
Article
Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (ST405 and ST167) Strains Carrying blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-5 and Diverse Virulence Factors in Hospitalized Patients
by Fatima Mujahid, Muhammad Hidayat Rasool, Muhammad Shafiq, Bilal Aslam and Mohsin Khurshid
Pathogens 2024, 13(11), 964; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13110964 - 5 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1198
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common infectious diseases in hospital settings, and they are frequently caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). The emergence of carbapenem-resistant (Carb-R) E. coli strains poses a significant threat due to their multidrug resistance and virulence. This study [...] Read more.
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common infectious diseases in hospital settings, and they are frequently caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). The emergence of carbapenem-resistant (Carb-R) E. coli strains poses a significant threat due to their multidrug resistance and virulence. This study aims to characterize the antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of Carb-R UPEC strains isolated from hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 1100 urine samples were collected from patients in Lahore and Faisalabad, Pakistan, between May 2023 and April 2024. The samples were processed to isolate and identify E. coli using standard microbiological techniques and VITEK®2, followed by amplification of the uidA gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method and broth microdilution. Resistance and virulence genes were detected through PCR and DNA sequencing, and sequence typing was performed using MLST. Results: Among the 118 Carb-R UPEC isolates, resistance was most frequently observed against sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (96.6%) and doxycycline (96.6%). All of the isolates remained sensitive to colistin and tigecycline. Sequence types ST405 (35.6%) and ST167 (21.2%) were predominant and carried the blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-5 genes. The distribution of virulence genes and a variety of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides, were observed as specifically linked to certain sequence types. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Uropathogenic E. coli (Carb-R UPEC) strains and highlights the presence of globally high-risk E. coli clones exhibiting extensive drug resistance phenotypes in Pakistani hospitals. The findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and stringent antibiotic stewardship to manage the spread of these highly resistant and virulent strains within hospital settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4291 KiB  
Article
Genomic Insights into Vietnamese Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-9-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Belonging to the High-Risk Clone ST357 Obtained from Bulgarian Intensive Care Unit Patients
by Tanya Strateva, Alexander Stratev and Slavil Peykov
Pathogens 2024, 13(9), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090719 - 25 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1211
Abstract
Extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (XDR-PA) has been highlighted as a serious public health threat. The present study aimed to explore the genomic characteristics of two Vietnamese extended-spectrum β-lactamase-9 (VEB-9)-producing XDR-PA isolates from Bulgaria in comparison to all blaVEB-9-positive strains with available [...] Read more.
Extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (XDR-PA) has been highlighted as a serious public health threat. The present study aimed to explore the genomic characteristics of two Vietnamese extended-spectrum β-lactamase-9 (VEB-9)-producing XDR-PA isolates from Bulgaria in comparison to all blaVEB-9-positive strains with available genomes. The isolates designated Pae51 and Pae52 were obtained from tracheobronchial aspirates of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, RT-qPCR, and phylogenomic analysis were performed. Pae51 and Pae52 were resistant to most antipseudomonal β-lactams including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones but remained susceptible to colistin and cefiderocol. Numerous resistance determinants were detected: blaVEB-9, blaPDC-3, blaOXA-10, blaOXA-50, aac(6′)-II, ant(2″)-Ia, ant(3″)-IIa, aph(3′)-IIb, cprP, catB7, dfrB2, sul1, fosA, and tet(A). Both isolates carried complex integrons with blaVEB-9 and tet(A) embedded next to the conservative 3′ end sequences. A variety of virulence factors were also identified, including the type III secretion system exotoxin U. Pae51 and Pae52 differed by only four SNPs and belonged to the high-risk clone ST357. To our knowledge, this is the first report of blaVEB-9-positive XDR-PA isolates in Bulgaria presenting a detailed genomic analysis. The development of novel antimicrobial strategies for such pathogens should be an essential part of infection control stewardship practices in ICU wards. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1246 KiB  
Article
Patterns, Outcomes and Economic Burden of Primary vs. Secondary Bloodstream Infections: A Single Center, Cross-Sectional Study
by Ioannis Chandroulis, Georgios Schinas, Anne-Lise de Lastic, Eleni Polyzou, Stamatia Tsoupra, Christos Davoulos, Martha Kolosaka, Vasiliki Niarou, Spyridoula Theodoraki, Dimitrios Ziazias, Foteini Kosmopoulou, Christina-Panagiota Koutsouri, Charalambos Gogos and Karolina Akinosoglou
Pathogens 2024, 13(8), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13080677 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1132
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be primary or secondary, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) are defined as infections where no clear infection source is identified, while secondary BSIs originate from a localized infection site. This study aims to compare [...] Read more.
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) can be primary or secondary, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) are defined as infections where no clear infection source is identified, while secondary BSIs originate from a localized infection site. This study aims to compare patterns, outcomes, and medical costs between primary and secondary BSIs and identify associated factors. Conducted at the University Hospital of Patras, Greece, from May 2016 to May 2018, this single-center retrospective cohort study included 201 patients with confirmed BSIs based on positive blood cultures. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, hospitalization costs, and laboratory parameters were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Primary BSIs occurred in 22.89% (46 patients), while secondary BSIs occurred in 77.11% (155 patients). Primary BSI patients were younger and predominantly nosocomial, whereas secondary BSI was mostly community-acquired. Clinical severity scores (SOFA, APACHE II, SAPS, and qPitt) were significantly higher in primary compared to secondary BSI. The median hospital stay was longer for primary BSI (21 vs. 12 days, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, mortality rates were higher in primary BSI (43.24% vs. 26.09%). Total care costs were significantly higher for primary BSI (EUR 4388.3 vs. EUR 2530.25, p = 0.016), driven by longer hospital stays and increased antibiotic costs. This study underscores the distinct clinical and economic challenges of primary versus secondary BSI and emphasizes the need for prompt diagnosis and tailored antimicrobial therapy. Further research should focus on developing specific management guidelines for primary BSI and exploring interventions to reduce BSI burden across healthcare settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 788 KiB  
Article
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Outbreak in an ICU: Investigation of Possible Routes of Transmission and Implementation of Infection Control Measures
by Maria Luisa Cristina, Marina Sartini, Gianluca Ottria, Elisa Schinca, Giulia Adriano, Leonello Innocenti, Marco Lattuada, Stefania Tigano, David Usiglio and Filippo Del Puente
Pathogens 2024, 13(5), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13050369 - 29 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1792
Abstract
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a non-fermentative, ubiquitous, gram-negative aerobic bacterium, is associated with high mortality rates, particularly in immunocompromised or debilitated patients. The prevalence rate of ICU-acquired pneumonia episodes caused by this microorganism has been found to be 2%. S. maltophilia has been identified [...] Read more.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a non-fermentative, ubiquitous, gram-negative aerobic bacterium, is associated with high mortality rates, particularly in immunocompromised or debilitated patients. The prevalence rate of ICU-acquired pneumonia episodes caused by this microorganism has been found to be 2%. S. maltophilia has been identified as one of the top 10 microorganisms responsible for such infections in EU/EEA countries. This study describes an outbreak of S. maltophilia in an intensive care unit of a hospital in northern Italy. This includes an epidemiological investigation of the cases, the environmental microbiological controls carried out, a comparison of the strains by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and the measures taken to prevent and control the outbreak. Among the seven clinical isolates of S. maltophilia analyzed herein, six demonstrated susceptibilities to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Conversely, one isolate of S. maltophilia exhibited resistance to first-line antibiotics. ST was found to be identical for six patients (ST 4), as well as in the environmental feedback on the trolley of Box 2. The analysis of the temporal and spatial progression of the outbreak has suggested that the transmission of S. maltophilia may have occurred through cross-transmission during care practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

52 pages, 1947 KiB  
Review
Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens
by Nesrine Bouhrour, Peter H. Nibbering and Farida Bendali
Pathogens 2024, 13(5), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13050393 - 8 May 2024
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5630
Abstract
Medical devices such as venous catheters (VCs) and urinary catheters (UCs) are widely used in the hospital setting. However, the implantation of these devices is often accompanied by complications. About 60 to 70% of nosocomial infections (NIs) are linked to biofilms. The main [...] Read more.
Medical devices such as venous catheters (VCs) and urinary catheters (UCs) are widely used in the hospital setting. However, the implantation of these devices is often accompanied by complications. About 60 to 70% of nosocomial infections (NIs) are linked to biofilms. The main complication is the ability of microorganisms to adhere to surfaces and form biofilms which protect them and help them to persist in the host. Indeed, by crossing the skin barrier, the insertion of VC inevitably allows skin flora or accidental environmental contaminants to access the underlying tissues and cause fatal complications like bloodstream infections (BSIs). In fact, 80,000 central venous catheters—BSIs (CVC-BSIs)—mainly occur in intensive care units (ICUs) with a death rate of 12 to 25%. Similarly, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTIs) are the most commonlyhospital-acquired infections (HAIs) worldwide.These infections represent up to 40% of NIs.In this review, we present a summary of biofilm formation steps. We provide an overview of two main and important infections in clinical settings linked to medical devices, namely the catheter-asociated bloodstream infections (CA-BSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTIs), and highlight also the most multidrug resistant bacteria implicated in these infections. Furthermore, we draw attention toseveral useful prevention strategies, and advanced antimicrobial and antifouling approaches developed to reduce bacterial colonization on catheter surfaces and the incidence of the catheter-related infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

9 pages, 240 KiB  
Case Report
Treatment Options for Nosocomial Ventriculitis/Meningitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Marios Karvouniaris, Zoi Aidoni, Eleni Gkeka, Stella Niki Primikyri, Konstantinos Pagioulas and Elena Argiriadou
Pathogens 2025, 14(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010003 - 26 Dec 2024
Viewed by 648
Abstract
Ventriculo-meningitis or nosocomial meningitis/ventriculitis is a severe nosocomial infection that is associated with devastating neurological sequelae. The cerebrospinal fluid isolates associated with the infection can be Gram-positive or -negative, while the Enterococcus spp. is rarely identified. We report a case of a 68-year-old [...] Read more.
Ventriculo-meningitis or nosocomial meningitis/ventriculitis is a severe nosocomial infection that is associated with devastating neurological sequelae. The cerebrospinal fluid isolates associated with the infection can be Gram-positive or -negative, while the Enterococcus spp. is rarely identified. We report a case of a 68-year-old woman with a past medical history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. She was admitted to the intensive care unit following a scheduled sphenoid wing meningioma resection. Her course was complicated with left middle cerebral artery pseudoaneurysm and hemispheric hemorrhage, and an arterial stent and external ventricular drainage catheter were placed. Neurological evaluation showed a minimal conscious state. She presented high fever on the 35th intensive care unit day. Cerebrospinal fluid was sampled and the external ventricular catheter was removed. Enterococcus faecalis was isolated from the culture specimen. The patient received targeted treatment with an ampicillin plus ceftriaxone combination, and a follow-up culture confirmed the pathogen’s eradication. Although she was considered cured, she had a prolonged intensive care unit stay and finally died in the ward two months after the completion of treatment. This case highlights the first reported use of this combination in a severe, non-endocarditis, invasive enterococcal infection, while the review discusses treatment options for nosocomial ventriculitis/meningitis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
Back to TopTop