Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Submerged Culture Parameters of the Aphid Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium equiseti Based on Sporulation and Mycelial Biomass
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploration of the Nuclear Proteomes in the Ciliate Oxytricha trifallax
Previous Article in Journal
Are ELISA and PCR Discrepancies in the Identification of Chlamydia pneumoniae Caused by the Presence of “Chlamydia-Related Bacteria”?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ciliate Morpho-Taxonomy and Practical Considerations before Deploying Metabarcoding to Ciliate Community Diversity Surveys in Urban Receiving Waters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/microorganisms11010188
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Possible Third Step Preventing Conjugation between Different Species of Blepharisma

by
Ayu Sugino
1,
Mayumi Kobayashi
2,
Mayumi Sugiura
3,* and
Terue Harumoto
3,4,*
1
Biological Sciences Course, Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506, Japan
2
Division of Science, Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506, Japan
3
Research Group of Biological Sciences, Division of Natural Sciences, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506, Japan
4
Center for Diversity and Inclusion, Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010188
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ciliates as Model Organisms: From ‘omics’ to Genetics, Ecology and Signaling)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the genus Blepharisma, reproductive isolation between different species appears to be established at least by two barriers: (1) a mating pheromone, i.e., gamone 1, and (2) a factor involved in pair formation. Using four species, we experimentally investigated other potential barriers to interspecific conjugation in Blepharisma, as well as the first and second barriers. Cell-free fluid from type I cells (CFF1) of B. americanum had no effect on B. undulans, B. japonicum, or B. stoltei. Type II cells of B. americanum responded to CFF1 from B. americanum but not to CFF1 from B. undulans, B. japonicum, or B. stoltei. Gamone 1, therefore, seems to be the first reproductive barrier (with the inclusion of B. americanum species [megakaryotype 3]) as reported previously. In pretreated cells with complementary gamones in B. undulans and B. americanum, inter-species pair formation was rare, but pair formation between B. americanum and B. japonicum and between B. americanum and B. stoltei occurred at relatively high frequency. Most of the inter-species B. americanum–B. stoltei pairs underwent nuclear changes specific to conjugation. No significant difference was observed between the intra- and inter-species pairs over the time course of the nuclear changes, but the percentage of abnormal cells was higher in inter-species pairs than in intra-species pairs, and no progenies were produced by inter-species pairs. These results suggest a third barrier or step, in addition to the first and second ones, in nuclear changes after pair formation that prevents interspecific conjugation in Blepharisma.

1. Introduction

Conjugation is a mode of sexual reproduction in ciliates that usually occurs within the same species; interspecific conjugation is relatively uncommon among ciliates. However, interspecific mating has been observed between Euplotes octocarinatus and E. patella, Paramecium caudatum and P. tetraurelia, P. caudatum and P. multimicronucleatum, and P. tetraurelia and P. multimicronucleatum [1,2]. Inter-species conjugation rarely occurs in the genus Blepharisma, and at least two barriers that block conjugation between different Blepharisma megakaryotypes (Mks) have been suggested [3].
In Blepharisma species, conjugation is usually initiated by the interaction between complementary mating-type cells (I and II) via mating pheromones, i.e., the so-called ‘gamones’ in the same species. Under food-deprived conditions, mating type I cells secrete the mating pheromone gamone 1, and mating type II cells secrete the mating pheromone gamone 2. These pheromones stimulate each other, and the cells then form mating pairs; the conjugation process thus takes place [4]. Gamone 1 is a glycoprotein with N-linked oligosaccharides [5,6] encoded by gamone 1 gene [7]. Gamone 2 was identified as 3-(2′-formylamino-5′-hydroxybenzoyl) lactate [8]. Gamone 1 is species-specific as far as reported, and gamone 2 is common among Blepharisma species [9].
During the initiation of conjugation, gamones 1 and 2 induce at least four phenomena: (1) the promotion of the secretion of another gamone in complementary mating-type cells [5], (2) the attraction of complementary mating-type cells [10,11,12], and (3) the transformation of complementary mating-type cells, enabling the cells to acquire the competence of adhesion first at the cilia and then at the cell surface [13,14]. (4) the induction of mating-type specific gene expression [15]. After these phenomena, both homotypic pairs (consisting of the same mating-type cells) and heterotypic pairs (consisting of complementary mating-type cells) are formed. Only cells of heterotypic pairs undergo meiosis and exchange one of two gametic nuclei and then generate fertilized nuclei [16]. Meiosis does not occur in homotypic pairs, and the pairs eventually separate [15,17].
More than 20 morphological species have been reported in the genus Blepharisma, and they are classified into four megakaryotypes (Mks) on the basis of their macronuclear morphology [18]: megakaryotype I (Mk1), characterized by a compact macronucleus; megakaryotype II (Mk2), with a binodal macronucleus; megakaryotype III (Mk3), showing a multinodal macronucleus; and megakaryotype IV (Mk4), with a filiform macronucleus. Several morphological species are included in each Mk class. B. americanum and B. musculus are classified as Mk3; they secrete species-specific gamone 1 and have no effect on each other [9]. They are thus known as reproductively isolated species. In contrast, the Mk4-class species B. japonicum and B. stoltei have always been questioned [19]. These species secrete gamone 1, which is effective on both species and may produce viable progenies. B. japonicum and B. stoltei were now recognized as closely related species in light of their mutual effectiveness of gamone 1 and the amino acid sequence homology of gamone 1 [3].
It has been experimentally studied that the reproductive isolation between different species appears to be established by at least two barriers [3]. The first barrier concerns the mating pheromone, gamone 1, as described above. The second barrier appears to occur during the process of pair formation. When both type I and type II cells of two different species are present, gamone 1 is secreted from type I cells, with a specific effect on the type II cells of each species; the type II cells of both species are stimulated and secrete gamone 2, which universally affects type I cells of both species. Thus, all cells are stimulated and pair formation even between different species seems to be possible. However, this was not the case when B. undulans (Mk2) and B. japonicum (Mk4) were used [3]. Even when the cells were stimulated, an interspecific pairing rate <2% was observed. The second barrier to prevent interspecific conjugation thus appears to occur at the mating stage involving a possible factor for pair formation [3].
We conducted the present study to confirm previous study and further investigate potential barriers to inter-species conjugation in Blepharisma. We used newly obtained Mk3 stocks to determine whether artificially stimulated cells form inter-species pairs (B. undulans (Mk2) and B. americanum (Mk3), B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4), and B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4)). When such inter-species pair formation was successful, we also determined whether the further conjugation steps such as meiosis of micronuclei, the formation of pronuclei, and the fertilization and development of new macronuclear anlagen occur normally. We also sought to clarify whether such interspecific conjugation produces viable progenies. The possibility of additional barriers or steps preventing further conjugation between different Blepharisma species is discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture

The stocks used in this study are listed in Table 1. The newly obtained stocks were CCAP1607/1 and KR-III. Stock CCAP1607/1 was purchased from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP, Dunbeg, Scotland). Stock ATCC30299 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). All stocks have been cultivated and maintained in our laboratory. Cells were cultured at 25 °C in diluted fresh lettuce juice medium inoculated with Enterobacter aerogenes 2 days before use. When the cells reached the stationary phase, they were concentrated by mild centrifugation, washed with SMB (Synthetic Medium for Blepharisma: physiologically balanced solution, SMB III medium without EDTA) [4,7] and suspended in SMB at 1500–2000 cells/mL density.

2.2. Preparation of Cell-Free Fluid (CFF)

To obtain CFF containing gamone 1, we incubated moderately starved type I cells at 25 °C for 2 days. The cells were then removed from the suspension by mild centrifugation, and the remaining CFF was filtered through a nylon net (mesh size 1 × 1 µm) and then through a 0.20 μm DISMIC-25 cs filter. The prepared CFF was designated as CFF1.

2.3. Preparation of Synthetic Gamone 2 (Blepharismon) and Induction of Pairing

Synthetic gamone 2 was chemically synthesized 3-(2’-formylamino-5’-hydroxybenzoyl) lactate, which is naturally secreted by B. japonicum type II cells [20,21,22,23] and was kindly provided by Prof. Hideo Iio and Yoshinosuke Usuki of Osaka Metropolitan University, Japan. Synthetic gamone 2 was dissolved in SMB, filtered, and kept frozen. For the induction of pairing, frozen gamone 2 was thawed and mixed with the appropriate cell suspension. Synthetic gamone 2 (1.6 µg/mL) corresponds to the activity of approx. 500 U/mL in B. japonicum strain R1072 (I) and also affects other Mk species [3].

2.4. Induction of Mating Pairs between Different Species Pretreated by Gamones

As shown in Figure 1, type I cells were pretreated with synthetic gamone 2 (final concentration: 1.6 µg/mL), and type II cells were pretreated with CFF1 derived from the same species for 3–4 h. When pair formation occurred, the suspension of homotypic pairs was stirred by a micropipette, and the separated cells were mixed with the appropriate cell suspension. Pretreatment of the cells is an indispensable process for synchronizing nuclear changes and creating a timetable.

2.5. Judgement of Inter-Species Pair or Intra-Species Pair and Observation of Nuclear Changes during Conjugation

For the assessment of inter-species or intra-species pairs, when the index of pair formation [7] reached >3, pairs of cells were collected directly with a micropipette from the mixture or by mild centrifugation and then fixed and stained as described below. The species of approx. 1500 cells in the mixtures including >100 pairs were classified based on the cell size and macronuclear shape.
For the observation of nuclear changes during conjugation, cells (40–50 pairs) were taken from the aliquot periodically (0, 2, 6, 12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24, 28, and 30 h after mixing) fixed and stained as described below, and nuclear stages were determined.
The cells were fixed on a glass slide with a mixture of 100% ethanol and acetic acid in the ratio 18:1 or 6:1. After air-drying, the slide was incubated in 70% ethanol overnight to remove the red pigment from the cells. The glass slides were rinsed in distilled water, mounted with a drop of DAPI solution (2.0 μg/mL), and observed under a fluorescent microscope (BX50, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Establishment of Viable Progenies after Conjugation

Conjugating pairs were isolated in SMB, and if the pair was maintained 1 day later, it was designated as a heterotypic pair. Such heterotypic pairs were gradually separated after conjugation, and the exconjugants that survived were isolated in culture medium. If the exconjugants divided at least once, the cells were isolated again in new culture medium as a caryonide. If the caryonide divided and established a clone, and the immature period was observed, it was identified as a progeny.

3. Results

3.1. Species-Specific Gamone 1 in Three Mk Species

Table 2 shows the pair inducibility of cell-free fluid from type I cells (CFF1) of each species. CFF1 from B. undulans (Mk2) only induced pair formation in type II cells of B. undulans, and it had no effect on B. japonicum (Mk4) or B. stoltei (Mk4) as reported [3]. CFF1 from the closely related species B. japonicum and B. stoltei affected both B. japonicum and B. stoltei, but it had no effect on B. undulans, also confirming previous observations [3]. CFF1 from B. americanum (Mk3) did not induce pair formation in B. japonicum, as reported [9]. With the use of newly obtained B. americanum stocks, we observed that CFF1 from B. americanum affected only B. americanum (Mk3) and had no effect on B. undulans (Mk2), B. japonicum (Mk4), or B. stoltei (Mk4). Type II cells of B. americanum responded to only CFF1 from B. americanum and not to CFF1 from B. undulans, B. japonicum, or B. stoltei. Gamone 1 that is present in CFF1 from each species thus appears to be species-specific (or at least Mk-specific) in Mk2, Mk3 and Mk4 Blepharisma.

3.2. Competence of Pair Formation between Species

Even though gamone 1 is species-specific or Mk-specific, pair formation might occur between species in cases in which both mating-type cells are separately stimulated by their complementary gamones. For example, type I and type II cells of species A and type I and type II cells of species B co-exist and secrete their own gamones. Type I cells of species A secrete species A-specific gamone 1 and stimulate type II cells of species A, and type I cells of species B secrete species B-specific gamone 1 and stimulate type II cells of species B. Stimulated type II cells of both species secrete gamone 2 (which is common among species), stimulating type I cells of both species A and species B. All types of cells are then stimulated, and it is possible that three types of pairs can form: species A–species A, species B–species B, and species A–species B.
For the mating type, homotypic (type I–type I, type II–type II) and heterotypic (type I–type II) pairs are also possible in each combination of species listed above. Homotypic pairs gradually separate, and heterotypic pairs are maintained for > 24 h Our earlier study revealed that even if both mating-type cells of B. undulans (Mk2) and B. japonicum (Mk4) are stimulated, the percentage of pair formation between species is remarkably low at <2% of total pairs [3]. Interspecific pair formation appears to be rare between B. undulans (Mk2) and B. japonicum (Mk4). In the present study, we examined interspecific pair formation between B. undulans (Mk2) and B. americanum (Mk3), between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4), and between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4).

3.2.1. Pair Formation between B. undulans (Mk2) and B. americanum (Mk3)

Type I cells of B. americanum (Mk3) were stimulated by synthetic gamone 2, then mixed with B. undulans (Mk2) type I and type II cells which had also been stimulated by synthetic gamone 2 and CFF1 of B. undulans, respectively. The cells’ pretreatment was as described in the Materials and Methods and Figure 1. One hundred pairs were fixed, stained, and observed by fluorescent microscopy. Species were identified by the macronuclear shape. Sixty-eight pairs were B. undulans–B. undulans pairs (68.0%), 29 pairs were B. americanum–B. americanum (29.0%), and three pairs were B. undulans–B. americanum (3.0%) (Table 3). A similar experiment showed that B. undulans–B. americanum pair accounted for 5.5%. Pair formation between B. undulans and B. americanum was thus rare, as in the case between B. undulans and B. japonicum [3].

3.2.2. Pair Formation between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4), and between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4)

Type I cells of B. americanum (Mk3) were stimulated by synthetic gamone 2, then mixed with B. japonicum (Mk4) type I and type II cells which had also been stimulated by synthetic gamone 2 and CFF1 of B. japonicum, respectively. We observed 101 pairs: 29 pairs were B. americanum–B. americanum pairs (28.7%), 29 were B. japonicum–B. japonicum (28.7%), and 43 were B. americanum–B. japonicum (42.6%) (Table 3). The percentage of inter-species pair formation was relatively high between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4). We also investigated pair formation between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4): 112 pairs were fixed and stained, and 21 pairs were B. americanum–B. americanum (18.8%), 16 were B. stoltei–B. stoltei (14.3%), and 75 were B. americanum–B. stoltei (67.0%) (Table 3). The percentage of pair formation was thus also high between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4).
These results indicate that if cells are artificially stimulated, pair formation occurs at relatively high frequency between B. americanum and B. japonicum and between B. americanum and B. stoltei, but at low frequency between B. undulans and B. americanum.

3.3. Nuclear Changes in Inter-Species B. americanum–B. stoltei Pairs

In the mixture of B. americanum and B. stoltei described above, inter-species pairing occurred at a relatively high frequency. We examined whether nuclear changes occur in such inter-species pairs, and when such changes occurred, we sought to determine whether the time course for nuclear changes is the same as in intra-species pairs. The time course of B. japonicum pairs has been described [24] (Figure 2). In the present study, we compared the time courses of intra-species B. americanum pairs and B. stoltei pairs, and inter-species B. americanum–B. stoltei pairs.
Figure 3 illustrates the time courses for nuclear changes of micronuclei during conjugation in intra-species pairs (B. americanum–B. americanum) and (B. stoltei–B. stoltei) and in inter-species pairs (B. americanum–B. stoltei). Nuclear changes occurred even in the inter-species pairs (Figure 4). In all three combinations, the completion of meiosis took approx. 14 h (although the nuclear changes in B. americanum were not synchronized very well); division of the synkaryon took ~18 h, and the formation of macronuclear anlagen took ~24 h (Figure 3). Few differences were thus observed in the time course of nuclear changes between species or between intra- and inter-species. However, the abnormality of nuclear changes was more frequently observed in the inter-species pairs (Figure 5).
Figure 5 depicts the frequency of abnormal conjugation in intra-species (B. americanum–B. americanum) (Figure 5A) and inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) (Figure 5B) pairs. Samples were periodically taken from the aliquot 2–30 h after induction. The observed abnormal conjugations were (i) exconjugant with an abnormal number (none or >3) of macronuclear anlagen (Figure 5C); (ii) prematurely separated mating cells with meiotic micronuclei and without macronuclear anlagen (Figure 5D); and (iii) mating cells with an asynchronous progression of nuclear changes (e.g., one of the conjugants showed meiosis stage III, whereas the mate showed stage VIII) (Figure 5E). Such abnormal conjugation was observed more often in inter-species pairs than intra-species pairs (Figure 5).
Although abnormality of conjugation was observed more often in inter-species pairs, most of the pairs underwent nuclear changes such as meiosis, formation of synkaryon, and macronuclear anlagen. Exconjugants, i.e., cells that separated after conjugation, were observed in both intra- and inter-species pairs. The following experiment was conducted to determine whether the exconjugants divide and establish caryonidal clones. We speculated that if this were to occur, the progeny of inter-species conjugation might be produced.

3.4. Progeny after Conjugation

Intra- and inter-species pairs were isolated 2–3 h after mixing, and if the pair was maintained after 1 day, it was identified as a heterotypic pair. Such heterotypic pairs were indeed obtained: B. americanum–B. americanum pairs (n = 17) and B. americanum–B. stoltei pairs (n = 27) (Table 4). The pairs gradually separated after conjugation, and the number of surviving exconjugants was 32 (94%) in B. americanum–B. americanum and 51 (94%) in B. americanum–B. stoltei. Surviving exconjugants were isolated in culture medium and if the exconjugants divided at least once, the cells were isolated again in new culture medium as a caryonide. Twenty-five exconjugants of B. americanum–B. americanum (of 26 isolates) divided, whereas no exconjugants of B. americanum–B. stoltei (of 43 isolates) divided. Most of the exconjugants of B. americanum–B. americanum established caryonidal clones. The immature period was observed in these caryonidal clones, and these clones were identified as true progenies. These results demonstrate that B. americanum–B. americanum pairs produced viable progenies, but B. americanum–B. stoltei pairs produced no progenies at all.

4. Discussion

This study revealed that CFF1 from B. americanum (Mk3) had no effect on either B. undulans (Mk2), B. japonicum (Mk4) or B. stoltei (Mk4). Type II cells of B. americanum responded to only CFF1 from B. americanum and not to CFF1 from B. undulans (Mk2), B. japonicum (Mk4), or B. stoltei (Mk4). Gamone 1 (which is contained in CFF1 from each species) therefore appears to be species-specific (or at least Mk-specific). With the inclusion of an Mk3 species (B. americanum) to prevent inter-species conjugation, the mating pheromone gamone 1 seems to be the first barrier to conjugation, as we have shown earlier [3].
Pair formation is the second step for preventing inter-species conjugation, as we have shown with the use of B. undulans (Mk2) and B. japonicum (Mk4) [3]. The present study also confirmed this in B. undulans (Mk2) and B. americanum (Mk3). Only a few pairs were formed between these two pretreated species by complementary gamones, but we found in the present study that the pair formation occurred at a relatively high frequency between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4) and between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4). This study provides the first observation of inter-species Blepharisma pairs that underwent nuclear changes specific to conjugation. There were no significant differences in the time courses of the nuclear changes between the intra- and inter-species pairs, but the frequency of abnormal cells in the inter-species pairs was higher than that in the intra-species pairs. Moreover, no exconjugants divided and no progenies were obtained in the inter-species pairs. Taken together, these results indicate that even if inter-species pair formation is successful, there may be another step after pair formation that prevents inter-specific conjugation. The exact timing and the substantial factor responsible for the step remain unknown.
Euplotes octocarinatus forms mating pairs with E. patella when each species is pretreated with its own mating pheromones [1], but the interspecific conjugation of Euplotes was prevented during mostly premeiotic division and meiosis, and all conjugants failed to survive. These findings suggested that (i) the adhesion molecules are not species-specific, and (ii) some factors involved in pre-meiotic division and meiosis are species-specific.
The presumptive steps or barriers of conjugation in Blepharisma and Euplotes that may prevent interspecific conjugation in both genera are shown in Figure 6 which is a revised one from our previous report [3]. On the basis of our study, we propose the term “step” instead of “barrier” because the mechanisms to prevent inter-species conjugation may be present at certain stage between meiosis of micronuclei and development of macronuclear anlagen in Blepharisma, and “step” is more appropriate than “barrier”. Species-specificity of mating pheromones or gamones seems to be the first barrier or step in both genera; however, the second and third barriers or steps differ between Blepharisma and Euplotes in the conjugation process. Our earlier study suggested at least two barriers, i.e., gamone 1 and specific factors involved in cell adhesion of Blepharisma [3]. Our present findings suggest that another step may be present after meiosis (Figure 6). However, these three steps do not always work for all interspecific conjugation. Interspecific conjugation is inhibited in Step 2 and does not progress further between B. undulans (Mk2) and B. japonicum (Mk4) [3] or between B. undulans (Mk2) and B. americanum (Mk3) (Table 3). However, interspecific conjugation progressed beyond Step 2 between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. japonicum (Mk4) and between B. americanum (Mk3) and B. stoltei (Mk4) (Table 3), and was prevented at Step 3 (Table 4). The details of the differences in steps for inhibition are still unknown, but may be related to the genetic distance between MKs. There are plenty of phylogenetic trees for Blepharisma species using SSU rRNA have been reported [25,26,27,28]. However, as the sequence of SSU rRNA is so close from species to species in Blepharisma and is not suitable to reveal the relationship between species, other markers should be used for the analysis. Using a mitochondrial gene (cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene), our recent study suggests that species of Mk3 are closer to those of Mk4 (data are not shown). It seems likely that the interspecific conjugation between Mk3 and Mk4 progressed beyond step2. The stop at Step 3 may be due in part to the failure of the macronuclear anlagen to develop normally in the interspecific pairs. Regardless of the reason, reproductive isolation in Blepharisma appears to be established in at least three steps. Future work will elucidate the mechanism of reproductive isolation within the genus Blepharisma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and experimental design, M.S. and T.H. The material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by A.S. and M.K. Writing—original draft preparation, T.H. Writing—review and editing, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI, no. 22K06315 to M.S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hideo Iio and Yoshinosuke Usuki of Osaka Metropolitan University for providing synthetic gamone 2. We also appreciate the Organization for the Promotion of Gender Equality at Nara Women’s University in obtaining academic English editing services.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kuhlmann, H.W.; Sato, K. Interspecific mating reactions between Euplotes octocarinatus and Euplotes patella syngen 2. Eur. J. Protistol. 1993, 29, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Murakami, Y.; Haga, N. Interspecific pair formation induced by natural mating reaction in Paramecium. Zool. Sci. 1995, 12, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kobayashi, M.; Miura, M.; Takusagawa, M.; Sugiura, M.; Harumoto, T. Two possible barriers blocking conjugation between different megakaryotypes of Blepharisma. Zool. Sci. 2015, 32, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Miyake, A. Cell interaction by gamones in Blepharisma. In Sexual Interaction in Eukaryotic Microbes; O’Day, D.H., Horgan, P.A., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 95–129. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miyake, A.; Beyer, J. Cell interaction by means of soluble factors (gamones) in conjugation of Blepharisma intermedium. Exptl. Cell Res. 1973, 76, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Braun, V.; Miyake, A. Composition of blepharmone, a conjugation-inducing glycoprotein of the ciliate Blepharisma. FEBS Lett. 1975, 53, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sugiura, M.; Harumoto, T. Identification, characterization, and complete amino acid sequence of the conjugation-inducing glycoprotein (blepharmone) in the ciliate Blepharisma japonicum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 14446–14451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kubota, T.; Tokoroyama, T.; Tsukuda, Y.; Koyama, H.; Miyake, A. Isolation and structure determination of blepharismin, a conjugation initiating gamone in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science 1973, 179, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Miyake, A.; Bleyman, L.K. Gamones and mating types in the genus Blepharisma and their possible taxonomic application. Genet. Res. Camb. 1976, 27, 67–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Honda, H.; Miyake, A. Taxis to conjugation-inducing substance in the ciliate Blepharisma. Nature 1975, 257, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miyake, A.; Rivola, V. Chemoattraction by gamone in Blepharisma japonicum. J. Protozool. 1989, 36, 24A. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sugiura, M.; Shiotani, H.; Suzaki, T.; Harumoto, T. Behavioural changes induced by the conjugation-inducing pheromones, gamone 1 and 2, in the ciliate Blepharisma japonicum. Eur. J. Protistol. 2010, 46, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Honda, H.; Miyake, A. Cell-to-cell contact by locally differentiated surface in conjugation of Blepharisma. Dev. Biol. 1976, 52, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bedini, C.; Lanfranchi, A.; Nobili, R.; Miyake, A. Ultrastructure of meiosis-inducing (heterotypic) and non-inducing (homotypic) cell unions in conjugation of Blepharisma. J. Cell Sci. 1978, 32, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sugiura, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Suzaki, T.; Harumoto, H. Alternative gene expression in type I and type II cells may enable further nuclear changes during conjugation of Blepharisma japonicum. Protist 2012, 163, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miyake, A.; Heckmann, K.; Görtz, H.D. Meiosis in Blepharisma japonicum. Protistologia 1979, 15, 473–486. [Google Scholar]
  17. Miyake, A. Control factor of nuclear cycles in ciliate conjugation: Cell-to-cell transfer in multicellular complexes. Science 1975, 189, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hirshfield, H.I.; Isquith, I.R.; DiLorenzo, A.M. Classification, distribution, and evolution. In Blepharisma; Giese, C., Ed.; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1973; pp. 304–332. [Google Scholar]
  19. Inaba, F. Conjugation between two strains of Blepharisma. J. Protozool. 1965, 12, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tokoroyama, T.; Hori, S.; Kubota, T. Synthesis of blepharismone, a conjugation inducing gamone in ciliate Blepharisma. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 1973, 49, 461–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tokoroyama, T.; Kawasaki, Y.; Nakatani, M.; Shibata, K. Biogenetic type synthesis of blepharismone, a conjugation inducing gamone in ciliate Blepharisma. Heterocycles 1978, 10, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Entzeroth, M.; Jaenicke, L. Synthese von Blepharismon, dem wiedermolekularen Konjugationshormonvon Blepharisma japonicum. Z Nat. 1981, 36c, 180–182. [Google Scholar]
  23. Entzeroth, M.; Kunczik, T.; Jaenicke, L. Darstellung von 3-(3-Indolyl) milchsäuren.–Eine neue Synthese von rac-Blepharismon, dem nieder-molekularen Konjugations-gamon von Blepharisma japonicum. Liebigs. Ann. Chem. 1983, 2, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miyake, A.; Rivola, V.; Harumoto, T. Double paths of macronucleus differentiation at conjugation in Blepharisma japonicum. Eur. J. Protistol. 1991, 27, 178–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernandes, N.M.; Pedroso Dias, R.J.; Xavier Senra, M.V.; Gomes Soares, C.A.; Silva-Neto, I.D. Morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequence of Blepharisma sinuosum Sawaya, 1940 (Ciliophora: Heterotrichea) from Brazil. Eur. J. Protistol. 2013, 49, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pan, H.; Stoeck, T. Redescription of the halophile ciliate, Blepharisma halophilum Ruinen, 1938 (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea, Heterotrichida) shows that the genus Blepharisma is non-monophyletic. Eur. J. Protistol. 2017, 61, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, X.; Kim, J.H.; Ahmed Shazib, S.U.; Kwon, C.B.; Shin, M.K. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of three heterotrichid species (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea), including a new species of Anigsteinia. Eur. J. Protistol. 2017, 61, 278–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hao, T.; Li, B.; Song, Y.; Warren, A.; Pan, X. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of two new Blepharisma species (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea) from northeastern China. Eur. J. Protistol. 2022, 85, 125908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 00188 g001 550
Figure 1. Procedure for the induction of mating pairs between different species.
Figure 1. Procedure for the induction of mating pairs between different species.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g001
Microorganisms 11 00188 g002 550
Figure 2. Nuclear changes of micronuclei during conjugation in B. japonicum (modified from [24]). Mei (I): Meiosis I, Mei (II): Meiosis II.
Figure 2. Nuclear changes of micronuclei during conjugation in B. japonicum (modified from [24]). Mei (I): Meiosis I, Mei (II): Meiosis II.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g002
Microorganisms 11 00188 g003 550
Figure 3. Time course of nuclear changes during conjugation in intra-species (B. americanum–B. americanum and B. stoltei–B. stoltei) pairs and in inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) pairs. Colored boxes: nuclear stages most frequently observed at the indicated time. Dotted lines: stages observed slightly at the indicated time.
Figure 3. Time course of nuclear changes during conjugation in intra-species (B. americanum–B. americanum and B. stoltei–B. stoltei) pairs and in inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) pairs. Colored boxes: nuclear stages most frequently observed at the indicated time. Dotted lines: stages observed slightly at the indicated time.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g003
Microorganisms 11 00188 g004 550
Figure 4. Inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) conjugating pairs stained with DAPI as described in Materials and Methods. Ba: B. americanum (with multinodal macronucleus); Bs: B. stoltei (with filiform macronucleus); mei-MIC: meiotic micronuclei; MAC: macronucleus; div-Syn: division of synkaryon; Maa: macronuclear anlagen. Scale: 50 µm.
Figure 4. Inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) conjugating pairs stained with DAPI as described in Materials and Methods. Ba: B. americanum (with multinodal macronucleus); Bs: B. stoltei (with filiform macronucleus); mei-MIC: meiotic micronuclei; MAC: macronucleus; div-Syn: division of synkaryon; Maa: macronuclear anlagen. Scale: 50 µm.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g004
Microorganisms 11 00188 g005 550
Figure 5. Frequency of abnormal nuclear changes of micronuclei in intra-species (B. americanum–B. americanum) and inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) pairs. % of abnormal nuclear changes in the intra-species (A) and in the inter-species (B). An exconjugant with an abnormal number of anlagen (C), prematurely separated mating cell (D), and mating cells with an asynchronous progression of nuclear changes (E). Maa: macronuclear anlagen; mei-MIC: meiotic micronuclei; MAC: macronucleus; Ba (st VIII): B. americanum (stage VIII, metaphase of Meiosis I); Bs (st III): B. stoltei (stage III, early prophase of Meiosis I). Scale: 50 µm.
Figure 5. Frequency of abnormal nuclear changes of micronuclei in intra-species (B. americanum–B. americanum) and inter-species (B. americanum–B. stoltei) pairs. % of abnormal nuclear changes in the intra-species (A) and in the inter-species (B). An exconjugant with an abnormal number of anlagen (C), prematurely separated mating cell (D), and mating cells with an asynchronous progression of nuclear changes (E). Maa: macronuclear anlagen; mei-MIC: meiotic micronuclei; MAC: macronucleus; Ba (st VIII): B. americanum (stage VIII, metaphase of Meiosis I); Bs (st III): B. stoltei (stage III, early prophase of Meiosis I). Scale: 50 µm.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g005
Microorganisms 11 00188 g006 550
Figure 6. Presumptive steps or barriers that prevent interspecific conjugation in Blepharisma and Euplotes. This figure has been modified after [3], by the addition of a third step in Blepharisma.
Figure 6. Presumptive steps or barriers that prevent interspecific conjugation in Blepharisma and Euplotes. This figure has been modified after [3], by the addition of a third step in Blepharisma.
Microorganisms 11 00188 g006
Table
Table 1. Stocks used in this study.
Table 1. Stocks used in this study.
MkSpeciesMating TypeStrainLong
Diameter 		Short
Diameter 		Collection Site
2B. undulansIEN-II13760Ibaraki, Japan
ISDT2-II13048Minamidaito Island, Japan
IISDT1-II11122Minamidaito Island, Japan
3B. americanumICCAP1607/1233105USA
IIKR-III14844Gyeongju, South Korea
4B. japonicumIR1072340164Bangalore, India
IIYC-IV232104Iwakuni, Japan
B. stolteiIATCC3029921186Lake Federsee, Germany
IIHT-IV19975Aichi, Japan
Mk: megakaryotype [18]. Dimensions of cells (long and short diameters) are shown in average (µm).
Table
Table 2. Species-specific (or at least Mk-specific) pair inducibility of CFF1 from Blepharisma.
Table 2. Species-specific (or at least Mk-specific) pair inducibility of CFF1 from Blepharisma.
Type II Cells
Mk2Mk3Mk4
SpeciesB. undulansB. americanumB. japonicumB. stoltei
CFF1 of type I cellsMk2B. undulans+−−−
Mk3B. americanum−+−−
Mk4B. japonicum−−++
B. stoltei−−++
Stocks of mating type I cells: SDT2-II (B. undulans), CCAP1607/1 (B. americanum), R1072 (B. japonicum), and ATCC30299 (B. stoltei). Stocks of mating type II cells: SDT1-II (B. undulans), KR-III (B. americanum), YC-IV (B. japonicum), and HT-IV (B. stoltei). Cell-free fluid from type I cells (CFF1) was mixed with moderately starved type II cells. Pair formation was observed (+) or not observed (−). Bold letters indicate the results newly obtained in this study.
Table
Table 3. Pairing capacity between species in complementary gamone-pretreated cells 1.
Table 3. Pairing capacity between species in complementary gamone-pretreated cells 1.
Species Mix Species Mix
Mk3B. americanum (I)Mk3B. americanum (I)
Mk2B. undulans (I)
B. undulans (II)		Mk4B. japonicum (I)
B. japonicum (II)		B. stoltei (I)
B. stoltei (II)
% inter-species pairing3.0%, 5.5%% inter-species pairing42.6%67.0%
1 More than 100 pairs were examined and counted for the percentage of inter-species pairing. Stocks used: CCAP1607/1 (B. americanum (I)), EN-II (B. undulans (I)), SDT1-II (B. undulans (II)), R1072 (B. japonicum (I)), YC-IV (B. japonicum (II)), ATCC30299 (B. stoltei (I)), HT-IV (B. stoltei (II)).
Table
Table 4. Exconjugants that survived after intra- and inter-species conjugation.
Table 4. Exconjugants that survived after intra- and inter-species conjugation.
B. americanum–B. americanumB. americanum–B. stoltei
No. of heterotypic pairs isolated1727
No. of exconjugants survived32/34 (94%)51/54 (94%)
No. of exconjugants divided25/26 (96%)0/43 (0%)
Stocks used: intra-species cross, B. americanum CCAP1607/4 (mating type I) and KR-III (mating type II), inter-species cross, B. americanum CCAP1607/4 (mating type I) and B. stoltei HT-IV (mating type II).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sugino, A.; Kobayashi, M.; Sugiura, M.; Harumoto, T. Possible Third Step Preventing Conjugation between Different Species of Blepharisma. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010188

AMA Style

Sugino A, Kobayashi M, Sugiura M, Harumoto T. Possible Third Step Preventing Conjugation between Different Species of Blepharisma. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sugino, Ayu, Mayumi Kobayashi, Mayumi Sugiura, and Terue Harumoto. 2023. "Possible Third Step Preventing Conjugation between Different Species of Blepharisma" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010188

APA Style

Sugino, A., Kobayashi, M., Sugiura, M., & Harumoto, T. (2023). Possible Third Step Preventing Conjugation between Different Species of Blepharisma. Microorganisms, 11(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop