Next Article in Journal
Fungicidal Activity of Silver and Silica Nanoparticles against Aspergillus sydowii Isolated from the Soil in Western Saudi Arabia
Next Article in Special Issue
Uptake of Levilactobacillus brevis JCM 1059 by THP-1 Cells via Interaction between SlpB and CAP-1 Promotes Cytokine Production
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Antimicrobial Effect of Various Single-Strain and Multi-Strain Probiotics, Dietary Supplements or Other Beneficial Microbes against Common Clinical Wound Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Trends and Applications of Nanoencapsulated Bacteriocins against Microbes in Food Quality and Safety

by
Bakhtawar Shafique
1,†,
Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha
1,†,
Mian Anjum Murtaza
1,
Noman Walayat
2,
Asad Nawaz
3,4,
Waseem Khalid
5,
Shahid Mahmood
1,
Muhammad Nadeem
1,
Muhammad Faisal Manzoor
6,
Kashif Ameer
1,*,
Rana Muhammad Aadil
7,* and
Salam A. Ibrahim
8,*
1
Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
2
College of Food Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
3
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
4
Institute for Innovative Development of Food Industry, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
5
Department of Food Science, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
6
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528011, China
7
National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
8
Food Microbiology and Biotechnology Laboratory, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085
Submission received: 27 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 28 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probiotics and Antimicrobial Effect)

Abstract

:
Bacteriocins are ribosomal-synthesized peptides or proteins produced by bacterial strains and can inhibit pathogenic bacteria. Numerous factors influence the potential activity of bacteriocins in food matrices. For example, food additives usage, chemical composition, physical conditions of food, and sensitivity of proteolytic enzymes can constrain the application of bacteriocins as beneficial food preservatives. However, novel bacteriocin nanoencapsulation has appeared as an encouraging solution. In this review, we highlight the bacteriocins produced by Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria including lactic acid bacteria that have shown positive results as potential food preservatives. In addition, this review encompasses the major focus on bacteriocins encapsulation with nanotechnology to enhance the antimicrobial action of bacteriocins. Several strategies can be employed to encapsulate bacteriocins; however, the nanotechnological approach is one of the most effective strategies for avoiding limitations. Nanoparticles such as liposomes, chitosan, protein, and polysaccharides have been discussed to show their importance in the nanoencapsulation method. The nanoparticles are combined with bacteriocins to develop the nano-encapsulated bacteriocins from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria including LAB. In food systems, nanoencapsulation enhances the stability and antimicrobial functionality of active peptides. This nanotechnological application provides a formulation of a broad range of antimicrobial peptides at the industry-scale level. Nano-formulated bacteriocins have been discussed along with examples to show a broader antimicrobial spectrum, increase bacteriocins’ applicability, extend antimicrobial spectrum and enhance stability.

1. Introduction

Synthetic products based on chemicals are typically used to avoid spoilage and enhance the shelf life of foods. However, these chemicals have numerous adverse impacts on the health of humans. Compared with synthetic chemicals, naturally derived compounds are preferable and are applied by biopreservation [1,2]. Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides, therefore ribosomes are used to synthesize them. The main criterion for the classification of bacteriocins is their origin. Depending on whether they are produced by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria, classes and subclasses of bacteriocins can be distinguished as shown in Figure 1. Lactic acid bacteria are utilized to produce bacteriocins that have the potential to retard the growth of pathogenic microorganisms [3]. Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria have been recognized as efficient at helping to maintain food safety and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [4,5]. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria and their phylogenetically associated strains have a much broader antimicrobial activity spectrum [6].
Lactic acid bacteriocins are utilized in both the medical field and the food sector. Concerning food applications, they have been successfully applied as co-cultures or starters in experiments in the pilot study [7]. In the last decade, significant research has shown the effectiveness of bacteriocins in several branches of the food industry [8]. For example, one particular bacteriocin, nisin, is successfully used to improve the quality and storage period of milk and milk products [9,10]. Another study demonstrated that lactic acid bacteria and paracin with broad antimicrobial spectrum were successfully used to protect apple juice before bacterial contamination [11]. Enterocins are the broad-spectrum cyclic peptides against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, can be applied in milk products as well. Other products such as beef or fresh fish can also be protected with bacteriocins [12,13,14].
Metabolic products, bactericidal proteins, and antibiotic substances are produced by lactic acid bacteria. Lactic acid bacteria have the potential to inhibit numerous microorganisms in the food environment and exhibit vital antimicrobial characteristics related to food safety and preservation. In addition, strains of lactic acid bacteria provide health-enhancing capabilities regarding their potential in the medical sector. For instance, gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Helicobacter pylori are mitigated by bacteriocins [15].
The functionality of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria is determined by many factors such as storage conditions, food matrix interaction, processing, pressure, temperature, and enzyme availability [16]. Effective nanoparticles are applied through nanoencapsulation to safeguard bacteriocins from degradation and deterioration. Nanoencapsulation is applied to bio-preservative bacteriocins to prevent enzyme degradation and to improve food product shelf life [17]. Nanoconjugates such as pediocin and nisin act as bacteriocins, and their applications provide unique packaging in food systems [18].
Gram-negative bacteriocins are used as proteins that efficiently play multi functions behavior to target pathogenic bacteria and bacterial species. Gram-positive bacteriocins are associated with advantageous properties such as the ability to deteriorate internal membranes and inhibit the growth of pathogenic microbes. Bacteriocins, either produced by Gram-negative or positive bacteria, always have the target of inhibiting the growth of other microorganisms in competition with the same environment. Hundreds of bacteriocins species have been discovered. The classification of bacteriocins is based on the sequence of amino acids, identified action mechanisms, and structure [19]. Starter cultures are used to produce bacteriocins, and exhibit potential applications in the dairy industry to protect fermented foods from the transmission of food pathogens [20]. Gram-positive bacteriocins are nano-encapsulated for application as bio-preservatives. Bacteriocin AS48 actively prevents pathogenic microbes such as L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, and B. cereus when used to prepare gelatin puddings, soy desserts, and baking cream. L. monocytogenes strains exist extensively in nature and are present in ready-to-eat meat. It has been recognized that Gram-positive bacteriocins inhibit or reduce the growth of L. monocytogenes during the processing of meat products [21].
Nanoencapsulation prevents proteolytic enzyme degradation and unwanted interactions with food components by enhancing food stability. Recently, several studies have revealed that bacteriocins encapsulation by nanoparticles improved the activity of peptides against multidrug-resistant bacteria and food spoilage microorganisms [22]. Anti-biofilms are manufactured by nanoencapsulation and have been regarded as a substantial mode for antimicrobial activity. Natural and synthetic nanoparticles are used in combination with bacteriocins to show improved efficacy in retarding the formation of biofilm and to assist in reducing antibiotic resistance [23]. Nanoparticles thus provide a wide range of characteristics to antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocins with better functionality. These characteristics are physiological solution stability, a broad antibacterial spectrum, non-toxic nature, and ease of synthesis with less production cost and concentration [23].
Liposomes, silver nanoparticles, niosomes, nanovesicles, chitosan, solid lipid nanoparticles, phosphatidylcholine liposomes, and nanoliposomes are combined with Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteriocins to develop nano-encapsulated bacteriocins for food systems. Nanoencapsulation promotes the antimicrobial action of bacteriocins to kill harmful bacteria, inhibits the interaction of pathogens directly with food substances, and ultimately extends the shelf life of food [24]. Nanoencapsulation is performed by several methods including nano-emulsification, nanoliposomes, electrospray, and formation of nanostructure with nanocrystals, nanostructure lipid carriers, and solid lipid nanoparticles [25].
This review addresses the importance of nanoencapsulation and highlights the bacteriocins of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their potential application in various food industry systems. In addition, we review significant literature studies on the formulation of nano-encapsulated bacteriocins and the action mechanism of nano-encapsulated bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria.

2. General Action Mechanism of Bacteriocins

Bacteriocins have been categorized into diverse classes, including Class I: lantibiotics that are stable in heat; Class II: non-lantibiotics (unmodified postranslationally); Subclass IIa: anti-Listeria-like and pediocin bacteriocins, Subclass IIb: two-peptide bacteriocins classified further into Subclass IIc: sec-dependent bacteriocins; Class III: non-lantibiotics that are labile to heat [26]. More bacteriocins have been separated and classified from lactic acid bacteria. Numerous bacteriocins have developed a position as effective antimicrobial agents due to their efficiency as food preservatives and provision of antagonistic impact to retard significant pathogens. The notable ones are nisin, pediocin, bulgarican, diplococcin, lactacins, acidophilin, plantaricins and helveticins [27].
The action mechanism of bacteriocins is focused on two diverse activity aspects, the physical interaction kinetics between susceptible cells and bacteriocin and certain biochemical lesions detection in target cells [28]. A wide variety of chemical structures permits bacteriocins to exhibit their impact on several important living cell functions (translation, transcription, biosynthesis of the cell wall, and replication, although most action is through the forming pores or membrane channels that disturb the potential energy [29]. It has been extensively postulated that the bacteriocin interacts with the target cell in two ways. The first way, which is perhaps reversible, resembles the bacteriocin’s physical adsorption using receptors in the cell. At this stage, bacteriocins are emerged to remove the cell intact; meanwhile, no perpetual physiological damage could be done. The second way causes irreversible pathological alternations because of certain biochemical cell damage [30].
In nature, microorganisms contribute to various mechanisms for establishing protection and interaction. These mechanisms are linked with the bacteriocins peptides production with prolonged antimicrobial activity. Gram-negative bacteriocin protein establishes an effective approach to prevent multi-drug-resistant bacteria through the folding of proteins into bacteria and by the production of certain species of antibiotics [31]. Protein bacteriocins capture pathways of nutrient uptake to cause cell death and translocation of the cell envelope. Their importation is strengthened by the parasitizing of intermembrane complexes of protein joined to the motive proton force, which causes the delivery of a toxic domain within the cell. A plethora of biophysical, genetic, biochemical, and structural procedures have taken place to uncover the components of the cell envelope involved in the import of bacteriocin [32].
Colicins are antibacterial proteins that are produced by some intestinal strains of bacteria, primarily situated in chromosomally encoded plasmids. These huge proteins contain three domains such as the amino-terminal domain that facilitates the transport of the target cell’s outer membrane, a receptor-binding domain that facilitates the transport within the periplasm, and a cytotoxic carboxy-terminal domain that shows the inhibitory impacts [33]. Three major action mechanisms for colicins have been described. These three mechanisms are the nuclease activity (e.g., target cell RNA/DNA), the formation of the pores that damage the integrity of the membrane, and murein synthesis inhibition [34]. E. coli is mainly responsible for the production of colicins which are bactericidal proteins that protect a colicinogenic plasmid. An immunity protein (imX or cxi), lysis proteins encoded gene and structural gene (cxa) are present in colicinogenic plasmids [32].
Colicin production regulation is facilitated by the response of SOS, which emerges to play a significant role in the host bacterial cell response to DNA damage. Three different action modes are provided by colicins: (1) the channels formation depends on voltage in the Gram-negative bacterial inner membrane, (2) the action of nuclease into the cytoplasm cells and (3) peptidoglycan degradation [32]. Genetic machinery available on chromosomes or plasmids is used to encode microcins. Microcins are categorized on the basis of three criteria: (1) the nature, localization, and presence of posttranslational modifications; (2) the organization of gene clusters; and (3) leader peptide sequences [35].
Bacteriocins display action by joining with the conforming receptor on the sensitive bacteria surface to retard bacterial growth. Bactericidal action mechanisms involve the peptidoglycanase type, RNase, and DNase function of the nuclease type and pore-developing type. Subtilisin A has an unmodified bacteriocin peptide structure and a low molecular weight. Colicin Ia and bacteriocin AS-48 have modified bacteriocin protein and peptide structures and low molecular weight as well. The strain is grown on the soft agar of sensitive bacteria LB to produce bacteriocin, and production zone occurs around the strains that produce bacteriocin. However, strains that do not produce bacteriocin have no inhibition zone [36]. The general bacteriocin mechanisms involve bacterial growth reduction comprising bacteriocin binding, bacteriocin translocation, enzyme activity modulation, and pore formation of the cytoplasmic membrane [37]. The general method of bacteriocins synthesis, anti-bacterial activity, and action mechanism of bacteriocins is shown in Figure 2.

3. Formulation of Nano-Encapsulated Bacteriocins

Nanoencapsulation is well defined as a novel technology to package constituents in minute assembly, with the usage of methods such as nano emulsification, nano structuration, and nanocomposite. It carries the final functionality of the product (containing limited core release) to maintain product quality expectations during storage [38]. Modification of nanomaterials can occur in the form of nanospheres, nanorods, nanoparticles, and nano frames and play their role in applications specifically with the means of biomedicine, electronic, solar energy conversion, environmental applications, water treatment, and some catalysis processes [39]. The principle of encapsulation includes core material or solid matrix usage to isolate bacterial cells, bioactive components, and other concerned agents from the environment. Nanoencapsulates are usually semi-permeable and spherical networks ranging in size from 10−9 m to 10−6 m [40,41].

3.1. Chitosan-Encapsulated Nisin

Nisin acts as a bacteriocin, also known as a food additive (E234) obtained from Lactococcus lactis, and exhibits antimicrobial properties and potential applications in food. Nisin imparts strong sporostatic and bactericidal actions to retard Gram-positive bacterial growth. Perhaps the bactericidal activity shown by nisin to inhibit Gram-negative bacterial growth is restricted due to nisin’s inaccessibility to the plasma membrane [42]. A liposome is applied as a shell material by encapsulation but faces numerous disadvantages, comprising increased oxidative degradation susceptibility, increased phospholipids cost, and joined liposomes sedimentation during storage [43]. Nonionic surfactant niosomes or vesicles are better substances for shell material by encapsulation in the food area due to their low surfactant material cost compared to the more expensive liposome materials. Numerous nonionic surfactant classes such as glucosyl dialkyl ethers, polyglycerol alkyl ethers, polyoxyethylene alkyl esters, and ether and crown ether are added in niosomes preparation [44].
Nano-encapsulated nisin imparts significant actions to suppress the growth of S. aureus in raw milk for 24 h and pasteurized samples for 48 h as compared to free nisin, whose action cannot exceed the storage life of milk and remains 14 and 24 h, respectively [45]. Chitosan is a biodegradable, nontoxic copolymer that contains units of N-acetyle-D-glucosamine and D-glucosamine from the deacetylation of chitin in hot alkali availability. Chitosan is a nontoxic, biocompatible polymer that has the cohesive capability to act as an antimicrobial peptide and is developed as a nanoparticle-based vehicle. Chitosan also shows antimicrobial activity to retard numerous pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, yeasts, and molds. The antimicrobial effect shown by chitosan is based on microorganism type, pH value, deacetylation degree, and molecular weight. Chitosan-encapsulated nisin is utilized to retard microbial growth and thus increase the shelf-life of food products [46,47,48].

3.2. Liposome-Encapsulated Pediocin

Nano-delivery systems containing carbohydrates, lipids, protein surfactants, and polymers have been modified to enhance and stabilize the biological activity of bacteriocins. For example, liposomes are comprised of spherical structures with phospholipids encompassing an aqueous medium through single or multiple bilayer membranes, and their size ranges from 10−9 to 10−6 nm. Liposomes are biodegradable and nontoxic agents appropriate for encapsulating both hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances [49]. The encapsulation of bacteriocins has been a significant development in utilizing natural antimicrobials in the area of food science. The activity of bacteriocins is influenced by various factors such as solubility changes, bacteriocins’ charge, inactivation through proteases, and bacteriocins binding to food components. A liposome is potentially used to encapsulate pediocin to sustain its antimicrobial activity for a long duration. Silver nanoparticles have antimicrobial efficiency, which can be achieved and increased by encapsulation with antimicrobial agents, namely bacteriocins. Nanotechnology is a novel, fabricated, and a new platform to develop nano-structured substances possessing antimicrobial activities [50].
Pediococcus acidilactici ITV26 is potentially utilized to produce pediocin bacteriocin which is a bioconservative and exhibits antilisterial activity. Inactivation of pediocin may occur when available in foods in free form. The binding/interaction of proteolytic enzymes with a few food substances is an antimicrobial activity-affected factor. Therefore, encapsulation must be applied to protect these peptides and limit their release into liposomes. Researchers must express interest in Class II of bacteriocin, namely pediocin, because of its thermostability and strong action to prevent Listeria monocytogenes [51]. Liposomes contain more than one phospholipid bilayer and are known as spherical vesicles. Liposomes also possess active peptides and are recognized as bacteriocins by enclosing peptides between phospholipids bilayers and into the aqueous center due to their amphiphilic nature. Liposomal vesicles contain molecules of amphiphilic nature, and their structure can be described as molecules with a non-polar tail, a polar head, a concentric series, and two hydrophobic chains that are found on each molecule [52]. Class IIa bacteriocin contains pediocin in the gelatinous form to reduce Listeria infection from the consumption of hot dogs. Additionally, phosphatidylcholine nanovesicles are loaded with pediocin AcH possessing high antimicrobial activity, high efficiency for entrapment (80%), and high stability [53].
Nanoliposomes have diverse compositions and structures and are regarded as versatile tools for encapsulation technologies. Liposomes consist of spherical, closed structures and are made up of curved lipid bilayers. These lipid bilayers enclose the surrounding solvent in their interior part. Major liposomal substances are phospholipids containing amphiphilic molecules with a water-soluble section consisting of a hydrophilic head and a lipid-soluble section consisting of a hydrophobic tail which forms the composition of liposomes [54]. This phospholipid property provides distinctive benefits to liposomes, such as enclosing themselves in aqueous media and establishing a perfect carrier system. Liposomes provide applications in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and most importantly, food. Liposomes are extensively utilized as carrier systems based on lipids in the food area, predominantly antimicrobial formulations by liposomes. Phosphatidylcholine, lecithin, nanoliposomes; guar gum, and alginate capsules; plus guar gum and alginate hybrid capsules are combined with nanoliposomes to form nano liposomal encapsulated pediocin [55].

3.3. Solid Lipid Nano-Encapsulated Colicin

Colicins are sensitive to heat and protease enzymes with more molecular weight (30–80 kDa). They are known as bactericidal proteins produced by the strains of E. coli and have one colicinogenic plasmid. Colicins compounds are primarily used and studied as model systems to study the bacteriocin evolution functions and structures [56]. Synthesis of colicin is lethal for the production of cells because of lysis protein co-expression. Colicins are categorized into three major groups: degrading peptidoglycan, pore-forming, and nuclease based on the interaction mechanism with the target cell. The accomplishment of uptake of colicin due to the target cell is conducted by involved receptors in nutrients transport such as Fiu-bound iron, Tsx receptor nucleosides, cobalamin receptor BtuB vitamin B12, siderophore FepA-, FhuA-, and Cir- [57]. Colicins, lantibiocins, and enterocins are broad-spectrum bacteriocins that affect the larger bacterial genera group. Moreover, porin proteins are used by colicins to limit the passive diffusion of amino acids, phosphates, and sugars with the aid of the outer membrane [58].
Gram-negative bacteria have the potential to manufacture an extensive bacteriocins variety that is named specifically after the Klebsiella pneumoniae klebicins genus or species-producing bacteriocins such as Serratia marcescens-producing marcescins, E. coli-producing colicins, Hafnia alvei-producing alveicins, and Enterobacter cloacae-producing cloacins. Pseudomonads are generally associated with the production of pyocins [59]. Gram-negative bacteria mainly produce bacteriocins from Enterobacteriaceae. They are categorized into two major families such as colicins having more molecular mass (30–80 kDa) and microcins having less molecular mass (between 1 and 10 kDa) peptides [60]. SOS response regulon causes the mitigation in colicins production and emerges to play a key role in bacteria to DNA damage response. Microcins are hydrophobic peptides with increased stability and maximum stress production, mainly depletion of nutrients. Microcins and colicins are significantly available in Escherichia coli. However, many species of Gram-negative bacteria produce bacteriocin-like constituents [32]. Major bacteriocins of Gram-ve bacteria are colicins [33], pyocins [61] and microcins [62].
Colicin is a representative Gram-negative bacteriocin mainly produced by Escherichia coli. It is a protein with maximum molecular weight and it is used to reduce several Gram-negative bacteria. Mice-treated streptomycin is survived by E. coli rather than the non-colicin. The competitive benefit is gained, which permits the existence of the strain produced by bacteriocin. Multi-strain and even in multispecies, probiotics are superior and endorsed to produce bacteriocin [63,64]. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) compose a suitable solid triglyceride core for the slow formulation of drug release. Colicins and nisin can be protected by SLN against degradation, increasing the anti-bacterial activity for the duration. Rather than free colicin and nisin, SLN enclosing colicin and nisin exhibited a great ability to retard L. plantarum TISTR 850 for up to 15 days and L. monocytogenes DMST 2871 for 20 days [65].

3.4. Nano-Encapsulated Microcins

The third type of bacteriocins produced by Gram-negative bacteria is microcins. Microcin is a bacteriocin that is synthesized by E. coli and has similarities with Gram-positive bacteriocins concerning thermal stability, protease resistance, and pH [66]. Microcins display dominant anti-bacterial activity and depend on subtle penetration mechanisms by the Gram-negative inner and outer bacterial membranes. Siderophore-microcins are involved in the binding of receptors to avoid the outer membrane in the transportation of iron. Cyclic microcin J25 is formed by the availability of an N-terminal macrolactam ring and utilizes the receptor of hydroxamate and intracellular protein SbmA membrane. Microcin C is synthesized as heptapeptide adenylate, requires external porins membrane and transporters of ABC membrane, and transforms into an adenylate that is a non-hydrolyzable aspartyl equivalent in the cytoplasm [67].
Microcin N (McnN) acts as antimicrobial peptides which have been examined for their capability to combat these foodstuff pathogens and selected for aquatic and human consumption. Bacteriocin McnN is synthesized by a non-pathogenic E. coli strain that shows activity to combat Salmonella and E. coli species [68]. Microcins from Class I contain Mirocin C7–C51, Microcin J25, and Microcin B. Microcin peptides from Class IIa are encoded by a plasmid including linkages of disulfide and require no modification of post-translation. Microcin peptides from Class IIb are chromosomally encoded peptides and undergo a general post-translation siderophore by C terminal modification [69]. Currently, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are known as host defense peptides (HDPs) and are interesting due to their potential for substitution in the novel strategies for resistance offered by bacteria to combat antibiotics in diseases and infections. However, several drawbacks are linked to antimicrobial peptides due to their lesser bioavailability, lesser solubility, and easy protease degradability that controls their antimicrobial usage. Vehicles used for AMPs delivery include polymers, micelles, nanoparticles, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, and other system types which permit the AMPs to be used as a substitute for antibiotic treatment [70].

3.5. Nano-Encapsulated Lantibiotics

Gram-positive bacteria are categorized into four broad groups: lantibiotics, large proteins, non-modified small peptides, and cyclic peptides [71]. Gram-positive bacteriocins are classified into two major classes: lantibiotics are included in Class I while unmodified postranslationally small bacteriocins are included in Class II. Lantibiotics are known as peptides that include wide modifications of post-translational and possess methyllanthionine and/or lanthionine residues. In the previous literature, it has been elucidated that this ribosomally and postranslationally synthesized class of modified peptides (RiPPs) is considerably unusual [19].
Gram-positive bacteriocins establish an extensive anti-bacterial spectrum as compared to other bacteriocins. A peptidoglycan multilayered thick wall is generally attributed to providing a large spectrum rather than an outer membrane. Small peptide penetration is enabled by outer organization regardless of any binding of the receptor [72]. The third bacteriocins class formerly comprised bacteriolysins, currently recognized tailocins, and large anti-bacterial proteins of Gram-positive bacteria (up to 10 kDa). Lantibiotics include typical amino acids such as methylanthionine (MeLan), dehydrobutyrin (Dhb), D-alanine (D-Ala), lanthionine (Lan), and dehydroalanine (Dha) [73].
Lantibiotics are peptides that have a reduced molecular weight of approximately 5 kDa and include residues of methyllanthionine and/or lanthionine. Lantibiotics provide stability to the bacteriocin structure and resistance to protease action. Lantipeptides are classified into four classes depending on the biosynthesis specifics, in which two compounds possess anti-bacterial activity. Lantibiotics are categorized into three types depending on the structure features, such as AI, AII, and B equivalent linear bacteriocins, combined bacteriocins, and globular bacteriocins conformation [74].
AI-type lantibiotics contain microbisporicin, nisin, and epilancin 15×. Their anti-bacterial action depends on the reduction of cell wall production due to the N-terminal domain bacteriocin binding to lipid II, also known as peptidoglycan precursor. Moreover, the domain C-terminal plays a significant role in pores formation that causes potential membrane violation. Type-B lantibiotics include mersacidin, cinnamicin, and actagardin with a globular tertiary compact structure [75]. An isolated group contains two lantibiotic components that provide synergistic anti-bacterial action. The most-reported two components of lantibiotic are lactacin 3147 which includes type A1 β-peptide (LtnA2) and type B α-peptide (LtnA1). Lactacin 3147 shows anti-bacterial action and is examined in the targeted cell membrane by the formation of the pores. Lantibiotics exhibit strong activity and structural diversity in combatting Gram-positive pathogens. For instance, nisin has been utilized as an effective food preservative for the last 50 years. Numerous novel lantibiotics are presently undergoing clinical trials to examine their antimicrobial potential [76].

3.6. Nano-Encapsulated Peptides

The most interesting and stable form of bacteriocins are cyclic structure bacteriocins for practical applications. The compounds of this class are glycocins, lasso peptides, and peptide bonds with “head-to-tail” bacteriocins. Lasso peptides are named thus due to tertiary structure characteristics which are observed by the isopeptide bond formation between the N-terminal macrolactam amine ring and the aspartic acids or glutamic carboxylic acid residue at the 7, 8, or 9 positions of the C-terminal tail peptide sequence. Recently, the three lasso peptide bacteriocin structures have been synthesized by Gram-positive bacteria that have been categorized as follows: streptomonomycin from Streptomonospora alba, svicenin from Streptomyces sviceus, and lariatin A from Rhodococcus jostii [77].
The highly stable structures of lasso peptides are resistant to high temperatures and enzyme action. Properties of lasso peptides are lost during linearization; thus, it is not required to synthesize active bacteriocins chemically. At the receptors, every lasso peptide is target-specific according to the bacterial specie. As a result, streptomonomycin is a prevailing bacillus species inhibitor. It is supposed that the activity of the bacteria resulted in the interaction of the WalR protein for division and metabolism in the cell wall. Consequently, regardless of the other classes of bacteriocins that have comparable action mechanisms due to structural features, three-dimension structure of every peptide produces a definite signaling molecule [78]. Bioactive peptides by nanoencapsulation thus enhance bioavailability and defend stability during distribution, processing, and storage. The result is that consumers are presented with food with potential health benefits, and the stability of these peptides is also improved [79,80]. Studies on the formulation of nano-encapsulated bacteriocins through different nanoparticles are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Reported Studies on the Formulation of Nano-encapsulated Bacteriocins.
Table 1. Reported Studies on the Formulation of Nano-encapsulated Bacteriocins.
LAB
Bacteriocins
Purification of
Bacteriocins
NanoparticlesApplied
Encapsulation Technique
Nanoencapsulation ConditionsEffective against
Bacteria
Effect of Nanoformulation and Applied TechniqueReferences
NisinMilk fat globule membrane (MFGM) phospholipids-based nanostructuresRhamnolipids (RLs)Ultrasonication-assisted self-assembly methodSonicated for 30 minPrevent Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenesEnhanced cheese preservation to prevent the foodborne pathogens[81]
Nisin------------Cinnamon essential oil nanocapsules (CEO-NPs)----------------------Retard the microbial growth and decreased lipid oxidationIncreased storage of beef slices for 15 days[82]
Peptide nisinDissolution of 3 mg/mL nisin in acetic acid solution at pH 4.0 to obtain a stock solution of nisinNanocarrier based on polysaccharide with curcuminUltrafiltration tubes, Magnetic stirringStirring for 30 min at 25 °C with final 4.0 pH14.00 mm on B. subtilis and 12.97 mm on L. monocytogenesNanocarriers were fabricated to provide multifunctional potential in the food and show powerful antimicrobial activity[83]
Nisin1 mg/mL nisin form Film-forming solutions (FFS) at 600 rpm by stirring at room temperature for 40 minNano-rhamnosomesField Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM)10 kV accelerated voltageInhibit the E. coli and L. monocytogenes growthProlonged bioactive preservation of food by broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity to combat Gram-negative and Gram-positive foodborne pathogens[84]
NisinDigestion of protein with trypsin 20 μg and incubation at 37 °C, dried for 16 h, and storage temp is −20 °CPhosphatidylcholine liposomesSonication and Thin-film hydration methodDried through thin film for 24 h in a desiccator and nisin solution in phosphate buffer (10 mm) addition at 100 μg/mL and sonicated for 3 min at 55 kHzLiposome-encapsulated nisin decreases stresses and lowers the occurrence of L. monocytogenesLiposome encapsulation might be an effective approach to prevent nisin resistance[85]
NisinNisin was dissolved in the water phase with soy oil (20 mL) and gelatin (1%)Polyacrylate Sodium (PAAS) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)Sonication, Response Surface Methodology, ElectrospinningUltra-sonication time (15 min) and 15%, centrifugation (6000 rpm) at 4 °C for 5 min after freeze-drying for 48 h, at −50 °CStaphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli growth was prevented for 16 daysNanofiber can potentially retard food microorganisms’ activity in food and prolong the strawberry’s shelf life[86]
PlantaricinSodium sulfate methodSilver nanoparticles------------------------Showed inhibitory activity towards Listeria monocytogenesThe stability period got increased from 5 days to 60 days[87]
Bacteriocin-----------Au-zein-based nanomatsElectrospinning methodSamples were stored at (4 ± 1 °C)~1 log CFU/g reduction of bacteriaReduced the growth of mesophilic aerobic bacteria in skinless fish fillets[88]
Nisin----------Nanofibers (NP) with polyethylene (PE) packsElectrospinning method1.2 mL/h, 8 cm, and 20 kVTotal mesophilic bacteria from 5.03 to 3.52 log CFU/g, Lactic acid bacteria from 3.22 to 2.02 log CFU/gPrevention of off-odor and reduction of microbial growth in rainbow trout fillets[89]

4. Advantage of Antimicrobial Peptides at the Food Industry Scale

The potential application of nano-encapsulated antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocins at the food industrial level needs to be encouraged. Several studies have demonstrated the possible use of lactic acid bacteria in the manufacturing of cheese. In this process, the active conversion of lactose to lactic acid produces bacteriocins to change the composition of complex cheese microflora and inhibition of pathogenic bacteria or adventitious spoilage. Particularly, the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives in 1969 claimed that nisin is regarded as safe to be potentially used in food. In 1983, number E234 was allocated to this bacteriocin; it was added to the European food additive list and, finally, US Food and Drug Agency approved it to be used effectively in processed, pasteurized cheese spreads in 1988. Bacteriocins that are produced from lactic acid bacteria are generally utilized to preserve food and inhibit the spoilage and pathogenic microbes in food products and provide significant antimicrobial dimensions [90].
Enterocin AS-48 treatment deactivates L. monocytogenes cells inoculated on the slices and surface fruit and completely or partially disables S. Aureus in several sauces of fruit and vegetable [91]. A wild strain of Streptococcus thermophilus ACA-DC 0001 was isolated from traditional products such as Greek yogurt used to produce Thermophilin ST-1 [92]. Thermophilin ST-1 has an inhibitory impact on numerous foodborne pathogens, food spoilage microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria, and on a few phytopathogens of Gram-negative bacteria including the following: Enterococcus faecalis EF1, Xanthomonas campestris BPIC 1660, Listeria innocua BL 86/20, Erwinia rubrifasciens BPIC 1710, Pseudomonas syringae BPIC 1549 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29996. Antimicrobial substances are sensitive to increased alkaline and acidic conditions, to proteolytic enzymes, specifically trypsin and pronase, heat-labile at 60 °C for 10 min, and exhibit a bactericidal action mode to prevent the Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris CNRZ-117 indicator strain [92].
Lactacin has an active antimicrobial potential that can be utilized in food products such as powdered soup, baby milk, cottage cheese, and yogurt [57]. It has been reported that lactacin is non-immunogenic and nontoxic and mitigates the occurrence of infection. Lactacin is produced by lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus lactis 3147), which is utilized significantly to prevent the development of several types of Gram-positive microorganisms such as Pediococcus acidilactici, Clostridium botulinum, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium sporogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus spp. [93,94].
Nanoencapsulation of bacteriocins is the successful development through regulatory approval from initial biological experimentation and observation to commercial application. In recent years, it has stimulated a new approach in bacteriocins research for the industrial model and market innovations. It is a fact that without understanding the nature and mode of action, bacteriocins can be problematic in food. To reduce these disadvantages, nanoencapsulation can be an effective approach in various important commercial and imaginative applications. The core matrix and structurally enhanced nanocapsule probably have the potential in food applications, especially to encapsulate the antimicrobial peptides that are produced by food-grade LAB. Most importantly, it is more likely to meet regulatory approval specifically to their origin for their introduction into fermented foods without any purification or concentration [4].

5. Conclusions

This review highlighted the integral role, features, action mechanism and nanoencapsulation method of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. Nowadays, food spoilage is a major concern in the food industry. The trend of applying natural and chemical-free preservatives has been increasing due to consumer concerns regarding the side effects of artificial preservatives as well as due to their chronic health effects. Bacteriocins are more efficient, anti-bacterial agents with fewer adverse effects. However, challenges and limitations are associated with bacteriocins usage as anti-bacterial agents or bio-preservatives in the food industry. Currently, available bacteriocin peptides have proven their efficacy, and various examples have been provided to ensure their commercial applications in the food sector. For example, nanoencapsulation acts as a suitable strategy to preserve biological activities and enhance the stability of nanoparticles when successfully applied to a food product. The efficient technique of nanoencapsulation uses nanomaterials that enhance the antimicrobial potential of bacteriocin. Moreover, these nanomaterials interact with bacteriocins to develop nano-formulated bacteriocins as well as establish the mechanism of action against targeted microorganisms which have been explained.

6. Future Recommendations

Although nano-encapsulated bacteriocins have been applied in the food industry efficiently, additional research effort is needed to encapsulate nutraceuticals and to explore them as nutraceutical carriers [49]. It is of great importance to conduct more studies on nano-encapsulated enterocin, lactacin, thermophilin, lacidin, sakacin, and bulgaricin [6]. Novel research approach is required to produce bacteriocins from genetically modified organisms and to develop suitable conditions for their application through nanoencapsulation methods [95]. Further studies are also needed to evaluate the in vivo efficiency and safety of peptides. Identifying the gene of new recombinant bacteriocins has become important by using polymerase chain reaction techniques to determine their applicability in food and medicine [36]. The bioavailability and stability of bacteriocins throughout the food chain during production, processing, distribution and storage is significant through nanoencapsulation method to modify the food with health benefits.

Funding

This research was funded, in part, by Grants (project Number NC.X337-5-21-170-1 and NC.X341-5-21-170-1) in addition to the 1890 capacity building project from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA).

Acknowledgments

The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of the Agricultural Research Station at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (Greensboro, NC 27411, USA). This research was funded, in part, by Grants (project Number NC.X337-5-21-170-1 and NC.X341-5-21-170-1) in addition to the 1890 capacity building project from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIFA.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García, P.; Rodríguez, L.; Rodríguez, A.; Martínez, B. Food biopreservation: Promising strategies using bacteriocins, bacteriophages and endolysins. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chowdhuri, A.; Iqbal, A.; Giasuddin, M.; Bhuiyan, A.A. Study on Isolation and Identification of Salmonella and Escherichia coli from Different Poultry Feeds of Savar Region of Dhaka, Bangladesh. J. Sci. Res. 2011, 3, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yi, Y.; Li, P.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, T.; Shan, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, X.; Lü, X. Current status and potentiality of class II bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: Structure, mode of action and applications in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Bacteriocins: Developing Innate Immunity For Food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fidan, H.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Simat, V.; Trif, M.; Tabanelli, G.; Kostka, T.; Montanari, C.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Özogul, F. Recent developments of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria: Facts and gaps. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Papagianni, M. Ribosomally synthesized peptides with antimicrobial properties: Biosynthesis, structure, function, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003, 21, 465–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Vuyst, L.; Leroy, F. Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Production, Purification, and Food Applications Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Production, Purification, and Food. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 13, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cui, Y.; Luo, L.; Yi, X.; Lu, Y.; Yanglei, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Lü, X. Mining, heterologous expression, purification, antibactericidal mechanism, and application of bacteriocins: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 20, 863–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Al-holy, M.A.; Al-nabulsi, A.; Osaili, T.M.; Ayyash, M.M.; Shaker, R.R. Inactivation of Listeria innocua in brined white cheese by a combination of nisin and heat. Food Control 2012, 23, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pimentel-filho, N.D.J.; Mantovani, C.; De Carvalho, F.; Dias, R.S.; Vanetti, M.C.D. Original article Efficacy of bovicin HC5 and nisin combination against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in fresh cheese. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pei, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Dai, L. Activity of paracin C from lactic acid bacteria against Alicyclobacillus in apple juice: Application of a novelty bacteriocin. J. Food Safety 2017, 37, e12350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ribeiro, S.C.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Characterization and Application of Antilisterial Enterocins on Model Fresh Cheese. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1303–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Woraprayote, W.; Pumpuang, L.; Tosukhowong, A.; Roytrakul, S.; Perez, R.H.; Zendo, T.; Sonomoto, K.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W. Two putatively novel bacteriocins active against Gram-negative food borne pathogens produced by Weissella hellenica BCC 7293. Food Control 2015, 55, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, Y.; Aizhan, R.; Yan, H.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Yi, Y.; Shan, Y. Characterization, modes of action, and application of a novel broad-spectrum bacteriocin BM1300 produced by Lactobacillus crustorum MN047. Braz. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 51, 2023–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Perez, R.H.; Zendo, T.; Sonomoto, K. Novel bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB): Various structures and applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lopes, N.A.; Brandelli, A. Nanostructures for delivery of natural antimicrobials in food. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2202–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandrakasan, G.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.I.; del Rocío López-Cuellar, M.; Palma-Rodríguez, H.M.; Chavarría-Hernández, N. Bacteriocin encapsulation for food and pharmaceutical applications: Advances in the past 20 years. Biotechnol. Lett. 2019, 41, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fahim, H.A.; Khairalla, A.S.; El-Gendy, A.O. Nanotechnology: A valuable strategy to improve bacteriocin formulations. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ge, J.; Kang, J.; Ping, W. Effect of Acetic Acid on Bacteriocin Production by Gram-Positive. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chikindas, M.L.; Weeks, R.; Drider, D.; Chistyakov, V.A.; Dicks, L.M.T. Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdulkarim, I.H.; Mohammed, S.S.D.; Orukotan, A.A. Gene Identification for Bacteriocin Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Selected Fermented Foods. Asian J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brandelli, A. Nanostructures as Promising Tools for Delivery of Antimicrobial Peptides. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Naskar, A.; Kim, K. Potential Novel Food-Related and Biomedical Applications of Nanomaterials Combined with Bacteriocins. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lelis, C.A.; De Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte Junior, C.A. Systematic Review on Nanoencapsulation Natural Antimicrobials in Foods: In Vitro versus In Situ Evaluation, Mechanisms of Action and Implications on Physical-Chemical Quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yousefi, M.; Narmani, A.; Jafari, S.M. Dendrimers as efficient nanocarriers for the protection and delivery of bioactive phytochemicals. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 78, 102125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cintas, L.M.; Casaus, M.P.; Herranz, C.; Nes, I.F.; Hernández, P.E. Review: Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2001, 7, 281–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Savadogo, A.; Ouattara, A.C.; Bassole, H.I.; Traore, S.A. Bacteriocins and lactic acid bacteria—A minireview. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 678–683. [Google Scholar]
  28. Todorov, S.D.; Chikindas, M.L. Lactic Acid Bacteria Bacteriocins and their Impact on Human Health. In Lactic Acid Bacteria; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; ISBN 9780429422591. [Google Scholar]
  29. Es, B.; Bhat, S.G. Marine Bacteriocins: A Review Marine Bacteriocins: A Review. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. 2016, 2, 00040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Muñoz, M.; Jaramillo, D.; Melendez, P.; Alméciga-diaz, C.J. Native and Heterologous Production of Bacteriocins from Gram-Positive Microorganisms. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Atanaskovic, I.; Kleanthous, C. Tools and Approaches for Dissecting Protein Bacteriocin Import in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Rebuffat, S. Bacteriocins from Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Classification? In Prokaryotic Antimicrobial Peptides; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cascales, E.; Buchanan, S.K.; Duche, D.; Kleanthous, C.; Lloube, R.; Postle, K.; Riley, M.; Slatin, S. Colicin Biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 158–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sylvie, D.; Beeckman, A.; Vanrompay, D.C.G. Bacterial Secretion Systems with an Emphasis on the Chlamydial Type III Secretion System. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 17–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gillor, O.; Kirkup, B.C.; Riley, M.A. Colicins and Microcins: The Next Generation Antimicrobials. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, S.; Lin, C.; Sung, C.T.; Fang, J. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: Application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bharti, V.; Singh, S.; Jain, N.; Ahirwal, L. Bacteriocin: A novel approach for preservation of food. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hildeliza, Q.B.; Chanona-pe, J.; Jose, L.S.M.; Gutie, G.F.; Jimene, A. Nanoencapsulation: A New Trend in Food Engineering Processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Divya, K.; Jisha, M.S. Chitosan nanoparticles preparation and applications. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kailasapathy, K. Microencapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria: Technology and Potential Applications Further Reading. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2002, 3, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Namasivayam, S.K.R.; Samrat, K.; Debnath, S.; Jayaprakash, C. Biocompatible chitosan nanoparticles incorporated bacteriocin (CSNps-B) preparation for the controlled release and improved anti-bacterial activity against food borne pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 625–631. [Google Scholar]
  42. Juncioni, L.; Arauz, D.; Faustino, A.; Vessoni, T.C. Nisin biotechnological production and application: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hsu, S.D.; Breukink, E.; Tischenko, E.; Lutters, M.A.G.; De Kruijff, B.; Kaptein, R.; Bonvin, A.M.J.J.; Van Nuland, N.A.J. The nisin—Lipid II complex reveals a pyrophosphate cage that provides a blueprint for novel antibiotics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sahin, N. Niosomes as nanocarrier systems. In Nanomaterials and Nanosystems for Biomedical Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 9781402062896. [Google Scholar]
  45. A Eldaly, E.; Mahmoud, F.A.; Abobakr, H.M. Preservative effect of chitosan coating on shelf life and sensory properties of chicken fillets during chilled storage. J. Nutr. Food Secur. 2018, 3, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  46. da Silva Malheiros, P.; Daroit, D.J.; Brandelli, A. Food applications of liposome-encapsulated antimicrobial peptides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bahrami, A.; Delshadi, R.; Jafari, S.M.; Williams, L. Nanoencapsulated nisin: An engineered natural antimicrobial system for the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 94, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Riesute, R.; Salomskiene, J.; Moreno, D.S.; Gustiene, S. Effect of yeasts on food quality and safety and possibilities of their inhibition. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aditya, N.P.; Espinosa, Y.G.; Norton, I.T. Encapsulation systems for the delivery of hydrophilic nutraceuticals: Food application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Campos, C.A.; Castro, M.P.; Rivas, F.P.; Schelegueda, L.I. Bacteriocins in food: Evaluation of the factors affecting their effectiveness. In Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science, Technology and Education; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kemperman, R.; Kuipers, A.; Karsens, H.; Nauta, A.; Kuipers, O.; Kok, J. Identification and characterization of two novel clostridial bacteriocins, circularin A and closticin 574. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Laridi, R.; Kheadr, E.E.; Benech, R.O.; Vuillemard, J.C.; Lacroix, C.; Fliss, I. Liposome encapsulated nisin Z: Optimization, stability and release during milk fermentation. Int. Dairy J. 2003, 13, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Mello, M.B.; da Silva Malheiros, P.; Brandelli, A.; Pesce da Silveira, N.; Jantzen, M.M.; de Souza da Motta, A. Characterization and antilisterial effect of phosphatidylcholine nanovesicles containing the antimicrobial peptide pediocin. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2013, 5, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bouaraba, L.; Maherania, B.; Kheirolomoomb, A.; Hasana, M.; Aliakbarianc, B.; Lindera, M.; Arab-Tehrany, E. Influence of lecithin—Lipid composition on physico-chemical properties of nanoliposomes loaded with a hydrophobic molecule. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 115, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Narsaiah, K.; Robin, S.N.J.; Whilson, A.; Mandge, H.; Manikantan, M.R.; Malik, R.K.; Vij, S. Pediocin-Loaded Nanoliposomes and Hybrid Alginate—Nanoliposome Delivery Systems for Slow Release of Pediocin. J. Biosci. 2012, 3, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Acedo, J.Z.; Chiorean, S.; Vederas, J.C.; van Belkum, M.J. The expanding structural variety among bacteriocins from Gram-positive bacteria Jeella. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 805–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Alvarez-sieiro, P.; Montalbán-lópez, M.; Mu, D.; Kuipers, O.P. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: Extending the family. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2939–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kalia, A.; Parshad, V.R. Novel trends to revolutionize preservation and packaging of fruits/fruit products: Microbiological and nanotechnological perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 55, 159–182, ISBN 9116124030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Brown, C.; Smith, K.; Brown, C.L.; Smith, K.; Mccaughey, L.; Walker, D. Colicin-like bacteriocins as novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of chronic biofilm-mediated infection. Prog. Chall. Bacteriocins Res. 2012, 40, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chavan, M.A.; Riley, M.A. Molecular Evolution of Bacteriocins in Gram-Negative Bacteria; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 19–43. [Google Scholar]
  61. Saha, S. A Tale of Two Tails: Characterization of R-Type and F-Type Pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  62. Duquesne, S.; Destoumieux-Garzón, D.; Peduzzi, J.; Rebuffat, S. Microcins, gene-encoded antibacterial peptides from enterobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 708–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ponnachan, B.; Dash, N.; Jaybhay, P.; Tiwari, R. Reviewing isolation and production of probiotics. Int. J. Med. Biomed. Stud. 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Abhari, K.; Eş, I.; Soares, M.B.; Oliveira, R.B.A.; Hosseini, H.; Rezaei, M.; Balthazar, C.F.; Silva, R.; Cruz, A.G.; et al. Interactions between probiotics and pathogenic microorganisms in hosts and foods: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Feng, L.; Mumper, R.J. A critical review of lipid-based nanoparticles for taxane delivery. Cancer Lett. 2012, 334, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Micenková, L.; Bosák, J.; Kucera, J.; Hrala, M.; Dolejšová, T. Colicin Z, a structurally and functionally novel colicin type that selectively kills enteroinvasive Escherichia coli and Shigella strains. Nat. Res. 2019, 9, 11127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Crone, W.J.K.; Vior, N.M.; Santos-aberturas, J.; Schmitz, L.G.; Leeper, F.J.; Truman, A.W. Zuschriften Dissecting Bottromycin Biosynthesis Using Comparative Untargeted Metabolomics Zuschriften. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 9791–9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gomaa, A.I.; Martinent, C.; Hammami, R.; Fliss, I. Dual Coating of Liposomes as Encapsulating Matrix of Antimicrobial Peptides: Development and Characterization. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Satchwell, K.L. Application of Microcin N and Tridecaptin A 1 to Control Bacterial Pathogens. Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  70. Martin-serrano, Á.; Rafael, G.; Ortega, P.; De Mata, F.J. Nanosystems as Vehicles for the Delivery of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs). Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Heng, N.C.; Wescombe, P.A.; Burton, J.P.; Jack, R.W.; Tagg, J.R. The diversity of bacteriocins in Gram-positive bacteria. In Bacteriocins; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 9783540366034. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ansari, A. Bacteriocin from LAB for Medical and Health Applications. In Beneficial Microorganisms in Medical and Health Applications; Springer: Cham, Swizerland, 2015; pp. 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wencewicz, T.A.; Miller, M.J. Sideromycins as Pathogen-Targeted Antibiotics. In Antibacterials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 151–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ekblad, B.; Kyriakou, P.K.; Oppega, C.; Nissen-meyer, J.; Kaznessis, Y.N. Structure—Function Analysis of the Two-Peptide Bacteriocin Plantaricin EF. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 5106–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dias, N.; Augusta, I.M. A Review “Clean Labeling”: Applications of Natural Ingredients in Bakery Products. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2018, 6, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ovchinnikov, K.V.; Kristiansen, P.E.; Straume, D.; Jensen, M.S.; Aleksandrzak-piekarczyk, T.; Nes, I.F.; Diep, D.B.; Vederas, J.C. The Leaderless Bacteriocin Enterocin K1 Is Highly Potent against Enterococcus faecium: A Study on Structure, Target Spectrum and Receptor. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Yadav, S.C.; Kumari, A.; Yadav, R. Development of peptide and protein nanotherapeutics by nanoencapsulation and nanobioconjugation. Peptides 2011, 32, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zimina, M.; Babich, O.; Prosekov, A.; Sukhikh, S.; Ivanova, S.; Shevchenko, M.; Noskova, S. Overview of Global Trends in Classification, Methods of Preparation and Application of Bacteriocins. MDPI Antibiot. 2020, 9, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Cabuk, B.; Okulklu, B.; Stanciuc, N.; Harsa, S.T. Nanoencapsulation of Biologically Active Peptides from Whey Proteins. J. Nutr. Health Food Sci. 2017, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mosquera, M.; Giménez, B.; Mallmann, I.; Ferreira, J.; Montero, P.; Gómez-guillén, M.C.; Brandelli, A. Nanoencapsulation of an active peptidic fraction from sea bream scales collagen. Food Chem. 2014, 156, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Khalid, A.S.; Niaz, T.; Zarif, B.; Shabbir, S.; Noor, T.; Shahid, R.; Imran, M. Milk phospholipids-based nanostructures functionalized with rhamnolipids and bacteriocin: Intrinsic and synergistic antimicrobial activity for cheese preservation. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, M.; Luo, W.; Yang, K.; Li, C. Effects of sodium alginate edible coating with cinnamon essential oil nanocapsules and Nisin on quality and shelf life of beef slices during refrigeration. J. Food Prot. 2022, 85, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Luo, L.; Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Zou, Y.; Huang, L.; Liang, Y.; Ren, J.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Q. Elaboration and characterization of curcumin-loaded soy soluble polysaccharide (SSPS)-based nanocarriers mediated by antimicrobial peptide nisin. Food Chem. 2021, 336, 127669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Niaz, T.; Imran, M. Diffusion kinetics of nisin from composite coatings reinforced with nano-rhamnosomes. J. Food Eng. 2021, 288, 110143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pinilla, C.M.B.; Stincone, P.; Brandelli, A. Proteomic analysis reveals differential responses of Listeria monocytogenes to free and nanoencapsulated nisin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 346, 109170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jiang, Y.; Ma, D.; Ji, T.; Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Li, S. Long-Term Antibacterial E ff ect of Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol / Polyacrylate Sodium Nanofiber Containing Nisin-Loaded Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Amer, S.A.; Abushady, H.M.; Refay, R.M.; Mailam, M.A. Enhancement of the antibacterial potential of plantaricin by incorporation into silver nanoparticles. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Çetinkaya, T.; Ceylan, Z.; Meral, R.; Kılıçer, A.; Altay, F. A novel strategy for Au in food science: Nanoformulation in dielectric, sensory properties, and microbiological quality of fish meat. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 101024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Oner, B.; Meral, R.; Ceylan, Z. Determination of some quality indices of rainbow trout fillets treated with nisin-loaded polyvinylalcohol-based nanofiber and packed with polyethylene package. LWT 2021, 149, 111854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Akbar, A.; Sadiq, M.B.; Ali, I.; Anwar, M.; Muhammad, J.; Shafee, M.; Ullah, S.; Qasim, S.; Ahmad, S.; Anal, A.K.; et al. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolated from fermented milk products and its antimicrobial potential. CyTA-J. Food 2019, 17, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. José, M.; Burgos, G.; Pulido, R.P.; López, C. The Cyclic Antibacterial Peptide Enterocin AS-48: Isolation, Mode of Action, and Possible Food Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22706–22727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Aktypis, A.; Kalantzopoulos, G. Purification and characterization of thermophilin ST-1, a novel bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus thermophilus ACA-DC 0001. Le Lait 2003, 83, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Kotenkova, E.; Ushakova, N.; Fedosov, E. The effect of lactating and some gastrointenstinal symbiotic bacteria on the growth of young rabbits in prepubertal period. Muz. Olten. Craiova Oltenia. Stud. Şi Comunicãri. Ştiinţele Nat. 2010, 26, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar]
  94. Andryukov, B.; Mikhailov, V.; Besednova, N. The Biotechnological Potential of Secondary Metabolites from Marine Bacteria. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Balciunas, E.M.; Martinez, F.A.C.; Todorov, S.D.; de Melo Franco, B.D.G.; Converti, A.; de Souza Oliveira, R.P. Novel biotechnological applications of bacteriocins: A review. Food Control 2013, 32, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical Abstract of Nano-encapsulated Bacteriocins in Food Safety.
Figure 1. Graphical Abstract of Nano-encapsulated Bacteriocins in Food Safety.
Microorganisms 11 00085 g001
Figure 2. General method of bacteriocins synthesis, anti-bacterial activity, and action mechanism of bacteriocins [36,37].
Figure 2. General method of bacteriocins synthesis, anti-bacterial activity, and action mechanism of bacteriocins [36,37].
Microorganisms 11 00085 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shafique, B.; Ranjha, M.M.A.N.; Murtaza, M.A.; Walayat, N.; Nawaz, A.; Khalid, W.; Mahmood, S.; Nadeem, M.; Manzoor, M.F.; Ameer, K.; et al. Recent Trends and Applications of Nanoencapsulated Bacteriocins against Microbes in Food Quality and Safety. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085

AMA Style

Shafique B, Ranjha MMAN, Murtaza MA, Walayat N, Nawaz A, Khalid W, Mahmood S, Nadeem M, Manzoor MF, Ameer K, et al. Recent Trends and Applications of Nanoencapsulated Bacteriocins against Microbes in Food Quality and Safety. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shafique, Bakhtawar, Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha, Mian Anjum Murtaza, Noman Walayat, Asad Nawaz, Waseem Khalid, Shahid Mahmood, Muhammad Nadeem, Muhammad Faisal Manzoor, Kashif Ameer, and et al. 2023. "Recent Trends and Applications of Nanoencapsulated Bacteriocins against Microbes in Food Quality and Safety" Microorganisms 11, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085

APA Style

Shafique, B., Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Murtaza, M. A., Walayat, N., Nawaz, A., Khalid, W., Mahmood, S., Nadeem, M., Manzoor, M. F., Ameer, K., Aadil, R. M., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2023). Recent Trends and Applications of Nanoencapsulated Bacteriocins against Microbes in Food Quality and Safety. Microorganisms, 11(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop