Next Article in Journal
A Tale of Two Seasons: Distinct Seasonal Viral Communities in a Thermokarst Lake
Next Article in Special Issue
Resistance to the Bacteriocin Lcn972 Deciphered by Genome Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Cellulase or Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the Ensiling Performance and Bacterial Community in Mixed Silage of Alfalfa and Leymus chinensis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Discovery of Oropharyngeal Microbiota with Inhibitory Activity against Pathogenic Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: An In Vitro Study of Clinical Isolates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms11020427
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nisin E Is a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Multiple Streptococcus equinus Strains

by
Ivan Sugrue
1,
Daragh Hill
1,
Paula M. O’Connor
1,2,
Li Day
3,
Catherine Stanton
1,2,
Colin Hill
1 and
R. Paul Ross
1,*
1
APC Microbiome Ireland, Biosciences Institute, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland
2
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., P61 C996 Cork, Ireland
3
Grasslands Research Centre, Te Ohu Rangahau Kai, AgResearch, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020427
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacteriocins: Academic Advances and Immediate Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nisin A, the prototypical lantibiotic, is an antimicrobial peptide currently utilised as a food preservative, with potential for therapeutic applications. Here, we describe nisin E, a novel nisin variant produced by two Streptococcus equinus strains, APC4007 and APC4008, isolated from sheep milk. Shotgun whole genome sequencing and analysis revealed biosynthetic gene clusters similar to nisin U, with a unique rearrangement of the core peptide encoding gene within the cluster. The 3100.8 Da peptide by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, is 75% identical to nisin A, with 10 differences, including 2 deletions: Ser29 and Ile30, and 8 substitutions: Ile4Lys, Gly18Thr, Asn20Pro, Met21Ile, His27Gly, Val32Phe, Ser33Gly, and Lys34Asn. Nisin E producing strains inhibited species of Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Clostridiodes and were immune to nisin U. Sequence alignment identified putative promoter sequences across the nisin producer genera, allowing for the prediction of genes in Streptococcus to be potentially regulated by nisin. S. equinus pangenome BLAST analyses detected 6 nisin E operons across 44 publicly available genomes. An additional 20 genomes contained a subset of nisin E transport/immunity and regulatory genes (nseFEGRK), without adjacent peptide production genes. These genes suggest that nisin E response mechanisms, distinct from the canonical nisin immunity and resistance operons, are widespread across the S. equinus species. The discovery of this new nisin variant and its immunity determinants in S. equinus suggests a central role for nisin in the competitive nature of the species.

1. Introduction

Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) caused an estimated 1.27 million deaths in 2019, which is predicted to rise to 10 million annually by the year 2050, according to the World Health Organisation [1,2]. Novel antimicrobials that can be utilised to combat AMR pathogens are increasingly in demand. Produced by bacteria, bacteriocins are a heterogeneous group of ribosomally-synthesised peptides and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) with antimicrobial activity [3,4]. They are small (<10 kDa), with either broad or narrow inhibition spectra and are classified into groups and subgroups according to their structure [5,6]. Class I bacteriocins are post-translationally modified and include lantibiotics, peptides in which serine and threonine residues are dehydrated enzymatically to 2,3-didehydroalanine (Dha) and 2,3-didehydrobutyrine (Dhb), which in turn form lanthionine and methyllanthionine thioether bridges with neighbouring cysteines [7]. Bacteriocins could be an alternative or adjunct to antibiotics, for certain applications.
Nisin is the prototypical lantibiotic, first described in 1928 as an ‘inhibiting effect’ produced by Lactococcus lactis on Lactobacillus bulgaricus [8]. The 34-amino acid lantibiotic has been studied extensively, was granted generally recognised as safe (GRAS) status in 1988, and was approved for use as a food ingredient by EFSA under the code E234 [9]. The structure of nisin A produced by L. lactis includes five rings, a three-residue flexible ‘hinge’ region, and a five-residue cationic tail that interacts with cell membranes and is crucial for activity [10]. Nisin inhibits a broad range of Gram-positive bacterial genera, including many clinically relevant pathogens, biofilms, and sporeformers [11,12,13]. Nisin has also been subject to extensive site-directed mutagenesis, which has identified functionally critical regions in which amino acid substitutions increase or decrease peptide activity against particular organisms [14,15,16].
More than ten natural variants of nisin have been identified since the discovery of nisin A. Nisin Z is produced by L. lactis and contains a single amino acid substitution (His27Asn) [17]. Nisin F and Q are also produced by members of the genus Lactococcus and exhibit only subtle differences in sequence [18,19]. More recently, distantly related nisin J, nisin O (O123, and O4), and kunkecin A were identified from human skin, gut, and honeybee microbiota, and are produced by Staphylococcus capitis, Blautia obeum, and Apilactobacillus kunkeei FF30-6, respectively [20,21,22]. The genus Streptococcus has been a rich source of natural nisin variants, and species of diverse origin produce nisin variants U/U2, H, P, and most recently, G [23,24,25,26,27].
Nisin expression is autoregulated by a two-component histidine kinase/response regulator quorum sensing system (nisRK) encoded within the nisin gene cluster [28]. Cells sensing extracellular mature nisin activate the expression of lantibiotic immunity and production machinery from two NisRK regulated promoters [29]. The NisRK two-component system is also exploited by a separate nisin resistance cassette identified in Streptococcus spp., which confers resistance to nisin through proteolytic cleavage and peptide export [30].
In this study, we aimed to isolate and characterise novel bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. Upon identification of two nisin variant-producing Streptococcus equinus strains, we sought to establish their novelty relative to other nisin producers through genetic comparison and to determine the prevalence of this nisin variant in the species. Comparative analysis of nisin variant gene clusters revealed specific regulatory elements of Streptococcus equinus and other Streptococcus spp. highlighting conservation and diversity across nisin expression regulation systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Isolation, Bacteriocin Activity Screening, and Speciation of Isolates

In total, 112 samples, consisting mainly of raw ovine, bovine, and caprine milk (Supplementary Table S1) were spread on several media for the isolation of putative lactic acid bacteria, as described previously ([31]). Briefly, samples were streaked or serially diluted and plated on Streptococcus thermophilus selective agar; M17 agar with 10% lactose; de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar containing 30 μg·mL−1 vancomycin, MRS adjusted to pH 5.4; Lactobacillus selective agar (LBS); and transgalactosylated oligosaccharide (TOS) agar, supplemented with 50 μg·mL−1 lithium mupirocin, and incubated for 24 to 72 h at 42 °C, 30 °C, and 37 °C, aerobically, and 42 °C, 30 °C, and 37 °C, anaerobically, respectively. All isolates were screened for bacteriocin production by overlaying with sloppy MRS agar (0.75% wt/vol agar), pre-tempered to 50 °C and seeded with 0.25% (vol/vol) of an overnight Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LMG6901 culture. Colonies producing distinct zones of inhibition were triple-streaked for purity and cultured in broth overnight to produce a cell-free supernatant (CFS) for subsequent well diffusion assays. Overnight cultures were centrifuged at 16,000× g for 3 min and the resulting supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm filter (Sarstedt, Wexford, Ireland), yielding CFS. For well diffusion assays, 20 mL volumes of sloppy MRS agar seeded with L. bulgaricus LMG6901 were poured into petri dishes and allowed to set. Six-millimeter wells were bored in the agar using glass Pasteur pipettes, into which 50 µL CFS was added. Plates were examined for zones of inhibition following overnight incubation. Supernatants producing zones of inhibition (active supernatant) were treated with 20 mg·mL−1 proteinase K (Merck) for 3 h to digest proteinaceous compounds, and the well diffusion assays were repeated. Loss of activity denoted a proteinaceous compound. Potential bacteriocin producers were subject to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, as previously described ([31]).

2.2. Strain Speciation and Genomic Comparison

Strains of interest were subject to genomic DNA extraction using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Merck, Wicklow, Ireland) and 16s rRNA gene sequencing (Genewiz, Leipzig, Germany) with the 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′), U1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) universal primers. Genomic DNA was quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer and prepared for sequencing with the Illumina Nextera XT kit, according to manufacturer protocols. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform with paired-end 2 × 300-bp reads using the Teagasc Sequencing Centre, (Teagasc Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland). Assemblies were performed de novo with SPADES (v 3.0.0) [32]. Contigs were aligned to reference genomes using Mauve (version 20150226, build 10), and annotation was performed using RAST (version 2.0) [33,34]. Any further annotation was performed using the Artemis genome browser (version 16.0) [35]. Average nucleotide identity was calculated relative to related species genomes using OrthoANI (version 0.93.1), with publicly available Streptococcus spp. reference genomes from NCBI [36]. Draft genomes were subject to bacteriocin gene cluster prediction with BAGEL4 [37]. Amino acid sequences of encoded bacteriocin peptides were aligned to homologues using MUSCLE and visualised using Jalview [38,39]. Percent identity matrices were generated using Clustal Omega [40]. A dendrogram of aligned peptide sequences was generated using SimplePhylogeny [41] and visualised using iTOL [42]. Streptococcus genomes were examined for genomic differences using the Mauve genome aligner, and Easyfig (version 2.1) [43]. Following genome sequencing, a 69 bp contig boundary gap was present within the nseB gene encoded by S. equinus APC4008. To close the gap and confirm the contiguous nature of the gene cluster, a PCR was performed with KOD Hot Start master mix (Merck) using the primers nisE_F (5′ CTGCCCGTTGGAGGTTAAGT 3′) and nisE_R (5′ ACAGTGTGCTTAGGACAAACA 3′), with a denaturation step of 96 °C for 2 min and 30 cycles of 96 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The single resulting 794 bp product was purified using a GenElute PCR purification kit (Merck) and sent for sequencing (Genewiz, Leipzig, Germany). The sequence was examined for quality using Chromas (version 2.6.6), then aligned to the corresponding region within S. equinus APC4007 and 4008, using Clustal Omega and Jalview.

2.3. Streptococcus Equinus Pangenome Analysis

Publicly available S. equinus sequences were acquired from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets, accessed on 10 March 2022 (Supplementary Table S2). Local BLAST+ executables were downloaded (ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/, accessed on 10 March 2022) and used to construct local nucleotide and protein databases from S. equinus genomes. The nucleotide database was interrogated using the 13,339 bp nucleotide sequence of the nisin E operon from S. equinus APC4007. The protein database was constructed and interrogated with Streptococcus sp. Nisin resistance and nisin immunity protein sequences were acquired from UniprotKB [44] (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).

2.4. Nisin Variant Cross-Immunity Assay

L. lactis ATCC11454, L. lactis NZ9800 pCI372-nisA, L. lactis NZ9800 pCI372-nisZ, L. lactis NZ9800 pCI372-nisF, L. lactis NZ9800 pCI372-nisQ, Staphylococcus capitis APC2923, S. uberis 42, S. equinus APC4007, S. equinus APC4008, S. hyointestinalis DPC6484, and S. agalactiae DPC7040 (nisin A, A, Z, F, Q, J, U, E, E, H, and P producers, respectively) were cultivated in the appropriate broth medium from fresh streak overnight (Table 1). The strains were stocked in a 96-well plate with glycerol to a final concentration of 20% (vol/vol). Using a 96-pin replicator, the nisin producers were stamped on M17 containing lactose, M17 containing glucose, and BHI agar plates. Following incubation overnight, the plates were subjected to agar overlay, as described above, with 50 mL sloppy agar inoculated either with a nisin producer or indicator species.

2.5. Promoter Prediction and Transcription Start Site Mapping

Nucleotide sequences containing nisin gene clusters were obtained (Supplementary Table S5) and used for promoter prediction by sequence alignment to known promoters in L lactis ssp. lactis [29]. Alignments were generated with Clustal Omega, and visualised with Jalview. Rho-independent terminators were predicted using ARNold [45], under default settings.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of Two Bacteriocin-Producing Streptococcus equinus Strains

S. equinus APC4007 and S. equinus APC4008 were initially isolated from separate sheep milk samples as small (1–3 mm diameter), round, convex, creamy-white, semi-translucent colonies. The colonies produced zones of inhibition against the acid-tolerant indicator species Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LMG6901 in agar overlays of colonies and spots on the plates (Figure 1). L. bulgaricus LMG6901 was also inhibited by the pH-neutralised cell-free supernatant of the isolates in a well diffusion assay indicating export of a soluble antimicrobial compound. This activity was found to be sensitive to treatment with proteinase K, suggesting that the compound was proteinaceous in nature (Figure 1).
S. equinus APC4007 and S. equinus APC4008 were subject to 16s rRNA gene sequencing and identified as Streptococcus sp. with 97–99% identity to Streptococcus lutetiensis, S. equinus, and Streptococcus infantarius. S. equinus APC4007 and 4008 were subject to whole-genome shotgun sequencing to speciate and characterise the strains, resulting in two draft genomes consisting of ten (JANHMF000000000) and nine (JANHME000000000) contigs, respectively. Average nucleotide identities of both strains were calculated relative to complete genomes of S. equinus MDC1, S. equinus NCTC8140, S. lutetiensis NCTC13774, S. infantarius FDAARGOS 1019, and S. gallolyticus ssp. gallolyticus DSM 16831 (RefSeq accessions: GCF_014041875.1, GCF_900636465.1, GCF_900475675.1, GCF_016127275.1, and GCF_002000985.1, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1). The two isolates shared the highest identity with S. equinus MDC1 and S. equinus NCTC8140 and thus, were designated as S. equinus species.

3.2. Nisin E Is a Novel Variant Unique to Streptococcus equinus

The genomes of S. equinus APC4007 and 4008 were found to encode highly similar nisin biosynthetic gene clusters (Figure 2a). The nucleotide region of the nisin production gene clusters was 99.86% identical between the two strains, containing 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The gene cluster organisation does not match any previously described nisin variant (Figure 2a). The gene clusters resemble the nisin U gene cluster, with genes corresponding to nsuBTCI (nseBTCI) located downstream of nsuPRKFEG (nsePRKFEG) (relative to nisin A in L. lactis). The position of the structural gene nseA, between nseFEG and nsePRK, is unlike the nisin A or U gene clusters (Figure 2a). Both strains encode a structural peptide, designated as nisin E, which shares 76.4% and 75% amino acid identity with the nisin A prepropeptide and the leaderless peptide, respectively (Figure 2b). Nisin E is 32 amino acids in length, containing 10 differences from nisin A; two deletions, Ser29 and Ile30, and eight substitutions, Ile4Lys, Gly18Thr, Asn20Pro, Met21Ile, His27Gly, Val32Phe, Ser33Gly, and Lys34Asn. The cleaved peptide is similar to nisin U, sharing 93.6% identity, two amino substitutions, Ile15Ala, Leu21Ile, and one additional C-terminal Asn32 residue (Figure 2b). The unmodified mass of the nisin E peptide is predicted to be 3245.9 Da and 3101 Da, following eight dehydrations. Mass spectrometry detected a mass of 3100.8 Da, corresponding to the mature peptide produced by S. equinus APC4007 and 4008 (Figure 2c). A dendrogram of peptide relatedness clustered nisin E with other Streptococcus derived nisins, U and P, in addition to O1 and O4 from Blautia obeum (Figure 3). S. hyointestinalis DPC6484′s nisin H clustered more closely with the lactococcal nisins A, Z, F, and Q.

3.3. A Predicted Streptococcus-Specific Promoter for Expression of nisP

Given the novel layout of the nisin E gene cluster, we sought to characterise the promoters responsible for nisin E expression through multiple sequence alignments of nucleotide regions upstream of nisA, nisF, nisR, and nisI-type genes of the A, Z, Q, H, P, U, E, J, and O type. These alignments revealed some conservation of promoter sequences across genera (Figure 4, Supplementary Figures S2–S4). Rho-independent terminator prediction software identified 30 transcription terminators, with a Gibbs free energy (ΔG) stronger than −5.0 kcal/mole across the nisin variant gene clusters (Figure 4, Supplementary Table S6). The nisin E gene cluster contained the most predicted terminators (7), followed by U (5), P (5), O (4), A (3), Z (3), Q (2), and J (1). None were predicted within the nisin H gene cluster. Seven putative terminator sequences were predicted to have a ΔG stronger than −10.0 kcal/mole, six of which are present in streptococcal gene clusters. The nisin E gene cluster contains three strong terminators, one within the nseR open reading frame, one immediately following nseK upstream of nseA, and a third following nseI. Nisin A, Z, Q, P, U, E, and O gene clusters contain predicted terminators of various strengths, immediately following the core peptide encoding genes (Figure 4).
The predicted promoter upstream of the nisR homologues in the Z and Q gene clusters (PnszR, and PnsqR) are homologous to L. lactis ssp. lactis (PnisR), which we designate Lactococcus type (L type) (Supplementary Figure S3). S. equinus APC4007, APC4008, S. uberis 42, S. agalactiae DPC7040, and Blautia obeum A2-162 share a distinct conserved predicted nisR promoter structure, which we designate as Streptococcus type (S type), that encodes a −35 and −10 nucleotide sequence of TGCACA and TATTAC, respectively, separated by 15 nucleotides (Supplementary Figure S3). S. hyointestinalis DPC6848 (nisin H) does not share the conserved −35 or −10 of either type upstream of nshR. The nisin O gene cluster encodes two copies of nisRK homologs, neither of which have nucleotide sequences that are similar to the predicted nisR promoters in Streptococcus or Lactococcus spp. (Supplementary Figure S3). Alignment of the 400 bp upstream of nisI and its homologues identified no obvious promoter elements conserved across species (Supplementary Figure S4).
The promoter responsible for the expression of the core peptide in L. Lactis (PnisA) is somewhat conserved in the Z, Q, H, O, U, E, and O operons with a −35 and −10 consensus of CTGAAC and TACAAT, respectively, with a non-canonical spacer of 20 nucleotides (Supplementary Data S9). The non-canonical −35 sequence is part of a conserved TCT-N8-TCT repeat, which is largely conserved across the NisRK regulated promoters, and is also present 54 bp upstream of the −35 in the nisin A and Z operons (Supplementary Figure S2). Staphylococcus capitis APC2923 (nisin J producer) does not encode a similar conserved promoter and is lacking an apparent −10 signal. The promoter responsible for nisF and its downstream genes is also conserved across the nisin operons, with a consensus of TGAACA and TATACT for the −35 and −10 regions, respectively, and a spacer length measuring 19 nucleotides (Supplementary Figure S2). Alignments of the DNA sequence upstream of the serine peptidase encoding gene (nisP) of S. equinus (nisin E), S. agalactiae (nisin P), and S. uberis (nisin U) revealed homology with the NisRK regulated promoters described above (Supplementary Figure S2). Upstream of nseP in S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008, respectively, a conserved sequence of CTGAAC and TAAAAT is present, and these sequences are nearly identical to the nisA consensus sequences of CTGAAC and TACAAT (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.4. Spectrum of Inhibition of Nisin E Producers and Cross-Immunity to Other Nisin Producers

The spectrum of inhibition of S. equinus APC4007 and 4008 was determined by deferred antagonism assay against 40 Grampositive indicators. Both strains inhibited the growth of seven indicator species tested (Table 2). Strong inhibition was observed against Lactobacillus bulgaricus LMG6901, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. lactis DPC5387, and Bacillus firmis DPC6349. Lactobacillus helveticus DPC5358, Ligilactobacillus salivarius DPC6502, Clostridioides difficile DPC6534, Clostridium sporogenes LMG10143, S. intermedius DSM20373, and L. lactis HP were weakly inhibited (Table 2). No inhibition was observed against other Bacillus and Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Listeria spp., or other streptococci (Table 2).
The cross-immunity of nisin E producers against other nisin producers was determined by a deferred antagonism assay on different growth media. S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008 were inhibited by nisin A, Z, F, and Q producers, weakly inhibited by nisin J, H, and P producers (<1.0 mm zone radius), and not inhibited at all by the nisin U producer (Figure 5). Nisin E producers failed to inhibit any nisin producers except for L. lactis NZ9800 pCI372-nisQ, which was weakly inhibited on all media. Both S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008 were weakly active against L. lactis HP and were consistently more active against L. bulgaricus LMG6901 on each media type (Figure 5).
Nisin production from all strains was improved by growth on BHI agar, when compared with M17 media containing glucose or lactose, as was evidenced by increased zone sizes against the non-nisin-producing indicators, L. lactis HP and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LMG6901 (Figure 5). S. agalactiae APC7040 (nisin P) failed to inhibit any strain when cultured on M17 agar containing lactose, despite evident growth. S. hyointestinalis DPC6484 (nisin H) was not inhibited by any nisin variant producer on any media type (Figure 5).

3.5. Nisin E Immunity Genes Are Spread throughout the Streptococcus equinus Pangenome

The nsePRKAFEGBTCI gene cluster, encoding nisin E production, was found in 6 of 44 publicly available S. equinus genomes (B315-G597, GA-1, SN033, pR-5, SI, MDC1), in addition to S. equinus APC 4007 and 4008 (Figure 6, Supplementary Table S7). Gene synteny is conserved within the production gene cluster across all the genomes, but differs approximately 10kb upstream and downstream of nse genes in both APC4007 and 4008 (Figure 6). A subset of 20/44 S. equinus genomes (45%) encode the nisin E histidine kinase/response regulator, and transport/immunity proteins (nseRKFEG) (Figure 7, Supplementary Table S7). These genes are present, without the corresponding nisin E production machinery. The encoded NseRKFEG proteins share a high level of amino acid identity with the corresponding proteins of the complete nisin E gene cluster, as opposed to homologous proteins encoded by nisin U (NsuRKFEG) or nisin A (NisRKFEG) (Supplementary Figure S5). A database of proteins extracted from the 44 public S. equinus genomes was searched for sequences homologous to the nisin resistance protein (Nsr), from which no significantly similar hits were identified. The same database was screened for the presence of nisin immunity protein (NisI) homologs, and only the immunity proteins encoded within the previously identified nisin E gene clusters were detected.

4. Discussion

We describe the production of a novel nisin E variant by two S. equinus strains, APC4007 and APC4008, that were isolated from unpasteurised sheep milk sampled from geographically separate locations in New Zealand; we then further describe the prevalence of this variant across the S. equinus pangenome using publicly available sequences. Nisin E described the following nisins: Z, U, F, Q, H, O1,2,3, and O4, P, J, G, and kunkecin A [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Streptococcal variants now compose 45% (U, H, P, G, E) of the natural nisin variants described, which may suggest an importance of their role in Streptococcus spp. competition and in niche colonisation or quorum sensing. Of the five streptococcal variants, two (P and E) are produced by members of the taxonomically complicated S. bovis/S. equinus complex (SBSEC) [25]. The SBSEC consists of seven species and subspecies which are mainly commensal bacteria that colonise gastrointestinal tracts of animals [46]. Species of the SBSEC are found in unpasteurized ruminant milk, likely via contamination of the teat skin and the teat canal. SBSEC members are implicated in infection and antimicrobial resistance, but are also used in food fermentation. Bacteriocin production by members of the SBSEC has been described previously, including bovicin HC5, bovicin HJ50, bovicin 255, macedocin, macedovicin, gallocin, and gallocin D [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. SBSEC member bacteriocin production has been suggested as a mechanism that may support diverse niche colonisation, including opportunistic pathogenesis [52,53,54]. As such, nisin E may confer an advantage to strains of S. equinus to colonise ruminant niches. Despite isolation from sheep milk, both strains of S. equinus produced less nisin E when cultured with lactose (Figure 5). Nisin A expression has been shown to be lactose/galactose inducible, in addition to the traditional NisRK induction [55]. This expression has been attributed to the presence of a NisRK regulated TCT-N8-TCT direct repeat upstream of the nisA promoter [56]. Expression by lactose is not apparent in S. equinus or in nisin P expression from S. agalactiae DPC7040 (Figure 5), which lack a similar repeat 54 bp upstream of the conserved promoter region (Supplementary Figure S2). However other non-lactococcal producers lack the repeat sequence and express nisin when cultured on lactose. This may suggest that the repeat sequence is not required for the expression of nisin on lactose, and that another mechanism limits nisin E and P production on the carbohydrate.
Nisin A has a dual mechanism of action, wherein it binds lipid II, preventing cell wall biosynthesis, and subsequently forms pores in bacterial cell membranes. Nisin variants are typically broad spectrum in nature, inhibiting a range of Gram-positive species, but variants may possess different specific activities or be differentially produced. The recently described nisin G produced by S. salivarius DPC6487 was found to be selectively active against 9 of 23 tested bacteria (21 Gram-positive), including Gram negative Fusobacterium spp., whereas a nisin A producer inhibited all 21 Gram-positive isolates to varying degrees [27]. Similarly, nisin E inhibited 9 of the 40 Gram-positive bacteria screened, including Bacillus firmis DPC6349, Clostridioides spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Staphylococcus intermedius DSM20373 (Table 2). It remains to be determined if this is due to a higher minimum inhibitory concentration of nisin E, that it is poorly expressed relative to other nisin variants, or a combination of these factors.
Nisin E is the second natural variant of 32 residues to be described, the first being the distantly related nisin O4, produced by the human gut bacterium, Blautia obeum [22]. Nisin E contains 10 differences from nisin A, including 8 substitutions, Ile4Lys, Gly18Thr, Asn20Pro, Met21Ile, His27Gly, Val32Phe, Ser33Gly, and Lys34Asn, and 2 deletions, Ser29 and Ile30 (Figure 2b). Nisin E is very similar to nisin U/U2 and P with just three (93% identity), and four (90% identity) amino acid differences, respectively. Specifically, Ala15, common to both nisin A and E, is changed into an Ile residing in nisin U, while Met21 is changed to Ile in nisin E and Leu in nisin U. The peptide is one amino acid longer than nisins U [23] and P, as nisin E contains an Asn32 residue which is absent in the other 31 amino acid peptides and all other nisins. S. equinus, S. agalactiae, S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus, and S. uberis are closely related and frequently inhabit the same niches, facilitating gene transfer events that may explain the similarity between nisin’s E, P, and U. If streptococcal nisin variants are frequently encountered by bacteria in animal GI-tracts, then maintaining nisin production and immunity systems would also be beneficial for competition survival. Nisin H, produced by S. hyotintestinalis DPC6484, is less similar to nisins E, P, and U (sharing ~67–70% amino acid identity) and more similar to nisin A (85% identity), which may suggest a more recent divergence from lactococcal nisins, which is also reflected in gene cluster structure. Nisin E lacks a serine at position 29, which in nisin A, makes the peptide susceptible to cleavage and inactivation by the nisin resistance protein (Nsr). Therefore, nisin E could be a desirable natural variant that escapes Nsr peptide inactivation, though this has yet to be demonstrated. Nisin E also contains a proline at position 20 which, when bioengineered in nisin A, shows an increased specificity of the peptide towards Staphylococcus aureus; taken together these changes may indicate nisin as a useful natural nisin variant for therapeutic purposes. However, previous studies have demonstrated that shortening the C-terminus of nisin A to 31 residues reduces its activity 10 fold, but nisin1–32 exhibits similar activity to that of the full length peptide. Extending the C-terminus has been found to improve the permeation of cell membranes by the peptide and to increase activity against Gram-negative bacteria [57]. However, it remains to be determined if the additional Asn residue impacts the activity relative to other nisins, particularly as Asn is a polar amino acid.
Among the variants, the hinge region of natural nisin variants displays a large degree of amino acid variation in residues 20 and 21. The hinge region of nisin A (NMK) is conserved in lactococcal-derived nisins, with the exception of nisin Q (NLK), which contains one amino acid difference. The hinge region of nisin E (PIK) more closely resembles the streptococcal-derived hinge regions, i.e., Nisin U and O (PLK) and nisin P (AIK). This variation likely impacts activity, as bioengineering of the nisin A hinge region has been previously demonstrated to alter the activity of nisin variants [16]. The isoleucine at position 21, within the hinge region of the nisin E peptide (PIK), is also present in nisin P (AIK) [25,26], although the specific three-residue hinge combination is unique to nisin E (Figure 2b).
Nisin E genes were detected among S. equinus species and not in other Streptococcus spp., including closely related members of the SBSEC. As such, nisin E production may be a unique feature of the species S. equinus, whereas nisin P has been found to be produced by both S. gallolyticus ssp. pasteurianus and by S. agalactiae DPC7040 [25,26]. The nisin E gene cluster encodes all of the genes typically involved in nisin production, including transport, modification, and immunity. However, the gene order differs from that of other nisin gene clusters, with the structural peptide immediately upstream from the lanFEG transport and immunity genes (Figure 2a). The nisin U gene cluster possesses transposases flanking the gene cluster, as well as another directly upstream from nsuA, to which the reorganisation of the cluster relative to nisin A is attributed [23]. The gene rearrangement of the nisin U gene cluster relative to nisin A is also observed in the similar streptococcal nisin P gene cluster (Figure 2). No transposase sequences were found in the nisin E gene cluster to indicate an obvious mechanism of gene rearrangement.
We sought to predict the promoters present in the nisin E gene cluster through sequence alignment with previously characterised promoters in the Lactococcus lactis nisin A gene cluster to provide further insights on nisin expression (Figure 4). The nisin A gene cluster contains two constitutive promoters for the transcription of the nisin immunity protein (nisI) and the response-regulator histidine kinase two-component system (nisRK), respectively [29,58]. It also contains two inducible NisRK-regulated promoters responsible for the expression of the nisin core peptide production (nisABTCI) and transport/immunity genes (nisFEG)(Figure 4) [29]. The constitutive promoter upstream of nisR in L. lactis is not conserved in Streptococcus spp., although we identified putative −35/−10 regions potentially responsible for NisRK expression. S. equinus APC4007 and 4008 share a conserved −10 region and −35, which overlaps with a TCT-N8-TCT direct repeat that is highly conserved across all NisRK regulated promoters (PnisA and PnisF). Two such repeats upstream of the transcription start site have been found to be optimal for inducible nisin expression in Lactococcus lactis [56]. Exploring the absence and presence of these repeats across nisin producers may be of interest in future expression studies to increase production of natural variants, some of which are known to be poorly expressed [22,25,26]. We also predict a third nisin-inducible promoter upstream of the serine peptidase gene (nseP) in the nisin E cluster, which is conserved in nisin U and P and would be essential for expression, given their location at the periphery of the gene cluster.
We predict a number of Rho-independent (stem loop) transcription terminators within the nisin E gene cluster, including the presence of a terminator within the nseR open reading frame that may result in reduced levels of nisin production, as has been previously demonstrated [59]. We note the similarity between predicted operon promoter and terminator structure (Figure 4) and the homology between peptide structures (Figure 3). Nisin J from S. capitis APC2923 does not cluster with other nisin variants, and indeed, the nucleotide sequences are highly divergent from other nisin production gene clusters. Interestingly, nisin H from S. hyointestinalis DPC6484 clusters more closely with lactococcal nisins, and the nucleotide sequences containing predicted promoters are dissimilar to nisin E, P, and U (Supplementary Figure S2). Nisin E clusters with closely related streptococcal variants nisin U and P, and is also more related to nisins O1,2,3, and O4 from B. obeum than its lactococcal variants.
Nisin E sensing and export/immunity genes (nseRKFEG), without corresponding production machinery genes, were found in 45.5% of publicly available Streptococcus equinus genomes (20/44) (Figure 7). Nisin resistance/immunity gene clusters have previously been described as consisting of an S41 peptidase nisin resistance protein (NSR) and a BceAB-type ABC transporter (NsrFP), which are regulated by the nisin response-regulator histidine-kinase two-component system (NisRK) [30,60]. Genes encoding NSR have been detected in a range of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria, including Corynebacterium spp., Leuconostoc spp., Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp., and typically confer high levels of resistance to nisin [30,61]. The genes identified in S. equinus are distinct from the nisin resistance gene cluster and are homologous to nisin E genes, with 19/20 strains encoding proteins with greater than 90% amino acid identity to NseRKFEG encoded in S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008 (Supplementary Figure S5). Previous comparative genome analysis of 43 L. lactis genomes identified a subset of four strains retaining nisFEG/nisI genes, without biosynthesis genes, but did not determine if these strains retained full immune capacity to nisin [62]. A gene-trait matching study of 710 individual L. lactis strains identified 59 strains that encoded nisRKFEG, without other biosynthetic machinery, and found that nisFEG always co-occurred with nisRK and imparted the ability to survive and acidify milk in the presence a 1.5 µg·mL−1 level of nisin, but was not as effective as the presence of nsr [63]. The same study identified the presence of the nisin immunity protein-encoding gene nisI co-localised with nisP in 16/710 genomes, which conferred some degree of nisin resistance [63]. The nisIP sub-gene cluster was not detected among S. equinus genomes, which could result from the fact that the two genes are at opposing ends of the nisin E gene cluster, rather than co-localised, as they are in the nisin A gene cluster, which would more easily facilitate co-retention after the loss of other genes (Figure 2a). The presence of nseRKFEG in S. equinus genomes likely confers a level of resistance to nisin E, enabling strains to colonise the same niche as nisin E producers, but without expending the energy involved in nisin production.
Nisin A is the prototypical lantibiotic, and it has been extensively researched and utilised since its discovery. Novel variants and related peptides continue to be identified across a multitude of genera, many of which are of interest in the context of the current and growing global AMR crisis. The continued discovery of novel nisin variants highlights the ubiquity of nisin-associated genes across prokaryotic genera, suggesting a strong role in Gram-positive bacterial competition in microbiomes. Features of the nisin E gene cluster in S. equinus shed light on the complexity of nisin cluster structure and expression and highlight some gaps in the current knowledge regarding the regulation of nisin variant expression, despite a long history of nisin expression system exploitation [64]. Further investigation of variant regulatory elements could result in improved production and enable in-depth characterisation and utilisation of non-lactococcal variants. Taken together, the discovery of this new nisin variant in some S. equinus strains, along with the finding that other strains apparently possess immunity determinants which are under nisin control, suggests a central role for nisin in the competitive nature of the species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11020427/s1, Figure S1: Phylogram and genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) S. equinus APC4007 and S. equinus APC4008, Figure S2: Nucleotide sequence alignment of 200bp region upstream of nisA, nisF, nisP and homologs, Figure S3: Nucleotide sequence alignment of intergenic region upstream of nisR and homologous genes, Figure S4: Nucleotide sequence alignment of 400bp region upstream of nisI and homologous genes, Figure S5: Amino acid percent identity heatmaps of NseRKFEG protein; Table S1: Type and origin of samples from which strains were isolated, Table S2: Genomes of Streptococcus equinus used in pangenome analysis, Table S3: Nisin resistance protein sequences used in pan genome screen, Table S4: Nisin immunity protein sequences used in pan genome screen, Table S5: Nucleotide accessions containing nisin operon sequences, Table S6: ARNold predicted forward strand terminators from nisin variant operons, Table S7: Streptococcus equinus genomes encoding nse genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P.R., C.H. and C.S.; methodology, R.P.R., C.H., C.S., I.S, D.H., P.M.O. and I.S.; investigation, I.S. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S.; writing—review and editing, I.S., D.H., P.M.O., L.D., C.S, C.H. and R.P.R.; visualization, I.S.; supervision, R.P.R., C.H. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Teagasc Walsh Scholarship and funded by the JPI Food Processing for Health Longlife Project and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), under grant number SFI/12/RC/2273 in APC Microbiome Ireland.

Data Availability Statement

Genomic data from this study has been deposited to Genbank under accession numbers JANHMF000000000 and JANHME000000000.

Acknowledgments

This work was part of the JPI Food Processing for Health Longlife collaboration between Teagasc and AgResearch. We would also like to acknowledge Spring Sheep Milk Co. (Auckland, New Zealand) for providing sheep milk samples for the isolation of the Streptococcus equinus APC4007 and APC4008 strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (IACG). No Time to Wait: Securing the Future from Drug-Resistant Infections; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections (accessed on 29 December 2022).
  3. Arnison, P.G.; Bibb, M.J.; Bierbaum, G.; Bowers, A.A.; Bugni, T.S.; Bulaj, G.; Camarero, J.A.; Campopiano, D.J.; Challis, G.L.; Clardy, J.; et al. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 108–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hegarty, J.W.; Guinane, C.M.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C.; Cotter, P.D. Bacteriocin production: A relatively unharnessed probiotic trait? F1000Research 2016, 5, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alvarez-Sieiro, P.; Montalbán-López, M.; Mu, D.; Kuipers, O.P. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: Extending the family. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2939–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Bacteriocins—A viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xie, L.; van der Donk, W.A. Post-translational modifications during lantibiotic biosynthesis. Current Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rogers, L.A. The inhibiting effect of streptococcus lactis on lactobacillus bulgaricus. J. Bacteriol. 1928, 16, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS); Younes, M.; Aggett, P.; Aguilar, F.; Crebelli, R.; Dusemund, B.; Filipič, M.; Frutos, M.J.; Galtier, P.; Gundert-Remy, U.; et al. Safety of nisin (E 234) as a food additive in the light of new toxicological data and the proposed extension of use. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e05063. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gross, E.; Morell, J.L. Structure of nisin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 4634–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shin, J.; Gwak, J.; Kamarajan, P.; Fenno, J.; Rickard, A.; Kapila, Y. Biomedical applications of nisin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 120, 1449–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, X.; Kuipers, O.P. Synthesis of silver-nisin nanoparticles with low cytotoxicity as antimicrobials against biofilm-forming pathogens. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2021, 206, 111965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gut, I.M.; Blanke, S.R.; van der Donk, W.A. Mechanism of Inhibition of Bacillus anthracis Spore Outgrowth by the Lantibiotic Nisin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011, 6, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Field, D.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Bioengineering of the model lantibiotic nisin. Bioengineered 2015, 6, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Field, D.; Begley, M.; O’Connor, P.M.; Daly, K.M.; Hugenholtz, F.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R. Bioengineered Nisin A Derivatives with Enhanced Activity against Both Gram Positive and Gram Negative Pathogens. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Healy, B.; Field, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Hill, C.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P. Intensive Mutagenesis of the Nisin Hinge Leads to the Rational Design of Enhanced Derivatives. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mulders, J.W.M.; Boerrigter, I.J.; Rollema, H.S.; Siezen, R.J.; de Vos, W.M. Identification and characterization of the lantibiotic nisin Z, a natural nisin variant. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991, 201, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. De Kwaadsteniet, M.; Ten Doeschate, K.; Dicks, L.M.T. Characterization of the structural gene encoding nisin F, a new lantibiotic produced by a Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolate from freshwater catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fukao, M.; Obita, T.; Yoneyama, F.; Kohda, D.; Zendo, T.; Nakayama, J.; Sonomoto, K. Complete Covalent Structure of Nisin Q, New Natural Nisin Variant, Containing Post-Translationally Modified Amino Acids. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 1750–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zendo, T.; Ohashi, C.; Maeno, S.; Piao, X.; Salminen, S.; Sonomoto, K.; Endo, A. Kunkecin A, a New Nisin Variant Bacteriocin Produced by the Fructophilic Lactic Acid Bacterium, Apilactobacillus kunkeei FF30-6 Isolated From Honey Bees. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Sullivan, J.N.; O’Connor, P.M.; Rea, M.C.; O’Sullivan, O.; Walsh, C.J.; Healy, B.; Mathur, H.; Field, D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Nisin J, a Novel Natural Nisin Variant, Is Produced by Staphylococcus capitis Sourced from the Human Skin Microbiota. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hatziioanou, D.; Gherghisan-Filip, C.; Saalbach, G.; Horn, N.; Wegmann, U.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J.; Mayer, M.J.; Narbad, A. Discovery of a novel lantibiotic nisin O from Blautia obeum A2-162, isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology 2017, 163, 1292–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wirawan, R.E.; Klesse, N.A.; Jack, R.W.; Tagg, J.R. Molecular and Genetic Characterization of a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Streptococcus uberis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. O’Connor, P.M.; O’Shea, E.F.; Guinane, C.M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Nisin H Is a New Nisin Variant Produced by the Gut-Derived Strain Streptococcus hyointestinalis DPC6484. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3953–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aldarhami, A.; Felek, A.; Sharma, V.; Upton, M. Purification and characterization of nisin P produced by a strain of Streptococcus gallolyticus. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; O’Connor, P.M.; Saalbach, G.; Walsh, C.J.; Hegarty, J.W.; Guinane, C.M.; Mayer, M.J.; Narbad, A.; Cotter, P.D. First evidence of production of the lantibiotic nisin P. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lawrence, G.W.; Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; Walsh, C.J.; O’Connor, P.M.; Begley, M.; Cotter, P.D.; Guinane, C.M. Nisin G is a novel nisin variant produced by a gut-derived Streptococcus salivarius. BioRxiv 2022. Preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kleerebezem, M. Quorum sensing control of lantibiotic production; nisin and subtilin autoregulate their own biosynthesis. Peptides 2004, 25, 1405–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. de Ruyter, P.G.; Kuipers, O.P.; Beerthuyzen, M.M.; van Alen-Boerrigter, I.; de Vos, W.M. Functional analysis of promoters in the nisin gene cluster of Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 3434–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khosa, S.; AlKhatib, Z.; Smits, S.H. NSR from Streptococcus agalactiae confers resistance against nisin and is encoded by a conserved nsr operon. Biol. Chem. 2013, 394, 1543–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sugrue, I.; O’Connor, P.M.; Hill, C.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. Actinomyces produces defensin-like bacteriocins (actifensins) with a highly degenerate structure and broad antimicrobial activity. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00529-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. A J. Comput. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar]
  33. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Carver, T.; Harris, S.R.; Berriman, M.; Parkhill, J.; McQuillan, J.A. Artemis: An integrated platform for visualization and analysis of high-throughput sequence-based experimental data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, I.; Kim, Y.O.; Park, S.-C.; Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. van Heel, A.J.; de Jong, A.; Song, C.; Viel, J.H.; Kok, J.; Kuipers, O.P. BAGEL4: A user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W278–W281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Waterhouse, A.M.; Procter, J.B.; Martin, D.M.A.; Clamp, M.; Barton, G.J. Jalview Version 2—A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal omega. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2014, 48, 1.25.1–1.25.33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McWilliam, H.; Li, W.; Uludag, M.; Squizzato, S.; Park, Y.M.; Buso, N.; Cowley, A.P.; Lopez, R. Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W597–W600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: An online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W242–W245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Naville, M.; Ghuillot-Gaudeffroy, A.; Marchais, A.; Gautheret, D. ARNold: A web tool for the prediction of Rho-independent transcription terminators. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pompilio, A.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Gherardi, G. An Overview on Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus Complex Isolates: Identification to the Species/Subspecies Level and Antibiotic Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mantovani, H.C.; Hu, H.; Worobo, R.W.; Russell, J.B. Bovicin HC5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis HC5. Microbiology 2002, 148, 3347–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiao, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, M.; Tang, S.; Zhao, X.; Huan, L. Bovicin HJ50, a novel lantibiotic produced by Streptococcus bovis HJ50. Microbiology 2004, 150, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Whitford, M.F.; McPherson, M.A.; Forster, R.J.; Teather, R.M. Identification of bacteriocin-like inhibitors from rumen Streptococcus spp. and isolation and characterization of bovicin 255. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Georgalaki, M.D.; Van den Berghe, E.; Kritikos, D.; Devreese, B.; Van Beeumen, J.; Kalantzopoulos, G.; De Vuyst, L.; Tsakalidou, E. Macedocin, a Food-Grade Lantibiotic Produced by Streptococcus macedonicus ACA-DC 198. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5891–5903. [Google Scholar]
  51. Georgalaki, M.; Papadimitriou, K.; Anastasiou, R.; Pot, B.; Van Driessche, G.; Devreese, B.; Tsakalidou, E. Macedovicin, the second food-grade lantibiotic produced by Streptococcus macedonicus ACA-DC 198. Food Microbiol. 2013, 33, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aymeric, L.; Donnadieu, F.; Mulet, C.; du Merle, L.; Nigro, G.; Saffarian, A.; Bérard, M.; Poyart, C.; Robine, S.; Regnault, B.; et al. Colorectal cancer specific conditions promote Streptococcus gallolyticus gut colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 115, 201715112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hill, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Altermann, E.; Day, L.; Hill, C.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. Extensive bacteriocin gene shuffling in the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex reveals gallocin D with activity against vancomycin resistant enterococci. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Harrington, A.; Proutière, A.; Mull, R.W.; du Merle, L.; Dramsi, S.; Tal-Gan, Y. Secretion, Maturation, and Activity of a Quorum Sensing Peptide (GSP) Inducing Bacteriocin Transcription in Streptococcus gallolyticus. Mbio 2021, 12, e03189-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chandrapati, S.; O’Sullivan, D.J. Nisin independent induction of the nisA promoter in Lactococcus lactis during growth in lactose or galactose. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chandrapati, S.; O’Sullivan, D.J. Characterization of the promoter regions involved in galactose- and nisin-mediated induction of the nisA gene in Lactococcus lactis ATCC 11454: Characterization of the nisA promoter. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, Q.; Montalban-Lopez, M.; Kuipers, O.P. Increasing the Antimicrobial Activity of Nisin-Based Lantibiotics against Gram-Negative Pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00052-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, H.; O’Sullivan, D.J. Identification of a nisI Promoter within the nisABCTIP Operon That May Enable Establishment of Nisin Immunity Prior to Induction of the Operon via Signal Transduction. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 8496–8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cheigh, C.-I.; Park, H.; Choi, H.-J.; Pyun, Y.-R. Enhanced nisin production by increasing genes involved in nisin Z biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A164. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Furtmann, F.; Porta, N.; Hoang, D.T.; Reiners, J.; Schumacher, J.; Gottstein, J.; Gohlke, H.; Smits, S.H. Characterization of the nucleotide-binding domain NsrF from the BceAB-type ABC-transporter NsrFP from the human pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15208. [Google Scholar]
  61. Simões, P.M.; Lemriss, H.; Dumont, Y.; Lemriss, S.; Rasigade, J.-P.; Assant-Trouillet, S.; Ibrahimi, A.; El Kabbaj, S.; Butin, M.; Laurent, F. Single-Molecule Sequencing (PacBio) of the Staphylococcus capitis NRCS-A Clone Reveals the Basis of Multidrug Resistance and Adaptation to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wels, M.; Siezen, R.; van Hijum, S.; Kelly, W.J.; Bachmann, H. Comparative Genome Analysis of Lactococcus lactis Indicates Niche Adaptation and Resolves Genotype/Phenotype Disparity. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Van Gijtenbeek, L.A.; Eckhardt, T.H.; Herrera-Dominguez, L.; Brockmann, E.; Jensen, K.; Geppel, A.; Nielsen, K.F.; Vindeloev, J.; Neves, A.R.; Oregaard, G. Gene-Trait Matching and Prevalence of Nisin Tolerance Systems in Lactococus lactis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 622835. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Mierau, I.; Kleerebezem, M. 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 00427 g001 550
Figure 1. Zones of inhibition of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LMG6901 produced by Streptococcus equinus strains APC4007 (top) and APC4008 (bottom) in deferred antagonism assays, and well diffusion assay of cell free supernatant (CFS) and CFS treated with proteinase K.
Figure 1. Zones of inhibition of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LMG6901 produced by Streptococcus equinus strains APC4007 (top) and APC4008 (bottom) in deferred antagonism assays, and well diffusion assay of cell free supernatant (CFS) and CFS treated with proteinase K.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g001
Microorganisms 11 00427 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Gene cluster structure comparison of natural nisin variants, including nisin E structure in Streptococcus equinus. (b) Amino acid sequence alignment of the nisin E propeptide to its related variants and nisin A; bold: predicted mass of nisin E. (c) MALDI-TOF colony mass spectra of S. equinus APC4007 displaying the nisin E mass at 3100.7 Da.
Figure 2. (a) Gene cluster structure comparison of natural nisin variants, including nisin E structure in Streptococcus equinus. (b) Amino acid sequence alignment of the nisin E propeptide to its related variants and nisin A; bold: predicted mass of nisin E. (c) MALDI-TOF colony mass spectra of S. equinus APC4007 displaying the nisin E mass at 3100.7 Da.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g002
Microorganisms 11 00427 g003 550
Figure 3. Dendrogram of nisin E in relation to other natural nisin variants. The tree scale represents branch length and indicates amino acid substitutions per position.
Figure 3. Dendrogram of nisin E in relation to other natural nisin variants. The tree scale represents branch length and indicates amino acid substitutions per position.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g003
Microorganisms 11 00427 g004 550
Figure 4. Predicted promoters of nisin variant production operons. Absent promoter sequences are denoted by arrows with question marks. Rho-independent transcription terminators of the forward strand with a free Gibbs energy (ΔG) lower than −5.0 kcal/mol are denoted by stem loop structures, predicted by ARNold.
Figure 4. Predicted promoters of nisin variant production operons. Absent promoter sequences are denoted by arrows with question marks. Rho-independent transcription terminators of the forward strand with a free Gibbs energy (ΔG) lower than −5.0 kcal/mol are denoted by stem loop structures, predicted by ARNold.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g004
Microorganisms 11 00427 g005 550
Figure 5. Cross immunity of natural nisin variants with nisin E producers on different media, determined by deferred antagonism assay. Inhibition is displayed as the zone radius (mm). Inset: amino acid percent identity matrix of the nisin immunity protein (NisI) and its homologues.
Figure 5. Cross immunity of natural nisin variants with nisin E producers on different media, determined by deferred antagonism assay. Inhibition is displayed as the zone radius (mm). Inset: amino acid percent identity matrix of the nisin immunity protein (NisI) and its homologues.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g005
Microorganisms 11 00427 g006 550
Figure 6. Multiple comparison of nisin E gene cluster (nsePRKAFEGBTCI) and its neighbouring genes detected in Streptococcus equinus genomes. Scale represents nucleotide identity.
Figure 6. Multiple comparison of nisin E gene cluster (nsePRKAFEGBTCI) and its neighbouring genes detected in Streptococcus equinus genomes. Scale represents nucleotide identity.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g006
Microorganisms 11 00427 g007 550
Figure 7. Multiple comparison of nisin E gene cluster and neighbouring open reading frames in Streptococcus equinus APC4008 with nseRKFEG, identified in publicly available S. equinus genomes. Scale represents nucleotide identity.
Figure 7. Multiple comparison of nisin E gene cluster and neighbouring open reading frames in Streptococcus equinus APC4008 with nseRKFEG, identified in publicly available S. equinus genomes. Scale represents nucleotide identity.
Microorganisms 11 00427 g007
Table
Table 1. Nisin-producing strains used in this study and their growth conditions.
Table 1. Nisin-producing strains used in this study and their growth conditions.
OrganismStrainNisin VariantTemp.O2Medium
Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactisATCC11454A30AerobicM17, 0.5% glucose
Lactococcus lactisNZ9800 pCI372-nisAA30AerobicM17, 0.5% glucose, 10 µg·mL−1 Chloramphenicol
Lactococcus lactisNZ9800 pCI372-nisZZ30AerobicM17, 0.5% glucose, 10 µg·mL−1 Chloramphenicol
Lactococcus lactisNZ9800 pCI372-nisFF30AerobicM17, 0.5% glucose, 10 µg·mL−1 Chloramphenicol
Lactococcus lactisNZ9800 pCI372-nisQQ30AerobicM17, 0.5% glucose, 10 µg·mL−1 Chloramphenicol
Staphylococcus capitisAPC2923J37AerobicBHI
Streptococcus uberis42U37AerobicBHI
Streptococcus equinusAPC4007E37AerobicBHI
Streptococcus equinusAPC4008E37AerobicBHI
Streptococcus hyointestinalisDPC6484H37AnaerobicBHI
Streptococcus agalactiaeDPC7040P37AerobicBHI
Table
Table 2. Spectrum of inhibition of nisin E producers S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008 against bacterial strains, as determined by a deferred antagonism assay.
Table 2. Spectrum of inhibition of nisin E producers S. equinus APC4007 and APC4008 against bacterial strains, as determined by a deferred antagonism assay.
OrganismStrainTempO2MediaInhibition
40074008
Bacillus cereusNCIMB70057737AerobicBHI−−
Bacillus subtilisS24937AerobicBHI−−
Bacillus thuringiensisDPC634137AerobicBHI−−
Bacillus firmisDPC634937AerobicBHI++++++
Clostridioides difficileDPC653437AnaerobicRCM++
Clostridioides sporogenesLMG1014337AnaerobicRCM++
Enterococcus faeciumNCDO094237AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC102637AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC103237AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC103337AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC103937AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC104437AerobicBHI−−
Enterococcus faecium (VRE)APC105537AerobicBHI−−
Lactococcus lactisHP30AerobicGM17++
Lactococcus lactis *ATCC1145430AerobicGM17−−
Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricusLMG690137AnaerobicMRS++++++
Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. lactisDPC538737AnaerobicMRS++++++
Lactobacillus helveticusDPC535837AnaerobicMRS++
Ligilactobacillus salivariusDPC650237AnaerobicMRS++
Listeria innocuaDPC176837AerobicBHI−−
Listeria monocytogenesDPC357237AerobicBHI−−
Listeria monocytogenesL02837AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureus3267937AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureusC5M37AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureus47.937AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureusDPC524337AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureusDPC767337AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureusR69337AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)DPC564637AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus epidermidisDSM309537AerobicBHI−−
Staphylococcus intermediusDSM2037337AerobicBHI++
Streptococcus agalactiae3537AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus agalactiae11937AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus agalactiaeAPC105537AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus agalactiaeATCC1381337AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus pneumoniaeAPC385037AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus pneumoniaeAPC385737AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus pyogenesDPC699237AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus uberisATCC534437AerobicBHI−−
Streptococcus uberisLL38337AerobicBHI−−
−, No activity; +, 0.5–1.5 mm inhibition zone; ++, 2–3.5 mm inhibition zone; +++, ≥4 mm inhibition zone; * nisin A producer.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sugrue, I.; Hill, D.; O’Connor, P.M.; Day, L.; Stanton, C.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Nisin E Is a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Multiple Streptococcus equinus Strains. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020427

AMA Style

Sugrue I, Hill D, O’Connor PM, Day L, Stanton C, Hill C, Ross RP. Nisin E Is a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Multiple Streptococcus equinus Strains. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sugrue, Ivan, Daragh Hill, Paula M. O’Connor, Li Day, Catherine Stanton, Colin Hill, and R. Paul Ross. 2023. "Nisin E Is a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Multiple Streptococcus equinus Strains" Microorganisms 11, no. 2: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020427

APA Style

Sugrue, I., Hill, D., O’Connor, P. M., Day, L., Stanton, C., Hill, C., & Ross, R. P. (2023). Nisin E Is a Novel Nisin Variant Produced by Multiple Streptococcus equinus Strains. Microorganisms, 11(2), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop