Next Article in Journal
Increase of Glycoalkaloid Content in Potato Tubers by Greening as a Method to Reduce the Spread of Pectobacterium and Dickeya spp. in Seed Production Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Inorganic Carbon Assimilation and Electrosynthesis of Platform Chemicals in Bioelectrochemical Systems (BESs) Inoculated with Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-H4
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Anti-Candida albicans Mode of Action of Enterococcus mundtii and Enterococcus faecium
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deciphering Molecular Factors That Affect Electron Transfer at the Cell Surface of Electroactive Bacteria: The Case of OmcA from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries

1
Institut de Minéralogie, Physique des Matériaux et Cosmochimie, Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS UMR, 7590, 75005 Paris, France
2
Laboratoire de Réactivité et Chimie des Solides, CNRS UMR 7314, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue Saint Leu, CEDEX 1, 80039 Amiens, France
3
Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l’Energie (RS2E), FR CNRS, 3459, 80039 Amiens, France
4
Université de Lille, UMR CNRS 8516-LASIRE Laboratoire Avancé de Spectroscopie pour les Intéractions, la Réactivité et l’Environnement, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
5
Université de Lille, FR 2638-IMEC-Institut Michel-Eugène Chevreul, 59000 Lille, France
6
Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 75005 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(3), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023

Abstract

:
Mn(II)-oxidizing organisms promote the biomineralization of manganese oxides with specific textures, under ambient conditions. Controlling the phases formed and their texture on a larger scale may offer environmentally relevant routes to manganese oxide synthesis, with potential technological applications, for example, for energy storage. In the present study, we sought to use biofilms to promote the formation of electroactive minerals and to control the texture of these biominerals down to the electrode scale (i.e., cm scale). We used the bacterium Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1 which can produce manganese oxide in a biofilm. We characterized the biofilm–mineral assembly using a combination of electron microscopy, synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Under optimized conditions of biofilm growth on the surface of current collectors, mineralogical characterizations revealed the formation of several minerals including a slightly crystalline MnOx birnessite. Electrochemical measurements in a half-cell against Li(0) revealed the electrochemical signature of the Mn4+/Mn3+ redox couple indicating the electroactivity of the biomineralized biofilm without any post-synthesis chemical, physical or thermal treatment. These results provide a better understanding of the properties of biomineralized biofilms and their possible use in designing new routes for one-pot electrode synthesis.

1. Introduction

Abundance, low toxicity, low cost and stability in the ambient atmosphere of MnO2-based oxides [1] make them particularly attractive as electrode materials for electrochemical systems, such as primary Zn/MnO2 cells (Leclanché, alkaline cells, 1.5 volts) [2,3] or Li/MnO2 coin-cells (3 volts) [4,5,6,7,8]. Synthesis conditions strongly influence the texture, morphology, particle size and degree of crystallinity of these Mn-oxides [9] with a determinant impact on electrochemical performances. Controlling the structural and textural properties of such electrode materials for batteries is key to reaching optimal electrochemical performances, but it is still challenging.
Birnessite, a phyllomanganate composed of layers of MnO6 octahedra with ≈7 Å interlayer spacing, shows the insertion of cations within its interplanar spaces [10,11]. Various methods have been developed to produce birnessite to be used as an electrode material, including sol–gel reactions, calcinations and hydrothermal decomposition, e.g., [12,13,14], sometimes triggered by the use of strongly oxidizing conditions, and generally under acidic conditions. These methods, however, are most of the time non-environmentally friendly and involve multistep synthesis pathways [15]. To bypass these multi-step processes, it is important to develop a simpler birnessite synthesis pathway, to guarantee an optimized morphology and texture of the electrode.
Our goal is to propose an alternative way of electrode material production. To do this, our approach has comprised using microbial biomineralization to synthesize a Mn-oxide-based electrode. Microbial biomineralization proceeding under soft conditions, i.e., at ambient temperature and in aqueous media, offers a possible abatement of the energetic cost for making electrode materials, as already reported for Fe-phosphates [16], Fe-oxides [17], Co3O4 [18,19], MnOx/C [20], MnO2 [21,22] and CuO [23].
In these systems, fungi, yeast and bacteria [24,25,26] promote the formation of mineral–organic assemblages, organized down to the nanometer scale (size range 1–100 nm) in a structure providing better electrochemical performances than their bulk counterparts formed under abiotic conditions. All of these previous studies have explored biomineralization in planktonic cultures, i.e., with bacterial cell suspensions in aqueous media, which have produced materials organized on the single-cell bacterial scale, i.e., submicrometer scale. These syntheses have required some post-processing after biomineralization such as heating and adding a polymer binder or conductive carbon to obtain good electrochemical performances. To go further, we want to propose a one-step synthesis method.
The main challenge of this study was to limit the post-synthesis processing steps and produce an electrode material directly on a collector. In order to do this, we proposed using one of the fundamental properties of bacteria, the biofilm. Biofilms are organized on a large scale and can colonize large areas (centimeters) [27]; we can therefore envisage colonizing a biofilm on a current collector and obtaining a texture on a centimeter scale. Biofilm-associated cells are different from their suspended counterparts by the generation of an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, reduced growth rates and the up-and down-regulation of specific genes [27]. Biomineralization can proceed within these biofilms, with the EPS acting as the preferential site for mineral nucleation and growth [28].
By analogy, biomineralization in microbial biofilms applied to electrode material synthesis could thus provide (1) an organic polymeric matrix acting as an analog of polymeric binders, (2) biominerals acting as electrochemically active matter and (3) a template acting as a current collector at the electrode (Figure 1).
Manganese biomineralization results from Mn2+ oxidation to Mn3+ and/or Mn4+, and is often catalyzed by a microbial multicopper oxidase enzyme [29,30,31,32] in the presence of di-oxygen or mediated by reactive oxygen species. Mn oxides formed by biomineralization are generally characterized by a nanometric size and a poorly crystallized structure. In planktonic conditions, the strain Pseudomonas putida produces birnessite, a layered manganese oxide [33,34,35]. This strain is also able to form a biofilm attached to stable surfaces and produce Mn oxide minerals [36,37]. The biosynthesis of manganese oxides constitutes a promising opportunity to be explored given controlling Mn-oxides’ structure and texture from the nano to the cm scale [38,39,40].
Here, as a proof of concept, we report a one-pot synthesis of birnessite-based electrodes without any post-processing above 80 °C. This was achieved using a carbon current collector colonized by a biomineralized biofilm of the Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1. Manganese oxides produced by the Mn-oxidizing bacteria acted as active matter of the electrode. We measured the kinetics of Mn2+ oxidation via P. putida in biofilm and determined the nature of the Mn-bearing biominerals formed. The composition of the electrode and the mineral’s structure and texture, as well as organic matter content, were determined using a combination of X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy, electron microscopies (SEM and TEM), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analyses coupled to mass spectrometry. Finally, we evaluated the electrochemical reactivity of these electrodes vs. lithium. Our results highlight the possibility of producing an electrochemically active electrode material of battery vs. lithium in a single step and at room temperature, which opens an alternative route for electrode material synthesis under environmentally relevant conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Culture and Production of Biomineralized Mn-Oxides in Biofilm

All solutions for culture media were sterilized via autoclaving at 121 °C. Biomineralized manganese oxides were produced in cultures of the Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1 (ATCC® 23483™). Bacteria were pre-cultured at 30 °C under aerobic conditions using an incubator system with horizontal stirring (120 rpm) overnight in a pH~6.8 growth medium composed of beef extract (3 g·L−1), peptone (5 g·L−1) and MnSO4·H2O (50 µM), after inoculation at 1/60 (v/v) from a stock culture stored at 4 °C. Then, cells were rinsed three times with a 10 mM HEPES solution with NaCl 10 mM (4000× g, 10 min), and then transferred in the stationary phase into 75 mL of biomineralization medium at a cell density of 2.3 × 108 cells/mL. The biomineralization medium (pH 7.40) was composed of HEPES (10 mM), (NH4)2SO4 (2 mM), NaCl (0.7 mM) and glucose (1 mM). MnSO4·H2O (0.2 mM) was added daily. An autoclaved carbon current collector (gas diffusion layer (GDL—Freudenberg ref H23)) of 0.8 cm in diameter and a thickness of 207 µm, previously weighed, was deposited and left floating at the surface of the biomineralization medium, just before bacteria inoculation. We assumed that the biofilm formed at the medium–air interface close to the GDL current collector and the biofilm formed directly at the surface of the GDL current collector had the same characteristics and so it will be named biofilm-MnOx (Figure 2). The use of biofilm formed at the medium–air interface close to the GDL is justified by the need to have a powder without a current collector for some analyses. Biofilm-MnOx experiments were performed for one week in a dark room, to avoid possible reactions with reactive oxygen species [41], at room temperature and without agitation to promote a uniform biofilm formation. Abiotic controls were prepared in the same way but without bacteria inoculation. Experiments were repeated at least ten times.

2.2. Kinetics of Manganese Oxide Precipitation with P. putida

The analyses were performed in triplicate. Manganese concentrations were measured daily via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Cetac ASX-520). The solution was filtered using a 0.22 µm filtration and acidified with HNO3 2% (Suprapur, Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA). Analyses were based on the determination of Mn remaining in the solution in the medium culture.

2.3. Sample Preparation for Biofilm Analyses

Biofilm-MnOx was collected via centrifugation (4000× g, 10 min) and rinsed 3 times with water. Colonized GDLs were collected and immersed 3 times in water for 10 min. Samples were further dried under air at 80 °C for two hours. Accordingly with characterization results, we suppose that the specific organization of the biomineral is not significantly affected below 80 °C and that all water loss in this temperature range concerns surface water only.

2.4. Abiotic Reference Compounds

Mn-bearing minerals were used as reference compounds for X-ray absorption, electron paramagnetic resonance and electrochemical studies. H0.5MnO2 and HMnPO4·3H2O were prepared via precipitation in aqueous solution. HMnPO4·3H2O was synthesized from MnSO4 1.275 g and KH2PO4 1 g in 15 mL water; the solution was transferred into an autoclave (Parr® 23 mL). Thereafter, the solution was heated overnight at 160 °C. Manganese oxide (H0.5MnO2) was prepared following the modified method from Villalobos et al. [33]:
  • 1 g KMnO4 in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (1));
  • 2.4 g MnCl2·4H2O in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (2));
  • 0.7 g NaOH in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (3)).
Solution (1) was added slowly to Solution (3) during stirring. Solution (2) was then added to the previous mixture and maintained during stirring overnight. The resulting precipitate was washed 3 times with 50 mL water. All powders were then washed twice with 50 mL water and once with acetone and finally dried in air at 80 °C. MnSO4·H2O, Mn2O3 and δ-MnO2 are commercial compounds purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.5. Biomineral Characterization

The mass of biofilm formed at the surface of the current collectors was measured by weighing the collector before and after colonization with a microbalance with an accuracy of up to a tenth of a microgram (XP2U Ultra Micro Balance Mettler Toledo®, Greifensee, Swiss). The average mass of biofilm on the support was 0.675 mg.
Proportions of mineral and organic matter in biofilm-MnOx were measured via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using an STA449C coupled to a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS 403 Aeolos) under dry air flow (50 mL·min−1) with a ramp of 5 °C·min−1, up to 900 °C. These analyses were coupled with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Biofilm-MnOx was characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed in capillaries with a Rigaku MM007HF X-ray diffractometer using a rotating molybdenum anode and a RAXIS4++ imaging plate detector. The background was removed using the software Match!
In addition, bulk Mn speciation was determined via quick X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) at the Mn K-edge (6539–6580 eV) at the ROCK beamline (SOLEIL synchrotron, Saint-Aubin, France). Samples were analyzed at ambient temperature in transmission mode using a Si(111) double-crystal monochromator. Spectra were calibrated by setting the first inflection point of a Mn foil to 6539 eV recorded in double transmission. XAS spectra were merged and normalized and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data were extracted using the Athena software [42]. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and k3-weighted EXAFS data were analyzed using the linear combination fit (LCF) procedure in Athena and a custom-built software based on the Levenberg–Marquardt minimization algorithm, respectively, as described in [43,44].
The textures of the biofilm-MnOx were investigated using a field emission gun (FEG) and ZEISS Ultra 55 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Zeiss, Marly-le-Roi, France), equipped with an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) probe (Bruker). Samples were imaged in back-scattered electron mode at 15 kV (working distance of 7.5 mm) and in secondary electron mode at 3 kV (working distance of 3 mm).
In addition, biofilm-MnOx was analyzed using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) in high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) mode, via high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and XEDS, using a JEOL2100F FEG-TEM (JEOL, France) operating at 200 kV. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were obtained in the areas of interest and used to characterize crystalline mineral phases.
EPR spectroscopy (electron paramagnetic resonance) was used to check the presence of paramagnetic species in the samples. Continuous wave (CW) measurements were performed with an X-band Bruker Elexsys E580 spectrometer operating at 9.6 GHz at room temperature, with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, modulation amplitude of 2 gauss and 2 mW (for powders) or 10 mW (for solutions) of microwave power. Before EPR analyses, powder samples (H0.5MnO2, planktonic-MnO2 [22] and biofilm-MnOx) were filled into 3 mm quartz tubes, whereas 2 mm quartz tubes were used to analyze the liquid samples.

2.6. Electrochemical Characterizations in Li Half-Cells

Electrochemical analyses were conducted in laboratory Swagelok-type cells. The active material (AM) used as a positive electrode consisted of biominerals formed within the biofilm nominally assigned to the MnOx composition. The proportion of minerals obtained via the deduction of the mineral part using TGA was used to calculate the mass of active material (AM) in the electrode. Biofilm-MnOx was provided directly from the positive electrodes, without carbon addition. The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox using biofilm-MnOx as the positive electrode separated from the negative electrode (lithium disk) by 2 sheets of glass fiber disks (Whatman GF/D borosilicate), with the whole setup being soaked in an LP30 electrolyte (LiPF6; 1 M) solution of ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) mixture (1/1 w/w). Galvanostatic cycling tests were conducted at room temperature between 2 V and 3.9 V potential at the rate of C/20 (1 electron exchanged per 20 h) or C/50 (1 electron exchanged per 50 h) using a MacPile controller (Claix, France). Specific capacities are reported in mAh per gram of AM (MnOx). H0.5MnO2 was also tested in the Li half-cell. Experiments were repeated at least three times. The proportion of the biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the current collector was low compared to the amount of amorphous material (current collector) and prevented us from being able to analyze the material obtained after the electrochemical cycle.

3. Results

3.1. Production of the Electrode: Biomineralized Biofilm Formed by Pseudomonas putida

Pseudomonas putida MnB1 has been reported to produce manganese oxide particles, mainly under planktonic conditions [33,36,45]. Its ability to form biofilms has otherwise been described in several publications [46,47,48]. However, in previous manganese oxide production studies, the medium was stirred, making the production of biofilms on a large scale impossible. In our study, we used this bacterial strain to form a biomineralized biofilm at the surface of a current collector in suitable conditions to produce electrochemically active manganese oxide.
The synthesis consisted of the incubation of P. putida MnB1 in a mineralization medium (Table 1), with a carbon current collector (GDL) placed at the surface of the medium. Without medium agitation, a biofilm developed after 10 h of incubation at the interface between the liquid medium and air as an orange-yellow slime. With daily additions of Mn2+, the color of the biofilm turned to a brown tint after 10 h, highlighting manganese oxide precipitation and forming the material Biofilm-MnOx (Figure 2). No precipitation could be observed by the naked eye in the abiotic control in the timeframe of the experiment (2 weeks). Such an air–liquid interfacial biofilm had not been previously described for the strain Pseudomonas putida MnB1 but is quite common among bacteria and could be impacted by modifications of pH, the viscosity of the medium and surface tension [49]. The precipitation yields of manganese ranged between 50% and 80% of the total Mn2+ added (Figure 3). Chemical analyses indicated that between 1200 µM and 1500 µM out of the total added Mn2+ (1900 µM over two weeks) had been precipitated by the end of the experiment (Figure 3). The precipitation of manganese-bearing solids occurred only within the biofilm, and more specifically in the uppermost parts in contact with di-oxygen. Experimentations with medium agitation reported a more efficient Mn precipitation than in this non-agitated biofilm-forming configuration [22,46], probably because Mn-oxidation catalyzed by a multicopper oxidase is dependent on the supply of di-oxygen [31]. The lesser efficiency of Mn2+ oxidation in a biofilm compared to planktonic conditions [22,46] is thus likely related to less efficient contact between Mn2+ and di-oxygen because of the absence of agitation which is nevertheless necessary to optimize biofilm formation.
In summary, we can cultivate Pseudomonas putida MnB1 without the agitation of the medium to form a biofilm at the interface between the liquid medium and air. The addition of Mn2+ into the medium during the process of biomineralization impacted the color of the biofilm and translated Mn2+ oxidation into the biofilm. The addition of support (current collector) at the surface of the medium did not prevent the process of biofilm formation.

3.2. Characterization of the Electrode Biofilm-MnOx

Mn-bearing solids produced in Biofilm-MnOx were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (Figure 4). Collected diffractograms display a peak at 7.4 Å, characteristic of birnessite (JCPDS #00-018-0802 [33,34]). In addition, β-MnIIIOOH, a Mn(III) oxyhydroxide (feitknechtite), was detected in the diffractograms by a shoulder at 4.6 Å [50] (Figure 4). The most plausible way to explain the presence of feitknechtite (β-MnIIIOOH) is an abiotic reaction between MnOx birnessite and the residual Mn2+ not oxidized by the bacteria [11]. This observation confirms that Mn oxides are highly reactive [51].
XANES spectra at the Mn K-edge were best fit by a linear combination of Mn4+ (52% ± 3%; reference d-MnO2), Mn3+ (20% ± 4%, reference Mn2O3) and two contributions of Mn2+, corresponding to two distinct references HMnPO4·3H2O (10% ± 9%) and MnSO4 (18% ± 7%) (Figure 5). The addition of two phases of Mn2+ improves the fit. XANES spectra results are consistent with XRD data, which showed the detection of MnO2, feitknechtite and HMnPO4 phases.
Thermal analyses (TGA/DTG) of Biofilm-MnOx were performed to determine the proportions of organic matter (bacterial cells + EPS) and minerals in the electrode material. The thermograms show three distinct phenomena, taking place upon heating under air (Figure 6a,b). The two weight losses in the temperature range of 20–200 °C denote the release of H2O coordinated to the interlayer cations, mineral water structure and surface humidity as described by [52]. The amount of water in the biomineralized biofilm measured via TGA was ~10%. The subsequent massive release of water and CO2 (~30%) at higher temperatures (ca 200–300 °C) matches the combustion of bacterial organic matter as previously reported in [16]. XRD analysis (data not shown here) indicated that the material collected after TGA was composed of Mn2O3 bixbyite (JCPDS #96-900-7521). The weight loss at around 550 °C could thus correspond to a reduction in the initial material (Mn4+) into Mn2O3 (Mn3+). The absence of any XRD-identified manganese phosphate does not rule out the presence of Mn-phosphate in this material as observed by XANES (Figure 5) but is indicative of its poor crystallinity.
The total weight obtained after TGA has been used in the calculation of the mineral/organics proportion. Taking into account the mass loss associated with the mineral during TGA, the mineral part in the biofilm (corresponding to a large part of MnOx but also including β-MnOOH and HMnPO4·3H2O) was ~57 wt% (from a total weight loss of ~43 wt%). This estimation will be used to calculate the percentage of active material (AM) in the electrode. In a first approximation, it was considered that AM has a MnO2 stoichiometry. It was then checked a posteriori that taking into account other phases present in the material (see results below) had no significant effect on the calculated proportions.
The current collector (GDL), which constitutes the substrate of the biofilm, was composed of an 8-µm diameter carbon fiber network (Figure 7a). After incubation in a mineralization medium with bacteria, we observed the colonization of the surface of the current collector by the biofilm, further confirmed by SEM observations (Figure 7b).
Carbon fibers of the current collector were still visible after colonization by the biofilm; bacteria were able to colonize fibers mostly at the surface of the current collector (Figure 7c). Mn oxides were localized in patchy zones of biofilm close to bacteria cells (Figure 7c,d). Aside from dominant carbon (composing the GDL substrate), the biofilm material contained phosphorus, manganese, nitrogen and sulfur (Figure 8b). Mn and P were detected as colocalized by EDX at some places in the biofilm (Figure 8a), whereas Mn-rich zones devoid of P were detected at a distance from the cells (Figure 8c). Manganese oxide agglomerates were porous and consisted of micrometer-sized polydisperse aggregates of nanoparticles (Figure 7d). The formation of a patchy mineral on the biofilm might be related to a heterogeneous distribution of bacteria in the biofilm. Regions hosting more abundant bacteria may have served as preferential Mn-oxidation sites, with EPS locally acting as nucleation points of the mineral.
To obtain more precise insights into the structure of Biofilm-MnOx down to the nanometer scale, we carried out TEM observations. As shown in Figure 7, the birnessite phase was extracellular (Figure 9a,c,e) and the SAED patterns (Figure 9a insert) confirmed its MnOx—birnessite structure. Organic matter, most probably the EPS, is co-localized with MnOx birnessite (Figure 9a). Co-localizations of Mn and P were identified near organic matter or cells (Figure 9c,d) and could correspond to Mn and P adsorbed at the surface of the organic matter or to a Mn(II)-phosphate phase as shown by SEM (Figure 8a) and XAS (Figure 5). In addition, the hydrolysis of polyphosphate granules such as those observed in some cells (Figure 9c) could provide a source of inorganic phosphate that may react with Mn2+ sorbed at the cell surface, leading to manganese phosphate precipitation near cells [36]. Mn2+ may thus be adsorbed at the edges or incorporated within the structure of birnessite [53,54]. As suggested by XAS (Figure 5), two types of Mn2+ are present, one in the form of Mn(II)-phosphate and another absorbed at the surface or in the structure of MnOx.
To confirm the presence of Mn2+, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a very useful tool used for the detection of paramagnetic species such as Mn2+ or Mn4+. The EPR spectrum of Biofilm-MnOx (black curve, Figure 10) consists of one broad peak with 522 G linewidth centered on g ≈ 1.997, on which a well-defined sextuplet is superimposed, indicating that the presence of Mn2+ ions in distorted octahedral coordination [55] resulted from hyperfine interactions between electron spin (S = 5/2) and nucleus spin (I = 5/2) [55] (Figure 10). Based on the g value and the narrow linewidth, the EPR signal was assigned to Mn4+ (S = 3/2) paramagnetic species which corroborates the findings reported in the literature by Kim et al. on the MnO2 biogenic oxide obtained with different bacteria (Bacillus spore, SG-1; Pseudomonas, GB-1, etc.) [56]. The same features (Mn4+ signal) had also been mentioned in the literature in layered Li[Mg0.5−xNixMn0.5]O2 oxides [57], in spinels (Li1+xMn2−xO4 with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1 [58], Li4Mn5O12 [59]) and in MnO2 powder [60]. Associated with Mn4+, the Mn2+ sextuplet has also been previously observed in the literature. For example, Kakazey et al. attributed such a sextuplet in MnO2 to the presence of traces of the salt initially used for the synthesis associated with the high content of physically adsorbed water at the surface of MnO2 particles and in the pores of their aggregates [60]. Another explanation could be provided by the presence of structural Mn2+ in the sample as already reported by Najafour et al. [61].
The presence of Mn2+ in Biofilm-MnOx could also be assigned to Mn2+ precipitated as manganese phosphate, Mn2+ adsorbed on the material’s surface or Mn2+ in the interlayers of birnessite to compensate for negative layer charges [10,62].
The EPR spectrum of the planktonic-MnO2 (red curve, Figure 10) displays a broad peak assigned to Mn4+ overlapped by a less pronounced sextuplet, indicating the presence of Mn2+ as confirmed by the pseudomodulation curve (inset, Figure 10). The Mn2+ detected with the planktonic-MnO2 could be attributed to a precipitated HMnPO4 as already shown by Galezowski et al. [22]; this amount of Mn2+ is very low compared to that observed with MnOx biofilm.
In the case of the abiotic H0.5MnO2, a very broad signal was obtained (blue curve, Figure 10) attributed to Mn4+ without any traces of Mn2+ as confirmed by the pseudomodulation EPR curve (inset, Figure 10, red curve). A very broad EPR signal had been obtained by Kim et al., with different synthetic MnO2 with a linewidth comprised between 1000 gauss and 2600 gauss [56].
In summary, the material produced (Biofilm-MnOx) through one-pot synthesis via the biofilm colonization of a GDL current collector and subsequent biomineralization was found to be a composite material. The biofilm and the biomineral, making up this composite material, are intimately engulfed and fixed at the surface of the current collector thanks to the exceptional adhesion capacity of biofilms [63]. It contains MnOx birnessite, β-Mn(III)OOH, Mn(II)-phosphate and Mn2+ absorbed at the surface of MnOx birnessite or located in the structure. β-Mn(III)OOH and Mn(II)-phosphate have no electrochemical activity and constitute dead masses in this range of potential (1.9 V to 4 V) [64,65]. As well as an equivalent amount of organic material derived from the cells, EPSs were also detected via TEM analyses, thus making this material a typical organic/inorganic hybrid composite.

3.3. Electrochemical Analysis of Biofilm-MnOx

MnO2 birnessite commonly studied as an electrode material of Li-ion batteries provides capacities more or less close to the theoretical capacity (308 mAh·g−1) depending on the size and the morphology of the particles and the cycling conditions [6,66,67]. Significant research has been devoted to the synthesis of MnO2 nanotubes and the development of methods to produce MnO2 with a controlled morphology is in demand [68].
The electrochemical performances of our bio-assisted electrode (Biofilm-MnOx) were evaluated vs. Li+/Li0 in the conditions listed previously. The potential versus composition profile for a biofilm-MnOx electrode cell is shown in Figure 11a. It reveals electrochemical activity at about ~3 volts vs. Li+/Li0 in agreement with an active Mn4+/Mn3+ redox couple [22,69] with a reversible capacity comprised between 130 and 160 mAh·g−1 at a C/20 rate (Figure 11a). This capacity corresponds to ~50% of the theoretical capacity of MnO2.
During the first discharge, the capacity corresponded to 80 mAh·g−1 at a C/20 rate (Figure 11a) and after the first charge the measured capacity corresponded to 130 mAh·g−1, which indicates an extra charging capacity of about 50 mAh·g−1. During the second discharge, a capacity near 105 mAh/g was recorded which indicates that the major part of the extra capacity observed in the first charge was reversible. Galvanostatic cycling had been performed in the charge (data not shown here) and the results showed the same extra capacity phenomenon. This reversible extra capacity can be explained if it is attributed to the extraction of a mobile charge-carrying cation that was already in the structure.
Given the mineralized medium solution, mobile extra cations in such structures could be Na+ or K+, but EDX analyses of biofilm-MnOx showed near-zero cation/Mn ratios (Figure 7c). This could then suggest that H+ or Mn2+ cations could be present in this biogenic birnessite.
To obtain further insight into this extra capacity observed during electrochemical cycling, galvanostatic tests of an abiotic H0.5MnO2 [33] were performed. As displayed in Figure 11e, the electrochemical test vs. Li+/Li0 revealed electrochemical activity at about ~3 volts vs. Li+/Li0 and a reversible capacity of 160 mAh·g−1 at a C/20 rate. No extra capacity had been observed upon cycling of this abiotic control and this finding could be explained by the absence of mobile H+ in the structure.
The absence of protons’ mobility in the structure of MnO2 supports our hypothesis that Mn2+ present in MnOx could be removed during the first charge, explaining the extra capacity.
In comparison, the biogenic manganese oxide (planktonic-MnO2) obtained with the bacteria Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1 in planktonic conditions, i.e., agitated suspension of bacteria and tested in battery vs. Li+/Li0 in a previous study [22], is shown (Figure 11c). The organic–inorganic composite material showed good electrochemical performances with high power and 300 mAh·g−1 of capacity (Figure 11c) and no extra capacity. EPR analysis of this biogenic manganese oxide (red curve, Figure 10) presented only a small amount of Mn2+ corresponding to HMn(II)PO4, which is a dead mass. This result indicated a low amount of Mn2+ in planktonic conditions as also detected by EPR analysis and confirmed the absence of Mn2+ associated with the manganese oxides. Moreover, in agreement with this result, galvanostatic tests indicated the absence of extra capacity under planktonic conditions and can thus lead one to conclude on the relationship between the presence of a large amount of Mn2+ associated with MnOx in the biofilm and the presence of extra capacity. We hypothesize that Mn2+ cations are present in the structure of biofilm-MnOx as detected using EPR spectroscopy (black curve, Figure 10) and XAS analysis (Figure 5) and were removed during the first charge, which could lead to the observed extra capacity. In the case of birnessite with hexagonal layer symmetry, Mn2+ or Mn3+ have indeed been described with vacancies in manganese–oxygen layers [10,53]
Moreover, this biofilm-MnOx electrode presented a rapid loss of capacity after a few cycles (Figure 11b). In fact, after the fourth cycle, the capacity of the electrode was equal to half of the starting capacity, which reflects low cyclability.
In comparison, the planktonic-MnO2 material presented good cyclability even after 20 cycles (Figure 11d). We note that an absence of extra capacity and good cyclability of the electrode for this condition might be correlated. Thus, the loss of cyclability observed with the biofilm-MnOx electrode could be due to the extraction of Mn2+ accompanied by a loss in structure of the active matter. This extracted Mn2+ could have been transferred to the negative electrode (lithium disk) and led to the positive electrode’s degradation.
To verify this hypothesis, an EPR spectrum of the negative electrode (lithium disk) after cycling was collected to detect possible Mn2+ traces. For this purpose, electrochemical cycling was conducted with the biofilm-MnOx as the positive electrode and the lithium disk as the negative electrode; after one cycle, the lithium disk was recovered, rinsed two times in DMC (dimethyl carbonate) and then incubated in water. The resulting solution was then analyzed via EPR spectroscopy using a 2 mm quartz tube. The obtained EPR spectrum (Figure 12) exhibited a sextet of lines due to the presence of Mn2+ in the solution, which could confirm the hypothesis of Mn2+ transfer from the cathode to the anode side. This phenomenon could be responsible for electrode modification during the electrochemical tests, resulting in a loss of cyclability when the biofilm-MnOx was used as the positive electrode (Figure 11b). This feature could also be related to a degradation of the positive electrode in the biofilm case due to structural modifications induced by the extraction of Mn2+ during the first charge.
In summary, we can produce an electrode material for batteries with a biogenic manganese oxide formed in biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the current collector (biofilm-MnOx). In the literature, all of these studies require post-synthesis processing to obtain an electrode material. For example, Miot et al. [17] provide the production of α-Fe2O3 via biomineralization for use as a conversion-based electrode material in lithium batteries. Shim et al. [18] propose the production of porous Co3O4 that exhibits excellent electrochemical performance in Li-ion batteries. Our method can produce an electrode material in a single synthesis. Electrochemical analyses have confirmed the presence of labile cations resulting in extra capacity during the charge. This presence of labile cations prevents our material from maintaining a good charge after several cycles.

4. Conclusions

The production of an electrode material for Li-ions batteries in a one-step process was achieved through biofilm biomineralization promoted by Pseudomonas putida using a GDL carbon current collector. The use of biomineralization in biofilm was interesting for two main reasons: (1) P. putida’s ability to produce active matter in a polymeric binder network (the extra-cellular polymeric substances (EPSs) produced by the cells) and (2) the possibility to provide a useful birnessite texture on the electrode scale.
The characterization of this electrode material revealed a complex composite material composed, almost equally, of both organic matter (bacteria cells and the EPS) and biogenic minerals (MnOx, β-MnOOH and HMnPO4·3H2O). Biogenic minerals, consisting of phyllomanganate birnessite, were highly textured and embedded in the matrix of biofilm, whereas Mn(II)-phosphates were formed in contact with cells and organic matter. Further EPR analyses were performed to obtain more information about the nature and behavior of Mn2+ cations present in the structure and indicated the presence of Mn2+ related to the electroactive mineral. This electrode material presented electrochemical activity vs. Li+/Li0 without any post-synthesis treatment.
Electrochemical tests of this biomineralized biofilm electrode (biofilm-MnOx) confirmed the presence of labile cations resulting in extra capacity during the charge. The absence of the extra capacity of both planktonic-MnO2 and abiotic H0.5MnO2 is, according to EPR analysis, related to the absence or low amount of Mn2+ in these special electrodes contrary to those of biofilm-MnOx, leading one to think that the extra capacity was due to Mn2+ in the structure of biofilm-MnOx. This extraction of Mn2+ could lead to a modification in mineral structure and a modification in the positive electrode, leading to a rapid loss of capacity during the cycles and making the electrode unstable in the battery.
The presence of Mn2+ associated with MnOx could be due to a diminution of enzymatic oxidation because of the absence of agitation in the medium. The Mn2+ in the medium could be absorbed and intercalated between layers of lamellar manganese oxides [10]. In addition, we evidenced the impact of the absence of agitation in the medium during the formation of the biofilm. Biomineralization under less oxygenated conditions led to the formation of Mn3+-containing phases, which are dead material and negatively impact electrochemical performance. This phase results from the competition between the enzymatic oxidation of Mn2+ into MnO2 and abiotic reactions between soluble Mn2+ and already-formed MnO2.
Our method, using a one-pot production at room temperature with a biofilm, leads to improved electrochemical performances of a birnessite-based electrode. In future work, the challenge would be to optimize the MnO2/organic proportions and Mn2+ biological oxidation efficiency in order to decrease Mn2+ remnants in the final material so as to obtain a more efficient electrode material without the presence of extra capacity. The possibility to obtain an optimized texture of the electrode material without extra capacity could further ensure a better exchange with lithium ions. One solution to optimize the performance of this material could be to use voltage polarization of the current collector during biofilm formation. Polarization can have a favorable effect on the colonization of the biofilm with a supportive or a repulsive effect depending on the bacterial strain, the hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature of the support or the different ionic forces at play in the culture medium [70,71]. The possibility of optimizing the colonization of biofilm on the current collector with an improved part of active matter could be an efficient way of producing manganese oxide. The facility to obtain microscale-textured manganese oxides directly on the current collector could pave the way for the more rational production of electrode materials.

Author Contributions

J.M., F.G., D.L., N.R. and L.G. conceived and planned the experiments. L.G., N.R., F.G. and H.A. performed the experiments. F.S.-P. helped with microbiology experiments using the IMPMC Biology Platform (GEMME). J.M., F.G., N.R., H.A. and L.G. performed the sample analyses. N.R., F.G., D.L., J.M., H.A. and L.G. contributed to the interpretation of the results. L.G. wrote the manuscript with critical feedback from all of the authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the ANR SRB project, grant ANR-14-CE33-0003-01, of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche, to JM. Parts of this work were supported by IPGP multidisciplinary program PARI, and by Paris—IdF region SESAME—grant N° 12015908. The SEM facility at the IMPMC is funded by Région Ile de France, grant SESAME 2006 N°I-07-593/R, INSU/CNRS, UPMC-Paris 6 and by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant N° ANR-07-BLAN-0124-01). The TEM facility at IMPMC is supported by Région Ile de France, grant SESAME 2000 E 1435.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Laure Cordier for running the ICP-AES experiments. We would like to thank the staff of the IMPMC (Sorbonne Université) for support and training with regard to the instruments, Benoît Baptiste and Ludovic Delbès for the XRD facility, Jean-Michel Guigner for the TEM facility and Imène Estève, Béatrice Doisneau and Stéphanie Delbrel for the SEM facility. We thank Antonella Iadecola (CNRS—RS2E) for running experiments at the ROCK beamline. We thank Hervé Vezin (LASIRE—Lille) for faithful discussions surrounding EPR spectroscopy results. Finally, we thank Mathieu Courty (CNRS—RS2E) for the thermogravimetric analysis. We thank Daphné Boursier (Laboratoire de réactivité et chimie des solides) for the proofreading and correction of English.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Post, J.E. Manganese Oxide Minerals: Crystal Structures and Economic and Environmental Significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3447–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jennings, C.W.; Vosburgh, W.C. A Proposed Mechanism for Self-Discharge of the Leclanché Cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1952, 99, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ghosh, S.; Brenet, J.P. Study of the Mechanism of Cathodic Reduction of Gamma Manganese Dioxide in the Leclanche Cell System. Electrochim. Acta 1962, 7, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thackeray, M.M.; Rossouw, M.H.; de Kock, A.; de la Harpe, A.P.; Gummow, R.J.; Pearce, K.; Liles, D.C. The Versatility of MnO2 for Lithium Battery Applications. J. Power Sources 1993, 43, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, H.; Popov, B.N. Synthesis and Characterization of MnO2-Based Mixed Oxides as Supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, D56–D62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brousse, T.; Toupin, M.; Dugas, R.; Athouël, L.; Crosnier, O.; Bélanger, D. Crystalline MnO2 as Possible Alternatives to Amorphous Compounds in Electrochemical Supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A2171–A2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alfaruqi, M.H.; Mathew, V.; Gim, J.; Kim, S.; Song, J.; Baboo, J.P.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, J. Electrochemically Induced Structural Transformation in a γ-MnO2 Cathode of a High Capacity Zinc-Ion Battery System. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3609–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qiu, N.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y. Low-Cost Birnessite as a Promising Cathode for High-Performance Aqueous Rechargeable Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 272, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marafatto, F.F.; Lanson, B.; Peña, J. Crystal Growth and Aggregation in Suspensions of δ-MnO2 Nanoparticles: Implications for Surface Reactivity. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 5, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lanson, B.; Drits, V.A.; Silvester, E.; Manceau, A. Structure of H-Exchanged Hexagonal Birnessite and Its Mechanism of Formation from Na-Rich Monoclinic Buserite at Low PH. Am. Mineral. 2000, 85, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bargar, J.R.; Tebo, B.M.; Bergmann, U.; Webb, S.M.; Glatzel, P.; Chiu, V.Q.; Villalobos, M. Biotic and Abiotic Products of Mn(II) Oxidation by Spores of the Marine Bacillus Sp. Strain SG-1. Am. Mineral. 2005, 90, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, R.; Zavalij, P.; Whittingham, M.S. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of KxMnO2·yH2O. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, R.; Chirayil, T.; Zavalij, P.; Whittingham, M.S. The Hydrothermal Synthesis of Sodium Manganese Oxide and a Lithium Vanadium Oxide. Solid State Ion. 1996, 86–88, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Komaba, S.; Kumagai, N.; Chiba, S. Synthesis of Layered MnO2 by Calcination of KMnO4 for Rechargeable Lithium Battery Cathode. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 46, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, J.; Shi, W.; Xiao, N.; Rui, X.; Tan, H.; Lu, X.; Hng, H.H.; Ma, J.; Yan, Q. Oxidation-Etching Preparation of MnO2 Tubular Nanostructures for High-Performance Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2769–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mirvaux, B.; Recham, N.; Miot, J.; Courty, M.; Bernard, S.; Beyssac, O.; Davoisne, C.; Sougrati, M.; Demortière, A.; Guyot, F.; et al. Iron Phosphate/Bacteria Composites as Precursors for Textured Electrode Materials with Enhanced Electrochemical Properties. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A2139–A2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miot, J.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Guyot, F.; Brest, J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Biomineralized α-Fe2O3: Texture and Electrochemical Reaction with Li. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shim, H.W.; Jin, Y.H.; Seo, S.D.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.-W. Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Bacillus Subtilis-Directed Porous Co3O4 Nanostructures. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rosant, C.; Avalle, B.; Larcher, D.; Dupont, L.; Friboulet, A.; Tarascon, J.-M. Biosynthesis of Co3O4 Electrode Materials by Peptide and Phage Engineering: Comprehension and Future. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9936–9943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.; Liu, D.; Jia, Z.; Csetenyi, L.; Gadd, G.M. Fungal Biomineralization of Manganese as a Novel Source of Electrochemical Materials. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 950–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Yu, Q.; Morioka, E.; Hirajima, T.; Sasaki, K. Synthesis of Biogenic Mn Oxide and Its Application as Lithium Ion Sieve. In Integration of Scientific and Industrial Knowledge on Biohydrometallurgy; Guiliani, N., Demergasso, C., Quatrini, R., Remonsellez, F., DavisBelmar, C., Levican, G., Parada, P., Barahona, C., Zale, R., Eds.; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 825, pp. 439–442. ISBN 978-3-03785-891-2. [Google Scholar]
  22. Galezowski, L.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Miot, J.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Guyot, F. Microbially Induced Mineralization of Layered Mn-Oxides Electroactive in Li Batteries. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ravichandran, S.; Radhakrishnan, J.; Sengodan, P.; Rajendran, R. Biosynthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticle from Clerodendrum Phlomidis and Their Decoration with Graphene Oxide for Photocatalytic and Supercapacitor Application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 9403–9411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Capeness, M.J.; Echavarri-Bravo, V.; Horsfall, L.E. Production of Biogenic Nanoparticles for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol and Oxidative Laccase-Like Reactions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gomez-Bolivar, J.; Mikheenko, I.P.; Orozco, R.L.; Sharma, S.; Banerjee, D.; Walker, M.; Hand, R.A.; Merroun, M.L.; Macaskie, L.E. Synthesis of Pd/Ru Bimetallic Nanoparticles by Escherichia Coli and Potential as a Catalyst for Upgrading 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural Into Liquid Fuel Precursors. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. He, P.; Guo, J.; Lei, L.; Jiang, J.; Li, Q.; Hu, Z.; Su, B.; Fu, Z.; Xie, H. Escherichia Coli Templated Iron Oxide Biomineralization under Oscillation. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 15010–15016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Donlan, R.M. Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tourney, J.; Ngwenya, B.T. Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) Mediate CaCO3 Morphology and Polymorphism. Chem. Geol. 2009, 262, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Learman, D.R.; Wankel, S.D.; Webb, S.M.; Martinez, N.; Madden, A.S.; Hansel, C.M. Coupled Biotic–Abiotic Mn(II) Oxidation Pathway Mediates the Formation and Structural Evolution of Biogenic Mn Oxides. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75, 6048–6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Geszvain, K.; McCarthy, J.K.; Tebo, B.M. Elimination of Manganese(II,III) Oxidation in Pseudomonas Putida GB-1 by a Double Knockout of Two Putative Multicopper Oxidase Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tebo, B.M.; Bargar, J.R.; Clement, B.G.; Dick, G.J.; Murray, K.J.; Parker, D.; Verity, R.; Webb, S.M. BIOGENIC MANGANESE OXIDES: Properties and Mechanisms of Formation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2004, 32, 287–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brouwers, G.J.; Vijgenboom, E.; Corstjens, P.L.A.M.; Vrind, J.P.M.D. Bacterial Mn2+ Oxidizing Systems and Multicopper Oxidases: An Overview of Mechanisms and Functions. Geomicrobiol. J. 2000, 17, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Villalobos, M.; Toner, B.; Bargar, J.; Sposito, G. Characterization of the Manganese Oxide Produced by Pseudomonas Putida Strain MnB1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 2649–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Villalobos, M.; Lanson, B.; Manceau, A.; Toner, B.; Sposito, G. Structural Model for the Biogenic Mn Oxide Produced by Pseudomonas Putida. Am. Mineral. 2006, 91, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Toner, B.; Manceau, A.; Webb, S.M.; Sposito, G. Zinc Sorption to Biogenic Hexagonal-Birnessite Particles within a Hydrated Bacterial Biofilm. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2006, 70, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Parikh, S.J.; Chorover, J. FTIR Spectroscopic Study of Biogenic Mn-Oxide Formation by Pseudomonas Putida GB-1. Geomicrobiol. J. 2005, 22, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gjermansen, M.; Ragas, P.; Sternberg, C.; Molin, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Characterization of Starvation-Induced Dispersion in Pseudomonas Putida Biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grote, G.; Krumbein, W.E. Microbial Precipitation of Manganese by Bacteria and Fungi from Desert Rock and Rock Varnish. Geomicrobiol. J. 1992, 10, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mandernack, K.W.; Post, J.; Tebo, B.M. Manganese Mineral Formation by Bacterial Spores of the Marine Bacillus, Strain SG-1: Evidence for the Direct Oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(IV). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 4393–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Polgári, M.; Hein, J.R.; Vigh, T.; Szabó-Drubina, M.; Fórizs, I.; Bíró, L.; Müller, A.; Tóth, A.L. Microbial Processes and the Origin of the Úrkút Manganese Deposit, Hungary. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 47, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Yao, J.; Wang, S.; Pan, X.; Xiao, R.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Qu, R. Phototransformation of Estrogens Mediated by Mn(III), Not by Reactive Oxygen Species, in the Presence of Humic Acids. Chemosphere 2018, 201, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ravel, B.; Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFITT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2005, 12, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Adra, A.; Morin, G.; Ona-Nguema, G.; Menguy, N.; Maillot, F.; Casiot, C.; Bruneel, O.; Lebrun, S.; Juillot, F.; Brest, J. Arsenic Scavenging by Aluminum-Substituted Ferrihydrites in a Circumneutral PH River Impacted by Acid Mine Drainage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 12784–12792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Miot, J.; Lu, S.; Morin, G.; Adra, A.; Benzerara, K.; Küsel, K. Iron Mineralogy across the Oxycline of a Lignite Mine Lake. Chem. Geol. 2016, 434, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Okazaki, M.; Sugita, T.; Shimizu, M.; Ohode, Y.; Iwamoto, K.; deVrinddeJong, E.W.; deVrind, J.P.M.; Corstjens, P. Partial Purification and Characterization of Manganese-Oxidizing Factors of Pseudomonas Fluorescens GB-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4793–4799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Toner, B.; Fakra, S.; Villalobos, M.; Warwick, T.; Sposito, G. Spatially Resolved Characterization of Biogenic Manganese Oxide Production within a Bacterial Biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Toner, B.; Sposito, G. Reductive Dissolution of Biogenic Manganese Oxides in the Presence of a Hydrated Biofilm. Geomicrobiol. J. 2005, 22, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Long, H.; Zhao, X.; Jia, K.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Lu, X.; Zhang, D. BifA Regulates Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas Putida MnB1 as a Primary Response to H2O2 and Mn2+. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rühs, P.A.; Böni, L.; Fuller, G.G.; Inglis, R.F.; Fischer, P. In-Situ Quantification of the Interfacial Rheological Response of Bacterial Biofilms to Environmental Stimuli. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Suib, S.L. Mechanistic and Kinetic Studies of Crystallization of Birnessite. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Webb, S.M.; Tebo, B.M.; Bargar, J.R. Structural Characterization of Biogenic Mn Oxides Produced in Seawater by the Marine Bacillus Sp. Strain SG-1. Am. Mineral. 2005, 90, 1342–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Eren, E.; Gumus, H.; Sarihan, A. Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Pb(II) Adsorption Behavior of K- and H-Birnessite Samples. Desalination 2011, 279, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grangeon, S.; Lanson, B.; Miyata, N.; Tani, Y.; Manceau, A. Structure of Nanocrystalline Phyllomanganates Produced by Freshwater Fungi. Am. Mineral. 2010, 95, 1608–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, Y.; Benkaddour, S.; Marafatto, F.F.; Peña, J. Diffusion- and PH-Dependent Reactivity of Layer-Type MnO2: Reactions at Particle Edges versus Vacancy Sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3476–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dvoranová, D.; Brezová, V.; Mazúr, M.; Malati, M.A. Investigations of Metal-Doped Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, S.S.; Bargar, J.R.; Nealson, K.H.; Flood, B.E.; Kirschvink, J.L.; Raub, T.D.; Tebo, B.M.; Villalobos, M. Searching for Biosignatures Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Analysis of Manganese Oxides. Astrobiology 2011, 11, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stoyanova, R.; Zhecheva, E.; Vassilev, S. Mn4+ Environment in Layered Li[Mg0.5-XNiMn0.5]O Oxides Monitored by EPR Spectroscopy. J. Solid State Chem. 2006, 179, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stoyanova, R.; Gorova, M.; Zhecheva, E. EPR of Mn4+ in Spinels Li1+xMn2−xO4 with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2000, 61, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stoyanova, R.; Gorova, M.; Zhecheva, E. EPR Monitoring of Mn4+ Distribution in Li4Mn5O12 Spinels. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2000, 61, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kakazey, M.; Ivanova, N.; Sokolsky, G.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.G. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of MnO2 Powders. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2001, 4, J1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Najafpour, M.M.; Kompany-Zareh, M.; Zahraei, A.; Sedigh, D.J.; Jaccard, H.; Khoshkam, M.; Britt, R.D.; Casey, W.H. Mechanism, Decomposition Pathway and New Evidence for Self-Healing of Manganese Oxides as Efficient Water Oxidizing Catalysts: New Insights. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 14603–14611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silvester, E.; Manceau, A.; Drits, V.A. Structure of Synthetic Monoclinic Na-Rich Birnessite and Hexagonal Birnessite; II, Results from Chemical Studies and EXAFS Spectroscopy. Am. Mineral. 1997, 82, 962–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Palmer, J.; Flint, S.; Brooks, J. Bacterial Cell Attachment, the Beginning of a Biofilm. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, X.B.; Wang, C.; Ye, F.M.; Zhu, Q.; Du, G.; Zhong, Y.; Peng, X.; Jiang, J.Z. Phase Transition of Manganese (Oxyhydr)Oxides Nanofibers and Their Applications to Lithium Ion Batteries and Separation Membranes. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Katkar, P.K.; Marje, S.J.; Pujari, S.S.; Khalate, S.A.; Deshmukh, P.R.; Patil, U.M. Single-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of Manganese Phosphate Microrods as a Cathode Material for Highly Stable Flexible Solid-State Symmetric Supercapacitors. Synth. Met. 2020, 267, 116446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hill, L.I.; Verbaere, A.; Guyomard, D. MnO2 (α-, β-, γ-) Compounds Prepared by Hydrothermal-Electrochemical Synthesis: Characterization, Morphology, and Lithium Insertion Behavior. J. Power Sources 2003, 119–121, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yin, J.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Marschilok, A.C. Synthetic Control of Manganese Birnessite: Impact of Crystallite Size on Li, Na, and Mg Based Electrochemistry. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 453, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Huang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Ruoff, R.S.; Wen, Z.; Liu, Q. Self-Assembly of Mesoporous Nanotubes Assembled from Interwoven Ultrathin Birnessite-Type MnO2 Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Manthiram, A.; Kim, J. Low Temperature Synthesis of Insertion Oxides for Lithium Batteries. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 2895–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Busalmen, J.P.; de Sanchez, S.R. Electrochemical Polarization-Induced Changes in the Growth of Individual Cells and Biofilms of Pseudomonas Fluorescens (ATCC 17552). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6235–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Duan, D.X.; Lin, C.G. Effect of Surface Free Energy and Electrochemical Polarization on Attachment of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 199–200, 1967–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the support and (b) of the electrode material of a battery. Each component of the biofilm is analogous to a component of battery electrode material. Black carbon was not added to the biofilm.
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the support and (b) of the electrode material of a battery. Each component of the biofilm is analogous to a component of battery electrode material. Black carbon was not added to the biofilm.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g001
Figure 2. Formation of brown biofilm at the surface of the medium and biofilm colonization on the black current collector after daily additions of Mn2+ in the medium.
Figure 2. Formation of brown biofilm at the surface of the medium and biofilm colonization on the black current collector after daily additions of Mn2+ in the medium.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of the concentration of Mn precipitated as a solid in Biofilm-MnOx (blue squares, indigo triangles and green circles correspond to three replicates in three independent cultures). Total cumulative added Mn2+ concentration (bars) increases with time following daily additions of Mn2+. Abiotic control (black square) does not show any significant Mn precipitation even after 13 days. In comparison, planktonic control (red triangle) indicates a Mn precipitation rate between 95 and 99% all over the experiment [22].
Figure 3. Evolution of the concentration of Mn precipitated as a solid in Biofilm-MnOx (blue squares, indigo triangles and green circles correspond to three replicates in three independent cultures). Total cumulative added Mn2+ concentration (bars) increases with time following daily additions of Mn2+. Abiotic control (black square) does not show any significant Mn precipitation even after 13 days. In comparison, planktonic control (red triangle) indicates a Mn precipitation rate between 95 and 99% all over the experiment [22].
Microorganisms 11 00603 g003
Figure 4. XRD analysis of the biogenic mineral of Biofilm-MnOx. Indexations correspond to birnessite except for the peak at 4.6 Å corresponding to β-MnOOH.
Figure 4. XRD analysis of the biogenic mineral of Biofilm-MnOx. Indexations correspond to birnessite except for the peak at 4.6 Å corresponding to β-MnOOH.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g004
Figure 5. Linear combination fitting (LCF) of Mn K-edge spectra of Biofilm-MnOx. XANES spectra at the Mn K-edge compared with the best fits corresponding to a linear combination of 52% ± 3% δ-MnO2, 20% ± 4% Mn3+, 18% ± 7% Mn2+ and 10% ± 9% HMnPO4·3H2O. The black solid line shows the data and the red dashed line is the best fit of the XANES data.
Figure 5. Linear combination fitting (LCF) of Mn K-edge spectra of Biofilm-MnOx. XANES spectra at the Mn K-edge compared with the best fits corresponding to a linear combination of 52% ± 3% δ-MnO2, 20% ± 4% Mn3+, 18% ± 7% Mn2+ and 10% ± 9% HMnPO4·3H2O. The black solid line shows the data and the red dashed line is the best fit of the XANES data.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g005
Figure 6. Differential thermogravimetric curves (DTG) (a) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGAs) (b) of Biofilm-MnOx.
Figure 6. Differential thermogravimetric curves (DTG) (a) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGAs) (b) of Biofilm-MnOx.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g006
Figure 7. SEM image (secondary electron detector) of carbon current collector before (a) and after (bd) incubation in biomineralization medium with bacteria (corresponding to Biofilm-MnOx). Bacteria in the biofilm (double arrow) are visible (insert in (c)) on fibers of the current collector (dotted arrow), mostly at the surface of the current collector; carbon fibers deeper in the current collector are not colonized by the biofilm (dotted arrow). The biomineral formed in the biofilm is close to bacteria cells (solid arrow) (c,d). Biominerals are porous and textured (d).
Figure 7. SEM image (secondary electron detector) of carbon current collector before (a) and after (bd) incubation in biomineralization medium with bacteria (corresponding to Biofilm-MnOx). Bacteria in the biofilm (double arrow) are visible (insert in (c)) on fibers of the current collector (dotted arrow), mostly at the surface of the current collector; carbon fibers deeper in the current collector are not colonized by the biofilm (dotted arrow). The biomineral formed in the biofilm is close to bacteria cells (solid arrow) (c,d). Biominerals are porous and textured (d).
Microorganisms 11 00603 g007
Figure 8. SEM-XEDS analysis of Biofilm-MnOx: SEM-EDX cartography with elemental maps of Mn, P and C (b) and XEDS spectrum of analyzed zones (black spares) correspond with biofilm (a) and biominerals (c).
Figure 8. SEM-XEDS analysis of Biofilm-MnOx: SEM-EDX cartography with elemental maps of Mn, P and C (b) and XEDS spectrum of analyzed zones (black spares) correspond with biofilm (a) and biominerals (c).
Microorganisms 11 00603 g008
Figure 9. TEM analysis of Biofilm-MnOx (a) showing bacteria (solid arrow) and extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow). Electron diffraction in the TEM (inset in (a)) is consistent with birnessite. STEM image showing extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow) (b) and STEM-XEDS composite elemental map of Mn, C and P with bacteria (solid arrow) (c). XEDS spectrum of one bacterium (d) and biominerals (e).
Figure 9. TEM analysis of Biofilm-MnOx (a) showing bacteria (solid arrow) and extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow). Electron diffraction in the TEM (inset in (a)) is consistent with birnessite. STEM image showing extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow) (b) and STEM-XEDS composite elemental map of Mn, C and P with bacteria (solid arrow) (c). XEDS spectrum of one bacterium (d) and biominerals (e).
Microorganisms 11 00603 g009
Figure 10. Room temperature EPR spectrum; inset: pseudomodulation of biofilm-MnOx (black), planktonic-MnO2 (red) and H0.5MnO2 (blue). Experimental conditions: power: 2 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.
Figure 10. Room temperature EPR spectrum; inset: pseudomodulation of biofilm-MnOx (black), planktonic-MnO2 (red) and H0.5MnO2 (blue). Experimental conditions: power: 2 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g010
Figure 11. Electrochemical cycling of (a) biofilm-MnOx, (c) planktonic-MnO2 and (e) abiotic H0.5MnO2 vs. Li°. Planktonic-MnO2 and abiotic H0.5MnO2 were tested with the addition of black carbon. Galvanostatic cycling curves were obtained at C/20 (1 Li exchanged in 20 h) starting at discharge. Capacity retention was in charge of (b) biofilm-MnOx and (d) planktonic-MnO2 at C/20 (1 Li in 20 h) for the first twenty cycles.
Figure 11. Electrochemical cycling of (a) biofilm-MnOx, (c) planktonic-MnO2 and (e) abiotic H0.5MnO2 vs. Li°. Planktonic-MnO2 and abiotic H0.5MnO2 were tested with the addition of black carbon. Galvanostatic cycling curves were obtained at C/20 (1 Li exchanged in 20 h) starting at discharge. Capacity retention was in charge of (b) biofilm-MnOx and (d) planktonic-MnO2 at C/20 (1 Li in 20 h) for the first twenty cycles.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g011
Figure 12. CW EPR spectrum together with pseudomodulation of Li–disk–water solution obtained after one cycle. Experimental conditions: power: 10 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.
Figure 12. CW EPR spectrum together with pseudomodulation of Li–disk–water solution obtained after one cycle. Experimental conditions: power: 10 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.
Microorganisms 11 00603 g012
Table 1. Composition of the rich and mineralization media used for bacterial cultures.
Table 1. Composition of the rich and mineralization media used for bacterial cultures.
Rich MediumMineralization Medium
CompositionConcentrationCompositionConcentration
Beef extract3 g/LHEPES10 mM
Peptone5 g/L(NH4)2SO4 2 mM
MnSO4·H2O50 µMNaCl0.7 mM
Glucose1 mM
MnSO4·H2O0.2 mM
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galezowski, L.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Miot, J.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Ahouari, H.; Guyot, F. Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603

AMA Style

Galezowski L, Recham N, Larcher D, Miot J, Skouri-Panet F, Ahouari H, Guyot F. Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galezowski, Laura, Nadir Recham, Dominique Larcher, Jennyfer Miot, Fériel Skouri-Panet, Hania Ahouari, and François Guyot. 2023. "Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603

APA Style

Galezowski, L., Recham, N., Larcher, D., Miot, J., Skouri-Panet, F., Ahouari, H., & Guyot, F. (2023). Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. Microorganisms, 11(3), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop