Next Article in Journal
Clostridioides difficile, a New “Superbug”
Next Article in Special Issue
Focus and Insights into the Synthetic Biology-Mediated Chassis of Economically Important Fungi for the Production of High-Value Metabolites
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Bacillus paramycoides Strains Isolated from Channa Fish sp. on Growth Performance of Labeo rohita Fingerlings Challenged by Fish Pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila MTCC 12301
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Specialized Metabolites Produced by Phytotopatogen Fungi to Control Weeds and Parasite Plants

Department of Chemical Sciences, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia 4, 802126 Naples, Italy
Microorganisms 2023, 11(4), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040843
Submission received: 26 January 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 23 March 2023 / Published: 26 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Specialized Metabolites from Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
Weeds such as parasite plants are one of the most serious pests that farmers are forced to combat since the development of agriculture using different methods including mechanic and agronomy strategies. These pests have generated significant losses of agrarian and herding production, constituting a serious impediment for agricultural activities in reforestation practices and in important infrastructures. All these serious problems have induced the expansive and massive use of synthetic herbicides, which represents one of the main cause of environmental pollution, as well as serious risks for human and animal health. An alternative environmental friendly control method could be the use of bioherbicides based on suitably bioformulated natural products, of which the main ones are fungal phytotoxins. This review covers the literature from 1980 to the present (2022) and concerns fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicidal activity in order to obtain their efficacy as bioherbicides for practical application in agriculture. Furthermore, some bioherbicides based on microbial toxic metabolites are commercially available, and their application in field, mode of action and future perspectives are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Weeds, including parasite plants, are among the most dangerous biotic stresses that attack agrarian, forest and ornamental plants. They cause crops marked losses in agrarian production [1]. The request to satisfy human need had become an urgent problem with the increase over time of world population, which could reach almost 10 billion by 2050 [2,3]. In addition, the rapid spread of weeds worldwide reduces the areas available for grazing, and these plants also are poisonous and harmful to grazing animals [4] and the forest and park heritage [5,6,7]. In addition, weeds create serious problems for important infrastructures [8,9]. Another severe consequence due to weed diffusion in the forest landscape is the drastic reduction in precious wood production [10,11].
The growth of weeds is in big competition with agrarian crops and forest plants by the subtraction of water, nutrients and light, and represents serious obstacles for agronomic activities [12,13]. The main control method used in the last five to six decades has been the massive and extensive use of synthetic herbicides with heavy effects on crop safety, risk for human and animal health and the increasing of environmental pollution, which noteworthily contributes to climate changes. These negative effects have increased with the rise of parallel weed resistance and the consequent increase in treatment repetitions [12,14,15]. These problems prompt the finding of alternative and ecofriendly strategies to control weeds, in particular those based on the use of natural compounds, which are biodegradable and not toxic. The fungal phytotoxins alone or in integrated strategy have been extensively studied as one of the more efficacious methods to combat weeds [16,17,18].
Fungal phytotoxins are secondary metabolites that play an important role in the induction of disease symptoms in agrarian and forest plants and weeds, and belong to different classes of naturally occurring compounds [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Considering the several publications on this topic and the importance of the arguments treated, some reviews were previously reported. The first two referred to a few fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity [27,28], some others deal with the use of fungal and their suitable formulates as mycoherbicides [29] and some discuss this topic together with the use of allelochemicals [30]. A reviewer reports as potential mycoherbicides only the Colletotrichum species [31], while another treats toxicological risks linked to the use of microorganisms as bio-herbicidal and the environmental damage due to their repeated augmentative applications [32]. Some other reviews, which are referred to in the successive decades (2000–2020), describe the fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity as a new tool for weed control, also detailing their production, purification and chemical characterization procedures [24,33,34]. Some others only describe the fungal phytotoxins proposed as potential bioherbicide for the control of a specific weed as Cirsium arvense, Sochus arevensis [13] and Chenopodium album [35]. A review describes the secondary volatile and not volatile metabolites biosynthesized by endophytic fungi [36]. Some other reviews report about the possibility to use fungal toxins to biological control parasite plants, in particular Pelipanche, Orobanche, Striga and Cuscuta spp., using different strategies. The first method is based on the use of fungal toxins and natural compounds from different sources able to inhibit the seed germination or to induce the so-called “frenching disease” [37], while the other caused the so-called “suicidal germination” induced by both fungal and vegetable metabolites [15]. A review reports about polyphenols produced by fungal pathogen of crops and forest plants with potential herbicidal and fungicides activities [38].
Considering the several publications on this topic and the importance of the arguments treated, some reviews were previously reported. The first two referred to a few fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity [27,28], some others deal with the use of fungal and their suitable formulates as mycoherbicides [29] and some discuss this topic together with the use of allelochemicals [30]. A reviewer reports as potential mycoherbicides only the Colletotrichum species [31], while another treats toxicological risks linked to the use of microorganisms as bio-herbicidal and the environmental damage due to their repeated augmentative applications [32]. Some other reviews, which are referred to in the successive decades (2000–2020), describe the fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity as a new tool for weed control, also detailing their production, purification and chemical characterization procedures [24,33,34]. Some others only describe the fungal phytotoxins proposed as potential bioherbicide for the control of a specific weed as Cirsium arvense, Sochus arevensis [13] and Chenopodium album [35]. A review describes the secondary volatile and not volatile metabolites biosynthesized by endophytic fungi [36]. Some other reviews report about the possibility to use fungal toxins to biological control parasite plants, in particular Pelipanche, Orobanche, Striga and Cuscuta spp., using different strategies. The first method is based on the use of fungal toxins and natural compounds from different sources able to inhibit the seed germination or to induce the so-called “frenching disease” [37], while the other caused the so-called “suicidal germination” induced by both fungal and vegetable metabolites [15]. A review reports about polyphenols produced by fungal pathogen of crops and forest plants with potential herbicidal and fungicides activities [38].
Considering the several publications on this topic and the importance of the arguments treated, some reviews were previously reported. The first two referred to a few fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity [27,28], some others deal with the use of fungal and their suitable formulates as mycoherbicides [29] and some discuss this topic together with the use of allelochemicals [30]. A reviewer reports as potential mycoherbicides only the Colletotrichum species [31], while another treats toxicological risks linked to the use of microorganisms as bio-herbicidal and the environmental damage due to their repeated augmentative applications [32]. Some other reviews, which are referred to in the successive decades (2000–2020), describe the fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicide activity as a new tool for weed control, also detailing their production, purification and chemical characterization procedures [24,33,34]. Some others only describe the fungal phytotoxins proposed as potential bioherbicide for the control of a specific weed as Cirsium arvense, Sochus arevensis [13] and Chenopodium album [35]. A review describes the secondary volatile and not volatile metabolites biosynthesized by endophytic fungi [36]. Some other reviews report about the possibility to use fungal toxins to biological control parasite plants, in particular Pelipanche, Orobanche, Striga and Cuscuta spp., using different strategies. The first method is based on the use of fungal toxins and natural compounds from different sources able to inhibit the seed germination or to induce the so-called “frenching disease” [37], while the other caused the so-called “suicidal germination” induced by both fungal and vegetable metabolites [15]. A review reports about polyphenols produced by fungal pathogen of crops and forest plants with potential herbicidal and fungicides activities [38].
Thus, the present review is the first one focused on only fungal metabolites with herbicidal activity. The results discussed in the two different sections were obtained from Sci-Finder research from 1980 to the present (2022) and chronologically reported. Section 3 describes fungal phytotoxins for the control of weeds, and the fourth section discusses fungal toxins regarding the control of parasite plants. This review is focused on fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicidal activity so as to obtain their efficacy as bioherbicides for practical application in agriculture and other fields. Furthermore, the bioherbicide based on microbial toxic metabolites commercially available, and their application in field, their mode of action and future perspectives are also discussed.

2. Recent Developments for the Purification and Identification of Natural Compounds

Innovative technologies have played an important role in the chemistry of natural compounds. As regards the compound purification from a complex mixture, HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) has assumed a crucial role in addition to the traditional chromatographic methods by column and TLC. HPLC is routinely used in the separation of natural compounds and the development of its hyphenated techniques, as LC/UV-photodiode array (LC/UV-DAD), LC/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and LC/nuclear magnetic resonance (LC/NMR) provide very efficacious tools to reach the fundamental goal of having a pure natural compound to submit to its identification. Biological samples managing the preparation of the sample to apply to the columns is a very important step. In fact, the sample may contain complex macromolecules and contaminants which could damage the column and are frequently expensive. Thus, these contaminants should be preliminary removed [39]. The chemical composition of a given mixture of natural compounds is generally analyzed conjointly by a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (CG-FID) and GC-mass spectrometry (MS) techniques for quantitative and qualitative purposes. The identification of compounds is performed by comparison of the experimental results with those reported in the electron ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS) spectra library. However, in many cases (i.e., less than 90% of agreement), the identification is not unambiguous and further investigation are necessary. To have the confirmation of the structure of the compound analysed, the NMR methodologies (1D 1H, 13C and/or two-dimensional (2D) NMR) must be used. NMR is the most powerful tool for the structural determination of organic compounds which frequently are completely novel and often possess unusual or unprecedent reported structural features. However, when two or more compounds with similar structure are present in the same sample, NMR spectra could contain signal systems which are difficult to assign (e.g., low signal intensity and/or significant chemical shift overlapping). In this context, the joint use of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) could be an efficient alternative method. In fact, ESI does not induce the molecular structure changing, and the spectra recorded are substantially devoid of fragment ions. However, significant structural data could only be provided by tandem mass spectrometry experiments (MS/MS), which permit the post-ionization process into a collision cell, and allow controlled ion dissociation [40,41].
In addition, in the last decade, ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) has been developed that more easily allow the unambiguous identification of an organic compound. In IM-MS experiments, using a buffer gas and applying a weak electric field, two ions that have the same mass-to-ratio pass through the drift cell and are differentially decelerated according to their active surface. This process is called collision cross section (CCS). Thus, the IM-MS method could be very suitable to analysing isomer mixtures [42].

3. Fungal Phytotoxins to Biocontrol Weeds

This section chronologically describes, except for the cases of treating the same argument, the source, structure and biological activity of the fungal metabolites which showed potential herbicidal activity to biocontrol weedy plants, and in some cases, other interesting biological activities.
Two phytopathogen fungi were isolated from infected leaves of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.), which was collected in Israel. Johnsongrass is one of the most dangerous weeds, inducing severe losses to 30 crops in 53 countries [43]. One of its pathogens was identfied as Alternaria alternata, which produced the known phytotoxic tenuazonic acid (1, Figure 1) [44]. The other fungus was identified as Exserohilum turcicum (also reported as Drechslera turcica), which is a known pathogen of sorghum and zea leaves causing elongated pale spots, often with a dark margin [45]. Compound 1 was firstly isolated from the culture filtrates of Alternaria longipes, which is the responsible agent of the tobacco brown spot disease. When a few drops (20 μL each) of aqueous solution containing different amount of compound 1 were applied to the tobacco leaf at 25–30 °C, the toxin induced necrotic spots surrounded by halos, which appeared within 60 h after inoculation [46]. E. turcicum also produced another phytotoxic compound, which was named monocerin (2, Figure 1). The latter compound (2) showed phytotoxic activity when assayed on cuttings of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), inducing a confluent necrotic spot 7 mm in diameter within 16 h after treatment. The necrotic area expanded with the increasing of time. When tested in the same condition on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cuttings, compound 2 caused the wilting of leaves, while the tissues became flaccid within 16 h after treatment. Finally, when assayed against johnsongrass at 1 mg/mL, monocerin compound 2 almost completely inhibited root elongation of pre-germinated seeds, and caused root necrosis. When it was tested at the lowest concentration (33 ppm), it induced approximately 50% reduction in root elongation after 96 h, as compared with controls. Tested at same concentration and time of incubation on seedling shoot growth, compound 2 caused a similar decrease [47].
Altheichin (3, Figure 1), which is a doubly hydrated form of 4,9-dihydroxy perylene-3,10-quinone, was isolated from Alternaria eichorniae, a pathogen of water hyacinth, which is an economically important aquatic weed. Water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) is a perennial, herbaceous and aquatic plant native to the Amazon basin. It is one of the most dangerous weeds predominantly diffused in the tropics and subtropics world regions. It generated heavy crops losses for rice and represents a great problem for navigable waterways, irrigation canals and drainage ditches. Alteichin (3), tested by leaf puncture on the host plant at concentrations of 1, 5 and 10 μg per 10 μL droplets, produced a necrotic fleck within 12 h, which grew to 3–4 mm in diameter after 5 days. Compound 3, assayed at similar concentrations, also caused necrotic lesions on tomato, Canada thistle, wheat, sunflower and barley leaves [48]. Alteichin (3) directly affected some sites in the plant cell, similar to the action of cercosporin, which causes structural changes in plant membranes [48].
Previously, two pigments from the same fungus were isolated in the ratio of 4:1 and identified as the two anthraquinone derivatives, which were named bostrycin and 4-deoxybostrycin (4 and 5, Figure 1). Compounds 4 and 5, when tested on the leaves of host plant and those of some agrarian and weedy plants, showed phytotoxicity, with necrosis ranging <1 to 3 mm when assayed at 250 μg/μL. These symptoms were comparable to those induced from the fungus producer culture filtrates, but at four-fold concentrated. Furthermore, the two toxins did not show toxicity when tested on the shoots of the aquatic plant hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) [49].
Bipolaroxin and dihydrobipolaroxin (6 and 7, Figure 1), which are two sesquiterpenoids belonging to the subgroup of eremophilanes, were isolated from Bipolaris cynodontis pathogen of Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon L.), which is recognised in 80 countries as a weed problem in at least 40 different crops, and is also known as one of the causers of “hay fever”. Bipolaroxin (6) was tested at a concentration range 0.038–3.8 mM against dicots such as Zea mays (corn), Helianthus annus (sunflower), Saccharam spp. (sugarcane) Eleucine indica (goosegrass), Festuca sp. (fescue), (wild oats), Amaranthus arverse (pigweed) and the two hosts Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) and S halepense (Johnson grass), showing selective phytotoxic activity against the two host weeds. Furthermore, when tested at 0.38 mM, it did not induce toxicity on agrarian crops such as wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and corn (Zea mays). Its dihydro analogue 7 did not cause phytotoxicity when assayed in the same conditions against Bermuda grass, goosegrass, wheat or barley, showing that the C12 aldehyde is a structural feature essential for activity [50].
Cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8, Figure 1) was produced together with six diketopiperazines from A. alternata, which is the causal agent of black leaf blight of spotted knapweed, (Centaurea maculosa) [51]. Since the 1900s, the weed has infested rangelands of the northwestern United States and southwestern Canada, causing ca. 70% losses in forage production [52]. Furthermore, C. maculasa rapidly spread in the absence natural predators, and it is efficacious enough to compete with native grasses. The other six diketopiperazine were identified as cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Phe-), cyclo(-L-Pro-D-Phe-), cyclo(-Pro-Ile-), cyclo(-Pro-Val-), cyclo(-Pro-Leu-) and cyclo(-Pro-Ala-) (914, Figure 1). The relative and absolute configuration of the last four dicyclopeptides was not determined at that time. All the diketopiperazines (814) were tested on knapweed leaf puncture, and hypocotyls and cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) caused lesions at concentrations ranging 10−3 to 10−5 M. Compounds 9 and 10 and showed different phytotoxicity, as the first (9) showed toxicity at 10−4 M and the other (10) inactivity even at 10−3 M. The other compounds, 11, 12, 13 and 14, were not toxic against knapweed at any of the test concentrations. Similar results were observed when the test was repeated with hypocotyl tissue. The host specificity of cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8) was determined using leaf puncture assay and with a wide variety of plants including both monocots and dicots, testing the toxin at a concentration range of 10−3–10−5. Among the 19 tested plants, which were infected from different A. alternata form, there are different agrarian crops and weeds, and compound 8 induced consistent necrotic lesions only in knapweed leaves [51]. Later cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8) was also produced by Lysobacter capsici AZ78 and showed antifungal activity against sporangia of Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola [53]. These two pathogens are, respectively, the causal agent of the late blight of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [54], as well as the the downy mildew of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) [55]. The application of L. capsici AZ78 culture filtrates appeared to be a convenient and ecofriendly alternative method to control the two diseases with respect to the traditional methods based on copper products, which possess a negative environmental impact and risks for human and animal health. A similar activity to protect the tomato plant from P. infestans was showed from the bacterial culture filtrates [53]. Cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8) and its four hemisynthetic derivatives prepared from compound 8 were used in a structure–activity relationship (SAR) study aimed to obtain a safe and environmentally friendly specific bioherbicide. The derivatives of compound 8 were obtained by the esterification of the phenol hydroxy group with the acetic anhydride, p-bromobenzoyl chloride, 5-azidopentanoic and 2-naphthoic acids [56]. The dicyclopeptide 8 and its four derivatives were tested for their antifungal activity against P. infestans. The results obtained showed that the antifungal activity increased with the polarity of the compounds. In fact, the acetyl and the naphthoyl ester of 8, which by cromatocgraphic profile were more polar compared to compound 8, and its p-bromobenzoyl and 5-azidopentanoyl esters showed increased activity [56]. The polarity of the derivatives could facilitate their crossing of the cell membrane, and when inside they could be hydrolyzed in the active phenolic form, a process that frequently occurs among the natural compound esters at physiological pH [57]. In addition, the very strong fungicidal activity of the 5-azidopenatoyl ester of compound 8 could also be increased by its reactivity. Indeed, in losing nitrogen, the esters could be converted in the corresponding very reactive nitrene, which could link with lone electron pair-bearing groups of the receptor binding sites [58,59].
L. capsici showed how to produce the other 2,5-diketopiperazines which showed toxicity against P. infestans and P. viticola. These were identified as cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Val-), cyclo(-D-Pro-D-Phe-), cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Leu-) and cyclo(-D-Pro-L-Tyr-) (1518, Figure 1) [60]. When tested against the phytopathogen Gram-positive bacterium Rhodococcus fascians, only compounds 8 and 15 showed antibiotic activity, reducing the bacterial viability by 16 and 5%, respectively, compared to the untreated control, and similar to that of chloramphenicol, which was used as a positive control [60]. Recently, cyclic dipeptides (cyclo-L-Pro-L-Tyr-), cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Val-), cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Leu-) and cyclo(-D-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8, 15, 17 and 18), together with the bacterial lipodepsipeptides such as tolaasins I, II, A, D and E, and WLIP together with hexacetyl- and tetrahydro-tolaasin I and WLIP methyl ester, were tested against several pathogenic bacteria and fungi. These latter included the Burkholderia caryophylli (syn. Pseudomonas caryophylli) responsible for bacterial wilt of carnation, causing serious losses in carnation production [61] and Pseudomonas syringae pv. panici, which induces diseases in different plants including rice, lilac, millet and pearl millet [62] as well as Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci, responsible for brown spots on tobacco, a disease named wildfire which causes severe economic consequences [63]. Pseudomonas syringae pv. siringae, which is the most polyphagous bacterium in the P. syringae complex affecting woody and herbaceous host plants [64], was also used together with Pseudomonas syringae pv. japonica, which is the causal agent of the black node disease of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestiuum L.) [65]. Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus megaterium and Escherichia coli were used as common laboratory strains. Colletotrichum truncatum, which is responsible for the dangerous soybean anthracnose in Argentina causing significant yield losses [66], is the only fungus used. The results obtained showed that the antibacterial and antifungal activity of lipodepsipeptides in the inhibition of microbial growth was 56–60 times higher than that of dicylopeptides. Among the lipodepsipeptides, the nonapeptides such as WLIP exhibited weaker fungicide activity against C. truncatum. The presence of some amino acid residues of the lactone ring of lipodepsipetides with a longer peptide side chain is an important feature in increasing activity, while the derivatization of the amino acid residues of both the macrocyclic lactone ring and linear peptide side chain weakly affects inhibitory activity [67].
Successively, A. alternata, which is described above as the causal agent of black leaf blight of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) [68], showed production alongside the diketopiperazine (814) and also other phytotoxins belonging to tetramic acids and perylenequinones families. In fact, tuenazoic acid (1), which was described aboce, was isolated from the fungal culture together with four perylenequinones such as alterlosin I and II (19 and 20, Figure 1), altertoxin III (21, Figure 1) and alteichin (3) [68]. The latter compound (3) was already reported above as phytotoxic metabolite of A. eichomiae [50] and was isolated as a pigment from A. altemata together with altertoxin III (21), which showed toxicity on lettuce [69] and also appeared to be a mutagenic substance [70]. All four perylenequinones (1921 and 3) were tested against knapweed, and alterlosins I and II (19 and 20) caused necrotic lesions at test concentrations of 10−4 M, with compound 20 inducing larger necrotic lesions compared to the small flecks induced by compound 19. Compounds 3 and 21 were not toxic to knapweed at any test concentration [68].
Viridiol (22, Figure 1) was isolated as the main phytotoxin from the cultures of Gliocladium virens when the fungus was grown on rice [71]. G. virens produces a number of metabolites with antimicrobial activity such as gliotoxin [72] and gliovirin [73] (23 and 24, Figure 1), which have antifungal and antibacterial activity. When the fungus peat mixture was applied at rates of 8.7% (of total volume) or less, most weeds were reduced >90%, while seedling dry weights also showed marked reduction. Similarly, applications of the same mixture at 4.5% induced the reduction in root and shoot weight of redroot pigweed by 93 and 98%, respectively. Crops were only affected at higher treatment levels. Viridiol production was detected 3 days after the incorporation of the fungus-peat mixture at a rate of 11%, reaching the peak on the fifth and sixth days. The values measured were proximately 25 ug viridiol/100 mL soil, and then a decrease to undetectable levels by the end of 2 weeks occurred. Compound 22 showed phytotoxicity against an annual composite species but was less toxic in monocot control [71].
Successively, viridiol (22) was isolated together with some analogues such as 1-deoxyviridiol, nodulisporiviridin M, demethoxyviridiol and hyfraxinic acid, which is a tetrasubstituted octanoic acid from the organic extract of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. The fungus was responsible for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) dieback in Europe. All the compounds were tested at concentrations of 1.0 and 0.5 mg/mL by a leaf puncture assay on Celtis australis L., Quercus suber L., Hedera elix L., Juglans regia L. and Fraxinus angustifolia L. Among them, hyfraxinic acid, viridiol and demethoxyviridiol showed strong phytotoxic activity on different Quercus spp. inducing necrotic lesions, while 1-deoxyviridiol and nodulisporiviridin M appeared to be inactive [74].
Cyperine (25, Figure 2) was produced from Ascochyta cypericola isolated from purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.), which is a well-known and ubiquitous weed that is widespread throughout Africa, India, Southern Asia, Australia, South and Central America and the southern United States [75]. A. cypericola induces both sunken lesions on the stem, sheath and involucre, as well as reddish-brown striations on the leaves of infected plants. Cyperine (25) is a strong phytotoxin with modest host selectivity within the genus Cyperus. The host weed (Cyperus rotundus L.) showed the greatest sensitivity to the toxin among the other species tested [76].
Cyperin (25) was also isolated together with 6-Methylsalicylic acid, epoxydon, desoxyepoxydon, phyllostine and epoxydon 6-methylsalicylate ester (2630, Figure 2) from Phoma sorghina, which was obtained from leaf spots on pokeweed (Phytolacca americana L.) [77]. Pokeweed is widespread throughout southeastern United States in disturbed habitats, and when infected by P. sorghina, showed leaves lesions which appeared brownish-black and ranged from 5 to 12 mm in diameter. The fungus is also well known as the causal agent of leaf spots on dicot crop plants and glume blight of rice [78,79,80,81,82,83]. The compounds 2530 induced necrosis on pokeweed leaves and on eight other weed species including sicklepod, Prickly sida, johnsongrass, sorghum, Morning Glory, jimsonweed, lambsquarters and watercress, appearing to be non-specific phytotoxins. Metabolites 25, 27 and 28 also exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against all bacteria and fungi tested, while compounds 25, 26 and 27 also inhibited sorghum root growth [77].
Ascochytine, 2 pyrenolide A and hyalopyrone (3133, Figure 2) were produced by Ascochyta hyalospora, which is a fungus responsible for lambsquarters or fat hen (Chenopodium album L.) leaf spot. The compounds 3133 showed phytotoxicity in tree assays using the host plant (lambsquarter) and other different weedy plants such as Prickly sida, sicklepod, Morning Glory, johnsongrass, sorghum, bentgrass, ragweed, watercress and jimsonweed. The strongest phytotoxic activity was showed by assaying ascochytine, the main fungal metabolite (31) on johnsongrass and sorghum. Compound 31 and pyrenolide A (32) exhibited comparable activity towards the host plant lambsquarters, while hyalopyrone (33) was markedly less active. Ascochytine and pyrenolide A also showed a similar activity in causing electrolyte leakage in lambsquarters and in inhibition sorghum root growth [84]. Ascocytine (31) was also isolated from some strains of A. pisi and A. fabae, which are well known as pathogens responsible of pea and bean anthracnose when cultivated in liquid medium. A. pisi also produced ascosalitoxin, 2,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-6,1,3di-methyl-2-oxopentyl)benzaldehyde (34, Figure 2) when grown autoclave kernels. Compound 34 showed phytotoxic activity on pea and bean leaves and pods, and on tomato seedlings, but had no zootoxicity [85].
Successively, the biocontrol of fat hen (C. album L.) was extensively studied with the economic support of the European Project FAIR5-CT97–3525 entitled “Optimizing Biological Control of a Dominant Weed in Major Crop”. Ascochyta caulina is a pathogen fungus which specifically infected Chenopodium album L., and was suggested as a potential mycoherbicide to control this weed, which is very dangerous and widespread in arable crops throughout Europe [86,87]. Ascaulitoxin, its aglycone (2,4,7-triamino-5-hydroxyoctandioic acid) and trans-4-aminoproline (35, 37 and 36, Figure 2) were isolated as phytotoxic metabolites from the fungal culture filtrates of A. cauilina [88,89,90]. The relative and absolute configuration of ascaulitoxin and trans-4-aminoproline (35 and 36) were, respectively, determined. That of toxin 35 was determined by studies on J-based NMR configurational analysis of a nitrogen-substituted system [91], while that of compound 36 was assigned through its enantioselective synthesis [89]. A HPLC method was developed for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the three phytotoxins using an anion exchange chromatography column and a pulsed amperometric detection [90]. A simple, convenient and ecofriendly method for large-scale preparation of the mixture of the three toxins by cation exchange chromatography was developed, affording an amount of phytotoxin to further characterize their herbicidal potential in green-house and field [92]. Ascaulitoxin and trans-4-aminoproline (35 and 36) were assayed to evaluate their phytoxicity, using 30 μg per droplet on punctured leaves of different plants including the host, other weeds and cultivated species. Compound 35 induced necrotic spots surrounded by chlorosis on C. album leaves and on other weeds (common sowthistle, annual fleabane, noogoora burr, tree of heaven), and on cultivated plants (pea). When assayed on tomato and redroot pigweed, it caused necrosis of reduced size. Compound 36, using the same test at 1 μg/μL, caused large areas of necrosis around the puncture point on fat hen. On other dicot (poppy, annual mercury, wild cucumber), through medium ones (tree of heaven, tomato, common sowthistle), the phytotoxicity varied from large necrotic areas to small necrotic spots (black nightshade). When compound 36 was assayed on several cultivated (wheat, oat, barley) and wild (canarygrass, slender foxtail, wild oat) monocots, it was not toxic. Both metabolites 35 and 36 did not exhibited antifungal and antibacterial activities when assayed at up to 50 μg per disk on Geotrichum candidum, Pseudomonas syringae sp. syringae and E. coli. and no zootoxic activity when tested, at concentrations up to 40 μg/mL in sea water on brine shrimp larvae (Artemia salina L.) [87,88]. The ascaulitoxin aglycone 37 was not biologically characterized, as in solution it converted into a complex mixture that was not identified, but could be probably the corresponding lactones and lactams.
The mode of action of the ascaulitoxin (35) was studied on Lemna paucicostata. Compound 35 showed a strong growth inhibition, with an IC50 value less than 1 μM, while assayed at 3 μM it almost completely inhibited the plant growth. Its action is slow, starting with growth inhibition, followed by darker green fronds, and then chlorosis and death. Most amino acids comprising non-toxic non-protein amino acids reversed the effect of the toxin 35 when supplied in the same medium. The addition of sucrose slightly increased the activity. D-Amino acids showed an inhibitory activity as that of ascaulitoxin, suggesting that toxic effects could not be due to the inhibition of amino acid synthesis. Oxaloacetate also reversed the activity. LC-MS analysis did not show interaction of the compound with lysine, which strongly reversed the effect of compound 35 [93].
In addition, to estimate the commercial potential of A. caulina toxin mixture, obtained from cation exchange chromatography of fungal culture filtrates as above reported [92], toxicity was evaluated according international protocol on aquatic and terrestrial organism as the algae Daphnia magna, the fish Brachydanio rerio and earthworms Eisenia foetida. The results obtained in both acute and chronic toxicity, by comparing the ecotoxicological profile of the toxin mixture with that of other herbicides, showed its lower ecotoxicity [94].
Later, chenopodolin (38, Figure 2), unrearranged ent-pimaradiene diterpene, was isolated from the culture filtrates of Phoma chenopodiicola, which is another fungal pathogen proposed as mycoherbicide for the control of C. album. Compound 38 caused necrotic lesions on Mercurialis annua, Cirsium arvense and Setaria viride (two dicot and one monocot plant species, respectively) by leaf puncture test at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. Some of its key derivatives were prepared such as the 3-O-p-iodobenzoyl, 3-O-acetyl esters, 1-O-deacetyl-, 6,O,15,16-tetrahydro- and 6,O,7,8,15,16-hexahydro derivatives, and assayed on the same tree weeds in comparison to the parent toxin. Among the derivatives tested, only the 1-O-deacetyl derivative caused necrosis, but to a lesser extent than those induced by compound 38. These results showed that the hydroxyl group at C-3, the α,β-unsaturated ketone at C-6 and probably the vinyl group at C-13 are important features for the activity [95].
Successively, three phytotoxic tetrasubstituted furopyrans such as chenopodolans A-C (3941, Figure 2) were isolated together with (R)-6-hydroxymellein (42, Figure 2) from the same fungus [96]. When the three toxins 3941 were assayed on the punctured detached leaves of Sonchus oleraceus, M. annua and C. album, chenopodolan B (40) was the most toxic compound, spreading necrosis on all three plant species tested, while chenopodolans A and C (39 and 41) had, respectively, almost the same toxicity, showing in particular phytotoxic activity against S. oleraceus and M. annua, and no toxicity. These results showed that the side chain linked to the pyran ring is an important structural feature for phytotoxicity. In particular, the presence of the tertiary hydroxy group present in compound 39, which is secondary in metabolites 40, is very important for the activity. Chenopodolan B (40) is the only metabolite that showed weak zootoxic activity in the assay on brine shrimps (A. salina L.), while any compound that showed antimicrobial activity when tested against G. candidum mand Gram-positive B. subtilis and Gram-negative E. coli. Chenopodolans A and B could have additive phytotoxic activities with chenopodolin and (-)-(R)-6-hydroxymellein produced by the same fungus [96].
From the same organic extract, other phytotoxic metabolites as chenopodolan D, chenisocoumarin and chenopodolin B (4345, Figure 2) were isolated. In particular, chenopodolin B (45) differed from compound 38 for the acetylation of the hydroxy group at C-3, while chenopodolan D from the close metabolites 3941 for the chain nature linked at C-4 of the pyran ring [97]. When assayed at 4 × 10−3 M by leaf puncture against non-host weeds such as Sonchus arvensis, Urtica dioica and Parietaria officinalis, compounds 43 and 45 showed phytotoxicity, while metabolite 44 was inactive. These results confirmed that the nature of the side chain at C-4 in chenopodolans, and in particular its hydroxylation, are important features for activity. The activity of chenopodolin B could also be explained by its possible hydrolysis to chenopodolin through the well-known lethal metabolism [53]. Successively, other new furopyrans close to compounds 3941 and 43 such as chenopodolans E and F (46 and 47, Figure 2) were isolated from the same organic extract, and the absolute configuration of chenopodolan B, remaining unassigned, was also determined. Both compounds 46 and 47 were assayed through leaf-punctured leaves at 2 mg/mL on S. arvensis, and only metabolite 47 was active, though it was not toxic when applied to Setaria. Compounds 46 induced ca. 75% larval mortality on A. salina larvae at 0.1 mg/mL [98].
The phthalides such as convolvulanic acids A and B, convolvulol (4851, Figure 2) and the α-pyrone convolvulopyrone (52, Figure 2) were isolated together with ergosterol and ergosterol peroxide (52 and 53, Figure 3) from the culture filtrates of Phomopsis convolvulus, which is a host-specific pathogen causing leaf spots and anthracnose lesions to the very dangerous and perennial weed bindweed (Corzvolvulus arvensis). All compounds were tested by leaf-cuttings on the host plant, and strong toxicity was observed assaying both compounds 48 and 49, while lesser phytotoxicity was exhibited by compounds 50 and 51. Convolvulanic acid B (49), at concentrations of 3.5 × 10−4 M, caused wilting and browning of plant tissues after only 4 h after inoculation. The same symptoms were induced by compound 48, but at 5 × 10−4 M and at 12 h after inoculation. The sterols, as expected, were not toxic [99].
Twelve eremophilane sesquiterpenes (5465, Figure 3) were isolated from the culture filtrates of Drechslera gigantea, a pathogen fungus of several grasses such as common weed crabgrass (Digitaria spp.), quackgrass (Agropyron repens) and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) [99]. Among all the sesquiterpenes isolated, there was the already known gigantenone (54) [100], which is close to phaseolinone (55), produced as the main phytotoxin by Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of soyabean charcoal rot. This is one of the most common and severe dry root rot diseases around the world, affecting about 500 cultivated and wild plant species [101]. In addition, petasol and phomenone (56 and 59), which were previously obtained, respectively, from the higher plant Petasis hybridis [102] and from Phoma destructive, which is a pathogen agent of tomatos [103], were also isolated from D. gigantea. The other sesquiterpenes (57 and 58 and 6065) were not associated with any common practical name. Sesquiterpenes 54, 55, 56 and 59, assayed by leaf puncture on monocot species at 10–20 μmol droplet, caused green islands sized >20 mm. The latter were <10 mm or there was no effect when were tested against the other eremophilans, except compounds 58, 60 and 61, which induced necrosis on dicots species when tested at 10–20 μmol [104].
Ophiobolin A (66, Figure 3), a carbotricyclic sesterterpene, was isolated as the main phtytotoxin together with its analogues 6-epi-ophiobolin A, 3-anhydro-6-epi-ophiobolin A and ophiobolin I (6769-Figure 3) from the culture filtrates of same fungus, using a strain collected in Florida from naturally infected large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis L.) [105]. Ophiobolin A (66) shares the same 5:8:5 carbotricyclic ring system with fucicoccins and cotylenins, two other groups of microbial metabolites produced by Phomopsis amygdali (syn. Fusicocum amygdali), the causal agent of almond and peach diseases [19], and with Cladosporium sp. 501–7W [106]. Compound 66 is the first member of a well-known phytotoxic sesterterpene group produced by several fungi attacking cereals, such as rice, maize and sorghum, and whose structure was independently determined by Canonica et al., 1966 [107] and Nozoe et al., 1966 [108]. Later, several close sesquiterpenes were isolated including ophiobolin B from Bipolaris oryzae [109], ophiobolin C from Bipolaris zizanie [108], ophiobolin D from Cephalosporium caerulens [110,111] and ophiobolin F from Bipolaris maydis [112]. Successively, a large number of ophiobolin up to ophiobolin Z and analogues were isolated from different fungi whose mainly belonged to Bipolaris genus. Among these ophiobolins, there are several that showed phytotoxic activity against agrarian and weedy plants as well as antibiotic, nematocidal, antiviral and cytotoxic activities. Furthermore, several SAR studies, which were carried using ophiobolin natural analogues and hemisynthetic derivatives, several of which were prepared starting from the parent cmpound 66, were reviewed by Au et al., 2000 [113] and Tian et al., 2017 [114]. All these results were also briefly reported in a recent review focused on the anticancer activity of ophibolin A and its mode of action [115]. Extensive studies were also carried out on ophiobolin A as a promising drug against the malignant brain glioblastoma. Among these studies, recently, a pharmacophore-directed retrosynthesis applied to ophiobolin A allowed the preparation of some bicyclic derivatives that showed anticancer activity. In particular, these synthetic derivatives exhibited cytotoxicity activity toward a breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and confirmed the importance of structural complexity for selectivity of ophiobolin A (vs. MCF10A cells), while C3 variations modulate stability [116]. Furthermore, considering the role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) on cancer and treating cancer cells with paraptosis-inducing compounds, such as ophiobolin A (66), which specifically targets otherwise-insensitive CSC and EMT cells to re-sensitize bulk tumor populations to chemotherapies, it was demonstrated that EMT is a key driver in increasing sensitivity to paraptosis-induced cell death with a short-term treatment with compound 66 [117].
Ophiobolin A (66) and its analogues 6-epi-ophiobolin A and 3-anhydro-6-epi-ophiobolin A and ophiobolin I (6769) were assayed on the punctured detached leaves of several monocot grasses (Avena ludoviciana, Bromus sterilis L., Cynodon dactylon, D. sanguinalis L., Echinochloa crus-galli L., Oryzopsis miliacea L., Phoenix canariensis, Setaria viridis L.) and dicotyledon weeds (Amaranthus retroflexus L., Chenopodium album L., Convolvulus arvensis L., Diplotaxis erucoides L. and Sonchus oleraceus L.), and compound 66 appeared to be more phytotoxic when compared to its analogues. Thus, structural features important to phytoxicity appeared to be the hydroxy group at C-3, the stereochemistry at C-6 and the aldehyde group at C-7. Furthermore, grass weeds seemed more sensitive to the phytotoxins than dicotyledons species, which tested ophiobolin caused large necrosis even at the lowest concentration assayed [105]. Later, from the same organic extract of D. gigantea, both liquid and solid kernels cultures ophiobolin E and 8-epi-ophiobolin J (70 and 71, Figure 3) and ophiobolins B and J (72 and 73, Figure 3) were, respectively, isolated [118]. The ophiobolins 7073 were tested at the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL on four weedy plants (Avena sterilis, Bromus sp., Hordeum murinum and Oryzopsis miliacea) using the leaf puncture assay. Among all compounds tested, only ophiobolins B and J (72 and 73) showed phytotoxicity, while compounds 70 and 71 were not toxic. In particular, ophiobolin B exhibited strong toxicity against Bromus sp. and Hordeum marinum leaves [118]. The modulated activity showed ophiobolin B (72) was similar to that previously observed for ophiobolin A [105], suggesting that the opening of the etheral ring between C-14 and C-17 is not important for the phytotoxicity. Furthermore, based on ophiobolin J (73), reduced or not toxic as showed by the close ophiobolin I (69) [100], this response could be attributed to the different conformation that the octacyclic B ring can assume as a consequence of the different position of the double bond, which is located between C-7 and C-8 in compound 69, and between C-6 and C-7 in compound 73. Furthermore, the lack of toxicity showed by compound 71 should be due to the epimerization of the hydroxy group of C-8, observed for the first time in ophiobolin group. Finally, the several structural differences present in ophiobolin E when compared to the parent compound (66) could justify its inactivity on all the plants tested [118].
Recent new investigation of the organic extract of D. gigantea culture filtrates, which were prepared to obtain more crystalline ophiobolin A (66) for in-depth investigation of its mode of action as an anticancer compound, another two ophibolins, named drophiobiolins A and B (74 and 75, Figure 3), were isolated [119]. Both ophiobolins 74 and 75, in comparison to compound 66, were assayed at 10−3 M by leaf puncture assay on cultivated (Lycopersicon esculentum L.), host (D. sanguinalis L.) and nonhost (C. album L.) weedy plants. Both compound 74 and 75 induced significant phytotoxicity. Drophiobolins A and B exhibited the same phytotoxicity as that of ophiobolin A on the host plant and tomato, while lesser toxicity was caused, in respect to compound 66, on C. album. Decreasing the concentration at 10−4 M, their toxicity slightly decreases on all tested plants with compounds 74 which appeared inactive on C. album. Furthermore, both drophiobiolins A and B (74 and 75) showed cytotoxicity against Hela B cells with IC50 value of 10 μM, but had a lesser or nil effect against Hacat, H1299 and A431 cells when compared to that of compound 66 [119].
AAL-toxin, alternariol monomethyl ether (76 and 77, Figure 4) and tenuazoic acid (1) were isolated from a strain of A. alternata which was obtained from infected tomato (cv. Beefsteak) plants. Among the nine strains isolated and grown on autoclaved rice medium and corn meal agar medium, only the SWSL 1 (NRRL 18822) showed phytotoxicity on 1-week-old jimsonweed plants [120].
Different Alternaria species were isolated from fruits, vegetables, grains and weeds including citrus, jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.), lettuce (Lactuca saligna L.), pear (Pyrus communis L.), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifoLia L.), anoda (Anoda cristata L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). These fungi caused different diseases such as black spot of Japanese pear, tobacco brown spot, early blight of potatoes and tomatoes, chlorosis of citrus, lettuce, and tobacco, leaf spotting of sicklepod, jimsonweed and spurred anoda and stem canker of tomatoes [121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133]. AAL-toxin (76) at concentrations of 200 μg/mL induced damage on excised jimsonweed leaves, which were characterized by soft rot diffusing from the point of inoculation along the veins, adaxially or abaxially to leaves. Alternariol monomethyl ether and tenuazonic acid (77 and 1) at concentrations of 800 and 420 μg/mL, respectively, were inactive in the same assay [120].
Depudecin (78, Figure 4) was isolated from Nimbya scirpicola, which had been obtained from a diseased paddy field weed, Eleocharis kuroguwai (Japanese name: kuroguwai) [134]. The fungus producer N. scirpicola induced strong orange spotting on stems of kuroguwai and exhibited high host specificity. When tested by leaf puncture assay at 10 μg/dose on several weeds, including the host and agrarian plants such as kuroguwai, kidney bean, cowpea hairy beggarticks, velvetleaf, barnyardgrass, green foxtail, wheat, rice and corn, depudecin (78) induced serious damage on kuroguwai stems necrotic lesions (5 mm diamater), while lesser necrotic symptoms (3–4 mm in diameter) were induced on cowpea and kidney bean, but was inactive on the other plants tested. When compound 78 was in droplets applied to intact kuroguwai stems, their surface became orange in appearance and then exhibited necrosis, which are symptoms similar to those found on diseased kuroguwai in the field. Compound 78, tested at 10−4, 10−3 and 10−2 M on lettuce seedling, inhibited roots at ca. 20, 81 and 100%, respectively [134]. Furthermore, depudecin was previously isolated from Alternaria brassicicola during a screening carried out to find new natural anticancer compounds. In fact, compound 78 caused the flat morphology of ras- and src-transformed NIH3T3 cells at a concentration of 1 ug/mL. Increasing its concentration (8–10 μg/mL), the 50% the growth inhibition of the same cells was observed [135].
Ferricrocin (79, Figure 3) is a siderophore which was isolated as phytotoxic metabolite from the culture of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides obtained from infected blackberry (Rubus spp.) [136]. The plant, which is well known as a host of C. gloeosporioides, was collected in North Carolina, USA [136]. Compound 79 was also previously isolated from Neurospora, Aspergillus and Epicoccum cultures [137,138,139,140]. Compound 79 was assayed against cotyledons of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) (7 days old) inducing phytotoxicity from 10−2 M to 1/64 × 10−2 M. Furthermore, compound 79 and its derivative deferriferricrocin, which lacking any metal, was assayed by leaf-puncture assay on some weeds such as beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum), dandelion (Taraxacum vulgare), pigweed (Amaranthus retrofiexus), johnsongrass (S. halepense), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), velvetleaf (A. theophrasti) and jointvetch (Aeschynomene spp.). The plants were treated with a 2 mL solution at 1 g/4 mL and phytotoxicity observed 7 days after the inoculation. The results obtained showed that deferriferricrocin had a stronger phytotoxic activity which appeared faster with respect to that of compound 79 [136].
Putaminoxin (80, Figure 4) is a phytotoxic nonenolide isolated as the main metabolite from Phoma putaminum, which was proposed for the biocontrol of Erigeron annuus [141]. This weed, which is commonly named annual fleabane, is an indigenous weed from North America widely found in field and pastures all over Europe, including Italy, on which the fungus induced necrotic spots, surrounded by chlorotic haloes. Compound 80 was tested by leaf puncture assay on the host plant at 20 μg per droplet, and induced chlorosis and 2 days later necrosis. When tested, using the same method on other weed species (annual, dog’s mercury, annual sowthistle, clover chickweed, fat-hen) and on non-host cultivated plants (mandarin, globe artichoke, nettle parsley, Swiss chard, strawberry, sweet basil and tomato), putaminoxin (80) showed a range of toxicities. Among the plants, tested mandarin and sweet basil appeared to be the less sensitive, while annual dog’s mercury was the most sensitive. The toxin also showed at 100 μg/disk weak toxicity toward G. candidum at 100 μg/disk, but was not toxic against E. coli and B. subtilis as well as against A. salina larvae [141]. Later, putaminoxins B and C (81 and 82, Figure 4), which are a phytotoxic nonenolide and a hexaketide, respectively, were isolated from the organic extract of the same fungus [142]. Both compounds 81 and 82 were tested on punctured and detached leaves of several weeds and cultivated plants at 8 μg/droplet. After 2 days, putaminoxin C (82) induced necrotic spots only on M. annua (annual dog’s mercury) and on Cynara cardunculus (globe artichoke) and chlorosis on Lycopersicon esculentum. No toxicity was observed on Vicia faba (faba bean), Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) and Cucumis sativus (cucumber). Putaminoxin B (81) did not have toxicity of any plant used. Only putaminoxin C (82) tested up to 40 μg/disk showed a clear inhibition of the growth of B. megaterium and no toxicity on Pseudomonas sp. [142]. Successively putaminoxins D and E (83 and 84, Figure 4) were isolated from the same fungus as two other nonenolides close to compound 80 [142]. When tested using the same method at concentration of 4 × 10−3 M on tomato and annual fleabane leaves, putaminoxin D and E (83 and 84) had no phytotoxic activity. These results suggested that the presence of the unaltered alkyl side chain at C-9 and both the double bond and the hydroxy group at C-5 of the macrocyclic ring are structural features important for the activity [143].
A SAR study was carried out using putaminoxin and the close pinolidoxin together with some of their natural analogs and hemisynthetic derivatives. Pinolidoxin (85, Figure 4) [144] is a phytotoxic nonenolide produced as the main metabolite together with it 7-epi, 5,6-dihydro and 5,6-epoxy analogues [144] by Dydimella pinodes (syn. Ascochyta pinodes), which is the causal agent of pea (Pisum sativum L.) anthracnose. The derivatives prepared from putaminoxin (80) were its 5-O-acetyl- and 5-epi-derivatives, while those of pinolidoxin (85) were its diacetyl, isopropylidene and hexahydro derivatives. The phytotoxic, antifungal and zootoxic activities of all natural nonenolides and their derivatives were assayed, respectively, on weeds such as annual fleabane, annual mercury showy crotalaria, Canada thistle, fat hen, buttercup oxalis and Noogoora burr, as well as crop plants such as sugarbeet cucumber, pea, tomato, sorghum and globe artichoke. The antifungal and zootoxic activities were assayed against G. candidum and brine shrimp (A. salina L.) larvae according to the methods previously reported [145]. Putaminoxin and pinolidoxin showed the strongest phytotoxicity, which appeared related to the integrity of the nonenolide ring and to the presence of both the hydroxy groups and the unmodified propyl side chain. All compounds exhibited antifungal activity, whereas pinolidoxin analogs and derivatives possessed high to weak zootoxicity [146].
Later, other nonenolides such as herbarumins I and II (86 and 87, Figure 4) were isolated from Phoma herbarum and proposed as mycohercides to biologically control the very dangerous weed prince’s feather (Amaranthus hypochondriacus). Compound 86 and 87 inhibited seed germination and seedling growth of A. hypochondriacus, showing IC50 values of 5.43 × 10−5 and 1.25 × 10−4, respectively. Thus, herbarumin I (86) appeared to be more active than compound 87 and the positive control (2,4-D: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) [147]. Later, herbarumin III (88, Figure 4) was isolated from the organic extract of the same culture filtrates, which exhibited strong phytotoxicity against seedlings of A. hypochondriacus with IC50 value of 2 × 10−5 M, inhibiting the radicle growth stronger than 2,4-D used as positive control and compound 87, while its activity was similar to that of herbarum I (86). These results suggested that the presence of the hydroxy group at C-2 decreases the phytotoxic activity [148]. The 2-epimer of herbarumin II (89, Figure 4) was isolated together with (E)-5,9-dihydroxydodec-6-enoic acid and herbarumin II (87) from the culture filtrates of Paraphaeosphaeria recurvifoliae, which were obtained from the leaf lesions of pendulous yucca (Yucca recurvifolici) in Korea [149]. Herbarumin I and III (86 and 89) and (E)-5,9-dihydroxydodec-6-enoic acid, when assayed at a concentration of 1.3 mg/mL on murine tyrosinase, partially purified, showing weak inhibitory activity such as 30%, 17% and 12%, respectively, while the positive control kojic acid exhibited 85% of inhibition tested at the same concentration [149]. More recently, herbarumin II ant its 2-epimer (87 and 89) were isolated together with pinolide, another close nonenolide, and pinolodoxin (85), which was the main metabolite, from a more virulent strain of D. pinodes [150]. When all these latter nonenolides were tested on several weeds and crops plants, only pinolidoxin showed phytotoxicity, suggesting an important role played from the hydroxy group at C-7 as well as its configuration. In fact, in pinolide, which had null or weak activity, this hydroxy group is α-located, while in pinolidoxin, herbarumin I and II and 2-epi-herbarumin II (85, 86, 87 and 89), which showed a strong activity, the same hydroxy group had β-configuration. The configuration of the hydroxy group at C-2 seems to assume a minor importance. In fact, in all the above nonenolides, it is α-located except for herbarumin II, in which this hydroxy group is β-located, and this different configuration did not affect the phytotoxicity. Finally, the 2,4-hexadienoic acid esterification of the hydroxy group at C-2, present only in pinolidoxin (85) seems a very important feature for its phytotoxicty [150].
Other nonenolides, named stagonolide A [151] and B–F [152], G–I [153] and J and K [154] (90100, Figure 4) and modiolide A [153] (101, Figure 4), were isolated from Stagonospra cirsii, which was proposed as a mycoherbicide for the control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense L.). This is a perennial and very dangerous weed that grows on arable land in North America, New Zealand and Europe, including the European part of the Russian Federation [155,156]. Stagonolide (90) was assayed on the leaves of different plant species such as lettuce, zinnia, sow-thistle, sunflower, pepper, peppermint, radish, hollyhock, pea and wheat, and annual flaebane induced high sensitivity the host plant Canada thistle as well as several of the other weeds, while two species of Solanaceae were insensitive to it. Compound 90 was tested on C. arvense seedling roots since 1 × 10−4 M caused phytotoxic symptoms that increased at a concentration of 5 × 10−3 M, becoming necrosis when it reached ~4 mm in diameter 48 h after treatment. When tested at the same concentration on leaf discs of weed species and cultivated plants, stagonolide (90) did not showed specificity. At concentrations ≥1 × 10−6 M, the nonenolide (90) inhibited the growth of C. arense seedling roots and decreased their length more than 30%. While tested at 1 µg/mL (~5 × 10−6 M) on seedlings of different plant species, it was more effective regarding the Asteraceae species (about 70% inhibition) than those of wheat and radish seedlings (about 30% inhibition). Finally, cucumber seedlings were insensitive to stagonolide at this concentration. The toxin showed low toxicity and no toxicity against Colpoda steinii (Protozoa) when tested at concentrations of 2 × 10−4 M and 1 × 10−4 M, respectively. At the concentration of 50–100 µg of stagonolide/disc, compound 90 showed weak antimicrobial activity against the fungus Candida tropicalis, but was not toxicit on B. subtilis and E. coli [147]. When stagonolides B-F (9195) were assayed at a concentration of 1 mg/mL by leaf disk puncture assay against C. arvense and Sonchus arvensis, they appeared to not be toxic [152]. Nonenolides 96101 were tested at 1 mg/mL, and metabolite 97 appeared to be the most toxic against C. arvense leaves. Stagonolide I and modiolide A (98 and 101) were markedly less active, while stagonolide G (96) was no toxic. When tested at the same concentration on cultivated plants, only stagonolide H (97) inhibited root growth in chicory seedlings (85% compared to control), and induced different sensitivity to the leaves of eight plant species, while other compounds were inactive at the concentration used [153].
When stagonolides J and K (99 and 100) were assayed at 0.13–2.00 mg/mL by punctured leaf disks of the host plant (S. arvensis), C. arvense and E. repens, compound 99 was non-toxic, while significant necrotic lesions (about 2 mm in diameter) were observed for compounds 100 at the maximal concentration of 2 mg/mL (∼10 mM) 2 days after the treatment, though it did not showed phytotoxicity against E. repens leaves [154].
Successively, stagonolides A, J and K, herbarumin I (90, 99, 100 and 86), and some their hemisynthetic derivatives, which were prepared through the parent compounds chemical modifications, such as 8-acetylherbarumin I, bis(acetyl)herbarumin I, 7-acetylstagonolide J, bis(acetyl)stagonolide J, acetylstagonolide K, 8-O-acetylstagonolide A and C-7 oxidized stagonolide K, were used to carry out a SAR study focused on recognizing structural features important to the design of new herbicide. The phytotoxicity of all natural stagonolides and their derivatives were assayed by leaf puncture assay on S. arvensis, agar seedling assay using lettuce (Lactuca sativa), and microalgae assay using Haematococcus lacustris as well as the antimicrobial activity using B. subtilis, and the cytotoxic activity using Sf9 cell line (ECACC 89070101) of the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). The results obtained showed that stagonolide A (90) and C-7 oxidized stagonolide K showed the strongest phytotoxic activity in leaf puncture assay and agar seedlings assay, and that the oxidation of C-7 hydroxyl group as in 90 and acetylstagonolide A determined toxicity regarding microalgae, B. subtilis and Sf9 cells independently from the configuration of C-9 propyl chain, which is R in 99 and its 8-O-acetyl derivative and S in oxidized C-7 stagonolide K. The compounds which did not showed oxidized C-7 exhibited none or little non-target activity, while the compounds having a 7S configuration possessed higher phytotoxicity than their 7R analogues. The mono- and bis(acetyl)-derivatives of herbarium I (86) showed high inhibitory activity against seedling growth and the lack of side toxicity appeared to have a strong potential for the development of pre-emergent herbicides [157].
Dendryols A-D (102105, Figure 5), which are anthraquinones derivatives, were isolated from the weed pathogen Dendryphiella sp., which was obtained from diseased Eleocharis kuroguwai [158]. The phytotoxic activity of compounds 102105 was tested by leaf puncture assay against 10–14-day-old host plant kuroguwai and other weeds and crop plants such as barnyardgrass, velvetleaf, rice corn and cowpea at concentrations starting from 5 mg/μL [159].
After 5 days of incubation, all compounds induced phytotoxic symptoms on the host plant kuroguwai. Among all the plant tested, barnyardgrass appeared to be sensitive to the four compounds showing necrotic area spread from the applied point to the top of the leaf [159].
Australifungin (106, Figure 5) was isolated from Sporormiella australis and belonged to a new group of ceramide synthase inhibitor. Thus, compound 106 was used as a tool to study ceramide synthase inhibition as a phytotoxic mechanism comparing its toxicity with that of sphingosine analogues using model systems for phytotoxicity and mammalian toxicity. Australifungin (106) inhibited the ceramide synthetase enzyme as the unrelated mycotoxins-AAL-toxins and fumonisin B in the sphingolipid biosynthesis pathway of animals. When tested at 5 μM on duckweed (Lemna pausicostata), cultures of australifungin (106) induced the accumulation of the phytosphingosine and sphinganine, which are sphingolipid precursors, but less than AAL-toxin TA or fumonisin B1 used at 1 μM. These effects determined the increase in electrolyte leakage at 24 h with consequent aggregation of duckweed fronds [160].
Brefeldin A and α,β-dehydrocurvularin (107 and 108, Figure 5) were isolated from Alternaria zinniae, proposed for the biocontrol of Xanthium occidentale [161]. This is a widespread noxious weed which caused severe losses to Australian summer crops and pastures. Both compounds 107 and 108 were also produced as two bioactive metabolites by other fungi belonging to the genera Alternaria, Ascochyta, Penicillium, Curvularia, Cercospora and Phyllosticta. When brefeldin A (107) was applied at 0.3 mg/droplet to X., occidentale caused the appearance of wider necrosis 1–2 days after inoculation both on host leaves and cotyledons. In addition, it did not show phytotoxicity on non-host plants including weedy and cultivated species. In the leaf puncture assay, both compounds 107 and 108, tested at 10−4 and 10−3 M, respectively, induced necrotic spots. Tijdeen et al., 1983 [162] had previously suggested that brefeldin A could be involved in the suppression of the defence mechanism of Carthamus tinctorius against the pathogen Alternaria chartami, as compound 107, at very low concentrations, suppressed the accumulation of phytoalexins in safflower suspension cultures. Thus, a possible practical application of brefeldin A could be its use together with the fungal producer to overcome the defence reaction of X. occidentale and consequently increase the phytotoxic effect and the fungal efficacy to control this weed [161].
A new ribofuranosyl triazolone, 2,4-Dihydro-4-(β-D-ribofuranosyl)-1,2,4(3H)-triazol-3-one (109, Figure 5), was isolated as the main phytotoxin produced by a fungal strain closely resembled Actinomadura madurae. Although metabolite 109 is reported for the first time as a naturally occurring compound, as some its analogues [163] it was already known as synthesized compound [164]. Compounds 109 share the same target site with hydantocidin (110, Figure 5), which is a well-known herbicides. The last one was first isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus [165] and then successively from a number of different Streptomyces strains [166,167]. Then, the synthesis of compound 110 was realized also from different companies [168,169,170,171]. Triazolones were tested using foliar-applied (postemergence) and soil-applied (preemergence) applications on whole plants and seeds of several species such as sunflower (H. annuus), morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), wild oats (Avena fatua) and blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Compound 109 exhibited a broad spectrum of phytotoxicity in the greenhouse, inducing phytotoxic symptoms such as stunting, systemic chlorosis and necrosis of apical meristems on all assayed species. In the postemergence test at 500 g ha−1, it also showed strong activity on all species except on Amaranthus retroflexus. In preemergence applications, the phytotoxicity was less extended. Furthermore, the rybofuranosyl triazolone 109 tested at 0.2 μM inhibited the root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana, but its effect was strongly reduced when tested together with adenine and guanine reaching IC50 value of 11.5 µM. These results suggested that adenine reversed the effects of compound 109, while guanine had no effect. A similar effect of adenine was reported for the phytotoxicity of the close hydantocidin (110) [168].
Five naphthopyranone derivatives (111115, Figure 5) were isolated, together with the well-known rubrofusarin B, emodin, citrinin and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester (116119, Figure 5) from the coprophilous fungus Guanomyces polythrix [172]. The fungus was isolated from bat guano in México in 1979. All the compounds isolated (111119) caused significant inhibition of radicle growth of two weed seedlings (A. hypochondriacus and Echinochloa crusgalli), with IC50 values ranging from 1.3 × 10−5–1.8 × 10−4 and 4.0 × 10−5–8.8 × 10−4, respectively, and interacting with both spinach and bovine brain calmodulins [172]. Citrinin (118) was previously isolated from Stagonospora apocyni, which caused a leaf spot disease on hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.). The fungus also produced other very well-known phytotoxin such as mellein, tyrosol and α-acetylorcinol. When placed on leaves of hemp dogbane and eight other weed species such as Sida spinosa L .(prickly sida), C. album L. (Lamb’s quarters), Ipomoea sp. (morning glory), Datura stramonium L. (jimson weed), Sorghum bicolor L. (sorghum); S. halepense L. (Johnson grass), Nasturtium officinale (water cress) and Cassia obtusifolia L. (sickle pod), all the compounds showed non-specific phytotoxicity [173].
Cytochalasins Z1, Z2 and Z3 (120122, Figure 5) were isolated together with cytochalasins F, T, deoxaphomin and cytochalasins B (123126, Fiure 5) from the wheat culture of Pyrenophora semeniperda, proposed as mycoherbicide to control grass weeds [174]. The fungus infects seeds and leaves of over 35 genera of grasses [175]. On brome grass (Bromus spp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), P. semeniperda caused the death of seed primordia and subsequent abortion of seed [176]. Cytochalasins are a large group of fungal natural compounds well known for their toxic effect, primarily on the mammalain cells. Cytochalasin B (126), which commonly occurred in other fungi, is the main metabolite produced by P. semeniperda, and together with the close cytochalasin A (127, Figure 5), are the first two members isolated of this family [177]. Cytochalasin A was also produced together with other ones above cited and non-toxic phomachalasins A-D. From Phoma exigua var. exigua, another fungus was proposed for the biocontrol of C. arvense and S. arvensis [178,179]. Today, more that 60 cytochalasins were characterized for their chemical and biological properties and subgrouped according to the size of the macrocyclic ring and residue attached to the C-3 of perhydroisoindolyl-1-one residue [26]. All the compounds isolated (120126) were tested in seedling assays on wheat and tomato, and the most active compounds were cytochalasin B (126), its 21,22-dihydroderivative, cytochalasins F (123) and Z3 (122) and deoxaphomin (125). The same compounds reduced the root length by about 50%, and in the leaf-puncture assay, only deoxaphomin induced small necrotic lesions. These results are in agreement with those of the previously described SAR studies in which the important role of the hydroxy group at C-7 for the biological activty was already highlighted [180,181,182].
The same cytochalsins were produced from strains of P. semeniperda isolated from cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in Utah, USA, with cytochalasin B proving to be the main phytotoxic metabolites. Cheatgrass, also known as downy brome, is an exotic winter annual grass which causes heavy losses in intensive agriculture, particularly in winter cereal production [183]. This very dangerous weed has also invaded millions of hectares of semiarid rangeland in western North America, and also induces wildfires with consequent heavy economic and environmental costs [184]. P. semeniperda is also able to produce phytotoxins belonging to another class of natural compounds. In fact, six spirocyclic γ-lactam, namely spirostaphylotrichin A, C, D, R, V and W (128133, Figure 5) and triticone E (134, Figure 5), were produced by the same strain of P. semeniperda, but grown in liquid cultures [185]. Two different bioassays were carried out to test all the metabolites isolated, but compounds 129 and 130, as well as 131 and 134, were assayed as a mixture. Spyrostaphylotrichin A (128) tested at 10−3 M strongly reduced the cheatgrass coleoptile elongation to 33%, the mixture of compound 129/130 showed intermediate activity, while the other mixture 131/134 was non-toxic, and spirostaphylotrichins 132 and 133 exhibited mild toxicity. Furthermore, spirostaphylotrichins A, C and D (128130), using leaf puncture assay, induced the appearance of necrosis, while the other compounds were inactive [185]. Successively from the same fungus but grown in solid culture were isolated pyrenophoric acid and pyrenophoric acids B and C (135137, Figure 6), and the closely related abscisic acid (138, Figure 6) [186,187], which is a well-known plant hormone. The four metabolites 135138 tested by B. tectorum seedling bioassays at 10−3 and 10−4 M caused 5 days coleoptile and radicle reductions. Abscisic acid (138) exhibited the strongest phytotoxicity inhibiting the germination, delaying the germination of germinated seeds, completely suppressing coleoptile elongation and markedly reducing radicle length. The observed relative toxicity ranking of the four compounds was the following: abscisic acid ≫ pyrenophoric acid B > pyrenophoric acid > pyrenophoric acid C (138136 > 135 > 137). These results suggested that the presence in C-10 of the α,β-unsaturated ketone in compound 138 seems to have an important role in the germination-inhibiting activity. The absence of this moiety in the other three metabolites significantly reduced their toxicity. Additionally, the different α-configuration of the chain bonded at C-7 observed in abscisic acid (138) could play a role in its strong phytotoxicity, as in the other three the configuration of the same carbon is opposite [186,187]. Among the pyrenophoric acids, as compound 136 was the most phytotoxic, its mode of action was studied. The results obtained showed that compound 136 activates the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway in order to inhibit seedling establishment, and it was hypothesized that P. semeniperda affected plant ABA biosynthesis as a strategy to reduce seed germination, increasing its capacity to induce seed mortality and thereby increasing its virulence through higher reproductive success [188].
Macrocidins A and B (139 and 140, Figure 6) were produced by Phoma macrostoma isolated from diseased Canada thistle (C. arvense) growing in several geographically diverse regions [189]. The symptoms of the disease were leaves bleaching and chlorosis. Biological assay of the two compounds 139 and 140 were carried out on greenhouse-grown plants, applying each compound in post-emergence to one pot containing four species such as sunflower (H.annuus), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), ivy leaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederaceae), wild oat (Avena fatua) or barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli).
Both macrocidins after 10 days induced significant toxicity on the broadleaf weeds but not activity on the grass weeds [189].
Ascosonchine (141, Figure 6), which is a phytotoxic enol tautomer of 4-pyridylpyruvic acid, was isolated from the culture filtrate of Ascochyta sonchi. The latter microorganism is a leaf pathogen proposed as another potential biocontrol agent of S. arvensis. Compound 141, already assayed at 1.2 × 10−3 M by the leaf puncture assay on the host plant after 2 days, caused necrosis similar to those induced by the pathogen. Then, it was tested at 15 μg/droplet. Using the same methods on several weedy and cultivated plants showed interesting selective toxicity. In fact, compound 141 was completely non-toxic on all the solanaceous species (tomato, eggplant, red pepper, potato), slightly active or almost inactive on leguminous (bean and chickpea) and cucurbitaceous (melon and zucchino) plants, but induced significant necrosis on many other species, such as Euphorbia, Salvia, Valerianella or Triticum [190].
Drazepinone (142, Figure 6), which is a trisubstituted naphthofuroazepinone, was isolated from Drechslera siccans, which is a pathogen fungus obtained from diseased seeds of ryegrass (Lolium perenne), another dangerous grass weed. Compound 142 was applied at 2 μg/μL to the wounded leaves of different weeds and durum wheat, causing necrosis on almost all the species tested. The severity of necrosis ranged from very wide, as in those induced on Urtica dioica, to smaller ones, as those observed on S. viridis and L. perenne leaves. Also significant were the necrosis caused on Euphorbia helioscopia, M. annua and C. album leaves. Compound 142 did not induce toxicity on Amaranthus retroflexus and Bromus sp. [191].
Phyllostoxin and phyllostin (143 and 144, Figure 6), which are a pentasubstituted bicyclo-octatrienyl acetic acid ester and a pentasubstituted hexahydrobenzodioxine carboxylic acid methyl ester, respectively, were produced by Phyllosticta cirsii, a fungal pathogen isolated from diseased C. arvense leaves and proposed for the biocontrol of this dangerous weed [192]. Compound 143, tested by leaf puncture on C. arvense at 10−3 M (20 µL/droplet), caused large necrosis, while on the contrary, compound 144, assayed at the same concentration, was not toxic. These results are not surprising, considering the noteworthy structural differences between the two compounds, suggesting that the presence of active functional groups in phyllostoxin are not present in the other metabolites. Both compounds did not show fungicide, bacteriocide and zootoxic activity [192]. The C-3-C-9 didehydro derivative of compound 144 was also successively isolated from the same organic extract and identified as scytolide (145, Figure 6), previously isolated from Scytalidium uredinicola, which is a destructive hyperparasite of western gall rust, and Endocronartium harknessii, one of the most severe forest tree diseases in Canada. Compound 145 strongly inhibited the germinaion of E. harknessii spores [193].
Cinnacidin (146, Figure 6), which is a cyclopentalenone-isoleucine derivative, was isolated from Nectria sp. [194]. Considering the phytotoxicity of compound 146 and its potential as a bioherbicide along with its instability and low amount available, two derivatives (Ca and Cb, Figure 6) were prepared by total synthesis, both as a mixture of two diastereomers, and used in the bioassay together with the parent compound, its biosynthetic precursor coronatine (147) and the related jasminic acid (148). Coronatine and cinnacidin (146) carbon skeletons are very similar, but they are produced by widely different organisms, as coronatine is produced by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae, while cinnacidin is produced by the fungus Nectria sp. All the compounds were applied on in pre- and post-emergence to the following weeds: Avena fatua L. (wild oat), A. retroflexus L. (redroot pigweed), E. crus-galli L. (barnyardgrass), Ipomoea hederacea L. (morningglory), Setaria faberi (giant foxtail) Helianthus annuus L. (common sunflower), Alopecurus myosuroides (blackgrass), Abutilon theophrasti L. (velvetleaf) D. sanguinalis L. (large crabgrass), Xanthium strumarium L. (common cocklebur), Zea mays L. (corn), Brassica napus L. (oilseed rape), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Triticum aestivum L. (wheat), Sorghum bicolor L. (sorghum). The phytotoxicity of the first analogue Ca had a result identical to that of its benzyl-protected ester (analogue Cb). Thus, considering the higher foliar absorption of Cb, due to its increased lipophilicity, the ester was used for the biological characterization and proved to be a potent herbicide. Taking into account the disease symptoms displayed by treated grass and dicot species, the mode of action of analogue of the Cb appears very similar to that of coronatine and jasminic acid (147 and 148, Figure 6), which is a very well-known bacterial toxin produced by different species of Pseudomonas syringae [195] and a well-known plant hormone [196], respectively. The phytotoxic activity of the ester Cb differed from that coronatine for the effect induced on the different plant species. Coronatine showed greater activity against warm season grasses, while Cb was more efficacious against cool season grasses [194].
Papyracillic acid (149, Figure 6) was isolated as the main phytotoxin produced by Ascochyta agropyrina var. nana proposed for the biocontrol of quack grass (Elytrigia repens), which is a noxious perennial weed widespread through the cold regions of both hemispheres [197]. When isolated as a crystalline compound, papyracyllic acid (149) is a stable compound that in solution converted into different isomers. Previously, it was isolated together with its methyl acetal (150, Figure 6), which was named papyracillic acid B, palmarumycins and microsphaeropsins from Microsphaeropsis sp. This latter fungus was obtained from a branch of the tree Larix decidus [198]. Compound 149 was also previously isolated together with lachnumon and mycorrhizin A from Lachum papyraceum, which produced nematicidal and antimicrobial metabolites [199]. Paypracyllic acid was also converted in some semisynthetic derivatives to perform a SAR study aimed to find a derivative with increased phytotoxicity and specificity. Compound 148 was converted in its methyl ester, methyl acetal (150) and four monoacetyl derivatives, two of which acted as a mixture of two inseparable epimers, and the dihydro derivative. The parent compound (149), its natural analogues (150) and the semisynthetic derivatives were tested by leaf disk puncture assay, at the concentration of 1 mg/mL, on the host and nonhost plants such as Canada thistle (C. arvense), Asian dock (Rumex confertus), dandelion (Taraxacum officinalis), barley (Hordeum vulgare), timothy grass (Phleum pretense), fat hen (C. album), double cinnamon rose (Rosa cinnamomea), perennial sowthistle (S. arvensis), hemp (Cannabis sativa) and red clover (Trifolium pretense). Compounds 149 and 150 and all the four monoacetyl derivatives showed phytotoxicity against E. repens, but the other derivatives were lesser toxic than papyracillic acid. Canada thistle leaves showed to be more sensitive to the same derivatives than compound 149. These results suggested that the butanolide ring is an important feature to impart phytotoxic activity. The methyl ester of 149 was not toxic being the only one having the opening of the hemiacetalized 1,6-dioxospiran. The lack of phytotoxicity of the dihydroderivative of 149, in which the butanolide ring is unaltered, also showed that the exocyclic methylene group at C-5 play a role in the induction of toxicity [197]. Agropyrenol, agropyrenal and agropyrenone (151153, Figure 6) were successively isolated from the organic extract of the same fungus (A. agropyrina var. nana), and are a phytototoxic substituted salicylaldehyde, a substituted naphthalene carbaldehyde and a pentasubstituted 3H-benzofuranone, respectively [200]. When assayed on the leaves of some weeds such as M. annua, C. album and S. viridis, agropyrenol showed strong phytotoxicity, causing the appearance of necrotic lesions, agropyrenal was less active, while agropyrenone was not toxic. None of the compounds showed antibiotic, fungicidal or zootoxic activity [200]. Six derivatives of agropyrenol were prepared by chemical modification of its functional group, namely by diacetylation, chetalization and mono-oxidization of the glycol system of the side chain, the hydrogenation of the double bond of the same residue and successive diacetylation of the glycol, and by reduction to primary alcohol of the aldehyde group. Agropyrenol and its six derivatives were assayed at 2 mg/ mL by applying 20 μL of solution to detached against C. album, C. arvense, M. annua, and S. oleraceus and one monocot S. viridis. Agropyrenol and its derivatives were also tested to inhibit seed germination of S. viridis and the rootlet growth using tomato seeds. Briefly, the results obtained showed that both the double bond and the diol system of the 3,4-dihydroxypentenyl side chain as well as the aldehyde group are important features to induce phytotoxicity [201].
Phomentrioloxin (154, Figure 6), a phytotoxic geranylcyclohexenetriol, was isolated from the liquid culture of Phomopsis sp., which is a fungal proposed for the biological control of Carthamus lanatus. This is a widespread and troublesome thistle (C. arvense) which causes severe crop and pastures losses in Australia. When tested by leaf puncture at a concentration of 6.85 mM on C. lanatus, C. album, C. arvense, M. annua, S. oleraceus and S. viridis, compound 154 causes the appearance of necrotic spots. Compound 154 also induced the reduction in growth and chlorophyll content in Lemna minor fronds and the inhibition of tomato rootlet elongation [202]. Succesively, phomentioloxin (154) was isolated together with gulypyrones A and B (155 and 156, Figure 6), two phytotoxic trisubstituted α-pyrones and phomentrioloxins B and C (157 and 158, Figure 6) from the cultures filtrates of a virulent strain of Diaporthe gulyae [203]. Metabolites 157 and 158 are, respectively, the 1,O- and 2,O-dehydro derivatives of phomentrioloxin. The fungus was obtained from stem cankers of sunflower and known to be pathogenic to saffron thistle. Other well-known metabolites were also isolated including 3-nitropropionic, the main metabolite, succinic, and p-hydroxy- and p-methylbenzoic acids, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde and nectriapyrone. Among all the isolated compounds, which were assayed at 5 mM on punctured leaf disks of weeds such as Papaver rhoes, Ecballium elaterium, Urtica dioica and Hedysarum coronarium, only nitropropnic acid induced significant necrosis and smaller ones also on M. annua, Lactuca serriola, Ailanthus altissima and Inula viscosa. Phomentrioloxin B (157) caused small but clear necrotic spots on a number of plant species, whereas gulypyrone induced leaf necrosis on H. annuus plantlets. All other compounds were weakly active or inactive [203].
Anhydromevalonolactone, tyrosol, (R)-(–)-mevalonolactone and cycloglycylproline (159162, Figure 6) were isolated from of the fungus Alternaria euphorbiicola, a pathogen of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) [204]. This species is a major weed in many tropical and subtropical countries, and determines significantly agricultural losses in important crops, particularly soybeans and corn [205]. All the compounds isolated (159162) were tested at concentrations as low as 80 µM by a leaf-punctured host plant causing bleached lesions with dark brown margins. When tested at 1 mM using the same method on different weeds such as Bidens pilosa, Bidens subalternans, Brachiaria decumbens, Chamaesyce hirta and Ipomoea grandifolia on the leaves of other relevant weeds, (R)-(–)-mevalonolactone (161) was active only against I. grandifolia, with symptoms similar to those induced on the host plant. Anhydromevalonolactone and tyrosol (159 and 160) showed a wider spectrum of phytotoxicity. Finally, cycloglycylproline (162) showed no toxicity against other species, thus presenting selective activity against E. heterophylla [205]. As cycloglycylproline (162) belongs to the same group of cyclodipetides reported above as phytotoxic metabolites isolated from A. alternata, the causal of black leaf blight of spotted knapweed, its phytotoxic activity was not surprising.
Mevalocidin (163, Figure 6) is a phytotoxin isolated Coniolariella sp. It was also obtained by basic treatment for 2 h at 25 °C starting from methylidenemevalonlactone [206]. Compound 163 showed a broad spectrum of post-emergent herbicidal properties greater than 50 % injury than all of the broadleaf and grass species tested at 4 kg/ha after 16 days and lethality after 21 days [207].
Cochliotoxin, radicinin, radicinol and their 3-epimers (164168, Figure 7) were isolated from Cochliobolus australiensis, a foliar fungal pathogen proposed for the biocontrol of buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare or Cenchrus ciliaris). This weed is a perennial grass which is a highly invasive species in the Sonoran Desert of Southern Arizona. All the compound isolated were assayed at a concentration of 2.5–5.0 × 10−3 M by coleoptile elongation test and by leaf puncture bioassay on buffelgrass and two nontarget native grasses such as tanglehead (Heteropogon contortus) and Arizona cottontop (Digitaria californica). Cochliotoxin (164) showed strong phytotoxicity, radicinin and 3-epi-radicinin (165 and 167) also exhibited phytotoxic activity, while radicinol and 3-epi-radicinol (166 and 168) were not toxic. All compounds were more active in leaf puncture bioassays on buffelgrass than on the nontarget grass [208]. From the organic extract of the same fungus, grown on different culture mediums were successively isolated as chloromonilinic acids C and D (169 and 170, Figure 7), which are two new tetrasubstituted 3-chromanonacrylic acids, together with chloromonilinic acid B (171, Figure 7). All three chloromonilinic acids tested 5 × 10−3 M were toxic to buffelgrass in a seedling elongation bioassay, with significantly delayed germination and dramatically reduced radicle growth [209]. Chloromonilinic acid B was firstly isolated together with its bromine analogue, chloromonilinic acid A and chloromonilicin (172, Figure 7) from the cherry rot fungus Monilinia fructicola [210]. Compound 172 inhibited the growth of M. fructicola, while chloromonilinic acids A and B were inactive. Chloromonilicin was previously isolated from A. sonchi, another fungus proposed for the biocontrol of S. arvensis [211].
Pyriculins A and B (173 and 174, Figure 7), two monosubstituted hex-4-ene-2,3-diols, were isolated together with (10S,11S)-(−)-epi-pyriculol, trans-3,4-dihydro-3,4,8-trihydroxy-1(2H)-napthalenone and (4S)-(+)-isosclerone (175–177, Figure 7) from Pyricularia grisea another foliar pathogen of buffelgrass (C. ciliaris) in North America proposed for the biocontrol of this very dangerous weed [212]. All the compounds isolated were bioassayed at 5 × 10−3 M in a buffelgrass coleoptile and radicle elongation tests. (10S,11S)-(−)-epi-Pyriculol (175) exhibited the strongest phytotoxic activity. Seed germination was significantly reduced with respect to the control, and radicles failed to elongate. All five compounds (173175) delayed germination, but only (10S,11S)-(−)-epi-pyriculol prevented radicle development of buffelgrass seedlings. Compound 175 had no effect on coleoptile elongation, while the other four compounds markedly induced the increase in coleoptile development relative to the control [212]. Successively from the organic extract of the same culture filtrates were isolated Dihydropyriculol, epi-dihydropyriculol, (R)-6,8-dihydroxy-3-methoxy-3-methyl-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one and (R)-mevalonolactone (4) (178180, Figure 7 and 161, Figure 6) [213] were successively isolated from the organic extract of the same culture filtrates. All the compounds isolate (161 and 178180) were bioassayed at 5 × 10–3 M in a buffelgrass coleoptile and radicle elongation test and no toxicity was detected. Oppositely, compounds 178 and 180 showed a significant stimulating effect of radical elongation. Furthermore, the difference in the induction of growth stimulation observed between compound 178 epimer 179 highlights the relationship between absolute configuration and biological activity of these fungal metabolites as well as in general for all naturally occurring compounds [213].
Pyrichalasin H (181, Figure 7) was successively isolated from P. grisea but obtained from infected leaves of Brachiaria eruciformis, locally known as “signal grass”, which is a common weed in Mississippi, USA. It was tested for germination and growth on Lactuca sativa (lettuce; dicot) and Agrostis stolonifera (bentgrass; monocot) seeds in 24-well plates. Pyrichalasin H (181) inhibited germination of the monocot at 330 µM, whereas it was lesser toxic against dicot. Compound 181 induced the growth reduction in the monocot duckweed (Lemna pausicostata) with IC50 value of 150 µM [214].
Colletotrichum species caused plant anthracnose diseases, whose symptoms include necrotic spots on leaves, stems, flowers and fruits, although sometime red rot, crown and stem rot, seedling blight and brown blotch were also reported [215]. Colletotrichum higginsianum, which belongs to Colletotrichum destructivum species complex [216], causes anthracnose leaf spot disease on many cultivated forms of Brassica. Colletochlorins E and F, which are, respectively, a tetrasubstituted pyran-2-one and a dihydrobenzofuran, (182 and 183, Figure 7), were isolated together with 4-chloroorcinol, colletopyrone and colletochlorin A, (184186; Figure 7) from the culture filtrates of the fungus C. higginsianum [217]. When assayed by leaf puncture on S arvensis and tomato leaves at 2 μg/μL applying a 20 μL/droplet, compound 184 induced a quite large necrosis (>1 cm), whereas 4-chloroorcinol (184) showed the strongest phytotoxicity. Similar results were observed testing compound 183 on Lemna minor and Phelipanche ramosa seed germination while colletochlorin E, colletopyrone and colletochlorin A (182, 185 and 186) were less or modestly active, respectively [216]. Colletopyrandione and colletochlorins G and H (187189, Figure 8) were also isolated from the organic extract of the culture filtrates of the same fungus [218]. Compound 187, tested at 2 μg/mL applying a 20 μL droplet by the puncture assay on different plant species, such as S. arvensis, H. annuus, Convolvulus arvensis and Ambrosia artemisiifolia, induced small but clear necrosis only on S. arvensis leaves, and smaller lesion on sunflower. The compounds 188 and 189 were not tested because of the very low amount available [218].
Colletochlorin A, orcinol and tyrosol (186, and 190 Figure 8, and 160) were isolated Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, a fungal pathogen proposed to biocontrol ragweed A. artemisiifolia L.). This weed is responsible for serious allergies harmful to humans. All the compounds isolated (160, 186 and 190) were tested on A. artemisiifolia by leaf puncture, and colletochlorin A (186) induced the fastest appearance of large necrosis, while orcinol (190) was not toxic. Colletochlorin A, assayed by uptake on Ambrosia plantlets, caused the wilting of the plants and the appearance of large leaf necrosis, while the stem appeared only slightly damaged. In the same assay, orcinol was weakly active and tyrosol was not toxic. Colletochlorin A caused clear frond browning on Lemna minor, with a total reduction in chlorophyll content of around 70%; the other two compounds were completely inactive [219]. The first asymmetric and total synthesis colletochlorin A (186) as well as that of colletorin A was also realized to have amount of both fungal metabolites to further characterize their biological properties [220].
Dirhamnolipid (Rha-Rha-C10-C10) (191, Figure 8) was isolated from C. gloeosporioides obtained BWH-1 from anthracnose disease-infected Bawanghua (Hylocereus undatus) in China [221]. Some varieties of this plant are cultivated for their fruits, while some other varieties were growth for their flowers. Both dried flowers and fruits are used in folk Chinese medicine [222]. Dirhamnolipid showed broad herbicidal activity against eight weed species with IC50 values ranging from 28.91 to 217.71 mg/L and no toxicity on Oryza sativa [221].
Curvulin and phaeosphaeride (192 and 193, Figure 8) were isolated from A Paraphoma sp., which was recognised as a pathogen of C. arvense. Compounds 192 and 193 were tested on wounded leaf segments of C. arvense and E. repens, at concentrations ≥840 and 67 and 84 mM, respectively, causing necrotic lesions on leaves within 24 h post-treatment. Compound 192 induced weak phytotoxic activity on Aamaranthus spinosus and Portulaca oleraceae [223].
Additionally, 9-O-Methylfusarubin, 9-O-methylbostrycoidin, 5-O-methylnectriafurone, trans-methyl-p-coumarate and terpestacin (194198, Figure 8) were isolated from the solid of Rutstroemia capillus-albis, which was recognized as the agent responsible of the so-called ‘bleach-blonde syndrome’ on the invasive annual grass weed Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) in Western North America [224]. Compounds 195 and 199 in a juvenile plant immersion bioassay at 10−4 M showed strong phytotoxicity, indulging wilting and plant death within 10 days. The other metabolites showed a lesser extended toxicity [224].
Methyl 8-Hydroxy-3-methyl-4-chloro-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-1-carboxylate and 5-chloromoniliphenone (199 and 200, Figure 8) were isolated together with another eleven closely related metabolites from A. sonchi proposed for the biocontrol of perennial sowthistle (S. arvensis). The other metabolites were identified as 4-chloropinselin, methyl 3,8-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4-chloro-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-1-carboxylate, pinselin, methyl 3,8-dihydroxy-6-methyl-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-1-carboxylate, methyl 8-hydroxy-6-methyl-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-1-carboxylate, chloromoncilin, moniliphenone, chloromonilinic acids B, C and D and α,β-diversolonic esters. All compounds were tested at concentrations of 2 mg/mL on leaf disks/segments of perennial sowthistle (S. arvensis) and couch grass (E. repens), showing weak phytotoxicity and inducing lesions up to 2.5 mm in diameter/length [225].
Araufuranone (201, Figure 8) was isolated together with neovasinin and 2,4-dihydroxy-6-hydoxymethylbenzaldehyde (202 and 203, Figure 8) from Ascochyta araujiae, collected from the infected leaves of white blade flower plant (Araujia hortorum) [226]. A. hotorum is a perennial vining plant species native to South America. It was introduced into many countries for ornamental and medicinal purposes as well as for its edible fruits, but it has become highly invasive, generating severe environmental problems. Assayed by a puncture, on six weeds such as Calamintha sp., Cyperus sp., Convolvulus arvensis L., Diplotaxis sp., Heliotropium europeum L. and Sonchus sp. at 0.8 mg/mL, araufuranone (201) showed a weak toxicity on the leaves of Diplotaxis sp. and Sonchus sp.; the other two metabolites were less toxic. Compounds 202 and 203, when assayed on cress, caused partially inhibition of rootlet elongation [226].

4. Fungal Phytotoxins to Biocontrol Parasitic Plants

Among the parasitic plants, witchweeds (Striga spp.) and broomrapes (Orobanche spp.) are the two most devastating species causing serious losses on several cereal and leguminous crops, respectively [227]. These parasitic plants are able to produce tiny but large numbers of seeds with prolonged viability and special germination requirements. Strigol, which was isolated from cotton, was discovered as the first very efficacious natural Striga germination stimulant starting from 10−15 M [228,229]. Successively, dihydrosorgoleone was isolated from sorghum as a stigolactone activity-like compound [230]. The chemical, biological, synthetic and biosynthetic aspects of strigolactones including analogues and derivatives were extensively investigated, and the results were reported in 2516 articles and 525 reviews from the SCiFinder research.
The main aims to control parasitic plants is to drastically reduced their soil seed bank. Two strategies based on the use of natural compounds and seed germination inhibition were proposed to biocontrol parasitic plants: (a) the use of fungal and plant metabolites able to inhibit the seed germination inducing their necrosis; (b) the use of natural compounds able to induce the seed germination in the absence of the host plant causing their aborption; this last strategy is the so-called “suicidal germination” [12,230].
This section chronologically describes, except the cases of treating the same argument, the source, structure and biological activity of the fungal metabolites which showed potential herbicidal activity to biocontrol parasitic plants and in some cases other interesting biological activities.
Fusaric, 9,10-dehydrofusaric acids (204 and 205, Figure 9) and their corresponding methyl esters (206 and 207, Figure 9) were isolated from the culture filtrates of Fusarium nygamai proposed for the biocontrol of Striga hermonthica [231]. S. hermonthica, commonly called witchweed, is a parasite weed which causes serious losses in many important cereal crops, such as sorghum, corn, millet, rice and sugarcane [232]. When assayed on tomato leaves and seedlings at 2.7 × 10−3 and 2 × 10−4 M, respectively, compound 204 and 205 and their methyl esters (206 and 207) induced wide chlorosis, which turn into necrosis, as well as in a strong inhibition of root elongation, respectively [230]. Additionally, Fusarium verticilloides, isolated from the tubercles of the parasitic weed Orobanche cumana in Israel, was able to produce phytotoxins. The fungus tested against O.cumana, Orobanche crenata, Pelipanche aegyptiaca and Pelipanche ramosa showing strong toxicity against P. aegyptiaca, P. ramosa and O. cumana. Its culture filtrates and the corresponding organic extract induced complete mortality of O. cumana and P. aegyptiaca seedlings in vitro. The toxin was isolated identified as fusaric acid (205) by transformation of the parent compound in the corresponding methyl ester [233].
For the control of the same parasitic plant S. hermontica as well clover broomrape, Orobanche minor were proposed cotylenins (CNs) and fusicoccins (FCs). Cotylenins and fusiccocins are glucosylated diterpenes sharing the same 5:8:5 carbotrycilcyc ring system. Fusicoccin A (FC, 208, Figure 9) was isolated as the main phytotoxin produced by Phompsis amygdali (syn. of Fusicoccum amygdali), the causal agent of a devastating disease of almond and peach trees. The surprising story of this phytotoxin, which was started in 1964 and continues today as a potential anticancer drug with more than 1680 citations, was recently reviewed [234]. All the cotyleninns were obtained from culture broth of Cladosporium sp. 501-7W [235,236]. Fusicoccin A (FC) and cotylenin A (CN-A) and their aglycones (fucicoccin deactyl aglycone and cotylenol, FC-A and CL) (208, 209, 210 and 211, Figure 9) at 10−4 M strongly induced Striga seed germination (60–86% germination), while any or negligible germination was observed in the same seeds incubated in distilled water, and strigol at 10−8 M induced higher germination (85–95%). The stimulants activities decreased in the order of strigol, CL, FC, CN-A and FC-A. Under the same experimental conditions, O. minor was more sensitive than S. hermonthica to all germination stimulants. In fact, strigol at 10−10 M induced >80% germination, while CN-A, CL, FC, and FC-A and at 10−4 M induced high germination (80–91%). At 10−5 M, CL and FC-A showed high activity (∼80% germination), while CN-A and FC induced poor (45%) and moderate (56%) activity, respectively [237]. A SAR study was carried out testing 24 natural analogues and hemisynthetic derivatives of fusicoccin (FC) and cotylenol, assaying their ability to stimulate the seed germination of P. ramosa. The natural analogues and derivatives of fusicoccin used were as follows: (a) the glucosides, 8-keto-triacetylFC, 19-deoxydideacetylFC, dideactylFC, 19-deoxy-19-fluorodideactylFC, 19-monoacetyldideacetylFC, 19-deoxy-3α-hydroxydideacetylFC, 3α-hydroxydideacetylFC, 12-monoaceyldideacetylFC, 16-O-demethyl-19-deoxydideacetyl-3-epiFC, de-t-pentenyl-16-O-demethyl-19-deoxydideacetylFC, perhydroFC, FC-pseudoacetonide, 8-keto-de-t-penyltetracetylFC, two isomers of de-t-pentenyletracetyl FC, 16-O-demethyl-de-t-pentenyl-19-deoxydideacetyl FC; among the aglycones are: (b) deacetylaglyconeFC, aglyconeFC, cotylenol, 8,9-isopropylidenedeacetylagliconeFC, 8,9-isopropylidene-19-deoxydeacetylaglycongeFC, 8,9-isopropylidene-12-keto-19-deocy deacetylaglyconeFC, 8,9-isopropylidene-12-epi-19-deoxydeacetylaglyconeFC, 8,9-isopropylidene-19-trityldeacetylaglyconeFC and an isomer of deacetylaglyconeFC. The results obtained showed that 8,9-isopropylidene of the corresponding FC deacetylaglycone and the dideacetylFC were the most active FC derivatives. In both groups of glucosides and aglycones (including cotylenol), the most important structural feature to impart activity appears to be the presence of the primary hydroxy group at C-19. The functionalities and the conformation of the carbotricyclic ring system also play a significant role. Thus, the dideacetyl derivative of FC, which is obtained by easy hydrolysis of the toxin (209) and could be prepared in high yield, had a potential for its practical application as a stimulant of P. ramosa to its biocontrol based on ‘‘suicidal germination’’ [238]. Successively, considering these results and the structural relation between FC-A (209) and ophiobolin A (66) and that the stimulation of seed germination is species-dependent, the two toxins and seven of the above cited FC derivatives were assayed at the concentration range of 10−4–10−7 M on seed germination of different Orobanche species such as P. aegyptiaca, P. ramosa, O. crenata, O. cumana, O. densiflora, O. fetida, O. gracilis, O. hederae and O. minor. Among all the compound tested, ophiobolin A and the hexacetyl and pentacetyl isomers of 16-O-demethyl-de-t-pentenylfusicoccin showed the highest stimulatory effect, while the other fusicoccin derivatives appeared to be practically inactive. The most sensitive species appeared to be P. aegyptica, O. cumana, O. minor and to a lesser extent, P. ramosa [239].
Seven macrocyclic trichothecenes, namely verrucarins A, B, M and L acetate; roridin A and isotrichoverrin B; and trichoverrol B and verrucarin E (212219, Figure 9) were isolated from Myrothecium verrucaria obtained from diseased P. ramosa collected in southern Italy. Compound 219, which is a disubstituted pyrrole, is the main metabolite, Fusarium compactum was also isolated from the same infected plant and produced as main metabolites as the trichothecene neosoloaniol monoacetate (220, Figure 10). Trichotechenes are well-known sesquiterpenoid mycotoxins produced by different fungi which possess high toxicity for humans and animals [240]. All the compounds isolated were tested on seed of P. ramosa according to previously optimized methods [241]. Except for verrucarin E (219), which is not a trichothecene and was inactive, all the metabolites 212218 and 220 when assayed at 100 µM totally inhibited the seeds stimulated germination and were still highly active up to 10 µM, causing total inhibition of seed germination, except for isotrichoverrin B and trichoverrol B (217 and 218), which were slightly less toxic and almost inactive, respectively [242].
Neosolaniol monoacetate (220) and roridin A (216) appeared strongly active at 1 µM, causing the total inhibition of seed germination. Verrucarins A, B and L acetate (212, 213 and 215) still showed a reduced activity inducing more than 50% inhibition of germination. Being that active metabolites are considered mycotoxin, their zootoxic activity was also investigated. All the metabolites in the assay on brine shrimps tested at 100 µM caused 100% of larvae mortality with the exception of inactive verrucarin E (219) [242]. It is interesting to observe that the phytotoxicity against P. ramosa seeds and zootoxicity to larvae seem unrelated. In fact, at 1 µM there were differences in toxicity, with neosolaniol monoacetate and roridin A being more phytotoxic, and verrucarin L acetate and verrucarin M being more zootoxic. Thus, these results could suggest the use of both compounds 216 and 220 as non-toxic bioherbicides as used at the low concentration of 1 mM [242].
The effect on seed germination and radicle growth of O. crenata, O. cumana, O. minor, and P. ramosa, of fungal metabolites, belonging to different classes of natural compounds on broomrape seed germination and radicle development, was determined in assays in vitro. The metabolites tested are cyclopaldic acid (221, Figure 10), a pentasubstituted benzofuranone, sphaeropsidin A, a pimarane diterpene, sphaeropsidone and epi-sphaeropsidone and epi-epoformin (222225, Figure 10), phytotoxic cyclohexeneepoxides produced, respectively, by Seiridium cupressi, the causal agent of canker of Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) and Diplodia quercivora an oak pathogen [243]. In addition, there were also assayed some already reported nonenolides such as pinolidoxin, herbarumin II, 2-epi-herbarumin II, (85, 87 and 89) and pinolide (226, Figure 10), produced by D. pinodes, the responsibility of pea-anthracnose [150], cavoxin and cavoxone (227 and 228, Figure 10), a pentasubstituted benzoic acid and the corresponding chromanone, produced by Phoma cava, isolated from infected chestnut [244], the already cited chenopodolin (38) and chenopodolan C (41), and 6-hydroxymellein (42), phytotoxins produced by P. chenopodicola proposed for the biocontrol of C. album [9,95] and by P. semeniperda proposed for the biocontrol of Annual grasses [175]. Among all the metabolites assayed, epi-sphaeropsidone and cyclopaldic acid induced broomrape germination in a species-specific manner. Furthermore, epi-epoformin, sphaeropsidin A and cytochalasans inhibited germination of GR24-treated broomrape seeds, while sphaeropsidin A, cycloheheneepoxides and cytochalasans always inhibited the growth of broomrape radicle. Finally, broomrape radicles treated with epi-sphaeropsidone, cytochalasins or sphaeropsidinA, respectively, developed a layer of papillae or became necrotic [245]. On the basis of these results, a more in-depth investigation showed that sphaeropsidine and epi-sphaeropsidone (223 and 224) were able to induce haustorium development in radicles of the parasitic weeds S. hermonthica, O. crenata and O. cumana. A SAR studies was carried out using compound 223 and 224, their chlorinated analogues, eight derivatives of sphaeropsidone and three of its 5-epimer (224). From compound 225, the acetyl, the 5-azidopentanoyl and p-bromobenzoyl esters, an aromatized triacetyl derivative, the corresponding quinone and hydroquinone and bromohydrin, and finally the dihydroxy derivative obtained for reductive opening of the epoxide group were prepared. From compound 225 the acetyl and 5-azidopentanoyl esters and the corresponding hyroquinone were prepared. All the natural and hemisynthetic derivatives were tested on O. cumana, O. crenata and S. hermonthica to find a molecular specificity model required for haustorium induction. The results obtained showed that the haustorium-inducing activity is due to the possibility of converting the natural sphaeropsidones and hemisynthetic derivatives in the corresponding 3-methoxyquinone. Additionally, the absolute configuration at C-5 played a role in the induction of such an activity [246].

5. Commercially Available Bioherbicides

Despite the extensive work performed on fungal metabolites with potential practical application as bioherbicide, no article and/or patent report about a product based on a pure or a mixture of the bioactive metabolites was described in the Section 3 and Section 4. This lack of application is essentially due to two limiting factors including the production of the amount of the bioactive metabolite at industrial level by fermentation or the developing of an ecofriendly and convenient simple enantioselective synthesis, as it was too difficult to develop an efficacy formulation for application in the field. Sometimes, another limitation could be their specific phytotoxicity. On the contrary, several products based on the formulation of fungal pathogens for weeds or parasite plants are commercialized since some years as reported in Table 1. Among all the bioherbicides reported in Table 1, to which is associated a commercial name, there are products formulated with fungal belonging to a well-known phytotoxin producer genera such as Colletortichum, Puccinia, Chondostereum and Sclerotium. Only one is formulated using a bacteria (Xanthomonas campetris sbsp. poae), and another one for the first time using a virus (TOBAMOVIRUS). The commercial bioerbicides are used to biocontrol some very dangerous weeds such as Ascochyta virginica, Morrenia odorata, Malva pusilla, Acacia spp. Cyperus esculentus, Cuscuta trees, Poa annua, Solanum viarum and Traxonum officinale. These weeds are very dangerous for cereals cultures (rice and soybean), Citrus groves, tree, forests, golf courses, natural environments and other different agrarian cultures [247,248].
Among commercial bioherbicides reported in Table 1 there is Collego, which is a powdery formulation containing 15% of Colletorichum gliosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene spores. This formulate is able to infect leaves, petioles and stems as well as seeds and seedlings. of Aeschynomene virginica, Aeschynomene indica and Sesbania exaltata. Symptoms are visible 7–10 days after application, allowing for 90–100% control. De Vine is sold as a liquid suspension containing 6 × 105 chlamydospores/mL of Phytophthora palmivora f. sp. aeschinomene to be applied on the surface of the soil. The suspension causes necrosis of stems and death of plants 1–6 weeks from application depending on the age of the Morrenia odorata plants. BIOMAL is a wettable powder of Colletotrichum gleosporioides f. sp. malvae, which is a fungus used to control Malva pusilla. It must be kept cold, and the spores require a certain degree of humidity to germinate and penetrate the mallow tissues. It has never had real commercial success because it requires about 20 h of wetting, is difficult to reach in natural conditions, for infection to develop and the disease to appear. Stompout, which is formulated using Cylindrobasidium leave spores in South Africa, accelerates the decomposition of stumps and roots of Acaia spp. in natural environments. Dr. Biosedge, which is formulate in the Japan using Puccinia canaliculata spores, inhibits the reproductive process and seed germination in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) when infested with different agrarian coltures.Myco.Tech was developed in the USA formulating Chondostereum purpureum spores. This mycohercide causes stump decay and prevents resprouting of some shrubs such as alder (Alnus rubra), pado (Prunus serotina) birch (Betula papyrifera) and poplar (Populous sp.), and is applied in forested areas. Camperico is a bioerbicide developed in Japan formulating the bacterium Xanthomonas campetstris subsp. poae for the control of the invasive weed Poa annua. The bioherbicide suppresses growth and causes black rot disease of weeds in golf courses. SoviNix is formulated as a concentrated liquid or a wettable powder containing tobacco mild green mosaic virus. The bioherbicide triggers a hypersensitive response in Solanum viarum and causes necrotic local lesions. It was used to control the invasive weed in perennial grass pastures. Sarritor is a formulate containing Sclerotium minor, isolated from lettuce, which absorbs plant tissue and is used to control dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and other broadleaf weeds in turfgrass.

6. Application Methods of Bioherbicides

Two different methods are used to apply the bioherbicides reported in Section 5 and are below briefly described.

6.1. Liquid Formulations

Post-emergency control with pathogens that essentially cause damage to leaves and stems.

6.2. Solid Formulations

Pathogens that induce infection at or below the soil surface.

7. Future Perspectives

Future prospects envisage different strategies for improving the efficacy of bioherbicides. The biological processes involve the identification of new targets, new agents, the multiple use of different pathogens and the simultaneous application of phytotoxins and pathogens as well as that of insects and pathogens. The technological strategies include the production methods, the increasing virulence of pathogens and precision agriculture. Integrated pest management involves the use of chemical products and the weed defense suppressants. Genetic methods involve the reduction in pesticide resistance, the development of biomarkers and the assessment of the environmental risks.

8. Conclusions

Weeds including parasite plants represent one of the most serious constraints in agrarian and pasture production, in reforestation practices in wood-producing countries, and in protection of forest and ornamental heritage as well as historic garden, archeological ruins and monuments. Severe problems are also generated in important infrastructures such as railways and highways because these plants can represent serious risks for the performance of regular service and cause serious accidents. These infestations determine heavy economic losses and require the use of efficacy methods to combat weeds and parasitic plants diffusion. In the past, agronomic and agrarian methods were used, but because of their low efficacy, these traditional methods were overcome in recent decades by the massive and extensive use of synthetic herbicides, which have generated the large problem of environmental pollution with a consequent contribution to climate changes, and due also to the repetition of treatment and the subsequent resistance developed by weedy plants. Severe risks for human and animal health were frequently recognized as being due to their transmission along the food chain. Thus, peoples and politicians inquire as to the development of alternative methods based on natural substance with herbicidal efficacy, selectivity, and ecofriendly properties. This review reports a complete overview of the fungal metabolites with herbicidal activity, reporting in details their source, the chemical properties, the biological activity and their potential practical application, while in some cases the results of structure-activity relationships studies were also discussed. All the results described for the biocontrol of weeds and parasite plants are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. However, for the most promising compounds found in the research, work should evaluate the eco- and human toxicological profile and develop their large production at an industrial level by fermentation or a total convenient and ecofriendly synthesis.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The literatures used to prepare this review were found on scifinder.cas.org/scifinder.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gladbach, A.; Zhang, Y.; Fantke, P.; Settles, L.; Glas, D. Environmental impact reduction of crop protection-how to model, how to Mmasure, how to achieve? In Proceedings of the SETAC Europe 32nd Annual Meeting: Towards a Reduced Pollution, Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260–20264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moyo, C.; Harrington, K.C.; Kemp, P.D.; Eerens, J.P.; Ghanizadeh, H. Wiper Application of herbicides to Cirsium arvense. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goldwasser, Y.; Sazo, M.R.M.; Lanini, W.T. Control of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris) parasitizing tomato with ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 2012, 26, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cannizzo, F. Briciole di Bellezza: Dialoghi di Speranza per il Futuro del Bel Paese; Mimesis Edizioni: Milano, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wheeler, G.S.; Jones, E.; Dyer, K.; Silverson, N.; Wright, S.A. Quarantine host range and natural history of Gadirtha fusca, a potential biological control agent of Chinese tallowtree (Triadica sebifera) in North America. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2018, 166, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kim, M.H.; Sung, C.Y.; Li, M.H.; Chu, K.H. Bioretention for stormwater quality improvement in Texas: Removal effectiveness of Escherichia coli. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 84, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schoenenberger, N.; D’Andrea, L. Surveying the occurrence of subspontaneous glyphosate-tolerant genetically engineered Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae) along Swiss railways. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2012, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Evidente, A.; Capretti, P.; Giordano, F.; Surico, G. Identification and phytotoxicity of 3-nitropropanoic acid produced in vitro by Melanconis thelebola. Experientia 1992, 48, 1169–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gazoulis, I.; Kanatas, P.; Papastylianou, P.; Tataridas, A.; Alexopoulou, E.; Travlos, I. Weed management practices to improve establishment of selected lignocellulosic crops. Energie 2021, 14, 2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Evidente, A.; Abouzeid, M.A. Characterization of phytotoxins from phytopathogenic fungi and their potential use as herbicides in integrated crop management. In Handbook of Sustainable Weed Management; Sing, H.P., Batish, D.R., Kohli, R.K., Eds.; The Haworth Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 507–532. [Google Scholar]
  13. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A. Fungal phytotoxins for control of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis. Pest Technol. 2011, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  14. Joel, D.M.; Hershenhorn, J.; Eizenberg, H.; Aly, R.; Ejeta, G.; Rich, P.J.; Ransom, J.K.; Sauerborn, J.; Rubiales, D. Biology and management of weedy root parasites. Hortic. Rev. 2007, 33, 267–349. [Google Scholar]
  15. Evidente, A.; Abouzeid, M.A.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.J. Recent achievements in the bio-control of Orobanche infesting important crops in the Mediterranean basin. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 461–483. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rimando, A.M.; Duke, O.S. Natural products for pest management. In Natural Products for Pest Management; ACS Symposium Series 927; Rimando, A.M., Duke, O.S., Eds.; American Chemica Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2006; pp. 2–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Loddo, D.; McElroy, J.S.; Giannini, V. Problems and perspectives in weed management. Ital. J. Agron. 2021, 16, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koivunen, M.E.; Coat, J.R.; Duke, O.S.; Beck, J.J. Pest Management with natural products. In Pest Management with Natural Products; ACS Symposium Series 1141; Beck, J.J., Coat, J.R., Duke, O.S., Koivunen, M.E., Eds.; American Chemica Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ballio, A.; Graniti, A. Phytotoxins and their involvement in plant disease. Experientia 1991, 47, 751–826. [Google Scholar]
  20. García-Pajón, C.M.; Collado, I.G. Secondary metabolites isolated from Colletotrichum species. Nat. Pod. Rep. 2003, 20, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Strange, R.N. Phytotoxins produced by microbial plant pathogens. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berestetskiy, O. Metabolite profiles and biological activity of extracts from Alternaria sonchi S-102 Culture grown by different fermentation methods. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2008, 44, 443–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Möbius, N.; Hertweck, C. Fungal phytotoxins as mediators of virulence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Varejão, E.V.; Demuner, A.J.; Barbosa, L.C.; Barreto, R.W. The search for new natural herbicides–Strategic approaches for discovering fungal phytotoxins. Crop Prot. 2013, 48, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schueffler, A.; Anke, T. Fungal natural products in research and development. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1425–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cimmino, A.; Masi, M.; Evidente, M.; Superchi, S.; Evidente, A. Fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicidal activity: Chemical and biological characterization. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 1629–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jones, R.W.; Hancock, J.G. Soilborne fungi for biological control of weeds. In Microbes and Microbial Products as Herbicides; ACS Symposium Series 439; Honcock, J.G., Ed.; American Chemica Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 276–286. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abbas, H.K.; Duke, S.O. Phytotoxins from plant pathogens as potential herbicides. J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 1995, 14, 523–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Sayed, W. Biological control of weeds with pathogens: Current status and future trends/Biologische Schadpflanzenbekämpfung mit Pathogenen: Aktueller Status und Trends von morgen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 2005, 112, 209–221. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoagland, R.E. Microbial allelochemicals and pathogens as bioherbicidal agents. Weed Technol. 2001, 15, 835–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chakraborty, A.; Ray, P. Mycoherbicides for the Noxious Meddlesome: Can Colletotrichum be a Budding Candidate? Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 754048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hoagland, R.E.; Boyette, C.D.; Weaver, M.A.; Abbas, H.K. Bioherbicides: Research and risks. Toxin Rev. 2007, 26, 313–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. .Strobel, G.; Kenfield, D.; Bunkers, G.; Sugawara, F.; Clardy, J. Phytotoxins as potential herbicides. Experientia 1991, 47, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, A.K.; Pandey, A.K. Fungal metabolites as a natural source of herbicide: A novel approach of weed management. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2019, 11, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cimmino, A.; Masi, M.; Evidente, M.; Evidente, A. Fungal phytotoxins with potential herbicidal activity to control Chenopodium album. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Macías-Rubalcava, M.L.; Garrido-Santos, M.Y. Phytotoxic compounds from endophytic fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 931–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vurro, M.; Boari, A.; Evdente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zermane, N. Natural metabolites for parasitic weed management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Abouzeid, M.; Evidente, A. Polyphenols as fungal phytotoxins, seed germination stimulants and phytoalexins. Phytochem. Rev. 2013, 12, 653–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hostettmann, K.; Hostettmann, M.; Marston, A. Preparative Chromatography Techniques. In Applications in Natural Product Isolation, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tringali, C. Bioactive Compounds from Natural Sources: Isolation, Characterization and Biological Properties; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Spano, M.; Andreani, S.; Naubron, J.V.; Mannina, L.; Pricl, S.; Muselli, A.; Tintaru, A. Smart IM-MS and NMR study of natural diastereomers: The study case of the essential oil from Senecio transiens. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 6695–6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wilkins, C.L.; Trimpin, S. Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry: Theory and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  43. Holm, L.G.; Plucknett, D.L.; Pancho, J.V.; Herberger, J.P. The World’s Worst Weeds-Distribution and Biology; The University Press of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  44. Iwasaki, S.; Muro, H.; Nozoe, S.; Okuda, S.; Sato, Z. Isolation of 3, 4-dihydro-3, 4, 8-trihydroxy-1 (2H)-naphthalenone and tenuazonic acid from Pyricularia oryzae cavara. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tarr, S.A.J. Diseases of Sorghum, Sudan Grass and Broom Corn; Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, UK, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mikami, Y.; Nishijima, Y.; Iimura, H.; Suzuki, A.; Tamura, S. Chemical studies on brown-spot disease of tobacco plants part I. Tenuazonic acid as a vivotoxin of Alternaria longipes. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1971, 35, 611–618. [Google Scholar]
  47. Robeson, D.J.; Strobel, G.A. Monocerin, a phytotoxin from Exserohilum turcicum (≡ Drechslera turcica). Agric. Biol. Chem. 1982, 46, 2681–2683. [Google Scholar]
  48. Robeson, D.; Strobel, G.; Matusumoto, G.K.; Fisher, E.L.; Chen, M.H.; Clardy, J. Alteichin: An unusual phytotoxin from Alternaria eichorniae, a fungal pathogen of water hyacinth. Experientia 1984, 40, 1248–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Charudattan, R.; Rao, K.V. Bostrycin and 4-deoxybostrycin: Two nonspecific phytotoxins produced by Alternaria eichhorniae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 43, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sugawara, F.; Strobel, G.; Fisher, L.E.; Van Duyne, G.D.; Clardy, J. Bipolaroxin, a selective phytotoxin produced by Bipolaris cynodontis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 8291–8294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Stierle, A.C.; Cardellina, J.H.; Strobel, G.A. Maculosin, a host-specific phytotoxin for spotted knapweed from Alternaria alternata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 8008–8011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Harris, P.; Cranston, R. An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1979, 59, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Puopolo, G.; Cimmino, A.; Palmieri, M.C.; Giovannini, O.; Evidente, A.; Pertot, I. Lysobacter capsici AZ78 produces cyclo (l-Pro-l-Tyr), a 2, 5-diketopiperazine with toxic activity against sporangia of Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 1168–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fry, W. Phytophthora infestans: The plant (and R gene) destroyer. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2008, 9, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gessler, C.; Pertot, I.; Perazzolli, M. Plasmopara viticola: A review of knowledge on downy mildew of grapevine and effective disease management. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, 3–44. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cimmino, A.; Puopolo, G.; Perazzolli, M.; Andolfi, A.; Melck, D.; Pertot, I.; Evidente, A. Cyclo (L-pro-L-tyr), the fungicide isolated from Lysobacter capsici AZ78: A structure–activity relationship study. Chem. Heterocycl. Compounds 2014, 50, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hassall, K.A. Biochemistry and Uses of Pesticides; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, Germany, 1990; p. 58. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bräse, S.; Gil, C.; Knepper, K.; Zimmermann, V. Organic azides: An exploding diversity of a unique class of compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 4, 5188–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sharma, K.; Butz, A.F.; Finckh, M.R. Effects of host and pathogen genotypes on inducibility of resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathol. 2010, 59, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cimmino, A.; Bejarano, A.; Masi, M.; Puopolo, G.; Evidente, A. Isolation of 2, 5-diketopiperazines from Lysobacter capsici AZ78 with activity against Rhodococcus fascians. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 4969–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kusumi, T.; Ohtani, I.; Nishiyama, K.; Kakisawa, H. Caryoynencins, potent antibiotics from a plant pathogen Pseudomonas caryophylli. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3981–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Young, J.M.; Fletcher, M.J. Pseudomonas syringae pv. panici (Elliott 1923) Young, Dye & Wilkie 1978 is a doubtful name. Australas. Plant Pathol. 1994, 23, 66–68. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mapuranga, N. A new race of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci on tobacco in Zimbabwe. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gutiérrez-Barranquero, J.A.; Cazorla, F.M.; de Vicente, A. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae associated with mango trees, a particular pathogen within the “hodgepodge” of the Pseudomonas syringae complex. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Young, J.M. Pseudomonas syringae pv. japonica (Mukoo 1955) Dye et al. 1980 is a junior synonym of Ps. syringae pv. syringae van Hall 1902. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 15, 129–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dias, M.D.; Dias-Neto, J.J.; Santos, M.D.; Formento, A.N.; Bizerra, L.V.; Fonseca, M.E.N.; Boiteux, L.S.; Café-Filho, A.C. Current status of soybean anthracnose associated with Colletotrichum truncatum in Brazil and Argentina. Plants 2019, 8, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Castaldi, S.; Cimmino, A.; Masi, M.; Evidente, A. Bacterial lipodepsipeptides and some of their derivatives and cyclic dipeptides as potential agents for biocontrol of pathogenic bacteria and fungi of agrarian plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 4591–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Stierle, A.C.; Caddlina, J.H.; Strobel, G.A. Phytotoxins from Alternaria alternata, a pathogen of spotted knapweed. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Okuno, T.; Natsume, I.; Sawai, K.; Sawamura, K.; Furusaki, A.; Matsumoto, T. Structure of antifungal and phytotoxic pigments produced by Alternaria sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 5653–5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Stack, M.E.; Mazzola, E.P.; Page, S.W.; Pohland, A.E.; Highet, R.J.; Tempesta, M.S.; Corley, D.G. Mutagenic perylenequinone metabolites of Alternaria alternata: Altertoxins I, II, and III. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 866–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jones, R.W.; Lanini, W.T.; Hancock, J.G. Plant growth response to the phytotoxin viridiol produced by the fungus Gliocladium virens. Weed Sci. 1988, 36, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bell, M.R.; Johnson, J.R.; Wildi, B.S.; Woodward, R.B. The structure of gliotoxin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Stipanovic, R.D.; Howell, C.R. The structure of gliovirin, a new antibiotic from Gliocladium virens. J. Antibiot. 1982, 35, 1326–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Masi, M.; Di Lecce, R.; Tuzi, A.; Linaldeddu, B.T.; Montecchio, L.; Maddau, L.; Evidente, A. Hyfraxinic acid, a phytotoxic tetrasubstituted octanoic acid, produced by the ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus together with viridiol and some of its analogues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 13617–13623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Upadhyay, R.K.; Kenfield, D.; Strobel, G.A.; Hess, W.M. Ascochyta cypericola sp. nov. causing leaf blight of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Can. J. Bot. 1991, 69, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stierle, A.; Upadhyay, R.; Strobel, G. Cyperine, a phytotoxin produced by Ascochyta cypericola, a fungal pathogen of Cyperus rotundus. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2191–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Dyke, C.V.; Chilton, W.S. Phytotoxic metabolites of Phoma sorghina, a new foliar pathogen of pokeweed. Mycologia 1992, 84, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Madrewesi, J.N.C. White leaf spot disease of fluted pumpkin (Telairia occidentalis) in Nigeria. Niger. J. Plant Prot. 1977, 3, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
  79. Saksena, A.K.; Jain, S.K.; Saksena, S.B. On the occurrence of three new fungal diseases of cultivated plants in India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Bioi. Sci. 1982, 52, 79–80. [Google Scholar]
  80. Shivapuri, A.; Mishra, A. Occurence of Phoma sorghina on phalsa. Indian J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 1982, 12, 13. [Google Scholar]
  81. Abdel-Rahim, A.M. Phoma sorghina causing a leaf spot of water hyacinth in the Sudan. Plant Pathol. 1984, 33, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kumar, P.; Seth, J.N. A new leaf spot disease of winged bean caused by Phoma sorghina. Int. J. Trop. Plant Dis. 1985, 3, 87–88. [Google Scholar]
  83. Prabhu, A.S.; Bedendo, I.P. Glume blight of rice in Brazil: Etiology, varietal reactions and loss estimates. Trop. Pest Manag. 1988, 34, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Chilton, W.S. Phytotoxins of Ascochyta hyalospora, causal agent of lambsquarters leaf spot. J. Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Evidente, A.; Capasso, R.; Vurro, M.; Bottalico, A. Ascosalitoxin, a phytotoxic trisubstituted salicylic aldehyde from Ascochyta pisi. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kempenar, C. Studies on Biological Control of Chenopodium album by Ascochyta caulin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  87. Netland, J.; Dutton, L.C.; Greaves, M.P.; Baldwin, M.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A.; Einhorn, G.; Scheepens, P.C.; French, L.W. Biological control of Chenopodium album L. in Europe. BioControl 2001, 46, 175–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Evidente, A.; Capasso, R.; Cutignano, A.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Ascaulitoxin, a phytotoxic bis-amino acid N-glucoside from Ascochyta caulina. Phytochemistry 1998, 48, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Trans-4-aminoproline, a phytotoxic metabolite with herbicidal activity produced by Ascochyta caulina. Phytochemistry 2000, 53, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C. Determination of Ascochyta caulina phytotoxins by high-performance anion exchange chromatography and pulsed amperometric detection. Phytochem. Anal. 2001, 12, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bassarello, C.; Bifulco, G.; Evidente, A.; Riccio, R.; Gomez-Paloma, L. Stereochemical studies on ascaulitoxin: A J-based NMR configurational analysis of a nitrogen substituted system. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8611–8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Avolio, F.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Boari, A.; Cimmino, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Large-scale production and purification of Ascochyta caulina phytotoxins and a new HPLC method for their analysis. Chromatographia 2011, 74, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Duke, S.O.; Evidente, A.; Fiore, M.; Rimando, A.M.; Dayan, F.E.; Vurro, M.; Christiansen, N.; Looser, R.; Hutzler, J.; Grossmann, K. Effects of the aglycone of ascaulitoxin on amino acid metabolism in Lemna paucicostata. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2011, 100, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fumagalli, P.; Andolfi, A.; Avolio, F.; Boari, A.; Cimmino, A.; Finizio, A. Ecotoxicological characterization of a mycoherbicide mixture from the fungus Ascochyta caulina. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Avolio, F.; Santini, A.; Tuzi, A.; Berestetskyi, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Chenopodolin: A phytotoxic unrearranged ent-pimaradiene diterpene produced by Phoma chenopodiicola, a fungal pathogen for Chenopodium album biocontrol. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Avolio, F.; Berestetskiy, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Chenopodolans A–C: Phytotoxic furopyrans produced by Phoma chenopodiicola, a fungal pathogen of Chenopodium album. Phytochemistry 2013, 96, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Evidente, M.; Cimmino, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Masi, M.; Berestetskyi, A.; Santoro, E.; Superchi, S.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Phytotoxins produced by Phoma chenopodiicola, a fungal pathogen of Chenopodium album. Phytochemistry 2015, 117, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Evidente, M.; Cimmino, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Masi, M.; Santoro, E.; Vergura, S.; Berestetskyi, A.; Superchi, S.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Chenopodolans E and F, two new furopyrans produced by Phoma chenopodiicola and absolute configuration determination of chenopodolan B. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 8502–8507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tsantrizos, Y.S.; Ogilvie, K.K.; Watson, A.K. Phytotoxic metabolites of Phomopsis convolvulus, a host-specific pathogen of field bindweed. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 2276–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Kenfield, D.; Bunkers, G.; Wu, Y.H.; Strobel, G.; Sugawara, F.; Hallock, Y.; Clardy, J. Gigantenone, a novel sesquiterpene phytohormone mimic. Experientia 1989, 45, 900–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Masi, M.; Sautua, F.; Zatout, R.; Castaldi, S.; Arrico, L.; Isticato, R.; Pescitelli, G.; Carmona, M.A.; Evidente, A. Phaseocyclopentenones A and B, phytotoxic penta-and tetrasubstituted cyclopentenones produced by Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot of soybean in Argentina. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sugama, K.; Hayashi, K.; Nakagawa, T.; Mitsuhashi, H.; Yoshida, N. Sesquiterpenoids from Petasites fragrans. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 1619–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bottalico, A.; Frisullo, S.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Capasso, R.; Corrado, E.; Randazzo, G. Occurrence of phomenone in Tomato plants infected by Phoma destructiva Plowr. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 1983, 22, 116–119. [Google Scholar]
  104. Sugawara, F.; Strobel, G.; Yoshida, S. Phytoactive eremophilanes produced by the weed pathogen Drechslera gigantea. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993, 57, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Vurro, M.; Fracchiolla, M.; Charudattan, R. Herbicidal potential of ophiobolins produced by Drechslera gigantea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1779–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sassa, T. Cotylenines, leaf growth substances produced by fungus. Part I. Isolation and characterization of cotylenins. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1971, 35, 1415–1418. [Google Scholar]
  107. Canonica, L.; Fiecchi, A.; Galli Kienle, M.; Scala, A. The costitution of cochliobolin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nozoe, S.; Hirai, K.; Tsuda, K. The structure of zizanin-A and -B, C25-terpenoids isolated from Helminthosporium zizaniae. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 2211–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Canonica, L.; Fiecchi, A.; Galli Kienle, M.; Scala, A. Isolation and constitution of cochliobolin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 1329–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Itai, A.; Nozoe, S.; Tsuda, K.; Okuda, S.; Iitaka, Y.; Makayama, Y. The structure of cephalonic acid, a pentaprenyl terpenoid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 42, 4111–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nozoe, S.; Itai, A.; Tsuda, K.; Okuda, S. Chemical transformation of cephalonic acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 8, 4113–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Nozoe, S.; Morisaki, M.; Fukushima, K.; Okuda, S. The isolation of an acyclic C25-isoprenoid alcohol, geranylnerolidol, and a new ophiobolin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 4457–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Au, T.K.; Chick, W.S.H.; Leung, P.C. The biology of ophiobolins. Life Sci. 2000, 67, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tian, W.; Deng, Z.; Hong, K. The biological activities of sesterterpenoid-type ophiobolins. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Masi, M.; Dasari, R.; Evidente, A.; Mathieu, V.; Kornienko, A. Chemistry and biology of ophiobolin A and its congeners. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tao, Y.; Reisenauer, K.N.; Masi, M.; Evidente, A.; Taube, J.H.; Romo, D. Pharmacophore-directed retrosynthesis applied to ophiobolin A: Simplified bicyclic derivatives displaying anticancer activity. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 8307–8312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Reisenauer, K.N.; Tao, Y.; Das, P.; Song, S.; Svatek, H.; Patel, S.D.; Mikhail, S.; Ingros, A.; Sheesley, P.; Masi, M.; et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition sensitizes breast cancer cells to cell death via the fungus-derived sesterterpenoid ophiobolin A. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Vurro, M.; Fracchiolla, M.; Charudattan, R.; Motta, A. Ophiobolin E and 8-epi-ophiobolin J produced by Drechslera gigantea, a potential mycoherbicide of weedy grasses. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2281–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zatout, R.; Masi, M.; Sangermano, F.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Santoro, E.; Calabrò, V.; Superchi, S.; Evidente, A. Drophiobiolins A and B, bioactive ophiobolan sestertepenoids produced by Dreschslera gigantea. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 3387–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Abbas, H.K.; Vesonder, R.F.; Boyette, C.; Peterson, S.W. Phytotoxicity of AAL-toxin and other compounds produced by Alternaria alternata to jimsonweed (Datura stramonium). Can. J. Bot. 1993, 71, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Boyette, C.D. Evaluation of Alternaria crassa for biological control of jimsonweed: Host range and virulence. Plant Sci. 1986, 45, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Brice, V.R.; Stack, M.E.; Mislivec, P.B. Incidence of toxic Alternaria species in small grains from the U.S.A. J. Food Sci. 1984, 49, 1626–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Harvan, D.J.; Pero, R.W. The structure and toxicity of Alternaria metabolites. In Mycotoxins and Other Fungal Related Food Problems; Advances in Chemistry; Rodricks, J.V., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1976; Volume 149, pp. 344–355. [Google Scholar]
  124. Hori, M.; Kakiki, K.; Misato, T. Mechanism of polyoxin-resistance in Alternaria kikuchiarza. J. Pestic. Sci. 1976, 1, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. King, A.D., Jr.; Schade, J.E. Alternaria toxins and their importance in food. J. Food Prot. 1984, 47, 886–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kohmoto, K.; Scheffer, R.P.; Whiteside, J.O. Host-selective toxins from Alternaria citri. Phytopathology 1979, 69, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kohmoto, K.; Verma, V.S.; Nishirnara, S.; Tagami, M.; Scheffer, R.P. New outbreak of Alternaria stem canker of tomato in Japan and production of host-selective toxins by the causal fungus. J. Fac. Agric. Tottori Univ. 1982, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  128. Logrieco, A.; Bottalico, A.; Solfrizzo, M.; Mule, G. Incidence of Alternaria species in grains from Mediterranean countries and their ability to produce mycotoxins. Mycologia 1990, 82, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Templeton, G.E. Alternanria toxins related to pathogenesis in plants. In Microbial Toxins; Kadis, S., Ciegler, A., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1972; pp. 169–172. [Google Scholar]
  130. Templeton, G.E.; Grable, C.I.; Fulton, N.D.; Bollenbacher, K. Factors affecting the amount and pattern of chlorosis caused by metabolite of Alternaria renuis. Phytopathology 1967, 57, 516–518. [Google Scholar]
  131. Tiejin, W.; Ceponis, M. Nature and extent of losses in fresh repacked tomatoes. Phytopathology 1982, 72, 266–267. [Google Scholar]
  132. Walker, H.L.; Riley, J.A. Evaluation of Alternaria cassiae for the biocontrol of sicklepod (Cassia obrnsifolia). Weed Sci. 1982, 30, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Walker, H.L.; Sciumbato, G.L. Evaluation of Alterrlaria macrospora as potential biocontrol agent for spurred anoda (Atzoda cristata): Host range studies. Weed Sci. 1979, 27, 612–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tanaka, M.; Ohra, J.; Tsujino, Y.; Sawaji, Y.; Fujimori, T. Phytotoxin produced by Nimbya scirpicola. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 565–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Matsumoto, M.; Matsutani, S.; Sugita, K.; Yoshida, H.; Hayashi, F.; Tcrui, Y.; Nakai, H.; Uotani, N.; Kawamura, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; et al. Depudecin: A novel compound inducing the flat phenotype of NIH3T3 cells doubly transformed by ras-and src-oncogene, produced by Alternaria brassicicola. J. Antibiot. 1992, 45, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Ohra, J.; Morita, K.; Tsujino, Y.; Tazaki, H.; Fujimori, T.; Goering, M.; Evans, S.; Zorner, P. Production of the phytotoxic metabolite, ferricrocin, by the fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995, 59, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Farr, D.F.; Bills, G.F.; Chamuris, G.P.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1989; p. 638. [Google Scholar]
  138. Keller-Schierlein, W.; Deer, A. Stoffwechselprodukte von Mikroorganismen. 45. Mitteilung. Über die Konstitution von Ferrirubin, Ferrirhodin und Ferrichrom A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1963, 46, 1907–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Neilands, J.B. Hydroxamic Acids in Nature: Sophisticated ligands play a role in iron metabolism and possibly in other processes in microorganisms. Science 1967, 156, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Barnes, L.; Eng-Wilmot, D.L.; Helm, D.V.D. Ferricrocin (C29H44FeN9O13. 7H2O), an iron (III)-binding peptide from Aspergillus versicolor. Acta Cryst. 1984, 40, 922–926. [Google Scholar]
  141. Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Capasso, R.; Andolfi, A.; Bottalico, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C. Putaminoxin, a phytotoxic nonenolide from Phoma putaminum. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 1637–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Capasso, R.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C. Putaminoxins B and C from Phoma putaminum. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Evidente, A.; Capasso, R.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C. Putaminoxins D and E from Phoma putaminum. Phytochemistry 1998, 48, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Capasso, R.; Vurro, M.; Botralico, A. Pinolidoxin, a phytotoxic nonenolide from Ascochyta pinodes. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 999–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Evidente, A.; Capasso, R.; Abouzeid, M.A.; Lanzetta, R.; Vurro, M.; Bottalico, A. Three new toxic pinolidoxins from Ascochyta pinodes. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Evidente, A.; Capasso, R.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C. Structure–activity relationship studies of putaminoxins and pinolidoxins: Phytotoxic nonenolides produced by phytopathogenic Phoma and Ascochyta species. Nat. Toxins 1998, 6, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rivero-Cruz, J.F.; García-Aguirre, G.; Cerda-García-Rojas, C.M.; Mata, R. Conformational behavior and absolute stereostructure of two phytotoxic nonenolides from the fungus Phoma herbarum. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5337–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Rivero-Cruz, J.F.; Macías, M.; Cerda-García-Rojas, C.M.; Mata, R. A New Phytotoxic Nonenolide from Phoma herbarum. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Seo, C.O.; Oh, H.C.; Lee, H.B.; Kim, J.K.; Kong, I.S.; Ahn, S.C. Hexaketides from phytopathogenic fungus Paraphaeosphaeria recurvifoliae. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 1803–1806. [Google Scholar]
  150. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Fondevilla, S.; Abouzeid, M.A.; Rubiales, D.; Evidente, A. Pinolide, a new nonenolide produced by Didymella pinodes, the causal agent of Ascochyta blight on Pisum sativum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 5273–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Yuzikhin, O.; Mitina, G.; Berestetskiy, A. Herbicidal potential of stagonolide, a new phytotoxic nonenolide from Stagonospora cirsii. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7707–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A.; Berestetskiy, A.; Mitina, G.; Andolfi, A.; Motta, A. Stagonolides B−F, nonenolides produced by Stagonospora cirsii, a potential mycoherbicide of Cirsium arvense. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A.; Berestetskiy, A.; Andolfi, A.; Motta, A. Stagonolides G–I and modiolide A, nonenolides produced by Stagonospora cirsii, a potential mycoherbicide for Cirsium arvense. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1897–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Dalinova, A.; Dubovik, V.; Chisty, L.; Kochura, D.; Ivanov, A.; Smirnov, S.; Petrova, M.; Zolotarev, A.; Berestetskiy, A. Stagonolides J and K and Stagochromene A, two new natural substituted nonenolides and a new disubstituted chromene-4,5-dione isolated from Stagonospora cirsii S-47 proposed for the biocontrol of Sonchus arvensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 13040–13050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mikhailova, N.F.; Tarasov, A.V. On the character of Cirsium arvense (Asteraceae) thickets. Bot. J. 1989, 74, 509–514. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  156. Donald, W.W. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arrvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 1990, 5, 193–250. [Google Scholar]
  157. Dalinova, A.; Fedorov, A.; Dubovik, V.; Voitsekhovskaja, O.; Tyutereva, E.; Smirnov, S.; Kochura, D.; Chisty, L.; Senderskiy, I.; Berestetskiy, A. Structure–activity relationship of phytotoxic natural 10-membered lactones and their semisynthetic derivatives. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Imaizumi, S.; Tokumasu, S.; Nitta, N.; Fujimori, T.; Yamada, M. A new disease of paddy weed Eleocharis kuroguwai caused by Dendryphiella sp. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 58, 158. [Google Scholar]
  159. Tanaka, M.; Ohra, J.; Tsujtno, Y.; Fujimori, T.; Ago, H.; Tsuge, H. Dendryol A, B, C, and D, four new compounds produced by a weed pathogenic fungus Dendryphiella sp. Z. Für Nat. C 1995, 50, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Abbas, H.K.; Duke, S.O.; Merrill Jr, A.H.; Wang, E.; Shier, W.T. Phytotoxicity of australifungin, AAL-toxins and fumonisin B1 to Lemna pausicostata. Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 1509–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Vurro, M.; Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Giordano, F.; Motta, A. Brefeldin A and α, β-dehydrocurvularin, two phytotoxins from Alternaria zinniae, a biocontrol agent of Xanthium occidentale. Plant Sci. 1998, 138, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Tietjen, K.G.; Hunkler, D.; Matern, U. Differential response of cultured parsley cells to elicitor from twonon-pathogenic strains of fungi. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983, 131, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Schmitzer, P.R.; Graupner, P.R.; Chapin, E.L.; Fields, S.C.; Gilbert, J.R.; Gray, J.A.; Peacock, C.L.; Gerwick, B.C. Ribofuranosyl triazolone: A natural product herbicide with activity on adenylosuccinate synthetase following phosphorylation. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Haines, D.R.; Leonard, N.J.; Wiemer, D.F. Syntheses and structure assignments of six azolinone ribonucleosides. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Nakajima, M.; Itoi, K.; Takamatsu, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Okazaki, T.; Kawakubo, K.; Masahiro Shindo, M.; Honma, T.; Tohjigamori, M.; Haneshi, T. Hydantocidin: A new compound with herbicidal activity from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. J. Antibiot. 1991, 44, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hoagland, R.E. The Genus Streptomyces: A Rich Source of Novel Phytotoxins; Ecology of Desert Environment; Scientific Publishers: Jodhpur, India, 2001; pp. 139–169. [Google Scholar]
  167. Harir, M.; Bendif, H.; Bellahcene, M.; Fortas, Z.; Pogni, R. Streptomyces secondary metabolites. Basic Biol. Appl. Actinobacteria 2018, 6, 99–122. [Google Scholar]
  168. Haneishi, T.; Nakajima, M.; Torikata, A.; Okazaki, T.; Tohjigamori, M.; Kawakubo, K. New Agrochemicail Named “Substance” no. 51262”, Its Preparation and Use. European Patent EP0232572A2, 19 August 1992. [Google Scholar]
  169. Pachlatko, J.P.; Zahner, H. New Streptomyces Hygroscopicus TU-2474—For production of the Herbicide Hydantocidin and the Bactericide Homomycin. German Patent DE 4129616 A1, Application 1991-09-06 Filed by Ciba Geigy AG, 3 December 1992. [Google Scholar]
  170. Chemla, P. Stereoselective synthesis of (+)-hydantocidin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7391–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Heim, D.R.; Cseke, C.; Gerwick, B.C.; Murdoch, M.G.; Green, S.B. Hydantocidin: A possible proherbicide inhibiting purine biosynthesis at the site of adenylosuccinate synthetase. Pest Biochem. Phys. 1995, 53, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Macías, M.; Ulloa, M.; Gamboa, A.; Mata, R. Phytotoxic compounds from the new coprophilous fungus Guanomyces polythrix. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Venkatasubbaiah, P.; Baudoin, A.B.A.M.; Chilton, W.S. Leaf spot of hemp dogbane caused by Stagonospora apocyni, and its phytotoxins. J. Phytopathol. 1992, 135, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Cytochalasins Z1, Z2 and Z3, three 24-oxa [14] cytochalasans produced by Pyrenophora semeniperda. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Medd, R.H. A review of the world distribution and host range of Pyrenophora semeniperda. Rev. Plant Pathol. 1992, 71, 891–901. [Google Scholar]
  176. Neergard, P. Seed Pathology; The Macmillan Press: London, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  177. Capasso, R.; Evidente, A.; Randazzo, G.; Ritieni, A.; Bottalico, A.; Vurro, M.; Logrieco, A. Isolation of cytochalasins A and B from Ascochyta heteromorpha. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 989–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Berestetskiy, A.; Evidente, A. Production of phytotoxins by Phoma exigua var. exigua, a potential mycoherbicide against perennial thistles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6304–6309. [Google Scholar]
  179. Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Berestetskiy, A.; Motta, A. Phomachalasins A–D, 26-oxa [16] and [15] cytochalasans produced by Phoma exigua var. exigua, a potential mycoherbicide for Cirsium arvense biocontrol. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 1557–1563. [Google Scholar]
  180. Bottalico, A.; Capasso, R.; Evidente, A.; Randazzo, G.; Vurro, M. Cytochalasins: Structure–activity relationships. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Capasso, R.; Evidente, A.; Vurro, M. Cytochalasin from Phoma exigua var. heteromorpha. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3945–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Vurro, M.; Bottalico, A.; Capasso, R.; Evidente, A. Cytochalasins from phytopathogenic Ascochyta and Phoma species. In Toxins in Plant Disease Development and Evolving Biotechnology; Upadhyay, R.K., Mukerji, K.G., Eds.; Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. PVT. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1997; pp. 127–147. [Google Scholar]
  183. Stahlman, P.W.; Miller, S.D. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) interference and economic thresholds in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 1990, 38, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Brooks, M.L.; D’Antonio, C.M.; Richardson, D.M.; Grace, J.B.; Keeley, J.E.; Di Tomaso, J.M.; Hobbs, R.J.; Pellant, M.; Pyke, D. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 2004, 54, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Clement, S.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A. Spirostaphylotrichin W, a spirocyclic γ-lactam isolated from liquid culture of Pyrenophora semeniperda, a potential mycoherbicide for cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) biocontrol. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 1497–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Evidente, A. Pyrenophoric acid, a phytotoxic sesquiterpenoid penta-2, 4-dienoic acid produced by a potential mycoherbicide, Pyrenophora semeniperda. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Cimmino, A.; Clement, S.; Black, B.; Evidente, A. Pyrenophoric acids B and C, two new phytotoxic sesquiterpenoids produced by Pyrenophora semeniperda. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10304–10311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Lozano-Juste, J.; Masi, M.; Cimmino, A.; Clement, S.; Fernández, M.A.; Antoni, R.; Meyer, S.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Evidente, A. The fungal sesquiterpenoid pyrenophoric acid B uses the plant ABA biosynthetic pathway to inhibit seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5487–5494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Graupner, P.R.; Carr, A.; Clancy, E.; Gilbert, J.; Bailey, K.L.; Derby, J.A.; Gerwick, B.C. The macrocidins: Novel cyclic tetramic acids with herbicidal activity produced by Phoma macrostoma. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1558–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Abouzeid, M.A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Ascosonchine, the enol tautomer of 4-pyridylpyruvic acid with herbicidal activity produced by Ascochyta sonchi. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Fracchiolla, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Drazepinone, a trisubstituted tetrahydronaphthofuroazepinone with herbicidal activity produced by Drechslera siccans. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Motta, A. Phyllostoxin and phyllostin, bioactive metabolites produced by Phyllosticta cirsii, a potential mycoherbicide for Cirsium arvense biocontrol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ayer, W.A.; Fukazawa, Y.; Orszanska, H. Scytolide, a new shikimate metabolite from the fungus Scytalidium uredinicola. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1993, 2, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Irvine, N.M.; Yerkes, C.N.; Graupner, P.R.; Roberts, R.E.; Hahn, D.R.; Pearce, C.; Gerwick, B.C. Synthesis and characterization of synthetic analogs of cinnacidin, a novel phytotoxin from Nectria sp. Pest Manag. Sci. 2008, 64, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Han, H.S.; Koh, Y.J.; Hur, J.S.; Jung, J.S. Identification and characterization of coronatine-producing Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 13, 110–118. [Google Scholar]
  196. Osbourn, A.E.; Lanzotti, V. Plant-Derived Natural Products; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 361–384. [Google Scholar]
  197. Evidente, A.; Berestetskiy, A.; Cimmino, A.; Tuzi, A.; Superchi, S.; Melck, D.; Andolfi, A. Papyracillic acid, a phytotoxic 1,6-dioxaspiro [4, 4] nonene produced by Ascochyta agropyrina var. nana, a potential mycoherbicide for Elytrigia repens biocontrol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 11168–11173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Shan, R.; Heidren, A.; Stadler, M.; Sterner, O. The reactivity of fungal papyracillic acid. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 6209–6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Shan, R.; Heidren, A.; Stadler, M.; Sterner, O. Papyracillic acid, a new penicillic acid analogue from the ascomycete Lachnum papyraceum. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 10249–102543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Vurro, M.; Berestetskiy, A.; Troise, C.; Zonno, M.C.; Mtta, A.; Evidente, A. Agropyrenol and agropyrenal, phytotoxins from Ascochyta agropyrina var. nana, a fungal pathogen of Elitrigia repens. Phytochemistry 2012, 79, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Cimmino, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Andolfi, A.; Troise, C.; Motta, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Agropyrenol, a phytotoxic fungal metabolite, and its derivatives: A structure–activity relationship study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1779–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Cimmino, A.; Andolfi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Troise, C.; Santini, A.; Tuzi, A.; Vurro, M.; Ash, G.; Evidente, A. Phomentrioloxin: A phytotoxic pentasubstituted geranylcyclohexentriol produced by Phomopsis sp., a potential mycoherbicide for Carthamus lanatus biocontrol. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Andolfi, A.; Boari, A.; Evidente, M.; Cimmino, A.; Vurro, M.; Ash, G.; Evidente, A. Gulypyrones A and B and Phomentrioloxins B and C produced by Diaporthe gulyae, a potential mycoherbicide for saffron thistle (Carthamus lanatus). J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Varejão, E.V.V.; Demuner, A.J.; Barbosa, L.C.D.A.; Barreto, R.W. Phytotoxic effects of metabolites from Alternaria euphorbiicola against its host plant Euphorbia heterophylla. Quím. Nova 2013, 36, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Webster, T.M.; Nichols, R.L. Changes in the prevalence of weed species in the major agronomic crops of the Southern United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Sica, V.P.; Figueroa, M.; Raja, H.A.; El-Elimat, T.; Darveaux, B.A.; Pearce, C.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Optimizing production and evaluating biosynthesis in situ of a herbicidal compound, mevalocidin, from Coniolariella sp. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  207. Gerwick, B.C.; Brewster, W.K.; de Boer, G.J.; Fields, S.C.; Graupner, P.R.; Hahn, D.R.; Pearce, C.J.; Schmitzer, P.R.; Webster, J.D. Mevalocidin: A novel, phloem mobile phytotoxin from Fusarium DA056446 and Rosellinia DA092917. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Clement, S.; Cimmino, A.; Cristofaro, M.; Evidente, A. Cochliotoxin, a dihydropyranopyran-4, 5-dione, and its analogues produced by Cochliobolus australiensis display phytotoxic activity against buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris). J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Clement, S.; Pescitelli, G.; Cimmino, A.; Cristofaro, M.; Evidente, A. Chloromonilinic acids C and D, phytotoxic tetrasubstituted 3-chromanonacrylic acids isolated from Cochliobolus australiensis with potential herbicidal activity against buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris). J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 2771–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Sassa, T.; Kachi, H.; Nukina, M. Chloromonilicin, a new antifungal metabolite produced by Monilinia fructicola. J. Antibiot. 1985, 38, 439–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Cimmino, A.; Pescitelli, G.; Berestetskiy, A.; Dalinova, A.; Krivorotov, D.; Tuzi, A.; Evidente, A. Biological evaluation and determination of the absolute configuration of chloromonilicin, a strong antimicrobial metabolite isolated from Alternaria sonchi. J. Antibiot. 2016, 69, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Górecki, M.; Mandoli, A.; Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G.; Cimmino, A.; Cristofaro, M.; Clement, S.; Evidente, A. Pyriculins A and B, two monosubstituted hex-4-ene-2,3-diols and other phytotoxic metabolites produced by Pyricularia grisea isolated from buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Chirality 2017, 29, 726–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Masi, M.; Santoro, E.; Clement, S.; Meyer, S.; Scafato, P.; Superchi, S.; Evidente, A. Further secondary metabolites produced by the fungus Pyricularia grisea isolated from buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Chirality 2020, 32, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Meepagala, K.M.; Clausen, B.M.; Johnson, R.D.; Wedge, D.E.; Duke, S.O. A phytotoxic and antifungal metabolite (pyrichalasin H) from a fungus infecting Brachiaria eruciformis (signal grass). J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 2019, 8, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  215. Waller, J.M.; Lenne, J.M.; Waller, S.J. Plant Pathologist’s Pocketbook, 3rd ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2012; pp. 4–18. [Google Scholar]
  216. Damm, U.; O’connell, R.J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The Colletotrichum destructivum species complex-hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Masi, M.; Cimmino, A.; Boari, A.; Tuzi, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Baroncelli, R.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Colletochlorins E and F, new phytotoxic tetrasubstituted pyran-2-one and dihydrobenzofuran, isolated from Colletotrichum higginsianum with potential herbicidal activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Masi, M.; Cimmino, A.; Boari, A.; Zonno, M.C.; Górecki, M.; Pescitelli, G.; Tuzi, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Colletopyrandione, a new phytotoxic tetrasubstituted indolylidenepyran-2,4-dione, and colletochlorins G and H, new tetrasubstituted chroman-and isochroman-3,5-diols isolated from Colletotrichum higginsianum. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 6644–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Masi, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Cimmino, A.; Reveglia, P.; Berestetskiy, A.; Boari, A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. On the metabolites produced by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides a fungus proposed for the Ambrosia artemisiifolia biocontrol; spectroscopic data and absolute configuration assignment of colletochlorin A. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 2, 1537–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Marsico, G.; Pignataro, B.A.; Masi, M.; Evidente, A.; Casella, F.; Zonno, M.C.; Takd, J.-H.; Bloomiquist, J.R.; Stefano, S.; Scafato, P. Asymmetric synthesis and structure-activity studies of the fungal metabolites colletorin A, colletochlorin A and their halogenates analogues. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 3912–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Xu, Z.; Shi, M.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, P.; Niu, Y.; Liao, M. Dirhamnolipid produced by the pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides BWH-1 and its herbicidal activity. Molecules 2019, 4, 2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Ma, W.J.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.R.; Zeng, Y.S.; Liao, M.D.; Chen, C.J.; Jia, D.M. First report of anthracnose disease on young stems of Bawanghua (Hylocereus undatus) caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in China. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Poluektova, E.; Tokarev, Y.; Sokornova, S.; Chisty, L.; Evidente, A.; Berestetskiy, A. Curvulin and phaeosphaeride A from Paraphoma sp. VIZR 1.46 isolated from Cirsium arvense as potential herbicides. Molecules 2018, 23, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Masi, M.; Meyer, S.; Górecki, M.; Pescitelli, G.; Clement, S.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A. Phytotoxic activity of metabolites isolated from Rutstroemia sp., the causal agent of bleach blonde syndrome on cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum). Molecules 2018, 23, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Dalinova, A.; Chisty, L.; Kochura, D.; Garnyuk, V.; Petrova, M.; Prokofieva, D.; Darya Prokofieva, D.; Yurchenko, A.; Dubovik, V.; Ivanov, A.; et al. Isolation and bioactivity of secondary metabolites from solid culture of the fungus, Alternaria sonchi. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  226. Masi, M.; Boari, A.; Sautua, F.; Carmona, M.A.; Vurro, M.; Evidente, A. Araufuranone: A new phytotoxic tetrasubstituted dihydrofuro [3, 2-b] furan-2 (5 H)-one isolated from Ascochyta araujiae. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Stewart, G.R.; Press, M.C. The physiology and biochemistry of parasitic angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 41, 127–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Cook, C.E.; Whichard, L.; Turner, B.; Wall, M.E.; Egley, G.H. Germination of witchweed (Striga lutea): Isolation and properties of a potent stimulant. Science 1966, 154, 1189–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Cook, C.E.; Whichard, L.P.; Wall, M.E.; Egley, G.H.; Coggon, P.; Luhan, P.A.; McPhail, A.T. Germination stimulants. II. The structure of strigol a potent seed germination stimulant for witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6198–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Joel, D.M.; Gressel, J.; Musselman, L.J. Parasitic Orobanchaceae. Parasitic Mechanisms and Control Strategies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  231. Capasso, R.; Evidente, A.; Cutignano, A.; Vurro, M.; Zonno, M.C.; Bottalico, A. Fusaric and 9, 10-dehydrofusaric acids and their methyl esters from Fusarium nygamai. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Abbasher, A.A.; Sauerborn, J. Fusarium nygamai, a potential bioherbicide for Striga hermonthica control in sorghum. Biocontrol 1992, 2, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Dor, E.; Hershenhorn, J.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A. Fusarium verticillioides as a new pathogen of the parasitic weed Orobanche spp. Phytoparasitica 2009, 37, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Marra, M.; Camoni, L.; Visconti, S.; Fiorillo, A.; Evidente, A. The surprising story of fusicoccin: A wilt-inducing phytotoxin, a tool in plant physiology and a 14-3-3-targeted drug. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Sassa, T.; Togashi, M.; Kitaguchi, T. The structures of cotylenins A, B, C, D and E. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1975, 39, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar]
  236. Sassa, T.; Neguro, T.; Ueki, H. Production and characterization of a new fungal metabolite, cotylenol. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1972, 36, 2281–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Yoneyama, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ogasawara, M.; Konnai, M.; Sugimoto, Y.; Sassa, T. Cotylenins and fusicoccins stimulate seed germination of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth and Orobanche minor Smith. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1583–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Evidente, A.; Andolfi, A.; Fiore, M.; Boari, A.; Vurro, M. Stimulation of Orobanche ramosa seed germination by fusicoccin derivatives: A structure–activity relationship study. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Rubiales, D.; Evidente, A. Stimulation of seed germination of Orobanche species by ophiobolin A and fusicoccin derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8343–8347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Cole, R.J.; Cox, R.H. Handobook of Toxic Metabolites; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 152–263. [Google Scholar]
  241. Zonno, M.C.; Vurro, M. Inhibition of germination of Orobanche ramosa seeds by Fusarium toxins. Phytoparasitica 2002, 30, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Andolfi, A.; Boari, A.; Evidente, A.; Vurro, M. Metabolites inhibiting germination of Orobanche ramosa seeds produced by Myrothecium verrucaria and Fusarium compactum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1598–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Masi, M.; Maddau, L.; Linaldeddu, B.T.; Scanu, B.; Evidente, A.; Cimmino, A. Bioactive metabolites from pathogenic and endophytic fungi of forest trees. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 208–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Evidente, A.; Randazzo, G.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Bottalico, A. Structure of cavoxin, a new phytotoxin from Phoma cava and cavoxone, its related chroman-4-one. J. Nat. Prod. 1985, 48, 916–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Cimmino, A.; Fernandez-Aparicio, M.; Andolfi, A.; Basso, S.; Rubiales, D.; Evidente, A. Effect of fungal and plant metabolites on broomrapes (Orobanche and Phelipanche spp.) seed germination and radicle growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10485–10492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Masi, M.; Maddau, L.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, M.; Rubiales, D.; Evidente, A. Induction of haustorium development by sphaeropsidones in radicles of the parasitic weeds Striga and Orobanche. A structure–activity relationship study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 5188–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Triolet, M.; Guillemin, J.P.; Andre, O.; Steinberg, C. Fungal-based bioherbicides for weed control: A myth or a reality? Weed Res. 2020, 60, 60–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Roberts, J.; Florentine, S.; Fernando, W.D.; Tennakoon, K.U. Achievements, developments and future challenges in the field of bioherbicides for weed control: A global review. Plants 2022, 11, 2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Metabolites produced by Alternaria alternata (1, 814, 1921), Exserohilum turcicum (2), Alternaria eichorniae (35), Bipolaris cynodontis (6 and 7), Lysobacter capsici (1518) and Gliocladium virens (2224).
Figure 1. Metabolites produced by Alternaria alternata (1, 814, 1921), Exserohilum turcicum (2), Alternaria eichorniae (35), Bipolaris cynodontis (6 and 7), Lysobacter capsici (1518) and Gliocladium virens (2224).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g001
Figure 2. Metabolites produced by Ascochyta cypericola (25), Phoma sorghina (2530), Ascochyta hyalospora (3133), Ascochyta pisi (34), Ascochyta caulina (3537), Phoma chenopodiicola (3847), Phomopsis convolvulus (4851).
Figure 2. Metabolites produced by Ascochyta cypericola (25), Phoma sorghina (2530), Ascochyta hyalospora (3133), Ascochyta pisi (34), Ascochyta caulina (3537), Phoma chenopodiicola (3847), Phomopsis convolvulus (4851).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g002
Figure 3. Metabolites produced by Phomopsis convolvulus (52 and 53) and Drechslera gigantea (5475).
Figure 3. Metabolites produced by Phomopsis convolvulus (52 and 53) and Drechslera gigantea (5475).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g003
Figure 4. Metabolites produced by Alternaria alternata (76 and 77), Nimbya scirpicola and Alternaria brassicola (78), Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (79), Phoma putaminum (8084), Dydimella pinodes (85), Phoma herbarum (8689) and Stagonospora cirsii (90101).
Figure 4. Metabolites produced by Alternaria alternata (76 and 77), Nimbya scirpicola and Alternaria brassicola (78), Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (79), Phoma putaminum (8084), Dydimella pinodes (85), Phoma herbarum (8689) and Stagonospora cirsii (90101).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g004
Figure 5. Metabolites produced Dendryphiella sp. (102105), Sporormiella australis (106), Alternaria zinniae (107 and 108), Actinomadura sp. (109), Streptomyces hygroscopicus (110), Guanomyces polythrix (111119), Pyrenophora semeniperda (120126 and 127134).
Figure 5. Metabolites produced Dendryphiella sp. (102105), Sporormiella australis (106), Alternaria zinniae (107 and 108), Actinomadura sp. (109), Streptomyces hygroscopicus (110), Guanomyces polythrix (111119), Pyrenophora semeniperda (120126 and 127134).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g005
Figure 6. Metabolites produced Pyrenophora semeniperda (135138), Phoma macrostoma (139 and 140), Ascochyta sonchi (141) Drechslera siccans (142), Phyllosticta cirsii (143 and 144), Scytalidium uredinicola (145), Nectria sp. (146), Pseudomonas syringae (147), Ascochyta agropyrina var. nana (149–153), Phomopsis sp. (154), Diaporthe gulyae (155–158), Alternaria euphorbiicola (159–162) and Coniolariella sp. (163).
Figure 6. Metabolites produced Pyrenophora semeniperda (135138), Phoma macrostoma (139 and 140), Ascochyta sonchi (141) Drechslera siccans (142), Phyllosticta cirsii (143 and 144), Scytalidium uredinicola (145), Nectria sp. (146), Pseudomonas syringae (147), Ascochyta agropyrina var. nana (149–153), Phomopsis sp. (154), Diaporthe gulyae (155–158), Alternaria euphorbiicola (159–162) and Coniolariella sp. (163).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g006
Figure 7. Metabolites produced by Cochliobolus australiensis (164171), Ascochyta sonchi (172), Perycularia grisea (173182) and Colletotrichum higginsianum (183186).
Figure 7. Metabolites produced by Cochliobolus australiensis (164171), Ascochyta sonchi (172), Perycularia grisea (173182) and Colletotrichum higginsianum (183186).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g007
Figure 8. Metabolites produced by Colletotrichum higginsianum (187190), Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (191), Paraphoma sp. (192 and 193), Rutstroemia capillus-albis (194198), Alternaria sonchi (199 and 200) and Ascochyta araujiae (201203).
Figure 8. Metabolites produced by Colletotrichum higginsianum (187190), Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (191), Paraphoma sp. (192 and 193), Rutstroemia capillus-albis (194198), Alternaria sonchi (199 and 200) and Ascochyta araujiae (201203).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g008
Figure 9. Metabolites produced by Fusarium nygamai (204207), Phomopsis amygdali (208 and 210), Cladosporium sp. (209 and 211) Myrothecium verrucaria (212219).
Figure 9. Metabolites produced by Fusarium nygamai (204207), Phomopsis amygdali (208 and 210), Cladosporium sp. (209 and 211) Myrothecium verrucaria (212219).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g009
Figure 10. Metabolites produced by Fusarium compactum (220), Seiridium cupressi (221) Diplodia cupressi (222225), Dydimella pinodes (226), Phoma cava (227 and 228).
Figure 10. Metabolites produced by Fusarium compactum (220), Seiridium cupressi (221) Diplodia cupressi (222225), Dydimella pinodes (226), Phoma cava (227 and 228).
Microorganisms 11 00843 g010
Table 1. Bioherbicides commercially available.
Table 1. Bioherbicides commercially available.
ProductCompanyMicroorganism
Formulated
Weed 1Colture 2
CollegoTUCO, Amarillo, TX, USAColletotrichum gleosporioides f. sp. aeschynomeneAeschynomene virginica, Aeschynomene indica and
Sesbania exaltata
Rice, soybean
De VineAbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USAPhytophthora palmivora f. sp.
aeschinomene
Morrenia odorataCitrus groves
BIOMALNovartis Biomedical research, Dorval, QC, CanadaColletotrichum gleosporioides f. sp. malvaeMalva pusillaDifferent
StompoutCAB International, Wallingford, UKCylindrobasidium leaveAcacia spp.Natural enviroments
Dr. BiosedgeBicosis (Adavanced Biocontrol System)
Co., Ltd., Geochang-gun
Gyeongsangnam-Do, Korea
Puccinia canaliculataCyperus esculentusDifferent
Myco.TechMycoTechnology, Inc., Aurora, CO, USAChondostereum purpureumTreesForests
CampericoJapan Tobacco, Inc., Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, JapanXanthomonas campestris subsp. poaePoa annuaGolf courses
SolviNixBIOPRODEX, INC., Gainesville, FL, USATobacco mild
green mosaic virus
Solanum viarumPerennial grass pastures
SarritorMcGill Spin-off
Anomera Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada
Sclerotim minorTraxonum officinaleNot reported
1 Weed biocontrolled. 2 Infested agrarian plant.
Table 2. Microbial phytotoxins to biocontrol weeds.
Table 2. Microbial phytotoxins to biocontrol weeds.
PhytotoxinWeedFungusBiological Activity References
Tuenazoic acid (1)Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) L.Alternaria alternata
Alternaria longipes
Phytotoxic activity on tobacco leaves [44]

[46]
Monocerin (2)Exserohilum turcicumPhytotoxic activity on the host plant, tomato and Cirsium arvenses[47]
Altheichin (3)Water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes)Alternaria eichorniae


Alternaria alternata
Phytotoxic activity on the host plant water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) and non-host plant
Pigment
[48]


[69]
Bostrycin (4)Alternaria eichorniaePhytotoxc activity on the host plant water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) and some agrarian and weedy plants[49]
4-Deoxybostrycin (5)
Bipolaroxin (6) Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon L.)Bipolaris cynodontisSpecific activity against the two host plants Bermuda grass and johnson grass[50]
Dihydrobipolaroxin (7)No toxicity
Cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Tyr-) (8)Knapweed, (Centaurea maculosa)Alternaria alternataPhytotoxic activity against the host knapweed,

Antifungal



Antibiotic
[51]


[53,55]



[60]
Cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Phe-) (9)Phytotoxic activity against the host knapweed[51]
cyclo(-L-Pro-D-Phe-) (10)No toxic on host plant
cyclo(-Pro-Hle-) (11)
cyclo(-Pro-Val-) (12)
cyclo(-Pro-Leu-) (13)
cyclo(-Pro-Ala-) (14)
cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Val-) (15)-Lysobacter capsiciAntifungal activity
Antibiotic activity
[60]
cyclo(-D-Pro-D-Phe-) (16)Antifungal activity
cyclo(-L-Pro-L-Leu-) (17)
cyclo(-D-Pro-L-Tyr-) (18)
Alterlosin I (19)Knapweed (Centaurea maculosa)Alternaria alternataPhytotoxic on knapweed[68]
Alterlosin II (20)
Altertoxin III (21)Phytotoxic on lettuge

Mutagenic.
[69]

[70]
Viridiol (22)Several spp.Gliocladium virens

Hymenoscyphus
fraxineus
Phytotoxic activity on weeds
Phytotoxic activity on some forest plant
[71]

[74]
Gliotoxin (23) Several spp.Gliocladium virensAntibiotic, Antifungal [71,72]
Gliovirin (24)[71,73]
Cyperine (25)Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.)Ascochyta cypericolaPhytotoxic activity on Cyperus spp.[76]
6-Methylsalicylic acid (26) Pockeweed (Phytolacca americana L.)Phoma sorghinaPhytotoxic activity on the host pokeweed and 8 other weeds [77]
Epoxydon (27)
Desoxyepoxydon (28)
Phyllostine (29)
Epoxydon 6-methylsalicylate ester (30)
Ascochytine (31)Lambsquarters or ft hen (Chenopodium album L.)Ascochyta hyalosporaPhytotoxic activity on the host lambsquarters and 8 other weeds[84]
Pyrenolide A (32)
Hyalopyrone (33)
Ascosalitoxin (34)Pea and bean (Pisum sativum and Phaseolus vulgaris) Ascochyta pisiPhytotoxic activity on the host plants[85]
Ascaulitoxin (35)Ascochyta caulinaPhytotoxic activity on the host lambsquarters[88]
trans-4-Aminoproline (36) [89]
2,4,7-Triamino-5-hydroxyoctandioic acid (37)[90]
Chenopodolin (38) Phoma chenopodiicolaPhytotoxic activity on Mercurialis annua, Cirsium arvense and Setaria viride[95]
Chenopodolan A (39) Phytotoxic activity on Sonchus oleraceus, M. annua and C. album[96]
Chenopodolan B (40)
Chenopodolan C (41)No phytoxicity
(R)-6-Hydroxymellein (42)No phytoxicity
Chenopodolan D (43)Phytotoxic activity on Sonchus arvensis, Urtica dioica and Parietaria officinalis[97]
Chenisocoumarin (44) No phytotoxic
Chenopodolin B (45)Phytotoxic activity on S. arvensis, U. dioica and P. officinalis
Chenopodolan E (46)Zootoxic acrivity[98]
Chenopodolan F (47)Phytotoxic activity on S. arvensis
Convolvulanic acid A (48)Bindweed (Corzvolvulus arvensis)Phomopsis convolvulusPhytotoxic activity against bindweed (Corzvolvulus arvensis)[99]
Convolvulanic acid B (49)
Convolvulol (50)
Convolvulopyrone (51)
Ergosterol (52)No toxicity
Ergosterol peroxide (53)
Gigantenone (54)Several grasses as weed cabgrass (Digitaria spp.), quackgrass (Agropyron repens) and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon)Drechslera giganteaPhytotoxic activity on monocot species [100]
Phaseolinone (55)
Petasol (56)
Sesquiterpenes (57)Not Toxic
Sequiterpene(58)Phytotoxic activity on dicot species
Phomenone (59)Phytotoxic activity on monocot species
Sesquiterpenes (60)Phytotoxic activity on dicot species
Sesquiterpenes (61)
Sesquiterpenes (62)Not Toxic
Sesquiterpenes (63)
Sesquiterpenes (64)
Sesquiterpenes (65)
Ohpiobolin A (66)Phytotoxic activity against some monocot grasses and dicot weeds [105]
6-epi-Ophiobolin A (67)Reduced phytotoxicity against some monocot grasses and dicot weeds
3-Anhydro-6-epi-ophiobolin A (68)
Ophiobolin I (69)No Toxicity
ophiobolin E (70)[118]
8-epi-Ophiobolin J (71)
Ophiobolins B (72)Phytotoxic activity against some weeds
Ophiobolin J (73)Reduce or no toxicity against some weeds
Drophiobiolins A (74)Phytotoxic activity on host, other weed and agrarian plants
Cytotoxic
[119]
Drophiobiolins B (75)
AAL-toxin (76)Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium)Alternaria alternataPhytotoxic activity on jimsonweed[120]
Alternariol monomethyl ether (77)No toxicity
Depudecin (78)Kuroguwai (Eleocharis kuroguwai) Nimbya scirpicola


Alternaria brassicola
Phytotoxic activity on host weed and some crops

Anticancer
[134]


[135]
Ferrocinin (79)blackberry (Rubus spp.)Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesPhytotoxic activity on some weeds[136]
Putaminoxin (80)Annual flaebane (Erigeron annuus)Phoma putaminumPhytotoxic activity on the host annual fleabane, some other weeds and cultivated plants[141]
Putaminoxin B (81)No toxicity[142]
Putaminoxin C (82)Phytotoxic activity on annual dog’s mercury, globe artichoke, tomato.
Putaminoxin D (83)No toxicity[143]
Putaminoxin E (84)
Pinolidoxin (85)Pisum sativum L.Dydimella pinodesPhytotoxic activity on some weed and crop plants[144]
Herbarumin I (86)Prine’s father (Amaranthus hypochondriacus)Phoma herbarumPhytotoxic activity against
Amaranthus hypochondriacus
[147]
Herbarumin II (87)
Herbarumin III (88)[148]
2-epi-Herbarumin II (89)Pendulus yucca (Yucca recurvifolici)Paraphaeosphaeria recurvifoliaeInhibition of murine tyrosinase[149]
Stagonolide A (90) Cirsium arvense
(Canada thisle)
Stagonospora cirsiiPhytotoxic activity against the host plant C. arvense, and several other weeds and cultivated plants[151]
Stagonolide B (91)No phytotoxicity[152]
Stagonolide C (92)
Stagonolide D (93)
Stagonolide E (94)
Stagonolide F (95)
Stagonolide G (96)[153]
Stagonolide H (97)Strong phytotoxicity against the host plants
Stagonolide I (98)Moderate phytotoxicity against the host plants
Stagonolide J (99)No toxicity[154]
Stagonolide K (100)Phytotoxicity against C. arvense and S. arvensis
Modiolide A (101)Moderate phytotoxicity against the host plants[153]
Dendryol A (102)Kuroguwai (Eleocharis kuroguwai)Dendryphiella sp.Phytotoxic activity against barnyardgrass[159]
Dendryol B (103)
Dendryol C (104)
Dendryol D (105)
Australifungin (106)No infected weedSporormiella australisPhytotoxicity against duckweed (Lemna pausicostata)[160]
Brefeldin (107) Alternaria zinniaeXanthium occidentale.Phytotoxicity against the host plant and other weeds [161]
α,β-Dehydrocurvularin (108)
2,4-Dihydro-4-(β-D-ribofuranosyl)-1,2,4(3H)-triazol-3-one (109)No infected weed Actinomadura sp. Phytotoxic activity on several weeds[163,168]
Hydantocidin (110)Streptomyces hygroscopicus[165,168]
Naphthopyranone derivatives (111)Guanomyces polythrixPhytotoxic activity against Amaranthus hypochondriacus and Echinochloa crusgalli[173]
Naphthopyranone derivatives (112)
Naphthopyranone derivatives (113)
Naphthopyranone derivatives (114)
Naphthopyranone derivatives (115)
Rubrofusarin B (116)
Emodin (117)
Citrinin (118)
hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.).

Stagonospora apocyni

Toxicity on several weeds

[174]
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid
methyl ester (119)
No infected weedGuanomyces polythrixPhytotoxic activity against Amaranthus hypochondriacus and Echinochloa crusgalli[173]
Cytochalasin Z1 (120)Annual grasses (Bromus spp.)Pyrenophora semeniperdaPhytotoxicity on wheat and tomato[175]
Cytochalasin Z2 (121)
Cytochalasin Z3 (122)
Cytochalasins F (123)
Cytochalsin T (124)
Deoxaphomin (125)
Cytochalasins B (126)
Cytochalasin A (127)Oleander nerium L. Phoma exigua var. heromorphaNot tested on weed[178]
Spirostaphylotrichin A (128)Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)Pyrenophora semeniperdaPhytotoxicity on cheatgrass and non-host plants[185]
Spirostaphylotrichin C (129)
Spirostaphylotrichin D (130)
Spirostaphylotrichin R (131)Non-toxic on cheatgrass
Spirostaphylotrichin V (132)Phytotoxicity on cheatgrass
Spirostaphylotrichin W (133)
Triticone E (134)Non-toxic on cheatgrass
Pyrenophoric acid (135)Phytotoxic activity on cheatgrass[186]
Pyrenophoric acid B (136)[187]
Pyrenophoric acid C (137)
Abscisic acid (138)
Macrocidins A (139)Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense)Phoma macrostomaPhytotoxicity on different weeds[189]
Macrocidins B (140)
Ascosonchine (141)Sowthistle (Socnhus arvensis)Ascochyta sonchiPhytotoxicity on several weed and cultivated plants [190]
Drazepinone (142)Ryegrass (Lolium perenne)Drechslera siccansPhytotoxicity on several weeds[191]
Phyllostoxin (143)Canada thistle Cirsium arvensePhyllosticta cirsiiPhytotoxicity on host plant [192]
Phyllostin (144)No toxicity
Scytolide (145)Pine-pine gall rust
(Endocronartium harknessii)
Scytalidium uredinicolaInhibiotion of inhibition of germination of E. harknessii spores[193]
Cinnamicidin (146)Not identifiedNectria sp.Phytotoxicity on several weeds[194]
Coronatine (147)Pseudomonas syringae[195]
Jasmonic acid (148)Plant hormone and fungal metabolites[196]
Papyracillic acid (149)Quack grass (Elytrigia repens)Ascochyta agropyrina var. nanaPhtotoxicity against different weeds[197]
Papyracillic acid methyl acetal (150)
Agropyrenol (151)[200]
Agropyrenal (152)
Agropyrenone (153)Not toxic
Phomentrioloxin (154) Saffron twistle (C. arvense)Phomopsis sp. Phytotoxicity on several weeds and some cultivated plants[202]
Gulypyrone A (155)Dyaporthe gulyaeNo toxicity[203]
Gulypyrone B (156)Phytotoxicity on Helianthus annuus plantlets
Phomentrioloxin B (157)Phytotoxicity on several weeds and some cultivated plants
Phomentrioloxin C (158)
Anhydromevalonolactone (159)wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla)Alternaria euphorbiicolaPhytotoxicity on host plant and other weed [204]
Tyrosol (160)
(R)-(–)-Mevalonolactone (161)
Cycloglycylprolin (162)Selective toxicity against the host plant
Mevalocidin (163)No infected weed Coniolariella sp.Phytotoxicity against broadleaf and grass species [206,207]
Cochliotoxin (164)buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare or Cenchrus ciliaris)Cochliobolus australiensisPhytotoxic activity on the host plant and other two native weeds[208]
Radicinin (165)
Radicinol (166)Not toxic
3-epi-Radicinin (167) Phytotoxic activity on the host plant and the other two native weeds
3-epi-Radicinol (168) Not toxic
Chloromonilinic acid C (169)Phytotoxicity on the host plant[209]
Chloromonilinic acid D (170)
Chloromonilinic acid B (171)
Chloromonilicin (172)Sowthistle (Socnhus arvensis)A. sonchiNo toxicity[1]
Peryculin A (173)buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare or Cenchrus ciliaris)Perycularia griseaPhytotoxicity on the host weed[212]
Peryculin B (174)
(10S,11S)-(−)-epi-Pyriculol (175)
trans-3,4-Dihydro-3,4,8-trihydroxy-1(2H)-napthalenon (176)
4S)-(+)-Isosclerone (177)
Dihydropyriculol (178) No toxicity[213]
epi-Dihydropyriculol (179)
3-Methoxy-6,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroisocoumarin (180)
Pyrichalasin H (181)Signal grass (Brachiaria eruciformis) Phytotoxicity on weeds and cultivated plants[214]
Colletochlorin E (182)Brassica sp.Colletetotrichum higginsianumPhytotoxicity on weeds, parasitic and cultivated plants[217]
Colletochlorin F (183)
4-Chlororcinol (184)
Colletopryrone (185)
Colletochlorin A (186)
Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)

Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides

Phytotoxicity on the host weed

[218]
Colletopyrandione (187)Rape (Brassica sp.)C. higginsianumPhytotoxicity on S. arvensis and Helianthus annuus[218]
Colletochlorin G (188)Not tested
Colletochlorin H (189)
Orcinol (190) Ragweed (A. artemisiifolia)C. gloeosporioidesPhytotoxicity on the host weed[219]
Dirhamnolipid (191)Bawanghua (Hylocereus undatus)Phytoxicity against different weeds[221]
Curvulin (192)Saffron thisle (C. arvense)Paraphoma sp.No toxicity [223]
Phaeosphaeride (193)
9-O-Methylfusarubin (194)Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)Rutstroemia capillus-albisPhytotoxicity on the host plant[224]
9-O-Methylbostrycoidin (195)Weak phytotoxicity on the host plant
5-O-Methylnectriafurone (196)
trans-Methyl-p-coumarate (197)
Terpestacin (198)
8-Hydroxy-3-methyl-4-chloro-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-1-carboxylate (199)Canada Thisle (S. arvensis)Alternaria sonchiPhytotoxicity on S. arvensis and E. repens[225]
Chloromoniliphenone (200)
Araufuranone (201)White blade flower (Araujia hortorum)Ascochyta araujiaePhytotoxicity on different weeds[226]
Neovasinin and (202)
2,4-Dihydroxy-6-hydoxy
Methylbenzaldehyde (203)
“—Means the same content.
Table 3. Microbial phytotoxins to biocontrol parasitic plants.
Table 3. Microbial phytotoxins to biocontrol parasitic plants.
PhytotoxinWeedFungusBiological Activity References
Fusaric acid (204)Purple witchweed (Striga hermonthica)



Broomrape (Orobanche cumana)
Fusarium nygamai




Fusarium verticilloides
Phytotoxicity on tomato and inhibition of Striga hermonthica seeds germination

Phytotoxicity against P. aegyptiaca, O. ramosa and O. cumana
[231]




[232]
9,10-Deydrofusaric acid (205)
Fusaric acid methyl ester (206)
9,10-Deydrofusaric methyl ester (207)
Fusicocin (208)No infected weedPhomopsis amygdalyStimulation of seeds germination of S. hermonthica and O. minor [237]
Cotylenin A (209)Cladosporium sp. 501-7W
Fusicoccin deacetyl aglycone (210)P. amygdaly
Cotylenol (211)Cladosporium sp. 501-7W
Verrucarin A (212)Broomrape (Pelipanche ramosa)Myrothecium verrucariaInhibition of P. ramosa seed germination[242]
Verrucarin B (213)
Verrucarin M (214)
Verrucarin L acetate (215)
Roridin A (216)
Isotrichoverrin B (217)
Trichoverrol B (218)
Verrucarin E (219) Not toxic
Neosolanial monoactate (220)Fusarium compactumInhibition of P. ramosa seed germination
Cyclopaldic acid (221)No infected weedDiplodia cupressiPhytotoxicity on O. crenata, O. cumana, O. minor, and P. ramosa[243]
Sphaeropsidin A (222)
Sphaeropsidone (223)
epi-Spheropsidone (224)
epi-Epoformin (225)
Pinolide (226)D. pinodesNo toxicity[150]
Cavoxin (227)Phoma cavaNo toxicity[244]
Cavoxone (228)
“—Means the same content.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Evidente, A. Specialized Metabolites Produced by Phytotopatogen Fungi to Control Weeds and Parasite Plants. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040843

AMA Style

Evidente A. Specialized Metabolites Produced by Phytotopatogen Fungi to Control Weeds and Parasite Plants. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(4):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040843

Chicago/Turabian Style

Evidente, Antonio. 2023. "Specialized Metabolites Produced by Phytotopatogen Fungi to Control Weeds and Parasite Plants" Microorganisms 11, no. 4: 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040843

APA Style

Evidente, A. (2023). Specialized Metabolites Produced by Phytotopatogen Fungi to Control Weeds and Parasite Plants. Microorganisms, 11(4), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040843

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop