Next Article in Journal
Epstein Barr Virus Exploits Genetic Susceptibility to Increase Multiple Sclerosis Risk
Previous Article in Journal
The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fe2+ Alleviated the Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 by Changing Nanoparticles Behavior in Solution

1
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Soil Multiscale Interfacial Process, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(11), 2189; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112189
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 26 September 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Anaerobic Digestion Processes)

Abstract

:
The negative effect of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) on the biological removal of nitrate (NO3) has received extensive attention, but the underlying mechanism is controversial. Additionally, there is no research on Fe2+ used to alleviate the cytotoxicity of NPs. In this paper, the effects of different doses of ZnO-NPs on the growth and NO3 removal of Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 were studied with or without Fe2+. The results showed that ZnO-NPs had a dose-dependent inhibition on the growth and NO3 removal of Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 and achieved cytotoxic effects through both the NPs themselves and the released Zn2+. The addition of Fe2+ changed the behavior of ZnO-NPs in an aqueous solution (inhibiting the release of toxic Zn2+ and promoting the aggregation of ZnO-NPs), thereby alleviating the poisonous effect of ZnO-NPs on the growth and nitrogen removal of P. tolaasii Y-11. This study provides a theoretical method for exploring the mitigation of the acute toxicity of ZnO-NPs to denitrifying microorganisms.

1. Introduction

Nitrate (NO3) is an increasingly serious pollutant in agricultural, urban, and industrial wastewater [1,2] due to the excessive use of fertilizers, discharge of livestock wastewater, and the infiltration of landfill leachate [3]. Previous reports demonstrated that nitrate could be removed efficiently and at a low-cost by microorganisms through assimilatory and dissimilatory reactions [4,5]. However, microorganisms are extremely susceptible to environmental factors. In recent decades, engineered nanoparticles (NPs), such as ZnO-NPs, have been widely used in sunscreens, coatings, and paints [6,7]. Commodities containing ZnO-NPs will inevitably be released into the environment during production, use and abandonment [6,8,9]. Finally, it accumulates and deposits in activated sludge [10]. Studies have shown that ZnO-NPs can change the community structure of functional flora in activated sludge [8,9,11] and inhibit enzyme activity [6], thus inhibiting nitrogen removal [12].
Up to now, many scholars found that Zn2+ dissolved from ZnO-NPs exhibited ion toxicity [6,10,13,14]. Zhang et al. [15] found that the accumulation of toxic Zn2+ in organisms resulted in the loss of 90% nitrogen removal capacity due to ZnO-NPs shock. In addition, ZnO-NPs are easily adsorbed on the surface of bacteria and can permeate into cells causing toxic effects [16]. Therefore, it is of great significance to clarify the toxicity source of ZnO-NPs in order to study and alleviate their toxicity.
Improving the stability of the ZnO-NPs or inhibiting their dissolution is one of the ways to alleviate the toxicity of the NPs. Some studies indicated that the composition of the solution had a key inhibitory effect on the dissolution of ZnO-NPs [6,17,18]. In addition, promoting aggregation and inhibiting diffusion can reduce the deposition of NPs on the surface of bacteria [19]. Iron is a widely available, environmentally friendly element, and Fe2+ is also an essential element for microbial growth. Some scholars proved that iron doping could reduce the cytotoxicity of NPs. For example, Li et al. [20] and Xia et al. [21] found that the iron matrix doped changed ZnO-NPs particles, slowing the rate of dissolution of the particles. Iron doping enhanced the combination of iron with zinc and oxygen, slowed the release of Zn2+, and achieved the purpose of reducing the cytotoxicity of ZnO [22]. However, there is no research on directly adding Fe2+ in sewage treatment to alleviate the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs.
Previous studies showed that Fe2+ could alleviate the cytotoxicity of CuO-NPs [23]. To determine the universality of Fe2+ to alleviate the cytotoxicity of NPs, we further explored the effect of Fe2+ on the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs. Using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) to further analyze the influence of exogenous Fe2+ on the water environment behavior of ZnO-NPs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterium and Culture Media

The used P. tolaasii Y-11 (KP410741) was isolated from winter paddy field, which proved that this strain was capable of NO3 removal [24].
The basal medium (BM) consisted of the following components (1 L, pH 7.3): 0.31 g NaNO3, 2.56 g CH3COONa, 0.42 g Na2HPO4, 1.5 g KH2PO4 and 0.1 g MgSO4·7H2O. Fe2+ was added together with the substrate in the form of FeSO4·7H2O (0.05 g/L) to explore the alleviating effect of Fe2+ on the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs. The Luria-Bertani (LB) medium contained (1 L, pH 7.3) NaCl 10 g, tryptone 10 g, and yeast extract 5 g.
Each 250 mL conical flask contained 100 mL medium. The sterilizing conditions of the medium were as follows: 121 °C for 20 min.

2.2. ZnO-NP Preparation and Characterization

Purity ZnO-NPs (20 nm, 99.9%, Zewu Company, Chongqing, China) were used in this study. ZnO-NPs (100 mg) were dispersed in 50 mL ultrapure water, and the suspension was prepared by ultrasonic (600 W and 40 kHz) for 20 min according to the method previously studied [23]. The Zeta potential was measured with a Zeta potential analyzer (ZetaPlus, Brookhaven, NY, USA) (Table S1). The hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs at different concentrations were determined by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS, Brookhaven, NY, USA) (Figure S1).

2.3. Evaluation of Mg2+ and Fe2+ on NO3 Removal Performance of Strain Y-11

Strain Y-11 was inoculated in LB medium, and shaken at 150 rpm (15 °C) for 36 h. Bacteria (10 mL) were harvested by centrifugation (6000 rpm, 5 min), washed twice with 5ml sterile ultrapure water, inoculated into different concentrations of Fe2+ basal medium (with or without Mg2+) and then incubated at 15 °C and 150 rpm [25]. All treatments were conducted in triplicates. The non-inoculation treatment was used as the control (CK); cell density (OD600) and nitrate (NO3). Three parallel measurements were taken for each treatment.

2.4. Evaluation of Fe2+ on NO3 Removal Performance of Strain Y-11 under ZnO-NPs (Zn2+) Stress

Strain Y-11 was exposed to BM with ZnO-NPs (0, 0.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg/L) or Zn2+ (0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 mg/L), and the non-inoculation treatment was used as the control (CK). The OD600, NO3 and metal ions (Mg2+, Fe2+ and Zn2+) were investigated after 48 h of incubation. Three parallel measurements were taken for each treatment.

2.5. Observation of ZnO-NPs Adsorption on Strain Y-11 Surface with or without Fe2+

The distribution of ZnO-NPs in bacterial suspension was analyzed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Phenom World, Eindhoven, Holland) and energy spectrum analysis (EDS). The treatment (5 mg/L ZnO-NPs) with significant difference in bacterial growth was selected, and 50 mL culture solution was centrifuged (6000 rpm, 10 min). The pellets were collected and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution (PBS, pH 7.4) at 4 °C for overnight. The treated supplies were washed again with PBS and dehydrated with a gradient of ethanol (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 15 min each). The sample was resuspended in 99% ethanol, dripped onto a silicon wafer, and dried in a dryer. Finally, the images were obtained using SEM-EDS at 15 kV voltage.

2.6. FTIR Analysis

In this study, FTIR was used to analyze the effect of Fe2+ addition on the main functional groups of the interaction between ZnO-NPs and strain Y-11. After 48 h of culture, the suspension treated with 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs was freeze-dried for 48 h. The 1 mg freeze-dried sample was ground with 100 mg potassium bromide in an agate mortar, and then pressed. FTIR (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrum was used to identify the main functional groups in the sample in the range of 400–4000 cm−1.

2.7. Analysis and Calculation

After 48 h of exposure, OD600 was tested using a spectrophotometer (UV755B, Shanghai Analytical Instruments General Factory, Shanghai, China) at an absorption wavelength of 600 nm. To eliminate the influence of high-concentration ZnO-NPs on the OD600 measurement, the following calculations were performed:
OD600 = OD600T − OD600CK
where OD600 was the actual cell density, OD600T and OD600CK were the cell densities of the experimental group and the control group, respectively.
The medium (10 mL) was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used for determination of NO3 and metal ions. Specifically, the measurement of the metal ions (Mg2+, Fe2+ and Zn2+) concentration used ICP-OES (5110, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). NO3 was determined by hydrochloric acid spectrophotometry, with reference to He et al. [25].
The removal efficiency of NO3 was calculated as follows:
R = (T0 − T1)/T0 × 100%
where R was the NO3 removal efficiency (%), T0 and T1 represented the initial and final NO3 concentration in the culture medium, respectively. The results were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). All statistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Fe2+ on Cell Proliferation and NO3 Removal of P. tolaasii Y-11

To evaluate the optimal addition of Fe2+, we explored the influence of Fe2+ on the NO3 removal of strain Y-11 (Figure S2). The cell proliferation and NO3 removal performance almost ceased when Mg2+ was not added to the BM. Even with the addition of Fe2+, the improvement was only slight. Therefore, Mg2+ was an essential nutrient of the growth and metabolism of strain Y-11 [25,26]. When the Fe2+ concentration increased from 0 to 10 mg/L, the OD600 significantly increased from 1.41 to 1.95, and the NO3 removal efficiency significantly increased from 58.66% to 85.89%. After that, the growth and NO3 removal showed no significant changes regarding the increase in the amount of Fe2+. So, the amount of Fe2+ added was 10 mg/L.

3.2. Effects of Fe2+ on Cell Proliferation and NO3 Removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under ZnO-NPs Stress

In the Fe2+-free treatment, ZnO-NPs had an inhibitory effect on the growth of strain Y-11, showing a dose-dependent pattern (Figure 1). ZnO-NPs, in measurements of 0.5 mg/L and 5 mg/L, promoted the NO3 removal (35.48% and 47.63%, respectively); 10 mg/L and 20 mg/L ZnO-NPs inhibited the NO3 removal (21.10% and 7.81%, respectively) (0 mg/L ZnO-NPs treatment was 35.26%). Although low-content ZnO-NPs inhibited cell proliferation, it promoted denitrification-related enzyme activity. It may be that the adsorption of ZnO-NPs on the surface of strain Y-11 inhibited cell proliferation due to electrostatic attraction [16]. However, the Zn2+ released from the low-content ZnO-NPs did not exceed the threshold of toxicity of strain Y-11, but stimulated the related enzyme activity. As the content of ZnO-NPs further increased, the cell activity was seriously affected. In the Fe2+-containing treatment, as the ZnO-NPs content increased from 0.5 mg/L to 20 mg/L, the NO3 removal efficiencies decreased from 69.82% to 9.10%, and the OD600 decreased from 1.463 to 0.779. At the same ZnO-NPs concentration, the NO3 removal efficiencies and OD600 of Fe2+-containing treatment were conspicuously higher than those of the Fe2+-free treatment (0-5 mg/L ZnO-NPs), which implied that Fe2+ could alleviate the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs. The reason for this could be that Fe2+ was a coenzyme factor of microbial metalloproteinases or certain functional enzymes, which could promote the electron transfer of microorganisms, improve the activity of microorganisms, and improve the utilization and transformation of nitrogen [27,28,29]. Additionally, with a high content of ZnO-NPs, especially 20 mg/L ZnO-NPs, the addition of Fe2+ did not significantly promote the removal of the NO3 by strain Y-11. We believed that 10 mg/L Fe2+ was not enough to alleviate all the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs under the treatment of this content of ZnO-NPs. Therefore, the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs could be further alleviated by increasing the dosage of Fe2+ (after all, within the range of 100 mg/L Fe2+, there was no ion toxicity to strain Y-11 (Figure S2)).

3.3. Effect of Fe2+ on the Release of Zn2+ from ZnO-NPs

It has been substantially recognized that ZnO-NPs releases Zn2+ in aqueous environments [14,30]. Through static dissolution experiments, the effect of Fe2+ on the amount of Zn2+ release from ZnO-NPs was evaluated (Figure 2). With the increase in ZnO-NPs content, the dissolved Zn2+ increased first and then decreased, reaching the maximum release of Zn2+ (1.27 mg/L) at 10 mg/L ZnO-NPs. This was similar to the results of Wang et al. [31] and Huang et al. [26]. The rapid aggregation and precipitation of high-content ZnO-NPs led to a reduction in Zn2+ dissolution [32]. The exogenous Fe2+ suppressed the release of Zn2+, and the release of Zn2+ reached the maximum value (0.77 mg/L) when treated with 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs.

3.4. Effect of Fe2+ on Cell Proliferation and NO3 Removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under Zn2+ Stress

Previous studies have shown that the release of Zn2+ from ZnO-NPs is the main source of its toxicity to certain microorganisms in aqueous media [6,33]. To investigate the source of the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs, a Zn2+ simulation experiment was conducted according to the amount of Zn2+ released from ZnO-NPs (Figure 3). Zn2+ is an important micronutrient, and an appropriate amount of Zn2+ can promote the growth and metabolism of microorganisms. An amount of 0.3 mg/L Zn2+ had a positive effect on strain Y-11. In the Fe2+-free treatment, the amount of Zn2+ released by 0.5–5 mg/L ZnO-NPs was in the range of 0.18–0.99 mg/L (Figure 2). In this case, the growth of strain y-11 was inhibited, but NO3 removal was promoted (Figure 1). Intriguingly, in the Fe2+-free treatment, as the Zn2+ concentration increased (0.3–0.9 mg/L), the OD600 decreased, and the NO3 removal efficiency decreased from 45.49% to 25.28%. The release of Zn2+ from ZnO-NPs is a slow process, which causes the difference between the results of the Zn2+ simulation experiments and the ZnO-NPs experiment. However, it was worth affirming that the Zn2+ released from low content ZnO-NPs (0.5 mg/L and 5 mg/L) was the main source of its cytotoxicity. The amount of Zn2+ released from 10 mg/L ZnO-NPs was 1.27 mg/L, and the strain growth and NO3 removal efficiency were inhibited (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Furthermore, when the content of Zn2+ was 1.2 mg/L, the NO3 removal efficiency increased to 40.65%. The reasons for this need further study. When the content of ZnO-NPs was 20 mg/L, although the release of Zn2+ was reduced, the activity of the strain was significantly inhibited (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The results showed that the high content of ZnO-NPs was the main source of their cytotoxicity.
In the Fe2+-containing treatment, exogenous Fe2+ could effectively alleviate the toxicity of Zn2+ and maintain a high OD600 (1.4) and NO3 removal efficiency (65%). Prominently, strain Y-11 was more affected by the content of ZnO-NPs than the content of Zn2+ (Figure 1). This further proved that ZnO-NPs themselves and Zn2+ interact together to cause their cytotoxicity to strain Y-11. This result matched the findings in another study which reported that the content of ZnO-NPs exceeded 1 mg/L, and the source of its toxicity to bacteria was not only due to dissolved Zn2+, but also contained ZnO-NPs themselves [26]. However, Wang et al. [31] believed that the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs was only dependent on Zn2+. The sources of cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs varied with different strain solutions, but dissolved Zn2+ was part of this source of cytotoxicity. The exogenous Fe2+ could alleviate the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs.

3.5. Effects of Fe2+ on the Main Functional Groups of the Interaction between ZnO-NPs and Strain Y-11

In order to further clarify the role of Fe2+ in alleviating the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs, the effects of Fe2+ on the surface functional groups of ZnO-NPs were studied by FTIR (Figure 4). The peak value appeared at 537 cm−1, confirming the presence of ZnO. Previous studies showed that the peaks in the range of 400–800 cm−1 were related to the metal-oxide group. Therefore, we believed that the newly appearing peak at 514 cm−1 was an Fe-O single peak in the Fe2+-containing treatment. A sharp peak appeared at 642 cm−1, corresponding to the stretching vibration of ZnO [34]. The absorption peaks at 823 cm−1 were the stretching vibrations of the unsaturated carbon–hydrogen bonds on the benzene ring. The peak observed at 863 cm−1 was considered to be the Zn-OH bending vibration [35]. The peaks at 1020 and 1066 cm−1 belonged to the P-O symmetric stretching vibration [20]. This indicated that the phosphate in the medium reacted with Zn or adsorbed on the surface of ZnO-NPs. The peaks at 2358 cm−1 were due to the sample’s absorption of CO2 from the environment. The absorption peaks at 3450 cm−1 were due to O-H stretching [36]. The fluctuation of the wavenumber of ZnO-NPs after the addition of Fe2+ showed that Fe2+ played a role in alleviating the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs. This confirmed that the addition of Fe2+ played a role in alleviating the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs.

3.6. Effects of Fe2+ on the Hydrodynamic Diameter of ZnO-NPs

The hydrodynamic diameter reflected the aggregation state of ZnO-NPs in the solution. The hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs increased from 687.21 nm to 1540.4 nm as its content increased (Table 1). That is, the high content of ZnO-NPs greatly increased the chance of a collision between the NP, resulting in the agglomeration of ZnO-NPs. In this study, exogenous Fe2+ made the hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs reach the micron level, losing its original specificity. It could be seen that the addition of Fe2+ promoted the aggregation of ZnO-NPs and slowed the diffusion of ZnO-NPs, thus slowing down the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs.

3.7. Effects of Fe2+ on the Adsorption of ZnO-NPs on the Surface of Strain Y-11

The evidence demonstrated that the large specific surface area made NPs easy to attach to microbial flocs through processes such as adsorption [16]. SEM-EDS images showed that the ZnO-NPs were adsorbed on the surface of the bacteria when Fe2+ was not added to the medium (Figure 5). The EDS spectrum showed that there was a strong Zn peak intensity near 1, 8.6, 9.5 keV, and an oxygen peak at 0.6 keV, indicating that ZnO-NPs were adsorbed on strain Y-11. Studies showed that ZnO-NPs were first deposited on the cell surface under the action of electrostatic force, resulting in a decrease in cell growth [6]. This study also found that ZnO-NPs exposure treatment could lead to a reduction in bacterial growth (Figure 1). The exogenous Fe2+ promoted the adsorption of Fe2+ on the surface of ZnO-NPs, leading to the formation of a “coating” on the surface of ZnO-NPs (Figure 5B). Additionally, the decrease in Zeta potential indicated that the addition of Fe2+ reduced the electrostatic repulsion between the ZnO-NPs (Table S1) and reduced the contact between the ZnO-NPs and the bacteria (Figure 5C). In summary, exogenous Fe2+ reduced the toxicity of NPs due to the increase in electrostatic repulsion and the “coating effect” of Fe2+ on the surface of ZnO-NPs, which hindered the physical contact between ZnO-NPs and the cell membranes.

4. Discussion

In this study, by comparing the effects of ZnO-NPs and Zn2+ on the strain Y-11, it was concluded that the toxicity of ZnO-NPs to strain Y-11 came from the NPs themselves and the dissolved Zn2+. This was consistent with the research results of Huang et al. [26]. On the one hand, ZnO-NPs itself could contact the cell and destroy the cell membrane. Due to its small size, ZnO-NPs had a good dispersibility and strong penetrating ability in an aqueous solution [37], could enter cells and cause a toxic effect on strain Y-11. On the other hand, the Zn2+ dissolved from ZnO-NPs could produce heavy metal ion toxicity to the strain Y-11. Related studies found that when the Zn2+ content exceeded 0.5 mg/L, it had a significant inhibitory effect on the biological nitrogen removal [25]. The nano-toxicity and Zn2+ toxicity of ZnO-NPs were affected by its dissolution, aggregation, adsorption and other behavior in the water. In this sense, the cytotoxicity of NPs could be mitigated by changing their behavior in solution.
Firstly, the release of free Zn2+ was an aspect of ZnO-NPs cytotoxicity. Studies showed that Zn2+ released from ZnO-NPs could severely inhibit denitrification [13,14]. For example, Zhang et al. [15] found that when toxic Zn2+ accumulated in organisms, 90% of the denitrification capacity was lost due to ZnO-NPs shock. Similarly, related studies found that Zn2+ released from ZnO-NPs had a toxicity effect on purely cultured microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Vibrio fischeri, etc.) [38]. ZnO-NPs had a good adsorption property, and the dissolved Zn2+ was adsorbed on its surface. This caused the dissolved Zn2+ to infiltrate into the cells along with the ZnO-NPs, which could be toxic to cells [16]. Li et al. [20] reduced the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs by adding Zn2+ chelating agents (citrate ion, EDTA, etc.). Wirth et al. [39] found that humic acid(HA) could lead to the reduction in free Ag+ and reduce the toxicity of Ag-NPs. This study found that the direct addition of Fe2+ could effectively reduce the dissolution of Zn2+ (Figure 2). It was noticed that the content of Fe2+ in the solution decreased from 0.44 mg/L to 0.04 mg/L with the increasing ZnO-NPs dose. It showed that Fe2+ was adsorbed by ZnO-NPs and inhibited the dissolution of Zn2+.
In addition, ZnO-NPs itself could also cause cytotoxicity. The small size of NPs predicted a greater mobility and cell penetration [40], and their aggregation state in an aqueous solution affected their mobility and toxicity [19,41]. Hence, reducing the adsorption of NPs on the cell surface and uptake could alleviate their cytotoxicity. Exogenous Fe2+ compressed the electric double layer on the surface of ZnO-NPs [42], thus promoting the aggregation of NPs and effectively reducing the mobility of ZnO-NPs. The aggregated ZnO-NPs reduced the deposition on the surface of bacteria and reduced cell uptake. Similarly, adding fulvic acid (FA) could prevent the physical contact between CuO-NPs and the cell membrane [43]. However, this approach would increase the burden of sewage treatment. In this study, the direct addition of Fe2+ to alleviate the cytotoxicity of ZnO-NPs provided theoretical support for the emergency regulation of the impact of NPs on the biological nitrogen removal system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9112189/s1, Figure S1: Hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs (1000 mg/L), Figure S2: Effects of Fe2+ on the growth and NO3 removal of P. tolaasii Y-11, Table S1: Zeta potential of ZnO-NPs with and without Fe2+.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y. and Z.L.; Data curation, C.Z.; Formal analysis, C.Z. and Z.L.; Investigation, C.Z.; Methodology, Y.Y.; Project administration, Z.L.; Validation, K.L. and Z.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.Y.; Writing—review and editing, Y.Y., K.L. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Fund of China, 42077217.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hu, W.; Tian, J.; Zang, N.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L. Study of the development and performance of centralized wastewater treatment plants in Chinese industrial parks. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paredes, I.; Otero, N.; Soler, A.; Green, A.J.; Soto, D.X. Agricultural and urban delivered nitrate pollution input to Mediterranean temporary freshwaters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 294, 106859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grant, S.B.; Azizian, M.; Cook, P.; Boano, F.; Rippy, M.A. Factoring stream turbulence into global assessments of nitrogen pollution. Science 2018, 359, 1266–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, W. Aerobic-heterotrophic nitrogen removal through nitrate reduction and ammonium assimilation by marine bacterium Vibrio sp. Y1-5. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 230, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, X.; Weisener, C.G.; Ni, J.; He, B.; Xie, D.; Li, Z. Nitrate assimilation, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, and denitrification coexist in Pseudomonas putida Y-9 under aerobic conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312, 123597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Q.; Li, T.; Gui, M.; Liu, S.; Zheng, M.; Ni, J. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on aerobic denitrification by strain Pseudomonas stutzeri PCN-1. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 239, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Osmond, M.J.; McCall, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in modern sunscreens: An analysis of potential exposure and hazard. Nanotoxicology 2009, 4, 15–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, D.Q.; Eng, C.Y.; Stuckey, D.C.; Zhou, Y. Effects of ZnO nanoparticle exposure on wastewater treatment and soluble microbial products (SMPs) in an anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor. Chemosphere 2017, 171, 446–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, T.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, R.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, H. Toxic effects of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles in environmental concentration on the nitrogen removal, microbial activity and community of Anammox process. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, Q.; Huang, K.; Sun, H.; Ren, H.; Zhang, X.-X.; Ye, L. Comparison of the impacts of zinc ions and zinc nanoparticles on nitrifying microbial community. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 343, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Xu, R.; Xiang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Jia, M.; Huang, J.; Xu, Z.; Cao, J.; Xiong, W.; Yang, Z. Addition of nanoparticles increases the abundance of mobile genetic elements and changes microbial community in the sludge anaerobic digestion system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, X.; Wu, R.; Chen, Y. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on wastewater biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2826–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cheng, Y.-F.; Zhang, Z.-Z.; Li, G.-F.; Zhu, B.-Q.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Zhu, W.-Q.; Fan, N.-S.; Jin, R.-C. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on high-rate denitrifying granular sludge and the role of phosphate in toxicity attenuation. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ye, J.; Gao, H.; Wu, J.; Chang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, R. Responses of nitrogen transformation processes and N2O emissions in biological nitrogen removal system to short-term ZnO nanoparticle stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Z.-Z.; Cheng, Y.-F.; Xu, L.-Z.-J.; Bai, Y.-H.; Xu, J.-J.; Shi, Z.-J.; Zhang, Q.-Q.; Jin, R.-C. Transient disturbance of engineered ZnO nanoparticles enhances the resistance and resilience of anammox process in wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, D.; Chen, Y. Critical review of the influences of nanoparticles on biological wastewater treatment and sludge digestion. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 36, 816–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kunhikrishnan, A.; Shon, H.K.; Bolan, N.S.; El Saliby, I.; Vigneswaran, S. Sources, distribution, environmental fate, and ecological effects of nanomaterials in wastewater streams. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 45, 277–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, Y.-H.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Hsiung, C.-E.; Lin, Y.-H.; Shih, Y.-H. Influence of water chemistry on the environmental behaviors of commercial ZnO nanoparticles in various water and wastewater samples. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hou, J.; Miao, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Ao, Y.; Qian, J.; Dai, S. Inhibitory effects of ZnO nanoparticles on aerobic wastewater biofilms from oxygen concentration profiles determined by microelectrodes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, M.; Zhu, L.; Lin, D. Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: Mechanism and the Influence of Medium Components. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1977–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xia, T.; Zhao, Y.; Sager, T.; George, S.; Pokhrel, S.; Li, N.; Schoenfeld, D.; Meng, H.; Lin, S.; Wang, X.; et al. Decreased dissolution of ZnO by rron doping yields nanoparticles with reduced toxicity in the rodent lung and zebrafish embryos. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1223–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. George, S.; Pokhrel, S.; Xia, T.; Gilbert, B.; Ji, Z.; Schowalter, M.; Rosenauer, A.; Damoiseaux, R.; Bradley, K.A.; Mädler, L. Use of a rapid cytotoxicity screening approach to engineer a safer Zinc Oxide nanoparticle through iron doping. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, X.; Gui, X.; Luo, Y.; Li, Z. Exogenous Fe2+ alleviated the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles on Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 under different nitrogen sources. PeerJ 2020, 8, e10351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. He, T.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z. Identification and characterization of a hypothermia nitrite bacterium Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2015, 55, 991–1000. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, T.; Xie, D.; Ni, J.; Li, Z. Ca(II) and Mg(II) significantly enhanced the nitrogen removal capacity of Arthrobacter arilaitensis relative to Zn(II) and Ni(II). J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, X.; Wang, Y.; Ni, J.; Xie, D.; Li, Z. Metal oxide nanoparticles resonate to ammonium removal through influencing Mg2+ absorption by Pseudomonas putida Y-9. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 296, 122339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Yan, D. Addition of Fe2+ increase nitrate removal in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 91, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jefferson, B.; Burgess, J.E.; Pichon, A.; Harkness, J.; Judd, S.J. Nutrient addition to enhance biological treatment of greywater. Water Res. 2001, 35, 2702–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, R.; Peng, Z.; Zhai, H.; Zhang, H. Effect of Fe (II) in low-nitrogen sewage on the reactor performance and microbial community of an ANAMMOX biofilter. Chemosphere 2018, 200, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, Y.; Gao, B.; Yue, Q.; Li, R. Application of enteromorpha polysaccharides as coagulant aid in the simultaneous removal of CuO nanoparticles and Cu2+: Effect of humic acid concentration. Chemosphere 2018, 204, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, D.; Lin, Z.; Wang, T.; Yao, Z.; Qin, M.; Zheng, S.; Lu, W. Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: The nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 308, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fairbairn, E.A.; Keller, A.A.; Mädler, L.; Zhou, D.; Pokhrel, S.; Cherr, G.N. Metal oxide nanomaterials in seawater: Linking physicochemical characteristics with biological response in sea urchin development. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 1565–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fang, X.; Yu, R.; Li, B.; Somasundaran, P.; Chandran, K. Stresses exerted by ZnO, CeO2 and anatase TiO2 nanoparticles on the Nitrosomonas europaea. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 348, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chauhan, A.K.; Kataria, N.; Garg, V. Green fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles using Eucalyptus spp. leaves extract and their application in wastewater remediation. Chemosphere 2020, 247, 125803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shaikh, F.; Panhwar, Q.K.; Balouch, A.; Ali, S.; Panhwar, W.A.; Sheikh, F. Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their functionalisation with chrysin: Exploration of its applications. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Motazedi, R.; Rahaiee, S.; Zare, M. Efficient biogenesis of ZnO nanoparticles using extracellular extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evaluation of photocatalytic, cytotoxic and other biological activities. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 101, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ye, J.; Gao, H.; Domingo-Félez, C.; Wu, J.; Zhan, M.; Yu, R.; Smets, B.F. Insights into chronic zinc oxide nanoparticle stress responses of biological nitrogen removal system with nitrous oxide emission and its recovery potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 327, 124797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aruoja, V.; Pokhrel, S.; Sihtmäe, M.; Mortimer, M.; Mädler, L.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa. Environ. Sci. Nano 2015, 2, 630–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wirth, S.M.; Lowry, G.V.; Tilton, R. Natural organic matter alters biofilm tolerance to silver nanoparticles and dissolved silver. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 12687–12696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Franklin, N.M.; Rogers, N.J.; Apte, S.C.; Batley, G.E.; Gadd, G.E.; Casey, P.S. Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO, and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): The importance of particle solubility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 8484–8490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hou, J.; You, G.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Miao, L.; Ao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lv, B.; Yang, Y. Impacts of CuO nanoparticles on nitrogen removal in sequencing batch biofilm reactors after short-term and long-term exposure and the functions of natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 22116–22125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mao, Y.; Li, H.; Huangfu, X.; Liu, Y.; He, Q. Nanoplastics display strong stability in aqueous environments: Insights from aggregation behaviour and theoretical calculations. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Dai, Y.; Xing, B. Mitigation of CuO nanoparticle-induced bacterial membrane damage by dissolved organic matter. Water Res. 2013, 47, 4169–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of Fe2+ on the proliferation and NO3 removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under ZnO-NPs stress.
Figure 1. Effect of Fe2+ on the proliferation and NO3 removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under ZnO-NPs stress.
Microorganisms 09 02189 g001
Figure 2. Effect of different content of ZnO-NPs on Zn2+ release.
Figure 2. Effect of different content of ZnO-NPs on Zn2+ release.
Microorganisms 09 02189 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Fe2+ on the proliferation and NO3 removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under Zn2+ stress.
Figure 3. Effect of Fe2+ on the proliferation and NO3 removal of P. tolaasii Y-11 under Zn2+ stress.
Microorganisms 09 02189 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs with or without Fe2+ addition.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs with or without Fe2+ addition.
Microorganisms 09 02189 g004
Figure 5. SEM-EDS images of Y-11 exposed to 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs with or without Fe2+. (A) is Fe2+-free treatment; (B) is Fe2+ adsorbed on ZnO-NPs; (C) is Fe2+-containing treatment.
Figure 5. SEM-EDS images of Y-11 exposed to 5 mg/L ZnO-NPs with or without Fe2+. (A) is Fe2+-free treatment; (B) is Fe2+ adsorbed on ZnO-NPs; (C) is Fe2+-containing treatment.
Microorganisms 09 02189 g005
Table 1. Effect of Fe2+ on the hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs.
Table 1. Effect of Fe2+ on the hydrodynamic diameter of ZnO-NPs.
Particle Size (nm) ZnO-NPs Content (mg/L)
0.551020
Fe2+-free--687.21973.761540.4
Fe2+-containing3103.724039.374583.634396.22
-- means not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, K.; Li, Z. Fe2+ Alleviated the Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 by Changing Nanoparticles Behavior in Solution. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112189

AMA Style

Yang Y, Zhang C, Li K, Li Z. Fe2+ Alleviated the Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 by Changing Nanoparticles Behavior in Solution. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11):2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Yuran, Can Zhang, Kaili Li, and Zhenlun Li. 2021. "Fe2+ Alleviated the Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 by Changing Nanoparticles Behavior in Solution" Microorganisms 9, no. 11: 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112189

APA Style

Yang, Y., Zhang, C., Li, K., & Li, Z. (2021). Fe2+ Alleviated the Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Pseudomonas tolaasii Y-11 by Changing Nanoparticles Behavior in Solution. Microorganisms, 9(11), 2189. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop