Next Article in Journal
Microbial Communities Present in Hydrothermal Sediments from Deception Island, Antarctica
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Determination of Antioxidant Capacity of Traditional Homemade Fruit Vinegars Produced with Double Spontaneous Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Sars-CoV-2 Virus Infection May Interfere CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Megakaryocyte–Erythroid Progenitors Differentiation Contributing to Platelet Defection towards Insurgence of Thrombocytopenia and Thrombophilia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sourdough Microbiome Comparison and Benefits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations

by
Denise C. Müller
1,2,
Sandra Mischler
1,
Regine Schönlechner
2 and
Susanne Miescher Schwenninger
1,*
1
Food Biotechnology Research Group, Institute of Food and Beverage Innovation, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), 8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1190 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1633; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081633
Submission received: 1 July 2021 / Revised: 23 July 2021 / Accepted: 23 July 2021 / Published: 30 July 2021

Abstract

:
In this study, the potential of Leuconostoc as non-conventional sourdough starter cultures was investigated. A screening for antifungal activities of 99 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains revealed high suppression of bakery-relevant moulds in nine strains of Leuconostoc with activities against Penicillium sp., Aspergillus sp., and Cladosporium sp. Mannitol production was determined in 49 Leuconostoc strains with >30 g/L mannitol in fructose (50 g/L)-enriched MRS. Further, exopolysaccharides (EPS) production was qualitatively determined on sucrose (40 g/L)-enriched MRS agar and revealed 59 EPS positive Leuconostoc strains that harboured dextransucrase genes, as confirmed by PCR. Four multifunctional Lc. citreum strains (DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113) were finally applied in lab-scale sourdough fermentations (30 °C, 24 h). Lc. citreum was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS up to 9 log CFU/g and pH dropped to 4.0 and TTA increased to 12.4. Antifungal compounds such as acetic acid, phenyllactic and hydroxyphenyllactic acids were determined up to 1.7 mg/g, 2.1 µg/g, and 1.3 µg/g, respectively, mannitol up to 8.6 mg/g, and EPS up to 0.62 g/100 g. Due to the observed multifunctionalities and the competitiveness in the natural flour microbiota present in sourdoughs, non-conventional LAB genera such as Leuconostoc seem promising for application in sourdough-based bakery products.

1. Introduction

Based on metabolic activities, the application of a lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation is used broadly in the food industry, e.g., for traditional sourdough fermentation [1]. LAB mainly belonging to species of the former genus of Lactobacillus that were recently classified by Zheng et al. [2] into the novel genera Lactiplantibacillus (Lpb.) plantarum subsp. plantarum (former: Lactobacillus (Lb.) plantarum), Levilactobacillus (Lev.) brevis (former: Lb. brevis), and Fructilactobacillus (F.) sanfranciscensis (former: Lb. sanfranciscensis) dominate the sourdough microbiota [3]. The application and suitability of these LAB genera as starter cultures in sourdough fermentations has been researched for years [3,4]. However, non-conventional LAB genera such as Leuconostoc (Lc.) and Weissella (W.) are still less studied but bear high potential as starter cultures in sourdough fermentations due to their adaptation and performance in sourdough fermentations [5].
Various functional activities of LAB have been researched in the last decades. LAB derived mannitol mainly produced by heterofermentative LAB [6] such as Lc. citreum can be used as sugar substitute that is relevant for the baking industries in the production of sugar-reduced baked goods [7]. Further, the formation of microbial exopolysaccharides (EPS) as a natural texture enhancing agent has been studied by Chen et al. [8] and was extensively studied in, e.g., Leuconostoc, Weissella, and species of the former genus of Lactobacillus such as Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum (former: Lb. plantarum) or Limosilactobacillus (Li.) reuteri (former Lb. reuteri) [9,10,11,12,13]. EPS synthetizing genes were investigated in Lc. citreum FDR241 by Coda et al. [14] and microbial built dextran, a glucan consisting of α(1→6)-linked glucopyranosyl units, was reported for bread texture-affecting properties [8,11].
A relevant aspect industrial bakeries have to face is fungal spoilage of the products due to fungal spores on surfaces, equipment, production staff, or aerocontamination on the production site [15]. Antifungal metabolites in LAB were studied extensively, focusing mainly on Lb. amylovorus [16,17], Li. reuteri (former: Lb. reuteri) [18,19], Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum (former: Lb. plantarum) [20,21], and Lev. hammesii (former Lb. hammesii) [22], in which different antifungal metabolites such as organic acids (lactic acid, acetic acid, phenyllactic acid) [23], fatty acid (monohydroxy C18:1) [22], or cyclic dipeptides [20] were detected. Fewer studies investigated antifungal activities of Leuconostoc strains and their application as non-conventional starter culture in sourdough fermentations [24,25,26]. However, considering the techno-functional activities of Leuconostoc strains, their use as even multifunctional starter cultures is promising to produce baked goods with less or no additives following a clean label strategy.
Leuconostoc strains are still described as non-conventional starter cultures [5]. However, they have increasingly gained attention due to their various functionalities, making them promising for application, e.g., in sugar reduction of soft buns as suggested by Sahin et al. [7]. So far, the focus has mainly been set on single functionalities, whereas this study examined LAB strains with multiple techno-functionalities that include mannitol production, antifungal activities, and EPS formation. With the aim to specifically suppress bakery-relevant fungal contaminants, the antifungal screening was carried out against fungal strains, isolated from an industrial bakery. This strategy led to the identification of promising Leuconostoc citreum strains with multiple techno-functional characteristics, i.e., mannitol production, EPS formation, and antifungal activities. Application of four selected Lc. citreum strains in lab-scale sourdough fermentations confirmed their assertiveness against the natural flour microbiota. Further, the monitoring of techno-functional metabolites production in sourdough allowed an evaluation for their suitability in sourdough fermentations and later application in bakery products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Strains and Culture Conditions

LAB were isolated from two different wheat sourdoughs. All strains were routinely cultivated on de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe agar (MRS, Biokar, Beauvais Cedex, France) and incubated for 72 h at 30 °C (unless otherwise noted). For the isolation of LAB, 10 g of sourdough was mixed with diluent (1 g peptone and 8.5 g natrium chloride) 1:10 and plated on MRS agar, followed by incubation at 30 °C for 3 days. Randomly selected bacterial cultures (n = 5–15 colonies per dilution) were purified two times on MRS agar and identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker, Bremen, Germany), as described by Miescher Schwenninger et al. [27]. Extraction for MALDI-TOF MS was done by transferring single colonies to sterile double-distilled water followed by ethanol addition (300 µL). The supernatant obtained after centrifugation (13,000× g, 20 °C, 2 min) was removed and 20 µL of 70% acetic acid were added and the suspension was mixed. Then, the same amount of acetonitrile was added, mixed, and centrifugated as described above. Besides the LAB strains isolated in this study, a variety of different LAB strains that are part of the culture collection of the Food Biotechnology Research Group of ZHAW (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) and that were previously isolated from cereal-based products were used and identified by MALDI-TOF MS if necessary. All LAB used within this study are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Fungal Contaminants from Industrial Bakery

In an industrial bakery, 58 fungal contaminants were isolated from air at ten different locations before and after the baking process using an air sampler equipped with either Dichloran-Bengalrot-Chloramphenicol (DRBC) agar or Dichloran Glycerin Chloramphenicol (DG18) agar. Further, fungi were selected from soft rolls produced without preservatives and stored until filamentous growth was visible. Fungal isolates were propagated on DRBC and DG18 agar at 25 °C until growth was visible, followed by 1–2 times purifying on the respective agar medium. In a first step, pure fungal cultures were classified according to their visual appearance on malt agar and Czapek Yeast Autolysate (CYA) agar, respectively, after growth at 25 °C for 7 days. In a second step, DNA of 1–2 representatives of each group (n = 16) was isolated and purified by using a Quick-DNA plant/seed miniprep Kit (D6020, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), followed by ITS sequencing, using standard primer ITS1 and ITS4 as described by White et al. [28]. Sequences were obtained by Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) and were evaluated using ITS database from NCBI blast: (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome; accessed on 27 June 2021).

2.3. Screening of LAB for Antifungal Activity against Moulds from A Bakery Environment

The antifungal screening was performed against Aspergillus (A.) flavus IB1 and A. tritici IB12, both isolated from soft rolls (this study). Penicillium (P.) crustosum FB005 was also isolated from soft rolls at the same industrial bakery as in this study [29], using an agar spot assay as described by Inglin et al. [30] with the following modifications. A wheat-based agar was used with wheat flour hydrolysate (WFH) that was prepared by mixing wheat flour (type 550, obtained from Meyerhans Mühlen AG, Weinfelden, CH) and water (1:5), followed by stirring at 90 rpm at 30 °C for 4 h and further cooling at 4 °C for 18 h prior to pH adjustment to 5.6 ± 0.2. For WFH agar, 15 g fructose, 15 g maltose, 15 g saccharose, 10 g yeast extract, and 18 g agar were mixed with 1 liter of wheat flour hydrolysate, followed by autoclaving (15 min, 121 °C). Then, 4 mL WFH agar were pipetted sterile into each cavity of a 6-well plate. For the antifungal screening, 10 mL of MRS broth were inoculated with one colony of a fully grown LAB culture and incubated at 30 °C for 17 h. Then, 2 μL of this culture were pipetted in the centre of the agar of each cavity and grown anaerobically at 30 °C for 72 h. After growth, 900 μL of soft malt agar (9% agar) inoculated with 4 × 106 spores/mL of each one of the three moulds were poured onto each cavity. After further incubation at 25 °C for 3 to 5 days, zones of inhibition were evaluated by the following system: no inhibition (−); brightening of the medium (+/−); 0.1–2.4 mm halo (+); 2.5–4.9 mm halo (++); > 5 mm halo with minor fungal growth (++(+)); and complete inhibition of the fungi (+++). A first evaluation was done in a single run and LAB strains with antifungal activities were confirmed in triplicates. Further, the antifungal spectrum of nine Leuconostoc strains with high antifungal activities was determined against six moulds isolated from a bakery environment in this study and belonging to the genera Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium, and a yeast (Vishniacozyma) using the agar spot assay as described above. Leuconostoc strains that inhibited fungal growth completely after the single run were confirmed in triplicates.

2.4. Screening of LAB for Mannitol Production

Mannitol production was screened in an MRS medium enriched with fructose (50 g/L), as described by Saha and Nakamura [31]. Therefore, strains were grown in MRS broth at 30 °C for 15 h. After incubation, cell counts were set to 1 × 106 CFU/mL in MRS medium enriched with fructose (50 g/L) and incubated at 30 °C for 72 h. Samples of 10 mL (t0 and t72) were centrifuged (8000× g, 20 °C, 5 min) and sterile-filtered (0.2 µm) prior to HPLC analysis on an Agilent 1260 system using a Rezex RPM monosaccharide PB+2 column (300 × 7.8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and a guard column (Carbo-Pb, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) coupled to an RI detector (1260 RID, G1362A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA; temperature set to 50 °C). Samples (5 µL) were eluted with double-distilled water at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and at a temperature of 85 °C.

2.5. Screening of LAB for EPS Production and Detection of Dextran Encoding Genes

A screening of LAB for EPS production was performed as described by Malang et al. [12] by estimating EPS production after growth on MRS agar enriched with 40 g/L sucrose for EPS production. Therefore, LAB strains were grown at 30 °C for 24 h in MRS broth. Then, 3 μL of the 24 h culture were pipetted onto the two agar media with different carbohydrate sources and incubated at 30 °C for 72 h. The produced slime was visually assessed, and the precipitation determined using 97% ethanol.
EPS positive strains of Leuconostoc sp. were further evaluated for the presence of genes encoding dextransucrase according to Coda et al. [14] using primer sets dsrM_F2 (5′-TTA GCA TCA TTA ACG AGA CCC-3′) and dsrM_R2 (5′-GCC AGT AAA GCC TTA TCA ACA G-3′), and dsrB_F2 (5′-GGT CAC TTC TGG CTT CAC TG-3′) and dsrB_R2 (5′-CCA TCA TTA CCC AAA TAG AAC CAC-3′). Briefly, 1 µL of each primer set was mixed with 12.5 µL of polymerase (KAPA Taq), 9.5 µL of double-distilled water, and 1 µL of template. The template was prepared by resuspending one colony in 100 µL of double-distilled water followed by heating up to 95 °C for 10 min. The PCR program was set as follows: 1 × (95 °C, 3 min); 35 × (95 °C, 30 s; 54 °C for dsrM_F2/dsrM_R2; 51 °C for dsrB_F2/dsrB_R2, 30 s; 72 °C, 30 s), 1 × (72 °C, 1 min). The amplified product was loaded on a 2% agarose gel having GelRed (Biotium) and run at 75 volts for 60 minutes, followed by gel analysis by an imaging system (Azure biosystems c300).

2.6. Lab-Scale Sourdough Fermentations with Selected Leuconostoc Strains

Lab-scale sourdough fermentations were prepared by mixing 200 g wheat flour (type 550, obtained from Meyerhans Mühlen AG, Weinfelden, CH) with sterile tap water (1:1), 1.5 g saccharose, and 1.5 g fructose (per 100 g flour) in a sterile beaker, followed by inoculation with 1 × 107 CFU of pure cultures of Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, or MA113 per gram sourdough. Cultures were therefore washed twice with sterile tap water and sourdough fermentations were covered by aluminium foil. Cell counts before and after 24 h fermentation at 30 °C were determined by mixing 10 g sourdough 1:10 with dilution solution and further surface plating on MRS and plate count (PC) agar, followed by incubation at 30 °C for 3 days. At each sampling point and agar medium, 15 colonies were randomly selected and analysed by MALDI-TOF MS to ensure growth of the desired LAB species. The following MALDI-TOF MS scores were applied: 0−1.69 = not reliable identification, 1.70–1.99 = probable genus identification, and 2.00−2.29 = secure genus identification, probable species identification. Further, pH and total titratable acidity (TTA) were measured at t0 and t24. Acidification (pH) of the sourdough was measured by analysing the diluted sourdough (1:10), whereas TTA was measured by adding 5 mL of acetone to 10 g of sourdough and 95 mL of distilled water, followed by manual stirring before the measurement in a Titrino plus 848 (Methrom, Zofingen, Switzerland).

2.7. Determination of Antifungal Compounds in Sourdough

Antifungal compounds in sourdough were quantified as described by Brosnan et al. [32] with the following modifications. Sourdough samples (ca. 30 g) were centrifuged (8000× g, 20 °C, 5 min) and 5 mL of supernatant were mixed with 4 g of magnesium sulphate, 1 g of sodium chloride, and 10 mL of ethyl acetate with 1% formic acid. The solution was shaken for 1 minute followed by further centrifugation (3000× g, 20 °C, 10 min). The supernatant was added to a dSPE kit tube (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and shaken for 1 min. Then, the tube was centrifuged (3000× g, 20 °C, 10 min), and the supernatant was mixed with 100 μL of dimethylsulfoxide and evaporated with nitrogen gas. The remaining sediment was mixed with 900 μL of a water/acetonitrile solution (90:10) and sterile-filtered. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was done on a HPLC system (Agilent 1260) that was equipped with a diodenarray detector (1260 DAD, G4212B) using a Gemini 5 µm C18 110 Å column (150 × 2 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and a guard column (C18, Phenomenex). Samples were eluted with double-distilled water with 1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 1% formic acid (B) with the following gradient: 0 min, 95% A and 5% B; 5 min, 90% A and 10% B; 10 min, 85% A and 15% B; 20 min, 85% A and 15% B; 30 min, 80% A and 20% B; 31 min, 1% A and 99% B; 37 min, 1% A and 99% B; 42 min, 95% A and 5% B; 43 min, 95% A and 5% B; 45 min, 95% A and 5% B; and 50 min, 95% A and 5 % B at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The temperature was not controlled. A volume of 10 µL was injected and detection was done at a wavelength of 210 nm. Hydroxyphenyllactic acid (HPLA), phenyllactic acid (PLA), benzoic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, hydrocaffeic acid, caffeic acid, hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (HPPA), trans-ferulic acid, coumaric acid, and hydroferulic acid were used as antifungal reference compounds.

2.8. Determination of Fructose, Mannitol, and Acids in Sourdoughs

Contents of sugars (fructose and mannitol) and organic acids (lactic and acetic acids) in sourdough were analysed as described by Müller et al. [33]. Therefore, 1 g of sourdough was diluted with 5 mL of double-distilled water, followed by heating up to 80 °C for 3 h. After centrifugation (5000× g, 4 °C, 5 min), the supernatant was mixed 1:1 with 7% perchloric acid. This mixture was stored at 4 °C overnight. After further centrifugation (5000× g, 4 °C, 5 min), samples were sterile-filtered (0.2 μm) and analysed by HPLC. Mannitol and fructose were determined as described above. Lactic and acetic acids were analysed by using a ROA-Organic Acid H+ column (150 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and a guard column (Carbo-H, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) with 0.005 M sulphuric acid as eluent at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The detection was done by DAD at 210 nm. The temperature of the column was set to 25 °C and a volume of 5 µL was injected.

2.9. Determination of EPS in Sourdoughs

Microbial and flour EPS in sourdough were analysed as described by Galli et al. [34] with the following modifications. A defined sourdough aliquot was centrifuged (11,000× g, 4 °C, 10 min), the supernatant was mixed with a double volume of cold ethanol and stored at 4 °C overnight. Then, samples were centrifugated (2500× g, 5 °C, 20 min) and the precipitated EPS were dissolved in double-distilled water and again precipitated with cold ethanol. This step was repeated. Finally, precipitated EPS were dried in a drying oven at 105 °C for 3 h and the quantity was determined gravimetrically by an analytical scale.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicates, unless otherwise stated. Dataset was analysed for normal distribution using Shapiro–Wilk test and/or was visually evaluated by Q–Q plot. If data were normally distributed, a one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD Test was applied as post hoc test. ANOVA was performed in RStudio (version 1.4.1106) at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. For not normally distributed data, a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was applied, following by Wilcoxon test as post hoc test (unpaired).

3. Results

3.1. Isolated LAB Strains from Cereal-Based Products

In total, 132 strains were isolated from two wheat sourdoughs using MRS agar. MALDI-TOF MS identification revealed Lc. citreum (54×), Lc. mesenteroides (1×), Lc. pseudomesenteroides (1×), Lc. palmae (2×), Lac. paracasei subsp. paracasei (43×), L. lactis (19×), Llb. curvatus (8×), F. fructivorans (2×), Lo. coryniformis subsp. coryniformis (1×), and W. confusa (1×).

3.2. Analysis of the Fungal Microbiota in an Industrial Bakery

In total, 58 fungal contaminants were isolated in an industrial bakery, either from air or from soft rolls produced without preservatives and stored at room temperature for 6 days. The isolates were further compiled to 16 groups based on their appearance on malt agar and CYA agar and, finally, 1−2 examples of each group were identified by sequence analyses of the ITS region. As shown in Table 2, a dominance of Aspergillus sp. (4 groups with 17 isolates), Penicillium sp. (5 groups with 24 isolates), and Cladosporium sp. (2 groups with 8 isolates) was determined within the mould contaminants. Aspergillus sp. was isolated before and after the baking process and, in contrast, Cladosporium sp., Penicillium sp., Aureobasidium sp., and Byssochlamys sp. were only isolated after the baking process. Yeast contaminants comprising Vishniacozyma sp., Rhodotorula sp., and Hannaella sp. were only isolated from facility air.

3.3. Antifungal Activities of LAB Determined on A Cereal-Based Medium

In a first step, a high-throughput screening of 99 LAB strains against P. crustosum FB005, A. flavus IB1, and A. tritici IB12 (both this study) was done on a cereal-based (WFH) medium (Table 3). Sensitivity of the three moulds was determined as follows: (I) P. crustosum FB005 was only very weakly suppressed determined by no clear halo formation; (II) A. flavus IB1 was generally moderately suppressed shown by halos of up to 2.4 mm by strains of Lev. brevis, Li. fermentum, Le. parabuchneri, Lc. citreum, Lc. mesenteroides, Lc. palmae, and Lc. pseudomesenteroides; and (III) A. tritici IB12 was strongly suppressed by 53 Leuconostoc sp. strains shown by halos of a radius of >5 mm. In a second step, based on the high-throughput screening, Leuconostoc strains with the highest antifungal activities (n = 9) were selected and screened on WFH medium against Cladosporium sp. strains B1 and F40, Penicillium sp. strains F27 and F43, and Aspergillus sp. F18 as representatives of contaminating moulds and Vishniacozyma sp. F9 as an example for a contaminating yeast. All tested strains of Leuconostoc sp. were able to inhibit the two strains of Cladosporium sp. (B1 and F40) and Vishniacozyma sp. F9 (Table 4). Lc. citreum DCM49 was the only strain that fully inhibited Aspergillus sp. F18 but only weakly inhibited both Penicillium strains (F27 and F43). In contrast, Lc. citreum DCM65 was the only strain that fully suppressed both Penicillium sp. strains (F27 and F43), but only weakly suppressed Aspergillus sp. F18. Further, Leuconostoc strains MA113, DCM83, and DCM27 were able to fully suppress Penicillium sp. strain F27 but to a lesser extent suppressed Penicillium sp. F43 and Aspergillus sp. F18.

3.4. Exopolysaccharides Production by LAB and Detection of Dextransucrase Genes

In a high-throughput screening on MRS-enriched sucrose medium strains of Lc. citreum (56), Lc. mesenteroides (3), Lc. palmae (2), and W. confusa (1) showed slimy colonies that precipitated immediately with ethanol addition indicating exopolysaccharides (EPS) production. No slime was detected in strains of Lev. brevis (73), Lac. paracasei subsp. paracasei (58), P. pentosaceus (43), Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum (33), L. lactis (19), Llb. curvatus (11), Lo. coryniformis subsp. coryniformis (6), Le. parabuchneri (4), C. paralimentarius (2), and C. kimchii (3). All Leuconostoc sp. strains were further analysed for presence or absence of dsrM and dsrB that are known genes encoding dextransucrase. At least one of these genes was present in all tested Leuconostoc strains (Table 5), dsrB was present in all tested Lc. citreum strains, and dsrM was present in 28 of the 56 tested strains of Lc. citreum.

3.5. Mannitol Production of Lactic acid Bacteria

In total, 69 out of 137 strains belonging to the species Lev. brevis, F. sanfranciscensis, Li. fermentum, Le. parabuchneri, Fu. rossiae, Lc. citreum, Lc. palmae, Lc. mesenteroides, and Lc. pseudomesenteroides showed mannitol production > 20 g/L in MRS supplemented with 50 g/L fructose (Table 6). All 54 strains of Leuconostoc citreum were mannitol producers, including 43 strains that yielded over 30 g/L mannitol in MRS medium.

3.6. Production of Techno-Functional Metabolites in Lab-Scale Sourdoughs Inoculated with Lc. citreum Strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, or MA113

Antifungal-, mannitol-, and EPS-producing Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113 were applied as pure cultures in 400 g lab-scale sourdough fermentations in beakers. As a negative control, a sourdough without inoculation (spontaneously fermented) was prepared. All sourdoughs with culture addition developed up to 8.9−9.2 log CFU of presumptive LAB/g within 24 h, whereas in the spontaneously fermented sourdough, presumptive LAB developed only up to 7.5 log CFU/g (Table 7). Uniform colony morphology was detected visually on MRS and PCA plates after incubation at 30 °C for 72 h in sourdoughs started with Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113. In total, 15 isolates collected on MRS and PCA from samples before (t0) and after (t24) fermentation of inoculated sourdoughs were confirmed as Lc. citreum with MALDI-TOF MS scores between 1.72 and 2.21 at a level of 7 log CFU/g and 9 log CFU/g, respectively. In spontaneously fermented sourdough, six isolates were not identified (MALDI-TOF MS scores < 1.70). The remaining isolates were identified as non-LAB species, with most frequent occurrence of Cronobacter (C.) sakazakii (6 out of 15, with MALDI-TOF MS scores between 1.73 and 2.09), one Enterobacter (E.) cloacae, and one E. asburiae isolated on PCA (MALDI-TOF MS scores of 1.81 and 2.03, respectively). In addition, one LAB strain identified as Llb. curvatus with a MALDI-TOF MS score of 1.72 was isolated from spontaneous fermented sourdough. Before fermentations (t0; with and without inoculation), pH values between 6.2 and 6.4 were measured that dropped to 4.0–4.1 at 30 °C after 24 h in sourdoughs with inoculation, contrary to 5.6 in the spontaneously fermented sourdough. TTA in sourdoughs before fermentation (t0) was 2.1–2.6 (with and without inoculation) and increased after 24 h of 30 °C fermentation to 11.6–12.4 (depending on the inoculated Lc. citreum strain), whereas TTA of the spontaneously fermented sourdough only increased to 5.5.
Before the fermentation (t0), lactic acid, acetic acid, and mannitol were below the detection limit in all sourdoughs. After 24 h of fermentation, lactic and acetic acids were determined at concentrations of up to 3.3 mg/g and 1.7 mg/g, respectively, in sourdoughs inoculated with Lc. citreum strains, in contrast to 0.4 mg/g and 0.2 mg/g, respectively, in the spontaneously fermented sourdough. The fructose content decreased in all sourdoughs inoculated with Lc. citreum strains but did not change in the spontaneously fermented sourdough (9.2 mg/g sourdough at t24). In Lc. citreum inoculated sourdoughs, mannitol increased to 7.8–8.6 mg/g, whereas no mannitol was determined in spontaneously fermented sourdough at t24. After 24 h of fermentation, the antifungal compounds HPLA and PLA were found in sourdough fermentations inoculated with Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, or MA113 at levels of 0.6–1.3 μg/g and 1.3–2.1 μg/g, respectively, whereas lower amounts of HPLA (0.2 μg/g) and PLA (0.7 μg/g) were determined in spontaneously fermented sourdough. At t0, EPS were determined at a concentration of 0.07–0.16 g/100 g in all sourdoughs (independent of the inoculation) that increased to 0.25–0.62 g/100 g (Lc. citreum inoculated) and 0.77 g/100 g (spontaneous fermentation).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the use of Lc. citreum as non-conventional LAB starter cultures with techno-functional characteristics and their suitability in sourdough fermentations. By applying a multifunctional starter culture that combines multiple techno-functional characteristics, the produced sourdough has high potential as a natural functional ingredient for baked goods [7]. This approach goes along with a clean label strategy aiming at reducing food additives (E-numbers) and following consumer’s demand for more naturally and gently produced food.
Fungal contaminations of baked goods are a major issue bakeries have to face, often leading to financial losses [35]. If mycotoxigenic moulds are involved, it even endangers human health [36]. Aerocontamination by spores from bakery-relevant moulds such as Penicillium, Eurotium, Aspergillus, and Cladosporium have been described as a reason for the spoilage of bread [29,37]. This usually occurs after the baking process during cooling, slicing, or storage of the soft bread [35]. Similar, typical bakery-relevant moulds including Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Cladosporium were isolated in this study from the facility’s air, whereas most isolates belonged to the genera Penicillium (24 isolates), Aspergillus (17 isolates), and Cladosporium (8 isolates). Furthermore, Byssochlamys, Aureobasidium, and yeasts (Hannaella, Vishniacozyma, and Rhodotorula) were found in the facility’s air. On soft breads, moulds of the genera Penicillium sp. and Cladosporium sp. were isolated. Since in this study Penicillium sp. and Cladosporium sp. were only isolated at locations after the baking process, it is assumed that the soft rolls were contaminated after the heating process, e.g., by aerocontamination, as mentioned by Santos et al. [38]. So far, there are different methods to overcome fungal contaminations in the bakery context such as the use of ethanol and modified atmosphere packaging [15]. A natural approach is the application of LAB strains with antifungal activities with the aim to replace or reduce food additives in future [39]. In order to find suitable antifungal starter cultures specifically acting against fungal spores within the baking environment, the dominate fungal flora of a bakery should be monitored as an initial step. A similar fungal monitoring was previously described by Freimüller Leischtfeld and Miescher Schwenninger [29], where it was shown that the main fungal contaminants belonged to Cladosporium sp., Aspergillus sp., and Penicillium sp. So far, strains of Leuconostoc sp. were less considered as antifungal cultures in sourdough fermentations compared to the well-studied species of the previous genera Lactobacillus reclassified to Lb. amylovorus, Li. reuteri (former: Lb. reuteri), and Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum (former: Lb. plantarum) [16,20,40]. This study showed that strains of the genus Leuconostoc (mainly Lc. citreum) revealed strong inhibition of bakery-relevant moulds such as Aspergillus, Cladosporium, and Penicillium on a cereal-based medium and are thus promising strains for application in biocontrol concepts of bakery products.
The metabolisms of heterofermentative LAB such as Leuconostoc sp. are well studied, and it is known that fructose is reduced followed by the formation of mannitol by a mannitol-dehydrogenase that is connected to the formation of acetate [41]. It is therefore a balancing act between mannitol production and the formation of acetic acid, of which the latter can impact sensory [33]. The present study demonstrates that mannitol produced by 62 tested strains of Leuconostoc sp. varied between 20 g/L and up to over 30 g/L, and almost 80% of the tested Lc. citreum strains produced over 30 g/L. Furthermore, strains of Leuconostoc sp. were shown to produce EPS that positively influence the bread texture, as reviewed by Zannini et al. [42]. In this study, EPS formation was detected in mannitol-producing Lc. citreum strains showing high potential for multiple functionalities. Further, all Leuconostoc strains harbored at least one gene-encoding dextransucrase of which all Lc. citreum strains showed presence of dsrB. Coda et al. [14] investigated five genes encoding dextransucrase and showed that the presence of dsrB was mainly responsible for the formation of dextran and that dsrB was the only gene that was significantly upregulated during sourdough fermentation started with Lc. citreum FDR241. It is therefore assumed that, among others, dextran is produced by the Lc. citreum strains investigated in this study.
Four selected Lc. citreum strains, DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113, with high antifungal activities, mannitol production, and EPS formation, were finally applied in lab-scale sourdough fermentations. The metabolic activity of the strains in sourdough, and thus their suitability as potential techno-functional starter cultures, was evaluated based on LAB growth, acidification, fructose reduction, mannitol production, EPS formation, and contents of antifungal compounds and was compared with a spontaneously fermented sourdough. The development of LAB up to 9.2 log CFU/g during 24 h at 30 °C and the confirmation of the presence of Lc. citreum by MALDI-TOF MS up to log 9 CFU/g, pH reduction from 6.4–6.2 to 4.0–4.1, TTA increase from 2.2–2.6 to 11.6–12.4, and production of lactic (3.0–3.3 mg/g) and acetic (1.5–1.7 mg/g) acids indicated the assertiveness of Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113 against the naturally occurring sourdough microflora. Acetic acid was described by Quattrini et al. [43] as the most relevant compound produced by LAB against fungal contaminants. Axel et al. [40] used the following minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) references at pH 5: > 45 mg/mL for lactic acid and 1.2–7.2 mg/mL for acetic acid as. In this study, lactic acid (3.0–3.3 mg/g) was clearly below this MIC reference, whereas acetic acid concentrations (1.5–1.7 mg/g) were within the MIC range. Besides lactic and acetic acids, minor amounts of further carboxylic acids were detected with up to 2.1 µg/g PLA and 1.3 µg/g HPLA. Their effect in the end product, e.g., in a sourdough bread, was described as too low by Axel et al. [40], using MIC references of 2500–10,000 µg/g for PLA and 5000 µg/g for HPLA. They hypothesized synergistic effects as being responsible for mould inhibition under acidic conditions [40]. Thus, there is still more research needed to better understand antifungal activities of LAB. Further, in lab-scale sourdough fermentations inoculated with the selected Lc. citreum strains, fructose was reduced and mannitol was produced in a range between 7.8 and 8.6 mg/g. In comparison, spontaneously fermented sourdough showed weak LAB development of only up to 7.5 log CFU/g, pH decrease from 6.3 to 5.6, TTA increase from 2.1 to 5.6, and only small production of lactic (0.4 mg/g) and acetic (0.2 mg/g) acids after 24 h fermentation. The conditions of the spontaneously fermented sourdough might have triggered the growth of the opportunistic foodborne pathogen C. sakazakii that was also isolated by Lou et al. [44] from cereal-based products. Since, in this study, no added fructose was metabolized during the spontaneous sourdough fermentation, it is assumed that the flora of the spontaneously fermented sourdough was not able to reduce fructose. Small amounts of EPS (0.07–0.16 g/100 g sourdough) were determined before the fermentation (t0) and independent of Lc. citreum inoculation or no inoculation, which could be due to naturally occurring polysaccharides in flour as described by Garófalo et al. [45]. Amounts of EPS slightly increased in fermented sourdoughs with and without inoculum up to 0.62 g/100 g and 0.77 g/100 g, respectively. The EPS produced in the spontaneously fermented sourdough may have been formed by C. sakazakii and or Enterobacter sp. C. sakazakii [46] and Enterobacter sp. [47] are known to produce EPS.

5. Conclusions

In this study, techno-functional characteristics, i.e., antifungal activities, mannitol production, and EPS formation of Lc. citreum strains DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113, were observed in screening assays. It was confirmed in lab-scale sourdough fermentations that all four Lc. citreum strains produced antifungal compounds (e.g., acetic acid, PLA, and HPLA), mannitol, and EPS. In summary, this study showed that Leuconostoc and specifically Lc. citreum have high potential as multiple techno-functional starter cultures in sourdough fermentations. Multiple functional sourdoughs as described in this study can be of interest since this may have beneficial applications in clean label strategies for bakery products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.M., R.S., and S.M.S.; methodology, D.C.M. and S.M.; investigation, D.C.M. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.M. and S.M.S.; writing—review and editing, D.C.M., S.M., R.S., and S.M.S.; visualization, D.C.M.; supervision, R.S. and S.M.S.; project administration, S.M.S.; funding acquisition, S.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Innosuisse (project No. 27772.1 PFLS-LS).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the industry partners (Fortisa AG and Diosna Dierks & Söhne GmbH), all students who contributed to this study (Christina Ulrich, Anja Portmann, Oliver Stöckli, Jan Häfliger, Jasmin Fleischmann, and Oriana Gasser), and Susette Freimüller Leischtfeld for her support in statistics. Further, Cost Action CA18101 SOURDOMICS “SOURDOugh biotechnology network towards novel, healthier, and sustainable food and bIoproCesseS” is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leroy, F.; De Vuyst, L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; O’Toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arora, K.; Ameur, H.; Polo, A.; Di Cagno, R.; Rizzello, C.G.; Gobbetti, M. Thirty years of knowledge on sourdough fermentation: A systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Vuyst, L.; Van Kerrebroeck, S.; Harth, H.; Huys, G.; Daniel, H.-M.; Weckx, S. Microbial ecology of sourdough fermentations: Diverse or uniform? Food Microbiol. 2014, 37, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Montemurro, M.; Celano, G.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M.; Rizzello, C.G.; Pontonio, E. Selection of non-Lactobacillus strains to be used as starters for sourdough fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2020, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wisselink, H.W.; Weusthuis, R.A.; Eggink, G.; Hugenholtz, J.; Grobben, G.J. Mannitol production by lactic acid bacteria: A review. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sahin, A.W.; Rice, T.; Zannini, E.; Axel, C.; Coffey, A.; Lynch, K.M.; Arendt, E.K. Leuconostoc citreum TR116: In-situ production of mannitol in sourdough and its application to reduce sugar in burger buns. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 302, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, X.Y.; Levy, C.; Gänzle, M.G. Structure-function relationships of bacterial and enzymatically produced reuterans and dextran in sourdough bread baking application. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 239, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bounaix, M.-S.; Gabriel, V.; Morel, S.; Robert, H.; Rabier, P.; Remaud-Siméon, M.; Gabriel, B.; Fontagné-Faucher, C. Biodiversity of exopolysaccharides produced from sucrose by sourdough lactic acid bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10889–10897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, Y.; Gänzle, M.G. Effect of temperature on production of oligosaccharides and dextran by Weissella cibaria 10 M. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 280, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. İspirli, H.; Özmen, D.; Yılmaz, M.T.; Sağdıç, O.; Dertli, E. Impact of glucan type exopolysaccharide (EPS) production on technological characteristics of sourdough bread. Food Control. 2020, 107, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Malang, S.K.; Maina, N.H.; Schwab, C.; Tenkanen, M.; Lacroix, C. Characterization of exopolysaccharide and ropy capsular polysaccharide formation by Weissella. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manini, F.; Casiraghi, M.C.; Poutanen, K.; Brasca, M.; Erba, D.; Plumed-Ferrer, C. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat bran sourdough. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Coda, R.; Xu, Y.; Moreno, D.S.; Mojzita, D.; Nionelli, L.; Rizzello, C.G.; Katina, K. Performance of Leuconostoc citreum FDR241 during wheat flour sourdough type I propagation and transcriptional analysis of exopolysaccharides biosynthesis genes. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, J.P.; Daifas, D.P.; El-Khoury, W.; Koukoutsis, J.; El-Khoury, A. Shelf life and safety concerns of bakery products—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 19–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Axel, C.; Röcker, B.; Brosnan, B.; Zannini, E.; Furey, A.; Coffey, A.; Arendt, E.K. Application of Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM19280 in gluten-free sourdough bread to improve the microbial shelf life. Food Microbiol. 2015, 47, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ryan, L.A.M.; Zannini, E.; Dal Bello, F.; Pawlowska, A.; Koehler, P.; Arendt, E.K. Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM 19280 as a novel food-grade antifungal agent for bakery products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 146, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadeghi, A.; Ebrahimi, M.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Abedfar, A. Application of the selected antifungal LAB isolate as a protective starter culture in pan whole-wheat sourdough bread. Food Control 2019, 95, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schmidt, M.; Lynch, K.M.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Fundamental study on the improvement of the antifungal activity of Lactobacillus reuteri R29 through increased production of phenyllactic acid and reuterin. Food Control 2018, 88, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dal Bello, F.; Clarke, C.I.; Ryan, L.A.M.; Ulmer, H.; Schober, T.J.; Ström, K.; Sjögren, J.; van Sinderen, D.; Schnürer, J.; Arendt, E.K. Improvement of the quality and shelf life of wheat bread by fermentation with the antifungal strain Lactobacillus plantarum FST 1.7. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 45, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lavermicocca, P.; Valerio, F.; Evidente, A.; Lazzaroni, S.; Corsetti, A.; Gobbetti, M. Purification and characteriation of novel antifungal compounds from the sourdough. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4084–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Black, B.A.; Zannini, E.; Curtis, J.M.; Gänzle, M.G. Antifungal hydroxy fatty acids produced during sourdough fermentation: Microbial and enzymatic pathways, and antifungal activity in bread. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1866–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sadiq, F.A.; Yan, B.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Lactic acid bacteria as antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic agents: A comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1403–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Choi, H.; Kim, Y.-W.; Hwang, I.; Kim, J.; Yoon, S. Evaluation of Leuconostoc citreum HO12 and Weissella koreensis HO20 isolated from kimchi as a starter culture for whole wheat sourdough. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2208–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ouiddir, M.; Bettache, G.; Leyva Salas, M.; Pawtowski, A.; Donot, C.; Brahimi, S.; Mabrouk, K.; Coton, E.; Mounier, J. Selection of Algerian lactic acid bacteria for use as antifungal bioprotective cultures and application in dairy and bakery products. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valerio, F.; Favilla, M.; De Bellis, P.; Sisto, A.; de Candia, S.; Lavermicocca, P. Antifungal activity of strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a semolina ecosystem against Penicillium roqueforti, Aspergillus niger and Endomyces fibuliger contaminating bakery products. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 32, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miescher Schwenninger, S.; Freimüller Leischtfeld, S.; Gantenbein-Demarchi, C. high-throughput identification of the microbial biodiversity of cocoa bean fermentation by MALDI-TOF MS. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 63, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 315–322. ISBN 978-0-12-372180-8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Susette, F.L.; Susanne, M.S. Bread Relevant Moulds. Bak+. Biscuit. Int. 2020, 2020, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  30. Inglin, R.C.; Stevens, M.J.A.; Meile, L.; Lacroix, C.; Meile, L. High-throughput screening assays for antibacterial and antifungal activities of Lactobacillus species. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 114, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Saha, B.C.; Nakamura, L.K. Production of mannitol and lactic acid by fermentation with Lactobacillus intermedius NRRL B-3693. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brosnan, B.; Coffey, A.; Arendt, E.K.; Furey, A. The QuEChERS approach in a novel application for the identification of antifungal compounds produced by lactic acid bacteria Cultures. Talanta 2014, 129, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Müller, D.C.; Nguyen, H.; Li, Q.; Schönlechner, R.; Miescher Schwenninger, S.; Wismer, W.; Gänzle, M. Enzymatic and microbial conversions to achieve sugar reduction in bread. Food Res. Int. 2021, 143, 110296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Galli, V.; Venturi, M.; Coda, R.; Maina, N.H.; Granchi, L. Isolation and characterization of indigenous Weissella confusa for in situ bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) production in chickpea sourdough. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sheikha, A.E.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G. Bread fungal contamination: Risk of mycotoxins, protection of anti-fungal and need to fungal identification. In Bread and Its Fortification; Rosell, C.M., Bajerska, J., El Sheikha, A.F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 160–172. ISBN 978-0-429-17255-7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahato, D.K.; Kamle, M.; Sharma, B.; Pandhi, S.; Devi, S.; Dhawan, K.; Selvakumar, R.; Mishra, D.; Kumar, A.; Arora, S.; et al. Patulin in food: A Mycotoxin concern for human health and its management strategies. Toxicon 2021, 198, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Le Lay, C.; Mounier, J.; Vasseur, V.; Weill, A.; Le Blay, G.; Barbier, G.; Coton, E. In vitro and in situ screening of lactic acid bacteria and propionibacteria antifungal activities against bakery product Spoilage Molds. Food Control 2016, 60, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santos, J.L.P.d.; Bernardi, A.O.; Pozza Morassi, L.L.; Silva, B.S.; Copetti, M.V.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Incidence, populations and diversity of fungi from raw materials, final products and air of processing environment of multigrain whole meal bread. Food Res. Int. 2016, 87, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Samapundo, S.; Devlieghere, F.; Vroman, A.; Eeckhout, M. Antifungal activity of fermentates and their potential to replace propionate in bread. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 76, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Axel, C.; Brosnan, B.; Zannini, E.; Peyer, L.C.; Furey, A.; Coffey, A.; Arendt, E.K. Antifungal activities of three different Lactobacillus species and their production of antifungal carboxylic acids in wheat sourdough. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gänzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zannini, E.; Waters, D.M.; Coffey, A.; Arendt, E.K. Production, properties, and industrial food application of lactic acid bacteria-derived exopolysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 1121–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quattrini, M.; Liang, N.; Fortina, M.G.; Xiang, S.; Curtis, J.M.; Gänzle, M. Exploiting synergies of sourdough and antifungal organic acids to delay fungal spoilage of bread. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 302, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lou, X.; Si, G.; Yu, H.; Qi, J.; Liu, T.; Fang, Z. Possible reservoir and routes of transmission of Cronobacter (Enterobacter sakazakii) via wheat flour. Food Control 2014, 43, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garófalo, L.; Vazquez, D.; Ferreira, F.; Soule, S. Wheat flour non-starch polysaccharides and their effect on dough rheological properties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2011, 34, 1327–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, J.-H.; Choi, N.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Biofilm formation and exopolysaccharide (EPS) production by Cronobacter sakazakii depending on environmental conditions. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Almutairi, M.H.; Helal, M.M.I. Exopolysaccharide production from isolated Enterobacter sp. strain ACD2 from the northwest of Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Overview of LAB strains used in this study.
Table 1. Overview of LAB strains used in this study.
Genus and Species 1Former Genus (Incl. Species)Total No. of IsolatesNo. of Isolates Used in ScreeningsIsolation SourceReferences
AntifungalEPSMannitol
Lev. brevisLb. brevis734733Wheat sourdough/Rye sourdoughZHAW collection 2
Lacticaseibacillus (Lac.) paracasei subsp. paracaseiLb. paracasei582583Wheat sourdough/Rye sourdoughThis study/
ZHAW collection
Li. fermentumLb. fermentum11- 31Baker’s yeastZHAW collection
Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarumLb. plantarum33103312Malt/baker’s yeastZHAW collection
Lactococcus (L.) lactis 1911919Wheat soudoughThis study
Latilactobacillus (Llb.) curvatusLb. curvatus11-118Wheat sourdough/baker’s yeastThis study/
ZHAW collection
Loigolactobacillus (Lo.) coryniformis subsp. coryniformisLb. coryniformis6-64Wheat sourdoughThis study/
ZHAW collection
Lentilactobacillus (Le.) parabuchneriLb. parabuchneri4141Rye sourdoughZHAW collection
Lb. delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckiiLb. delbrueckii1--1Brewer’s spent grainZHAW collection
Compani-lactobacillus (C.) paralimentariusLb. paralimentarius2-2-Rye sourdoughZHAW collection
C. kimchiiLb. kimchii3-31Rye sourdoughZHAW collection
F. fructivoransLb. fructivorans21-2Wheat sourdoughThis study
F. sanfranciscensisLb. sanfranciscenis21-2Rye sourdoughZHAW collection
Furfurilactobacillus (Fu.) rossiaeLb. rossiae1--1Rye sourdoughZHAW collection
Pediococcus (P.) pentosaceus 43-432Wheat sourdoughZHAW collection
Lc.lactis 14--14Brewer’s spent grainZHAW collection
Lc. citreum 68685654Wheat sourdough/maltThis study/
ZHAW collection
Lc. mesenteroides 5335Wheat sourdough/baker’s yeastThis study/
ZHAW collection
Lc. pseudo-mesenteroides 33-1Wheat sourdough/maltThis study/
ZHAW collection
Lc. palmae 2222Wheat sourdoughThis study
W. confusa 2211Wheat sourdough/maltThis study/
ZHAW collection
1 Classification according to Zheng et al. [2]. ² Strains obtained from ZHAW culture collection (Food Biotechnology Research Group). ³ Not applied in the screening (-).
Table 2. Representative strains of 16 groups of 58 fungal contaminants isolated from ten different locations from facility air and soft rolls (produced without preservatives) and identified by sequence analyses of the ITS region.
Table 2. Representative strains of 16 groups of 58 fungal contaminants isolated from ten different locations from facility air and soft rolls (produced without preservatives) and identified by sequence analyses of the ITS region.
Macroscopic GroupsNo. of Isolates per GroupGenus/SpeciesIdentified StrainIsolation
Location
Isolated before baking
12Vishniacozyma victoriaeF9Facility air
25Aspergillus sp. (A. austwickii/A. aflatoxiformans) 2F17Facility air
33Aspergillus sp. (A. tennesseensis/A. jensenii) 2F18Facility air
Isolated after baking
42Aspergillus welwitschiaeF32Facility air
57Aspergillus sp. (A. austwickii/A. aflatoxiformans) 2F55Facility air
64Penicillium sp. (P. fuscoglaucum/P. palitans/P. commune) 2F26Facility air
73Penicillium chrysogenumF27Facility air
8 111Penicillium rubens
Penicillium sp.(P. fuscoglaucum/P. palitans)2
F43
B3
Facility air
Soft rolls
94Penicillium sp. (P. fuscoglaucum/P. palitans/P. commune) 2F66Facility air
102Penicillium rubensB4Soft rolls
111Cladosporium antarcticumF61Facility air
12 17Cladosporium sp. (C. subcinereum/C. antarcticum) 2
Cladosporium domesticum
B1
F40
Soft rolls
Facility air
131Aureobasidium melanogenumF47Facility air
143Byssochlamys spectabilisF57Facility air
151Hannaella oryzaeF33Facility air
162Rhodotorula mucilaginosaF20Facility air
1 Two isolates per group. ² Species in brackets could not be distinguished by the method applied; appropriate identification is only possible on genus level.
Table 3. Antifungal activities of 99 LAB strains determined on WFH medium against P. crustosum FB005, A. flavus IB1, and A. tritici IB12 all isolated from soft rolls. Numbers in rows represent numbers of antifungal strains; zones of inhibition (halo measured from edge of colony to edge of zone of inhibition): +++ = complete inhibition of fungi; ++(+) = > 5 mm with minor fungi growth; ++ = 2.5–4.9 mm; + = 0.1–2.4 mm; +/- = no halo but a brightening of the medium; and - = no inhibition. If inhibition was detected in the single run, screening was performed in triplicates.
Table 3. Antifungal activities of 99 LAB strains determined on WFH medium against P. crustosum FB005, A. flavus IB1, and A. tritici IB12 all isolated from soft rolls. Numbers in rows represent numbers of antifungal strains; zones of inhibition (halo measured from edge of colony to edge of zone of inhibition): +++ = complete inhibition of fungi; ++(+) = > 5 mm with minor fungi growth; ++ = 2.5–4.9 mm; + = 0.1–2.4 mm; +/- = no halo but a brightening of the medium; and - = no inhibition. If inhibition was detected in the single run, screening was performed in triplicates.
Mould Contaminants
P. crustosum FB005A. flavus IB1A. tritici IB12
Genus and SpeciesTotal StrainsInhibitionNo. of StrainsInhibitionNo. of StrainsInhibitionNo. of Strains
Lev. brevis4- 14
+
3
1
+++4
Li. fermentum1+/−1+1++(+)1
F. fructivorans1-1-1-1
Le. parabuchneri1+/−1+1+++1
Lac. paracasei subsp. paracasei2-2-2+2
Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum10-10-10+/−
+
1
9
F. sanfranciscensis1-1-1-1
L. lactis1-1-1+/−1
Lc. citreum68-
+/-
62
6
-
+
64
4
+
++
++(+)
+++
3
17
8
40
Lc. mesenteroides3-3-
+
2
1
+
++
++(+)
1
1
1
Lc. palmae2
+/−
1
1

+
1
1
+++2
Lc. pseudo-mesenteroides3-3
+
2
1
+/−
+++
1
2
W. confusa2-2-2++(+)
+++
1
1
1 single run if no inhibition (-) was detected.
Table 4. Inhibition spectrum of nine Leuconostoc strains determined on WHF medium against six fungal contaminants of a bakery environment with Cladosporium sp., Penicillium sp., and Aspergillus sp. as representative moulds and Vishniacozyma sp. as yeast example. Cladosporium sp. B1 was isolated from soft rolls, whereas the other fungal contaminants were isolated from facility air. Zones of inhibition (halo measured from edge of colony to edge of zone of inhibition): +++ = complete inhibition of fungi; ++(+) = > 5 mm with minor fungi growth; ++ = 2.5–4.9 mm; + 0.1–2.4 mm; +/- = no halo but a brightening of the medium; and - = no inhibition. Experiments were performed in triplicates if the mould was fully inhibited in the first run.
Table 4. Inhibition spectrum of nine Leuconostoc strains determined on WHF medium against six fungal contaminants of a bakery environment with Cladosporium sp., Penicillium sp., and Aspergillus sp. as representative moulds and Vishniacozyma sp. as yeast example. Cladosporium sp. B1 was isolated from soft rolls, whereas the other fungal contaminants were isolated from facility air. Zones of inhibition (halo measured from edge of colony to edge of zone of inhibition): +++ = complete inhibition of fungi; ++(+) = > 5 mm with minor fungi growth; ++ = 2.5–4.9 mm; + 0.1–2.4 mm; +/- = no halo but a brightening of the medium; and - = no inhibition. Experiments were performed in triplicates if the mould was fully inhibited in the first run.
Isolated Fungi from Bakery Environment
Genus/SpeciesCladosporium sp. B1 1Cladosporium domesticum F40Vishniacozyma victoriae F9Penicillium chrysogenum F27Penicillium rubens F43Aspergillus sp. F18 2
Lc. citreum DCM49++++++++++ 3+/− 3+++
Lc. citreum DCM65++++++++++++++++ 3
Lc. citreum MA113++++++++++++++++ 3
Lc. citreum MA079+++++++++++(+) 3++++(+)
Lc. citreum DCM63+++++++++++(+) 3+/− 3++ 3
Lc. citreum DCM74++++++++++ 3++++(+)
Lc. citreum DCM83+++++++++++++/− 3+ 3
Lc. mesenteroides DCM27+++++++++++++++ 3
Lc. palmae DCM85++++++++++ 3++ 3+ 3
1 Identified as C. subcinereum/C. antarcticum, appropriate identification is only possible on genus level by the method applied. 2 Identified as A. tennesseensis/A. jensenii, appropriate identification is only possible on genus level by the method applied. 3 Single run if no inhibition (-) was detected.
Table 5. EPS production of 59 Leuconostoc sp. strains on MRS supplemented with sucrose (40 g/L) and presence of dextransucrase genes dsrM (fragment size: 221 bp) and dsrB (fragment size: 192).
Table 5. EPS production of 59 Leuconostoc sp. strains on MRS supplemented with sucrose (40 g/L) and presence of dextransucrase genes dsrM (fragment size: 221 bp) and dsrB (fragment size: 192).
LAB StrainsSlimy
Colony
Precipitation
with ETOH 1
Dextransucrase-Encoding Genes
dsrMdsrB
PresentAbsentPresentAbsent
Lc. citreum (56)++2828560
Lc. mesenteroides (1)++0110
Lc. palmae (2)++0220
1 Slime precipitation confirmed EPS (+), and genes encoding for dextransucrase were amplified by using primer sets dsrM_F2/dsrM_R2 and dsrB_F2/dsrB_R2.
Table 6. Mannitol production of LAB in MRS medium supplemented with fructose (50 g/L) incubated at 30 °C for 72 h.
Table 6. Mannitol production of LAB in MRS medium supplemented with fructose (50 g/L) incubated at 30 °C for 72 h.
Mannitol
Genus/SpeciesNo. of Strains Tested0–20 g/L20–30 g/L>30 g/L
L. lactis1919 1
Lpb. plantarum subsp. plantarum1212
Llb. curvatus88
Lo. coryniformis subsp. coryniformis44
Lac. paracasei subsp. paracasei33
Lev. brevis31 2
F. fructivorans22
F. sanfranciscensis2 11
P. pentosaceus22
Lb. delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii11
Li. fermentum1 1
C. kimchii11
Le. parabuchneri1 1
Fu. rossiae1 1
W. confusa11
Lc. lactis1414
Lc. citreum54 1143
Lc. palmae2 11
Lc. mesenteroides5 14
Lc. pseudomesenteroides1 1
1 Numbers in columns three to five show the number of mannitol-producing strains.
Table 7. Cell counts, pH, TTA, antifungal compounds, acids, fructose, mannitol, and EPS in lab-Scheme 400 g, 30 °C, 24 h) inoculated with four Lc. citreum strains and a spontaneously fermented sourdough without inoculation at t0 (before) and t24 (after fermentation for 24 h at 30 °C). Given values are average values ± standard deviation.
Table 7. Cell counts, pH, TTA, antifungal compounds, acids, fructose, mannitol, and EPS in lab-Scheme 400 g, 30 °C, 24 h) inoculated with four Lc. citreum strains and a spontaneously fermented sourdough without inoculation at t0 (before) and t24 (after fermentation for 24 h at 30 °C). Given values are average values ± standard deviation.
Lc. citreum DCM49Lc. citreum DCM65Lc. citreum MA079Lc. citreum MA113No Inoculum
LAB
(log CFU/g)
t07.2 ± 0.0 a7.1 ± 0.3 a7.2 ± 0.1 a7.2 ± 0.2 a<5 b
t249.2 ± 0.1 a9.1 ± 0.1 ab9.0 ± 0.1 ab8.9 ± 0.1 b7.5 ± 0.1 c
pHt06.4 ± 0.0 a6.4 ± 0.1 a6.3 ± 0.0 a6.2 ± 0.0 a6.3 ± 0.0 a
t244.0 ± 0.0 a4.0 ± 0.0 a4.0 ± 0.0 a4.1 ± 0.0 a5.6 ± 0.2 b
TTAt02.2 ± 0.1 b2.3 ± 0.1 ab2.4 ± 0.1 ab2.6 ± 0.2 a2.1 ± 0.1 b
t2412.4 ± 0.1 b12.1 ± 0.1 ab11.6 ± 0.3 a11.8 ± 0.3 ab5.5 ± 0.2 c
Antifungal compounds (μg/g sourdough)
HPLAt0n.d.0.0 ± 0.1 an.d.0.2 ± 0.2 an.d.
t241.1 ± 0.2 ab0.6 ± 0.5 ab1.3 ± 0.1 a1.2 ± 0.6 a0.2 ± 0.3 b
PLAt0n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
t241.6 ± 0.4 ab1.8 ± 0.5 a2.1 ± 0.4 a1.3 ± 0.0 ab0.7 ± 0.7 b
Acids (mg/g sourdough)
t0n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Lactic acidt243.0 ± 0.0 a3.1 ±0.0 a3.1 ± 0.3 a3.3 ± 0.4 a0.4 ± 0.1 b
t0n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Acetic acidt241.6 ± 0.0 a1.5 ± 0.0 a1.7 ± 0.1 a1.6 ± 0.1 a0.2 ± 0.1 b
Carbohydrates (mg/g sourdough)
Fructoset010.0 ± 0.9 a9.7 ± 1.9 a10.5 ± 1.7 a8.2 ± 1.7 a9.3 ± 1.0 a
t24n.d.2.03 ± 0.1 an.d.2.4 ± 0.3 a9.2 ± 0.5 b
t0n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Mannitolt247.8 ± 0.5 a8.3 ± 0.2 a7.9 ± 0.8 a8.6 ± 1.0 an.d.
EPS formation (g/100 g sourdough
t00.09 ± 0.05 ab0.13 ± 0.05 ab0.16 ± 0.01 a0.07 ± 0.01 b0.11 ± 0.01 ab
t240.36 ± 0.04 a0.45 ± 0.46 a0.25 ± 0.06 a0.62 ± 0.37 a0.77 ± 0.19 a
n.d.: not detected molecules. a–c ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post hoc test (Tukey HSD Test/Wilcoxon) were carried out for each measurement and point in time (t0 and t24). Values in one row following the same letter are not significantly different.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Müller, D.C.; Mischler, S.; Schönlechner, R.; Miescher Schwenninger, S. Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081633

AMA Style

Müller DC, Mischler S, Schönlechner R, Miescher Schwenninger S. Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(8):1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081633

Chicago/Turabian Style

Müller, Denise C., Sandra Mischler, Regine Schönlechner, and Susanne Miescher Schwenninger. 2021. "Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations" Microorganisms 9, no. 8: 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081633

APA Style

Müller, D. C., Mischler, S., Schönlechner, R., & Miescher Schwenninger, S. (2021). Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations. Microorganisms, 9(8), 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081633

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop