Next Article in Journal
Congenital Human Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Narrative Review of Maternal Immune Response and Diagnosis in View of the Development of a Vaccine and Prevention of Primary and Non-Primary Infections in Pregnancy
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Rhizospheric Microbiota as a Bioremediation Tool for the Protection of Soil-Plant Systems from Microcystins Phytotoxicity and Mitigating Toxin-Related Health Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms9081748
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Engagement of CEACAM1 by Helicobacter pylori HopQ Is Important for the Activation of Non-Canonical NF-κB in Gastric Epithelial Cells

by
Karin Taxauer
1,
Youssef Hamway
1,
Anna Ralser
1,
Alisa Dietl
1,
Karin Mink
1,
Michael Vieth
2,
Bernhard B. Singer
3,
Markus Gerhard
1 and
Raquel Mejías-Luque
1,*
1
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
2
Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
3
Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1748; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081748
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 4 August 2021 / Accepted: 10 August 2021 / Published: 16 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori infects half of the world’s population and is a major risk factor for gastric cancer development. In order to attach to human gastric epithelial cells and inject the oncoprotein CagA into host cells, H. pylori utilizes the outer membrane protein HopQ that binds to the cell surface protein CEACAM, which can be expressed on the gastric mucosa. Once bound, H. pylori activates a number of signaling pathways, including canonical and non-canonical NF-κB. We investigated whether HopQ–CEACAM interaction is involved in activating the non-canonical NF-κB signaling pathway. Different gastric cancer cells were infected with the H. pylori wild type, or HopQ mutant strains, and the activation of non-canonical NF-κB was related to CEACAM expression levels. The correlation between CEACAM levels and the activation of non-canonical NF-κB was confirmed in human gastric tissue samples. Taken together, our findings show that the HopQ–CEACAM interaction is important for activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway in gastric epithelial cells.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori colonizes the gastric mucosa of every second human being worldwide [1]. Although the majority of infected individuals are asymptomatic, H. pylori infection can result in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [2,3]. MALT lymphoma arises from long-term H. pylori infection resulting in the growth of malignant lymphatic cell clones [4,5,6]. Early-stage gastric MALT lymphomas are antigen-dependent illnesses and hence, H. pylori eradication therapy using antibiotics induces regression in three out of four patients [5]. In contrast, late-stage MALT lymphomas show high-grade transformation and acquire chromosomal translocations becoming antigen-independent and resistant to the eradication therapy [7]. In addition, H. pylori is one of the major risk factors for developing gastric cancer, classified as a class I carcinogen by the WHO in 1994 [8,9,10,11]. In 2018, gastric cancer accounted for about one million new cancer cases worldwide and was the fifth most common cancer type [12]. Intestinal-type gastric cancer develops over decades through a multistep process initiated by infection-induced gastritis, that further progresses to atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and cancer [13,14], while no precursor lesions have been identified for diffuse tumours.
To colonize the gastric epithelium, H. pylori initially has to adhere to gastric epithelial cells (reviewed in [15]). The bacterium achieves this by expressing several outer membrane proteins (OMP) that interact with different host receptors [16,17,18]. In previous work, the adhesin HopQ was found to bind to human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs), mainly CEACAM1 and 5, and to a lesser extent to CEACAM3 or 6 [19,20,21]. Importantly, we showed that HopQ-CEACAM interaction is essential for type IV secretion system (T4SS)-dependent CagA translocation and interleukin 8 (IL8) secretion [19]. Inside the host cell, CagA interacts with signalling molecules such as Src and c-Abl kinases, resulting in its phosphorylation [22]. This affects a number of host signalling pathways that regulate the expression of cytokines and growth factors involved in immune responses, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and cell elongation [23,24,25]. One of those signalling pathways is the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). However, whether activation of NF-κB is completely CagA-dependent, T4SS dependent, or just H. pylori strain-specific, is still under debate [26,27,28,29].
The NF-κB pathway is divided into two signalling arms, the canonical and the non-canonical pathway, according to the IκB kinase (Iκκ) subunits employed [30,31]. Upon H. pylori infection, the canonical NF-κB pathway is activated in gastric epithelial cells or infiltrating immune cells [28,29,30]. Accumulating evidence also indicates an important role for non-canonical NF-κB in H. pylori induced gastric malignancies [32,33,34]. The non-canonical NF-κB pathway is activated by a defined subset of tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily members such as lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR), B cell activating factor belonging to TNF family receptor (BAFFR), CD40, receptor activator for NF-κB (RANK), TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), TNFR2 and other TNFR superfamily members [30,35]. LTβR, which is expressed on lymphoid stromal and epithelial cells, is activated by two main ligands LTα1β2 or LIGHT (homologous to lymphotoxins exhibits inducible expression, competes with herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D for the receptor HVEM expressed on T lymphocytes) [35]. Receptor activation leads to the stabilization of NF-κB inducing kinase (NIK) that phosphorylates the Iκκα homodimer resulting in the phosphorylation of p100 and degradation of p100 to p52, which then forms a heterodimer with RelB [36]. The formed heterodimer translocates into the nucleus to induce gene expression [35]. Previous work in our laboratory demonstrated that activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway via lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR) signalling aggravates the pro-inflammatory response to H. pylori in gastric epithelial cells, while blocking LTβR signalling reduces gastric inflammation. Activation of this pathway was mostly induced by LTβ and depended on the presence of a functional T4SS in the bacterium [32].
Considering that HopQ-CEACAM binding is essential for T4SS functionality [33,37,38,39], we sought to investigate whether HopQ-CEACAM interaction influences the activation of non-canonical NF-κB signalling in gastric epithelial cells. Our results indicate that HopQ-CEACAM interaction not only effects CagA translocation or IL8 secretion, but also influences the activation of the non-canonical NF-ĸB pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Gastric cancer cell lines: AGS (ATCC CRL-1739), KatoIII (ATCC HTB-103), MKN7 (JCRB1025), MKN45 (JCRB0254), NCI-N87 (ATCC CRL-5822), NUGC-4 (JCRB0834), SNU1 (ATCC CRL-5971), St2957 (CVCL_9557) and St3051 (CVCL_9558) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and supplemented with 10 % (v/v) FCS and 1% (v/v) Pen/Strep. Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) (ATCC CCL-61) and vector control CHO-CEACAM1-4L (CHO CC1) [21] were cultured in DMEM and supplemented with 10 % (v/v) FCS and 1% (v/v) Pen/Strep. Cells were kept in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2. Regular mycoplasma testing was performed.

2.2. H. pylori Strains

P12 [40] and G27 [41] H. pylori strains were grown on Wilkins-Chalgren (WC) blood agar plates supplemented with Dent (OXOID, Hampshire, UK) and kept at microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C and 10% (v/v) CO2. G27/P12 isogenic strains, G27ΔhopQ [19], G27ΔcagE [42], P12ΔhopQ [20], P12ΔcagA [43] and P12ΔcagE [44], were grown in plates containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 15 µg/mL of chloramphenicol or 50 µg/mL streptomycin under the same conditions.

2.3. Infection Experiments

Cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 in a 24-well plate (for protein and ELISA) or 5 × 105 in a 6-well plate (for RNA). The next day, the cell medium was replaced by DMEM containing only FCS without antibiotics. On the day of infection, cells of one well were counted to calculate the number of bacteria needed. H. pylori was grown for 48 h on WC agar plates with Dent supplement and collected in BHI/10% FCS medium. Bacterial density was determined by measuring the optical density (OD600), with OD600 = 1 = 2 × 108 bacteria. H. pylori was applied at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10, 20, or 50 and incubated for eight hours. After the incubation time, the supernatant was collected to perform IL8 ELISA, and cells were washed once with 1x PBS and lysed for protein or RNA expression analysis.

2.4. Binding Assay

H. pylori was grown on WC Dent agar plates for 48 h, the optical density was measured and adjusted to 2 × 108 bacteria in 1 mL media, and the bacteria was stained for 30 min with 10 µM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) [39]. The labeled bacteria were washed twice and added at an MOI of 10 to 1 × 105 cells, which were previously seeded in a 96-well V bottom plate. After an incubation period of 30 min under constant shaking, the supernatant was discarded, and the infected cells were washed 4 times with PBS. After fixing cells in 0.5% (v/v) PFA/PBS, the cells were analysed on a CytoFLEX S flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Cells not incubated with labeled bacteria served as a negative control. Binding was assessed, after pre-gating on single cells, based on fluorescent signals using FlowJo software (version 10.7.2).

2.5. Immunofluorescence (IF)

To visualize the binding of H. pylori to gastric cells, 1 × 105 MKN45 and NUGC-4 gastric cancer cells were seeded on coverslips and grown for 24 h. CFSE-labeled wild type H. pylori, or isogenic mutant strains, were added at an MOI of 10 and co-incubated with the cells for 3 h. Infected cells were fixed with methanol/acetone, stained with phalloidin (red, actin), and mounted with DAPI-containing media (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). Images were taken using an SP5 confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.6. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Human gastric biopsy samples from paraffin-embedded blocks were obtained from the tissue bank of the Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth in Germany, after the approval of the local ethics committee (155_20B). Briefly, sections were stained for NF-κB 2 (#3017, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:800) or CEACAM1 (provided by B. B. Singer, Essen, Germany; 5 µg/mL). Head-induced antigen retrieval was conducted using 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate (pH 6). The primary antibody was incubated at 4 °C overnight and the bound secondary antibody (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was detected using diaminobenzidine solution (DAB). Slides were scanned and examined using an Olympus Virtual Slide Imaging System (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokio, Japan).

2.7. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

To test for IL8 concentration in culture supernatants, samples were diluted at 1:40 (MKN45) or 1:10 (NUGC-4) in culture media or were used pure (SNU1). ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ready-Set Go ELISA Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.8. Western Blot

To check for protein expression, equal volumes of protein lysate were loaded on an 8% or 6% sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel, and electrophoresis (SDS page) was performed. Separated proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Protran 0.45, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat milk in TBS-T buffer (Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v)) at room temperature for one hour. The blocked membrane was probed with primary antibodies targeting NF-κB2 (#3017, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1000), and CEACAM1 + 5 (provided by B. B. Singer; 2.5 μg/mL) at 4 °C overnight. GAPDH was used as a protein loading control (#2118, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1000). After washing, the membrane was incubated with secondary HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG antibody (Promega). Proteins were detected by applying ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantified with LabImage software (INTAS, Ahmedabad, India). Protein levels were normalized to GAPDH.

2.9. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)

RNA was isolated using an RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Next, DNase treatment was performed, and 1 µg RNA was used to prepare cDNA. LTβ, A20, CEACAM1, CEACAM5, CEACAM6, CCL2, CXCL10, and GAPDH primer sequences are shown in Table 1. Relative mRNA levels were calculated using the equation 2−∆ct after normalizing values to the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Fold mRNA expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆ct formula. Thus, values were first normalized to the housekeeping gene and afterwards to the values of the control samples.

2.10. Statistics

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons was used for normally distributed data. For not normally distributed data, the ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were performed. Statistical significance was determined as * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001.

3. Results

3.1. H. pylori HopQ Is Involved in the Activation of the Non-Canonical NF-κB Pathway

We previously observed that the activation of non-canonical NF-κB in response to H. pylori infection occurred on a secondary loop post-canonical NF-κB activation that required a functional T4SS [32]. Since HopQ is important for proper T4SS functionality, CagA translocation and NF-κB activation, we explored whether HopQ plays a role in the activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. Thus, we infected MKN45 gastric cancer cells with wild type H. pylori strains as well as isogenic HopQ deficient strains. CagA as well as CagE knockout strains served as controls. Wild type H. pylori infection resulted in the activation of non-canonical NF-κB, as p100 was efficiently processed to p52, regardless of the strain used for infection (Figure 1a). In contrast, only reduced or no processing of p100 was detected in cells infected with HopQ or CagE deficient strains, while lack of CagA did not affect activation of the pathway (Figure 1a), as observed previously [32]. As expected, activation of canonical NF-κB was also hampered after infection with P12ΔhopQ, as reduced levels of IL8 secretion (Figure 1b) as well as mRNA levels of A20 (Figure 1c) were observed. Likewise, the expression of LTβ, a ligand which is crucial for activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway upon H. pylori infection, was lower in MKN45 gastric cancer cells infected with HopQ mutant strains compared to expression in cells infected with wild type bacteria (Figure 1d). In addition, the expression of NF-κB target genes CXCL10 and CCL2 was reduced when HopQ was missing (Figure 1e). Similar effects were observed at a higher MOI (MOI 20 or 50) in infected MKN45 cells (Figure 1a,d).

3.2. Gastric Cells Express Different Levels of CEACAMs That Are Altered upon H. pylori Infection

After previously finding that HopQ interacts with CEACAM receptors expressed on gastric epithelial cells, we examined whether HopQ-CEACAM binding was required for activation of non-canonical NF-κB. Initially, we screened a panel of gastric cancer cell lines for their basal expression levels of CEACAM1, 5 and 6, which are important for binding of H. pylori to the gastric epithelium [19]. We observed that gastric cancer cells showed different CEACAM expression levels at baseline (Figure 2a,b). A few cell lines, such as MKN45 cells, showed expression of all three CEACAMs (1, 5 and 6) (Figure 2a). In contrast, other gastric cells such as NUGC-4, expressed only low levels of CEACAM1, while no CEACAM expression was detected in SNU1 cells at baseline (Figure 2a,b). Interestingly, infection of MKN45 and NUGC-4 cells with wild type H. pylori increased CEACAM expression levels (Figure 2c,d), while after infection with HopQ mutant strains, no significant changes in CEACAM expression were detected (Figure 2c,d). Moreover, CEACAM5 and 6 mRNA levels were much lower in infected NUGC-4 compared to MKN45 cells after H. pylori infection. No CEACAM expression was detected in infected SNU1 cells, suggesting that the presence of the ligand (HopQ) favours the expression of the receptor (CEACAM).

3.3. HopQ–CEACAM Interaction Is Important for the Activation of the Non-Canonical NF-κB Pathway

Our results from the MKN45 cells suggested that the interaction between HopQ and CEACAM receptors expressed on epithelial cells was necessary for activation of non-canonical NF-κB signalling (Figure 1a). To substantiate this observation and to explore the impact of CEACAM expression on activation of the NF-κB pathway, we infected NUGC-4 cells expressing low levels of CEACAM1 in addition to SNU1 cells, which do not express CEACAMs able to bind to HopQ. Processing of p100 to p52 was not altered in these cell lines upon infection, and no changes between wild type and HopQ deficient bacteria could be detected (Figure 3a).
When analysing IL8 release, lack of HopQ led to a slight decrease in IL8 secretion in infected NUGC-4 cells, while no IL8 secretion was detected in SNU1, regardless the H. pylori strain used for infection (Figure 3b).
We next examined activation of canonical NF-κB signalling, by measuring A20 mRNA expression. A20 is an endogenous inhibitor of the canonical NF-κB pathway and is upregulated upon pathway activation. A20 levels were increased in NUGC-4 and SNU1 cells upon infection. Lack of HopQ only slightly affected A20 expression in NUGC-4, while no differences were detected between H. pylori wild type and H. pylori HopQ-deficient infected cells. Absence of HopQ did not alter A20 levels in SNU1 cells (Figure 3c).
We also analysed mRNA levels of the non-canonical NF-κB ligand LTβ, which was slightly affected by the absence of HopQ in NUGC-4 cells. Again, no changes in LTβ expression were detected in SNU1 cells infected with the HopQ deficient strain (Figure 3d).
Finally, we assessed bacterial binding in cells expressing different levels of CEACAMs. We observed that binding of H. pylori to MKN45 cells showing high levels of CEACAM expression was highly influenced by the presence of HopQ. In contrast, lack of HopQ barely affected H. pylori binding to NUGC-4 cells expressing low CEACAM1 protein levels. Notably, we found very few bacteria bound to SNU1 cells, which lack CEACAM expression (Figure 3e,f).
Taken together, these observations indicate that activation of non-canonical NF-κB is highly dependent on gastric epithelial CEACAM expression levels and thus on bacterial binding to CEACAM through the bacterial protein HopQ.

3.4. CEACAM1 Expression and Activation of the Non-Canonical NF-κB Pathway Positively Correlate in Human Gastritis and Gastric Cancer Samples

To confirm our previous findings observed in gastric cancer cells in human gastric tissue samples, healthy tissue, gastritis, intestinal-type, and diffuse-type gastric cancer biopsies were stained for CEACAM1 and NF-κB2 by immunohistochemistry (Figure 4). In healthy stomach tissue, no CEACAM1 expression was observed. However, CEACAM1 expression was induced in H. pylori-induced gastritis as well as in gastric tumors. Activation of non-canonical NF-κB, as detected by p52 nuclear staining, was observed in H. pylori-infected tissue and gastric cancers, correlating with CEACAM1 expression in 46% of patient samples with H. pylori-induced gastritis, 62.5% of intestinal-type gastric tumor samples and in 100% of diffuse-type gastric cancer samples analysed.
Taken together, these results indicate that the binding of H. pylori to gastric epithelial cells via the HopQ-CEACAM interaction is important for the activation of non-canonical NF-κB in gastric cells.

4. Discussion

CEACAM receptors are cell surface proteins expressed in various cell types including epithelial, endothelial and immune cells (e.g., leukocytes, dendritic cells) [45,46]. CEACAMs play an essential role in different biological processes, such as cell adhesion, tumor suppression, angiogenesis or leukocyte activation, and are upregulated in the tissue or in sera during cancer progression in different cancer types such as colorectal or pancreatic cancer [47,48]. Notably, CEACAMs are also surface receptors used by different gram-negative bacteria, such as Neisseria, Eschericia coli, Salmonella as well as by H. pylori to bind to the human epithelium [19,46,49]. H. pylori possesses different adhesion molecules, each with their own human cell receptor [50]. Binding of H. pylori to CEACAM receptors is mediated by the adhesin HopQ. This interaction is not only essential for binding of H. pylori to the gastric epithelium but also for cag pathogenicity island (cagPAI)-dependent CagA translocation and induction of IL8 secretion by gastric epithelial cells, thereby modulating the host immune response [19,37,39]. In this immune response, the activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway plays a crucial role, as we previously observed that this signalling pathway is important for the recruitment of immune cells to the stomach upon H. pylori infection [32]. When assessing the influence of various H. pylori virulence factors, including CagA, CagE, BabA, SabA, VacA, gGT or UreA/B on the activation of non-canonical NF-κB pathway, we observed that only a functional T4SS was required [32]. However, the role of bacterial adhesins such as HopQ was not assessed. Considering the previously reported functions of HopQ related to T4SS functionality and downstream signalling, we hypothesised in the current study whether HopQ binding to CEACAM receptors could be important for the activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. To this end, we used gastric cells expressing different levels of CEACAM receptors, as well as cells lacking CEACAMs. This approach allowed us to confirm that HopQ-CEACAM interaction is important for the activation of non-canonical NF-κB.
The involvement of HopQ in T4SS-dependent signalling was firstly reported by Begolova et al., who showed that HopQ is important for the T4SS-dependent activation of canonical NF-κB, the induction of MAPK signalling, and the secretion of IL8 [38]. More recently, Maubach et al. showed similar results [51]. Interestingly, in the latter study, a possible effect of HopQ-CEACAM binding on non-canonical NF-κB was also assessed, and it was concluded that this interaction supports activation of non-canonical NF-κB mediated by the type T4SS [51].
Importantly, we included human gastric tissue samples in our study where we could observe that activation of non-canonical NF-κB relates to expression of CEACAM1. In healthy tissue, no CEACAM1 expression was found but it was upregulated in tissue samples presenting gastric inflammation induced by H. pylori as well as in gastric adenocarcinomas, where CEACAM1 may be involved in tumor angiogenesis as reported previously [52,53]. Our in vitro data further suggest that the presence of HopQ is not only important for the activation of non-canonical NF-κB, but also for the induction of the expression of its receptor, because up-regulation of CEACAM expression upon H. pylori infection was only observed in cells where HopQ-CEACAM binding occurred. This phenomenon has been described for other pathogens and their corresponding receptors. For instance, in the respiratory tract, non-typeable Haemophilus influenza was shown to stimulate the expression of intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), which in turn functions as its receptor [54,55]. In the gastrointestinal tract, Crohn’s Disease-associated Escherichia coli was found to induce the expression of its own receptor, in this case CEACAM6, in ileal epithelial cells [56]. Nevertheless, further research is necessary to determine how HopQ-mediated upregulation of CEACAM expression occurs, paying especial attention to cytokines released and signalling pathways activated after CagA translocation into epithelial cells facilitated by the HopQ-CEACAM interaction.
Different studies support the important role of non-canonical NF-κB signalling in gastric carcinogenesis [32,33,34]. However, despite its involvement in the development and progression of other tumor entities being extensively reported [57,58], further research is necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms leading to activation of this pathway in gastric tumors, the consequences of this activation and the identification of possible therapeutic strategies that can be used for targeted treatment. Our current study sheds some light into the mechanisms important for non-canonical NF-κB activation upon H. pylori infection and suggests that blocking the HopQ-CEACAM interaction may be a promising strategy to control H. pylori-induced gastric malignancies.

5. Conclusions

The present study has addressed the question of whether H. pylori’s adhesin HopQ is involved in the activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, as this binding protein is important for the functionality of the T4SS. Our data suggest that the HopQ–CEACAM interaction plays an important role in the activation of this pathway by inducing LTβ mRNA expression as well as p100 to p52 processing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and R.M.-L.; methodology, K.T., Y.H., A.R., A.D., K.M., M.V., B.B.S.; formal analysis, K.T. and R.M.-L.; writing—original draft preparation, K.T. and R.M.-L.; writing—review and editing, K.T., M.G. and R.M.-L.; supervision, R.M.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by DFG, GE 2042 6-1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Klinikum Bayreuth (protocol code 155-20B 19 May 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Teresa Burrell for English proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hooi, J.K.Y.; Lai, W.Y.; Ng, W.K.; Suen, M.M.Y.; Underwood, F.E.; Tanyingoh, D.; Malfertheiner, P.; Graham, D.Y.; Wong, V.W.S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Takahashi-Kanemitsu, A.; Knight, C.T.; Hatakeyama, M. Molecular anatomy and pathogenic actions of Helicobacter pylori CagA that underpin gastric carcinogenesis. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cover, T.L. Helicobacter pylori Diversity and Gastric Cancer Risk. MBio 2016, 7, e01869-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Santacroce, L.; Cagiano, R.; Del Prete, R.; Bottalico, L.; Sabatini, R.; Carlaio, R.G.; Prejbeanu, R.; Vermesan, H.; Dragulescu, S.I.; Vermesan, D.; et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric MALTomas: An up-to-date and therapy highlight. Clin. Ter. 2008, 159, 457–462. [Google Scholar]
  5. Craig, V.J.; Arnold, I.; Gerke, C.; Huynh, M.Q.; Wundisch, T.; Neubauer, A.; Renner, C.; Falkow, S.; Muller, A. Gastric MALT lymphoma B cells express polyreactive, somatically mutated immunoglobulins. Blood 2010, 115, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, H.P.; Zhu, Y.L.; Shao, W. Role of Helicobacter pylori virulence factor cytotoxin-associated gene A in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 8219–8226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bailey, P.; Chang, D.K.; Nones, K.; Johns, A.L.; Patch, A.M.; Gingras, M.C.; Miller, D.K.; Christ, A.N.; Bruxner, T.J.; Quinn, M.C.; et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2016, 531, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Schistosomes, Liver Flukes and Helicobacter Pylori; IARC: Lyon, France, 1994; Volume 61, pp. 1–241. [Google Scholar]
  9. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Infection with Helicobacter Pylori; IARC: Lyon, France, 1994; Volume 61, pp. 177–240. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahmoudian, R.A.; Gharaie, M.L.; Abbaszadegan, R.; Forghanifard, M.M.; Abbaszadegan, M.R. Interaction between LINC-ROR and Stemness State in Gastric Cancer Cells with Helicobacter pylori Infection. Iran. Biomed. J. 2021, 25, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, J.; Wei, J.; Wang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wei, Z.; Hou, X.; Xu, J.; He, Y.; Yang, D. Transcriptome hallmarks in Helicobacter pylori infection influence gastric cancer and MALT lymphoma. Epigenomics 2020, 12, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Correa, P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: A multistep and multifactorial process--First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 6735–6740. [Google Scholar]
  14. Duarte, H.O.; Gomes, J.; Machado, J.C.; Reis, C.A. Gastric cancer: Basic aspects. Helicobacter 2018, 23 (Suppl. 1), e12523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sterbenc, A.; Jarc, E.; Poljak, M.; Homan, M. Helicobacter pylori virulence genes. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 4870–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wroblewski, L.E.; Peek, R.M.; Wilson, K.T. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: Factors that modulate disease risk. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 713–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Polk, D.B.; Peek, R.M. Helicobacter pylori: Gastric cancer and beyond. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Backert, S.; Clyne, M.; Tegtmeyer, N. Molecular mechanisms of gastric epithelial cell adhesion and injection of CagA by Helicobacter pylori. Cell Commun. Signal. 2011, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Javaheri, A.; Kruse, T.; Moonens, K.; Mejias-Luque, R.; Debraekeleer, A.; Asche, C.I.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Kalali, B.; Bach, N.C.; Sieber, S.A.; et al. Helicobacter pylori adhesin HopQ engages in a virulence-enhancing interaction with human CEACAMs. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Koniger, V.; Holsten, L.; Harrison, U.; Busch, B.; Loell, E.; Zhao, Q.; Bonsor, D.A.; Roth, A.; Kengmo-Tchoupa, A.; Smith, S.I.; et al. Erratum: Helicobacter pylori exploits human CEACAMs via HopQ for adherence and translocation of CagA. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Moonens, K.; Hamway, Y.; Neddermann, M.; Reschke, M.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Kruse, T.; Kammerer, R.; Mejias-Luque, R.; Singer, B.B.; Backert, S.; et al. Helicobacter pylori adhesin HopQ disrupts trans dimerization in human CEACAMs. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e98665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mueller, D.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Brandt, S.; Yamaoka, Y.; De Poire, E.; Sgouras, D.; Wessler, S.; Torres, J.; Smolka, A.; Backert, S. c-Src and c-Abl kinases control hierarchic phosphorylation and function of the CagA effector protein in Western and East Asian Helicobacter pylori strains. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tegtmeyer, N.; Backert, S. Role of Abl and Src family kinases in actin-cytoskeletal rearrangements induced by the Helicobacter pylori CagA protein. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 90, 880–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fischer, W. Assembly and molecular mode of action of the Helicobacter pylori Cag type IV secretion apparatus. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Qu, C.K. The SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatase: Signaling mechanisms and biological functions. Cell Res. 2000, 10, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lamb, A.; Chen, L.F. The many roads traveled by Helicobacter pylori to NFkappaB activation. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lamb, A.; Chen, L.F. Role of the Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammatory response in the development of gastric cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Schweitzer, K.; Sokolova, O.; Bozko, P.M.; Naumann, M. Helicobacter pylori induces NF-kappaB independent of CagA. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11, 10–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Feige, M.H.; Sokolova, O.; Pickenhahn, A.; Maubach, G.; Naumann, M. HopQ impacts the integrin alpha5beta1-independent NF-kappaB activation by Helicobacter pylori in CEACAM expressing cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 308, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rahman, M.M.; McFadden, G. Modulation of NF-kappaB signalling by microbial pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gilmore, T.D. Introduction to NF-kappaB: Players, pathways, perspectives. Oncogene 2006, 25, 6680–6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mejias-Luque, R.; Zoller, J.; Anderl, F.; Loew-Gil, E.; Vieth, M.; Adler, T.; Engler, D.B.; Urban, S.; Browning, J.L.; Muller, A.; et al. Lymphotoxin beta receptor signalling executes Helicobacter pylori-driven gastric inflammation in a T4SS-dependent manner. Gut 2017, 66, 1369–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Feige, M.H.; Vieth, M.; Sokolova, O.; Tager, C.; Naumann, M. Helicobacter pylori induces direct activation of the lymphotoxin beta receptor and non-canonical nuclear factor-kappa B signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2018, 1865, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mejias-Luque, R.; Lozano-Pope, I.; Wanisch, A.; Heikenwalder, M.; Gerhard, M.; Obonyo, M. Increased LIGHT expression and activation of non-canonical NF-kappaB are observed in gastric lesions of MyD88-deficient mice upon Helicobacter felis infection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sun, S.C. The noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 246, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sun, S.C. Non-canonical NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Tegtmeyer, N.; Ghete, T.D.; Schmitt, V.; Remmerbach, T.; Cortes, M.C.C.; Bondoc, E.M.; Graf, H.L.; Singer, B.B.; Hirsch, C.; Backert, S. Type IV secretion of Helicobacter pylori CagA into oral epithelial cells is prevented by the absence of CEACAM receptor expression. Gut Pathog. 2020, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Belogolova, E.; Bauer, B.; Pompaiah, M.; Asakura, H.; Brinkman, V.; Ertl, C.; Bartfeld, S.; Nechitaylo, T.Y.; Haas, R.; Machuy, N.; et al. Helicobacter pylori outer membrane protein HopQ identified as a novel T4SS-associated virulence factor. Cell. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1896–1912. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Hamway, Y.; Taxauer, K.; Moonens, K.; Neumeyer, V.; Fischer, W.; Schmitt, V.; Singer, B.B.; Remaut, H.; Gerhard, M.; Mejias-Luque, R. Cysteine Residues in Helicobacter pylori Adhesin HopQ are Required for CEACAM-HopQ Interaction and Subsequent CagA Translocation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Haas, R.; Meyer, T.F.; van Putten, J.P. Aflagellated mutants of Helicobacter pylori generated by genetic transformation of naturally competent strains using transposon shuttle mutagenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 8, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiang, Z.; Censini, S.; Bayeli, P.F.; Telford, J.L.; Figura, N.; Rappuoli, R.; Covacci, A. Analysis of expression of CagA and VacA virulence factors in 43 strains of Helicobacter pylori reveals that clinical isolates can be divided into two major types and that CagA is not necessary for expression of the vacuolating cytotoxin. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Censini, S.; Lange, C.; Xiang, Z.; Crabtree, J.E.; Ghiara, P.; Borodovsky, M.; Rappuoli, R.; Covacci, A. cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 14648–14653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Backert, S.; Muller, E.C.; Jungblut, P.R.; Meyer, T.F. Tyrosine phosphorylation patterns and size modification of the Helicobacter pylori CagA protein after translocation into gastric epithelial cells. Proteomics 2001, 1, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shariq, M.; Kumar, N.; Kumari, R.; Kumar, A.; Subbarao, N.; Mukhopadhyay, G. Biochemical Analysis of CagE: A VirB4 Homologue of Helicobacter pylori Cag-T4SS. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pavlopoulou, A.; Scorilas, A. A comprehensive phylogenetic and structural analysis of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 1314–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Obrink, B. CEA adhesion molecules: Multifunctional proteins with signal-regulatory properties. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1997, 9, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gebauer, F.; Wicklein, D.; Horst, J.; Sundermann, P.; Maar, H.; Streichert, T.; Tachezy, M.; Izbicki, J.R.; Bockhorn, M.; Schumacher, U. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM) 1, 5 and 6 as biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hammarstrom, S. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: Structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1999, 9, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, Q.; Wang, L.C.; Di Benigno, S.; Gray-Owen, S.D.; Stein, D.C.; Song, W. Neisseria gonorrhoeae infects the heterogeneous epithelia of the human cervix using distinct mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kalali, B.; Mejias-Luque, R.; Javaheri, A.; Gerhard, M. H. pylori virulence factors: Influence on immune system and pathology. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 426309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Maubach, G.; Sokolova, O.; Tager, C.; Naumann, M. CEACAMs interaction with Helicobacter pylori HopQ supports the type 4 secretion system-dependent activation of non-canonical NF-kappaB. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 310, 151444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guo, J.Q.; Yu, W.H.; Wang, H.J.; Liu, B.; Zhu, K.X.; Zhang, Q.H.; Zhang, T.G.; Xu, W.H.; Wang, H.B.; Wu, H.L.; et al. Different expression patterns of CEACAM1 and its impacts on angiogenesis in gastric nonneoplastic and neoplastic lesions. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 19 (Suppl. 3), S365–S374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shi, J.F.; Xu, S.X.; He, P.; Xi, Z.H. Expression of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1(CEACAM1) and its correlation with angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2014, 210, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frick, A.G.; Joseph, T.D.; Pang, L.; Rabe, A.M.; St Geme, J.W., 3rd; Look, D.C. Haemophilus influenzae stimulates ICAM-1 expression on respiratory epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 4185–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Avadhanula, V.; Rodriguez, C.A.; Ulett, G.C.; Bakaletz, L.O.; Adderson, E.E. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae adheres to intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on respiratory epithelial cells and upregulates ICAM-1 expression. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Barnich, N.; Carvalho, F.A.; Glasser, A.L.; Darcha, C.; Jantscheff, P.; Allez, M.; Peeters, H.; Bommelaer, G.; Desreumaux, P.; Colombel, J.F.; et al. CEACAM6 acts as a receptor for adherent-invasive E. coli, supporting ileal mucosa colonization in Crohn disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Wolf, M.J.; Seleznik, G.M.; Zeller, N.; Heikenwalder, M. The unexpected role of lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling in carcinogenesis: From lymphoid tissue formation to liver and prostate cancer development. Oncogene 2010, 29, 5006–5018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Fernandes, M.T.; Dejardin, E.; dos Santos, N.R. Context-dependent roles for lymphotoxin-beta receptor signaling in cancer development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1865, 204–219. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 09 01748 g001 550
Figure 1. Activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway upon H. pylori infection in MKN45 gastric cells. MKN45 cells were infected with P12 or G27 wild type H. pylori strains or isogenic mutant strains at an MOI of 10, 20 or 50 for 8 h. (a) p100 to p52 processing detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as loading control. (b) IL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. (c) A20, (d) LTβ and (e) CXCL10 and CCL2 mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to uninfected controls and calculated using the 2-ΔΔct equation. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (a,c–e) or Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s correction (b). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 1. Activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway upon H. pylori infection in MKN45 gastric cells. MKN45 cells were infected with P12 or G27 wild type H. pylori strains or isogenic mutant strains at an MOI of 10, 20 or 50 for 8 h. (a) p100 to p52 processing detected by Western blot. GAPDH was used as loading control. (b) IL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. (c) A20, (d) LTβ and (e) CXCL10 and CCL2 mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to uninfected controls and calculated using the 2-ΔΔct equation. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (a,c–e) or Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s correction (b). * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001.
Microorganisms 09 01748 g001
Microorganisms 09 01748 g002 550
Figure 2. CEACAM expression levels are upregulated upon H. pylori infection. Different gastric cancer cells were screened for basal CEACAM1, 5 and 6 mRNA (a) and protein (b) expression by qPCR and Western blot, respectively. MKN45 (c) and NUGC-4 (d) cells were infected with P12 wild type H. pylori strain, or isogenic mutant strains, at an MOI of 10 for 8 h. CEACAM1, 5 and 6 mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to GAPDH and calculated using the 2−Δct equation. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to test differences between means.
Figure 2. CEACAM expression levels are upregulated upon H. pylori infection. Different gastric cancer cells were screened for basal CEACAM1, 5 and 6 mRNA (a) and protein (b) expression by qPCR and Western blot, respectively. MKN45 (c) and NUGC-4 (d) cells were infected with P12 wild type H. pylori strain, or isogenic mutant strains, at an MOI of 10 for 8 h. CEACAM1, 5 and 6 mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to GAPDH and calculated using the 2−Δct equation. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to test differences between means.
Microorganisms 09 01748 g002
Microorganisms 09 01748 g003 550
Figure 3. Interaction of HopQ with CEACAM is important for activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. NUGC-4 and SNU1 cells were infected with P12 wild type H. pylori strain, or isogenic mutant strains, at an MOI of 10 for 8 h. (a) p100 to p52 processing was detected by Western blot. GAPDH served as a loading control and was used for normalization. (b) IL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. (c) A20 and (d) LTβ mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to uninfected controls and calculated using the 2-ΔΔct equation. (e) Binding assay. CFSE-labeled bacteria were incubated with gastric cancer cells for 30 min with shaking. After washing and fixation, samples were analyzed for GFP signal on a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex flow cytometer. (f) Representative confocal images of H. pylori P12 wild type, P12ΔhopQ, P12ΔcagA and P12ΔcagE (green) binding to MKN45 and NUGC-4 cells. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue), and cell membranes were stained with phalloidin (red). Scale bar: 50 µm. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to test differences between means. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3. Interaction of HopQ with CEACAM is important for activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. NUGC-4 and SNU1 cells were infected with P12 wild type H. pylori strain, or isogenic mutant strains, at an MOI of 10 for 8 h. (a) p100 to p52 processing was detected by Western blot. GAPDH served as a loading control and was used for normalization. (b) IL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. (c) A20 and (d) LTβ mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. All qPCR values were normalized to uninfected controls and calculated using the 2-ΔΔct equation. (e) Binding assay. CFSE-labeled bacteria were incubated with gastric cancer cells for 30 min with shaking. After washing and fixation, samples were analyzed for GFP signal on a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex flow cytometer. (f) Representative confocal images of H. pylori P12 wild type, P12ΔhopQ, P12ΔcagA and P12ΔcagE (green) binding to MKN45 and NUGC-4 cells. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue), and cell membranes were stained with phalloidin (red). Scale bar: 50 µm. Graphs show mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to test differences between means. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Microorganisms 09 01748 g003
Microorganisms 09 01748 g004 550
Figure 4. Concomitant CEACAM1 and p52 expression in human gastritis and tumor samples. Representative images of normal mucosa (n = 3), gastritis (n = 13), intestinal-type gastric cancer (GC) (n = 8), and diffuse-type GC (n = 3) tissue are shown, which were stained for CEACAM1 and p52 (NF-κB2). Scale bar: 100 µm.
Figure 4. Concomitant CEACAM1 and p52 expression in human gastritis and tumor samples. Representative images of normal mucosa (n = 3), gastritis (n = 13), intestinal-type gastric cancer (GC) (n = 8), and diffuse-type GC (n = 3) tissue are shown, which were stained for CEACAM1 and p52 (NF-κB2). Scale bar: 100 µm.
Microorganisms 09 01748 g004
Table
Table 1. List of human qPCR primers.
Table 1. List of human qPCR primers.
PrimerForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)
LTβGAG GAC TGG TAA CGG AGA CGGGG CTG AGA TCT GTT TCT GG
A20TCC TCA GGC TTT GTA TTT GAG CTCT CCC GTA TCT TCA CAG CTT
CEACAM1GCA ACA GGA CCA CAG TCA AGCCA GGG CTA CTG CTA TCA G
CEACAM5AGG CCA ATA ACT CAG CCA GT [36]GGC TTG GGC AGC TCC GC
CEACAM6CGT CGG CAT CAC GAT TGG [37]TGG GAT TGG AGG AGC TAG AAG [37]
CCL2CTT CGG AGT TTG GGT TTG CTTCAT TGT GGC CAA GGA GAT CTG
CXCL10TAT TCC TGC AAG CCA ATT TTG TCTCT TGA TGG CCT TCG ATT CTG
GAPDHGAA GGT GAA GGT CGG AGTGAA GAT GGT GAT GGG ATT TC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taxauer, K.; Hamway, Y.; Ralser, A.; Dietl, A.; Mink, K.; Vieth, M.; Singer, B.B.; Gerhard, M.; Mejías-Luque, R. Engagement of CEACAM1 by Helicobacter pylori HopQ Is Important for the Activation of Non-Canonical NF-κB in Gastric Epithelial Cells. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081748

AMA Style

Taxauer K, Hamway Y, Ralser A, Dietl A, Mink K, Vieth M, Singer BB, Gerhard M, Mejías-Luque R. Engagement of CEACAM1 by Helicobacter pylori HopQ Is Important for the Activation of Non-Canonical NF-κB in Gastric Epithelial Cells. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(8):1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taxauer, Karin, Youssef Hamway, Anna Ralser, Alisa Dietl, Karin Mink, Michael Vieth, Bernhard B. Singer, Markus Gerhard, and Raquel Mejías-Luque. 2021. "Engagement of CEACAM1 by Helicobacter pylori HopQ Is Important for the Activation of Non-Canonical NF-κB in Gastric Epithelial Cells" Microorganisms 9, no. 8: 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081748

APA Style

Taxauer, K., Hamway, Y., Ralser, A., Dietl, A., Mink, K., Vieth, M., Singer, B. B., Gerhard, M., & Mejías-Luque, R. (2021). Engagement of CEACAM1 by Helicobacter pylori HopQ Is Important for the Activation of Non-Canonical NF-κB in Gastric Epithelial Cells. Microorganisms, 9(8), 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop