Next Article in Journal
Review: Application and Prospective Discussion of Machine Learning for the Management of Dairy Farms
Next Article in Special Issue
Epidemiology and Classification of Mastitis
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Benchmarking Tool for Dairy Herd Management Using Routinely Collected Herd Records
Previous Article in Special Issue
First Molecular Detection and Characterization of Hemotropic Mycoplasma Species in Cattle and Goats from Uganda
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ani10091688
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland

by
Jan Siemionek
†,
Konrad Przywara
and
Anna Szczerba-Turek
*,†
Department of Epizootiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 13, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1688; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091688
Submission received: 15 July 2020 / Revised: 9 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Veterinary Microbiology in Farm Animals)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica derived from poultry meat is the primary cause of Salmonella infection in humans and the second most ubiquitous zoonosis in the European Union after campylobacteriosis. Wildlife animals and livestock can be a reservoir of Salmonella spp., and they can contribute to the persistence of bacteria in the environment. Salmonella spp. pathogens can also be a source of widespread infections in fur-bearing animals, such as foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and mink (Neovison vision). This study analysed the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in two Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms and the correlations between animals that tested positive for Salmonella spp and breeding results. Salmonella Heidelberg, S. Saintpaul, and S. Reading were isolated. All three serotypes are typically isolated from commercial poultry flocks. In this study, Salmonella spp. increased the risk of female infertility, but further research is needed to confirm the results. This is the first report on the prevalence of S. Heidelberg, S. Saintpaul, and S. Reading in an Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) population.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the occurrence of Salmonella spp. infections in two Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland, and to analyse the correlations between animals that tested positive for Salmonella spp and breeding results. Faecal samples were taken from 1094 clinically healthy blue foxes from the basic stock of farms A and B. Salmonella spp. were detected in 18.06% (56/310) of the samples collected in farm A and in 15.94% (125/784) of the samples collected in farm B. All isolated strains belonged to S. enterica subsp. enterica serotypes Salmonella Saintpaul (S. Saintpaul), Salmonella Reading (S. Reading), and Salmonella Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg). All three serotypes are typically isolated from commercial poultry flocks. Salmonella spp. infections significantly increased the risk of female infertility, but further research is needed to confirm the results. This is the first report on the prevalence of S. Heidelberg, S. Saintpaul, and S. Reading in faecal samples collected from Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland.

1. Introduction

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica derived from poultry meat is the primary cause of Salmonella infection in humans worldwide [1]. In 2018, 91,857 confirmed cases of Salmonella species (spp.) infections were registered in the European Union (EU), making salmonellosis the second most frequently reported zoonosis in the EU after campylobacteriosis (N = 246,571) [2]. More than 2500 serotypes have been identified to date, but most human infections are caused by only several serotypes [3]. In humans, Salmonella spp. pathogens are transmitted through food of animal origin, such as eggs, chicken, pork, or beef [4]. Salmonella spp. can be transmitted between animal species and between animals and humans, including by vectors [5,6,7]. Salmonella spp. are excreted with the faeces of healthy animals for long periods of time and can be isolated at any stage of the food chain [8,9]. Salmonella spp. are also one of the most common sources of infectious outbreaks in fur-bearing animals such as mink (Neovison vision) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes) [10]. The data on the epidemiological distribution of Salmonella spp. in mink and foxes are very limited. Salmonella spp. pathogens are transmitted when farmed animals are fed the meat of infected animals [11]. Feed of animal origin should constitute the bulk of fox diets (70–85%). The quality and composition of feed are not always strictly monitored. Feeds of low quality can introduce undesirable ingredients into the food chain. Fox feeds are composed mainly of fish, fish offal, poultry, poultry offal, abattoir offal, and cereals with mineral and vitamin supplements. These feeds are the main sources of infection in carnivorous fur-bearing animals [11,12]. Salmonella spp. infections lead to disorders of the digestive system, including abdominal and intestinal problems. Typical symptoms include diarrhoea, vomiting, and fever, but Salmonella spp. can also cause miscarriage and foetal death [10]. A high mortality rate was reported in infected newborns in the first days of life.
The objective of this study was to determine the occurrence of Salmonella spp. infections in two Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland and to analyse the correlations between animals that tested positive for Salmonella spp. and breeding results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The study was performed on 1094 fresh faecal samples obtained from the basic stock of clinically healthy and variously aged male and female Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus). The animals were bred in two farms (A and B) in the Polish region of Warmia and Mazury. The farms were selected by a veterinarian specialising in diseases of fur-bearing animals for convenience sampling. Arctic foxes were housed in individual cages according to the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 28 June 2010 [13]. All adult animals were tested only once. Between October 2014 and May 2015, a total of 310 of fresh faecal samples were collected underneath the cages occupied by 250 females and 60 males in farm A, and a total of 784 fresh faecal samples were collected underneath the cages occupied by 624 females and 160 males in farm B. Faecal samples were placed in sterile plastic tubes and transported in a refrigerator to the laboratory within 8 h.

2.2. Bacteriological Examination

Faecal samples of approximately 25 g each were initially incubated in 225 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) for 20–24 h at 37 °C under aseptic conditions. Salmonella spp. were isolated according to Polish Standards [14]. Five typical colonies were selected from each culture for further identification. Bacterial species were confirmed using the API20E biochemical test kit (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). All strains were stored at −80 °C in Brain Heart Infusion broth (Difco, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 15% glycerine (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.3. Serotyping

Serotyping was performed by agglutination using commercial sera for O and H antigens (Difco, BD, Sparks, MD), according to Kauffmann–White classification [3].

2.4. Epidemiological and Statistical Analyses

The Clopper–Pearson ‘exact’ method based on the beta distribution at a significance level of α = 0.05 and 95% confidence interval was applied in basic statistical analyses. Data were processed statistically with EpiTools open-source epidemiological calculators [15]. The correlations between the number of females that had given birth/ females that had miscarried/ infertile females vs. the number of live-born/weaned cubs of Salmonella-positive and negative females were determined in Fisher’s exact test. Relative risk and attributable risk were calculated in cohort observational studies at a significance level of α = 0.05 and 95% confidence interval using the Working in Epidemiology (WinEpi) open-source programme. The reproduction rate and the case fatality rate (CFR) in cubs were calculated based on the adopted breeding indices for fur-bearing animals.

3. Results

In farm A, 14.4% of the analysed females (36/250, 95% CI = 10.29–19.37) and 33.33% of the males (20/60, 95% CI = 21.69–46.69) tested positive for Salmonella spp. All strains belonged to Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg) (n=56). In the group of Salmonella-positive females, 55.56% had given birth (20/36, 95% CI = 38.10–72.06), 16.67% had miscarried (6/36, 95% CI = 6.37–32.81), and 27.78% were infertile (10/36, 95% CI = 14.20–45.19). In the group of Salmonella-negative females, 70.56% had given birth (151/214, 95% CI = 63.96–76.58), 14.49% had miscarried (31/214 95% CI = 10.06–19.93), and 14.95% were infertile (32/214, 95% CI = 10.46–20.45). The results of bacteriological and serological analyses are shown in Table 1.
In farm B, 16.99% of the evaluated females (106/624, 95% CI = 14.12–20.12) and 11.88% of the males (19/160, 95% CI = 7.30–17.92) tested positive for Salmonella spp. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Saintpaul (S. Saintpaul) was identified in 66.04% of the females (70/106, 95% CI = 56.20–74.96) and 68.42% of the males (13/19, 95% CI = 43.45–87.42). Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Reading (S. Reading) was identified in 33.96% of the females (36/106, 95% CI = 25.04–43.80) and 31.58% of the males (6/19, 95% CI = 12.58–56.55). The results are shown in Table 1. In the group of Salmonella-positive females, 82.08% had given birth (87/106, 95% CI = 73.43–88.85), 10.38% had miscarried (11/106, 95% CI = 5.30–17.81), and 7.55% were infertile (8/106, 95% CI = 3.31–14.33). In the group of Salmonella-negative females, 86.68% had given birth (449/518, 95% CI = 83.45–89.49), 10.23% had miscarried (53/518, 95% CI = 7.76–13.17), and 3.09% were infertile (16/518, 95% CI = 1.78–4.97). The correlations between the number of Salmonella-positive and negative females that had given birth/had miscarried/were infertile were not significant (p-values in the two-tailed test: 0.08, 0.79, 0.08 in farm A, and 0.22, 1.00, 0.04 in farm B, respectively).
The calculated risk estimates for Salmonella-positive females that had given birth/had miscarried/were infertile differed between farms. No significant differences were observed among Salmonella-positive females that had given birth/had miscarried, but in the group of infertile females, the relative risk was determined at 1.85 (95% CI = 1.00–3.43) in farm A and 2.44 (95% CI = 1.07–5.56) in farm B, respectively. The risk of infertility in Salmonella-positive females was determined at 12.82% in farm A and 4.46% in farm B, respectively.
The number of live-born/weaned cubs delivered by Salmonella-positive and negative females was determined at 3.20/3.15 and 5.23/4.85 per mother in farm A, and at 9.38/7.06 and 9.57/7.03 per mother in farm B, respectively. The results are collated in Table 1. The case fatality rate (CFR) among the offspring of Salmonella-positive and negative females was determined at 1.59% and 7.34% in farm A, and at 24.63% and 26.49% in farm B, respectively. The correlations between the number of live-born/weaned cubs delivered by Salmonella-positive and negative females were not statistically significant. Cub mortality was 23.07% higher in farm B than in farm A.

4. Discussion

The One Health approach was developed in the early 2000s with the goal of recognising the continuous, cumulative and globally interdependent interactions between causes and effects within ecosystems and their human and animal populations. This approach can be applied to food security, economic sustainability, and animal welfare [16,17]. Free-living red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) can be a reservoir of Salmonella spp. In an Italian study, Salmonella spp. were identified in 5.7% of the tested samples, in Austria at 2.1%, and in Norway at 6.5%, respectively [18,19,20]. In Poland, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in free-living foxes (Vulpes vulpes) was determined at 3.15% [21]. The prevalence of Salmonella spp. in farmed foxes reached 4.2% [22]. These studies indicate that free-living red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) harbour numerous Salmonella spp. serotypes which are also responsible for infections in Europe [23]. In the present study, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) was determined at 18.06% (56/310) in farm A, and 15.94% (125/784) in farm B. All isolated serotypes (S. Saintpaul, S. Reading, and S. Heidelberg) belonged to S. enterica subsp. enterica. The identified serotypes are commonly encountered in commercial poultry farms which are the primary reservoirs of all Salmonella spp. serotypes in different countries [24,25] and may trigger human infections around the world [25,26,27]. The presence of these poultry pathogens in foxes results from feeding these animals with poultry slaughter waste, mainly from turkey processing. In 1999 and 2009, S. Saintpaul, S. Senftenberg, S. Anatum, S. Heidelberg, S. Hadar, S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, S. Enteritidis, and S. Agona were isolated from chicken and turkey carcasses in north-eastern Poland [12,28]. In 2014 and 2016, S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Anatum, S. Kentucky, S. Infantis, and S. Mbandaka were isolated from broiler chicken flocks in the same region [29]. Warmia and Mazury is a leading producer of turkeys in Poland, and it is characterised by high availability of poultry slaughter waste, including hard waste such as heads and legs, or soft waste such as meat and bone meal. These nutritious and energy-dense feed components are often acquired and stored in poor sanitary conditions, which can lead to the contamination of entire feed lots, mainly with Salmonella rods. Hygiene standards in hatcheries and poultry processing plants have to be improved to prevent the circulation of Salmonella spp. serotypes in poultry feed, animals, and the environment [30].
Correlations between animals that tested positive for Salmonella spp and the breeding results of Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) were also determined in the study. The only statistically significant result was that in both farms, Salmonella-positive females were at higher risk of infertility. Reproductive problems have a complex aetiology in Arctic foxes, and numerous factors that affect fertility need to be controlled, including in statistical analyses. In the examined farms, CFR values were not correlated with the number of Salmonella-positive or negative females. The risk of cub mortality was around 23.07% higher in the larger farm (B), but further research is needed to confirm these results.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in the examined farms was estimated between 15.94% and 18.06%. All isolated strains were identified as serotypes S. Saintpaul, S. Reading, and S. Heidelberg of S. enterica subsp. enterica which are potentially pathogenic for humans. The risk of infertility was significantly higher in the population of Salmonella-positive females at 4.46–12.82%. This is the first report on the prevalence of S. Heidelberg, S. Saintpaul, and S. Reading in faecal samples collected from Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) farms in Poland.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and K.P.; methodology, J.S.; K.P., and A.S.-T.; software, A.S.-T.; validation, J.S., K.P., and A.S.-T.; formal analysis, J.S. and A.S.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and A.S.-T.; writing—review and editing, J.S.; K.P., and A.S.-T.; supervision, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project financially supported by Minister of Science and Higher Education in the range of the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12.000.000 PLN”.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank fox farm owners for facilitating this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Foley, S.L.; Johnson, T.J.; Ricke, S.C.; Nayak, R.; Danzeisen, J. Salmonella pathogenicity and host adaptation in chicken-associated serovars. Microbial. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 582–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2019, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Grimont, P.A.D.; Weill, F.X. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars, 9th ed.; WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur: Paris, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pires, S.M.; Vigre, H.; Makela, P.; Hald, T. Using outbreak data for source attribution of human salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis in Europe. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rubini, S.; Ravaioli, C.; Previato, S.; D’Incau, M.; Tassinari, M.; Guidi, E.; Lupi, S.; Merialdi, G.; Bergamini, M. Prevalence of Salmonella strains in wild animals from a highly populated area of north-eastern Italy. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2016, 52, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Wales, A.D.; Carrique-Mas, J.J.; Rankin, M.; Bell, B.; Thind, B.B.; Davies, R.H. Review of the carriage of zoonotic bacteria by arthropods, with special reference to Salmonella in mites, flies and litter beetles. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57, 299–314. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krawiec, M.; Kuczkowski, M.; Kruszewicz, A.G.; Wieliczko, A. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Salmonella in free-living birds in Poland. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Paulsen, P.; Smulders, F.J.M.; Hilbert, F. Salmonella in meat from hunted game: A central Europe perspective. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hilbert, F.; Smulders, F.J.M.; Chopra-Dewasthaly, R.; Paulsen, P. Salmonella in the wildlife-human interface. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dietz, H.H.; Chriél, M.; Andersen, T.H.; Jørgensen, J.C.; Torpdahl, M.; Pedersen, H.; Pedersen, K. Outbreak of Salmonella Dublin-associated abortion in Danish fur farms. Can. Vet. J. 2006, 47, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar]
  11. European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General. The Welfare of Animals Kept for Fur Production. Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. Scientific Steering Committee at Its Meeting of 12–13 December 2001. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scah_out67_en.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  12. Mikołajczyk, A.; Radkowski, M. Salmonella spp. on chicken cracasses in a processing plant in Poland. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1475–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 28 June 2010 on the Minimum Requirements for Breeding Animal Species other than the Species for which the Applicable Protection Standards have been Laid down by European Union Regulations. Polish Journal of Laws No. 116 (2010), Item 778. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20101160778/O/D20100778.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2020). (In Polish)
  14. Polish Committee for Standardization. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp.; PN-EN ISO 6579:2003; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sergeant, E.S.G. Epitools Epidemiological Calculators. Ausvet. 2018. Available online: http://epitools.ausvet.com.au (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  16. Evans, B.R.; Leighton, F.A. A history of One Health. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2014, 33, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ruegg, S.R.; McMahon, B.J.; Hasler, B.; Esposito, R.; Nielsen, L.R.; Speranza, C.I.; Ehlinger, T.; Peyre, M.; Aragrande, M.; Zinsstag, J.; et al. A Blueprint to evaluate One Health. Front. Public Health 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chiari, M.; Ferrari, N.; Giardiello, D.; Lanfranchi, P.; Zanoni, M.; Lavazza, A.; Alborali, L.G. Isolation and identification of Salmonella spp. from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) in northern Italy. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Glawischnig, W.; Lazar, J.; Wallner, A.; Kornschober, C. Cattle-derived Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin infections in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Tyrol, Austria. J. Wildl. Dis. 2017, 53, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Handeland, K.; Nesse, L.L.; Lillehaug, A.; Vikøren, T.; Djønne, B.; Bergsjø, B. Natural and experimental Salmonella Typhimurium infections in foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 132, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nowakiewicz, A.; Zięba, P.; Ziółkowska, G.; Gnat, S.; Muszyńska, M.; Tomczuk, K.; Majer Dziedzic, B.; Ulbrych, Ł.; Trościańczyk, A. Free-Living Species of Carnivorous Mammals in Poland: Red Fox, Beech Marten, and Raccoon as a Potential Reservoir of Salmonella, Yersinia, Listeria spp. and Coagulase-Positive Staphylococcus. PLoS ONE 2016, 12, e0155533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kłapeć, T.; Cholewa, A.; Kostro, K.; Karamon, J.; Zdybel, J. Występowanie pasożytów jelitowych i salmonelli w odchodach lisów i norek hodowlanych w fermach województwa lubelskiego w aspekcie ich rolniczego wykorzystania. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and Salmonella in the feaces of farm-bred foxes and mink in Lublin Voivodeship as a potential risk in agriculture use. Med. Weter. 2015, 71, 787–790. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hendriksen, R.S.; Vieira, A.R.; Karlsmose, S.; Lo Fo Wong, D.M.; Jensen, A.B.; Wegener, H.C.; Aarestrup, F.M. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: Results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 887–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Foley, S.L.; Lynne, A.M.; Nayak, R. Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, E149–E162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miller, E.A.; Elnekave, E.; Flores-Figueroa, C.; Johnson, A.; Kearney, A.; Munoz-Aguayo, J.; Tagg, K.A.; Tschetter, L.; Weber, B.P.; Nadon, C.A.; et al. Emergence of a novel Salmonella enterica serotype Reading clonal group is linked to its expansion in commercial turkey production, resulting in unanticipated human illness in North America. mSphere 2020, 5, e00056-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Thomson, R.M.; Henderson, H.J.; Smith-Palmer, A. An outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul in a Scottish childcare facility: The influence of parental under-reporting. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Etter, A.J.; West, A.M.; Burnett, J.L.; Wu, S.T.; Veenhuizen, D.R.; Ogas, R.A.; Oliver, H.F. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg food isolates associated with a Salmonellosis outbreak have enhanced stress tolerance capabilities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01065-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zdrodowska, B.; Liedtke, K.; Radkowski, M. Post-harvest Salmonella spp. prevalence in turkey carcasses in processing plant in the northeast part of Poland. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2014, 17, 181–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Witkowska, D.; Kuncewicz, M.; Żebrowska, J.P.; Sobczak, J.; Sowińska, J. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in broiler chicken flocks in northern Poland in 2014–2016. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sławoń, J.; Saba, L.; Bis-Wencel, H.; Wencel, C. Pałeczki Salmonella w środowisku ferm mięsożernych zwierzat futerkowych. Salmonella spp. occurrence on farms of fur-bearing carnivourous animals. Med. Weterynaryjna 1994, 5, 545–548. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and reproductive success in Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus).
Table 1. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and reproductive success in Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus).
Reproductive Success
Total		Farm A
Females
250		Farm A
Males
60		Farm B
Females
624		Farm B
Males
160
Salmonella-
Negative		Salmonella-
Positive		Salmonella-
Negative		Salmonella-
Positive		Salmonella-
Negative		Salmonella-
Positive		Salmonella-
Negative		Salmonella-
Positive
Total21436402051810614119
No. offemalesthat gave birth15120----44987----
No. of females that miscarried316----5311----
No. of infertile females3210----168----
No. of live-born cubs/No. of females that
gave birth		790/151 = 5.2364/20 = 3.2----4299/449 = 9.57816/87 = 9.38----
No. of weaned puppies/No. of females
that gave birth		732/151 = 4.8563/20 = 3.15----3160/449 = 7.03615/87 = 7.06----
Case fatality rate (CFR)7.341.56----26.4924.63
S. enterica subsp. enterica serotype
Saintpaul 70 13
Reading 36 6
Heidelberg 36 20

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siemionek, J.; Przywara, K.; Szczerba-Turek, A. The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland. Animals 2020, 10, 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091688

AMA Style

Siemionek J, Przywara K, Szczerba-Turek A. The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091688

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siemionek, Jan, Konrad Przywara, and Anna Szczerba-Turek. 2020. "The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland" Animals 10, no. 9: 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091688

APA Style

Siemionek, J., Przywara, K., & Szczerba-Turek, A. (2020). The Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Two Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) Farms in Poland. Animals, 10(9), 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091688

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop