Erratum: Gravrok, J., et al. Beyond the Benefits of Assistance Dogs: Exploring Challenges Experienced by First-Time Handlers. Animals 2019, 9, 203

The authors wish to make the following corrections [1]:

• In

  Table 1. Demographic information for case study participants.

  Case Study	Type of AD	Handler Gender	Adult/Child	Participants	Code	Time of Interview (mo. Post AD Placement)	Mode of Interview
  1	Seizure alert dog	Male	Young Adult	Handler	H1	6 12	In person In person
  				Parent	P1	6 12	In person In person
  				Instructor	ADI1	8	In person
  2	Psychosocial AD	Male	Middle Age Adult	Handler	H2	6 12	In person In person
  				Parent	P2	6 12	In person In person
  				Carer	C2	7	Phone
  				Instructor	ADI2	6 12	Phone In person
  3	Mobility AD	Female	Adult	Handler	H3	6 12	In person Phone
  				Instructor	ADI3	6	In person
  4	Medical alert dog	Male	Child (age 12)	Handler	H4	6	In person
  				Parent	P4	6	In person
  				Instructor	ADI4	6	In person
  5	Guide dog	Male	Young Adult	Handler	H5	6 12	Phone Phone
  				Parent	P5	6	Phone
  6	Medical alert dog	Female	Young Adult	Handler	H6	6	In person
  				Parent	P6	6 12	Phone Phone
  				Other 2	O6	6	Phone
  7	Guide dog	Female	Child (age 14) 1	Handler	H7	8 14	In person Phone
  				Parent	P7	8	In person
  				Instructor	ADI7	8	In person
  				Other 3	O7	8	In person

  ¹ the handler was 14 years old at 8 months, 15 years old at 14 months; ² the AD organization’s psychologist; ³ the handler’s learning support educator at school.

  , under case study 4, the code was originally labeled as H8, P8 and ADI 8; these labels should be H4, P4 and ADI 4, respectively. Please see the corrected Table 1 below. The codes were used correctly in the text.
• In the first paragraph of 3.1.3 Hospital Admissions, the sentence “Even the handler who kept the dog with him during the hospital admission noted a regression in training.” should be removed. This was an error.
• The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.