Next Article in Journal
Helminths of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) from Units of Conservation Management and Sustainable Use of Wildlife Installed in the Eastern Economic Region of Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
Muscle Cortisol Levels, Expression of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Oxidative Stress Markers in the Teleost Fish Argyrosomus regius Exposed to Transport Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Dog Bite Incidents in Chile: Factors Related to the Patterns of Human-Dog Relationship
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mucosal Hallmarks in the Alimentary Canal of Northern Pike Esox lucius (Linnaeus)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Salinity, Temperature and Ammonia Acute Stress Response in Seabream (Sparus aurata) Juveniles: A Multidisciplinary Study

1
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
2
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science (BCA), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, I-35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
3
Valle Ca’ Zuliani Società Agricola Srl, I-34074 Monfalcone, Gorizia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These two authors equally contributed to the study.
Animals 2021, 11(1), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010097
Submission received: 19 November 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 2 January 2021 / Published: 6 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho-Physiological Evaluation of Fish Welfare)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) is a teleost fish of great relevance in marine aquaculture, especially in the Mediterranean area and one of the most important farmed food marine species in Europe. Nevertheless, in captivity fish are usually exposed to stressful conditions, with a consequent negative impact on animal welfare and growth. The principal goal of this study was to shed light on the acute stress response of gilthead seabream juveniles exposed to different stressors using a multidisciplinary approach. For this purpose, gilthead seabream have been exposed to three different stress tests (temperature, salinity, and ammonia changes) and several laboratory techniques have been used to evaluate their growth and stress response. Results revealed that all the tested stressors had an impact on fish growth and health, particularly thermic and chemical exposure, whereas salinity seems to have a minor effect since this species can efficiently face with extreme variations in environmental salinity. The present work aimed to obtain relevant information on acute stress response of gilthead seabream to be used for improving farming condition and ensuring fish welfare.

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the acute response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles exposed to temperature, salinity and ammonia stress. Radioimmunoassay was used to evaluate cortisol levels, whereas insulin-like growth factors (igf1 and igf2), myostatin (mstn), heat-shock protein 70 (hsp70) and glucocorticoid receptor (gr) gene expression was assessed trough Real-Time PCR. The presence and localization of IGF-I and HSP70 were investigated by immunohistochemistry. In all the stress conditions, a significant increase in cortisol levels was observed reaching higher values in the thermic and chemical stress groups. Regarding fish growth markers, igf1 gene expression was significantly higher only in fish subjected to heat shock stress while, at 60 min, igf2 gene expression was significantly lower in all the stressed groups. Temperature and ammonia changes resulted in a higher mstn gene expression. Molecular analyses on stress response evidenced a time dependent increase in hsp70 gene expression, that was significantly higher at 60 min in fish exposed to heat shock and chemical stress. Furthermore, the same experimental groups were characterized by a significantly higher gr gene expression respect to the control one. Immunostaining for IGF-I and HSP70 antibodies was observed in skin, gills, liver, and digestive system of gilthead seabream juveniles.

1. Introduction

The worldwide decline of marine fisheries stocks has provided stimulus for rapid growth in fish and shellfish farming. Particularly, global production of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) has reached 237,049 tonnes in 2018 primarily from aquaculture activities [1]. In the Mediterranean area, the production of seabream ranges from extensive polyculture (e.g., vallicoltura in Italy and lagoon production in Egypt) or semi-intensive production in earth ponds (Portugal and southern Spain) to highly intensive land-based systems (raceways or tanks), inshore (Greece and Turkey) and offshore sea cages (Cyprus, Italy and Spain).
An extensive literature is available about fish biology of stress and physiological and behavioural responses to a wide variety of physical, chemical and biological stressors, both in wild and captivity conditions (including aquaculture) [2,3,4,5,6]. In particular, water quality is one of the most important contributors to fish welfare; temperature, salinity and ammonia represent, in fact, the most common water parameters affecting physiological stress. Thermal and osmotic stress take place when water temperature or salinity, respectively, exceed the optimal ranges, modifying the normal physiological functions and triggering energy-consuming stress responses [7].
As a result of global climate change, it is predicted that variations in temperature and salinity could be important causes of stress in aquaculture [8,9], possibly affecting fish production. Moreover, temperature and salinity are considered abiotic crucial factors which may affect the development and survival of fish during larval growth [10,11,12].
In addition, rises in water temperature, salinity and pH led to ammonia concentration increase [7]. Ammonia is the main end product of nitrogen metabolism in marine teleosts and reduced growth was observed in fish exposed to increased ammonia levels for a short period [13,14].
Variations in water quality parameters (temperature, salinity, ammonia content) can induce fish growth reduction influencing the expression of insulin-like growth factors (igf1 and igf2) and myostatin (mstn) [14,15,16,17,18,19] by the activation of stress response system. In fish, both IGF complex and myostatin play a key role in growth regulation [10,20,21,22,23]. The IGF complex includes the two highly conserved primary ligands (IGF-I and IGF-II), high-affinity transmembrane receptors that belong to the insulin/IGF receptor family and six IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP-1 to -6) [22,24,25]. In fish, IGF-I is mainly produced in liver, although numerous other organs express this molecule as well [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. IGF-II shows a structural sequence similar to that of IGF-I and, in fish, exhibits a ubiquitous expression and acts mainly as a growth factor [29,33,34,35,36]. Myostatin is a member of the TGF-β superfamily and, in fish, its expression has been observed in several organs such as brain, eyes, exocrine and endocrine pancreas, gills, gonads, heart, intestine, kidney, liver, oesophagus, pharynx, skin, spleen, stomach and muscle fish explants [37,38,39,40,41,42].
The primary stress response in fish involves the release of catecholamines and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–interrenal (HPI) axis. Corticotropin releasing factor from the hypothalamus acts on the pituitary to synthesize and release corticotropic hormone, which in turn stimulates the synthesis and mobilization of glucocorticoid hormones (cortisol in teleost fish) from the interrenal cells [2,43]. Cortisol acts as an agonist of glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR is a member of nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors and it regulates gene transcription interacting with glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) or with numerous cytosolic proteins including chaperones, kinases, phosphatases and proteasome [44] to recover homeostasis and HPI axis functioning [45,46].
At cellular level, the stress response is mediated by the heat shock proteins (HSPs), a family of highly conserved proteins that are present in all cells in all life forms [3,47,48,49]. In fish, a variation in HSP70 expression has been observed not only after exposure to thermal shock [3], but also as a consequence of an osmotic shock [50,51,52] or after an ammonia stress exposure [14,53,54].
In this study, the effect of acute changes in temperature, salinity and ammonia, within a range that is likely to be found in a fish farm, were investigated in gilthead seabream juveniles. Particularly, the role of these abiotic factors on growth markers and short-term stress response was investigated through a multidisciplinary approach including: (i) Radioimmunoassay (RIA) to evaluate cortisol levels; (ii) Real-time PCR to evaluate gr, hsp70, igf1, igf2 and mstn gene expression (iii) immunohistochemistry to evaluate the cellular localization of HSP70 and IGF-I.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics

All procedures involving animals were conducted in line with the Italian legislation and approved by the Ethics Committee of Università Politecnica delle Marche and the Italian Ministry of Health (prot. No AQUASTRESS/2013).

2.2. Experimental Design and Sampling

Gilthead seabream juveniles (n = 600; 70 dph; mean weight 0.25 g) were provided by the Valle Cà Zuliani Società Agricola s.r.l. (Monfalcone, Go) and transported to the Department of Life and Environmental Sciences (Ancona) in aerated tanks.
Fish have been acclimated for 25 days in four 200 L tanks equipped with mechanical biological and UV filtration (Panaque, Viterbo, Italy) and fed (2% body weight) with a commercial diet (Perla 4.0–5.0, Skretting) three times a day before the stress tests. Water parameters were kept constant and daily controlled (temperature 19 °C; salinity 30 ppt; ammonia: <0.02 mg/L; nitrates 10 mg/L). Finally, 24 h before the stress test, fish were starved and transferred in three 100 L tanks per experimental treatment (control, salinity, temperature and ammonia).
Fish were then subjected to lower salinity (20‰), higher temperature (28 °C) and higher ammonia concentration (1.5 mg/L), respectively. The degree of changes of each stressor has been selected on the basis of adverse conditions expected in a commercial farm. Temperature increase (2 °C/10 min) was obtained by the use of a 1000 W heaters (Prodac, Cittadella, Padova, Italy), while salinity was decreased by gradually adding distilled water (2 ppt/min). High ammonia concentration was gained by adding water obtained by macerating commercial feed over the days before the stress test (20 L/10 min). The beginning of the test was set at the reach of the stress conditions for each experimental group (20‰ of salinity, 28 °C of water temperature and 1.5 mg/L of ammonia, respectively).
At 0–30 and 60 min from the beginning of the test, 10 fish per tank (30 fish per experimental group) were euthanized with a lethal dose of MS222 (300 mg/L) and properly stored for further analyses.

2.3. Cortisol

For cortisol analyses, 10 whole body fish per experimental group were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Whole body cortisol was measured by a specific microtiter radioimmunoassay (RIA) as described by Bertotto et al. [18]. Each fish was thawed out and pulverized in liquid nitrogen, and 100 mg of the resulting powders were suspended in 1 mL phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.2) and extracted with 8 mL of diethyl ether. The dry extracts were dissolved in PBS and used for RIAs. Briefly, a 96-well microtiter plate (Optiplate, Perkin Elmer Life Sciences) was coated with anti-rabbit c-globulin serum raised in a goat (dilution 1:1000 in 0.15 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 9, at 4 °C) and, after PBS double washing, incubated overnight at 4 °C with the specific antiserum solution. Standards, quality controls, unknown extracts and 3H tracers were then added and, after overnight incubation at 4 °C, the plate was washed with PBS, added with 200 µL scintillation cocktail (Microscint 20, Perkin Elmer Life Sciences) and counted on a beta-counter (Top-Count, Perkin Elmer Life Sciences).
The anti-cortisol serum showed the following cross-reactions: cortisol 100%, prednisolone 44.3%, 11-deoxycortisol 13.9%, cortisone 4.95%, corticosterone 3.5%, prednisone 2.7%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone 1.0%, 11-deoxycorticosterone 0.3%, dexamethasone 0.1%, progesterone < 0.01%, 17-hydroxypregnenolone < 0.01%, pregnenolone < 0.01%.
To validate steroid determination in seabream juveniles’ whole body, competitive dose-response binding curves were created by serial extract dilutions of seabream (parallelism test) and the intra-inter-assays and recovery tests were performed.

2.4. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

RNA extraction was performed according to Piccinetti et al. [55]. Total RNA extraction from 5 seabream juveniles’ whole body (randomly collected from each of the 3 tanks) was optimized using RNAzol RT reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, R4533) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The total RNA extracted was eluted in 40 μL of RNase-free water (Qiagen). Final RNA concentrations were determined by NanoPhotometerTM P-Class (Implen, München, Germany). RNA integrity was verified by ethidium bromide staining of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA bands on 1% agarose gel. RNA was stored at −80 °C until use. Total RNA was treated with DNAse (10 IU at 37 °C for 10 min, MBI Fermentas). Finally, 5 μg of RNA were used for cDNA synthesis using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy).

2.5. Real-Time PCR

PCRs were performed with SYBR Green in an iQ5 iCycler thermal cycler (both from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), in triplicate according to Maradonna et al. [56]. Reactions were set on a 96-well plate by mixing, for each sample, 1 μL cDNA diluted 1:20, 5 μL of 2× concentrated iQ TM SYBR Green Supermix containing SYBR Green as the fluorescent intercalating agent, 0.3 μM forward primer and 0.3 μM reverse primer. The thermal profile for all reactions was 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C and 20 s at 72 °C. Fluorescence was monitored at the end of each cycle. Dissociation curve analysis showed a single peak in all cases.
Relative quantification of the expression of genes involved in fish stress response (gr and hsp70) and growth (igf1, igf2 and mstn), was performed using β-actin and 18s as the housekeeping genes to standardize results by removing variation in mRNA and cDNA quantity and quality [57]. Amplification products were sequenced, and homology was verified. No amplification product was detected in negative controls and no primer-dimer formation was found in control templates. Data were analysed using the iQ5 optical system software version 2.0 including Genex Macro iQ5 Conversion and Genex Macro iQ5 files (all from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primer sequences were designed using Primer3 (210 v. 0.4.0, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) starting from seabream sequences available in GenBank. Primers were used at a final concentration of 10 pmol μL−1 (for sequences, please see Table 1).

2.6. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

For immunohistochemistry, 5 seabream juveniles’ whole body per experimental group were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 4 °C overnight, washed in PBS, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Consecutive sections were cut at a thickness of 4 μm using a microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Elite ABC KIT system (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). Before applying the primary antibodies, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the sections in 3% H2O2 in PBS. Non-specific binding sites were blocked by incubating the sections in normal goat serum (Dakocytomation, Milano, Italy). Sections were then incubated with the primary antisera (monoclonal anti HSP70 dilution 1:600, Stressgen Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, USA; polyclonal anti IGF-1 dilution 1:200, Ibt System, Reutlingen, Germany), overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with biotin-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit Ig antibodies (Dakocytomation), washed with PBS and reacted with peroxidase-labeled avidin-biotin complex (Vector Laboratories). The immunoreactive sites were visualized using a freshly prepared solution of 10 mg of 3.3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB, Sigma, Milano, Italy) in 15 mL of a 0.5 M Tris buffer at pH 7.6, containing 1.5mL of 0.03% H2O2. To ascertain structural details, sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin.
The specificity of the immunostaining was verified by incubating sections with: (i) PBS instead of the specific primary antibodies; (ii) pre-immune sera instead of the primary antisera; (iii) PBS instead of the secondary antibodies. The results of these controls were negative (i.e., staining was abolished).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data from cortisol analysis have been subjected to analysis of variance by using a Linear Model of R software (R Core Team2019) with stress type and sampling time as main factors. Data from Real-time PCR analyses were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (with stress factor and sampling time as explanatory variable) followed by Tukey’s and Dunnett’s test for time course and sampling point analysis, respectively, with a statistical software package, SigmaStat 3.1 (Systat Software, Chicago, IL, USA). All data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Differences among means with p < 0.05 were accepted as being statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cortisol

The cortisol assay showed acceptable parallelism and reproducibility (linear regression curve y = 19.2x − 0.2; regression coefficient R2: 0.99; CV % intra-assay = 5.8; CV % inter-assay = 13.9). The recovery test with value higher than 75% confirmed the efficiency of steroid extraction method. As reported in Figure 1, cortisol levels showed a significant increase related to the time in thermal and ammonia stress groups with respect to control both at 30 and 60 min (all p < 0.001) but not in the salinity group. In post stress sampling times, the salinity group cortisol level significantly differed from the others (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001) except to that of control at 60 min post stress. Significant differences were detected also between thermal and ammonia stress groups at 60 min (p < 0.001) but not at 30 min (Figure 1).

3.2. Real-Time PCR Results

3.2.1. Stress Response

The glucocorticoid receptor (gr) gene expression (Figure 2A) showed a time-related significant (p < 0.05) decrease in control group, from 0 to 60 min treatment. Salinity and thermic stress groups did not show significant changes in gr transcript during the trial, while ammonia stress groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in gr gene expression after 60 min treatment. As regards differences within the same sampling point, at both 0 and 30 min, no significant differences were observed among the experimental groups. Differently, at 60 min, both thermic and ammonia stress groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) higher gr gene expression with respect to control and salinity stress groups (Figure 2A).
Considering hsp70 gene expression (Figure 2B), control and salinity stress groups did not show significant changes neither in time nor within the same sampling points. During the time course, a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increasing of hsp70 gene expression in both thermic (after 30 and 60 min) and ammonia (after 60 min) stress groups was observed. Considering differences within the same sampling time, a significantly (p < 0.05) higher hsp70 gene expression was evident in the thermic stress (at both 30 and 60 min) and ammonia (only at 60 min) groups respect to the other ones.

3.2.2. Fish Growth Markers

As regards both igf1 and igf2 gene expression (Figure 3A,B), significant differences during the time course and within the same sampling time were detected only after 60 min treatment. In fact, both time course and time point analysis, evidenced a significant increase (p < 0.05) of igf1 transcript in thermic stress group after 60 min treatment respect to the other sampling points (0 and 30 min) (Figure 3A). Differently, a significant increasing (p < 0.05) of igf2 gene expression (Figure 3B) was observed in control and ammonia groups at 60 compared to 0 and 30 min of stress treatment. Furthermore, at 60 min, all the groups subjected to a stress condition showed a significantly (p < 0.05) lower igf2 gene expression respect to control group.
Regarding mstn gene expression (Figure 3C), time course analysis showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase after 30-min treatment followed by a significant decrease after 60-min treatment in thermic stress group, while in ammonia stress group, a significant (p < 0.05) increase of mstn gene expression was detectable only after 60-min treatment. Considering differences within the same sampling time, a significantly (p < 0.05) higher mstn gene expression was evident in the thermic stress (at both 30 and 60 min) and ammonia (only at 60 min) groups respect to the other ones.

3.3. Immunohistochemistry

3.3.1. HSP70 Immunohistochemistry

In general, HSP70 immunoreactivity was expressed in skin, gills, liver and digestive system of both controls and stressed animals with a higher intensity in stressed animals than in controls. Instead, the lateral muscle, cartilages and connective tissue of control groups did not show any HSP70 expression (Table 2).
In particular, at cellular level, immunoreactivity to HSP70 antibody was detected in: (i) the epithelial cells of skin (Figure 4A); (ii) scattered cells of gill epithelium at the level of primary and secondary lamellae (Figure 4B); (iii) scattered cells of the gastric epithelium of stomach as well as in the gastric pits (Figure 4C); (iv) the rodlet cells scattered throughout the intestinal epithelium of ammonia stressed animals (Figure 4D). The hepatocytes of liver parenchyma showed an immunopositivity too (insert in Figure 4D).

3.3.2. IGF-I Immunohistochemistry

In general, an intense immunoreactivity was present in the skin, gills, and digestive system of stressed fish, whereas no reactivity was found in control animals at the level of trunk musculature, cartilages, and dense connective tissue, regardless of the stress experimental condition (Table 2). In particular, at cellular level, the anti-IGF-1 antibody revealed an immunostaining in: (i) the epithelial cells of skin (Figure 5A); (ii) scattered cells of gill epithelium at the level of primary and secondary lamellae (Figure 5B); (iii) the cytoplasm of cells lining the lumen of the stomach as well as in the cytoplasm of gastric pits (Figure 5C); (iv) the cytoplasm of enterocytes (Figure 5D). Moreover, rodlet cells imunoreactivity to IGF-I antibody was detected in the intestine epithelium of fish subjected to ammonia stress (Figure 5D). The parenchyma of liver showed an immunopositivity at the level of the cytoplasm of the hepatocytes (Figure 5D).

4. Discussion

In aquaculture practices, temperature and salinity changes and increasing ammonia concentrations are considered important fish stressors [58]. Changes in temperature and salinity can affect metabolism, growth and survival of cultured fish while short-term ammonia exposure can cause oxidative stress and apoptosis and altered osmoregulatory function [59,60]. Regardless of the stress factor, the primary response is the activation of HPI axis which releases corticosteroid hormones like cortisol [2,61]. Cortisol is one of the most commonly used biomarkers to detect a stressful situation in fish [18,62,63,64], but it is well known that also gene expression of stress markers like hsp70 and gr can be considered a prized indicator to better understand fish cellular and physiological status [65,66]. The determining role of cortisol in the stress response has been confirmed also in the present study. In fact, fish exposed to short-term changes of temperature and ammonia, similar to those that can possibly occur in a commercial farm, were characterized by higher levels of this hormone respect to control already after 30 min of treatment. Increases of cortisol due to changes in these two environmental factors have been already reported in other species as black seabream (Spondyliosoma cantharus), blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala), brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [59,67,68,69,70]. Acute change in salinity failed to increase cortisol significantly confirming the euryhalinity of the gilthead seabream [71,72].
The cortisol results in the present study are supported by molecular ones that evidenced a significantly increased gr gene expression in the same groups (temperature and ammonia) at 60 min of treatment, further highlighting that cortisol acts through glucocorticoid receptors and elevates GR transcript levels [73,74]. Furthermore, to confirm the stress response, temperature and ammonia groups were characterized also by a significant time dependent increase in the hsp70 gene expression at 60 min. In teleost fish, in addition to the HPI axis activation, acute stressors may act at a cellular level causing a higher synthesis of heat shock proteins in order to offer the cell a protection in stress conditions [75,76,77]. Among all the HSPs, the HSP70 inducible isoform is frequently activated by thermal stress and temperature-induced increases in hsp70 gene expression have been detected in different fish species [18,78]. In the present study, increased temperature elevated the hsp70 gene expression level already at 30 min confirming the sensitivity of this indicator to the thermal shock [3,18]. In accordance with our results, different studies reported increased HSP70 transcriptions in fish exposed to ammonia [59,79]. As regards salinity stress, no significant changes in gr and hsp70 gene expression were evident with respect to control according to the observed cortisol levels. As previously suggested, this result is justified by the fact that Sparus aurata is an euryhaline teleost able to easily cope with extreme changes in environmental salinity [71,72].
The primary function of fish responses to variable stress factors is to adapt metabolism to face the energy requirement and to maintain homeostasis [80]. At this regard, it is well known that a physiological link between stress and growth-related genes exists [32]. Teleost species subjected to various stress factors usually evidence increased serum cortisol levels which have been associated to a suppression of the somatotropic axis [81,82,83]. The mechanisms through which glucocorticoids inhibit growth may involve the GH/IGF-I/IGFBP network [84]. For this reason, the influence of acute stress on igfs expression has been investigated in different fish species evidencing, in most cases, a downregulation in fish exposed to different stressors as, among them, temperature or salinity changes or high ammonia levels [17,82,85,86,87,88]. Accordingly, in the present study, igf2 gene expression was significantly lower in groups subjected to a stress condition with respect to control after 60 min of treatment. Differently, igf1 gene expression was significantly higher even if only in the thermic stress group. At this regard, it should be pointed out that igf1 expression is regulated by GH hormone and increases with the onset of the post-natal growth [89,90]. Juveniles fish show faster growth rate with increased temperature which can be considered as the major external factor influencing growth [91]. On this regard, it has been demonstrated that, in fish under optimal nutritional status, temperature can increase plasma GH levels with a consequent stimulation of igf1 gene expression [92,93]. Finally, the higher mstn gene expression observed in thermic and ammonia stress groups could be related to the higher cortisol level detected in the same experimental groups. Glucocorticoids in fact strongly regulate myostatin transcript levels in mammals via glucocorticoid response elements (GR Es) in the myostatin promoter, and this has been demonstrated in several fish species, suggesting a possible direct regulation of cortisol on muscle growth also in these animals [94,95,96,97].
Given the importance of HSP70 and IGF-I in describing fish growth and welfare [30,77,98], in the present work the localization of these proteins has been investigated by immunohistochemistry. Immunopositivity for HSP70 and IGF-I antibodies was detected in several tissues and organs of gilthead seabream juveniles, regardless of the experimental condition. Considering IGF-I, an intense reactivity was present in the skin, gills, and digestive system of stressed fish, whereas no reactivity was found in control animals at the level of trunk musculature, cartilages, and dense connective tissue. Immunopositivity was detected also in the parenchyma of liver. Specifically, a strong IGF-I immunoreactivity was evident in the epithelial cells of skin, stomach (including the gastric pits) and intestine, in the epithelium of both primary and secondary lamellae of gills, and in the hepatocytes of liver. These results are in agreement with those in literature [29,30,99,100,101], where a similar pattern of IGF-I immunostaining was observed in Sparus aurata and other fish species, thus attesting the role of IGF-I in the regulation of fish somatic growth, regardless of whether the animal is stressed or not. As to HSP70, it was expressed in skin, gills, liver and digestive system of both controls and stressed animals. Instead, the lateral muscle, cartilages and connective tissue of control groups did not show any HSP70 expression. The same immunohistochemical localization of HSP70 has been found by Fiocchi et al. [102] in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) exposed to manipulation and temperature changes. In fact, they observed both a weak presence of immunoprecipitates in the control groups and an increased immunopositivity in gills, liver and intestine of heat shock stressed fish. This notable increase of immunoprecipitates in the skin, gills, liver and intestine was evident also in other studies [77,103,104] of fish exposed to abiotic stress (environmental pollution and transport). Moreover, rodlet cells imunoreactivity to both IGF-I and HSP70 antibodies was detected in the intestine epithelium of fish subjected to ammonia stress. This result is consistent with those of Fiocchi et al. [102] from sea bass exposed to a different stressor, i.e., temperature, confirming that the appearance of these cells is commonly related to stressful conditions [102,103,105,106,107,108].

5. Conclusions

Short term exposure of seabream juveniles to changes in temperature and ammonia induced a stress response attested by a significant increase in cortisol, gr and hsp70 gene expression levels within 60 min of treatment. The reduction in salinity did not evoke a significant response indicating the euryhaline characteristics of this species. Stress also produced variations in the transcripts of genes linked to growth but with less marked and clear trends, as is often reported in the literature. Considering the potential variability of the environmental factors tested in the farm, it will be necessary to carry out similar studies in the future to explore the response of animals after exposure to medium and long term stress conditions.

Author Contributions

Planning of the experimental design, I.O., G.R. and D.B.; fish trial, I.O., G.R., D.B. and S.C.; molecular biology and statistical analysis, I.O. and M.Z.; molecular biology statistical analysis, S.R.; cortisol analysis, E.N.; immunohistochemical analysis, M.B. and C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, I.O., M.B., M.Z., G.R., D.B.; funding acquisition, I.O., G.R. and D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by project Fondi di Ateneo to Daniela Bertotto and by Project Fondi di Ateneo 2014 to Ike Olivotto.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Italian legislation and approved by the Ethics Committee of Università Politecnica delle Marche and the Italian Ministry of Health (prot. No AQUASTRESS, date of approval 14.06.2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article. If needed, supplementary material is available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to dedicate this work to Chiara Carla Piccinetti, a friend and colleague that recently passed away.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; p. 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wendelaar Bonga, S.E. The stress response in fish. Physiol. Rev. 1997, 77, 591–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Iwama, G.K.; Thomas, P.T.; Forsyth, R.B.; Vijayan, M.M. Heat shock protein expression in fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1998, 8, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Olivotto, I.; Mosconi, G.; Maradonna, F.; Cardinali, M.; Carnevali, O. Diplodus sargus interrenal-pituitary response: Chemical communication in stressed fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 127, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Piccinetti, C.C.; Ricci, L.A.; Tokle, N.; Radaelli, R.; Pascoli, P.; Cossignani, L.; Palermo, F.; Mosconi, G.; Nozzi, V.; Raccanello, F.; et al. Malnutrition may affect common sole (Solea solea L.) growth, pigmentation and stress response: Molecular, biochemical and histological implications. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2012, 161, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Piccinetti, C.C.; Grasso, L.; Maradonna, F.; Radaelli, G.; Ballarin, C.; Chemello, G.; Evjemo, J.O.; Carnevali, O.; Olivotto, I. Growth and stress factors in ballan wrasse (Labrus bergylta) larval development. Aquacult. Res. 2017, 48, 2567–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Portz, D.E.; Woodley, C.M.; Cech, J.J. Stress-associated impacts of short-term holding on fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2006, 16, 125–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Noyes, P.D.; McElwee, M.K.; Miller, H.D.; Clark, B.W.; Van Tiem, L.A.; Walcott, K.C.; Erwin, K.N.; Levin, E.D. The toxicology of climate change: Environmental contaminants in a warming world. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 971–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elhakeem, A.; Elshorbagy, W. Evaluation of the long-term variability of seawater salinity and temperature in response to natural and anthropogenic stressors in the Arabian Gulf. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 76, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olivotto, I.; Di Stefano, M.; Rosetti, S.; Cossignani, L.; Pugnaloni, A.; Giantomassi, F.; Carnevali, O. Live prey enrichment, with particular emphasis on HUFAs, as limiting factor in False percula clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris, Pomacentridae) larval development and metamorphosis: Molecular and biochemical implications. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2011, 159, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rosemore, B.J.; Welsch, C.A. The effects of rearing density, salt concentration, and incubation temperature on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryo development. Zebrafish 2012, 9, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Schmidt, K.; Starck, J.M. Developmental plasticity, modularity, and heterochrony during the phylotypic stage of the zebra fish, Danio rerio. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2010, 314, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Foss, A.; Imsland, K.; Roth, B.; Schram, E.; Stefansson, S.O. Effects of chronic and periodic exposure to ammonia on growth and blood physiology in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquaculture 2009, 296, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Randazzo, B.; Chemello, G.; Tortarolo, I.; Chiarello, G.L.; Zalas, M.; Santini, A.; Liberatore, M.; Liberatore, M.; Selli, E.; Olivotto, I. A novel photocatalytic purification system for fish culture. Zebrafish 2017, 14, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Larsen, D.A.; Beckman, B.R.; Dickhoff, W.W. The effect of low temperature and fasting during the winter on metabolic stores and endocrine physiology (insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and thyroxine) of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 123, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davis, K.B.; Peterson, B.C. The effect of temperature, stress, and cortisol on plasma IGF-I and IGFBPs in sunshine bass. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 149, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Breves, J.P.; Hirano, T.; Grau, E.G. Ionoregulatory and endocrine responses to disturbed salt and water balance in Mozambique tilapia exposed to confinement and handling stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2010, 155, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bertotto, D.; Poltronieri, C.; Negrato, E.; Richard, J.; Pascoli, F.; Simontacchi, C.; Radaelli, G. Whole body cortisol and expression of HSP70, IGF-I and MSTN in early development of sea bass subjected to heat shock. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 174, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sinha, A.K.; Liew, H.J.; Diricx, M.; Kumar, V.; Darras, V.M.; Blust, R.; De Boeck, G. Combined effects of high environmental ammonia, starvation and exercise on hormonal and ion-regulatory response in goldfish (Carassius auratus L.). Aquat. Toxicol. 2012, 15, 114–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Castillo, J.; Codina, M.; Martinez, M.L.; Navarro, I.; Gutiérrez, J. Metabolic and mitogenic effects of IGF-I and insulin on muscle cells of rainbow trout. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, 286, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, C.Y.; Hu, S.Y.; Gong, H.Y.; Chen, M.H.C.; Lu, J.K.; Wu, J.L. Suppression of myostatin with vector-based RNA interference causes a double-muscle effect in transgenic zebrafish. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 387, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moriyama, S.; Ayson, F.G.; Kawauchi, H. Growth regulation by insulin-like growth factor-I in fish. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Falcinelli, S.; Randazzo, B.; Vargas Abúndez, J.A.; Cangiotti, G.; Olivotto, I.; Carnevali, O. Kluyveromyces fragilis RNA extract supplementation promotes growth, modulates stress and inflammatory response in zebrafish. Aquacult. Res. 2018, 49, 1521–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peter, R.E.; Marchant, T.A. The endocrinology of growth in carp and related species. Aquaculture 1995, 129, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reinecke, M.; Collet, C. The phylogeny of the insulin-like growth factors. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1998, 183, 1–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Duan, C. Nutritional and developmental regulation of insulin-like growth factor in fish. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 306S–314S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Duguay, S.J.; Lai-Zhang, J.; Steiner, D.F.; Funkenstein, B.; Chan, S.J. Developmental and tissue-regulated expression of IGF-I and IGF-II mRNAs in Sparus aurata. J. Mol Endocrinol. 1996, 16, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Funkenstein, B.; Almuly, R.; Chan, S.J. Localization of IGF-I and IGF-I receptor mRNA in Sparus aurata larvae. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1997, 107, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patruno, M.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Funkenstein, B.; Radaelli, G. Cloning and expression of insulin-like growth factors I and II in the shi drum (Umbrina cirrosa). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 137, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patruno, M.; Sivieri, S.; Poltronieri, C.; Sacchetto, R.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Martinello, T.; Funkenstein, B.; Radaelli, G. Real-time polymerase chain reaction in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical localization of insulin-like growth factor-I and myostatin during development of Dicentrarchus labrax (Pisces: Osteichthyes). Cell Tissue Res. 2008, 331, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reinecke, M.; Schmid, A.; Ermatinger, R.; Loffin-Cueni, D. Insulin-like growth factor I in the teleost Oreochromis mossambicus the tilapia: Gene sequence tissue expression and cellular localization. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 3613–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reinecke, M.; Björnsson, B.T.; Dickhoff, W.W.; McCormick, S.D.; Navarro, I.; Power, D.M.; Gutiérrez, J. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors in fish: Where we are and where to go. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2005, 142, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Radaelli, G.; Domeneghini, C.; Arrighi, S.; Bosi, G.; Patruno, M.; Funkenstein, B. Localization of IGF-I, IGF-I receptor and IGFBP-2 in developing Umbrina cirrosa (Pisces: Osteichthyes). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2003, 130, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carnevali, O.; Cardinali, M.; Maradonna, F.; Parisi, M.; Olivotto, I.; Polzonetti-Magni, A.M.; Mosconi, G. Hormonal regulation of hepatic IGF-I and IGF-II gene expression in the marine teleost Sparus aurata. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2005, 71, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wood, A.W.; Duan, C.; Bern, H.A. Insulin-like growth factor signaling in fish. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2005, 243, 215–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Radaelli, G.; Poltronieri, C.; Bertotto, D.; Funkenstein, B.; Simontacchi, C. Cellular localization of insulin-like growth factor-II protein in the sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) from hatching to adult. Histol. Histopathol. 2008, 23, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Maccatrozzo, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Cardazzo, B.; Rizzo, G.; Patarnello, T. A novel second myostatin gene is present in teleost fish. FEBS Lett. 2001, 509, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Maccatrozzo, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Radaelli, G.; Mascarello, F.; Patarnello, T. Characterization of the myostatin gene in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): Sequence genomic structure and expression pattern. Mar Biotechnol. 2001, 3, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Roberts, S.B.; Goetz, F.W. Differential skeletal muscle expression of myostatin across teleost species and the isolation of multiple myostatin isoforms. FEBS Lett. 2001, 491, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Radaelli, G.; Rowlerson, A.; Mascarello, F.; Patruno, M.; Funkenstein, B. Myostatin precursor is present in several tissues in teleost fish: A comparative immunolocalization study. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 311, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Funkenstein, B.; Balas, V.; Skopal, T.; Radaelli, G.; Rowlerson, A. Long-term culture of muscle explants from Sparus aurata. Tissue Cell 2006, 38, 399–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garikipati, D.K.; Gahr, S.A.; Roalson, E.H.; Rodgers, B.D. Characterization of rainbow trout myostatin-2 genes (rtMSTN-2a and -2b): Genomic organization differential expression and pseudogenization. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 2106–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Schreck, C.B. Stress and compensation in teleostean fishes: Response to social and physical factors. In Stress and Fish; Pickering, A.D., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1981; pp. 295–321. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yudt, M.R.; Cidlowski, J.A. The glucocorticoid receptor: Coding a diversity of proteins and responses through a single gene. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002, 16, 1719–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Heitzer, M.D.; Wolf, I.M.; Sanchez, E.R.; Witchel, S.F.; DeFranco, D.B. Glucocorticoid receptor physiology. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2007, 8, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Krug, R.G.; Poshusta, T.L.; Skuster, K.J.; Berg, M.R.; Gardner, S.L.; Clark, K.J. A transgenic zebrafish model for monitoring glucocorticoid receptor activity. Genes Brain Behav. 2014, 13, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Morimoto, R.I.; Tissieres, A.; Georgopoulos, C. Stress Proteins in Biology and Medicine; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1990; p. 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Feder, M.E.; Hofmann, G.E. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: Evolutionary and ecological physiology. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 1999, 61, 243–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zarantoniello, M.; Bruni, L.; Randazzo, B.; Vargas, A.; Gioacchini, G.; Truzzi, C.; Annibaldi, A.; Riolo, P.; Parisi, G.; Cardinaletti, G.; et al. Partial Dietary Inclusion of Hermetia illucens (Black Soldier Fly) Full-Fat Prepupae in Zebrafish Feed: Biometric, Histological, Biochemical, and Molecular Implications. Zebrafish 2018, 15, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Smith, T.R.; Tremblay, G.C.; Bradley, T.M. Hsp70 and a 54 kDa protein (Osp54) are induced in salmon (Salmo salar) in response to hyperosmotic stress. J. Exp. Zool. 1999, 284, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Basu, N.; Nakano, T.; Grau, E.G.; Iwama, G.K. The effects of cortisol on heat shock protein 70 levels in two fish species. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 24, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Larsen, P.F.; Nielsen, E.E.; Williams, T.D.; Loeschcke, V. Intraspecific variation in expression of candidate genes for osmoregulation, heme biosynthesis and stress resistance suggests local adaptation in European flounder (Platichthys flesus). Heredity 2008, 101, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sung, Y.Y.; Roberts, R.J.; Bossier, P. Enhancement of Hsp70 synthesis protects common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., against lethal ammonia toxicity. J. Fish Dis. 2012, 35, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qin, C.; Zhao, D.; Gong, Q.; Qi, Z.; Zou, Y.; Yue, X.; Xie, B. Effects of pathogenic bacterial challenge after acute sublethal ammonia-N exposure on heat shock protein 70 expression in Botia reevesae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Piccinetti, C.C.; Montis, C.; Bonini, M.; Laurà, R.; Guerrera, M.C.; Radaelli, G.; Vianello, F.; Santinelli, V.; Maradonna, F.; Nozzi, V.; et al. Transfer of Silica-Coated Magnetic (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles through Food: A Molecular and Morphological Study in Zebrafish. Zebrafish 2014, 11, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Maradonna, F.; Gioacchini, G.; Falcinelli, S.; Bertotto, D.; Radaelli, G.; Olivotto, I.; Carnevali, O. Probiotic supplementation promotes calcification in Danio rerio larvae: A molecular study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M. The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Eissa, N.; Wang, H.P. Transcriptional stress responses to environmental and husbandry stressors in aquaculture species. Rev. Aquac. 2016, 8, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jia, R.; Liu, B.-L.; Han, C.; Huang, B.; Lei, J.-L. Effects of ammonia exposure on stress and immune response in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 3149–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Hou, X.; Xue, X.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z. Interactive effects of temperature and salinity on the survival, oxidative stress, and Na+/K+–ATPase activity of newly hatched obscure puffer (Takifugu obscurus) larvae. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 45, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Galhardo, L.; Oliveira, R.F. Psychological stress and welfare in fish. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 11, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Simontacchi, C.; Negrato, E.; Pazzaglia, M.; Bertotto, D.; Poltronieri, C.; Radaelli, G. Whole-body concentrations of cortisol and sex steroids in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus, Richardson 1836) during early development and stress response. Aquacult. Int. 2009, 17, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Eissa, N.; Wang, H.P. Physiological stress response of Yellow Perch subjected to repeated handlings and salt treatments at different temperatures. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2013, 75, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Long, L.; Zhang, H.; Ni, Q.; Liu, H.; Wu, F.; Wang, X. Effects of stocking density on growth, stress, and immune responses of juvenile Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) in a recirculating aquaculture system. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 219, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Eissa, N.; Wang, H.P.; Yao, H.; Shen, Z.G.; Shaheen, A.A.; Abou-ElGheit, E.N. Expression of Hsp70, Igf1, and three oxidative stress biomarkers in response to handling and salt treatment at different water temperatures in yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zarantoniello, M.; Zimbelli, A.; Randazzo, B.; Compagni, M.D.; Truzzi, C.; Antonucci, M.; Riolo, P.; Loreto, N.; Osimani, A.; Milanović, V.; et al. Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) reared on roasted coffee by-product and Schizochytrium sp. as a sustainable terrestrial ingredient for aquafeeds production. Aquaculture 2020, 518, 734659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chadwick, J.G.; Nislow, K.H., Jr.; McCormick, S.D. Thermal onset of cellular and endocrine stress responses correspond to ecological limits in brook trout, an iconic cold-water fish. Conserv. Physiol. 2015, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shi, Q.; Wen, X.; Zhu, D.; Aweya, J.J.; Li, S. Protective effects of Sargassum horneri against ammonia stress in juvenile black sea bream, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mirghaed, A.T.; Fayaz, S.; Hoseini, S.M. Effects of dietary 1,8-cineole supplementation on serum stress and antioxidant markers of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) acutely exposed to ambient ammonia. Aquaculture 2019, 509, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jia, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Meng, Z.; Huang, B.; Guan, C. Physiological response of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L) during hyperthermal stress. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Arjona, F.J.; Ruiz-Jarabo, I.; Páscoa, I.; Gonçalves, O.; Martín del Río, M.P.; Mancera, J.M. Seasonal variation in osmoregulatory and metabolic parameters in earthen pond-cultured gilthead sea bream Sparus auratus. Aquac. Res. 2009, 40, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Arjona, F.J.; Ruiz-Jarabo, I.; García-Lopez, A.; Flik, G.; Mancera, J.M. Water temperature affects osmoregulatory responses in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 88, 102526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Aluru, N.; Vijayan, M.M. Hepatic transcriptome response to glucocorticoid receptor activation in rainbow trout. Physiol. Genom. 2007, 31, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Faught, E.; Vijayan, M.M. Mechanisms of cortisol action in fish hepatocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 199, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cara, J.B.; Aluru, N.; Moyano, F.J.; Vijayan, M.M. Food-deprivation induces HSP70 and HSP90 protein expression in larval gilthead sea bream and rainbow trout. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 142, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Todgham, A.E.; Schulte, P.M.; Iwama, G.K. Cross-tolerance in the tidepool sculpin: The role of heat shock proteins. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2005, 78, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Poltronieri, C.; Negrato, E.; Bertotto, D.; Majolini, D.; Simontacchi, C.; Radaelli, G. Immunohistochemical localization of constitutive and inducible Heat Shock Protein 70 in carp (Cyprinus carpio) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to transport stress. Eur. J. Histochem. 2008, 52, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nakano, K.; Takemura, A.; Nakamura, S.; Nakano, Y.; Iwama, G.K. Changes in the cellular and organismal stress responses of the subtropical fish, the Indo-Pacific sergeant, Abudefduf vaigiensis, due to the 1997-1998 El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2004, 70, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, C.N.; Li, X.F.; Tian, H.Y.; Zhang, D.D.; Jiang, G.Z.; Lu, K.L.; Liu, G.X.; Liu, W.B. Effects of fructooligosaccharide on immune response, antioxidant capability and HSP70 and HSP90 expressions of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) under high ammonia stress. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 41, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tort, L.; Teles, M. Genomic Responses to Stress Challenges in Fish. In Functional Genomics in Aquaculture; Saroglia, M., Liu, Z.J., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mommsen, T.P.; Vijayan, M.M.; Moon, T.W. Cortisol in teleosts: Dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1999, 9, 211–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Link, K.; Berishvili, G.; Shved, N.; D’Cotta, H.; Baroiller, J.F.; Reinecke, M.; Eppler, E. Seawater and freshwater challenges affect the insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGF-II in liver and osmoregulatory organs of the tilapia. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 327, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pujante, I.M.; Martos-Sitcha, J.A.; Moyano, F.J.; Ruiz-Jarabo, I.; Martínez-Rodríguez, G.; Mancera, J.M. Starving/re-feeding processes induce metabolic modifications in thick-lipped grey mullet (Chelon labrosus, Risso 1827). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 180, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Peterson, B.C.; Small, B.C. Effects of exogenous cortisol on the GH/IGF-I/IGFBP network in channel catfish. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2005, 28, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cao, Y.B.; Chen, X.Q.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.C.; Wang, Y.X.; Chang, J.P.; Du, J.Z. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor of naked carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) in Lake Qinghai: Expression in different water environments. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2009, 161, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Saera-Vila, A.; Calduch-Giner, J.A.; Prunet, P.; Pérez-Sánchez, J. Dynamics of liver GH/IGF axis and selected stress markers in juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) exposed to acute confinement. Differential stress response of growth hormone receptors. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 154, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Cheng, C.H.; Yang, F.F.; Liao, S.A.; Miao, Y.T.; Ye, C.X.; Wang, A.L. Effect of acute ammonia exposure on expression of GH/IGF axis genes GHR1, GHR2 and IGF-1 in pufferfish (Takifugu obscurus). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 41, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sadoul, B.; Vijayan, M.M. Stress and Growth. In Fish Physiology; Schreck, C.B., Tort, L., Farrell, A.P., Brauner, C.J., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2016; Volume 35, pp. 167–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pierce, A.L.; Breves, J.P.; Moriyama, S.; Hirano, T.; Grau, E.G. Differential regulation of Igf1 and Igf2 mRNA levels in tilapia hepatocytes: Effects of insulin and cortisol on GH sensitivity. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 211, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Nipkow, M.; Wirthgen, E.; Luft, P.; Rebl, A.; Hoeflich, A.; Goldammer, T. Characterization of igf1 and igf2 genes during maraena whitefish (Coregonus maraena) ontogeny and the effect of temperature on embryogenesis and igf expression. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2018, 40, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gabillard, J.-C.; Weil, C.; Rescan, P.Y.; Navarro, I.; Gutierrez, J.; Le Bail, P.Y. Does the GH/IGF system mediate the effect of water temperature on fish growth? A review. Cybium 2005, 29, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gabillard, J.C.; Weil, C.; Rescan, P.Y.; Navarro, I.; Gutiérrez, J.; Le Bail, P.Y. Environmental temperature increases plasma GH levels independently of nutritional status in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2003, 133, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gabillard, J.C.; Weil, C.; Rescan, P.Y.; Navarro, I.; Gutiérrez, J.; Le Bail, P.Y. Effects of environmental temperature on IGF1, IGF2, and IGF type I receptor expression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2003, 133, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Garikipati, D.K.; Gahr, S.A.; Rodgers, B.D. Identification characterization and quantitative expression analysis of rainbow trout myostatin-1a and myostatin-1b genes. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 190, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Funkenstein, B.; Balas, V.; Rebhan, Y.; Pliatner, A. Characterization and functional analysis of the 5′ flanking region of Sparus aurata myostatin-1 gene. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 153, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. De Santis, C.; Jerry, D.R. Differential tissue-regulation of myostatin genes in the teleost fish Lates calcarifer in response to fasting. Evidence for functional differentiation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011, 335, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Galt, N.J.; McCormick, S.D.; Froehlich, J.M.; Biga, P.R. A comparative examination of cortisol effects on muscle myostatin and HSP90 gene expression in salmonids. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016, 237, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Poltronieri, C.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Simontacchi, C.; Bertotto, D.; Funkenstein, B.; Radaelli, G. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis and immunohistochemical localization of HSP70 in sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax exposed to transport stress. Eur. J. Histochem. 2007, 51, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Perrot, V.; Moiseeva, E.B.; Gozes, Y.; Chan, S.J.; Ingleton, P.; Funkenstein, B. Ontogeny of the insulin-like growth factor system (IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGF-IR) in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata): Expression and cellular localization. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1999, 116, 445–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Radaelli, G.; Patruno, M.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Funkenstein, B. Expression and cellular localization of insulin-like growth factor-II protein and mRNA in Sparus aurata during development. J. Endocrinol. 2003, 178, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Radaelli, G.; Poltronieri, C.; Simontacchi, C.; Negrato, E.; Pascoli, F.; Libertini, A.; Bertotto, D. Immunohistochemical localization of IGF-I, IGF-II and MSTN proteins during development of triploid sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Eur. J. Histochem. 2010, 54, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Fiocchi, E.; Civettini, M.; Carbonara, P.; Zupa, W.; Lembo, G.; Manfrin, A. Development of molecular and histological methods to evaluate stress oxidative biomarkers in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Fish Physiol Biochem. 2020, 46, 1577–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Giari, L.; Simoni, E.; Manera, M.; Dezfuli, B.S. Histocytological responses of Dicentrarchus labrax (L.) following mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Boscolo Papo, M.; Bertotto, D.; Quaglio, F.; Vascellari, M.; Pascoli, F.; Negrato, E.; Binato, G.; Radaelli, G. Histopathology and stress biomarkers in the clam Venerupis philippinarum from the Venice Lagoon (Italy). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 39, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Iger, Y.; Abraham, M. Rodlet cells in the epidermis of fish exposed to stressors. Tissue Cell 1997, 29, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Manera, M.; Dezfuli, B.S. Rodlet cells in teleosts: A new insight into their nature and functions. J. Fish. Biol. 2004, 65, 597–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Dezfuli, B.S.; Simoni, E.; Giari, L.; Manera, M. Effects of experimental terbuthylazine exposure on the cells of Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Chemosphere 2006, 64, 1684–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Poltronieri, C.; Laurà, R.; Bertotto, D.; Negrato, E.; Simontacchi, C.; Guerrera, M.C.; Radaelli, G. Effects of exposure to overcrowding on rodlet cells of the teleost fish Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Vet. Res. Commun. 2009, 33, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cortisol concentrations in the different experimental groups of seabream juveniles at each sampling times (0, 30- and 60-min post stress). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Cortisol concentrations in the different experimental groups of seabream juveniles at each sampling times (0, 30- and 60-min post stress). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 00097 g001
Figure 2. Relative mRNA levels of genes involved in stress response analysed in seabream juveniles: (A) gr and (B) hsp70. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 15). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Relative mRNA levels of genes involved in stress response analysed in seabream juveniles: (A) gr and (B) hsp70. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 15). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 00097 g002
Figure 3. Relative mRNA levels of genes involved in fish growth analysed in seabream juveniles: (A) igf1; (B) igf2 and (C) mstn. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 15). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Relative mRNA levels of genes involved in fish growth analysed in seabream juveniles: (A) igf1; (B) igf2 and (C) mstn. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 15). Different letters denote statistically significant differences in time course analysis (lowercase) or within the same sampling point (uppercase) (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 00097 g003
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization of HSP70 in Sparus aurata. All panels are counterstained with haematoxylin. (A) control fish. HSP70 immunoreactivity in the epithelium of the skin (asterisks); the lateral muscle is negative (arrowheads); (B) control fish. The epithelium lining both primary and secondary lamellae shows an immunoreactivity (asterisks); (C) thermal stressed fish. Gastric pits (asterisks) and liver parenchyma (arrowheads) exhibit an immunopositivity to HSP70 antibody; (D) ammonia stressed fish and as inserted a salinity stressed fish. Intestinal rodlet cells (asterisks) and hepatocytes are immunopositive (arrowheads). Bars: 200 μm for all panels.
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization of HSP70 in Sparus aurata. All panels are counterstained with haematoxylin. (A) control fish. HSP70 immunoreactivity in the epithelium of the skin (asterisks); the lateral muscle is negative (arrowheads); (B) control fish. The epithelium lining both primary and secondary lamellae shows an immunoreactivity (asterisks); (C) thermal stressed fish. Gastric pits (asterisks) and liver parenchyma (arrowheads) exhibit an immunopositivity to HSP70 antibody; (D) ammonia stressed fish and as inserted a salinity stressed fish. Intestinal rodlet cells (asterisks) and hepatocytes are immunopositive (arrowheads). Bars: 200 μm for all panels.
Animals 11 00097 g004
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical localization of IGF-I in Sparus aurata. All panels are counterstained with haematoxylin. (A) control fish. In the skin, immunopositivity was localized at the level of the epithelium (asterisks), whereas the trunk musculature is negative (arrowheads); (B) thermal stressed fish. In gills, the epithelium of primary and secondary lamellae showed an immunoreactivity (asterisks); (C) salinity stressed fish. The epithelium of the stomach shows immunoreactivity to IGF-I antibody (arrowheads); a positivity was also evident in the gastric pits (asterisks); (D) ammonia stressed fish. Enterocytes (arrowheads), intestine rodlet cells (asterisks) and liver parenchyma (arrows) showing strong immunoreactivity to IGF-I antibody. Bars: 40 μm (A), 200 μm (B), 200 μm (C), 200 μm (D).
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical localization of IGF-I in Sparus aurata. All panels are counterstained with haematoxylin. (A) control fish. In the skin, immunopositivity was localized at the level of the epithelium (asterisks), whereas the trunk musculature is negative (arrowheads); (B) thermal stressed fish. In gills, the epithelium of primary and secondary lamellae showed an immunoreactivity (asterisks); (C) salinity stressed fish. The epithelium of the stomach shows immunoreactivity to IGF-I antibody (arrowheads); a positivity was also evident in the gastric pits (asterisks); (D) ammonia stressed fish. Enterocytes (arrowheads), intestine rodlet cells (asterisks) and liver parenchyma (arrows) showing strong immunoreactivity to IGF-I antibody. Bars: 40 μm (A), 200 μm (B), 200 μm (C), 200 μm (D).
Animals 11 00097 g005
Table 1. Primers sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Primers sequences used in this study.
GeneForward Primer (5′–3′)Reverse Primer (5′–3′)
gr5′- GCCTTTTGGCATGTACTCAAACC -3′5′- GGACGACTCTCCATACCTGTTC -3′
hsp705′- GTACGGTCTGGACAAAGGCA -3′5′- GGTTCTCTTGGCCCTCTCAC -3′
igf15′- AGCCCAGAGACCCTGTGC -3′5′- CAGCTCACAGCTTTGGAAGCA -3′
igf25′- TGGGATCGTAGAGGAGTGTTGT -3′5′- CTGTAGAGAGGTGGCCGACA -3′
mstn5′- GGCCTGGACTGTGATGAGAA -3′5′- GCATGTTGATGGGTGACATC -3′
β-act5′- GGTACCCATCTCCTGCTCCAA -3′5′- GAGCGTGGCTACTCCTTCACC -3′
18s5′- GTGAGGTTTCCCGTGTTGAG -3′5′- GACCATAAACGGTGCCAACT -3′
Table 2. Immunohistochemical localizations of HSP70 and IGF-I in different tissues of Sparus aurata (control and stressed animals): −, not detectable; +/−, slight but above background levels; +, moderate staining; ++ marked staining.
Table 2. Immunohistochemical localizations of HSP70 and IGF-I in different tissues of Sparus aurata (control and stressed animals): −, not detectable; +/−, slight but above background levels; +, moderate staining; ++ marked staining.
TissueCtrlSalinity StressTemperature StressAmmonia Stress
HSP70IGF-IHSP70IGF-IHSP70IGF-IHSP70IGF-I
Skin+++++++++++++++
Muscle
Gills+++++++++++++++
Stomach+/−++++++++++++
Intestine+/−++++++++++++
Liver+/−+++++++++++++
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zarantoniello, M.; Bortoletti, M.; Olivotto, I.; Ratti, S.; Poltronieri, C.; Negrato, E.; Caberlotto, S.; Radaelli, G.; Bertotto, D. Salinity, Temperature and Ammonia Acute Stress Response in Seabream (Sparus aurata) Juveniles: A Multidisciplinary Study. Animals 2021, 11, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010097

AMA Style

Zarantoniello M, Bortoletti M, Olivotto I, Ratti S, Poltronieri C, Negrato E, Caberlotto S, Radaelli G, Bertotto D. Salinity, Temperature and Ammonia Acute Stress Response in Seabream (Sparus aurata) Juveniles: A Multidisciplinary Study. Animals. 2021; 11(1):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zarantoniello, Matteo, Martina Bortoletti, Ike Olivotto, Stefano Ratti, Carlo Poltronieri, Elena Negrato, Stefano Caberlotto, Giuseppe Radaelli, and Daniela Bertotto. 2021. "Salinity, Temperature and Ammonia Acute Stress Response in Seabream (Sparus aurata) Juveniles: A Multidisciplinary Study" Animals 11, no. 1: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010097

APA Style

Zarantoniello, M., Bortoletti, M., Olivotto, I., Ratti, S., Poltronieri, C., Negrato, E., Caberlotto, S., Radaelli, G., & Bertotto, D. (2021). Salinity, Temperature and Ammonia Acute Stress Response in Seabream (Sparus aurata) Juveniles: A Multidisciplinary Study. Animals, 11(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop