Goose Embryonic Development, Glucose and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations, and Eggshell Features Depend on Female Age and Laying Period
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Goose Farm and Egg Collection
2.2. Egg Incubation and Sample Collection
2.3. Glucose, T3, and T4 Hormones Concentration
2.4. Embryo Assessment
- embryo (%),
- CAM (%),
- yolk sack (%),
- heart (%),
- liver (%).
2.5. Statistics
3. Results
3.1. Glucose and T3 and T4 Hormone Concentration
3.1.1. Glucose
3.1.2. Triiodothyronine (T3) and Thyroxine (T4)
3.2. Embryo Assessment
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sechman, A.; Bobek, S. Concentration of thyroid hormones in the yolk of avarian follicles during the ovulatory cycle of hen. [Stężenie hormonów tarczycy w żółtku pęcherzyków jajnikowych kury w czasie cyklu owulacyjnego]. Zesz. Nauk. Przeg. Hod. 1997, 31, 115–120. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Christensen, V.L.; Donaldson, W.E.; McMurtry, J.P. Physiological differences in late embryos from turkey breeders at different ages. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czarnecki, C.M. Influence of exogenous T4 on body weight, feed consumption, T4 levels, and myocardial glycogen in furazolidone-fed turkey poults. Avian Dis. 1991, 35, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Króliczewska, B. Selected hormones in embryonic development and bird growth. [Wybrane hormony w rozwoju embrionalnym i wzroście ptaków]. Pol. Drob. 2014, 11, 8–13. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Gardahaut, M.F.; Fontaine-Perus, J.; Rouaud, T.; Bandman, E.; Ferrand, R. Developmental modulation of myosin expression by thyroid hormone in avian skeletal muscle. Development 1992, 115, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, S.M.; Taylor, J.M.; Tapscott, S.J.; Gurley, C.M.; Carter, W.J.; Peterson, C.A. Selective accumulation of MyoD and Myogenin mRNAs in fast and slow adult skeletal muscle is controlled by innervation and hormones. Development 1993, 118, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stockdale, F.E. Myogenic cell lineages. Dev. Biol. 1992, 154, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.W. The endocrine regulation of chicken growth. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 23, 1668–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, D.B.; King, C.R. Thyroidal influence on early muscle growth of chickens. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1976, 21, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, V.L.; Donaldson, W.E.; Nestor, K.E. Embryonic viability and metabolism in turkey lines selected for egg production or growth. Poult. Sci. 1993, 72, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, V.L.; Wineland, M.J.; Fasenko, G.M.; Donaldson, W.E. Egg storage effects on plasma glucose and supply and demand tissue glycogen concentrations of broiler embryos. Poult. Sci. 2001, 80, 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morris, T.R. Environmental control for layers. World Poult. Sci. J. 2004, 60, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olanrewaju, H.A.; Thaxton, J.P.; Dozier, W.A.; Purswell, J.L.; Roush, W.B.; Branton, S.L. A review of lighting programs for broiler production. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 4, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
- Buyse, J.; Kuhn, E.R.; Decuypere, E. The use of intermittent lighting in broiler raising. 1. Effect on broiler performance and efficiency of nitrogen retention. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manser, C.E. Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: A review. Anim. Welf. 1996, 5, 341–360. [Google Scholar]
- Powell, D.J.; Velleman, S.G.; Cowieson, A.J.; Singh, M.; Muir, W.I. Influence of chick hatch time and access to feed on broiler muscle development. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1433–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hulet, R.; Gladys, G.; Hill, D.; Meijerhof, R.; El-Shiekh, T. Influence of Egg Shell Embryonic Incubation Temperature and Broiler Breeder Flock Age on Posthatch Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucharska-Gaca, J.; Adamski, M.; Biesek, J. The age of the geese from the parent flock and the laying period affect the features of the eggs. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rząsa, J.; Sechman, A.; Bednarczyk, M.; Mika, M.; Rosiński, A.; Paczoska-Eliasiewicz, H. Pattern of plasma thyroid and gonadal hormones concentrations during embryogenesis in two strains of white Italian goose. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 35–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyns, G.E.; Venken, K.; Morreale de Escobar, G.; Kuhn, E.R.; Darras, V.M. Dynamics and regulation of intercellular thyroid hormone concentrations in embryonic chicken liver, kidney, brain and blood. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 2003, 134, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.W.; McMurtry, J.P.; Coon, C.N. Developmental changes of plasma insulin, glucagon, insulin-like growth factors, thyroid hormones and glucose concentrations in chick embryos and hatched chicks. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Groef, B.; Grommen, S.V.H.; Darras, V.M. Hatching the cleidoic egg: The role of thyroid hormones. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yahav, S.; Collin, A.; Shinder, D.; Picard, M. Thermal manipulations during broiler chick embryogenesis: Effects of timing and temperature. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1959–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietras, M.; Herbut, E.; Barowicz, T. Effect of thyrotropin releasing hormone on the level of thyroid hormones, oxygen consumption and growth of broiler cockerels reared under various thermal conditions. [Wpływ hormonu uwalniającego tyreotropinę na poziom hormonów tarczycy, zużycie tlenu i wzrost kogutów brojlerów odchowywanych w różnych warunkach termicznych]. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 1996, 23, 77–86. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Tong, Q.C.; Romanini, E.; Exadaktylos, V.; Bahr, C.; Berckmans, D.; Bergoug, H.; Eterradossi, N.; Roulston, N.; Verhelst, R.; McGonnell, I.M.; et al. Embryonic development and the physiological factors that coordinate hatching in domestic chickens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 3, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, H.R. Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, post-hatching growth and hatchability. World Poult. Sci. J. 1997, 47, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nangsuay, A.; Ruangpanit, Y.; Meijerhof, R.; Attamangkune, S. Yolk absorption and embryo development of small and large eggs originating from young and old breeder hens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 2648–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonis, A.; Dmoch, M. Role and significance of yolk sac in the pre- and posthatching periods in chickens. [Rola i znaczenie woreczka żółtkowego w okresie pre- i postnatalnym piskląt]. Życie Wet. 2007, 82, 666–667. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Şahan, U.; Ipek, A.; Sozcu, A. Yolk sac fatty acid composition, yolk absorption, embryo development, and chick quality during incubation in eggs from young and old broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2069–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadgary, L.; Cahaner, A.; Kedar, O.; Uni, Z. Yolk sac nutrient composition and fat uptake in late-term embryos in eggs from young and old broiler breeder hens. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2441–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morita, V.S.; Boleli, I.C.; Cargnelutti Filho, A. Hematological values and body, heart and liver weights of male and female broiler embryos of young and old breeder eggs. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2009, 11, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, B.P.; Fairchild, B.D.; Wilson, J.L.; Dozier, W.A.; Buhr, R.J. Breeder age and zinc source in broiler breeder hen diets on progeny characteristics at hatching. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2004, 13, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Burggren, W.W. Hypoxic level and duration differentially affect embryonic organ system development of the chicken (Gallus gallus). Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 3191–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mróz, E.; Łepek, G. Control of allantoic development in goose eggs. [Kontrola rozwoju omoczni w jajach gęsich]. Zesz. Nauk. Przeg. Hod. 1999, 45, 177–178. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Mortola, J.P.; Awam, K.A. Growth of the chicken embryo: Implications of egg size. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2010, 156, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tullett, S.G.; Deeming, D.C. Failure to turn eggs during incubation: Effects on embryo weight, development of the chorioallantois and absorption of albumen. Brit. Poult. Sci. 1987, 28, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, P.D.; Perry, G.C.; Koutoulis, K.C. Correlations between yolk size and age, egg weight or body weight at sexual maturity. Brit. Poult. Sci. 1998, 39, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reidy, T.R.; Atkinson, J.L.; Leeons, S. Size and components of poultry yolk sac. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latour, M.A.; Peebles, E.D.; Boyle, C.R.; Doyle, S.M.; Pansky, T.; Brake, J.D. Effects of breeder hen age and dietary fat on embryonic and neonatal broiler serum lipids and glucose. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Dea, E.E.; Fasenko, G.M.; Feddes, J.J.R.; Robinson, F.E.; Segura, J.C.; Ouellette, C.A.; Van Middelkoop, J.H. Investigating the eggshell conductance and embryonic metabolism of modern and unselected domestic avian genetic strains at two flock ages. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 2059–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulmer-Franco, A.M.; Fasenko, G.M.; O’Dea, E.E. Hatching egg characteristics, chick quality, and broiler performance at 2 breeder flock ages and from 3 egg weights. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doskocil, M.; Blazek, J.; Nĕmcová, P.; Stárková, B. Structure of the hen’s egg shell and its changes during incubation. A scanning electron microscope study. Anat. Anz. 1985, 159, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gualhanone, A.; Furlan, R.L.; Fernandez-Alarcon, M.F.; Macari, M. Effect of breeder age on eggshell thickness, surface temperature, hatchability and chick weight. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2012, 14, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakulska, E.; Badowski, J.; Bielińska, H.; Bednarczyk, M. Influence of age on physical characteristics of eggs and hatchability of white Kołuda goslings. [Wpływ wieku na cechy fizyczne jaj i wylęgowość piskląt gęsi Białych Kołudzkich]. Zesz. Nauk. Przeg. Hod. 2003, 68, 63–71. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Połtowicz, K.; Calik, J. The influence of age and origin of laying hens on the quality of food egg shells. [Wpływ wieku i pochodzenia kur nieśnych na jakość skorup jaj spożywczych]. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 2002, 61, 84–85. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Navarro, A.; Kalin, O.; Nys, Y.; Garcia-Ruiz, J.M. Influence of the microstructure on the shell strength of eggs laid by hens of different ages. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2002, 43, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, A.C.; Bain, M.M.; Solomon, S.E. Organic matrix morphology and distribution in the palisade layer of eggshells sampled at selected periods during lay. Brit. Poult. Sci. 1998, 39, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panheleux, M.; Nys, Y.; Williams, J.; Gautron, J.; Boldicke, T.; Hincke, M.T. Extraction and quantification by ELISA of eggshell organic matrix proteins (ovocleidin-17, ovalbumin, ovotransferrin) in shell from young and old hens. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Y.; Zhanming, L.; Jinming, P. Changes in pigment, spectral transmission and element content of pink chicken eggshells with different pigment intensity during incubation. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El-Hanoun, A.M.; Rizk, R.E.; Shahein, E.H.A.; Hassan, N.S.; Brake, J. Effect of incubation humidity and flock age on hatchability traits and posthatch growth in Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2390–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balkan, M.; Karakas, R.; Biricik, M. Changes in eggshell thickness, shell conductance and pore density during incubation in the Peking duck (Anas platyrhynchos f. dom.). Ornis Fenn. 2006, 83, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
- Ketta, M.; Tůmová, E. Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: A review. Anim. Sci. 2016, 61, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, I.C.S.I.; Leandro, N.S.M.I.; Mesquita, M.A.I.; Café, M.B.I.; Mello, H.H.C.I.; Gonzales, E.I. Effect of incubator type and broiler breeder age on hatchability and chick quality. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 2, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tullett, S.G.; Board, R.G. Determinants of avian eggshell porosity. J. Zool. 1977, 183, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, N.S.; Moran, E.T., Jr. Effect of flock age and postemergent holding in the hatcher on broiler live performance and further processing yield. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2005, 14, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tona, K.; Bamelis, F.; Coucke, W.; Bruggeman, V.; Decuypere, E. Relationship between broiler breeder’s age and egg weight loss and embryonic mortality during incubation in largescale conditions. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2001, 10, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, J.; Khan, S.H.; Mukhtara, N.; Tanveer, A.; Riaz, A.P. Effects of egg size (weight) and age on hatching performance and chick quality of broiler breeder. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016, 44, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stępińska, M.; Mróz, E.; Krawczyk, M.; Otowski, K.; Górska, A. Effect of hen age and storage time on egg weight loss and hatchability results in turkeys. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 17, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijerhof, R. Embryo temperature—A new parameter in the hatchery? [Temperatura zarodka–nowy parametr w zakładzie wylęgowym?]. Pol. Drob. 2001, 11, 37–39. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Lourens, A.; Van den Brand, H.; Meijerhof, R.; Kemp, B. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability and post-hatch development. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourens, A.; Molenaar, R.; Van den Brand, H.; Heetkamp, M.J.; Meijerhof, W.R.; Kemp, B. Effect of egg size on heat production and the transition of energy from egg to hatchling. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nowaczewski, S.; Babuszkiewicz, M.; Kaczmarek, S. Effect of broiler breeders age on eggshell temperature, embryo viability and hatchability parameters. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 16, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Badowski, J. Review of issues related to the hatching technology of goose eggs. [Przegląd problematyki związanej z technologią lęgu jaj gęsich]. Biul. Inf. IZ. 1998, 218, 29–38. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Lis, M.W. Bird embryo thermoregulation part I. Measurements of egg shell temperature. [Termoregulacja zarodka ptaków cz. I. Pomiary temperatury skorupy jaj]. Pol. Drob. 2012, 1, 3–6. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
Groups 1 n = 15/per Group | Egg Weight (g) | Embryo Weight (g) | Embryo Length (cm) | Share in Egg (%) | Share in the Embryo (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Embryo | CAM 2 | Heart | Liver | ||||
Female age | |||||||
I | 153.8 ± 5.9 d | 8.81 ± 0.84 c | 8.71 ± 0.61 c | 5.74 ± 0.61 a | 3.84 ± 0.59 b | 0.70 ± 0.18 b | 1.43 ± 0.24 c |
II | 176.3 ± 7.6 c | 9.57 ± 0.69 b | 9.29 ± 0.96 ab | 5.46 ± 0.54 b | 3.57 ± 0.71 b | 0.82 ± 0.16 a | 1.98 ± 0.44 a |
III | 194.4 ± 9.1 b | 9.85 ± 0.91 ab | 9.40 ± 0.70 a | 5.08 ± 0.51 c | 4.28 ± 1.06 a | 0.74 ± 0.15 b | 1.70 ± 0.27 b |
IV | 211.4 ± 7.8 a | 9.99 ± 0.80 a | 9.08 ± 0.93 b | 4.73 ± 0.46 d | 4.40 ± 0.91 a | 0.70 ± 0.16 b | 1.62 ± 0.29 b |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.028 | <0.001 |
Laying period | |||||||
The beginning | 188.6 ± 23.4 a | 9.43 ± 0.96 | 8.80 ± 0.65 c | 5.04 ± 0.57 b | 4.11 ± 1.04 a | 0.71 ± 0.18 b | 1.72 ± 0.45 a |
The peak | 179.2 ± 21.5 b | 9.64 ± 0.97 | 9.02 ± 0.53 b | 5.43 ± 0.61 a | 4.06 ± 0.70 a | 0.80 ± 0.16 a | 1.71 ± 0.28 a |
The end | 175.1 ± 21.7 c | 9.69 ± 0.92 | 10.10 ± 0.62 a | 5.59 ± 0.74 a | 3.66 ± 0.53 b | 0.74 ± 0.11 ab | 1.54 ± 0.20 b |
p-value | <0.001 | 0.255 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Interaction: female age × laying period | |||||||
p-value | 0.003 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.195 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Groups 1 n = 15/per Group | Egg Weight (g) | Embryo Weight (g) | Embryo Length (cm) | Share in Egg (%) | Share in the Embryo (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Embryo | Yolk Sac | CAM 2 | Heart | Liver | ||||
Female age | ||||||||
I | 153.3 ± 6.4 d | 51.52 ± 4.28 c | 17.32 ± 0.63 c | 33.61 ± 2.51 a | 28.10 ± 3.26 b | 2.54 ± 0.47 | 0.51 ± 0.08 | 1.66 ± 0.36 b |
II | 172.6 ± 8.9 c | 56.25 ± 5.07 b | 18.19 ± 1.03 b | 32.60 ± 2.44 a | 31.18 ± 3.05 a | 2.62 ± 1.15 | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 1.82 ± 0.22 a |
III | 192.5 ± 8.7 b | 59.31 ± 4.48 a | 18.47 ± 1.07 a | 30.82 ± 1.97 b | 28.81 ± 3.32 b | 2.62 ± 0.41 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 1.79 ± 0.21 ab |
IV | 210.0 ± 8.1 a | 58.67 ± 4.33 a | 18.11 ± 0.98 b | 27.95 ± 2.02 c | 30.35 ± 2.54 a | 2.55 ± 0.48 | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 1.77 ± 0.24 ab |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.228 | 0.247 | 0.043 |
Laying period | ||||||||
The beginning | 189.8 ± 22.1 a | 59.42 ± 4.57 a | 17.30 ± 0.59 c | 31.57 ± 3.00 | 29.19 ± 3.24 b | 2.94 ± 0.33 a | 0.51 ± 0.06 b | 1.76 ± 0.23 |
The peak | 178.9 ± 21.0 b | 55.24 ± 4.61 b | 18.24 ± 0.80 b | 31.11 ± 3.08 | 30.74 ± 3.71 a | 2.38 ± 0.58 b | 0.59 ± 0.09 a | 1.79 ± 0.19 |
The end | 174.7 ± 21.9 c | 53.26 ± 5.24 b | 18.95 ± 0.95 a | 30.85 ± 3.19 | 29.04 ± 2.52 b | 2.33 ± 0.27 b | 0.52 ± 0.06 b | 1.74 ± 0.37 |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.237 | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.588 |
Interaction: female age × laying period | ||||||||
p-value | 0.283 | 0.424 | 0.001 | 0.053 | 0.021 | 0.984 | 0.168 | 0.159 |
Groups 1 n = 15/per Group | Egg Weight (g) | Embryo Weight (g) | Embryo Length (cm) | Share in Egg (%) | Share in the Embryo (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Embryo | Yolk Sac | CAM 2 | Heart | Liver | ||||
Female age | ||||||||
I | 152.3 ± 6.6 d | 82.87 ± 9.84 d | 22.16 ± 0.84 b | 54.33 ± 5.85 a | 12.95 ± 2.85 d | 1.56 ± 0.17 b | 0.43 ± 0.05 b | 2.08 ± 0.74 |
II | 174.5 ± 9.9 c | 95.81 ± 8.12 c | 23.38 ± 0.86 a | 54.93 ± 4.02 a | 14.60 ± 3.58 c | 1.54 ± 0.20 b | 0.50 ± 0.08 a | 1.97 ± 0.37 |
III | 191.6 ± 8.9 b | 103.22 ± 9.81 b | 23.43 ± 0.88 a | 53.81 ± 4.07 a | 15.59 ± 2.94 b | 1.64 ± 0.17 b | 0.51 ± 0.06 a | 1.88 ± 0.28 |
IV | 209.4 ± 9.7 a | 108.73 ± 9.21 a | 23.27 ± 1.56 a | 51.93 ± 3.91 b | 17.08 ± 2.87 a | 1.94 ± 0.30 a | 0.45 ± 0.08 b | 1.97 ± 0.55 |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.04 | 0.456 |
Laying period | ||||||||
The beginning | 189.5 ± 22.5 a | 102.69 ± 11.75 a | 23.35 ± 1.05 a | 54.30 ± 3.01 | 12.87 ± 8.03 b | 1.65 ± 0.21 | 0.49 ± 0.08 b | 1.88 ± 0.45 b |
The peak | 177.9 ± 21.6 b | 94.52 ± 12.29 b | 22.54 ± 1.38 b | 53.27 ± 4.21 | 13.74 ± 2.69 a | 1.71 ± 1.18 | 0.47 ± 0.07 b | 1.88 ± 0.23 b |
The end | 172.9 ± 21.7 c | 91.89 ± 14.22 b | 22.37 ± 6.78 b | 53.22 ± 6.71 | 12.71 ± 2.73 b | 1.91 ± 0.92 | 0.53 ± 0.15 a | 2.21 ± 0.69 a |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.444 | <0.001 | 0.591 | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Interaction: female age × laying period | ||||||||
p-value | 0.226 | 0.424 | <0.001 | 0.565 | 0.843 | 0.998 | 0.286 | 0.353 |
Feature n = 15/per Group | Group | Eggshell Thickness (mm) | p-Value (days) A,B… | Eggshell Density (g × cm3) | p-Value (days) A,B… | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 16 | Day 22 | Day 31 | Day 16 | Day 22 | Day 31 | ||||
Female age 1 | I | 0.525 ± 0.064 A | 0.502 ± 0.065 AB | 0.477 ± 0.054 B | <0.001 | 2.107 ± 0.116 B | 2.142 ± 0.212 Ab | 2.215 ± 0.143 Ab | <0.001 |
II | 0.513 ± 0.051 AB | 0.489 ± 0.042 BC | 0.464 ± 0.043 C | <0.001 | 2.159 ± 0.135 C | 2.282 ± 0.213 Bb | 2.301 ± 0.083 Aa | <0.001 | |
III | 0.512 ± 0.045 A | 0.491 ± 0.085 AB | 0.467 ± 0.041 B | <0.001 | 2.212 ± 0.154 | 2.260 ± 0.135 a | 2.208 ± 0.108 b | 0.502 | |
IV | 0.514 ± 0.054 A | 0.498 ± 0.054 AB | 0.469 ± 0.066 B | <0.001 | 2.148 ± 0.182 | 2.203 ± 0.155 ab | 2.220 ±0.129 b | 0.511 | |
Laying period | The beginning | 0.544 ± 0.051 Aa | 0.517 ± 0.088 Ba | 0.496 ± 0.040 Ca | <0.001 | 2.228 ± 0.201 | 2.217 ± 0.126 | 2.251 ± 0.095 a | 0.059 |
The peak | 0.505 ± 0.087 Ab | 0.479 ± 0.047 Bb | 0.464 ± 0.040 Bb | <0.001 | 2.177 ± 0.163 | 2.184 ± 0.148 | 2.188 ± 0.168 b | 0.434 | |
The end | 0.482 ± 0.039 Ac | 0.475 ± 0.041 Ab | 0.441 ± 0.058 Bc | <0.001 | 2.119 ± 0.111 B | 2.149 ± 0.225 AB | 2.275 ± 0.062 Aa | <0.001 | |
p-value a,b… | Female age | 0.108 | 0.955 | 0.560 | 0.751 | 0.005 | <0.001 | ||
Laying period | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.286 | 0.099 | <0.001 | |||
Interaction | 0.237 | 0.217 | 0.134 | 0.844 | 0.054 | <0.001 |
Groups 1 n = 15/per Group | Egg Weight (g) | Day of Incubation | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 26 | ||
Female age | ||||||||||||||
I | 153.3 ± 6.3 d | 1.56 ± 0.73 | 2.33 ± 0.51 b | 3.23 ± 0.65 | 4.14 ± 0.95 | 4.97 ± 0.95 | 5.76 ± 1.08 | 6.71 ± 1.37 | 7.58 ± 1.44 | 8.39 ± 1.67 | 9.37 ± 1.81 | 10.43 ± 2.28 | 11.69 ± 2.20 | 12.79 ± 2.47 |
II | 173.3 ± 8.84 c | 1.61 ± 0.49 | 2.44 ± 0.63 a | 3.42 ± 0.77 | 4.28 ± 0.91 | 5.21 ± 1.12 | 6.02 ± 1.26 | 7.08 ± 1.96 | 7.60 ± 1.64 | 8.66 ± 2.19 | 9.77 ± 2.04 | 10.88 ± 2.40 | 11.92 ± 2.57 | 13.03 ± 2.86 |
III | 192.56 ± 8.26 b | 1.67 ± 0.59 | 2.65 ± 0.84a | 3.41 ± 0.71 | 4.27 ± 0.86 | 5.11 ± 1.30 | 5.99 ± 1.26 | 6.86 ± 1.34 | 7.67 ± 1.62 | 8.58 ± 1.79 | 9.42 ± 2.07 | 10.56 ± 2.14 | 11.60 ± 2.39 | 12.64 ± 2.64 |
IV | 211.07 ± 9.36 a | 1.54 ± 0.58 | 2.42 ± 0.60 a | 3.26 ± 0.77 | 4.08 ± 0.82 | 4.94 ± 1.00 | 5.59 ± 1.02 | 6.83 ± 1.65 | 7.59 ± 1.42 | 8.48 ± 1.55 | 9.38 ± 1.74 | 10.42 ± 1.93 | 11.52 ± 2.20 | 12.60 ± 2.41 |
p-value | <0.001 | 0.236 | <0.001 | 0.052 | 0.188 | 0.103 | 0.068 | 0.278 | 0.244 | 0.516 | 0.221 | 0.251 | 0.500 | 0.505 |
Laying period | ||||||||||||||
The beginning | 189.3 ± 22.3 a | 1.66 ± 0.67 b | 2.36 ± 0.48 b | 3.17 ± 0.57 b | 3.99 ± 0.66 b | 4.71 ± 0.96c | 5.42 ± 1.57 b | 6.33 ± 0.99 b | 7.11 ± 1.08 b | 7.89 ± 1.19 c | 8.68 ± 1.30 b | 9.73 ± 1.72a | 10.75 ± 1.65 b | 11.52 ± 1.76 b |
The peak | 178.0 ± 21.9 b | 1.50 ± 0.43 b | 2.31 ± 0.53 b | 3.29 ± 0.71 b | 4.19 ± 0.98 b | 5.11 ± 0.98 b | 5.98 ± 1.18 b | 7.19 ± 1.97 a | 7.92 ± 1.56 a | 8.69 ± 1.99 b | 9.86 ± 1.86 a | 10.89 ± 2.18 b | 12.27 ± 2.41 a | 13.61 ± 2.54 a |
The end | 174.3 ± 21.02 c | 1.76 ± 0.62 a | 2.78 ± 0.94 a | 3.65 ± 0.87 a | 4.54 ± 1.14 a | 5.57 ± 1.28 a | 6.35 ± 1.42 a | 7.30 ± 1.60 a | 8.29 ± 1.79 a | 9.35 ± 2.02 a | 10.28 ± 2.34 a | 11.50 ± 2.44 b | 12.38 ± 2.69 a | 13.56 ± 3.02 a |
p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Interaction: female age × laying period | ||||||||||||||
p-value | <0.001 | 0.337 | <0.001 | 0.348 | 0.569 | 0.207 | 0.593 | 0.221 | 0.124 | 0.316 | 0.406 | 0.409 | 0.421 | 0.221 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kucharska-Gaca, J.; Adamski, M.; Biesek, J. Goose Embryonic Development, Glucose and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations, and Eggshell Features Depend on Female Age and Laying Period. Animals 2022, 12, 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192614
Kucharska-Gaca J, Adamski M, Biesek J. Goose Embryonic Development, Glucose and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations, and Eggshell Features Depend on Female Age and Laying Period. Animals. 2022; 12(19):2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192614
Chicago/Turabian StyleKucharska-Gaca, Joanna, Marek Adamski, and Jakub Biesek. 2022. "Goose Embryonic Development, Glucose and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations, and Eggshell Features Depend on Female Age and Laying Period" Animals 12, no. 19: 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192614
APA StyleKucharska-Gaca, J., Adamski, M., & Biesek, J. (2022). Goose Embryonic Development, Glucose and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations, and Eggshell Features Depend on Female Age and Laying Period. Animals, 12(19), 2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192614