Next Article in Journal
Association between Phenotypes of Antimicrobial Resistance, ESBL Resistance Genes, and Virulence Genes of Salmonella Isolated from Chickens in Sichuan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Different Vitrification Techniques on Viability and Apoptotic Index of Domestic Cat Testicular Tissue Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Stress Factors and Their Effects on Productivity in Sheep

1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat 66100, Turkey
2
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Kurumbapet, Pondicherry 605009, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(17), 2769; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172769
Submission received: 18 July 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Small Ruminants)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Stress factors (heat, cold, transport, treatment, nutritional, shearing, and weaning) are stimulants that initiate a stress response and are an inevitable result of today’s livestock practices. Stress factors, together with the changes in biological functions in animals, constitute the cost of stress. The animal’s response to a particular stress factor may vary depending on the animal’s breed, sex, age, and physiological status; the type of stress factor and its duration and density; and interactions between various factors, such as shelter, nutrition, climate, production practices, and the environment. This review aimed to reveal the importance of some stress factors in sheep and their effects on sheep productivity.

Abstract

Products obtained from sheep have an economically important place in the world. Their adaptability to different climatic conditions, their ease of care and feeding, their high utilization of poor pasture areas with low yield and quality, the ease of flock management, their high twinning rate, and their short intergenerational period are some of the advantages of sheep production. Sheep production has the ability to adapt better to environmental stress factors, as can be understood from the presence of sheep in different geographical regions at a global level. However, the changes in environmental conditions and production cause some negative results in animals. All these negative results expose animals to various stress factors (heat, cold, transport, treatment, nutritional, shearing, weaning, etc.). All stress factors that directly and indirectly affect sheep production ultimately lead to compromised performance, decreased productivity, increased mortality, and adverse effects on the immune system. In order to cope with the current stress parameters in animals and to achieve optimum production, a holistic approach is needed according to the environmental conditions and available resources. It is important to consider the factors involved in these responses in order to manage these processes correctly and to develop adequate strategies and improve sheep welfare. This review aimed to reveal the importance of some stress factors in sheep and their effects on sheep productivity.

1. Introduction

Sheep production is a strategic branch of animal husbandry and has an important place in many countries, although sheep production varies according to market demand [1]. For many years, sheep have been raised by societies for their meat, milk, and wool due to their behavioral characteristics and high adaptability to the environment [2,3,4]. Their tail structures, one of the main features that distinguish sheep breeds, can be used as an energy store for the animals to cope with harsh environmental conditions [5,6,7,8]. This is one of the important advantages of sheep compared to other species.
Stress is a reflex reaction that occurs as a result of an animal’s inability to cope with the negative effects of various factors and its inability to adapt, and can have many negative results [9,10]. The stimuli that trigger stress are not necessarily painful, but psychological states such as fear or anxiety activate physiological responses that could impose a deleterious impact on the animal. When the animal perceives a threat, it develops a behavioral, autonomic, endocrine, or immune response to maintain homeostasis [11,12]. If the animal cannot withstand the stress, this may cause significant disturbances in the organ functions and systems of the body, abnormal biological functions, and pathologies. In addition to physiological changes under the influence of the stressor, this can lead to significant dysfunction and behavioral changes in the animal, and even death [11,13,14]. Stress responses are related not only to the nature, intensity, and duration of the triggering stimulus, but also to the individual response tendencies or temperament of the animals [11].
Factors that cause stress in farms and pastures mostly include unfavorable housing conditions, inappropriate procedures, veterinary procedures (treatments, vaccinations, blood tests, and surgical interventions), animal production practices (numbering, weaning, grouping, shearing, tail docking, and hoof care), adverse weather conditions (extreme heat and cold), and malnutrition [14,15]. In addition, the conditions that are provided during the pre-slaughter period for the animals to be slaughtered, transport vehicles, loading and unloading, transport, pre-slaughter feeding and watering, the treatment of the animal in the slaughterhouse, and stunning practices are also considered to be stress factors [16].
During the transportation of animals, poor road conditions, the driving performance of the drivers, transport vibrations, road length, climate, and the lack of water and feed can cause stress in animals [17,18,19]. When these stress factors are repeated, the intensity of the action increases; when multiple stresses act simultaneously, their negative effect on the animal will increase [14,20]. In addition, studies have also reported that stress in farm animals may have detrimental effects on the quality of food products [21,22] and may have potential effects on food safety [23].
All farm animals will experience some level of stress (psychological or physiological) at different periods throughout their lives [23,24]. If the exposure to stress factors in farm animals can be managed correctly, this will have a positive effect on the productivity of the animals and will also increase their welfare. Some stress factors in sheep production are shown in Figure 1, and some negative effects of the stress factors on sheep productivity are shown in Figure 2.

2. Cold Stress

For each species, the temperature values of the thermal comfort zone for optimum production are different, as well as the temperature sensitivity of the species varying according to their age and physiological periods. Most often in farm animals, the focus is on the negative effects of heat stress on animals rather than cold stress. However, in winter, one of the biggest stress factors for animals is exposure to cold. Cold stress increases energy expenditure in ruminants [25], resulting in increased utilization of lipids as an energy substrate [26]. In the case of cold stress, animals can compensate for their body temperature by increasing feed intake to meet their increased energy requirements for life support [27] and it is generally stated that cold weather has a minimal effect on the reproductive ability of animals [28]. However, one of the biggest problems in livestock is seasonality and nutritional status [29]. Feeding animals on inadequate pastures is an important factor that can negatively affect animal performance, and feed intake is an important factor that affects biological indicators in the body [30,31]. Ewes are seasonal polyestrous animals and births usually occur in winter. The effectiveness of feed utilization during this period can be poor. The reasons for this include low temperatures, which will lead to low food intake, low digestibility, and high requirements for maintaining body temperature [32,33,34]. Therefore, exposure to cold during winter in ruminants is defined as a source of stress that impairs their growth, production, and reproduction [35]. Furthermore, sheared ewes and lambs are particularly susceptible to cold exposure [36,37]. Sejian et al. (2017) [38] reported that cold stress negatively affected growth, physiological adaptation, blood metabolites, stress, and reproductive hormone levels in Malpura ewes. Simeonov et al. (2022) [34] reported that lambs reared at an average temperature of 12.6 °C gained significantly more live weight than lambs reared at lower temperatures in a study conducted to determine the effect of different environmental temperatures (medium: 12.6 °C; low: 5.1 °C; very low: −3 °C) on growth and feed intake in early weaned lambs. These reports highlight the negative impact of cold stress on sheep and thus appropriate mitigation measures need to be taken to reduce the losses and improve the animal welfare.
It has been reported that cold, wet, and windy weather may cause a significant increase in lamb mortality and hypothermia may be responsible for almost half of perinatal lamb losses [39,40,41]. Therefore, cold stress is a critical factor in the survival of newborn lambs [42]. Lambs lose heat quickly when wet, especially in windy and cold weather, and providing shelter and protection of newborn lambs from wet and wind chill can contribute significantly to reducing thermal stress [42,43]. Genetic variation in cold tolerance of newborn lambs is known to exist and recent research has shown that genetic variation exists in the β3-adrenergic receptor in Merino lambs; these variations are associated with cold tolerance and mortality from cold stress [42,44].
Environmental temperature is the main exogenous regulator of thyroid gland activity and there is an inverse relationship between ambient temperature and blood thyroid hormone (TH) concentrations in sheep and goats [45,46,47,48,49]. It has been reported that seasonal variations in blood TH levels generally show minimum values in summer and maximum values in winter months [50,51,52]. Souza et al. (2002) [53], according to results obtained from sampling every 2 months for 1 year, reported that rams showed the highest TH concentration in the afternoon and the lowest TH concentration in the early morning. Generally, lamb breeds reared in extensive conditions (hill regions) have better thermoregulation than those reared intensively in the lowlands, which is related to birth coat characteristics accompanied by higher concentrations of thyroid hormones (important for endogenous heat production and coat growth) in hill lambs than in lowland lambs [54]. Doubek et al. (2003) [13] reported that 2- to 3-day-old Merino lambs exposed to cold stress showed a stronger increase in thyroid hormone levels than Romney Marsh lambs. Dwyer and Morgan (2006) [55] reported that Blackface lambs had higher T3 and T4 levels than Suffolk lambs at birth, which were associated with the higher body temperature and better thermoregulation ability of Blackface lambs.
Studies in different species have reported that HSP70, which varies seasonally and temporally, can be used as a biomarker for adaptation to hot and cold stress conditions [56]. Banerjee et al. (2014) [57] investigated the seasonal variation in the expression pattern of genes under the HSP70 family in heat- and cold-adapted goats (Capra hircus) and reported that HSPA1A and HSPA8 expression was higher in winter months in both heat- and cold-adapted goats, but other HSPs were down-regulated. Furthermore, the results obtained indicate that the expression pattern of HSP70 genes is species-specific and breed-specific due to differences in thermal tolerance and adaptation to different climatic conditions. Mohanarao et al. (2014) [58] reported that HSP27 is a useful indicator for evaluating the stress response in vitro and provides the basis for further in vivo studies to validate this gene as a thermal stress indicator in animals. In addition, it was reported that this study constitutes an important step in understanding the cellular stress response in terms of the expression of HSP genes against heat and cold in goats.

3. Heat Stress

Economic losses associated with temperature stress in the livestock industry include slow growth rates, reduced fertility, increased veterinary costs, animal diseases, unfavorable milk quantity and quality, inconsistent carcass quality and composition, reduced market weights, and increased animal welfare issues [59,60]. Livestock are susceptible to heat stress due to their metabolic rate and growth, high production levels, and species-specific characteristics such as rumen fermentation, sweating, and skin insulation. Heat stress is the most important stress in the life of livestock with detrimental consequences for animal health, productivity, and product quality, thus directly affecting animal production. Moreover, due to its indirect effects, heat stress in summer severely hinders pasture and water availability, which ultimately results in severe nutritional and water stress in animals [60,61]. Although small ruminant farming is mostly pasture-based, changes in feed and water resources can cause stress. Under extreme environmental conditions, both the quantity and quality of available pastures are affected [62]. With the changing climate, animals may have to walk long distances to find pasture, and this movement causes great stress in animals. Thus, animals are exposed not only to temperature stress, but also to feeding, water, and walking stress. In this case, the animal’s body reserves will not be sufficient to effectively counteract multiple environmental stressors, as the animal will be exposed to multiple stressors at the same time. Consequently, this is attributed to the animal’s inability to cope with the combined effects of different stressors, the animal cannot adapt and struggles to maintain normal homeothermia [61,63,64]. It has been reported that water requirements of heat-stressed animals can double during heat stress compared to heat-neutral conditions [65]. The increase in water intake is crucial for thermoregulation to counteract water evaporation through panting and sweating [66]. In addition, water is an essential nutrient required for many physiological functions necessary for maximum performance in livestock [67]. Water is necessary for body temperature regulation, growth, reproduction, lactation mechanisms, the digestion model, nutrient exchange, excretion of waste products, and heat balance. Studies have reported that exposure of ewes to hot environmental conditions causes a significant increase in water intake as well as water cycling [68,69].
High temperature causes physiological, biochemical, and behavioral changes that negatively affect the welfare of sheep, which in turn negatively affects the immune, nervous, and endocrine systems of the animals, increases the health problems of the animal, and negatively affects parameters such as animal life span, quality, and yield level. Furthermore, stressful situations caused by adverse environmental conditions can also significantly reduce fiber diameter, wool quality, and fiber strength [70,71]. Since meteorological characteristics such as relative humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed together with high ambient temperature increase the degree of sensation of environmental temperature, these data should be evaluated as a whole. This situation may cause critical effects of temperature stress on the yields obtained in animal production in farms [72,73,74].

3.1. Impact of Heat Stress on Physiological Profile

The main consequence of heat stress in livestock is a reduction in feed intake, which is a natural, protective, and adaptive mechanism used by animals under high ambient temperatures to counteract the increase in metabolic heat production [75,76]. Verma et al. (2000) [77] reported in their study that changes in the concentration of thyroid hormones in the blood reflect the metabolic and nutritional status of the animal, and that decreased feed intake was due to the direct effect of increased temperature on the satiety center of the hypothalamus. In addition, it has been stated that heat stress increases the secretion of leptin and adiponectin in animals, causing a decrease in feed consumption. Slimen et al. (2019) [78] reported that environmental temperature stress affects not only physiological responses but also the energy and oxidative metabolism of sheep exposed to environmental temperature stress, that decreased feed intake is partly responsible for decreased energy metabolism, and oxidative stress is also responsible for metabolic disorders that further alter ovine production performance. Rana et al. (2014a) [79] conducted a study to investigate the effect of heat stress on blood parameters in sheep and divided the animals into three groups as zero hours (T0), four hours (T4), and eight hours (T8) of exposure to direct sunlight. As a result of the study, it was reported that red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb%), and packed cell volume (PCV%) increased significantly with increasing temperature stress and that temperature stress caused significant changes in some blood parameters in domestic sheep.

3.2. Impact of Heat Stress on Sheep Milk Production

It has been reported that milk production characteristics in ovine animals are negatively correlated with temperature or relative humidity, different sheep breeds have variable tolerance to temperature and humidity, and sunlight has less effect on milk yield and more effect on casein yield, fat, and clot hardness [11,80,81]. It is reported that increasing the environmental temperature jeopardizes udder health and milk quality in ewes and may lead to mastitis or lower milk quality. Furthermore, exposure to intense solar radiation adversely affects the hygienic quality of milk. The increased bacterial load in milk is represented by higher amounts of pathogenic microorganisms and milk neutrophils and increases the somatic cell count [82]. High environmental temperatures can increase energy requirements by up to 25%, jeopardizing productivity in lactating ewes. Both heat stress and the progression of lactation result in decreased mobilization of body reserves for milk synthesis and reduced milk yield and quality. In studies, it has been reported that heat stress decreases both the fat and protein content of milk and in parallel with the increase in temperature and humidity index, milk yield decreases up to 75% [83].

3.3. Impact of Heat Stress on Sheep Growth, Meat and Carcass Traits

Exposure of sheep to high temperatures causes a decrease in body weight, daily body weight gain, growth rate, and total body weight [84]. As a result of adaptive responses to chronic heat stress, animals generally reduce feed intake to reduce metabolic heat production, which has effects on carcass fat accumulation, carcass yield, and intramuscular fat content [66]. In addition, ambient temperature is reported to affect feed digestibility by changing the volume of the gastrointestinal tract and the rate of passage through the digestive tract [67,85]. Recent studies have shown that heat stress not only causes physiological and metabolic disturbances in animals, but also may affect carcass and meat quality characteristics by altering the rate and degree of postmortem muscle glycolysis and the resulting pH [86].
Heat stress is known to be associated with dark-colored firm and dry meat (DFD) in ruminants [87]. Animals exposed to chronic heat stress have reduced muscle glycogen reserves, leading to lower lactic acid production, resulting in dark, tough, and dry meat, characterized by a high final pH and greater WHC, which is commonly observed in ruminant animals [88,89]. Rana et al. (2014b) [90] reported that heat stress was effective on carcass characteristics and meat quality traits of domestic sheep and temperature stress decreased the weight of edible and non-edible components. Kadim et al. (2008) [73] showed that high ambient temperatures caused significant negative effects on meat quality in sheep and goats. Sheep and goats slaughtered at an ambient temperature of 35 °C had higher pH values and lower color (lightness, redness, and yellowness) than those slaughtered at 21 °C, indicating that seasonal temperatures are the main cause of differences in meat quality. In addition, it has been reported that meat shelf-life and safety decreases in various species due to increased lipid and protein oxidation and a favorable environment for bacterial growth during hot seasons [91,92].

3.4. Heat Stress and Sheep Reproduction

Heat stress potentially reduces mating behavior and fertility of ewes and rams, increases embryonic mortality, impairs embryo development, reduces lamb birth weight, and increases perinatal lamb mortality [93,94]. Studies have shown that heat stress reduces behavioral estrus duration, estrus incidence, and cycle length [95,96,97]. Heat stress impairs sperm production and sperm quality in rams and negatively affects semen quality by increasing the rate of morphologically abnormal sperm [98,99,100]. In addition, heat stress also negatively affects prenatal and postnatal offspring development in ewes. Continuous exposure of ewes to high ambient temperatures during pregnancy impairs placental development and fetal growth, resulting in the birth of lambs with high probability of death or low birth weight [101,102,103]. Low birth weight is one of the main risk factors contributing to neonatal lamb mortality [104,105]. In summary, the reproductive performance of ewes is adversely affected by increasing temperatures and heat stress makes ewes more vulnerable to reduced reproduction, production, milk quantity and quality, meat quantity and quality, as well as reduced immunity and even offspring mortality.

4. Nutritional Stress

Although sheep farming is practiced in almost all regions of the world, it is widespread in arid and semi-arid regions. Nutritional stress is a major constraint to ruminant livestock production in semi-arid regions. With the cessation of rainfall, the quantity and quality of grazing land declines rapidly, leaving cereal crop residues as the main feed source. These residues are low in nitrogen (N) and high in crude fiber; these characteristics limit intake and digestibility, resulting in malnutrition [106]. Sheep grazing in these areas face extreme fluctuations in the quantity and quality of feed offered throughout the year. It has been reported that the energy demands of animals vary according to different seasons and physiological periods and if ewes are exposed to prolonged nutritional stress, it may cause a wide range of negative effects on their productivity, affecting both immediate production and lifetime performance [107,108,109].

4.1. Impact of Nutritional Stress on Physiological Status of the Animal

Pregnancy is a physiological process characterized by a significant increase in energetic and oxygen demands to ensure adequate fetal growth and development. Therefore, both mother and fetus may experience oxidative stress during pregnancy. The nutritional levels of pregnant animals also affect their energy reserves [27,110]. Nawito et al. (2016) [111] reported that feeding under arid conditions caused oxidative stress in pregnant sheep and goats. Maternal nutrition is a factor that can adversely affect offspring through altered macro- or micronutrient intake during pregnancy. Both maternal nutrient restriction and overfeeding result in offspring that exhibit poor postnatal growth, reduced muscle mass, increased adiposity, impaired metabolism, and altered immunity. Furthermore, offspring born to restricted-fed and overfed mothers are at risk of developing chronic metabolic diseases in adulthood [112,113,114,115]. Sejian et al. (2014) [116] investigated the effects of dietary restrictions on growth, physiological adaptation, and reproduction in sheep. As a result, 60% dietary restriction significantly decreased body weight, body condition score, plasma insulin-like growth factor, pulse rate, respiratory rate, plasma glucose, and significantly increased total cholesterol, plasma tri-iodo-thyroxine and thyroxine, plasma cortisol, estrus % and estrus duration, plasma concentration of growth hormone, plasma concentration of progesterone, and estrous cycle length. Parraguez et al. (2022) [117] examined the effects of antioxidants and nutritional supplementation on early oxidative stress and fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancies of malnourished ewes. As a result, it was reported that, in addition to nutritional supplementation, the administration of herbal antioxidants may constitute a good nutritional strategy for ewes reared under harsh environmental conditions. Trotta et al. (2020) [118] conducted a study to investigate the effects of nutrient restriction from mid to late gestation on maternal and fetal digestive enzyme activities in ewes and reported that some maternal and fetal digestive enzyme activities may change in response to maternal nutrient restriction. Maurya et al. (2019) [119] in their study to evaluate the effects of combined stresses (temperature and nutrition) on physiological adaptation, blood biochemical, and endocrine responses in Malpura rams; it was stated that when two stressors occur simultaneously, the total effect on the adaptive ability of rams to adapt to stressful conditions can be severe.

4.2. Impact of Nutritional Stress on Sheep Milk Production and Composition

Most of the sheep milk produced in the world is processed into cheese, yogurt, and other dairy products. Sheep milk composition is strongly influenced by nutrition, especially in high yielding animals. In particular, milk fat composition, milk protein content, milk flavor, and milk yield are easily influenced by the diet of the animals. In addition, nutritional stress and certain vitamins affect the somatic cell content of milk, which in turn affects cheese yield and quality. As dairy sheep are usually grazed, they are often subjected to nutritional stress due to variability in pasture characteristics and the influence of meteorological events. In general, the botanical composition of pastures and nutrition can modify the flavor, quality, and safety of sheep milk, and it is also possible to improve these characteristics by nutritional characteristics of the diet [120]. Al-Saiady (2006) [121] reported that the milk performance of ewes of two sheep breeds fed diets with normal and limited dry-matter intake and different concentrate/roughage ratios were significantly affected. In addition, the decrease in milk yield under heat stress is greater for older and higher lactating animals, especially during the peak of lactation. There is also a decrease in milk yield in animals experiencing cold stress, but this decrease is less than in animals experiencing heat stress [122,123].

4.3. Nutritional Stress and Sheep Reproduction

Reproductive performance in ewes is strongly influenced by feed availability during the mating season. Idris et al. (2010) [124] tested different feed sources to examine their effects on ewe productivity and reproductive performance during two physiological stages (mating period and pre-lambing period) in ewes. As a result, they reported that nutritional supplementation improved body condition score, lambing rate, fertility rate, fecundity, pregnancy, weaning rate, and reduced abortion rate in ewes. Borowczyk et al. (2006) [125] reported that nutrition affects various reproductive functions including hormone production, oocyte competence, fertilization and early embryonic development. It was reported that malnutrition of ewes resulted in a low body weight and body condition score, which had a negative effect on oocyte quality, resulting in lower cleavage and blastocyst formation rates. Musa et al. (2018) [126] reported that vitamin E administration alone and in combination with selenium improved reproductive performance in ewes.

4.4. Impact of Nutritional Stress on Wool and Fiber Quality

Hunter et al. (1990) [127] investigated the effects of feeding and lambing stress on wool fiber and wool fiber properties in Merino, Dohne Merino, and Mutton Merino sheep. As a result, it was reported that limited feeding and lambing stress reduced fiber diameter by 30% on average. Fiber strength was not affected by feeding or lambing stress, but the observed differences in fiber strength were largely due to differences in fiber diameter. Olivier and Olivier (2005) [128] investigated the effect of short-term feeding stress after weaning on wool production characteristics of Merino ewes. As a result, they reported that nutritional stress inactivated the wool follicles of ewes in different groups and some follicles shed their fibers, but the inactivation of follicles was not permanent and did not have a permanent detrimental effect on the wool production potential of ewes.
In conclusion, nutrition is a fundamental factor affecting reproduction, fertility, survival, milk yield and quality, live weight, meat yield and quality, fleece yield and quality, and health in ewes, and it is also an application that can be used to reduce the effects of some stress factors. Therefore, short and long term exposure of animals to nutritional stress can cause many negative effects on metabolism, physiology and yields.

5. Transportation and Treatment Stress

Animal transport is a very important link in the supply chain and is also one of the most problematic areas of animal welfare. The standards that must be complied with for live animal exports, both for road and maritime transport, are of great importance in the livestock industry. No matter how well-organized animal transport is, a sudden change in living conditions on farms can lead to changes in animal welfare and animals trying to adapt to the current situation. This is expressed as a typical stress reaction that animals are exposed to during transport. In addition, poor road conditions, driving performance of drivers, transport conditions, road length, climate, lack of water and feed can cause stress in animals during transport [19,129,130]. Some studies have shown that the main factors affecting the welfare of sheep during road transport are driving behavior, noise, acceleration, road type [131,132], vehicle design [133,134], transport intensity [135], duration of the journey [136,137] and transport of different breeds together, new environment, hunger, thirst and fatigue [133], excessive ventilation, cold or heat stress [138,139]. It is recommended that transport vehicles should never be completely closed as lack of ventilation can cause extreme stress and even suffocation [140].
Fear, hunger, thirst, physical injury and fatigue due to pre-slaughter treatment, capture, loading, transport, unloading, and stunning techniques have negative effects on animal health, welfare, and meat quality [141,142,143]. The energy required for muscle activity in live animals is provided by muscle glycogen. In rested healthy animals, the glycogen content of muscles is high. After slaughter, blood circulation in the body is interrupted, so is the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the muscles and muscle fibers. Metabolic processes take place in the absence of oxygen and muscle glycogen is converted into lactic acid. Since lactic acid is not transported with the circulation, it remains in the muscles and this causes the pH to drop from the normal values of 7.00–7.40 to 5.40–5.70 in live animals. One of the main criteria for meat quality is the final pH of the muscles, determined by glycogen depletion and post-mortem lactic acid accumulation. Lactic acid is essential to produce tender meat with a good taste and good color. If the animal experiences stress before and during slaughter, glycogen is depleted and the lactic acid formed in post-mortem meat is reduced. This has a serious negative effect on meat quality. Therefore, animals should not be exposed to stress and injuries during pre-slaughter procedures to prevent unnecessary depletion of muscle glycogen stores. Resting the animals in the 24-h pre-slaughter period is an important issue that should be emphasized in order to maximize muscle glycogen in the slaughtered carcasses and to create ideal conditions [144,145,146,147].
Kadim et al. (2006) [148] reported that the transport of animals had a significant effect on meat quality and caused a significant increase in meat pH and shear force values in animals transported before slaughter. In another study, lambs carried for 5 h had lower carcass yield and water-holding capacity of meat than lambs carried for 30 min [149]. Andronie et al. (2008) [129] reported that plasmatic glucose levels decreased, urea levels increased, body weight decreased due to travel time and lack of feed and water during this period, thus travel time is one of the main transport-related stress factors leading to a decrease in the quality level of sheep welfare. Lendrawati et al. (2020) [150] investigated 4, 8 and 12 h of road transport duration on body weight loss, hematological and biochemical responses of sheep. The results showed that increased transport time significantly increased body weight loss and decreased hematocrit, cortisol, and glucose values in blood. Tozlu Çelik et al. (2021) [19] aimed to determine the effects of transport and altitude in Karayaka sheep. The results obtained showed that transport and altitude significantly affected triiodothyronine, tyrosine, and oxidative stress parameters of malondialdehyde (MDA), so these factors were reported to cause stress in sheep. Ekiz et al. (2012a) [151] reported that in their study with different sheep breeds, significant breed differences were observed in terms of behavioral responses to some physiological, biochemical, and stress factors that may arise from transport and related transport procedures, and therefore, it was reported that breed differences in stress responses should be taken into account in the planning of transport and production procedures while considering an animal welfare approach. In conclusion, all animals are under a certain amount of stress during transport and all treatments prior to slaughter, which can be detrimental to meat yield and meat quality.

6. Shearing Stress

Shearing is an important adaptation strategy for many sheep breeds to seasonal changes, especially in summer, and it can also change the resistance of animals to high temperatures, but in recent years, shearing has not been carried out regularly on farms in some regions for various reasons. Gowane et al. (2017) [152] reported that the amount of wool produced from sheep varies according to climate region, breed, age, sex, nutrition, shearing range, and the commercial value of wool also depends on wool yield and quality. Therefore, shearing is a necessary practice in sheep production to ensure wool removal, usually on an annual basis. Shearing before the onset of hot weather can reduce the effects of heat stress in sheep. However, factors such as grabbing, turning, dragging, foot binding, separation from the flock, waiting time, and close human contact during shearing and exposure of animals to noise and possible skin injuries during shearing all constitute an important short-term stressor that can jeopardize animal welfare [153,154,155].
In some studies, it has been reported that shearing in different seasons significantly affects thermoregulation and some physiological and blood parameters [156,157], and also shearing affects oxidative parameters and causes a change in the homeostatic balance of sheep leading to oxidative stress [158]. Hargreaves and Hutson (1990) [159] reported that shearing is a routine husbandry practice and produces an acute short-term stressor as indicated by a significant increase in plasma cortisol concentrations. Panaretto (1968) [160] reported that shearing of sheep causes cold stress in animals for a period of time after shearing, depending on the climate and fleece length at the time, and post-shearing cold stress significantly increases heat loss and feed requirements, resulting in losses in production efficiency.
Piccione et al. (2002) [161] investigated the effects of shearing on body temperature in different sheep breeds in spring. As a result, shearing caused an increase of over 1 °C in the internal body temperature of sheep for all breeds, which was expressed as an overreaction to the mild cold stress caused by fleece loss. Elvidge and Coop (1974) [162] reported that there were significant differences in the results of their study in which the increased heat production and feed requirements resulting from shearing were estimated from the body weight changes in sheared and non-sheared ewe diets. Carcangiu et al. (2008) [163] investigated how stress caused by shearing stages can alter growth hormone (GH) cortisol and some hemato–chemical parameters in the Sarda sheep breed. The results obtained show that GH secretion in animals is affected by the whole stress procedure (separation, tying, and shearing). Even if shearing is necessary for animals, it was reported to cause a significant change in blood parameters involved in the stress response. Fidan et al. (2009) [164] determined the stress response of Sakız sheep during shearing and evaluated its effects on oxidant–antioxidant status. Blood malondialdehyde (MDA) and cortisol concentrations increased after shearing compared to baseline, while glutathione (GSH) concentration decreased significantly. These results suggest that MDA and GSH are potent markers for assessing oxidant/antioxidant status and indicate that shearing is a stressful situation leading to oxidative stress, which can be increased by strong glucocorticoid secretion. Al-Ramamneh et al. (2011) [165], investigated the effect of shearing on water turnover, body surface temperatures, and other physiological variables in sheep reared under summer temperate conditions. As a result, it was reported that shearing under temperate conditions significantly decreases body temperature, water intake, and respiratory rate and thus causes stress in sheep, which should be taken into account when determining shearing times under current management practices. Casella et al. (2016) [166] reported that thermal stress caused by shearing is one of the most stressful events in the life of sheep, considering that shearing can affect the thermoregulatory mechanisms and welfare of sheep. Arfuso et al. (2022) [153] investigated the usefulness of eye temperature assessment by infrared thermography (IRT) to evaluate the acute stress response in sheep during shearing and reported that IRT measurement allows a more accurate interpretation of the behavioral response in sheep.
In conclusion, shearing is a necessary practice in sheep production, but it is a fact that the treatment that sheep are exposed to before, after, and during shearing negatively affects animal welfare and causes acute stress.

7. Weaning Stress

Weaning leads to a change in environmental conditions including the feeding regime for the offspring. Commercial farms usually separate ewes and lambs before natural weaning. Early weaning results in the breaking of the ewe–lamb bond, with changes occurring simultaneously in both the physical and social environment, coupled with the cessation of suckling and the complete replacement of milk with solid foods. This process varies depending on the objectives of each sheep farm and the characteristics of the lambs, including their age and weight, and their ability to eat solid food. Early weaning triggers behavioral, physiological, and immunological changes with negative consequences on the health of both ewes and lambs, as well as raising animal welfare concerns over lamb growth [167,168,169].
Freitas-de-Melo et al. (2013) [167] reported that sudden weaning, a common management practice in sheep production systems, causes behavioral and physiological responses indicative of stress in ewes and lambs. Schichowski et al. (2008) [170] investigated the responses to weaning in 50- and 100-day-old lambs and reported that weaning caused a significant increase in cortisol levels in both lamb groups.
One of the most important consequences of weaning stress in lambs is decreased feed intake. The decrease in feed intake leads to a decrease in growth rate and thus increased susceptibility to diseases [168]. Ekiz et al. (2012b) [171] investigated the effects of weaning duration and rearing type on average daily body weight gain (ADG) of lambs at different growth stages. The results obtained showed that weaning caused a decrease in ADG of lambs. Pascual-Alonso et al. (2015) [172] analyzed the effect of post-weaning treatment strategies on welfare and production traits of lambs. They reported that the use of social enrichment at weaning, i.e., gentle handling and daily human contact, resulted in lambs being less reactive and better able to regulate their physiological stress in the post-weaning period, thus improving lamb health and weight. Mohapatra et al. (2021) [173], in their study to predict early weaning-related stress in lambs, showed that comparable changes in body weight and blood biochemical levels indicated that weaning at 60 days enabled lambs to cope with behavioral and physiological weaning stress.
Napolitano et al. (2008) [174] reported that early weaning negatively affects the welfare of lambs, with clear and obvious detrimental effects on various functions of animals. In addition, they stated that behavioral measures are more sensitive for the detection of stressful conditions compared to endocrine or immune indicators commonly used to determine welfare. Damián et al. (2013) [175] aimed to determine which behaviors are triggered in lambs in response to separation from their mothers or changes in feeding and maternal separation during weaning. As a result, it was reported that separating lambs from their mothers is an important stressor and this plays a key role in the behavioral response to weaning in lambs. Separation from their mothers at weaning in grazing lambs was reported to increase the frequency of vocalization, walking, shadowing, as well as pacing behavior, and decrease the frequency of grazing. In addition, changes related to feeding and separation from adults are also an important component of the stress response to weaning. Casuriaga et al. (2022) [176] aimed to compare the behavioral and immunological responses of twin lambs housed with and without siblings after weaning. As a result, twin lambs housed with their siblings were more stressed at early weaning and showed more intense behavioral changes and poorer immunological status than twin lambs housed separately from their siblings.
Recent research suggests that age at weaning affects the development of ruminal bacteria in lambs at an early age [177]. Li et al. (2020) [178] reported that weaning significantly affected the morphological and functional development of the rumen and bacterial community composition. Wang et al. (2022) [169] reported that weaning affected rumen bacterial development and investigated rumen microbiota in early weaned lambs compared to conventionally weaned lambs. As a result, it was reported that early weaning caused a significant decrease in rumen microbiota richness and diversity in the short term and changes in rumen microbiota were associated with the persistence of weaning stress.
In conclusion, in traditional sheep production systems, lambs are suckled by their mothers and weaned at approximately 45–50 days of age. This situation involves a number of stress parameters for the offspring, both social, physiological, and nutritional, leading to a change in feeding regime. Weaning has a potential impact not only on the ewe–lamb relationship but also on the health of the lamb. In general, early weaned lambs involve more animal welfare concerns compared to conventionally weaned lambs, so it is important to develop strategies to minimize these responses.

8. Conclusions

Major changes have occurred in animal production in recent years. The rapid population growth in the world increases the demand for food- and production-based sectors, at the same time increasing the establishment of higher capacity production systems and the tendency towards integrated production activities. Nutritional conditions, housing conditions, and environmental conditions have changed significantly in this period and a dramatic increase in production has occurred. Issues such as sustainability of animal production under changing climatic conditions, evaluation of mutual interaction in different aspects, and ensuring adaptation in farm animals should be emphasized sensitively. All farm animals are exposed to some stress throughout their lives. In sheep, in addition to issues such as the type of stress, duration, degree of repetition, and how many different stress factors are present at the same time, many factors such as age, physiological period, breed, nutrition, yield status, health status, etc., have a role in the effects that will occur. Sheep try to cope with challenging conditions by using physiological and behavioral stress responses. When these responses are inhibited or not successful, typical behavioral and physiological symptoms of stress occur. In this situation, animal welfare is jeopardized and acute or chronic stress seriously affects animal health, productivity, and product quality of animal production. In this study, some important issues related to stress and its effects on sheep productivity (heat and cold stress, nutritional stress, transport stress, shearing stress, weaning stress) and relevant results obtained from some recently developed practices are discussed. Based on such research, information about the effects of management and husbandry requirements such as nutrition, housing, and environmental conditions on animal welfare is obtained and it provides ideas for making arrangements in these areas. As a result, stress research in sheep will contribute to the correct management of these processes, to produce solutions to different aspects of animal production with a holistic perspective, and to make improvements in these areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.T. and V.S. methodology: H.T. and V.S.; investigation: H.T. and V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.T. and V.S.; writing—review and editing H.T. and V.S.; visualization: H.T. and V.S.; supervision: H.T. and V.S.; project administration: H.T. and V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, C.; Qiao, Y.; Mao, R.; Li, M.; Wang, M. Enhanced LiteHRNet based sheep weight estimation using RGB-D images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 206, 107667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amane, A.; Belay, G.; Kebede, A.; Dessie, T.; Worku, S.; Hanotte, O.; Vila, E. Analysis of tail morphology and osteology in Ethiopian indigenous sheep. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2023, 47, 103776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruiz-Larranaga, O.; Langa, J.; Rendo, F.; Manzano, C.; Iriondo, M.; Estonba, A. Genomic selection signatures in sheep from the Western Pyrenees. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 501, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vigne, J.-D. The origins of animal domestication and husbandry: A major change in the history of humanity and the biosphere. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gebremichael, S. Sheep Resources of Ethiopia: Genetic Diversity and Breeding Strategy. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gizaw, S. Goat breeds of Ethiopia: A guide for identification and utilization. In Ethiopian Sheep and Goats Productivity Improvement Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Tech. Bull. Number 2009, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lv, F.-H.; Peng, W.-F.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Li, W.-R.; Liu, M.-J.; Ma, Y.-H.; Zhao, Q.-J.; Yang, G.-L.; Wang, F.; et al. Mitogenomic meta-analysis identifies two phases of migration in the history of eastern Eurasian sheep. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 33, 2515–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moradi, M.H.; Nejati-Javaremi, A.; Moradi-Shahrbabak, M.; Dodds, K.G.; McEwan, J.C. Genomic scan of selective sweeps in thin and fat tail sheep breeds for identifying of candidate regions associated with fat deposition. BMC Genet. 2012, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Etim, N.N.; Williams, M.E.; Evans, E.I.; Offiong, E.E. Physiological and behavioural responses of farm animals to stress: Implications to animal productivity. Am. J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2013, 1, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moberg, G.P. Biological Response to Stress: Implications for Animal Welfare. In The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare; Mobert, G.P., Mench, I.A., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2000; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar, B. Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front. Biosci. Elite 2012, 4, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Selye, H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature 1936, 138, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Doubek, J.; Šlosarkova, S.; Fleıscher, P.; Mala, G.; Skrıvanek, M. Metabolic and hormonal profiles of potentiated cold stress in lambs during early postnatal period. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 48, 403–411. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hristov, S.; Maksimović, N.; Stanković, B.; Žujović, M.; Pantelić, V.; Stanišić, N.; Zlatanović, Z. The most significant stressors in intensive sheep production. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2012, 28, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Degabriele, R.; Fell, L.R. Changes in behaviour, cortisol and lymphocyte types during isolation and group confinement of sheep. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2001, 79, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pârvu, M.; Andronie, I.; Andronie, V.; Dinu, C. Induced response of some welfare indicators in slaughtered sheep. In Proceedings of the the XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene, Tartu, Estonia, 17–21 June 2007; Volume 2, pp. 1060–1065. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, S.J.G.; Forslıng, M.L.; Broom, D.M. Stress responses of sheep to routine prosedures changes in plasma concentrations of vazopressin, oxytocin and cortisol. Vet. Rec. 1998, 142, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Minka, N.; Ayo, J. Physiological Responses of Food Animals to Road Transportation Stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 9, 6601–6613. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tozlu Çelik, H.; Aslan, F.A.; Us Altay, D.; Kahveci, M.E.; Konanç, K.; Noyan, T.; Ayhan, S. Effects of transport and altitude on hormones and oxidative stress parameters in sheep. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0244911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krizanova, O.; Babula, P.; Pacak, K. Stress, Catecholaminergic System and Cancer. Stress 2016, 19, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferguson, D.M.; Warner, R.D. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rosenvold, K.; Andersen, H.J. Factors of significance for pork quality-a review. Meat Sci. 2003, 64, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rostagno, M.H. Can stress in farm animals increase food safety risk? Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Altınçekiç, Ş.; Koyuncu, M. Çiftlik hayvanları ve stres. Hayvansal Üretim Derg. 2012, 53, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  25. Young, B. Cold stress as it affects animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 1981, 52, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Blaxter, K.; Wainman, F. Environmental temperature and the energy metabolism and heat emission of steers. J. Agric. Sci. 1961, 56, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants, Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vincent, C.K. Effects of season and high environmental temperature on fertility in cattle: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1972, 161, 1333–1338. [Google Scholar]
  29. Alam, M.M.; Hashem, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain, M.M.; Haque, M.R.; Sobhan, Z.; Islam, M.S. Behavior, physiological and blood parameters of goat. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 22, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  30. AL-Musawi, J.E.; Hassan, S.A.; Muhammad, S.F. Effect of cold stress on some blood parameters of sheep and goats. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 1617–1620. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ouanes, I.; Abdennour, C.; Aouaidjia, N. Effect of cold winter on blood biochemistry of domestic sheep fed natural pasture. Ann. Biol. Res. 2011, 2, 306–313. [Google Scholar]
  32. Christopherson, J.; Kennedy, P. Effect of the thermal environment on digestion in ruminants. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1983, 63, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delfino, J.; Mathison, G. Effects of cold environment and intake level on the energetic efficiency of feedlot steers. J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 69, 4577–4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Simeonov, M.S.; Stoycheva, I.; Harmon, D.L. Environmental temperature influences diet selection and growth in early-weaned lambs. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 12, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kang, H.; Lee, I.; Piao, M.; Gu, M.; Yun, C.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Baik, M. Effects of ambient temperature on growth performance, blood metabolites, and Immune cell populations in Korean cattle steers. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maurya, V.P.; Sejian, V.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Effect of cold stress on growth, physiological responses, blood metabolites and hormonal profile of native Malpura lambs under hot semi-arid tropics of India. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 83, 370–373. [Google Scholar]
  37. Verbeek, E.; Oliver, M.H.; Waas, J.R.; McLeay, L.M.; Blache, D.; Matthews, L.R. Reduced cortisol and metabolic responses of thin ewes to an acute cold challenge in mid-pregnancy: Implications for animal physiology and welfare. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sejian, V.; Kumar, D.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Physiological rhythmicity in Malpura ewes to adapt to cold stress in a semi-arid tropical environment. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 2017, 49, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Houston, D.C.; Maddox, J.G. Causes of mortality among young Scottish Blackface lambs. Vet. Rec. 1974, 95, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alexander, G.; Lynch, J.J.; Mottershead, B.E.; Donnelly, J.B. Reduction in lamb mortality by means of grass wind-breaks: Results of a five-year study. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1980, 13, 329–332. [Google Scholar]
  41. McCutcheon, S.N.; Holmes, C.W.; McDonald, M.F. The starvation-exposure syndrome and neonatal lamb mortality. A review. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1981, 41, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dwyer, C.M. The welfare of the neonatal lamb. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 76, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McCutcheon, S.N.; Holmes, C.W.; McDonald, M.F.; Rae, A.L. Resistance to cold stress in the newborn lamb. 1. Responses of Romney, Drysdale×Romney, and Merino lambs to components of the thermal environment. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1983, 26, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Forrest, R.H.; Hickford, J.G.H.; Wynyard, J.; Merrick, N.; Hogan, A.; Frampton, C. Polymorphism at the beta(3)-adrenergic receptor (ADRB3) locus of Merino sheep and its association with lamb mortality. Anim. Genet. 2006, 37, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dickson, W.M. Endocrine glands. In Duke’s Physiology of Domestic Animals, 11th ed.; Swenson, M.J., Reece, W.O., Eds.; Comstock Publishers Association: Ithaca, NY, USA; London, UK, 1993; pp. 629–666. [Google Scholar]
  46. Webster, J.R.; Moenter, S.M.; Woodfill, C.J.I.; Karsh, F.J. Role of the thyroid gland in seasonal reproduction. II. Thyroxine allows a season-specific-suppression of gonadotropin secretion in sheep. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Starling, J.M.C.; da Silva, R.G.; Negrao, J.A.; Maia, A.S.C.; Bueno, A.R. Seasonal variation of thyroid hormones and cortisol of sheep in tropical environment. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2005, 34, 2064–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Colavita, G.P.; Debenedetti, A.; Ferri, C.; Lisi, C.; Lucaroni, A. Blood thyroid hormone concentrations by the domestic goat: Seasonal and age-related variations. Boll. Della Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1983, 49, 779–785. [Google Scholar]
  49. Todini, L.; Lucaroni, A.; Malfatti, A.; Debenedetti, A.; Costarelli, S. Male-female differences in the annual profiles of the thyroid hormones blood level by the goat. Atti Della Soc. Ital. Sci. Vet. 1992, 46, 169–173. [Google Scholar]
  50. Salem, M.H.; Elsherbiny, A.A.; Khalil, M.H.; Yousef, M.K. Diurnal and seasonal rhythm in plasma-cortisol, triiodothyronine and thyronine as affected by the wool coat in barki sheep. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 61, 946–951. [Google Scholar]
  51. Okab, A.B.; Elebanna, I.M.; Mekkawy, M.Y.; Hassan, G.A.; Elnouty, F.D.; Salem, M.H. Seasonal-changes in plasma thyroid-hormones, total lipids, cholesterol and serum transaminases during pregnancy and at parturition. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 63, 946–951. [Google Scholar]
  52. Menegatos, J.; Goulas, C.; Kalogiannis, D. The productivity, ovarian and thyroid activity of ewes in an accelerated lambing system in Greece. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 65, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Souza, M.I.L.; Bicudo, S.D.; Uribe-Velasquez, L.F.; Ramos, A.A. Circadian and circannual rhythms of T3 and T4 secretions in Polwarth-Ideal rams. Small Rumin. Res. 2002, 46, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dwyer, C.M.; Lawrence, A.B. A review of the behavioural and physiological adaptations of hill and lowland breeds of sheep that favour lamb survival. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 92, 235–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dwyer, C.M.; Morgan, A. Maintenance of body temperature in the neonatal lamb: Effects of breed, birth weight, and litter size. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nagayach, R.; Gupta, U.D.; Prakash, A. Expression profiling of hsp70 gene during different seasons in goats (Capra hircus) under sub-tropical humid climatic conditions. Small Rumin. Res. 2017, 147, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Banerjee, D.; Upadhyay, R.C.; Chaudhary, U.B.; Kumar, R.; Singh, S.; Ashutosh, G.J.M.; Polley, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Das, T.K.; De, S. Seasonal variation in expression pattern of genes under HSP70: Seasonal variation in expression pattern of genes under HSP70 family in heat- and cold-adapted goats (Capra hircus). Cell Stress Chaperones 2014, 19, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mohanarao, G.J.; Mukherjee, A.; Banerjee, D.; Gohain, M.; Dass, G.; Brahma, B.; Datta, T.K.; Upadhyay, R.C.; De, S. HSP70 family genes and HSP27 expression in response to heat and cold stress in vitro in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of goat (Capra hircus). Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 116, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Al-Dawood, A. Towards heat stress management in small ruminants-a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gonzalez, E.B.; Sacchero, D.M.; Easdale, M.H. Environmental influence on Merino sheep wool quality through the lens of seasonal variations in fibre diameter. J. Arid Environ. 2020, 181, 104248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sejian, V.; Bahadur, S.; Shekhawat, I.; Madiajagan Malik, P.; Soren, N.M.; Kumar, D.; Maurya, V.P.; Shinde, A.K.; Sahoo, A.; Naqvi, M. Environmental stress ımpact on small ruminants production. In Sheep and Goat Meat Production and Processing; Shinde, A.K., Gadekar, Y.P., Naqvi, S.M.K., Sahoo, A., Eds.; Satish Serial Publishing House: Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 157–181. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tüfekci, H.; Çelik, H.T. Effects of climate change on sheep and goat breeding. Black Sea J. Agric. 2021, 4, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sejian, V.; Maurya, V.P.; Kumar, K.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Effect of multiple stresses (thermal, nutritional and walking stress) on the Reproductive performance of Malpura ewes. Vet. Med. Int. 2012, 2012, 471760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sejian, V.; Maurya, V.P.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Effect of walking stress on growth, physiological adaptability and endocrine responses in Malpura ewes under semi-arid tropical environment. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Beede, D.K.; Collier, R.J. Potential nutritional strategies for intensively managed cattle during thermal stress. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 62, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marai, I.F.M.; El-Darawany, A.A.; Fadiel, A.; Abdel-Hafiz, M.A.M. Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 71, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Conrad, J.H. Feeding of farm animals in hot and cold environments. In Stress Physiology in Livestock Volume II Ungulates; Yousef, M.K., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1985; pp. 205–226. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ismail, E.; Abdel-Latif, H.; Hassan, G.A.; Salem, M.H. Water metabolism and requirement of sheep as affected by breed and season. World Rev. Anim. Prod. 1995, 30, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
  69. Monty Jr, D.E.; Kelley, L.M.; Rice, W.R. Acclimatization of St.-Croix, Karakul and Rambouillet sheep to intense and dry summer heat. Small Rumin. Res. 1991, 4, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Friend, M.A.; Robards, G.E. Fibre diameter and staple strength of sheep selected for divergent clean fleece weight when subjected to an increase in intake or an increase in intake and diet change. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005, 56, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Robertson, S.M.; Robards, G.E.; Wolfe, E. The timing of nutritional restriction during reproduction influences staple strength. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2000, 51, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Joy, A.; Taheri, S.; Dunshea, F.R.; Leury, B.J.; DiGiacomo, K.; Osei-Amponsah, R.; Brodie, G.; Chauhan, S.S. Non-invasive measure of heat stress in sheep using machine learning techniques and infrared thermography. Small Rumin. Res. 2022, 207, 106592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kadim, I.T.; Mahgoub, O.; Al-Marzooqi, W.; Al-Ajmi, D.S.; Al-Maqbali, R.S.; Al- Lawati, S.M. The influence of seasonal temperatures on meat quality characteristics of hot-boned, m. psoas major and minor, from goats and sheep. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yaslıoğlu, E.; İlhan, H. Güney Marmara süt sığırı yetiştiriciliğinin ısı stresi yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2016, 13, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kouba, M.; Hermier, D.; Le Dividich, J. Influence of a high ambient temperature on lipid metabolism in the growing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Odongo, N.E.; Alzahal, O.; Lindinger, M.I.; Duffield, T.F.; Valdes, E.V.; Terrell, S.P.; McBride, B.W. Effects of mild heat stress and grain challenge on acid-base balance and rumen tissue histology in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Verma, D.N.; Lal, S.N.; Singh, S.P.; Parkash, O. Effect of season on biological responses and productivity of buffalo. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 152, 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  78. Slimen, I.B.; Chniter, M.; Najar, T.; Ghram, A. Meta-analysis of some physiologic, metabolic and oxidative responses of sheep exposed to environmental heat stress. Livest. Sci. 2019, 229, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rana, M.S.; Hashem, M.A.; Sakib, M.N.; Kumar, A. Effect of heat stress on blood parameters in indigenous sheep. J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ. 2014, 12, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Finocchiaro, R.; van Kaam, J.B.C.H.M.; Portolano, B.; Misztal, I. Effect of Heat Stress on Production of Mediterranean Dairy Sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 1855–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sevi, A.; Annicchiarico, G.; Albenzio, M.; Taibi, L.; Muscio, A.; Dell’Aquila, S. Effects of solar radiation and feeding time on behavior, ımmune response and production of lactating ewes under high ambient temperature. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sevi, A.; Caroprese, M. Impact of heat stress on milk production, immunity and udder health in sheep: A critical review. Small Rumininant Res. 2012, 107, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Peana, I.; Fois, G.; Cannas, A. Effects of heat stress and diet on milk production and feed and energy intake of sarda ewes. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 6, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Abdel-Hafez, M.A.M. Studies on the Reproductive Performance in Sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  85. Shafie, M.M.; Murad, H.M.; El-Bedawy, T.M.; Salem, S.M. Effect of heat stress on feed intake, rumen fermentation and water turnover in relation to heat tolerance response by sheep. Egypt. J. Anim. Prod. 1994, 31, 317–327. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang, M.; Dunshea, F.R.; Warner, R.D.; DiGiacomo, K.; Osei-Amponsah, R.; Chauhan, S.S. Impacts of heat stress on meat quality and strategies for amelioration: A review. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2020, 64, 1613–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gregory, N.G. How climatic changes could affect meat quality. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1866–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Adzitey, F.; Nurul, H. Pale soft exudative (PSE) and dark firm dry (DFD) meats: Causes and measures to reduce these incidences. Int. Food Res. J. 2011, 18, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mitlöhner, F.M.; Galyean, M.L.; McGlone, J.J. Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 2043–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Rana, M.S.; Hashem, M.A.; Akhter, S.; Habibullah, M.; Islam, M.H.; Biswas, R.C. Effect of heat stress on carcass and meat quality of indigenous sheep of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 43, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mujahid, A.; Pumford, N.R.; Bottje, W.; Nakagawa, K.; Miyazawa, T.; Akiba, Y.; Toyomizu, M. Mitochondrial oxidative damage in chicken skeletal muscle induced by acute heat stress. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 44, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, R.R.; Pan, X.J.; Peng, Z.Q. Effects of heat exposure on muscle oxidation and protein functionalities of pectoralis majors in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Robertson, S.; Friend, M. Strategies to ameliorate heat stress effects on sheep reproduction. In Climate Change and Livestock Production: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 175–183. [Google Scholar]
  94. van Wettere, W.H.; Kind, K.L.; Gatford, K.L.; Swinbourne, A.M.; Leu, S.T.; Hayman, P.T.; Kelly, J.M.; Weaver, A.C.; Kleemann, D.O.; Walker, S.K. Review of the impact of heat stress on reproductive performance of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Indu, S.; Sejian, V.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Impact of simulated semiarid tropical environmental conditions on growth, physiological adaptability, blood metabolites and endocrine responses in Malpura ewes. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Naqvi, S.M.K.; Maurya, V.P.; Gulyani, R.; Joshi, A.; Mittal, J.P. The effect of thermal stress on superovulatory response and embryo production in Bharat Merino ewes. Small Rumin. Res. 2004, 55, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Romo-Barron, C.B.; Diaz, D.; Portillo-Loera, J.J.; Romo-Rubio, J.A.; Jimenez-Trejo, F.; Montero-Pardo, A. Impact of heat stress on the reproductive performance and physiology of ewes: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2019, 63, 949–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Arman, C.; Quintana Casares, P.I.; Sanchez-Partida, L.G.; Setchell, B.P. Ram sperm motility after intermittent scrotal insulation evaluated by manual and computer-assisted methods. Asian J. Androl. 2006, 8, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hansen, P. Effect of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 3341–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Setchell, B.P. The Parkes Lecture: Heat and the testis. Reproduction 1998, 114, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Macías-Cruz, U.; Álvarez-Valenzuela, F.D.; Correa-Calderón, A.; Díaz-Molina, R.; Mellado, M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Avendaño-Reyes, L. Thermoregulation of nutrient-restricted hair ewes subjected to heat stress during late pregnancy. J. Therm. Biol. 2013, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Pérez, R.V.; Macías Cruz, U.; Avendaño Reyes, L.; Correa-Calderón, A.; López Baca, M.D.L.Á.; Lara Rivera, A.L. Impacto del estrés por calor en la producción de ovinos de pelo. Revisión. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2020, 11, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ross, T.T.; Goode, L.; Linnerud, A.C. Effects of high ambient temperature on respiration rate, rectal temperature, fetal development and thyrold gland activity in tropical and temperate breeds of sheep. Theriogenology 1985, 24, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fogarty, N.M.; Hopkins, D.L.; van de Ven, R. Lamb production from diverse genotypes. 1. Lamb growth and survival and ewe performance. Anim. Sci. 2000, 70, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Geenty, K.G.; Brien, F.D.; Harden, S.; Hocking-Edwards, J.E.; Hart, K.; Van Der Werf, J.H.; Hinch, G.N.; Dobos, R.C.; Refshauge, G.; McCaskill, M.; et al. Reproductive performance in the Sheep CRC Information Nucleus using artificial insemination across different sheep-production environments in southern Australia. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2014, 54, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Smith, T. Some tools to combat dry season nutritional stress in ruminants under African Conditions. In Proceedings of the Final Review Meeting of an IAEA Technical Cooperation Regional AFRA Project, Animal Production and Health Section, Cairo, Egypt, 25–29 November 2002. [Google Scholar]
  107. Allden, W.G. The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1970, 40, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Martin, G.B.; Rodger, J.; Blache, D. Nutritional and environmental effects on reproduction in small ruminants. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2004, 16, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sejian, V.; Maurya, V.P.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Effect of thermal, nutritional and combined (thermal and nutritional) stresses on growth and reproductive performance of Malpura ewes under semi-arid tropical environment. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 95, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mutinati, M.; Piccinno, M.; Roncetti, M.; Campanile, D.; Rizzo, A.; Sciorsci, R.L. Oxidative stress during pregnancy in the sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2013, 48, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nawito, M.F.; Abd El Hameed, A.R.; Sosa, A.S.A.; Mahmoud, K.G.M. Impact of pregnancy and nutrition on oxidant/antioxidant balance in sheep and goats reared in South Sinai, Egypt. Vet. World 2016, 9, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hoffman, M.L.; Reed, S.A.; Pillai, S.M.; Jones, A.K.; McFadden, K.K.; Zinn, S.A.; Govoni, K.E. Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium: The effects of poor maternal nutrition during gestation on offspring postnatal growth and metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 2222–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Jones, A.K.; Hoffman, M.L.; Pillai, S.M.; McFadden, K.K.; Govoni, K.E.; Zinn, S.A.; Reed, S.A. Gestational restricted-and over-feeding promote maternal and offspring inflammatory responses that are distinct and dependent on diet in sheep. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 98, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nathanielsz, P.W.; Poston, L.; Taylor, P.D. In utero exposure to maternal obesity and diabetes: Animal models that identify and characterize implications for future health. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 34, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wu, G.; Bazer, F.W.; Wallace, J.M.; Spencer, T.E. Board-Invıted Revıew: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 2316–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sejian, V.; Bahadur, S.; Naqvi, S.M. Effect of nutritional restriction on growth, adaptation physiology and estrous responses in Malpura ewes. Anim. Biol. 2014, 64, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Parraguez, V.H.; Sales, F.; Peralta, O.; De los Reyes, M.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Oxidative Stress and Fetal Growth Restriction Set Up Earlier in Undernourished Sheep Twin Pregnancies: Prevention with Antioxidant and Nutritional Supplementation. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Trotta, R.J.; Vasquez-Hidalgo, M.A.; Vonnahme, K.A.; Swanson, K.C. Effects of nutrient restriction during midgestation to late gestation on maternal and fetal postruminal carbohydrase activities in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skz393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Maurya, V.P.; Sejian, V.; Kumar, D.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Impact of Heat Stress, Nutritional Stress and Their Combinations on the Adaptive Capability of Malpura Sheep under Hot Semi-Arid Tropical Environment. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 2019, 7, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  120. Pulina, G.; Nudda, A.; Battacone, G.; Cannas, A. Effects of nutrition on the contents of fat, protein, somatic cells, aromatic compounds, and undesirable substances in sheep milk. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 131, 255–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Al-Saiady, M.Y. Effect of restricted feeding, breed and diet on sheep milk yield. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2006, 30, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ravagnolo, O.; Misztal, I. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 82, 126–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Endris, M.; Feki, E. Review on effect of stress on animal productivity and response of animal to stressors. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2021, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  124. Idris, A.O.; Kijora, C.; El-Hag, F.M.; Salih, A.M. Effect of dietary supplementation on reproductive performance of Sudanese Desert sheep. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2010, 2010, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  125. Borowczyk, E.; Caton, J.S.; Redmer, D.A.; Bilski, J.J.; Weigl, R.M.; Vonnahme, K.A.; Borowicz, P.P.; Kirsch, J.D.; Kraft, K.C.; Reynolds, L.P.; et al. Effects of plane of nutrition on in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Musa, S.I.; Bitto, I.I.; Ayoade, J.A.; Oyedipe, O.E. Effects of vitamin E and selenium on fertility and lamb performance of yankasa sheep. Open J. Vet. Med. 2018, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hunter, L.; Van Wyk, J.B.; De Wet, P.J.; Grobbelaar, P.D.; Pretorius, P.S.; Morris, J.D.V.; Leeuwner, W. The effects of nutritional and lambing stress on wool fibre and processing characteristics. Wool Technol. Sheep Breed 1990, 38, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  128. Olivier, W.J.; Olivier, J.J. The effect of nutritional stress on the wool production potential of strong and fine wool Merino sheep. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 35, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Andronie, I.; Monica, P.; Andronie, V. The effects of transport stress on sheep welfare. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 41, 729–734. [Google Scholar]
  130. Teke, B.; Ekiz, B.; Akdag, F.; Ugurlu, M.; Ciftci, G.; Senturk, B. Effects of stocking density of lambs on biochemical stress parameters and meat quality related to commercial transportation. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cockram, M.S.; Baxter, E.M.; Smith, L.A.; Bell, S.; Howard, C.M.; Prescott, R.J.; Mitchell, M.A. Effect of driver behaviour, driving events and road type on the stability and resting behaviour of sheep in transit. Anim. Sci. 2004, 79, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ruiz-de-la-Torre, J.L.; Velarde, A.; Manteca, X.; Diestre, A.; Gispert, M.; Hall, S.J.G.; Broom, D.M. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 227–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Broom, D.M. The welfare of livestock during road transport. In Long Distance Transport and the Welfare of Farm Animals; Appleby, M., Cussen, V., Garcés, L., Lambert, L., Turner, J., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2008; Volume 7, pp. 157–181. [Google Scholar]
  134. Collins, T.; Stockman, C.A.; Barnes, A.L.; Miller, D.W.; Wickham, S.L.; Fleming, P.A. Qualitative behavioural assessment as a method to identify potential stressors during commercial sheep transport. Animals 2018, 8, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tarrant, P.V.; Kenny, F.J.; Harrington, D.; Murphy, M. Long distance transportation of steers to slaughter: Effect of stocking density on physiology, behaviour and carcass quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1992, 30, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fisher, A.D.; Niemeyer, D.O.; Lea, J.M.; Lee, C.; Paull, D.R.; Reed, M.T.; Ferguson, D.M. The effects of 12, 30, or 48 h of road transport on the physiological and behavioural responses of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 2144–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Messori, S.; Pedernera-Romano, C.; Rodriguez, P.; Barnard, S.; Giansante, D.; Magnani, D.; Dalmau, A.; Velarde, A.; Dalla Villa, P. Effects of different rest-stop durations at control posts during a long journey on the welfare of sheep. Vet. Ital. 2017, 53, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  138. Fisher, A.D.; Stewart, M.; Duganzich, D.M.; Tacon, J.; Matthews, L.R. The effects of stationary periods and external temperature and humidity on thermal stress conditions within sheep transport vehicles. N. Z. Vet. J. 2005, 53, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wojtas, K.; Cwynar, P.; Kołacz, R. Effect of thermal stress on physiological and blood parameters in merino sheep. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 58, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chambers, P.G.; Grandin, T.; Heinz, G.; Srisuvan, T. Guidelines for Humane Handling, Transport, and Slaughter of Livestock; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Humane Society of the United States (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  141. Adenkola, A.Y.; Ayo, J.O. Physiological and behavioural responses of livestock to road transportation stress: A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 4845–4856. [Google Scholar]
  142. Eriksen, M.S.; Rødbotten, R.; Grøndahl, A.M.; Friestad, M.; Andersen, I.L.; Mejdell, C.M. Mobile abattoir versus conventional slaughterhouse- Impact on stress parameters and meat quality characteristics in Norwegian lambs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013, 149, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gregory, N.G.; Grandin, T. Animal Welfare and Meat Science; CABI Publising Wallingford: Oxfordshire, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  144. Ivanov, N.T. Sheep welfare during transport and slaughter in Bulgaria–impact of welfare on slaughter carcass and meat quality: A review. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2020, 44, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Immonen, K.; Puolanne, E. Variation of residual glycogen-glucose concentration at ultimate pH values below 5.75. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ouali, A.; Herrera-Mendez, C.N.; Coulis, G.; Becila, S.; Boudjellal, A.; Aubry, L.; Sentandre, M.A. Revisiting the conversion of muscle into meat and the underlying mechanisms. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Santos, A.; Giráldez, F.; Mateo, J.; Frutos, J.; Andrés, S. Programming Merino lambs by early feed restriction reduces growth rates and increases fat accretion during the fattening period with no effect on meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2018, 135, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kadim, I.T.; Mahgoub, O.; Al-Kindi, A.; Al-Marzooqi, W.; Al-Saqri, N.M. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. De la Fuente, J.; Sanchez, M.; Perez, C.; Lauzurica, S.; Vieira, C.; González de Chávarri, E.; Díaz, M.T. Physiological response and carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs in relation to transport time and stocking density during transport by road. Animal 2010, 4, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lendrawati, L.; Priyanto, R.; Jayanegara, A.; Manalu, W.; Desrial, D. Effect of different transportation period on body weight loss, hematological and biochemical stres responses of sheep. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 2020, 45, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ekiz, B.; Ergul Ekiz, E.; Yalçıntan, H.; Koçak, O.; Yılmaz, A.; Güneş, H. The effects of transport stress on certain welfare parameters and behaviours in Red Karaman, Imroz, Sakız and Karakul rams. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Istanb. Univ. 2012, 38, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  152. Gowane, G.R.; Gadekar, Y.P.; Prakash, V.; Kadam, V.; Chopra, A.; Prince, L.L.L. Climate Change Impact on Sheep Production: Growth, Milk, Wool, and Meat. In Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 31–69. [Google Scholar]
  153. Arfuso, F.; Acri, G.; Piccione, G.; Sansotta, C.; Fazio, F.; Giudice, E.; Giannetto, C. Eye surface infrared thermography usefulness as a noninvasive method of measuring stress response in sheep during shearing: Correlations with serum cortisol and rectal temperature values. Physiol. Behav. 2022, 250, 113781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Dikmen, S.; Orman, A.; Ustuner, H. The effect of shearing in a hot environment on some welfare indicators in Awassi lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011, 43, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sanger, M.E.; Doyle, R.E.; Hinch, G.N.; Lee, C. Sheep exhibit a positive judgement bias and stress-induced hyperthermia following shearing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 131, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Piccione, G.; Lutri, L.; Casella, S.; Ferrantelli, V.; Pennisi, P. Effect of shearing and environmental conditions on physiological mechanisms in ewes. J. Environ. Biol. 2008, 29, 877–880. [Google Scholar]
  157. Suhaır, S.M.; Abdalla, M.A. Effects of seasonal changes and shearing on thermoregulation, blood constituents and semen characteristics of desert rams (Ovis aries). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 1884–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Piccione, G.; Fazio, F.; Casella, S.; Pennisi, P.; Caola, G. Influence of shearing onoxidative stress and some physiological parameters in ewes. Anim. Sci. J. 2011, 82, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hargreaves, A.L.; Hutson, G.D. The stress response in sheep during routine handling procedures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 26, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Panaretto, B.A. Some metabolic effects of cold stress on undernourished non-pregnant ewes. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1968, 19, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Piccione, G.; Caola, G.; Refinetti, R. Effect of shearing on the core body temperature of three breeds of Mediterranean sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 2002, 46, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Elvidge, D.G.; Coop, I.E. Effect of shearing on feed requirements of sheep. N. Z. J. Exp. Agric. 1974, 2, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Carcangiu, V.; Vacca, G.M.; Parmeggiani, A.; Mura, M.C.; Pazzola, M.; Dettori, M.L.; Bini, P.P. The effect of shearing procedures on blood levels of growth hormone, cortisol and other stress haematochemical parameters in Sarda sheep. Animal 2008, 2, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Fidan, A.F.; Kucukkurt, I.; Eryavuz, A.; Cigerci, I.H.; Yardimci, M.; Ozdemir, A. Effects of shearing procedures on oxidant-antioxidant status in Chios sheep. Rev. Médecine Vétérinaire 2009, 160, 349–355. [Google Scholar]
  165. Al-Ramamneh, D.; Gerken, D.M.; Riek, A. Effect of shearing on water turnover and thermobiological variables in German Blackhead mutton sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 4294–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Casella, S.; Giudice, E.; Passantino, A.; Zumbo, A.; Di Pietro, S.; Piccione, G. Shearing induces secondary biomarkers responses of thermal stress in sheep. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2016, 34, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  167. Freitas-de-Melo, A.; Orihuela, A.; Hötzel, M.J.; Ungerfeld, R. What do we know and need to know about weaning in sheep? An overview of weaning practises, stress and welfare. Front. Anim. Sci. 2022, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Karakus, F. Weaning stress in lambs. J. Int. Sci. Publ. Agric. Food 2014, 2, 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  169. Wang, S.; Chai, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, N.; Cui, K.; Bi, Y.; Ma, T.; Tu, Y.; Diao, Q. The temporal dynamics of rumen microbiota in early weaned lambs. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Schichowski, C.; Moors, E.; Gauly, M. Effects of weaning lambs in two stages or by abrupt separation on their behavior and growth rate. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ekiz, B.; Ergül Ekiz, E.; Yalçıntan, H.; Koçak, Ö.; Yılmaz, A. Effects of suckling length (45, 75 and 120 d) and rearing type on cortisol level, carcass and meat quality characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Pascual-Alonso, M.; Miranda-de la Lama, G.C.; Aguayo-Ulloa, L.; Ezquerro, L.; Villarroel, M.; Marín, R.H.; Maria, G.A. Effect of postweaning handling strategies on welfare and productive traits in lambs. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2015, 18, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mohapatra, A.; De, K.; Saxena, V.K.; Mallick, P.K.; Devi, I.; Singh, R. Behavioral and physiological adjustments by lambs in response to weaning stress. J. Vet. Behav. 2021, 41, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Napolitano, F.; De Rosa, G.; Sevi, A. Welfare implications of artificial rearing and early weaning in sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Damián, J.P.; Hötzel, M.J.; Banchero, G.; Ungerfeld, R. Behavioural response of grazing lambs to changes associated with feeding and separation from their mothers at weaning. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Casuriaga, D.; Ungerfeld, R.; Ciappesoni, G.; Freitas-de-Melo, A. Lambs are more stressed at early weaning when housed with their twin. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Mao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yun, Y.; Ji, W.; Jin, Z.; Wang, C.; Yu, Z. Weaning age affects the development of the ruminal bacterial and archaeal community in hu lambs during early life. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 636865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Li, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G.; Niu, X.; Wang, W.; Li, F.; Li, F.; Zhang, Z. The functional development of the rumen is influenced by weaning and associated with ruminal microbiota in lambs. Anim. Biotechnol. 2020, 33, 612–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Some stress factors in sheep production.
Figure 1. Some stress factors in sheep production.
Animals 13 02769 g001
Figure 2. Some negative effects of stress factors on sheep productivity.
Figure 2. Some negative effects of stress factors on sheep productivity.
Animals 13 02769 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tüfekci, H.; Sejian, V. Stress Factors and Their Effects on Productivity in Sheep. Animals 2023, 13, 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172769

AMA Style

Tüfekci H, Sejian V. Stress Factors and Their Effects on Productivity in Sheep. Animals. 2023; 13(17):2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172769

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tüfekci, Hacer, and Veerasamy Sejian. 2023. "Stress Factors and Their Effects on Productivity in Sheep" Animals 13, no. 17: 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172769

APA Style

Tüfekci, H., & Sejian, V. (2023). Stress Factors and Their Effects on Productivity in Sheep. Animals, 13(17), 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172769

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop