This study focused on the evaluation of combined Se (organic and inorganic) and I supplementation in dairy cow diets, using the maximum levels allowed by European Union legislation, in order to assess its effects on the productive parameters and the mineral and metabolic status of the animals, as well as on the composition and quality of milk, cheese, and yogurt. In addition, this study explores the potential for specific labeling of dairy products derived from this feeding strategy.
4.2. Production Parameters and Metabolic Status
In the field of dairy farming, the study of production parameters is important, since a reduction in milk production is one of the most economically critical issues associated with Se deficiency, presenting significant impacts on farms [
45]. From our experience, we observed that a daily intake of 11.5 mg of Se and 112.5 mg of I did not influence the milk yield and body condition of cows. From this perspective, Givens et al. [
46] also observed no differences in the cows’ body condition following Se intake but noted that increasing the dietary Se level from 9.4 mg/day to 14.3 mg/day, regardless of the Se source, resulted in a 2 kg/day decrease in milk production. However, in our test, the daily Se consumption was lower and similar between diets where we only changed the Se source. In contrast, in a study conducted by Bagnicka et al. [
47], the authors observed that the milk volume produced after 90 days of supplementation with Se yeast, with an ingestion amount of 6 mg Se/day, was approximately 20% higher than in the group supplemented with an inorganic Se source. On the other hand, in another study, Iannaccone et al. [
48] observed no variations in the milk yield with a daily I intake of 85 mg/day, and Kaufmann and Rambeck [
49] did not observe any differences in body weight gain and feed intake after supplementing the cows’ diets with 150 mg I/day. As for the joint supplementation, Moschini [
4] did not determine any effects between the milk yield and the levels of Se and I added to the feed, with maximum intake levels of 11.30 mg Se/cow/day and 82.17 mg I/cow/day being obtained. This result is in line with our results, even though these authors only used inorganic sources of food.
Moreover, we determined that diet supplementation with organic Se and I did not affect the levels of Ca, P, Cu, Zn, and Se in the sampled blood. However, the day effect on Ca, Cu, Zn, and Se levels recorded at the end of this study can probably be associated with factors related to the stage of lactation or production, and these changes in blood trace element concentrations are not uniform among herds [
50,
51]. Several regulation points exist in the transfer of minerals to the blood, including intestinal absorption, which plays an important role in regulating the homeostatic control of Zn and Cu. Moreover, during the milk synthesis stage, there is an increase in the demand for Ca, in addition to a relatively slow response to the regulation of Ca absorption from the intestinal tract [
51].
On the other hand, the level of Se in blood depends mainly on recent dietary intake and the bioavailability of the form of supplemented Se [
52] since transformation pathways that take place in the rumen are highly dependent on the type of Se chemical compounds [
53]. Inorganic salts, such as sodium selenite, are highly susceptible to dissolution and form elemental Se in the rumen environment [
54], are poorly absorbed with a short half-life in the body, and are mostly excreted in feces [
12,
55] while organic sources such as Se yeast improve the bioavailability of Se, increasing its incorporation into the microbial protein as seleno-aminoacids in rumen metabolism [
54,
56]. Several studies observed a higher Se content in the blood samples tested when Se yeast, instead of sodium selenite, was added to the cows’ diets [
47,
54,
57,
58] since organic Se forms more efficiently accumulate in tissues, being more bioavailable and less toxic than inorganic forms [
12]. However, we observed that, although one of the diets was supplemented with an organic source of Se, we did not view significant differences in the blood Se levels. The same result was reported by Azorín et al. [
59] after supplementing cows’ diets with moderate levels of organic and inorganic Se. This result can be explained by the fact that the incorporation of Se into erythrocytes occurs during cell synthesis, acting as a long-term marker of the nutritional status of this mineral and reflecting a more chronic Se status [
54,
60]. In addition, the lack of a response can be associated with the fact that the total dietary Se intake was above the threshold at which a response would be recorded, as was evident in the study conducted by Juniper et al. [
61].
Selenium contributes substantially to the antioxidant defense network [
62] and forms part of the active center of many antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) [
22], whose activity depends on the level of Se in feed and is considered a reliable indicator of Se uptake and its concentration in whole blood [
61,
63]. In our study, a day effect was observed at the end of the test in relation to the GSH-Px levels, and an interaction between the ration type and time was also observed when GSH-Px was measured in relation to hemoglobin, this effect being greater in the group supplemented with organic Se and I. Sun et al. [
58] employed a similar approach and observed an improvement in the antioxidant capacity of dairy cows with an increase in serum GSH-Px after Se yeast supplementation. In contrast, Juniper et al. [
61] reported no significant treatment effects on the GSH-Px level, and they hypothesized that this could have been due to the brief trial period that did not provide enough time for any differences in the GSH-Px activity to develop. In addition, in our study, we did not observe any differences in the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) or total oxidant status (TOS), but an increasing trend for the TOS at the end of the experimental period was observed.
Similar to the mineral content in blood, the differences we observed in some plasma metabolites at the end of the test could be mainly related to the lactation stage, where serum protein, albumin, and glucose could be subject to changes [
64]. Only significant differences were registered for the glucose and total protein levels, which were lower in both groups at the end of the study but presented an increasing trend for the glucose level in the serum for the SeI-diet group. This trend to increase the glucose levels after Se supplementation is in accordance with Pamungkas et al. [
65], who obtained higher glucose levels after supplementing animals’ diets with a mixture of Se and vitamin E. This result can also be related to the high-dose I supplementation scenario since Hillman and Curtis [
66] observed that serum glucose increased after feeding cows with an average iodide amount of 164 mg/cow/day.
In ruminants, it has been determined that >70% of ingested I is absorbed in the rumen and omasum. However, in the abomasum, I secretion exceeds absorption, although significant I reabsorption occurs in the small and large intestines [
67]. The tissue that accumulates the most I in cattle is the thyroid gland [
34], where it is incorporated into the synthesis of thyroid hormones [
68]. In addition, the mammary gland concentrates I, excreting it through milk. There is a strong correlation between the amount of I in the diet and the concentration of I in milk [
69], and several studies indicate that total I excretion through milk ranges from 10 to 55%, depending on the level of I and the presence of anti-nutritional factors [
68].
Selenium and I are both essential for normal thyroid hormone metabolism [
3,
4], with I acting as an essential substrate for thyroid hormone synthesis while the selenoproteins protect the thyroid from oxidative stress incurred during this process and regulate the number of active hormones [
7]. An iodine–selenium imbalance affects the regulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis and leads to diseases associated with multiple metabolic disorders [
70,
71]. To evaluate the effects of supplementation with organic Se and a high I level on the thyroid metabolism of cows, the level of total thyroxine (T
4) hormone in cow plasma was determined. Se enzymes are responsible for the conversion of T
4 in triiodothyronine (T
3), the active metabolite that has a much shorter half-life than T
4 [
3,
6]. Specifically, the enzyme responsible for this activation is 5-iodothyronine deiodinase, a Se-dependent protein [
72]. Despite this behavior, long-term variations in dietary Se levels, such as a sustained deficiency over time, are necessary to observe the effects on thyroid hormone concentrations [
73]. On the other hand, plasma T
4 values tend to be relatively stable and hardly respond to short-term dietary I supplementation in cattle [
74]. In our test, at the end of the experimental period, only an interaction between diet type and time was observed, with a decrease in the T
4 hormone in the control group fed with low levels of I. Some researchers observed lower levels of the T
4 hormone in goats prior to I supplementation, with trial periods over 50 days being conducted [
75,
76]. Moreover, it can be determined that the metabolism of thyroid hormones is very complex and multifactorial, making simple interpretations difficult to perform [
76].
Currently, in animal production, both the health status and welfare of animals are of particular importance [
77,
78], not only from the point of view of the researcher, farmer, or livestock technician but also for their transfer of knowledge to society at large [
79]. It should be noted that no pathology was observed during the trial and no negative effects on the physiological state of the animals were evidenced from the results obtained.
4.3. Milk
Despite the fact that many researchers have observed a reduction in the SCC in milk after Se and I supplementations [
48,
58,
80], no influence of diet was observed in our study, and we perceived an increase in these levels at the end of the test, which could be associated with the lactation stage [
81,
82].
Milk composition varies substantially throughout the lactation period, mainly as a result of physiological changes occurring in a cow [
81,
83]. In our study, the differences observed in the chemical composition of milk at the end of the experimental period (increases in fat and protein and a decrease in lactose) were consistent with the results reported by other authors throughout the lactation period [
84,
85,
86]. From this perspective, in a study conducted by Sun et al. [
58], the researchers observed the day effect on protein, fat, lactose, and non-fat solids after supplementing cows’ diet with Se yeast at 0.5 or 5 mg/kg of DM, but with no treatment effect. Givens et al. [
46] also did not observe any effects on the main chemical components of milk after supplementing cows’ diets with different Se concentrations (ranging from 0.38 to 1.14 mg/kg of DM). In contrast, Nudda et al. [
87] observed a reduction in milk lactose levels in small ruminants when supplemented with 0.90 mg/day of potassium iodide compared with the control group supplemented with 0 mg/day and another group supplemented with 0.45 mg/day. Furthermore, they observed no effects on the protein level, but they did observe a reduction in the fat content after supplementation with 0.90 mg/day.
Milk mineral levels also varied throughout the lactation period [
81], and this could explain the day effects observed for P and Zn, which resulted in an increase in the content of these minerals at the end of the test. Furthermore, the slight increase observed in the Zn level is in accordance with the result obtained by Bagnicka et al. [
47], who observed higher levels of Zn after 90 days of supplementation with Se yeast. Some studies have shown that Se and I supplementation in feed affects the concentration of these trace elements in milk [
4,
12,
22,
47,
68,
80]. In a similar manner, Mehdi and Dufrasne [
72] perceived that analyzing the Se content in cows’ milk is a simple way to assess the Se status of a herd, and Berg et al. [
88] believed that the amount of I in cows’ milk reflected the dietary I content and was also an indicator of the I status of the animals.
Fresh milk obtained from the supplemented diet group had 208% more Se and 424% more I than the control group at the end of the test. This observation is in agreement with the result obtained by Barbé et al. [
12], who determined the highest quantity of Se present in cow milk when they supplemented the diet with Se yeast, which, when compared with other Se sources, was the most efficient source to transfer Se to the milk. Similar values of milk Se concentration were reported by Givens et al. [
46], who obtained a level of 28 μg/L after feeding cows with Se yeast in the amount of 0.4 mg/kg of DM. Bagnicka et al. [
47] determined an increase of over 300% of Se in cow milk subjected to organic Se treatment compared to the inorganic source. This occurs because the mammary gland is one of the most active protein-synthesizing organs in cows, and the selenomethionine present in organic Se sources is largely incorporated into milk proteins in a nonspecific way, instead of methionine [
12,
22,
89]. It is important to highlight that this positive effect of an increased Se level in the milk of cows fed with the SeI ration does not seem to be affected by the high levels of I present in this diet. The level of I analyzed in the milk from the SeI group was also interesting to consider since it was 559% higher at the end of the test than at the initial level. Using a similar approach, Kaufmann and Rambeck [
49] determined that a higher I intake increased the I concentration in milk, and the researchers obtained I levels in a range of 400–500 µg/L with an I supplementation of 60–150 mg/day in the feed.
Dietary reference values for Se and I for the adult population may vary; thus, for Se, the Institute of Medicine [
90] indicates a population reference intake of 55 µg/day, and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [
91] describes an adequate intake of 70 μg/day. For I, the most common population reference intake value in the literature is 150 μg/day for adults [
92]. Therefore, 100 mL of milk produced by the SeI group at the end of the study reached 5–6% of the daily reference value for Se, and 80% for I.
According to Regulation 1169/2011 (Articles 32 and 33, and Annex XIII Part A) of the European Union, beverages that provide 7.5% of the daily reference intake levels of Se or I can be labeled as a “source of Se” (≥4.13 µg/100 mL) or “source of I” (≥11.25 µg/100 mL), respectively [
93]. In addition, if food contains at least twice the value considered as a “source of”, it can be considered to contain a “high content”. On this basis, we did not achieve an appropriate supplementation level in the milk that could be labeled as a source of Se by the end of the test (the maximum Se level in our experiment was 3.32 expressed as µg/100 mL). These results are in line with the results of previous works [
22,
89,
94], where the achievement of milk Se levels above 4.13 µg/100 mL is successful when cows’ feed is supplemented with more than 0.2 ppm of an organic Se source, and this is not legally permitted in the European Union. As for I, labeled levels were obtained as a source of I in the milk for both groups, both at the beginning and end of the test. These results are reasonable, considering that milk is recognized as a natural source of I in the diet of human beings [
95]. In addition, at the end of the study, milk obtained from the control and supplemented groups could be labeled as milk with a “high I content” (≥22.5 µg/100 mL), reaching an I value of 120.2 expressed as μg/100 mL in the SeI group. It is worth noting that this level of I found in 100 mL of milk represents 20% of the maximum daily intake limit in the human diet recommended by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) [
25] (UL = 600 μg/day). Currently, some authors indicate that levels of I supplementation below the maximum permitted levels would be sufficient to enrich milk in I, without compromising the margin of safety for its consumption [
68]. Also, the literature reports highly variable levels of I in milk, influenced by factors including dietary contributions, presence of I antagonists, and management practices, such as the application of iodine-based disinfectants on the udder [
68,
96]. This variability highlights the importance of informing consumers about the I levels in the dairy products they consume to ensure their proper use in human nutrition.
4.4. Dairy Products
Dehydration achieved using the spray-drying method is the most frequently used technique in the field to promote the preservation and stabilization of milk constituents to extend their storage life and later use [
97]. Since trace minerals can be lost during heat treatment or other unit operations involving heat, such as evaporation and drying [
98], it is important to evaluate the mineral levels in dairy products produced after milk processing. In our study, the spray-dried milk collected from the group supplemented with organic Se and I (SeI ration) could be labeled as a “source of Se”, since, in the European Union, solid food that provides 15% of the daily reference intake of Se (≥8.25 µg/100 g) complies with this rule. Thus, the Se content in the spray-dried milk obtained from the SeI group reached a value of 22.66 µg/100 g, and this dairy product could also be labeled as “high in Se” since it contained more than twice the amount necessary to conform to the source declaration. Furthermore, the I content suitable for the source declaration (≥22.5 µg/100 g of solid food) was evident in the spray-dried milk obtained from both treatment groups, and the samples could also be labeled as “high in I” because they contained ≥45 µg of I/100 g in solid food (245.47 and 1568.65 µg/100 g of spray-dried milk for the control and SeI groups, respectively). Although the mineral values observed in the spray-dried milk are high, we must consider that, at the moment of consumption, the product will be reconstituted or can be used in the manufacture of other products as a food ingredient to create value-added foods [
99].
Ultimately, we observed that dietary supplementation with organic Se and I had a positive effect on the levels of both minerals in the fresh cheese, without affecting the chemical composition, pH, cheese yield, water activity, colorimetric parameters, and the levels of the other minerals in the product. This result is in accordance with that of Ianni et al. [
80], who observed no changes in the general chemical composition of cheeses following organic Se supplementation at a level of 0.45 mg/kg in total mixed ration, but they obtained a higher Se level in cheeses from the group supplemented with organic Se, achieving 290 µg/kg after 7 days of testing and 306 µg/kg after 120 days. On the other hand, Ling et al. [
22] conducted a study in dairy cows in which they evaluated two consecutive feeding periods with different forms of Se inclusion. In the first experimental period, the diet was supplemented with inorganic Se and, after 64 days, the second period of 57 days began in which cows consumed a combination of organic and inorganic Se at levels similar to those in our trial. The cheeses produced in the first experiment reached a Se level of 146 µg/kg, increasing to 361 µg/kg during the second period. Thus, the combination of the two forms of Se in the diet transferred Se to the cheese most effectively. However, in comparison with our results, the cheeses resulting from the dietary treatment in which the two forms of Se were combined, obtained higher levels than those obtained in our trial (361 µg/kg versus 164 µg/kg), although these authors produced a type of semi-mature cheese, unlike our case, which was fresh cheese. In addition, they suggested that the Se transfer coefficient from milk to cheese depended on the type of cheese processing performed since a lower protein content in cheese could be the reason for the lower Se transfer observed in some studies [
100,
101], supporting the idea that casein micelles could be the most important location for cheese Se, where selenomethionine is non-specifically incorporated [
22]. For this reason, Moschini et al. [
4] believed that Se was a more suitable element for producing enriched hard cheeses. Despite the fact that a significant fraction of I can be lost during milk processing and cheese manufacturing activities due to its high volatility and solubility properties [
17,
102,
103], fresh cheeses represent a very good source for the enrichment of this element [
4] since they retain higher amounts of whey, where most of the I content is found in solution or associated with whey proteins [
104]. However, the mineral concentration eventually increases due to moisture loss as maturation progresses, so hard cheeses will always possess higher mineral levels [
103].
Taking into account the daily reference intake levels of Se and I for the adult population, 50 g of cheese from the SeI group at the end of the test met the 15% recommended dietary allowance for Se and the 90% recommended dietary allowance for I. Following the European Union regulations, we observed that fresh cheeses produced by both groups could be labeled as sources of Se (≥8.25 µg/100 g of solid food) and I (≥22.50 µg/100 g of solid food). It is important to highlight that the cheese produced by the SeI group presented a Se content of 16.4 µg/100 g, which was very close to the declaration of a high Se content (16.5 µg/100 g of solid food). In addition, a “high I content” (≥45 µg/100 g) was evident in cheeses from both groups, reaching an I value of 269.7 µg/100 g in the supplemented group.
Selenium and I supplementations did not modify the texture profile of the fresh cheeses manufactured in the trial. Only a slight decrease was observed for the adhesiveness parameter in the SeI group. Regarding the sensory profile study, the higher overall acceptability of cheeses obtained from the control group could be related to the milder cow milk flavor assessed in the supplemented group. In contrast, Azorín et al. [
59] observed that supplementation with moderate levels of inorganic Se plus organic Se did not affect the cow milk flavor of cheeses, achieving mean overall acceptability values similar to ours.
Experimental diets did not affect the physicochemical properties of the yogurts produced. In contrast, Achanta et al. [
105] determined that the Se enrichment of yogurts could reduce the loss of whey, suggestively leading to a better water holding capacity. Similar to the study conducted with the cheese, no differences were observed in Ca, P, Cu, and Zn levels. In addition, yogurts produced by the SeI group exhibited quantitatively higher Se values, but no significant differences were observed. Csapó et al. [
106] observed higher levels of Se in their yogurts after feeding cows with Se yeast at a level of 2 mg Se/day. Moreover, significant differences were viewed for the I level, and yogurts produced from both treatments could be labeled as a “source of I” (≥22.50 µg/100 g), and a “high I content” (≥45 µg/100 g) could be specified for yogurts from the SeI group. Taking into account the daily reference intake levels of Se and I for the adult population, 50 g of yogurt from the SeI group at the end of the test would achieve the 58% recommended dietary allowance of I. It should be noted that, with the SeI diet, we obtained I levels much higher than those reported in the literature, although wide variability in the I content of dairy products has been reported [
104,
107]. Additionally, our level of I supplementation is much higher than that evaluated by other authors [
69].
It is important to evaluate the sensory properties of processed yogurts since their enrichment with some minerals can produce certain properties in the final product that make it unsuitable for human consumption. Alzate et al. [
108] experienced a metallic odor and observed a pinkish color in Se-enriched fermented milk when the Se concentrations were above 2 µg/g; however, these values were significantly higher than the maximum observed in our experiment. In our tested yogurts, the panelists determined that there were no significant differences in the parameters analyzed between the control and supplemented groups, achieving both a medium and high level of overall acceptance.