Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Level and Supplemental Herbal Extract Blend on Selected Blood Variables in Broiler Chickens Vaccinated against Coccidiosis
1
Department of Nutrition Physiology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, 32-083 Balice, Poland
2
Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Biology, Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2018, 8(11), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110208
Submission received: 4 October 2018
/
Revised: 29 October 2018
/
Accepted: 12 November 2018
/
Published: 15 November 2018
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Today the poultry industry is facing mounting pressure to phase out chemoprophylaxis. One of the major threats to the poultry production is coccidiosis, a widespread parasitic disease, commonly controlled by in-feed coccidiostats. The use of immunoprophylaxis with the live anticoccidial vaccines instead of coccidiostats in broiler chickens is a promising approach; however, there is a broad reluctance to use them in intensive production due to a possible transient performance deterioration. Thus, nutritional methods such as dietary modification or herbal extracts used as complements to anticoccidial vaccination may support gaining a satisfactory performance, as well as an improved health status in broilers.
Abstract
Immunoprophylaxis with a live anticoccidial vaccine is regarded as the most promising alternative in place of in-feed coccidiostats in the poultry industry. An experiment, designed as a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with 6 replicate pens per treatment and 8 male Ross 308 chicks per pen, was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary crude protein (CP) levels (21.6% or 23.6%, during the starter phase) and a herbal extract (HE) blend dietary supplementation (Echinacea purpurea, Salvia officinalis, Thymus vulgaris, Rosmarinus officinalis, Allium sativum, Origanum vulgare; 0 or 2 g/kg of feed) on selected hematological, biochemical, redox, and immunological parameters in broilers vaccinated against coccidiosis (anticoccidial vaccine (ACV); none or 1× dose, administered at 1 d of age). The blood samples were collected at 14 d of age. Anticoccidial vaccination (p < 0.05) had a negative effect on immune responses, as shown by a reduced total white blood cells (WBC) count, a reduced lymphocytes count (L), a higher proportion of heterophils (H) in leukogram assessments, as well as H/L-ratio increase. ACV resulted in a decrease in phagocytic activity assessed as decreased percentage of phagocytic cells, phagocytic index and NBT test, as well as in reductions in plasma glucose and LDL-cholesterol concentrations, and increases in HDL-cholesterol and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity. In terms of redox status, ACV significantly increased the catalase (CAT) activity and ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), and decreased malondialdehyde concentrations. An increase in dietary CP in vaccinated chickens resulted in higher relative L and lower relative H counts, a lower H/L ratio, a decrease in AST and an increase in CAT activities, but also a decrease in FRAP and concentrations of lipid peroxides. Vaccinated chickens fed a diet supplemented with HE were characterized by higher relative L and lower relative H counts, a lower H/L ratio, and a decrease in AST activity. A change of diet composition, such as an increase in CP content and dietary HE supplementation, can be recommended in broilers vaccinated against coccidiosis, mainly due to its positive effect in alleviating stress levels. However, the simultaneous increase of CP and HE dietary supplementation offered no additional relevant benefits in most of the blood indices of vaccinated chickens.
1. Introduction
Coccidiosis, a parasitic disease caused by the protozoan coccidia of the genus Eimeria, is one of the most common intestinal threats to poultry production, causing annual financial losses of over $3 billion globally [1] and €51 million in Poland [2]. The parasites multiply in the intestinal epithelium, leading to diverse effects, from reduced performance and symptoms of a subclinical form of infection such as tissue damage, digestive disorders, malabsorption, and, in cases of severe coccidiosis, death, frequently accompanied by visible clinical signs such as diarrhea and hemorrhage [3,4].
Immunoprophylaxis with a live anticoccidial vaccine (ACV) is regarded as the most promising alternative to in-feed coccidiostats [5]. The vaccine delivers a small number of live virulent or attenuated oocysts which undergo a complete parasitical life cycle in the epithelium. Two to three consecutive infections with circulating oocysts stimulate development of solid immunity [6]. This process sometimes leads to transient performance deterioration by inducing a state of mild subclinical coccidiosis associated with a reduced absorptive intestinal area, malabsorption, and inflammation, as well as secondary enteritis as a result of impaired gut integrity following replication of the vaccine’s oocysts in the intestinal epithelium [7]. Thus, the use of live anticoccidial vaccines in broiler chickens is not widespread, due to the risk of insufficient compensation for reduced body weight gain during the relatively short lifespan of chickens [7].
Numerous recent studies have focused on nutritional methods as complements to immunoprophylaxis, as stated in the review by Arczewska-Włosek and Świątkiewicz [8] on nutrition as a modulatory factor of the efficacy of live ACV in broiler chickens. Moreover, according to Lee et al. [9], a proper protein level in starter diet is crucial to avoid performance deterioration due to vaccination. The authors conducted a series of experiments to examine the effect of various protein levels in starter diets (from 20 to 24%) on the performance of broilers vaccinated with ACV, and the level of 23% or 24% crude protein (CP) yielded a higher body weight gain (BWG) in comparison to 21% and 22% CP. In another study, ACV affected feed intake and caused a reduction in BWG and feed conversion ratio (FCR), independent of dietary CP level; however, the growth rates of chickens fed 21% and 23% CP diets were significantly higher than those fed 19% CP diets, and FCR improved as the CP level increased [10]. In the study by Arczewska-Włosek et al., [11], a higher than normative dietary crude protein content (23.6%) and supplementation with herbal extracts were found to be supportive factors partially limiting the negative influence of live ACV on the performance of broiler chickens, without exerting coccidiostatic properties which could interfere with the circulation of the vaccine strain and thus the acquisition of immunity. Despite numerous reports on the performance results of different nutritional strategies in chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis [7,9,10,11], data concerning their effect on blood variables are limited. The main goal of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of single and combined nutritional methods, such as increasing dietary CP or/and supplementation with herbal extracts (HE), on selected hematological, biochemical, redox, and immunological blood variables in chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Birds and Experimental Design
The protocols for this study were approved by the 2nd Local Ethical Committee on Animal Testing, Cracow, Poland (Authorization No. 1065/2013). This study was carried out in compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU and in accordance with the Act on Experiments on Animals of 21 January 2005 and the Regulation of the Minister of Science and Information Technology of 29 July 2005 on the National Committee for Animal Experimentation.
A total of 384 one-day-old male Ross 308 broiler chickens, obtained from a commercial hatchery (Daniela Kożuch Poultry Hatchery, Łężkowice, Poland) were randomly assigned to a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to examine the effects of the following factors: ACV (none or 1× dose), dietary CP level (21.6% or 23.6%) and dietary supplementation with a blend of herbal extracts (0 or 2 g/kg feed). Each of the 8 experimental groups comprised 6 replicates (pens) of 8 birds. The birds were kept in standard environmental rearing conditions and in floor pens with wood shavings as a bedding material to ensure the circulation of the vaccine’s oocysts. To reduce the risk of transmission of the vaccine oocysts, the pens were separated by polyvinyl chloride sheets as barriers.
All birds were fed ad libitum with maize-soybean meal basal diets free of antibiotic growth promoters and coccidiostats and formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of broilers for the starter phase [12]. The nutrient content of the diets was calculated according to the chemical composition of raw feedstuffs, and metabolizable energy value according to equations from European Tables [13]. Samples of feed mixtures were analyzed, using standard AOAC methods [14], for moisture (method 930.15), crude protein (method 984.13), crude fat (method 920.39) and ash (method 942.05). Amino acids were analyzed in acid hydrolysates, after initial performic acid oxidation of sulfur amino acids and after alkaline hydrolysis of tryptophan (method 982.30). Calcium content was analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (method 968.08) and total phosphorus content colorimetrically by the molybdovanadate method (method 965.17).
Data relating to performance indices and a profile of oocyst output were previously published and therefore are not presented in this article [11].
2.2. Experimental Factors
At 1 d of age, half the chicks were administered per os a single dose of commercial live attenuated trivalent anticoccidial vaccine (Livacox® T; BIOPHARM Research Institute of Biopharmacy and Veterinary Drugs, Jílové u Prahy, Czech Republic). The vaccine dose (0.01 mL) contained 300–500 sporulated oocysts of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella suspended in 0.25 mL distilled water. Birds from non-vaccinated groups were administered the same volume of distilled water.
The calculated CP levels in the experimental starter diets were 21.6% and 23.6% in the groups receiving normative or increased CP, respectively, while the respective analyzed values were 21.3% and 23.24% (Table 1).
The HE blend was administered at a dose of 2 g/kg feed (Intermag Ltd., Olkusz, Poland). One kilogram of blend contained: dry extract from Echinacea purpurea, 400 mg; oleoresin Salvia officinalis, 27,800 mg; oleoresin Thymus vulgaris, 5000 mg; oil extract from Rosmarinus officinalis 2500 mg; oil from Allium sativum, 1670 mg; and oil from Origanum vulgare, 1000 mg.
2.3. Sample Collection
To evaluate the health status, blood samples were collected at 14 d of age from the wing vein of 6 chickens per experimental group (1 chicken/1 replicate; n = 6). After blood collection the chickens were immediately sacrificed by decapitation after electrical stunning.
Hematocrit values (Ht), hemoglobin levels (Hb), and total white blood cells (WBC) with leukograms and red blood cells (RBC) counts were determined using standard methods according to Feldman et al. [15]. The heterophil to lymphocyte ratio (H/L) was also estimated as an indicator of stress condition [16,17].
The immunological analyses involved the identification of the phagocytic activity of leukocytes against the Staphylococcus aureus 209P strain, expressed as the proportion of phagocytic cells (%PC) and as the phagocytic index (PI) [18]. The respiratory burst activity of the heterophils was quantified by reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) to formazan as a measurement of the production of oxygen radicals [19]. Serum lysozyme concentration was determined by the turbidimetric method [18]. Kits developed by Cormay Co. (PZ Cormay Inc., Lomianki, Poland) were used to determine the following biochemical indices in the blood plasma samples: total protein (TP), uric acid (UA), bilirubin (BIL), creatinine (CREAT), and total cholesterol (TC) and its fractions, i.e., high-density (HDL-C) and low-density (LDL-C) lipoproteins, triacylglycerol (TG), as well as activity of the enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).
As previously described [20], the following indicators of redox status were determined in chicken blood plasma: concentrations of lipid peroxides (LOOH); malondialdehyde (MDA); a ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP), as a parameter of antioxidant potential; and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using STATISTICA 12 software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, United States) software for a three-way ANOVA with ACV, dietary CP level, and HE blend supplementation as the main factors. Duncan’s multiple range test [21] was used to determine the interactions and differences between the treatment’s main effects, considering the probability level of p ≤ 0.05 as significant.
3. Results
Table 2 and Table S1 in Supplementary Materials present the hematological indices analyzed in blood collected at 14 d of age. A significant increasing effect of HE on RBC count was recorded. The Ht and Hb values were not statistically affected by the experimental factors. The effect of ACV for WBC was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05), as an administration of ACV resulted in a significant decrease in WBC count. Moreover, ACV × CP, CP × HE or ACV × CP × HE interactions were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) for WBC. In unvaccinated birds, increasing dietary CP levels resulted in increased WBC; however, the combined use of increased CP and HE resulted in WBC levels similar to that obtained in birds receiving diets with normative CP. In vaccinated birds, neither an increase in dietary CP level nor an increase in supplemental HE had an effect on WBC.
When we consider the independent effects, the administration of ACV increased the proportion of H and reduced the proportion of L in leukograms, while the opposite effect was observed by increasing dietary CP. In addition, HE had no effect on these variables (Table 2). ACV × CP, ACV × HE or CP × HE interactions were also found to be significant for proportions (%) of H and L. In vaccinated birds, increased CP or HE supplementation resulted in a reduction of H and in an increase in L proportions in leukograms compared to vaccinated birds with normal CP levels or without HE supplementation, respectively (Table S1 in Supplementary Materials). As a result, a decrease in the heterophils to lymphocytes (H/L) ratio was observed. Moreover, birds receiving a diet with increased CP showed a lower H/L ratio compared to the CPN group. The proportions of monocytes, basophils and eosinophils in leukograms were not significantly affected by the examined variables.
Significant effects of ACV were observed on lysozyme concentration, % PC, PI and NBT; the levels of all these variables were depressed in vaccinated birds. Similarly, HE supplementation resulted in a decrease in lysozyme concentration, % PC and NBT (Table 3 and Table S2 in Supplementary Materials).
In unvaccinated birds, increased CP or HE supplementation resulted in increased AST activities (Table 4, Table S3 in Supplementary Materials). A significant decrease in AST activity was shown in vaccinated birds fed a diet with increased CP in comparison with vaccinated ones receiving a diet with normative CP, although this activity was still higher than in unvaccinated birds receiving dietary normative CP. In vaccinated birds, the supplementation with HE resulted in decrease in AST activity to the level found in unvaccinated birds fed with unsupplemented diet. A significant increase in AST activity was observed in birds receiving the diet with increased CP and supplemented with HE in comparison with those fed an unsupplemented diet with increased CP, while in birds receiving normative dietary CP, the HE supplementation decreased the AST activity. Generally, the effects of increased CP or HE supplementation were observed for ALT activity. The activity of this enzyme was reduced in birds fed a diet with increased CP, but elevated in birds supplemented with HE. An almost two-fold increase in ALT activity was observed in unvaccinated birds as a result of HE supplementation, although the effect of the vaccination on ALT activity was not significant. LDH activity was decreased in vaccinated birds, while dietary HE supplementation resulted in an increase of LDH activity (Table 4, Table S3 in Supplementary Materials).
In regard to lipid parameters (Table 5, Table S4 in Supplementary Materials), ACV significantly increased HDL-C and decreased LDL-C levels. Supplementation with HE reduced TG levels and increased HDL-C levels; however, these effects were significant only in unvaccinated chickens.
Glucose level was significantly decreased in vaccinated birds, while TP or UA levels were not affected by any of the experimental factors (Table 6). The CREAT concentration was decreased in birds receiving increased dietary CP levels, while HE supplementation resulted in increased BIL levels (Table 6, Table S4 in Supplementary Materials).
In regard to the parameters describing redox status (Table 7, Table S6 in Supplementary Materials), ACV increased CAT activity and FRAP values, and reduced blood MDA concentration. Generally, increased CP significantly elevated FRAP and SOD activity, but reduced LOOH concentration. For CAT activity, a significant ACV × CP × HE interaction was observed. CAT activity was nearly two-fold higher in vaccinated chickens receiving diets with an increased CP level without HE supplementation, or 1.5-times higher in those receiving the low CP level diets with HE addition, compared to the group of vaccinated untreated chickens, while the combined use of increased CP or HE supplementation had no significant effects. In unvaccinated birds receiving increased dietary CP an increase in FRAP was found in comparison with birds fed with normative CP. In vaccinated ones receiving increased CP significantly lower FRAP was observed in comparison with those fed a diet with normative CP, although this result was still significantly increased in comparison with unvaccinated birds fed a diet with normative CP level. HE supplementation increased FRAP, but only in unvaccinated birds.
Increased CP significantly reduced LOOH concentration in birds vaccinated against coccidiosis, but elevated MDA concentration in unvaccinated birds.
4. Discussion
Data describing blood variables in chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis are limited; therefore, the authors decided to discuss many of the obtained results with reports on the impact of coccidiosis. Moreover, in some studies multiple doses of ACV have been used to induce subclinical coccidiosis in broilers [22].
The obtained hematological values for 14-day-old chickens were surprising; significant reductions of WBC counts and lymphocytes proportion in leukograms as a result of the vaccination were observed. ACV also led to an increased proportion of heterophils in leukograms. Heterophils are the predominant granulated leukocytes in acute inflammatory responses in gallinaceous birds. An increase in heterophils is usually associated with their participation in the initial response during the first 6 to 12 h following an immunological challenge [23,24]. Ognik et al. [25] identified an increase in the number of heterophils and a decrease in the number of lymphocytes as a result of acute infections, for example coccidiosis, along with severe stress. In the current study, the prolonged (up to the 14th day after the vaccination) higher proportion of H and higher H/L ratio could suggest inflammation and increased stress levels in birds vaccinated against coccidiosis. The positive effects of increased dietary CP or HE supplementation in chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis such as increase of lymphocytes and reduction of heterophils proportion in leukograms, as well as a consequently reduced H/L ratio indicate the beneficial effect of these factors on the alleviation of post-vaccination stress. In contrast with these results, da Silva et al. [24] reported reduced Ht and Hb values, along with increased leukocyte and lymphocyte counts, in 34-day-old chickens vaccinated at 3 d of age, but not statistically significant effect of vaccination on H/L ratio was observed.
Coccidiosis often leads to the induction of non-specific immune responses with the production of reactive nitrogen species such as nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [26,27]. This mechanism is primarily explained as a response of the organism (production of reactive radical species against oocysts), but this may also negatively affect chickens if their antioxidant defense system is not able to protect them against oxidative damage. Some reports indicate the impairment of the anti-oxidant/pro-oxidant equilibrium in favor of pro-oxidants, indicating oxidative stress as a result of this poultry parasitosis [28,29,30]. In broilers infected with E. acervulina [30] and E. tenella [31,32], oxidative stress was observed as an effect of the increased NO and/or MDA concentration and alterations in the activity of anti-oxidant enzymes, i.e., reduced SOD and increased CAT activity. In the current study, the influence of ACV on redox status was reflected in a reduced concentration of MDA, and increased CAT activity, without affecting SOD activity. Presumably, permanent contact with low doses of attenuated oocysts led to a different adaptive mechanism which, in the case of enzymatic anti-oxidants, relied on the stimulation of CAT rather than SOD activity. The oxidative/anti-oxidative parameters obtained in the current study could not clearly confirm the presence of oxidative stress in vaccinated birds, although a higher proportion of heterophils was noted in leukograms. The increase in the level of heterophils, whose mode of action in the mechanism of innate non-specific immunity response is to generate ROS in the oxidative burst, results in increased LOOH and/or MDA content. In the current study, the profiles of pro-oxidative/anti-oxidative parameters, such as LOOH and MDA contents influenced by ACV, were not consistent with those expected. It is possible that this can be partially explained by the results of phagocytic assays which indicate the suppression of the phagocytic activity of leukocytes in birds vaccinated against coccidiosis (reduced %PC, PI, NBT). The same effect was noted in terms of the impact of HE. This inhibitory effect of HE on the function of phagocytic cells is difficult to explain. It was expected that the Echinacea purpurea extract included in HE would exert immuno-stimulatory properties, as Allen [33] has proposed this herb as a potential adjuvant for live vaccines against coccidiosis.
The concentration of serum lysozyme, a component of humoral non-specific immunity, was significantly decreased by ACV vaccination or HE supplementation. Such a reducing effect of ACV can be directly attributed to the negative effect of the presence and multiplication of intestinal oocysts, regarded as a challenge similar to infection. Sotirov and Koinarski [34] observed decreased serum lysozyme concentrations in chickens infected with E. tenella, along with increased cecal lysozyme levels (8 to 78 times higher than in control groups); thus indicating the direction of lysozyme mobilization. In the current study, the concentration of serum lysozyme was about 35% lower in chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis, indicating that the period of vaccination +14 d was not sufficient for a return to homeostasis. The immuno-suppressive effect of HE in respect to lysozyme concentration was, again, unexpected and requires further verification.
Generally, the GLU level recorded in this study was found to be reduced in vaccinated chickens. This effect could be attributed to inflammation in the intestinal tract followed by glucose absorption [35] being affected as a direct result of impaired gut integrity.
Analysis of AST, ALT or LDH activities is generally used to evaluate the effect of various feed supplements on the liver profile of birds. A lack of effect on, or decrease in, AST, ALT or LDH activities indicates that the supplement does not interfere with liver function [29]. While ACV significantly increased AST activity, increased CP or supplementation of HE significantly reduced it in vaccinated birds, indicating the hepatoprotective effect of these treatments in broilers vaccinated against coccidiosis. Increased AST and ALT activities as a result of coccidiosis have been reported in previous studies by Patra et al. [36] and Abd El-Maksoud et al. [35].
Abd El-Maksoud et al. [35] also investigated the effect of the infection of hens with coccidiosis on lipid parameters and indicated a significant effect of parasitosis observed as a reduction in TC, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C fractions compared to a non-infected group. In the current study, we found a higher HDL-cholesterol fraction in vaccinated compared to non-vaccinated birds. HE supplementation also increased HDL-cholesterol fraction, a known effect of botanicals [37,38,39].
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the effect of increased CP level and/or dietary supplementation with herbal extracts, along with the impact of live ACV, is not clear. At the same time, vaccination with live oocysts is regarded as a challenge, and causes similar effects to mild subclinical coccidiosis, frequently affecting birds’ responses in a different manner from their responses to clinical coccidiosis. In spite of these inconsistent results, the negative effect of ACV was generally reflected in many of the studied hematological, immunological, biochemical and redox blood parameters. The application of dietary treatments, such as increased CP or HE supplementation, could be recommended due to their positive effect in terms of inducing: reduced H/L ratios, a signal of lowered stress; and lowered AST, a parameter demonstrating hepatoprotective properties. Moreover, increased dietary CP resulted in increased CAT activity or decreased LOOH content in vaccinated birds, indicators of the activation of antioxidant activity. However, the simultaneous use of these nutritional methods offered no additional relevant benefits in terms of most of the blood indices of vaccinated chickens.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/8/11/208/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.A.-W., S.Ś. and D.J.; Formal analysis, A.A.-W. and K.O.; Investigation, A.A.-W. and S.Ś.; Methodology, A.A.-W., S.Ś., K.O. and D.J.; Project administration, A.A.-W.; Resources, A.A.-W. and S.Ś.; Supervision, A.A.-W. and S.Ś.; Writing—original draft, A.A.-W.; Writing—review & editing, S.Ś., K.O. and D.J.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Centre for Research and Development in Poland and conducted within the Biostrateg programme: ‘GUTFEED—innovative nutrition in sustainable poultry production’ BIOSTRATEG1/267659/7/NCBR/2015.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Dalloul, R.A.; Lillehoj, H.S. Poultry coccidiosis: Recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2006, 5, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szeleszczuk, P.; Doner, S.; Nerc, J. Preliminary assessment of financial losses caused by coccidiosis in broiler chicken production. In Proceedings of the Ist International Technical Conference Eimeriana Avia, Poultry Coccidiosis—Actual Challenges AD 2016, Wrocław, Poland, 26–27 February 2016; pp. 97–104. [Google Scholar]
- Vermeulen, A.; Schaap, D.; Schetters, T.P. Control of coccidiosis in chickens by vaccination. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 100, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, R.B. Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: Rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity. Avian Pathol. 2005, 34, 159–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapman, H.; Cherry, T.; Danforth, H.; Richards, G.; Shirley, M.; Williams, R. Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: The role of live vaccines. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharman, P.A.; Smith, N.C.; Wallach, M.G.; Katrib, M. Chasing the golden egg: Vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunol. 2010, 32, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lehman, R.; Moran, E.T.; Hess, J.B. Response of coccidiostat- versus vaccination-protected broilers to gelatin inclusion in high and low crude protein diets. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Arczewska-Włosek, A.; Świątkiewicz, S. Nutrition as a modulatory factor of the efficacy of live anticoccidial vaccines in broiler chickens. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2014, 70, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.T.; Eckert, N.H.; Ameiss, K.A.; Stevens, S.M.; Anderson, P.N.; Anderson, S.M.; Barri, A.; McElroy, A.P.; Danforth, H.D.; Caldwell, D.J. The effect of dietary protein level on performance characteristics of coccidiosis vaccinated and nonvaccinated broilers following mixed-species Eimeria challenge. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 1916–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Parker, J.; Oviedo-Rondón, E.O.; Clack, B.A.; Clemente-Hernández, S.; Osborne, J.; Remus, J.C.; Kettunen, H.; Mäkivuokko, H.; Pierson, E.M. Enzymes as Feed Additive to Aid in Responses Against Eimeria Species in Coccidia-Vaccinated Broilers Fed Corn-Soybean Meal Diets with Different Protein Levels. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Arczewska-Włosek, A.; Świątkiewicz, S.; Kowal, J.; Józefiak, D.; Długosz, J. The effect of increased crude protein level and/or dietary supplementation with herbal extract blend on the performance of chickens vaccinated against coccidiosis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 229, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smulikowska, S.; Rutkowski, A. Recommended Allowances and Nutritive Value of Feedstuffs. Poultry Feeding Standards (In Polish), 4th ed.; The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, PAS, Jabłonna, Polish Branch of WPSA: Jabłonna, Poland, 2005; ISBN 83-917097-7-9. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, W.M.M.A. European Table of Energy Values for Poultry Feedstuffs, 3rd ed.; Subcommittee Energy of the Working Group nr. 2 Nutrition of the European Federation of Branches of the World’s Poultry Science Association: Beekbergen, The Netherlands, 1989; ISBN 90-71463-00-0. [Google Scholar]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2005; ISBN 0-935584-77-3. [Google Scholar]
- Feldman, B.V.; Zinkl, J.G.; Nemi, C.J. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000; ISBN 978-0-683-30692-7. [Google Scholar]
- Jahanian, R.; Rasouli, E. Dietary chromium methionine supplementation could alleviate immunosuppressive effects of heat stress in broiler chicks. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lentfer, T.L.; Pendl, H.; Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G.; Fröhlich, E.K.F.; Borell, E.V. H/L ratio as a measurement of stress in laying hens—Methodology and reliability. Br. Poult. Sci. 2015, 56, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siwicki, A.K.; Anderson, D.P. Nonspecific defense mechanisms assay in fish: II. Potential killing activity of neutrophils and macrophages, lysozyme activity in serum and organs and total immunoglobulin (Ig) level in serum. In Fish Diseases Diagnosis and Prevention Methods; Inland Fisheries Institute: Olsztyn, Poland, 1993; pp. 105–112. ISBN 83-901037-1-0. [Google Scholar]
- Park, B.H.; Fikrig, S.M.; Smithwick, E.M. Infection and nitroblue-tetrazolium reduction by neutrophils: A diagnostic aid. Lancet 1968, 292, 532–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ognik, K.; Wertelecki, T. Effect of different vitamin E sources and levels on selected oxidative status indices in blood and tissues as well as on rearing performance of slaughter turkey hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duncan, D.B. Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics 1955, 11, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohiti-Asli, M.; Ghanaatparast-Rashti, M. Dietary oregano essential oil alleviates experimentally induced coccidiosis in broilers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 120, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harmon, B.G. Avian heterophils in inflammation and disease resistance. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 972–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- da Silva, I.C.M.; Ribeiro, A.M.L.; Canal, C.W.; Pinheiro, C.C.; de Vieira, M.; Gonçalves, T.A.; Pereira, R.A.; Lacerda, L. Broiler chicken responses to immunological stimuli as mediated by different levels of vitamin E in the diet. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2009, 18, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ognik, K.; Cholewińska, E.; Czech, A. The Effect of Adding Hesperidin, Diosmin, Quercetin and Resveratrol Extracts to Feed for Turkey Hens on Selected Immunological and Biochemical Blood Indices. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016, 16, 1101–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Perez-Carbajal, C.; Caldwell, D.; Farnell, M.; Stringfellow, K.; Pohl, S.; Casco, G.; Pro-Martinez, A.; Ruiz-Feria, C.A. Immune response of broiler chickens fed different levels of arginine and vitamin E to a coccidiosis vaccine and Eimeria challenge. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1870–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Muthamilselvan, T.; Kuo, T.-F.; Wu, Y.-C.; Yang, W.-C. Herbal Remedies for Coccidiosis Control: A Review of Plants, Compounds, and Anticoccidial Actions. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pourali, M.; Kermanshahi, H.; Golian, A.; Razmi, G.R.; Soukhtanloo, M. Antioxidant and anticoccidial effects of garlic powder and sulfur amino acids on Eimeria-infected and uninfected broiler chickens. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 15, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ognik, K.; Krauze, M. The potential for using enzymatic assays to assess the health of turkeys. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2016, 72, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koinarski, V.; Gabrashanska, M.; Georgieva, N.; Petkov, P. Antioxidant parameters in Eimeria acervulina infected chicks after treatment with a new zinc compound. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2006, 50, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
- Georgieva, N.V.; Koinarski, V.; Gadjeva, V. Antioxidant status during the course of Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens. Vet. J. 2006, 172, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.L.; Suo, X.; Gu, J.H.; Zhang, W.W.; Fang, Q.; Wang, X. Influence of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract in Broiler Chickens: Effect on Chicken Coccidiosis and Antioxidant Status. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Allen, P.C. Dietary supplementation with Echinacea and development of immunity to challenge infection with coccidia. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 91, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sotirov, L.; Koinarski, V. Lysozyme and complement activities in broiler chickens with coccidiosis. Rev. Méd. Vét. Fr. 2003, 154, 780–784. [Google Scholar]
- Abd El-Maksoud, H.A.; Afaf, D.A.-M.; El-Badry, M.A. Biochemical Effect of Coccidia Infestation in Laying Hen. BENHA Vet. Med. J. 2014, 26, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
- Patra, G.; Ali, M.A.; Chanu, K.V.; Jonathan, L.; Joy, L.K.; Prava, M.; Ravindran, R.; Das, G.; Devi, L.I. PCR Based Diagnosis of Eimeria tenella Infection in Broiler Chicken. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2010, 9, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, I.H. Effects of phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, digestibility, blood metabolites, intestinal microbiota, meat color and relative organ weight after oral challenge with Clostridium perfringens in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2014, 160, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.-C.; Steiner, T.; Aufy, A.; Lien, T.-F. Effects of supplemental essential oil on growth performance, lipid metabolites and immunity, intestinal characteristics, microbiota and carcass traits in broilers. Livest. Sci. 2012, 144, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toghyani, M.; Toghyani, M.; Gheisari, A.; Ghalamkari, G.; Eghbalsaied, S. Evaluation of cinnamon and garlic as antibiotic growth promoter substitutions on performance, immune responses, serum biochemical and haematological parameters in broiler chicks. Livest. Sci. 2011, 138, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Composition of experimental diet for starter (1–21 d) phase and nutrient content in basal feed mixtures.
Table 1.
Composition of experimental diet for starter (1–21 d) phase and nutrient content in basal feed mixtures.
| Ingredient [g/kg]: | Normative CP Level | Increased CP Level |
|---|---|---|
| Maize | 579.3 | 505.3 |
| Soybean meal | 360 | 420 |
| Soybean oil | 18 | 32 |
| Limestone | 16 | 16 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 14.5 | 14.5 |
| Sodium choloride | 3 | 3 |
| dl-Methionine | 2 | 2 |
| l-Lysine hydrochloride | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vitamin-mineral premix 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Calculated nutritional value per kg of feed: | ||
| Crude protein [g/kg] | 216 | 236 |
| Metabolizable energy [MJ/kg] | 12.3 | 12.3 |
| Analysed chemical composition of the basal feed mixtures [g/kg]: | ||
| Dry matter | 874 | 877 |
| Crude ash | 69 | 76.1 |
| Crude protein | 213.3 | 232.4 |
| Crude fat | 35.1 | 36.1 |
| Crude fibre | 24.2 | 22.9 |
| Calcium | 14.7 | 15.9 |
| Phosphorus | 7.45 | 7.33 |
| Asp [g/kg] | 21.86 | 25.31 |
| Tre [g/kg] | 7.7 | 8.65 |
| Ser [g/kg] | 10.21 | 11.23 |
| Glu [g/kg] | 36.95 | 41.17 |
| Pro [g/kg] | 12.11 | 13.17 |
| Gli [g/kg] | 8.51 | 9.67 |
| Ala [g/kg] | 10.05 | 11.19 |
| Val [g/kg] | 9.75 | 11.06 |
| Ile [g/kg] | 8.68 | 10.01 |
| Leu [g/kg] | 17.49 | 19.6 |
| Tyr [g/kg] | 6.73 | 7.25 |
| Fen [g/kg] | 11.32 | 12.6 |
| His [g/kg] | 6.41 | 7.25 |
| Lis [g/kg] | 14.54 | 16.37 |
| Arg [g/kg] | 15.68 | 17.58 |
| Cys [g/kg] | 3.11 | 3.27 |
| Met [g/kg] | 5.11 | 5.46 |
| Trp [g/kg] | 2.6 | 2.82 |
1 The premix provided, per 1 kg of diet vitamin A—12,000 IU; vitamin D3—3000 IU; vitamin E—42 IU; vitamin K3—3.6 mg; vitamin B1—2.4 mg; vitamin B2—8.4 mg; vitamin B6—6 mg; vitamin B12 –0.048 mg; Ca-pantotenate—12 mg; niacine—48 mg; folic acid—1.2 mg; biotin—0.096 mg; choline chloride—177 mg; manganese—96 mg; zinc—72 mg; iron—72 mg; copper—18 mg; iodine—2.4 mg; selenium—0.3 mg.
Table 2.
The hematological indices and leukogram of chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | RBC | WBC | Ht | Hb | H | L | MONO | EOS | BASO | H/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | [1012 L−1] | [109 L−1] | [L L−1] | [g−1] | [%] | [%] | [%] | [%] | [%] | |
| − | N | − | 2.20 | 15.9 | 27.0 | 6.28 | 27.7 | 69.3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| + | 2.68 | 17.6 | 29.6 | 5.38 | 33.8 | 62.2 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 0.55 | ||
| I | − | 2.44 | 22.3 | 27.9 | 4.45 | 32.0 | 64.3 | 1.67 | 0.83 | 1.17 | 0.50 | |
| + | 2.90 | 18.6 | 27.5 | 5.47 | 29.3 | 67.5 | 1.17 | 0.83 | 1.17 | 0.43 | ||
| + | N | − | 2.45 | 15.1 | 29.2 | 6.80 | 42.3 | 53.8 | 1.67 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 0.79 |
| + | 2.60 | 14.8 | 28.2 | 4.97 | 40.2 | 55.8 | 1.33 | 1.17 | 1.50 | 0.72 | ||
| I | − | 2.64 | 13.6 | 28.2 | 5.90 | 32.0 | 64.8 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 0.51 | |
| + | 2.64 | 13.2 | 27.2 | 5.65 | 26.8 | 70.0 | 1.17 | 0.83 | 1.17 | 0.38 | ||
| SEM | 0.057 | 0.689 | 0.469 | 0.336 | 0.879 | 0.949 | 0.112 | 0.098 | 0.098 | 0.022 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | ||||||||||||
| Effects | ACV | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | * | NS | * | |
| CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | ||
| HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | |
| ACV × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | ||
| CP × HE | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | * | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; RBC—red blood cells; WBC—white blood cells; Ht—haematocrit; Hb—haemoglobin; H—heterophils; L—lymphocytes; MONO—monocytes; EOS—eosinophils; BASO—basophils; H/L—heterophils/lymphocytes.
Table 3.
The immunological indices of chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | Lysozyme [mg L−1] | %PC | PI | NBT: Positive Heterophils | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | [%] | |||
| − | N | − | 3.79 | 44.0 | 5.95 | 26.3 |
| + | 2.81 | 36.3 | 5.90 | 23.8 | ||
| I | − | 3.53 | 45.8 | 6.40 | 29.0 | |
| + | 2.56 | 38.8 | 6.00 | 22.8 | ||
| + | N | − | 2.30 | 36.3 | 5.72 | 23.7 |
| + | 1.50 | 32.5 | 5.55 | 19.2 | ||
| I | − | 2.51 | 36.8 | 5.95 | 22.8 | |
| + | 1.89 | 33.7 | 5.52 | 20.7 | ||
| SEM | 0.138 | 1.124 | 0.087 | 0.738 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | ||||||
| Effects | ACV | * | * | * | * | |
| CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| HE | * | * | NS | * | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| ACV × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; %PC—percentage of phagocytic cells; PI—phagocytic index; NBT—test reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium.
Table 4.
The biochemical indices of chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | AST [U/L] | ALT [U/L] | LDH [U/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | |||
| − | N | − | 233 | 6.68 | 494 |
| + | 236 | 10.2 | 803 | ||
| I | − | 330 | 4.02 | 466 | |
| + | 418 | 9.54 | 534 | ||
| + | N | − | 432 | 8.98 | 292 |
| + | 335 | 9.13 | 283 | ||
| I | − | 292 | 8.65 | 264 | |
| + | 303 | 6.29 | 404 | ||
| SEM | 11.79 | 0.445 | 34.6 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | |||||
| Effects | ACV | * | NS | * | |
| CP | NS | * | NS | ||
| HE | NS | * | * | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | * | NS | NS | |
| ACV × HE | * | * | NS | ||
| CP × HE | * | NS | NS | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; LDH—lactate dehydrogenase.
Table 5.
The lipid indices of chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | TG [mmol/L] | TC [mmol/L] | HDL-C [mmol/L] | LDL-C [mmol/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | ||||
| − | N | − | 0.397 | 2.25 | 1.11 | 0.466 |
| + | 0.174 | 2.82 | 1.64 | 0.459 | ||
| I | − | 0.321 | 2.28 | 1.13 | 0.379 | |
| + | 0.215 | 2.61 | 1.64 | 0.347 | ||
| + | N | − | 0.311 | 2.48 | 1.66 | 0.233 |
| + | 0.321 | 2.39 | 1.49 | 0.260 | ||
| I | − | 0.262 | 2.51 | 1.36 | 0.406 | |
| + | 0.277 | 2.44 | 1.60 | 0.241 | ||
| SEM | 0.017 | 0.049 | 0.046 | 0.030 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | ||||||
| Effects | ACV | NS | NS | * | * | |
| CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| HE | * | NS | * | NS | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| ACV × HE | * | * | * | NS | ||
| CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; TG—triacylglycerol; TC—total cholesterol; HDL-C—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table 6.
The biochemical indices chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | TP [g/L] | GLU [mmol/L] | UA [µmol/L] | CREAT [µmol/L] | BIL [µmol/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | |||||
| − | N | − | 29.5 | 19.2 | 215 | 21.2 | 28.4 |
| + | 31.8 | 18.0 | 341 | 26.0 | 30.8 | ||
| I | − | 27.7 | 16.5 | 298 | 19.2 | 28.4 | |
| + | 29.8 | 17.3 | 259 | 17.8 | 30.4 | ||
| + | N | − | 29.6 | 14.6 | 352 | 20.5 | 28.7 |
| + | 29.6 | 15.8 | 302 | 23.3 | 29.4 | ||
| I | − | 30.2 | 13.3 | 289 | 21.2 | 29.5 | |
| + | 29.8 | 17.0 | 281 | 19.2 | 35.6 | ||
| SEM | 0.511 | 0.511 | 15.94 | 5.194 | 0.699 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | |||||||
| Effects | ACV | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | |
| CP | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | ||
| HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| ACV × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; TP—total protein; GLU—glucose; UA—uric acid; CREAT—creatinine; BIL—bilirubin.
Table 7.
The redox status indices of chicken blood collected at 14 d of age.
| Factors | FRAP [μmol/L] | SOD [U/mL] | CAT [U/mL] | LOOH [μmol/L] | MDA [μmol/L] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACV | CP | HE | |||||
| − | N | − | 98 | 27.2 | 31.3 | 1.98 | 0.842 |
| + | 292 | 26.5 | 28.6 | 2.15 | 0.657 | ||
| I | − | 291 | 25.5 | 19.7 | 1.44 | 0.925 | |
| + | 532 | 29.0 | 20.4 | 1.91 | 1.345 | ||
| + | N | − | 459 | 28.6 | 38.2 | 3.06 | 0.793 |
| + | 395 | 25.3 | 52.9 | 1.99 | 0.688 | ||
| I | − | 363 | 29.5 | 76.0 | 1.18 | 0.570 | |
| + | 330 | 29.7 | 35.2 | 1.92 | 0.556 | ||
| SEM | 19.78 | 0.417 | 2.975 | 0.111 | 0.058 | ||
| Significance (p-Value) | |||||||
| Effects | ACV | * | NS | * | NS | * | |
| CP | * | * | NS | * | NS | ||
| HE | * | NS | * | NS | NS | ||
| Interactions | ACV × CP | * | NS | * | * | * | |
| ACV × HE | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| CP × HE | NS | * | * | * | NS | ||
| ACV × CP × HE | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | ||
NS—p > 0.05; *—p ≤ 0.05; VAC—anticoccidial vaccine; CP—crude protein level, N—normative; I—increased; HE—herbal extract blend; SEM—standard errors mean; FRAP—total antioxidant potential, as a ferric reducing ability of plasma; SOD—superoxide dismutase; CAT—catalase; LOOH—lipid peroxides; MDA—malondialdehyde.
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Arczewska-Włosek, A.; Świątkiewicz, S.; Ognik, K.; Józefiak, D. Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Level and Supplemental Herbal Extract Blend on Selected Blood Variables in Broiler Chickens Vaccinated against Coccidiosis. Animals 2018, 8, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110208
AMA Style
Arczewska-Włosek A, Świątkiewicz S, Ognik K, Józefiak D. Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Level and Supplemental Herbal Extract Blend on Selected Blood Variables in Broiler Chickens Vaccinated against Coccidiosis. Animals. 2018; 8(11):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110208
Chicago/Turabian StyleArczewska-Włosek, Anna, Sylwester Świątkiewicz, Katarzyna Ognik, and Damian Józefiak. 2018. "Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Level and Supplemental Herbal Extract Blend on Selected Blood Variables in Broiler Chickens Vaccinated against Coccidiosis" Animals 8, no. 11: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110208
APA StyleArczewska-Włosek, A., Świątkiewicz, S., Ognik, K., & Józefiak, D. (2018). Effect of Dietary Crude Protein Level and Supplemental Herbal Extract Blend on Selected Blood Variables in Broiler Chickens Vaccinated against Coccidiosis. Animals, 8(11), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110208
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
