The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest K0 of Sands up to Very High Stresses
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe manuscript titled "The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest K0K_0 of Sands Under Very High Stresses" has been reviewed.
The paper requires comprehensive revision regarding its format, English language, and the presentation of work through figures and tables.
After careful consideration, I have decided not to accept the paper for publication in this journal. I recommend that the authors address the necessary revisions before considering submission to other journals.
Best regards,
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageThe length of the paragraphs is not typical in academic English.
Author Response
Please see the attachement
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors1.Provide a detailed description of the experimental setup and procedural steps, particularly regarding the design and functionality of the specialized oedometer used for high-stress level measurements.
2. Enhance the results section with more detailed data presentation, such as scatter plots, trend lines, or box plots to illustrate the range and distribution of K0. Include statistical analyses such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and regression analyses to evaluate the impact of different factors on K0.
3. Expand the literature review section to include a deeper exploration of K0 theories, discussing how different theoretical models predict K0 and how these predictions align or differ from the experimental data.
4. Ensure consistency and accuracy in the use of soil mechanics parameters throughout the document.
5. Conduct validations of the experimental results, for instance, through the replication of experiments to test the reproducibility of the data, or by comparing them with known soil models or standards.
6. Discuss and develop mathematical models to describe the behavior of K0 with varying stress paths, including predictions under unconventional stress conditions.
7. Provide a comprehensive error analysis detailing measurement errors, potential inadequacies in experimental condition controls, and biases introduced during data processing.
8. Improve the quality and clarity of graphs and illustrations to ensure all figures are equipped with clear legends, labels, and appropriate scales. Data points in the graphs should include error bars or confidence intervals to visualize the variability and uncertainty of the data.
9. Expand the discussion section to delve deeper into how the experimental findings impact practical engineering designs, such as high earth dams or deep excavation support structures.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageIt is best to find a specialized polishing agency to polish the paper
Author Response
Please see the attachement
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe manuscript investigates the behavior of the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (K0) in sands subjected to very high stresses, reaching up to 120 MPa. The experiments were conducted using a specially designed oedometer capable of applying very high vertical stresses. The research aims to provide insights into the behavior of K0 under extreme conditions relevant to high-pressure geotechnical projects such as deep foundations, tunnels, and storage shafts.
The author clearly explains the scientific problem and reviews relevant literature in the Introduction. The materials and equipment used in the tests are well described and appropriately detailed. The results are presented accurately and concisely. The manuscript is written clearly and is easy to understand, with conclusions that align well with the test results. However, the images in the PDF version of the manuscript are of lower quality.
I have no objections to the text and believe it can be published in its current form.
Author Response
Please see the attachement
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe author has revised the paper according to my requirements, and I think the revised paper can be accepted.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageThe author has revised the paper according to my requirements, and I think the revised paper can be accepted.
