An Investigation of Multilingual Domestic University Student Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. EAP Proficiency Levels and Academic Performance in University
2.2. Domestic Students in Singapore: English as Lingua Franca in a Multilingual Context
2.3. Students’ Learning Experiences with EAP
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Participants
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Overall Programme Perceptions
Student MHBK also expected the EAP programme to be time consuming and hence, stress students unnecessarily:So, I don’t believe just because we have a bad grade back in our O-Levels, it means that we have to go through with this English programme. Making it voluntary would, I guess, make us feel better to go through with it.
… if I’m in the business school… there is a lot that I need to complete, and the fact that I need to do the EP programme is like adding on to the stress and everything.
While most did not articulate initial positive programme perceptions such as how the programme would be able to diagnose students’ academic writing and hence, be useful for structuring and writing reports, student TSYS said:For me, it was a task to complete… it was just, something to check and move on…
… it will help students know more about, understand, have a better understanding of the university grading, as in like, the university expectations on the students’ command of English. For example, like reporting, report writing skills, those like presentation, all those areas…
No, I don’t think (the programme) should be made compulsory… I think it’s more for let’s say like, citation wise, then I think they should like really have like, a proper lesson or module and make it compulsory for all students attend.
4.1.1. Programme Delivery
In addition, student IMFM commented:But the learning materials for this EP course, right, is very useful in a sense that if I never do it right, then probably I wouldn’t know how university (functions), what is the requirement and (it is) also a good revision. And the good thing about this is, videos, having videos is like… very good, very easy for us. And it’s at our own time, we can study at our own time.
Yeah, personally, I feel like it is quite helpful. Like, there is a lot of detail, yeah, it is quite detailed, that is very important. And it is like, when you go through the learning materials, right, they really provide you everything like, from scratch like, all those basic information which is, personally, I feel it’s very useful.
4.1.2. Linguistic Improvement
In another example, student LYX commented on an improvement in grammar:… I guess in terms of writing I try very hard, to use whatever I’ve learned in the… in the proficiency course. So… like, things like, what was that… Like I guess punctuation, it really helped a lot….
In terms of improvement in paraphrasing, MHBK said:I think it helps me actually quite a lot in like writing, yeah, in writing. I think I used to… was not aware that my grammar was wrong and then I do not even like further check it. But for now, I actually, like after writing everything, I will check all the sentences.
Paraphrasing… paraphrasing used to be hard for me last time. Like, I always don’t understand how it was done and everything. But I think the EP programme like taught me like, okay, there are other ways of paraphrasing your, your answers. You don’t necessarily have to be like that, but it can be like this. And, but what is important is the gist and the summary of what you are trying to paraphrase there.
4.1.3. Learning Transfer
… there’s a change… in terms of my writing, yes, definitely, I do see a change. Previously, I, when I constructed the sentence, I just used simple English. I don’t, I don’t even bother to use the bombastic English and everything. But now, when I construct an essay, I can see the structuring of my essays getting better.
4.1.4. Changes in Self-Efficacy
Then… for me to be able to complete the EP (English proficiency) programme, I was a bit more relieved, and I think that also gave a little bit more confidence because, I would assume that the EP programme is done by the English professors and all. So, if at their level it’s acceptable, then, it gave me some confidence to continue writing for the other modules as well.
I would say (my English proficiency remained) about probably the same. Around there… Probably minor (change).
5. Discussion
5.1. Specification of Purposes
5.2. Integration of Progress Measures
5.3. Link of EAP Content with Disciplinary Study
5.4. Varied Formats of Content
5.5. Extended Time of Delivery
5.6. Reinforcement of Selected Topics
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Participant | Age | Ethnicity | Gender | Academic Discipline |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP | 32 | Chinese | Female | Business |
PLW | 23 | Chinese | Female | Business |
LCKM | 23 | Chinese | Male | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
NRK | 30 | Indian | Male | Science and Technology |
SAS | 30 | Indian | Male | Science and Technology |
GKWJ | 35 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
TZL | 25 | Chinese | Female | Human Development |
NGYA | 36 | Chinese | Male | Human Development |
BTSL | 42 | Chinese | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
MKA | 26 | Malay | Male | Science and Technology |
WMF | 30 | Chinese | Female | Science and Technology |
TKSD | 40 | Chinese | Male | Human Development |
SK | 47 | Indian | Female | Human Development |
TBSS | 43 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
HHES | 23 | Chinese | Male | Business |
CHM | 22 | Chinese | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
MHBK | 31 | Malay | Male | Business |
TSYS | 23 | Chinese | Female | Business |
CFPP | 56 | Chinese | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
AKPL | 24 | Chinese | Male | Human Development |
DCEL | 23 | Chinese | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
VLQH | 25 | Chinese | Female | Human Development |
LCYA | 31 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
LC | 26 | Chinese | Male | Business |
SABK | 26 | Malay | Female | Human Development |
SHBS | 31 | Malay | Female | Business |
HBI | 26 | Malay | Female | Science and Technology |
KYSJ | 26 | Chinese | Male | Human Development |
SABS | 35 | Malay | Female | Human Development |
LYX | 23 | Chinese | Female | Business |
LJC | 23 | Chinese | Male | Business |
AHAS | 31 | Malay | Male | Science and Technology |
MHMS | 27 | Malay | Male | Science and Technology |
DCCT | 26 | Chinese | Female | Business |
NBMF | 30 | Malay | Female | Business |
NSAL | 24 | Malay | Female | Science and Technology |
CQ | 23 | Chinese | Female | Business |
JYJL | 23 | Chinese | Male | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
LJJ | 28 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
CMH | 44 | Chinese | Female | Human Development |
JTW | 26 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
BTKW | 25 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
TYS | 45 | Chinese | Male | Business |
LJ | 29 | Chinese | Male | Science and Technology |
IMFM | 28 | Malay | Female | Business |
TGL | 33 | Chinese | Male | Business |
TL | 48 | Chinese | Female | Human Development |
CCC | 48 | Chinese | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
SMSA | 22 | Others | Male | Science and Technology |
NBA | 48 | Malay | Female | Humanities and Behavioural Sciences |
Appendix B
- Describe your previous English learning experience
- How did you prepare for high stakes English language exams previously e.g., PSLE/N/O/A/IB?
- Did you have to engage additional help beyond school e.g., tuition, and why?
- What were some classroom interactions that were memorable and useful for building your English proficiency e.g., class presentations/debates?
- What language do you speak at home mainly (in % on a daily basis) and at work? How was this language used?
- Do you use this language for communication/writing notes? How about English?
- With whom do you use English with e.g., friends, and how much (% on a daily basis)?
- How would you describe your English proficiency currently?
- Do you face any issues where English is used in university e.g., understanding course content, assignment requirements?
- How would you say your listening/reading/writing/grammar is? Is it within your expectations?
- What were some factors that contributed to your current English proficiency?
- Would you share whether your EP has improved since you were matriculated and how it has improved? What were some factors that helped (or hindered) in this improvement?
- Have you been frustrated while having to complete assignments due to English proficiency?
- How confident have you been (after completing the EP programme) in presenting in front of classes/completing writing assignments?
- Currently, how much writing in English do you do (% on a daily basis) and for what purposes?
- Did you use English for informal (IG/Twitter/Blogs), formal (class assignments, presentations)?
- What was the frequency e.g., often, seldom?
- Was informal/formal use of English in (a) useful in building your English proficiency?
- What types of writing have you done so far in the university e.g., assignments? What is the length of the assignments (number of words)? Have you always exceeded the word limit? Describe how English proficiency impacted you in completing these assignments.
- Did you experience difficulties with writing these assignments where language was a concern?
- Have any instructors given you feedback on your writing or presentation with regard to articulation of ideas and English proficiency? How did you react to the feedback and what did you do about it?
- Have you been worried about doing well for assignments due to English proficiency?
- Have you had (and how often) concerns about assignment deadlines owing to English proficiency?
- You would have completed the EP programme in the university. How has the EP programme helped you?
- How is your learning experience in the EP programme in general?
- What SDE courses (SDE101 diagnostic course, SDE102 basic writing course, SDE103 grammar, SDE104 academic reading, SDE105 advance writing course) were you enrolled? How was your learning experience in those courses, respectively?
- What would you say has been most useful of the programme (and how it has been useful)?
- What you would say is useful to have for students offering subsequent EP programmes? How would these be useful for students?
Appendix C
Appendix D
Themes. | Sub-Theme | Codes | No. of Cases |
---|---|---|---|
Programme delivery | Appropriate design of the course | Sufficient learning materials that were fit for purpose | 5 |
Appropriate delivery of the course | Design of timeline facilitates completion | 8 | |
Design of self-paced courses facilitates completion | 9 | ||
Linguistic improvement | Perceived improved linguistic skills | Grammar | 22 |
Punctuation | 6 | ||
Paraphrasing | 5 | ||
Listening | 9 | ||
Perceived no improvement in linguistic skills | Expected more focus on proper citation and referencing | 15 | |
Learning transfer | Application of EAP to subsequent academic studies | Able to use correct conventions of grammar | 8 |
Able to better structure essay as part of assessment | 15 | ||
Able to write with varying styles to suit requirements of different courses | 13 | ||
Able to build arguments | 10 | ||
Able to read and comprehend | 5 | ||
Able to do proper citation and referencing | 5 | ||
Change in self-efficacy | Somewhat improvement in English proficiency | Reading skills | 6 |
Academic writing skills | 9 | ||
No improvement in English proficiency | English proficiency remained the same | 11 | |
Mismatched expectations | 6 | ||
Confidence boost after first attempt of EAP programme | More confidence in writing | 6 | |
More confidence in speaking | 1 |
References
- Bridgeman, B.; Cho, Y.; DiPietro, S. Predicting grades from an English language assessment: The importance of peeling the onion. Lang. Test. 2016, 33, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neumann, H.; Padden, N.; McDonough, K. Beyond English language proficiency scores: Understanding the academic performance of international undergraduate students during the first year of study. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2019, 38, 324–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.; Vanderford, S.; Grote, E. Evidence of English language proficiency and academic achievement of non-English-speaking background students. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2012, 31, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phakiti, A. Predicting NESB international postgraduate students’ academic achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Appl. Educ. Stud. 2008, 3, 18–38. [Google Scholar]
- Hathaway, J. Developing that voice: Locating academic writing tuition in the mainstream of higher education. Teach. High. Educ. 2015, 20, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolton, K.; Botha, W.; Bacon-Shone, J. English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: Policy, realities and challenges. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev. 2017, 38, 913–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, Y.; Bridgeman, B. Relationship of TOEFL iBT® scores to academic performance: Some evidence from American universities. Lang. Test. 2012, 29, 421–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ockey, G.J.; Gokturk, N. Standardized language proficiency tests in higher education. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching; Gao, X., Ed.; Springer International Handbooks of Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, A. Placement testing. In The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment; Coombe, C., O’Sullivan, B., Davidson, P., Stoynoff, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 164–170. [Google Scholar]
- Wait, I.W.; Gressel, J.W. Relationship between TOEFL score and academic success for international engineering students. J. Eng. Educ. 2009, 98, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodrow, L. Academic success of international postgraduate education students and the role of English proficiency. Univ. Syd. Pap. TESOL 2006, 1, 51–70. [Google Scholar]
- Yen, D.; Kuzma, J. Higher IELTS Score, Higher Academic Performance? The Validity of IELTS in Predicting the Academic Performance of Chinese Students. Worcest. J. Learn. Teach. 2009, 3, 1–7. Available online: https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/811 (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Feast, V. The impact of IELTS scores on performance at university. Int. Educ. J. 2002, 3, 70–85. [Google Scholar]
- Arrigoni, E.; Clark, V. Investigating the Appropriateness of IELTS Cut-Off Scores for Admissions and Placement decisions at an English-Medium University in Egypt. IELTS Res. Rep. Online Ser. 2015, 1–13, 29. [Google Scholar]
- Dooey, P.; Oliver, R. An investigation into the predictive validity of the IELTS Test as an indicator of future academic success. Prospects 2002, 17, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghenghesh, P. The relationship between English language proficiency and academic performance of university students—Should academic institutions really be concerned? Int. J. Appl. Linguist. Engl. Lit. 2015, 4, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, Y.-J.; Greene, J. The predictive validity of an ESL placement test: A mixed methods approach. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2007, 1, 366–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eddey, P.; Baumann, C. Graduate business education: Profiling successful students and its relevance for marketing and recruitment policy. J. Educ. Bus. 2009, 84, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lea, M.; Street, B. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts; Lea, M., Street, B., Eds.; Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK, 2000; pp. 32–46. [Google Scholar]
- Milton, J.; Treffers-Daller, J. Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Appl. Linguist. Rev. 2013, 4, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, L.; Bo, W.V. Evaluating the efficacy of English proficiency on initial semestral results for higher education L1 English speakers in a multilingual context. High. Educ. Eval. Dev. 2021, 15, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakir, A. Medium-of-instruction policy in Singapore. In Medium of Instruction Policies; Tollefson, J.W., Tsui, A.B., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 117–133. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, R.; Hu, G.; Gu, P.Y. The relationship between use of writing strategies and English proficiency in Singapore primary schools. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2014, 23, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, P.Y.; Hu, G.; Zhang, L.J. Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Lang. Educ. 2005, 19, 281–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwek, M.Y.P.; Alsagoff, L. English teachers using Singapore colloquial English in the classroom: An examination of two secondary school teachers’ lessons. In Proceedings of the ERAS Conference, Singapore, 29–31 May 2006; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10497/15698 (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Siemund, P.; Schulz, M.E.; Schweinberger, M. Studying the linguistic ecology of Singapore: A comparison of college and university students. World Engl. 2014, 33, 340–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyland, K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Wingate, U.; Tribble, C. The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. Stud. High. Educ. 2012, 37, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, G. Developing an EAP writing course for Chinese ESL students. RELC J. 2007, 38, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knoch, U.; Rouhshad, A.; Oon, S.P.; Storch, N. What happens to ESL students’ writing after three years of study at an English medium university? J. Second Lang. Writ. 2015, 28, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storch, N.; Tapper, J. The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2009, 8, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsang, W.K.; Wong, M. Giving Grammar the Place it Deserves in Process Writing. Prospect Aust. J. TESOL 2000, 15, 34–45. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/307954 (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Terraschke, A.; Wahid, R. The impact of EAP study on the academic experiences of international postgraduate students in Australia. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2011, 10, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, N. An academic literacies argument for decentralizing EAP provision. ELT J. 2016, 70, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, M.A. Transfer climate and EAP education: Students’ perceptions of challenges to learning transfer. Engl. Specif. Purp. 2010, 29, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Chen, L. A mixed-methods study on international students’ perceptions of EAP writing programs—To what degree it could help me. Int. J. TESOL Stud. 2019, 1, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Wardle, E. Understanding ‘transfer’from FYC: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. WPA Writ. Program Adm. 2007, 31, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
- Merriam, S.B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education; Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Poth, C. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Dooey, P. Students’ perspectives of an EAP pathway program. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2010, 9, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, S.; Morrison, B. The first term at university: Implications for EAP. ELT J. 2011, 65, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Viegen, S.; Russell, B. More than language—Evaluating a Canadian university EAP bridging program. TESL Can. J. 2019, 36, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yung, K.W.-H.; Fong, N. Learning EAP at university: Perceptions of high-achieving first-year ESL undergraduates. ELT J. 2019, 73, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, M. The Online University Classroom: One Perspective for Effective Student Engagement and Teaching in an Online Environment. J. Eff. Teach. 2014, 14, 99–110. Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/161213/ (accessed on 13 June 2022).
- Dixson, M.D. Creating Effective Student Engagement in Online Courses: What do Students Find Engaging? J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 2010, 10, 1–13. Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/54817/ (accessed on 13 June 2022).
- Dunworth, K.; In-Course Student English Language Development. Five Years on: English Language Competence of International Students Outcomes Report Prepared for Australian Education International and International Education Association of Australia. Australia 2013. Available online: https://www.ieaa.org.au/documents/item/54 (accessed on 13 June 2022).
- Harris, A.J. Identifying Students Requiring English Language Support: What Role can a PELA Play? J. Acad. Lang. Learn. 2013, 7, A62–A78. Available online: https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/276 (accessed on 13 June 2022).
- Hirvela, A.; Du, Q. Why am I paraphrasing?: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2013, 12, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keefe, K.; Shi, L. An EAP program and students’ success at a Canadian university. TESL Can. J. 2017, 34, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazgutova, D.; Hanks, J. L2 learners’ perceptions of their writing strategies on an intensive EAP course. J. Acad. Writ. 2020, 11, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bo, W.V.; Lim, L.; Lin, Y. An Investigation of Multilingual Domestic University Student Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes. Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090328
Bo WV, Lim L, Lin Y. An Investigation of Multilingual Domestic University Student Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes. Behavioral Sciences. 2022; 12(9):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090328
Chicago/Turabian StyleBo, Wenjin Vikki, Lyndon Lim, and Yuna Lin. 2022. "An Investigation of Multilingual Domestic University Student Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes" Behavioral Sciences 12, no. 9: 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090328
APA StyleBo, W. V., Lim, L., & Lin, Y. (2022). An Investigation of Multilingual Domestic University Student Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090328