Drivers and Obstacles of Consumers’ Continuous Participation Intention in Online Pre-Sales: Social Exchange Theory Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework and Literature Review
2.1. Online Pre-Sales
2.2. Perceived Value and Continuous Participation Intention
2.3. Social Exchange Theory
3. Research Hypothesis Development
3.1. Perceived Benefits/Cost and Consumer Satisfaction
3.2. Perceived Benefits/Cost and Continuous Participation Intention
3.3. Consumer Satisfaction and Continuous Participation Intention
3.4. Moderating Effect of Product Type
4. Research Methods
4.1. Measurement Instrument
4.2. Data Collection
5. Data Analysis
5.1. Reliability and Validity Tests
5.2. Structural Model Path Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
5.3. Moderating Effect Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
6. Discussion
7. Implications and Limitations
7.1. Theoretical Implications
7.2. Practical Implications
7.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Item | Source |
---|---|---|
Utility benefit (UB) | I feel that shopping during an online pre-sale is good value for money | [62,102] |
I can avoid the risk of out-of-stock items by shopping via online pre-sales | ||
I have a more personalized choice of products in the online pre-sale | ||
Hedonic benefit (HB) | I find online pre-sales on e-commerce platforms very interesting | [62,102] |
I enjoy the online pre-sale shopping model | ||
Participating in online pre-sales makes me feel good | ||
I feel engaged when browsing the pre-sale goods | ||
Social benefit (SB) | I can keep up with fashion trends by shopping through online pre-sales | [62,120] |
I feel like I have something to talk about with other users when I participate in online pre-sales | ||
I communicate and share my experiences with others when I participate in online pre-sales | ||
I feel a sense of achievement when I share my experiences of online pre-sales with other users | ||
Search cost (SC) | It takes me a long time to search for the details of pre-sale goods | [45] |
In the online pre-sale, sellers have a limited time frame for the pre-sale | ||
I have to put a lot of effort into sifting through valuable information for online pre-sales | ||
Waiting cost (WC) | I have to wait a while for the final payment after paying a deposit for some pre-sale orders | [44,46] |
I have to wait a long time for my order to be shipped when I shop in online pre-sale mode | ||
When I shop online, it takes longer than I expected for my order to be delivered | ||
Adjustment cost (AC) | Changing my pre-sale order will take more time and effort than other online shopping models | [45] |
It is more trouble to solve problems with merchants not delivering on time in the online pre-sale | ||
It will take me more time and effort to return a pre-sale product if it does not arrive as expected | ||
Consumer satisfaction (CS) | I think it is a wise choice to shop through an online pre-sale | [102] |
Overall, the products and services provided during an online pre-sale met my expectations | ||
I am generally satisfied with the online pre-sale | ||
Consumer continuous participation intention (CPI) | I would like to continue to participate in online pre-sales and purchase products again | [75] |
I would recommend the online pre-sale to others | ||
I would encourage my friends and family to take part in an online pre-sale |
References
- Xie, J.; Shugan, S.M. Electronic Tickets, Smart Cards, and Online Prepayments: When and How to Advance Sell. Mark. Sci. 2001, 20, 219–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D. Under what conditions will social commerce business models survive? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2013, 12, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Benyoucef, M. User preferences of social features on social commerce websites: An empirical study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 95, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.J.; Li, X. Advance Selling in Marketing Channels. J. Mark. Res. 2023, 60, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Guo, C.; Zhou, H.; Chen, X. Pre-sale ordering strategy based on the new retail context considering bounded consumer rationality. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 2023, 19, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Stecke, K.E. Pre-Orders for New To-be-Released Products Considering Consumer Loss Aversion. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2010, 19, 198–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; He, Y.; Gou, Q.; Yang, W. Optimal advance selling strategy with information provision for omni-channel retailers. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 329, 573–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Li, G.; Shang, J. Optimizing mixed bundle pricing strategy: Advance selling and consumer regret. Omega 2023, 115, 102782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, C. Advance selling of new products considering retailers’ learning. Int. J. Econ. Theory 2020, 16, 306–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Bai, S.; Yu, H. Pre-Sale Strategy for Fresh Agricultural Products Under the Consideration of Logistics Services. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 127742–127752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Xu, M.; Chen, Z.; Guan, X. Optimal pricing for advance selling with uncertain product quality and consumer fitness. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2019, 70, 1457–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.; Turban, E. Introduction to the Special Issue Social Commerce: A Research Framework for Social Commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2011, 16, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stratu-Strelet, D.; Gil-Gómez, H.; Oltra-Badenes, R.; Guerola-Navarro, V. Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing Latin America countries: Building a democracy consolidation theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 195, 122742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Gómez, H.; Guerola-Navarro, V.; Oltra-Badenes, R.; Lozano-Quilis, J.A. Customer relationship management: Digital transformation and sustainable business model innovation. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja 2020, 33, 2733–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Benyoucef, M. From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2013, 12, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Teunter, R.H.; Zhu, S.X. Online marketing: When to offer a refund for advanced sales. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2019, 36, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Li, X.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y.H. Social shopping website quality attributes increasing consumer participation, positive eWOM, and co-shopping: The reciprocating role of participation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 24, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietz, T. Drivers of Human Stress on the Environment in the Twenty-First Century. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 2017, 42, 189–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fehrenbach, D.; Herrando, C. The effect of customer-perceived value when paying for a product with personal data: A real-life experimental study. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 137, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.J.; Ferrin, D.L.; Rao, H.R. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis. Support Syst. 2008, 44, 544–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, A.; Stecke, K.E.; Zhao, X. Advance Selling by a Newsvendor Retailer. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2011, 20, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, B.; Xu, Q.; Shan, R. Pricing and outsourcing strategies in different online sales models within a co-opetitive supply chain. Manag. Decis. Econ. 2024, 45, 828–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y. A reverse mechanism of advance selling driven by information asymmetry and competition. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Yang, W. Optimal pre-order strategy with delay in payments. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 305, 347–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fay, S.; Xie, J. The Economics of Buyer Uncertainty: Advance Selling vs. Probabilistic Selling. Mark. Sci. 2010, 29, 1040–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Tian, J.; Fan, Z. Optimal presale strategy considering consumers’ preference reversal or inconsistency. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 146, 106581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wu, C. Optimal trade-in strategy for advance selling with strategic consumers proportion. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e273124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Guo, L.; Hu, M.; Liu, W. Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2017, 37, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.; Lin, J.C. Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2016, 108, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, Y.; Chen, F. The effect of interactivity of brands’ marketing activities on Facebook fan pages on continuous participation intentions: An S–O-R framework study. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 74, 103446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goel, P.; Parayitam, S.; Sharma, A.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. A moderated mediation model for e-impulse buying tendency, customer satisfaction and intention to continue e-shopping. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 142, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, H.X.; Hashim, A.H.; Osman, S.; Lau, J.L.; Aw, E.C. The future of e-commerce? Understanding livestreaming commerce continuance usage. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2023, 51, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S.; Gao, P. Understanding group-buying websites continuance: An extension of expectation confirmation model. Internet Res. 2015, 25, 767–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doha, A.; Elnahla, N.; McShane, L. Social commerce as social networking. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 47, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Tang, J.; Men, J.; Zheng, X. Consumer perceived value and impulse buying behavior on mobile commerce: The moderating effect of social influence. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Fang, Y.; Lim, K.H. Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 53, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, C.M.; Wang, E.T.G.; Fang, Y.H.; Huang, H.Y. Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Inf. Syst. J. 2014, 24, 85–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zollo, L.; Filieri, R.; Rialti, R.; Yoon, S. Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers’ benefits and experience. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Inf. Manage. 2016, 53, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Chen, K.; Chen, P.; Cheng, S. Perceived value, transaction cost, and repurchase-intention in online shopping: A relational exchange perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 2768–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, C.; Chang, J.; Tang, K. Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telemat. Inform. 2016, 33, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Huang, V.; Chen, X.; Davison, R.M.; Hua, Z. Social value and online social shopping intention: The moderating role of experience. Inf. Technol. People 2018, 31, 688–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Chang, Y. Cross-border e-commerce: Consumers’ intention to shop on foreign websites. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 1256–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teo, T.S.H.; Yu, Y. Online buying behavior: A transaction cost economics perspective. Omega 2005, 33, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, Y.; Mezei, J. When do AI chatbots lead to higher customer satisfaction than human frontline employees in online shopping assistance? Considering product attribute type. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 103059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhaigude, S.A.; Mohan, B.C. Customer experience in social commerce: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2023, 47, 1629–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, S.N.; Malik, N.; Rana, N.P.; Vishnani, S.; Srivastava, S. Validating the antecedents of customer M-payment loyalty: An empirical investigation. Internet Res. 2022, 32, 1862–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, S.; Hsu, C. Understanding online repurchase intention: Social exchange theory and shopping habit. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 2016, 14, 19–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McFarland, L.A.; Ployhart, R.E. Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015, 100, 1653–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homans, G.C. Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 1958, 63, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Yao, Z.; Tang, P.; Ma, Y. Impacts of different interactions on viewers’ sense of virtual community: An empirical study of live streaming platform. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2023, 42, 940–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, I.; Choi, J.; Kim, S. Effect of benefits and risks on customer’s psychological ownership in the service industry. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 2022, 34, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, R.; Liu, M.J.; Blut, M. What’s in it for you? Examining the roles of consumption values and Thaler’s acquisition–transaction utility theory in Chinese consumers’ green purchase intentions. Eur. J. Market. 2022, 56, 1065–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Debei, M.M.; Akroush, M.N.; Ashouri, M.I. Consumer attitudes towards online shopping The effects of trust, perceived benefits, and perceived web quality. Internet Res. 2015, 25, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, J.; Suk, K. Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free Promotion. J. Retail. 2020, 96, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Chung, N.; Ahn, K.; Lee, J. When social media met commerce: A model of perceived customer value in group-buying. J. Serv. Mark. 2016, 30, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osatuyi, B.; Qin, H.; Osatuyi, T.; Turel, O. When it comes to Satisfaction… It depends: An empirical examination of social commerce users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 111, 106413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stathopoulou, A.; Balabanis, G. The effects of loyalty programs on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty toward high- and low-end fashion retailers. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5801–5808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.K.; Verma, P. Impact of sales Promotion’s benefits on perceived value: Does product category moderate the results? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.; Kettinger, W.J.; Poston, R.S. The effect of online social value on satisfaction and continued use of social media. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 2015, 24, 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, S.S.C.; Wu, Y.; Sie, Y. Generating consumer resonance for purchase intention on social network sites. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 69, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busalim, A.H.; Ghabban, F.; Hussin, A.R.C. Customer engagement behaviour on social commerce platforms: An empirical study. Technol. Soc. 2021, 64, 101437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hecht, C.A.; Grande, M.R.; Harackiewicz, J.M. The Role of Utility Value in Promoting Interest Development. Motiv. Sci. 2021, 7, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, H.; Yang, J.; Fan, C. Risk factors of consumer switching behaviour for cross-border e-commerce mobile platform. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2020, 18, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, T.J.; Hamilton, S.F.; Yonezawa, K. Variety and the Cost of Search in Supermarket Retailing. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2017, 50, 263–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Chan, M. Smartphone uses and emotional and psychological well-being in China: The attenuating role of perceived information overload. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2022, 41, 2427–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruelle, D.; Lervik-Olsen, L.; Gustafsson, A. The clock is ticking—Or is it? Customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter. J. Retail. 2023, 99, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.K.; Bolton, R.N. The Effect of Customers’ Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgments. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2002, 30, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, J.; Cameron, M. The Effects of the Service Environment on Affect and Consumer Perception of Waiting Time: An Integrative Review and Research Propositions. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1996, 24, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vollero, A.; Sardanelli, D.; Siano, A. Exploring the role of the Amazon effect on customer expectations: An analysis of user-generated content in consumer electronics retailing. J. Consum. Behav. 2023, 22, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Speier-Pero, C.; Schuetz, S. Why do people shop online? A comprehensive framework of consumers’ online shopping intentions and behaviors. Inf. Technol. People 2022, 35, 1590–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, P.; Miao, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, X. Informational cascade, regulatory focus and purchase intention in online flash shopping. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2023, 62, 101343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, D.; Ju, S. The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Cui, T.; Liu, N.; Deng, Y.; Guo, J. Demystifying continuous participation in game applications at social networking sites: A social playfulness design perspective. Internet Res. 2018, 28, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Huang, Y.; Qian, L. Social trust and algorithmic equity: The societal perspectives of users’ intention to interact with algorithm recommendation systems. Decis. Support Syst. 2024, 178, 114115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Wong, S.F.; Wang, S.; Chang, Y. Continue staying in online health platforms or not: The moderating role of threat appraisal. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2024, 124, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molinillo, S.; Anaya-Sánchez, R.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F. Analyzing the effect of social support and community factors on customer engagement and its impact on loyalty behaviors toward social commerce websites. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 108, 105980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zhao, L.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J. Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Inf. Manage. 2016, 53, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.F.W.T.; Gao, F.; Tan, T.F. Channel Changes Choice: An Empirical Study About Omnichannel Demand Sensitivity to Fulfillment Lead Time. Manage. Sci. 2024, 70, 2954–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Shen, J. Design shopping as an experience: Exploring the effect of the live-streaming shopping characteristics on consumers’ participation intention and memorable experience. Inf. Manage. 2023, 60, 103810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Yang, F.; Men, J. Recommendation content matters! Exploring the impact of the recommendation content on consumer decisions from the means-end chain perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2023, 68, 102589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akter, S.; Ambra, D.J.; Ray, P. Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of mHealth. Inf. Manage. 2013, 50, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Wang, R. Chatbots in e-commerce: The effect of chatbot language style on customers’ continuance usage intention and attitude toward brand. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 1970, 78, 311–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luan, J.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, F.; Liu, H. Search product and experience product online reviews: An eye-tracking study on consumers’ review search behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 65, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Shih, H. How do search-based and experience-based information matter in the evaluation of user satisfaction? The case of TripAdvisor. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 73, 659–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Han, M.; Feng, J. Helpfulness of online reviews: Examining review informativeness and classification thresholds by search products and experience products. Decis. Support Syst. 2019, 124, 113099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weathers, D.; Sharma, S.; Wood, S.L. Effects of online communication practices on consumer perceptions of performance uncertainty for search and experience goods. J. Retail. 2007, 83, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, P.; Lurie, N.H.; Mitra, S. Searching for Experience on the Web: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Behavior for Search and Experience Goods. J. Mark. 2009, 73, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Sun, Y. Supply chain decision-making of green products considering a retailer’s fairness concerns under a pre-sale model. J. Clean Prod. 2023, 414, 137457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, P.Y.; Chung, H. The Effect of Product Type and Regulatory Focus on the Performance of Advance Selling Strategy. J. Channel Retail. 2022, 27, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Anlamlier, E.; Ulu, S. Temporary or permanent social media post? The impact of product type. Psychol. Mark. 2022, 39, 1736–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aw, E.C.; Kamal Basha, N.; Ng, S.I.; Ho, J.A. Searching online and buying offline: Understanding the role of channel-, consumer-, and product-related factors in determining webrooming intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, M.G.; Gupta, S.D.; Paul, J. Perceived usefulness of online customer reviews: A review mining approach using machine learning & exploratory data analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 150, 147–164. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, M. The searching artificial intelligence: Consumers show less aversion to algorithm-recommended search product. Psychol. Mark. 2022, 39, 1902–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, S. Information search in the internet markets: Experience versus search goods. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018, 30, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S. Antecedents and consequences of in-store experiences based on an experiential typology. Eur. J. Market. 2013, 47, 693–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhar, R.; Wertenbroch, K. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J. Mark. Res. 2000, 37, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Román, S. Relational Consequences of Perceived Deception in Online Shopping: The Moderating Roles of Type of Product, Consumer’s Attitude Toward the Internet and Consumer’s Demographics. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 95, 373–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, C.; Wang, W. The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context. Internet Res. 2017, 27, 772–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cureton, E.E. Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika 1966, 31, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 8–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gustafsson, J.E.; Martenson, R. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Contemp. Psychol. Apa Rev. Books 2002, 47, 478–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Z.; Hau, K.T.; Chang, L. A comparison of moderator and mediator and their application. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2005, 268–274. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D.Y.; Kim, H. Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, J.C.; Kang, T. Reciprocal intention in knowledge seeking: Examining social exchange theory in an online professional community. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2019, 48, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, N.; Yang, C.; Han, L.; Jou, M. Too much overload and concerns: Antecedents of social media fatigue and the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 139, 107500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Liu, X. The Impact of Information Overload of E-Commerce Platform on Consumer Return Intention: Considering the Moderating Role of Perceived Environmental Effectiveness. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, W.; Liberatore, J.M.; Nydick, L.R.B.; Chung, Q.; Sloane, E. Impact of process change on customer perception of waiting time: A field study. Omega 2004, 32, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhan, H.S.Z.; Anderson, E.T. Multiyear Impact of Backorder Delays: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. Mark. Sci. 2023, 42, 314–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, Y.; Jiang, L. Managing presales with two payments and return policy when consumers are time-inconsistent. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2023, 32, 3594–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X. Examining the role of emotion in online consumer reviews of various attributes in the surprise box shopping model. Decis. Support Syst. 2020, 136, 113344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandon, P.; Wansink, B.; Laurent, G. A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness. J. Mark. 2000, 64, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merhi, M.; Hone, K.; Tarhini, A.; Ameen, N. An empirical examination of the moderating role of age and gender in consumer mobile banking use: A cross-national, quantitative study. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2021, 34, 1144–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiau, W.; Luo, M.M. Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 2431–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, S.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Park, H.K. The effect of the preorder strategy on consumers’ product choice: The moderating role of product experience and payment timing. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 99, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Li, M.; Dai, D.; Guo, L. The effects of social commerce environmental characteristics on customers’ purchase intentions: The chain mediating effect of customer-to-customer interaction and customer-perceived value. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2021, 48, 101073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Characteristics | Type | Frequency (n = 527) | % |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 220 | 41.7% |
Female | 307 | 58.3% | |
Age | <18 | 3 | 0.6% |
19~25 | 430 | 81.6% | |
26~35 | 88 | 16.7% | |
>36 | 6 | 1.1% | |
Education | High school and below | 5 | 0.9% |
College | 45 | 8.5% | |
Undergraduate | 370 | 70.2% | |
Master’s degree and above | 107 | 20.3% | |
Online shopping experience (year) | <1 | 4 | 0.8% |
1–3 | 92 | 17.5% | |
3–5 | 205 | 38.9% | |
>5 | 226 | 42.9% | |
Job | Students | 431 | 81.8% |
Party and government organizations and public institution staff | 21 | 4.0% | |
Enterprise, company staff | 56 | 10.6% | |
Farmers | 3 | 0.6% | |
Freelance | 15 | 2.8% | |
Other | 1 | 0.2% |
Item | CITC | Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted | Standardized Factor Load Values | Cronbach’s α | AVE | CR | UB | HB | SB | SC | WC | AC | CS | CPI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB | UB 1 | 0.852 | 0.911 | 0.891 | 0.933 | 0.823 | 0.933 | 0.907 | |||||||
UB 2 | 0.871 | 0.895 | 0.920 | ||||||||||||
UB 3 | 0.863 | 0.901 | 0.911 | ||||||||||||
HB | HB 1 | 0.844 | 0.920 | 0.882 | 0.937 | 0.789 | 0.937 | 0.074 | 0.888 | ||||||
HB 2 | 0.854 | 0.917 | 0.889 | ||||||||||||
HB 3 | 0.850 | 0.918 | 0.887 | ||||||||||||
HB 4 | 0.857 | 0.916 | 0.895 | ||||||||||||
SB | SB 1 | 0.818 | 0.905 | 0.858 | 0.925 | 0.755 | 0.925 | 0.147 | 0.127 | 0.869 | |||||
SB 2 | 0.818 | 0.905 | 0.861 | ||||||||||||
SB 3 | 0.827 | 0.902 | 0.870 | ||||||||||||
SB 4 | 0.839 | 0.898 | 0.886 | ||||||||||||
SC | SC 1 | 0.838 | 0.913 | 0.891 | 0.93 | 0.816 | 0.930 | 0.185 | 0.057 | 0.169 | 0.903 | ||||
SC 2 | 0.863 | 0.894 | 0.920 | ||||||||||||
SC 3 | 0.868 | 0.889 | 0.911 | ||||||||||||
WC | WC 1 | 0.837 | 0.899 | 0.884 | 0.925 | 0.805 | 0.925 | 0.135 | −0.18 | 0.049 | 0.056 | 0.897 | |||
WC 2 | 0.849 | 0.889 | 0.901 | ||||||||||||
WC 3 | 0.854 | 0.885 | 0.906 | ||||||||||||
AC | AC 1 | 0.818 | 0.901 | 0.864 | 0.92 | 0.795 | 0.921 | 0.085 | 0.182 | 0.163 | 0 | 0.169 | 0.892 | ||
AC 2 | 0.857 | 0.869 | 0.917 | ||||||||||||
AC 3 | 0.840 | 0.884 | 0.893 | ||||||||||||
CS | CS 1 | 0.851 | 0.927 | 0.886 | 0.938 | 0.837 | 0.939 | 0.224 | 0.279 | 0.282 | 0.228 | 0.256 | −0.245 | 0.915 | |
CS 2 | 0.885 | 0.899 | 0.932 | ||||||||||||
CS 3 | 0.881 | 0.904 | 0.926 | ||||||||||||
CPI | CPI 1 | 0.654 | 0.688 | 0.821 | 0.788 | 0.577 | 0.800 | 0.393 | 0.339 | 0.377 | 0.395 | 0.376 | −0.339 | 0.532 | 0.760 |
CPI 2 | 0.690 | 0.656 | 0.829 | ||||||||||||
CPI 3 | 0.562 | 0.802 | 0.607 |
Indicators | Reference Standards | Measurement Results |
---|---|---|
CMIN/DF | 1–3 is excellent, 3–5 is good | 1.193 |
RMSEA | <0.05 is excellent, <0.08 is good | 0.019 |
IFI | >0.9 is excellent, >0.8 is good | 0.995 |
TLI | >0.9 is excellent, >0.8 is good | 0.994 |
CFI | >0.9 is excellent, >0.8 is good | 0.995 |
Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p | Hypothetical Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB → CS | 0.143 | 0.047 | 3.057 | 0.002 | H1a Supported |
HB → CS | 0.227 | 0.05 | 4.503 | *** | H1b Supported |
SB → CS | 0.249 | 0.055 | 4.497 | *** | H1c Supported |
SC → CS | −0.176 | 0.046 | −3.815 | *** | H2a Supported |
WC → CS | −0.195 | 0.048 | −4.067 | *** | H2b Supported |
AC → CS | −0.18 | 0.05 | −3.583 | *** | H2c Supported |
UB → CPI | 0.111 | 0.019 | 5.774 | *** | H3a Supported |
HB → CPI | 0.085 | 0.021 | 4.125 | *** | H3b Supported |
SB → CPI | 0.109 | 0.023 | 4.778 | *** | H3c Supported |
SC → CPI | −0.126 | 0.019 | −6.606 | *** | H4a Supported |
WC → CPI | −0.109 | 0.02 | −5.493 | *** | H4b Supported |
AC → CPI | −0.094 | 0.02 | −4.603 | *** | H4c Supported |
CS → CPI | 0.106 | 0.019 | 5.455 | *** | H5 Supported |
Search-Based | Experience-Based | Difference Examination | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | |Z| | Hypothetical Results | |||
Path | B | Std. Error | Beta | B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
UB → CS | 0.009 | 0.068 | 0.007 | 0.125 | 0.205 | 0.049 | 0.188 | 4.174 | 2.338 * | H6a Supported |
HB → CS | 0.002 | 0.078 | 0.002 | 0.031 | 0.323 | 0.055 | 0.26 | 5.884 | 3.363 *** | H6b Supported |
SB → CS | 0.069 | 0.086 | 0.048 | 0.803 | 0.443 | 0.055 | 0.367 | 8.078 | 3.664 *** | H6c Supported |
SC → CS | −0.029 | 0.066 | −0.026 | −0.44 | −0.288 | 0.051 | −0.247 | −5.609 | 3.105 ** | H7a Supported |
WC → CS | −0.11 | 0.07 | −0.094 | −1.576 | −0.053 | 0.056 | −0.045 | −0.939 | 0.636 | H7b Unsupported |
AC → CS | −0.046 | 0.073 | −0.038 | −0.632 | −0.189 | 0.053 | −0.166 | −3.552 | 1.585 | H7c Unsupported |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | t | B | t | B | t | |
constant | 4.250 *** | 9.354 | 4.255 *** | 10.499 | 4.272 *** | 10.985 |
Gender | −0.106 | −0.865 | −0.046 | −0.417 | −0.016 | −0.149 |
age | −0.046 | −0.341 | −0.06 | −0.491 | −0.039 | −0.338 |
edu | −0.069 | −0.72 | −0.105 | −1.225 | −0.146 | −1.767 |
exper | 0.043 | 0.629 | 0.046 | 0.761 | 0.049 | 0.854 |
job | −0.003 | −0.056 | −0.007 | −0.13 | −0.007 | −0.143 |
UB | 0.136 ** | 3.023 | 0.001 | 0.024 | ||
SB | 0.241 *** | 4.447 | 0.077 | 1.034 | ||
HB | 0.225 *** | 4.432 | 0.003 | 0.046 | ||
SC | −0.158 *** | −3.509 | −0.022 | −0.387 | ||
WC | −0.183 *** | −3.912 | −0.103 | −1.707 | ||
AC | −0.160 *** | −3.358 | −0.043 | −0.698 | ||
TYPE | 0.053 | 0.615 | 0.058 | 0.699 | ||
UB*TYPE | 0.210 * | 2.344 | ||||
SB*TYPE | 0.252 * | 2.387 | ||||
HB*TYPE | 0.439 *** | 4.378 | ||||
SC*TYPE | −0.269 ** | −2.99 | ||||
WC*TYPE | 0.045 | 0.461 | ||||
AC*TYPE | −0.146 | −1.532 | ||||
R 2 | 0.003 | 0.222 | 0.297 | |||
F | F (5521) = 0.292, p = 0.917 | F (12,514) = 12.213, p = 0.000 | F (18,508) = 11.900, p = 0.000 | |||
∆R 2 | 0.003 | 0.219 | 0.075 | |||
∆F | F (5521) = 0.292, p = 0.917 | F (7514) = 20.672, p = 0.000 | F (6508) = 8.995, p = 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Yin, J.; Wang, L.; Cong, R. Drivers and Obstacles of Consumers’ Continuous Participation Intention in Online Pre-Sales: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111094
Wang Y, Qiu X, Yin J, Wang L, Cong R. Drivers and Obstacles of Consumers’ Continuous Participation Intention in Online Pre-Sales: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(11):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111094
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Ya, Xiaodong Qiu, Jiwang Yin, Liya Wang, and Rong Cong. 2024. "Drivers and Obstacles of Consumers’ Continuous Participation Intention in Online Pre-Sales: Social Exchange Theory Perspective" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 11: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111094
APA StyleWang, Y., Qiu, X., Yin, J., Wang, L., & Cong, R. (2024). Drivers and Obstacles of Consumers’ Continuous Participation Intention in Online Pre-Sales: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111094