An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
2.2. Eco-Innovation Capabilities
2.3. Business Performance
2.4. Resource-Based View (RBV) Theory
3. Results
3.1. The Implementation of Eco-Product Innovation
“Our cake decoration powder is made from recycled cookies that have been unsold and crushed. We implement existing materials to avoid any waste of our main product, and all of our ingredients are made with natural materials that do not pollute the surrounding areas”.(P1)
“Our firm is open to the people who did not want any of their old mattresses and sold them to us. We buy the old mattress and recycle it to make a new one. That is one of our specialties because we have a unique strategy to innovate from a rotten product to a new product”.(P4)
3.2. The Implementation of Eco-Process Innovation
“Our process is we recycled our existing product to produce another product such as cooking power or cake powder. This is because we did not want to commit to another new raw material as it would increase our production costs”.(P1)
“There are several steps to take when producing a new mattress or piece of furniture. So, we decided to accept the rotten product so that we could recycle it, and that is the reason for the changes to our production process. The level of our solid waste can be prevented”.(P4)
“Regarding the process, we actually invested more in R&D regarding our product to ensure that it was eco-friendly for our customers to use. It would seem that, like our customers from the medical institute, it is our responsibility to develop research toward our product to improve its effectiveness”.(P2)
“We received numerous complaints and suggestions about our product from our customers due to the COVID-19 pandemic. So, we decided to do some research on our ingredients because we want to develop and add anti-bacterial ingredients to our main product”.(P3)
3.3. The Implementation of Eco-Organisational Innovation
“The idea of implementing recycling practises in our organisation comes from myself, the founder of this company. It is my responsibility to ensure that these practises are successful, as well as our ideas for any other innovation activity in the future”.(P1)
“As the company’s leader, I make motivation a top priority and share it with all of my employees to ensure that green environments and sustainability plan can be achieved. We discussed in our weekly meeting the status and techniques for handling our raw materials, liquid and solid waste, and any other harmful materials in our firm”.(P2)
“A great organisational chart that constantly reminds us of the importance of sustainability in every operation. It is critical to ensuring that our organisation is always on the right track in planning when it comes to protecting the environment while manufacturing products”.(P3)
“Managers always closely supervise our employees as they handle and manage solid waste. This is to ensure that our waste is located in one specific place. We used this technique because unmanaged waste can be found anywhere in our area and will harm everyone in our firm”.(P4)
3.4. The Implementation of Eco-Marketing Innovation
“We do have our own brand name for our product. For the packaging, we also used natural materials, such as boxes and paper bags. We use as little plastic as possible in our packaging”.(P1)
“Implementing digital marketing is our tool for promoting our product. We also have our own brand name, and we make some changes to our packaging to enhance its sustainability towards nature and the environment. We only use boxes that can be recycled after being used”.(P2)
“The power of word-of-mouth is our main strategy for marketing. Actually, we put the green label and anti-bacterial label on our core product after implementing innovative practices”.(P3)
“Our coverage was limited, so our promotion relied on word-of-mouth from our customers. Most of our customers are pleased with our pricing range because it is still competitively priced in the furniture industry”.(P4)
“We have made every effort to keep our pricing as low as possible for our clients. The product design will also be considered as the main reason for us to decide the price for our product”.(P5)
3.5. The Implementation of Eco-Technology Innovation
“We made extra investments in technological innovation because the machine had to manufacture a variety of bottles, adhere to all chemical regulations established by the Malaysian Minister of Health, and guarantee the safety of our clients, including hospital users. All the safety guidelines for chemicals had to be followed”.(P2)
“We were able to purchase some unique and modern equipment to make sure our employees could operate them safely and continue creating high-quality goods. Without raising utility expenses, our new machines used lower voltage levels”.(P4)
“The machine in which we invest is more time-sensitive, and our production level is increasing at the same time. We can process and bulk our product more than usual to meet the demands of our customers”.(P6)
“We cannot easily employ eco-innovation practices due to our product. Our product is an exclusive batik, which we designed one and only for our customer. What can we do for our product innovation? A beg? A shoe? Are you sure you will buy it? We already know that a minority of Malaysian people love to wear batik shoes or beg. So, we stick to one product, which is “Baju Kurung Batik”. This is why we cannot adapt eco-innovation like a product or process like others”.(P5)
“I think my company should not invest more in eco-innovation. It is because we just sew a bulk of clothes and any other fabric materials and make them exactly as our customers’ demand. My company was not suitable for implementation because it is simply a clothing factory. We did not use any chemical materials or any harmful resources in our production process”.(P6)
4. Materials and Methods
Data Collection
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Summary of the Study
6.2. Contribution and Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abeysekara, Nadeesha, Haijun Wang, and Duminda Kuruppuarachchi. 2019. Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal 25: 1673–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, Nawal Abdalla, and Ghadah Alarifi. 2021. Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: The role of external support. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 10: 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adan, Mazmira, and Saiful Izzuan Hussain. 2021. The Relationship between Economic Growth, Small and Medium Enterprises and the Number of Employees in Malaysia using Vine Copula Approach. Sains Malaysiana 50: 2455–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, Munir, and Yiyun Wu. 2022. Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. Journal of Environmental Management 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alshebami, Ali Saleh. 2023. Green Innovation, Self-Efficacy, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Economic Performance: Interactions among Saudi Small Enterprises. Sustainability 15: 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmi, Fadhlur Rahim, Haslinda Musa, Abdul Rahim Abdullah, and Norfaridatul Akmaliah Othman. 2017. Analyzing the awareness of green technology in Malaysia practices. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day. pp. 252–54. Available online: https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=XYYlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA252&lpg=PA252&dq=Analyzing+the+awareness+of+green+technology+in+Malaysia+practices.+Proceedings+of+Mechanical+Engineering+Research+Day+2017&source=bl&ots=XGTlp-I4iO&sig=ACfU3U2FKDdkclzGQ0OEIME1H-Z-GIjYpg&hl=zh-CN&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDrbrc9a_-AhXvklYBHefqBdcQ6AF6BAgWEAM#v=onepage&q=Analyzing%20the%20awareness%20of%20green%20technology%20in%20Malaysia%20practices.%20Proceedings%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineering%20Research%20Day%202017&f=false (accessed on 20 December 2022).
- Bacinello, Edilson, Gérson Tontini, and Anete Alberton. 2021. Influence of corporate social responsibility on sustainable practices of small and medium-sized enterprises: Implications on business performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28: 776–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barney, Jay. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biscione, Antonella, Annunziata de Felice, Teodoro Gallucci, and Giovanni Lagioia. 2021. Four types of eco-innovation for Baltic firms. Economic Research 35: 196–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caputo, Francesco, Alexeis Garcia-Perez, Valentina Cillo, and Elisa Giacosa. 2019. A knowledge-based view of people and technology: Directions for a value co-creation-based learning organisation. Journal of Knowledge Management 23: 1314–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceptureanu, Sebastian Ion, Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, Doina Popescu, and Olguta Anca Orzan. 2020. Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs. Sustainability 12: 7106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ch’ng, Phey-Chen, Jeffrey Cheah, and Azlan Amran. 2021. Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 283: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Colin C. J., Chen-lung Yang, and Chwen Sheu. 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production 64: 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). 2021. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Performance 2020. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=159&bul_id=KzdrS25pRTZ1VGFkcTlNY0FEczBYUT09&menu_id=TE5CRUZCblh4ZTZMODZIbmk2aWRRQT09 (accessed on 4 October 2021).
- Department of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal. 2022. Index Of Industrial Production, Malaysia November 2022. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/ctwoByCat&parent_id=89&menu_id=SjgwNXdiM0JlT3Q2TDBlWXdKdUVldz09 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
- Diaconu, Mihaela. 2011. Technological Innovation: Concept, Process, Typology and Implications in the Economy. Theoretical and Applied Economics 18: 127–44. [Google Scholar]
- Díaz-García, Cristina, Ángela González-Moreno, and Francisco J. Sáez-Martíneza. 2015. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 17: 6–23. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, Ying, Xi Wang, Jun Jin, Yuanbo Qiao, and Lei Shi. 2014. Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 34: 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenmann, Tom. 2021. Why Start-ups Fail. Harvard Business Review 2021: 76–85. [Google Scholar]
- Fernando, Yudi, Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour, and Wen-Xin Wah. 2019. Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling 141: 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, Yudi, Ming-Lang Tseng, Robert Sroufe, Ahmed Zainul Abideen, Muhammad Shabir Shaharudin, and Rajan Jose. 2021. Eco-innovation impacts on recycled product performance and competitiveness: Malaysian automotive industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption 28: 1677–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fethi, Sami, and Abdulhamid Rahuma. 2020. The impact of eco-innovation on CO2 emission reductions: Evidence from selected petroleum companies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 53: 108–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gage, Deborah. 2012. The Venture Capital Secret: 3 Out of 4 Start-Ups Fail. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443720204578004980476429190 (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Geng, Duanyang, Kee-hung Lai, and Qinghua Zhu. 2021. Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics 231: 107869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Gaoxiang, and Zheng Wang. 2018. Research on global carbon abatement driven by R&D investment in the context of INDCs. Energy 148: 662–75. [Google Scholar]
- Guzmán, Cristina Aibar, and Francisco M. Somohano Rodríguez. 2021. Do Consumers Value Environmental Innovation in Product? Administrative Science 11: 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, Chun-Yi, Bi-Huei Tsai, Chiao-Shan Chen, and Ming-Tsang Lu. 2021. Exploring green marketing orientations towards sustainability the hospitality industry in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Sustainability 13: 4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hojnik, Jana, and Mitja Ruzzier. 2016a. Drivers of and barriers to eco-innovation: A case study. International Journal Sustainability Economy 8: 273–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hojnik, Jana, and Mitja Ruzzier. 2016b. The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production 133: 812–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hojnik, Jana, Mitja Ruzzier, and Tatiana S. Manolova. 2018. Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 171: 1312–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishola, Bolaji. 2019. Handling Waste in Manufacturing: Encouraging Re-Manufacturing, Recycling and Re-Using in United States of America. Procedia Manufacturing 39: 721–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islami, Xhavit, Naim Mustafa, and Marija Topuzovska Latkovikj. 2020. Linking Porter’s generic strategies to firm performance. Future Business Journal 6: 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janahi, Noora A., Christopher M. Durugbo, and Odeh R. Al-Jayyousi. 2021. Eco-innovation strategy in manufacturing: A systematic review. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 5: 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Wenbo, Huaqi Chai, Jing Shao, and Taiwen Feng. 2018. Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 198: 1311–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Cheng, Asif Razzaq, Faiza Saleem, and Avik Sinha. 2022. Asymmetric effects of eco-innovation and human capitaldevelopment in realizing environmental sustainabilityin China: Evidence from quantile ARDL framework. Economic Research 35: 4947–70. [Google Scholar]
- Johnstone, Micael-Lee, and Laypeng Tan. 2015. Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 132: 311–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsikeas, Constantine S., Constantinos N. Leonidou, and Athina Zeriti. 2016. Eco-friendly product development strategy: Antecedents, outcomes, and contigent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44: 660–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kemp, René, and Peter Pearson. 2007. Final Report MEI Project about Measuring Eco-Innovation. Maastricht: UM Merit. [Google Scholar]
- Kemp, René, and Serena Pontoglio. 2011. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics 72: 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshminder, J. S., and V. G. R. Chandran. 2017. Eco-Innovation in the Chemical Manufacturing Firms- Insights for Policy Response. Institutions and Economies 9: 21–42. [Google Scholar]
- Kesidou, Effie, and Lichao Wu. 2020. Stringency of environmental regulation and eco-innovation: Evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan and green patents. Economics Letters 190: 109090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Hyojin, and Daesik Hur. 2021. Feeling torn? The conflicting effects of market and entrepreneurial orientations on manufacturing SMEs’ innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klewitz, Johanna, and Erik G. Hansen. 2014. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation of SMEs: A Systematic Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristinae, Vivy, I. Made Wardana, I. Gusti Ayu Ketut Giantari, and Agoes Ganesha Rahyuda. 2020. The role of powerful business strategy on value innovation capabilities to improve marketing performance during COVID-19 pandemic. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 8: 675–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, Anuj, and Nishu Ayedee. 2021. An interconnection between COVID-19 and climate change problem. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems 24: 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larbi-Siaw, Otu, Hu Xuhua, Ebenezer Owusu, Abigail Owusu-Agyeman, Brou Ettien Fulgence, and Samuel Akwasi Frimpong. 2022. Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies. Technology in Society 68: 101899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonelli, Simona, Francesca Masciarelli, and Fabrizia Fontana. 2019. The impact of personality traits and abilities on entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 34: 269–94. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, Yi-Chuan, and Kuen-Hung Tsai. 2019. Innovation intensity, creativity enhancement, and eco-innovation strategy: The roles of customer demand and environmental regulation. Business Strategy and the Environment 28: 316–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Pengfei, Huamao Wang, and Zhaojun Yang. 2016. Investment and financing for SMEs with a partial guarantee and jump risk. European Journal of Operational Research 239: 1161–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maldonado-Guzmán, Gonzalo, and Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes. 2020. Eco-innovation practices’ adoption in the automotive industry. International Journal Of Innovation Science 12: 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MIDA. 2020. Green Technology Incentives: Towards Achieving Sustainable Development in Malaysia. Available online: https://www.mida.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Green-technology-High-Res-Final.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2022).
- Moreno-Mondéjar, Lourdes. 2019. Open strategies and eco-innovation for business success in the Spanish agro-food industry. In Open-Innovation Strategies and Eco-Innovation in Agro-Food Industries. Oxfordshire: Chartridge Books Oxford, pp. 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Mouzas, Stefanos, and Florian Bauer. 2022. Rethinking business performance in global value chains. Journal of Business Research 144: 679–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangmee, Chaiyawit, Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz, Nusanee Meekaewkunchorn, Nuttapon Kassakorn, and Bilal Khalid. 2021. Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Social Sciences 10: 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negny, Stéphane, Jean-Pierre Belaud, G. Cortes Robles, E. Roldan Reyes, and J. Barragan Ferrer. 2012. Toward an eco-innovative method based on a better use of resources: Application to chemical process preliminary design. Journal of Cleaner Production 32: 101–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newsroom. 2022. Apple Expands the Use of Recycled Materials Across Its Products. Available online: https://www.apple.com/my/newsroom/2022/04/apple-expands-the-use-of-recycled-materials-across-its-products/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
- Nguyen, Nguyen Phong, and Samuel Adomako. 2021. Innovations that generate ecological improvements and help maintain a sustainable environment are also classified as “eco-innovations”. The implementation of new products, processes, organisational structures, technologies, or systems to be used by the company is also examined as part of its eco-innovation capabilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29: 79–88. [Google Scholar]
- Novitasari, Maya, Ali Saleh Alshebami, and M. Agus Sudrajat. 2021. The Role of Green Supply Chain Management in Predicting Indonesian Firms’ Performance: Competitive Advantage and Board Size Influence. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management 5: 137–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NSDC. 2016. SME Development Policies and Programmes. Available online: www.smecorp.gov.my/images/SMEAR/latest/2/Chapter%204.pdf (accessed on 22 September 2020).
- Obi, James, Ayodotun Stephen Ibidunni, Atolagbe Tolulope, Maxwell Ayodele Olokundun, Augusta Bosede Amaihian, Taiye Tairat Borishade, and Peter Fred. 2018. Contribution of small and medium enterprises to economic development: Evidence from a transiting economy. Data in Brief 18: 835–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OECD. 2009. Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-innovation: Towards a Green Economy. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/42957785.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2023).
- OECD. 2018. Strengthening SMEs and Entrepreneurship For Productivity and Inclusive Growth. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/ministerial/documents/2018-SME-Ministerial-Conference-Key-Issues.pdf (accessed on 6 November 2022).
- OECD. 2021. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2021. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/industry/smes/SME-Outlook-2021-Country-profiles.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2022).
- Oladimeji, Olufunke, Jennifer Cross, and Heather Keathley-Herring. 2020. System dynamics applications in performance measurement research: Progress and challenges. Management Decision 59: 1181–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oželienė, Danguolė. 2018. Model of Company’s Social Sustainability. License 41: 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pace, Kevin K. 2016. Outsourcing Human Resource Competencies: A Quantitative Study of Their Influence On Operational Performance. Minneapolis: Capella University, School of Business and Technology. [Google Scholar]
- Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus, Carla S. ten Caten, Carlos F. Jung, José Luis D. Ribeiro, Helena Victorovna G. Navas, and Virgílio A. Cruz-Machado. 2016. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 2277–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus, Carla Schwengber ten Caten, Carlos Fernando Jung, Helena Victorovna Guitiss Navas, and Virgílio Antônio Cruz-Machado. 2018. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs from emerging markets: Systematic literature review and challenges. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 48: 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Xuerong, and Yang Liu. 2016. Behind eco-innovation: Managerial environmental awareness and external resource acquisition. Journal of Cleaner Production 139: 812–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peyravi, Bahman, and Artūras Jakubavičius. 2022. Drivers in the Eco-Innovation Road to the Circular Economy: Organisational Capabilities and Exploitative Strategies. Sustainability 14: 10748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portillo-Tarragona, Pilar, Sabina Scarpellini, Jose M. Moneva, Jesus Valero-Gil, and Alfonso Aranda-Usón. 2018. Classification and Measurement of the Firms’ Resources and Capabilities Applied to Eco-Innovation Projects from a Resource-Based View Perspective. Sustainability 10: 3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, Md Shidur. 2017. The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning 6: 102–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rama, Agyemang, Bekolo Ngoa Celestin, Shuangying Chen, and Konan Martin. 2022. Assessment of Eco-Innovation Drivers within the Informal Sector in Ghana. Sustainability 14: 6903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rennings, Klaus. 1998. Towards a Theory and Policy of Eco-Innovation—Neoclassical and (Co-) Evolutionary Perspectives. Center for European Economic Research (ZEW) 1998: 98–124. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, Laura, Julio Navio-Marco, and Raquel Ibar-Alonso. 2021. Influence of organisational innovation and innovation in general on eco-innovation in European companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 22: 840–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossiter, Will, and David J. Smith. 2018. Green innovation and the development of sustainable communities: The case of Blueprint Regeneration’s Trent Basin Development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 19: 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, Arsalan, and Ali Salman Saleh. 2020. Key determinants of SMEs’ export performance: A resource-based view and contingency theory approach using potential mediat. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 35: 635–54. [Google Scholar]
- Sanni, Maruf. 2018. Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 131: 303–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehnem, Simone, Adriane A. Farias S. L. de Queiroz, Susana Carla Farias Pereira, Gabriel dos Santos Correia, and Edson Kuzma. 2022. Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment 31: 236–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siva, Vanajah, Ida Gremyr, Bjarne Bergquist, Rickard Garvare, Thomas Zobel, and Raine Isaksson. 2016. The support of Quality Management to sustainable development: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 138: 148–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Yunpeng, Figen Yesilada, Zubaria Andlib, and Tahseen Ajaz. 2021. The role of eco-innovation and globalization towards carbon neutrality in the USA. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 113568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sund, Kristian J., Marcel Bogers, J. Andrei Villarroel, and Nicolai J. Foss. 2016. Managing tensions between new and existing business models. MIT Sloan Management Review 57: 8–10. [Google Scholar]
- Suroso, Agus, Ade Irma Anggraeni, and Andriyansah. 2017. Optimizing SMEs’ Business Performance Through Human Capital Management. European Research Studies Journal XX: 588–99. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Kai, Yuan Qiu, and Di Zhou. 2020. Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises (ESI Highly Cited Paper and Research Front). Science of The Total Environment 712: 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taques, Fernando Henrique, Manuel G López, Leonardo F Basso, and Nelson Areal. 2021. Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 6: 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toha, Md. Abu, Satirenjit Kaur Johl, and Parvez Alam Khan. 2020. Firm’s Sustainability and Societal Development from the Lens of Fishbone Eco-Innovation: A Moderating Role of ISO 14001–2015 Environmental Management System. Processes 8: 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triguero, Ángela, María C. Cuerva, and Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez. 2022. Closing the loop through eco-innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment 31: 2337–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varadarajan, Rajan. 2018. Innovation, Innovation Strategy, and Strategic Innovation. In Innovation and Strategy. Review of Marketing Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, vol. 15, pp. 143–66. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Shuqin, Tyson Ang, and Vivien E. Jancenelle. 2018. Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 45: 230–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wernerfelt, Birger. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wicaksono, Tutur, Md Billal Hossain, and Csaba Bálint Illés. 2021. Prioritizing Business Quality Improvement of Fresh Agri-Food SMEs through Open Innovation to Survive the Pandemic: A QFD-Based Model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7: 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wursan, Lucky, Radi Rinandiyana, and Tine Badriatin. 2021. Social Media Promotion Effect on Product Purchase Decisions through Word of Mouth Marketing. Linguistics and Culture Review 5: 821–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Yongzhe, Yufeng Chen, and Jiafeng Miao. 2022. Eco-innovation in SMEs: A scientometric review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29: 48105–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, Qiong, Finxin Liu, Shibin Sheng, and Heng Fang. 2019. Does eco-innovation lift firm value? The contingent role of institutions in emerging markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 34: 1763–78. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, Wong Pit, Nurulizwa Rashid, and Samer Ali Al-Shahmi. 2022. A Comparative Study on the Eco-Innovation Practices between Hotels and Manufacturing Auto Parts Firms in Malaysia. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications 71: 8–18. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Feifei, Ye Shi, and Teng Wang. 2020. R&D investment and Chinese manufacturing SMEs’ corporate social responsibility: The moderating role of regional innovative milieu. Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 120840. [Google Scholar]
- Yun, JinHyo Joseph, and Xiaofei Zhao. 2020. Business Model Innovation through a Rectangular Compass: From the Perspective of Open Innovation with Mechanism Design. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6: 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Feng, and Lei Zhu. 2019. Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 28: 1012–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Qi, Qiuhong Zhao, Xuan Zhao, and Ling Tang. 2020. On the introduction of green product to a market with environmentally conscious consumers. Computers & Industrial Engineering 139: 106190. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Yu, Yanying Mao, Liudan Jio, Chenyang Shuai, and Heshan Zhang. 2021. Eco-efficiency, eco-technology innovation and eco-well-being performance to improve global sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 89: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Yue-Jun, Yu-Lu Peng, Chao-Qun Ma, and Bo Shen. 2017. Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100: 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulkiffli, Siti Nur ‘Atikah, Nur Farah Zafira Zaidi, Siti Falindah Padlee, and Najahul Kamilah Aminy Sukri. 2022. Eco-Innovation Capabilities and Sustainable Business Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 14: 7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Participant | Position | Number of Employees | Size of the Firm | Production | Post-Pandemic Business |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | Owner | 5 | Small | Food and Beverage | Operable |
P2 | Owner | 150 | Medium | Medical and Care | Operable |
P3 | Owner | 40 | Small | Toiletries and Cosmetics Product | Operable |
P4 | Sales & Shipment Manager | 200 | Medium | Furniture | Operable |
P5 | Owner | 30 | Medium | Textile and Clothes | Operable |
P6 | Owner | 12 | Small | Textile and Clothes | Operable |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sukri, N.K.A.; Zulkiffli, S.N.‘A.; Mat, N.H.N.; Omar, K.; Mawardi, M.K.; Zaidi, N.F.Z. An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040113
Sukri NKA, Zulkiffli SN‘A, Mat NHN, Omar K, Mawardi MK, Zaidi NFZ. An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia. Administrative Sciences. 2023; 13(4):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040113
Chicago/Turabian StyleSukri, Najahul Kamilah Aminy, Siti Nur ‘Atikah Zulkiffli, Nik Hazimah Nik Mat, Khatijah Omar, Mukhammad Kholid Mawardi, and Nur Farah Zafira Zaidi. 2023. "An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia" Administrative Sciences 13, no. 4: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040113
APA StyleSukri, N. K. A., Zulkiffli, S. N. ‘A., Mat, N. H. N., Omar, K., Mawardi, M. K., & Zaidi, N. F. Z. (2023). An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040113