Soc Estimation of the Lithium-Ion Battery Pack using a Sigma Point Kalman Filter Based on a Cell’s Second Order Dynamic Model

Abstract

This paper deals with the state of charge (SoC) estimation of a lithium-ion battery pack (LiBP) connected by some cells in series and parallel. The voltage noise, noise and current bias of current through the LiBP are taken into account in the SoC estimation problem. In order to describe the cell dynamic more accurately, especially for practical applications with charge and discharge amplitude varying suddenly, in this paper we use the second dynamic order model of the cell to estimate the SoC of the LiBP. By applying the sigma point Kalman filter (SPKF), the average SoC of the pack and bias current of current measurement are estimated by first estimator; the second estimator estimates the SoC differences of the cell modules from average SoC of the pack. The SoC of the cell modules are the sum of average SoCs of the pack and the SoC differences. By only using two estimators, the calculation complexity for SoC estimation is more reduced; this is very useful for the LiBP, which has the number of cells connected in a large series. This method was applied for the pack of SAMSUNG ICR18650-22P connected by seven cell modules; the cell modules were connected by nine cells in parallel; the LiBP was charged and discharged with amplitude varying suddenly. The estimated SoC of seven cell modules is smaller than 2% for a temperature operating range typically −5 °C to 45 °C. The comparison of the accuracy of SoC estimation based on the first and the second order dynamic models is made; the result shows that the SoC estimation used the second order dynamic model is more exact.

1. Introduction

Today, the lithium ion battery (LiB) is used widely in the practical applications because of its advantages, such as high energy density, no memory and no scheduled cycling, less self-discharge, long battery life and low maintenance. LiBP can provide extremely high currents and can discharge very rapidly when short-circuited [1,2]. For an application with high power, for example, electric vehicles or hybrid electric vehicles, the lithium ion battery pack (LiBP) is formed by connecting some cells in parallel and series in order to get the desired power. State of charge (SoC) is the important parameter of the cell, it is used to determine the electrical energy remaining of the cell in the battery management system (BMS). However, when it comes to the LiBP, the SoC of the pack is not the proper definition in the practice [3]. For the LiBP with many cells connected in series, the definitions average SoC of the pack and SoC of cells are used. The average SoC of the pack shows the amount of electrical energy of the pack, and the SoC of cells indicates the electrical energy in the cells. Average SoC of the pack and SoC of cells are two very important parameters for the BMS and cell balance control in the practice.

In recent years, an assortment of techniques has been proposed in order to achieve accurate battery SoC estimation. The most common methods are: the terminal voltage (open loop) method, the internal resistance method and the Coulomb counting method [4,5]; the methods are based on the equivalence circuit model of cell [6,7], the adaptive model considering the hysteristic, the noise, the varying of cell resistance dependent on the aging process and the operating temperature [8]. The methods use the Kalman filter [9], extended Kalman filter (EKF) [10] and particle point (PF) [11,12]. Additionally, there are SoC estimation methods based on learning algorithms such as neural networks [13,14], fuzzy logic and the nonlinear fractional model [15,16].

For the LiBP, the SoC estimation problem is still a hard problem [17,18]. Not only does this problem consider the complexity of the LiBP’s model, the cell SoC, the average SoC for the cells connected in series, the complexity of the estimation algorithm and the computing rate, but the influence of parameters in the cell model and measurement noise are considered too [3]. Each consideration could bring forward some different methods to solve the SoC estimation for LiBP with different accuracies. In order to estimate the SoC of the cell, we need to measure exactly the operating temperature, voltage and current through a cell. In the practice, the voltage and current measurements always are affected by Gausses noise with a zero mean. The current bias is added on current measurements which are caused by the amplifier. In this paper we present the SoC estimation for the LiBP connected by $N_s$ cell modules in series; each cell module is connected by $N_p$ cells in parallel (see Figure 1). In this research, we use the second dynamic model of cell considering the voltage measurement noise of cell module, noise and current bias of the current though LiBP.

The SPKF, known as one of the state estimation methods, has some advantages over the EKF by application ranges, and this method estimates more accurately the states for the second-order system or higher; meanwhile, computational complexity is the same as EKF. SPKF is easily implemented, as there is no requirement of the Jacobi matrix calculation [19,20,21,22]. For the EKF, the system’s nonlinear dynamic is linearized at the sampling time, the input distributions are mapped via the linearized dynamic function to calculate the output distributions, and the output distributions are less accurate if there is high nonlinear of the system dynamic. For the SPKF, the whole of the input distributions are mapped thought the nonlinear dynamic functions to get the output distribution. The SPKF algorithm is applied to estimate the average SoC of LiBP and the SoC differences of the cell modules from the average SoC of LiBP. SoC of cell modules is the sum of the average SoC of LiBP and the SoC differences of the cell modules. The cell dynamic with charge and discharge amplitude varying suddenly is described more exactly by using the second dynamic model. This research shows that the SoC estimation of LiBP using the second order dynamic model is more exact when compared with using the first order dynamic model, especially in the operating condition with the voltage measurement noise, noise and current bias of the current though LiBP.

This paper is organized into five parts. The introduction is described in the first section; the second order dynamic model of cell and the model of the LiBP are given in the second section. In Section 3, the estimation SoC of LiBP using the SPKF is presented; some experimental results are shown in the next section. Finally, discussions are mentioned in the last section.

2. The Second Order Dynamic Model of the Cell and the Model of the LiBP

2.1. The Second Order Dynamic Model of the Cell Influenced by Voltage Noise, Noise and Current Bias

Based on our previous work [6], the second order equivalent circuit model of the cell is shown in Figure 2.

For the state estimation problem of the cell, we consider the states of cell to be two currents through two dynamic branches of cell $i_{R_1},i_{R_2}$, the hysteresis $h$, SoC $z$ and the current bias $b$. The input and output of the model are current though the cell $i(t)$, and voltage $v(t)$, respectively. The input $i(t)$ and output $v(t)$ are measurable and influenced by noises which have Gaussian distribution with zero mean. Set the state vector, input vector and output at the sample time $k$ as Equation (1).

$${\underset{\_}{x}}_{k+1}=\left[\begin{array}{c}{i}_{R_1,k+1}\\ i_{R_2,k+1}\\ h_{k+1}\\ z_{k+1}\\ b_{k+1}\end{array}\right],{\underset{\_}{u}}_k=\left[\begin{array}{c}{i}_k\\ \mathrm{sgn}(i_k)\end{array}\right],y_k=v_k$$

(1)

The state model of the cell on the discrete time domain is written in the Equation (2) as follows.

$$\left[\begin{array}{c}{i}_{R_1,k+1}\\ i_{R_2,k+1}\\ h_{k+1}\\ z_{k+1}\\ b_{k+1}\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}{A}_{R_1{C}_1}& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& A_{R_2{C}_2}& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& A_h& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 1& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0& 1\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{i}_{R_1,k}\\ i_{R_2,k}\\ h_k\\ z_k\\ b_k\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{cc}\left(1-A_{R_1{C}_1}\right)& 0\\ \left(1-A_{R_2{C}_2}\right)& 0\\ 0& \left(1-A_h\right)\\ \frac{-{\eta }_k\Delta t}{Q}& 0\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{i}_k\\ \mathrm{sgn}\left(i_k\right)\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{c}{w}_{i_{R1,k}}\\ w_{i_{R2,k}}\\ 0\\ 0\\ w_{b,k}\end{array}\right]$$

(2)

The matrices in the Equation (2) are calculated as

$$\begin{array}{l}{A}_{R_1{C}_1}=\exp \left(\frac{-\Delta t}{R_1{C}_1}\right),A_{R_2{C}_2}=\exp \left(\frac{-\Delta t}{R_2{C}_2}\right),B_{R_1{C}_1}=1-A_{R_1{C}_1},B_{R_2{C}_2}=1-A_{R_2{C}_2}\\ A_h=\exp \left(-\left|\frac{{\eta }_k{i}_k{\gamma }_k\Delta t}{Q}\right|\right);B_h=1-A_h;\underset{\_}{w}={\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}{w}_{i_{R1,k}}& w_{i_{R2,k}}& 0& 0& w_{b,k}\end{array}\right]}^T\end{array}$$

(3)

with $\underset{\_}{w}$ is the system disturbance vector, including the noises influencing the currents through two dynamic branches of cell $w_{i_{R_1,k}},w_{i_{R_2,k}}$ and current bias noise through cell $w_{b,k}$. The parameters ${\eta }_k,{\gamma }_k$ are the columbic efficiency and positive constant; they all depend on the operating temperature of cell. The output equation of the model describing the relationship of the voltage drop on two electrodes of cell and the current, SoC—the hysteresis and currents through two dynamic branches—is written as follows.

$$v_k=OCV\left(z_k\right)+M{h}_k-R_1{i}_{R_1,k}-R_2{i}_{R_2,k}-R_0{i}_k+{\zeta }_k$$

(4)

In short, the state space model of cell related to the voltage noise, noise and current bias of the current through the cell is

$$\left\{\begin{array}{l}{\underset{\_}{x}}_{k+1}=A_k{\underset{\_}{x}}_k+B_k{\underset{\_}{u}}_k+{\underset{\_}{w}}_k\\ y_k=OCV\left(z_k\right)+C_k{\underset{\_}{x}}_k+D_k{\underset{\_}{u}}_k+{\zeta }_k\end{array}\right.$$

(5)

in which, the matrices of Equation (5) are formed as follows.

$$\begin{array}{l}{A}_k=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}{A}_{R_1{C}_1}& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& A_{R_2{C}_2}& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& A_h& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 1& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0& 1\end{array}\right],B_k=\left[\begin{array}{cc}\left(1-A_{R_1{C}_1}\right)& 0\\ \left(1-A_{R_2{C}_2}\right)& 0\\ 0& \left(1-A_h\right)\\ \frac{-{\eta }_k\Delta t}{Q}& 0\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right]\\ C=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}-R_1& -R_2& M& 0& 0\end{array}\right],D=\left[\begin{array}{cc}-R_0& 0\end{array}\right]\end{array}$$

(6)

with ${\zeta }_k$ is the voltage noise of cell.

2.2. The Model of LiBP

Suppose that for the LiBP formed by $N_s$ cell modules connected in series, each cell module includes $N_p$ cells connected in parallel; the notations of the quantities are describe in Figure 3.

For the cell module, which has some cells with different initial SoCs connected in parallel, after a certain period of time, the SoC of the cells in the module will balance itself. Then, the cells will have the same SoC and a voltage drop on two electrodes. The model of a LiBP is converted into a model of the cell modules connected in series, as shown in Figure 3. Thus, the average SoC of the cell module is the SoC of the cells in that module after a certain period of time. Illustration of the process of self-balancing of currents through four cells, and the SoCs and voltages of cells in a cell module are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively, in which the initial SoCs of four cells are 0.9 (90%), 0.85 (85%), 0.8 (80%) and 0.75 (75%). The internal resistances of cells $R_0$ are 0.0013 Ω, 0.0012 Ω, 0.0012 Ω and 0.0011 Ω. After a period of 200 s, the SoCs of four cells are balanced by themselves; all four cells have the same SoC and the same voltage drop on two electrodes.

We suppose that all the cells in the pack are the same kind, and are represented by a second order dynamic model with parameters $\eta ,Q,\gamma ,M_0,M,R_0,R_1{C}_1,R_2{C}_2,R_1,R_2$. The relationship between open-circuit voltage (OCV) and SoC according to the working temperature of the cell has been determined experimentally [6]. Define the parameters of the LiBP as follows:

$SO{C}_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$, $R_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$ are the matrices representing the initial SoC, the resistance R₀ of the cells in the pack, respectively.

The initial SoC (at the time $k=0$) of the cell module $i^{th}$ is counted as

$${\overline{z}}_0^{(i)}=\frac{1}{N_p}{\displaystyle \sum _{j=1}^{Np}SO{C}_0(i,j)},i=1,2,...,N_s$$

(7)

The internal resistance of the cell module $i^{th}$ is

$${\overline{R}}_0^i=\frac{1}{{\displaystyle {\sum }_{j=1}^{N_p}\frac{1}{R_0(i,j)}}}\hspace{1em}i=1,2,...,N_s$$

(8)

The capacity of the cell module $i^{th}$ is

$$Q^{(i)}={\displaystyle {\sum }_{j=1}^{N_p}Q=N_{p}Q}\hspace{1em}i=1,2,...,N_s$$

(9)

The LiBP now is modeled by $N_s$ cell modules connected in series. Normally, we need $N_s$ estimators to estimate the SoC of $N_s$ cell modules, and then average SoC of LiBP is average of the estimated SoC of $N_s$ cell modules. This method has a large calculation burden if $N_s$ is large, as the estimation algorithm is then complex, and noise is considered. In this research, by only using two estimators, the average SoC of a pack is estimated by the first estimator; the second estimator is used to estimate the SoC differences for the cell modules from the average SoC of the pack. Finally, the SoC of the cell modules is the sum of the average SoC of the pack and the SoC differences, respectively.

3. Soc Estimation for the LiBP Using the SPKF

To estimate the average SoC of $N_s$ cell modules in LiBP, the quantities, including $N_s$ voltages on the cell modules, the operating temperature of LBP and the current through LiBP pack are measured continuously at sampled-times. Using the sigma point estimation algorithm [19,20,21], two steps are performed at each sample time $k$, as follows:

Step 1. Estimate the average SoC of LiBP and current bias of current through the LiBP; this step is done by algorithm SPKF 1.

Step 2. Estimate SoC difference of each cell module from the average SoC determined in Step 1 by algorithm SPKF 2. Finally, estimate the SoC for all cell modules by the sum of the average SoC of LiBP and the SoC difference corresponding to the cell modules.

To conduct Step 1, suppose the LiBP as the equivalent cell described by the second order dynamic model. The state variables need to be estimated, including the currents through two dynamic branches $i_{R_1},i_{R_2}$, the hysteresis $h$, SoC of the equivalent cell $z$ and the bias current of current through the equivalent cell $b$.

The input of the estimation model is the current through the LiBP with bias current and measurement noise; the output is the voltage on LiBP. Define the estimated state variable vector as

$$\underset{\_}{x}={\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}{i}_{R_{1,k}}& i_{R_2}& h_k& z_k& b_k\end{array}\right]}^T$$

(10)

The covariance matrices of state estimation errors, system noises (noise of current, noise of current bias) and voltage noise are ${\sigma }_{\tilde{x}}$, ${\sigma }_w$ and ${\sigma }_{\zeta }$, respectively.

The General Algorithms

SoC Estimation Algorithm for LiBP.

Initialize the parameters of cell  Initialize the parameters of LiBP including:  $SO{C}_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$, $R_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$  Initialize the covariance matrices  Calculate the initial SoC of the cell modules in the LiBP ${\overline{z}}_0^{(i)}$  Calculate the internal resistance of the cell modules ${\overline{R}}_0^i$  Calculate the capacity of the cell module $Q^{(i)}$

For sample time k = 1 to ∞ do

Measure the current through the LiBP   Measure the voltages on the cell modules   Measure the temperature   Estimate the state ${\widehat{\underset{\_}{x}}}_k^{+}$ for equivalent cell and estimate the bias current by using the algorithm SPKF 1

For cell module i = 1 to $N_s$ do

Estimate the SoC difference $\Delta {\widehat{z}}^{(i)}{}_k^{}$ of cell module $i^{th}$ by using the algorithm SPKF 2

End

Calculate the SoC for all cell modules ${\widehat{z}}^{(i)}={\widehat{z}}_k+\Delta {\widehat{z}}^{(i)}{}_k^{},i=1,2...,N_s$

End

The algorithm SPKF 1 and SPKF 2 are presented in the Appendix A.

4. The Experimental Results

To test the SoC estimation algorithm for LiBP, in this study we use LiBP with seven cell modules connected in series; each cell module consists of nine cells connected in parallel. Cells used in the LiBP are Lithium–SAMSUNG with parameters (supplied by manufacturer): ICR18650-22P 2200 mAh, Vmax = 4.25 V, Vmin =2.75 V, nominal voltage 3.62 V. The test temperature limit is considered from −5 °C to 45 °C.

By experimental testing, the dynamic parameters of the cell are given in

Table 1. The second order dynamic parameters of the cell with respect to the temperature.

	−5 °C	5 °C	15 °C	25 °C	35 °C	45 °C
${\eta }_k$	1.0870	0.9803	1.0221	1.0184	1.0543	1.0399
Q(mAh)	2200	2200	2200	2200	2200	2200
$\gamma$	250.0000	78.4916	63.6762	2.0749	170.0408	151.3064
$M_0(V)$	0.0073	0.0049	0.0048	0.0018	0.0036	0.0024
$M(V)$	0.0347	0.0257	0.0188	0.0177	0.0201	0.0185
$R_0(\Omega )$	0.0013	0.0013	0.0012	0.0012	0.0012	0.0011
$R_1{C}_1(s)$	0.6124	1.7556	0.3228	1.4882	0.2997	0.4631
$R_2{C}_2(s)$	3.9035	7.5994	8.1119	36.8543	5.1841	6.5319
$R_1(\Omega )$	0.0204	0.0203	0.0201	0.0019	0.0019	0.0019
$R_2(\Omega )$	0.0494	0.0376	0.0288	0.0443	0.0136	0.0134

. Instead of forming a plot of the relationship between the OCV and SoC at many temperatures, we only form the relationship between the OCV and SoC at reference temperature 20 °C and the change amount of OCV with respect to the SoC when the temperature changes 1 °C at reference temperature 20 °C, so the relationship between OCV and SOC at any temperature can be calculated easily. The relationship between OCV and SoC at 20 °C and the change amount of OCV with respect to the SoC when the temperature changes 1 °C at reference temperature 20 °C are given in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. Figure 6 shows that the relationship OCV and SoC is strong, nonlinear relationship, and the OCV–SOC characteristic curve is greatly influenced by the temperature change and has a great influence on the accuracy of battery state estimation.

The LiBP power is 480 W; the voltage at both ends of the LiBP is 24 V. The initial parameters of the LiBP assumed at 25 °C include $SO{C}_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$, $R_0\in R^{(N_s\times N_p)}$(see

Table A1. Initial SoC of cells in the LiBP at 25 °C (The SoC from 0% to 100% expressed as range from 0 to 1).

	Cell1	Cell2	Cell3	Cell4	Cell5	Cell6	Cell7	Cell8	Cell9
Module 1	0.49	0.69	0.63	0.99	0.52	0.80	0.80	0.71	0.54
Module 2	0.78	0.6	0.98	0.74	0.64	0.47	0.71	0.44	0.80
Module 3	0.56	0.88	0.99	0.96	0.99	0.42	0.56	0.93	0.44
Module 4	0.67	0.99	0.79	0.83	0.64	0.77	0.98	0.60	0.57
Module 5	0.90	0.50	0.92	0.70	0.80	0.74	0.72	0.54	0.57
Module 6	0.52	0.54	0.64	0.78	0.94	0.98	0.42	0.47	0.90
Module 7	0.59	0.82	0.78	0.93	0.99	0.85	0.82	0.59	0.67

and

Table A2. The initial resistances R₀ of the cells in the LiBP at 25 °C (Ω).

	Cell1	Cell2	Cell3	Cell4	Cell5	Cell6	Cell7	Cell8	Cell9
Module 1	0.0013	0.0014	0.0011	0.0015	0.0010	0.0010	0.0013	0.0011	0.0012
Module 2	0.0014	0.0011	0.0013	0.0011	0.0013	0.0012	0.0011	0.0014	0.0011
Module 3	0.0014	0.0014	0.0012	0.0014	0.0014	0.0011	0.0013	0.0011	0.0015
Module 4	0.0013	0.0012	0.0012	0.0014	0.0015	0.0014	0.0013	0.0014	0.0010
Module 5	0.0011	0.0014	0.0014	0.0012	0.0010	0.0012	0.0014	0.0013	0.0014
Module 6	0.0011	0.0012	0.0013	0.0013	0.0013	0.0013	0.0012	0.0015	0.0014
Module 7	0.0011	0.0011	0.0013	0.0010	0.0012	0.0011	0.0011	0.0010	0.0014

in the Appendix A).

The covariance matrices of the state vector estimation errors of the current noise and the voltage noise are listed as follows, respectively.

$${\sigma }_{\tilde{x},0}^{+}=\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}0.001& 0& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0.0001& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0.01& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0.01& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 0& 0.01\end{array}\right],{\sigma }_{\tilde{w}}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.001& 0\\ 0& 0.001\end{array}\right],{\sigma }_{\overline{\zeta }}=0.001,$$

(11)

The bias current is 0.5 A $\left(b_k=0.5A\right)$; the charge and discharge scenarios with current through the LiBP and the voltages measured on seven cell modules over a period of 3900 s are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.

In order to show the capability of describing more the cell dynamic more exactly, the SoC estimation is experimented on for the LiBP, charged and discharged; with amplitude varying suddenly (see Figure 8), the maximum charged and discharged amplitudes of current are 5 A and 23 A, respectively. We suppose that the measured current through LiPB drifts with the bias current 0.5 A. This experimental charged and discharged scenario is similar to the charged and discharged situation of LiBP using for EVs in practice. The measured voltages of seven cell modules are influenced by the noise; the varying of those voltages depends on the charged and discharged amplitude of current through LiPB, as shown in the Figure 9.

The average SoC estimations for cell modules in LiBP are shown in Figure 10; the SoC estimation errors of the cell modules are plotted in Figure 11. From the SoC estimation results, we see that after about 0.1 h, the SoC estimations of the cell modules are close to the actual average SoC of the cell modules. The SoC estimation errors for the cell modules 1–7 at the end point of the experiment are: 0.17%, 0.4%, 0.15%, 0.5%, 0.17%, 0.02% and 0.17%, respectively (see Figure 11). The SoC estimation errors of cell modules are quite small; Module 2 and Module 4 get the largest errors (0.4% and 0.5%, respectively).

Figure 12 plots the estimation of current bias of the current through the LiBP; after a period of time 0.05 h, the estimated value is distributed around the true value of 0.5 A. The error of this estimation is quite large; the largest error is approximately 0.1 A, but the mean of this error calculated over the experimental period of time is about 4%. So the estimation of current bias is acceptable in the practice.

Figure 13 depicts the changing in voltage and current through the cells of the cell Module 1. The current through the nine cells has the same varying as the current through the LiBP. The Figure 14 plots the comparison of SoC estimation errors of seven cell modules of LiBP using the first and second order dynamic models. The results show that when using the second order dynamic model of the cell, the SoC estimation of the cell modules in the LiBP is about 10 times smaller than using the first order dynamic model. The comparison result is illustrated in the

Table A3. The comparison of SoC estimation error of cell modules for two cases: the first and second order dynamic models of the cell at 25 °C.

	Module 1	Module 2	Module 3	Module 4	Module 5	Module 6	Module 7
The first order dynamic model	1%	1%	1%	1%	1.2%	0.9%	2%
The second order dynamic model	0.17 %	0.4%	0.15%	0.5%	0.17%	0.02%	0.17%

.

Figure 15 is the comparison of the SoC estimation errors of the cell modules in the LiBP tested by operating temperatures: −5, 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 °C. In general, the SoC estimation errors of the cell modules are small at the temperatures ranging from −5 to 25 °C (the SoC of cell modules is estimated more accurately). At the temperature −5 °C, the SoC estimation error is positive; this means that the SoC estimation errors will be much larger than the actual cell module average SoC, about 2%. However, the SoC estimation error of cell module is negative for temperature ranging from 35 °C to 40 °C, so the SoC estimation is much smaller than actual cell module average SoC, about 2%. This SoC estimation is a very significant for the SoC estimation for LiBP compared with methods presented in the literature [3,18].

The calculation time of the SoC estimation algorithm in this test is 0.002 s, corresponding to a sample time of T_s = 1 s.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents the SoC estimation method for the LiBP formed by $N_s$ cell modules connected in series; each cell module includes $N_p$ cells connected in parallel. In this research, we use the second dynamic model of cell considering the cell module voltage measuring noise, noise and current bias of the current in order to describe more exactly the nonlinear dynamics of cell for practical applications with charge and discharge amplitude varying suddenly. Based on the principle of SPKF, the SoC estimation algorithm for the cell modules in LiBP is applied, taking into account the voltage noise, noise and current bias of current through the LiBP. The algorithm was tested experimentally for LiBP consisting of seven cell modules connected in series; each cell module consisted of nine Lithium Ion cells SAMSUNG ICR18650-22P in parallel. Experimental results for the temperature ranging from −5 °C to 45 °C show that the SoC estimations for cell modules are quite accurate compared with the methods presented in the materials [3,18]. The results show that using the second order dynamic model of the cell also brings accuracy higher in SoC estimation for cell modules than using the first order dynamic model.