Research of the Photo-Optical Method Application for Measuring Selected Data on the Movement of a Parachute for Type M-282
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Canopy area: 26.9 m2.
- Number of cells: 7.
- Descent rate at the weight of 100 kg depending on the braking mode:2.5–5 m·s−2.
- Gliding ratio: 2.5–3:1.
- Forward speed at the weight of 100 kg: max. 12 m·s−1.
- The photo-optical method in the application area of parachuting, for measuring the rate of descent of the M-282 parachute, within the investigation of movement data;
- Verification of the use of the photo-optical method in the application area of parachuting, within the research of the issue, by performing twelve test jumps with the M-282 parachute;
- Integration of knowledge from the investigation of a parachutist’s accident using the photo-optical method, with knowledge from research parachute jumps, within the research of the topic, for the formulation of the following research;
- The results of the M-282 parachute research of the topic showed the potential use of the photo-optical method for the design of recommendations for testing, investigative applications, individualized training programs, injury prevention aspects, and reduction of the risk of injury in parachuting. The process of identifying the vertical speed of the parachute by the photo-optical method was correct. It is a suitable method of evaluating M-282 parachute motion data in parachuting.
1.1. Theoretical Background
- Operational measurement for practical in-flight use (for example, a terminal flight with a parachute glider in the case of paragliding).
- Measurement to verify the functional parameters of the parachute before its release for in-flight operations. These can also be used in the area of investigation of parachute accidents. This article focuses on both of these areas.
1.1.1. Measurement of the Vertical Parachute Speed Using the Classic Method
- The impact of the characteristics of the fiber that the rope is made of and current meteorological conditions (objective atmospheric temperature and moisture) on the objective string length.
- The impact of several of windings on the rope at the moment of load fall on the rope length.
- The impact of load diversion from the vertical axis due to the horizontal direction of the parachute movement.
1.1.2. Measurement of the Vertical Parachute Speed Using a FLYTEC 4030 Variometer
- Uncertainty resulting from turbulence of agitated air that causes the device to be blown over.
- Inlet of a dynamic air compression into a pressure sensor cannot be completely avoided during the functional flight.
2. Materials and Methods of the Measurement of the Parachute Vertical Speed Using the Photo-Optical Method
2.1. Conditions for Testing
2.2. Demarcation of a Basic Scheme
2.3. Reguirements for the Deckle Strap
2.4. Reguirements for the Reference Length
2.5. Taking into Account the Direction of the Wind and the Position of the Sun
- The wind direction according to the parachute parameters. During the measurement of the vertical speed of the parachutist–parachute set, the landing must be against the wind (or rarely with a wind) and never with a side wind. During the measurement of the vertical speed of the set load, the parachute will move in the direction of the least resistance, i.e., with the wind.
- The sun position (i.e., never scan against the sun).
2.6. Scanning the Reference Length
2.7. Camera Readiness for Scanning of Parachute Movement
2.8. Required Procedure for the Test Parachutist
2.9. Determination of the Perpendicular Distance of the Points A and B
2.10. Photo Montage Construction
2.11. The Correction of the Reference Length for the Selected Parts’ Center
2.12. The Time Interval of a Parachute Movement
2.13. Calculation of the Average Vertical Parachute Speed
2.14. The Transformation of Result in the of Zero Height International Standard Atmosphere
2.15. Apparatus Used during the Experiment
- Sequential shooting mode 0.3 s.
- Maximum error in adhering to the time interval during sequential shooting mode 0.01 s.
- Sequential shooting quality 1.0 Mpx.
- Measuring range 50 m;
- Accuracy class II.
- Tripod base with rotating around the vertical axis, with rotation around the longitudinal axis and with rotation around the transverse axis.
- Easy locking of the base position in all three axes.
- Easy adjustment to the horizontal plane.
3. Results
3.1. The Photo-Optical Method—Test Jump Number 1
Sn,n+1 | Kdist | RLdistance | khor | chor | RLhor | kvert | cvert | RLvert |
[m] | [mm] | [ ] | [ ] | [mm] | [ ] | [ ] | [mm] | |
1,2 | −0.225 | 35.988 | 0.571 | 0.99822 | 35.924 | 0.112 | 0.99844 | 35.868 |
2,3 | −0.786 | 36.408 | 0.477 | 0.99866 | 36.359 | 0.195 | 0.9971 | 36.254 |
3,4 | −1.685 | 37.081 | 0.379 | 0.99911 | 37.048 | 0.279 | 0.9971 | 36.941 |
4,5 | −2.472 | 37.67 | 0.275 | 0.99911 | 37.637 | 0.363 | 0.98552 | 37.092 |
5,6 | −3.483 | 38.427 | 0.165 | 1 | 38.427 | 0.446 | 0.98418 | 37.819 |
Sn,n+1 | RLn,n+1 | svertphoto | SC | svertreal | vvert | |||
[mm] | [mm] | [ ] | [m] | [m·s−1] | ||||
1,2 | 34.368 | 24.476 | 0.017184 | 1.42434 | 4.748 | |||
2,3 | 34.738 | 25.473 | 0.017369 | 1.46658 | 4.889 | |||
3,4 | 35.396 | 25.376 | 0.017698 | 1.43384 | 4.779 | |||
4,5 | 35.541 | 25.282 | 0.01777 | 1.42271 | 4.742 | |||
5,6 | 36.238 | 25.368 | 0.018119 | 1.40009 | 4.667 | |||
vvert | T | p | ρr | vvertISA | [m·s−1] | |||
[m·s−1] | [K] | [Pa] | [ ] | [m·s−1] | ||||
4.748 | 280.15 | 96600 | 0.9802 | 4.701 | −0.017 | |||
4.889 | 4.84 | 0.122 | ||||||
4.779 | 4.732 | 0.014 | ||||||
4.742 | 4.695 | −0.023 | ||||||
4.667 | 4.621 | −0.097 |
3.2. Device FLYTEC 4030—Test Jump Number 1
vvert [m·s−1] | T [K] | p [Pa] | ρr [ ] | vvertISA [m·s−1] | [m·s−1] |
4.5 | 280.15 | 96,600 | 0.9802 | 4.455 | −0.307 |
4.9 | 4.851 | 0.089 | |||
5.1 | 5.049 | 0.287 | |||
5.2 | 5.148 | 0.386 | |||
5.1 | 5.049 | 0.287 | |||
5.0 | 4.950 | 0.188 | |||
4.8 | 4.752 | −0.010 | |||
4.6 | 4.554 | −0.208 | |||
4.5 | 4.455 | −0.307 | |||
4.4 | 4.356 | −0.406 |
3.3. Overall Results of the Test Jumps Number 1 to 6
Test Jump Number | The Photo-Optical Method | FLYTEC 4030 |
---|---|---|
1 | 4.718 | 4.762 |
2 | 4.616 | 4.526 |
3 | 4.640 | 4.705 |
4 | 4.723 | 4.747 |
5 | 4.598 | 4.622 |
6 | 4.636 | 4.611 |
average: | 4.655 | 4.662 |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Analysis of Influencing Parameters and Quantification of Their Influence on the Uncertainty of Measurement Results
Appendix A.1.1. Standard Uncertainty Type A for the 1st Test Jump
Appendix A.1.2. Standard Uncertainty Type A for the 2nd Test Jump
Appendix A.1.3. Standard Uncertainty Type A for the 3rd Test Jump
vvert [m·s−1] | T [K] | p [Pa] | ρr [ ] | vvertISA [m·s−1] | [m·s−1] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.748 | 280.15 | 96,600 | 0.9802 | 4.701 | −0.017 |
4.889 | 4.840 | 0.122 | |||
4.779 | 4.732 | 0.014 | |||
4.742 | 4.695 | −0.023 | |||
4.667 | 4.621 | −0.097 |
Appendix A.1.4. Standard Uncertainty Type B
- An error in the linear measurement;
- Deduction error;
- Temperature influence on the measuring tool and RL.
- The error in a locating of a position of reference points RPn and point Sn,n+1;
- The error in defining RLdistance;
- The error in defining RLhor and RLvert;
- The error in defining the angle β;
- The pixel error and deduction error.
- Normal Gaussian distribution with χ = 2 (selected for sources of uncertainty Z3 and Z7);
- Triangular Simpson’s distribution with χ = ;
- Trapezoidal distribution with χ = 2.32;
- Even rectangular distribution with χ = (selected for sources of uncertainty Z1, Z2, Z4, Z5, and Z6);
- Bimodal triangular distribution with χ = ;
- Bimodal Dirac distribution with χ = 1.
Source of Uncertainty Zj | Estimation Zjmax | Selected Disposal | χ | uBj Uncertainty | Conversion Coefficient of Sensibility Axj | Share to the Resulting Uncertainty Type B uxj |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z1 | ±0.13 m·s−1 | universal | 0.075 m·s−1 | 1 | 0.075 m·s−1 | |
Z2 | ±0.04 m·s−1 | universal | 0.023 m·s−1 | 1 | 0.023 m·s−1 | |
Z3 | ±0.112 m·s−1 | standard | 2 | 0.056 m·s−1 | 1 | 0.056 m·s−1 |
Z4 | ±0.19 m·s−1 | universal | 0.11 m·s−1 | 1 | 0.11 m·s−1 | |
Z5 | ±100 Pa | universal | 57.74 Pa | 3 × 10−5 m·s−1·Pa−1 | 0.0017 m·s−1 | |
Z6 | ±1 K | universal | 0.58 K | 0.01 m·s−1·K−1 | 0.0058 m·s−1 | |
Z7 | ±0.0425 kg·m−3 | standard | 2 | 0.02125kg·m−3 | 1.53 m·s−1·(kg·m−3)−1 | 0.033 m·s−1 |
Appendix A.1.5. The Final Standard Uncertainty Type B
Appendix A.1.6. The Combined Standard Uncertainty
Appendix A.1.7. Extended Uncertainty
Appendix A.1.8. The Results of the Measurement of the Vertical Parachute Speed M-282 Using the Photo-Optical Method
References
- Lafourcade, P.; Bruneau, O.; Philippe, A.; Bard, A. Military parachuting. Sci. Sports 2018, 33, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalavsky, P. Safety and reliability in skydiving activities. J. KONBIN 2008, 1, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
- Westman, A. Skydiving. In Adventure and Extreme Sports Injuries; Mei-Dan, O., Carmont, M., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2012; pp. 69–90. [Google Scholar]
- Loebel, F.; Fekonja, L.; Vajkoczy, P.; Hecht, N. Hangman’s fracture caused by parachute opening deceleration captured on video. World Neurosurg. 2018, 119, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Posselt, B.N.; Hodkinson, P.D. Aviation medicine considerations in parachuting operations. J. R. Army Med. Corps. 2019, 165, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rowbotham, S.K.; Blau, S.; Hislop-Jambrich, J. The skeletal trauma resulting from a fatal B.A.S.E jump: A case study showing the impact of landing feet-first under extreme vertical deceleration. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 286, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalavsky, P.; Gazda, J.; Kimlickova, M. Emergency bail-out from aircraft–Landing with personal rescue parachutes. Acta Avion. 2015, 17, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
- Kalavsky, P.; Socha, V.; Socha, L.; Kutilek, P.; Gazda, J.; Kimlickova, M. Conditions for abandonment out of a helicopter using personal rescue parachute. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT) 2015, Brno, Czech Republic, 19–21 May 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MarS, a.s. Technical Description, User´s Manual and Packing Instructions for the M-282 Main Canopy; MarS, a.s.: Poříčí nad Sázavou, Czech Republic, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Standard SAE AS 8015B. Minimum Performance Standards for Personnel Parachute Assemblies and Components; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Standard PIA TS 135. Minimum Performance Standards for Personnel Parachute Assemblies and Components; Parachute Industry Association: Gold Canyon, AZ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Peek, G. Skydiving Fall Rate, Parks College Parachute Research Group, Saint Louis University, 1997, Update 2006. Available online: https://www.pcprg.com/baro.htm (accessed on 14 November 2020).
- Pachwicewicz, M.; Weremczuk, J.; Rzewuski, S. Skydiver flight parameters recorder. In Proceedings of the 2018 XV International Scientific Conference on Optoelectronic and Electronic Sensors (COE), Warsaw, Poland, 17–20 June 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard STN EN 12491. Paragliding Equipment. Reserve Parachutes. Safety Requirements and Test Methods; SÚTN: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Criteria for Choosing a Paragliding Reserve Parachute. Internal Material PerfectFly. Airworthiness Requirements for Hanggliders and Paragliders LTF-2009 Tests of German Hang Glider Association (DHV) Publicised by the German Aviation Authorities. 2009. Available online: https://www.dhv.de/fileadmin/user_upload/aktuell_zu_halten/technik/tec_downloads/LTF2009_Eng_final.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Gasparovic, P. Emergency Parachutes for Hang Gliding, Deltaklub. 2009. Available online: http://www.deltaklub.neton.sk/index1.php?str=73 (accessed on 14 November 2020).
- Cheng, H.; Yu, L.; Rong, W.; Jia, H. A numerical study of parachute inflation based on a mixed method. Aviation 2012, 16, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvin, L.K. Experimantal investigation of full-scale and model parachute opening AIAA Report. In Proceedings of the 8th Aerodynamic Decelator an Baloon Technology Conference, Hyannis, MA, USA, 2–4 April 1984; Available online: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.1984-820 (accessed on 14 November 2020).
- Kenji, T. Fluid structure interaction modelling of spacecraft parachutes for simulation-based design. J. Appl. Mech. 2012, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.; Wang, J.; Han, L. Dynamics model of landing process for parachute simulator. In Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems; AsiaSim 2016, SCS AutumnSim 2016; Zhang, L., Song, X., Wu, Y., Eds.; Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Singapore, 2016; Volume 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Rong, W.; Chen, G.L. The use of LS-DYNA to simulate the permeability parameters of the parachute canopy. Spacecr. Recovery Remote Sens. 2009, 30, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
- Coquet, Y.; Bordenave, P.; Capmas, G.; Espinosa, C. Improvements in fluid structure interaction simulations of parachute using LS-DYNA. In Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, Dublin, Ireland, 23–26 May 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dvorak, Z.; Cekerevac, Z.; Kelemen, M.; Sousek, R. Enhancing of security on critical accident locations using telematics support. In Proceedings of the ICSIT 2010-International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–9 April 2010; pp. 414–417, Code 131063. [Google Scholar]
- Balatka, M.; Fuchs, P.; Kamenicky, J.; Sousek, R.; Kelemen, M. Exposure of the environment and surface water by dangerous liquids—The slop outflow model. In Proceedings of the WMSCI 2011-15th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL, USA, 19–22 July 2011; Volume 3, pp. 280–284, Code 93266. [Google Scholar]
- Cejpa, C. Textbooks for Parachuting. Theory and Practice of Parachute Sport; Our Troops: Prague, Czech Republic, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Potvin, J. Calculating the descent rate of a round parachute. Parks Coll. Parachut. Res. Group 2013. Available online: https://www.pcprg.com/rounddes.htm (accessed on 14 November 2020).
- Kalavsky, P. Directive for Parachute and Paratrooper Equipment Testing. Slovak Aeronautical Institute (SLI) Kosice, 2019 (Accepted by Military Aviation Authority of the Slovak Republic). Available online: http://www.sli.sk/phocadownload/osvedcenia/pzvt.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Technical Metrological Regulation of TPM 0051-93–Designating of the Measurement of Indeterminateness; Czechoslovak Metrology Institute: Brno, Czech Republic, 1993.
- Kalavsky, P. Determination of the Parachute Flight Trajectory and Its Analysis—Skydiving Accident; Personal Investigation Documentation; Senica, Slovakia, Slovak National Aero Club: Kosice, Slovak Republic, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaľavský, P.; Rozenberg, R.; Korba, P.; Kelemen, M., Jr.; Antoško, M.; Sabo, J.; Džunda, M. Research of the Photo-Optical Method Application for Measuring Selected Data on the Movement of a Parachute for Type M-282. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125637
Kaľavský P, Rozenberg R, Korba P, Kelemen M Jr., Antoško M, Sabo J, Džunda M. Research of the Photo-Optical Method Application for Measuring Selected Data on the Movement of a Parachute for Type M-282. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(12):5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125637
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaľavský, Peter, Róbert Rozenberg, Peter Korba, Martin Kelemen, Jr., Matej Antoško, Jozef Sabo, and Milan Džunda. 2021. "Research of the Photo-Optical Method Application for Measuring Selected Data on the Movement of a Parachute for Type M-282" Applied Sciences 11, no. 12: 5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125637
APA StyleKaľavský, P., Rozenberg, R., Korba, P., Kelemen, M., Jr., Antoško, M., Sabo, J., & Džunda, M. (2021). Research of the Photo-Optical Method Application for Measuring Selected Data on the Movement of a Parachute for Type M-282. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125637