Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Sodium Hydroxide Conversion Using Regression Analysis in CSTR
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of BiodentineTM on the Odontogenic/Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Side-Channel Attacks on Embedded Neural Networks: A Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Histological and Histomorphometric Effectiveness of the Barrier Membranes for Jawbone Regeneration: An Overview of More Than 30 Years’ Experience of Research Results of the Italian Implant Retrieval Center (1988–2020)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Complex Electromagnetic Fields on Candida albicans Adhesion and Proliferation on Polyacrylic Resin

by
Morena Petrini
1,
Silvia Di Lodovico
2,
Giovanna Iezzi
1,
Alessandro Cipollina
1,3,
Adriano Piattelli
1,4,5,6,
Luigina Cellini
2 and
Simonetta D’Ercole
1,*
1
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66013 Chieti, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy
3
Private Practice, Via Piacenza, 7, 92019 Sciacca, Italy
4
Biomaterials Engineering Group, Catholic University of San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, 30107 Murcia, Spain
5
Fondazione Villaserena per la Ricerca, Via Leonardo Petruzzi 42, 65013 Città Sant’Angelo, Italy
6
Casa di Cura Villa Serena del dott. L. Petruzzi, 65013 Città Sant’Angelo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(15), 6786; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156786
Submission received: 15 June 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Technologies in Oral Research)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

This study paves the way for future and potential applications of this technology in the treatment of candidiasis, especially in subjects wearing polyacrylic dentures.

Abstract

(1) Background: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of several sessions of the antibacterial protocol of complex electromagnetic fields (CMFs) on planktonic Candida albicans and fungal ability, after treatment with CMFs, to adhere and proliferate on acrylic resin materials. (2) Methods: Planktonic overnight cultures of Candida albicans were subjected to different entities of CMFs treatments. Four test groups were compared: “p1”: treated only with the first program of the antibacterial protocol; “p1–p5” subjected to the first five programs; “1 antibacterial” received one complete session of the protocol and “2 antibacterial” received two complete sessions. After the treatments, the number of colony forming units (CFUs) were recorded. Then, C. albicans broth cultures were cultivated on polyacrylic resin discs and evaluated for CFUs and subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. (3) Results: Microbiological analysis showed that CMFs promoted a significant reduction of C. albicans CFUs when the protocol “p1–p5” was applied. No statistically significant differences between test groups were observed if the time of exposure to CMFs was increased. SEM observations and CFUs showed that CMFs treatments have the ability to reduce C. albicans adherence and proliferation on discs. (4) Conclusions: The CMFs showed an antifungal effect as well as a decrease in C. albicans adhesion on polyacrylic resin.

1. Introduction

Denture wearers have an increased potential to suffer halitosis, oral candidiasis, and other types of stomatitis due to the increase of local and systemic risk factors [1,2].
Candida spp. are normal commensals of the oral cavity, but they can turn into pathogens in the presence of some local factors, like the reduction of salivary flow rate and oral hygiene habits, food stagnation, and systemic factors, like the increase of blood glucose [3].
Among the Candida spp., Candida albicans is the most virulent yeast in the oral cavity [4]. It has the ability to adhere to oral epithelium and denture surfaces, to proliferate, to produce a biofilm, and then to start disseminating in other areas of the oral cavity. The clinical manifestation of oral candidiasis is very variegated: some patients could be totally asymptomatic, but others can manifest painful lesions and/or also difficulties associated with deglutition [5]. In particular, 60–65% of denture wearers are affected by Candida-associated denture stomatitis (CADS) [6].
Polyacrylic resin dentures represent a local risk factor for many reasons. C. albicans can colonize the surfaces, but also the trauma exerted by the prosthesis can traumatize the oral mucosa and facilitate the penetration of the yeasts into the oral epithelium. Moreover, the presence of other factors that are typically of elderly people, such as xerostomia, an immune system impairment, and poly-drug assumption, could induce a bacterial dysbiosis and promote Candida spp. proliferation [7]. Candida-biofilm infections can have devastating consequences, and can be life-threatening, if the bloodstream is invaded, since cells are usually resistant to antifungal drugs and to the host immune system.
Currently, the elective method of treatment of CADDS includes the improvement of oral hygiene habits, the use of topical or systemic antifungal substances, and the repair or substitution of the old prosthesis with a new one. All these procedures are very costly for the patients, and, furthermore, the recurrence of the lesions is not excluded. The development of antifungal resistance, which is a current problem, similar to antibiotics resistance, is constantly reducing the efficacy of the currently available drugs, as well as their therapeutic effects [8,9]. It has been shown that Pseudomonas aeruginosa confers protection to neighboring yeasts against azoles, increasing the risk of Candidiasis during polymicrobial infections [10].
Moreover, patients with polydrug assumption, or with reduction of drug clearance, may not be able to tolerate the administration of further medicaments.
Consequently, investigations into alternative methods to reduce Candida-biofilm infections are encouraged. The use of light devices, such as lasers or LEDs, which has shown great potential against different types of bacteria, has not always proven to be effective against C. albicans, which has shown defense mechanisms [11,12,13,14,15]. Indeed, the presence of enzymes, like superoxide dismutases and catalases protect against reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are responsible for bacterial deletion [16,17,18]. Greco et al. showed the efficacy of a novel gel containing aminolevulinic acid associated with photodynamic therapy in inhibiting C. albicans growth in biofilm and inoculum [19], thanks to the intrinsic acidic pH of the formulation and the induction of free radical production. However, it is important to also investigate the possible effects of other devices that could offer other therapeutic options against this commensal/serious pathogen. Another technology that showed an antibacterial activity and could have a potential efficacy against Candida spp., and consequently should be further investigated, is the electromagnetic field (EF).
Cellini et al. demonstrated that exposure of Escherichia coli to 50 Hz EF for 20–120 min produces a significant change in the bacterial morphotype and aggregation, suggesting a possible role of EF as a stressing factor [20].
Oncul et al. showed that extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields are able to induce a change in the physicochemical properties of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, an alteration of their respiratory activity, and a slight decrease in bacterial growth [21].
The in vitro and clinical applications of magnetic fields are very varied and include the reduction of neoplastic cells as well as reduction symptomatic of pain in patients affected by fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) [22,23,24,25]. Some devices emitting magnetic fields are equipped with specific programs in which different fields are emitted, in a specific order, and, consequently, are termed complex magnetic fields (CMFs).
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of different timings of CMFs antibacterial protocols on planktonic Candida albicans. The secondary objective is to evaluate the viability of the treated yeast, cultivated on pink polyacrylic resin discs—the same material used to fabricate complete removable dentures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Complex Electromagnetic Fields Source

The CMFs instrument, Slim version (M.F.I. Medicina Fisica Integrata, Rome, Italy), is an electronic device that emits pulsed multi-frequency electromagnetic fields between 1 and 250 microT of variable intensity, frequency, wave form, and time stimulation.
The CMFs generator (M.F.I. Medicina Fisica Integrata, Italy) is provided with different programs that work in relation to the configuration of the specific sector of application. Each program is composed of nine different steps with different intensities (1–250 microT), frequencies (1–250 Hz), interval times, and forms of complex multi-frequency waves.

2.2. Fungal Culture and Quantification of Colony Forming Units

The reference strain Candida albicans ATCC 10231, stored at −80 °C, was cultured in Sabouraud agar and incubated at 37 °C under aerobic conditions (Figure 1A). Fresh colonies of C. albicans were used to obtain a broth culture in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640) (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) plus 2% glucose.
The suspension of the broth culture was standardized using a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Milan, Italy) adjusting the optical density to OD600 = 0.762 corresponding to 10^7 colony forming units/mL.
Aliquots of 20 mL were dispensed in triplicate into Petri plates for each treatment group (Figure 1B):
  • UE: Unexposed positive controls of broth culture of C. albicans that received any treatment
  • P1: was subjected to one program of antibacterial protocol with complex electromagnetic fields (CMFs) for a total of 3 min of therapy
  • P1–P5: was subjected to five programs of antibacterial protocol of CMFs for a total of 17 min of therapy
  • A1: was subjected to one complete session of the antibacterial protocol with complex electromagnetic fields (CMFs) for a total of 23 min of therapy
  • A2: was subjected to two complete sessions of the antibacterial protocol with complex electromagnetic fields (CMFs) for a total of 46 min of therapy
Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
At the end of each treatment, the samples were checked, serially diluted 1:10 in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), and plated on Sabouraud agar plates. Then, the samples were incubated at 37 °C and the number of colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) was determined, as previously described [26].

2.3. Cultivation of Candida albicans on Polyacrylic Resin

A total of 24 discs of polymerized polyacrylic resin (GC EUROPE N.V., Leuven, Belgium) 7 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness, were prepared in the dental laboratory of “Gabriele d’Annunzio” University. After the polymerization, all samples were smoothed by using sandpaper mounted on mandrill, followed by polishing with brushing with pumice of decreasing particle sizes.
They were placed in 75% alcohol for 60 min (Figure 1C), dried with sterile gauze, and irradiated on both surfaces by means of ultraviolet rays for 30 min.
The discs, thus sterilized, were placed in 24-well plates with 1 mL of human saliva, and conditioned for 2 h at room temperature, while gently stirred at 120 rpm × g. The use of saliva was approved by the local ethical committee and was obtained and managed as previously described [27,28,29].
The discs were washed with DPBS and then inoculated with 1 mL of suspensions of C. albicans samples from the groups: controls (UE) and 1 and 2 antibacterial. All discs were incubated in an aerobic condition at 37 °C for 24 h.
Negative controls were also prepared, consisting of uninoculated resin discs.
After incubation, the fungal suspension was removed, and the samples were washed three times with DPBS to remove non-adherent C. albicans cells.
Subsequently, 12 discs were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in DPBS and dehydrated in alcohol at increasing concentrations for SEM observation.
The other 12 discs were placed in sterile tubes containing 1 mL of DPBS and then treated with an ultrasonic bath (Euronda, Vicenza Spa, Italy) at a frequency of 40 kHz and potency of 81 W for 4 min, and then vortexed at 1000 rpm for 2 min to remove fungal cells adhering to the surface of the material.
The observations under the microscope, through vital staining, before sowing on the plate, confirmed that the fungal suspension consisted of a mixture of single, viable cells.
The fungal suspensions were subjected to serial dilutions, cultured on Sabouraud agar plates, and incubated overnight at 37 °C, followed by the CFU/mL count.
The number of C. albicans cells present on the surface of the resin discs was calculated in order to evaluate the ability of the microorganism to colonize the resin surfaces.

2.4. Scanning Electron Microscope Observation (SEM)

Before starting the SEM observation, a Desk Sputter Coater (Phenom-World B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was used to sputter the resin samples with gold (150 A).
A Phenom ProX scanning electron microscope (Phenom-World B.V., The Netherlands) was used to characterize all samples at 2000× magnification and to visualize the biofilm formation on the different discs. Ten fields of SEM were visualized and counted, by two different blind operators, for each group.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results were recorded in a Microsoft Excel database (16.43 version 2020, Microsoft 365, Redmond, Washington, DC, USA) and CFU/mL were expressed as log10CFU/mL. Then, the statistical evaluation was performed by using SPSS for Windows version 21 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The homogeneity of the parameters was verified by the Levene test, then the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups, and, in the case of statistically significant results, the LSD test was performed. The significance threshold was set at 0.05.

3. Results

The Levene test showed significant results (p < 0.05) and values of F near to 1 in all comparisons performed, so all data were considered homogeneous and were subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA). This analysis showed p < 0.001 for all comparisons, so data were subjected to the LSD test, for intergroup analysis.
The colony forming units for mL were expressed in terms of log10 (Figure 2). UE samples were characterized by a count of 7.001 ± 0.311 (log10CFU/mL). All groups treated with CMFs showed a fungal reduction in respect to controls, but the P1 program alone (6.981 ± 0.001) was not effective on providing a statistically significant difference. The other protocols showed a significant reduction of C. albicans, compared to controls and P1; P1-P5, 1 antibacterial, and 2 antibacterial were characterized by 6.833 (±0.048), 6.814 (±0.001), and 6.902 (±0.002) log10(CFU/mL), respectively.
The SEM observations of polyacrylic resin discs (Figure 3) showed a significant reduction of C. albicans adhesion on both test discs, without differences between 1 and 2 sessions of the antibacterial program.
The quantification of CFUs, after 24 h of fungal cultivation on the resin discs, showed a significant reduction of the viable cells on test groups (Figure 4): 1 antibacterial, 6.119 (±0.240); 2 antibacterial, 6.421 (±0.347); with respect to UE, 7.0725 (±0.294) log10(CFUs/mL). No significant differences were found between 1 and 2 antibacterial programs.

4. Discussion

The effects of different treatment times with the antibacterial protocol were tested on planktonic C. albicans in order to find alternative treatments that could kill or increase the susceptibility of this fungus to traditional antifungals [30,31,32].
The inhibitory effect of CMFs with the antibacterial protocol was significant by using the first five programs (p1–p5). On the contrary, 3 min of treatment were not effective in significantly reducing the CFUs with respect to the controls. No difference was reported for the programs (p1–p5) and A1, and no additive effects were measured by applying a double session (A2). The program used in this study is a sequence of six steps (3–5 min each, and overall duration of 23 min), with frequency ranging between 6 and 70 Hz, intensity between 6 and 95 µT, and complex waveforms with multiple harmonics. Each step of the program is focused on a specific fungal function to be interfered with.
The influence of EFs, both static and pulsing, on microorganisms has been extensively demonstrated. Bacteria exposed to these fields lose the capability of dividing and multiplying [33]. In particular, the authors showed that the frequency of the EFs has a paramount importance when it comes to the effect: at a 4-Hz frequency, the survival rate of E. coli K 121 was 20%; meanwhile, at 50 Hz, the survival rate turned out to be 53%.
The mechanisms of action of electromagnetic fields on bacteria proposed in the literature are variable: it is usually accepted that they could interact with cell membranes, causing a physicochemical change, with a consequent influence in the signal transduction system. Other hypotheses include changes in transmembrane potential, in the membrane potential of mitochondria, in the surface charge, and in hydrophobicity [21,34,35].
Binhi et al. hypothesized that pulsing EFs (between 0 and 110 µT) influence bacterial polar surface macromolecules following the ion resonance model according to Liboff (Stark effect), a model very similar to what had been demonstrated for calcium, magnesium, and chlorine ions. The molecular rotation induced by complex magnetic fields (CMFs) interferes with the bacterial capability of producing filaments and reproducing [36]. Moreover, as suggested by many authors, magnetic fields seem to interfere with fungal plasma membrane organization. It seems to alter the sphingolipid-ergosterol domain that is fundamental for the hyphal formation and consequently for the Candida’s ability to adhere to different surfaces and invade tissues. It has been shown that the plasma membrane alteration provided by the exposure to magnetic fields to Candida albicans have a synergic effect with antifungal treatments, increasing the drug susceptibilities of Candida albicans [37,38].
The results of this study using an alternative therapeutic approach are very encouraging because a recent paper reported that C. albicans showed 50% resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole, two antifungal drugs currently used to treat candidiasis [39].
Moreover, these results were in accordance with the recent studies of Novickij et al. and Sztafrowski et al. that showed the inhibitory effects of pulsed electric fields on the viability and hyphal length of C. albicans [40,41].
C. albicans is characterized by its polymorphism: it can exist as a unicellular yeast, or filamentous hyphae and pseudohyphae. Some authors have hypothesized that the different shapes could be connected with different virulence levels: the presence of hyphae should promote the ability of C. albicans to adhere onto surfaces and penetrate into epithelial cells [42,43]. Kurnatowski et al. showed that EFs could increase the susceptibility of Candida spp. against miconazole, but the effects were significant only at the second week of exposure to electromagnetic fields [44]. On the contrary, Bayat et al. found that long-term exposure of mice to 900 MHz GSM radiation on experimental cutaneous candidiasis could retard the wound healing and reduce the survival rate of the mice, due to induced oxidative stress, disturbance in immune cell functions, and altered gene expression [45].
The mechanism of action of EFs on C. albicans could be the alteration of cellular membrane with the modification of the permeabilization [46].
However, the interpretation of previous literature is quite difficult, due to the different protocols of EFs applied, as well as the different exposure environments. Indeed, radiation parameters include wave frequency, intensity, continuous or discontinuous output, and the duration of the exposure [45]. With the introduction of CMFs, a combination of different programs has been included in the different protocols. Moreover, the outcome of EF exposure depends on the nature of both the radiation and the target molecules. Consequently, the adoption of simple, in vitro, experimental study designs could help in the development of efficacious EF therapeutic protocols and in increasing knowledge of the mechanisms of action.
Considering that the device used in this study is currently set up to automatically complete one cycle of treatment until A1, for testing the adherence on polyacrylic resin, we performed the experiments only on A1 and A2. SEM images and the CFU count confirmed that Candida albicans adherence on the polyacrylic discs was significantly reduced in the exposed groups. It is important to highlight that adherence to these surfaces is highly influenced by superficial roughness. Rougher acrylic surfaces were associated with a higher number of Streptococcus spp., Bacteroides gingivalis, Actinomyces spp., and Candida albicans [47,48,49]. However, in order to avoid any risk of bias, all samples, were subjected to the same finishing procedures, which are the same as those traditionally used during the production of complete dentures. The clinical implications of these results are very important, because this technology could be used to eradicate yeasts from dentures, without the use of chemical substances that could damage the resin surface and could slowly release potentially irritants into the mouths of the patients. The same device could also be used to treat the oral manifestations of candidiasis, although other in vivo and in vitro studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of this protocol in the clinical use.

5. Conclusions

A partial session (p1–p5) of the antibacterial protocol with complex electromagnetic fields (CMFs) on planktonic C. albicans was enough to promote a significant reduction of fungal CFUs. However, no significant differences were found by increasing the duration of EFs exposure.
A single session of the antibacterial protocol significantly reduced the fungal ability to adhere and proliferate on polyacrylic resin materials with respect to the unexposed controls.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.P. and S.D.; methodology: S.D., L.C., and S.D.L.; software: M.P. validation: L.C., A.C., A.P., and G.I.; formal analysis: M.P. and S.D.; investigation: M.P., S.D., and S.D.L.; resources: A.P., L.C., G.I., and A.C.; data curation: M.P. and S.D.; writing—original draft preparation: M.P. and S.D.; writing—review and editing: A.P., L.C., G.I., and A.C.; supervision: A.P., L.C., G.I., and A.C.; funding acquisition: A.P., L.C., G.I., and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by FAR Grants, 2020, D’Ercole, Cellini, Piattelli and partly by Piattelli grant number 20102ZLNJ5, financed by MIUR, Italy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chieti-Pescara (protocol code SALI and date of approval 9 October 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Marco Mantarro and M.F.I. Medicina Fisica Integrata, Italy, for providing the free use of the device, as well as to Emanuela Di Campli for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petrini, M.; Costacurta, M.; Ferrante, M.; Trentini, P.; Docimo, R.; Spoto, G. Association between the organoleptic scores, oral condition and salivary β-galactosidases in children affected by halitosis. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2014, 12, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costacurta, M.; Petrini, M.; Biferi, V.; Arcuri, C.; Spoto, G.; Brescia, A.; Docimo, R. Dental prosthesis and halitosis: Evaluation of oral malodor in patients with and without a dental prosthesis. J. Osseointegr. 2020, 12, 730–735. [Google Scholar]
  3. O’Donnell, L.E.; Robertson, D.; Ramage, G. Candida Virulence Factors. Oral Candidosis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rosa, E.A. (Ed.) Oral Candidosis: Physiopathology, Decision Making, and Therapeutics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lalla, R.V.; Patton, L.L.; Dongari-Bagtzoglou, A. Oral candidiasis: Pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment strategies. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2013, 41, 263–268. [Google Scholar]
  6. Salerno, C.; Pascale, M.; Contaldo, M.; Esposito, V.; Busciolano, M.; Milillo, L.; Guida, A.; Petruzzi, M.; Serpico, R. Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Med. Oral. Patol. Oral. Cir. Bucal. 2011, 16, e139–e143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Vasconcellos, A.A.; Gonçalves, L.M.; Del Bel Cury, A.A.; da Silva, W.J. Candida-Associated Denture Stomatitis: Clinical Relevant Aspects. Oral Candidosis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sanglard, D.; Ischer, F.; Parkinson, T.; Falconer, D.; Bille, J. Candida albicans mutations in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway and resistance to several antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2404–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Akins, R.A. An update on antifungal targets and mechanisms of resistance in Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, 285–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bandara, H.M.H.N.; Wood, D.L.A.; Vanwonterghem, I.; Hugenholtz, P.; Cheung, B.P.K.; Samaranayake, L.P. Fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans is induced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Ercole, S.; Di Fermo, P.; Di Giulio, M.; Di Lodovico, S.; Di Campli, E.; Scarano, A.; Tripodi, D.; Cellini, L.; Petrini, M. Near-infrared NIR irradiation and sodium hypochlorite: An efficacious association to counteract the Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in endodontic infections. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 210, 111989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Petrini, M.; Spoto, G.; Scarano, A.; D’Arcangelo, C.; Tripodi, D.; Di Fermo, P.; D’Ercole, S. Near-infrared LEDS provide persistent and increasing protection against E. faecalis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2019, 197, 111527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. D’Ercole, S.; Spoto, G.; Trentini, P.; Tripodi, D.; Petrini, M. In vitro inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis with a led device. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 160, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Petrini, M.; Trentini, P.; Tripodi, D.; Spoto, G.; D’Ercole, S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of LED irradiation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017, 168, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Radunović, M.; Petrini, M.; Vlajic, T.; Iezzi, G.; Di Lodovico, S.; Piattelli, A.; D’Ercole, S. Effects of a novel gel containing 5-aminolevulinic acid and red LED against bacteria involved in peri-implantitis and other oral infections. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 205, 111826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brown, A.J.; Haynes, K.; Gow, N.A.; Quinn, J. Stress Responses in Candida. Candida Candidiasis 2014, 15, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hwang, C.-S.; Rhie, G.; Oh, J.-H.; Huh, W.-K.; Yim, H.-S.; Kang, S.-O. Copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase (Cu/ZnSOD) is required for the protection of Candida albicans against oxidative stresses and the expression of its full virulence. Microbiology 2002, 148, 3705–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wysong, D.R.; Christin, L.; Sugar, A.M.; Robbins, P.W.; Diamond, R.D. Cloning and Sequencing of a Candida albicans Catalase Gene and Effects of Disruption of This Gene. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 1953–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Greco, G.; Di Piazza, S.; Chan, J.; Zotti, M.; Hanna, R.; Gheno, E.; Zekiy, A.O.; Pasquale, C.; De Angelis, N.; Amaroli, A. Newly formulated 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy on Candida albicans. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 29, 101575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cellini, L.; Grande, R.; Di Campli, E.; Di Bartolomeo, S.; Di Giulio, M.; Robuffo, I.; Trubiani, O.; Mariggio, M.A. Bacterial response to the exposure of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oncul, S.; Cuce, E.M.; Aksu, B.; Inhan Garip, A. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on bacterial membrane. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2016, 92, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tofani, S.; Barone, D.; Cintorino, M.; de Santi, M.M.; Ferrara, A.; Orlassino, R.; Ossola, P.; Peroglio, F.; Rolfo, K.; Ronchetto, F. Static and ELF magnetic fields induce tumor growth inhibition and apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics 2001, 22, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alfano, A.P.; Taylor, A.G.; Foresman, P.A.; Dunkl, P.R.; McConnell, G.G.; Conaway, M.R.; Gillies, G.T. Static Magnetic Fields for Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2001, 7, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weintraub, M.I.; Wolfe, G.I.; Barohn, R.A.; Cole, S.P.; Parry, G.J.; Hayat, G.; Cohen, J.A.; Page, J.C.; Bromberg, M.B.; Schwartz, S.L. Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003, 84, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zwolińska, J.; Gąsior, M.; Śniezek, E.; Kwolek, A. The use of magnetic fields in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the literature. Reumatologia 2016, 54, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cataldi, V.; Di Campli, E.; Fazii, P.; Traini, T.; Cellini, L.; Di Giulio, M. Candida species isolated from different body sites and their antifungal susceptibility pattern: Cross-analysis of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. D’Ercole, S.; Cellini, L.; Pilato, S.; Di Lodovico, S.; Iezzi, G.; Piattelli, A.; Petrini, M. Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2020, 31, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petrini, M.; Giuliani, A.; Di Campli, E.; Di Lodovico, S.; Iezzi, G.; Piattelli, A.; D’Ercole, S. The Bacterial Anti-Adhesive Activity of Double-Etched Titanium (DAE) as a Dental Implant Surface. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tripodi, D.; Cosi, A.; Fulco, D.; D’Ercole, S. The Impact of Sport Training on Oral Health in Athletes. Dent. J. 2021, 9, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gavanji, S.; Larki, B. Comparative effect of propolis of honey bee and some herbal extracts on Candida albicans. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 23, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Farkash, Y.; Feldman, M.; Ginsburg, I.; Steinberg, D.; Shalish, M. Polyphenols Inhibit Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Farkash, Y.; Feldman, M.; Ginsburg, I.; Steinberg, D.; Shalish, M. Green Tea Polyphenols and Padma Hepaten Inhibit Candida albicans Biofilm Formation. Evid-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 1690747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stepanian, R.S.; Barsegian, A.A.; Alaverdian, Z.h.R.; Oganesian, G.G.; Markosian, L.S.; Airapetian, S.N. The effect of magnetic fields on the growth and division of the lon mutant of Escherichia coli K-12. Radiats Biol. Radioecol. 2000, 40, 319–322. [Google Scholar]
  34. Santoro, N.; Lisi, A.; Pozzi, D.; Pasquali, E.; Serafino, A.; Grimaldi, S. Effect of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field exposure on morphological and biophysical properties of human lymphoid cell line (Raji). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1997, 1357, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sadafi, H.A.; Mehboodi, Z.; Sardari, D. A Review of the Mechanisms of Interaction between the Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and Human Biology. PIERS Online 2006, 2, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Binhi, V.N.; Alipov, Y.D.; Belyaev, I.Y. Effect of static magnetic field on E. Coli cells and individual rotations of ion-protein complexes. Bioelectromagnetics 2001, 22, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pasrija, R.; Prasad, T.; Prasad, R. Membrane raft lipid constituents affect drug susceptibilities of Candida albicans. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. McCourt, P.; Liu, H.Y.; Parker, J.E.; Gallo-Ebert, C.; Donigan, M.; Bata, A.; Giordano, C.; Kelly, S.L.; Nickels, J.T., Jr. Proper sterol distribution is required for Candida albicans hyphal formation and virulence. G3 (Bethesda) 2016, 6, 3455–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zaidi, K.U.; Mani, A.; Thawani, V.; Mehra, A. Total Protein Profile and Drug Resistance in Candida albicans Isolated from Clinical Samples. Mol. Biol. Int. 2016, 2016, 4982131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sztafrowski, D.; Suchodolski, J.; Muraszko, J.; Sigler, K.; Krasowska, A. The influence of N and S poles of static magnetic field (SMF) on Candida albicans hyphal formation and antifungal activity of amphotericin B. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 2019, 64, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Novickij, V.; Švedienė, J.; Paškevičius, A.; Markovskaja, S.; Girkontaitė, I.; Zinkevičienė, A.; Lastauskienė, E.; Novickij, J. Pulsed electric field-assisted sensitization of multidrug-resistant Candida albicans to antifungal drugs. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kurzai, O.; Schmitt, C.; Bröcker, E.B.; Frosch, M.; Kolb-Mäurer, A. Polymorphism of Candida albicans is a major factor in the interaction with human dendritic cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 295, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Villar, C.C.; Kashleva, H.; Dongari-Bagtzoglou, A. Role of Candida albicans polymorphism in interactions with oral epithelial cells. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 19, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurnatowski, P.; Klimiuk, C.; Głowacka, A. Effect of electromagnetic waves on sensitivity of fungi of the genus Candida to miconazole. Wiadomości Parazytol. 2003, 49, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bayat, M.; Hemati, S.; Soleimani-Estyar, R.; Shahin-Jafari, A. Effect of long-term exposure of mice to 900 MHz GSM radiation on experimental cutaneous candidiasis. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Novickij, V.; Lastauskienė, E.; Švedienė, J.; Grainys, A.; Staigvila, G.; Paškevičius, A.; Girkontaitė, I.; Zinkevičienė, A.; Markovskaja, S.; Novickij, J. Membrane Permeabilization of Pathogenic Yeast in Alternating Sub-microsecond Electromagnetic Fields in Combination with Conventional Electroporation. J. Membr. Biol. 2018, 251, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bollen, C.M.; Lambrechts, P.; Quirynen, M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A Review of the Literature. Dent. Mater. 1997, 13, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kagermeier-Callaway, A.S.; Willershausen, B.; Frank, T.; Stender, E. In vitro colonization of acrylic resin denture base materials by Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces viscosus. Int. Dent. J. 2000, 50, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Morgan, T.D.; Wilson, M. The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by Streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Experimental phases: (A) Colonies of Candida albicans on Sabouraud dextrose agar plate. (B) Petri dishes containing the fungal suspension during the complex electromagnetic field (CMFs) treatment. (C) Ethanol dehydration steps of polyacrylic resin discs, before the SEM observation.
Figure 1. Experimental phases: (A) Colonies of Candida albicans on Sabouraud dextrose agar plate. (B) Petri dishes containing the fungal suspension during the complex electromagnetic field (CMFs) treatment. (C) Ethanol dehydration steps of polyacrylic resin discs, before the SEM observation.
Applsci 11 06786 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of the viable planktonic Candida albicans Log10 CFU/mL (error bars show ± standard deviation) after treatment with CMFs Antibacterial protocol, with different times of exposure.
Figure 2. Comparison of the viable planktonic Candida albicans Log10 CFU/mL (error bars show ± standard deviation) after treatment with CMFs Antibacterial protocol, with different times of exposure.
Applsci 11 06786 g002
Figure 3. Candida albicans adherence on polyacrylic resin discs. (A) Yeasts exposed to a double antibacterial treatment. (B) Yeasts exposed to a single antibacterial program. (C) Unexposed yeasts. (D) Average cell count on SEM scans of area of 135 µm2. A1: one complete session of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. A2: two complete sessions of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. * p-value < 0.05. Red arrows show the Candida cells.
Figure 3. Candida albicans adherence on polyacrylic resin discs. (A) Yeasts exposed to a double antibacterial treatment. (B) Yeasts exposed to a single antibacterial program. (C) Unexposed yeasts. (D) Average cell count on SEM scans of area of 135 µm2. A1: one complete session of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. A2: two complete sessions of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. * p-value < 0.05. Red arrows show the Candida cells.
Applsci 11 06786 g003
Figure 4. The colony forming units (log10 CFUs/mL) at 24 h of Candida albicans exposed and unexposed to EFs and cultivated on resin discs. UE were the unexposed controls. A1: one complete session of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. A2: two complete sessions of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. Statistical significance with p < 0.05. Error bars = standard deviation.
Figure 4. The colony forming units (log10 CFUs/mL) at 24 h of Candida albicans exposed and unexposed to EFs and cultivated on resin discs. UE were the unexposed controls. A1: one complete session of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. A2: two complete sessions of the antibacterial protocol with CMFs. Statistical significance with p < 0.05. Error bars = standard deviation.
Applsci 11 06786 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petrini, M.; Di Lodovico, S.; Iezzi, G.; Cipollina, A.; Piattelli, A.; Cellini, L.; D’Ercole, S. Effects of Complex Electromagnetic Fields on Candida albicans Adhesion and Proliferation on Polyacrylic Resin. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156786

AMA Style

Petrini M, Di Lodovico S, Iezzi G, Cipollina A, Piattelli A, Cellini L, D’Ercole S. Effects of Complex Electromagnetic Fields on Candida albicans Adhesion and Proliferation on Polyacrylic Resin. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(15):6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petrini, Morena, Silvia Di Lodovico, Giovanna Iezzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Luigina Cellini, and Simonetta D’Ercole. 2021. "Effects of Complex Electromagnetic Fields on Candida albicans Adhesion and Proliferation on Polyacrylic Resin" Applied Sciences 11, no. 15: 6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156786

APA Style

Petrini, M., Di Lodovico, S., Iezzi, G., Cipollina, A., Piattelli, A., Cellini, L., & D’Ercole, S. (2021). Effects of Complex Electromagnetic Fields on Candida albicans Adhesion and Proliferation on Polyacrylic Resin. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156786

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop