Next Article in Journal
Elemental Carbon and Its Fractions during Evolved Gas Analysis with Respect to Pyrolytic Carbon and Split Time
Next Article in Special Issue
Toxic Effects of Heavy Metals and Organic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment Porewater on the Amphipod Hyalella azteca and Zebrafish Brachydanio rerio Embryos from Different Rivers in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Defect Detection AI Model for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Using High Dynamic Range Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correlation between Heavy Metal-Induced Histopathological Changes and Trophic Interactions between Different Fish Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Population Structure of the Copepod Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) in the Kuroshio Current Edge, Southeastern East China Sea

1
Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
2
Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
3
Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
4
Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Both authors contributed equally to the present contribution.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7545; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167545
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 2 August 2021 / Accepted: 8 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomonitoring of Aquatic Systems)

Abstract

:
The abundance of adult males, females, and copepodites, and sex ratio of a Temora turbinata population and seawater hydrology were studied from 2018 to 2019 in waters off northeast Taiwan, northwest Pacific Ocean. The hydrological parameters showed significant differences between sampling months caused by interactions of Kuroshio, East China Sea water, and the China Coastal Current. The highest average abundance was recorded from the June 2018 cruise with 2903.92 ± 3499.47 (inds. m−3), followed by a cruise in June 2019 with an average abundance of 1990.64 ± 1401.55 (inds. m−3). The sex ratio ranged between 0.25 and 2.33; the records were significantly higher in samples of June 2018 than during other sampling cruises (one-way ANOVA). The spatiotemporal distribution of T. turbinata showed a clear pattern of seasonal changes among sampling stations and distribution zones. Abundance of females and copepodites correlated significantly positive (r = 0.755, p < 0.001), whereas sex ratio (r = 0.247, p = 0.119) did not correlate significantly. The present study revealed that the abundance of T. turbinate was highest in June and was positively correlated with seawater temperature; furthermore, this is the first time the in situ sex ratio of T. turbinata in western Pacific waters has been reported.

1. Introduction

Zooplankton provides important trophic links in aquatic and marine trophic webs by transferring energy and materials from microbes to higher trophic levels [1]. Zooplankters are the main natural food source of larval and juvenile fishes worldwide [2]. Zooplankters are valuable indicators of ecological conditions due to their intermediate position, linking primary production with consumers at higher levels of the trophic cascade, and being sensitive to environmental characteristics [1,3,4]. Zooplankters are sensitive to changing physical and chemical properties of waters. These abiotic parameters affect the spatial distribution and abundance of zooplankton [5,6,7]. As such, environmental changes could also affect the geographic distribution of certain species [3,8]. At the same time, some opportunistic species could adapt to particular environmental changes [9]. The copepod assemblage is the most dominant group of the zooplankton community and is considered as a key group in the marine pelagic environment [10].
The copepod genus Temora belongs to the family Temoridae with broadcast-spawning representatives. It is planktonic and important as it provides one of the major groups of prey for commercially shoaling fishes [11]. To date, a total of six species belong to the genus Temora worldwide. According to historical records, four species of Temora have been reported in waters around Taiwan [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Among those, Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) and Temora discaudata (Giesbrecht, 1889) were recorded in the waters of northern Taiwan [22]. Temora turbinata has been recorded as the predominant species in mesozooplankton communities in various environments around the world, such as in Korea [23], in Taiwan [21], in Brazilian coastal waters [24], and in coastal and shelf waters [11], as well as tropical and subtropical areas in general [20,25,26,27,28]. This species is widely adapted to a variety of environments, such as polluted and eutrophicated waters, eutrophic lagoons, outfall areas, and nuclear power plant discharge areas [17,20,27,29,30,31]. T. turbinata could especially cooccur with the bloom-forming Karenia brevis in the Gulf of Mexico, a toxic dinoflagellate [32]. The feeding behavior of T. turbinata is opportunistic and omnivorous and depends on the food item composition in ambient waters. Previous reports found it primarily herbivorous and rarely carnivorous [33]. In addition, T. turbinata as a suspension feeder prefers microscopic and non- or slow-moving plankter, such as Thalassiosira spp. [34], and moving prey ciliates [35].
In dioecious species, the theoretical sex ratio is balanced (1:1, female:male), whereas biased sex ratios are quite common in nature [36,37,38]. The sex ratio represents an internal factor that affects population dynamics and growth [39,40]. In marine copepods, sex determination and sex ratios are governed by diverse hydrological factors, such as pH, chemical composition, temperature, depth, and hydrostatic pressure, which commonly leads to an alteration of sex ratios and reproductive timing [41,42,43]. For example, the sex ratio of Acartia tonsa increased from 0.3 ± 0.1 to 1.3 ± 0.1 with a decrease of salinity from 35 to 13 PSU in the laboratory [44]. Besides such abiotic factors, previous reports revealed that biotic factors, such as metabolism, reproductive age, and life span, also play important roles that affect the sex ratios of copepods [45,46,47]. The scarcity of data referring to in situ sex ratios is also due to the effect of differential vertical migration of sexes, and the difficulty of identifying sexes in immature copepodites. Sex ratio is, therefore, probably the most understudied population trait in copepod ecology [43].
A few studies reported developmental time, growth, length-weight relationship, chemical content, egg production rate, biomass, and temporal variation in the population production rate of T. turbinata from different ocean areas [30,48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
The sampling area was next to Kueishan Island located at the I-Lan Bay in the coastal waters of northeastern Taiwan which is affected by the Kuroshio Current (KC) [55]. The Kuroshio originates near the bifurcation of the North Equatorial Current at about 13° N, then flows northwards along the Philippine and Taiwan eastern coastlines to Japan and off Sanriku, east coast of Honshu, Japan. It affects one of the largest marine ecosystems worldwide and represents the major current in the west as a boundary in the northwest Pacific Ocean [56,57,58]. It flows over the I-Lan ridge before entering the East China Sea and transports warm water masses from the north Pacific tropical and intermediate waters [59,60,61]. Besides the Kuroshio, several freshwater discharges also affect the hydrological characteristics around Kueishan Island (KI) [62]. The southwest monsoon prevails during May to October and the northeast monsoon prevails during November to February in this region [63]. The river run-off is affected by weather changes and precipitation. The hydrology of I-Lan Bay strongly affects the aquatic biota in this area [64,65,66].
To date, we have only a limited understanding of the composition of T. turbinata populations, such as sex ratio and the proportion of copepodites and adults. At the southern coast of the ECS, T. turbinata is an important zooplankton species. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation of the issues of biology and ecology of T. turbinata is important and necessary. In the present study, the abundance of copepodites and male and female adults of T. turbinata were measured, and the spatiotemporal distribution patterns in waters off Northeastern Taiwan were compared to reveal the following issues: (1) the seasonal composition of T. turbinata populations in the zooplankton; (2) whether the geographic distribution of T. turbinata is correlated with zones of seabed depth; (3) the sex structure of T. turbinata during different monsoon periods in waters off northeastern Taiwan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Area and Field Study

Field sampling was carried out during four cruises in June (Southwest monsoon period) and September (Southwest-Northeast monsoon transition period) in 2018, and March (Northeast monsoon period) and June (Southwest monsoon period) in 2019 around Kueishan Island, in I-Lan Bay off northeastern Taiwan (Figure 1). Samples were collected from 12 selected stations distributed in three seabed depth zones [shallow depth zone (<200 m), middle depth zone (200–400 m), deep depth zone (>400 m)] during each cruise (Table 1). In the past, the research methods of copepods in this water area were to collected samples from surface zone, such as [7,55,67]. Therefore, the present study collected samples from the surface zone for do comparison with the past studies. A conical net (45 cm in diameter, 200 μm mesh size, and 180 cm length) was horizontally towed in surface waters (above the 10 m depth contour) for 10 min at each station to collect zooplankton samples. A flow-meter (Hydrobios, Germany) was fixed at the center of the net mouth to calculate the respective filtered water volumes. Zooplankton samples were immediately preserved in 5–10% neutralized seawater-formalin for identifying and counting their abundance in the laboratory. The hydrographic parameters temperature and salinity were measured by Sea-bird CTD equipment at each station.

2.2. Zooplankton Identification and Abundance Measurement

Zooplankton samples were divided by a Folsom plankton sample splitter until the subsamples contained about 300–500 individuals. Temora turbinata were identified with the help of related taxonomic references [68,69,70,71]. Male, female, and copepodites of T. turbinata were counted separately under a dissecting microscope (SMZ1500, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The number of each item was applied to calculate the in situ abundance of individuals per cubic meter (inds. m−3).

2.3. Data Analysis

Spatial and temporal variations of T. turbinata populations were studied by collecting them from different monsoon throughout 4 cruises, and the PAST (Paleontological statistics [72]) software package was used to analyze the abundance and proportion of T. turbinata in each sample. A total of 48 samples were used to calculate similarities before clustering and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analyses. Euclidean distance was used to evaluate the relative similarity of populations between samples. In order to reduce the bias of samples, the functional test for transformation of data was applied prior to conducting a similarity analysis by Box and Cox [73]. The value (λ) was 0.919, therefore, the original abundance data of T. turbinata were using log10 (x + 1) for all samples. The value of sex ratio represents all male individuals divided by females in each sample.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the post hoc Tukey’s Honestly Significance Difference (HSD) test provided differences in population structure among sampling months and sampling zones. Pearson’s correlation analysis estimated the relationship between abundance of copepods and hydrographic parameters. Statistical analysis made use of the statistical software package SPSS v24.

3. Results

3.1. Hydrological Conditions

The salinity profiles showed high variation during the four sampling cruises (Figure 2a–d), which was influenced by both the China Coastal water (CCW) and Kuroshio water (KW) in the study area. The observed salinity curves during the June 2018 and March 2019 cruises were similar to KW (Figure 2a,c). The salinity curves showed a wide variation and were mostly closed to the CCW curve during the September cruise in 2018 (Figure 2b). Most stations showed the salinity curve close to the CCW salinity curve, except station S5 which was weakly affected by the KW during the June cruise in 2019 (Figure 2d).
Figure 2e shows at 5 m depth the correlation between salinity and temperature. The averaged surface seawater temperature (SST) was highest in September 2018 with values 27.87 ± 0.65 °C (mean ± standard deviation). During this cruise, SST varied from 26.39 °C to 28.55 °C, while the average sea surface salinity (SSS) was only 33.53 ± 0.16 PSU which was the lowest of all sampling cruises. During the cruises in June 2018 and June 2019, the average SST was 26.35 ± 0.48 °C and 27.14 ± 0.39 °C and the average SSS was 34.47 ± 0.03 PSU and 33.88 ± 0.10 PSU, respectively. The lowest average SST was 24.14 ± 0.57 °C, recorded during the cruise in March 2019, with the highest average SSS 34.61 ± 0.03 PSU. The SST limit was 23.61 to 25.21 °C in March 2019. The average SST and salinity were significantly different among the four sampling cruises (p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA).

3.2. Variation and Distribution of the Temora turbinata Population

The average abundance of T. turbinata showed a seasonal variation (Figure 3). The highest average abundance was recorded during the June 2018 cruise with 2903.92 ± 3499.47 (inds. m−3). This was followed by the cruise in June 2019 with an average abundance of 1990.64 ± 1401.55 (inds. m−3). The lowest average abundance was 96.35 ± 77.91 (inds. m−3), recorded during the cruise in March 2019. During the September 2018 cruise, the abundance was 174.31 ± 176.05 (inds. m−3), being a little higher than during the cruise in March 2019. Overall, the average abundance was lowered during the northeastern (March) and southwestern-northeastern monsoon transition period (September) compared to the southwestern monsoon period (June).
During the cruise in June 2018, the overall abundance ranged from 109.85 to 12,736.91 (inds. m−3) (Figure 3a). The highest abundance was recorded at station 12 in the northwest of KI. During that cruise, the average abundance of males was 841.03 ± 975.37 (inds. m−3) and that of females was 606.34 ± 394.21 (inds. m−3); the highest average abundance of copepodites was 1751.09 ± 2080.13 (inds. m−3), which was recorded during the cruise in June 2018. SST and salinity were 26.41 °C and 34.43 PSU at this station. The lowest abundance was recorded at station S5, being located in the most eastern area far away from KI. The SST and salinity were 26.82 °C and 34.56 PSU at station S5. The abundance at station S4-1 was 155.71 (inds. m−3), which is near to station S5. The highest SST (27.50 °C) was recorded at station S4-1 during this cruise, where the salinity of the surface waters was 34.48 PSU. Taken together, the horizontal copepod distribution showed that the total abundance of the western inshore area was higher than in the eastern offshore area of KI.
During the cruise in September 2018, the average abundance of males and females was 34.04 ± 48.18 (inds. m−3) and 54.60 ± 75.56 (inds.m−3), and the copepodite average abundance was 76.18 ± 21.99 (inds. m−3). The lowest total abundance was recorded at station S4 (9.80 inds. m−3), which was located at the eastern offshore area with an SST of 28.12 °C. The highest abundance was recorded at station Ex2 (518.16 ind. m−3), near to the east of KI with an SST of 28.07 °C. The abundance center appeared in the region of the southeastern coast of KI and the far eastern offshore area (Figure 3b). This was due to a relatively higher abundance at the offshore station S5 (483.34 inds. m−3), where the SST was 26.39 °C.
A low abundance of the T. turbinata population appeared in March 2019 at station 12 which is located at the northwest of KI and at station S4-1 which is at the eastern offshore area of KI. During the spring cruise, the male average abundance was 27.14 ± 27.49 (inds. m−3) and the female average abundance was 31.89 ± 38.13 (inds. m−3), and the average abundance of copepodite stages was only 37.32 ± 42.11 (inds. m−3). The horizontal distribution showed that the highest abundance (278.35 inds. m−3) of the total T. turbinata population appeared at station 10 east of the KI area with SST 23.65 °C (Figure 3c).
The total abundance ranged from 698.98 to 5721.86 (inds. m−3) during the June 2019 summer cruise. The average abundance of copepodites was 543.27 ± 229.13 (inds. m−3) during the summer cruise in 2019 (Figure 3d). The highest abundance occurred at station Ex1, and was located close to the northeast coast of KI with the highest SST 27.71 °C. The lowest abundance was recorded at the eastern offshore stations S4 and 15 in the south of KI. The SST was 26.84 °C and 26.79 °C at stations S4 and 15, respectively. The horizontal distribution was similar to records during the June 2018 cruise. The population center of T. turbinata was in the east of KI.

3.3. Sex Ratio Differences of Temora turbinata

The sex ratio of T. turbinata demonstrated seasonal variation (Figure 4). Sex ratios were highest at station Ex1 during the cruise in June 2019, whereas the lowest recorded was 0.25 at station Ex1 in samples from March 2019. The one-way ANOVA results revealed that the sex ratio was significantly higher in samples of June 2018 (1.33 ± 0.51) than in September 2018 (0.76 ± 0.32, p = 0.039) and in March 2019 (0.70 ± 0.27, p = 0.044). The mean value for the sex ratio in June 2019 (1.23 ± 0.61) was not significantly different from other samplings (p > 0.05). It is worth noting that the sex ratio of T. turbinata showed a clear conversion phenomenon. In June, the proportion of adult males was relatively high. In contrast, the proportion of adult females was relatively high in September and March (Figure 4).

3.4. Seasonal Population Structure of Temora turbinata

Cluster analysis results based on Euclidean distances are shown in Figure 5a. The cluster analysis results of the samples are mainly divided into two groups. The first group (group A) contains most samples from June 2018, June 2019, and two samples collected in September 2018. The second group (group B) contains most of the samples from September 2018, March 2019, and two samples from cruises in June 2018. The results of the cluster analysis proved that there were clear differences between the T. turbinata populations among seasons (Table 2). From the composition of the two groups, it can clearly be seen that the densities of adult males, adult females and copepodites in the samples of group A were higher than those of group B. A similar result is indicated by the proportion of copepodites in both groups that accounts for a relatively higher proportion of adult males compared to adult females. In contrast, the proportion of adult males in group A (29.72%) is higher than that in group B (20.19%), and the proportion of adult females in group B (26.23%) is higher than that of group A (23.76%). This phenomenon of switching proportions of adult individuals matches with the analysis of sex ratios (Figure 4).
The NMDS data of T. turbinata are shown in Figure 5b. The figure also indicates that the close distribution of T. turbinata having a similar population structure in samples collected in June 2018 and 2019 was apparently different from those collected in September 2018 and March 2019. Compared to the other months, variations in March 2019 were higher. The samples in September 2018 were distributed between the samples in June 2018 and March 2019, which is consistent with the characteristics of the monsoon transition period in September. The dynamic proportion of adult males, adult females, and copepodites in each sampling month indicated a seasonal succession.

3.5. Statistical Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Temora turbinata

Among four sampling cruises, multiple comparisons of mean values for abundance of all adult males and females, as well as the copepodites of T. turbinata, were conducted using ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post hoc test. First, the temporal patterns of total T. turbinata abundances showed variations among sampling cruises (Figure 6). The abundance of all adult T. turbinata was significantly higher in June 2019 (1447.37 ± 1342.86 inds. m−3) than in September 2018 (88.64 ± 123.5 inds. m−3, p = 0.012) and March 2019 (59.03 ± 53.29 inds. m−3, p = 0.01; Figure 6a). Similarly, the abundance of male T. turbinata was significantly higher in June 2019 (841.03 ± 975.37 inds. m−3) than in September 2018 (34.04 ± 48.18 inds. m−3, p = 0.016) and March 2019 (27.14 ± 27.49 inds. m-3, p = 0.015) (Figure 6b). The abundance of female T. turbinata was significantly higher in June 2018 (539.99 ± 752.99 inds. m−3) and June 2019 (606.34 ± 394.21 inds. m−3) than in September 2018 (54.6 ± 75.56 inds. m−3, p < 0.04) and March 2019 (31.89 ± 38.13 inds. m−3, p < 0.03) (Figure 6c). Furthermore, the abundance of copepodites of T. turbinata was significantly higher in June 2018 (1751.09 ± 2080.13 inds. m−3) than in September 2018 (85.67 ± 76.18 inds. m−3, p = 0.002), March 2019 (37.32 ± 42.11 inds. m−3, p = 0.001), and June 2019 (543.27 ± 229.13 inds. m−3, p = 0.034) (Figure 6d). In contrast, the abundance of all adult, male, female, and copepodite of T. turbinata were not significantly different to the location of stations across the three sampling depth zones (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA) (Figure 7). The average abundance of T. turbinata showed no significant differences among the 12 selected stations (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Similarly, there was no significant distribution pattern among sampling stations and depth zone during each sampling cruise (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Abundance of all adult males and females, the copepodites, and the sex ratio (male/female) of T. turbinata were not significantly correlated with salinity and seawater temperature (p > 0.05) (Table 3). The abundance of all adult T. turbinata was significantly positive correlated with sex ratio (r = 0.405, p = 0.009). It is worth noting that there was a significantly positive correlation between the abundance of females and the abundance of copepodites (r = 0.755, p < 0.001), whereas this was not significantly correlated with sex ratio (r = 0.247, p = 0.119) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

4.1. Hydrography off Northeastern Taiwan Waters

In the northwestern Pacific, the seasonal monsoon, impinging eddies, and typhoons affect the Kuroshio Current (KC) and shift its path [74,75]. During the northeast monsoon in winter, the southward cold current (such as the China Coast Current marked with blue arrows in Figure 1) increased and the Kuroshio Current (the pathway was marked with black arrows in Figure 1) shifted closer to the eastern shore of Taiwan, whereas during the southwest monsoon in summer, fall and spring, the KC moved seawards [74,76]. Where the KC encountered the continental shelf of China in the ECS, the I-Lan ridge northeast of Taiwan, its mainstream was forced to turn northeastwards [77]. A small branch of the KC maintained its momentum towards the shelf, mixing the waters of the ECS and the KC, providing a complex oceanographic environment [78,79] which subsequently greatly affected the biota [16,17,55,66,80]. The Kuroshio waters transport tropical and subtropical fauna, and transport neritic fauna towards offshore, this way increasing the diversity of the mesozooplankton assemblage in I-Lan Bay [55,80]. The present study investigated the seasonal distribution and variation of T. turbinata populations in the area around KI, revealing remarkable differences in spatiotemporal variability throughout the developmental cycles of its populations.

4.2. Biology and Ecology of Temora turbinata

Temora turbinata is a warm water epipelagic, neritic species. It can tolerate wide ranges of temperature (5–35 °C) and salinity (20–45 ppt). The ideal temperature and salinity for its culture was 25–28 °C and 30–35 ppt, respectively [81]. It is more frequent and more abundantly recorded in the northern hemisphere compared to the southern hemisphere [82]. Temora turbinata was more dominant at low salinity waters in the Indus Delta of Pakistan [81]. Ara reported that the most dominant Temora stylifera was substituted by T. turbinata along the southern border of São Paulo State [27,83].
Temora turbinata was reported to be associated with the KBC in the Taiwan Strait [3,21,84,85] and was also commonly found around coastal waters of Taiwan [7,20,85,86,87]. Hwang et al. [3] and Dur et al. [88] found that T. turbinata occurred in waters of >28 °C temperature and was considered as a warm-water indicator species in the northwest of Taiwan. Tseng et al. [20] reported about the decadal data of T. turbinata and found that it was an important copepod species, abundant in the southwestern monsoon prevailing period from waters adjacent to nuclear power plants along the northeast coast of Taiwan. In their research, peak of abundance was recorded in summer, indicating a possible temperature effect, and was followed by a second peak in autumn. The lowest record of abundance was 96.35 ± 77.91 (inds. m−3) in spring when the northeastern monsoon prevails. Previous studies confirmed that T. turbinata has strong adaptability and could survive in various environments. Therefore, it represents the most dominant copepod species and is representative of the mesozooplankton in coastal Taiwan waters.
Copepods account for the majority of mesozooplankton abundance in the open seas of the tropics and can comprise 70% or more of the zooplankton community in abundance and about 30% of its biomass [89]. However, copepod populations in the field are dominated by juvenile stages. The abundance of copepodites usually outnumbers those of adults [90]. For example, copepodites account for 27–41% of total zooplankton abundance in the southeastern Baltic Sea [91]. McKinnon and Duggan [90] reported copepodite percentages ranging between 59.77% and 90.82% of the total copepod numbers in Bathurst Island, Indonesia, Darwin Harbour, the Arafura Sea, Kimberley, the Great Barrier Reef, Northwest Cape, and Scott Reef. In this research, the percentage of copepodite limits was 27.29% to 60.30%, which is relatively lower than reported from other areas. The copepodite percentage may be closely related to the differences in life strategies and life spans of different species. For example, T. turbinata spawned about 15–30 eggs per day almost without diapause or dormant eggs. At optimal temperature conditions, about 80% eggs hatched after 15–20 h and it would take about 15 days from the naupliar phase to metamorphose into adults. The life span of the adults was reported to be about 20–25 days [81], while the longevity of A. tonsa, which belongs to the Acartiidae Family, was about (29.31 ± 5.9) to (32.52 ± 6.1) days in laboratory cultures under different salinity conditions [44]. The longevity of T. turbinata was obviously longer than A. tonsa.

4.3. Sex Ratio of Copepods

Unbalanced sex ratios were discovered at the beginning of the 20th century by Sewell [92]. Kiørboe [40] reviewed the sex ratio of 12 copepod families and pointed out that the values varied between 0.15 and 1.1. The general sex ratios were higher and had a wider range of variation in broadcast spawners than in sac spawners (Table 4). Hirst and Kiørboe [93] reported that the sex ratio of Temora longicornis was lowest with 0.75 during February to October in 1947 and the highest number was recorded with 1.63 during March to September in 1993. The sex ratio of Temora stylifera ranged from 0.32 (from September 1971 to August 1973) to 1.27 (during September 1986 to June in 1988). The present study found that T. turbinata and the other two congener species (T. longicornis and T. stylifera) show similar changes in sex ratio.
The sex ratio of pelagic copepods is typically female biased. Species of the copepod families Oithonidae and Paracalanidae were often recorded with extremely female-skewed sex ratios [40,111,112]. Hirst et al. [112] estimated that predation contributed to more than 69% of the field mortality rate in adult males, whereas in adult females it was about 36%. This suggests that the male to female ratio skews in pelagic copepods were primarily caused by differential predation mortality of the sexes in the adult stage [112]. Lack of food can cause female-skewed sex ratios and if females have low physical fitness, this would result in a decrease of population size [113]. In contrast, the low survival rate of males in an environment lacking food leads to a change in sex ratios [114]. A female-biased sex ratio due to the higher mortality of males to females was found during cyanobacteria blooms in an open sea area near to Storfjärden, Baltic Sea [115]. Moreover, a harmful dinoflagellate bloom was reported to decrease the abundance of male copepods [116,117]. Male life span is shortened [38]. Further investigations should be carried out to clearly understand the interaction of sex ratio with the dynamics of populations.

5. Conclusions

The hydrographic environment across our survey area was dominated by the mixing of water masses of the Kuroshio Current with near shore waters. The water masses showed an obvious seasonal successional variation indicating possible temperature effect during our research. The abundance of T. turbinata was mainly linked to hydro-parameters such as seawater temperature. The results confirmed that T. turbinata showed significant seasonal changes as indicated by previous studies in coastal areas of Taiwan. The present study revealed for the first time the in situ sex ratio of T. turbinata in western Pacific waters. Population dynamics are as yet very little studied in the area, and they are worth investigating in more detail in the future. Furthermore, information about food supply, mortality, and high spatiotemportal sampling resolution will be needed to comprehensively understand the population dynamics of T. turbinata in these understudied waters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-G.W., J.-S.H. and C.-G.W.; methodology, Y.-G.W. and L.-C.T.; software, J.-S.H. and B.-P.X.; validation, Y.-G.W., L.-C.T. and R.-X.S.; formal analysis, L.-C.T. and Y.-G.W.; investigation, Y.-G.W. and J.-S.H.; resources, J.-S.H. and X.-Y.C.; data curation, Y.-G.W. and L.-C.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-G.W. and L.-C.T.; writing—review and editing, J.-S.H., C.-G.W., B.-P.X., R.-X.S. and X.-Y.C.; visualization, Y.-G.W., B.-P.X., R.-X.S. and X.-Y.C.; supervision, J.-S.H. and C.-G.W.; project administration, J.-S.H. and X.-Y.C.; funding acquisition, J.-S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful for the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan through grants from MOST 107-2811-M-019-004, MOST 108-2811-M-019-504, MOST 109-2811-M-019-504, and MOST 110-2811-M-019-504 to L.-C.T. The grants MOST 105-2621-M-019-001, MOST 106-2621-M-019-001, MOST 107-2621-M-019-001, MOST 108-2621-M-019-003, MOST 109-2621-M-019-002, and MOST 110-2621-M-019-001, and grants from the Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering through Grant no. 109J13801-51 to J.-S.H. This work was also supported by the Monitoring and Protection of the Seamount Ecosystem in the Western Pacific Ocean (DY135-E2-2-04), Bilateral Cooperation of Maritime Affairs, The Marine Biological Sample Museum Upgrade And Expansion (GASI-01-02-04) and Biological classification system research of the Global climate change and ocean atmosphere interaction research. The authors are grateful to members of J.-S. Hwang’s laboratory for their assistance during the field works during cruises to the waters off northeastern Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the involvement (=sampling) of invertebrates that were not protected nor harmed during sampling.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kiørboe, T. A Mechanistic Approach to Plankton Ecology; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lahnsteiner, F.; Kletzl, M.; Weismann, T. The risk of parasite transfer to juvenile fishes by live copepod food with the example Triaenophorus crassus and Triaenophorus nodulosus. Aquaculture 2009, 295, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hwang, J.-S.; Souissi, S.; Tseng, L.-C.; Seurong, L.; Schmitt, F.G.; Fang, L.-S.; Peng, S.-H.; Wu, C.-W.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Twan, W.-H.; et al. A 5-year study of the influence of the northeast and southwest monsoons on copepod assemblages in the boundary coastal waters between the East China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. J. Plankton Res. 2006, 28, 943–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Campos, C.C.; Garcia, T.M.; Neumann-Leitao, S.; Soares, M.O. Ecological indicators and functional groups of copepod assemblages. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 83, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hwang, J.-S.; Dahms, H.-U.; Tseng, L.-C.; Chen, Q.-C. Intrusions of the Kuroshio Current in the northern South China Sea affects copepod assemblages of the Luzon Strait. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2007, 352, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alcaraz, M.; Calbet, A.; Estrada, M.; Marrasé, C.; Saiz, E.; Trepat, I. Physical control of zooplankton communities in the Catalan Sea. Progr. Oceanogr. 2007, 74, 294–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ka, S.; Hwang, J.-S. Mesozooplankton distribution and composition on the northeastern coast of Taiwan during autumn: Effects of the Kuroshio Current and hydrothermal vents. Zool. Stud. 2011, 50, 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hwang, J.-S.; Wong, C.-K. The China Coastal Current as a driving force for transporting Calanus sinicus (Copepoda: Calanoida) from its population centers to waters off Taiwan and Hong Kong during the winter northeast monsoon period. J. Plankton Res. 2005, 27, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Uriarte, I.; Villate, F. Effects of pollution on zooplankton abundance and distribution in two estuaries of the basque coast (Bay of Biscay). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gismervik, I. Top-down impact by copepods on ciliate numbers and persistence depends on copepod and ciliate species composition. J. Plankton Res. 2006, 28, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Piliai, P.P. Post-naupliar development of the calanoid copepod Temora turbinata (Dana), with remarks on the distribution of species of the genus Temora in the Indian Ocean. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India 1975, 17, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tseng, W.Y. Planktonic copepods from the waters off Tansui (in Chinese, with English abstract). Bull. Taiwan Fish. Res. Inst. 1975, 24, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shih, C.T.; Young, S.S. A checklist of free-living copepods, including those associated with invertebrates, reported from the adjacent seas of Taiwan. Acta Zool. Taiwanica 1995, 6, 65–81. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hsieh, C.H.; Chiu, T.S. Summer spatial distribution of copepods and fish larvae in relation to hydrography in the northern Taiwan Strait. Zool. Stud. 2002, 41, 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsiao, S.-H.; Lee, C.Y.; Shih, C.T.; Hwang, J.-S. Calanoid copepods of the Kuroshio Current east of Taiwan, with notes on the presence of Calanus jashnovi Hulseman, 1994. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 323–331. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lo, W.T.; Hwang, J.S.; Cheng, Q.C. Spatial variations of copepods in the surface waters of the southeastern Taiwan Strait. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 218–228. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hsu, P.K.; Lo, W.T.; Shih, C.T. The coupling of copepod assemblages and hydrography in a eutrophic lagoon in Taiwan: Seasonal and spatial variations. Zool. Stud. 2008, 47, 172–184. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hwang, J.-S.; Souissi, S.; Dahms, H.-U.; Tseng, L.-C.; Schmitt, F.G.; Chen, Q.-C. Rank-abundance allocations as a tool to analyze planktonic copepod assemblages off the Danshuei river estuary (northern Taiwan). Zool. Stud. 2009, 48, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hwang, J.-S.; Kumar, R.; Hsieh, C.-W.; Kuo, A.Y.; Souissi, S.; Hsu, M.-H.; Wu, J.-T.; Liu, W.-C.; Wang, C.-F.; Chen, Q.-C. Patterns of zooplankton distribution along the marine, estuarine and riverine portions of the Danshuei ecosystem in northern Taiwan. Zool. Stud. 2010, 49, 335–352. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tseng, L.-C.; Kumar, R.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Faunal shift between two copepod congeners (Temora discaudata and T. turbinata) in the vicinity of two nuclear power plants in southern East China Sea: Spatiotemporal patterns of population trajectories over a decade. Hydrobiologia 2011, 666, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tseng, L.-C.; Wang, Y.-G.; Lian, G.-S.; Hwang, J.-S. A multi-year investigation of the Temoridae (Copepoda, Calanoida) assemblage succession within the interplay waters of the northern South China Sea. Crustaceana 2020, 93, 519–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hwang, J.-S.; Tu, Y.-Y.; Tseng, L.-C.; Fang, L.-S.; Souissi, S.; Fang, T.-H.; Lo, W.-T.; Twan, W.-H.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Wu, C.-H.; et al. Taxonomic composition and seasonal distribution of copepod assemblages from waters adjacent to nuclear power plant I and II in Northern Taiwan. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2004, 12, 380–391. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jang, M.C.; Shin, K.; Lee, T.; Noh, I. Feeding selectivity of calanoid copepods on phytoplankton in Jangmok Bay, South coast of Korea. Ocean Sci. J. 2010, 45, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anna, E.E.S. Remains of the Protozoan Sticholonche zanclea in the faecal pellets of Paracalanus quasimodo, Parvocalanus crassirostris, Temora stylifer and Temora turbinata (Copepoda, Calanoida) in Brazilian coastal waters. Braz. J. Oceanogr. 2013, 61, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Goswami, S.C.; Padmavati, G. Zooplankton production composition and diversity in the coastal waters of Goa. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 1996, 25, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lopez-Salgado, I.; Suarez-Morales, E. Copepod assemblages in surface waters of the western Gulf of Mexico. Crustaceana 1998, 71, 312–330. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ara, K. Temporal variability and production of Temora turbinata (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the Cananeia Lagoon estuarine system, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Sci. Mar. 2002, 66, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chang, W.B.; Fang, L.S. Temporal and spatial variations in species composition, distribution, and abundance of copepods in Kaohsiung Harbor, Taiwan. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 454–463. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fang, T.-H.; Hwang, J.-S.; Shiao, S.-H.; Chen, H.-Y. Trace metals in seawater and copepods in the ocean outfall area off the northern Taiwan coast. Mar. Environ. Res. 2006, 61, 224–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tseng, L.-C.; Souissi, S.; Dahms, H.-U.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Copepod communities related to water masses in the southwest East China Sea. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2008, 62, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dunbar, F.N.; Webber, M.K. Zooplankton distribution in the eutrophic Kingston Harbour, Jamaica. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2003, 73, 343–359. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lester, K.M.; Heil, C.A.; Neely, M.B.; Spence, D.N.; Murasko, S.; Hopkins, T.L.; Sutton, T.T.; Burghart, S.E.; Bohrer, R.N.; Remsen, A.W.; et al. Zooplankton and Karenia brevis in the Gulf of Mexico. Cont. Shelf Res. 2008, 28, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Turner, J.T. Zooplankton feeding ecology: Contents of fecal pellets of the copepods Temora turbinata and T. stylifera from continental shelf and slope waters near the mouth of the Mississippi River. Mar. Biol. 1984, 82, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, K.H.; Doi, H.; Nishibe, Y.; Nam, G.S.; Nakano, S.I. Feeding behavior of the copepod Temora turbinata: Clearance rate and prey preference on the diatom and microbial food web components in coastal areas. J. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 37, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, C.-H.; Dahms, H.-U.; Buskey, E.J.; Strickler, J.R.; Hwang, J.-S. Behavioral interactions of the copepod Temora turbinata with potential ciliate prey. Zool. Stud. 2010, 49, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bennett, H. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection–A Complete Variorum Edition; Fisher, R.A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; p. 318. [Google Scholar]
  37. Irigoien, X.; Obermüller, B.; Head, R.N.; Harris, R.P.; Rey, C.; Hansen, B.W.; Hygum, B.H.; Heath, M.R.; Durbin, E.G. The effect of food on the determination of sex ratio in Calanus spp.: Evidence from experimental studies and field data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 57, 1752–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Timofeev, S.F. Sex ratios in the population of Thysanoessa raschii (M. Sars, 1864) (Euphausiacea) in the Barents Sea (with some notes on the sex ratios in the order Euphausiacea). Crustaceana 2002, 75, 937–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mauchline, J. The biology of calanoid copepods. Adv. Mar. Biol. 1998, 33, 1–710. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kiørboe, T. Sex, sex-ratios, and the dynamics of pelagic copepod populations. Oecologia 2006, 148, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Volkman-Rocco, B. The effect of delayed fertilization in some species of the genus Tisbe (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Biol. Bull. 1972, 142, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gophen, M. Sex ratio in Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) Populations in lake Kinneret (Israel). Hydrobiologia 1979, 66, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gusmao, L.F.M.; Mckinnon, A.D.; Richardson, A.J. No evidence of predation causing female-biased sex ratios in mating pelagic copepods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 482, 279–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shayegan, M.; Fereidouni, A.E.; Agh, N.; Khalili, K.J. Effects of salinity on egg and fecal pellet production, development and survival, adult sex ratio and total life span in the calanoid copepod, Acartia tonsa: A laboratory study. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2016, 34, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Legrand, J.J.; Legrand-Hamelin, E.; Juchault, P. Sex determination in Crustacea. Biol. Rev. 1987, 62, 439–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Korpelainen, H. Sex ratio and conditions required for environmental sex determination in animals. Biol. Rev. 1990, 65, 147–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kouwenberg, J.H.M. Sex ratio of Calanoid copepods in relation to population composition in the northwestern Mediterranean. Crustaceana 1993, 64, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roff, J.C.; Turner, J.T.; Webber, M.K.; Hopcroft, R.R. Bacterivory by tropical copepod nauplii: Extent and possible significance. Aquat. Microbial Ecol. 1995, 9, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hopcroft, R.R.; Roff, J.C. Zooplankton growth rates: The influence of female size and resources on egg production of tropical marine copepodites. Mar. Biol. 1998, 132, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hopcroft, R.R.; Roff, J.C. Zooplankton growth rates: The influence of size in nauplii of tropical marine copepodites. Mar. Biol. 1998, 132, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chisholm, L.A.; Roff, J.C. Size-weight relationships and biomass of tropical neritic copepods off Kingston, Jamaica. Mar. Biol. 1990, 106, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chisholm, L.A.; Roff, J.C. Abundance, growth rate, and production of tropical neritic copepods off Kingston, Jamaica. Mar. Biol. 1990, 106, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ara, K. Variabilidade Temporal e Produção dos Copépodos no Complexo Estuarino-Lagunar de Cananéia. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ara, K. Length-weight relationships and chemical content of the planktonic copepods in the Cananéia Lagoon estuarine system, São Paulo, Brazil. Plankton Biol. Ecol. 2001, 48, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tseng, L.-C.; Hung, J.-J.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Seasonality of the copepod assemblages associated with interplay waters off northeastern Taiwan. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2013, 67, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Qiu, B.; Lukas, R. Seasonal and interannual variability of the North Equatorial Current, the Mindanao Current and the Kuroshio along the Pacific western boundary. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 12315–12330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qu, T.; Lukas, R. The bifurcation of the North Equatorial Current in the Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2003, 33, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qiu, B.; Chen, S. Interannual-to-decadal variability in the bifurcation of the North Equatorial Current off the Philippines. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2010, 40, 2525–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rudnick, L.D.; Jan, S.; Centurioni, L.; Lee, C.; Lien, R.C.; Wang, J.; Lee, D.K.; Tseng, R.S.; Kim, Y.Y.; Chern, C.S. Seasonal and mesoscale variability of the Kuroshio near its origin. Oceanography 2011, 24, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Wang, F. Spreading and salinity change of North Pacific tropical waters in the Philippine Sea. J. Oceanogr. 2012, 68, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gordon, A.L.; Flament, P.; Villanoy, C.; Centurioni, L. The nascent Kuroshio of Lamon Bay. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2014, 119, 4251–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wu, Y.S. The Impact of Land-Use Change on the Watershed Runoff: Lan-Yang River Catchment as an Example. Ph.D. Thesis, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  63. LC–FRD (Library of Congress–Federal Research Division). Country Profile: Taiwan; Library of Congress–Federal Research Division: Washington, DA, USA, 2005; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dahms, H.-U.; Tseng, L.-C.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Chen, Q.-C.; Kim, B.-R.; Hwang, J.-S. Biodiversity of planktonic copepods in the Lanyang River (northeastern Taiwan), a typical watershed of Oceania. Zool. Stud. 2012, 51, 160–174. [Google Scholar]
  65. Dahms, H.-U.; Tseng, L.-C.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. A model study for an oceania watershed: Spatio-temporal changes of mesozooplankton in riverine and estuarine parts of the Lanyang River in Taiwan. Ecol. Res. 2013, 28, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tseng, L.-C.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Sarkar, S.K.; Bhattacharya, B.D.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Influence of Kuroshio water on the annual copepod community structure in an estuary in the northwest Pacific Ocean. Cont. Shelf Res. 2016, 118, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tseng, L.-C.; Hung, J.-J.; Molinero, J.C.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Indicator species and seasonal succession of planktonic copepod assemblages driven by the interplay of subtropical and temperate waters in the southern East China Sea. Crustaceana 2015, 88, 96–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, Q.-C. Zooplankton of China Seas; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992; Volume 1, pp. 1–87. ISBN 7-03-002599-7. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen, Q.-C.; Zhang, S.-Z. The planktonic copepods of the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. I. Calanoida. Stud. Mar. Sin. 1965, 7, 20–31. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  70. Chihara, M.; Murano, M. An Illustrated Guide to Marine Plankton in Japan; Tokai University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lian, G.-S.; Wang, Y.-G.; Sun, R.X.; Hwang, J.-S. Species Diversity of Marine Planktonic Copepods in China’s Seas; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 2019; p. 868. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  73. Box, G.E.P.; Cox, D.R. Analysis of transformations (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. 1964, 26, 211–246. [Google Scholar]
  74. Sun, X.P. Analysis of the surface path of the Kuroshio in the East China Sea. In Essays on the Investigation of the Kuroshio; Sun, X.P., Ed.; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1987; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  75. Yang, Y.J.; Jan, S.; Chang, M.H.; Wang, J.; Mensah, V.; Kuo, T.H.; Tsai, C.J.; Lee, C.Y.; Andres, M.; Centurioni, L.R. Mean Structure and Fluctuations of the Kuroshio East of Taiwan from In Situ and Remote Observations. Oceanography 2015, 28, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chao, S.Y. Circulation of the East China Sea, a numerical study. J. Oceanogr. 1991, 46, 273–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hsueh, Y.; Chern, C.S.; Wang, J. The intrusion of the Kuroshio across the continental slope northeast of Taiwan. J. Geophys. Res. 1992, 97, 14323–14330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, C.T. As the Kuroshio turns, (I) Characteristics of the current. Acta Oceanogr. Taiwanica 1983, 14, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, C.T.; Pai, S.C. As the Kuroshio turns, (II) The oceanic front north of Taiwan. Acta Oceanogr. Taiwanica 1987, 18, 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  80. Hsieh, H.; Lo, W. Mesoscale distribution and assemblage structure of fish larvae in the Kuroshio waters off eastern Taiwan. Mar. Biodivers. 2019, 49, 1971–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Vinod, S.; Santhosh, B.; Rani, M.G.; Muhammed, A.F.; Aneesh, K.S.; Mijo, V.A.; Unnikrishnan, C. Biological information and culture techniques of Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849). In Culture Techniques of Marine Copepods; ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute: Kochi, India, 2018; pp. 44–51. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sabahat, H.K. Adults and Copepodite Stages of Temora turbinata (Copepoda: Calanoida) from the Indian Ocean. Pakistan J. Zool. 2006, 38, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  83. Muxagata, E.; Gloeden, I.M. Ocorrenacia de Temora turbinata Dana 1849 (Crustacea: Copepoda) no estuãrio da Lagoa dos Patos, RS, Brasil. Nauplius 1995, 3, 163–164. [Google Scholar]
  84. Hsieh, C.H.; Chiu, T.S.; Shih, C.T. Copepod diversity and composition as indicators of the intrusion of the Kuroshio Branch Current into the northern Taiwan Strait in spring 2000. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 393–403. [Google Scholar]
  85. Lan, Y.C.; Shih, C.T.; Lee, M.A.; Shieh, H.Z. Spring distribution of copepods in relation to water masses in the northern Taiwan Strait. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 332–343. [Google Scholar]
  86. Tseng, L.-C.; Kumar, R.; Dahms, H.-U.; Chen, Q.-C.; Hwang, J.-S. Monsoon driven seasonal succession of copepod assemblages in the coastal waters of the northeastern Taiwan Strait. Zool. Stud. 2008, 47, 46–60. [Google Scholar]
  87. Lo, W.-T.; Hwang, J.-S.; Chen, Q.-C. Identity and abundance of surface-dwelling, coastal copepods of southwestern Taiwan. Crustaceana 2001, 74, 1139–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dur, G.; Hwang, J.-S.; Souissi, S.; Tseng, L.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Chen, Q.-C. An overview of the influence of hydrodynamics on the spatial and temporal patterns of calanoid copepod communities around Taiwan. J. Plank. Res. 2007, 29, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Longhurst, A.R. Relationship between diversity and the vertical structure of the upper ocean. Deep Sea Res. 1985, 32, 1535–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McKinnon, A.D.; Duggan, S. Community ecology of pelagic copepods in tropical waters. In Copepods: Diversity, Habitat and Behavior; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 25–49. [Google Scholar]
  91. Polunia, J.J.; Lange, E.K.; Krechik, V.A. Structure and Distribution of Autumn Zooplankton in the Southeastern Baltic Sea in 2015. Oceanology 2019, 59, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sewell, R.B.S. Notes on the surface living Copepoda of the Bay of Bengal I and II. Rec. Indian Mus. 1912, 7, 313–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hirst, A.G.; Kiørboe, T. Mortality of marine planktonic copepods: Global rates and patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 230, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Schnack, S.B. Seasonal change of zooplankton in Kiel Bay III. Calanoid copepods. Kiel. Meeresforsch 1978, 4, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  95. Hirst, A.G.; Sheader, M.; Williams, J.A. Annual pattern of calanoid copepod abundance, prosome length and minor role in pelagic carbon flux in the Solent, UK. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1999, 177, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Marshall, S. On the biology of the small copepods in Loch Striven. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1949, 28, 45–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Digby, P.S.B. The Biology of the Small Planktonic Copepods of Plymouth. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1950, 29, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Mcalice, W.Y.L.J. Seasonal Succession and Breeding Cycles of Three Species of Acartia (Copepoda: Calanoida) in a Marine Estuary. Estuaries 1979, 2, 228–235. [Google Scholar]
  99. Norrbin, M.F. Seasonal Patterns in gonad maturation, sex-ratio and size in some small, high latitude copepods—Implications for overwintering tactics. J. Plankton Res. 1994, 16, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liang, D.; Uye, S.-I. Population dynamics and production of the planktonic copepods in a eutrophic inlet of the Inland Sea of Japan. II. Acartia omorii. Mar. Biol. 1996, 125, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Digby, P.S.B. The biology of the marine planktonic copepods of Scoresby Sound, East Greenland. J. Anim. Ecol. 1954, 23, 298–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gibbons, S.G. Calanus finmarchicus and Other Copepods in Scottish Waters in 1933; Fishery Board for Scotland (Scientific Investigations): Edinburgh, Scotland, 1936; pp. 3–37. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wiborg, K.F. The production of zooplankton in the Oslo Fjord in 1933–1934. Hvalrådets Skr. 1940, 21, 1–87. [Google Scholar]
  104. Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, M. Variability of some morpho-ecological factors in six pelagic copepods from the Aegean Sea. Mar. Biol. 1969, 3, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Moore, E.A.; Sander, F. Physioecology of tropical copepods. II. Sex ratios. Crustaceana 1983, 44, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, M. Sex ratio in the pelagic copepods Temora stylifera Dana and Centropages typicus Krøyer. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1972, 8, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hopkins, C.C.E. The breeding biology of Euchaeta norvegica (Boeck) (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Loch Etive, Scotland: Assessment of breeding intensity in terms of seasonal cycles in the sex ratio, spermatophore attachment, and egg-sac production. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1982, 60, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liang, D.; Uye, S. Population dynamics and production of the planktonic copepods in a eutrophic inlet of the Inland Sea of Japan. III. Paracalanus sp. Mar. Biol. 1996, 127, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Goswami, S.C. Development stages, growth and sex ratio in Pseudodiaptomus binghami Sewell (Copepoda: Calanoida). Ind. J. Mar. Sci. 1978, 7, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  110. Liang, D.; Uye, S. Seasonal reproductive biology of the egg-carrying calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus marinus in a eutrophic inlet of the Inland Sea of Japan. Mar. Biol. 1997, 128, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gusmão, L.F.M.; McKinnon, A.D. Sex ratios, intersexuality and sex change in copepods. J. Plankton Res. 2009, 31, 1101–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hirst, A.G.; Bonnet, D.; Conway, D.V.P.; Kiørboe, T. Does predation control adult sex ratios and longevities in marine pelagic copepods? Limnol. Oceanogr. 2010, 55, 2193–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sellner, K.G.; Olson, M.M.; Kononen, K. Copepod grazing in a summer cyanobacterial bloom in the Gulf of Finland. Hydrobiologia 1994, 292, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Finiguerra, M.B.; Dam, H.G.; Avery, D.E.; Burris, Z. Sex-specific tolerance to starvation in the copepod Acartia tonsa. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2013, 446, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Engström-Öst, J.; Brutemark, A.; Vehmaa, A.; Mothwani, N.H.; Katajisto, T. Consequences of a cyanobacteria bloom for copepod reproduction, mortality and sex ratio. J. Plankton Res. 2015, 37, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Avery, D.E.; Altland, K.K.; Dam, H.G. Sex-related differential mortality of a marine copepod exposed to a toxic dinoflagellate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008, 53, 2627–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Carotenuto, Y.; Ianora, A.; Miralto, A. Maternal and neonate diatom diets impair development and sex differentiation in the copepod Temora stylifera. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2011, 396, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling stations in the area of investigation along the northeastern Taiwan coast.
Figure 1. Sampling stations in the area of investigation along the northeastern Taiwan coast.
Applsci 11 07545 g001
Figure 2. Salinity profile above 50 meters depth recorded at each sampling station. Data referred to 2018 in June (above 30 m depth) (a), September (b); and 2019 in March (c), June (d). The temperature (T) and salinity (S) diagram shows the distribution of averaged values of surface water (above the 10 m depth) of each sampling stations during all cruises (e). Two reference temperature–salinity curves were recorded from cruise OR1 618 between 15 July and 29 July 2001; the blue and red solid lines of T-S curves indicating the CCW (plume of Yangtze River; 30°30′ N 122°52′ E) and KW (Kuroshio water; 25°10′ N 123°10′ E) (adopted from Tseng et al. [30]), respectively.
Figure 2. Salinity profile above 50 meters depth recorded at each sampling station. Data referred to 2018 in June (above 30 m depth) (a), September (b); and 2019 in March (c), June (d). The temperature (T) and salinity (S) diagram shows the distribution of averaged values of surface water (above the 10 m depth) of each sampling stations during all cruises (e). Two reference temperature–salinity curves were recorded from cruise OR1 618 between 15 July and 29 July 2001; the blue and red solid lines of T-S curves indicating the CCW (plume of Yangtze River; 30°30′ N 122°52′ E) and KW (Kuroshio water; 25°10′ N 123°10′ E) (adopted from Tseng et al. [30]), respectively.
Applsci 11 07545 g002
Figure 3. The variation of abundance and composition of Temora turbinata population during each cruise; variation in June (a), September (b) 2018; and March (c), June (d) 2019.
Figure 3. The variation of abundance and composition of Temora turbinata population during each cruise; variation in June (a), September (b) 2018; and March (c), June (d) 2019.
Applsci 11 07545 g003
Figure 4. Male to female ratios of adult Temora turbinata during each cruise. The boundary of the box closest to zero and of the box farthest from zero marks the 25th percentile and the 75th percentile, respectively; a line within the box indicates the median. Whiskers (error bars) above and below the box mark the 90th and 10th percentiles.
Figure 4. Male to female ratios of adult Temora turbinata during each cruise. The boundary of the box closest to zero and of the box farthest from zero marks the 25th percentile and the 75th percentile, respectively; a line within the box indicates the median. Whiskers (error bars) above and below the box mark the 90th and 10th percentiles.
Applsci 11 07545 g004
Figure 5. Clustering dendrogram of different Temora turbinata samples using Euclidean distances and clustering strategy of flexible links in the area off Northeastern Taiwan (a), and nonmetric multidimensional scaling of all samples (b).
Figure 5. Clustering dendrogram of different Temora turbinata samples using Euclidean distances and clustering strategy of flexible links in the area off Northeastern Taiwan (a), and nonmetric multidimensional scaling of all samples (b).
Applsci 11 07545 g005
Figure 6. The abundance of all adults (a), males (b), females (c), and copepodites (d) of Temora turbinata throughout four samplings from June 2018 to June 2019 by using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. Significant differences are indicated by different superscripts (p < 0.05) among the sampling months in the waters off Northeast Taiwan.
Figure 6. The abundance of all adults (a), males (b), females (c), and copepodites (d) of Temora turbinata throughout four samplings from June 2018 to June 2019 by using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. Significant differences are indicated by different superscripts (p < 0.05) among the sampling months in the waters off Northeast Taiwan.
Applsci 11 07545 g006
Figure 7. The abundance of all adults (a), males (b), females (c), and copepodites (d) of Temora turbinata among three seabed-depth zones from June 2018 to June 2019.
Figure 7. The abundance of all adults (a), males (b), females (c), and copepodites (d) of Temora turbinata among three seabed-depth zones from June 2018 to June 2019.
Applsci 11 07545 g007
Table 1. Location and depth of sampling stations in waters off northeastern Taiwan, SZ = shallow depth zone (<200 m), MZ = middle depth zone (200–400 m), DZ = deep depth zone (>400 m).
Table 1. Location and depth of sampling stations in waters off northeastern Taiwan, SZ = shallow depth zone (<200 m), MZ = middle depth zone (200–400 m), DZ = deep depth zone (>400 m).
StationLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Seabed DepthGrouping
St 124°53.42′122°01.17′454DZ
St 1024°50.46′121°59.40′210MZ
St 1224°52.33′121°55.90′130SZ
St 1524°48.01′121°56.45′273MZ
St Ex124°50.57′121°58.02′123SZ
St Ex224°49.81′121°57.75′156SZ
St S124°50.06′121°54.92′167SZ
St S224°49.67′121°57.16′57SZ
St S324°49.93′122°00.25′288MZ
St S424°50.10′122°04.08′674DZ
St S4-124°50.09′122°09.64′536DZ
St S524°50.06′122°13.25′878DZ
Table 2. Composition of grouping results by cluster analysis, where numbers show abundance (inds. m−3, mean ± SD) and their proportion (%) in parentheses.
Table 2. Composition of grouping results by cluster analysis, where numbers show abundance (inds. m−3, mean ± SD) and their proportion (%) in parentheses.
Cluster GroupingGroup AGroup B
Adult male736.4 ± 876.08 (29.72%)23.05 ± 22.33 (20.19%)
Adult female588.81 ± 575.61 (23.76%)30.11 ± 32.87 (26.37%)
Copepodite1152.73 ± 1569.72 (46.52%)61.03 ± 50.65 (53.45%)
Table 3. Correlation results of all adult abundance (individuals m−3), male abundance, female abundance, copepodite abundance, and sex ratio (male/female) according to Pearson’s correlation analysis. The value represents the correlation (r), and the value in parentheses represents p.
Table 3. Correlation results of all adult abundance (individuals m−3), male abundance, female abundance, copepodite abundance, and sex ratio (male/female) according to Pearson’s correlation analysis. The value represents the correlation (r), and the value in parentheses represents p.
All Adult AbundanceMale AbundanceFemale AbundanceCopepodite AbundanceSex Ratio
Salinity−0.014
(0.923)
−0.027
(0.854)
0.005
(0.972)
0.197
(0.180)
0.106
(0.511)
Temperature0.175
(0.233)
0.181
(0.219)
0.157
(0.286)
0.025
(0.866)
0.194
(0.223)
All adult abundance 0.983 **
(<0.001)
0.964 **
(<0.001)
0.661 **
(<0.001)
0.405 **
(0.009)
Male
abundance
0.899 **
(<0.001)
0.569 **
(<0.001)
0.496 **
(0.001)
Female
abundance
0.755 **
(<0.001)
0.247
(0.119)
Copepodite abundance 0.196
(0.218)
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 4. Field adult sex ratio of planktonic copepods (adopted from Hirst and Kiørboe [93]).
Table 4. Field adult sex ratio of planktonic copepods (adopted from Hirst and Kiørboe [93]).
SpeciesSex RatiosPeriodLocationReferences
Family Acartiidae
Acartia bifilosa0.59January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
A. bifilosa0.35January–December/1993Southampton Water, UKHirst et al. [95]
Acartia clausi0.72April–December/1993Southampton Water, UKHirst et al. [95]
A. clausi0.2September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
A. clausi0September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
A. clausi0.75January–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
A. clausi0.56January–November/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
A. clausi0.75November/1971–December/1972Damariscotta River estuary, USALee and McAlice [98]
Acartia discaudata0.89March–December/1993Southampton Water, UKHirst et al. [95]
A. discaudata0.45January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
Acartia longiremis0.67January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
A. longiremis0.18October/1985–October/1986Balsfjorden, NorwayNorrbin [99]
A. longiremis0.39November/1971–December/1972Damariscotta River estuary, USALee and McAlice [98]
Acartia omori0.79November/1986–July/1987Fukuyama Harbor, Inland Sea of JapanLiang and Uye [100]
Acartia tonsa0.39January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
A. tonsa1.44November/1971–December/1972Damariscotta River estuary, USALee and McAlice [98]
Family Calanidae
Calanus finmarchicus0August/1950–August/1961Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
C. finmarchicus0.23February–August/1933Scottish WatersGibbons [102]
Calanus finmarchicus0.25June/1933–May/1934Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
C. helgolandicus0.18September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
C. helgolandicus0.08September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
C. helgolandicus0.043 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
Calanus minor0.283 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
Calanus tenuicornis0.013 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
Undinula vulgaris0.33September/1971–August/1973St Vincents, BarbadosMoore and Sander [105]
Family Candaciidae
Candacia armata0.39September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
C. armata0.75September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
Family Centropagidae
Centropages hamatus1.78March–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
C. hamatus1.04January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
C. hamatus0.37March–December/1993Southampton Water, UKHirst et al. [95]
C. hamatus1.13June/1933–May/1934Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
Centropages typicus0.81September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
C. typicus0.79September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
C. typicus0.85January–October/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
C. typicus0.723 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
C. typicus0.72February/1965–December/1965North Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [106]
Centropages violaceus0.593 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
Family Clausocalanidae
Clausocalanus spp.0.15September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
Clausocalanus spp.0.18September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
Microcalanus pygmaeus1.4January–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
M. pygmaeus0.03August/1950–August/1951Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
M. pygmaeus0.25June/1933–May/1934Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
Pseudocalanus acuspes0.43October/1985–October/1986Balsfjorden, NorwayNorrbin [99]
Pseudocalanus elongatus0.27January–December/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
P. minutus0.28January–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
P. minutus0.03August/1950–August/1951Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
P. minutus0.25June/1933–May/1934Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
Pseudocalanus sp.0.39January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
Family Euchaetidae
Euchaeta marina/acuta0.22September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
E. marina/acuta0.19September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
Euchaeta norvegica0.12September/1971–April/1972Loch Etive, ScotlandHopkins [107]
Family Metridiidae
Metridia longa0August/1950–September/1950Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
M. longa0.54June/1933–August/1938Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
Pleuromamma gracilis0.52September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
P. gracilis0.41September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
Family Oithonidae
Oithona nana0.27August–December/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
Oithona similis0.18January–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
O. similis0.18January–December/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
O. similis0.06August/1950–August/1951Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
Family Oncaeidae
Oncaea borealis0.45August/1950–August/1951Scoresby Sound, East GreenlandDigby [101]
O. borealis0.32June/1933–May/1934Oslo Fjord, NorwayWiborg [103]
Oncaea mediterranea0.75September/1971–August/1973St Vincents, BarbadosMoore and Sander [105]
Family Paracalanidae
Paracalanus parvus0.15September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
P. parvus0.1September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
P. parvus0.15July–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
P. parvus0.18August/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
P. parvus0.1January–December/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
Paracalanus sp.0.45November/1986–October/1987Fukuyama Harbor, Inland Sea of JapanLiang and Uye [108]
Family Pseudodiaptomidae
Pseudodiaptomus binghami0.22June–September of 1971–1973Mandovi Estuary, IndiaGoswami [109]
P. binghami0.22June–September of 1971–1973Zuari Estuary, IndiaGoswami [109]
P. binghami0.2June–September of 1971–1973Cumbarjua Canal, IndiaGoswami [109]
Pseudodiaptomus marinus0.64November/1986–November/1987Fukuyama Harbor, Inland Sea of JapanLiang and Uye [110]
Family Temoridae
Temora longicornis1.08March–October/1933Loch Striven, ScotlandMarshall [96]
T. longicornis0.75February–October/1947Plymouth Area, English ChannelDigby [97]
T. longicornis1.04January/1970–October/1971Kiel Bay, BalticSchnack [94]
T. longicornis1.63March–September/1993Southampton Water, UKHirst et al. [95]
Temora stylifera1.27September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
T. stylifera0.85September/1986–June/1988Golfe du Lion, MediterraneanKouwenberg [47]
T. stylifera0.753 seasonsNorth Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [104]
T. stylifera0.75February/1965–December/1965North Aegean SeaMoraitou-Apostolopoulou [106]
T. stylifera0.32September/1971–August/1973St Vincents, BarbadosMoore and Sander [105]
Temora turbinata1.13June/2018Kueishan IslandPresent study
T. turbinata0.62September/2018Kueishan IslandPresent study
T. turbinata0.85March/2019Kueishan IslandPresent study
T. turbinata1.39June/2019Kueishan IslandPresent study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.-G.; Tseng, L.-C.; Xing, B.-P.; Sun, R.-X.; Chen, X.-Y.; Wang, C.-G.; Hwang, J.-S. Seasonal Population Structure of the Copepod Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) in the Kuroshio Current Edge, Southeastern East China Sea. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7545. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167545

AMA Style

Wang Y-G, Tseng L-C, Xing B-P, Sun R-X, Chen X-Y, Wang C-G, Hwang J-S. Seasonal Population Structure of the Copepod Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) in the Kuroshio Current Edge, Southeastern East China Sea. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(16):7545. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yan-Guo, Li-Chun Tseng, Bing-Peng Xing, Rou-Xin Sun, Xiao-Yin Chen, Chun-Guang Wang, and Jiang-Shiou Hwang. 2021. "Seasonal Population Structure of the Copepod Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) in the Kuroshio Current Edge, Southeastern East China Sea" Applied Sciences 11, no. 16: 7545. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167545

APA Style

Wang, Y. -G., Tseng, L. -C., Xing, B. -P., Sun, R. -X., Chen, X. -Y., Wang, C. -G., & Hwang, J. -S. (2021). Seasonal Population Structure of the Copepod Temora turbinata (Dana, 1849) in the Kuroshio Current Edge, Southeastern East China Sea. Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7545. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop