Next Article in Journal
Algorithmic Music for Therapy: Effectiveness and Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Localized Surface Plasmon Fields Manipulation on Nanostructures Using Wavelength Shifting
Previous Article in Journal
HMD-Based VR Tool for Traffic Psychological Examination: Conceptualization and Design Proposition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Desulfurization Capacity with Cu-Based Macro-Porous Sorbents for Hydrogen Production by Gasification of Petroleum Cokes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Shot Peening on the Evolution of Scale on T91 Steel Exposed to Steam

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Korea
2
KEPCO Research Institute, Korea Electric Power Corporation, Munji-ro, Yusung-Gu, Daejeon 34056, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(19), 8831; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198831
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano Korea 2021)

Abstract

:
Shot peening can be an effective solution for the prevention or retardation of scale formation, and subsequent exfoliation, upon exposure of the inner tube to steam in coal-fired power plants. In this study, specimens of T91 tubes were shot peened and then exposed to 1-bar steam for 100–1000 h at 650 °C, and were then analyzed using Vickers hardness test and microscopic techniques OM, SEM, TEM, etc. The analysis indicates that the oxide scales are typically Fe2O3 on the topmost layer, Fe3O4 below, and a FeCr2O4 spinel on the bottom in both shot peening treated and untreated specimens. However, the oxide scale thicknesses of shot peened specimens are thinner, indicating that shot peened specimens have better oxidation resistance. In addition, numerous defects, such as voids and micro-cracks, were found in the untreated specimens, which are believed to cause exfoliation of the uppermost Fe2O3 layers of the specimens exposed to steam for 800 and 1000 h. By contrast, the shot peened specimens maintained a dense contact oxide scale with fewer defects.

1. Introduction

Owing to their microstructural stability, high temperature strength, and oxidation resistance, 9Cr-1Mo ferritic-martensitic (F-M) steels are universally found in high temperature applications in fossil fuel power plants. During exposure to high temperature steam environments, oxidation is an unavoidable problem for boiler tubes, such as found in superheaters and reheaters [1,2].
The oxidation behavior of F-M steels has been investigated by several groups [3,4,5], and are dependent on various factors, including temperature, atmosphere, and oxygen concentration. Tan et al. [6] reported that the oxide scale with a three-layer microstructure composed of Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and (Fe, Cr)3O4 formed on T91 steel in an (Ar + H2O) atmosphere at 600–700 °C. The difference in the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) of Fe2O3 (12.5 × 10−6 K−1 at 100–1200 °C) and Fe3O4 (18.8 × 10−6 K−1 at 300–800 °C) result in partial exfoliation of outer Fe2O3 layer. The studies by Chen et al. [5] indicated that the oxide scales of T91 steel exhibited higher thickness, higher interconnected porosity, and weak adhesion to metal matrix for high oxygen concentration exposure. According to Wagner’s theory of oxidation [7], the oxidation rate depends highly on the diffusion of the ions across the oxide scale during the steady state of oxidation.
Shot peening is a widely used method to cause plastic deformation at the surface, resulting in high-density dislocations and refined grains [8]. Shot peening improves oxidation resistance due to the increased number of pathways for Cr to diffuse to the surface to form a Cr-rich protective layer. An inner Cr-rich protective layer of Cr2O3 and FeCr2O4 has been observed in both P92 and SS304H steel [9,10,11]. Similar results were also reported by J. Kurley and B. Pint [12]: a protective Cr- and Mn-rich oxide layer improved the steam oxidation resistance, forming a thinner oxide scale, and showing less mass change of 304H at 550–625 °C. However, this benefit began to break down after ~5000 h exposure at 650 °C.
Thus, an investigation of the formation and evolution of oxide scales in the early stage of steam oxidation is called for. In this study, we characterize the features of oxidation behavior of T91 steel after short-term steam exposures of 100–1000 h.

2. Materials and Methods

T91 boiler tube steels were purchased from “ILJIN Steel” with outer diameter of 50.8 mm and wall thickness of 6.5 mm. The as-received tubes were cut into 15 × 10 × 2 mm3 pieces and mechanically polished to #2000 grit-finish before ultrasonic shot peening (SP) and subsequent steam exposure. Steam was generated by heating distilled water to ~ 650 °C; it was then blown across the sample surface for 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 h. further details of the steam exposure are available in reference [10]. The shot peening conditions and specimen list are presented in Table 1.
The chemical composition of the T91 tubes was measured by optical emission spectrometry (OES, mode ARL-3460), and is given in Table 2. The morphology, elemental distribution, and phase distribution of the oxidation scale were determined by SEM (JSM-6510, equipped with INCA EDS, operated at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV), FE-SEM (EBSD, TESCAN MIRA II LMH equipped with TSL OIM components with the depth beam scan mode), XRD (Rigaku SmartLab, operated at a tube voltage and current of 45 kV and 200 mA), and TEM (Philip CM200-FEG, operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV). Specimens for SEM/EBSD analysis were prepared by mechanical polishing with #2000 grit and subsequent final polishing with a 0.05 μm colloidal silica suspension for 1 h. Specimens for TEM observation were prepared by Struers TenuPol-5 twin jet polishing system. The microhardness was measured by a Vickers hardness tester (Future-Tech Model FM-7E) on the polished cross section with 1 μm metallographic polishing cloth. Then the hardness of each depth was tested for five times on the load of 200 gf.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Shot Peening on Microstructure PRIOR to Steam Exposure

The equiaxed grain and uniformly distributed M23C6 precipitates were observed in the original T91 specimen, as shown in Figure 1. Shot peening causes plastic deformation near the surface, hence it changes the microstructure and surface properties. Microstructural investigation of untreated and SP-treated specimens was performed by SEM and EBSD. Figure 2 shows the effect of shot peening on the surface microstructure. The original equiaxed grains in the untreated specimens are ~10 µm, as shown Figure 2a. The presence of smaller grains near the shot peened surface and a gradual increase in the grain size towards the core of the materials validates the grain refinement effect of the shot peening, which is shown in Figure 2c, where the grain size near the shot peened surface is ~3 µm. The refinement of the grains is likely to improve the hardness according to the Hall–Petch relationship. To characterize the surface hardening effect of the shot peening, the Vickers hardness was measured. The Vickers hardness of the topmost surface was ~250 HV, decreasing to the original value of ~216 HV with increasing depth as shown in Figure 3. During plastic deformation in shot peening, precipitates might also be refined, resulting in an increase in number density as reported for M23C6 [8].

3.2. Characteristics of the Oxidation Scale

Figure 4 shows cross-sectional EBSD micrographs of untreated and shot peened specimens after steam exposure at 650 °C for 200 h. The phase identification revealed that the oxides are Fe2O3 in the top layer, followed by Fe3O4 layer and then a Fe-Cr-O spinel layer, which agrees with the oxidation scale structure reported by Chen et al. [5].
Figure 5 shows cross-sectional SEM micrographs of the untreated (a1–a4) and SP-treated (b1–b4) specimens after steam exposure at 650 °C for 100, 600, 800, and 1000 h. After steam exposure, the thickness of the scale formed on the untreated specimens increased rapidly with oxidation time. In contrast, the oxidation scale formed on the shot peened specimens was relatively stable and grew only slowly with increasing oxidation durations. In addition, numerous defects, such as voids and micro-cracks, formed between the Fe2O3 and the Fe3O4 layer in the untreated specimens, as shown in Figure 5(a1–a4). With a further increase of exposure time to 800 h, exfoliation of the outer layer and breakage of the inner layer were observed in the untreated specimens as shown in Figure 5(a3). However, the shot peened specimens maintained a compact scale, with fewer defects during the entire steam exposure, Figure 5(b1–b4). The diffusion of iron beyond these defects is greatly retarded and thought to be the main reason for the separation of the outer layer. The process of the exfoliation of the outer layer progress is as Nishimura proposed [13].

4. Discussion

4.1. Evolution of Oxidation Scale

Figure 6 shows a plot of the oxidation scale thickness in Table 3 as a function of oxidation duration. The abrupt decrease in the scale thickness of the untreated specimens at 800 and 1000 h are believed to be due to the exfoliation of the outer layer, as shown in Figure 5(a3,a4). In agreement with previous observations [14,15,16,17], parabolic oxidations kinetics were observed for both untreated and shot peened specimens. As can be seen in Figure 6, the experimental data points can be fit by a parabolic curve, represented by the following equation:
d2 = kp × t,
where d is the total scale thickness, kp is the parabolic rate constant, and t is the oxidation time. The values of kp of untreated and shot peened specimens derived from best fits to the curve are 3 × 10−7 and 1.5 × 10−7 mm2/min, respectively. It can be said that the growth rate of oxidation scale of shot peened specimens is much slower than that of untreated specimens at 650 °C steam exposure.

4.2. Effect of Shot Peening

Shot peening refines strain-induced grains, leading to a fine grain with a large fraction of grain boundaries on the peened surface. The fraction of low-angle grain boundaries in the surface area increased from 35.6% in the untreated specimen to 49.9% in the shot peened specimen calculated from Figure 2b,d. The grain size and grain boundaries determine the diffusion rates of elements during the formation of protective oxide layer. The effective diffusivity (Deff) of preferential nucleating elements is the sum of the lattice diffusivity (Dl) and the diffusivity of the grain boundary (DGB), as proposed by Peng [18],
Deff = (1 − f) × Dl + f × DGB,
where f is the area proportion of the grain boundary. Assuming the grains are cubic, f = 2δ/d (δ is the GB width and d the grain size). Considering that DGB ≫ Dl, Equation (2) can be simplified as
Deff = Dl + 2δ/d × DGB,
Thus, the effective diffusivity of Cr noticeably increases with decreasing grain size induced by shot peening through grain boundary diffusion.
Figure 7 shows cross-sectional SEM micrographs of untreated and shot peened specimens after 100 and 600 h steam exposure. Figure 8 shows cross-sectional EDS mapping micrographs of shot peened specimens after 600 h steam exposure. There is no Cr-depleted zone apparent at the oxide-metal interface of the untreated specimen during the early stage of oxidation (100 h), which is totally different in the shot peened specimen. There, a Cr-depleted zone forms due to outward diffusion of Cr to form a Cr-rich protective layer by decomposition of precipitate M23C6. This means, shot peening induced plenty of grain boundaries to provide more pathways for the outward diffusion of Cr.

5. Conclusions

In this work, the effects of shot peening on preventing the oxidation scale formed on T91 upon steam exposure were investigated. We reach the following conclusions:
  • Grain refinement occurs on the top surface of the 10-min shot peened specimen, for which the grain size is ~3 µm, compared to the original grain size of ~10 µm.
  • After 100–600 h steam exposure at 650 °C, oxide scales formed on T91 specimens were identified as: an uppermost Fe2O3 layer, an Fe3O4 layer below, and an FeCr2O4 spinel layer. The total scale thickness of the SP and untreated specimens as measured at various steam exposure durations follows parabolic oxidation kinetics. Untreated specimens exhibit much larger scale thickness and faster scale growth rate than SP-treated specimens, indicating that shot peening improves oxidation resistance.
  • After steam exposure for 800–1000 h at 650 °C, numerous voids and micro-cracks form between the Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 layers in the untreated specimens, resulting in partial exfoliation of the uppermost Fe2O3 layer. In contrast, the SP-treated specimens retain dense and compact oxidation scale with few voids or micro-cracks.
  • A Cr-depleted zone forms at the oxide-metal interface in the SP-treated specimen after 100 h steam exposure, in which decomposition of M23C6 precipitate is observed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H. and L.X.; methodology, L.X. and Y.H.; validation, Y.H., Y.K. and K.S.; formal analysis, L.X.; investigation, L.X.; resources, Y.K. and Y.H.; data curation, L.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; writing—review and editing, K.S.; visualization, L.X.; supervision, K.S.; project administration, Y.K. and Y.H.; funding acquisition, Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (no. 20161110100090). This work was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (no. 2018R1A5A6075959).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fry, A.; Osgerby, S.; Wright, M. Oxidation of alloys in steam environments: A review. In NPL Report MATC; National Physical Laboratory: London, UK, 2002; Volume 90, pp. 45–89. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shingledecker, J.P.; Pint, B.A.; Fry, A.T.; Wright, I.G. Managing Steam-Side Oxidation and Exfoliation in USC Boiler Tubes. Adv. Mater. Process. 2013, 171, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Laverde, D.; Gomez-Acebo, T.; Castro, F. Continuous and cyclic oxidation of T91 ferritic steel under steam. Corros. Sci. 2004, 46, 613–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, G.; Wang, C.; Yu, F.; Tian, J. Evolution of oxide film of T91 steel in water vapor atmosphere at 750°C. Oxid. Met. 2014, 81, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Sridharan, K.; Todd, A. Corrosion behavior of ferritic–martensitic steel T91 in supercritical water. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 2843–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, D.; Xu, J.; Zhao, G.; Guan, Y.; Li, M. Oxidation characteristic of ferritic–martensitic steel T91 in water–vapor atmosphere. Chin. J. Mater. Res. 2009, 22, 599–605. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atkinson, A. Wagner theory and short circuit diffusion. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1988, 4, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, Y.; Yang, C.W.; Lee, J.H.; Shin, K. Study of the Microstructural Evolution of Tempered Martensite Ferritic Steel T91 upon Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification. Appl. Microsc. 2015, 45, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Li, K.; Ma, H.; He, Y.; Chang, J.; Bae, S.Y.; Shin, K. Microstructural evolution and oxidation resistance of T92 boiler tube steel upon long-term supercritical steam test. Fusion Eng. Des. 2017, 125, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, H.; He, Y.; Bae, S.Y.; Shin, K. Effect of shot peening on oxidation behavior of SS304H upon long term steam exposure. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 6167–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Naraparaju, R.; Christ, H.J.; Renner, F.U.; Kostka, A. Effect of shot-peening on the oxidation behaviour of boiler steels. Oxid. Met. 2011, 76, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kurley, J.M.; Pint, B.A. The Effect of Shot Peening on Steam Oxidation of 304H Stainless Steel. Oxid. Met. 2020, 93, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nishimura, N.; Komai, N.; Hirayama, Y.; Masuyama, F. Japanese experience with steam oxidation of advanced heat-resistant steel tubes in power boilers. Mater. High Temp. 2005, 22, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Downey, B.J.; Bermel, J.C.; Zimmer, P.J. Kinetics of the nickel–chlorine reaction at temperatures between 350 and 600 °C. Corrosion 1969, 25, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arıztegui, A.; Gomez-Acebo, T.; Castro, F. Steam oxidation of ferritic steels: Kinetics and microstructure. Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. Vidr. 2000, 39, 305. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khanna, A.S.; Rodriguez, P.; Gananamoorthy, J.B. Oxidation kinetics, breakaway oxidation, and inversion phenomenon in 9Cr–1Mo steels. Oxid. Met. 1986, 26, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vossen, J.P.T.; Gawenda, P.; Rahts, K.; Schorr, M.; Schutze, M. Limits of the oxidation resistance of several heat-resistant steels under isothermal and cyclic oxidation as well as under creep in air at 650°C. Mater. High Temp. 1997, 14, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, X.; Yan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, F. Effect of grain refinement on the resistance of 304 stainless steel to breakaway oxidation in wet air. Acta Mater. 2005, 53, 5079–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microstructure of the T91 specimens: (a) SEM and (b) TEM with corresponding SADP of S1, and (c) EDS results of S1 before shot peening.
Figure 1. Microstructure of the T91 specimens: (a) SEM and (b) TEM with corresponding SADP of S1, and (c) EDS results of S1 before shot peening.
Applsci 11 08831 g001
Figure 2. Surface microstructure of the specimens before steam oxidation: (a,b) SEM and EBSD IPF with orientation map of the untreated specimen, (c,d) SEM and EBSD IPF with orientation map of the shot peened specimen.
Figure 2. Surface microstructure of the specimens before steam oxidation: (a,b) SEM and EBSD IPF with orientation map of the untreated specimen, (c,d) SEM and EBSD IPF with orientation map of the shot peened specimen.
Applsci 11 08831 g002
Figure 3. Microhardness of T91 untreated (black squares) and shot peened (red triangles) specimens.
Figure 3. Microhardness of T91 untreated (black squares) and shot peened (red triangles) specimens.
Applsci 11 08831 g003
Figure 4. EBSD results of the oxidation scale of T91 test: (a) IQ map, (b) IPF with orientation map, (c) phase map of untreated specimens after 200 h steam exposure, (d) IQ map, (e) IPF with orientation map, and (f) phase map of SP-treated specimens after 200 h steam exposure.
Figure 4. EBSD results of the oxidation scale of T91 test: (a) IQ map, (b) IPF with orientation map, (c) phase map of untreated specimens after 200 h steam exposure, (d) IQ map, (e) IPF with orientation map, and (f) phase map of SP-treated specimens after 200 h steam exposure.
Applsci 11 08831 g004aApplsci 11 08831 g004b
Figure 5. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxide scale after steam exposure of for various durations: (a1a4) for untreated and (b1b4) for shot peened specimens.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxide scale after steam exposure of for various durations: (a1a4) for untreated and (b1b4) for shot peened specimens.
Applsci 11 08831 g005
Figure 6. Oxidation scale thickness as a function of exposure time: (a) total layer, (b) outer Fe-oxide (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) layer, and (c) inner (Fe-Cr-O spinel) layer.
Figure 6. Oxidation scale thickness as a function of exposure time: (a) total layer, (b) outer Fe-oxide (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) layer, and (c) inner (Fe-Cr-O spinel) layer.
Applsci 11 08831 g006
Figure 7. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxidation scale: (a) untreated 100 h, (b) untreated 600 h, (c) SP 100 h, and (d) SP 600 h.
Figure 7. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxidation scale: (a) untreated 100 h, (b) untreated 600 h, (c) SP 100 h, and (d) SP 600 h.
Applsci 11 08831 g007
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxidation scale of SP-treated specimen after 600 h steam exposure.
Figure 8. Cross-sectional SEM images of oxidation scale of SP-treated specimen after 600 h steam exposure.
Applsci 11 08831 g008
Table 1. Shot peening and steam exposure conditions of T91 specimens.
Table 1. Shot peening and steam exposure conditions of T91 specimens.
Shot Peening
Treatment
Ball SizeAmplitudeFrequencyDuration
2.0 mm50 μm20 kHz10 min
Steam exposure
durations
Test durations
100 h200 h400 h600 h800 h1000 h
Table 2. Nominal and measured chemical composition (wt. %) of the T91.
Table 2. Nominal and measured chemical composition (wt. %) of the T91.
ElementsCSiMnPSNiCrMoNAlNbVFe
* T91
standard
0.07~0.140.20~0.500.30~0.60≤0.020≤0.010≤0.408.00~9.500.85~1.050.03~0.07≤0.020.06~0.100.18~0.25Bal.
** OES
measured
0.090.330.37--0.148.660.89--0.070.22Bal.
* T91 = ASTM-A213, ** OES: optical emission spectrometry.
Table 3. Oxidation scale layer thickness of untreated and shot peened T91 specimens after steam exposures of various durations (Fe-oxide refers to Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 combined).
Table 3. Oxidation scale layer thickness of untreated and shot peened T91 specimens after steam exposures of various durations (Fe-oxide refers to Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 combined).
Exposure Time
(h)
Total Scale
Thickness (μm)
Fe-Cr-O Layer
Thickness (μm)
Fe-Oxide Layer
Thickness (μm)
UntreatedSPUntreatedSPUntreatedSP
10063.0 ± 2.349.0 ± 2.528.0 ± 1.018.4 ± 1.835.8 ± 1.330.6 ± 1.2
20072.8 ± 1.664.4 ± 0.930.5 ± 0.828.6 ± 1.242.3 ± 1.335.8 ± 1.3
40079.0 ± 3.067.4 ± 4.032.3 ± 0.931.1 ± 0.846.7 ± 2.136.3 ± 1.0
600102.1 ± 2.967.9 ± 0.935.0 ± 1.230.6 ± 1.067.1 ± 2.337.3 ± 1.6
80057.4 ± 1.1
(left over)
68.9 ± 2.131.6 ± 0.830.3 ± 1.225.8 ± 5.438.6 ± 1.9
100067.2 ± 5.8
(left over)
70.1 ± 2.433.8 ± 1.331.1 ± 0.933.4 ± 5.639.0 ± 1.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; He, Y.; Kang, Y.; Shin, K. Effect of Shot Peening on the Evolution of Scale on T91 Steel Exposed to Steam. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8831. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198831

AMA Style

Xu L, He Y, Kang Y, Shin K. Effect of Shot Peening on the Evolution of Scale on T91 Steel Exposed to Steam. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(19):8831. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Liming, Yinsheng He, Yeonkwan Kang, and Keesam Shin. 2021. "Effect of Shot Peening on the Evolution of Scale on T91 Steel Exposed to Steam" Applied Sciences 11, no. 19: 8831. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198831

APA Style

Xu, L., He, Y., Kang, Y., & Shin, K. (2021). Effect of Shot Peening on the Evolution of Scale on T91 Steel Exposed to Steam. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 8831. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop