Next Article in Journal
Sensitivity Criterion and Law on a Navigation Receiver under Single Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of Rockfill Materials Based on Fractal Theory
Previous Article in Journal
A Multi-Component Physiotherapeutic Intervention among Schoolchildren with Myopia: 3D-Based Vision Training Program with Auditory Frequency Entrainment and Electrical Stimulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Structural Behavior and Fatigue Performance of a KR-Type Rail Clip
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/app12010202
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Design Problem in the Formulation of a Special Moment Resisting Connection Device for Preventing Local Buckling

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010202
by Salvatore Benfratello, Luigi Palizzolo * and Santo Vazzano
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010202
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 20 December 2021 / Published: 25 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Structural Engineering, Volume III)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a parametric study on the optimal design of the proposed LRPD in terms of the new approach. It is an interesting topic to discuss the problem from a structural point of view. However, it is believed, the paper needs to detail in various sections of the article body in terms of the research discussion and concept clarity. The Review comments are included in the manuscript as uploaded, annotated, PDF copy of this paper. It is suggested to provide responses and updates for the comments in a separate file with a clear explanation and location of the update in the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Authors are grateful to the reviewers for their suggestions and remarks. The paper has been deeply revised and improved following the remarks of the reviewers. In the attached file a point by point reply is reported.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Find in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Authors are grateful to the reviewer for his suggestions and remarks. The paper has been deeply revised and improved following the remarks of the reviewers. In the attached file a point by point reply is reported.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

There is no Methods part in the article.

(1), (2), (3) equations are repeated twice.

Explanations of the equations should begin with "where".

Figure 5 is not detalized - what is presented in parts a), b), c).

Rounding of numbers should be equalized in Table 3.

Author Response

Authors are grateful to the reviewer for his suggestions and remarks. The paper has been deeply revised and improved following the remarks of the reviewers. In the following a point by point reply is reported.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The reviewer responded to all my comments. Therefore, it is accepted in present form. 

Reviewer 2 Report

 No further suggestions and comments.

Back to TopTop