Next Article in Journal
Single Evaluation of Use of a Mixed Reality Headset for Intra-Procedural Image-Guidance during a Mock Laparoscopic Myomectomy on an Ex-Vivo Fibroid Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of a Hollow-Core Woodpile-Based Mode Launcher for Dielectric Laser Accelerators
Previous Article in Journal
Phage Display Preparation of Specific Polypeptides in Atherosclerotic Foam Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Design Options for Compact Linear Accelerators for High Flux Neutron Source
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Quality Factor Enhancement of 650 MHz Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity for CEPC

1
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2
Key Laboratory of Particle Acceleration Physics & Technology, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Center for Superconducting RF and Cryogenics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
School of Nuclear Sciences and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020546
Submission received: 15 December 2021 / Revised: 31 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Compact Particle Accelerators Technology)

Abstract

:
Medium-temperature (mid-T) furnace baking was conducted at 650 MHz superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavity for circular electron positron collider (CEPC), which enhanced the cavity unloaded quality factor (Q0) significantly. In the vertical test (2.0 K), Q0 of 650 MHz cavity reached 6.4 × 1010 at 30 MV/m, which is remarkably high at this unexplored frequency. Additionally, the cavity quenched at 31.2 MV/m finally. There was no anti-Q-slope behavior after mid-T furnace baking, which is characteristic of 1.3 GHz cavities. The microwave surface resistance (RS) was also studied, which indicated both very low Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and residual resistance. The recipe of cavity process in this paper is simplified and easy to duplicate, which may benefit the SRF community.

1. Introduction

SRF cavities made of niobium are broadly adopted for the modern accelerators, which have demonstrated much higher Q0 and lower RS than cavity made of copper. Here, RS is the electrical resistance of surface layer to current, and inversely proportional to Q0 of SRF cavity. Recently, the technology of medium-temperature (mid-T, 250–400 °C) baking is used to increase Q0 of 1.3 GHz cavities successfully, which dissolves the oxides in the surfaces of niobium [1,2,3]. It is more convenient and easier than nitrogen doping/infusion [4,5,6]. At the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), the 1.3 GHz single-cell cavity was evacuated with pump and received mid-T baking at 300 °C in an oven. The highest Q0 of cavities mid-T baked exceeded 5 × 1010 (at 2.0 K). The mid-T furnace baking of 1.3 GHz single-cell cavities also succeed at High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), which was conducted in a vacuum furnace. The Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IHEP) also successfully developed mid-T furnace baking of 1.3 GHz single-cell and nine-cell cavities.
For low-frequency (<1 GHz) elliptical cavities used in colliders and proton/neutron sources [7,8,9], Q0 usually decreases more quickly along with accelerating gradient than that of 1.3 GHz cavities. Nitrogen doping could increase Q0 of 650 MHz single-cell β = 0.9 cavity for the Proton Improvement Plan II (PIP-II) project to 7 × 1010 at medium fields of approximately 15–25 MV/m [7]. However, there are very few mid-T baking attempts of low-frequency cavities, which may demonstrate differences with 1.3 GHz as well as nitrogen doping [7,10]. Thus, the mid-T furnace baking of 650 MHz cavity for CEPC was carried out at IHEP, which obtained high Q0 and low RS successfully.

2. The Process of Mid-T Furnace Baking

The cavity investigated in this paper is a 650 MHz single-cell β = 1 SRF cavity for CEPC, which is made of fine-grain niobium with high residual-resistivity-ratio (RRR > 300). The ratio of the peak surface magnetic field (Bpeak) to accelerating gradient (Eacc) is approximately 4.2. Firstly, the 650 MHz cavity received bulk electro-polishing (EP) process with a total removal of ~315 μm, where the temperature was below 25 °C all the time. There was no high-temperature annealing for hydrogen outgassing before or after EP, because we wanted to simplify the recipe of mid-T furnace baking, which combines high-temperature annealing and mid-T furnace baking at a later stage. Therefore, the 650 MHz cavity received high-pressure rinsing (HPR), assembly, low-temperature baking (120 °C for 48 h) and vertical test directly after bulk EP [1]. In the vertical test of EP baseline (blue icon), the 650 MHz cavity quenched at a very high gradient of 37.5 MV/m (Bpeak = 158 mT) with Q0 of 1.4 × 1010 in Figure 1, which indicated smooth and defect-free surfaces of the cavity. However, the Q value was slightly lower than the CEPC vertical test (VT) spec of 4.0 × 1010 at 22 MV/m. The behavior of Q-slope may result from hydrogen diffused in the cavity during EP process. The radiation began to increase at 33 MV/m, so field emission was low during the vertical test. RS of the 650 MHz cavity (blue icon) increased exponentially along with the accelerating gradient in Figure 2, which is typical for cavity EP processed [7,9]. Hence, the cavity was considered qualified to receive mid-T furnace baking.
Afterwards, the 650 MHz cavity was subjected to high-temperature annealing at 900 °C for 3 h (hydrogen degassing) [11,12], and the following light EP was cancelled. Then, the cavity was exposed to air for 3 days in cleanroom (oxidation). Finally, it received mid-T furnace baking at 300 °C for 3 h [13] as well as 1.3 GHz nine-cell cavity [3], which is shown in Figure 3. During the entire process, both cavity flanges were covered with niobium foils, which had been chemically polished, to keep the cavity inner surface from dust. The process of mid-T furnace baking was key to improve Q0 of 650 MHz cavity. Prior to mid-T furnace baking, the furnace was pumped adequately to obtain ultimate vacuum (<5 × 10−6 Pa). The highest pressure of furnace vacuum was about 3.5 × 10−5 Pa during the process of mid-T furnace baking (Figure 4), which was maintained with two cryopumps. After cooling down, the vacuum pressure was about 2.5 × 10−6 Pa, and the cavity was taken out.

3. Vertical Test after Mid-T Furnace Baking

Following mid-T furnace baking, the 650 MHz cavity was subjected to HPR and assembled with flanges. Then, it received a vertical test immediately, while the usual low-temperature baking was cancelled. The cavity demonstrated significantly high Q0 at all fields during the vertical test, which is shown in Figure 1. Extremely high Q0 was achieved at low fields, which exceeded 1.0 × 1011. The cavity also exceeded the CEPC vertical test spec of 4.0 × 1010 at 22 MV/m. The Q0 reached 6.3 × 1010 at 31 MV/m, which was much higher than 2.1 × 1010 of EP baseline. There was no field emission during the test, and the cavity quenched at 31.2 MV/m (Bpeak = 131 mT) finally. Furthermore, there was no anti-Q-slope behavior, which is usual for 1.3 GHz cavities after mid-T baking [1,2,3].
The surface resistance after mid-T furnace baking is depicted in Figure 2, which was remarkably lower than EP baseline. It was about 2.5 nΩ at low fields and 4.5 nΩ at high fields, which was significantly low and increased slowly as a function of gradient.
The 650 MHz cavity also received vertical tests at lower temperatures (1.5–2.0 K) to investigate the composition of RS, which consists of BCS resistance (RBCS) and residual resistance (Rres). The value of RBCS increases exponentially as a function of temperature. However, Rres remains consistent when the temperature increase from 1.5 to 2.0 K [14].
R S = R BCS + R res
R BCS = A f 2 T exp Δ T k T
Here, k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, f is the frequency of SRF cavity, 2Δ is the energy gap of niobium. A is the coefficient that depends on the superconducting parameters of niobium, such as mean free path, coherence length and London penetration.
RBCS at 2.0 K (Figure 5) and Rres (Figure 6) of 650 MHz cavity were calculated according to Equations (1) and (2), and compared with 1.3 GHz cavity, which adopted the same recipe of mid-T furnace baking. Rres remained <2 nΩ at both low and high fields in Figure 6, which is rather low at this frequency. It was less than 1 nΩ at low fields. RBCS was 2 nΩ constantly at low fields, and slightly increased as a function of accelerating gradient above 20 MV/m in Figure 5. The decrease in RBCS as a function of accelerating gradient for 1.3 GHz cavity [1,2,3] did not appear for 650 MHz cavity. It confirms that mid-T furnace baking could not reverse RBCS at the frequency of 650 MHz. Therefore, the anti-Q-slope behavior cannot be observed at 650 MHz cavity mid-T furnace baked. Similarly, nitrogen doping could not reverse RBCS of 650 MHz cavity, either [7,15].

4. Conclusions

Mid-T furnace baking was attempted at 650 MHz single-cell cavity, which achieved a state-of-the-art high Q0 at the accelerating gradient of 30 MV/m. Extremely low RS of 3.4 nΩ at 25 MV/m was demonstrated, while the typical value of RS is 5~10 nΩ.
Nitrogen doping is another kind of processing for SRF cavities, which can also improve Q0. It is also carried out in a vacuum furnace along with the injection of nitrogen gas by thermal diffusion, which is followed by light EP to remove the niobium nitrides inside cavity surface [16]. Compared with nitrogen doping, mid-T furnace baking is much easier and more convenient. These studies can help to enhance the performance and comprehension of large elliptical (<1 GHz) superconducting cavities, which are broadly used by synchrotron light sources, proton/neutron sources and high-energy colliders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S. and B.L.; Data curation, S.J. and Z.M.; Formal analysis, P.S.; Funding acquisition, P.S. and W.P.; Investigation, P.S. and J.Z.; Methodology, J.Z.; Project administration, W.P.; Resources, F.H.; Software, S.Z., L.Y. and X.H.; Supervision, P.S.; Visualization, C.D.; Writing—original draft, P.S.; Writing—review and editing, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12075270, 11505197), Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB25000000) and the Platform of Advanced Photon Source Technology R&D.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Beijing HE-Racing Technology Co., Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Posen, S.; Romanenko, A.; Grassellino, A.; Melnychuk, O.; Sergatskov, D. Ultralow surface resistance via vacuum heat treatment of superconducting radio-frequency cavities. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 13, 014024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ito, H.; Araki, H.; Takahashi, K.; Umemori, K. Influence of furnace baking on Q–E behavior of superconducting accelerating cavities. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 2021, 071G01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, F.; Pan, W.; Sha, P.; Zhai, J.; Mi, Z.; Dai, X.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, C.; Liu, B.; et al. Medium-temperature furnace baking of 1.3 GHz 9-cell superconducting cavities at IHEP. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 34, 095005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gonnella, D.; Aderhold, S.; Burrill, A.; Daly, E.; Davis, K.; Grassellino, A.; Grimm, C.; Khabiboulline, T.; Marhauser, F.; Melnychuk, O.; et al. Industrialization of the nitrogen-doping preparation for SRF cavities for LCLS-II. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2018, 883, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grassellino, A.; Romanenko, A.; Trenikhina, Y.; Checchin, M.; Martinello, M.; Melnychuk, O.S.; Chandrasekaran, S.; A Sergatskov, D.; Posen, S.; Crawford, A.C.; et al. Unprecedented quality factors at accelerating gradients up to 45MVm−1 in niobium superconducting resonators via low temperature nitrogen infusion. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 30, 094004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, B.; Sha, P.; Dong, C.; He, F.; Pan, W.; Mi, Z.; Zhai, J.; Jin, S.; Dai, J.; Li, Z.; et al. Nitrogen doping with dual-vacuum furnace at IHEP. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2021, 993, 165080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martinello, M.; Bice, D.J.; Boffo, C.; Chandrasekeran, S.K.; Eremeev, G.V.; Furuta, F.; Grassellino, A.; Melnychuk, O.; Sergatskov, D.A.; Wu, G.; et al. Q-factor optimization for high-beta 650 MHz cavities for PIP-II. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 174501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, H.; Sha, P.; Zhai, J.; Pan, W.; Li, Z.; Mi, Z.; He, F.; Zhang, X.; Dai, J.; Han, R.; et al. Development and vertical tests of 650 MHz 2-cell superconducting cavities with higher order mode couplers. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2021, 995, 165093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McGee, K.; Kim, S.; Elliott, K.; Ganshyn, A.; Hartung, W.; Metzgar, E.; Ostroumov, P.; Popielarski, L.; Taylor, A.; Xu, T.; et al. Medium-velocity superconducting cavity for high accelerating gradient continuous-wave hadron linear accelerators. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2021, 24, 112003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McGee, K. New Results on N-Doping Applied to 5-Cell Elliptical β = 0.65 644 MHz Cavities. Tesla Technology Collaboration Meeting 2021. Available online: https://indico.desy.de/event/27572/contributions/94301/attachments/63521/ (accessed on 10 November 2021).
  11. Trenikhina, Y.; Romanenko, A.; Kwon, J.; Zuo, J.-M.; Zasadzinski, J.F. Nanostructural features degrading the performance of superconducting radiofrequency niobium cavities revealed by TEM and EELS. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1503.02046. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ciovati, G.; Myneni, G.; Stevie, F. High field Q slope and the baking effect: Review of recent experimental results and new data on Nb heat treatments. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Accel. Beams 2010, 13, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Delheusy, M.; Stierle, A.; Kasper, N.; Kurta, R.P.; Vlad, A.; Dosch, H.; Antoine, C.; Resta, A.; Lundgren, E.; Andersen, J. X-ray investigation of subsurface interstitial oxygen at Nb/oxide interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 101911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Padamsee, H. RF Superconductivity: Science, Technology, and Applications; WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Martinello, M.; Aderhold, S.; Chandrasekaran, S.K.; Checchin, M.; Grassellino, A.; Melnychuk, O.; Posen, S.; Romanenko, A.; Sergatskov, D.A. Advancement in the Understanding of the Field and Frequency Dependent Microwave Surface Resistance of Niobium. In Proceedings of the SRF2017, Lanzhou, China, 17–21 July 2017; pp. 364–367. Available online: https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/srf2017/papers/tuyaa02.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2021).
  16. Grassellino, A.; Romanenko, A.; Sergatskov, D.; Melnychuk, O.; Trenikhina, Y.; Crawford, A.; Rowe, A.; Wong, M.; Khabiboulline, T.; Barkov, F. Nitrogen and argon doping of niobium for superconducting radio frequency cavities: A pathway to highly efficient accelerating structures. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2013, 26, 102001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Vertical test results of 650 MHz SRF cavity (Blue: processed with EP; Red: processed with mid-T furnace baking).
Figure 1. Vertical test results of 650 MHz SRF cavity (Blue: processed with EP; Red: processed with mid-T furnace baking).
Applsci 12 00546 g001
Figure 2. Surface resistance (RS) of 650 MHz SRF cavity (Blue: processed with EP; Red: processed with mid-T furnace baking).
Figure 2. Surface resistance (RS) of 650 MHz SRF cavity (Blue: processed with EP; Red: processed with mid-T furnace baking).
Applsci 12 00546 g002
Figure 3. Setup of the mid-T furnace baking for 650 MHz cavity.
Figure 3. Setup of the mid-T furnace baking for 650 MHz cavity.
Applsci 12 00546 g003
Figure 4. Temperature and vacuum curves during mid-T furnace baking.
Figure 4. Temperature and vacuum curves during mid-T furnace baking.
Applsci 12 00546 g004
Figure 5. BCS resistance (RBCS) of 650 MHz cavity and 1.3 GHz cavity (at 2.0 K), which both received mid-T furnace baking.
Figure 5. BCS resistance (RBCS) of 650 MHz cavity and 1.3 GHz cavity (at 2.0 K), which both received mid-T furnace baking.
Applsci 12 00546 g005
Figure 6. Residual resistance (Rres) of 650 MHz cavity and 1.3 GHz cavity, which both received mid-T furnace baking.
Figure 6. Residual resistance (Rres) of 650 MHz cavity and 1.3 GHz cavity, which both received mid-T furnace baking.
Applsci 12 00546 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sha, P.; Pan, W.; Zhai, J.; Mi, Z.; Jin, S.; Liu, B.; Dong, C.; He, F.; Ye, L.; He, X.; et al. Quality Factor Enhancement of 650 MHz Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity for CEPC. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020546

AMA Style

Sha P, Pan W, Zhai J, Mi Z, Jin S, Liu B, Dong C, He F, Ye L, He X, et al. Quality Factor Enhancement of 650 MHz Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity for CEPC. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(2):546. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020546

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sha, Peng, Weimin Pan, Jiyuan Zhai, Zhenghui Mi, Song Jin, Baiqi Liu, Chao Dong, Feisi He, Lingxi Ye, Xiangcong He, and et al. 2022. "Quality Factor Enhancement of 650 MHz Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity for CEPC" Applied Sciences 12, no. 2: 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020546

APA Style

Sha, P., Pan, W., Zhai, J., Mi, Z., Jin, S., Liu, B., Dong, C., He, F., Ye, L., He, X., & Zheng, S. (2022). Quality Factor Enhancement of 650 MHz Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity for CEPC. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020546

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop