Next Article in Journal
Variational Inference for a Recommendation System in IoT Networks Based on Stein’s Identity
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on the Surface Adhesive Characteristic of Iced Aluminum Alloy Plate
Previous Article in Journal
A Theoretical Approach to Ordinal Classification: Feature Space-Based Definition and Classifier-Independent Detection of Ordinal Class Structures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process: Properties, Characterization, and Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Ageing on Abrasion Volume Loss, Density, and Structural Components of Subfossil Oak

1
Department of Materials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Division of Botany, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 20/II, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Division for Silviculture, Croatian Forest Research Institute, Cvjetno naselje 41, 10 450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 1814; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041814
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 30 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Surface Sciences and Technology Section)

Abstract

:
Subfossil oak wood has spent centuries or millennia in the aquatic medium (rivers, lakes, bogs, etc.) and, due to water anoxic conditions, its decomposition is very slow. As a result of its long residing in specific conditions, its chemical composition, appearance, as well as mechanical and tribological properties have changed. Because of its aesthetic and mechanical properties, subfossil wood is very attractive and often used to produce valuable objects. The main objective of this study was to test how abrasion wear resistance of subfossil oak is affected by ageing. The effects of ageing on wood density and on the structure of lignin and cellulose were tested, as well as the loss of volume during abrasion in correlation with these changes. A study was conducted on samples of recent (regular) pedunculate oak wood and on six subfossil pedunculate oak samples in the age range of 890 and nearly 6000 years. Abrasion wear resistance was expressed through the loss of volume recorded using the Taber abraser. The smallest abrasion volume loss was measured for the recent oak specimens. Linear regression analyses showed that there was a very strong negative linear relationship between the age of subfossil oak and its abrasion volume loss. There was also a strong, but positive and significant linear correlation between subfossil oak age and density. Ageing also affected the structural composition of wood. Results obtained by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy indicated a reduction of the relative crystalline fraction of subfossil wood in recent oak. The degradation of lignin in subfossil oak samples progressed more slowly over time than cellulose degradation. There was a negative correlation between age and the ratio of cellulose and lignin degradation; however, that relationship was found statistically insignificant. Similar results were obtained for the relationship between abrasion wear resistance and changes in the structural composition of the studied samples of subfossil oak wood.

1. Introduction

Wet and anaerobic conditions that exist in riverbeds, bogs, peatlands, and similar aquatic areas may preserve wood for many hundreds and even thousands of years [1,2]. In such habitats, wood biodeterioration is very slow and mainly bacterial, because typical terrestrial wood degraders (insects, calms, brown rot, white-rot fungi, etc.) need oxic conditions for their growth. Based on the micromorphological degradation pattern they produce, microorganisms categorized as erosion bacteria are the most common involved in microbiological attack in anaerobic aquatic environments [3]. The wood found and preserved in waterlogged conditions is called abonos, subfossil wood, or bog wood. Numerous wood species (e.g., oak, elm, and ash) can be preserved that way. Among these species, oak, in particular, is preserved exceptionally well. The good preservation of old oak trunks may be the result of a high content of tannins, which also inhibit the deleterious activity of bacteria and fungi. Due to mineral deposition from river water into the wood, the durability, appearance, and structure of the wood are modified [4,5,6]. Subfossil oak is highly appreciated for its hardness and durability as well for its attractive dark color and good acoustic properties and is therefore often used for the production of musical instruments, ornaments, jewelry, sculptures, and also for luxurious furniture, parquet, and veneers [2,7,8].
Various physical and chemical properties of subfossil wood have been investigated in Croatia [2,9,10,11] and abroad [12,13,14,15,16], but in the literature, we did not find any data concerning the measurement of abrasion resistance (or of resistance to any other wear mechanisms) in subfossil oak wood. Abrasive wear resistance can be defined as the ability to resist mechanical wear caused by hard particles that move along a solid surface (ASTM G40-21a) [17]. This property depends on the hardness, yield strength, and density of wood and on the abrasive grain size, but it is not possible to set up an entirely unambiguous quantitative relationship between these properties [13,18,19].
In general, the analysis of the mechanical, physical, and chemical properties of subfossil oak shows that the properties of subfossil wood have changed in relation to those of recent oak. However, these changes caused by time as well as the conclusions reached by different examiners have not always been consistent. The reason for that is the different aquatic conditions in which the examined samples originated [7,20,21,22,23,24].
Ordinarily, the composition of wood includes three elements, i.e., cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose. Previous studies showed that with ageing, the wood content of cellulose decreases, and that of lignin increases in relation to the composition of recent wood [21]. Cellulose is a crystalline fraction, while lignin and hemicellulose are amorphous fractions in wood. Wood crystallinity may be a suitable indicator for estimating the level of wood degradation during ageing. Crystallinity also strongly affects the tribological, physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of wood. FTIR spectroscopy is one of the methods that can provide details about the crystallinity and structural characteristics of wood and, consequently, can give useful information about wood degradation [12,25,26,27].
This paper presents the results of abrasion wear resistance measurements for recent (regular) oak samples and six subfossil oak samples which were collected in Northern Bosnia and Herzegovina. Since the abrasion resistance of subfossil oak has not been studied yet and is an important property for machining (subfossil wood often causes a strong blunting of tools), the goal of the present research was to summarize and analyze the possible correlation between abrasion wear resistance, density, and changes found in wood structural components caused by ageing in aquatic medium.

2. Materials and Methods

Six subfossil oak trunks (samples 1–5) were retrieved from the Sava riverbed between the villages of Grebnice (45.046648, 18.528779) and Domaljevac (45.074475, 18.588781) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Figure 1). The trunks were found under a 1–2 m layer of gravel in the central part of the riverbed where the depth of the river is never less than 5–6 m. The oldest subfossil oak trunk (sample 6) originated from a gravel pit in the village of Oštra Luka (45.001281, 18.568225). That gravel pit developed following the gravel exploitation within the area of the Sava River branch. The trunk was taken from a depth of 8 to 9 m under the water level of the lake, below a thin layer of sand and silt.
Sample 0 was regular recent pedunculate oak wood from an approximately 70-year-old tree, stored indoors for 5 years. That trunk (sample 0) originated from the forest near the village of Štitar (45.107301, 18.632835), approximately 5 km from the location where the first five subfossil trunks were retrieved (Figure 1). Its growth ring width was about 1.6 mm.
This part of the land is characterized by a lowland fluvial accumulation-type of relief, slightly sloping towards the east, and is dominated by alluvial calcareous loamy soils (Figure 1). The samples of subfossil wood were dated by means of the Carbon-14 dating method. The ages and locations of the subfossil samples are listed in Table 1.
Microstructure analysis, abrasion wear resistance testing, density measurements, moisture content measurements, and FTIR analysis were performed on all samples, from 0 to 6.
The wood specimens intended for microstructural determination analyses were prepared as thin cross sections with a microtome and were examined under an OLYMPUS BX 51-P transmittance light microscope for the purpose of wood taxa identification. The wood anatomy atlas [29] was used for the identification of the examined samples. The test pieces intended for the determination of abrasion wear resistance were cut from the heartwood, their dimensions being 5 mm × 5 mm × 40 mm (Figure 2). All pieces were acclimatized for a few weeks at room temperature. Wood specimens showing cracks or some other defects were rejected and not used in the test. Ten wood specimens were examined for each sample (0–6). The length of all test pieces (40 mm) coincided with the natural axes of fiber orientation (longitudinal direction), and the friction surface (5 mm × 5 mm) coincided with the cross section of the wood. We selected the test specimens from oak trunks with an as similar as possible growth ring width (1.3–1.9 mm),to avoid the influence of the percentage of late and early wood on abrasion wear resistance [30]. The samples of subfossil oak were much darker than the sample of recent oak (Figure 2), owing to the reaction between the iron from the riverbed soil and the tannins in the oak wood [7].
For the evaluation of abrasion wear resistance, a Taber abraser with a 125 mm rotating abrasive disc was used (Figure 3). The disc rotational speed was 1 rev/s, and the load applied to keep the test pieces in contact with sandpaper was 4.91 N. The sandpaper was designated as P180, with am 82 μm mean diameter of the abrasive particles. To remove sawdust during the process of abrasion, a vacuum cleaner was used. The weight loss (Δm) of the test pieces was measured after 300 grinding cycles. According to the ISO 13061-1:2014 standard [31], the moisture content of the samples was determined in order to calculate the mass loss (Δm12) and density (ρ12) at 12 % moisture content. The density ρ12 was calculated according to ISO 13061-2:2014 standard [32]. The mass loss (Δm12) was converted into the abrasion volume loss (ΔV12). The abrasive wear resistance was expressed as the value inversely proportional to the volume loss value.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis was performed by an IR Spirit spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an ATR device with a single-reflection diamond crystal. The spectra were collected in the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 over 32 scans at a resolution of 2 cm−1. The FTIR–ATR analysis was done directly on the surface of the wood samples (three replicates) at room temperature. The normalized intensities of all peaks were calculated using the intensity of the reference band at 1031 cm−1.
We performed linear regression analyses to define the relationships between abrasion volume loss, age of the samples, density, and degree of degradation. The statistical analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel, version 2102.

3. Results and Discussion

The microstructural determination analyses showed that all the subfossil trunks examined in this study belonged to the subgenus Quercus (Figure 4). Although the species of the subgenus Quercus cannot be distinguished reliably from one another only on the basis of their wood anatomy [29], due to the ecology of few Quercus species that grow in the Sava River Basin [33,34,35], we are confident that all the tested samples originated from the Quercus robur species (pedunculate oak).
Table 2 shows the results of the measurements of mass loss after 300 grinding cycles and of density at 12 % moisture content.
The mean values of volume loss of the samples ranged from 83.5 to 116.9 mm3. The normal wood sample (0) showed the lowest value of volume loss. All subfossil oak samples (1–6) showed a higher value of volume loss and lower abrasive wear resistance compared to the recent oak (0) (Figure 5). If only the subfossil oak samples were taken into consideration, linear regression analyses of the test results indicated that there was a strong negative linear relationship between abrasive volume loss and age (Figure 6). The correlation coefficient for this relationship was −0.927 (R2 = 0.859). This decrease of abrasive volume loss could be unexpected, because of the presumption that with age, abrasion resistance will continue decreasing. Although the degradation of wood progresses with time, simultaneously, the process of fossilization occurs, and the content of iron, calcium, ash, and extractives in oak wood increases [7,21,22]. The process of fossilization is the most probable microstructural reason for abrasion wear resistance growth. Although there is a strong negative linear relationship between abrasive volume loss and age, we must be aware that some previous investigations showed that for subfossil samples, the time factor was of minor importance, while the environment played the main role in the process of destruction and fossilization of wood as well as in the changing of its mechanical and physical properties. An example is reported in the study of Kolar and Rybníček [20] of the physical and mechanical properties of sub-fossil oak and their comparison with those of recent wood. The research showed an unambiguous difference between a recent sample and all subfossil samples, but the properties of subfossil samples were not clearly dependent on the age of the samples. Five of the subfossil samples investigated in this study originated from a very short section of the river Sava (Figure 1); therefore, in this study, the quality of water and the geological background of the test specimens were almost the same, which certainly influenced by such a strong relationship between age and abrasion wear resistance.
The mean density value of the samples at 12% MC (ρ12) ranged from 0.714 to 0.802 g/cm3 (Table 2). The coefficient of variation for each sample was smaller than 10 %, which according to ISO 13061-2, indicated allowed variability. Figure 7 shows a strong positive linear relationship between the values of subfossil sample density (ρ12) and their age, with correlation coefficient R = 0.876 (R2 = 0.767). All subfossil oak specimens of age up to 3890 years had similar density values (0.714–0.733 g/cm3) which were significantly lower than the density values of recent oak (0.798 g/cm3). The two oldest samples of subfossil oak aged 4555 and 5890 years had a higher density than younger specimens. The density of the oldest subfossil oak (0.802 g/cm3) was slightly higher than the density of recent oak.
The decrease in density of subfossil wood compared to recent wood conforms to the results published in the studies by Kolar et al. [20] and Guyette et al. [36]. These studies pointed out that wood density generally decreases with the age. However, a large variation of the results was also noted, and the analyzed samples were younger than the two oldest samples of this study. The increase in density of the two analyzed oldest samples (5 and 6) could be related to mineral deposition from the river water, which was also proved by their dark color, resulting from the high concentration of iron in the wood [7,22]. According to Mankowsky et al. [37], archaeological wood is characterized by a directly proportional relationship between wood density and the content of mineral compounds.
Linear regression analyses showed a strong negative linear correlation, with correlation coefficient R = −0.948 (R2 = 0.900), between abrasion volume loss and wood density at 12% MC (Figure 8). The oldest subfossil sample and the normal wood sample (0) showed the highest density values and the lowest volume loss in the abrasion test. Although the subfossil sample had a slightly higher density than the recent oak sample, its volume loss was higher. This conforms to the results obtained in the study of Mankowsky et al. [37], where it was shown that with, the same density values, the normal wood (recent) sample had better mechanical properties than the subfossil sample.
The chemical composition of the representative control specimen (0) and specimens 1–6 was analyzed by infrared spectroscopy. We recorded the FTIR spectra of the representative control specimen (0) and specimens 1–6, and all the detected bands are presented in Figure 9. The results for the tested samples (1–6) were compared to the spectra of the representative control specimen (0). The main bands associated with cellulose and hemicelluloses were identified at 3650–3000, 2903, 1736, 1458, 1423 1368, 1319, 1156, 1103, 1031, and 897 cm−1, while lignin was identified by the bands at 1595, 1509, 1265, and 1232 cm−1 [20,27,38,39,40].
According to the obtained FTIR spectra results, it was found that ageing played an important role in wood structural composition; the intensity of the bands was lower compared to the band intensity of the control specimen (0) (Figure 9).
More useful information on wood degradation with respect to ageing can be obtained by calculating the ratio between bands located at 1368 and 1509 cm−1 and at 1319 and 1336 cm−1 [27]. The calculated transmittance ratios I1368/I1509 and I1319/I1336 are shown in Table 2.
The transmittance ratio I1368/I1509 can be used as the crystallinity index of wood samples [27]. The degradation fraction of wood can be obtained from the transmittance ratio between the peak at 1368 cm−1, which is attributed to the cellulose fraction, and the peak at 1509 cm−1, attributed to the lignin fraction.
It was found that there was no statistically significant linear correlation between the degree of degradation of wood structural components and the age of the samples, as well as between the abrasion volume loss and the degree of wood structure degradation.
The I1368/I1509 ratio decreased during wood ageing compared to the control sample (0) (Table 2). This suggests that the degradation of lignin in subfossil oak samples progressed more slowly over time than cellulose degradation. A linear correlation between the I1368/I1509 ratio and wood age gave only a moderate correlation coefficient R = −0.640 (R2 = 0.410), Figure 10.
As the samples were not exposed over time to the same environmental conditions, such as the presence of oxygen that influences lignin degradation, there appeared a big difference regarding lignin degradation in samples 1–6, as expected. The I1368/I1509 ratio had no influence on the loss of volume during abrasion (Figure 11).
The transmittance ratio between the peaks located at 1319 and 1336 cm−1 may give information about the degradation of crystalline and amorphous cellulose. If the I1319/I1336 ratio decreases, the degradation of crystalline cellulose is more intense than the degradation of amorphous cellulose [25,26,27]. The obtained results reported in Table 2 and Figure 12 indicated that in all subfossil samples, the I1319/I1336 ratio decreased compared to that for the control sample (0). It can be noted that the ratio was constant for all subfossil samples, except for sample 5, where the degradation of crystalline cellulose was slightly slower than for other samples compared to that in the recent sample. The results obtained indicated that the ageing of subfossil wood has a moderate negative linear relationship with the I1319/I1336 ratio, R = −0.421 (R2 = 0.177). We also found a moderate negative linear correlation between the I1319/I1336 ratio and volume loss during abrasion, with a correlation coefficient of R = −0.564 (R2 = 0.318), as shown in Figure 13.

4. Conclusions

The age of subfossil wood has a great influence on abrasion wear. The recent (normal wood) oak sample showed the highest abrasion wear resistance; with increasing age, the abrasion volume loss of subfossil wood decreased.
There was a strong positive linear correlation between the subfossil oak wood density and its age. The subfossil samples aged up to 3890 years showed a similar density that was much lower than the density of the recent oak. A further increase in age led to a significant increase in the density of subfossil wood.
We found a strong negative linear correlation between abrasion volume loss and wood density.
Lignin degradation compared to cellulose degradation increased more slowly with the increasing age of subfossil oak. Linear regression analyses showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between wood’s age and the ratio of cellulose and lignin degradation.
The results showed no linear correlation between abrasion wear resistance and the ratio of lignin and cellulose degradation of subfossil oaks.
Compared to the recent sample, all subfossil oak samples showed a lower ratio of the contents of crystalline and amorphous cellulose. This suggests that the degradation of amorphous cellulose in subfossil oak was slower than the degradation of crystalline cellulose, but there was no significant correlation between them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R. and S.E.; methodology, V.R. and S.E.; software, M.K.; validation, V.R., S.E., M.K. and T.D.; formal analysis, V.R. and M.K.; investigation, V.R.; resources, V.R. and S.E.; data curation, V.R. and S.E.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R., S.E. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, V.R., S.E., M.K. and T.D.; visualization, V.R. and S.E.; supervision, V.R.; project administration, V.R.; funding acquisition, V.R. and S.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bednar, H.; Fengel, D. Physikalische, chemische und strukturelle Eigenschaften von rezentem und subfossilem Eichenholz. Holz Roh- Werkst. 1974, 32, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sinković, T.; Govorčin, S.; Dubravac, T.; Roth, V.; Sedlar, T. Comparison some physical and mechanical properties of abonos and recent oak (Quercus robur L.). Šumarski List 2009, 891, 605–611. [Google Scholar]
  3. Broda, M.; Hill, C.A.S. Conservation of Waterlogged Wood—Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Forests 2021, 12, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kránitz, K.; Sonderegger, W.; Bues, C.T.; Niemz, P. Effects of aging on wood: A literature review. Wood Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Christiernin, M.; Notley, S.M.; Zhang, L.; Nilsson, T.; Henriksson, G. Comparison between 10,000-year old and contemporary spruce lignin. Wood Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fengel, D. Aging and fossilization of wood and its components. Wood Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. van Bürck, U.; Wagner, F.E.; Lerf, A. Mössbauer studies of subfossil oak. Hyperfine Interact. 2011, 208, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dubravac, T. Unique 6000 year old abonos furniture. Hrvat. Šume 2009, 149, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rede, V.; Essert, S.; Kodvanj, J. Annual ring orientation effect on bending strength of subfossil elm wood. J. Wood Sci. 2017, 63, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rede, V.; Essert, S.; Šokčević, Z. Effects of microstructural orientation on the abrasive wear resistance of subfossil elm wood in three orthogonal planes. Wear 2017, 380–381, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Essert, S.; Rede, V.; Švagelj, Z. The bending modulus of elasticity of subfossil elm wood. Wood Res. 2018, 63, 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kubovský, I.; Kačíková, D.; Kačík, F. Structural changes of oak wood main components caused by thermal modification. Polymers 2020, 12, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ncube, E. Use of a simple abrasive-wear resistance test device to assess the suitability of selected hardwoods for wood flooring. Sci. Res. Essays 2008, 3, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Büyüksari, Ü.; As, N.; Dündar, T.; Korkmaz, O. Micro-mechanical properties of Oak wood and comparison with standard-sized samples. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2017, 19, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mania, P.; Tomczak, A. Properties of oak roundwood with and without frost cracks. Forests 2020, 11, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bijak, S.; Lachowicz, H. Impact of tree age and size on selected properties of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) wood. Forests 2021, 12, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. ASTM G40-21a; Standard Terminology Relating to Wear and Erosion. ASTM International: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2021.
  18. Ohtani, T.; Inoue, A.; Tanaka, C. Abrasive wear properties of compressed sugi wood. J. Wood Sci. 2002, 48, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Horvat, I. Drvnoindustrijski Priručnik; Tehnička knjiga: Zagreb, Croatia, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kolář, T.; Rybníček, M. Physical and mechanical properties of subfossil oak (Quercus, sp.) wood. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2010, 58, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kolář, T.; Rybníček, M.; Střelcová, M.; Hedbávný, J.; Vít, J. The changes in chemical composition and properties of subfossil oak deposited in holocene sediments. Wood Res. 2014, 59, 149–166. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krutul, D.; Radomski, A.; Zawadzki, J.; Zielenkiewicz, T.; Antczak, A. Comparison of the chemical composition of the fossil and recent oak wood. Wood Res. 2010, 55, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Voulgaridis, E.; Passialis, C. Shrinkage and colour restoration of oakwood buried in the ground. Holzforsch. Holzverwert. 1990, 4, 74–75. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kúdela, J.; Reinprecht, L. Einfluß der Holzfeuchte auf die Druckfestigkeit von rezentem und subfossilem Eichenholz (Quercus robur L.). Holzforschung 1990, 44, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Broda, M.; Popescu, C.M. Natural decay of archaeological oak wood versus artificial degradation processes—An FT-IR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction study. Spectrochim. Acta- Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 209, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Emandi, A.; Vasiliu, C.I.; Budrugeac, P.; Stamatin, I. Quantitative investigation of wood composition by integrated FT-IR and thermogravimetric methods. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2011, 45, 579–584. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lionetto, F.; Del Sole, R.; Cannoletta, D.; Vasapollo, G.; Maffezzoli, A. Monitoring wood degradation during weathering by cellulose crystallinity. Materials 2012, 5, 1910–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia: Blank Maps. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_map_of_Europe_(with_disputed_regions).svg (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  29. Schweingruber, F.H. Anatomy of European Woods; Paul Haupt: Bern, Switzerland, 1990; ISBN 3258042586. [Google Scholar]
  30. Straže, A.; Dremelj, M.; Žveplan, E.; Čufar, K. Changes in physical properties of oak wood from historical constructions during service life/Spremembe fizikalnih lastnosti hrastovega lesa iz zgodovinskih konstrukcij v življenjski dobi. Les/Wood 2018, 67, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. ISO 13061-1:2014; Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood—Test Methods for Small Clear Wood Specimens—Part 1: Determination of Moisture Content for Physical and Mechanical Tests. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  32. ISO 13061-2:2014; Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood—Test Methods for Small Clear Wood Specimens—Part 2: Determination of Density for Physical and Mechanical Tests. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  33. Nikolić, T. (Ed.) Flora Croatica Database. Prirodoslovno-Matematički Fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. Available online: https://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  34. Temunović, M.; Franjić, J.; Vessella, F.; Simeone, M.C. Resolving the taxonomic status of the mysterious “green oak” (Quercus × viridis Trinajstić) from Croatia based on phylogenetic analysis. Sumar. List 2018, 142, 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  35. Šilić, Č. Dendroflora atlas (trees and shrubs) of Bosnia i Hercegovina. Matica Hrvat. Čitluk 2005, 134–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Guyette, R.P.; Stambaugh, M. The age and density of ancient and modern oak wood in streams and sediments. IAWA J. 2003, 24, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mañkowski, P.; Kozakiewicz, P.; Drodek, M. The selected properties of fossil oak wood from medieval burgh in P£oñsk. Wood Res. 2016, 61, 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  38. Boukir, A.; Mehyaoui, I.; Fellak, S.; Asia, L.; Doumenq, P. The effect of the natural degradation process on the cellulose structure of Moroccan hardwood fiber: A survey on spectroscopy and structural properties. Mediterr. J. Chem. 2019, 8, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Colom, X.; Carrillo, F.; Nogués, F.; Garriga, P. Structural analysis of photodegraded wood by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 80, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boukir, A.; Fellak, S.; Doumenq, P. Structural characterization of Argania spinosa Moroccan wooden artifacts during natural degradation progress using infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Heliyon 2019, 5, e02477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. View of the oak samples’ locations of origin [28].
Figure 1. View of the oak samples’ locations of origin [28].
Applsci 12 01814 g001
Figure 2. Wood specimen prepared for the abrasion testing arranged from the recent oak (0) to the oldest subfossil oak (1–6).
Figure 2. Wood specimen prepared for the abrasion testing arranged from the recent oak (0) to the oldest subfossil oak (1–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g002
Figure 3. Taber abraser.
Figure 3. Taber abraser.
Applsci 12 01814 g003
Figure 4. Microstructure of (A) recent normal wood and (B) subfossil (sample 6) oak wood.
Figure 4. Microstructure of (A) recent normal wood and (B) subfossil (sample 6) oak wood.
Applsci 12 01814 g004
Figure 5. Abrasion volume loss of recent (white) and subfossil oak wood samples (gray).
Figure 5. Abrasion volume loss of recent (white) and subfossil oak wood samples (gray).
Applsci 12 01814 g005
Figure 6. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and age of subfossil oak wood (samples 1–6).
Figure 6. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and age of subfossil oak wood (samples 1–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g006
Figure 7. Correlation of density at 12% MC and age of subfossil oak wood samples (1–6).
Figure 7. Correlation of density at 12% MC and age of subfossil oak wood samples (1–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g007
Figure 8. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and density at 12% MC of oak woods samples (0–6).
Figure 8. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and density at 12% MC of oak woods samples (0–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g008
Figure 9. FTIR spectra acquired from wood samples (0–6).
Figure 9. FTIR spectra acquired from wood samples (0–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g009
Figure 10. Correlation between the I1368/I1509 ratio and wood age of oak wood samples.
Figure 10. Correlation between the I1368/I1509 ratio and wood age of oak wood samples.
Applsci 12 01814 g010
Figure 11. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and the I1368/I1509 ratio.
Figure 11. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and the I1368/I1509 ratio.
Applsci 12 01814 g011
Figure 12. Correlation between the I1319/I1336 ratio and the age of oak wood samples (0–6).
Figure 12. Correlation between the I1319/I1336 ratio and the age of oak wood samples (0–6).
Applsci 12 01814 g012
Figure 13. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and the I1319/I1336 ratio for samples 0–6.
Figure 13. Correlation between abrasion volume loss and the I1319/I1336 ratio for samples 0–6.
Applsci 12 01814 g013
Table 1. The origin of the examined subfossil samples and their age.
Table 1. The origin of the examined subfossil samples and their age.
ID Sample Origin of SampleConventional 14C Age (BP)/Years
1Grebnice/Domaljevac890 ± 50
2Grebnice/Domaljevac1195 ± 50
3Grebnice/Domaljevac1840 ± 55
4Grebnice/Domaljevac3890 ± 65
5Grebnice/Domaljevac4555 ± 65
6Oštra Luka5890 ± 115
Table 2. Mass loss after 300 grinding cycles and density at 12% moisture content (MC), I1368/I1509 and I1319/I1336 of oak wood samples (Xp, mean value, SD, standard deviation, CV, coefficient of variation (%), min, minimum value, max, maximum value).
Table 2. Mass loss after 300 grinding cycles and density at 12% moisture content (MC), I1368/I1509 and I1319/I1336 of oak wood samples (Xp, mean value, SD, standard deviation, CV, coefficient of variation (%), min, minimum value, max, maximum value).
SAMPLE IDΔm12 (g)ρ12 (g/cm3)I1368/I1509I1319/I1336
XpSDMinMaxXpSDMinMaxCV
00.0670.0030.0620.0700.7980.0280.7600.8333.51.221.08
10.0820.0070.0720.0940.7140.0220.6850.7422.91.200.88
20.0810.0040.0770.0850.7250.0490.6530.7946.70.840.83
30.0750.0040.0710.0830.7490.0250.7060.8033.30.460.85
40.0730.0050.0640.0800.7330.0640.6520.8218.70.560.82
50.0730.0060.0660.0840.7730.0260.7290.8023.40.670.94
60.0710.0050.0650.0790.8020.0130.7800.8211.60.680.84
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rede, V.; Essert, S.; Kocijan, M.; Dubravac, T. Influence of Ageing on Abrasion Volume Loss, Density, and Structural Components of Subfossil Oak. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041814

AMA Style

Rede V, Essert S, Kocijan M, Dubravac T. Influence of Ageing on Abrasion Volume Loss, Density, and Structural Components of Subfossil Oak. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(4):1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041814

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rede, Vera, Sara Essert, Martina Kocijan, and Tomislav Dubravac. 2022. "Influence of Ageing on Abrasion Volume Loss, Density, and Structural Components of Subfossil Oak" Applied Sciences 12, no. 4: 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041814

APA Style

Rede, V., Essert, S., Kocijan, M., & Dubravac, T. (2022). Influence of Ageing on Abrasion Volume Loss, Density, and Structural Components of Subfossil Oak. Applied Sciences, 12(4), 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041814

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop