Typhoon Loss Assessment in Rural Housing in Ningbo Based on Township-Level Resolution
Abstract
:Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Data Sources
3. Methods
3.1. RBF Neural Network Fundamentals
3.2. BP Neural Network Fundamentals
3.3. Construction of Typhoon Loss Assessment Model for Rural Housing
4. Results
4.1. Typhoon Characteristics and Wind Field Simulation
4.2. Typhoon Loss Statistics in Rural Housing in Ningbo
4.3. Model Training and Verification
4.4. Model Prediction
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The RBF neural network could effectively establish a typhoon loss assessment model from the causal factors to the losses of the disaster-bearing bodies, and the RBF neural network converged faster and had a smaller overall prediction error compared to the commonly used BP neural network.
- (2)
- Overall, the insured loss rate of rural housing due to typhoons showed a positive correlation with the typhoon wind speed affecting Ningbo area. Under the impact of typhoon disaster, the insured loss rate of rural housing was higher in the townships of southern Ningbo than in the townships of northern Ningbo. The townships with larger insured loss rates were concentrated in mountainous and coastal areas that are prone to secondary disasters under the attack of the typhoon’s peripheral spiral wind and rain belt.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Batts, M.E.; Simiu, E.; Russell, L.R. Hurricane Wind Speeds in the United States. J. Struct. Div. 1980, 106, 2001–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiou, P.N. Design Wind Speeds in Tropical Cyclone-Prone Regions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Vickery, P.J.; Twisdale, L.A. Wind-Field and Filling Models for Hurricane Wind-Speed Predictions. J. Struct. Eng. 1995, 121, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, J.P.; Duan, Z.D.; Chang, L. Typhoon risk analysis for key coastal cities in southeast China. J. Nat. Disaster 2002, 11, 9–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, L.; Ge, Y.J.; Xiang, H.F. Application of typhoon stochastic simulation and its extreme value wind prediction. J. Tongji Univer. Nat. Sci. 2005, 33, 885–889. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Y.F.; Duan, Z.D.; Xiao, Y.Q.; Ou, J.P.; Chang, L.; Li, Q.S. Typhoon wind hazard analysis for southeast China coastal regions. Struct. Saf. 2011, 33, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.H.; Hong, H.P. Use of historical best track data to estimate typhoon wind hazard at selected sites in China. Nat. Hazards 2014, 76, 1395–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, H.P.; Li, S.H.; Duan, Z.D. Typhoon Wind Hazard Estimation and Mapping for Coastal Region in Mainland China. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2016, 17, 04016001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, G.; Zhao, L.; Cao, S.; Zhu, L.; Ge, Y. Estimation of tropical cyclone wind hazards in coastal regions of China. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 20, 1617–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vickery, P.J.; Skerlj, P.F.; Twisdale, L.A. Simulation of Hurricane Risk in the U.S. Using Empirical Track Model. J. Struct. Eng. 2000, 126, 1222–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, M.; Soukup, G.; Cocke, S.; Gulati, S.; Morisseau-Leroy, N.; Hamid, S.; Dorst, N.; Axe, L. State of Florida hurricane loss projection model: Atmospheric science component. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2005, 93, 651–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- James, M.K.; Mason, L.B. Synthetic Tropical Cyclone Database. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 2005, 131, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emanuel, K.; Ravela, S.; Vivant, E.; Risi, C. A Statistical Deterministic Approach to Hurricane Risk Assessment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2006, 87, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.H.; Rosowsky, D.V. Synthetic hurricane wind speed records: Development of a database for hazard analysis and risk studies. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2007, 8, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vickery, P.J.; Wadhera, D.; Twisdale, L.A.; Lavelle, F.M.U.S. Hurricane Wind Speed Risk and Uncertainty. J. Struct. Eng. 2009, 135, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.H.; Hong, H.P. Observations on a Hurricane Wind Hazard Model Used to Map Extreme Hurricane Wind Speed. J. Struct. Eng. 2015, 141, 04014238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.H.; Hong, H.P. Typhoon wind hazard estimation for China using an empirical track model. Nat. Hazards 2016, 82, 1009–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Duan, Z. A statistical dynamics track model of tropical cyclones for assessing typhoon wind hazard in the coast of southeast China. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2018, 172, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emanuel, K.A. A fast intensity simulator for tropical cyclone risk analysis. Nat. Hazards 2017, 88, 779–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jing, R.; Lin, N. Tropical Cyclone Intensity Evolution Modeled as a Dependent Hidden Markov Process. J. Clim. 2019, 32, 7837–7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, M.; Wang, Q.; Li, Q.; Jing, R.; Lin, N.; Wang, L. Typhoon wind hazard estimation by full-track simulation with various wind intensity models. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2021, 218, 104792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Y.; Matsui, M.; Hibi, K. An analytical model for simulation of the wind field in a typhoon boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1995, 56, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, E.F.; Cardone, V.J. Practical Modeling of Hurricane Surface Wind Fields. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 1996, 122, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, H.Y.; Liu, M.; Lu, M.; Quan, R.S.; Zhang, L.J.; Wang, J.J. Evaluation of typhoon hazard risk in coastal areas of China in the past 20 years. Geoscience 2011, 6, 764–768. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yin, J.; Yin, Z.; Xu, S. Composite risk assessment of typhoon-induced disaster for China’s coastal area. Nat. Hazards 2013, 69, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pielke, R.A., Jr.; Gratz, J.; Landsea, C.W.; Collins, D.; Saunders, M.A.; Musulin, R. Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2008, 9, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, W.H.; Zhong, X.C.; Qiao, Y.; Lin, W.; Xu, H.; Li, Y. Evaluation of vulnerability of rural housing based on typhoon disaster insurance data in Zhejiang Province. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. 2011, 47, 409–414. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.L.; Zhu, X.C.; Hu, B.; Gu, X.L. Research on typhoon disaster prediction model in Ningbo based on BP neural network. J. Atmos. Sci. 2018, 41, 668–675. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lou, W.P.; Chen, H.Y.; Zheng, F.; Rui, W.U. Economic loss assessment of typhoon disaster based on principal component neural network. Geogr. Res. 2009, 28, 1243–1254. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ying, M.; Zhang, W.; Yu, H.; Lu, X.; Feng, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, D. An Overview of the China Meteorological Administration Tropical Cyclone Database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2014, 31, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schilling, R.J.; Carroll, J.J.J.; Al-Ajlouni, A.F. Approximation of nonlinear systems with radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2001, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, M.F.; Li, Q.; Xu, H.W.; Lou, W.J.; Lin, N. Non-stationary statistical modeling of extreme wind speed series records with exposure correction. Wind Struct. 2018, 26, 129–146. [Google Scholar]
- Vickery, P.J.; Wadhera, D. Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight-level pressure and H* Wind data. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2008, 47, 2497–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB50009-2012; Building Structure Load Code. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese)
Year | Impact Time (Month/Day) | Typhoon Number and Name | Landing Location | Path Type | (Meteorological Station Observation) 10 min Average Maximum Wind Speed in Ningbo (m/s) | (Yan Meng Wind Field Model) 10 min Average Maximum Wind Speed in Ningbo (m/s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 6/15–6/17 | 1407 Hagibis | Shantou, Guangdong | Type III | 6.3 | 5.3 |
2014 | 7/8–7/9 | 1408 Neoguri | Not landed in China | Type III | 6.4 | 7.6 |
2014 | 7/23–7/27 | 1410 Matmo | Taiwan; Fuzhou, Fujian | Type II | 7.8 | 8.6 |
2014 | 8/1–8/2 | 1412 Nakri | Not landed in China | Type III | 6.0 | 8.4 |
2014 | 9/21–9/24 | 1416 Fung-wong | Taiwan; Ningbo, Zhejiang | Type I | 7.9 | 18.4 |
2015 | 7/9–7/13 | 1509 Chan-hom | Zhoushan, Zhejiang | Type I | 9.0 | 33.0 |
2016 | 9/12–9/16 | 1614 Meranti | Xiamen, Fujian | Type II | 5.8 | 6.2 |
2016 | 9/16–9/17 | 1616 Malakas | Not landed in China | Type III | 9.2 | 10.9 |
2016 | 10/3–10/5 | 1618 Chaba | Not landed in China | Type III | 8.5 | 3.8 |
2017 | 7/2–7/4 | 1703 Nanmadol | Not landed in China | Type III | 9.7 | 6.0 |
2017 | 7/27–7/30 | 1709 Nesat | Taiwan; Fuqing, Fujian | Type II | 6.3 | 5.0 |
2017 | 7/31–8/2 | 1710 Haitang | Taiwan; Fuqing, Fujian | Type II | 7.7 | 5.6 |
2017 | 9/13–9/17 | 1718 Talim | Not landed in China | Type III | 8.4 | 11.4 |
2018 | 7/9–7/11 | 1808 Maria | Lianjiang, Fujian | Type II | 9.3 | 11.5 |
2018 | 7/21–7/23 | 1810 Ampil | Shanghai | Type II | 7.9 | 20.1 |
2018 | 7/26–8/03 | 1812 Jongdari | Shanghai | Type II | 9.5 | 23.1 |
2018 | 8/10–8/14 | 1814 Yagi | Wenling, Zhejiang | Type I | 7.5 | 19.2 |
2018 | 8/16–8/19 | 1818 Rumbia | Shanghai | Type II | 8.4 | 22.2 |
2018 | 8/22–8/23 | 1819 Soulik | Not landed in China | Type III | 6.0 | 9.5 |
2018 | 10/4–10/6 | 1825 Kong-rey | Not landed in China | Type III | 11.0 | 4.6 |
2019 | 7/17–7/19 | 1905 Danas | Not landed in China | Type III | 7.0 | 6.6 |
2019 | 8/9–8/11 | 1909 Lekima | Wenling, Zhejiang | Type I | 12.3 | 28.2 |
2019 | 9/6–9/7 | 1913 Lingling | Not landed in China | Type III | 8.8 | 12.6 |
2019 | 9/21–9/22 | 1917 Tapah | Not landed in China | Type III | 9.8 | 5.4 |
2019 | 10/1–10/3 | 1918 Mitag | Zhoushan, Zhejiang | Type I | 15.5 | 32.4 |
District and County | 6-Year Total Payout (¥) | 6-Year Total Coverage (¥) | Insured Loss Rate | The Township with the Largest Insured Loss Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beilun | 188,000 | 11,336,218,951 | 0.00166% | Meishan Township (0.007252%) |
Cixi | 309,000 | 60,500,740,600 | 0.00051% | KuangYan Township (0.001439%) |
Fenghua | 152,600 | 23,526,372,972 | 0.00065% | Shangtian Township (0.001381%) |
Haishu | 183,600 | 21,288,276,900 | 0.00086% | Hengjie Township (0.00474%) |
Jiangbei | 48,000 | 5,741,707,313 | 0.00084% | Hongtang Street (0.001141%) |
Ninghai | 382,049 | 25,547,294,750 | 0.00150% | Chayuan Township (0.003258%) |
Xiangshan | 393,900 | 20,265,580,500 | 0.00194% | Maoyang Township (0.009984%) |
Yinzhou | 145,950 | 26,797,96,800 | 0.00054% | Jungi Township (0.001853%) |
Yuyao | 543,400 | 37,188,688,850 | 0.00146% | Luting Township (0.009502%) |
Zhenhai | 53,035 | 7,841,041,500 | 0.00068% | Luotuo Street (0.001003%) |
Average insured loss rate | 0.00106% |
Township Number | Township Name | Actual Value (×10−2) | RBF Predicted Value (×10−2) | RBF Error Value (×10−2) | BP Predicted Value (×10−2) | BP Error Value (×10−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Kuangyan Town | 0.097% | 0.103% | 0.006% | 0.090% | 0.007% |
15 | Chayuan Township | 0.058% | 0.026% | 0.032% | 0.356% | 0.298% |
24 | Maoyang Township | 0.106% | 0.095% | 0.011% | 0.023% | 0.083% |
35 | Luotuo Street | 0.077% | 0.156% | 0.079% | 0.302% | 0.225% |
37 | Shangtian Town | 0.098% | 0.416% | 0.318% | 1.456% | 1.358% |
47 | Meishan Township | 0.103% | 0.080% | 0.023% | 0.283% | 0.180% |
48 | Zhenqi Town | 0.085% | 0.054% | 0.031% | 0.259% | 0.174% |
69 | Luting Township | 0.519% | 1.058% | 0.539% | 0.812% | 0.293% |
73 | Hengjie Town | 0.073% | 0.039% | 0.034% | 0.270% | 0.197% |
87 | Hongtang Street | 0.096% | 0.069% | 0.027% | 0.345% | 0.249% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Q.; Jia, H.; Zhang, J.; Mao, J.; Fan, W.; Huang, M.; Zheng, B. Typhoon Loss Assessment in Rural Housing in Ningbo Based on Township-Level Resolution. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073463
Li Q, Jia H, Zhang J, Mao J, Fan W, Huang M, Zheng B. Typhoon Loss Assessment in Rural Housing in Ningbo Based on Township-Level Resolution. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(7):3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073463
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Qiang, Hongtao Jia, Jun Zhang, Jianghong Mao, Weijie Fan, Mingfeng Huang, and Bo Zheng. 2022. "Typhoon Loss Assessment in Rural Housing in Ningbo Based on Township-Level Resolution" Applied Sciences 12, no. 7: 3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073463
APA StyleLi, Q., Jia, H., Zhang, J., Mao, J., Fan, W., Huang, M., & Zheng, B. (2022). Typhoon Loss Assessment in Rural Housing in Ningbo Based on Township-Level Resolution. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073463