The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Bridge Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) System
2.1. The Importance of Using the SHM System
2.2. Defining and Identifying the Damage
- -
- Level I (Damage detection): This level is identified when a damage event occurs.
- -
- Level II (Damage location): This level is detected when damage occurs, and then the location and orientation of the damage are determined.
- -
- Level III (Damage typification): This level is detected when damage occurs, the location and orientation of the damage, and then damage severity is determined, and the kind of damage is estimated.
- -
- Level IV (Damage extent): This level considers the possibilities of limiting or postponing the extent of damage once previous levels have been completed.
- -
- Level V (Damage prediction): After completing the previous four levels, this level assesses the bridge’s remaining usable life or its viability status, depending on the situation.
2.3. Challenges and Different Sorts of SHM Systems
3. SHM of Bridge, AI and Recent Technologies
3.1. SHM of Bridge and AI
- -
- Regression (Supervised learning techniques): Regression techniques are used to predict the output values based on the input characteristics found in the data that is put into the system.
- -
- Classification (Supervised learning techniques): Classification, in contrast to regression, yields a category (label) rather than a numeric value. It is important to know that binary classification means predicting one of two classes, while multi-class classification means predicting one of more than two classes.
- -
- Clustering (Unsupervised learning techniques): Clustering is the technique of organizing a set of things such that items within the same group (called a cluster) are more comparable to each other than those within any other grouping.
3.2. SHM of Bridge and AI and Drone Technology
3.3. SHM of Bridge and AI and 3D Printing
4. Discussion and Remarks
- -
- In the data-driven method, the data patterns of the changes in bridges are directly examined, and since failure detection can become a statistical pattern recognition problem, conventional data-driven methods are derived from multivariate statistics. But their applications are not perfect because they use a large volume of data and take a long time to process. Since the introduction of cloud computing, traditional computing concerns have taken a back seat. Furthermore, new algorithms that incorporate greater parameters provide interesting answers to the issues of inefficient data processing in huge data sets. These advances are aided by the use of big data and AI technology [143,144]. The review of the past literature showed that AI is a promising way to analyze the huge datasets that come from monitoring the health of bridges, which is difficult and complicated when using with traditional methods. Based on these intelligent approaches, computational techniques are used to create a framework for SHM systems that are based on big data and solve computational problems. These techniques can also be used to create new ways to analyze data. In data-driven methods, one of the most important capabilities of artificial intelligence methods is pattern recognition that can identify damage. In fact, damage detection aims to train a model that can draw a decision boundary between the damaged and undamaged states. In the realm of data analysis, a plethora of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques and algorithms may be found. Meanwhile, deep learning is one approach to machine learning and AI that models how the human brain acquires knowledge and excels at processing massive datasets. One of Deep Learning’s most valuable features is that, as more data is supplied, the model’s performance improves [145,146]. Automatic actions are also included in the modeling processes and feature extraction. So, it is suggested that more in-depth studies be done on how deep learning, one of the newest types of AI, can be used to improve the analysis and damage detection in SHM for bridges.
- -
- Bridge structure health monitoring is long-term monitoring to ensure that the bridge is always operational. Sensors are one of the most important components of this system, one which plays a key role in monitoring bridges in order to obtain sufficient, accurate, and reliable data [147,148]. Therefore, choosing the type of data collection sensor is very important. These sensors should be durable enough to deal with environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and corrosive substances, Also, choosing the location of these sensors is one of the other important points that should be considered. Although there are suggestions, instructions, and rules for choosing the right type and location of sensors, due to the importance of the issue and the relatively high cost of their preparation and installation, more studies should be done in the field of finding more optimal solutions [149,150]. Optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, and harmony search algorithm are among the optimization algorithms that can be very effective in this regard.
- -
- In SHM bridge systems, visual inspections are often expensive, take a long time, and are not always easy. Although inspection by human inspectors has an important advantage, and that is the accompaniment of the inspector’s senses in the system of SHM, such as the inspector’s sense of sight, touch, and hearing, which can be an advantage over the use of drones. But it should be noted that an inspector could also make a mistake. One of the best alternatives to visual inspection of bridges is the use of drones. Drones are reliable and intelligent tools that can check on the condition of bridges online and effectively [151,152]. Since the first drone was built, manufacturing of them has increased, and now, during the fourth industrial revolution, companies are realizing that drones may benefit from a wider range of features and improvements. Drones can check the condition of the bridge from relatively any angle and pinpoint specific damage thanks to their high altitude of flight. In addition to being able to fly in a variety of weather situations, UAVs may also be equipped with high-tech cameras that allow them to continuously monitor the bridges from every angle [153]. Given recent developments in the fields of Internet of Things, 5G and 6G Internet, as well as artificial intelligence, on the one hand, and experts’ desire to use drones in SHM systems on the other, many developments and studies are still required. Without a doubt, these changes will make it easier for drones to check on the health of bridges. With the improvement of technology and the simplification and improvement of laws and rules, drones can be used in bridge SHM systems on a large scale and as a useful tool.
- -
- In an age when artificial intelligence (AI) techniques like machine learning are being employed to improve the value chain, 3D printing technology is an integral aspect of the fourth industrial revolution. As it is becoming more crucial as a decision maker, AI is becoming increasingly capable of processing enormous volumes of complicated data in a very short period. With the advent of new software and advances in AI, the system will be able to discern this need on its own and take over quality monitoring of the parts [154,155,156]. Using artificial intelligence, 3D printer technology can definitely help to fix many parts of bridges in the coming years in a better way.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Al Nuaimi, E.; Al Neyadi, H.; Mohamed, N.; Al-Jaroodi, J. Applications of big data to smart cities. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2015, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 2017, 60, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, B.N.; Khan, M.; Han, K. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prus, P.; Sikora, M. The impact of transport infrastructure on the sustainable development of the region—Case study. Agriculture 2021, 11, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razmjoo, A.; Østergaard, P.A.; Denai, M.; Nezhad, M.M.; Mirjalili, S. Effective policies to overcome barriers in the development of smart cities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 79, 102175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Astarita, V. Challenges and Opportunities of Using Data Fusion Methods for Travel Time Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Istanbul, Turkey, 17–20 May 2022; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 587–592. [Google Scholar]
- Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Gallelli, V.; Astarita, V. Prioritizing the Potential Smartification Measures by Using an Integrated Decision Support System with Sustainable Development Goals (a Case Study in Southern Italy). Safety 2022, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estes, A.C.; Frangopol, D.M. Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states. J. Bridge Eng. 2001, 6, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, A.; Zia, A.; Koliba, C. Adapting bridge infrastructure to climate change: Institutionalizing resilience in intergovernmental transportation planning processes in the Northeastern USA. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2017, 22, 175–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casas, J.R.; Moughty, J.J. Bridge damage detection based on vibration data: Past and new developments. Front. Built Environ. 2017, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jeong, Y.; Kim, W.; Lee, I.; Lee, J. Bridge inspection practices and bridge management programs in China, Japan, Korea, and US. J. Struct. Integr. Maint. 2018, 3, 126–135. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, L.; Frangopol, D.M.; Mondoro, A.; Yang, D.Y. Sustainability-informed bridge ranking under scour based on transportation network performance and multiattribute utility. J. Bridge Eng. 2018, 23, 04018082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Zhou, Z. Sustainability-based lifecycle management for bridge infrastructure using 6D BIM. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Artese, S.; Zinno, R. TLS for dynamic measurement of the elastic line of bridges. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zinno, R.; Artese, S. Innovative methods and materials in structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranyal, E.; Sadhu, A.; Jain, K. Road condition monitoring using smart sensing and artificial intelligence: A review. Sensors 2022, 22, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sony, S.; Dunphy, K.; Sadhu, A.; Capretz, M. A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques. Eng. Struct. 2021, 226, 111347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moughty, J.J.; Casas, J.R. A state-of-the-art review of modal-based damage detection in bridges: Development, challenges, and solutions. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Song, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, B. Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altunışık, A.C.; Okur, F.Y.; Karaca, S.; Kahya, V. Vibration-based damage detection in beam structures with multiple cracks: Modal curvature vs. modal flexibility methods. Nondestruct. Test. Evaluat. 2019, 34, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vardanega, P.J.; Webb, G.T.; Fidler, P.R.A.; Huseynov, F.; Kariyawasam, K.K.G.K.D.; Middleton, C.R. Bridge monitoring. In Innovative Bridge DESIGN Handbook; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2022; pp. 893–932. [Google Scholar]
- He, Z.; Li, W.; Salehi, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Jiao, P. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. 2022, 136, 104168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zinno, R.; Artese, S.; Clausi, G.; Magarò, F.; Meduri, S.; Miceli, A.; Venneri, A. Structural health monitoring (SHM). In The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 225–249. [Google Scholar]
- Ghazal, T.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Alshurideh, M.T.; Alzoubi, H.M.; Ahmad, M.; Akbar, S.S.; Akour, I.A. IoT for smart cities: Machine learning approaches in smart healthcare—A review. Fut. Internet 2021, 13, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Qiao, L.; Kumar Singh, A.; Wang, Q. AI-empowered IoT security for smart cities. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2021, 21, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alavi, A.; Feng, M.; Jiao, P.; Sharif-Khodaei, Z. (Eds.) The Rise of Smart Cities: Advanced Structural Sensing and Monitoring Systems; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Greco, F.; Lonetti, P.; Zinno, R. An analytical delamination model for laminated plates including bridging effects. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2002, 39, 2435–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artese, S.; Lerma García, J.L.; Zagari, G.; Zinno, R. The survey, the representation and the structural modeling of a dated bridge. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Archaeology, Computer Graphics, Cultural Heritage and Innovation, Valencia, Spain, 5–7 September 2016; pp. 162–168. [Google Scholar]
- Khosravikia, F.; Potter, A.; Prakhov, V.; Zalachoris, G.; Cheng, T.; Tiwari, A.; Frohlich, C. Seismic Vulnerability and Post-Event Actions for Texas Bridge Infrastructure; No. FHWA/TX-18/0-6916-1; Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Moss, R.; Matthews, S. In-service structural monitoring a state-of-the-art review. Struct. Eng. 1995, 73, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
- Sohn, H.; Farrar, C.R.; Hemez, F.M.; Shunk, D.D.; Stinemates, D.W.; Nadler, B.R. A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001; Los Alamos National Laboratory Report No. LA-13976-MS; Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, New Mexico, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Artese, S.; Achilli, V.; Zinno, R. Monitoring of bridges by a laser pointer: Dynamic measurement of support rotations and elastic line displacements: Methodology and first test. Sensors 2018, 18, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Enshaeian, A.; Rizzo, P. A Review on Bridge Instrumentation in the United States. In European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 709–717. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, J.M.; Ni, Y.Q. Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng. Struct. 2005, 27, 1715–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Ontiveros, J.R.; Vazquez-Becerra, G.E.; Quintana, J.A.; Carrion, F.J.; Guzman-Acevedo, G.M.; Gaxiola-Camacho, J.R. Implementation of PPP-GNSS measurement technology in the probabilistic SHM of bridge structures. Measurement 2021, 173, 108677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousa, M.A.; Yussof, M.M.; Udi, U.J.; Nazri, F.M.; Kamarudin, M.K.; Parke, G.A.; Ghahari, S.A. Application of Digital Image Correlation in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridge Infrastructures: A Review. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlHamaydeh, M.; Ghazal Aswad, N. Structural Health Monitoring Techniques and Technologies for Large-Scale Structures: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. 2022, 27, 03122004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, M.; Mansoor, A. Structural Health Monitoring and IoT: Opportunities and Challenges. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence of Things, Hanoi, Vietnam, 19–21 May 2022; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar]
- Enshaeian, A.; Ghahremani, B.; Rizzo, P. A review about recent bridge health monitoring programs in the United States. In Proceedings of the Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XVI, Long Beach, CA, USA; 2022; Volume 12048, pp. 395–403. [Google Scholar]
- Maroni, A.; Tubaldi, E.; McDonald, H.; Zonta, D. An SHM-based classification system for risk management of bridge scour. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Smart Infrastructure and Construction. In Institution of Civil Engineers—Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2022; ICE: London, UK, 2022; Volume 175, pp. 92–102. [Google Scholar]
- Momeni, H.; Ebrahimkhanlou, A. High-dimensional data analytics applications in SHM and NDE: Tensor analysis of thermal videos. In Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2022; Volume 12046, pp. 237–242. [Google Scholar]
- Momeni, H.; Ebrahimkhanlou, A. High-dimensional data analytics in structural health monitoring and non-destructive evaluation: A review paper. Smart Mater. Struct. 2022, 31, 043001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azari, H.; O’Shea, D.; Campbell, J. Application of unmanned aerial systems for bridge inspection. Transp. Res. Rec. 2022, 2676, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthorpe, R.J.; Hughes, A.J.; Gardner, P. A forward model driven structural health monitoring paradigm: Damage detection. In Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 3, pp. 119–126. [Google Scholar]
- Pallarés, F.J.; Betti, M.; Bartoli, G.; Pallarés, L. Structural health monitoring (SHM) and Nondestructive testing (NDT) of slender masonry structures: A practical review. Constr Build Mater. 2021, 297, 123768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, J.; Mullins, G.; Lewis, C.; Winters, D. State of the Practice and Art for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridge Substructures; No. FHWA-HRT-09-040; United States, Federal Highway Administration; Office of Infrastructure Research and Development: McLean, VA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Milillo, P.; Giardina, G.; Perissin, D.; Milillo, G.; Coletta, A.; Terranova, C. Pre-collapse space geodetic observations of critical infrastructure: The Morandi Bridge, Genoa, Italy. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cuong-Le, T.; Nghia-Nguyen, T.; Khatir, S.; Trong-Nguyen, P.; Mirjalili, S.; Nguyen, K.D. An efficient approach for damage identification based on improved machine learning using PSO-SVM. Eng. Comput. 2022, 38, 3069–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuong-Le, T.; Minh, H.L.; Sang-To, T.; Khatir, S.; Mirjalili, S.; Wahab, M.A. A novel version of grey wolf optimizer based on a balance function and its application for hyperparameters optimization in deep neural network (DNN) for structural damage identification. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 142, 106829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rytter, A. Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Gordan, M.; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.; Ismail, Z.; Ghaedi, K.; Carroll, P.; McCrum, D.; Samali, B. State-of-the-art review on advancements of data mining in structural health monitoring. Measurement 2022, 193, 110939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heiza, K.M.; Khalil, A.H.; El Nawawy, O.A. State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing). In Proceedings of the 11th The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, Agadir, Morocco, 22–24 April 2016; Volume 11, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Comisu, C.C.; Taranu, N.; Boaca, G.; Scutaru, M.C. Structural health monitoring system of bridges. Procedia Eng. 2017, 199, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lydon, D.; Lydon, M.; Kromanis, R.; Dong, C.Z.; Catbas, N.; Taylor, S. Bridge damage detection approach using a roving camera technique. Sensors 2021, 21, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Xi, R.; Li, C.; Li, G. Review of bridge structural health monitoring based on GNSS: From displacement monitoring to dynamic characteristic identification. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 80043–80065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V.K.; Renault, É.; Ha, V.H. Road anomaly detection using smartphone: A brief analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile, Secure, and Programmable Networking, MSPN 2018, Paris, France, 18–20 June 2018; Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 11005, pp. 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malekloo, A.; Ozer, E.; Al-Turjman, F. Combination of GIS and SHM in prognosis and diagnosis of bridges in earthquake-prone locations. In Smart Grid in IoT-Enabled Spaces; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 139–158. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, T.; Chun, C.; Ryu, S.K. Detection of road-surface anomalies using a smartphone camera and accelerometer. Sensors 2021, 21, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krichen, M. Anomalies detection through smartphone sensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 7207–7217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malekian, A.; Chitsaz, N. Concepts, procedures, and applications of artificial neural network models in streamflow forecasting. In Advances in Streamflow Forecasting; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 115–147. [Google Scholar]
- Indhu, R.; Sundar, G.R.; Parveen, H.S. A Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for vibration-based SHM and vision-based SHM. In Proceedings of the 2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS), Coimbatore, India, 23–25 February 2022; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 418–422. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, K.; Muthukkumarasamy, V. Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 12–14 December 2016; IEEE: Piscataway Township, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1392–1393. [Google Scholar]
- Ibba, S.; Pinna, A.; Seu, M.; Pani, F.E. CitySense: Blockchain-oriented smart cities. In Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Cologne, Germany, 22–26 May 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, L.; Xie, G.; Qu, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46134–46145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krichen, M.; Lahami, M.; Cheikhrouhou, O.; Alroobaea, R.; Maâlej, A.J. Security testing of internet of things for smart city applications: A formal approach. In Smart Infrastructure and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 629–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, B.; Khamparia, A.; Sagayam, K.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Ahad, M.A.; Debnath, N.C. Blockchain for smart cities: A review of architectures, integration trends and future research directions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krichen, M.; Ammi, M.; Mihoub, A.; Almutiq, M. Blockchain for modern applications: A survey. Sensors 2022, 22, 5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Security, privacy and risks within smart cities: Literature review and development of a smart city interaction framework. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haritos, N.; Owen, J.S. The use of vibration data for damage detection in bridges: A comparison of system identification and pattern recognition approaches. Struct. Health Monit. 2004, 3, 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friswell, M.I. Damage identification using inverse methods. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2007, 365, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biliszczuk, J.; Hawryszków, P.; Teichgraeber, M. SHM system and a FEM model-based force analysis assessment in stay cables. Sensors 2021, 21, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz, M.; Charbonnel, P.É.; Chamoin, L. Robust energy-based model updating framework for random processes in dynamics: Application to shaking-table experiments. Comput. Struct. 2022, 264, 106746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordan, M.; Razak, H.A.; Ismail, Z.; Ghaedi, K. Data mining-based damage identification using imperialist competitive algorithm and artificial neural network. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 2018, 15, e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordan, M.; Ismail, Z.B.; Razak, H.A.; Ghaedi, K.; Ghayeb, H.H. Optimization-based evolutionary data mining techniques for structural health monitoring. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2020, 9, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zinno, R.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Guido, G.; Vitale, A. Artificial intelligence and structural health monitoring of bridges: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 88058–88078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorini Morosini, A.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Geem, Z.W. Development of a binary model for evaluating water distribution systems by a pressure driven analysis (PDA) approach. Appl. Sci. 2022, 10, 3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamwal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M.; Giallanza, A. Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: A systematic review and future research directions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guido, G.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Vitale, A.; Astarita, V. Application of Feature Selection Approaches for Prioritizing and Evaluating the Potential Factors for Safety Management in Transportation Systems. Computers 2022, 11, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, T.; Ardolino, M.; Bacchetti, A.; Perona, M. The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 1922–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi, H.; Burgueño, R. Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering. Eng. Struct. 2018, 171, 170–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flah, M.; Ragab, M.; Lazhari, M.; Nehdi, M.L. Localization and classification of structural damage using deep learning single-channel signal-based measurement. Autom. Constr. 2022, 139, 104271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.B.; Tewari, S.; Biswas, S.; Lohani, B.; Dwivedi, U.D.; Dwivedi, D.; Jung, J.P. Recent Advancements in AI-Enabled Smart Electronics Packaging for Structural Health Monitoring. Metals 2021, 11, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginan, C.P.; Jayalekshmi, B.R. Applications of AI in Health Monitoring of Structures in Potential Seismic Areas—A Review. In A System Engineering Approach to Disaster Resilience; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 351–363. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, J.; Tang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Heng, J.; Chu, X.; Wu, T. Intelligent cognition of traffic loads on road bridges: From measurement to simulation–A review. Measurement 2022, 200, 111636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.K.; Huang, T.H. Damage quantification of 3D-printed structure based on composite multiscale cross-sample entropy. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 30, 015015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escarcega, M.; Bradley, S.; Campos, G.; Randall, P.; Strebe, L.; Momeni, H.; Ebrahimkhanlou, A. Corrosion Monitoring and Mitigation in Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Novel 3D-Printed Valves and Internet-of-Things Approach. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Virtual, 1–5 November 2021; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 85543, p. V001T01A007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flah, M.; Nunez, I.; Ben Chaabene, W.; Nehdi, M.L. Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: A systematic review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2021, 28, 2621–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.W.; Ni, Y.Q.; Wang, S.M. Structural health monitoring of railway bridges using innovative sensing technologies and machine learning algorithms: A concise review. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 1, liac009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Civera, M.; Mugnaini, V.; Zanotti Fragonara, L. Machine learning-based automatic operational modal analysis: A structural health monitoring application to masonry arch bridges. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghiasi, A.; Ng, C.T.; Sheikh, A.H. Damage detection of in-service steel railway bridges using a fine k-nearest neighbor machine learning classifier. Structures 2022, 45, 1920–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueiredo, E.; Moldovan, I.; Alves, P.; Rebelo, H.; Souza, L. Smartphone Application for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Sensors 2022, 22, 8483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bud, M.A.; Moldovan, I.; Radu, L.; Nedelcu, M.; Figueiredo, E. Reliability of probabilistic numerical data for training machine learning algorithms to detect damage in bridges. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez-Cabrera, A.; Escamilla-Ambrosio, P.J. Review of Machine-Learning Techniques Applied to Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Building and Bridge Structures. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgadillo, R.M.; Casas, J.R. Bridge damage detection via improved completed ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise and machine learning algorithms. Struct Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baba, S.; Kondoh, J. Damage evaluation of fixed beams at both ends for bridge health monitoring using a combination of a vibration sensor and a surface acoustic wave device. Eng. Struct. 2022, 262, 114323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yuen, K.V. Review of artificial intelligence-based bridge damage detection. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2022, 14, 16878132221122770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordan, M.; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.; Ghaedi, K.; Thambiratnam, D.P.; Ismail, Z. Introduction to monitoring of bridge infrastructure using soft computing techniques. In Applied Methods in Design and Construction of Bridges, Highways and Roads-Theory and Practice; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Bono, A.; D’Alfonso, L.; Fedele, G.; Filice, A.; Natalizio, E. Path Planning and Control of a UAV Fleet in Bridge Management Systems. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuge, S.; Xu, X.; Zhong, L.; Gan, S.; Lin, B.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X. Noncontact deflection measurement for bridge through a multi-UAVs system. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2022, 37, 746–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Modir, A.; Tansel, I. Analysis of Force Sensing Accuracy by Using SHM Methods on Conventionally Manufactured and Additively Manufactured Small Polymer Parts. Polymers 2022, 14, 3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, M.; Lourenço, P.B.; Ramana, G.V. Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures by using the internet of things: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 48, 103954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharry, T.; Guan, H.; Nguyen, A.; Oh, E.; Hoang, N. Latest advances in finite element modelling and model updating of cable-stayed bridges. Infrastructures 2022, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moallemi, A.; Burrello, A.; Brunelli, D.; Benini, L. Model-based vs. data-driven approaches for anomaly detection in structural health monitoring: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Glasgow, UK, 17–20 May 2021; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Azimi, M.; Eslamlou, A.D.; Pekcan, G. Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors 2020, 20, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malekloo, A.; Ozer, E.; AlHamaydeh, M.; Girolami, M. Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights. Struct. Health Monit. 2022, 21, 1906–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Entezami, A.; Sarmadi, H.; Behkamal, B.; Mariani, S. Big data analytics and structural health monitoring: A statistical pattern recognition-based approach. Sensors 2020, 20, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueiredo, E.; Brownjohn, J. Three decades of statistical pattern recognition paradigm for SHM of bridges. Struct. Health Monit. 2022, 21, 3018–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.S.; Bagchi, A.; Said, A. Developing a pattern-based method for detecting defective sensors in an instrumented bridge. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2013, 3, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Artikis, A.; Weidlich, M.; Gal, A.; Kalogeraki, V.; Gunopulos, D. Self-adaptive event recognition for intelligent transport management. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Silicon Valley, CA, USA, 6–9 October 2013; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 319–325. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, H.; Far, B.H. Simulation-based benefit analysis of pattern recognition application in intelligent transportation systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 28th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Halifax, NS, Canada, 3–6 May 2015; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 507–512. [Google Scholar]
- Entezami, A.; Shariatmadar, H.; Mariani, S. Early damage assessment in large-scale structures by innovative statistical pattern recognition methods based on time series modeling and novelty detection. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2020, 150, 102923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noori, A.M.; Mikaeil, R.; Mokhtarian, M.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Foroughi, M. Feasibility of intelligent models for prediction of utilization factor of TBM. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2020, 38, 3125–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Gallelli, V.; Astarita, V. Development of a binary classification model to assess safety in transportation systems using GMDH-type neural network algorithm. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorini Morosini, A.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Choi, D.Y.; Geem, Z.W. Sensitivity analysis for performance evaluation of a real water distribution system by a pressure driven analysis approach and artificial intelligence method. Water 2021, 13, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guido, G.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Vitale, A.; Astarita, V.; Park, Y.; Geem, Z.W. Evaluation of Contributing Factors Affecting Number of Vehicles Involved in Crashes Using Machine Learning Techniques in Rural Roads of Cosenza, Italy. Safety 2022, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbarzadeh, M.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Jalali, S.M.E.; Zare, S.; Mikaeil, R. Developing the Rule of Thumb for Evaluating Penetration Rate of TBM, Using Binary Classification. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2022, 40, 4685–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Memarpour Ghiaci, A.; Guido, G.; Vitale, A. Road safety assessment and risks prioritization using an integrated SWARA and MARCOS approach under spherical fuzzy environment. Neural. Comput. Appl. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikaeil, R.; Piri, M.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Careddu, N.; Hashemolhosseini, H. An Experimental-Intelligent Method to Predict Noise Value of Drilling in Dimension Stone Industry. JME 2022, 13, 693–713. [Google Scholar]
- Gomes, G.F.; Mendéz, Y.A.D.; Alexandrino, P.D.S.L.; da Cunha Jr, S.S.; Ancelotti, A.C., Jr. The use of intelligent computational tools for damage detection and identification with an emphasis on composites–A review. Compos. Struct. 2018, 196, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikaeil, R.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Ataei, M. Performance prediction of circular saw machine using imperialist competitive algorithm and fuzzy clustering technique. Neural. Comput. Appl. 2018, 29, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, A.; Indragandhi, V.; Ravi, L.; Subramaniyaswamy, V. Detection of Cracks and damage in wind turbine blades using artificial intelligence-based image analytics. Measurement 2019, 147, 106823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, G.T.S.; Tsang, Y.P.; Wu, C.H.; Wong, W.H.; Choy, K.L. A computer vision-based roadside occupation surveillance system for intelligent transport in smart cities. Sensors 2019, 19, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mousavi, M.; Gandomi, A.H.; Abdel Wahab, M.; Glisic, B. Monitoring onsite-temperature prediction error for condition monitoring of civil infrastructures. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Li, H. Relationship modeling between vehicle-induced girder vertical deflection and cable tension by BiLSTM using field monitoring data of a cable-stayed bridge. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2021, 28, e2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Z. Long-Short Term Memory Network-Based Monitoring Data Anomaly Detection of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge. Sensors 2022, 22, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, M.; Gandomi, A.H. Structural health monitoring under environmental and operational variations using MCD prediction error. J. Sound Vibrat. 2021, 512, 116370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Ansari, F.; Wu, B.; Li, S.; Morgese, M.; Zhou, J. LSTM approach for condition assessment of suspension bridges based on time-series deflection and temperature data. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2022, 25, 3450–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahmoradi, J.; Talebi, E.; Roghanchi, P.; Hassanalian, M. A comprehensive review of applications of drone technology in the mining industry. Drones 2020, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doole, M.; Ellerbroek, J.; Hoekstra, J. Estimation of traffic density from drone-based delivery in very low-level urban airspace. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 88, 101862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Nayyar, A.; Luhach, A.K.; Khan, M.S.; Singh, A. A novel Software-Defined Drone Network (SDDN)-based collision avoidance strategy for on-road traffic monitoring and management. Veh. Commun. 2021, 28, 100313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sony, S.; Laventure, S.; Sadhu, A. A literature review of next-generation smart sensing technology in structural health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019, 26, e2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Meng, X.; Ogbebor, J.O.; Guo, S. Efficient, Low-cost Bridge Cracking Detection and Quantification Using Deep-Learning and UAV Images (No. 20STLSU12); Transportation Consortium of South-Central States; Louisiana State University: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mandirola, M.; Casarotti, C.; Peloso, S.; Lanese, I.; Brunesi, E.; Senaldi, I. Use of UAS for damage inspection and assessment of bridge infrastructures. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 72, 102824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, B.J.; Guo, Y. Measuring traffic-induced loads and 3D bridge displacements with UAVs. In Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Sustainability and Innovations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 279–285. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.; Chen, G.; Ding, Q.; Yuan, B.; Yang, X. Three-dimensional reconstruction-based vibration measurement of bridge model using UAVs. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polydorou, E.; Robinson, D.; Taylor, S.; McGetrick, P. Health Monitoring of Structures Using Integrated Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA, 29–31 March 2021; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 243–255. [Google Scholar]
- Gordan, M.; Ismail, Z.; Ghaedi, K.; Ibrahim, Z.; Hashim, H.; Ghayeb, H.H.; Talebkhah, M. A brief overview and future perspective of unmanned aerial systems for in-service structural health monitoring. Eng. Adv. 2021, 1, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, C.; Hendrickson, C.; McNeil, S.; Bullock, D. A field prototype of a robotic pavement crack sealing system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Tokyo, Japan, 3–5 June 1992; pp. 313–322. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Yoo, H.S.; Lee, J.H.; Han, S.W. Chronological development history of X–Y table-based pavement crack sealers and research findings for practical use in the field. Autom. Constr. 2009, 18, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Yam, J.W. A laboratory prototype of automatic pavement crack sealing based on a modified 3D printer. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2022, 23, 2969–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeon, J.; Kang, J.; Yan, W. Spall damage repair using 3D printing technology. Autom. Constr. 2018, 89, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordan, M.; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.; Ismail, Z.; Ghaedi, K.; Hamad Ghayeb, H. Data mining-based structural damage identification of composite bridge using support vector machine. J. AI Data Min. 2021, 9, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
- Fakharian, P.; Eidgahee, D.R.; Akbari, M.; Jahangir, H.; Taeb, A.A. Compressive strength prediction of hollow concrete masonry blocks using artificial intelligence algorithms. Structures 2023, 47, 1790–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, J.Y.; Fu, Y.; Huang, S.K.; Chang, C.M. SHM data anomaly classification using machine learning strategies: A comparative study. Smart Struct. Syst. 2022, 29, 77–91. [Google Scholar]
- Hajializadeh, D. Deep learning-based indirect bridge damage identification system. Struct. Health Monit. 2022, 00, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ásgrímsson, D.S.; González, I.; Salvi, G.; Karoumi, R. Bayesian deep learning for vibration-based bridge damage detection. In Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data Science Techniques; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 27–43. [Google Scholar]
- Noel, A.B.; Abdaoui, A.; Elfouly, T.; Ahmed, M.H.; Badawy, A.; Shehata, M.S. Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut. 2017, 19, 1403–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glisic, B. Concise Historic Overview of Strain Sensors Used in the Monitoring of Civil Structures: The First One Hundred Years. Sensors 2022, 22, 2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, J.H.; Jo, H.; Laflamme, S.; Li, J.; Downey, A.; Bennett, C.; Jung, H.J. Automatic control of AC bridge-based capacitive strain sensor interface for wireless structural health monitoring. Measurement 2022, 202, 111789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komarizadehasl, S.; Lozano, F.; Lozano-Galant, J.A.; Ramos, G.; Turmo, J. Low-Cost Wireless Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Sensors 2022, 22, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, S.; Satme, J.; Alkharusi, S.; Vitzilaios, N.; Downey, A.; Rizos, D. Drone-based vibration monitoring and assessment of structures. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldana-Rodríguez, D.; Ávila-Granados, D.L.; Villalba-Vidales, J.A. Use of unmanned aircraft systems for bridge inspection: A review. Dyna 2021, 88, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumarapu, K.; Mesapam, S.; Keesara, V.R.; Shukla, A.K.; Manapragada, N.V.S.K.; Javed, B. RCC Structural Deformation and Damage Quantification Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Image Correlation Technique. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.W.; Lin, T.K.; Kuo, S.Y.; Huang, T.H. Integration of high-resolution laser displacement sensors and 3D printing for structural health monitoring. Sensors 2017, 18, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baduge, S.K.; Thilakarathna, S.; Perera, J.S.; Arashpour, M.; Sharafi, P.; Teodosio, B.; Mendis, P. Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-Toscano, M.J.; Rodriguez-Quinonez, J.C.; Sergiyenko, O.; Flores-Fuentes, W.; Ramirez-Hernandez, L.R.; Hernandez-Balbuena, D.; Rascon, R. Novel sensing approaches for structural deformation monitoring and 3d measurements. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 11318–11328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Acronyms and Abbreviations | Definition | Acronyms and Abbreviations | Definition |
---|---|---|---|
AANN | Auto associative neural network | KNN | K-nearest neighbors |
AI | Artificial intelligence | LIN | Linear |
ANN | Artificial neural network | LSTM | Long-Short Term Memory |
ARMA | Auto-regressive moving average | MAVs | Micro air vehicles |
CART | Classification and regression tree | MLP | Multilayer perceptron |
CEEMDAN-HHT | Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise—Hilbert Huang transform | ML | Machine learning |
CHAID | Chi-squared automated interaction detection | NDE | Non-destructive evaluation |
CNN | Convolutional neural network | NDT | Non-destructive testing |
CRISP-DM | Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining | PCA | Principal component analysis |
CS | Cuckoo search | PPP | Precise point positioning |
DIC | Digital image correlation | PRNN | Pattern recognition neural network |
DL | Deep Learning | PSO | Particle swarm optimization |
DM | Data Mining | QUEST | Quick, unbiased, efficient statistical tree |
DTEs | Decision tree ensembles | RBF | Radial basis function |
ERA | Eigensystem realization algorithm | RBFNN | Radial basis function neural network |
FEA | Finite element analysis | RCNN | Region Based Convolutional neural network |
FNN | Feed-forward neural networks | ResNet | Residual Networks |
FCM | Fuzzy c-means | RF | Random forest |
FRF | Frequency response function | SDP | Structural damage prediction |
GAN | Generative adversarial network | SHM | Structural health monitoring |
GK | Gustafson–Kessel | SOM | Self-organizing map |
GMM | Gaussian mixture models | SVM | Support vector machine |
GNSS | Global navigation satellite system | UAVs | Unmanned aerial vehicles |
ICA | Imperial competitive algorithm | ULSCD | Uniform load surface curvature difference |
IoT | Internet of Things | VGGNet | Visual graphics group network |
ITS | Intelligent transportation systems | YOLO | You only look once |
Research | ML Technique | Sensors | UAVs | IoT | 3D Printers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lin and Huang [85] | + | ||||
Escarcega et al. [86] | + | + | |||
Flah et al. [87] | + | + | + | ||
Wang et al. [88] | + | + | + | + | |
Civera et al. [89] | + | + | |||
Ghiasi et al. [90] | + | + | |||
Figueiredo et al. [91] | + | + | |||
Bud et al. [92] | + | + | + | ||
Gomez-Cabrera, and Escamilla-Ambrosio [93] | + | + | |||
Delgadillo and Casas [94] | + | + | |||
Baba, and Kondoh [95] | + | + | |||
Zhang, and Yuen [96] | + | + | + | + | |
Gordan et al. [97] | + | + | |||
Bono et al. [98] | + | + | |||
Zhuge et al. [99] | + | + | |||
Modir, and Tansel [100] | + | + | + | ||
Overall | + | + | + | + | + |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zinno, R.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Guido, G.; Rashvand, K.; Vitale, A.; Sarhadi, A. The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010097
Zinno R, Haghshenas SS, Guido G, Rashvand K, Vitale A, Sarhadi A. The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(1):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010097
Chicago/Turabian StyleZinno, Raffaele, Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas, Giuseppe Guido, Kaveh Rashvand, Alessandro Vitale, and Ali Sarhadi. 2023. "The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges" Applied Sciences 13, no. 1: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010097
APA StyleZinno, R., Haghshenas, S. S., Guido, G., Rashvand, K., Vitale, A., & Sarhadi, A. (2023). The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010097