Innovative Strategies for Combining Solar and Wind Energy with Green Hydrogen Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Renewable Energy Integration
2.1. Overview of Renewable Energy
2.2. Current State of Solar and Wind Energy Technologies
2.2.1. Significance of Solar and Wind in Advancing Sustainable Energy Transition
2.2.2. The Evolution of Solar Energy Technologies
2.2.3. Wind Energy Technologies
2.2.4. Integrating Solar and Wind Renewable Energy Systems
3. Innovative Strategies
3.1. Optimized Energy Conversion and Storage
3.1.1. Techniques for Efficient Energy Conversion
3.1.2. Advanced Storage Solutions for Hydrogen
3.2. Grid Integration and Management
3.2.1. Strategies for Integrating Hybrid Systems into the Grid
3.2.2. Smart Grid Technologies and Management Practices
4. Case Studies and Applications
4.1. Case Study 1: Regional Implementation
4.2. Case Study 2: Environmental Siting of Hydrogen Production Hubs
Comparison of Hybrid Systems in Different Environments
5. Discussion
5.1. Renewable Energy Sources
5.1.1. Solar-Powered Hydrogen Production System
5.1.2. Wind-Powered Hydrogen Production System
5.1.3. Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy System for Hydrogen Production
- Refueling automobiles at H2 stations, where a kilogram of H2 may be produced at a price of 13.12 USD.
- Batteries increase the system performance and enable uninterrupted constant operation of the solar–wind/H2 system.
- The hybrid system has a higher efficiency factor than the single system.
- Supplying homes with power with fuel cells that run on hybrid systems that produce H2.
- Supplying cars with H2 for as little as 9.28 USD/kg.
- At an efficiency of about 61%, the production of 239 kg/h has been attained.
5.2. Challenges and Limitations
- Intermittency and Variability: The inherent fluctuation of solar and wind energy is a substantial obstacle to achieving consistent hydrogen generation. Variations in renewable energy production can result in ineffective electrolysis processes and unreliable hydrogen provision [106,107]. Hybrid solar–wind–hydrogen systems employ multi-layered control strategies to manage renewable energy fluctuations across various timescales. Short-term responses (seconds to minutes) utilize power electronics, battery storage, and fuel cells for rapid adjustments. Medium-term strategies (minutes to hours) incorporate predictive algorithms, energy management systems, and flexible electrolyzer operation. Long-term approaches (hours to days) leverage hydrogen storage, seasonal forecasting, and grid interconnections. Advanced control methods, including adaptive systems, model predictive control, and hierarchical structures, coordinate these components. This comprehensive approach ensures continuous system stability by balancing energy production, storage, and consumption, effectively addressing the intermittent nature of renewable sources in an integrated and efficient manner.
- High capital cost: The equipment required for electrolysis, hydrogen storage, and fuel cells remains expensive. These high initial investments can be a significant barrier to entry for many potential adopters, particularly in regions without strong policy support. Also, developing the necessary infrastructure for large-scale hydrogen storage and distribution requires substantial investment and technological advancements [108,109,110,111,112,113].
- Market Uncertainty and Regulatory hurdles: The embryonic state of the green hydrogen market introduces ambiguity for investors, potentially constraining financing for extensive projects and impeding industry expansion. Also, a lack of standardized regulations and codes for hydrogen systems in many regions can slow down project development and increase compliance costs [107,114,115,116].
- Material degradation: Prolonged exposure to hydrogen can degrade certain materials in electrolyzers and fuel cells, potentially reducing the system lifespan and increasing maintenance costs. Therefore, accurately predicting the performance degradation of fuel cells is both theoretically significant and practically important, highlighting the need for further research in this area [117].
- Safety issues: Hydrogen is extremely combustible and necessitates cautious handling. Integrating strong safety measures and protocols increases the overall complexity and cost of the system, especially in densely populated regions.
- Fuel cell efficiency: The process of converting electricity into hydrogen through electrolysis and subsequently converting it back into electricity using fuel cells is characterized by a relatively poor overall efficiency, often ranging from 30% to 40%. This decrease in efficiency can render the system less economically feasible as compared to the direct utilization of renewable electricity or alternative energy storage technologies [118,119,120,121].
- Automated forecasting and control systems: The integration of solar and wind resources with hydrogen production can be optimized with the use of intelligent control systems and advanced weather forecasting technologies. The influence of intermittency can be reduced by using machine learning algorithms to forecast the output of renewable energy and modify electrolysis processes appropriately.
- Cost reduction strategies: One way to lower the capital costs of hydrogen systems is to use less expensive materials, increase the output, and enhance manufacturing processes. The use of carbon pricing mechanisms, government incentives, and subsidies may contribute to the increased economic viability of these systems.
- Standardization and market policy support: Regulatory hurdles can be reduced through the development and implementation of international standards for hydrogen systems. Government policies that incentivize green hydrogen production and use can help create a more stable market environment and attract investment. This can include feed-in tariffs for green hydrogen, mandates for hydrogen use in certain sectors, and support for research and development.
- Development of advanced materials: Research into more durable and hydrogen-resistant materials can extend the lifespan of system components and reduce maintenance costs. This includes developing new catalysts, membranes, and structural materials for electrolyzers and fuel cells.
- Efficiency improvements: The overall efficiency of the system can be raised by continuing research into more effective electrolysis technologies, such as high-temperature electrolysis and sophisticated proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers. Hydrogen-based energy storage can also become more viable through creating reversible fuel cells and increasing fuel cell efficiency.
5.3. Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
Anion Exchange Membrane | AEM |
Alternating Current | AC |
Alkaline Electrolysis | ALK |
Alkaline Fuel Cell | AFC |
Alkaline Water Electrolysis | AWE |
Advanced Metering Infrastructure | AMI |
Artificial Intelligence | AI |
Balance of Plant | BOP |
Building-integrated Photovoltaics | BIPV |
Carbon dioxide Capture and Utilisation | CCU |
Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage | CCS |
Concentrated Solar Power | CSP |
Carbon monoxide | CO |
Carbon dioxide | CO2 |
Copper | Cu |
Direct Current | DC |
Direct Methanol Fuel Cell | DMFC |
Deep Learning | DL |
European Power Exchange | EPEX |
Energy Management Electrolysis | EMS |
Fossil abiotic depletion potentials | F-ADP |
Fuel cell electric vehicles | FCVEs |
Gas hydrogen storage | GH2 |
Gigawatts | GW |
Greenhouse Gas | GHG |
Green Hydrogen | GH |
Hybrid renewable energy systems | HRES |
Hydrogen evolution reaction | HER |
Hydrogen energy storage systems | HESSs |
High Voltage Direct Current | HVDC |
Levelized cost of hydrogen | LCOH |
Life Cycle Assessment | LCA |
Liquid hydrogen storage | LH2 |
Low Heating Value | LHV |
Machine Learning | ML |
Material-based hydrogen storage | MH2 |
Maximum Power Point tracking | MPPT |
Methane | CH4 |
Megawatts | MW |
Metric Tonnes | MT |
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells | MCFC |
Natural Gas | NG |
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion | OTEC |
Oxygen Evolution Reaction | OER |
Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell | PAFC |
Photo-electrocatalysis | PEC |
Photovoltaic | PV |
Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells | PEMFC |
Power Management System | PMS |
Power-to-Gas | P2G |
Power-to-X | PtX |
Proton Exchange Membrane | PEM |
Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis | PEMEC |
Renewable Energy Sources | RES |
Salinity Gradient Solar Pond | SGSP |
Solar-to-hydrogen | STH |
Solid Oxide Electrolysis | SOE |
Steam Methane Reformer | SMR |
Substitute Natural Gas | SNG |
Terawatts | TW |
Ten-Year Network Development Plan | TYNDP |
Thermoelectric Generator | TEG |
Transmission System Operators | TSOs |
Trilateral Cycle | TLC |
United Nation | UN |
Variable Renewable Energy | VRE |
Western Interconnection | WI |
Wind Turbine | WT |
Zinc Cadmium Sulphide | ZnCds |
References
- Elkhatat, A.; Al-Muhtaseb, S.A. Combined ‘Renewable Energy–Thermal Energy Storage (RE–TES)’ Systems: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghahosseini, A.; Bogdanov, D.; Breyer, C. A Techno-Economic Study of an Entirely Renewable Energy-Based Power Supply for North America for 2030 Conditions. Energies 2017, 10, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benghanem, M.; Mellit, A.; Almohamadi, H.; Haddad, S.; Chettibi, N.; Alanazi, A.M.; Dasalla, D.; Alzahrani, A. Hydrogen Production Methods Based on Solar and Wind Energy: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnabuife, S.G.; Hamzat, A.K.; Whidborne, J.; Kuang, B.; Jenkins, K.W. Integration of renewable energy sources in tandem with electrolysis: A technology review for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parra, D.; Valverde, L.; Pino, F.J.; Patel, M.K. A review on the role, cost and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonisation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razi, F.; Dincer, I. A critical evaluation of potential routes of solar hydrogen production for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 264, 121582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelkareem, M.A.; Abdelghafar, A.A.; Mahmoud, M.; Sayed, E.T.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Alami, A.H.; Al Agha, M.M.; Olabi, A.G. Optimized solar photovoltaic-powered green hydrogen: Current status, recent advancements, and barriers. Sol. Energy 2023, 265, 112072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ba-Alawi, A.H.; Nguyen, H.-T.; Aamer, H.; Yoo, C. Techno-economic risk-constrained optimization for sustainable green hydrogen energy storage in solar/wind-powered reverse osmosis systems. J. Energy Storage 2024, 90, 111849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stolte, M.; Minuto, F.D.; Lanzini, A. Optimizing green hydrogen production from wind and solar for hard-to-abate industrial sectors across multiple sites in Europe. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 79, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoghi, M.; Hosseinzadeh, N.; Gharaie, S.; Zare, A. Energy and exergy-economic performance comparison of wind, solar pond, and ocean thermal energy conversion systems for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Nassar, A.K.; Al-Jiboory, A.K.; Viktor, P.; Telba, A.A.; Awwad, E.M.; Amjad, A.; Fakhruldeen, H.F.; Algburi, S.; Mashkoor, S.C.; et al. Mapping Europe renewable energy landscape: Insights into solar, wind, hydro, and green hydrogen production. Technol. Soc. 2024, 77, 102535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikuerowo, T.; Bade, S.O.; Akinmoladun, A.; Oni, B.A. The integration of wind and solar power to water electrolyzer for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 76, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, S.; Sharma, S.K.; Lal, S. Feasible synergy between hybrid solar PV and wind system for energy supply of a green building in Kota (India): A case study using iHOGA. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 315, 118783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saray, J.A.; Gharehghani, A.; Hosseinzadeh, D. Towards sustainable energy Carriers: A solar and Wind-Based systems for green liquid hydrogen and ammonia production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 304, 118215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimentel, D. Renewable and solar energy technologies: Energy and environmental issues. In Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems: Benefits and Risks; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashie-Lewis, B.C.; Nnabuife, S.G. Hydrogen Production, Distribution, Storage and Power Conversion in a Hydrogen Economy—A Technology Review. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021, 8, 100172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vikara, D.; Shih, C.Y.; Lin, S.; Guinan, A.; Grant, T.; Morgan, D.; Remson, D. US DOE’s Economic Approaches and Resources for Evaluating the Cost of Implementing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS). J. Sustain. Energy Eng. 2018, 5, 307–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Gaast, W.; Begg, K.; Flamos, A. Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batra, G. Renewable Energy Economics: Achieving Harmony between Environmental Protection and Economic Goals. Soc. Sci. Chron. 2023, 2, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nekrasov, S.A. Reducing Costs for Integration of Renewable Energy Sources: A Way to Making Renewable Energy More Accessible. Therm. Eng. 2021, 68, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnabuife, S.G.; Darko, C.K.; Obiako, P.C.; Kuang, B.; Sun, X.; Jenkins, K. A Comparative Analysis of Different Hydrogen Production Methods and Their Environmental Impact. Clean Technol. 2023, 5, 1344–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, O.A.; Masood, S.H. A brief overview of solar and wind energy in Libya: Current trends and the future development. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 377, 012136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nema, P.; Nema, R.K.; Rangnekar, S. A current and future state of art development of hybrid energy system using wind and PV-solar: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2096–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Algburi, S.; Sameen, A.Z.; Salman, H.M.; Jaszczur, M. A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Solar and wind-powered solutions: Challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. Results Eng. 2023, 20, 101621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Zuo, C.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, H.; Cheng, M.; Hao, F.; Bao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Perovskite-based tandem solar cells. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekar, M.; Senthilkumar, T. Five decades of evolution of solar photovoltaic thermal (PVT) technology—A critical insight on review articles. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 128997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machín, A.; Márquez, F. Advancements in Photovoltaic Cell Materials: Silicon, Organic, and Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials 2024, 17, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbert, G.M.J.; Iniyan, S.; Sreevalsan, E.; Rajapandian, S. A review of wind energy technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1117–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, R.; Babu, N.R. Recent developments of control strategies for wind energy conversion system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, T.; Islam, S.Z.; Hemmati, A.; Khalid, M.S.U. A Review of Recent Advancements in Offshore Wind Turbine Technology. Energies 2022, 15, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMorland, J.; Collu, M.; McMillan, D.; Carroll, J. Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 163, 112499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhutta, M.M.A.; Hayat, N.; Farooq, A.U.; Ali, Z.; Jamil, S.R.; Hussain, Z. Vertical axis wind turbine—A review of various configurations and design techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1926–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajpar, A.H.; Ali, I.; Eladwi, A.E.; Bashir, M.B.A. Recent development in the design of wind deflectors for vertical axis wind turbine: A review. Energies 2021, 14, 5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawle, Y.; Gupta, S.C.; Bohre, A.K. Review of hybrid renewable energy systems with comparative analysis of off-grid hybrid system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2217–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltamaly, A.M.; Mohamed, M.A. Optimal Sizing and Designing of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Smart Grid Applications; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanan, C.J.; Lim, K.H.; Kurnia, J.C.; Roy, S.; Bora, B.J.; Medhi, B.J. Towards sustainable power generation: Recent advancements in floating photovoltaic technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 194, 114322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Götz, M.; Lefebvre, J.; Mörs, F.; Koch, A.M.; Graf, F.; Bajohr, S.; Reimert, R.; Kolb, T. Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 1371–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.S.; Himabindu, V. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis—A review. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2019, 2, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadhani, F.; Hussain, M.A.; Mokhlis, H. A Comprehensive Review and Technical Guideline for Optimal Design and Operations of Fuel Cell-Based Cogeneration Systems. Processes 2019, 7, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, J.; Meng, X.; Tang, X.; Li, H.; Hasanien, H.; Alharbi, M.; Dong, Z.; Shen, J.; Sun, C.; Fan, F.; et al. An Accurate Parameter Estimation Method of the Voltage Model for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Energies 2024, 17, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.-T.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.-Y.; Tian, W.-W.; Yuan, Z.-Y. Water electrolysis for hydrogen production: From hybrid systems to self-powered/catalyzed devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 49–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Abdulateef, A.M.; Hafedh, S.A.; Al-samari, A.; Abdulateef, J.; Sameen, A.Z.; Salman, H.M.; Al-Jiboory, A.K.; Wieteska, S.; Jaszczur, M. Renewable energy-to-green hydrogen: A review of main resources routes, processes and evaluation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 17383–17408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usman, M.R. Hydrogen storage methods: Review and current status. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meda, U.S.; Rajyaguru, Y.V.; Pandey, A. Generation of green hydrogen using self-sustained regenerative fuel cells: Opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 28289–28314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olabi, A.G.; Abdelghafar, A.A.; Baroutaji, A.; Sayed, E.T.; Alami, A.H.; Rezk, H.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 23498–23528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukaume, S.; Nagasaki, Y.; Tsuda, M. Stable power supply of an independent power source for a remote island using a Hybrid Energy Storage System composed of electric and hydrogen energy storage systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 13887–13899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Li, J. A three-stage intelligent coordinated operation for grouped hydrogen-based hybrid storage systems considering the degradation and the future impacts based on multi-criteria decision making. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 6817–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Greenblatt, J.B.; Wei, M.; Eichman, J.; Saxena, S.; Muratori, M.; Guerra, O.J. Flexible grid-based electrolysis hydrogen production for fuel cell vehicles reduces costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, W. Ensemble prediction aided multi-objective co-design optimizations of grid-connected integrated renewables for green hydrogen production. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 425, 138585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şevik, S. Techno-economic evaluation of a grid-connected PV-trigeneration-hydrogen production hybrid system on a university campus. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 23935–23956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cozzolino, R.; Bella, G. A review of electrolyzer-based systems providing grid ancillary services: Current status, market, challenges and future directions. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 1358333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SaberiKamarposhti, M.; Kamyab, H.; Krishnan, S.; Yusuf, M.; Rezania, S.; Chelliapan, S.; Khorami, M. A comprehensive review of AI-enhanced smart grid integration for hydrogen energy: Advances, challenges, and future prospects. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 67, 1009–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wazirali, R.; Yaghoubi, E.; Abujazar, M.S.S.; Ahmad, R.; Vakili, A.H. State-of-the-art review on energy and load forecasting in microgrids using artificial neural networks, machine learning, and deep learning techniques. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 225, 109792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatasatish, R.; Dhanamjayulu, C. Reinforcement learning based energy management systems and hydrogen refuelling stations for fuel cell electric vehicles: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 27646–27670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, H.; Qayyum, F.; Iqbal, N.; Khan, M.A.; Naqvi, S.S.A.; Khan, S.; Kim, D.H. Secure Hydrogen Production Analysis and Prediction Based on Blockchain Service Framework for Intelligent Power Management System. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 3192–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnabuife, S.G.; Oko, E.; Kuang, B.; Bello, A.; Onwualu, A.P.; Oyagha, S.; Whidborne, J. The prospects of hydrogen in achieving net zero emissions by 2050: A critical review. Sustain. Chem. Clim. Action 2023, 2, 100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mueller, M.; Dittmeyer, R. Wind-to-Hydrogen Tech Goes to Sea: Is Electrolysis Cheaper Offshore? A New Project will Find Out. IEEE Spectr. 2023, 60, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Gordón, R.; Sánchez-Diéguez, M.; Fattahi, A.; Morales-España, G.; Sijm, J.; Faaij, A. Modelling a highly decarbonised North Sea energy system in 2050: A multinational approach. Adv. Appl. Energy 2022, 5, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hevia-Koch, P.; Jacobsen, H.K. Comparing offshore and onshore wind development considering acceptance costs. Energy Policy 2019, 125, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linnerud, K.; Dugstad, A.; Rygg, B.J. Do people prefer offshore to onshore wind energy? The role of ownership and intended use. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 168, 112732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryberg, D.S.; Caglayan, D.G.; Schmitt, S.; Linßen, J.; Stolten, D.; Robinius, M. The future of European onshore wind energy potential: Detailed distribution and simulation of advanced turbine designs. Energy 2019, 182, 1222–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maienza, C.; Avossa, A.M.; Ricciardelli, F.; Coiro, D.; Troise, G.; Georgakis, C.T. A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz, H.; Serna, J.; Nieto, J.; Soares, C.G. Market Needs, Opportunities and Barriers for the Floating Wind Industry. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Gordón, R.; Gusatu, L.; Morales-España, G.; Sijm, J.; Faaij, A. Benefits of an integrated power and hydrogen offshore grid in a net-zero North Sea energy system. Adv. Appl. Energy 2022, 7, 100097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flammini, M.G.; Prettico, G.; Mazza, A.; Chicco, G. Reducing fossil fuel-based generation: Impact on wholesale electricity market prices in the North-Italy bidding zone. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2021, 194, 107095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Hybrid Projects: How to Reduce Costs and Space of Offshore Developments. no. December 2018. 2019. Available online: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publications/hybrid-projects-how-reduce-costs-and-space-offshore-developments_en (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Walker, B. Place-based allocation of R&D funding: Directing the German innovation system for hydrogen technologies in space. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 2024, 52, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, M.; Vo, D.N.; Yu, H.; Shu, C.M.; Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Strategies for flexible operation of power-to-X processes coupled with renewables. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 179, 113282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, M.; Akimov, A.; Gray, E.M. Economics of renewable hydrogen production using wind and solar energy: A case study for Queensland, Australia. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabaneh, R.; RoyChoudhury, J.; Braun, J.F.; Saxena, S. The Clean Hydrogen Economy and Saudi Arabia: Domestic Developments and International Opportunities; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Kolodziejczyk, B. The role of hydrogen in Australia’s decarbonization and export strategy. In The Clean Hydrogen Economy and Saudi Arabia; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2024; pp. 308–328. [Google Scholar]
- Brannock, M.W.D.; Dagg, B.J.; Mitchell, K.P. Water for hydrogen production: Challenges and opportunities supported by real-world case studies. In Proceedings of the International Desalination Association International World Congress “Charting Resilient Water Solutions”, Sydney, Australia, 9–13 October 2022; pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar-Burnham, E.; Szemat-Vielma, W. Hydrogen Price Race in Australia. In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 12–14 February 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garlett, E.; Holcombe, S. Sustainable Water in Mining? The Importance of Traditional Owner Involvement in Commercial Water Use and Management in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia. Oceania 2023, 93, 282–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BAYKARA, S. Hydrogen production by direct solar thermal decomposition of water, possibilities for improvement of process efficiency. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2004, 29, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A. Hydrogen from solar energy, a clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 4110–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gül, M.; Akyüz, E. Hydrogen Generation from a Small-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Thermal (PV/T) Electrolyzer System: Numerical Model and Experimental Verification. Energies 2020, 13, 2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chadegani, E.A.; Sharifishourabi, M.; Hajiarab, F. Comprehensive assessment of a multi-generation system integrated with a desalination system: Modeling and analysing. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 174, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, T.M.; Ramzy, K.; Elnaghi, B.E.; Abelwhab, M.N.; El-Salam, M.A. Using MATLAB to model and simulate a photovoltaic system to produce hydrogen. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 185, 101–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, T.L.; Kelly, N.A. Predicting efficiency of solar powered hydrogen generation using photovoltaic-electrolysis devices. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 900–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, A.H.; Liao, Z.; Wang, K.; Abdelsamie, M.M.; Xu, C.; Wang, Y. Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis for the Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis under Various Operating Conditions and Design Parameters. Energies 2022, 15, 8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaner, M.R.; Atwater, H.A.; Lewis, N.S.; McFarland, E.W. A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2354–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matute, G.; Yusta, J.M.; Beyza, J.; Monteiro, C. Optimal dispatch model for PV-electrolysis plants in self-consumption regime to produce green hydrogen: A Spanish case study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 25202–25213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temiz, M.; Dincer, I. Concentrated solar driven thermochemical hydrogen production plant with thermal energy storage and geothermal systems. Energy 2021, 219, 119554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marefati, M.; Mehrpooya, M. Introducing a hybrid photovoltaic solar, proton exchange membrane fuel cell and thermoelectric device system. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 2019, 36, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouali, H.A.L.; Moussaoui, M.A.; Mezrhab, A. Hydrogen Production from Two Commercial Dish/Stirling Systems Compared to the Photovoltaic System-Case Study: Eastern Morocco. Appl. Sol. Energy 2020, 56, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, P.; Hu, W.; Xu, X.; Liu, W.; Huang, Q.; Chen, Z. Optimal operation of a wind-electrolytic hydrogen storage system in the electricity/hydrogen markets. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 24412–24423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genç, M.S.; Çelik, M.; Karasu, İ. A review on wind energy and wind–hydrogen production in Turkey: A case study of hydrogen production via electrolysis system supplied by wind energy conversion system in Central Anatolian Turkey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 6631–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, W.; Yumei, H.; Abbas, Q.; Hafeez, M.; Mohsin, M.; Fatima, A.; Jamali, M.A.; Jamali, M.; Siyal, A.; Sohail, N. Assessment of Wind Energy Potential for the Production of Renewable Hydrogen in Sindh Province of Pakistan. Processes 2019, 7, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douak, M.; Settou, N. Estimation of Hydrogen Production Using Wind Energy in Algeria. Energy Procedia 2015, 74, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, M.; Naghdi-Khozani, N.; Jafari, N. Wind energy utilization for hydrogen production in an underdeveloped country: An economic investigation. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 1044–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almutairi, K.; Dehshiri, S.S.H.; Dehshiri, S.J.H.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Issakhov, A.; Techato, K. A thorough investigation for development of hydrogen projects from wind energy: A case study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 18795–18815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khouya, A. Levelized costs of energy and hydrogen of wind farms and concentrated photovoltaic thermal systems. A case study in Morocco. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 31632–31650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayodele, T.R.; Mosetlhe, T.C.; Yusuff, A.A.; Ntombela, M. Optimal design of wind-powered hydrogen refuelling station for some selected cities of South Africa. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 24919–24930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedaghat, A.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Rezaei, M.; Jahangiri, M.; Mehrabi, A. A new semi-empirical wind turbine capacity factor for maximizing annual electricity and hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15888–15903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cao, X.; Liu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Nan, Z.; Teng, L.; Peng, W.; Bian, J. Safety of hydrogen storage and transportation: An overview on mechanisms, techniques, and challenges. Energy Reports 2022, 8, 6258–6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I. Evaluation of a wind energy based system for co-generation of hydrogen and methanol production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15869–15877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babatunde, O.M.; Munda, J.L.; Hamam, Y. Hybridized off-grid fuel cell/wind/solar PV /battery for energy generation in a small household: A multi-criteria perspective. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 6437–6452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal-Agustín, J.L.; Dufo-López, R. Techno-economical optimization of the production of hydrogen from PV-Wind systems connected to the electrical grid. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 747–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, D.; Bamisile, O.; Adebayo, V.; Huang, Q.; Dagbasi, M.; Okonkwo, E.C.; Al-Ansari, T. Integration of wind turbine with heliostat based CSP/CPVT system for hydrogen production and polygeneration: A thermodynamic comparison. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 3316–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Guo, Y. Integration Design and Operation Strategy of Multi-Energy Hybrid System Including Renewable Energies, Batteries and Hydrogen. Energies 2020, 13, 5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awaleh, M.O.; Adan, A.-B.; Dabar, O.A.; Jalludin, M.; Ahmed, M.M.; Guirreh, I.A. Economic Feasibility of Green Hydrogen Production by Water Electrolysis Using Wind and Geothermal Energy Resources in Asal-Ghoubbet Rift (Republic of Djibouti): A Comparative Evaluation. Energies 2021, 15, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambou, F.; Guilbert, D.; Zasadzinski, M.; Rafaralahy, H. A Comprehensive Survey of Alkaline Electrolyzer Modeling: Electrical Domain and Specific Electrolyte Conductivity. Energies 2022, 15, 3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Privitera, S.M.S.; Muller, M.; Zwaygardt, W.; Carmo, M.; Milazzo, R.G.; Zani, P.; Leonardi, M.; Maita, F.; Canino, A.; Foti, M.; et al. Highly efficient solar hydrogen production through the use of bifacial photovoltaics and membrane electrolysis. J. Power Sources 2020, 473, 228619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gado, S.; Ookawara, M.; Nada, S.; Hassan, H. Performance assessment of photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) hybrid adsorption-vapor compression refrigeration system. J. Energy Syst. 2022, 6, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, O.; Gambhir, A.; Staffell, I.; Hawkes, A.; Nelson, J.; Few, S. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 30470–30492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brey, J.J. Use of hydrogen as a seasonal energy storage system to manage renewable power deployment in Spain by 2030. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 17447–17457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The International Renewable Energy Agency. Green hydrogen for industry: A guide to policy making. IRENA 2022, 67. Available online: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2022/Mar/IRENA_Green_Hydrogen_Industry_2022_.pdf?rev=720f138dbfc44e30a2224b476b6dfb77 (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Staffell, I.; Scamman, D.; Abad, A.V.; Balcombe, P.; Dodds, P.E.; Ekins, P.; Shah, N.; Ward, K.R. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 463–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eichman, J.; Harrison, K.; Peters, M. Novel Electrolyzer Applications: Providing More Than Just Hydrogen; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2014.
- Glenk, G.; Reichelstein, S. Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajanovic, A.; Haas, R. Economic prospects and policy framework for hydrogen as fuel in the transport sector. Energy Policy 2018, 123, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hydrogen Council. Path to Hydrogen Competitiveness: A Cost Perspective. no. January, 88, 2020. Available online: www.hydrogencouncil.com (accessed on 23 August 2024).
- Quarton, C.J.; Tlili, O.; Welder, L.; Mansilla, C.; Blanco, H.; Heinrichs, H.; Leaver, J.; Samsatli, N.J.; Lucchese, P.; Robinius, M.; et al. The curious case of the conflicting roles of hydrogen in global energy scenarios. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinius, M.; Otto, A.; Heuser, P.; Welder, L.; Syranidis, K.; Ryberg, D.S.; Grube, T.; Markewitz, P.; Peters, R.; Stolten, D. Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 1: The Principle of Sector Coupling. Energies 2017, 10, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaudin, M.; Zareipour, H.; Schellenberglabe, A.; Rosehart, W. Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2010, 14, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X.; Mei, J.; Tang, X.; Jiang, J.; Sun, C.; Song, K. The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model. Energies 2024, 17, 3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifzadeh, M.; Cooper, N.; Noordende, H.V.; Shah, N. Operational strategies and integrated design for producing green hydrogen from wind electricity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 64, 650–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedaghat, A.; Kalbasi, R.; Narayanan, R.; Mehdizadeh, A.; Soleimani, S.M.; Malayer, M.A.; Al-Khiami, M.I.; Salem, H.; Hussam, W.K.; Sabati, M.; et al. Integrating solar PV systems for energy efficiency in portable cabins: A case study in Kuwait. Sol. Energy 2024, 277, 112715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, A.B. Multi-objective size optimization and economic analysis of a hydrogen-based standalone hybrid energy system for a health care center. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 62, 1154–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martire, M.; Kaya, A.F.; Morselli, N.; Puglia, M.; Allesina, G.; Pedrazzi, S. Analysis and optimization of a hybrid system for the production and use of green hydrogen as fuel for a commercial boiler. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 56, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Key Parameters | Alkaline Electrolysis | PEM Electrolysis | Solid Oxide Electrolysis |
---|---|---|---|
State of development | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial |
Cell temperature in °C | 40–90 | 20–100 | 800–1000 |
Electrolyte | Alkaline solution | Solid polymer membrane | ZrO2 ceramic doped with Y2O3 |
Charge carrier | OH− | H3O+/H+ | O2− |
System power consumption (future) in kWh/m3 (Hs) | 4.3–5.7 | 4.1–4.8 | Not Available |
Cell voltage in V | 1.8–2.4 | 1.8–2.2 | 0.91–1.3 |
H2 production in m3/h (STP, per system) | <760 ≈ 2.7 MW | Up to 450 ≈ 1.6 MW | Not Available |
Cold start time | Minutes–hours | Seconds–minutes | Not Available |
Fuel Cell Type | PEMFC | AFC | DMFC | PAFC | MCFC | SOFC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating temp (°C) | 30–100 | 90–100 | 50–100 | 160–220 | 600–700 | 500–1000 |
Fuels | Hydrocarbons or methanol | Pure hydrogen | Methanol | Hydrogen from natural gas | Natural gas, biogras, others | Natural gas or propane, hydrocarbons or methanol |
Electrolyte | Solid polymeric membrane | Aqueoussolutionof potassium hydroxide soaked in a matrix | Solid organic polymer poly-perfluorosulfonic acid | 100% phosphoric acid stabilized in an alumina-based matrix | Li2CO3/K2CO3 materials stabilized in an alumina-based matrix | Solid, stabilized zirconia ceramic matrix with free oxide ions |
Energy conversion efficiency (heat and power) (%) | 85–90 | 85 | 85 | 85–90 | 85 | Up to 90 |
Electrical efficiency (%) | 30–40 | 60 | 20–25 | 40–42 | 43–47 | 50–60 |
Typical stack size | <1–100 kW | 10–100 kW | up to 1.5 kW | 50–1000 kW (250 kW module typical) | <1–1000 kW (250 kW module typical) | 5–3000 kW |
Operational life cycle | 40,000–50,000 h (stationary) Up to 5000 h (mobile) | Up to 5000 h | 10,000–20,000 h | Up to 40,000 h | Up to 15,000 h | Up to 40,000 h |
Storage Method | Hydrogen Content (wt.% H2) | Volumetric Density (g/L) | Volumetric Energy Density (MJ/L) |
---|---|---|---|
Compression | |||
1 bar, RT | 100 | 0.0814 | 0.01 |
350 bar, RT | 100 | 24.5 | 2.94 |
700 bar, RT | 100 | 41.4 | 4.97 |
700 bar, RT, (inlc. Type IV tank) | 5.7 | 40.8 | 4.9 |
Liquid Hydrogen | |||
1 bar, −253 °C | 100 | 70.8 | 8.5 |
1 bar, −253 °C (inlc. tank) | 14 | 51 | 6.12 |
Metal Hydrides | |||
MgH2 | 7.6 | 110 | 13.2 |
FeTiH2 | 1.89 | 114 | 13.7 |
Metal Hydride | H2 Capacity (wt.%) | Desorption Temperature (°C) | Desorption Enthalpy (kJ/mol H2) |
---|---|---|---|
MgH2 | 7.6 | >300 | 75 |
MgH2–LiBH4 | 11.4 | >350 | 45 |
MgH2–LiAlH4 (1:1 M) | 9.4 | >250 | 45 |
FeTiH2 | 1.89 | >30 | 28 |
LaNi5H6 | 1.4 | >100 | 31 |
Mg2NiH4 | 3.59 | >280 | 65 |
MgH2–NaAlH4 (1:1 M) | 7.6 | >175 | - |
Mg2FeH6 | 5.5 | >300 | 77.6 |
Country | Electricity Cost (USD/Kwh) | H2 Production Cost (USD/Kg) | References |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | NA | 3.10 | [88] |
Pakistan | NA | 4.02 | [89] |
Algeria | NA | 1.214 | [90] |
Iran | 0.0325–0.0755 | 1.375–1.59 | [91] |
Iran | 0.068–0.115 | 2.1008–3.5602 | [92] |
Morocco | NA | 2.36–2.66 | [93] |
South Africa | NA | 6.34–8.97 | [94] |
Afghanistan | 0.063–0.079 | 2.118–2.261 | [91] |
Kuwait | NA | 13.28–11.52 | [95] |
Integrated Solar and Wind Systems for H2 Production | Cost Analysis: H2 Production (USD/kg) Vs. Electricity Generation (USD/kWh) | Performance Metrics and Specifications | References |
---|---|---|---|
Synergized Solar-Wind Hybrid for H2 Production | The cost of generated electricity ranges from 0.06 to 0.55 $/kwh. H2 production costs range from $3.73 to $4.65 per kg. | Utilized in the electrification process. Production of H2 exceeds that of PV and wind. Used as a method for desalination. Utilized as a cooling mechanism utilized as a system of heating. Enhanced effectiveness. | [89,92,93,96,97] |
Wind-Driven H2 Production | H2 production costs range from 5.27–8.01. The cost of electricity produced in USD/kg ranges from 0.08 to 0.55 USD/kwh. | An AC/DC converter is required to power the electrolysis. Extreme wind speed settings. Efficiency is about 5–14%. | [84,85,86,87,102] |
Solar Photovoltaics and H2 | The cost of producing H2 ranges from 3.41 to 16.01 USD/kg, whereas the cost of generated electricity ranges from 0.06–0.38 USD/kWh. | The most commonly used technology for green H2 production. Requires minimal maintenance. Increases H2 output. Lowers production costs. Achieved efficiency of 12.4% in 2010 and 21% by 2020. | [50,79,81,103,104,105] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nnabuife, S.G.; Quainoo, K.A.; Hamzat, A.K.; Darko, C.K.; Agyemang, C.K. Innovative Strategies for Combining Solar and Wind Energy with Green Hydrogen Systems. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219771
Nnabuife SG, Quainoo KA, Hamzat AK, Darko CK, Agyemang CK. Innovative Strategies for Combining Solar and Wind Energy with Green Hydrogen Systems. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(21):9771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219771
Chicago/Turabian StyleNnabuife, Somtochukwu Godfrey, Kwamena Ato Quainoo, Abdulhammed K. Hamzat, Caleb Kwasi Darko, and Cindy Konadu Agyemang. 2024. "Innovative Strategies for Combining Solar and Wind Energy with Green Hydrogen Systems" Applied Sciences 14, no. 21: 9771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219771
APA StyleNnabuife, S. G., Quainoo, K. A., Hamzat, A. K., Darko, C. K., & Agyemang, C. K. (2024). Innovative Strategies for Combining Solar and Wind Energy with Green Hydrogen Systems. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219771