Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Pre-Treatment on the Rehydration of Dried Apple Cube
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring and Improving Aircraft Maintenance Processes Using IT Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Modeling of NaCl and FeSO4 Pretreatment Effect on Refractory Copper Ore Leaching

1
Departamento de Ingeniería en Metalurgia, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó 1531772, Chile
2
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1110939, Chile
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Procesos de Minerales, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
4
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Minas, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031375
Submission received: 11 December 2024 / Revised: 14 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 29 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

:
Black copper oxides, a significant copper resource, present challenges in leaching due to their refractory nature and complex mineralogical composition. This study investigates the sulfation dynamics of the reductive leaching process of black copper ores with the purpose of increasing the copper leaching, focusing on the influences of time and the addition of NaCl and FeSO4 on sulfation behavior. Experiments were designed to replicate industrial conditions using oxidized minerals from the Codelco Salvador hydrometallurgy plant. Multivariate nonlinear regression models and response surface methodology were employed to analyze sulfation behavior. The findings demonstrate that analytical acid consumption (AAC) exerts a consistently positive and statistically significant effect on sulfation across the sampled domain, while NaCl and FeSO₄ also influence the process. However, variations in their levels showed limited impact. Time was significant only within the 24–48 h range. The optimized model predicted maximum sulfation at 60 h with 60% AAC, 90 g NaCl, and 42 g FeSO₄, with strong alignment between the observed and predicted values. These insights emphasize the importance of pretreatment methods, including sulfuric acid curing and NaCl addition, in improving leaching efficiency.

1. Introduction

In certain regions of the world, special copper deposits, known as exotic, exist. These deposits are distinct due to their formation and the composition of their mineralogical species. For instance, porphyry copper deposits undergo oxidation when exposed to atmospheric oxygen and water, forming an oxidation zone. This zone is characterized by the oxidation of hypogene sulfide minerals and the formation of secondary mineral assemblages, which can cause acid rock drainage. The formation of this zone is influenced by various factors, including the mineralogy of the hypogene sulfides, the neutralization potential of gangue minerals, and the presence of an unsaturated zone, which is affected by tectonics, climate, erosion, and the incision of the hydrographic network [1,2]. During the supergene processes, the leachate solution contains elements such as Cu, Mn, and K in solution and can be transported over long distances. These elements then reprecipitate further down in the supergene profile, where the conditions are reducing. In the Atacama Desert, Cu is reprecipitated in the oxide zone through carbonates, chlorides, sulfates, oxides, and copper [3,4]. Exotic copper deposits found in Arizona, New Mexico, and Sonora are metal deposits associated with porphyry Cu deposits. These deposits are usually zoned from ferricrete upgradient and extend into the bedrock leached cap. Moving downgradient, they are seen as black manganese oxides or Cu wad and are eventually found as chrysocolla in the Cu-rich systems [5,6]. The exotic copper deposits exhibit a wide range of size, with some reaching up to 3.5 million tons of copper. Notable examples of these deposits in northern Chile include Radomiro Tomic, El Tesoro, Spence, Mina Sur, and Lomas Bayas [6].
Researchers have made numerous efforts to categorize black copper oxides, but these have yielded inconsistencies. Before early 1988, copper pitch and copper wad were the only recognized minerals of this type. Pincheira et al. proposed the term “black copper silicate” to refer to both minerals, since they share a similar composition and lack a defined crystalline structure [7]. In the copper mining industry, exotic deposits containing minerals refractory to traditional leaching agents, such as sulfuric acid, are commonly referred to as black copper oxides or black coppers. These oxidized ores consist of copper minerals and mineraloids exhibiting green and black hues, which contain significant levels of manganese. The exotic ores include atacamite, chrysocolla copper wad, copper pitch, and neotocite [8,9,10].
It is crucial to emphasize the scarcity of information in the literature regarding the leaching of oxidized minerals containing black copper oxides, despite the significant industrial value of these deposits. This underscores the novelty and potential impact of the proposed investigation, based on the pioneering studies conducted by Contreras and Torres [11,12]. From Contreras, three of the five leaching media used have been selected, i.e., acid, chloride, and acid-reducing, which have shown great potential for the extraction of copper in mixed Cu-Mn-Fe compounds. From the manuscript by Torres et al., the methodology focused on ore pretreatment has been adopted to reduce the redox potential of the leaching solution. It is essential to recognize that not all manganese-containing species are challenging to leach. For manganese carbonate ores, a combination of sulfuric acid and chloride ions effectively dissolves all the manganese present in the ore [13].
Among the species that are most studied for the leaching of black copper are those that contain manganese. Literature reports frequently discuss the use of reducing agents to enhance the dissolution of manganese from the ores [14]. Several studies have been conducted to dissolve manganese-bearing ores, mainly through pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, and biohydrometallurgical routes [14,15]. For instance, ferrous sulfate, sulfur dioxide, and sulfite solutions can serve as effective reducing agents [16]. The leaching of manganese ores using organic reducing agents has also been tested. It has been determined that oxalic acid, when utilized at elevated temperatures within an acidic medium, can effectively dissolve a significant portion (up to 98%) of the manganese present in the minerals [17,18]. Benavente et al. emphasized the importance of manganese-containing species. They noted that these species have a non-crystalline structure and a variable composition. This composition mainly includes copper, manganese, iron, aluminum, and silicon. These traits enhance their resistance to dissolution. Similar characteristics can be found in mineral samples, such as marine polymetallic nodules and manganese ores [19,20,21].
Concerning the wide variety of mineral species present in ores containing black oxides, Contreras proposed the following dissolution reactions [12].
Tenorite (CuO) demonstrates leachability in acidic solutions according to reaction (1), with an equilibrium pH of around 4.5. Dissolution can be accelerated by using hydrochloric acid or increasing the temperature.
CuO(s) + H2SO4(aq)→CuSO4(aq) + H2O(l)
Hematite (Fe2O3), a mineral, exhibits insolubility in water and virtual insolubility in acidified and cyanide solutions, necessitating a more energetic acid, such as hydrochloric acid, for dissolution. Reaction (2) demonstrated that the reaction involving hematite manifests negative free energy, representing its spontaneous nature. Nevertheless, practical application reveals that the kinetics of this reaction are notably slow.
Fe2O3(s) + 6H+(aq)→2Fe+3(aq) + 3H2O(l))
Manganic oxide (Mn2O3) is insoluble in water, so it requires a reducing agent for complete dissolution in diluted sulfuric acid. Adding a suitable reducing agent, such as Fe+2 (reaction (3)), can significantly improve this process.
Mn2O3(s) + 2H+(aq)→Mn+2(aq) + MnO2(s) + H2O(l)
MnO2 + 2Fe+2(aq) + 4H+(aq)→Mn+2(aq) + 2Fe+3(aq) + 2H2O(l)
Mn2O3(s) + 2Fe+2(aq) + 6H+(aq)→2Mn+2(aq) + 2Fe+3(aq) + 3H2O(l)
Manganous oxide (MnO) is a compound known for its easy solubility in most acids (reaction (4)).
MnO(s) + 2H+(aq)→Mn+2(aq) + H2O(l)
Cupric ferrite (CuFe2O4) exhibits high resistance to acid solutions at room temperature under typical leaching conditions. However, enhanced dissolution of this compound can be achieved by elevating the temperature, increasing the acid concentration, or varying the type of acid used, such as by employing hydrochloric acid (HCl). The chemical reaction depicting the dissolution of cupric ferrite is provided below (reaction (5)).
CuFe2O4(s) + 8H+(aq)→Cu+2(aq) + 2Fe+3(aq) + 4H2O(l)
Copper manganite (CuMn2O4) requires an acidic medium for the leaching reaction. Furthermore, the facilitation of dissolution and kinetics requires the presence of a reducing agent, such as a ferrous ion (Fe2+).
CuMn2O4(s) + 8H+(aq) + 2Fe+2(aq)→Cu+2(aq) + 2Fe+3(aq) + 2Mn+2(aq) + 4H2O(l)
The pretreatment of ores is crucial for enhancing the solubility of mineral species. This process primarily involves the addition of concentrated sulfuric acid, a method commonly called “curing” in an industrial context. Furthermore, sodium chloride or nitrate ions have been used to pretreat refractory copper ores such as chalcopyrite [22,23]. Torres et al. have demonstrated that curing is essential for enhancing the leaching of ores containing black copper. The manuscript suggests prolonged pretreatment that involves the use of sulfuric acid and the addition of sodium chloride. The researchers conclude that the impact of sodium chloride is primarily significant for the dissolution of manganese [11].
This research used oxidized minerals from the Codelco Salvador hydrometallurgy plant, particularly from the “Damiana” mine sector. The primary goal of this study was to replicate essential industrial conditions and refine the pretreatment process to enhance the leaching of oxidized ores containing black copper oxides. Furthermore, we will explore the synergistic effects of NaCl and FeSO4 on the copper sulfation through statistical modeling. The significance of this research is anchored in its contribution to the existing body of knowledge, mainly due to the limited availability of studies within the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ore Sample

Oxidized copper ore from a heap leaching operation located in Copiapó, Chile, was used in this study. The sample was received directly from tertiary crusher discharge. The P80 value was 7632 µm. The elemental composition of the ore was determined by atomic spectrometry (SpectrAA 220, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The chemical composition shows 0.76% total copper, 0.67% soluble copper, 0.46% manganese, 0.1% magnesium, 0.62% calcium, 0.21% aluminum, and 5.37% iron.
X-ray diffraction using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) determined the primary mineralogical composition of the ore samples, which include chrysocolla (PDF card no. 00-003-0219), malachite (PDF card no. 00-002-0345), azurite (PDF card no. 01-070-1579), atacamite (PDF card no. 01-078-0372), brochantite (PDF card no. 01-087-0454), chalcocite (PDF card no. 01-083-1462), chalcopyrite (PDF card no 01-074-1737), and bornite (PDF card no 00-014-0323).

2.2. Leaching Column Tests

The ore samples underwent agglomeration and were subsequently loaded into cylindrical columns constructed from HDPE, measuring 1 m in height and 315 mm in diameter. The pretreatment stage was then implemented, during which water and acid were added, based on the results obtained during the previous phase. For samples that included NaCl and FeSO4, the reagents were introduced before adding water and acid to accurately simulate the industrial process, specifically, the mixing on a conveyor belt before entering the agglomerating drum. Upon completion of the pretreatment stage, the resulting agglomerates were placed into the columns. The irrigation of the ore within these columns was carried out using peristaltic pumps. The leaching columns were irrigated for 70 days at an average irrigation rate of 6 L/hm2. Leaching column tests were executed at room temperature, approximately 20 °C. All column leaching tests were performed in duplicate, and a standard deviation of ±2% was obtained for all the tests.

2.3. Statistical Modeling

The study investigated how various independent variables affect leaching kinetics, including time, acid consumption, and the addition of sodium chloride (NaCl) and iron sulfate (FeSO4). This was achieved through the application of response surface methodology (RSM), a statistical technique that helps to determine the relationships between multiple factors and their collective impact on the leaching process [24].
The compound central face design (CCF) and a nonlinear polynomial regression model were applied in the experimental design to study Cu dissolution. The sulfation test procedure was executed according to the following guidelines for each respective test:
-
Sample mass: 3.0 kg;
-
Water: 0.3 L;
-
Washed water: 6.1 L.
Developing reliable and efficient methods for creating models to represent the dynamics of complex processes, such as leaching from laboratory data, is critically important in research. In this context, response surface methodology (RSM) has been developed as an effective instrument for researchers in various fields. RSM provides a robust solution characterized by minimal fitting time and low computational demands, positioning it as an excellent option for modeling and enhancing our understanding of dynamic processes, while also enabling accurate predictions of laboratory data. Through the application of RSM, researchers can efficiently attain their desired outcomes, thereby empowering them to make confident and well-informed decisions [25,26].
RSM encompasses a set of statistical methodologies utilized to model and analyze scenarios in which multiple independent or explanatory variables exert influence on a response variable. These techniques primarily aim to design experiments that yield values for the response variable and identify the mathematical model that best fits the collected data [27]. Ultimately, the goal is to determine the factor values that optimize the system’s operating conditions [28]. The distinction between RSM and traditional experimental design lies in their objectives. Experimental design is primarily concerned with identifying the most effective combination or sample from those that have been tested. In contrast, RSM aims to determine the optimal operating conditions of a process throughout the range of sampled parameters, specifically within the domain of the independent variables [29].
The methodology involved conducting pretreatment experiments that examined four factors (Table 1), resulting in a total of 240 experimental trials (Table 2). The aim was to study the effects of time, acid consumption, and the addition of NaCl, and FeSO4 on the leaching. Minitab 18 software was utilized for modeling and experimental design, enabling the investigation of linear effects and interactions. The experimental data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis, focusing on factors that significantly explain the variability of the model and demonstrate high statistical significance.
The general form of the experimental model is given by the following Equation (7):
Y = f ( x 1 , , x n ) = b 0 + i = 1 n b i x i + i = 1 n j = 1 n b i j x i x j + i = 1 n j = 1 n k = 1 n b i j k x i x j x k
In this context, the variable xi represents the independent variables, while the parameters b denote the coefficients associated with those independent variables. The R2 statistic, along with the p-values, are essential in evaluating the adequacy of the developed model for describing the process of nitration based on the sampled values. The R2 coefficient quantifies the proportion of the total variability in the dependent variable relative to the mean accounted for by the regression model. Concurrently, the p-values serve as indicators of statistical significance, revealing whether a statistically significant relationship exists between the response variable and the independent variables [30].
The initial model, fitted from sample data, was subsequently improved by optimization using the L-BFGS-B method from the SciPy library in Python [31]. The L-BFGS-B method, which stands for limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with boundary constraints, is an unconstrained optimization algorithm used to find the minimum scalar functions of several variables. This method, implemented in the SciPy library [32], takes advantage of a constrained approximation of the Hessian matrix, which makes it especially efficient for large optimization problems. In addition, L-BFGS-B allows for the handling of boundary constraints on the variables, guaranteeing that the solution lies within a specific range. In summary, optimization with L-BFGS-B seeks to improve the model fit by finding the parameters that minimize the objective function, considering the possible boundary constraints set.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Exploratory Analysis

Upon conducting an analysis of the main effects (refer to Figure 1), it has been concluded that all factors included in the experimental design have a significant impact on the response variable. This finding suggests a directly proportional relationship between the independent variables and the response. Additionally, an inverse exponential trend in sulfation is observed as a function of time. In contrast, sulfation displays a linear and directly proportional trend relative to AAC and NaCl. Lastly, a slight, directly proportional linear trend is noted between the response variable and FeSO4.
The contour plots in Figure 2 indicate a preliminary observation that sulfation increases at mean time levels (refer to Figure 2a–c) and at the maximum levels of the other independent variables sampled (refer to Figure 2d–f).

3.2. Analysis of the Impact of Each Factor on the Response

This report presents an analysis conducted using single-factor ANOVA to examine the relationship between a continuous variable and categorical factors (the levels of an independent variable). The primary objective is to determine whether there are significant differences among the population means of two or more groups.
The findings indicate that the p-value for the ANOVA, which assesses sulfation as a function of time, is less than 0.05. This result suggests that the responses across the various levels studied differ significantly, confirming that at least some of the group means are not the same. In addition, the graph illustrating Fisher’s simultaneous confidence intervals reveals that the confidence interval for the difference in means between the 24 h level and the 48, 72, 96, and 120 h levels does not cross zero (refer to Figure 3). This indicates that the differences in these means are statistically significant. Conversely, the confidence intervals for the other pairs of means do intersect with zero, suggesting that those differences are not statistically significant (Figure 3a). Moreover, the residual plot derived from the single-factor ANOVA (as presented in Figure 3b) indicates that the data distribution is not skewed and does not exhibit outliers. The p-value from the normality test of the residuals further confirms that the residuals follow a normal distribution.
This analysis provides valuable insights into the impact of time on sulfation processes and identifies significant variations among the studied levels.
Similarly, the one-factor ANOVA for comparing the means of the response variable indicates that the means at each level for AAC are significantly different, i.e., none of the intervals of the differences include 0 (see Figure 4a), while the normality test is presented in Figure 4b.
The impact of variations in the NaCl level on the level of sulfation indicates that the level of sulfation is higher in the presence of sodium chloride (NaCl > 0) (see Figure 4c); however, no significant differences are observed at different NaCl levels (30, 61, 91). The analysis of residuals of the single-factor ANOVA for NaCl corroborates that these are normally distributed (see Figure 4d). Finally, the ANOVA for FeSO4 indicates no differences between the different levels, so it is possible to conclude that there are no significant differences in the level of sulfation at different levels of this independent variable (see Figure 4e,f).

3.3. Multiple Regression Modeling of Sulfation

The multiple regression model fitted from the experimental design is shown in Equation (8):
y = 17.368309 + 1.028948 x 1 + 0.214509 x 3 0.013451 x 1 2 + 0.00339 x 2 2 0.005783 x 3 2 + 0.002214 x 1 x 3 + 0.000049 x 1 3 + 0.000027 x 3 3 0.000156 x 4 3 + 0.000014 x 1 2 x 2 0.000045 x 1 x 2 x 3 0.000091 x 2 2 x 4 + 0.000028 x 2 x 3 2 + 0.000236 x 2 x 4 2 + 0.00001 x 3 2 x 4
ANOVA analysis indicates that the model fitted in Equation (8) adequately represents sulfation under the set of parameters sampled. The model requires no additional adjustments and is validated by the goodness-of-fit statistics shown in Table 3, although the statistics, p-values (p ≤ 0.05), and R2 (72.72%) indicate that the model is statistically significant (see Table 3 and Table 4). Nevertheless, enhancements in the model’s fit may be attainable through the expansion of the sample size or the incorporation of additional variables that could impact the response. Furthermore, the F-test substantiates the statistical significance of the fitted model.
The analysis of the standardized residuals derived from the model specified in Equation (8) indicates that they conform to a normal distribution, as illustrated in Figure 5. This conclusion is supported by the p-value obtained from the hypothesis test, which is 0.414. Since this p-value is more significant than the significance level, it confirms the normality of the residuals ( α = 0.05 ).
The surface plot modeling the response suggests that sulfation exhibits an increase at low to intermediate levels of the sampled parameters. The analysis indicates that maximum sulfation is attained at approximately 60 h across all time combinations (refer to Figure 6a–c).
In contrast, the response plots illustrated in Figure 6d–f demonstrate a corresponding increase in sulfation when the other independent variables examined occur in elevated levels. A directly proportional relationship is observed between the percentage of sulfation and the variables ACC, NaCl, and FeSO4.

3.4. Response Optimization

By optimizing the response for the analytical model (see Equation (8)) that demonstrates sulfation using the L-BFGS-B method, the optimal response for the regression model is approximately 27.95%. Table 5 presents the factors at the optimum level.
Note that the time at the optimal level is not given by the highest level of the variable (eq), which is approximately 60.14 h. The highest level of sulfation is reached when the analytical consumption of acid, NaCl, and FeSO4 are at their maximum.

4. Conclusions

The present investigation focused on the dynamics of a black copper reductive leaching process, examining how time, AAC, NaCl, and FeSO4 influence sulfation. The key findings can be summarized as follows:
  • The study successfully modeled complex sulfation dynamics associated with the pretreatment of copper ores with black oxides, utilizing multivariate nonlinear regression models;
  • The experimental design and response surface methodology proved valuable tools for analyzing sulfation behavior in regards to variations in independent variables;
  • An exploratory analysis, validated by main effects analysis, revealed that the relationships between the independent variables—analytical acid consumption (AAC), NaCl, and FeSO4—are directly proportional to sulfation across the entire sampled domain;
  • Time was found to have a statistically significant effect only within the 24–48 h variation, with no significance observed in other comparisons;
  • Analytical acid consumption exhibited a consistent positive gradient for sulfation throughout the domain, maintaining statistical significance at all levels sampled;
  • While the presence of NaCl was statistically significant, the substantial effect was noticed when comparing the tests without chloride and with the maximum addition of NaCl;
  • No statistically significant differences were detected among the levels of FeSO4 sampled;
  • The regression model developed to represent sulfation demonstrated a beneficial statistical fit, with a marginal difference between the fitted and predicted coefficients of determination, indicating its reliability as a predictive tool;
  • The model optimization identified optimum sulfation values around 60 h, with an analytical acid consumption of 60%, 90 g of NaCl, and 42 g of FeSO4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., E.G., and J.C.; methodology, R.S. and E.G.; software, M.S., M.M., and I.C.; validation, R.S., N.T., and A.G.; formal analysis, M.M. and I.C.; investigation, R.S. and J.C.; resources, R.S. and E.G.; data curation, R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, A.G., E.G., and N.T.; visualization, N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy constraints.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dold, B.; Pinget, M.-C.; Fontboté, L. Genesis of the Exotic Chrysocolla—“Copper Pitch/Wad”—Atacamite/Brochantite Ore at the Exótica (Mina Sur) Deposit, Chuquicamata, Chile. Miner. Depos. 2023, 58, 569–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kahou, Z.S.; Brichau, S.; Poujol, M.; Duchêne, S.; Campos, E.; Leisen, M.; d’Abzac, F.-X.; Riquelme, R.; Carretier, S. First U-Pb LA-ICP-MS in Situ Dating of Supergene Copper Mineralization: Case Study in the Chuquicamata Mining District, Atacama Desert, Chile. Miner. Depos. 2021, 56, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leybourne, M.I.; Cameron, E.M. Source, Transport, and Fate of Rhenium, Selenium, Molybdenum, Arsenic, and Copper in Groundwater Associated with Porphyry–Cu Deposits, Atacama Desert, Chile. Chem. Geol. 2008, 247, 208–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mote, T.I.; Brimhall, G.H.; Tidy-Finch, E.; Muller, G.; Carrasco, P. Application of Mass-Balance Modeling of Sources, Pathways, and Sinks of Supergene Enrichment to Exploration and Discovery of the Quebrada Turquesa Exotic Copper Orebody, El Salvador District, Chile. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 367–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayes, T.S.; Brown, J.G.; Sutley, S.J.; Whelan, J.F. Geology and Rock-Water Geochemistry of Exotic Copper Deposits, Ferricretes, and Manganocretes Associated with Porphyry Copper Deposits in Arizona, New Mexico, and Sonora; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Menzies, A.; Campos, E.; Hernández, V.; Sola, S.; Riquelme, R.; Barraza, M. Understanding Exotic-Cu Mineralisation: Part II—Characterisation of Black Copper (Cobre Negro) Ore. In Proceedings of the 13th SGA Biennial Meeting, Nancy, France, 24–27 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pincheira, M.; Dagnino, A.; Kelm, U.; Helle, S. Copper Pitch y Copper Wad”: Contraste Entre Las Fases Presentes En Las Cabezas y En Los Ripios En Pruebas de Lixiviación de Materiales de Mina Sur, Chuquicamata. In Proceedings of the Abstr, X Congreso Geológico Chileno, Concepción, Chile, 6–10 October 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. Patricio, C.C.; Gonzalo, R.S. Oxide Mineralization at the Radomiro Tomic Porphyry Copper Deposit, Northern Chile. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cameron, E.M.; Leybourne, M.I.; Palacios, C. Atacamite in the Oxide Zone of Copper Deposits in Northern Chile: Involvement of Deep Formation Waters? Miner. Depos. 2007, 42, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sillitoe, R.H. Supergene Oxidized and Enriched Porphyry Copper and Related Deposits; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Torres, D.; Pérez, K.; Trigueros, E.; Jeldres, R.I.; Salinas-Rodríguez, E.; Robles, P.; Toro, N. Reducing-Effect of Chloride for the Dissolution of Black Copper. Metals 2020, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Contreras, Y. Estudio de Lixiviación de Óxidos Sintéticos de Cu-Fe-Mn Como Base Para Explicar El Comportamiento de Los Óxidos Negros; Universidad de Concepción: Concepción, Chile, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X.; Tang, J.; Zhou, C.; Guo, L.; Yang, J. Synergistic Leaching Mechanism of Chloride Ions for Extracting Manganese Completely from Manganese Carbonate Ores. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pérez, K.; Toro, N.; Robles, P.A.; Galleguillos-Madrid, F.M.; Gálvez, E.D.; González-Sanz, F.J.; Marino, E.; Castillo, J.; Jamett, I.A.; Hernández, P.C. Extraction of Cobalt and Manganese from Ferromanganese Crusts Using Industrial Metal Waste through Leaching. Metals 2024, 14, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sinha, M.K.; Purcell, W. Reducing Agents in the Leaching of Manganese Ores: A Comprehensive Review. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 187, 168–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, G.; Jiang, C.; Liu, R.; Xie, Z.; Liu, Z.; Cen, S.; Tao, C.; Guo, S. Leaching Kinetics of Manganese from Pyrolusite Using Pyrite as a Reductant under Microwave Heating. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 277, 119472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.; Cheng, C.Y. Manganese Metallurgy Review. Part I: Leaching of Ores/Secondary Materials and Recovery of Electrolytic/Chemical Manganese Dioxide. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 89, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sinha, M.K.; Purcell, W.; Van Der Westhuizen, W.A. Recovery of Manganese from Ferruginous Manganese Ore Using Ascorbic Acid as Reducing Agent. Miner. Eng. 2020, 154, 106406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sahoo, R.N.; Naik, P.K.; Das, S.C. Leaching of Manganese from Low-Grade Manganese Ore Using Oxalic Acid as Reductant in Sulphuric Acid Solution. Hydrometallurgy 2001, 62, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benavente, O.; Hernández, M.C.; Melo, E.; Ardiles, L.; Quezada, V.; Zepeda, Y. Copper Extraction from Black Copper Ores through Modification of the Solution Potential in the Irrigation Solution. Metals 2019, 9, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quezada, V.; Benavente, O.; Beltrán, C.; Díaz, D.; Melo, E.; García, A. Dissolution of Black Copper Oxides from a Leaching Residue. Metals 2020, 10, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benavente, O.; Hernández, M.C.; Melo, E.; Núñez, D.; Quezada, V.; Zepeda, Y. Copper Dissolution from Black Copper Ore under Oxidizing and Reducing Conditions. Metals 2019, 9, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Cruells, M.; Melo, E. The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching. Metals 2021, 11, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hernández, P.C.; Dupont, J.; Herreros, O.O.; Jimenez, Y.P.; Torres, C.M. Accelerating Copper Leaching from Sulfide Ores in Acid-Nitrate-Chloride Media Using Agglomeration and Curing as Pretreatment. Minerals 2019, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bezerra, M.A.; Santelli, R.E.; Oliveira, E.P.; Villar, L.S.; Escaleira, L.A. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a Tool for Optimization in Analytical Chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hemmat Esfe, M.; Hatami, H.; Kiannejad Amiri, M.; Alidoust, S.; Toghraie, D.; Esfandeh, S. Multi-Objective Optimization of Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of TiO2/BioGlycol-Water Nanofluids with Sorting Non-Dominated Genetic Algorithm II Coupled with Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hemmat Esfe, M.; Amoozadkhalili, F.; Toghraie, D. Comprehensive Study of MWCNT and CuO/SAE50 Hybrid Nanofluid with Experimental Method and Response Surface Methodology and Introducing This Nanofluid to the Industry. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 297, 116693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. David, H.A.; Edwards, A.W.F. Annotated Readings in the History of Statistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bettonvil, B.; del Castillo, E.; Kleijnen, J.P.C. Statistical Testing of Optimality Conditions in Multiresponse Simulation-Based Optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 199, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cintas, P.G.; Almagro, L.M.; Llabres, X.T.-M. Industrial Statistics with Minitab; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; ISBN 1118383788. [Google Scholar]
  31. Devore, J.L. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences; Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780840068279. [Google Scholar]
  32. The SciPy Community Optimization and Root Finding (Scipy.Optimize)—SciPy v1.4.1 Reference Guide. Available online: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/optimize.html (accessed on 12 May 2020).
Figure 1. Main effects plots of sulfation (%) versus time (h); AAC (%); NaCl (g); and FeSO4 (g).
Figure 1. Main effects plots of sulfation (%) versus time (h); AAC (%); NaCl (g); and FeSO4 (g).
Applsci 15 01375 g001
Figure 2. Percent sulfation as a function of time and AAC (a); time and NaCl (b); time and FeSO4 (c); AAC and NaCl (d); AAC and FeSO4 (e); and NaCl and FeSO4 (f).
Figure 2. Percent sulfation as a function of time and AAC (a); time and NaCl (b); time and FeSO4 (c); AAC and NaCl (d); AAC and FeSO4 (e); and NaCl and FeSO4 (f).
Applsci 15 01375 g002
Figure 3. Individual confidence intervals for the differences in the means of the different levels of the time variable (a) and analysis of the model’s residuals (b).
Figure 3. Individual confidence intervals for the differences in the means of the different levels of the time variable (a) and analysis of the model’s residuals (b).
Applsci 15 01375 g003
Figure 4. Individual confidence intervals for the differences in the means of the different levels and residuals plot of the models for the independent variables AAC (a,b); NaCl (c,d); and FeSO4 (e,f).
Figure 4. Individual confidence intervals for the differences in the means of the different levels and residuals plot of the models for the independent variables AAC (a,b); NaCl (c,d); and FeSO4 (e,f).
Applsci 15 01375 g004
Figure 5. Standardized residuals plot (a) and normality test (b) of the fitted model in Equation (8).
Figure 5. Standardized residuals plot (a) and normality test (b) of the fitted model in Equation (8).
Applsci 15 01375 g005
Figure 6. Response surface plot for sulfation versus: time and ACC (a); time and NaCl (b); time and FeSO4 (c); AAC and NaCl (d); AAC and FeSO4 (e); and NaCl and FeSO4 (f).
Figure 6. Response surface plot for sulfation versus: time and ACC (a); time and NaCl (b); time and FeSO4 (c); AAC and NaCl (d); AAC and FeSO4 (e); and NaCl and FeSO4 (f).
Applsci 15 01375 g006aApplsci 15 01375 g006b
Table 1. Levels of the explanatory variables of the design of the experiments.
Table 1. Levels of the explanatory variables of the design of the experiments.
VariableUnitNotationLevels
TimeHoursx1{24, 48, 72, 96, 120}
AAC%x2{40, 50, 60}
NaClgx3{0, 30, 60, 90}
FeSO4gx4{0, 14, 28, 42}
Table 2. Sulfation results of the experimental design.
Table 2. Sulfation results of the experimental design.
Exp. x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 Sulf.Exp. x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 Sulf.Exp. x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 Sulf.
1246091282481486000171619650912821
224609142238248406128171629640914221
3245091421983485000161639650914221
4246091018844840300161649660301419
52460611418854860014161659660302819
62460302816864840042161669650602819
724606042168748403014161679660602819
82460610158848406114161689640901419
9246030141589486002815169964061018
1024506114159048400014170964091018
112460612815914840604214171965091018
1224603001492485002812172965001418
13246001414934840610111739640302818
1424600013944850014101749660601418
1524600421395484001491759640614217
16244060141396484002871769650302816
1724506028139772609128301779650304216
182450614213987260300291789640611416
192450610129972603014291799640612816
20245091012100725091282918096500015
21245000111017260614227181965002815
22244091011102726004226182966002815
232450014111037260612826183966004215
24246002811104726000251849640301415
2524500421110572603028251859650301415
26245030421110672603042251869650611415
272460304211107726001424187964002813
28245091141110872606114241889640304213
2924609114111097240902824189965004212
30245030010110726091422319096400011
312450028101117250301422191964001411
3224503014101127240302822192964004211
332440304210113725030282219312060914231
34245091281011472503042221941206004228
352440009115725060422219512050914227
3624403009116725091422219612060612826
372440301491177260610211971206091025
38244061289118724030142119812050612825
3924406142911972609114211991206030023
4024409142912072409142212001205091022
41244060081217240300202011206001422
42244001481227250300202021206002822
4324400427123725060282020312060301422
442440028612472509101920412060302822
4524503028612572609101920512060304222
462440911461267250014192061205031021
4724409128512772406142192071205004221
48244030284128725061141820812050614221
494860612829129725091141820912060614221
50486091028130724091017210120600020
514860600261317250028172111205061020
524850910241327260028172121206060020
5348609128241337250610162131205002820
5448506102313472500421621412050302820
554860301423135724060141621512040612820
564860304223136724061281521612050912820
5748506142231377250001421712060912820
5848606042231387240014142181204092018
594860914223139724091141421912040312818
60485030282214072406001322012050304218
61486030282214172400281222112060601418
624850304222142724030421222212060911418
63485061282214372400421122312040922818
644850912822144724000102241204061017
6548509142221459660300282251205001417
66485030021146966091282722612050301417
67486030021147966091422722712040314216
68484030422114896609102622812040611416
69484091020149966090142522912050611416
70486004220150966030422423012040911416
71485061142015196503002323112050911416
724860611420152966061422323212040914216
7348409142201539640300222331204002814
74485004219154965061422223412040614214
75485030141915596600021235120500013
764840911419156965060021236120400012
7748509114191579660610212371204030012
7848609114191589660014212381204001412
794840912819159965091142123912040301412
80484030281816096409028212401204004210
Table 3. ANOVA of experimental design.
Table 3. ANOVA of experimental design.
SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF-Valuep-Value
Regression155141.85342.79039.810.000
x 1 1704.79704.79381.860.000
x 3 1164.15164.14619.060.000
x 1 2 1486.97486.96956.560.000
x 2 2 1381.25381.25444.280.000
x 3 2 1118.54118.54413.770.000
x 1 x 3 157.5657.5586.680.010
x 1 3 1323.47323.46837.570.000
x 3 3 161.7361.7337.170.008
x 4 3 166.5566.5557.730.006
x 1 2 x 2 136.6936.6954.260.040
x 1 x 2 x 3 162.2362.2297.230.008
x 2 2 x 4 192.7992.78710.780.001
x 2 x 3 2 133.6333.6333.910.049
x 2 x 4 2 184.3184.3109.790.002
x 3 2 x 4 165.1265.1187.560.006
Error2241928.658.610
Total2397070.50
Table 4. Model summary adjusted in Equation (8).
Table 4. Model summary adjusted in Equation (8).
R2R2 (adjust.)R2 (predict.)
72.72%70.90%68.51%
Table 5. Values of the independent variables at the optimal level.
Table 5. Values of the independent variables at the optimal level.
VariableOptimal Value
x 1 60.14
x 2 60
x 3 90
x 4 42
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castillo, J.; Saldana, M.; Toro, N.; Mura, M.; Castillo, I.; Guzmán, A.; Gálvez, E.; Sepúlveda, R. Statistical Modeling of NaCl and FeSO4 Pretreatment Effect on Refractory Copper Ore Leaching. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031375

AMA Style

Castillo J, Saldana M, Toro N, Mura M, Castillo I, Guzmán A, Gálvez E, Sepúlveda R. Statistical Modeling of NaCl and FeSO4 Pretreatment Effect on Refractory Copper Ore Leaching. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(3):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castillo, Jonathan, Manuel Saldana, Norman Toro, Mauricio Mura, Ignacio Castillo, Alexis Guzmán, Edelmira Gálvez, and Rossana Sepúlveda. 2025. "Statistical Modeling of NaCl and FeSO4 Pretreatment Effect on Refractory Copper Ore Leaching" Applied Sciences 15, no. 3: 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031375

APA Style

Castillo, J., Saldana, M., Toro, N., Mura, M., Castillo, I., Guzmán, A., Gálvez, E., & Sepúlveda, R. (2025). Statistical Modeling of NaCl and FeSO4 Pretreatment Effect on Refractory Copper Ore Leaching. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop