Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System in Smart City Infrastructure
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Intelligent Service: it is necessary to provide information that visualizes augmented reality (AR)-based hazardous area classification and safe evacuation route based on fire area, reflecting characteristics and environment of building areas in smart city infrastructure through linkage of physical and virtual domain in buildings [6];
- Safety Guideline: it is necessary to provide safe guideline service by providing guidance to the occupants and rescuers to reduce the casualties caused by uncertainty of evacuation route in a building that has poor visibility due to fire [7];
- Smart Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Real-Time Remote System: It is expected that IoT-based remote system will be capable of quick response in connection with fire department through providing real-time fire occurrence information [8].
2. Related Works
2.1. Intelligent Service for Fire Disaster Response
2.2. Smart IoT Based Real-Time Remote System
2.3. AR-Based Smart Monitoring Service
3. Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System (BTDMS)
3.1. System Architecture
- Information Layer: In the information layer, there are many types of data such as building disaster management data, user location data, device and sensor data, user behavior data, and rescue situation monitoring data in the information layer. Disaster environment information collected from the sensors are stored and processed in the DMBD. The IoT sensors gather the disaster environment information and send the data to the DMBD. Rescue situation monitoring data created through the IoT disaster control agent (IDCA) are stored in the real time rescue situation monitoring data module, and the enhanced/updated data is sent to the IDCA;
- AI/Big-Data Connection Layer: The AI/big-data connection layer implements the key roles in the disaster management system and classifies building information data, device information data, user information data, and real time rescue situation monitoring analysis data coming from the information layer for the disaster forecast and management service. The building disaster management server (BDMS) in the AI/big-data connection layer is composed of building disaster context management (BDCM), disaster situation data management (DSDM), AI-based building data analyzer (ABDA), and IoT disaster control agent (IDCA). The roles of BDCM are management of fire disaster, environmental context, and user location, data gathering information, and data storage. The DSDM manages the lists of disaster management service and the way of IoT sensors/actuators and provides necessary information. Thus, the AI/big-data connection layer is classified as fire context awareness, fire spread prediction, and optimum evacuation space analysis coming from the information layer through the ABDA and the IDCA;
- Service Layer: The service layer is where the optimum disaster management evacuation takes place; it provides services such as the fire context awareness, fire spread prediction, optimum evacuation space analysis, and actuator integrated control, etc. It is responsible for providing optimum service to users and receiving disaster control information from the IDCA. It is composed of disaster management service design (DMSD), disaster management service organization (DMSO), IoT based disaster management service (IDMS), and IoT service resolution (ISR) module;
- Virtual Layer: The virtual layer provides a service that confirmation of evacuation place. It selects the best fit evacuation place and provides AR-based optimum escape guidelines. Also, it provides the safety facilities information for AR-based intelligent configuration of the safe/unsafe area.
3.2. System Diagram and Components
- Real-time environmental information monitoring: ICT/IoT based real-time fire situation monitoring and AR-based optimum evacuation guideline by intelligent sensor connection;
- Provides the smart building disaster management service by intelligent connection between sensors, actuator, gateway, and server.
3.3. Smart Fire Extinguish and Fire Escape Guidance Algorithm
4. Control Scenarios
4.1. Main Service Scenario
- Detection of the Fire Occurrence Place: Real-time ignition detection service package by smart sensors detect fire point and provides real-time AR-based fire occurrence monitoring service to users, administrators, and rescuers;
- Context Awareness and Actuator Control-Based Fire Detection: This is an actuator control service package through detection of fire occurrence. When a fire is detected, it shuts down gas and electricity which can further enlarge the fire;
- AR-Based Fire Escape Guideline Service: Provides safe evacuation and rescue guidelines to rescuers and fire fighters through fire status information detected by human detection sensors and smart sensors;
- Connection of Integrated Control Center and Safety Center: Provides services for rapid reporting and real-time monitoring to fire stations and control centers after a fire occurs.
4.2. Total Flow Chart of Service
4.2.1. [Service Package #1] Detection of the Fire Occurrence Place
- Smart sensor-based real time fire detection: Collecting real-time information from smart sensors, including gas leak detector sensors, temperature sensors, electric leak detector sensors, and multi-gas detector sensors, which monitor the fire in real time and report the situation to the server immediately when a fire is detected from the smart sensor;
- Send the sensing data: Real-time sensing data is transmitted to the server through Smart ZigBee gateway;
- AR-based fire occurrence monitoring: Sensing data sent to the server is processed through a collection and analysis algorithm model, and displays the location information of sensor data, status information, etc. on the AR-based user interface (UI) screen of smart phones, smart pads, and so on. Users, administrators, and rescuers identify evacuation and rescue guidelines through this AR-based UI screen so that they can be safely rescued.
4.2.2. [Service Package #2] Context Awareness and Actuator Control-Based Fire Detection
- Fire occurrence situation: This step blocks the damper when a fire is detected. First, the temperature sensor detects the temperature rise due to fire. Second, the gas sensor detects the gas from the fire. Third, the flame sensor detects whether a fire is caused by a fire, detects the occurrence of a fire, and cuts off the air supply through damper interception;
- Gas explosion situation: This step shuts off the gas valve when detecting the occurrence of fire due to gas explosion. The gas leak detection sensors will discern whether there has been a gas leak. When a fire occurs due to a gas leak, the flame detection sensor and temperature sensor detect this. After transmitting the status information to the server, the server cuts off the gas supply through the gas valve breaker;
- Power overload situation: This step cuts off electricity when detecting the occurrence of fire due to power overload. The flame detection sensor and integrated gas sensor detect and occurrence of a fire, and the electric leakage detection sensor detects a short circuit. The sensor detects whether a fire has occurred, transmits the status information to the server, and then server then cuts off the electricity supply through an electric breaker.
4.2.3. [Service Package #3] AR-Based Fire Escape Guidelines Service
- Occupant: Provides safe evacuation location guidelines. After detecting the location of the fire from the smart sensor and transmitting it to the server, the server provides AR-based optimal guides to the occupants through smart phones and smart pads;
- Rescuer: Provides the rescuer with the best rescue guidelines for the quick and safe rescue of the occupants. The location and status information of the occupants are collected from the smart sensor and transmitted to the server. The server informs the rescuer of the location of the occupants and provides the optimal rescue guidelines for safety.
4.2.4. [Service Package #4] Connection of the Integrated Control Center and the Safety Center
- Fire occurrence reporting step: The server of each building that has collected the fire occurrence information recognizes the status and immediately reports to the safety center if the building manager cannot respond;
- Fire occurrence monitoring and dispatch step: The safety center receives the report, monitors the fire situation in real time, and dispatches fire engines immediately;
- Real-time fire monitoring step: The integrated control center monitors the fire situation in real time and continuously provides information on the fire situation to the rescuer;
- Arrival and rescue step of fire area: The rescuer arrives at the fire area and rescues the occupants through AR-based smart building disaster management service of smart phones and smart pads.
5. Implementation and Results
5.1. Occupant’s Optimal Evacuation Route
5.2. Rescuer Rescue Guide
5.3. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Future Perspective
- Intelligent service: AR technology provides rapid structure and evacuation simulation and guidance reflecting the characteristics and environment of buildings and areas in smart city through linkage of physical and virtual domain in the building;
- Safety Guideline: Provide safe guideline services to occupants and rescuers in the event of actual fire;
- IoT-based real-time remote system: IoT-based remote system capable of quick response in connection with fire department through providing real-time fire occurrence information.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cavallo, A.; Ireland, V. Preparing for complex interdependent risks: A system of systems approach to building disaster resilience. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014, 9, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meissner, A.; Luckenbach, T.; Risse, T.; Kirste, T.; Kirchner, H. Design challenges for an integrated disaster management communication and information system. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Workshop on Disaster Recovery Networks (DIREN 2002), New York, NY, USA, 24 June 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Asimakopoulou, E.; Bessis, N. Buildings and crowds: Forming smart cities for more effective disaster management. In Proceedings of the 2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), Seoul, Korea, 30 June–2 July 2011; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 229–234. [Google Scholar]
- The Korea Times. Available online: http://www.koreatimes.com/article/20170614/1061005 (accessed on 12 July 2018).
- The National Fire Data Center. Available online: https://www.nfds.go.kr/fr_scls_0301.jsf (accessed on 12 July 2018).
- Dimakis, N.; Filippoupolitis, A.; Gelenbe, E. Distributed building evacuation simulator for smart emergency management. Comput. J. 2010, 53, 1384–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, S.M.; Zhou, W.; Chenji, H.; Won, M.; Lee, Y.O.; Pazarloglou, A.; Stoleru, R.; Barooah, P. Distressnet: A wireless ad hoc and sensor network architecture for situation management in disaster response. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2010, 48, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutter, S.L.; Barnes, L.; Berry, M.; Burton, C.; Evans, E.; Tate, E.; Webb, J. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heo, B.-Y.; Heo, W.-H. Economic analysis for collapse hazard areas. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, N.; Agrawal, V. An agent-based simulation system for concert venue crowd evacuation modeling in the presence of a fire disaster. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 2807–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Ren, A.; Chen, C. Agent-based evacuation model of large public buildings under fire conditions. Autom. Construct. 2009, 18, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.; Hu, M.; Lin, H. Agent-based simulation of building evacuation: Combining human behavior with predictable spatial accessibility in a fire emergency. Inf. Sci. 2015, 295, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantarci, B.; Mouftah, H.T. Trustworthy sensing for public safety in cloud-centric internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, B.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, S.; Chen, J. Situation-aware iot service coordination using the event-driven soa paradigm. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2016, 13, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanan, R.; Elhassan, O.; Bensalem, R. An iot-based autonomous system for workers’ safety in construction sites with real-time alarming, monitoring, and positioning strategies. Autom. Construct. 2018, 88, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirohara, Y.; Ishida, T.; Uchida, N.; Shibata, Y. Proposal of a disaster information cloud system for disaster prevention and reduction. In Proceedings of the 2017 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), Taipei, Taiwan, 27–29 March 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 664–667. [Google Scholar]
- Wafi, Z.K.; Malek, M.F.A.; Alnajjar, S.H.; Ahmad, R.B. Early warning system for disaster management in rural area. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), Pulau Langkawi, Malaysia, 25–27 August 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 369–372. [Google Scholar]
- Milgram, P.; Kishino, F. A Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays ieice transactions on information and systems. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994, e77-D, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar]
- Journal of Safety. Available online: https://www.anjunj.com/news/article View.html?idxno=16302 (accessed on 26 December 2018).
- Palvia, P.C. A model and instrument for measuring small business user satisfaction with information technology. Inf. Manag. 1996, 31, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsirmpas, C.; Rompas, A.; Fokou, O.; Koutsouris, D.J.I.S. An indoor navigation system for visually impaired and elderly people based on radio frequency identification (RFID). Inf. Sci. 2015, 320, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boguslawski, P.; Mahdjoubi, L.; Zverovich, V.; Fadli, F.; Barki, H. BIM-GIS modelling in support of emergency response applications. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2015, 149, 381–391. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Wright, G.; Cheng, J.C.; Li, X.; Liu, R. A state-of-the-art review on the integration of building information modeling (bim) and geographic information system (gis). Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Shannon, J.; Voun, H.; Truijens, M.; Chi, H.-L.; Wang, X.J.S. Spatial and temporal analysis on the distribution of active radio-frequency identification (rfid) tracking accuracy with the kriging method. Sensor 2014, 14, 20451–20467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Classification | Number | Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|
Total | 2645 | 100 |
Toxic Gas Inhalation | 786 | 29.72 |
Toxic Gas Inhalation and Burn | 304 | 11.49 |
Burn | 913 | 34.52 |
Falling or Slipping | 66 | 2.5 |
Building Collapse | 6 | 0.23 |
Falling during Evacuation | 35 | 1.32 |
Confinement | 3 | 0.11 |
Laceration | 57 | 2.16 |
Complex Cause | 50 | 1.89 |
Unknown | 309 | 11.68 |
Others | 116 | 4.39 |
Classification | Within 5 min | Within 10 min | Within 20 min | Within 30 min | Within 1 h | One Hour or More |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sum | 14,799 | 7763 | 3190 | 327 | 93 | 17 |
Current System | Proposed System |
---|---|
|
|
Step | Description | Sensor | Server | Actuator | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive Sensor | Extinction Sensor | ||||
Prevention |
|
| - |
|
|
Ignite |
|
|
|
|
|
Sensing |
|
| - |
|
|
Extinguish |
|
|
|
|
|
Evacuation |
|
| - |
|
|
Final |
|
| - |
|
|
Service | Details of the Scenario |
---|---|
IoT sensor value monitoring to detect fire location —Building section analysis |
|
IoT sensor value monitoring to detect fire area —Building facade analysis |
|
Service | Details of the Scenario |
---|---|
Fire occurrence—Control the Damper Breaker |
|
Gas explosion situation—Control the Gas Valve Breaker |
|
Power overload situation—Control the Electric Breaker |
|
Service | Details of the Scenario |
AR-based Fire Escape Guideline Service |
|
Service | Details of the Scenario |
---|---|
AR-based real-time rescue status monitoring and notification |
|
Smart integration monitoring and interconnection with safety center |
|
Device name | Gas Leak Detector | Device name | Electric Leak Detector | ||
Type | Sensor | Type | Actuator | ||
Object gas | Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), City gas | Size | 7.5 × 7.5 × 3.5 | ||
Method | Catalytic combustion, diffusion type | communication | Zigbee | ||
Device name | Flame Detection Sensor | Device name | Damper Breaker | ||
Type | Sensor | Type | Actuator | ||
Size | 3.2 × 7 × 4 | Maximum Power | 12W | ||
Weight | 0.3 | Size | 3.2 × 7 × 4 | ||
Device name | Multi Gas Detector | Device name | Gas Valve Breaker | ||
Type | Sensor | Type | Actuator | ||
Measurement item | Carbon monoxide, Carbon dioxide, Methane, Formaldehyde, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Particle | Pipe size | 15 A, 20 A, 25 A | ||
Weight | 0.5 | Operation range | −20 °C~40 °C | ||
Device name | Temperature Sensor | Device name | Smart Gateway | ||
Type | Sensor | Type | Gateway | ||
Operation range | −55 °C~+200 °C | Size | 11.5 × 4.1 × 1.5 | ||
Weight | 0.3 | Weight | 0.3 |
Classification | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | Step 5 | Step 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing system | Connection form | Sensor-Gateway | Gateway-Server | Server-Monitoring System | Monitoring System-Manager | Manager-Safety Center | Safety Center-Rescuer |
Proposed system | Connection form | Sensor-Gateway | Gateway-LTE Modem | WEB-Occupant | - | - | - |
WEB-Manager | - | - | - | ||||
WEB-Safety Center | Safety Center-Rescuer |
Classification | Existing System | Proposed System |
---|---|---|
Related Technology |
|
|
Total extinguishing and evacuation Time |
|
|
CPU control signal transfer rate from server to sensors | x*a | i*a |
Speed of the fire situation detection |
|
|
Speed of the actuator control |
|
|
Ease of use about rescue |
|
|
Efficiency of connection with the control center |
|
|
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Park, S.; Park, S.H.; Park, L.W.; Park, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, T.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, H.; Kim, S.M.; Chang, H.; et al. Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System in Smart City Infrastructure. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112239
Park S, Park SH, Park LW, Park S, Lee S, Lee T, Lee SH, Jang H, Kim SM, Chang H, et al. Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System in Smart City Infrastructure. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(11):2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112239
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Sangmin, Soung Hoan Park, Lee Won Park, Sanguk Park, Sanghoon Lee, Tacklim Lee, Sang Hyeon Lee, Hyeonwoo Jang, Seung Min Kim, Hangbae Chang, and et al. 2018. "Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System in Smart City Infrastructure" Applied Sciences 8, no. 11: 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112239
APA StylePark, S., Park, S. H., Park, L. W., Park, S., Lee, S., Lee, T., Lee, S. H., Jang, H., Kim, S. M., Chang, H., & Park, S. (2018). Design and Implementation of a Smart IoT Based Building and Town Disaster Management System in Smart City Infrastructure. Applied Sciences, 8(11), 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112239