Next Article in Journal
Association of Trimethylamine N-Oxide with Normal Aging and Neurocognitive Disorders: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
P3b Amplitude and Latency in Tic Disorders: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Coupling between the Fronto-Parietal Network and Default Mode Network Is Associated with Balanced Time Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Pilot Study on Plasma and Urine Neurotransmitter Levels in Children with Tic Disorders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/brainsci12091202
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Aetiology of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies

by
Jilong Jiang
†,
Mengxin Chen
†,
Huifang Huang
and
Yanhui Chen
*
Department of Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(9), 1202; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091202
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Neurobiology and Genetics of Tourette Syndrome)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Introduction: Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) are common neurodevelopmental/-psychiatric disorders. The aetiological factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of TS/CTD are still poorly understood. The possible risk factors for TS/CTD are considered to be a combination of genetic, immunological, psychological and environmental factors. A comprehensive systematic review was conducted to assess the association between aetiological factors and TS/CTD. (2) Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang data, and CNKI, were searched to identify the etiological factors of children and adolescents (≤18 years) with TS/CTD based on a case-control study. Quality assessments were performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). (3) Results: According to sample sizes and NOS values, recent evidence may support that genetic factors (BTBD9 and AADAC), immunological factors (streptococcus and mycoplasma pneumoniae infections), environmental factors (conflict, history of perinatal diseases, and family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases and recurrent respiratory infections) and psychological factors (major life events) are associated with the pathogenesis of TS/CTD. (4) Conclusions: Some risk factors in different categories may be the etiological factors of TS/CTD, but there is a lack of studies on the interaction among the factors, which may require more attention in the future.

1. Introduction

Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) are common neurodevelopmental/psychiatric disorders with an onset in childhood and adolescence, which are characterized by multiple sudden, rapid, recurrent, and non-rhythmic motor and vocal tics [1,2]. TS and CTD are among the five categories of tic disorders included in the fifth edition of the American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [3]. TS/CTD is often comorbid with obsessive-compulsive behaviour (OCB) or disorder (OCD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, anxiety, and other behavioural disorders [4].
However, the etiological factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of TS/CTD are still poorly understood. The pathogenesis of TS/CTD is considered to be caused by a combination of genetic, immunological, psychological and environmental factors. Although there have been some systematic reviews on risk factors of TS/CTD, many non-English studies and many types of factors have not been taken into account. To better investigate the aetiology of TS/CTD, a comprehensive systematic review of eligible studies conducted without language restriction before February 2022 was performed to assess the association between risk factors and pathogenesis of TS/CTD based on case-control studies.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was designed under the items of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [5,6]. The study does not involve the collection of patients’ individual information; thus the approval of the Ethics Committee is not required for the study.

2.1. Information Sources and Research Strategies

Articles published before February 2022 were retrieved from electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang data, and CNKI. The search terms for all five databases used were: (“Tourette syndrome” OR “Tourette disorder” OR “chronic tic disorder”) AND (“genetic” OR “gene” OR “immunity” OR “immune” OR “infection” OR “psychology” OR “psychosocial” OR “mental” OR “environment” OR “influencing factor” OR “risk factor” OR “etiology” OR “cause” OR “prevalence” OR “epidemiology”). The structure of the queries was tailored to the requirements of each database. The references of retrieved articles and review articles were also manually searched for studies that had been missed.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The following criteria were considered for the inclusion of the studies: (1) focused on risk factors for TS/CTD in children and adolescents (≤18 years); (2) case-control studies; (3) TS or CTD diagnosed according to DSM-3 [7], DSM-3TR [8], DSM-4 [9], DSM-4TR [10], or DSM-5 [3] criteria; (4) no language restrictions; (5) with or without comorbidities.
Studies were excluded as follows: (1) participants (>18 years) included or without clear data of age; (2) diagnosed according to other criteria or without clear diagnostic criteria; (3) duplicate publications of the same population; (4) abstracts, reviews, conference articles, academic dissertations, letters, editorial materials or books.; (5) participants with pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections (PANDAS) or participants without TS/CTD are included in case group, and (7) studies exclusively on animal models or in vitro.

2.3. Assessment of Literature Quality

According to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), studies were judged on three broad perspectives: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case-control or cohort studies respectively. A maximum of nine points was assigned to each study: four for selection, two for comparability, and three for outcomes. The quality of all included studies was evaluated separately by two researchers [11]. Discrepancies were discussed and adjudicated by a third researcher until consensuses were reached on every item. Studies with scores of 7~9 and 4~6 stars were defined as ‘High’ and ‘Fair’ quality, respectively, while studies with 3 or less than 3 stars were considered to represent ‘Poor’ quality [12].

3. Results

The process of literature retrieval and study selection is shown in Figure 1. A total of 3288 results were retrieved. After the exclusion of duplication, the publications were independently screened by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, thirty-three studies were selected and included in this systematic review as shown in Table 1.

3.1. Characteristics of Studies

The characteristics of the studies, including the first author, published year, the countries of participants, the diagnosis of cases, the number of cases and controls, the categories of factors, and the results of the included studies, are shown in Table 1. Three studies [42,43,44] could not be classified well. Several factors included in the study by Zhao et al. [33] did not fit any of the four categories.

3.2. Quality of Studies

The details of NOS values and quality of studies are shown in Table 1 and Table S1.

3.3. Etiological Factors

3.3.1. Genetic Factors

Dopaminergic system-related genes were of particular interest (6/13). Five [15,16,17,20,21] of the six studies focused on the dopaminergic system relative genes were conducted in the Chinese population. Another study [13] conducted in the Italian population recruited subjects with TS (n = 15) and matched normal controls (NC) (n = 15). The mRNA expression of dopamine D5 receptor (DRD5) in the TS group was significantly higher than in NC group (p < 0.001), but there were no differences in DRD 2, 3 or 4 mRNA expression. In the study by Lu et al. [21], the genotype and allele frequencies of DRD4 616C/G were significantly different between CTD (n = 84) and NC (n = 100) (p = 0.02; p = 0.004). However, some results of the studies were inconsistent. Ji et al. [17] also focused on DRD4, and they did not find differences in genotype and allele frequencies of DRD4 exon III 48 bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs). Other dopaminergic system-related genes were also investigated, but no positive results were obtained. He et al. [16] found no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of DRD3 rs6280 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between TS (n = 160) and NC (n = 90) (p = 0.161; p = 0.423). A study [15] compared common TS (n = 63), refractory TS (n = 52) and NC (n = 57) to analyze the polymorphisms of dopamine transporter 1 (DAT1). There were no significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies of DAT1 40bp VNTRs among each group (p = 0.423). In the study by Liu et al. [13], which included 106 subjects with TS, there were no significant differences in the polymorphisms of dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH) Taq1 between TS and NC.
Forty-six probes were identified with a fold change > 1.5 in the study by Lit et al. [19] which included 30 subjects with TS and 28 normal NC, but TS could not be separated from NC by unsupervised hierarchical clustering and principal components analysis. Tian et al. [24] detected that there were significant differences in the expressions of 376 exon probe sets between TS (n = 26) and NC (n = 23) (p < 0.005, fold change > |1.2|). Only two exons had a corrected p < 0.9 by using the false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons, but no exon had a multiple comparison corrected p < 0.05. Ninety genes had different expression of a single exon (p < 0.005), and there were three genes with a corrected p < 0.05 based on the Benjamini and Hochberg FDR of <0.05 for multiple comparison correction, including ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide (UTY), myosin ⅩⅧB (MYO18B), and potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily H (eag-related), member 4 (KCNH4).
Yuan et al. [25] compared TS (n = 200) with NC (n = 300) and identified two variations of arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) in two unrelated patients with TS, including a heterozygous splice-site variant, c.361 + 1G > A (rs762169706), and a missense variant, c.744A > T (p.R248S, rs186388618). However, the c.744A > T variant was also identified in two controls. Lei et al. [18] did not find differential expressions of histidine decarboxylase (HDC), HECT domain and RCC-1 like domain 1 (HERC1), HECT domain and RCC-1 like domain 2 (HERC2), cholinergic receptor, neuronal nicotinic alpha polypeptide 7 (CHRNA7), ubiquitin protein ligase E3A (UBE3A), or ubiquitin specific peptidase 3 (USP3) in TS subjects (n = 30) compared with NC subjects (n = 30). While the expression of amyloid precursor protein-binding protein A2 (APBA2) in TS (n = 84) was significantly lower than in NC (n = 100) (p < 0.01), whose sample sizes was expanded. Guo et al. [14] found that the variant rs9296249 of BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 9 (BTBD9) was significantly correlated with TS (n = 100) compared with NC (n = 440) (p = 0.010). However, other variants of BTBD 9 and serotonin 2C receptor were not significantly different between both groups (p > 0.05).
There were not just studies on genes, but also some studies on epigenetics. Both studies focused on microRNA (miRNA, miR), and were conducted in the Italian population. Rizzo et al. [23] identified downregulated expression of miR-429 by analyzing 52 TS patients and 15 NC patients (Wilcoxon test p = 0.01; t-test p = 0.004). The study by Mirabella et al. [22] compared TS (n = 6), TS with Arnold-Chiari syndrome (ACTS) (n = 11) and NC (n = 8). The results showed that miR-23a-3p was upregulated in TS compared to NC (1.67-fold), miR-130a-3p was downregulated in ACTS or TS compared to NC (−1.56-fold; −1.61-fold), miR-222-3p and miR-451a were upregulated in ACTS compared to NC (1.95-fold; 1.58-fold), and the FDR was <0.05 for each pairwise comparison.
Seven studies [14,15,16,19,20,22,23] were judged to be of high quality, and six studies [13,17,18,21,24,25] were judged as fair quality according to the NOS. The studies by Lei et al. [18] and Ferrari et al. [13] highlighted the defects in the selection and description of controls, and potential selection biases of cases. In additional, potential selection biases of cases were also found in six studies [14,17,19,21,23,25], and selection biases of controls were found in five studies [14,16,20,21,25]. The study by Guo et al. [14] was the only one which was blinded for ascertainment of exposure.
Both negative and positive results were reported in the studies focused on different genes, different loci, or miRNA. There is little high-quality evidence to support the association between dopaminergic system-relate genes and TS/CTD. Ferrari et al. [13] demonstrated DRD5 mRNA expression was high in TS. Polymorphisms of DRD4 616C/G associated with CTD were reported in the study by Lu et al. [21] Polymorphisms of BTBD9 and lower expression of APBA2 were reported in the studies by Guo et al. [14] and Lei et al. [18], respectively. However, among the four studies, only the Guo et al. study was of high quality. Differential expressions of several miRNAs in TS were reported in the studies by Rizzo et al. [23] and Mirabella et al. [22], and both studies were identified as high quality.

3.3.2. Immunological Factors

Four studies involved Streptococcal infections. The study by Ji et al. [29] including TS (n = 32) and NC (n = 30) showed that the titers of anti-streptolysin O (ASO) in TS were significantly higher than that in NC (p < 0.05). Another study by Rizzo et al. [30] found anti-streptolysin titers were increased (>400 IU/L) in 41/69 (59.4%) in TS patients and 14/72 (19.4%) NC (p = 0.000). Dong et al. [28] reported that ASO titers were elevated (≥200 IU/L) in 27 (56.3%) TS patients and 2 (10.0%) NC patients (p < 0.05). Cheng et al. [27] compared TS (n = 67) with NC (n = 60) and found that ASO titers increased (≥250 IU/L) in 13/66 (19.7%) TS and 0 NC (p < 0.01).
Other relevant factors were also investigated. The study by Ji et al. [29] also found that the level of interleukin (IL)-6 in TS patients was higher than that in NC patients (p < 0.05). However, they did not find any significant differences in the value of cluster differentiation (CD) 3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+, or the level of IL-8 between both groups (p > 0.05). Cheng et al. [27] demonstrated that the levels of soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) and soluble glycoprotein (sgp) 130 in TS were significantly higher than in NC patients (p < 0.01). In their study, significant differences in positive rates of anti-brain antibody (ABAb) and antinuclear antibody (ANAb) were also reported (66% vs. 4% and 53% vs. 25%, p < 0.01 respectively). T Rizzo et al. [30] also identified that 22 (31.9%) TS patients had positive anti-basal ganglia antibodies, while 7 (9.7%) NC patients had the positive antibodies (p = 0.002). Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) was another pathogen of interest in the included studies, in addition to streptococcus. The results of the study by Chang et al. [26] showed that the positive rates of MP antibody (antibody titers ≥ 1:160) and MP-specific antibody immunoglobulin (Ig) A were significantly higher in TS (n = 60) than in NC patients (n = 60) (30.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.0012; 35.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.0031), but there were no significant differences in MP-specific antibody IgM or IgG (p = 0.374; p = 0.56). Yang et al. [31] identified that there were significant differences in the positive rates of antibody and IgA of MP in TS (n = 50) compared to NC (n = 50) (32.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.001; 30.0% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.003). Similarly, no significant differences in MP-specific antibody IgM or IgG were found (p = 0.36; p = 0.54). The study by Yuce et al. [32] included TS only (n = 19), OCD plus TS (n = 13) and controls (n = 35), and revealed that the presence of any allergic disease, positive skin prick test rates and rates of eczema diagnosis were significantly higher in the TS plus OCD group compared with control group (p = 0.018; p = 0.011; p = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in these factors, as well as asthma diagnoses, in the levels of IgE or eosinophil counts between TS only group and control group (p = 0.076; p = 0.607; p = 0.294; p = 0.480; p = 0.554; p = 0.539). Frequencies of recurrent respiratory tract infections within one year were reported to be correlated with TS in the study by Zhao et al. [23] (p < 0.01, OR 1.040, 95%CI 1.019~1.062).
Quality assessments resulted in an NOS standard of ‘high’ for the study by Rizzo et al. [30] and ‘fair’ for the other seven studies [26,27,28,29,31,32,33]. Comparability and exposure ascertainment were inadequate in the seven studies. The study by Cheng et al. [27] had loss of one subject in the results section without description. With the exception of the study by Cheng et al. [27], all other studies had obvious defects in control selection.
No study included CTD subjects. Although there was only one high-quality study, and different reference indicators were applied in some studies, the results of four studies were consistent that positive ASO or anti-streptolysin was associated with TS. This indicated that streptococcal infection plays a role in the pathogenesis of TS. It was reported that the positive rates of MP antibody and special antibody IgA in TS were increased, especially in TS with OCD comorbidity, in two ‘fair’ studies. The evidence for elevated IL-6 ABAb and ANAb in TS was ‘fair’. There was no available evidence to prove that IL-8, IgE, and T lymphocytes were associated with TS/CTD.

3.3.3. Environmental Factors

Family relevant factors and perinatal factors were used to assess environmental factors. Gu et al. [34] analyzed the family environment of TS (n = 60) and NC (n = 60). The results showed that there were low intimacies and high conflicts in TS (p = 0.000; p = 0.000), but there were no significant differences in emotional expression and independence (p = 0.87; p = 0.103). Liu et al. [38] compared the TS only group (n = 40), and the TS plus OCD group (n = 33) with NC group (n = 40) to analyze family environment and parenting style. Conflicts, father’s refusal and denial, father’s overprotection, and mother’s over-intervention and overprotection were higher in TS only group and TS plus OCD group (ANOVA: p = 0.000; p = 0.003; p = 0.000; p = 0.001), and father’s emotional warmth was lower in TS only group and TS plus OCD group (ANOVA: p = 0.004). In addition, organization was lower in the TS only group (p = 0.035). No other factors were shown to be associated with TS in this study. Liu et al. [45] demonstrated that five family environmental factors (including conflicts, recreational orientation, independence, organization and control) in TS (n = 55) were significantly different from those in matched controls (n = 55) (p < 0.01).
Prenatal and perinatal factors, as well as other factors, were also detected. Motlagh et al. [40] investigated the risk factors of prenatal and perinatal periods, including heavy maternal smoking, high maternal stress levels, medical condition, and low birth weight. There were trends that the frequencies of heavy maternal smoking and the levels of severe maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy were higher in TS only (n = 45) and TS plus ADHD (n = 60) compared with NC (n = 65), but without significant differences (heavy smoking: p = 0.19, p = 0.052; severe psychological stress: p = 0.11, p = 0.07). Klug et al. [36] analyzed five parental variables (including parents’ age, parents’ education, and marital status), five prenatal variables (including prior pregnancy termination, and live birth now dead), five perinatal variables (including Apgar scores, and birthweight) in TS (n = 92) with NC (n = 460). Prior pregnancy termination was the only significant risk marker (p < 0.05), while other variables were not significantly different. The study by Zhao et al. [33] assessed other 18 risk factors except recurrent respiratory tract infections within one year, with nine related factors involved. There were significant differences in several factors between TS (n = 206) and NC (n = 125), including history of perinatal diseases, and family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases (single-factor analysis: p < 0.001, p < 0.001; multiple-factors analysis: p = 0.065, p = 0.547, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There were significant differences in parents’ personality traits and parents’ lifestyle by single-factor analysis (p = 0.002; p = 0.016; p = 0.002), while there were no significant differences in these factors by multiple-factors analysis (p = 0.065; p = 0.547; p = 0.054). No statistical differences were found in other points. Six relevant factors were explored in the study by Li et al. [35] Compared with control group (n = 100), threatened abortion, birth injuries, food preference, exposure of games and television, strict discipline, and anorexia were related risk factors for the TS group (n = 160) by multiple-factors analysis (p = 0.23; p = 0.000; p = 0.012; p = 0.005). Khalifa et al. [35] investigated TS (n = 25) and controls (n = 25). The percentage of first-degree relatives with psychiatric disorders in TS patients was higher than that in controls (80% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). TS mothers were twice as likely to have pregnancy complications and were younger than control mothers when giving birth to the index child (p < 0.001). There were no differences in education of parents, socioeconomic status or divorce rate between the two groups.
Studies by Motlagh et al. [40], Gu et al. [34] and Liu et al. [38] were considered ‘high’ quality. These studies performed well in terms of selection, but poorly in ascertainment of exposure and comparability. The other five studies were considered ‘fair’ quality. Exposure ascertainment, control selection, and comparability were poor. For some reason, two controls did not receive the same interview and examination in the study by Khalifa et al. [35] The control group was not well defined in the study by Li et al. [37]
There were both consistent and inconsistent results in the three studies of family environmental factors. Conflict was consistently identified as a risk factor for TS. Several aspects of parenting were recognized to be related to TS. Although Liu et al. [45] found that control and independence were related to TS, the other two studies did not support this. The sample size and quality of the study by Liu et al. [45] were smaller than those of the other two studies, and the grouping of the study by Liu et al. [45] was less precise than that of another study [38]. These factors may not be so important for TS. The results of perinatal factors were inconsistent, and the only study with high-quality did not identify any factor that played a role in TS/CTD.

3.3.4. Psychological Factors

Horesh et al. [39] analyzed TS (n = 41) and NC (n = 24) by using a life experience survey and a junior temperament and character inventory. They failed to prove the association between TS and stressful life events without any significantly different variable. Another study by Horesh et al. [41] including TS (n = 132) and NC (n = 49), identified there was a higher quantity of negative major life events and a lower quantity of positive major life events in TS (p < 0.05; p < 0.05). However, minor life events were not related to TS.
Both studies were considered ‘fair’. Both of them had similar flaws in comparability and exposure ascertainment. Both studies were designed to analyze the effects of life events on TS but the results were inconsistent. The study by Horesh et al. [41] supported the association between TS and major life events, which was more recent, and enrolled more cases and controls. TS may be more or less related to life events.

3.3.5. Other Factors

Liu et al. [44] tested TS (n = 22) and NC (n = 18) and showed that levels of plasma prolactin increased in TS (0.01 < p < 0.05). Erbay et al. [43] investigated three kinds of hormones, including testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and cortisol of TS/CTD (n = 26) and NC (n = 25). Higher levels of testosterone and DHEA-S were found in TS/CTD compared to NC (p = 0.019; p = 0.025), but no statistical differences were found between the cortisol levels in the two groups (p = 0.642). Corbett et al. [42] estimated the reactivity and diurnal rhythms of cortisol in TS (n = 20) and neurotypical controls (n = 16). The outcomes showed that the diurnal pattern was not different, but lower cortisol levels in the evening were observed (p = 0.08). Thus, to assess the response to stress, four timing periods (arrival, post-mock, pre-MRI, and post-MRI) were studied, and higher levels of cortisol caused by the MRI environment in TS were revealed (p = 0.033). The study by Zhao et al. [33] did not find differences in the levels of lead, selenium, zinc, or 25-hydroxyvitamin D (p = 0.085; p = 0.24; p = 0.829; p = 0.361).
The study by Erbay et al. [43] was judged to be of fair quality. Studies by Liu et al. [44] and Corbett et al. [42] were both judged as ‘fair’ based on NOS standards. The study by Liu et al. [44] did not meet the standards of NOS well, probably because it was published before the NOS was available. The study by Corbett et al. [42] was low in terms of comparability, exposure ascertainment, and case representativeness.
Cortisol levels were tested in two studies, but the study by Erbay et al. [43] only evaluated the levels of cortisol at 9:00 in the morning. Neither study found differences in cortisol levels in the morning, and evidence did not support a link between cortisol levels in the morning and TS. Decreased levels in the evening and elevated levels in response to stress were reported, but the sample size included in the study was small, and the quality of the study was fair. Increased plasma prolactin has been reported but similar shortcomings existed in small sample size and non-high quality of the study. Microelements or 25-hydroxyvitamin were not identified to be related to TS in a ‘fair’ study.

4. General Discussion

The majority of studies included had similar flaws with control sources, which might affect the validity of the results. Among the nine studies, the sample size of TS/CTD patients was greater than 100, but only four studies, including two studies of genetic factors, and two studies of environmental factors, involved sample sizes of both TS/CTD patients and controls greater than 100. In addition, the sample sizes of TS/CTD patients in seven studies were smaller than 30, which included three studies of high quality. According to sample sizes and NOS values, our review may be more supportive of that BTBD9, AADAC, streptococcus and MP infections, conflict, history of perinatal diseases, family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases, recurrent respiratory infections, positive and negative major life events being associated with the pathogenesis of TS/CTD.
BTBD9 and AADAC may be associated with TS/CTD according to studies in which the sample sizes of both TS/CTD patients and controls were greater than 100. The relationship between BTBD9 and TS has been reported in the study by Rivière et al. [46] BTBD9 mutated mice exhibited alterations in circling behaviour and more restlessness, which are regarded as tic-like behaviours [47]. BTBD9 knockout (KO) mice have increased striatal neural activity [48]. The striatum, as one of the components of the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortica (CSTC) circuit, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of TS/CTD [5]. The study by Pagliaroli et al. [49] also reported the association between AADAC and TS. Moreover, the association of AADAC with TS was previously identified by a meta-analysis with a large sample size [50]. The expression of AADAC has been detected in the brain regions of humans and mice and been related to the pathogenesis of TS/CTD [50,51]. These findings suggest the possibility of BTBD9 and AADAC as etiological factors of TS/CTD. Effective drugs for TS/CTD therapy, such as haloperidol, aripiprazole and ecopipam mainly act on DRD2 and DRD1 [52,53,54], while differential expression of DRD2 mRNA was not found in TS/CTD in the study by Ferrari et al. [13] The roles of related genes in the pathogenesis of TS/CTD are still unclear and need further study. This may help determine the pathogenesis of TS/CTD and find new treatment options
Two studies focused on MP infections in TS, and both studies were aimed at the Chinese population. It was reported that macrolides effectively treated one case of TS infected by MP [55]. Moreover, Müller et al. considered MP infection as an aggravating factor in TS [56]. Our study is basically consistent with the previous meta-analysis by Lamothe et al. [57] in that there are an elevated level of ASO in TS. Rizzo et al. [30] identified that elevated anti-streptolysin titers are accompanied by positive anti-basal ganglia. However, different ASO titer cut-off values were used in these studies, which may bias our results. This suggests, at least in part, that MP and streptolysin infections are related to TS/CTD, but the mechanism by which infections cause TS/CTD remains unclear. More studies are needed to focus on the mechanism of TS/CTD caused by infections.
Chao et al. [58] performed a systematic review of prenatal factors for TS, and found that maternal smoking and low birth weight are associated with TS. This is inconsistent with our results, and may be due to the different types of literature included in our study. Family environmental factors, including conflict and family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases may be linked to TS/CTD. Comprehensive family-based behavioural interventions have been implemented for TS/CTD [59]. A family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases has been focused on, but a combination of genetic and environmental factors could be involved. Future studies may need to pay more on attention to the interaction of genetic and non-genetic factors.
Life events reflect psychological stress, and psychological components may affect immunity and health [60]. Two studies by the same first author involved life events with different consequences, and in the later published report, the sample sizes of both TS patients and controls were greater than 100. Personality patterns are factors that regulate the correlation between genetic susceptibility, life events, and the pathogenesis of a psychiatric disorder [61]. Psychological interventions are effective on TS/CTD [62] and they are listed as first-line treatments for TS/CTD [63]. This suggests that positive and negative major life events are the underlying etiologial factors of TS/CTD.
TS and CTD are complex and heterogeneous diseases and their pathogenesis may be multifactorial [5]. In our review, we found that TS/CTD might be related to many factors. However, no study was found to focus on the interaction of genetic and non-genetic factors, and these should be further studied.
Our systemic review is based on several factors. Heterogeneities in comorbidities, sample sizes, patient characteristics, sources of controls and cases, and ascertainment of exposure may confound comparisons between etiological factors and between studies. Some studies did not provide a clear number of females or males, so reviewer reliability is difficult to judge. Some factors (genetic factors, environmental factors) were estimated more in adults or based on family studies or cohort studies. Our review was limited to the age ≤ 18 years based on case-control studies, which may have led to failure in capturing more relevant available data.

5. Conclusions

Our systematic review found recent evidence to support that genetic factors (BTBD9 and AADAC), immunological factors (streptococcus and MP infections), environmental factors (conflict, history of perinatal diseases, and family history of neurological, and psychiatric diseases and recurrent respiratory infections) and psychological factors (positive and negative major life events) are associated with the pathogenesis of TS/CTD. There is still a lack of studies on the interaction between these factors. Further studies are needed to take into account their interaction to understand the causative factors of TS/CTD.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/brainsci12091202/s1, Table S1: Quality assessment of the included studies.

Author Contributions

The general idea was conceived by J.J., M.C. and Y.C. Methodology and research were performed by J.J. and M.C. The results were discussed by J.J., M.C. and Y.C. The article was written by J.J. and M.C. Quality assessments of studies were performed by M.C. and H.H. The article was reviewed by J.J. and Y.C. with valuable suggestions. The English was revised by J.J. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by Fujian Natural Science Foundation Project (2021J01775).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Zhongling Ke for some ideas on study design. Thanks are also expressed to two anonymous reviewers, for the constructive comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Szejko, N.; Robinson, S.; Hartmann, A.; Ganos, C.; Debes, N.; Skov, L.; Haas, M.; Rizzo, R.; Stern, J.; Münchau, A.; et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part I: Assessment. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2022, 31, 383–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernandez, T.V.; State, M.W.; Pittenger, C. Tourette disorder and other tic disorders. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 147, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Z.-S.; Cui, Y.-H.; Sun, D.; Lu, Q.; Jiang, Y.-W.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.-Q.; Luo, R.; Fang, F.; Zhou, S.-Z.; et al. Current Status, Diagnosis, and Treatment Recommendation for Tic Disorders in China. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed.; Revised; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; Revised; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stang, A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 25, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jakovljevic, A.; Jakovljevic, T.S.; Duncan, H.F.; Nagendrababu, V.; Jacimovic, J.; Aminoshariae, A.; Milasin, J.; Dummer, P.M.H. The association between apical periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review. Int. Endod. J. 2021, 54, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ferrari, M.; Termine, C.; Franciotta, D.; Castiglioni, E.; Pagani, A.; Lanzi, G.; Marino, F.; Lecchini, S.; Cosentino, M.; Balottin, U. Dopaminergic receptor D5 mRNA expression is increased in circulating lymphocytes of Tourette syndrome patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2008, 43, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, J.; Lei, J.; Deng, X.; Xu, H.; Yang, Z.; Kuang, S.; Tang, J.; Luo, Z.; et al. Analysis of the BTBD9 and HTR2C variants in Chinese Han patients with Tourette syndrome. Psychiatr. Genet. 2012, 22, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, F.; Zheng, Y.; Cheng, Y.H.; Liang, Y.Z.; Yang, J.H.; Cui, Y.H.; Jia, J.P. Association between Tourette syndrome curative effects and the dopamine transporter gene. Chin. J. Psychiatry 2011, 44, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  16. He, F.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, H.-H.; Cheng, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-Y. Association between Tourette Syndrome and the Dopamine D3 Receptor Gene Rs6280. Chin. Med. J. 2015, 128, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ji, W.D.; Zhou, J.X.; Yang, C.; Huang, X.Q.; Yao, J.; Guo, T.Y.; Guo, L.T.; Liu, X.H. The executive function in Han Chinese children with Tourette’s syndrome and it’s association with polymorphism of DRD4 VNTR. Chin. Ment. Health J. 2010, 24, 568–573. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lei, J.; Xu, H.; Liang, H.; Su, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Song, Z.; Le, W.; Deng, H. Gene expression changes in peripheral blood from Chinese Han patients with Tourette syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2012, 159B, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lit, L.; Enstrom, A.; Sharp, F.R.; Gilbert, D. Age-related gene expression in Tourette syndrome. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2009, 43, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, H.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, B.S. Study on the dopamine beta-hydroxylase gene Taq I digestion polymorphism and Tourette syndrome: A case-control study. Chin. J. Contemp. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2009, 9, 60–64. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu, Y.; Ma, H.-W.; Xi, C.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yao, L.; Gao, J.; Wang, W.; Zhou, M. Association between the polymorphism in the promoter region of dopamine D4 receptor gene and chronic tic disorder. Chin. J. Contemp. Pediatr. 2006, 8, 357–360. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirabella, F.; Gulisano, M.; Capelli, M.; Lauretta, G.; Cirnigliaro, M.; Palmucci, S.; Stella, M.; Barbagallo, D.; Di Pietro, C.; Purrello, M.; et al. Enrichment and Correlation Analysis of Serum miRNAs in Comorbidity Between Arnold-Chiari and Tourette Syndrome Contribute to Clarify Their Molecular Bases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 13, 608355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rizzo, R.; Ragusa, M.; Barbagallo, C.; Sammito, M.; Gulisano, M.; Calì, P.V.; Pappalardo, C.; Barchitta, M.; Granata, M.; Condorelli, A.G.; et al. Circulating miRNAs profiles in Tourette syndrome: Molecular data and clinical implications. Mol. Brain 2015, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tian, Y.; Liao, I.H.; Zhan, X.; Gunther, J.R.; Ander, B.P.; Liu, D.; Lit, L.; Jickling, G.C.; Corbett, B.A.; Bos-Veneman, N.G.; et al. Exon expression and alternatively spliced genes in Tourette syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2011, 156, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, L.; Zheng, W.; Yang, Z.; Deng, X.; Song, Z.; Deng, H. Association of the AADAC gene and Tourette syndrome in a Han Chinese cohort. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 666, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chang, J.; Li, H.B.; Liang, D.; Chen, Y.B.; Lu, J.R.; Zhao, H.X. Association between Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and children with Tourette syndrome. Chin. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2006, 32, 349–350. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cheng, Y.H.; Li, W.B.; Wang, L.F.; Liu, R.M.; Zheng, Y. Increased expression of autoantibody protein and soluble IL-6 receptor in serum of patients with Tourette’s syndrome patients. J. Neurosci. Ment. Health 2009, 9, 207–209. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dong, L.X.; Hao, Y.Q. Study on the relationship between Tourette syndrome and the changes of ASO. J. Chifeng Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2009, 25, 63–64. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ji, W.D.; Li, N.; Guo, B.Y.; Zhou, J.X.; Huang, X.Q. Determination of T-cell subpopulations, ASO, IL-6, and IL-8 in children with Tourette’s syndrome. J. Zhengzhou Univ. (Med. Sci.) 2005, 40, 337–339. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rizzo, R.; Gulisano, M.; Pavone, P.; Fogliani, F.; Robertson, M.M. Increased Antistreptococcal Antibody Titers and Anti—Basal Ganglia Antibodies in Patients with Tourette Syndrome: Controlled Cross-Sectional Study. J. Child Neurol. 2006, 21, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yang, H.; Wang, Y.J.; Qin, F.L. Association between Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and children with Tourette syndrome. Chin. J. Mod. Drug Appl. 2010, 4, 48–49. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yuce, M.; Guner, S.N.; Karabekiroglu, K.; Baykal, S.; Kilic, M.; Sancak, R.; Karabekiroglu, A. Association of Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder with allergic diseases in children and adolescents: A preliminary study. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 18, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, R.X.; Luo, Y.J.; Ren, D. Analysis of risk factors of children with Tourette Syndrome. Chin. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Pediatr. (Electron. Ed.) 2017, 13, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gu, H.L.; Chen, H.; Ji, J.P.; Kang, J.J.; Zhang, Y. Behavior problems and family environment of children with Tourette syndrome. Matern. Child Health Care China 2013, 28, 3943–3945. [Google Scholar]
  35. Khalifa, N.; von Knorring, A.-L. Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders in a total population of children: Clinical assessment and background. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94, 1608–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Klug, M.G.; Burd, L.; Kerbeshian, J.; Benz, B.; Martsolf, J.T. A comparison of the effects of parental risk markers on pre- and perinatal variables in multiple patient cohorts with fetal alcohol syndrome, autism, Tourette syndrome, and sudden infant death syndrome: An enviromic analysis. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2003, 25, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, D.; Li, Y.R.; He, L.Y. Analysis of risk factors of children with Tourette Syndrome. Guangdong Med. J. 2010, 31, 2698–2699. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, X.M.; Wang, Y.W.; Yi, M.J.; Chu, Q.; Li, L.X. Family environment and rearing styles of parents of children with Tourette syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder. Chin. Ment. Health J. 2007, 21, 595–597. [Google Scholar]
  39. Horesh, N.; Zimmerman, S.; Steinberg, T.; Yagan, H.; Apter, A. Is onset of Tourette syndrome influenced by life events? J. Neural Transm. 2008, 115, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Motlagh, M.G.; Katsovich, L.; Thompson, N.; Lin, H.; Kim, Y.-S.; Scahill, L.; Lombroso, P.J.; King, R.A.; Peterson, B.S.; Leckman, J.F. Severe psychosocial stress and heavy cigarette smoking during pregnancy: An examination of the pre- and perinatal risk factors associated with ADHD and Tourette syndrome. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010, 19, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Horesh, N.; Shmuel-Baruch, S.; Farbstein, D.; Ruhrman, D.; Milshtein, N.B.A.; Fennig, S.; Apter, A.; Steinberg, T. Major and minor life events, personality and psychopathology in children with Tourette syndrome. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 260, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Corbett, B.; Mendoza, S.; Baym, C.; Bunge, S.; Levine, S. Examining cortisol rhythmicity and responsivity to stress in children with Tourette syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008, 33, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Erbay, L.G.; Kartalci, Ş.; Ozcan, O.O.; Demir, A.; Uyumlu, A.B.; Kutuk, M.O. Testosterone and DHEA-S levels with chronic tic disorder in children. J. Obs.-Compuls. Relat. Disord. 2016, 9, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Z.S.; Yang, L.Z.; Wang, F.L.; Lin, Q.; Zuo, Q.H. Changes in plasma prolactin levels in children with Tourette syndrome. J. Brain Nerv. Dis. 1998, 6, 182. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, K.X.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, X.X. Analysis on the family environment of children with Tourette syndrome. J. Clin. Res. 2008, 25, 211–213. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rivière, J.-B.; Xiong, L.; Levchenko, A.; St-Onge, J.; Gaspar, C.; Dion, Y.; Lespérance, P.; Tellier, G.; Richer, F.; Chouinard, S.; et al. Association of Intronic Variants of the BTBD9 Gene with Tourette Syndrome. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. DeAndrade, M.; Johnson, R.L.; Unger, E.L.; Zhang, L.; Van Groen, T.; Gamble, K.; Li, Y. Motor restlessness, sleep disturbances, thermal sensory alterations and elevated serum iron levels in Btbd9 mutant mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, 3984–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lyu, S.; Xing, H.; DeAndrade, M.P.; Liu, Y.; Perez, P.D.; Yokoi, F.; Febo, M.; Walters, A.S.; Li, Y. The Role of BTBD9 in Striatum and Restless Legs Syndrome. Eneuro 2019, 6, 0277-19.2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pagliaroli, L.; Vereczkei, A.; Padmanabhuni, S.S.; Tarnok, Z.; Farkas, L.; Nagy, P.; Rizzo, R.; Wolanczyk, T.; Szymanska, U.; Kapisyzi, M.; et al. Association of Genetic Variation in the 3′UTR of LHX6, IMMP2L, and AADAC with Tourette Syndrome. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bertelsen, B.; Stefánsson, H.; Jensen, L.R.; Melchior, L.; Debes, N.M.; Groth, C.; Skov, L.; Werge, T.; Karagiannidis, I.; Tarnok, Z.; et al. Association of AADAC Deletion and Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome in a Large European Cohort. Biol. Psychiatry 2016, 79, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lein, E.S.; Hawrylycz, M.J.; Ao, N.; Ayres, M.; Bensinger, A.; Bernard, A.; Boe, A.F.; Boguski, M.S.; Brockway, K.S.; Byrnes, E.J.; et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 2007, 445, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pringsheim, T.; Holler-Managan, Y.; Okun, M.S.; Jankovic, J.; Piacentini, J.; Cavanna, A.E.; Martino, D.; Müller-Vahl, K.; Woods, D.W.; Robinson, M.; et al. Comprehensive systematic review summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology 2019, 92, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zheng, W.; Li, X.-B.; Xiang, Y.-Q.; Zhong, B.-L.; Chiu, H.F.; Ungvari, G.S.; Ng, C.H.; Lok, G.K.; Xiang, Y.-T. Aripiprazole for Tourette’s syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2016, 31, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gilbert, D.L.; Murphy, T.K.; Jankovic, J.; Budman, C.L.; Black, K.J.; Kurlan, R.M.; Coffman, K.A.; McCracken, J.T.; Juncos, J.; Grant, J.E.; et al. Ecopipam, a D1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of Tourette syndrome in children: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 1272–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schuhfried, G.; Stanek, G. Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome Caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae Successfully Treated with Macrolides. Klin. Pädiatrie 2014, 226, 295–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Müller, N.; Riedel, M.; Blendinger, C.; Oberle, K.; Jacobs, E.; Abele-Horn, M. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and Tourette’s syndrome. Psychiatry Res. 2004, 129, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lamothe, H.; Tamouza, R.; Hartmann, A.; Mallet, L. Immunity and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for immune implications in Tourette syndrome. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 3187–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chao, T.-K.; Hu, J.; Pringsheim, T. Prenatal risk factors for Tourette Syndrome: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bennett, S.M.; Capriotti, M.; Bauer, C.; Chang, S.; Keller, A.E.; Walkup, J.; Woods, D.; Piacentini, J. Development and Open Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for Young Children with Chronic Tics: The CBIT-JR Study. Behav. Ther. 2020, 51, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buse, J.; Kirschbaum, C.; Leckman, J.; Münchau, A.; Roessner, V. The Modulating Role of Stress in the Onset and Course of Tourette’s Syndrome: A Review. Behav. Modif. 2014, 38, 184–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yap, S.C.; Anusic, I.; Lucas, R.E. Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. J. Res. Pers. 2012, 46, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Liang, J.-H.; Zhang, S.-X.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tan, K.-Y.; Zhang, J.-S.; Zhao, Y.; Kakaer, A.; Chen, Y.-J. Role of psychotherapy strategy for the management of patients with Tourette syndrome—A Bayesian network meta-analysis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2021, 143, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Andrén, P.; Jakubovski, E.; Murphy, T.L.; Woitecki, K.; Tarnok, Z.; Zimmerman-Brenner, S.; van de Griendt, J.; Debes, N.M.; Viefhaus, P.; Robinson, S.; et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part II: Psychological interventions. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2022, 31, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 12 01202 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Brainsci 12 01202 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
ResultsStudy QualityNOS ValuesCategoriesCases/Controls (N)DiagnosisCountryStudies
Higher DRD5 mRNA levels in TS compared to healthy controls. No differences in DRD2, DRD3, or DRD4. mRNA.Fair4genetic15/15TSItaly[13]
A significant association between TS and the variant rs9296249 of BTBD9. No differences in the other four variants.High7genetic110/440TSChina[14]
No significant differences in polymorphisms of DAT1 between groups.High8genetic115/57TSChina[15]
No statistical differences in the allele and genotype frequencies of DRD3 rs6280 SNPs between TS and controls.High7genetic160/90TSChina[16]
No significant in DRD4 exon III 48 bp variable number of tandem repeats.Fair6genetic86/51TSChina[17]
Significant differences in APBA2 expression between TS and NC.Fair5genetic84/100TSChina[18]
No global expression differences between TS and controls. Within each age strata (5–9, 10–12, and 13–16), the expression of many genes differed between TS and controls.High7genetic30/28TSthe United States[19]
No significant differences in the polymorphism of DBH Taq1 digestion between TS and NC.High7genetic106/80CTDChina[20]
Significant differences in both genotype and allele frequencies of DRD4 616C/G between CTD and controls.Fair4genetic85/100CTDChina[21]
miR-23a-3p upregulated in TS compared to NC. miR-130a-3p downregulated in ACTS and TS compared to NC. miR-222-3p and miR-451a upregulated in ACTS compared to NC.High7genetic17/8TSItaly[22]
MiR-429 significantly downregulated in TS to normal controls.High7genetic58/28TSItaly[23]
Expressions of 376 exon probe set significantly different between TS and NC, but no exon with multiple comparisons corrected p < 0.05. 90 genes (transcripts) differently expressed of one exon in TS compared to NC, while three genes with a corrected p < 0.05 based on the Benjamini and Hochberg FDR for multiple comparison correction.Fair6genetic26/23TSthe United States[24]
Two variants of AADAC, including c.361 + 1G > A, and c.744A > T, identified in two unrelated TS patients. The c.361 + 1G > A variant absent in controls, the c.744A > T variant identified in two NC.Fair6genetic200/300TSChina[25]
Significantly higher MP antibody (titers ≥ 1:160) and MP-specific antibody IgA in TS than in NC.Fair6immunological60/60TSChina[26]
ASO titers raised (≥250 IU/L) in 13/66 (19.7%) TS and 0 NC.Fair4immunological67/64TSChina[27]
ASO titers raised (≥200 IU/L) in 27/48 (56.3%) TS and 2/20 (10.0%) NC.Fair6immunological48/20TSChina[28]
Significantly higher titers of ASO in TS than in NC.Fair6immunological32/30TSChina[29]
Raised anti-streptolysin titers in 41 of 69 (59%) TS and 14 of 72 (19%) controls. Positive anti-basal ganglia antibodies in 22 of 69 (32%) TS compared with 7 of 72 (10%) controls.High7immunological,69/72TSItaly[30]
Significant differences in the positive rates of MP antibody and MP-specific antibody IgA in TS compared to NC.Fair6immunological50/50TSChina[31]
More comorbid allergic diseases in TS compared to controls. No significant differences in IgE levels and eosinophil counts.Fair6immunological25/25TSTurkey[32]
Significant differences in frequencies of recurrent respiratory infections within one year, history of perinatal diseases, and family history of neurological and psychiatric diseases. No significant differences in the other variables.Fair6Immunological, environmental206/125TSChina[33]
Low intimacy and high conflict in TS. No significant differences in emotional expression or independence.High7environmental60/60TSChina[34]
First-degree relative with psychiatric disorders in eighty per cent of TS. Non-significant of reduced optimality score in the prenatal, perinatal or neonatal periods in TS compared to controls. No differences in socio-economic status.Fair5environmental25/25TS, CTDSweden[35]
Significant differences in prior terminations between TS and controls.High7environmental72/460TSthe United States[36]
According to multiple-factors analysis, threatened abortion and birth injuries, food preference, exposure to games and television, strict discipline, and anorexia related to TS.Fair5environmental160/100TSChina[37]
Higher conflict, rejection, and denial from father, overprotection from father, over-intervention and overprotection from mother, and lower emotional warmth from father in both TS only and TS plus OCD.High7environmental73/40TSChina[38]
Five (conflict, recreational orientation, independence, organization, and control) over ten family environmental factors of TS significantly different from those of matched controls.Fair6environmental55/55TSChina[39]
Higher frequencies of heavy maternal smoking and the levels of severe maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy in TS only and TS plus ADHD compared to NC, but without significant differences.High7environmental105/65TSthe United States[40]
No significant differences in life events between TS and NC.Fair6psychological41/24TSIsrael[39]
Major life events correlated with TS. Minor life events correlated with more severe symptomatology.Fair6psychological132/49TSIsrael[41]
Lower evening cortisol for TS. Higher levels of cortisol in response to MRI environment for TS.Fair6other20/16TSthe United States[42]
Higher testosterone and DHEA-S levels in TS than in controls. No statistical differences between the cortisol levels.Fair6other26/25TS, CTDTurkey[43]
Significantly higher soluble IL-6 receptor and soluble glycoprotein 130 in TS than in NC.Fair4other22/18TSChina[44]
AADAC: arylacetamide deacetylase; ACTS: Tourette syndrome comorbidity with Arnold-Chiari syndrome; ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; APBA2: amyloid precursor protein-binding protein A2; ASO: anti-streptolysin O; CTD: chronic tic disorder; DAT1: dopamine transporter 1; DBH: dopamine beta-hydroxylase; DRD2: dopamine D2 receptor; DRD3: dopamine D3 receptor; DRD4: dopamine D4 receptor; DRD5: dopamine D5 receptor; FDR: false discovery rate; IgA: immunoglobulin A; IgE: immunoglobulin E; IL-6: interleukin-6; miR: microRNA; MP: Mycoplasma pneumoniae; N: number; NC: normal controls; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa scale; OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder; SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms; TS: Tourette syndrome.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, J.; Chen, M.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y. The Aetiology of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091202

AMA Style

Jiang J, Chen M, Huang H, Chen Y. The Aetiology of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(9):1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Jilong, Mengxin Chen, Huifang Huang, and Yanhui Chen. 2022. "The Aetiology of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies" Brain Sciences 12, no. 9: 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091202

APA Style

Jiang, J., Chen, M., Huang, H., & Chen, Y. (2022). The Aetiology of Tourette Syndrome and Chronic Tic Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies. Brain Sciences, 12(9), 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop