Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of the Safety, Efficacy, and Accuracy of Frame-Based versus Remebot Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Systems for Biopsy of Brainstem Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study Finds No Common Viruses in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Children with Pseudotumor Cerebri
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/brainsci13020363
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Income with Post-Stroke Cognition and the Underlying Neuroanatomical Mechanism

by
Jingyuan Tian
1,
Yue Wang
2,3,4,
Li Guo
1,* and
Shiping Li
2,3,4,*
1
Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
2
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
3
National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Disease, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
4
Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(2), 363; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020363
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objective: To investigate the association between income and post-stroke cognition at 3 months, and the underlying neuroanatomical mechanism. Methods: Patients with first-ever ischemic stroke were enrolled and analyzed. Baseline information on income and neuroimaging measurements with predictive values for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) were collected within 7 days of the admission. Three months after the index stroke, all participants underwent a detailed neuropsychological test battery. The associations between income and PSCI and between income and brain structural measurements were investigated. Results: A total of 294 patients were recruited for this study. Lower income was independently associated with poor cognitive performance on Stroop tests, Clinical Dementia Rating, Boston Naming Test, and Verbal Fluency Test. Regarding neuroimaging parameters, lower income was associated with a lower total brain volume (TBV)/total intracranial volume (TICV) ratio (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Lower income is associated with an increased chance of post-stroke cognitive decline, particularly in executive function and language domains. Since global brain atrophy (measured by TBV/TICV ratio) is a strong predictor for PSCI, its correlation with income may help explain the neuroanatomical mechanism between income and post-stroke cognition.

1. Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide [1]. While the functional outcomes of ischemic stroke patients have improved with the rapid development of acute reperfusion therapy [2], post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remains prevalent, occurring in approximately half of survivors [3]. The negative impacts of PSCI on stroke recurrence [4], disability [5], and mortality [6] will impose substantial burdens on patients, their caregivers, and healthcare systems. Therefore, efforts should be made immediately to identify modifiable risk factors for PSCI for early disease detection and prompt intervention.
Cognitive function following a stroke varies significantly among individuals. The observed discrepancies may be caused by the interaction of multiple factors, including demographic characteristics, prior pathology, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics [7]. Among these factors, socioeconomic status (SES) is an active topic of research in cognitive decline and dementia [8,9], and its detrimental effects on poor functional outcomes, disability, and mortality in stroke survivors have been well investigated [10,11]. However, the literature exploring the association between SES and PSCI is scant, especially in developing countries such as China, where massive SES inequality exists. SES is a comprehensive concept with diverse components, and measures of individual-level SES typically consist of income, occupation, and educational attainment. A recent study suggested that these indicators are distinct theoretical constructs, likely with different pathways influencing and affecting cognitive functions [12]. Thus, disentangling the contributions of each indicator will provide important insights into the potential mechanisms of how SES shapes the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Greg J. Duncan et al. suggested utilizing the economic components of SES for monitoring relationships between SES and health [13]. Income is among the most important parts of the economic composition of SES, and studies have shown that lower income is a significant predictor of poorer cognitive function [14]. Individuals with annual per capita income below the poverty line are at a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment [15]. A longer duration of poverty, in both young adults and the elderly, was associated with poorer cognitive function [16,17]. As for stroke survivors, a recent study of the relationship between risk factors and several health domains revealed that lower income was associated with worse executive function scores [18]. Nevertheless, in this study, the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders executive function scale, rather than a detailed neuropsychological assessment, was administered to patients. Thus, the effect of income on domain-specific cognitive functions after stroke remains to be elucidated.
A growing body of literature has shown that SES indicators are associated with specific brain structures. For example, community socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with cortical morphology [19]. Educational attainment moderates the effect of age on hippocampal volume [20]. Lower socioprofessional attainment at midlife was associated with faster hippocampal atrophy [21]. Events associated with lower socioeconomic environments during development and aging could influence the structural and functional plasticity of the hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex [22]. Interestingly, some of these brain structures are also known to have the potential to predict PSCI in the acute phase of the stroke. Understanding the association between income and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predictors for PSCI will help understand the potential neuroanatomical mechanisms of income-related post-stroke cognitive performance. According to a recent systematic review, among MRI parameters with predictive values for cognitive outcomes after stroke, global brain atrophy is one of the most consistent predictors across various studies [23]. Brain atrophy refers to the loss or shrinkage of neurons, which is reflected as a reduction in brain volume, and can be measured using neuroimaging. In clinical practice, the ratio of total brain volume (TBV) to total intracranial volume (TICV), also known as the brain parenchymal fraction, is frequently used to measure global brain atrophy [24]. TBV/TICV ratio was found to be associated with neuropsychological performance [25] and is a simple technique to distinguish dementia patients from healthy controls [26]. Although a positive correlation between SES and brain volume in aging-related regions has been identified [27], the relationship between income and total brain volume or global brain atrophy (as indexed by TBV/TICV ratio) in stroke survivors is yet unknown.
Based on the evidence of the relationship between global brain atrophy and PSCI, if we can further demonstrate a connection between income and PSCI, as well as between income and global brain atrophy, we can infer that income may be correlated with PSCI via the brain atrophy process. To test this hypothesis, we utilized data from the China National Clinical Research Center Alzheimer’s Disease and Neurodegenerative Disorder Research (CANDOR), which included information on first-ever ischemic stroke patients. Baseline information about income and MRI parameters were collected within 7 days post-stroke. Three months after the index stroke, all the participants underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests. After categorizing participants into lower- and higher-income groups, neuropsychological features and MRI measurements were compared, and the effects of income on each cognitive domain and structural brain measurement were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was a subgroup analysis of CANDOR. CANDOR is an ongoing study started in July 2019, with the goal being to investigate the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and prognosis of cognitive impairment and dementia. Individuals eligible for this study included the following criteria: (1) aged between 40 and 100, (2) hospitalized with first-ever ischemic stroke, (3) duration from the stroke onset to admission being less than 7 days, and (4) without pre-existing cognitive impairment, indicated by a score of ≤3.5 from the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a history of asymptomatic cerebral infarction, psychiatric disorders, uncontrolled epilepsy, severe pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases, systematic diseases that affect the central nervous system, uncontrolled metabolic syndrome and endocrine diseases, and malignant tumors, and (2) poor ability to fulfill the examinations, such as literacy problems, severe hearing difficulty, and visual impairment. Data of the subjects were initially obtained from the vascular cognitive cohort of the CANDOR study, based on the above eligibility criteria. After excluding individuals who did not provide information on their monthly income, and those with missing 3D-T1 MRI data and incomplete neuropsychological assessment, 294 patients were finally enrolled in this study.
We used monthly income as a proxy for SES. To avoid an illness factor on income, we recorded the data of self-reported pre-stroke income during their hospitalization. Monthly income was calculated by summing up all the households’ monthly income and dividing it by the number of residents. Participants were separated into the following two groups: (1) those with a monthly income of less than 5000 Chinese Yuan (CNY), and (2) those with a monthly income of more than CNY 5000. The group classification was not arbitrary. We used the per capita disposable income data in Beijing for reference, which was CNY 69,433.5 in 2020. We then averaged the per capita disposable income every month (CNY ≈ 5786) and used CNY 5000 for the group criteria. The information on the population’s income is available from the China Statistical Yearbook, published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China. Other variables assessed at baseline contained demographic characteristics and vascular risk factors. Demographic characteristics were age, gender, and years of educational attainment. Vascular risk factors included history of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and drinking.
Each research center quantitatively measured signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity, and geometric distortion. MRI data were acquired using a 3.0 T scanner, with the maximum thickness of 1.5 mm. The 3D T1-weighted anatomical images were corrected for intensity and non-uniformity with the N4 algorithm. Reconstruction of the brain surface was acquired via the FreeSurfer (version 7.2.0, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) (accessed on 6 October 2022) recon-all pipeline. The following brain measurements were all obtained with this pipeline: hippocampus volume, TBV, cortex volume, white matter volume, gray matter volume, TBV, TICV, TBV/TICV ratio, hippocampus volume, and mean cortical thickness. TBV was calculated by summing the volume of gray matter and white matter. TICV was calculated by adding the TBV and the volume of cerebrospinal fluid. TBV/TICV ratio was computed as the percentage of TBV to TICV to correct for differences in head size. Global brain atrophy was represented by a lower TBV/TICV ratio.
All the participants underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests 3 months after a stroke, which included the following aspects: (1) tests for global cognitive performance, such as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR); (2) tests for domain-specific cognitive performance, including Digit-Span test (DST), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF), Stroop Color-Word Test-Victoria version, Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT A and TMT B), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Verbal Fluency Test-animal (VFT), Boston Naming Test (BNT), and Clock Drawing Test (CDT); and (3) tests for psychiatric symptoms, including Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). As for domain-specific cognitive tests, words in DST backwards and DST forwards are summed to obtain DST total score. RAVLT in our study includes 3 sub-tests, RAVLT total learning, RAVLT long-delayed recall, and RAVLT recognition. ROCF has 4 sub-tests, including ROCF copy, ROCF immediate recall, ROCF long-delayed recall, and ROCF recognition [28]. The Victoria version Stroop tests consists of 3 tests, including Dot (D) test, Word (W) test, and Color (C) test. Time to complete each test was scored [29]. The obtained score of TMT A and TMT B represent the amount of time required to complete the task [30]. The score of SDMT was the number of correctly matched digits and symbols in a given time (90 s) [31]. VFT was determined by the number of animal names in 1 min. BNT Beijing version included 30 pictures, and the number of correctly named pictures were scored. CDT required subjects to draw a clock pointing to 11:10 on a white sheet of paper [32]. Lower values indicate better performance in CDR, Stroop test, TMT A and B, NPI, and GDS, but poor performance in MMSE, MoCA, DST, RAVLT, ROCF, SDMT, VFT, BNT and CDT. All the tests were administered by examiners trained in neuropsychological assessment.
Descriptive analyses were performed to summarize the characteristics of the participants. Continuous variables were expressed as means (standard deviations) and categorical variables as counts (percentages). Potential differences between two income groups were tested by 2-tailed t tests for continuous data and chi-squared tests for categorical data. To summarize the relationship between income and variables of cognitive performance and MRI outcomes that showed significant differences in group comparisons, multiple linear regression models were performed to calculate the β coefficient and accompanying 95% CIs. All the models were adjusted for age, gender, and years of educational attainment. We used SPSS software (version 24.0) for the analyses. A 2-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Two hundred ninety-four first-ever ischemic stroke patients were evaluated in this study, of whom 178 patients had a monthly income of less than CNY 5000, and 116 had a monthly income of more than CNY 5000. The mean age of the whole sample was 58.3 years (±9.2), 226/294 (76.9%) were male, and mean years of educational attainment was 10.7 (±3.3). Full characteristics of the study participants are described in Table 1.

3.1. Comparisons between Patients with Lower Income and Higher Income

Table 1 shows the differences in demographics and vascular risk factors between the two groups. Patients in the lower-income and higher-income groups did not differ in age, gender, or vascular risk factors. Compared to higher-income group patients, lower-income patients had fewer years of schooling (p < 0.001). Comparisons of neuropsychological assessments 3 months after the stroke are presented in Table 2. Patients in the lower-income group showed lower scores on MMSE, MoCA, DST total, RAVLT total learning, VFT, and BNT, and higher scores on CDR and Stroop tests (all p < 0.05).
MRI outcomes in each income group are displayed in Table 3. Patients in the lower-income group had a lower TBV/TICV ratio (p = 0.022) compared to their higher-income counterparts. However, the two groups had no significant differences in bilateral cortex volume, white matter volume, gray matter volume, TBV, bilateral hippocampus volume, and bilateral mean cortical thickness.

3.2. Association between Income and Post-Stroke Cognitive Functions and MRI Outcomes

Linear regression models were used to assess the association of income with post-stroke cognitive performance and MRI outcomes, which showed statistical differences in group comparisons. As shown in Table 4, after adjustments for age, gender, and educational years, as the level of income increased, the risks of lower scores on global CDR (β = −0.120, 95%CI: −0.163 to −0.005), total CDR (β = −0.147, 95%CI: −0.689 to −0.088), Stroop D time (β = −0.163, 95%CI: −5.837 to −0.951), Stroop W time (β = −0.158, 95%CI: −11.153 to −1.517), and Stroop C time (β = −0.144, 95%CI: −9.181 to −0.946) increased, and the risks of higher scores on VFT (β = 0.142, 95%CI: 0.308 to 2.630) and BNT (β = 0.113, 95%CI: 0.060 to 1.811) also increased. The only neuroimaging parameter in the multivariable linear regression model was the TBV/TICV ratio. A positive association was found between income and TBV/TICV ratio (β = 0.166, 95%CI: 0.004 to 0.024), when controlled for age, gender, and years of education.

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that income was independently associated with cognitive performance 3 months after the stroke and the TBV/TICV ratio (as a proxy for global brain atrophy). Given that global brain atrophy has been demonstrated to have a predictive value for PSCI in previous studies [23,33], our findings may help reveal the neuroanatomical underpinnings of the association between income and post-stroke cognitive performance.
The association between lower income and worse cognitive performance 3 months after the ictus found in our study was consistent with a prior review, which showed that stroke survivors from lower SES had worse outcomes [34]. Regarding post-stroke cognitive outcomes, Abdel Douiri et al. found PSCI prevalence increased as the level of SES decreased [35]. In contrast to that study, which utilized employment as a proxy for SES, our study provided new evidence for the detrimental effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on post-stroke cognitive performance, by using income as an indicator of SES. Furthermore, we performed detailed neuropsychological tests, which enabled us to identify income-related post-stroke cognitive decline in CDR, Stoop tests, VFT, and BNT. CDR is a widely used cognition severity-ranking scale [36], and the remaining tests focus mainly on executive function and language ability [37,38]. Compared to the previous study, which indicated a close relationship between income and executive deficits in stroke survivors [18], we further discovered that the Stroop tests were sensitive in assessing lower income-related post-stroke executive deficits, and that lower income also had a negative influence on both global cognition severity and language ability. Executive dysfunction is a recognized feature of vascular cognitive impairment [39], and impairment in executive function could predict poor survival in ischemic stroke patients [6]. Thus, our findings of lower income as a modifiable risk factor for executive function in stroke survivors have profound implications.
Due to the strong association between specific neuroimaging markers and PSCI, we next investigated the effects of lower income on several brain structures with previously demonstrated predictive values in PSCI. Here, we showed that income was significantly associated with global brain atrophy. This result is consistent with those studies indicating that SES influences brain integrity. For example, Leslie Grasset et al. revealed that income volatility, which implied drops in income and episodes of lower income, was associated with total brain microstructural integrity [40]. Moreover, in a cross-sectional study, Hunt et al. found that a high level of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with considerably decreased TBV [41]. Another study demonstrated that higher SES was associated with greater global brain volumes in white adults [42]. There could be several explanations for the association between income and global brain atrophy. First, exposure to low income can be regarded as a stressful event that may impact the brain’s plasticity via neurobiological pathways [22]. For instance, stress-related disruption of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity may affect brain areas with corticosteroid receptors. Indeed, this type of receptor is present throughout the whole brain. Prior research has shown a correlation between higher cortisol (output of the HPA axis) levels and decreased total brain-tissue volume [43]. Second, lifelong exposure to low-income conditions may lead to unhealthy behaviors. It has been demonstrated that smoking for an extended period of time severely affects brain perfusion levels [44], which may result in reduced cerebral volume. High-income individuals, in contrast, typically have healthy lifestyles, which includes getting more exercise. Physical activity has been linked to less brain atrophy [45] and may improve brain health by increasing neurotrophic factor production and brain plasticity [46].
After demonstrating the relationship between income and post-stroke cognitive decline and between income and TBV/TICV ratio, we tried to develop a framework that connected income, global brain atrophy, and post-stroke cognitive performance by interpreting the association between global brain atrophy and PSCI. Previously, a rich body of literature described the association between brain atrophy and PSCI. Majon Muller et al. indicated that smaller TBV was associated with poor executive performance, and this association strengthened with infarcts [47]. Another study found a cumulative effect of global brain atrophy on cognition in dementia-free elderly with cerebrovascular disease [48]. Furthermore, a Singapore study using moderated mediation analysis demonstrated that global atrophy was indirectly related to post-stroke dementia by disrupting language, executive functions, and memory [49]. The underlying mechanism between brain atrophy and PSCI can be explained as follows. First, global brain atrophy reflects a disease- or aging-associated loss of the brain. According to the brain reserve concept, a pre-existing neuropathology may impact the brain’s capacity to utilize the remaining brain tissue to take over functions from areas affected by the subsequent neuropathology (e.g., stroke attack) on cognition [50]. Second, concerning executive function, previous studies have provided insights into how income and other SES indicators affect executive functions through brain structural changes. Executive functions are mainly subserved by the prefrontal cortex. As mentioned earlier, stressful life events caused by lower income could alter the plasticity of the whole brain. The prefrontal cortex is one of the most vulnerable brain structures during this process [22]. This conclusion was further validated by a recent study showed that a SES-related decline in executive function was mediated by a reduction in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volume [51]. According to the “bigger is better” hypothesis, loss of prefrontal cortex volume was associated with worse executive function [52]. Meanwhile, patients with a smaller prefrontal cortex cannot resist subsequent stroke attacks on executive functions.
The strength of this study Is the”comb’nation of structural MRI measurements and comprehensive neuropsychological tests on a group of first-ever ischemic stroke patients. As far as we know, we are the first study to explore the neuroanatomical correlates of income and post-stroke cognitive performance. Several limitations should be noted in this study. First, given that the income and neuroimaging data were collected at the baseline, we cannot demonstrate the causality of the observed relationship between income and global brain atrophy. Future prospective studies with follow-up data are needed to determine the causality between them and how the brain structure will evolve during exposure to decreased income. Second, because the follow-up of CANDOR is ongoing, we only obtained the data on cognitive performance 3 months after the stroke. It is necessary to further explore the effect of income on long-term post-stroke cognitive performance. Finally, income was recorded as self-based data, which might contain recall bias. However, self-reported income is commonly utilized in research that evaluates the association between income and health.

5. Conclusions

Lower income is associated with worse post-stroke cognitive performance, including global cognitive function, executive function, and language ability. Exposure to lower income may lead to cognitive decline in stroke survivors by disrupting pre-stroke normal brain aging. Our findings have important implications. Along with secondary prevention for stroke recurrence, public health promotion strategies for PSCI prevention should be modified to narrow the income inequalities and protect those particularly disadvantaged.

Author Contributions

L.G. and S.L. conceived the study. J.T., S.L. and L.G. did the scientific literature search. J.T. and Y.W. collected data and performed the analyses. J.T., L.G. and S.L. interpreted the data and wrote. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Grant No. Z181100001518005) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB39000000).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital (approval number: KY 2019-004-007).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants and investigators who participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feigin, V.L.; Stark, B.A.; Johnson, C.O.; Roth, G.A.; Bisignano, C.; Abady, G.G.; Abbasifard, M.; Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abedi, V.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Stroke and Its Risk Factors, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021, 20, 795–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Toyoda, K.; Yoshimura, S.; Nakai, M.; Koga, M.; Sasahara, Y.; Sonoda, K.; Kamiyama, K.; Yazawa, Y.; Kawada, S.; Sasaki, M.; et al. Twenty-Year Change in Severity and Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes. JAMA Neurol. 2022, 79, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lo, J.W.; Crawford, J.D.; Desmond, D.W.; Godefroy, O.; Jokinen, H.; Mahinrad, S.; Bae, H.-J.; Lim, J.-S.; Köhler, S.; Douven, E.; et al. Profile of and Risk Factors for Poststroke Cognitive Impairment in Diverse Ethnoregional Groups. Neurology 2019, 93, e2257–e2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. The PICASSO Investigators; Kwon, H.S.; Lee, D.; Lee, M.H.; Yu, S.; Lim, J.-S.; Yu, K.-H.; Oh, M.S.; Lee, J.-S.; Hong, K.-S.; et al. Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment as an Independent Predictor of Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: PICASSO Sub-Study. J. Neurol. 2020, 267, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nys, G.M.S.; van Zandvoort, M.J.E.; de Kort, P.L.M.; van der Worp, H.B.; Jansen, B.P.W.; Algra, A.; de Haan, E.H.F.; Kappelle, L.J. The Prognostic Value of Domain-Specific Cognitive Abilities in Acute First-Ever Stroke. Neurology 2005, 64, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Oksala, N.K.J.; Jokinen, H.; Melkas, S.; Oksala, A.; Pohjasvaara, T.; Hietanen, M.; Vataja, R.; Kaste, M.; Karhunen, P.J.; Erkinjuntti, T. Cognitive Impairment Predicts Poststroke Death in Long-Term Follow-Up. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2009, 80, 1230–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rost, N.S.; Brodtmann, A.; Pase, M.P.; van Veluw, S.J.; Biffi, A.; Duering, M.; Hinman, J.D.; Dichgans, M. Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 1252–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marden, J.R.; Tchetgen Tchetgen, E.J.; Kawachi, I.; Glymour, M.M. Contribution of Socioeconomic Status at 3 Life-Course Periods to Late-Life Memory Function and Decline: Early and Late Predictors of Dementia Risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 186, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cadar, D.; Lassale, C.; Davies, H.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Batty, G.D.; Steptoe, A. Individual and Area-Based Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Dementia Incidence in England: Evidence From a 12-Year Follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Psychiatry 2018, 75, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bettger, J.P.; Zhao, X.; Bushnell, C.; Zimmer, L.; Pan, W.; Williams, L.S.; Peterson, E.D. The Association between Socioeconomic Status and Disability after Stroke: Findings from the Adherence EValuation After Ischemic Stroke Longitudinal (AVAIL) Registry. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Akyea, R.K.; Vinogradova, Y.; Qureshi, N.; Patel, R.S.; Kontopantelis, E.; Ntaios, G.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Kai, J.; Weng, S.F. Sex, Age, and Socioeconomic Differences in Nonfatal Stroke Incidence and Subsequent Major Adverse Outcomes. Stroke 2021, 52, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duncan, G.J.; Magnuson, K. Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Functioning: Moving from Correlation to Causation: Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Functioning. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 2012, 3, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duncan, G.J.; Daly, M.C.; McDonough, P.; Williams, D.R. Optimal Indicators of Socioeconomic Status for Health Research. Am. J. Public Health 2002, 92, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miu, J.; Negin, J.; Salinas-Rodriguez, A.; Manrique-Espinoza, B.; Sosa-Ortiz, A.L.; Cumming, R.; Kowal, P. Factors Associated with Cognitive Function in Older Adults in Mexico. Glob. Health Action 2016, 9, 30747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, L.; Cao, Q. Poverty Increases the Risk of Incident Cognitive Impairment among Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study in China. Aging Ment. Health 2020, 24, 1822–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zeki Al Hazzouri, A.; Elfassy, T.; Sidney, S.; Jacobs, D.; Pérez Stable, E.J.; Yaffe, K. Sustained Economic Hardship and Cognitive Function: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Kobayashi, L.C. Duration of Poverty and Subsequent Cognitive Function and Decline Among Older Adults in China, 2005–2018. Neurology 2021, 97, e739–e746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Katzan, I.L.; Thompson, N.R.; Uchino, K.; Lapin, B. The Most Affected Health Domains after Ischemic Stroke. Neurology 2018, 90, e1364–e1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gianaros, P.J.; Kuan, D.C.-H.; Marsland, A.L.; Sheu, L.K.; Hackman, D.A.; Miller, K.G.; Manuck, S.B. Community Socioeconomic Disadvantage in Midlife Relates to Cortical Morphology via Neuroendocrine and Cardiometabolic Pathways. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 27, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Noble, K.G.; Grieve, S.M.; Korgaonkar, M.S.; Engelhardt, L.E.; Griffith, E.Y.; Williams, L.M.; Brickman, A.M. Hippocampal Volume Varies with Educational Attainment across the Life-Span. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Elbejjani, M.; Fuhrer, R.; Abrahamowicz, M.; Mazoyer, B.; Crivello, F.; Tzourio, C.; Dufouil, C. Life-Course Socioeconomic Position and Hippocampal Atrophy in a Prospective Cohort of Older Adults. Psychosom. Med. 2017, 79, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McEwen, B.S.; Gianaros, P.J. Central Role of the Brain in Stress and Adaptation: Links to Socioeconomic Status, Health, and Disease: Central Links between Stress and SES. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1186, 190–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Casolla, B.; Caparros, F.; Cordonnier, C.; Bombois, S.; Hénon, H.; Bordet, R.; Orzi, F.; Leys, D. Biological and Imaging Predictors of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke: A Systematic Review. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 2593–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Callahan, B.L.; Ramirez, J.; Berezuk, C.; Duchesne, S.; Black, S.E.; for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease Development: A Comparison of Cognitive Criteria and Associated Neuroimaging Biomarkers. Alz. Res. Ther. 2015, 7, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bigler, E.D.; Neeley, E.S.; Miller, M.J.; Tate, D.F.; Rice, S.A.; Cleavinger, H.; Wolfson, L.; Tschanz, J.; Welsh-Bohmer, K. Cerebral Volume Loss, Cognitive Deficit and Neuropsychological Performance: Comparative Measures of Brain Atrophy: I. Dementia. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2004, 10, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bigler, E.D.; Tate, D.F. Brain Volume, Intracranial Volume, and Dementia. Investig. Radiol. 2001, 36, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dougherty, R.J.; Moonen, J.; Yaffe, K.; Sidney, S.; Davatzikos, C.; Habes, M.; Launer, L.J. Smoking Mediates the Relationship between SES and Brain Volume: The CARDIA Study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Lv, L.; Min, G.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Overview of the Complex Figure Test and Its Clinical Application in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Including Copying and Recall. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scarpina, F.; Tagini, S. The Stroop Color and Word Test. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Oosterman, J.M.; Vogels, R.L.C.; van Harten, B.; Gouw, A.A.; Poggesi, A.; Scheltens, P.; Kessels, R.P.C.; Scherder, E.J.A. Assessing Mental Flexibility: Neuroanatomical and Neuropsychological Correlates of the Trail Making Test in Elderly People. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2010, 24, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheridan, L.; Fitzgerald, H.; Adams, K.; Nigg, J.; Martel, M.; Puttler, L.; Wong, M.; Zucker, R. Normative Symbol Digit Modalities Test Performance in a Community-Based Sample. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2006, 21, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sunderland, T.; Hill, J.L.; Mellow, A.M.; Lawlor, B.A.; Gundersheimer, J.; Newhouse, P.A.; Grafman, J.H. Clock Drawing in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Novel Measure of Dementia Severity. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1989, 37, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Puy, L.; Barbay, M.; Roussel, M.; Canaple, S.; Lamy, C.; Arnoux, A.; Leclercq, C.; Mas, J.-L.; Tasseel-Ponche, S.; Constans, J.-M.; et al. Neuroimaging Determinants of Poststroke Cognitive Performance: The GRECogVASC Study. Stroke 2018, 49, 2666–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Marshall, I.J.; Wang, Y.; Crichton, S.; McKevitt, C.; Rudd, A.G.; Wolfe, C.D.A. The Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Stroke Risk and Outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 1206–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Douiri, A.; Rudd, A.G.; Wolfe, C.D.A. Prevalence of Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: South London Stroke Register 1995–2010. Stroke 2013, 44, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Lim, W.S.; Chong, M.S.; Sahadevan, S. Utility of the Clinical Dementia Rating in Asian Populations. Clin. Med. Res. 2007, 5, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Alvarez, J.A.; Emory, E. Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2006, 16, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lezak, M.D.; Howieson, D.B.; Loring, D.W.; Hannay, H.J.; Fischer, J.S. Neuropsychological Assessment; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-19-511121-7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Moorhouse, P.; Rockwood, K. Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Current Concepts and Clinical Developments. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grasset, L.; Glymour, M.M.; Elfassy, T.; Swift, S.L.; Yaffe, K.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Zeki Al Hazzouri, A. Relation between 20-Year Income Volatility and Brain Health in Midlife: The CARDIA Study. Neurology 2019, 93, e1890–e1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hunt, J.F.V.; Buckingham, W.; Kim, A.J.; Oh, J.; Vogt, N.M.; Jonaitis, E.M.; Hunt, T.K.; Zuelsdorff, M.; Powell, R.; Norton, D.; et al. Association of Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage with Cerebral and Hippocampal Volume. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Waldstein, S.R.; Dore, G.A.; Davatzikos, C.; Katzel, L.I.; Gullapalli, R.; Seliger, S.L.; Kouo, T.; Rosenberger, W.F.; Erus, G.; Evans, M.K.; et al. Differential Associations of Socioeconomic Status with Global Brain Volumes and White Matter Lesions in African American and White Adults: The HANDLS SCAN Study. Psychosom. Med. 2017, 79, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Echouffo-Tcheugui, J.B.; Conner, S.C.; Himali, J.J.; Maillard, P.; DeCarli, C.S.; Beiser, A.S.; Vasan, R.S.; Seshadri, S. Circulating Cortisol and Cognitive and Structural Brain Measures: The Framingham Heart Study. Neurology 2018, 91, e1961–e1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Durazzo, T.; Meyerhoff, D.; Murray, D. Comparison of Regional Brain Perfusion Levels in Chronically Smoking and Non-Smoking Adults. IJERPH 2015, 12, 8198–8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gow, A.J.; Bastin, M.E.; Munoz Maniega, S.; Valdes Hernandez, M.C.; Morris, Z.; Murray, C.; Royle, N.A.; Starr, J.M.; Deary, I.J.; Wardlaw, J.M. Neuroprotective Lifestyles and the Aging Brain: Activity, Atrophy, and White Matter Integrity. Neurology 2012, 79, 1802–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ho, A.J.; Raji, C.A.; Becker, J.T.; Lopez, O.L.; Kuller, L.H.; Hua, X.; Dinov, I.D.; Stein, J.L.; Rosano, C.; Toga, A.W.; et al. The Effects of Physical Activity, Education, and Body Mass Index on the Aging Brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Muller, M.; Appelman, A.P.; van der Graaf, Y.; Vincken, K.L.; Willem, P.T.M.; Geerlings, M.I. Brain Atrophy and Cognition: Interaction with Cerebrovascular Pathology? Neurobiol. Aging 2011, 32, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, X.; Phua, A.; Collinson, S.L.; Hilal, S.; Ikram, M.K.; Wong, T.Y.; Cheng, C.Y.; Venketasubramanian, N.; Chen, C. Additive Effect of Cerebral Atrophy on Cognition in Dementia-Free Elderly with Cerebrovascular Disease. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2019, 4, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yatawara, C.; Ng, K.P.; Chander, R.; Kandiah, N. Associations between Lesions and Domain-Specific Cognitive Decline in Poststroke Dementia. Neurology 2018, 91, e45–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Satz, P. Brain Reserve Capacity on Symptom Onset After Brain Injury: A Formulation and Review of Evidence for Threshold Theory. Neuropsychology 1993, 7, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shaked, D.; Katzel, L.I.; Seliger, S.L.; Gullapalli, R.P.; Davatzikos, C.; Erus, G.; Evans, M.K.; Zonderman, A.B.; Waldstein, S.R. Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Volume as a Mediator between Socioeconomic Status and Executive Function. Neuropsychology 2018, 32, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yuan, P.; Raz, N. Prefrontal Cortex and Executive Functions in Healthy Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Neuroimaging Studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 42, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of Study Participants by Income.
Table 1. Characteristics of Study Participants by Income.
VariablesTotal
(n = 294)		Income ≤ 5000
(n = 178)		Income > 5000
(n = 116)		p Value
Age, mean (SD), y58.3 (9.2)57.8 (9.1)59.0 (9.4)0.269
Gender, male, n (%)226 (76.9%)134 (75.3%)92 (79.3%)0.423
Education, mean (SD), y10.7 (3.3)9.9 (2.9)12.0 (3.5)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)93 (31.6%)51 (28.7%)42 (36.2%)0.173
Hypertension, n (%)167 (56.8%)98 (55.1%)69 (59.5%)0.454
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)64 (21.8%)40 (22.5%)24 (20.7%)0.717
Smoking, n (%)132 (44.9%)80 (44.9%)52 (44.8%)0.984
Drinking, n (%)107 (36.4%)63 (35.4%)44 (37.9%)0.658
Table
Table 2. Comparisons of Neuropsychological Assessments.
Table 2. Comparisons of Neuropsychological Assessments.
Neuropsychological Tests aIncome ≤ 5000Income > 5000p Value
MMSE23.9 (4.6)25.5 (2.8)<0.001
MoCA19.8 (5.3)21.6 (4.5)0.003
Global CDR score0.3 (0.4)0.2 (0.2)<0.001
Total CDR score1.0 (1.5)0.5 (0.8)<0.001
DST total10.8 (2.8)11.7 (2.8)0.004
RAVLT total learning32.1 (11.4)35.8 (12.0)0.008
RAVLT long-delayed recall5.4 (3.7)6.0 (4.0)0.149
RAVLT recognition7.7 (7.3)7.7 (8.5)0.928
ROCF copy28.6 (32.0)24.6 (11.9)0.395
ROCF immediate recall13.0 (10.3)11.7 (10.4)0.475
ROCF long-delayed recall11.9 (10.0)11.1 (10.3)0.669
ROCF recognition17.7 (3.1)17.9 (3.3)0.441
Stroop D time25.7 (11.4)21.5 (7.7)<0.001
Stroop W time34.9 (23.6)27.9 (10.2)0.001
Stroop C time41.0 (19.7)35.0 (12.2)0.002
TMT A62.5 (31.0)54.8 (34.4)0.173
TMT B139.5 (98.3)125.0 (82.2)0.363
SDMT27.5 (13.6)31.5 (14.6)0.082
VFT14.1 (4.8)16.4 (5.2)<0.001
BNT21.0 (4.2)22.8 (3.5)<0.001
CDT8.0 (2.5)8.3 (2.1)0.210
NPI2.0 (5.9)1.3 (2.9)0.261
GDS3.0 (2.7)3.1 (2.7)0.808
a—results are expressed as mean (SD).
Table
Table 3. Comparisons of MRI outcomes.
Table 3. Comparisons of MRI outcomes.
MRI OutcomesIncome ≤ 5000Income > 5000p Value
Left cortex volume a224,321.8 (21,002.0)221,565.4 (20,003.6)0.263
Right cortex volume a223,867.0 (21,842.3)221,201.2 (19,530.9)0.287
White matter volume a457,446.2 (54,594.2)453,105.5 (51,407.8)0.496
Gray matter volume a604,332.8 (53,542.4)597,600.6 (50,852.4)0.283
TBV a1,117,680.1 (105,441.6)1,108,126.8 (101,394.5)0.441
TBV/TICV ratio b74.4 (3.8)75.5 (4.6)0.022
Left hippocampus volume a3523.2 (363.1)3483.8 (408.4)0.387
Right hippocampus volume a3652.4 (401.9)3573.4 (370.8)0.091
Left mean cortical thickness c2.4 (0.1)2.4 (0.1)0.352
Right mean cortical thickness c2.4 (0.1)2.4 (0.1)0.399
a—results are expressed as mean (SD), mm3; b—results are expressed as mean (SD), %; c—results are expressed as mean (SD), mm.
Table
Table 4. The linear regression models for the relationship between income and neuropsychological tests and MRI outcomes.
Table 4. The linear regression models for the relationship between income and neuropsychological tests and MRI outcomes.
Dependent Variables aStandardized β Coefficient95%CIp Value
MMSE0.094(−1.108 to 1.653)0.085
MoCA0.061(−0.413 to 1.663)0.237
Global CDR score−0.120(−0.163 to −0.005)0.038
Total CDR score−0.147(−0.689 to −0.088)0.011
DST total0.110(−0.026 to 1.277)0.060
RAVLT total learning0.086(−0.490 to 4.604)0.113
Stroop D time−0.163(−5.837 to −0.951)0.007
Stroop W time−0.158(−11.153 to −1.517)0.010
Stroop C time−0.144(−9.181 to −0.946)0.016
VFT0.142(0.308 to 2.630)0.013
BNT0.113(0.060 to 1.811)0.036
TBV/TICV ratio0.166(0.004 to 0.024)0.004
a—all the models are adjusted by age, gender, and years of educational attainment.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, J.; Wang, Y.; Guo, L.; Li, S. Association of Income with Post-Stroke Cognition and the Underlying Neuroanatomical Mechanism. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020363

AMA Style

Tian J, Wang Y, Guo L, Li S. Association of Income with Post-Stroke Cognition and the Underlying Neuroanatomical Mechanism. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(2):363. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Jingyuan, Yue Wang, Li Guo, and Shiping Li. 2023. "Association of Income with Post-Stroke Cognition and the Underlying Neuroanatomical Mechanism" Brain Sciences 13, no. 2: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020363

APA Style

Tian, J., Wang, Y., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2023). Association of Income with Post-Stroke Cognition and the Underlying Neuroanatomical Mechanism. Brain Sciences, 13(2), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop