Next Article in Journal
Dietary Anti-Aging Polyphenols and Potential Mechanisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Eccentric Cycling Training Improves Erythrocyte Antioxidant and Oxygen Releasing Capacity Associated with Enhanced Anaerobic Glycolysis and Intracellular Acidosis
Previous Article in Journal
Human Placental NADPH Oxidase Mediates sFlt-1 and PlGF Secretion in Early Pregnancy: Exploration of the TGF-β1/p38 MAPK Pathways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diazoxide and Exercise Enhance Muscle Contraction during Obesity by Decreasing ROS Levels, Lipid Peroxidation, and Improving Glutathione Redox Status
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/antiox10020282
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differences between Professional and Amateur Cyclists in Endogenous Antioxidant System Profile

by
Francisco Javier Martínez-Noguera
1,*,
Pedro E. Alcaraz
1,
Raquel Ortolano-Ríos
1,
Stéphane P. Dufour
2,3 and
Cristian Marín-Pagán
1
1
Research Center for High Performance Sport, Campus de los Jerónimos, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain
2
Faculty of Medicine, Translational Medicine Federation (FMTS) UR 3072, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
3
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(2), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020282
Submission received: 16 January 2021 / Revised: 9 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Exercise)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Currently, no studies have examined the differences in endogenous antioxidant enzymes in professional and amateur cyclists and how these can influence sports performance. The aim of this study was to identify differences in endogenous antioxidants enzymes and hemogram between competitive levels of cycling and to see if differences found in these parameters could explain differences in performance. A comparative trial was carried out with 11 professional (PRO) and 15 amateur (AMA) cyclists. All cyclists performed an endogenous antioxidants analysis in the fasted state (visit 1) and an incremental test until exhaustion (visit 2). Higher values in catalase (CAT), oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and GSSG/GSH ratio and lower values in superoxide dismutase (SOD) were found in PRO compared to AMA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, an inverse correlation was found between power produced at ventilation thresholds 1 and 2 and GSSG/GSH (r = −0.657 and r = −0.635; p < 0.05, respectively) in PRO. Therefore, there is no well-defined endogenous antioxidant enzyme profile between the two competitive levels of cyclists. However, there was a relationship between GSSG/GSH ratio levels and moderate and submaximal exercise performance in the PRO cohort.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Competitive cycling is highly stressful on both aerobic and anaerobic metabolisms. Road cycling races require the riders to produce high relative power output (W/kg) for short duration (i.e., less than 1 min at the start, during steep climb and at the end of the race) while also sustain efforts that last for several minutes to several hours [1]. Overall, professional cyclists (PRO) perform high training volumes (~32,500 Km) during the competitive season, which include 90–100 race days [2]. On the other hand, amateur competitive cyclists (AMA) can be defined as cyclists that train 3–7 times per week, with daily training volumes of 60–120 min and that compete about 20 times in a year [3]. During training sessions and competitions (aerobic and anaerobic exercise), there is a rise in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent oxidative stress, which can lead to a favorable adaptation in the body’s antioxidant defense system [4]. This improvement in the endogenous antioxidant system is generally associated with lower levels of oxidative stress biomarkers [5].
Within the endogenous antioxidant system, superoxide dismutase (SOD) is the first line of enzymatic defense that transforms the superoxide radical(O2•−) into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [6]. Then, H2O2, which is also harmful to cells, can be metabolized in a couple of ways: (1) conversion into water by glutathione peroxidase (GPx) with the reduced glutathione consumption (GSH) being converted into oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and (2) when the production of H2O2 exceeds the capacity of glutathione peroxidase, catalase (CAT) takes over to remove the excess H2O2 [7]. However, un-neutralized H2O2 can interact with transition metals, such as Fe2+ and Cu+, and result in the production of the hydroxyl radical (•OH; i.e., Fenton reaction), which is an extremely powerful oxidizing agent that reacts with all biological macromolecules. However, currently it is not clear what the end product of the Fenton reaction •OH or FeO2+ is [8]. Finally, •OH can elicit damage to DNA, oxidation of the thiol group of proteins and peroxidation of lipids [9].
Exercise increases oxygen uptake and almost 0.15% of the oxygen consumed can be converted into ROS, which can be harmful to muscle and mitochondrial function [10]. Recent findings show that the main source of ROS during exercise is nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases [11]. It is known that long-duration strenuous exercise and extensive sprint training can exceed our ability to detoxify the action of reactive oxygen species within the blood cells, as well as at the muscle level [12]. Conversely, prevention of oxidative stress to enhance performance in professional athletes can be done by the adaptation mechanisms (hormesis) and detoxifying function of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPx, glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione-s-transferase), as well as via non-enzymatic antioxidants (such as vitamins E, A, C, and GSH and GSSG [13]. Therefore, it has been suggested that higher levels of the endogenous antioxidant system may improve performance of skeletal muscle contraction [5]. Cordova et al. [14] analyzed antioxidant markers and showed an average GSH of 3.24 μmol·g−1 Hb, GSSG of 1.54 μmol·g−1 Hb, GSSG/GSH ratio of 0.56 %, catalase (CAT) of 172.0 mmol·min−1·g−1 Hb and superoxide dismutase (SOD) of 1983.0 U·g−1 Hb activity. In a previous study [15], average values of GSH of ~4.7 μmol·g−1 Hb, GSSG of ~0.7 μmol·g−1 Hb and GSSG/GSH ratio of 0.15% were observed in PRO cyclists in February in of the same competitive season, suggesting that training season can modify the levels of these components of the endogenous antioxidant system [5,12,15].
At rest, endogenous antioxidant enzymes (EAE) levels are generally lower in athletes than in sedentary subjects, although higher or unchanged levels have been observed [6,16]. Several factors may explain this discrepancy, the most important being differences in the methods used to estimate the state of oxidative stress, the characteristics of the sample population (high-level athlete, sedentary, etc.) and the time of measurement (period of the sport’s season) [13]. However, what is clearly evident is that acute exercise can lead to an imbalance between ROS and endogenous antioxidants, causing what is known as oxidative stress [7]. A recent study has shown that acute exercise at low, moderate or high intensity has the capacity to reduce GSH concentration and increase SOD and CAT activity compared to baseline, in addition to increasing F2-isoprostanes (markers of oxidative stress) at all levels of exercise. [17]. In addition, it is generally known that chronic exercise causes an increase in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense, leading to adaptations to the training response and improving the protection against ROS [18]. Chronic exercise (6-week cycling training) has the ability to increase the concentration and activity of GSH, SOD and CAT, while maintaining the levels of F2-isoprostanes [17]. This same study also found that moderate and high intensity exercise promoted greater adaptations in antioxidant markers than low intensity exercise at baseline.
Despite the large amount of information on the EAE status and their relationship to the effects of acute and chronic exercise, to our knowledge, there are no studies that have compared the status of antioxidant enzymes between professional and amateur cyclists and their relationship to performance. Therefore, the main objective of this research was to determine the differences in endogenous antioxidants enzymes and hemogram levels between PRO and AMA, and whether these might be related to differences in performance (power output at VT1, VT2 and VO2MAX) in an incremental test. Finally, the secondary objective was to assess whether differences between endogenous antioxidant enzymes and hematological were associated with differences in performance between PRO and AMA.

2. Methodology

2.1. Selection of Participants

A total of 26 male cyclists (11 PRO, 15 AMA) were recruited and completed the study. The PRO were competing at the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) PRO TOUR level and have participated in UCI major stage races (Vuelta a España, Giro d’Italia, Tour de France). The 15 AMA were from the southeast region of Spain. The PRO riders were selected based on the following criteria: (1) 20 to 40 years of age, (2) enrolled in a professional licensed team and (3) competed in at least one of the main 3-week stage races in the last years. Subjects for the AMA group had to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) 20 to 40 years of age, (2) had at least 3 years of cycling experience and (3) performed specific training 6–12 h/week.
All subjects signed the informed consent document before their participation. The study was performed following the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration for Human Research [19] and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Murcia (CE091802).

2.2. Study Protocol

The experimental design of the study required each rider to visit the laboratory twice between the end of October and December (i.e., post-season period). In the first visit, a medical exam and blood analysis were completed to check their state of health. In the second visit (post-48 h), the cyclists performed a maximal incremental test. The 2 h prior to this latter test, they ingested a standardized breakfast, which was based relative to body mass (557.7 kcal) and composed of 95.2 g of carbohydrates (68%), 19.0 g of protein (14%) and 11.3 g of lipids (18%), established by a sports nutritionist. All subjects were instructed to refrain from high-intensity training 48 h before each visit.

2.3. Incremental Test

An incremental step test with final ramp until exhaustion was performed on a cycle ergometer (Cyclus 2TM, RBM elektronik- automation GmbH, Germany) using a metabolic cart (Metalyzer 3B. Leipzig, Germany) to determine VT1, VT2 and VO2max, as well as the associated levels of power output. The testing protocol started with 35 W and increased by 35 W every 2 min until RER > 1.05 was reached, from which the final ramp (+35 W·min−1) until exhaustion was initiated [20]. To ensure that VO2MAX was achieved, at least 2 of the following criteria had to be met: plateau in the final VO2 values (increase ≤ 2.0 mL·kg−1·min−1 in the two last loads), maximal theoretical HR (220-age)·0.95) [21], RER ≥ 1.15 and lactate ≥ 8.0 mmol·L−1 [22,23]. Ventilatory thresholds were obtained using the ventilatory equivalents method described by Wasserman [24].

2.4. Blood Analysis

A total of 21.5 mL of blood were withdrawn from the antecubital vein for analyses: one 3.0 mL tube with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for hemogram and another 3.5 mL tube with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for biochemical parameters. For the measurement of antioxidant parameters, five 3.0 mL EDTA tubes were obtained, where one tube was immediately centrifuged at 3500 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. All tubes were temporarily stored at 2–4 °C and then sent to an external laboratory for analysis. Red blood cell count was carried out in an automated Cell-Dyn 3700 analyser (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL, USA) using internal (Cell-Dyn 22) and external (Program of Excellence for Medical Laboratories-PEML) controls. Values of erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit and hematometra indexes (mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH) and mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)) were estimated.

2.5. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status Markers

2.5.1. Catalase

The activity of catalase was measured in the whole blood using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The catalase enzyme extracts the peroxides from the region of the gel it occupies, following the isolation of the native protein. The removal of peroxide does not cause potassium ferricyanide (yellow substance) to be reduced to potassium ferrocyanide, which reacts with ferric chloride to form a blue Prussian precipitate. The catalase positive control activity is defined in international unit equals (1 unit) to the amount of catalase necessary to decompose 1.0 μM of H2O2 per minute at pH 7.0 at 25 °C while H2O2 concentration falls from ≈ 10.3 mM to 9.2 mM. The absorbance of H2O2 decreases at 240 nm proportional to its decomposition so that the concentration of H2O2 is critical in this determination. The decrease in absorbance per time unit is the measure of catalase activity [25]. Results were expressed in U/g of Hb.

2.5.2. SOD

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured using an SD125 Ransod kit (Randox Ltd. Crumlin, Reino Unido) in whole blood. Xanthine and xanthine oxidase were used to produce superoxide anion (O2•−), which responded with the 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (INT) reactive and formed a red complex that is detectable at 420 nm. The SOD activity was measured as the inhibition degree of this reaction [26]. Results were expressed in U/g of Hb.

2.5.3. Glutathione

The analysis of reduced glutathione (GSH) was performed using the glutathione-S-transferase assay described by Akerboom and Sies [27]. Calculation of GSH was performed from lymphocytes treated with perchloric acid at a final concentration of 6%, collecting the supernatant after vortexing and subsequent centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. Following collection of the supernatants in vials, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to a Waters NH2 ODS S5 column (0.052, 25 cm) was conducted. Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was analyzed using a similar method described by Asensi. [28].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 21.0, International Business Machines Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Levene and Shapiro–Wilks tests were performed to check for homogeneity and normality of the data, respectively. A Student’s t-test for unpaired data was used to evaluate differences between groups. Additionally, the standardized mean differences were calculated using Cohen’s effect size (ES) (95% confidence interval) for all comparisons. Threshold values for ES statistics were as follows: >0.2 small, >0.5 moderate, >0.8 large [29]. The different correlations between the parameters were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation (r). Significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Subject Characteristics

The general characteristics and hemogram results are presented in Table 1. Age, body mass and height were not different between PRO and AMA groups. Interestingly, PRO had higher MCH (4.8%, p < 0.001) and MCHC (3.6%, p < 0.001) compared to AMA. There were no group differences in RBC, Hb, HCT and MCV (Table 1). No correlation was found between age and antioxidant markers in both groups. However, there were correlations found between age and Hb, HCT and MCHC (r ≤ −0.597, p < 0.05).

3.2. Antioxidant Parameters

Table 2 shows the outcomes of CAT, SOD, GSSG, GSH, %GSSG/GSH and GSSG+GSH, which were measured at baseline before the incremental tests. Higher levels in CAT (30.0%, p < 0.001), GSSG (63.2%, p < 0.001) and %GSSG/GSH (70.1%, p < 0.001), and lower levels in SOD (−16.2%, p = 0.009) were found in PRO compared to AMA. However, no differences in GSH (−4.3%, p = 0.216) and GSSG+GSH (−3.5%, p = 0.317) values were observed between PRO and AMA.

3.3. Physiological and Metabolic Parameters at VT1

VO2, W, WR, %VO2MAX, HR and RER values at VT1 are shown in Table 3. Significant group differences in VO2 (76.0%, p < 0.001), W (90.4%, p < 0.001), WR (92.5%, p < 0.001), %VO2MAX (53.3%, p < 0.001) and HR (12.9%, p = 0.004), but not for RER (0.78%, p = 0.707) were observed.
GSSG/GSH was significantly correlated with WVT1 and VO2VT1(r = −0.657 and r = −0.651; p < 0.05, respectively) in PRO (Table 4) (Figure 1).

3.4. Physiological and Metabolic Parameters at VT2

Table 3 demonstrates the VT2 results of VO2, W, WR, %VO2MAX, HR and RER. Significant group differences in VO2VT2 (25.6%, p = <0.001), WVT2 (32.5%, p = <0.001), WRVT2 (34.1%, p < 0.001) and %VO2MAXVT2 (6.6%, p = 0.005) were observed.
GSSG/GSH was significantly correlated with WVT2 and VO2VT2(r = −0.635 and r = −0.622; p < 0.05, respectively) in PRO (Figure 1). GSSG tended to correlate with WVT2 (r = −0.575; p = 0.06) in PRO (Table 4).

3.5. Physiological and Metabolic Parameters at VO2max

Maximal values of VO2, VO2/R, W, WR, HR and RER are presented in Table 3. Significant group differences in VO2MAX (15.9%, p = 0.002), VO2/RMAX (17.5%, p = 0.002), WMAX (23.8%, p < 0.001), WRMAX (25.8%, p < 0.001), and RERMAX (7.0%, p = 0.001), but not for HRMAX (p = 0.966) were found.
In VO2MAX, no correlation with any antioxidant marker was observed (Table 4).

4. Discussion

This study provides the first direct comparison of endogenous antioxidant, hematological, performance and metabolic biomarkers (VT1, VT2 and VO2MAX) between PRO and AMA cyclists. Our results demonstrate that: (i) PRO have higher values in MCH, MCHC, CAT, GSSG and GSSG/GSH but lower values in SOD than AMA; (ii) PRO have higher levels of absolute and relative power output and oxygen consumption in all intensity zones (VT1, VT2 and VO2MAX) than in AMA, with the largest differences found at VT1; (iii) inverse correlations were identified in WVT1, VO2VT1, WVT2 and VO2VT2 with GSSG/GSH in PRO.

Differences in Antioxidant Enzymes and Hemogram

When intense physical exercise is performed (especially in untrained or those not familiar with the exercise), there is an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species, which are neutralized by our complex endogenous antioxidant defense system (GSH, GSSG, CAT, SOD, GPx and GR) and by exogenous antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenes) [30].
Regarding EAE, we observed higher levels of CAT activity, GSSG and GSSG/GSH, but lower levels of SOD activity in PRO versus AMA. Mena et al. [31] found higher resting levels of SOD, CAT and GPx in a sample of PRO cyclists compared to sedentary people. Tauler et al. [32] also showed differences in antioxidant enzyme activity in erythrocyte between PRO and AMA at rest. In the same study, a decrease in CAT (−12%), GPx (−14%) and GR activity (−16%) but an increase in SOD activity of about 25% after a submaximal test (80% VO2MAX; 1 h 30 min) was reported [32].
Long distance runners have been shown to have a three-fold higher CAT activity compared to short distance runners [18]. Similarly, it was observed that marathon runners had twice as high catalase activity compared to sprinters [12]. In this study, we also demonstrated higher levels of CAT in PRO than in AMA, and this may be largely explained by the fact that PRO perform greater volume, intensity and competitions (higher aerobic load and prolonged periods of exercise) than AMA, which induces higher levels of exposure to ROS and, consequently, adaptations of EAE [6]. When CAT levels increase, it is possible that GPx activity is not sufficient to neutralize high levels H2O2 (endurance exercise) [7].
Regarding SOD, Mena et al. [31] observed lower levels of SOD activity (−32.1%) in PRO than in elite cyclist, but in the case of CAT (80.0%) and GPx (149.0%), the levels were higher, reporting an ascending behavior of SOD during a stage race (2800 km in 17 stages) in PRO. Tauler et al. [32] has also found lower levels of SOD activity in PRO (−19.8%) than in AMA at baseline, which are in line with the results of our study. Antioxidant enzyme activity can be modified either by an initial increase (adaptation) or a decrease if the oxidative stress of long duration (utilization) [33]. Therefore, the low basal levels of SOD activity in professional cyclists could be overwhelmed and the high concentration of superoxide anions could activate CAT, allowing compensated metabolization of H2O2. This may be the reason why PRO has lower levels of SOD activity than AMA, as PRO have higher levels of exercise exigency that sometimes get close to exhaustion, which can lead a decrease in the working capacity of SOD.
On the other hand, there is evidence to suggest that GSH or GSH/GSSG decreases during exercise because of its utilization against ROS [33]. Ultra-endurance exercise depletes erythrocyte GSH levels by ∼66% for 24 h and levels remain ∼33% lower than normal 1 month later [34]. PRO frequently compete in longer distance events than AMA, which can lead to lower levels of GSH in PRO than in AMA, although no differences were observed in GSH between PRO vs. AMA in our study. In addition, the muscle can import GSH from plasma during exercise, and as a result, there is a change in the GSH/GSSG ratio after exercise with a decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio at the time of exhaustion [35]. Furthermore, it is important to mention that tissues are not only capable of importing GSH but also exporting GSSG under oxidative stress [35]. Moreover, GSH is a molecule that is key in cellular redox status regulation, and consequences of prolonged GSH depletion may include a compromise in immunity, where lower GSH is associated with decreased lymphocyte proliferation and increased viral reactivation [34].
GSSG levels are a biomarker of cellular oxidative stress, since GSH is an important antioxidant in many tissues and oxidizes in the catalyzed reduction of H2O2 to H2O to become GSSG [36]. The increase in GSH (mainly) and GSSG in plasma after exercise could be explained by an efflux from the liver to other tissues, including skeletal muscle [37]. GSSG levels in skeletal muscle have previously been shown to increase by ~50% in rats after running on a treadmill at moderate intensity [38] and by ~20% after cycling in humans (workload corresponding to 90% of VO2peak; 10 × 4 min) [39]. Leonardo et al. [40] observed an increase in both GSSG and GSSG/GSH after a period of intense PRO training, which returned to their baseline levels after a period of tapering. We found similar baseline values of GSSG in our study. In addition, we found higher levels of GSSG and GSSG/GSH in PRO than in AMA.
The efforts made during cycling competitions produce oxidative stress in lymphocytes, leading to a reduction in GSH levels and an increase in GSSG levels. The decrease in GSH and increase in GSSG during exercise may be explained by an increase in H2O2 formation, as reported by Wang et al. who found that high-intensity exercise (80% VO2MAX) decreased GSH levels while lipid peroxidation increased immediately and after 24h of exercise [41]. Furthermore, in this study, lymphocytes were incubated with H2O2 for 2 and 4 h, promoting an increase in DNA fragmentation immediately and 24 h after high intensity exercise. Thus, H2O2 would cause a failure of the endogenous antioxidant system leading to DNA damage in lymphocytes. Ferrer et al. [42] found that high intensity exercise (swimming) increased GPx activity (converts GSH to GSSG) in lymphocytes, in the same way as other authors found after a cycling stage [43,44]. This supports the decrease in GSH and increase in GSSG after high intensity exercise. Therefore, the higher levels of GSSG and GSSG/GSH in PRO vs. AMA in our study may be due to a higher production of ROS, which leads to a higher production of GSSG and, consequently, of GSSG/GSH together with a decrease in GSH.
In addition, our study is the first to show correlations between GSSG/GSH with WVT1 (r = −0.657) and WVT2 (r = −0.635) in PRO. This is also supported by a trend towards a significant correlation between GSSG and WVT2 (r = −0.575; p = 0.06) in PRO. These relationships suggest that cyclists who generate more power at VT1 and VT2 have lower GSSG/GSH levels, and therefore, less oxidative stress, as GSSG/GSH ratio is known to be a marker of antioxidant status [20].
In response to strenuous physical working conditions, the body’s antioxidant capacity may be temporarily diminished, as its components are used to scavenge the harmful radicals that are produced [45]. It is well known that exercise-induced ROS are detrimental to physiological function, including decreased performance and immune function and increased fatigue [45]. Moreover, it has been shown that the response of antioxidant capacity to exercise responds in a similar way to the activity of EAE [45]. Therefore, the antioxidant defense system may be temporarily reduced in response to increased ROS production but may increase during the recovery period as a result of the initial prooxidant insult [46]. However, contradictory findings have been reported where increases in GPx, SOD, and CAT, as well as decreases in GPx, GR, SOD have been observed [45]. Evidently, this controversy may depend on the moment of sampling (i.e., period of the season), as well as on the duration and intensity of the exercise, which varies considerably between studies.
It could be that there is an undefined optimal level of ROS production and oxidative damage required for adaptations in antioxidant defenses and other physiological parameters, leading to health and performance improvements [45]. However, overproduction of ROS and oxidative damage due to chronic long-term exercise and/or overtraining may exceed the above-mentioned optimal level, resulting in irreparable oxidative damage, which can lead to the development or progression of poor health and/or disease [47]. Therefore, the measurement of the antioxidant capacity (CAT, SOD, GSH, GSSG and GSGG/GSH) of the body is used as a marker of oxidative stress and can provide us insight on how it affects performance. Given the results of our research and the evidence shown in the scientific literature, there is no endogenous antioxidant profile defined in PRO compared to AMA.
There are also other antioxidant proteins, such as peroxiredoxin (PRX) and thioredoxin (TRX) containing thiol groups, with a high capacity to neutralize reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and decrease oxidative stress [48]. One study showed how moderate and high-intensity exercise and a low volume high intensity interval training trial increased TRX (85%, 64% and 206%, respectively); however, PRX only increased during high intensity exercise (moderate: −6229%; high: 203% and low volume high intensity interval: −23%, respectively) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [48]. In addition, an increase in nuclear transcription factor kappa B was found during all exercises, suggesting an activation of the inflammatory system, probably due to increased oxidative stress. Future studies should examine whether there are differences in these antioxidant proteins between PRO and AMA and their relationship with performance.
Regarding hematological parameters, no significant differences were found except for MCH and MCHC between PRO vs. AMA. Schumacher et al. found hematological values in elite cyclists from the German national team (blood samples collected between November and January) and the values were similar to ours in Hb (~15.5 g/dL), Hct (~45.0%) and RBC (~5.0 × 106/mm3) in PRO [49]. In addition, other studies have found hematological values of approximately 15.0 g/dL of Hb and 45% of Hct in professional cyclists [50,51,52]. Well-trained cyclists have found values of 14.3 g/dL in Hb and 43.1% in Hct, values lower than PRO [53]. However, Bejder et al. [54] observed amateur competitive cyclist values of 14.8 g/dL Hb, 42.8% Hct, 4.92 × 106·μL−1RBC, 87.1 fl MCV, 30.1 pg MCH and 34.6 g/dL MCHC, lower than those reported in PRO.
MCH indicates the amount of hemoglobin contained in an erythrocyte and MCHC is the average hemoglobin concentration [55]. Therefore, the red blood cells of PROs will have a higher oxygen transport capacity due to the higher levels of MCH and MCHC. Currently, no study on cyclists has examined the differences in MCH and MCHC, so we cannot draw many conclusions in this regard. These hematological parameters have mainly been used as markers of anemia both in athletes and in the general population [56], but so far, they are not associated with an athlete’s performance level in this study.

5. Limitations

Our study had limitations with regards to the sample number, since it was more difficult to recruit PRO athletes than lower-level athletes (AMA).
Differences in endogenous antioxidant marker between this study and previous works may be influenced by the instrumentation and methodology used, the timing of the season at which the measurements were made, and the training status of the cyclists.

6. Conclusions

Regarding the endogenous antioxidants profile, PRO had higher values of CAT, GSSG and GSSG/GSH compared to AMA. An inverse correlation was found for the first time between WVT1 and WVT2 with GSSG/GSH at rest only in PRO. This indicates better antioxidant status that allow for higher performance with regard to power output. Future studies should examine how training adaptations affect the studied variables and how antioxidant enzymes evolve during a race stage (e.g. Tour de France), in order to see their association with performance, recovery and fatigue, thereby helping to develop monitoring tools for medical doctors, nutritionists and coaches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.J.M.-N., C.M.-P., R.O.-R. and P.E.A.; methodology, F.J.M.-N., C.M.-P., R.O.-R. and P.E.A.; formal analysis, F.J.M.-N. and C.M.-P.; investigation, F.J.M.-N., C.M.-P. and R.O.-R.; resources, F.J.M.-N. and C.M.-P.; data curation, F.J.M.-N., C.M.-P. and R.O.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, F.J.M.-N.; writing—review and editing, F.J.M.-N., C.M.-P. and S.P.D.; visualization, F.J.M.-N. and C.M.-P.; supervision, C.M.-P., S.P.D. and P.E.A.; project administration, F.J.M.-N. and C.M.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Murcia (CE091802).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research Center in High-Performance Sport of the Catholic University of Murcia (Murcia, Spain). We would like to acknowledge Linda H. Chung for her help in this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faria, E.W.; Parker, D.L.; Faria, I.E. The science of cycling: Physiology and training—Part 1. Sports Med. 2005, 35, 285–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lucia, A.; Hoyos, J.; Chicharro, J.L. Physiology of professional road cycling. Sports Med. 2001, 31, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jeukendrup, A.E.; Craig, N.P.; Hawley, J.A. The bioenergetics of World Class Cycling. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2000, 3, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Margaritelis, N.V.; Paschalis, V.; Theodorou, A.A.; Kyparos, A.; Nikolaidis, M.G. Redox basis of exercise physiology. Redox Biol. 2020, 35, 101499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bentley, D.J.; Ackerman, J.; Clifford, T.; Slattery, K.S. Acute and chronic effects of antioxidant supplementation on exercise performance. In Antioxidants in Sport Nutrition; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; Volume 141. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloomer, R.J.; Fisher-Wellman, K.H. Blood oxidative stress biomarkers: Influence of sex, exercise training status, and dietary intake. Gend Med. 2008, 5, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Urso, M.L.; Clarkson, P.M. Oxidative stress, exercise, and antioxidant supplementation. Toxicology 2003, 189, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koppenol, W.H.; Hider, R.H. Iron and redox cycling. Do’s and don’ts. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 133, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mylonas, C.; Kouretas, D. Lipid peroxidation and tissue damage. In Vivo 1999, 13, 295–309. [Google Scholar]
  10. St-Pierre, J.; Buckingham, J.A.; Roebuck, S.J.; Brand, M.D. Topology of superoxide production from different sites in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 44784–44790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sakellariou, G.K.; Jackson, M.J.; Vasilaki, A. Redefining the major contributors to superoxide production in contracting skeletal muscle. The role of NAD(P)H oxidases. Free Radic. Res. 2014, 48, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marzatico, F.; Pansarasa, O.; Bertorelli, L.; Somenzini, L.; Della Valle, G. Blood free radical antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxides following long-distance and lactacidemic performances in highly trained aerobic and sprint athletes. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 1997, 37, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pingitore, A.; Lima, G.P.; Mastorci, F.; Quinones, A.; Iervasi, G.; Vassalle, C. Exercise and oxidative stress: Potential effects of antioxidant dietary strategies in sports. Nutrition 2015, 31, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cordova, A.; Sureda, A.; Albina, M.L.; Linares, V.; Belles, M.; Sanchez, D.J. Oxidative stress markers after a race in professional cyclists. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2015, 25, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Serrano, E.; Venegas, C.; Escames, G.; Sanchez-Munoz, C.; Zabala, M.; Puertas, A.; de Haro, T.; Gutierrez, A.; Castillo, M.; Acuna-Castroviejo, D. Antioxidant defence and inflammatory response in professional road cyclists during a 4-day competition. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 1047–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Falone, S.; Mirabilio, A.; Pennelli, A.; Cacchio, M.; Di Baldassarre, A.; Gallina, S.; Passerini, A.; Amicarelli, F. Differential impact of acute bout of exercise on redox- and oxidative damage-related profiles between untrained subjects and amateur runners. Physiol. Res. 2010, 59, 953–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Margaritelis, N.V.; Theodorou, A.A.; Paschalis, V.; Veskoukis, A.S.; Dipla, K.; Zafeiridis, A.; Panayiotou, G.; Vrabas, I.S.; Kyparos, A.; Nikolaidis, M.G. Adaptations to endurance training depend on exercise-induced oxidative stress: Exploiting redox interindividual variability. Acta Physiol. (Oxford) 2018, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kostaropoulos, I.A.; Nikolaidis, M.G.; Jamurtas, A.Z.; Ikonomou, G.V.; Makrygiannis, V.; Papadopoulos, G.; Kouretas, D. Comparison of the blood redox status between long-distance and short-distance runners. Physiol. Res. 2006, 55, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Martínez-Noguera, F.J.; Marín-Pagán, C.; Carlos-Vivas, J.; Rubio-Arias, J.A.; Alcaraz, P.E. Acute Effects of Hesperidin in Oxidant/Antioxidant State Markers and Performance in Amateur Cyclists. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Millet, G.P.; Vleck, V.E.; Bentley, D.J. Physiological Differences Between Cycling and Running. Sports Med. 2009, 39, 179–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Edvardsen, E.; Hem, E.; Anderssen, S.A. End criteria for reaching maximal oxygen uptake must be strict and adjusted to sex and age: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Howley, E.T.; Bassett, D.R., Jr.; Welch, H.G. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: Review and commentary. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1995, 27, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wasserman, K.; Beaver, W.L.; Whipp, B.J. Gas exchange theory and the lactic acidosis (anaerobic) threshold. Circulation 1990, 81, Ii14–Ii30. [Google Scholar]
  25. Weydert, C.J.; Cullen, J.J. Measurement of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in cultured cells and tissue. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Randox Laboratories Ltd. Radicales Libres; Randox Laboratories Ltd.: Crumlin, UK, 1996; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  27. Akerboom, T.P.; Sies, H. Assay of glutathione, glutathione disulfide, and glutathione mixed disulfides in biological samples. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981; Volume 77, pp. 373–382. [Google Scholar]
  28. Asensi, M.; Sastre, J.; Pallardo, F.V.; Estrela, J.M.; Viña, J. Determination of oxidized glutathione in blood: High-performance liquid chromatography. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 234, pp. 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cohen, J. Statistical power. Anal. Behav. Sci. 1988, 2, 273–406. [Google Scholar]
  30. Evans, W.J. Vitamin E, vitamin C, and exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 647S–652S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mena, P.; Maynar, M.; Gutierrez, J.M.; Maynar, J.; Timon, J.; Campillo, J.E. Erythrocyte Free Radical Scavenger Enzymes in Bicycle Professional Racers. Adaptation to Training. Int. J. Sports Med. 1991, 12, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tauler, P.; Aguiló, A.; Guix, P.; Jiménez, F.; Villa, G.; Tur, J.A.; Córdova, A.; Pons, A. Pre-exercise antioxidant enzyme activities determine the antioxidant enzyme erythrocyte response to exercise. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Finaud, J.; Lac, G.; Filaire, E. Oxidative stress: Relationship with exercise and training. Sports Med. 2006, 36, 327–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turner, J.E.; Hodges, N.J.; Bosch, J.A.; Aldred, S. Prolonged depletion of antioxidant capacity after ultraendurance exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 1770–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Banerjee, A.K.; Mandal, A.; Chanda, D.; Chakraborti, S. Oxidant, antioxidant and physical exercise. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2003, 253, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Morrison, D.; Hughes, J.; Della Gatta, P.A.; Mason, S.; Lamon, S.; Russell, A.P.; Wadley, G.D. Vitamin C and E supplementation prevents some of the cellular adaptations to endurance-training in humans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 89, 852–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lew, H.; Pyke, S.; Quintanilha, A. Changes in the glutathione status of plasma, liver and muscle following exhaustive exercise in rats. FEBS Lett. 1985, 185, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wadley, G.D.; Nicolas, M.A.; Hiam, D.S.; McConell, G.K. Xanthine oxidase inhibition attenuates skeletal muscle signaling following acute exercise but does not impair mitochondrial adaptations to endurance training. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 304, E853–E862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, S.J.; Sandström, M.E.; Lanner, J.T.; Thorell, A.; Westerblad, H.; Katz, A. Activation of aconitase in mouse fast-twitch skeletal muscle during contraction-mediated oxidative stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 293, C1154–C1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Leonardo-Mendonça, R.C.; Concepción-Huertas, M.; Guerra-Hernández, E.; Zabala, M.; Escames, G.; Acuña-Castroviejo, D. Redox status and antioxidant response in professional cyclists during training. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2014, 14, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.-S.; Huang, Y.-H. Effects of exercise intensity on lymphocyte apoptosis induced by oxidative stress in men. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 95, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferrer, M.D.; Tauler, P.; Sureda, A.; Tur, J.A.; Pons, A. Antioxidant regulatory mechanisms in neutrophils and lymphocytes after intense exercise. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tauler, P.; Aguiló, A.; Gimeno, I.; Guix, P.; Tur, J.A.; Pons, A. Different effects of exercise tests on the antioxidant enzyme activities in lymphocytes and neutrophils. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2004, 15, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sureda, A.; Tauler, P.; Aguiló, A.; Cases, N.; Fuentespina, E.; Córdova, A.; Tur, J.A.; Pons, A. Relation between oxidative stress markers and antioxidant endogenous defences during exhaustive exercise. Free Radic. Res. 2005, 39, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fisher-Wellman, K.; Bloomer, R.J. Acute exercise and oxidative stress: A 30 year history. Dyn. Med. 2009, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Steinberg, J.G.; Delliaux, S.; Jammes, Y. Reliability of different blood indices to explore the oxidative stress in response to maximal cycling and static exercises. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imag. 2006, 26, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lee, I.M.; Hsieh, C.C.; Paffenbarger, R.S., Jr. Exercise intensity and longevity in men. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. JAMA 1995, 273, 1179–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wadley, A.J.; Chen, Y.W.; Bennett, S.J.; Lip, G.Y.; Turner, J.E.; Fisher, J.P.; Aldred, S. Monitoring changes in thioredoxin and over-oxidised peroxiredoxin in response to exercise in humans. Free Radic. Res. 2015, 49, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Schumacher, Y.O.; Jankovits, R.; Bültermann, D.; Schmid, A.; Berg, A. Hematological indices in elite cyclists. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2002, 12, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aguiló, A.; Tauler, P.; Pilar Guix, M.; Villa, G.; Córdova, A.; Tur, J.A.; Pons, A. Effect of exercise intensity and training on antioxidants and cholesterol profile in cyclists. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2003, 14, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guglielmini, C.; Casoni, I.; Patracchini, M.; Manfredini, F.; Grazzi, G.; Ferrari, M.; Conconi, F. Reduction of Hb levels during the racing season in nonsideropenic professional cyclists. Int. J. Sports Med. 1989, 10, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Saris, W.H.; Senden, J.M.; Brouns, F. What is a normal red-blood cell mass for professional cyclists? Lancet 1998, 352, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heuberger, J.; Rotmans, J.I.; Gal, P.; Stuurman, F.E.; van’t Westende, J.; Post, T.E.; Daniels, J.M.A.; Moerland, M.; van Veldhoven, P.L.J.; de Kam, M.L.; et al. Effects of erythropoietin on cycling performance of well trained cyclists: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017, 4, e374–e386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bejder, J.; Andersen, A.B.; Goetze, J.P.; Aachmann-Andersen, N.J.; Nordsborg, N.B. Plasma volume reduction and hematological fluctuations in high-level athletes after an increased training load. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2017, 27, 1605–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. López-Santiago, N. La biometría hemática. Acta Pediátr. México 2016, 37, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wintrobe, M.M. Classification of the Anemias on the Basis of Differences in the Size and Hemoglobin Content of the Red Corpuscles. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1930, 27, 1071–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 10 00282 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlations between the power generated at the ventilation threshold 1 and 2 between the GSSS/GSH ratio in PRO and AMA.
Figure 1. Correlations between the power generated at the ventilation threshold 1 and 2 between the GSSS/GSH ratio in PRO and AMA.
Antioxidants 10 00282 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline general characteristics and hemogram variables of professional and amateur cyclists.
Table 1. Baseline general characteristics and hemogram variables of professional and amateur cyclists.
PROAMAp-ValueCohen’s dEffect Size
Age (years)28.3 (4.65)29.3 (6.54)0.6710.17Trivial
Body mass (kg)68.5 (4.43)69.9 (5.50)0.4880.28Small
Height (cm)178.0 (6.93)175.0 (6.71)0.2740.44Small
HEMOGRAM
RBC (106·μL−1)5.06 (0.281)5.15 (0.260)0.4410.08Trivial
Hb (g·dl−1)15.6 (0.827)15.1 (0.676)0.1070.49Small
HCT (%)44.5 (2.28)44.6 (1.57)0.8660.13Trivial
MCV (fl)87.9 (2.19)86.8 (2.92)0.3051.10Large
MCH (pg)30.8 (0.35)29.4 (1.03)<0.0011.44Large
MCHC (%)35.0 (0.74)33.8 (0.60)<0.0011.19Large
Values are expressed as mean (SD). Abbreviations: RBC = red blood cell; Hb = hemoglobin; HCT = hematocrit; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and SD = standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Endogenous antioxidant enzymes from professional and amateur cyclists.
Table 2. Endogenous antioxidant enzymes from professional and amateur cyclists.
PROAMAp-ValueCohen’s dEffect Size
CAT (U/g Hb)32.5 (5.34)25.0 (4.51)<0.0011.55Large
SOD (U/g Hb)1213 (233.0)1447 (184.4)0.0091.13Large
GSSG
(nmol/mg protein)		0.524 (0.103)0.321 (0.077)<0.0012.28Large
GSH
(nmol/mg protein)		24.4 (2.00)25.5 (2.17)0.2160.50Moderate
GSSG/GSH2.16 (0.436)1.27 (0.279)<0.0012.52Large
GSSG+GSH
(nmol/mg protein)		24.9 (2.02)25.8 (2.19)0.3170.41Small
Values are expressed as mean (SD). Abbreviations: CAT = catalase; SOD = superoxide dismutase; GSH = reduced glutathione; GSSG = oxidized glutathione; % GSSG/GSH = oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio and SD = standard deviation.
Table
Table 3. Metabolic and performance variables of professional and amateur cyclists.
Table 3. Metabolic and performance variables of professional and amateur cyclists.
PROAMAp-ValueCohen’s dEffect Size
VT1
VO2 (mL·min−1)3593 (271.0)2041 (401.0)<0.0014.40Large
W299 (32.9)157 (36.1)<0.0014.07Large
WR (W·kg−1)4.37 (0.42)2.27 (0.56)<0.0014.14Large
%VO2max76.2 (3.91)49.7 (5.58)<0.0015.36Large
HR (beats·min−1)149 (14.7)132 (13.2)0.0041.25Large
RER0.906 (0.05)0.899 (0.04)0.7070.15Trivial
VT2
VO2 (mL·min−1)4259 (234.0)3389 (505.0)<0.0012.10Large
W379 (34.0)286 (45.1)<0.0012.28Large
WR (W·kg−1)5.54 (0.41)4.13 (0.74)<0.0012.28Large
%VO2max90.3 (2.36)84.7 (5.67)0.0051.24Large
HR (beats·min−1)168 (11.1)171 (9.4)0.4670.29Small
RER1.01 (0.05)1.03 (0.03)0.3230.40Small
VO2max
VO2 (mL·min−1)4714 (241.0)4066 (580.7)0.0021.38Large
VO2/R (mL·kg−1·min−1)69.0 (3.94)58.7 (9.58)0.0031.34Large
W474 (31.5)383 (49.2)<0.0012.13Large
WR (W·kg−1)6.93 (0.44)5.51 (0.81)<0.0012.09Large
HR (beats·min−1)186 (7.42)186 (7.62)0.9660.02Trivial
RER1.22 (0.04)1.14 (0.06)0.0011.49Large
Values are expressed as mean (SD). Abbreviations: VO2 = oxygen uptake; VO2max = maximum oxygen consumption; VO2/R = maximum oxygen consumption relative to weight; W = power output; WR = power output relative to weight; %VO2max = percentage of VO2max; HR = heart rate (beats·min−1); RER = respiratory exchange ratio; VT1 = ventilatory threshold 1; VT2 = ventilatory threshold 2 and SD = standard deviation.
Table
Table 4. Correlation between endogenous antioxidant enzymes and performance-metabolic variables from professional and amateur cyclists.
Table 4. Correlation between endogenous antioxidant enzymes and performance-metabolic variables from professional and amateur cyclists.
CATSODGSSGGSH%GSSG/GSHGSSG + GSH
PRO (n = 11)
WVT1r−0.1200.305−0.4490.425−0.6570.397
p-value0.720.360.170.190.030.23
VO2VT1r0.0010.378−0.4420.457−0.6510.429
p-value0.9980.2520.1730.1570.0300.188
WVT2r−0.2530.183−0.5750.116−0.6350.085
p-value0.450.590.060.730.040.80
VO2VT2r−0.3190.423−0.5180.277−0.6220.247
p-value0.340.200.100.410.040.46
WMAXr−0.0450.186−0.3420.239−0.4430.219
p-value0.900.580.300.480.170.52
VO2MAXr−0.3750.422−0.3120.304−0.4140.284
p-value0.260.200.350.360.210.40
AMA (n = 15)
WVT1r0.1810.1720.206−0.1020.256−0.098
p-value0.520.540.460.720.360.73
VO2VT1r0.3600.1590.182−0.1080.230−0.105
p-value0.190.570.520.700.410.71
WVT2r0.4140.113−0.0020.047−0.0460.040
p-value0.130.690.990.870.870.89
VO2VT2r0.3580.234−0.104−0.068−0.097−0.077
p-value0.190.690.710.810.730.78
WMAXr0.1800.173−0.136−0.3790.009−0.386
p-value0.520.540.630.160.970.16
VO2MAXr0.2890.278−0.118−0.3340.001−0.339
p-value0.300.320.660.220.100.22
Values are expressed as mean (SD). Abbreviations: CAT = catalase (U/g Hb); SOD = superoxide dismutase (U/g Hb); GSH = reduced glutathione (nmol/mg protein); GSSG = oxidized glutathione (nmol/mg protein); % GSSG/GSH = oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio; VO2 = oxygen uptake; VO2MAX = maximum oxygen consumption; VT1 = ventilatory threshold 1; VT2 = ventilatory threshold 2 and W = power output
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Noguera, F.J.; Alcaraz, P.E.; Ortolano-Ríos, R.; Dufour, S.P.; Marín-Pagán, C. Differences between Professional and Amateur Cyclists in Endogenous Antioxidant System Profile. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020282

AMA Style

Martínez-Noguera FJ, Alcaraz PE, Ortolano-Ríos R, Dufour SP, Marín-Pagán C. Differences between Professional and Amateur Cyclists in Endogenous Antioxidant System Profile. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(2):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Noguera, Francisco Javier, Pedro E. Alcaraz, Raquel Ortolano-Ríos, Stéphane P. Dufour, and Cristian Marín-Pagán. 2021. "Differences between Professional and Amateur Cyclists in Endogenous Antioxidant System Profile" Antioxidants 10, no. 2: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020282

APA Style

Martínez-Noguera, F. J., Alcaraz, P. E., Ortolano-Ríos, R., Dufour, S. P., & Marín-Pagán, C. (2021). Differences between Professional and Amateur Cyclists in Endogenous Antioxidant System Profile. Antioxidants, 10(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop