Optimal DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine Supplementation Improved Intestinal Physical Barrier Function by Changing Antioxidant Capacity, Apoptosis and Tight Junction Proteins in the Intestine of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)
by
Pei Wu
1,2,3,†, 
Yuening Su
1,†, 
Lin Feng
1,2,3, 
Weidan Jiang
1,2,3,
Shengyao Kuang
4,
Ling Tang
4,
Jun Jiang
5, 
Yang Liu
1,2,3,* and
Xiaoqiu Zhou
1,2,3,*,‡ 1
Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Fish Nutrition and Safety Production University Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
3
Key Laboratory of Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 611130, China
4
Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Academy of Animal Science, Sichuan Animtech Feed Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610066, China
5
College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Lead contact.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(9), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091652
Submission received: 25 June 2022
/
Revised: 16 August 2022
/
Accepted: 19 August 2022
/
Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidants Benefits in Aquaculture)
Abstract
:The present study was a part of a larger research project that aimed to investigate the effects of Met-Met supplementation on fish growth and intestinal health. This study mainly focused on the relationship between dietary Met-Met and intestinal physical barrier function in fish. Seven iso-nitrogenous diets supplemented with 2.50 g/kg DL-methionine (DL-Met) and six graded levels of Met-Met (0.00, 0.79, 1.44, 1.84, 2.22, and 2.85 g/kg) were used to feed juvenile grass carp for 10 weeks, after which a 14-day Aeromonas hydrophila challenge test was performed. The results indicated that optimum levels of Met-Met decreased intestinal oxidative damage, probably by increasing total antioxidant capacity, and the activity and gene expression levels of several antioxidant enzymes, which were closely related to the changed Nrf2/Keap1 signaling. Meanwhile, optimum levels of Met-Met decreased intestinal apoptosis and improved the intestinal tight junction, as evident by the downregulated mRNA levels of initiator and executioner caspases; the pro-apoptotic-related proteins FasL, Apaf-1, and Bax; and upregulated mRNA levels of the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Mcl-1b, and IAP and the TJ proteins claudins, occludin, and ZOs. Furthermore, the positive effects of Met-Met on improving intestinal physical barrier function were superior to those of DL-Met in fish. These findings showed that optimal Met-Met supplementation improved intestinal physical barrier function, probably by changing antioxidant capacity, apoptosis, and tight junction proteins in fish.
1. Introduction
Because of its shortage and high cost, replacing fishmeal with plant proteins has been a major objective for sustainable aquaculture [1]. Moreover, several plant oil and extracts, such as pomegranate seed oil [2], hot pepper (Capsicum sp.) oil [3], and Thymus vulgaris essential oil [4], are usually beneficial for fish growth and health. However, using plant proteins to replace dietary fishmeal usually results in essential amino acid (EAA) deficiencies [5]. Adding crystalline amino acids (CAAs) to plant-ingredients-based diets is likely to become an increasingly common practice to optimize the nutritional value of these diets. It has been found that crystalline amino acid supplementation improved fish growth and protein synthesis, as well as immunity and antioxidant capacity [6,7]. Methionine is a major limiting EAA in most plant-based ingredients of fish feed [1]. Studies have shown that supplementing a plant-ingredients-based diet with DL-methionine improved the growth performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [1] and juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum) [5]. However, CAAs was not utilized as efficiently as AAs in protein, partly because of the faster leaching of CAAs, as reported in young yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) [8], juvenile Cyprinus carpio Var. Jian [9], and juvenile Chinese sucker (Myxocyprinus asiaticus) [10]. Consequently, decreasing the leaching rate of purified AAs would enhance their utilization. DL-methionyl-DL-methionine dipeptide (Met-Met) has low water solubility and high hydrothermal stability, and can be cleaved enzymatically by fish under physiological conditions to provide free D- and L-methionine, and thus it has been used as a methionine supplement for aquaculture to reduce the leaching losses of methionine [11].
Up to now, supplementation with Met-Met has improved the growth of juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) [12], juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [13], and white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [14,15]. Fish growth and health is closely correlated to intestinal barrier function, as the intestine is not only an important organ for nutrients absorption, but is also a vital barrier that could restrict the access of harmful agents [16]. The physical barrier and the immune barrier are vital parts of the intestinal barrier in fish. Our previous study indicated that optimal Met-Met addition enhanced intestinal immunity in juvenile grass carp [12]. However, little information about the relationship between Met-Met and the intestinal physical barrier is available for fish. The intestinal physical barrier is mainly made up by the enterocytes and tight junctions [16], and could be damaged by oxidative stress and abnormal apoptosis of the intestinal epithelial cells [17]. Limited studies have shown that optimal levels of Met-Met enhanced the total antioxidant capacity of Nile tilapia liver [13] and white leg shrimp plasma [15]. In mammal, Met-Met up-regulated Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) mRNA level in bovine mammary tissue explants [18]. JAK2 improved the mRNA levels of the anti-apoptosis protein B-cell lymphoma protein-2 (Bcl-2) and prevented cell death in murine hematopoietic cells [19]. Additionally, the expression of two tight junction proteins, claudin-1 and ZO-1, in the jejunum of squabs was increased by dietary Met-Met supplementation [20]. These observations revealed that optimal Met-Met addition might maintain the intestinal physical barrier in fish by modulating the antioxidant ability, cellular apoptosis, and intracellular tight junctions of the intestine, which is worth researching.
This study expands on our previous study, which found that optimal Met-Met addition enhanced fish growth performance and intestinal immunity [12], and aims to fill the knowledge gap regarding Met-Met and intestinal physical barrier function in fish by analyzing intestinal antioxidants, cellular apoptosis, and tight junction proteins in juvenile grass carp, which could provide more information revealing the mechanisms whereby Met-Met enhances fish intestinal health. Moreover, the optimum Met-Met supplementation for grass carp juveniles based on intestinal physical barrier function and a comparison of the effects of Met-Met and DL-Met are also evaluated to give a reference for formulating commercial feed for grass carp.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Diets, Animal and Experimental Design
The details of the experimental procedures were similar to those previously described by Su et al. [12]. In brief, a basal diet based on fishmeal, soybean meal, and cottonseed meal was formulated to satisfy the nutrient requirements, except for methionine, of juvenile grass carp. The composition of the basal diet is presented in Table 1. The contents of methionine and cysteine in the basal diet (methionine deficiency) were measured to be 4.26 and 3.77 g/kg, respectively, by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as described by Pan et al. [21]. The positive control diet was formulated to meet the fishes’ requirements for total sulfur amino acids by adding DL-methionine (DL-Met) at a level of 2.50 g/kg to the basal diet. The six Met-Met diets were formulated by supplementing 0.00 (negative control), 1.00, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, and 3.00 g/kg Met-Met (Evonik, Essen, Germany) to the basal diet, and the Met-Met concentrations in the six diets were analyzed to be 0.00, 0.79, 1.44, 1.84, 2.22, and 2.85 g/kg according to the HPLC method. All the seven experimental diets were iso-nitrogenous and iso-lipidic.
After being obtained from a local fishery (Sichuan, China), healthy juvenile grass carp were raised within net cages (1.5 m × 0.8 m × 1.5 m) for 4 weeks of acclimatization. Next, 2520 fish (10.10 ± 0.03 g body weight) in total were allocated to 7 groups randomly with 6 replicates per group (42 cages in total, 60 fish in each cage), and fed to apparent satiation with the respective experimental diets four times every day (i.e., 7:00, 11:00, 15:00, and 19:00) for 70 days. During the feeding trial, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, and pH values were ≥6.0 mg/L, 27 ± 2 °C, and 7.0 ± 0.4, respectively, and the light conditions followed a natural light/dark cycle (approximately 13/11 h).
2.2. Challenge Test and Sampling
A detailed description of the challenge test has been previously reported [12]. In brief, after the growth trial, 60 fish were chosen from each group and inoculated intraperitoneally with a 1.0 mL nonlethal dosage of A. hydrophila (2.5 × 106 CFU/mL). During the 14-day infection period, the same diets as in the feeding trial were fed to the grass carp. At the end of the challenge test, all grass carp in each group were anaesthetized using a benzocaine bath (50 mg/L) and sacrificed by a blow on the head, and the intestines were removed, divided into three parts (proximal intestine (PI), mid intestine (MI), and distal intestine (DI)), then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, followed by storage at −80 °C. The degree of intestinal red coloration, swelling, and hyperemia of the grass carp was recorded in our previous study [12].
2.3. Biochemical Analysis
For biochemical analysis, six intestines from each group were homogenized following the kit instructions. The contents of protein carbonyl (PC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and reactive oxygen species (ROS); total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), anti-hydroxyl radical (AHR), and anti-superoxide anion (ASA) capacity; activity of antioxidant enzymes (i.e., superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR)); and the content of reduced glutathione (GSH) were analyzed with commercial kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) in line with the specific protocols.
2.4. mRNA Abundance Analysis
Following the manufacturer’s instruction, the intestinal total RNA was obtained using the RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Spectrophotometric (A260/A280) analysis and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis were used to determine the RNA quantity and quality. cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Subsequently, quantitative real-time PCR was conducted using a commercial kit (SYBR Green, Takara, Dalian, China) in a real-time PCR detection system (CFX96, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The sequences of the specific primers are shown in Table 2. On the basis of our preliminary experiment results, β-actin was used as a reference gene (data not shown). Relative mRNA levels of the target genes were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method after verifying the amplification efficiency of the primers to be approximately 100%.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
All data were presented as means and SD, and statistically analyzed using SPSS software 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). After the normality and homoscedasticity assumptions has been confirmed, one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test were used to assess the differences among groups at p < 0.05. GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for data visualization.
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Supplemented Met-Met on Antioxidant-Related Parameters in Grass Carp Intestines
As presented in Figure 1, compared with the negative control group (Met deficiency, 0.00 g/kg Met-Met), the positive control group (group supplemented with 2.50 g/kg DL-Met) and the Met-Met supplementation groups significantly reduced the MDA, PC, and ROS content in the three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp (p < 0.05). However, compared with the optimal Met-Met groups (1.44 or 1.84 g/kg), higher levels of Met-Met significantly increased the contents of MDA, PC, and ROS in fish intestines (p < 0.05). Contrary to the changes in MDA, the activity of T-AOC, ASA, and AHR in the PI, MI, and DI significantly increased with an increase in the supplemented Met-Met levels up to 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). Furthermore, intestinal T-AOC and the activity of ASA and AHR in the positive control group were higher than those in the negative control group (the Met-deficient group) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2).
In the PI, the activity of T-SOD, MnSOD, and GR in the 1.84 g/kg Met-Met group and GST activity and GSH content in the 1.44 g/kg Met-Met group were significantly higher than those in other Met-Met groups (p < 0.05), whereas the activity of CAT and GPx was enhanced as Met-Met supplementation increased to 1.44 g/kg (p < 0.05) and then plateaued (Table 3). In the MI, the activity of T-SOD, MnSOD, and GPx in the 1.84 g/kg Met-Met group; the activity of GST and GR in the 1.44 g/kg Met-Met group; and the GSH content in groups with 1.44 and 1.84 g/kg Met-Met were higher than those in the other Met-Met-supplemented groups (p < 0.05), whereas CAT activity was increased in response to an increase in Met-Met up to 0.79 g/kg (p < 0.05), followed by a plateau (Table 3). In the DI, the activity of T-SOD, MnSOD, and GR, as well as GSH content in the group with 1.84 g/kg Met-Met; CAT and GPx activity in the group with 1.44 g/kg Met-Met; and GST activity in the 1.44 and 1.84 g/kg Met-Met groups were higher than those in the other Met-Met-supplemented groups (p < 0.05) (Table 3). However, supplemented DL-Met and Met-Met had no significant effect on intestinal CuZnSOD activity (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 4, in comparison with the negative control group (the Met-deficient group), the relative gene expression levels of MnSOD, GPx1a, GSTO1, GSTO2, and GR were significantly upregulated by optimal Met-Met supplementation to 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05), and CAT, GPx4a, GPx4b, GSTP2, and GSTR were significantly upregulated by Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 g/kg (p < 0.05); after that, the expression levels of these genes showed a decrease with a further enhancement in Met-Met; however, GPx1b was upregulated significantly by optimal Met-Met supplementation to 0.79 g/kg (p < 0.05), followed by a plateau. As presented in Table 5, compared with the negative control group (the Met-deficient group), the relative gene expression levels of MnSOD, GPx4a, GSTP2, and GR were significantly upregulated with increased Met-Met levels up to 1.44 g/kg (p < 0.05), while GPx1a, GPx1b, GPx4b, GSTO1, GSTO2, and GSTR mRNA levels were significantly upregulated with Met-Met supplementation to 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05) and CAT was upregulated significantly by Met-Met supplementation to 0.79 g/kg (p < 0.05), followed by a plateau. As presented in Table 6, the relative gene expression levels of antioxidant enzymes in the DI showed similar patterns to those in the PI and MI. Furthermore, the relative gene expression levels of MnSOD, GPx1a, GPx1b, GPx4a, GPx4b, GSTO1, GSTP2, GSTR, and GR in the PI, MI, and DI in the negative control group (the Met-deficient group) were significantly lower than those in the positive control (DL-Met-supplemented group). However, the relative gene expression levels of CuZnSOD and GSTP1 in the PI, MI, and DI were not significantly influenced by Met-Met supplementation (p > 0.05).
Furthermore, mRNA levels of the key regulatory molecule Nrf2 in the PI, MI, and DI were significantly upregulated by the enhancement of Met-Met levels to 1.44 g/kg (p < 0.05), but after that, they declined with further increase in Met-Met (Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6). Conversely, the relative expression levels of Keap1a and Keap1b in the PI, MI, and DI were significantly downregulated with Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 g/kg (p < 0.05) and increased with a further increase in Met-Met (Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6).
3.2. Effects of Supplemented Met-Met on Apoptosis-Related Parameters in Grass Carp Intestine
As shown in Figure 3A, in the PI, the relative gene expressions of cysteinyl aspartic acid-protease 2 (caspase-2), -3, -7, -8, -9, fatty acid synthetase ligand (FasL), and apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) were significantly downregulated with Met-Met supplementation at levels of 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg in the diet (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the relative gene expression levels of Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) were significantly downregulated with dietary Met-Met levels up to 0.79 g/kg (p < 0.05), followed by a plateau (p > 0.05). However, the relative gene expression levels of B-cell lymphoma protein-2 (Bcl-2), myeloid cell leukemia-1b (Mcl-1) and inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP) were upregulated significantly by Met-Met supplementation up to 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05). The expression levels of these genes in the positive control group were not different from those in the group supplemented with 0.79 g/kg Met-Met.
The relative gene expression levels of caspase-2, -3, -7, -8, -9, FasL, Apaf-1, and Bax in the MI were significantly downregulated with increased Met-Met up to 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05), respectively (Figure 3B). Meanwhile, the relative gene expression levels of Bcl-2, Mcl-1, and IAP in the MI were upregulated significantly with Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05), respectively. The mRNA levels of these genes in the positive control group showed no significant difference from those in the 0.79 g/kg Met-Met group (p > 0.05).
The relative gene expression levels of caspase-2, -3, -7, -8, FasL, Apaf-1, and Bax in the DI were downregulated with Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg (p < 0.05), respectively (Figure 3C). Meanwhile, the caspase-9 mRNA level in the DI was significantly downregulated with an increase in the Met-Met level to 0.79 g/kg (p < 0.05), then had a plateau (p > 0.05). Moreover, the relative gene expression levels of Bcl-2, IAP, and Mcl-1 in the DI were upregulated significantly by increased Met-Met levels to 1.44 g/kg diet (p < 0.05). Except for caspase-3, the relative expression levels of these genes in the positive control group showed no significant difference from those in the 0.79 g/kg Met-Met group (p > 0.05).
3.3. Effects of Supplemented Met-Met on the Relative Expression Levels of TJ Genes in Grass Carp Intestine
The present results showed that the mRNA levels of claudin-b, -f, -7a, -7b, -11, -12, -15b, occludin, zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1), and ZO-2 in the PI, MI, and DI, as well as those of claudin-3c and claudin-15a in the PI and MI, were upregulated significantly with Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 or 1.84 g/kg diet (p < 0.05), respectively, then declined with a further increase in Met-Met supplementation (p < 0.05) (Figure 4). Meanwhile, the relative gene expression level of claudin-15a in the DI was significantly upregulated with Met-Met supplementation to 1.44 g/kg diet (p < 0.05) and plateaued thereafter (p > 0.05). However, compared with the negative control group, Met-Met supplementation had no significant impacts on the relative expression levels of claudin-c in the PI, MI, and DI, or of claudin-3c in the DI (p < 0.05). Except for mid intestinal claudin-f, the relative expression levels of these genes in the positive control group (DL-Met-supplemented group) showed no significant difference from those in the group with 0.79 g/kg Met-Met (p > 0.05) (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
Our previous study found that Met-Met supplementation improved fish growth and intestinal immune function [12]. Besides the intestinal immune barrier, the intestinal physical barrier is another important barrier that could affect intestinal health in fish. Accordingly, the present study focuses on the effects of Met-Met supplementation on intestinal physical barrier functions in juvenile grass carp, as indicated by intestinal antioxidant capacity, cellular apoptosis, and intracellular tight junctions.
4.1. Optimal Met-Met Supplementation Enhanced Antioxidant Capacity Partly Related to Nrf2 Signaling in Fish Gut
As far as we know, the oxidative damage to lipids and proteins that is caused by an imbalance in the production and detoxification of ROS could impair cellular integrity and functionality [24]. Similar to all aerobic organisms, fish have also developed antioxidant defenses that include antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, GPx, GST, GR, and CAT, as well as non-enzyme antioxidants such as GSH, to scavenge and detoxify ROS, thereby decreasing oxidative damage to cells [25]. In this study, we found, for the first time, that optimal Met-Met supplementation enhanced the capacities of T-AOC, AHR, and ASA; the activity of antioxidant enzymes including MnSOD, GPx, GST, GR, and CAT; and GSH content along with decreasing contents of ROS, MDA, and PC in juvenile grass carp intestines, suggesting that optimum Met-Met could increase antioxidant capacity in the fish gut, thereby decreasing oxidant damage. Similarly, optimal levels of Met-Met enhanced T-AOC and decreased MDA content in Nile tilapia liver [13] and in white leg shrimp plasma [15], as well as increasing hemolymph T-AOC and decreasing hepatopancreas MDA in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [26]. Interestingly, the present results found that optimum Met-Met supplementation boosted the activity of MnSOD but not CuZnSOD in the intestine. This might be partly correlated to the expression of the MnSOD and CuZnSOD genes. In rats, the antioxidant enzyme activity was related to expression of the corresponding genes [27]. In this study, our data showed that Met-Met supplementation upregulated the relative expression of MnSOD but not the CuZnSOD gene in juvenile grass carp intestine, which could partly explain the change in MnSOD and CuZnSOD activity. Meanwhile, in this study, optimum Met-Met enhanced the relative gene expression levels of CAT, GPx1a, GPx1b, GPx4a, GPx4b, GSTO1, GSTO2, GSTP2, GSTR, and GR in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp, which might partly lead to the enhancement of their corresponding enzymes’ activity. However, in zebrafish, supplementation with 2.8 g/kg Met-Met increased gut SOD2, CAT, and GPx1 gene expressions after treatment for 48 h, but decreased them after treatment for 20 d [28]. The supplemented dose of Met-Met might have led to different results in juvenile grass carp and zebrafish. In the present study, 2.85 g/kg Met-Met supplementation did not change the gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes compared with the negative control group but decreased the gene expressions when compared with the optimal Met-Met group.
Another interesting result in this study was that optimum dietary Met-Met had different effects on various SOD and GST isoforms, as evident by the upregulated MnSOD and GSTP2 mRNA levels but lack of change in the CuZnSOD and GSTP1 mRNA levels in juvenile grass carp intestine. However, there was no more information about the effects of Met-Met supplementation on the various isoforms of antioxidant enzyme genes. The possible reasons for the difference might be as follows. Firstly, the various impacts of Met-Met supplementation on MnSOD and CuZnSOD gene expression might be partly correlated to the methionine accumulation in the mitochondria. To our knowledge, CuZnSOD is a major cytoplasmic antioxidant enzyme, whereas MnSOD is an important mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme in aerobic cells [29]. A study found that methionine is an evolutionarily selected antioxidant building block of respiratory chain complexes in living cells’ mitochondria [30]. Therefore, the accumulation of methionine in the mitochondria might partly contribute to the enhanced MnSOD gene expression in the optimal Met-Met group; however, this hypothesis needs further confirmation. Secondly, the various effects of Met-Met on the GSTP1 and GSTP2 gene expressions might be partly associated with Keap1. In rats, the knockout of Keap1 upregulated the gene expression of GSTP2 but not GSTP1 in the liver [31]. In this study, optimum Met-Met downregulated Keap1a and Keap1b mRNA levels in juvenile grass carp intestines. Accordingly, the change in GSTP1 and GSTP2 might be partly due to the change of Keap1.
Furthermore, the most biologically relevant substrate of Keap1 is Nrf2, which serves as a major regulator of antioxidant enzymes or proteins [31]. In the present study, optimum Met-Met upregulated Nrf2 relative gene expression. However, little information is currently available about the relationship between Met-Met and Nrf2 signaling. In human hepatic carcinoma cells, TOR inhibition decreased Nrf2 expression [32]. Our previous study found that optimum Met-Met enhanced total TOR and phosphorylated TOR levels in juvenile grass carp intestine [12], which might partly explain the improved expression of Nrf2 in this study.
4.2. Optimum Met-Met Supplementation Inhibited Intestinal Apoptosis in Fish
Additionally, apoptosis has also been implicated in contributing to compromised intestinal barrier function [33]. The death receptor pathway (including FasL/caspase-8) and the mitochondrial pathway (including Apaf-1/caspase-9) are the two main apoptotic pathways, which could be regulated by anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2, Mcl-1, and IAP and pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax, and finally executed mainly by caspase-3 and -7 in mammals [34]. In this study, for the first time, we investigated the impacts of Met-Met on apoptosis in fish guts and found that optimum Met-Met down-regulated the relative gene expression levels of caspase-2, -3, -7, -8, and -9, as well as the pro-apoptotic-related proteins FasL, Apaf-1, and Bax, but increased the relative gene expression levels of the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Mcl-1, and IAP in juvenile grass carp intestine, suggesting that Met-Met might suppress apoptosis related to the death receptor pathway and the mitochondrial pathway in animal gut. However, the involvement of Met-Met in decreasing cell apoptosis in fish has been ill-defined thus far. The Met-Met-decreased oxidative damage might partly contribute to the decrease in intestinal apoptosis. It has been known that oxidant damage could lead to cellular apoptosis [35]. As stated above, optimum Met-Met declined the ROS content and oxidative damage to lipids and proteins in fish intestine.
4.3. Optimum Met-Met Strengthened the Tight Junction in Fish Intestines
Intestinal physical barrier function is also correlated to intercellular tight junctions (TJ) in vertebrates, which are constituted by transmembrane proteins (e.g., claudins and occludin), as well as linker proteins (e.g., zonula occludens-1, -2) [33]. Decreased expression levels of occludin and ZO-1 would disturb the intestinal barrier function in fish [36]. Furthermore, the intestinal epithelial tight junction could be improved by inhibiting the activation of MLCK in mammals [37]. This study, for the first time, investigates the impacts of Met-Met on TJ proteins and MLCK in fish intestines. The present results found that optimum Met-Met upregulated occludin, claudin-b, -c (only in the DI), -f, -3c (not in the DI), -7a, -7b, -11, -12, -15a, -15b, ZO-1, and ZO-2 mRNA levels and down-regulated MLCK mRNA levels in juvenile grass carp intestines, suggesting that optimum Met-Met supplementation could improve the tight junctions in fish intestines. To our knowledge, there is no more information about the regulation of intracellular tight junction proteins by Met-Met in fish intestines. In domestic pigeons (Columba livia), a similar result showed that Met-Met supplementation also increased the protein expression of claudin-1 and ZO-1 in the jejunum [20], demonstrating that optimal Met-Met was beneficial for the intestinal tight junctions of animals.
Interestingly, we found that Met-Met supplementation did not affect the relative gene expression of claudin-c in the PI and MI of grass carp, but increased it in the DI. The mechanisms underlying these impacts are not well characterized, but might be partly correlated with IL-8. A study in humans showed that IL-8 could stimulate the release of cortisol [38]. In goldfish, cortisol decreased the claudin-c mRNA level in gill epithelia [35]. Our previous study observed that optimal Met-Met downregulated the relative mRNA level of IL-8 only in the DI and not in the PI and MI. Therefore, the increased claudin-c in the DI might be attributed to the downregulated distal intestine IL-8 by optimal Met-Met. However, the detailed mechanisms await further characterization.
4.4. The Comparison between the Influences of Met-Met and DL-Met on the Intestinal Physical Barrier in Fish
As elucidated above, Met-Met supplementation at 1.44–1.84 g/kg could enhance the intestinal physical barrier function, probably by enhancing antioxidant capacity, decreasing excessive cellular apoptosis, and improving intracellular tight junctions, in juvenile grass carp. When compared with the positive control (DL-Met 2.50 g/kg), the beneficial effects of 1.44–1.84 g/kg Met-Met on intestinal antioxidant capacity, cellular apoptosis, and intracellular tight junctions were equal or better. The possible reasons might be as follows. Firstly, it was found that the absorption rates of Met-Met were greater than those of crystalline methionine in the intestine of rats [39]. Secondly, the asynchronous absorption of dietary crystalline methionine and protein-bound methionine could reduce the protein synthesis efficiency in fish [10]. Moreover, in comparison with crystalline methionine, methionine-containing dipeptides showed greater protein synthesis efficiency in bovine mammary epithelial cells [40]. Therefore, the stronger influence of Met-Met on fish intestinal barrier function might be related to the fact that dietary Met-Met had better absorption rates and protein synthesis efficiency than DL-Met. This finding indicated that Met-Met might be a good source of methionine for fish.
4.5. The Optimum Levels of Met-Met for Juvenile Grass Carp
With the continuous advances in the understanding of cell and organism metabolism, determining the nutrients requirement or optimal supplementation of feed additives based on various aspects in addition to fish growth is useful for aquaculture. Thus, in this study, we determined the optimum levels of Met-Met supplementation on the basis of intestinal antioxidant parameters, and found that the optimum levels of Met-Met for juvenile grass carp ranged from 1.52 to 1.73 g/kg diet (with methionine at 4.26 g/kg and cysteine at 3.77 g/kg in the diet) based on the MDA content and T-AOC in the three intestinal segments (Table 7), which were close to those based on growth performance and intestinal immunity (1.61–1.68 g/kg diet) [12]. Similar results were found in leucine requirements for young grass carp, which showed that the leucine requirements for young grass carp based on intestinal antioxidant capacity were close to those based on growth performance and intestinal immunity [41,42]. These results indicated that the improved grass carp growth by Met-Met supplementation, like Leu, partly resulted from maintaining the fish intestinal health. It is reported that the health of fish affects consumers’ willingness to pay more for fish [43]. Meanwhile, fish health is a major concern of fish farmers, and could affect fish flesh quality [44]. Accordingly, for aquaculture systems, it is better to use a dose of Met-Met at 1.68–1.73 g/kg diet, which was better for grass carp intestinal health.
5. Conclusions
As summarized in Figure 5, this study found that optimum levels of Met-Met increased the antioxidant capacity of fish intestine, as evident by the enhanced activities and gene expressions of MnSOD, CAT, GPx, GST, and GR, which were probably correlated with the change in Nrf2/Keap1 signaling; decreased intestinal apoptosis, as evident by downregulated pro-apoptotic-related proteins and upregulated anti-apoptotic proteins; and improved intestinal tight junctions, as evident by the enhanced gene expressions of tight junction proteins (claudins, occludin, and ZOs), thereby being helpful for enhancing fish intestinal physical barrier function. However, supplementation with Met-Met showed different effects on various SOD and GST isoforms in the intestine, and on claudin-c and -3c in various intestinal segments with unknown mechanisms. Additionally, the positive influences of optimal Met-Met on improving intestinal physical barrier function were superior to those of DL-Met in fish. The optimum levels of Met-Met based on antioxidant parameters (MDA contents and T-AOC in the three intestinal segments) were estimated to be 1.52–1.73 g/kg diet (with methionine at 4.26 g/kg and cysteine at 3.77 g/kg in the diet) for juvenile grass carp.
Author Contributions
P.W. performed writing—original draft preparation, visualization, and formal analysis. Y.S. performed investigation and formal analysis. L.F. and W.J. performed writing—review and editing. S.K. performed validation. L.T. and J.J. helped prepared the experiment. Y.L. performed methodology and project administration. X.Z. performed supervision and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072985; 31772866), National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD0900200, 2018YFD0900400), National Natural Science Foundation of China for Outstanding Youth Science Foundation (31922086), the Young Top-Notch Talent Support Program, China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-45), and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YFN0036).
Institutional Review Board Statement
All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (SICAU-2017-106).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the personnel of the funder teams for their kind assistance.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.
References
- Belghit, I.; Skiba-Cassy, S.; Geurden, I.; Dias, K.; Surget, A.; Kaushik, S.; Panserat, S.; Seiliez, I. Dietary methionine availability affects the main factors involved in muscle protein turnover in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Acar, Ü.; Parrino, V.; Kesbiç, O.S.; Lo Paro, G.; Saoca, C.; Abbate, F.; Yılmaz, S.; Fazio, F. Effects of Different Levels of Pomegranate Seed Oil on Some Blood Parameters and Disease Resistance Against Yersinia ruckeri in Rainbow Trout. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parrino, V.; Kesbic, O.S.; Acar, U.; Fazio, F. Hot pepper (Capsicum sp.) oil and its effects on growth performance and blood parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 3226–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zargar, A.; Rahimi Afzal, Z.; Soltani, E.; Taheri Mirghaed, A.; Ebrahimzadeh Mousavi, H.A.; Soltani, M.; Yuosefi, P. Growth performance, immune response and disease resistance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed Thymus vulgaris essential oils. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 3097–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Chi, S.; Tan, B.; Dong, X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Han, F.; Liu, D. DL-Methionine supplementation in a low-fishmeal diet affects the TOR/S6K pathway by stimulating ASCT2 amino acid transporter and insulin-like growth factor-I in the dorsal muscle of juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Br. J. Nutr. 2019, 122, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zheng, S.; Wu, G. Nutrition and Functions of Amino Acids in Fish. In Amino Acids in Nutrition and Health; Wu, G., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 133–168. [Google Scholar]
- Wassef, E.A.; Saleh, N.E.; Ashry, A.M. Taurine or Sodium Diformate Supplementation to a Low Fishmeal Plant-Based Diet Enhanced Immunity and Muscle Cellularity of European Sea-Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). J. FisheriesSciences.com 2021, 15, 026–028. [Google Scholar]
- Aoki, H.; Akimoto, A.; Watanabe, T. Periodical changes of plasma free amino acid levels and feed digesta in yellowtail after feeding non-fishmeal diets with or without supplemental crystalline amino acids. Fish. Sci. 2001, 67, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.Q.; Zhao, C.R.; Lin, Y. Compare the effect of diet supplementation with uncoated or coated lysine on juvenile Jian Carp (Cyprinus carpio Var. Jian). Aquac. Nutr. 2007, 13, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Gong, S.; Yang, H.; Lin, Y.; Yu, D.; Luo, Z. Effects of supplementation of crystalline or coated lysine and/or methionine on growth performance and feed utilization of the Chinese sucker, Myxocyprinus asiaticus. Aquaculture 2011, 316, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, S.F.; Funnell, N.P.; Shankland, K.; Kabova, E.A.; Häußner, T.; Hasselbach, H.; Braune, S.; Kobler, C.; Albers, P.W. Structure and spectroscopy of methionyl-methionine for aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Wu, P.; Feng, L.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Figueiredo-Silva, C.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y. The improved growth performance and enhanced immune function by DL methionyl-DL-methionine are associated with NF-κB and TOR signalling in intestine of juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 74, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, T.; Zhao, W.; He, J.; Liao, S.; Xie, J.; Xie, S.; Masagounder, K.; Liu, Y.; Tian, L.; Niu, J. Dietary DL-methionyl-DL-methionine supplementation increased growth performance, antioxidant ability, the content of essential amino acids and improved the diversity of intestinal microbiota in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Br. J. Nutr. 2020, 123, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.J.; Lemme, A.; He, J.Y.; Yin, P.; Figueiredo-Silva, C.; Liu, Y.J.; Xie, S.W.; Niu, J.; Tian, L.X. Fishmeal levels can be successfully reduced in white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) if supplemented with DL-Methionine (DL-Met) or DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine (Met-Met). Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, R.; Wang, Z.; He, J.; Masagounder, K.; Xu, W.; Mai, K.; Ai, Q. Effects of DL-methionyl-DL-methionine supplementation on growth performance, immune and antioxidative responses of white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed low fishmeal diet. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niklasson, L.; Sundh, H.; Fridell, F.; Taranger, G.L.; Sundell, K. Disturbance of the intestinal mucosal immune system of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), in response to long-term hypoxic conditions. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 31, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pijls, K.E.; Jonkers, D.M.; Elamin, E.E.; Masclee, A.A.; Koek, G.H. Intestinal epithelial barrier function in liver cirrhosis: An extensive review of the literature. Liver Int. 2013, 33, 1457–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, F.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. Methionyl-Methionine Promotes α-s1 Casein Synthesis in Bovine Mammary Gland Explants by Enhancing Intracellular SubstrateAvailability and Activating JAK2-STAT5 and mTOR-Mediated Signaling Pathways. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1748–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakai, I.; Kraft, A.S. The Kinase Domain of Jak2 Mediates Induction of Bcl-2 and Delays Cell Death in Hematopoietic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 12350–12358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, C.; Tong, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, H.; Tan, H.; Gao, C. DL-methionine and DL-methionyl-DL-methionine increase intestinal development and activate Wnt/b-catenin signaling activity in domestic pigeons (Columba livia). Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, F.; Feng, L.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, J.; Wu, P.; Kuang, S.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; et al. Methionine hydroxy analogue enhanced fish immunity via modulation of NF-κB, TOR, MLCK, MAPKs and Nrf2 signaling in young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 56, 208–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Y.Y.; Jiang, W.D.; Liu, Y.; Wu, P.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.Y.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.N.; Zhang, Y.A.; et al. Optimal dietary alpha-linolenic acid/linoleic acid ratio improved digestive and absorptive capacities and target of rapamycin gene expression of juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Aquac. Nutr. 2016, 22, 1251–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, C.; Chiu, Y. Ambient temperature influences aging in an annual fish (Nothobranchius rachovii). Aging Cell 2009, 8, 726–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Álvarez, R.M.; Morales, A.E.; Sanz, A. Antioxidant defenses in fish: Biotic and abiotic factors. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2005, 15, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, J.; Masagounder, K.; He, S.; Zhu, T.; Yuan, Y.; Shi, B.; et al. Dietary DL-methionyl-DL-methionine supplementation could improve growth performance under low fishmeal strategies by modulating TOR signalling pathway of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Nutr. 2021, 27, 1921–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiedge, M.; Lortz, S.; Drinkgern, J.; Lenzen, S. Relation between antioxidant enzyme gene expression and antioxidative defense status of insulin-producing cells. Diabetes 1997, 46, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casetta, J.; Ribeiro, R.P.; Lewandowski, V.; Khatlab, A.S.; de Oliveira, N.A.; Boscolo, W.R.; Gasparino, E. Expression of the PEPT1, CAT, SOD2 and GPX1 genes in the zebrafish intestine supplemented with methionine dipeptide under predation risk. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 1214–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zelko, I.N.; Mariani, T.J.; Folz, R.J. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: A comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bender, A.; Hajieva, P.; Moosmann, B. Adaptive Antioxidant Methionine Accumulation in Respiratory Chain Complexes Explains the Use of a Deviant Genetic Code in Mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16496–16501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taguchi, K.; Maher, J.M.; Suzuki, T.; Kawatani, Y.; Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M. Genetic analysis of cytoprotective functions supported by graded expression of Keap1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 3016–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shay, K.P.; Michels, A.J.; Li, W.; Kong, A.N.; Hagen, T.M. Cap-independent Nrf2 translation is part of a lipoic acid-stimulated detoxification stress response. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruewer, M.; Luegering, A.; Kucharzik, T.; Parkos, C.A.; Madara, J.L.; Hopkins, A.M.; Nusrat, A. Proinflammatory cytokines disrupt epithelial barrier function by apoptosis-independent mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6164–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Elmore, S. Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007, 35, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chasiotis, H.; Kelly, S.P. Effect of cortisol on permeability and tight junction protein transcript abundance in primary cultured gill epithelia from stenohaline goldfish and euryhaline trout. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 172, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chasiotis, H.; Kolosov, D.; Bui, P.; Kelly, S.P. Tight junctions, tight junction proteins and paracellular permeability across the gill epithelium of fishes: A review. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2012, 184, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weber, C.R.; Raleigh, D.R.; Su, L.; Shen, L.; Sullivan, E.A.; Wang, Y.; Turner, J.R. Epithelial myosin light chain kinase activation induces mucosal interleukin-13 expression to alter tight junction ion selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12037–12046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, T.; Saitoh, D.; Takasu, A.; Kiyozumi, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Okada, Y. Serum cortisol as a predictive marker of the outcome in patients resuscitated after cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 2004, 62, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lis, M.T.; Crampton, R.F.; Matthews, D.M. Effect of dietary changes on intestinal absorption of L-methionine and L-methionyl-L-methionine in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 1972, 27, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Bender, P.K.; Akers, R.M.; Webb, K.J. Methionine-containing peptides can be used as methionine sources for protein accretion in cultured C2C12 and MAC-T cells. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Deng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Qu, B.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.; Tang, L.; Tang, W.; Wu, P.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Dietary leucine regulates the intestinal immune status, immune-related signalling molecules and tight junction transcript abundance in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture 2015, 444, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Kuang, S.; Tang, L.; Wu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, L.; Zhou, X. Differential growth performance, intestinal antioxidant status and relative expression of Nrf2 and its target genes in young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) fed with graded levels of leucine. Aquaculture 2014, 434, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, L.E.; Higuchi, A. Is fish worth more than meat?—How consumers’ beliefs about health and nutrition affect their willingness to pay more for fish than meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 65, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldissera, M.D.; Souza, C.F.; Zeppenfeld, C.C.; Velho, M.C.; Klein, B.; Abbad, L.B.; Ourique, A.F.; Wagner, R.; Da Silva, A.S.; Baldisserotto, B. Dietary supplementation with nerolidol nanospheres improves growth, antioxidant status and fillet fatty acid profiles in Nile tilapia: Benefits of nanotechnology for fish health and meat quality. Aquaculture 2020, 516, 734635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation on malondialdehyde (MDA, (A)), protein carbonyl (PC, (B)), and reactive oxygen species (ROS, (C)) contents in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d, e within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 1.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation on malondialdehyde (MDA, (A)), protein carbonyl (PC, (B)), and reactive oxygen species (ROS, (C)) contents in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d, e within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 2.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation on total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC, (A)), anti-superoxide anion activity (ASA, (B)), and anti-hydroxyl radical activity (AHR, (C)) in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d, e within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 2.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation on total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC, (A)), anti-superoxide anion activity (ASA, (B)), and anti-hydroxyl radical activity (AHR, (C)) in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d, e within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 3.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative expressions of apoptotic-related genes in the proximal intestine (A), mid intestine (B), and distal intestine (C) of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 3.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative expressions of apoptotic-related genes in the proximal intestine (A), mid intestine (B), and distal intestine (C) of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative expressions of tight-junction-related genes in the proximal intestine (A), mid intestine (B), and distal intestine (C) of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative expressions of tight-junction-related genes in the proximal intestine (A), mid intestine (B), and distal intestine (C) of juvenile grass carp. Data represent means of six fish in each group, error bars indicate S.D. a, b, c, d within a column, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 5.
General summary for the effects of Met-Met on the intestinal physical barrier in fish.
Table 1.
Formulation and nutrients content of the basal diet.
| Ingredients | Content (%) | Nutrients | Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish meal | 3.00 | Crude protein d | 32.64 |
| Soybean meal | 36.90 | Crude lipid d | 4.45 |
| Cottonseed meal | 22.72 | Methionine d | 0.43 |
| Fish oil | 2.75 | Cysteine d | 0.38 |
| Soybean oil | 1.25 | n-3 e | 1.05 |
| Wheat flour | 22.33 | n-6 e | 0.97 |
| Vitamin premix a | 1.00 | Available phosphorus f | 0.84 |
| Mineral premix b | 1.00 | ||
| Ca(H2PO4)2 | 2.98 | ||
| L-Lys (98.5%) | 0.35 | ||
| L-Thr (98.5%) | 0.17 | ||
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | 2.00 | ||
| Choline chloride (50%) | 0.50 | ||
| Ethoxyquin (30%) | 0.05 | ||
| Met-Met/DL-Met premix c | 3.00 |
a Per kilogram of vitamin premix (g/kg): retinyl acetate (500,000 IU/g), 2.10; cholecalciferol (500,000 IU/g), 0.40; D, L-α-tocopherol acetate (50%), 12.58; menadione (22.9%), 0.83; cyanocobalamin (1%), 0.94; D-biotin (2%), 0.75; folic acid (95%), 0.42; thiamine nitrate (98%), 0.09; ascorhyl acetate (95%), 4.31; niacin (99%), 4.04; meso-inositol (98%), 19.39; calcium-D-pantothenate (98%), 3.85; riboflavin (80%), 0.73; pyridoxine hydrochloride (98%), 0.62. All ingredients were diluted with corn starch to 1 kg. b Per kilogram of mineral premix (g/kg): MnSO4.H2O (31.8% Mn), 2.6590; MgSO4.H2O (15.0% Mg), 200.0000; FeSO4.H2O (30.0% Fe), 12.2500; ZnSO4.H2O (34.5% Zn), 8.2460; CuSO4.5H2O (25.0% Cu), 0.9560; KI (76.9% I), 0.0650; Na2SeO3 (44.7% Se), 0.0168. All ingredients were diluted with corn starch to 1 kg. c Met-Met/DL-Met premix was added to obtain DL-Met or graded levels of Met-Met, and the amount of glycine and corn starch was reduced to compensate. The per-kilogram of premix composition from diet 1 was 83.33 g DL-Met, 317.67 g glycine and 599.00 g corn starch. Premix composition per kilogram from diet 2 to 7 was as follows: Met-Met 0.00, 33.33, 50.00, 66.67, 83.33, 100.00 g, glycine 360.00, 342.00, 333.00, 324.00, 315.00, 306.00 g and corn starch 640.00, 624.67, 617.00, 609.33, 601.67, 594.00 g, respectively. d Crude protein, crude lipid, methionine, and cysteine contents were the measured values. The methionine concentrations from diet 1 to 7 were analyzed to be 6.71, 4.26, 5.03, 5.75, 6.23, 6.70, and 7.42 g/kg by the method of high-performance liquid-chromatographic (HPLC) as described by our previous study, Su et al. [12]. e n-3 and n-6 contents were referenced to Zeng et al. [22] and calculated according to NRC [23]. f Available phosphorus was calculated according to NRC [23].
Table 2.
Real-time PCR primer sequences.
| Target Gene | Primer Sequence FORWARD (5′→3′) | Primer Sequence Reverse (5′→3′) | Temperature (°C) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| occludin | TATCTGTATCACTACTGCGTCG | CATTCACCCAATCCTCCA | 59.4 | KF193855 |
| ZO-1 | CGGTGTCTTCGTAGTCGG | CAGTTGGTTTGGGTTTCAG | 59.4 | KJ000055 |
| ZO-2 | TACAGCGGGACTCTAAAATGG | TCACACGGTCGTTCTCAAAG | 60.3 | KM112095 |
| claudin-b | GAGGGAATCTGGATGAGC | ATGGCAATGATGGTGAGA | 57.0 | KF193860 |
| claudin-c | GAGGGAATCTGGATGAGC | CTGTTATGAAAGCGGCAC | 59.4 | KF193859 |
| claudin-f | GCTGGAGTTGCCTGTCTTATTC | ACCAATCTCCCTCTTTTGTGTC | 57.1 | KM112097 |
| claudin-3c | ATCACTCGGGACTTCTA | CAGCAAACCCAATGTAG | 57.0 | KF193858 |
| claudin-7a | ACTTACCAGGGACTGTGGATGT | CACTATCATCAAAGCACGGGT | 59.3 | KT625604 |
| claudin-7b | CTAACTGTGGTGGTGATGAC | AACAATGCTACAAAGGGCTG | 59.3 | KT445866 |
| claudin-11 | TCTCAACTGCTCTGTATCACTGC | TTTCTGGTTCACTTCCGAGG | 62.3 | KT445867 |
| claudin-12 | CCCTGAAGTGCCCACAA | GCGTATGTCACGGGAGAA | 55.4 | KF998571 |
| claudin-15a | TGCTTTATTTCTTGGCTTTC | CTCGTACAGGGTTGAGGTG | 59.0 | KF193857 |
| claudin-15b | AGTGTTCTAAGATAGGAGGGGAG | AGCCCTTCTCCGATTTCAT | 62.3 | KT757304 |
| FasL | AGGAAATGCCCGCACAAATG | AACCGCTTTCATTGACCTGGAG | 61.4 | KT445873 |
| Bcl-2 | AGGAAAATGGAGGTTGGGAT | CTGAGCAAAAAAGGCGATG | 60.3 | JQ713862.1 |
| Mcl-1b | TGGAAAGTCTCGTGGTAAAGCA | ATCGCTGAAGATTTCTGTTGCC | 58.4 | KT757307 |
| Bax | CATCTATGAGCGGGTTCGTC | TTTATGGCTGGGGTCACACA | 60.3 | JQ793788.1 |
| Apaf-1 | AAGTTCTGGAGCCTGGACAC | AACTCAAGACCCCACAGCAC | 61.4 | KM279717 |
| IAP | CACAATCCTGGTATGCGTCG | GGGTAATGCCTCTGGTGCTC | 58.4 | FJ593503.1 |
| caspase-2 | CGCTGTTGTGTGTTTACTGTCTCA | ACGCCATTATCCATCTCCTCTC | 60.3 | KT757313 |
| caspase-3 | GCTGTGCTTCATTTGTTTG | TCTGAGATGTTATGGCTGTC | 55.9 | JQ793789 |
| caspase-7 | GCCATTACAGGATTGTTTCACC | CCTTATCTGTGCCATTGCGT | 57.1 | KT625601 |
| caspase-8 | ATCTGGTTGAAATCCGTGAA | TCCATCTGATGCCCATACAC | 59.0 | KM016991 |
| caspase-9 | CTGTGGCGGAGGTGAGAA | GTGCTGGAGGACATGGGAAT | 59.0 | JQ793787 |
| CuZnSOD | CGCACTTCAACCCTTACA | ACTTTCCTCATTGCCTCC | 61.5 | GU901214 |
| MnSOD | ACGACCCAAGTCTCCCTA | ACCCTGTGGTTCTCCTCC | 60.4 | GU218534 |
| CAT | GAAGTTCTACACCGATGAGG | CCAGAAATCCCAAACCAT | 58.7 | FJ560431 |
| GPx1a | GGGCTGGTTATTCTGGGC | AGGCGATGTCATTCCTGTTC | 61.5 | EU828796 |
| GPx1b | TTTTGTCCTTGAAGTATGTCCGTC | GGGTCGTTCATAAAGGGCATT | 60.3 | KT757315 |
| GPx4a | TACGCTGAGAGAGGTTTACACAT | CTTTTCCATTGGGTTGTTCC | 60.4 | KU255598 |
| GPx4b | CTGGAGAAATACAGGGGTTACG | CTCCTGCTTTCCGAACTGGT | 60.3 | KU255599 |
| GSTR | TCTCAAGGAACCCGTCTG | CCAAGTATCCGTCCCACA | 58.4 | EU107283 |
| GSTP1 | ACAGTTGCCCAAGTTCCAG | CCTCACAGTCGTTTTTTCCA | 59.3 | KM112099 |
| GSTP2 | TGCCTTGAAGATTATGCTGG | GCTGGCTTTTATTTCACCCT | 59.3 | KP125490 |
| GSTO1 | GGTGCTCAATGCCAAGGGAA | CTCAAACGGGTCGGATGGAA | 58.4 | KT757314 |
| GSTO2 | CTGCTCCCATCAGACCCATTT | TCTCCCCTTTTCTTGCCCATA | 61.4 | KU245630 |
| GR | GTGTCCAACTTCTCCTGTG | ACTCTGGGGTCCAAAACG | 59.4 | JX854448 |
| Nrf2 | CTGGACGAGGAGACTGGA | ATCTGTGGTAGGTGGAAC | 62.5 | KF733814 |
| Keap1a | TTCCACGCCCTCCTCAA | TGTACCCTCCCGCTATG | 63.0 | KF811013 |
| Keap1b | TCTGCTGTATGCGGTGGGC | CTCCTCCATTCATCTTTCTCG | 57.9 | KJ729125 |
| β-actin | GGCTGTGCTGTCCCTGTA | GGGCATAACCCTCGTAGAT | 61.4 | M25013 |
ZO, zonula occludens; FasL, fatty acid synthetase ligand; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma protein-2; Mcl-1b, myeloid cell leukemia-1b; Bax, Bcl-2-associated X protein; Apaf-1, apoptotic protease-activating factor-1; IAP, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins; caspase, cysteinyl aspartic acid-protease; CuZnSOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; GR, glutathione reductase; Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; Keap1, Kelch-like-ECH-associated protein 1.
Table 3.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on antioxidant-related parameters in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp.
Table 3.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on antioxidant-related parameters in three intestinal segments of juvenile grass carp.
| DL-Met | Met-Met | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 1.44 | 1.84 | 2.22 | 2.85 | |
| Proximal intestine | |||||||
| T-SOD | 16.65 ± 1.05 bc | 14.74 ± 0.82 a | 16.07 ± 0.62 b | 17.55 ± 0.88 cd | 18.64 ± 1.06 d | 17.29 ± 1.15 c | 16.51 ± 1.01 bc |
| CuZnSOD | 10.29 ± 0.89 | 10.05 ± 0.85 | 10.15 ± 0.74 | 10.83 ± 0.77 | 10.80 ± 0.85 | 10.45 ± 0.75 | 10.13 ± 0.84 |
| MnSOD | 6.36 ± 0.38 bc | 4.69 ± 0.39 a | 5.93 ± 0.35 b | 6.72 ± 0.45 c | 7.84 ± 0.66 d | 6.84 ± 0.56 c | 6.39 ± 0.56 bc |
| CAT | 2.46 ± 0.19 bc | 1.97 ± 0.18 a | 2.36 ± 0.14 b | 2.63 ± 0.20 c | 2.62 ± 0.13 c | 2.64 ± 0.26 c | 2.61 ± 0.16 c |
| GPx | 150.94 ± 11.12 c | 103.17 ± 7.81 a | 129.66 ± 8.18 b | 146.66 ± 8.46 c | 156.66 ± 9.80 c | 157.77 ± 8.17 c | 156.91 ± 9.00 c |
| GST | 59.26 ± 3.43 c | 42.35 ± 2.74 a | 58.59 ± 4.58 c | 64.34 ± 4.92 d | 57.61 ± 2.60 c | 54.68 ± 4.23 bc | 50.95 ± 3.19 b |
| GR | 51.07 ± 2.92 cd | 36.66 ± 2.32 a | 48.10 ± 2.91 bc | 58.05 ± 3.25 e | 62.93 ± 4.40 f | 52.53 ± 4.10 d | 46.15 ± 3.52 b |
| GSH | 7.05 ± 0.36 c | 4.06 ± 0.37 a | 6.38 ± 0.22 b | 7.90 ± 0.42 d | 6.98 ± 0.47 c | 6.24 ± 0.46 b | 6.01 ± 0.42 b |
| Mid intestine | |||||||
| T-SOD | 16.11 ± 0.65 c | 12.69 ± 0.79 a | 15.85 ± 0.64 c | 16.50 ± 0.90 c | 18.34 ± 0.81 d | 16.32 ± 0.77 c | 14.76 ± 0.75 b |
| CuZnSOD | 9.25 ± 0.54 | 8.99 ± 0.82 | 9.26 ± 0.67 | 9.57 ± 0.42 | 9.69 ± 0.49 | 9.64 ± 0.39 | 8.98 ± 0.69 |
| MnSOD | 6.86 ± 0.56 c | 3.70 ± 0.30 a | 6.60 ± 0.25 c | 6.93 ± 0.55 c | 8.65 ± 0.70 d | 6.67 ± 0.53 c | 5.79 ± 0.41 b |
| CAT | 3.60 ± 0.17 b | 3.00 ± 0.18 a | 3.66 ± 0.13 b | 3.57 ± 0.10 b | 3.63 ± 0.27 b | 3.63 ± 0.13 b | 3.60 ± 0.14 b |
| GPx | 146.70 ± 9.91 b | 108.59 ± 7.15 a | 137.27 ± 7.03 b | 158.61 ± 10.37 c | 179.94 ± 9.84 d | 147.05 ± 10.62 b | 136.25 ± 10.62 b |
| GST | 60.54 ± 2.18 e | 46.15 ± 3.24 a | 55.81 ± 1.47 c | 61.58 ± 3.12 e | 59.00 ± 2.50 de | 56.83 ± 1.16 cd | 52.92 ± 1.67 b |
| GR | 61.42 ± 3.39 d | 37.91 ± 2.15 a | 51.39 ± 4.35 bc | 67.91 ± 5.09 e | 60.48 ± 5.09 d | 55.83 ± 3.71 c | 49.70 ± 2.87 b |
| GSH | 7.73 ± 0.71 c | 4.81 ± 0.41 a | 5.91 ± 0.31 b | 7.40 ± 0.65 c | 7.93 ± 0.74 c | 6.24 ± 0.62 b | 5.84 ± 0.43 b |
| Distal intestine | |||||||
| T-SOD | 16.57 ± 0.79 bc | 14.35 ± 0.42 b | 16.31 ± 0.69 a | 17.54 ± 1.11 cd | 18.13 ± 0.37 d | 16.97 ± 0.84 bc | 16.13 ± 1.12 b |
| CuZnSOD | 9.54 ± 0.67 | 9.46 ± 0.41 | 9.55 ± 0.29 | 9.64 ± 0.51 | 9.60 ± 0.74 | 9.52 ± 0.47 | 9.47 ± 0.92 |
| MnSOD | 7.03 ± 0.32 bc | 4.89 ± 0.41 a | 6.76 ± 0.52 b | 7.90 ± 0.70 d | 8.53 ± 0.50 e | 7.45 ± 0.65 cd | 6.66 ± 0.48 b |
| CAT | 2.57 ± 0.22 bc | 2.30 ± 0.13 a | 2.55 ± 0.09 bc | 2.70 ± 0.14 c | 2.48 ± 0.19 ab | 2.44 ± 0.19 ab | 2.37 ± 0.14 ab |
| GPx | 126.59 ± 8.04 d | 98.11 ± 4.86 a | 117.42 ± 5.69 c | 137.53 ± 8.66 e | 128.77 ± 5.39 d | 117.85 ± 8.47 c | 107.95 ± 7.18 b |
| GST | 61.64 ± 4.96 c | 49.32 ± 1.59 a | 57.01 ± 1.11 b | 63.04 ± 1.56 c | 65.45 ± 3.67 c | 56.51 ± 3.79 b | 52.37 ± 3.43 a |
| GR | 51.98 ± 4.34 c | 38.98 ± 3.11 a | 47.14 ± 3.65 b | 57.81 ± 3.44 d | 64.57 ± 2.99 e | 52.42 ± 2.59 c | 46.32 ± 2.19 b |
| GSH | 7.15 ± 0.37 c | 3.81 ± 0.18 a | 4.92 ± 0.24 b | 7.44 ± 0.73 c | 8.33 ± 0.53 d | 6.99 ± 0.60 c | 5.41 ± 0.36 b |
Values are means and standard deviations (n = 6). a, b, c, d, e, f within a row, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05). T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase (U/mg protein); CuZnSOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (U/mg protein); MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase (U/mg protein); CAT, catalase (U/mg protein); GPx, glutathione peroxidase (U/mg protein); GST, glutathione-S-transferase (U/mg protein); GR, glutathione reductase (U/g protein); GSH, glutathione (mg/g protein).
Table 4.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the proximal intestine of juvenile grass carp.
Table 4.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the proximal intestine of juvenile grass carp.
| DL-Met | Met-Met | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 1.44 | 1.84 | 2.22 | 2.85 | |
| CuZnSOD | 1.02 ± 0.20 | 0.99 ± 0.18 | 1.07 ± 0.15 | 1.08 ± 0.14 | 1.08 ± 0.16 | 1.05 ± 0.16 | 1.04 ± 0.11 |
| MnSOD | 1.02 ± 0.22 b | 0.71 ± 0.16 a | 0.95 ± 0.11 b | 1.27 ± 0.13 c | 1.29 ± 0.17 c | 1.00 ± 0.21 b | 0.84 ± 0.14 ab |
| CAT | 1.01 ± 0.11 bc | 0.71 ± 0.13 a | 0.88 ± 0.10 ab | 1.15 ± 0.25 c | 1.11 ± 0.22 c | 1.12 ± 0.13 c | 1.07 ± 0.19 bc |
| GPX1a | 1.01 ± 0.17 bc | 0.69 ± 0.13 a | 0.84 ± 0.16 ab | 1.04 ± 0.20 bc | 1.12 ± 0.17 c | 1.06 ± 0.16 c | 0.95 ± 0.13 bc |
| GPx1b | 1.01 ± 0.17 b | 0.71 ± 0.14 a | 1.00 ± 0.22 b | 1.12 ± 0.13 b | 1.13 ± 0.15 b | 1.09 ± 0.14 b | 0.95 ± 0.12 b |
| GPx4a | 1.02 ± 0.19 b | 0.75 ± 0.12 a | 0.96 ± 0.16 ab | 1.37 ± 0.27 c | 1.02 ± 0.19 b | 0.85 ± 0.13 ab | 0.74 ± 0.13 a |
| GPx4b | 1.01 ± 0.18 b | 0.73 ± 0.13 a | 0.93 ± 0.16 ab | 1.27 ± 0.29 c | 0.89 ± 0.16 ab | 0.81 ± 0.09 ab | 0.79 ± 0.13 a |
| GSTo1 | 1.02 ± 0.23 bc | 0.74 ± 0.14 a | 1.00 ± 0.12 bc | 1.29 ± 0.15 d | 1.34 ± 0.25 d | 1.16 ± 0.20 cd | 0.88 ± 0.17 ab |
| GSTo2 | 1.01 ± 0.17 b | 0.74 ± 0.14 a | 1.00 ± 0.23 b | 1.23 ± 0.17 c | 1.36 ± 0.25 c | 0.94 ± 0.18 ab | 0.83 ± 0.15 ab |
| GSTp1 | 1.01 ± 0.13 | 0.96 ± 0.13 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.20 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 1.09 ± 0.22 |
| GSTp2 | 1.02 ± 0.25 b | 0.73 ± 0.15 a | 0.93 ± 0.13 ab | 1.41 ± 0.12 c | 1.05 ± 0.22 b | 0.84 ± 0.16 ab | 0.79 ± 0.15 a |
| GSTR | 1.02 ± 0.20 b | 0.75 ± 0.14 a | 0.99 ± 0.23 ab | 1.35 ± 0.22 c | 1.06 ± 0.22 b | 0.98 ± 0.11 ab | 0.86 ± 0.16 ab |
| GR | 1.01 ± 0.17 bc | 0.72 ± 0.19 a | 0.89 ± 0.21 ab | 1.16 ± 0.29 c | 1.20 ± 0.21 c | 0.88 ± 0.14 ab | 0.79 ± 0.17 ab |
| Nrf2 | 1.02 ± 0.22 cd | 0.59 ± 0.10 a | 1.06 ± 0.17 cd | 1.16 ± 0.22 d | 1.04 ± 0.19 cd | 0.90 ± 0.17 bc | 0.79 ± 0.19 ab |
| Keap1a | 1.01 ± 0.17 ab | 1.58 ± 0.19 c | 1.02 ± 0.18 ab | 0.82 ± 0.19 a | 1.03 ± 0.20 ab | 1.12 ± 0.21 b | 1.22 ± 0.22 b |
| Keap1b | 1.01 ± 0.13 ab | 1.28 ± 0.15 c | 1.12 ± 0.17 bc | 0.85 ± 0.13 a | 1.03 ± 0.16 ab | 1.13 ± 0.13 bc | 1.20 ± 0.19 bc |
Values are means and standard deviations (n = 6). a, b, c, d within a row, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05). CuZnSOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; GR, glutathione reductase; Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; Keap1, Kelch-like-ECH-associated protein 1.
Table 5.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the mid intestine of juvenile grass carp.
Table 5.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the mid intestine of juvenile grass carp.
| DL-Met | Met-Met | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 1.44 | 1.84 | 2.22 | 2.85 | |
| CuZnSOD | 1.02 ± 0.21 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 1.07 ± 0.18 | 1.09 ± 0.16 | 1.02 ± 0.17 | 1.04 ± 0.24 | 1.03 ± 0.19 |
| MnSOD | 1.01 ± 0.12 b | 0.80 ± 0.06 a | 0.97 ± 0.20 ab | 1.26 ± 0.19 c | 0.91 ± 0.13 ab | 0.89 ± 0.13 ab | 0.81 ± 0.14 a |
| CAT | 1.02 ± 0.21 b | 0.71 ± 0.10 a | 0.91 ± 0.13 b | 0.96 ± 0.12 b | 1.07 ± 0.12 b | 1.02 ± 0.13 b | 1.07 ± 0.17 b |
| GPX1a | 1.03 ± 0.22 b | 0.74 ± 0.14 a | 0.86 ± 0.09 ab | 1.26 ± 0.18 c | 1.37 ± 0.24 c | 1.03 ± 0.19 b | 0.84 ± 0.11 ab |
| GPx1b | 1.01 ± 0.18 bc | 0.74 ± 0.09 a | 1.06 ± 0.17 bc | 1.21 ± 0.19 cd | 1.29 ± 0.18 d | 0.92 ± 0.18 ab | 0.77 ± 0.13 a |
| GPx4a | 1.01 ± 0.16 bc | 0.71 ± 0.14 a | 1.04 ± 0.21 bc | 1.22 ± 0.17 c | 1.10 ± 0.21 c | 0.85 ± 0.12 ab | 0.79 ± 0.12 a |
| GPx4b | 1.01 ± 0.16 bc | 0.71 ± 0.14 a | 0.83 ± 0.11 ab | 1.13 ± 0.20 c | 1.37 ± 0.16 d | 0.94 ± 0.13 bc | 0.85 ± 0.18 ab |
| GSTo1 | 1.01 ± 0.13 b | 0.73 ± 0.10 a | 1.02 ± 0.18 b | 1.27 ± 0.14 c | 1.30 ± 0.21 c | 1.03 ± 0.21 b | 0.84 ± 0.16 ab |
| GSTo2 | 1.02 ± 0.22 ab | 0.79 ± 0.15 a | 1.02 ± 0.16 ab | 1.14 ± 0.23 bc | 1.26 ± 0.15 c | 1.00 ± 0.20 ab | 0.83 ± 0.13 a |
| GSTp1 | 1.01 ± 0.20 | 0.99 ± 0.14 | 1.07 ± 0.20 | 1.09 ± 0.19 | 1.06 ± 0.20 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.02 ± 0.13 |
| GSTp2 | 1.01 ± 0.18 bc | 0.73 ± 0.14 a | 0.99 ± 0.11 bc | 1.13 ± 0.23 c | 0.98 ± 0.13 bc | 0.87 ± 0.17 ab | 0.83 ± 0.11 ab |
| GSTR | 1.02 ± 0.19 b | 0.73 ± 0.12 a | 0.92 ± 0.16 ab | 1.30 ± 0.20 c | 1.38 ± 0.27 c | 0.99 ± 0.16 b | 0.82 ± 0.07 ab |
| GR | 1.02 ± 0.21 bc | 0.66 ± 0.13 a | 1.17 ± 0.19 cd | 1.31 ± 0.21 d | 1.00 ± 0.16 bc | 0.90 ± 0.14 b | 0.82 ± 0.11 ab |
| Nrf2 | 1.00 ± 0.10 bc | 0.74 ± 0.11 a | 1.14 ± 0.18 cd | 1.28 ± 0.18 d | 1.00 ± 0.10 bc | 0.92 ± 0.14 b | 0.86 ± 0.08 ab |
| Keap1a | 1.02 ± 0.26 bc | 1.36 ± 0.14 d | 0.85 ± 0.17 ab | 0.73 ± 0.12 a | 1.09 ± 0.12 c | 1.19 ± 0.16 cd | 1.21 ± 0.19 cd |
| Keap1b | 1.01 ± 0.19 ab | 1.27 ± 0.20 c | 0.97 ± 0.13 a | 0.88 ± 0.13 a | 1.20 ± 0.17 bc | 1.23 ± 0.22 c | 1.24 ± 0.16 c |
Values are means and standard deviations (n = 6). a, b, c, d within a row, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05). CuZnSOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; GR, glutathione reductase; Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; Keap1, Kelch-like-ECH-associated protein 1.
Table 6.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the distal intestine of juvenile grass carp.
Table 6.
Effects of dietary DL-Met and Met-Met supplementation (g/kg diet) on relative gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2 signaling in the distal intestine of juvenile grass carp.
| DL-Met | Met-Met | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 1.44 | 1.84 | 2.22 | 2.85 | |
| CuZnSOD | 1.03 ± 0.24 | 1.00 ± 0.20 | 1.07 ± 0.13 | 1.14 ± 0.23 | 1.06 ± 0.24 | 1.02 ± 0.20 | 1.01 ± 0.19 |
| MnSOD | 1.01 ± 0.18 b | 0.74 ± 0.12 a | 0.93 ± 0.08 ab | 1.29 ± 0.19 c | 0.94 ± 0.19 ab | 0.86 ± 0.15 ab | 0.83 ± 0.14 ab |
| CAT | 1.01 ± 0.15 ab | 0.86 ± 0.21 a | 1.00 ± 0.13 ab | 1.17 ± 0.22 bc | 1.27 ± 0.20 c | 0.93 ± 0.15 a | 0.84 ± 0.08 a |
| GPX1a | 1.01 ± 0.15 bc | 0.71 ± 0.12 a | 1.00 ± 0.16 bc | 1.18 ± 0.09 cd | 1.27 ± 0.22 d | 1.09 ± 0.17 cd | 0.82 ± 0.15 ab |
| GPx1b | 1.02 ± 0.22 bc | 0.74 ± 0.15 a | 1.00 ± 0.13 abc | 1.26 ± 0.32 c | 1.27 ± 0.19 c | 1.08 ± 0.25 bc | 0.86 ± 0.14 ab |
| GPx4a | 1.00 ± 0.11 c | 0.68 ± 0.10 a | 0.83 ± 0.14 ab | 1.26 ± 0.14 d | 1.01 ± 0.14 c | 0.89 ± 0.15 bc | 0.74 ± 0.13 ab |
| GPx4b | 1.01 ± 0.15 b | 0.74 ± 0.14 a | 0.92 ± 0.15 ab | 1.39 ± 0.27 c | 1.07 ± 0.17 b | 0.87 ± 0.16 ab | 0.77 ± 0.11 a |
| GSTo1 | 1.02 ± 0.23 b | 0.73 ± 0.13 a | 0.84 ± 0.13 ab | 1.28 ± 0.23 c | 0.99 ± 0.19 b | 0.81 ± 0.20 ab | 0.73 ± 0.12 a |
| GSTo2 | 1.02 ± 0.23 bc | 0.78 ± 0.15 a | 1.03 ± 0.13 bc | 1.23 ± 0.12 cd | 1.25 ± 0.23 d | 0.97 ± 0.16 ab | 0.80 ± 0.15 a |
| GSTp1 | 1.01 ± 0.18 | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.16 | 1.10 ± 0.20 | 1.00 ± 0.14 | 1.06 ± 0.21 | 0.98 ± 0.15 |
| GSTp2 | 1.01 ± 0.18 bc | 0.77 ± 0.18 a | 0.95 ± 0.15 ab | 1.20 ± 0.21 c | 0.98 ± 0.15 b | 0.83 ± 0.13 ab | 0.75 ± 0.11 a |
| GSTR | 1.02 ± 0.19 b | 0.75 ± 0.15 a | 0.91 ± 0.14 ab | 1.27 ± 0.16 c | 1.06 ± 0.19 b | 0.86 ± 0.14 ab | 0.78 ± 0.11 a |
| GR | 1.03 ± 0.24 b | 0.73 ± 0.11 a | 0.95 ± 0.11 ab | 1.29 ± 0.25 cd | 1.42 ± 0.27 d | 1.08 ± 0.14 bc | 0.88 ± 0.16 ab |
| Nrf2 | 1.01 ± 0.16 b | 0.64 ± 0.11 a | 1.13 ± 0.16 bc | 1.27 ± 0.21 c | 1.04 ± 0.16 b | 0.81 ± 0.12 a | 0.77 ± 0.09 a |
| Keap1a | 1.01 ± 0.16 ab | 1.29 ± 0.25 c | 1.11 ± 0.19 bc | 0.85 ± 0.17 a | 1.11 ± 0.18 bc | 1.16 ± 0.22 bc | 1.23 ± 0.20 bc |
| Keap1b | 1.01 ± 0.15 ab | 1.27 ± 0.17 c | 0.96 ± 0.14 a | 0.89 ± 0.11 a | 1.17 ± 0.15 bc | 1.21 ± 0.21 c | 1.23 ± 0.16 c |
Values are means and standard deviations (n = 6). a, b, c, d within a row, means without a common lowercase superscript differ (p < 0.05). CuZnSOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; GR, glutathione reductase; Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; Keap1, Kelch-like-ECH-associated protein 1.
Table 7.
The optimal levels of Met-Met supplementation for juvenile grass carp based on the intestinal antioxidant parameters.
Table 7.
The optimal levels of Met-Met supplementation for juvenile grass carp based on the intestinal antioxidant parameters.
| Parameters | Regression Equation | R2 | p | Optimal Level of Met-Met (g/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI | MDA | y = 4.0114x2 − 13.377x + 29.711 | 0.9158 | 0.02 | 1.67 |
| PC | y = 0.3073x2 − 1.0392x + 2.7039 | 0.9172 | 0.03 | 1.69 | |
| ROS | y = 19.303x2 − 70.801x + 160.04 | 0.9382 | 0.02 | 1.83 | |
| AHR | y = −3.5705x2 + 11.776x + 34.574 | 0.8519 | 0.06 | 1.65 | |
| ASA | y = −13.701x2 + 52.013x + 71.432 | 0.8589 | 0.05 | 1.90 | |
| T-AOC | y = −0.2453x2 + 0.8498x + 1.1529 | 0.8986 | 0.03 | 1.73 | |
| MI | MDA | y = 3.3909x2 − 11.155x + 24.489 | 0.8824 | 0.04 | 1.64 |
| PC | y = 0.2155x2 − 0.7092x + 2.252 | 0.8987 | 0.03 | 1.65 | |
| ROS | y = 19.117x2 − 55.073x + 137.57 | 0.8445 | 0.06 | 1.44 | |
| AHR | y = −4.1452x2 + 13.877x + 36.22 | 0.9220 | 0.02 | 1.67 | |
| ASA | y = −24.882x2 + 81.343x + 107.02 | 0.9583 | 0.01 | 1.67 | |
| T-AOC | y = −0.3335x2 + 1.0892x + 1.3004 | 0.9701 | 0.01 | 1.63 | |
| DI | MDA | y = 3.4159x2 − 11.569x + 27.058 | 0.9293 | 0.02 | 1.69 |
| PC | y = 0.156x2 − 0.5145x + 2.3605 | 0.8855 | 0.04 | 1.65 | |
| ROS | y = 25.517x2 − 75.992x + 153.41 | 0.8690 | 0.05 | 1.49 | |
| AHR | y = −4.4182x2 + 14.862x + 36.781 | 0.9305 | 0.02 | 1.68 | |
| ASA | y = −16.465x2 + 52.281x + 73.494 | 0.8724 | 0.05 | 1.59 | |
| T-AOC | y = −0.2413x2 + 0.7319x + 1.5154 | 0.8167 | 0.08 | 1.52 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wu, P.; Su, Y.; Feng, L.; Jiang, W.; Kuang, S.; Tang, L.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X. Optimal DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine Supplementation Improved Intestinal Physical Barrier Function by Changing Antioxidant Capacity, Apoptosis and Tight Junction Proteins in the Intestine of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091652
AMA Style
Wu P, Su Y, Feng L, Jiang W, Kuang S, Tang L, Jiang J, Liu Y, Zhou X. Optimal DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine Supplementation Improved Intestinal Physical Barrier Function by Changing Antioxidant Capacity, Apoptosis and Tight Junction Proteins in the Intestine of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Antioxidants. 2022; 11(9):1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091652
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Pei, Yuening Su, Lin Feng, Weidan Jiang, Shengyao Kuang, Ling Tang, Jun Jiang, Yang Liu, and Xiaoqiu Zhou. 2022. "Optimal DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine Supplementation Improved Intestinal Physical Barrier Function by Changing Antioxidant Capacity, Apoptosis and Tight Junction Proteins in the Intestine of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)" Antioxidants 11, no. 9: 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091652
APA StyleWu, P., Su, Y., Feng, L., Jiang, W., Kuang, S., Tang, L., Jiang, J., Liu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2022). Optimal DL-Methionyl-DL-Methionine Supplementation Improved Intestinal Physical Barrier Function by Changing Antioxidant Capacity, Apoptosis and Tight Junction Proteins in the Intestine of Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Antioxidants, 11(9), 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091652
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
