Next Article in Journal
Silymarin as a Natural Antioxidant: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Betalains, Phenols and Antioxidant Capacity in Cactus Pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] Fruits from Apulia (South Italy) Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Convolvulus arvensis Dried Extract as a Potential Antioxidant in Food Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Content of Hypodaphnis Zenkeri and Its Antioxidant Effects against Fenton Reactions’ Mediated Oxidative Injuries on Liver Homogenate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/antiox4010185
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant, Biomolecule Oxidation Protective Activities of Nardostachys jatamansi DC and Its Phytochemical Analysis by RP-HPLC and GC-MS

by
Sakina Razack
1,
Kandikattu Hemanth Kumar
1,
Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu
1,
Mahadeva Naika
2 and
Farhath Khanum
1,*
1
Biochemistry and Nanosciences Division, Defence Food Research Laboratory, Mysore-570011, India
2
Applied Nutrition Division, Defence Food Research Laboratory, Mysore-570011, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2015, 4(1), 185-203; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4010185
Submission received: 11 November 2014 / Revised: 4 February 2015 / Accepted: 2 March 2015 / Published: 12 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analytical Determination of Polyphenols)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The study aimed at analyzing the metabolite profile of Nardostachys jatamansi using RP-HPLC, GC-MS and also its antioxidant, biomolecule protective and cytoprotective properties. The 70% ethanolic extract of Nardostachys jatamansi (NJE) showed the presence of polyphenols and flavonoids (gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, homovanillin, epicatechin, rutin hydrate and quercetin-3-rhamnoside) analyzed by RP-HPLC, whereas hexane extract revealed an array of metabolites (fatty acids, sesquiterpenes, alkane hydrocarbons and esters) by GC-MS analysis. The antioxidant assays showed the enhanced potency of NJE with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 222.22 ± 7.4 μg/mL for 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 13.90 ± 0.5 μg/mL for 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 113.81 ± 4.2 μg/mL for superoxide, 948 ± 21.1 μg/mL for metal chelating and 12.3 ± 0.43 mg FeSO4 equivalent/g of extract for ferric reducing antioxidant power assays and was more potent than hexane extract. NJE effectively inhibited 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced oxidation of biomolecules analyzed by pBR322 plasmid DNA damage, protein oxidation of bovine serum albumin and lipid peroxidation assays. The observed effects might be due to the high content of polyphenols, 53.06 ± 2.2 mg gallic acid equivalents/g, and flavonoids, 25.303 ± 0.9 mg catechin equivalents/g, of NJE compared to the hexane fraction. Additionally, the extract abrogated the protein, carbonyl, and ROS formation, and NJE showed cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y neuronal cells above 75 μg/mL. Thus, the study suggests that the herb unequivocally is a potential source of antioxidants and could aid in alleviating oxidative stress-mediated disorders.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) comprise free radicals, such as superoxide anion (O2−) and hydroxyl (HO·) radicals, and non-free radical species, such as H2O2 and singlet oxygen (1O2), and these comprise different forms of activated oxygen [1,2,3]. ROS are known to damage cellular membranes by inducing lipid peroxidation, damage DNA, proteins and lipids [4]. Thus, excessive production of free radicals/ROS leads to oxidation of biomolecules, and this has been implicated in the etiology of several human diseases, such as atherosclerosis, ischemia reperfusion injury, ageing and liver-related diseases [5,6]. To protect the cells and organ systems of the body from free radicals/ROS, the human body has evolved a highly sophisticated and complex antioxidant protection system. Antioxidants are capable of stabilizing, or deactivating, free radicals before they damage cells. The body’s antioxidant defense system comprises endogenous antioxidant enzymes, viz. superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, catalase, etc., that catalyze free radical quenching reactions. In addition, dietary antioxidants, like ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherols and tocotrienols (vitamin E), carotenoids and other low molecular weight compounds, such as glutathione and lipoic acid, also aid in stabilizing free radicals [7].
Plant-derived substances, collectively called phytonutrients or phytochemicals, are known for their antioxidant activity [7]. Consumption of natural antioxidants is associated with reduced risks of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and other diseases associated with ageing [8,9]. In recent years, consumption of the natural phytochemicals present in berry crops, teas, herbs, oilseeds, beans, fruits and vegetables have markedly increased [10,11]. The oxidative DNA damage plays a significant role in mutagenesis, cancer, aging and other human pathologies [12,13]. The best strategy to counter oxidative stress is supplementation of food rich in herbal bioactives [14].
Nardostachys jatamansi DC is a member of the plant family, Valerianaceae, is a perennial herb growing to about 10–60 m in height and is commonly referred to as Indian spikenard. It is found in the alpine Himalayas from Punjab to Sikkim and Bhutan at an altitude of 3000–5000 m. The plant has been reported to possess antianxiety, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, anticonvulsant, antiparkinsons, antidepressant and antimicrobial activities [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Nardostachys jatamansi has been attributed with exorbitant medicinal properties, and it was our interest to analyze the 70% ethanolic and hexane extracts for their in vitro antioxidant activities, with the former extract comprising both polar and non-polar metabolites and the latter exclusively non-polar. Scarce literature is available with regards to the antioxidant and biomolecules protective properties of the 70% ethanolic extract and also with regard to the hexane extract. Hence, the rationale of the present study was to characterize the 70% ethanol and hexane extracts of N. jatamansi by RP-HPLC and GC-MS analysis and to assess the extract for its antioxidant potency, quantification of polyphenols and flavonoids and, further, to verify the ability of the extract to inhibit the oxidation of biomolecules to understand the possible role of the antioxidant activity of the herb.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH), agarose, ethidium bromide, bovine serum albumin, gallic acid, catechin, homovanillic acid, epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, rutin hydrate and quercetin-3-rhamnoside were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. pBR322 plasmid DNA was purchased from Genetix, Bangalore. India. The other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and were procured from Merck, Bangalore, India.

2.2. Plant Material and Preparation of the Extract

The root material was procured from a local supplier at Mysore, India. The plant was identified by Dr. K. Madhava Chetty, Botanist, Department of Botany, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India. The voucher specimen (Herbarium Accession Number 1911) was deposited in the herbarium, Department of Botany, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India. The roots were washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove the adhering sand particles and shade dried. The thoroughly dried roots were powdered and extracted by shaking with 70% ethanol and hexane with a plant material:solvent ratio of 1:10, filtered through Whatmann filter paper No. 1 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and were evaporated to dryness under vacuum on a rotary evaporator (Heidolph rotacool, Germany) into a thick residue. The 70% ethanol fraction was subsequently lyophilized (Lyolab, Hyderabad, India), and the powder was used for analysis. The yield of the 70% ethanol fraction (NJE) was 7.4% and the hexane fraction (NJH) was 4.2%.

2.3. Metabolite Profile of N. jatamansi

2.3.1. Reversed Phase-HPLC Analysis of the 70% Ethanol Fraction

Phenolic compounds of NJE were identified using a diode array detector (JASCO Pu-1580 HPLC system, JASCO Inc., Easton, MD, USA) on a reverse phase C18 column (150 × 4.5 mm, JASCO Inc.). The mobile phase was with two solvents: 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 100% methanol (B). The total run time was 60 min. The eluting compounds were detected by monitoring at 270 nm. The phenolic compounds were identified by comparing the retention time (RT) of the unknowns with the standards [24]. The polyphenols were partially extracted from the sample using the solid-phase extraction method on a C18 reverse phase sep-pak column (Catologue Number: WAT094226, HLB3CC, Waters India Private Limited, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India), and the eluant obtained was injected into reversed phase-HPLC for analysis. The lyophilized plant extract (1 mg/mL) was redissolved in 0.1% formic acid in water, and 20 μL of the sample and the standards were injected for analysis. The standards injected include gallic acid (RT-9.98), catechin (RT-18.17), chlorogenic acid (RT-22.02), homovanillin (RT-23.12), epicatechin (RT-24.09), rutin hydrate (RT-37.33) and quercetin-3-rhamnoside (RT-40.61).

2.3.2. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Analysis (GC-MS-HT-TOF) of the Hexane Fraction

The metabolite profiling of NJH was carried out by GC–MS analysis on an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, US) coupled with LECO Corporation (St. Joseph, MI, USA) with the following conditions: the column used was 29.3 m × 0.7 m, 320 μm, capillary column −29.300 m, operating in an electron ionization mode at 70 eV; with helium as a carrier gas at a constant flow of 1.50 mL/min and an injection volume of 1.0 μL; injector temperature 250 °C; ion source temperature 200 °C. The oven temperature was initially 70 °C for 1 min, increased to 160 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min and increased finally to 320 °C for 15 min at a rate of 3 °C/min. The mass spectrometer was operated at an acquisition rate of 10 spectra/s, and the scan range was set between 50 and 600 m/z. The detector voltage was set to 1450 V and the electron energy to −70 V.

2.4. Phytochemical Screening of the Plant Extract

2.4.1. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The total polyphenols were estimated by the Folin–Ciocalteu method [25]. Briefly, to different concentrations of the plant extract (100–1000 μg/mL), 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:10) and 2 mL of 7% Na2CO3 were added and incubated at room temperature for 90 min, and the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 765 nm (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Gallic acid (10–100 μg/mL) was used as a standard, and the amount of total polyphenolic content was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per gram extract (mg GAE/g).

2.4.2. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

Briefly, to different concentrations of plant extracts (100–1000 μg/mL), 75 μL of 5% NaNO2 and 150 μL of 10% AlCl3 were added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Then, 500 μL of 1 M NaOH followed by 775 μL of water were added, vortexed and the absorbance measured at 510 nm [26]. Catechin (10–100 μg/mL) was used as the standard, and the amount of total flavonoids was expressed as mg of catechin equivalents per gram extract (mg CE/g).

2.5. In Vitro Free Radical Scavenging and Antioxidant Activities

2.5.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The free radical scavenging activity of NJE and NJH were measured by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay [27]. Briefly, 500 μL of DPPH (0.5 mM in methanol) solution was mixed with different amounts of sample (100–1000 μg/mL), and the volume was made to 3 mL with methanol. The mixture was incubated in the dark for 45 min at room temperature, and the absorbance was recorded at 515 nm. Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA; 10–100 μg/mL) was used as the standard antioxidant compound. Methanol was used as the blank. The percent inhibition was calculated as follows:
Percentage inhibition (%) = [AC − AS/AC] × 100
where AC is the absorbance of positive control and AS is the absorbance of the sample.

2.5.2. ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay

The ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt) radical cation scavenging activity of NJE/NJH was assayed [28]. The working solution was prepared by mixing two stock solutions of 14 mM ABTS solution and 4.9 mM potassium persulfate solution in equal amounts and allowed to react for 12–16 h at room temperature in the dark. This solution (5 mL) was diluted with absolute ethanol until the OD value reached 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. The working solution was thoroughly mixed at room temperature, and 1 mL of this solution was mixed with different concentrations of plant extracts (10–100 μg/mL). Additionally, the scavenging capacity of the extract for ABTS+ was calculated and expressed as the percent inhibition. The IC50 value was calculated and compared with ascorbic acid (5–50 μg/mL), used as a standard.

2.5.3. Metal Chelating

Briefly, to different concentrations of the extracts (100–2000 μg/mL), 50 μL of FeCl2 (2 mM) were added. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 200 μL of ferrozine (2 mM); the mixture was vortexed and left at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance was then measured spectrophotometrically at 562 nm [29]. The % of inhibition of the ferrozine-Fe2+ complex was calculated by:
% Inhibition = [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100
where A0 is the absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance of the samples and standards. The ability of the extracts to chelate ferrous ion was compared with EDTA (100 μg/mL), used as a standard.

2.5.4. Superoxide Radical Scavenging Activity

The superoxide radicals were generated in 16 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 50 μM nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), 78 μM NADH and different concentrations of plant extract (100–1000 μg/mL). The reaction was started by adding 10 μM PMS to the mixture. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 5 min, and the absorbance was measured at 560 nm [30]. l-ascorbic acid (10–100 μg/mL) was used as the control. The percent inhibition of superoxide anion generation was calculated by using the following formula:
% Inhibition = [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100
where A0 is the absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance of sample extract/standard.

2.5.5. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay

The antioxidant capacity was determined by the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay [31]. The stock solutions included 300 mM acetate buffer (3.1 g of CH3COONa and 16 mL of CH3OOH), pH 3.6, 10 mM TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine) solution in 40 mM HCl and 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O solution. The fresh working solution was prepared by mixing 25 mL acetate buffer, 2.5 mL TPTZ and 2.5 mL FeCl3·6H2O. The temperature of the solution was raised to 37 °C before the assay. Plant extract (10–100 μg/mL) was allowed to react with 2850 μL of the FRAP solution for 30 min in the dark. Readings of the colored product (ferrous tripyridyltriazine complex) were measured at 593 nm.

2.6. Biomolecules Oxidation Assays

2.6.1. AAPH-Induced Plasmid Nick Assay

Conversion of the supercoiled form of plasmid DNA to open circular and further linear form has been used as an index of DNA damage. The DNA damage protective activity of the NJE was assessed using pBR322 plasmid DNA [32]. Different concentrations of NJE (5, 10, 15 μg from a stock of 1 mg/mL) and plasmid DNA (0.5 μg) were incubated at room temperature followed by the addition of AAPH (200 mM). The reaction mixture was made up to 20 μL and incubated for one hour at 37 °C. The DNA samples were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel, and the band intensities were analyzed using Easy win 32 software from Herolab (Herolab GmbH Laborgeraete, Wiesloch, Germany).

2.6.2. Protein Oxidation

The oxidation of BSA (5 μg) in phosphate buffer was initiated by 200 mM AAPH, and the inhibitory properties of NJE were measured at a fixed concentration (1 mg/mL). After incubation for one hour at 37 °C, BHT (0.02%) was added to prevent further formation of peroxyl radicals, and the samples were assayed by SDS-PAGE [33].

2.6.3. Thiobarbituric Acid-Reactive Substances Assay

Male Wistar albino rats weighing 200–220 g were housed under conventional conditions and were allowed free access to food and water. The experiments were carried out according to Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) guidelines for the care and use of experiment animals approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee. The rats were anaesthetized, and the liver and brain were removed and homogenized (10% w/v) in sodium phosphate buffer (pH, 7.4). Homogenates were then centrifuged at 5000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Oxidative stress was induced using AAPH [34]. The reaction mixture was composed of liver/brain homogenate (15 mg protein), 120 mM AAPH and different concentrations of NJE (100–1000 μg/mL). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, and the extent of lipid peroxidation of the liver homogenate in the presence and absence of the plant extract was evaluated by measuring the product of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. After incubation, the reaction was terminated by adding 2% BHT followed by the addition of 1 mL of TCA (20% w/v) to the mixture. After centrifugation at 3000× g for 15 min, the supernatant was incubated with 1 mL of thiobarbituric acid (TBA, 0.67%) at 100 °C for 15 min, and the absorbance was measured at 532 nm. The data were expressed in terms of the percent inhibition.
% Inhibition = [AC − AS/AC] × 100
where AC is the absorbance of the control, and AS is the absorbance of the sample.

2.6.4. Estimation of Reactive Oxygen Species

The extent of inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was evaluated using 2′,7′-dichlorodihydro fluorescein diacetate (DCHF-DA). The brain and liver homogenates (10% w/v) were incubated with different concentrations of NJE (10–100 μg/mL) and gallic acid (1 mg/mL) as a standard. After incubation for half an hour, AAPH (120 mM), a peroxyl radical inducer, was added to all of the wells, except the control, and incubated for 30 min. Later, 10 μM of DCFH-DA was added and incubated for 60 min. The fluorescence of DCF (dichlorofluorescein) was measured at 492-nm excitation and 520-nm emission. Results were expressed as the percent of fluorescence [35].

2.6.5. Estimation of Protein Carbonyls

The protein carbonyl content (PCC) of the rat liver homogenates in the presence and absence of NJE (10–100 μg/mL)/AAPH (120 mM) was evaluated [36]. One milliliter of 10 mM DNPH (dinitrophenyl hydrazine) in 2 N HCl was added to the reaction mixture (2 mg of protein), and samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Then, 1 mL of trichloroacetic acid 10% was added to each reaction mixture and centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min. The protein pellet was washed thrice with 2 mL of ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) and dissolved in 1 mL of guanidine hydrochloride (6 M, pH 2.3) and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The carbonyl content was calculated based on the molar extinction coefficient of DNPH (ε = 2.2 × 104 cm−1 M−1). The data were expressed in terms of the percent of inhibition.

2.7. Cytoprotective Effects

LDH Leakage Assay

The human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were procured from the National Center for Cell Sciences, Pune, India. Cells were seeded into 25-cm2 flasks in DMEM/F-12, 1:1 mixture supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, antibiotic and antimycotic solution and maintained in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C. Media were changed every alternate day, and the experiment was carried out in serum-free media. Once the cells reached confluence, they were treated with NJE at different concentrations (10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 1000 μg/mL) for 24 h. After 24 h, to the untreated cells, 10 μL of cell lysis solution (2% Triton X-100 in PBS) were added; this accounted for the total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Cells were centrifuged at 2000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and 100 μL of the supernatant were collected. To this, 900 μL of the LDH estimation (Agappe-11407002, Kerala, India) reaction mixture was added and measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm for 3 min.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All of the analyses were carried out in triplicate. The values of the in vitro antioxidant assays are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The other tests were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Metabolite Profile of N. jatamansi

3.1.1. Reversed Phase-HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

The reversed phase-HPLC analysis aided in the identification (Figure 1) and quantification (Table 1) of polyphenols present in NJE. The identified polyphenols include gallic acid (0.18 mg/g), catechin (4.37 mg/g), chlorogenic acid (19.90 mg/g), homovanillic acid (32.02 mg/g), epicatechin (4.23 mg/g), rutin hydrate (0.08 mg/g) and quercetin-3-rhamnoside (7.13 mg/g). However, a few of the polyphenols could not be identified, due to a lack of standards. The relative concentrations of each identified metabolite was estimated on the basis of the relative standard calibration curve.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g001 1024
Figure 1. RP-HPLC chromatogram of the identified polyphenols in the ethanolic extract of N. jatamansi.
Figure 1. RP-HPLC chromatogram of the identified polyphenols in the ethanolic extract of N. jatamansi.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g001
Table
Table 1. Quantification of the identified polyphenols by RP-HPLC.
Table 1. Quantification of the identified polyphenols by RP-HPLC.
No.PolyphenolsRT (min)Concentration (mg/g)
1Gallic acid9.880.18
2Catechin18.164.37
3Chlorogenic acid22.2719.90
4Homovanillin22.6032.02
5Epicatechin24.094.23
6Rutin hydrate37.170.08
7Quercetin-3-rhamnoside40.567.13

3.1.2. GC-MS Analysis

The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of the hexane fraction of N. jatamansi is shown in Figure 2. The chemical formulae, retention time and mass of the identified compounds are listed in Table 2.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g002 1024
Figure 2. Total ion chromatogram of the hexane fraction of N. jatamansi.
Figure 2. Total ion chromatogram of the hexane fraction of N. jatamansi.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g002
Table
Table 2. Phytochemical analysis of the N. jatamansi hexane extract.
Table 2. Phytochemical analysis of the N. jatamansi hexane extract.
No.RT (min)Compound NameChemical FormulaMassArea (%)Hit
19.62DodecaneC12H26170.2041.6151
211.222-Furanmethanol, tetrahydro-5-methyl-transC6H12O116.0840.0311
313.98LinaloolC10H18O154.1350.3621
415.30Benzenemethanol, a-methyl-propanoateC11H14O2178.0990.7051
515.681H-Cyclopropa(a)naphthalene, 1a,2,3,5,6,7,7a,7b-octahydro-1,1,7,7a-tetramethyl-(1aR-(1aa,7a,7aa,7ba))C15H24204.1881.0611
616.02a-MuuroleneC15H24204.18814.0711
716.391H-Cycloprop(e)azulene,1a,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7b-octahydro-1,1,4,7-tetramethyl-(1aR-(1aa,4a,4aa,7ba))C15H24204.1889.1845
816.69l-calameneneC15H22202.1720.0651
917.11Α-iononeC13H20O192.1510.6431
1017.41Bicyclo(3.3.1)nonan-2-one,1-methyl-9-(1-methylethylidene)C13H20O192.1518.3291
1117.63Neoisolongifolene,8,9-dehydroC15H22202.1722.0021
1217.81(−)-à-PanasinsenC15H24204.1881.7161
1318.13Neoisolongifolene,8,9-dehydroC15H22202.17210.861
1418.96Bicyclo(2.2.2)octa-2,5-diene, 1,2,3,6-tetramethylC12H18162.1413.6431
1519.15Isolongifolene,4,5,9,10-dehydroC15H20200.1571.241
1619.76trans-NerolidolC15H26O222.1984.7811
1719.88para-methoxyphenylpiperazineC11H16N2O192.12635.5761
1820.2Cyclolongifolene oxide, dehydroC15H22O218.1671.3681
1921.511(2H)-Naphthalenone,octahydro-4a,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-ethylethyl)-, (4aR-(4aa,7a,8aa))C15H26O222.1980.3291
2022.052-tetradecenalC14H26O210.19844.8731
2130.1Palmitic acidC16H32O2256.241.5371
2231.64Oleic acidC18H34O2282.2565.4991
2332.862,8,9-Trioxa-5-aza-1-silabicyclo(3.3.3)undecane,1-methoxyC7H15NO4Si205.0770.1651
2437.22Tridecanoic acid, methyl esterC14H28O2228.2090.6251
2539.71HeptacosaneC27H56380.4382.6641

3.2. In Vitro Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Activities

The DPPH free radical scavenging assay results represent a strong effect of the extract to scavenge free radicals. The percent scavenging activity of the extracts showed an increase with the subsequent increase in the concentration of the extract. The 70% ethanol extract was more potent than the hexane fraction, and the IC50 values for DPPH, ABTS+, superoxide radical scavenging, metal chelation and ferric reducing antioxidant activities were found to be 222.22 ± 7.4 μg/mL, 13.90 ± 0.5 μg/mL, 113.81 ± 4.2 μg/mL, 948 ± 21.1 μg/mL and 12.3 ± 0.43 mg FeSO4E/g of extract, respectively. However, the hexane fraction also exhibited antioxidant activity with IC50 values of 432.68 ± 13.7 μg/mL for DPPH, 23.57 ± 1.4 μg/mL for ABTS+, 255.72 ± 9.7 μg/mL for superoxide radical scavenging, 1211 ± 27.8 μg/mL for metal chelation and 45.62 ± 1.34 mg FeSO4E/g of extract for the ferric-reducing antioxidant assay (Table 3).
Table
Table 3. Polyphenol and flavonoid content, antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of ethanolic extract of Nardostachys jatamansi (NJE) and the hexane fraction (NJH). Values are represented as the means ± SD of the triplicate determination. ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt. CE, catechin equivalents.
Table 3. Polyphenol and flavonoid content, antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of ethanolic extract of Nardostachys jatamansi (NJE) and the hexane fraction (NJH). Values are represented as the means ± SD of the triplicate determination. ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt. CE, catechin equivalents.
AssayEthanolic Extract (NJE)Hexane Extract (NJH)
Total polyphenolic content53.06 ± 2.2 mg GAE/g of extract13.87 ± 1.3 mg GAE/g of extract
Total flavonoids25.303 ± 0.9 mg CE/g of extract4.58 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g of extract
DPPH radical scavenging assay (IC50)222.22 ± 7.4 μg/mL432.68 ± 13.7 μg/mL
Metal chelation (IC50)948 ± 21.1 μg/mL1211 ± 27.8 μg/mL
ABTS (IC50)13.90 ± 0.5 μg/mL23.57 ± 1.4 μg/mL
Superoxide (IC50)113.81 ± 4.2 μg/mL255.72 ± 9.7 μg/mL
Anti-lipid peroxidation (IC50)465.11 ± 14.3 μg/mL (brain)587.53 ± 17.6 μg/mL (brain)
539.08 ± 18.9 μg/mL (liver)685.15 ± 13.4 μg/mL (liver)
Ferric-reducing antioxidant power12.3 ± 0.43 mg FeSO4E/g of extract45.62 ± 1.34 mg FeSO4E/g of extract
The 70% ethanol extract exhibited strong antioxidant capacity in comparison to that of the hexane extract. Hence, the 70% ethanol extract was further used to analyze the protective effect against AAPH-induced oxidative damage of biomolecules.

Polyphenol and Flavonoid Contents

NJE showed a high content of polyphenols, 53.06 ± 2.2 mg GAE/g of the extract (gallic acid equivalent), and flavonoids, 25.303 ± 0.9 mg CE/g of the extract (catechin equivalents), whereas NJH showed 13.87 ± 1.3 mg GAE/g of the extract of polyphenols and 4.58 ± 0.3 mg GAE/g of the extract of flavonoids (Table 3).

3.3. Protective Properties against Biomolecules Oxidation

3.3.1. NJE Inhibits AAPH-Induced DNA Damage

AAPH is a water-soluble initiator, which decomposes at physiological temperature, producing alkyl radicals, which react with oxygen to form alkyl peroxyl radicals to initiate protein oxidation [37]. The protective potential of the plant extract against DNA damage induced by AAPH (200 mM) was measured using pBR322 DNA. As shown in Figure 3, the plasmid DNA was mainly of the supercoiled form (bottom band) and open circular form (top band) in the absence of AAPH (Lane 1). With the addition of 10 mM AAPH, the supercoiled form decreased and converted into the open circular form (Lane 2). The addition of the extract significantly inhibited the formation of the open circular form as compared to the positive control (85%; 15 μg/mL extract). Gallic acid at 5 μg/mL also showed significant protection against DNA damage (95%).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g003 1024
Figure 3. Inhibition of DNA damage by NJE. Lane 1, plasmid DNA (pBR322); Lane 2, DNA + 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH); Lane 3, DNA + AAPH + 5 μg extract; Lane 4, DNA + AAPH + 10 μg extract; Lane 5, DNA + AAPH + 15 μg extract; Lane 6, DNA + AAPH + 10 μg GA.
Figure 3. Inhibition of DNA damage by NJE. Lane 1, plasmid DNA (pBR322); Lane 2, DNA + 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH); Lane 3, DNA + AAPH + 5 μg extract; Lane 4, DNA + AAPH + 10 μg extract; Lane 5, DNA + AAPH + 15 μg extract; Lane 6, DNA + AAPH + 10 μg GA.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g003

3.3.2. NJE Inhibits Protein Oxidation

The protective property of the plant extract against protein oxidation was determined by the oxidation of BSA initiated by AAPH. After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C, the samples were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. The results demonstrated that the plant extract showed 50% protection against BSA oxidation (Lanes 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) in a dose-dependent manner. In Lane 2 (positive control), in the presence of the radical inducer AAPH (200 mM), BSA was completely degraded, whereas gallic acid at 10 μg/mL showed a complete protective effect (Figure 4).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g004 1024
Figure 4. Inhibition of protein oxidation by NJE. Lane 1, BSA; Lane 2, BSA + AAPH; Lane 3, BSA + AAPH + 5 μg extract; Lane 4, BSA + AAPH + 10 μg extract; Lane 5, BSA + AAPH + 15 μg extract; Lane 6, BSA + AAPH + 20 μg extract; Lane 7, BSA + AAPH + 25 μg extract; Lane 8, BSA + AAPH + 10 μg GA.
Figure 4. Inhibition of protein oxidation by NJE. Lane 1, BSA; Lane 2, BSA + AAPH; Lane 3, BSA + AAPH + 5 μg extract; Lane 4, BSA + AAPH + 10 μg extract; Lane 5, BSA + AAPH + 15 μg extract; Lane 6, BSA + AAPH + 20 μg extract; Lane 7, BSA + AAPH + 25 μg extract; Lane 8, BSA + AAPH + 10 μg GA.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g004

3.3.3. Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation

Further, the potential of 70% ethanol extract to inhibit lipid peroxidation induced by AAPH (a peroxyl radical inducer) in rat liver and brain homogenate was analyzed by the TBARS assay. The IC50 values of NJE for inhibiting lipid peroxides in the brain and liver are 465.11 ± 14.3 μg/mL, 539.08 ± 18.9 μg/mL, respectively, and for NJH are 587.53 ± 17.6 μg/mL (brain) and 685.15 ± 13.4 μg/mL (liver) (Table 3).

3.3.4. Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species

This assay was performed to check the protective efficacy of the plant extract against intracellular ROS generation. AAPH caused a significant increase in ROS production in comparison with that of the control. NJE at 100 μg/mL was effective at combating ROS and showed 58% and 55% ROS inhibition in the liver and brain homogenates (Figure 5).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g005 1024
Figure 5. Antioxidant effects of NJE and gallic acid on AAPH-induced ROS generation.
Figure 5. Antioxidant effects of NJE and gallic acid on AAPH-induced ROS generation.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g005

3.3.5. NJE Inhibits Protein Carbonyl Content

The protein carbonyl formation increases drastically under various pathological conditions of oxidative stress [38]. AAPH significantly increased the formation of protein carbonyls in comparison to that of the control. The increasing concentration of the extract was effective at inhibiting the protein carbonyls formed with 100 μg/mL of NJE, showing a 61% and 54% inhibitory effect on protein carbonyls formed in the liver and brain homogenates (Figure 6).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g006 1024
Figure 6. Inhibitory effects of NJE and gallic acid on AAPH-induced protein carbonyl formation.
Figure 6. Inhibitory effects of NJE and gallic acid on AAPH-induced protein carbonyl formation.
Antioxidants 04 00185 g006

3.4. Cytotoxicity of NJE by the Plasma Membrane Leakage Assay

Cell damage was evaluated by measuring the leakage of intracellular LDH into the medium. The extract was not toxic up to 75 μg/mL. However, pretreatment of the cells above 100 μg/mL exhibited cell damage, and an increased LDH release was observed (Figure 7).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g007 1024
Figure 7. Effects of NJE on LDH release in SH-SY5Y neuronal cells (* p < 0.05 vs. control).
Figure 7. Effects of NJE on LDH release in SH-SY5Y neuronal cells (* p < 0.05 vs. control).
Antioxidants 04 00185 g007

4. Discussion

Modern lifestyle, including the fast pace of life and reduced physical activity, seems to have a direct, as well as indirect effect on human health, especially mental and physical stress. The first and foremost manifestation is anxiety. Excessive anxiety can prove to be disabling and could lead to other neuropsychiatric disorders. There are several reports demonstrating that physical/mental stress leads to oxidative stress, which, in turn, becomes a cause for more serious illness [39,40].
In the present investigation, preliminarily, we analyzed the phytochemicals present in N. jatamansi. Reversed phase-HPLC analysis aided in quantifying the polyphenols present in NJE. The identified polyphenols contribute to the enhanced antioxidant potency of the herb and help in scavenging ROS. In plants, polyphenols and flavonoids serve as protectors against a wide variety of environmental stresses, while, in humans, flavonoids appear to function as “biological response modifiers”. The broad therapeutic effects of polyphenols and flavonoids can be largely attributed to their antioxidant properties [7]. Polyphenols and flavonoids are naturally-occurring antioxidant substances, which exhibit myriad pharmacological actions on the central nervous system and are effective at managing anxiety and depression [41]. Reports demonstrated that polyphenols, such as gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid and quercetin-3-rhamnoside, exhibit anxiolytic effects [42]. GC-MS analysis aided in the identification of an array phytochemicals, such as fatty acids, sesquiterpenes, alkane hydrocarbons and esters. Among the identified compounds, alpha-muurolene, a sesquiterpene, was found to be abundant. Sesquiterpenes have been ascribed as potent antioxidants [43]. Another identified metabolite, linalool, a monoterpene, has been used as a sleep aid and is effective in the treatment of psychosis and anxiety [44]. Omega 3-fatty acids and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids have been implicated with diminishing inflammation [45] and reduce the risk of thrombosis [46].
Polyphenols and flavonoids are gaining importance for their antioxidant properties, as they are effective hydrogen donors [47]. These natural antioxidants provide health benefits associated with preventing damage due to biological degeneration and any oxidative onslaught [34]. Previous studies also reported that the dried roots of N. jatamansi contain sesquiterpenes, like jatamansone, spirojatamol, patchouli alcohol, norseychelanone, jatamol A and B, lignans and neolignans, like virolin, pinoresinol, jatamansic acid, and terpenic coumarins, like oroselol and jatamansin. The essential oil is composed of sesquiterpenoids and coumarins. Jatamansone is the principle sesquiterpenoid and is attributed with rendering majority of the biological activity [48,49].
The free radical scavenging activity of N. jatamansi was evaluated by an array of antioxidant assays. The DPPH free radical scavenging assay is extensively employed to determine the antioxidant activities of different samples in a short time. This suggests that the plant extract contains compounds that are capable of donating hydrogen to a free radical in order to remove the odd electron, which is responsible for the radical’s reactivity [50]. The ABTS+ radical scavenging assay reflects the capacity of an antioxidant species to donate electrons or hydrogen atoms to inactivate this radical cation. The reducing power of a compound serves as a significant indicator of its potential antioxidant activity [51]. The ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay is described as a rapid and novel method for assessing the antioxidant power of various samples. Fe3+ reduction is often used as an indicator of electron donating activity, which is an important mechanism of phenolic antioxidant action and can be strongly correlated with other antioxidant properties [52]. The superoxide anion radical is one of the strongest reactive oxygen species generated among the free radicals. Thus, the antioxidant activity is attributed to various mechanisms, like the prevention of chain initiation, binding of transition metal ion catalysts, prevention of continued hydrogen abstraction, reductive capacity, radical scavenging activity and decomposition of peroxides [53,54]. In the present study, the results suggest that 70% ethanol extract is a potent scavenger of free radicals compared to the hexane extract. This might be due to the diverse content of phytochemicals in the 70% ethanol fraction of N. jatamansi.
The excessive production of free radicals, collectively called ROS, is known to cause oxidation of biomolecules and is observed in degenerative diseases and ageing. Thus, the inhibition of oxidation of these biomolecules may be vital for the alleviation of an array of diseases. Damage to DNA is known to alter replication and transcription, causing cell death or mutations. Oxidative modifications of DNA have been suggested to contribute to aging and various diseases, including cancer and chronic inflammation [55]. Lipid peroxidation is a free radical chain reaction, which arises from the oxidative conversion of polyunsaturated fatty acids by HO• to lipid peroxides, which, in turn, can damage biological membranes. The malondialdehyde level is widely utilized as a marker of lipid peroxidation in states of elevated oxidative stress. Thus, it can be correlated to the identified metabolites serving as antioxidants, being mainly capable of scavenging these free radicals and thereby preventing DNA damage, protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation. The results are suggestive of the fact that the plant extract is effective at the prevention of lipid peroxidation, a common causative agent in cell membrane disruption and cell damage [56].
The protective effect of antioxidants on cells is thought to reside in their ability to reduce the level of intracellular ROS generation [57]. The fluorescent probe 2′,7′-dichlorodihydro fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) is used to measure ROS that crosses cell membranes and that are enzymatically hydrolysed to nonfluorescent DCFH. In the presence of ROS, DCFH is oxidized to a highly fluorescent compound, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), and measured to quantify the ROS generation [58]. AAPH, a peroxyl radical generator, caused an increase in ROS production that was alleviated by NJE dose dependently.
The oxidative damage to the proteins caused by free radicals has been shown to play a significant role in aging and several pathological events [59]. The major molecular mechanism leading to structural modifications in proteins is free radical-mediated protein oxidation characterized by carbonyl formation. The measurement of protein carbonyls is used to assess the oxidative damage of proteins [60]. As observed, NJE inhibited protein carbonyl (PCO) formation, confirming its antioxidative role and demonstrating that it could be a good source of antioxidants and could protect against oxidative insults. The cytotoxic effect of the extract assessed by the LDH assay on SH-SY5Y cells showed that the extract is non-toxic up to the dose of 75 g/mL and could be used to further verify the antioxidant effects at the cellular level.

5. Conclusions

Oxidative stress causes cellular damage and subsequent cell death. The results obtained suggests that Nardostachys jatamansi rhizome contains good amounts of polyphenols, flavonoids and sesquiterpenes and thereby exhibits high antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities. The extract was found to chelate iron, scavenge superoxide radical and has a high reducing power. It inhibited protein oxidation, DNA damage and decreased the malondialdehyde level. The extract effectively scavenged ROS and inhibited protein carbonyls. Hence, these in vitro assays support the idea that Nardostachys jatamansi can be a good source of natural antioxidants to alleviate oxidative stress-mediated disorders.

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out for Project No. DFR 297, funded by the Defence Research and Development Organization, India. The authors acknowledge the constant support and encouragement given by the Director, Defence Food Research Laboratory (DFRL), Mysore, India. The authors are grateful to Prasanth Bitla, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, for the GC-MS-HT-TOF analysis.

Author Contributions

Sakina Razack, Kandikattu Hemanth Kumar, Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu and Farhath Khanum conceived of and designed the experiments. Sakina Razack performed the experiments and wrote the paper. Kandikattu Hemanth Kumar participated in GC-MS and cell culture studies. Sakina Razack and Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu analyzed the data. Mahadeva Naika facilitated the reversed phase-HPLC analysis. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yildirim, A.; Mavi, A.; Oktay, M.; Kara, A.A.; Algur, O.F.; Bilaloglu, V. Comparison of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Tilia (Tilia argenta Desf Ex DC), sage (Salvia triloba L.) and black tea (Camellia sinensis) extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5030–5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gulcin, I.; Oktay, M.O.; Kufrevioglu, O.I.; Aslan, A. Determination of antioxidant activity of lichen Cetraria islandica (L.). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 79, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mittova, V.; Volokitam, M.; Guy, M.; Tal, M. Activities of SOD and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes in subcellular compartments in leaves and roots of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 110, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dean, R.T.; Stocker, R.; Davies, M.J. Biochemistry and pathology of radical-mediated protein. J. Biochem. 1997, 324, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aruoma, O.I. Free radicals, oxidative stress and antioxidants in human health and disease. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1998, 75, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Percival, M. Antioxidants. Clin. Nutr. Insight 1998, 31, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashokkumar, D.; Mazumder, U.K.; Gupta, M.; Senthilkumar, G.P.; Selvan, V.T. Evaluation of antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Oxystelma esculentum in various in vitro models. J. Compliment. Integr. Med. 2008, 5, 1553–3840. [Google Scholar]
  9. Veerapur, V.P.; Prabhakar, K.R.; Parihar, V.P.; Kandadi, M.R.; Ramakrishana, S.; Mishra, B.; Satish Rao, B.S.; Srinivasan, K.K.; Priyadarsini, K.I.; Unnikrishnan, M.K. Ficus racemosa stem bark extract: A potent antioxidant and a probable natural radioprotector. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2009, 6, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kitts, D.D.; Yuan, Y.V.; Wijewickreme, A.N.; Hu, C. Antioxidant properties of a North American gingseng extract. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2000, 203, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Muselík, J.; García-Alonso, M.; Martín-López, M.P.; Želmièka, M.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C. Measurement of antioxidant activity of wine catechins, procyanidins, antocyanins and piranoantocyanins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aviram, M. Review of human studies on oxidative damage and antioxidant protection related to cardiovascular diseases. Free Radic. Res. 2000, 33, 85–97. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baynes, J.W. From life to death-the struggle between chemistry and biology during aging: The Maillard reaction as an amplifier of genomic damage. Biogerontology 2000, 1, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halliwell, B. Oxidative stress, nutrition and health. Experimental strategies for optimization of nutritional antioxidant intake in humans. Free Radic. Res. 1996, 25, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rao, V.S.; Rao, A.; Karanth, K.S. Anticonvulsant and neurotoxicity profile of Nardostachys jatamansi in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 102, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahmad, M.; Yousuf, S.; Khan, M.B.; Hoda, M.N.; Ahmad, A.S.; Ansari, M.A.; Ishrata, T.; Agrawalb, A.K.; Islama, F. Attenuation by Nardostachys jatamansi of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced parkinsonism in rats: Behavioral, neurochemical, and immunohistochemical studies. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2006, 83, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Subashini, R.; Yogeeta, S.; Gnanapragasam, A.; Devaki, T. Protective effect of Nardostachys jatamansi on oxidative injury and cellular abnormalities during doxorubicin-induced cardiac damage in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Joshi, H.; Parle, M. Nardostachys jatamansi improves learning and memory in mice. J. Med. Food 2006, 9, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kumar, V.P.; Chauhan, N.S.; Padh, H.; Rajani, M. Search for antibacterial and antifungal agents from selected Indian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dhingra, D.; Goyal, P.K. Inhibition of MAO and GABA: Probable mechanisms for antidepressant-like activity of Nardostachys jatamansi DC. in mice. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 46, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Dandagi, P.M.; Patil, M.B.; Mastiholimath, V.S.; Gadad, A.P.; Dhumansure, R.H. Development and evaluation of hepatoprotective polyherbal formulation containing some indigenous medicinal plants. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 70, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jadhav, V.M.; Thorat, R.M.; Kadam, V.J.; Kamble, S.S. Herbal anxiolyte: Nardostachys jatamansi. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 2, 1208–1211. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khan, M.B.; Hoda, M.N.; Ishrat, T.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, M.M.; Ahmad, A.; Yusuf, S.; Islama, F. Neuroprotective efficacy of Nardostachys jatamansi and crocetin in conjunction with selenium in cognitive impairment. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 33, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ross, K.A.; Beta, T.; Arntfield, S.D. A comparative study on the phenolic acids identified and quantified in dry beans using HPLC as affected by different extraction and hydrolysis methods. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic acid-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sakanaka, S.; Tachibana, Y.; Okada, Y. Preparation and antioxidant properties of extracts of Japanese persimmon leaf tea (kakinoha-cha). Food Chem. 2005, 89, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eberhardt, M.V.; Lee, C.Y.; Liu, R.H. Antioxidant activity of fresh apple. Nature 2000, 405, 903–904. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dinis, T.C.P.; Madeira, V.M.C.; Almeida, L.M. Action of phenolic derivatives (acetoaminophen, Salicylate and 5-aminosalicylate) as inhibitora of membrane lipid peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1994, 315, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ye, X.Y.; Wang, H.X.; Liu, F.; Ng, T.B. Ribonuclease, cell free transalation inhibitory and superoxide radical scavenging activities of the iron-binding protein lactoferrin from bovine mill. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2000, 32, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Benzie, I.E.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, J.C.; Kim, H.R.; Kim, T.; Jang, Y.S. Antioxidant property of an ethanol extract of the stem of Opuntia ficus-indica Var. Saboten. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6490–6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kwon, H.Y.; Choi, S.Y.; Won, M.H.; Kang, T.C.; Kang, J.H. Oxidative modification and inactivation of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase by 2, 2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1543, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bahramikia, S.; Ardestani, A.; Yazdanparast, R. Protective effects of four Iranian plants against free radical-mediated protein oxidation. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kobayashi, D.; Kondo, K.; Uehara, N.; Otokozawa, S.; Tsuji, N.; Yagihashi, A.; Watanabe, N. Endogenous reactive oxygen species is an important endogenous reactive oxygen species is an important mediator of miconazole antifungal effect. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Reznick, A.Z.; Packer, L. Oxidative damage to proteins: Spectrophotometric method for carbonyl assay. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 233, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Cai, Y.J.; Fang, J.G.; Ma, L.P.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.L. Inhibition of free radical induced peroxidation of rat liver microsomes by resveratrol and its analogues. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1637, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dalle-Donnea, I.; Rossib, R.; Giustarinib, D.; Milzania, A.; Colomboa, R. Protein carbonyl groups as biomarkers of oxidative stress. Clin. Chim. Acta 2003, 329, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Leeuwenburgh, C.; Heinecke, J.W. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in exercise. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, J.K.; Mori, A. Stress, aging, brain oxidative damage. Neurochem Res 1999, 24, 1479–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bouayed, J. Polyphenols: A potential new strategy for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2010, 6, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bouayed, J.; Rammal, H.; Dicko, A.; Younos, C.; Soulimani, R. Chlorogenic acid, a polyphenol from Prunus domestica (Mirabelle), with coupled anxiolytic and antioxidant effects. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007, 262, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Neganova, M.E.; Afanas’eva, S.V.; Klochkov, S.G.; Shevtsovs, E.F. Mechanisms of antioxidant effect of natural sesquiterpene lactone and alkaloid derivatives. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2012, 152, 720–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Linck, V.M.; da Silva, A.L.; Figueiro, M.; Caramao, E.B.; Morena, P.R.H.; Elisabetsky, E. Effects of inhaled linalool in anxiety, social interaction and aggressive behaviour in mice. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 679–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Richard, D.; Kefi, K.; Barbe, U.; Bausero, P.; Visioli, F. Polyunsaturated fatty acids as antioxidants. Pharmacol. Res. 2008, 57, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kalmijn, S.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Launer, L.J.; Kromhout, D. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, and cognitive function in very old men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 145, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rice-Evans, C.A.; Miller, N.J.; Bramley, P.M.; Pridham, J.B. The relative antioxidant activity of plant derived polyphenolic flavonoids. Free Radic. Res. 1995, 22, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hoerster, H.; Ruecker, G.; Tautges, J. Valeranone content in the roots of Nardostachys jatamansi and Valeriana officinalis. Phytochem 1977, 1, 1070–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rucker, G.; Tautges, J.; Sleck, A.; Wenzl, H.; Graf, E. Isolation and pharmacological activity of the sesquiterpene valeranone from Nardostachys jatamansi DC (in German). Arzneimittelforschung 1978, 28, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Aiyegoro, O.A.; Okoh, A.I. Prelimnary phytochemical screening and invitro antioxidant activities of the aqueous extract of Helichrysum longifolium DC. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2010, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gordon, M.H. The mechanism of antioxidant action in vitro. In Food Antioxidants; Hudson, B.J.F., Ed.; Elsevier Applied Science: London, UK, 1990; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dorman, H.J.D.; Peltoketo, A.; Hiltunen, R.; Tikkanen, M.J. Characterisation of the antioxidant properties of deodorized aqueous extracts from selected Lamiaceae herbs. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kumar, R.S.; Rajkapoor, B.; Perumal, P. Antioxidant activities of Indigofera cassioides Rottl. Ex. DC. using various in vitro assay models. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hemanth Kumar, K.; Razack, S.; Nallamuthu, I.; Khanum, F. Phytochemical analysis and biological properties of Cyperus rotundus L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, J.L.; Weissman, L.; Bohr, V.A.; Mattson, M.P. Mitochondrial DNA damage and repair in neurodegenerative disorders. DNA Repair 2008, 7, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Barrera, G.; Pizzimenti, S.; Dianzani, M.U. Lipid peroxidation: Control of cell proliferation cell differentiation and cell death. Mol. Aspects Med. 2008, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Roche, M.; Tarnus, E.; Rondeau, P.; Bourdon, E. Effects of nutritional antioxidants on AAPH- or AGEs-induced oxidative stress in human SW872 liposarcoma cells. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2009, 25, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. LeBel, C.P.; Ischiropoulos, H.; Bondys, S.C. Evaluation of the probe 2′,7′-dichiorofluorescin as an indicator of reactive oxygen species formation and oxidative stress. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1992, 5, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Stadtman, E.R.; Levin, R.L. Protein oxidation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 899, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ardestani, A.; Yazdanparast, R. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Achillea santolina extracts. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Razack, S.; Kumar, K.H.; Nallamuthu, I.; Naika, M.; Khanum, F. Antioxidant, Biomolecule Oxidation Protective Activities of Nardostachys jatamansi DC and Its Phytochemical Analysis by RP-HPLC and GC-MS. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4010185

AMA Style

Razack S, Kumar KH, Nallamuthu I, Naika M, Khanum F. Antioxidant, Biomolecule Oxidation Protective Activities of Nardostachys jatamansi DC and Its Phytochemical Analysis by RP-HPLC and GC-MS. Antioxidants. 2015; 4(1):185-203. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4010185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Razack, Sakina, Kandikattu Hemanth Kumar, Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu, Mahadeva Naika, and Farhath Khanum. 2015. "Antioxidant, Biomolecule Oxidation Protective Activities of Nardostachys jatamansi DC and Its Phytochemical Analysis by RP-HPLC and GC-MS" Antioxidants 4, no. 1: 185-203. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4010185

APA Style

Razack, S., Kumar, K. H., Nallamuthu, I., Naika, M., & Khanum, F. (2015). Antioxidant, Biomolecule Oxidation Protective Activities of Nardostachys jatamansi DC and Its Phytochemical Analysis by RP-HPLC and GC-MS. Antioxidants, 4(1), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4010185

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop