Next Article in Journal
Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancer Vaccine Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Immunosenescence on Vaccine Immune Responses and Countermeasures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Childhood Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination on Invasive Disease Serotypes in Serbia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for Antigenic Saccharides: From Conjugation Chemistry to Vaccine Design

by
Marie-Jeanne Archambault
1,2,3,
Laetitia Mwadi Tshibwabwa
1,2,3,
Mélanie Côté-Cyr
1,2,3,
Serge Moffet
4,
Tze Chieh Shiao
4 and
Steve Bourgault
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P.8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
2
Quebec Network for Research on Protein Function, Engineering and Applications (PROTEO), Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
3
The Center of Excellence in Research on Orphan Diseases-Fondation Courtois (CERMO-FC), Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
4
Glycovax Pharma Inc., Laval, QC H7V 5B7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2024, 12(11), 1290; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111290
Submission received: 11 September 2024 / Revised: 6 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 19 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Glycoconjugate Vaccines and Nanovaccines)

Abstract

:
Glycoconjugate vaccines have been effective in preventing numerous bacterial infectious diseases and have shown recent potential to treat cancers through active immunotherapy. Soluble polysaccharides elicit short-lasting immune responses and are usually covalently linked to immunogenic carrier proteins to enhance the antigen-specific immune response by stimulating T-cell-dependent mechanisms. Nonetheless, the conjugation of purified polysaccharides to carrier proteins complexifies vaccine production, and immunization with protein glycoconjugates can lead to the undesirable immunogenic interference of the carrier. Recently, the use of nanoparticles and nanoassemblies for the delivery of antigenic saccharides has gathered attention from the scientific community. Nanoparticles can be easily functionalized with a diversity of functionalities, including T-cell epitope, immunomodulator and synthetic saccharides, allowing for the modulation and polarization of the glycoantigen-specific immune response. Notably, the conjugation of glycan to nanoparticles protects the antigens from degradation and enhances their uptake by immune cells. Different types of nanoparticles, such as liposomes assembled from lipids, inorganic nanoparticles, virus-like particles and dendrimers, have been explored for glycovaccine design. The versatility of nanoparticles and their ability to induce robust immune responses make them attractive delivery platforms for antigenic saccharides. The present review aims at summarizing recent advancements in the use of nano-scaled systems for the delivery of synthetic glycoantigens. After briefly presenting the immunological mechanisms required to promote a robust immune response against antigenic saccharides, this review will offer an overview of the current trends in the nanoparticle-based delivery of glycoantigens.

1. Introduction

Vaccination constitutes one of the most effective strategies for preventing infectious diseases and has recently demonstrated the potential to treat cancers through active immunotherapy [1,2]. Vaccines mainly act by training the immune system to recognize and tackle pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria, and this was historically achieved by introducing a killed, or attenuated, pathogen [3]. The immune system of the immunized host responds by generating antibodies and immune cells that specifically recognize the pathogen upon subsequent exposures [4]. These conventional vaccines based on live-attenuated and inactivated pathogens have played key roles in preventing serious infectious diseases for decades [3,4]. More recently, novel approaches such as nucleic acid, viral vector and subunit vaccines have provided safer alternatives for inducing potent and long-lasting antigen-specific immune responses and improving vaccine safety [3,4]. Moreover, active immunotherapy, which aims at harnessing immune cells and immune memory to target cancer cells, has emerged as a promising strategy to fight cancers [1,5].
A promising approach for vaccine design and immunotherapy involves the use of polysaccharides as antigens for subunit vaccines. Polysaccharides are complex carbohydrates that can be found on the surface of all human cells and microbes, including bacteria and viruses [6]. Glycans are highly specific to certain pathogens and, to some extent, to cancer cells, making them potential antigens for vaccination. However, antigenic glycans usually elicit a short-lasting immune response that fails to generate T-cell-dependent memory B-cells [6,7]. Furthermore, polysaccharides induce very weak antigen-specific immune responses in young children and immunocompromised patients [6,8]. To overcome these limitations, saccharidic antigens are usually covalently linked to an immunogenic protein carrier, leading to robust and long-lasting a T-cell-dependent immune response, allowing processes such as class switching and affinity maturation to take place [4,6,8]. The first glycoconjugate vaccine, which was against Haemophilus influenzae type b, used the diphteria toxoid as an immunogenic protein carrier and was licensed in the late 1980s [2,7,9]. To this day, glycoconjugates used in clinics include vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Salmonella typhi [2,10]. Nonetheless, challenges associated with the production and manufacturing of glycoconjugate vaccines as well as their efficacy remain to be addressed. Glycoantigens are usually isolated from bacterial cultures, and this complex, multistep procedure results in low yields and, often, the high level of heterogenicity of the glycan mixtures. The conjugation of the isolated bacterial polysaccharides to the carrier protein is technically challenging because the glycoantigen needs to be chemically activated, which can lead to its degradation and/or the alteration of its structure by hydrolysis or oxidation, depending on the chemistry employed [8,11]. This leads to issues with batch-to-batch reproducibility and limits widespread use, particularly in areas with limited resources [8]. Furthermore, the undesirable interference of immunogenicity between the carrier protein and the saccharide unit(s) can result in antigen competition and carrier-induced epitope suppression (CIES) [10,12]. CIES occurs when pre-existing immunity against an immunostimulant carrier protein can lead to a diminished antibody response against the antigen conjugated to the same carrier [12].
Ongoing research in the field of glycoconjugate vaccines aims at addressing these limitations by developing novel strategies to enhance safety, efficacy, production and accessibility. With recent advancements in nanotechnology, there is huge potential for the development of nanoparticle-based delivery systems for glycoantigens that can overcome the challenges associated with protein-based glycoconjugates. Notably, nanoparticles can protect the saccharidic antigens from degradation and can enhance their uptake by immune cells, ultimately leading to a robust and prolonged immune response [8,13,14]. Furthermore, by precisely controlling their shape, size, surface chemistry as well as the degree of functionalization with immunological components, it is possible to finely modulate and polarize the immune response [14,15,16]. In this context, this short review aims at summarizing the recent advancements in the use of nano-scaled systems for the delivery of synthetic glycoantigens. After briefly presenting the immunological mechanisms necessary to promote a robust immune response against antigenic saccharides, we will present a broad overview of the current trends in the nanoparticle-based delivery of glycoantigens, exploring opportunities and challenges associated with this strategy. While several comprehensive reviews focusing on the design of glycoconjugate vaccines to fight cancers or bacterial infections have been published over the last few years [2,7,10,17,18,19,20,21], the present short review focuses exclusively on the preparation and use of (semi)-synthetic glycoconjugate nanoparticles as next-generation vaccines.

2. Immune Responses Against Antigenic Polysaccharides

Carbohydrates are essential components for cellular functions and can be found on the cell surface of all living organisms, from bacteria to mammals [8]. Pathogenic bacteria, fungi and parasites expose polysaccharides on their surface that play pivotal roles in initiating infection, acting as virulent factors and/or aiding pathogens in evading the immune system of the infected hosts [6,7]. Cancer cells also display an overabundance of specific glycan structures on the outer leaflet of their plasma membrane, which can be used to distinguish tumor cells from healthy cells [17,22]. The administration of isolated and soluble polysaccharides results in a short-lived immune response associated with T-cell-independent immunity, which limits the presentation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) on major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) [7,8,22]. Thus, polysaccharides fail to activate T-cells, which is essential for inducing long-lasting immunity, resulting in the secretion of low-affinity IgM antibodies through T-cell-independent mechanisms [23] (Figure 1A).
To overcome this limitation, polysaccharides are usually covalently linked to immunogenic carrier proteins, such as tetanus toxoid or diphtheria toxoid. This conjugation enhances the immune response by stimulating T-cell-dependent mechanisms, which is possible because of the presence of T-cell epitopes within the protein sequence [8,23]. The stimulation of B-cells and subsequent production of high-affinity IgG antibodies requires antigen binding with B-cell receptors along with stimulation by cytokines secreted by T helper cells (Figure 1B) [8,22,23,24]. Portions of the glycoconjugate including carbohydrates bind with and induce the clustering of B-cell receptors. After internalization into a B-cell endosome, the glycoconjugate molecule undergoes processing, with proteases breaking it into smaller peptides and glycopeptides, resulting in the generation of glycan-peptides. Certain fragments can then be loaded onto MHC II molecules, leading to the cell surface presentation of peptides and/or glycopeptides to the CD4 T-cells to trigger an adaptive response. In both cases, this leads to the recognition of the peptide and/or the glycan by the T helper cell, which in turn stimulates the secretion of cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-2 [23]. This induces the maturation of associated memory B-cells, prompting these cells to produce high-affinity carbohydrate-specific IgG antibodies [8,23,24,25]. The mechanisms by which carbohydrate-specific antibodies contribute to protection against the initial infection, the growth and/or the propagation of microbial pathogens involve several key processes. For instance, the activation of the complement system helps to identify target pathogens, or cancer cells, for their elimination by the host organism [26]. Moreover, the opsonization of the pathogens facilitates their phagocytosis and destruction by immune cells [26]. Moreover, the binding of antibodies to cancer cells’ glycoproteins may also interfere with critical survival signaling, such as that of growth factors, for attachment to the extracellular matrix or surrounding cells, or for nutrient uptake. Together, these mechanisms allow carbohydrate antibodies to play an important role in the immune response against a variety of infectious agents, as well as towards cancer cells. For detailed information regarding the induction of immune response against polysaccharides and the subsequent protection conferred, we encourage readers to consult the comprehensive review of Kappler and colleagues [27].

3. Nanocarriers for Saccharide Antigens

The use of carrier proteins in glycoconjugate vaccines was a breakthrough as it addressed the poor immunogenicity of isolated polysaccharides. Carrier proteins were found to enhance the recognition of saccharidic antigens by the immune system, leading to the activation of T-cells and the subsequent long-lasting production of antibodies by B-cells, thus significantly improving the efficacy of glycovaccines [8,13,22,23,24,25]. Five carrier proteins are currently licensed for human glycoconjugate vaccines: diphtheria toxoid (DT), tetanus toxoid (TT), cross reacting material 197 (CRM197), Haemophilus protein D (PD) and the outer membrane protein complex of serogroup B meningococcus (OMPC) [6,10,21]. In contrast, there are only four types of bacteria for which a corresponding glycoconjugate vaccine has been approved for human use: Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Salmonella typhi [6,10,21]. Immunization with nanoparticle-based delivery systems presents numerous benefits in comparison to conventional protein conjugate vaccines. Through rational engineering, nanoparticles can mimic pathogens and present a repetitive display of antigens on their surface [28,29]. Additionally, their nanoscale size, in the range of most pathogens, enables efficient adsorption by APCs, enhancing the presentation of antigens to adaptive immune cells, and facilitates their passive diffusion into lymph nodes (LNs) [30]. Furthermore, the shape of nanoparticles can also influence the immune response. Studies have shown that rod-shaped structures tend to be more pro-inflammatory compared to spherical particles [31,32]. Conjugation to nanoparticles also leads to improved stability and the prolonged release of antigens [28,29]. Nanoplatforms used for the presentation and delivery of glycoantigens can be classified into various types based on their chemical nature and supramolecular structure, including lipid vesicles, metallic nanoparticles, virus-like particles (VLPs) and dendrimers.

3.1. Liposomal Nanocarriers

Liposomal carriers, which are usually assembled from amphiphilic molecules, can present clusters of carbohydrate antigens on their surface, which help to stimulate B-cells by presenting a repetitive structure to cross-link with the B-cell receptors [27]. These carriers often have intrinsic self-adjuvanting effects by activating different immune pathways, including those involving Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and natural killer T (NKT) cells [33]. For instance, the adjuvant AS01 used in human vaccines is constituted of liposomes prepared from two immunostimulant lipids: 3-O-desacyl-4ʹ-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and the saponin QS-21 [34,35]. Liposomes are usually spherical nanovesicles composed of a lipid bilayer that can be conjugated with and/or encapsulate antigens [33,34]. Their size dictates which immune response will be activated. For instance, liposomes approximatly 100 nm in diameter will promote Th2-balanced responses, while larger ones, with a diameter of 400 nm or greater, will promote Th1-balanced reponses [33]. These nanoparticles have been extensively studied for antigen delivery due to their biocompatibility and ability to carry a diversity of antigens, as well as immunomodulating molecules (Table 1) [29,33]. Liposomes enhance the stability of antigens by protecting them against physiologycal processes, including enzymatic degradation, and promoting their uptake by APCs, which is often associated with the similar phospholipid composition between the plasma membrane of APCs and liposomes, [36,37]. Altogether, this leads to improved antigen-specific immune responses.
The Thomsen nouveau (Tn) antigen, i.e., N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), which is frequently highly abundant on the surface of cancer cells, was conjugated to cholesterol and incorporated in liposomes of approximately 150 nm that encapsulated the TLR9 agonist unmethylated 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′ (CpG) (Table 1) [49]. This glycoliposome showed a strong interaction with an anti-Tn-specific antibody and improved the presentation of the Tn antigen by both bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and spleen-derived B-cells, which are essential for eliciting robust T- and B-cell-mediated immune responses [38]. The evaluation of immunogenicity in mice revealed that this liposomal glycovaccine stimulates the robust production of anti-Tn-specific IgG, as well as the secretion of IFN-γ [38].
Glycoliposomes can be obtained by exploiting the self-assembling propensity of palmitoylated peptides (Pam2 and Pam3), which are known for their strong immunomodulating properties involving the activation of the heterodimeric receptors TLR1/TLR2 and TRL2/TLR6 [50]. For example, a synthetic oligosaccharide mimicking the O-antigen of Shigella flexneri 2a lipopolysaccharide and the influenza hemagglutinin peptide HA307–319, used as a T helper epitope, were respectively assembled into 70 to 90 nm vesicles and conjugated to the maleimide group of Pam3CAG [39]. This fully synthetic nanovesicles triggered specific antibody responses against the glycoantigen when administered intramuscularly to mice and provided protection against an experimental challenge with S. flexneri 2a [39]. The obtained immune response was associated with the dense exposition of the glycoantigens, resulting in the clustering and activation of B-cells, and the high cellular uptake primed the T helper cells [39]. Moreover, the Tn antigen was conjugated to a the T-cell epitope YAF, a 20-residue peptide derived from a protein of the outer membrane of N. meningitidis, and the glycopeptide was linked to Pam3Cys to form a 100 nm diameter liposomal vaccine formulation [40,51]. This liposomal formulation triggered a robust production of glyco-specific IgG, involving the maturation of dendritic cells and the activation of T helper cells by means of the built-in adjuvant Pam3Cys and the YAF T-cell epitope peptide [40].
In an alternative strategy, the Tn antigen was first conjugated to an unnatural amino acid, α-methylserine, and the glycosylated α-methylserine was incorporated into the most immunogenic region of the protein mucin 1 (MUC1), which is overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells [52,53]. A T helper epitope from human poliovirus 1 was also incorporated and these different moieties were conjugated to the TLR2/TLR6 agonist Pam3Cys. The incorporation of this glycolipopeptide into a phospholipid-based liposomal formulation resulted in the elicitation of a robust IgG antibody response against the MUC1-Tn antigen upon mice intradermal immunization, with the predominance of the IgG3 subclass, which is typical for carbohydrate-specific responses [41,54]. This work was initially inspired by Boons and colleagues who used a similar glycolipopeptide, but with the glycoantigen attached directly to Pam3CSK4 [42,55]. The liposomal formulation incorporating Pam3CSK4 and the QS-21 adjuvant, a mixture of saponin molecules from the Q. Saponaria tree, triggered high titers of antigen-specific IgG, with the predominance of IgG1, which has roles in the Th2 (humoral) response, and IgG2a, which participates in cellular cytotoxicity [42,56,57].
The glycolipid α-galactosylceramide (α-GC), a natural amphiphilic adjuvant molecule, has also been exploited for the design of self-assembled lipid nanocarriers. Synthetic α-GC can activate invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells through binding to TCRs, which then triggers the release of immunostimulatory cytokines [58,59]. A liposomal nanovaccine combining the sialyl-Tn (sTn) antigen and the α-GC glycolipid as a built-in adjuvant proved to be very effective in stimulating the IgM-to-IgG switch of anti-sTn antibodies [43]. Similarly, the Tn glycoantigen was covalently attached through the carbamate moiety of α-GC and co-formulated within liposomes with a diameter between 100 and 400 nm to generate a self-adjuvated vaccine that produced robust anti-Tn IgG antibody responses and enhanced affinity maturation, a key process to generate antibodies with increased affinity, avidity and ability to neutralize invading pathogens [44]. Another liposomal vaccine formulation with the S. pneumoniae serotype 14 polysaccharide (Pn14PS) and a glycolipid derived from α-GC (PBS57), known as an iNKT cell activator, led to high levels of IgG against the S. pneumoniae antigen upon immunization in mice [45]. Notably, the IgG titers induced by this fully synthetic formulation were higher than those observed with the commercialized Prevnar13 vaccine, a 13-valent pneumococcal glycoconjugate vaccine using the protein CRM197 as an immunogenic carrier [45,60]. This study showed that not only is the α-GC critical for inducing a robust humoral response, but the liposomal nanostructure also plays an important role for the high production of anti-Pn14PS IgG [45].
The TLR4 agonist MPLA, an analog of lipid A of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, has also been harnessed for the design of lipid nanocarriers for synthetic saccharide antigens [61]. The activation of membrane-bound TLR4 of macrophages and dendritic cells by MPLA leads to the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which create a microenvironment conducive to antigen presentation and the recruitment of immune cells [61,62,63]. Additionally, MPLA stimulates the production of antigen-specific antibodies by B-cells, contributing to long-lasting humoral immunity [63]. Owing to these immunostimulant properties, MPLA has been investigated as a potential carrier for polysaccharides. For instance, a tetrasaccharide derived from the extremity lipoarabinomannan (LAM) capsular polysaccharide of M. tuberculosis was conjugated to MPLA, which was then incorporated into liposomes composed of distearoylphosphatidylcholine and cholesterol, yielding a robust IgG antibody response against the carbohydrate component upon immunization in mice [46]. Additionally, α-2,9-polysialic acid from the capsular polysaccharide of N. meningitidis group C was conjugated to MPLA. A high secretion of anti-sialic acid IgG was measured upon immunization in mice, with mainly IgG2b and IgG2c isotypes, which are important for the T-independent response and the Th1 (cellular) response, respectively [46,47,56,64]. Furthermore, the antisera bound avidly to the capsular polysaccharide of N. meningitidis group C cells, showing that the antibodies can be directed to the bacteria [47]. MPLA was also investigated as a potential carrier molecule and natural enhancer for producing a fully synthetic glycoconjugate vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. This study revealed that liposomes incorporating MPLA conjugated to GM3, a glycoantigen expressed on melanoma and other cancer cells, produced a robust IgG antibody response in mice, with IgG3 as a main subclass [48]. These examples highlight the great potential of MPLA as a carrier for glycoantigen owing to its self-adjuvating properties.

3.2. Gold Nanoparticles

Inorganic nanoparticles, including gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and silica nanoparticles, have gained attention for their potential use in vaccine development due to their physicochemical properties that improve antigen stability and targeting [65,66,67]. Inorganic nanoparticles can be easily functionalized, are usually biocompatible, and can be customized in terms of their shape and size [65]. These characteristics modulate their recognition and uptake by APCs, with larger spheric AuNPs being demonstrated to be more effective for antibody production [32]. For example, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-Tn complexes, with different densities of the glycoantigen, were conjugated to 5 to 20 nm spherical AuNPs (Table 2). The resulting nanoparticle-based glycoconjugate vaccine elicited a robust antigen-specific immune response, as evidenced by the ability of the resulting antibodies to recognize naturally occurring Tn-antigen glycans and mucins found on mammalian cells [68]. Notably, the density of the Tn antigen, which plays an important role in B-cell activation, conjugated on the PEG chain had a significant impact on the immune response. In fact, the highest IgG titers were reported for glyco-AuNPs with PEG25Tn25 and PEG80Tn20 [68]. Additionally, three to five nm spherical AuNPs coated with a peptide derived from the C3d protein used as a B-cell adjuvant and a peptide derived from tumor-associated mucin 4 (MUC4) and conjugated with Thomsen–Friedenreich (TF; Gal-GalNAc) were found to elicit anti-TF IgM and IgG antibodies upon immunization in mice [69].
AuNPs have also been investigated for the development of bacterial glycoconjugate vaccines. In a recent study, a synthetic tetrasaccharide epitope related to the S. pneumoniae serotype 14 polysaccharide (Pn14PS) was conjugated to two nm spherical AuNPs in combination with a T helper peptide (OVA323–339), and this formulation was injected subcutaneously in mice [70]. This resulted in the robust production of specific anti-Pn14PS IgG antibodies. Moreover, splenocytes isolated from these immunized mice showed increased TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-5 secretion upon stimulation with OVA323–339, indicating the activation of memory T-cells [70]. Similarly, fragments of serotype 14 (Pn14PS) and 19F (Pn19F) of S. pneumoniae and a T helper peptide (OVA323–339) were linked to AuNPs [71]. Interestingly, when mice were immunized with these two nm AuNPs, the presence of both Pn19F and Pn14PS on the same AuNPs significantly increased specific IgG antibody levels against Pn14PS compared to nanoparticles displaying Pn14PS alone. In sharp contrast, no anti-Pn19F IgG was generated, suggesting that the use of a longer polysaccharide fragment with multiple repeating units may be necessary to create a conformational epitope that can effectively activate the immune system [71]. In another study, the terminal-branched hexaarabinofuranoside fragment (Ara6) from lipoarabinomannan and arabinogalactan were conjugated to AuNPs and evaluated in rabbits [72]. These polysaccharides constitute the primary component of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the etiologic agent of tuberculosis [73]. The antisera of immunized rabbits showed high levels of anti-Ara6 specific antibodies that bind to the surface of Mycobacteria cells [72]. Overall, these studies highlight that AuNPs demonstrate significant potential as a delivery nanoplatform for glycoantigens for vaccines to prevent bacterial infections and fight cancers.

3.3. Virus-like Particles

Virus-like particles (VLPs) are composed of self-assembling proteins usually originating from viral capsid proteins that mimic the structure of viruses, but lack genetic materials, making them safe vaccines [74]. VLPs can display multiple copies of the antigen in a repetitive manner on their surface, promoting the recognition, uptake and activation of APCs. These proteinaceous nanoparticles have been successful in eliciting strong immune responses against the grafted antigen and are currently used in human vaccines, as exemplified with the licensed VLP-based vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B and E, malaria and coronavirus [74,75].
Bacteriophage Qβ is a single-stranded RNA virus known to infect Gram-negative bacteria by their pili and has been used for the design of VLPs for antigen delivery, including glycoantigens [76,77]. In a study, MUC1-TF and MUC1-sTn glycopeptides were linked to bacteriophage Qβ VLPs by amide coupling, and the immunogenicity of these nanoparticles was evaluated in transgenic mice expressing human MUC1 (Table 3) [78]. The sera IgG antibodies generated in response to the Qβ-MUC1-TF construct exhibited a stronger binding affinity to the B16-MUC1 melanoma cells, compared to the IgG antibodies induced upon immunization with the soluble forms of unglycosylated MUC1 peptide or MUC1-sTn, highlighting the key contribution of the VLP nanocarrier. Furthermore, vaccination with Qβ-MUC1-TF provided significant protection against cancer cells in a model of tumor metastasis [78].
Another study demonstrated that presenting the Tn glycoantigen on bacteriophage Qβ VLP triggers strong humoral immune responses against the glycoantigen. The impact of different adjuvants, exposition of the antigens and vaccine dosage on the intensity and the isotype antibodies were also investigated. It was observed that the local concentration of antigens at the injection site, rather than the overall dose administered, was an important factor for generating high Tn-specific IgG levels [79]. The IgG antibodies generated showed high levels of specificity and affinity towards endogenous Tn antigens located on the surface of human leukemia cells, supporting the potential of the Qβ-Tn nanovaccine to fight cancers [79]. The conjugate MUC1-β-TF with bacteriophage Qβ carrier triggered the production of high levels of IgG that could recognize diverse glycoforms of the tumor-associated MUC1 antigen. These antibodies were also able to target and eliminate tumor cells [80]. The bacteriophage Qβ nanocarrier was also evaluated for the delivery of bacterial polysaccharides. Synthetic fragments of S. pneumoniae serotype 3 and 14 capsular polysaccharides were conjugated onto bacteriophage Qβ VLPs by copper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition, which was possible because of the addition of an N-hydroxysuccinimide-alkyne linker on the primary amine of the carrier. These glycoconjugates stimulated specific IgG against both glycoantigens and protected mice against S. pneumoniae infections [81]. As a proof of concept, the capsular polysaccharide of serotype II (PSII) Streptrococcus agalactiae was conjugated Qβ, and it was observed that a single dose of this glycoconjugate nanovaccine elicits the robust production of IgG and opsonic antibodies against the PSII [82].
The capsid from the cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) was also used as a carrier for synthetic saccharide antigens in the context of cancer immunotherapy. The Tn antigen was conjugated on the CPMV capsid by means of an orthogonal conjugation between a maleimide group on the sugar unit and two non-native cysteine residues on the VLP [83]. When injected to mice subcutaneously, this formulation triggered a strong immune response, with sera IgG antibodies effectively interacting with Tn antigens on the surface of breast cancer cells [83]. These studies indicate that VLPs, which have been proven to be efficient for the delivery of proteinaceous antigens, can also be exploited for the delivery of synthetic glycoantigens.

3.4. Dendrimers

Dendrimers are highly branched polymers with defined three-dimensional architectures and sizes that lead to distinctive chemical and biological properties [84]. Their surface can be easily functionalized, facilitating the orthogonal conjugation of various molecules, including oligosaccharides [84]. Along with their capacity to stimulate the immune system through their surface multivalency, the flexibility of dendrimers enables the generation of precise nanostructures with tailored characteristics, making nanomaterials appealing for vaccination [84,85]. For example, a cluster of three Tn antigens containing a T-cell epitope from the poliovirus (PV) was linked to a lysine scaffold to generate a highly branched dendrimer (Table 4). Upon immunization in mice, high levels of anti-Tn IgG that recognize cancer cells were produced and provided protection in a tumor challenge study [86]. Subsequently, Lo-Man and colleagues investigated the effects of using different residues for presenting the Tn glycoantigen, such as serine (Ser), threonine (Thr) and homoserine (hSer) [87]. While the antibodies generated with the unnatural residue Tn-hSer did not recognized tumor cell lines, the ones from mice immunized with the Tn-Ser and Tn-Thr led to anti-Tn antibodies that avidly bind tumor cell lines [87]. Subsequently, the T-cell epitope from PV was replaced by epitopes derived from tetanus toxoid (TT830–844) and the Pan DR ‘universal’ T helper epitope (PADRE) for a more humanized formulation. Both vaccine formulations elicited high titers of Tn-specific antibodies [87]. The antibodies from the TT(830–844)-functionalized dendrimers recognized and promoted the killing of tumor cell lines [87]. Finally, the TT830–844 formulation was prepared under GMP conditions and evaluated in a phase I clinical trial for its potential usage as a breast cancer therapeutic vaccine [88]. The results demonstrated that this fully synthetic vaccine formulation elicited the production of anti-Tn IgG in all immunized individuals without any significant side effects. Furthermore, these antibodies were able to recognize cancer cell lines presenting the Tn glycoantigen and to eliminate cancer cells by the mobilization and activation of the complement system [89]. To the best of our knowledge, no additional clinical trials were conducted with this formulation.

4. Chemical Strategies for the Conjugation of Synthetic Glycoantigens to Nanocarriers

The covalent attachment of antigenic polysaccharides purified from pathogens to carrier proteins has been historically achieved through reductive amination between the amine groups on the exposed Lys side chains and the carbonyl groups of the carbohydrates [48,90]. Alternatively, polysaccharide activation with 1-cyano-4-dimethylaminopyridine tetrafluoroborate (CDAP) and subsequent conjugation onto the Lys amine groups have also been exploited [91]. For example, the approved pneumococcal vaccines PCV7 (Pfizer) and Pneumosil (Serum Institute of India) are obtained from the conjugation of S. pneumoniae CPS to CRM197 through reductive amination [42,90,92] and CDAP chemistry [93], respectively. While robust, these approaches can prove inefficient and do not allow for the precise loading and orientation of the antigens [94]. The low selectivity of reductive amination can also result in undesired molecular cross-linking. Moreover, the isolation of polysaccharides from bacterial pathogens does not result in homogenous glycoconjugates and often requires a further chemical transformation for covalent linkage to immunogenic carriers. The need for higher levels of versatility and control over glycan structure, antigen density, purity and homogeneity has encouraged the use of synthetic glycans [48,90]. Additionally, de novo synthesis eliminates the risks associated with pathogen contamination caused by improper purification when using biological material [95].

4.1. Preparation of Synthetic Glycoantigens

Synthetic glycans offer key advantages over polysaccharides isolated from living organisms for the preparation of glycoconjugate nanovaccines, including stereochemical control and customized functionalization [96]. Synthetic glycans can display a diversity of unnatural functionalities intended for the ligation of the nanocarriers, including alkyne, aldehyde and azido groups [97]. Nonetheless, the synthesis of oligosaccharides remains complex and challenging. Glycans are usually obtained through linear multistep and/or convergent synthesis [96], whereas alternative strategies, such as one-pot synthesis, solid-phase synthesis and enzyme-assisted synthesis, have shown great potential [98]. For instance, two analogs of the tumor-associated Lewis Y (Ley) glycoantigen were synthesized through multiple cycles of orthogonal deprotection and glycosylation in a single reaction vessel [99]. This automated method exploited the variations in anomeric center reactivity amongst protected thioglycoside building blocks and harnessed the activation of their thiols [96]. These synthetic glycans were then modified with disuccinimidal glutarate to obtain active esters for coupling to the primary amines of the protein KLH [99]. By exploiting the regiospecificity and stereoselectivity of glycosyltransferases and glycosidases, enzymatic biosynthesis can be combined with chemical synthesis to obtain pure and homogenous glycoantigens with a high yield [100,101]. Notably, enzyme-assisted synthesis can convert monosaccharides into specific oligosaccharides, without the use of protecting groups [102,103]. For example, a homogenous polysaccharide derived from Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W (NmW) CPS was prepared using a sequential one-pot multienzyme (OPME) reaction [100,101]. Starting with commercially available N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and galactose as building blocks, size-controlled semi-synthetic NmW oligosaccharides were assembled enzymatically [100].
Notably, glycans are often attached to the hydroxyl group of the side chain of Ser and Thr residues to mimic O-glycosylation, which is an important protein post-translational modification that participates in viral infection and that can be used to differentiate cancer cells from healthy cells by the immune system [104,105,106]. Usually, the glycans are first attached to the side chain before the subsequent insertion of the building block into the peptide chain assembled by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) [86]. Through repeated coupling and deprotection cycles, SPPS for allows the chemical synthesis of a diversity of glycopeptides that can be orthogonally conjugated to diverse nanocarriers upon cleavage from the solid support [107]. For SPPS, the reactive groups of the glycosylated amino acid are modified with orthogonal protecting groups, including acetyl (glycan) and Fmoc (N-terminus amine), providing the free carboxylic acid for coupling with the deprotected amine group of the elongated peptidyl-resin [95,108,109]. For example, a protected methylserine functionalized with the Tn antigen was incorporated into an 11-residue peptide derived from the MUC1 antigen through standard SPPS [104,105]. While being an efficient and versatile approach, SPPS requires the careful selection of the solid support, linker, protective groups and cleavage strategy [108,110]. Notably, the hydroxyl groups of the glycan usually need to be protected by acetylation to avoid side reactions, requiring deacetylation after cleavage from the solid support and adding additional steps to the synthesis scheme [95,108,109]. Moreover, the potential hydrolysis of the glycosidic linkages under the harsh acidic conditions of the cleavage of the peptide from the resin needs to be considered when elaborating a synthesis scheme for glycopeptides [109].
Overall, these approaches have allowed for the synthesis of diverse glycoantigens, either as oligosaccharides or glycopeptides, that adequately mimic the naturally occurring glycans on the cellular target, which can then be easily attached to the nanocarrier of choice. The chemical synthesis of glycans and glycoconjugates is a complex and vast subject that is beyond the scope of the present review, and several excellent and highly comprehensive reviews have been published over the years [6,98,111,112,113].

4.2. Conjugation of Glycans and Glycopeptides to Nanocarriers

As for polysaccharides isolated from bacteria, synthetic glycans can be attached to nanocarriers through reductive amination. This reaction takes place when a carbonyl group from the saccharide unit reacts with a primary amine on the carrier to form an imine (Schiff base), which is subsequently reduced to a secondary amine by reduction, often using NaBH3CN or NaBH4 (Figure 2) [114]. This process can sometimes be preceded by periodate oxidation to increase the number of available aldehyde groups on the glycans [11]. A reduction reaction can also take place between a synthetic glycan, or glycopeptide, and an inorganic nanocarrier, such as AuNPs, to form multivalent bonds. For example, the MUC4 glycopeptide antigen containing a thiol group was conjugated to gold through NaBH4 reduction, and the resulting glyco-AuNPs triggered a robust anti-glycan humoral response [69].
Synthetic glycoantigens can be linked to nanocarriers by means of the formation of an amide bond. This conjugation approach is often based on the use of 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) as a crosslinking molecule able to form amide bonds between a carboxylic acid and a primary amine without inserting itself into the final product (Figure 2) [115]. EDC reacts with a carboxylic group and forms an unstable o-acylisourea ester intermediate that promptly reacts with a primary amine, leading to the formation of the amide bond and the release of an isourea by-product [115]. The introduction of sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) stabilizes the reactive o-acylisourea intermediate through the formation of an NHS-ester, allowing for a higher reaction yield [115,116]. This strategy based on EDC chemistry was used for the synthesis of monovalent and tetravalent Tn-calixarene glycoconjugates, which induced robust anti-Tn IgG production in immunized mice [117].
Copper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), also known as “click chemistry”, has proven to be an efficient tool for the selective coupling of glycoantigens and glycopeptides to nanocarriers [102,103]. Using copper as a catalyst, this reaction involves the stereospecific formation of a stable triazole ring between the azide of one coupling partner and the alkyne moiety of the other (Figure 2) [102]. Notably, the lack of the azide group from virtually all natural compounds and its low reactivity in aqueous solution confer a high level of bio-orthogonality to this reaction [102,118,119]. For example, an azide-functionalized derivative of the tumor-associated carbohydrate TACA antigen GM3 was coupled to MPLA containing a propargyl group, resulting in a liposomal glycoconjugate nanovaccine [48]. As copper toxicity constitutes a notable concern, copper-free conditions and catalysts have been developed for biomedical applications, although lower yields and/or reaction rates are often observed [120]. Notably, the presence of a triazole link between the TA3Ha tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen and the Qβ bacteriophage VLP, used as the nanocarrier, significantly reduced the level of anti-TA3Ha antibodies in immunized mice, with some antibodies directed towards the triazole linker [121]. This observation emphasizes that the choice of linker between the saccharidic antigen and the nanocarrier is critical to achieve the desired immunogenicity of glycoconjugate nanovaccines.
The orthogonal maleimide-thiol Michael addition that leads to the formation of a stable thioether bond has also been employed for the preparation of glycoconjugates. For instance, a synthetic sulfhydryl derivative of the Shigella flexneri O-specific polysaccharide antigen was linked to a maleimide-functionalized lipopeptide (Pam3CAG) to generate self-adjuvanted glycoliposomes [39]. Due to the lower prevalence of thiols on proteins compared to primary amines, the maleimide-thiol addition has a higher specificity than reductive amination or EDC/NHS chemistry [122]. Moreover, since thiol groups can be generated either through the reduction of intrinsic disulfide bonds or through common addition reactions with primary amines, this reaction can be performed with a wide variety of nanocarriers [123,124]. Other coupling strategies have also been explored for the formation of covalent bonds between synthetic glycoantigens and nanocarriers. For example, a sialyl-Tn antigen displaying an azide moiety was linked to an α-galactosyl-ceramide (αGalCer) immunostimulating molecule through the hydrogenolysis of the azide and subsequent amidation of the amine with p-nitrophenylester [43].
Overall, the covalent attachment of synthetic glycans to nanocarriers can be realized through a diversity of ligation strategies, each with their own advantages and limitations (Table 5). A thorough examination of the physicochemical properties of the antigen, linker and nanocarrier, the reactive conditions, as well as the production time and costs is critical to elaborate the optimal conjugation strategy. Notably, it is known that the linker position, length and chemical structure affect the orientation of the glycoantigen grafted on the surface. In turn, this modulates the glycan’s presentation to immune receptors and influence the resulting immunogenicity of the glycoconjugates, as well as the binding affinity and specificity of the generated antibodies [125]. These observations further highlight the importance of carefully selecting the conjugation chemistry for the development of glycovaccines.

5. Conclusions

Glycans are highly prevalent on the cell surface of all living organisms, and they constitute key molecular targets for the development of subunit vaccines [6,7]. However, the use of soluble polysaccharides as vaccines leads to short-lived immune responses, as it induces T-cell-independent immunity [7,8,22]. Consequently, this approach fails to activate T-cells, a critical step for generating long-lasting immunity [23]. To address this limitation, saccharide antigens are usually attached to immunogenic protein carriers, albeit this approach complexifies production and can lead to undesirable immunogenic interference [12]. Recently, nanoparticle-based delivery systems have shown great potential to overcome these limitations [8,13]. Different types of nanoparticles, such as liposomes assembled from lipidic TLR agonists, gold nanoparticles, VLPs and dendrimers, have been explored for glycoconjugate vaccines. The versatility of nanoparticles and their ability to induce robust immune responses makes them attractive delivery platforms for vaccines and immunotherapies targeting glycoantigens. As research in this field continues to progress, we can expect further developments and innovative applications of nanoparticle-based glycoantigen delivery systems that could significantly improve the prevention of infectious diseases and the treatment of cancers. Notwithstanding, there are still some challenges to address in order to elicit the suitable immune response against glycoantigens, which will require a better understanding of the influence of the conjugation chemistry and of the chemical nature of the nanocarriers in the immune responses against the grafted glycans [25]. The conjugation chemistry and the linker both play a critical role in the presentation of the glycoantigen to immune receptors, which modulates the immunogenicity of the glycoconjugate. In some cases, the antibodies generated could be less specific and/or have a lower binding affinity toward the naturally occurring glycoantigens, requiring careful design. As a diversity of glycans are naturally present on human cells and the bacteria constituting our microbiome [128], synthetic glycoconjugate vaccines need to be carefully designed to address potential molecular mimicry between the pathogenic glycoantigen and the host’s glycans. Progress in fundamental glycobiology and in our understanding of how oligosaccharides interact with the immune system will further pave the way to more effective, safer and affordable glycoconjugate vaccines.

Author Contributions

M.-J.A. and L.M.T. made substantial contributions to the concept, literature review, drafting, preparation of the figures and writing of this review. M.C.-C., S.M., T.C.S. and S.B. contributed to the critical revision and writing of the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), grant RGPIN-2018-06209 (S.B.), by a Mitacs Accelerate (grant IT33124; S.B.) and by Glycovax Pharma Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data reported.

Acknowledgments

M.-J.A. and L.M.T. acknowledge scholarships from Mitacs. M.-J.A. would like to thank the research center at PROTEO-UQAM for its financial support, and M.C.-C. is a recipient of a Vanier scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Serge Moffet and Tze Chieh Shiao were employed by Glycovax Pharma Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Glycovax Pharma Inc. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

References

  1. Naran, K.; Nundalall, T.; Chetty, S.; Barth, S. Principles of Immunotherapy: Implications for Treatment Strategies in Cancer and Infectious Diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Anderluh, M.; Berti, F.; Bzducha-Wróbel, A.; Chiodo, F.; Colombo, C.; Compostella, F.; Durlik, K.; Ferhati, X.; Holmdahl, R.; Jovanovic, D.; et al. Recent advances on smart glycoconjugate vaccines in infections and cancer. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 4251–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vetter, V.; Denizer, G.; Friedland, L.R.; Krishnan, J.; Shapiro, M. Understanding modern-day vaccines: What you need to know. Ann. Med. 2018, 50, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pollard, A.J.; Bijker, E.M. A guide to vaccinology: From basic principles to new developments. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Waldman, A.D.; Fritz, J.M.; Lenardo, M.J. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: From T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Del Bino, L.; Østerlid, K.E.; Wu, D.-Y.; Nonne, F.; Romano, M.R.; Codée, J.; Adamo, R. Synthetic Glycans to Improve Current Glycoconjugate Vaccines and Fight Antimicrobial Resistance. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 15672–15716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stefanetti, G.; Borriello, F.; Richichi, B.; Zanoni, I.; Lay, L. Immunobiology of Carbohydrates: Implications for Novel Vaccine and Adjuvant Design Against Infectious Diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hulbert, S.W.; Desai, P.; Jewett, M.C.; DeLisa, M.P.; Williams, A.J. Glycovaccinology: The design and engineering of carbohydrate-based vaccine components. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 68, 108234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anderson, P.W.; Pichichero, M.E.; Insel, R.A.; Betts, R.; Eby, R.; Smith, D.H. Vaccines consisting of periodate-cleaved oligosaccharides from the capsule of Haemophilus influenzae type b coupled to a protein carrier: Structural and temporal requirements for priming in the human infant. J. Immunol. 1986, 137, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van der Put, R.M.F.; Metz, B.; Pieters, R.J. Carriers and Antigens: New Developments in Glycoconjugate Vaccines. Vaccines 2023, 11, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morais, V.; Suarez, N. Conjugation Mechanism for Pneumococcal Glycoconjugate Vaccines: Classic and Emerging Methods. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pichichero, M.E. Protein carriers of conjugate vaccines: Characteristics, development, and clinical trials. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2013, 9, 2505–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brisse, M.; Vrba, S.M.; Kirk, N.; Liang, Y.; Ly, H. Emerging Concepts and Technologies in Vaccine Development. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 583077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Al-Halifa, S.; Gauthier, L.; Arpin, D.; Bourgault, S.; Archambault, D. Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zottig, X.; Côté-Cyr, M.; Arpin, D.; Archambault, D.; Bourgault, S. Protein Supramolecular Structures: From Self-Assembly to Nanovaccine Design. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. D’Amico, C.; Fontana, F.; Cheng, R.; Santos, H.A. Development of vaccine formulations: Past, present, and future. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2021, 11, 353–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roy, R.; Mousavifar, L. Carrier diversity and chemical ligations in the toolbox for designing tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) as synthetic vaccine candidates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 3353–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Freitas, R.; Peixoto, A.; Ferreira, E.; Miranda, A.; Santos, L.L.; Ferreira, J.A. Immunomodulatory glycomedicine: Introducing next generation cancer glycovaccines. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 65, 108144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weyant, K.B.; Mills, D.C.; DeLisa, M.P. Engineering a new generation of carbohydrate-based vaccines. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2018, 19, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mettu, R.; Chen, C.-Y.; Wu, C.-Y. Synthetic carbohydrate-based vaccines: Challenges and opportunities. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Micoli, F.; Adamo, R.; Costantino, P. Protein Carriers for Glycoconjugate Vaccines: History, Selection Criteria, Characterization and New Trends. Molecules 2018, 23, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, D.; Shaikh, A.S.; Wang, F. Recent Advance in Tumor-associated Carbohydrate Antigens (TACAs)-based Antitumor Vaccines. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 850–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Avci, F.Y.; Li, X.; Tsuji, M.; Kasper, D.L. A mechanism for glycoconjugate vaccine activation of the adaptive immune system and its implications for vaccine design. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rappuoli, R.; De Gregorio, E.; Costantino, P. On the mechanisms of conjugate vaccines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Avci, F.; Berti, F.; Dull, P.; Hennessey, J.; Pavliak, V.; Prasad, A.K.; Vann, W.; Wacker, M.; Marcq, O. Glycoconjugates: What It Would Take To Master These Well-Known yet Little-Understood Immunogens for Vaccine Development. mSphere 2019, 4, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goldberg, B.S.; Ackerman, M.E. Antibody-mediated complement activation in pathology and protection. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2020, 98, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kappler, K.; Hennet, T. Emergence and significance of carbohydrate-specific antibodies. Genes Immun. 2020, 21, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fries, C.N.; Curvino, E.J.; Chen, J.-L.; Permar, S.R.; Fouda, G.G.; Collier, J.H. Advances in nanomaterial vaccine strategies to address infectious diseases impacting global health. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhu, G. Nanovaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 11, e1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Treuel, L.; Jiang, X.; Nienhaus, G.U. New views on cellular uptake and trafficking of manufactured nanoparticles. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 20120939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagy, N.A.; de Haas, A.M.; Geijtenbeek, T.B.H.; van Ree, R.; Tas, S.W.; van Kooyk, Y.; de Jong, E.C. Therapeutic Liposomal Vaccines for Dendritic Cell Activation or Tolerance. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 674048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Niikura, K.; Matsunaga, T.; Suzuki, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Yamaguchi, H.; Orba, Y.; Kawaguchi, A.; Hasegawa, H.; Kajino, K.; Ninomiya, T.; et al. Gold Nanoparticles as a Vaccine Platform: Influence of Size and Shape on Immunological Responses In Vitro and In Vivo. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3926–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matić, Z.; Šantak, M. Current view on novel vaccine technologies to combat human infectious diseases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 25–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chatzikleanthous, D.; O’Hagan, D.T.; Adamo, R. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for Delivery of Vaccine Adjuvants and Antigens: Toward Multicomponent Vaccines. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 2867–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Smith, C.L.; Richardson, B.; Rubsamen, M.; Cameron, M.J.; Cameron, C.M.; Canaday, D.H. Adjuvant AS01 activates human monocytes for costimulation and systemic inflammation. Vaccine 2024, 42, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guimarães, D.; Cavaco-Paulo, A.; Nogueira, E. Design of liposomes as drug delivery system for therapeutic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 601, 120571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elhabak, M.; Shebl, R.I.; Omar, S. Modulating Liposomal Nanoparticles to Enhance Uptake and Targeting of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. Future Microbiol. 2023, 18, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, R.; Liu, Y.; Luo, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G. Liposome-Based Carbohydrate Vaccine for Simultaneously Eliciting Humoral and Cellular Antitumor Immunity. ACS Macro Lett. 2022, 11, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Said Hassane, F.; Phalipon, A.; Tanguy, M.; Guerreiro, C.; Bélot, F.; Frisch, B.; Mulard, L.A.; Schuber, F. Rational design and immunogenicity of liposome-based diepitope constructs: Application to synthetic oligosaccharides mimicking the Shigella flexneri 2a O-antigen. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5419–5426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buskas, T.; Ingale, S.; Boons, G.-J. Towards a Fully Synthetic Carbohydrate-Based Anticancer Vaccine: Synthesis and Immunological Evaluation of a Lipidated Glycopeptide Containing the Tumor-Associated Tn Antigen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5985–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martínez-Sáez, N.; Supekar, N.T.; Wolfert, M.A.; Bermejo, I.A.; Hurtado-Guerrero, R.; Asensio, J.L.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Busto, J.H.; Avenoza, A.; Boons, G.-J.; et al. Mucin architecture behind the immune response: Design, evaluation and conformational analysis of an antitumor vaccine derived from an unnatural MUC1 fragment. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ingale, S.; Wolfert, M.A.; Gaekwad, J.; Buskas, T.; Boons, G.J. Robust immune responses elicited by a fully synthetic three-component vaccine. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yin, X.-G.; Chen, X.-Z.; Sun, W.-M.; Geng, X.-S.; Zhang, X.-K.; Wang, J.; Ji, P.-P.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Baek, D.J.; Yang, G.-F.; et al. IgG Antibody Response Elicited by a Fully Synthetic Two-Component Carbohydrate-Based Cancer Vaccine Candidate with α-Galactosylceramide as Built-in Adjuvant. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 456–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Broecker, F.; Götze, S.; Hudon, J.; Rathwell, D.C.K.; Pereira, C.L.; Stallforth, P.; Anish, C.; Seeberger, P.H. Synthesis, Liposomal Formulation, and Immunological Evaluation of a Minimalistic Carbohydrate-α-GalCer Vaccine Candidate. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4918–4927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Deng, S.; Bai, L.; Reboulet, R.; Matthew, R.; Engler, D.A.; Teyton, L.; Bendelac, A.; Savage, P.B. A peptide-free, liposome-based oligosaccharide vaccine, adjuvanted with a natural killer T cell antigen, generates robust antibody responses in vivo. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1437–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L.; Feng, S.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Gu, G. Synthesis and Immunological Comparison of Differently Linked Lipoarabinomannan Oligosaccharide–Monophosphoryl Lipid A Conjugates as Antituberculosis Vaccines. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 12085–12096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liao, G.; Zhou, Z.; Suryawanshi, S.; Mondal, M.A.; Guo, Z. Fully Synthetic Self-Adjuvanting α-2,9-Oligosialic Acid Based Conjugate Vaccines Against Group C Meningitis. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, S.; Guo, Z. Carbohydrate-Monophosphoryl Lipid A Conjugates Are Fully Synthetic Self-Adjuvanting Cancer Vaccines Eliciting Robust Immune Responses in the Mouse. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fu, C.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Cai, H.; Xiao, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, H. Tumor-associated antigens: Tn antigen, sTn antigen, and T antigen. HLA 2016, 88, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kaur, A.; Kaushik, D.; Piplani, S.; Mehta, S.K.; Petrovsky, N.; Salunke, D.B. TLR2 Agonistic Small Molecules: Detailed Structure–Activity Relationship, Applications, and Future Prospects. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 233–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wiertz, E.; Van Gaans-van den Brink, J.; Gausepohl, H.; Prochnicka-Chalufour, A.; Hoogerhout, P.; Poolman, J. Identification of T cell epitopes occurring in a meningococcal class 1 outer membrane protein using overlapping peptides assembled with simultaneous multiple peptide synthesis. J. Exp. Med. 1992, 176, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Burchell, J.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Boshell, M.; Gendler, S.; Duhig, T. A short sequence, within the amino acid tandem repeat of a cancer-associated mucin, contains immunodominant epitopes. Int. J. Cancer 1989, 44, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gao, T.; Cen, Q.; Lei, H. A review on development of MUC1-based cancer vaccine. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 132, 110888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Perlmutter, R.M.; Hansburg, D.; Briles, D.E.; Nicolotti, R.A.; Davie, J.M. Subclass restriction of murine anti-carbohydrate antibodies. J. Immunol. 1978, 121, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lakshminarayanan, V.; Thompson, P.; Wolfert, M.A.; Buskas, T.; Bradley, J.M.; Pathangey, L.B.; Madsen, C.S.; Cohen, P.A.; Gendler, S.J.; Boons, G.J. Immune recognition of tumor-associated mucin MUC1 is achieved by a fully synthetic aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 tripartite vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Collins, A. IgG subclass co-expression brings harmony to the quartet model of murine IgG function. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016, 94, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ragupathi, G.; Gardner, J.R.; Livingston, P.O.; Gin, D.Y. Natural and synthetic saponin adjuvant QS-21 for vaccines against cancer. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2011, 10, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Croudace, J.E.; Curbishley, S.M.; Mura, M.; Willcox, C.R.; Illarionov, P.A.; Besra, G.S.; Adams, D.H.; Lammas, D.A. Identification of distinct human invariant natural killer T-cell response phenotypes to alpha-galactosylceramide. BMC Immunol. 2008, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Seino, K.I.; Taniguchi, M. 4.02—Innate Immunity: NKT Cells. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Kamerling, H., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  60. Reinert, R.R.; Paradiso, P.; Fritzell, B. Advances in pneumococcal vaccines: The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine received market authorization in Europe. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2010, 9, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Erridge, C.; Bennett-Guerrero, E.; Poxton, I.R. Structure and function of lipopolysaccharides. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baldridge, J.R.; Crane, R.T. Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) Formulations for the Next Generation of Vaccines. Methods 1999, 19, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Brunner, R.; Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Pali-Schöll, I. The ABC of clinical and experimental adjuvants—A brief overview. Immunol. Lett. 2010, 128, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nazeri, S.; Zakeri, S.; Mehrizi, A.A.; Sardari, S.; Djadid, N.D. Measuring of IgG2c isotype instead of IgG2a in immunized C57BL/6 mice with Plasmodium vivax TRAP as a subunit vaccine candidate in order to correct interpretation of Th1 versus Th2 immune response. Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 216, 107944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mateu Ferrando, R.; Lay, L.; Polito, L. Gold nanoparticle-based platforms for vaccine development. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2020, 38, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sengupta, A.; Azharuddin, M.; Al-Otaibi, N.; Hinkula, J. Efficacy and Immune Response Elicited by Gold Nanoparticle-Based Nanovaccines Against Infectious Diseases. Vaccines 2022, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hess, K.L.; Medintz, I.L.; Jewell, C.M. Designing inorganic nanomaterials for vaccines and immunotherapies. Nano Today 2019, 27, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Parry, A.L.; Clemson, N.A.; Ellis, J.; Bernhard, S.S.R.; Davis, B.G.; Cameron, N.R. ‘Multicopy Multivalent’ Glycopolymer-Stabilized Gold Nanoparticles as Potential Synthetic Cancer Vaccines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9362–9365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brinãs, R.P.; Sundgren, A.; Sahoo, P.; Morey, S.; Rittenhouse-Olson, K.; Wilding, G.E.; Deng, W.; Barchi, J.J., Jr. Design and Synthesis of Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles Bearing Tumor-Associated Glycopeptide Antigens as Potential Cancer Vaccines. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Safari, D.; Marradi, M.; Chiodo, F.; Dekker, H.A.T.; Shan, Y.; Adamo, R.; Oscarson, S.; Rijkers, G.T.; Lahmann, M.; Kamerling, J.P.; et al. Gold nanoparticles as carriers for a synthetic Streptococcus pneumoniae type 14 conjugate vaccine. Nanomedicine 2012, 7, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vetro, M.; Safari, D.; Fallarini, S.; Salsabila, K.; Lahmann, M.; Penadés, S.; Lay, L.; Marradi, M.; Compostella, F. Preparation and immunogenicity of gold glyco-nanoparticles as antipneumococcal vaccine model. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Burygin, G.L.; Abronina, P.I.; Podvalnyy, N.M.; Staroverov, S.A.; Kononov, L.O.; Dykman, L.A. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of glyco-gold nanoparticles carrying synthetic mycobacterial hexaarabinofuranoside. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mishra, A.K.; Driessen, N.N.; Appelmelk, B.J.; Besra, G.S. Lipoarabinomannan and related glycoconjugates: Structure, biogenesis and role in Mycobacterium tuberculosis physiology and host-pathogen interaction. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 1126–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nooraei, S.; Bahrulolum, H.; Hoseini, Z.S.; Katalani, C.; Hajizade, A.; Easton, A.J.; Ahmadian, G. Virus-like particles: Preparation, immunogenicity and their roles as nanovaccines and drug nanocarriers. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hadj Hassine, I.; Ben M’hadheb, M.; Almalki, M.A.; Gharbi, J. Virus-like particles as powerful vaccination strategy against human viruses. Rev. Med. Virol. 2024, 34, e2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gorzelnik, K.V.; Cui, Z.; Reed, C.A.; Jakana, J.; Young, R.; Zhang, J. Asymmetric cryo-EM structure of the canonical Allolevivirus Qβ reveals a single maturation protein and the genomic ssRNA in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11519–11524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Roldão, A.; Mellado, M.C.; Castilho, L.R.; Carrondo, M.J.; Alves, P.M. Virus-like particles in vaccine development. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2010, 9, 1149–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, X.; McKay, C.; Pett, C.; Yu, J.; Schorlemer, M.; Ramadan, S.; Lang, S.; Behren, S.; Westerlind, U.; Finn, M.G.; et al. Synthesis and Immunological Evaluation of Disaccharide Bearing MUC-1 Glycopeptide Conjugates with Virus-like Particles. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14, 2176–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yin, Z.; Comellas-Aragones, M.; Chowdhury, S.; Bentley, P.; Kaczanowska, K.; Benmohamed, L.; Gildersleeve, J.C.; Finn, M.G.; Huang, X. Boosting immunity to small tumor-associated carbohydrates with bacteriophage qβ capsids. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, X.; McFall-Boegeman, H.; Rashidijahanabad, Z.; Liu, K.; Pett, C.; Yu, J.; Schorlemer, M.; Ramadan, S.; Behren, S.; Westerlind, U.; et al. Synthesis and immunological evaluation of the unnatural β-linked mucin-1 Thomsen-Friedenreich conjugate. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 2448–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Polonskaya, Z.; Deng, S.; Sarkar, A.; Kain, L.; Comellas-Aragones, M.; McKay, C.S.; Kaczanowska, K.; Holt, M.; McBride, R.; Palomo, V.; et al. T cells control the generation of nanomolar-affinity anti-glycan antibodies. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1491–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Carboni, F.; Cozzi, R.; Romagnoli, G.; Tuscano, G.; Balocchi, C.; Buffi, G.; Bodini, M.; Brettoni, C.; Giusti, F.; Marchi, S.; et al. Proof of concept for a single-dose Group B Streptococcus vaccine based on capsular polysaccharide conjugated to Qβ virus-like particles. NPJ Vaccines 2023, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Miermont, A.; Barnhill, H.; Strable, E.; Lu, X.; Wall, K.A.; Wang, Q.; Finn, M.G.; Huang, X. Cowpea mosaic virus capsid: A promising carrier for the development of carbohydrate based antitumor vaccines. Chemistry 2008, 14, 4939–4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chowdhury, S.; Toth, I.; Stephenson, R.J. Dendrimers in vaccine delivery: Recent progress and advances. Biomaterials 2022, 280, 121303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shiao, T.C.; Roy, R. Glycodendrimers as functional antigens and antitumor vaccines. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lo-Man, R.; Vichier-Guerre, S.; Bay, S.; Dériaud, E.; Cantacuzène, D.; Leclerc, C. Anti-tumor immunity provided by a synthetic multiple antigenic glycopeptide displaying a tri-Tn glycotope. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 2849–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lo-Man, R.; Vichier-Guerre, S.; Perraut, R.; Dériaud, E.; Huteau, V.; BenMohamed, L.; Diop, O.M.; Livingston, P.O.; Bay, S.; Leclerc, C. A fully synthetic therapeutic vaccine candidate targeting carcinoma-associated Tn carbohydrate antigen induces tumor-specific antibodies in nonhuman primates. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4987–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Laubreton, D.; Bay, S.; Sedlik, C.; Artaud, C.; Ganneau, C.; Dériaud, E.; Viel, S.; Puaux, A.L.; Amigorena, S.; Gérard, C.; et al. The fully synthetic MAG-Tn3 therapeutic vaccine containing the tetanus toxoid-derived TT830-844 universal epitope provides anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2016, 65, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rosenbaum, P.; Artaud, C.; Bay, S.; Ganneau, C.; Campone, M.; Delaloge, S.; Gourmelon, C.; Loirat, D.; Medioni, J.; Pein, F.; et al. The fully synthetic glycopeptide MAG-Tn3 therapeutic vaccine induces tumor-specific cytotoxic antibodies in breast cancer patients. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2020, 69, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Costantino, P.; Rappuoli, R.; Berti, F. The design of semi-synthetic and synthetic glycoconjugate vaccines. Expert. Opin. Drug Discov. 2011, 6, 1045–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lees, A.; Barr, J.F.; Gebretnsae, S. Activation of Soluble Polysaccharides with 1-Cyano-4-Dimethylaminopyridine Tetrafluoroborate (CDAP) for Use in Protein–Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccines and Immunological Reagents. III Optimization of CDAP Activation. Vaccines 2020, 8, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kay, E.; Cuccui, J.; Wren, B.W. Recent advances in the production of recombinant glycoconjugate vaccines. NPJ Vaccines 2019, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Duke, J.A.; Avci, F.Y. Emerging vaccine strategies against the incessant pneumococcal disease. NPJ Vaccines 2023, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gildersleeve, J.C.; Oyelaran, O.; Simpson, J.T.; Allred, B. Improved procedure for direct coupling of carbohydrates to proteins via reductive amination. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 1485–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, L.; Wang, N.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, X.; Yan, Z.; Shao, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Fu, C. Therapeutic peptides: Current applications and future directions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Seeberger, P.H.; Finney, N.; Rabuka, D.; Bertozzi, C.R. Chemical and Enzymatic Synthesis of Glycans and Glycoconjugates. In Essentials of Glycobiology, 2nd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Freeze, H.H., Stanley, P., Bertozzi, C.R., Hart, G.W., Etzler, M.E., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  97. Pickens, C.J.; Johnson, S.N.; Pressnall, M.M.; Leon, M.A.; Berkland, C.J. Practical Considerations, Challenges, and Limitations of Bioconjugation via Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition. Bioconjug Chem. 2018, 29, 686–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Seeberger, P.H.; Overkleeft, H.S. Chemical Synthesis of Glycans and Glycoconjugates. In Essentials of Glycobiology, 3rd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Darvill, A.G., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 679–681. [Google Scholar]
  99. Li, Q.; Jiang, W.; Guo, J.; Jaiswal, M.; Guo, Z. Synthesis of Lewis Y Analogues and Their Protein Conjugates for Structure-Immunogenicity Relationship Studies of Lewis Y Antigen. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 13232–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, R.; Yu, H.; Muthana, S.M.; Freedberg, D.I.; Chen, X. Size-Controlled Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Homogeneous Oligosaccharides of Neisseria meningitidis W Capsular Polysaccharide. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 2791–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Adegbite, A.; McCarthy, P.C. Recent and Future Advances in the Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Homogeneous Glycans for Bacterial Glycoconjugate Vaccine Development. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hein, C.D.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, D. Click chemistry, a powerful tool for pharmaceutical sciences. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25, 2216–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Stefanetti, G.; Saul, A.; MacLennan, C.A.; Micoli, F. Click Chemistry Applied to the Synthesis of Salmonella Typhimurium O-Antigen Glycoconjugate Vaccine on Solid Phase with Sugar Recycling. Bioconjug Chem. 2015, 26, 2507–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Reily, C.; Stewart, T.J.; Renfrow, M.B.; Novak, J. Glycosylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 346–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Dell, A.; Galadari, A.; Sastre, F.; Hitchen, P. Similarities and differences in the glycosylation mechanisms in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Int. J. Microbiol. 2010, 2010, 148178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Roy, R. Cancer cells and viruses share common glycoepitopes: Exciting opportunities toward combined treatments. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1292588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Shivatare, S.S.; Shivatare, V.S.; Wong, C.H. Glycoconjugates: Synthesis, Functional Studies, and Therapeutic Developments. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 15603–15671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Stawikowski, M.; Fields, G.B. Introduction to peptide synthesis. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2012, 69, 18.1.1–18.1.13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Weishaupt, M.; Eller, S.; Seeberger, P.H. Solid phase synthesis of oligosaccharides. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 478, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Babych, M.; Bertheau-Mailhot, G.; Zottig, X.; Dion, J.; Gauthier, L.; Archambault, D.; Bourgault, S. Engineering and evaluation of amyloid assemblies as a nanovaccine against the Chikungunya virus. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19547–19556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lv, Z.; Liu, H.; Hao, H.; Rahman, F.U.; Zhang, Y. Chemical synthesis of oligosaccharides and their application in new drug research. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 249, 115164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chabre, Y.M.; Roy, R. Multivalent glycoconjugate syntheses and applications using aromatic scaffolds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4657–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, R.; Yu, H.; Chen, X. Recent progress in chemical synthesis of bacterial surface glycans. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 58, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lees, A.; Sen, G.; LopezAcosta, A. Versatile and efficient synthesis of protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines using aminooxy reagents and oxime chemistry. Vaccine 2006, 24, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rivera-Santiago, R.F.; Sriswasdi, S.; Harper, S.L.; Speicher, D.W. Probing structures of large protein complexes using zero-length cross-linking. Methods 2015, 89, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Farkas, P.; Cizova, A.; Bekesova, S.; Bystricky, S. Comparison of EDC and DMTMM efficiency in glycoconjugate preparation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 60, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Geraci, C.; Consoli, G.M.; Galante, E.; Bousquet, E.; Pappalardo, M.; Spadaro, A. Calix[4]arene decorated with four Tn antigen glycomimetic units and P3CS immunoadjuvant: Synthesis, characterization, and anticancer immunological evaluation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Stefanetti, G.; Allan, M.; Usera, A.; Micoli, F. Click chemistry compared to thiol chemistry for the synthesis of site-selective glycoconjugate vaccines using CRM(197) as carrier protein. Glycoconj. J. 2020, 37, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bricha, S.; Cote-Cyr, M.; Tremblay, T.; Nguyen, P.T.; St-Louis, P.; Giguere, D.; Archambault, D.; Bourgault, S. Synthetic Multicomponent Nanovaccines Based on the Molecular Co-assembly of beta-Peptides Protect Against Influenza A Virus. ACS Infect. Dis. 2023, 9, 1232–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kim, E.; Koo, H. Biomedical applications of copper-free click chemistry: In vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 7835–7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yin, Z.; Chowdhury, S.; McKay, C.; Baniel, C.; Wright, W.S.; Bentley, P.; Kaczanowska, K.; Gildersleeve, J.C.; Finn, M.G.; BenMohamed, L.; et al. Significant Impact of Immunogen Design on the Diversity of Antibodies Generated by Carbohydrate-Based Anticancer Vaccine. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 2364–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lahnsteiner, M.; Kastner, A.; Mayr, J.; Roller, A.; Keppler, B.K.; Kowol, C.R. Improving the Stability of Maleimide-Thiol Conjugation for Drug Targeting. Chemistry 2020, 26, 15867–15870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Nino-Ramirez, V.A.; Insuasty-Cepeda, D.S.; Rivera-Monroy, Z.J.; Maldonado, M. Evidence of Isomerization in the Michael-Type Thiol-Maleimide Addition: Click Reaction between L-Cysteine and 6-Maleimidehexanoic Acid. Molecules 2022, 27, 5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sarkar, B.; Jayaraman, N. Glycoconjugations of Biomolecules by Chemical Methods. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 570185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Grant, O.C.; Smith, H.M.; Firsova, D.; Fadda, E.; Woods, R.J. Presentation, presentation, presentation! Molecular-level insight into linker effects on glycan array screening data. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Verez-Bencomo, V.; Fernandez-Santana, V.; Hardy, E.; Toledo, M.E.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Heynngnezz, L.; Rodriguez, A.; Baly, A.; Herrera, L.; Izquierdo, M.; et al. A synthetic conjugate polysaccharide vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b. Science 2004, 305, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Gober, I.N.; Riemen, A.J.; Villain, M. Sequence sensitivity and pH dependence of maleimide conjugated N-terminal cysteine peptides to thiazine rearrangement. J. Pept. Sci. 2021, 27, e3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.-X.; Chen, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the immune processing of (A) polysaccharides and (B) glycoconjugates leading to cytokine production and antibody secretion. Glycoconjugates can be processed intracellularly and are displayed as glycopeptides on B-cell via MHC II, allowing for recognition by T-cells. Co-stimulation between B- and T-cells leads to cytokine release and B-cell activation. This T-cell-dependent response generates high-affinity, class-switched antibodies and memory cells. BCR: B-cell receptor; MHC: Major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T-cell receptor; IL: Interleukin. (C) Schematic representation of glycoconjugate nanoparticles. (1) Liposomes that can incorporate immune activators such as Pam2, Pam3, alpha galactosylceramide, and MPLA. (2) Gold nanoparticles. (3) Virus-like particles, such as bacteriophage Q beta (PDB: 1QBE). (4) Dendrimers such as tetravalent lysine core dendrimer, represented here with N-acetylgalactosamine.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the immune processing of (A) polysaccharides and (B) glycoconjugates leading to cytokine production and antibody secretion. Glycoconjugates can be processed intracellularly and are displayed as glycopeptides on B-cell via MHC II, allowing for recognition by T-cells. Co-stimulation between B- and T-cells leads to cytokine release and B-cell activation. This T-cell-dependent response generates high-affinity, class-switched antibodies and memory cells. BCR: B-cell receptor; MHC: Major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T-cell receptor; IL: Interleukin. (C) Schematic representation of glycoconjugate nanoparticles. (1) Liposomes that can incorporate immune activators such as Pam2, Pam3, alpha galactosylceramide, and MPLA. (2) Gold nanoparticles. (3) Virus-like particles, such as bacteriophage Q beta (PDB: 1QBE). (4) Dendrimers such as tetravalent lysine core dendrimer, represented here with N-acetylgalactosamine.
Vaccines 12 01290 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the strategies for glycan antigens’ chemical conjugation to nanocarriers. EDC: 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide; NHS: sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide.
Figure 2. Overview of the strategies for glycan antigens’ chemical conjugation to nanocarriers. EDC: 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide; NHS: sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide.
Vaccines 12 01290 g002
Table 1. Liposomal carriers for the delivery of bacterial and cancer glycoantigens.
Table 1. Liposomal carriers for the delivery of bacterial and cancer glycoantigens.
NanocarrierAntigenConjugation ChemistryAdditional AdjuvantImmune ResponsesRef.
CholesterolTnCopper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)CpGAnti-Tn IgG production
IFN-γ secretion
[38]
Pam3CAGThree repeating units of O-antigen from S. flexneri and Influenza peptide (HA307–319)Thiol-maleimideNoneSpecific antibodies and protection against S. flexneri[39]
Pam3CysTn-YAF (T helper)C-term amide couplingNone or QS21Anti-Tn IgG production[40]
Pam3CysSK4T helper-
MUC1-Tn
Amide coupling on solid supportNoneAnti-MUC1-Tn IgG
Predominant IgG3
[41]
Pam2CysSK4 and Pam3CysSK4T helper-
MUC1-Tn
Amide coupling on solid supportNone or QS-21Anti-MUC1-Tn IgG higher with Pam3
Predominant IgG1 and IgG2a
[42]
α-galactosylceramidesTnAmide coupling via diselenoesterNoneAnti-sTn IgG production[43]
TnAmide couplingNoneAnti-Tn IgG production
Affinity maturation
[44]
PBS150Tetrasaccharide of S. pneumoniae serotype 14Amide couplingNoneSpecific IgG against S. pneumoniae 14[45]
Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA)Lipoarabinomannan of M. tuberculosisCopper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)NoneSpecific IgG against M. tuberculosis
Predominant IgG1
[46]
α-2,9-Polysialic acid capsular polysaccharide of N. meningitidis group CAmide couplingNone, Alumn, CFA or TiterMax GoldSpecific IgG against N. meningitis group C
Predominantly IgG2b and IgG2c
[47]
GM3Amide coupling or Copper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)None or TiterMax GoldAnti-GM3 IgG production
Predominant IgG3
[48]
CpG: unmethylated 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′; HA: hemagglutinin; Tn: N-acetylgalactosamine Thomsen nouveau; sTn: sialyl-Tn; CFA: complete Freund’s adjuvant.
Table 2. Gold nanoparticles as carriers for the delivery of glycoantigens.
Table 2. Gold nanoparticles as carriers for the delivery of glycoantigens.
NanocarrierAntigenConjugation ChemistryAdditional AdjuvantImmune ResponsesRef.
AuNPTnNaBH4 reductionNoneAnti-Tn IgG production
Recognition of mucins presenting different form of Tn
[68]
TF-MUC4 and C3d peptideNaBH4 reductionNoneAnti-MUC4-TF IgM and IgG production[69]
Oligosaccharide of S. pneumoniae serotype 14 and OVA323–339Oxidation reduction
(S-Au)
MPLA and Quil-AAnti-Pn14PS IgG production
TNF-α IL-4 and IL-5 production
[70]
Oligosaccharide of S. pneumoniae serotype 14 and 19F, and Ova323–339Oxidation reduction
(S-Au)
Quil-AAnti-Pn14PS IgG production[71]
Hexaarabinofuranoside fragment (Ara6) of lipoarabinomannan of M. tuberculosisOxidation reduction
(S-Au)
Complete FreundSpecific antibodies against Mycobacteria cells[72]
Legend: Tn: Thomsen nouveau; TF: Thomsen–Friedenreich; MUC4: mucin 4 peptide; OVA: ovalbumin; MPLA: monophosphoryl-Lipid A.
Table 3. VLPs as nanocarriers for the delivery of synthetic glycoantigens.
Table 3. VLPs as nanocarriers for the delivery of synthetic glycoantigens.
NanocarrierAntigenConjugation ChemistryAdditional AdjuvantImmune ResponsesRef.
Bacteriophage QβMUC1-TF and MUC1-sTnAmide couplingMPLAAnti-MUC1-TF and anti-MUC1-sTn IgG production
Protection against cancer cells
[78]
TnCopper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)Complete Freund or TiterMax Gold or AlumAnti-Tn IgG production and strong binding with human leukemia cells[79]
MUC1-β-TFAmide couplingMPLAAnti-MUC1-β-TF IgG production which can eliminate tumor cells[80]
Tetrasaccharide of S. pneumoniae serotype 3 et 14Copper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)αGCSpecific IgG against S. pneumoniae 3 and 14[81]
Capsular polysaccharide of S. agalactiae 2Reductive aminationAlumnSpecific IgG against S. agalactiae 2[82]
Cowpea Mosaic Virus
(CPMV)
TnThiol-maleimideComplete FreundAnti-Tn IgG production and strong binding with breast cancer cells[83]
Legend: MUC1, mucin 1 peptide; TF, Thomsen–Friedenreich; sTn, sialyl-Tn; MPLA, monophosphoryl lipid A; Tn, Thomsen nouveau; αGC, α-galactosylceramide.
Table 4. Dendrimeric carriers for the delivery of cancer glycoantigens.
Table 4. Dendrimeric carriers for the delivery of cancer glycoantigens.
NanocarrierAntigenConjugation ChemistryAdditional AdjuvantImmune ResponsesRef.
Tetravalent lysine core3Tn-PVAmide coupling on solid support (Pfp-ester)AlumnAnti-Tn IgG production
Protection against tumor
[86]
3Tn(S or T or hS)-PVAmide coupling on solid support (Pfp-ester)AlumnAnti-Tn IgG production and recognition of tumor cells[87]
3Tn-PADRE or 3Tn- TT830–844Amide coupling on solid support (Pfp-ester)Alumn and CpGAnti-Tn IgG production and recognition and killing of tumor cells[87]
3Tn-TT830–844Amide coupling on solid support (Pfp-ester)AS-15Anti-Tn IgG production and recognition and killing of tumor cells
IFN-y production
[88]
Legend: Tn: Thomsen nouveau; PV: polio virus peptide; Pfp: pentafluorophenyl; PADRE: Pan DR ‘universal’ T helper epitope; TT: tetanus toxoid peptide; CpG: unmethylated 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′.
Table 5. Chemical strategies for conjugation of glycans on nanocarriers.
Table 5. Chemical strategies for conjugation of glycans on nanocarriers.
Conjugation StrategyAdvantagesLimitationsRef.
Copper-mediated azide-alkyne cycloadditionOrthogonal reaction
Mild and simple reactive conditions
High yield
Stereospecific
Vast array of conjugation partners
Minimal, or no purification needed
Requires non-native azide and alkyne groups
Copper catalyst can be cytotoxic if not properly removed
Triazole linker can lead to low immunogenicity
Antibodies can target the triazole linker
[102,103,118,120,121]
Thiol-maleimide additionOrthogonal reaction
High yield
Mild reaction conditions
Side reactions can occur (thiazine formation)
Requires available thiol group and maleimide functionalization
[123,126,127]
Reductive aminationUbiquitous carbonyl groups on glycans
Useful for conjugation to peptide, protein and inorganic carriers
Variety of effective reducing agents
Low specificity
Heterogenicity of the final product
Undesirable cross-linkage
[69,70,71]
EDC/NHS ligationHigh yield and reaction rate
Carboxylic groups can be easily added to glycans
Short linker (amide bond)
Requires primary amine group on the carrier
Optimization may be required
Protection of non-targeted carboxylic acids needed
[41,115,116,117]
Legend: EDC: 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide; NHS: sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Archambault, M.-J.; Tshibwabwa, L.M.; Côté-Cyr, M.; Moffet, S.; Shiao, T.C.; Bourgault, S. Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for Antigenic Saccharides: From Conjugation Chemistry to Vaccine Design. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111290

AMA Style

Archambault M-J, Tshibwabwa LM, Côté-Cyr M, Moffet S, Shiao TC, Bourgault S. Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for Antigenic Saccharides: From Conjugation Chemistry to Vaccine Design. Vaccines. 2024; 12(11):1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Archambault, Marie-Jeanne, Laetitia Mwadi Tshibwabwa, Mélanie Côté-Cyr, Serge Moffet, Tze Chieh Shiao, and Steve Bourgault. 2024. "Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for Antigenic Saccharides: From Conjugation Chemistry to Vaccine Design" Vaccines 12, no. 11: 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111290

APA Style

Archambault, M. -J., Tshibwabwa, L. M., Côté-Cyr, M., Moffet, S., Shiao, T. C., & Bourgault, S. (2024). Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for Antigenic Saccharides: From Conjugation Chemistry to Vaccine Design. Vaccines, 12(11), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop