Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Al-Containing ZSM-58 Zeolite Membranes Using Rapid Thermal Processing for CO2/CH4 Mixture Separation
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Commercial Developments and Recent Laboratory Research of Dialyzers and Membranes for Hemodialysis Application
Previous Article in Journal
Supported MXene/GO Composite Membranes with Suppressed Swelling for Metal Ion Sieving
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Assessment on Average Pressure Drop and Dust-Holding Capacity of Hollow-Fiber Membranes in Air Filtration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/membranes11080622
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Green Diluent for the Preparation of Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Membranes via a Thermally-Induced Phase Separation Method

by
Yuanhui Tang
1,2,
Mufei Li
1,2,
Yakai Lin
2,*,
Lin Wang
2,
Fangyu Wu
2 and
Xiaolin Wang
2,*
1
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Membrane Materials and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(8), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080622
Submission received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 6 August 2021 / Accepted: 10 August 2021 / Published: 13 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hollow Fiber Membranes and Their Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The use of green solvents satisfies safer chemical engineering practices and environmental security. Herein, myristic acid (MA)—a green diluent—was selected to prepare poly- (4-methyl-1-pentene) (PMP) membranes with bicontinuous porous structure via a thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) process to maintain a high gas permeability. Firstly, based on the Hansen solubility parameter ‘distance’, Ra, the effect of four natural fatty acids on the PMP membrane structure was compared and studied to determine the optimal green diluent, MA. The thermodynamic phase diagram of the PMP-MA system was calculated and presented to show that a liquid-liquid phase separation region could be found during the TIPS process and the monotectic point was around 34.89 wt%. Then, the effect of the PMP concentration on the morphologies and crystallization behavior was systematically investigated to determine a proper PMP concentration for the membrane preparation. Finally, PMP hollow fiber (HF) membranes were fabricated with a PMP concentration of 30 wt% for the membrane performance characterization. The resultant PMP HF membranes possessed good performances that the porosity was 70%, the tensile strength was 96 cN, and the nitrogen flux was 8.20 ± 0.10 mL·(bar·cm2·min)−1. We believe that this work can be a beneficial reference for people interested in the preparation of PMP membranes for medical applications.

1. Introduction

Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) (PMP) is a semi-crystalline polyolefin that has several interesting properties, such as high thermal stability, good chemical resistance, excellent gas permeability, and biosecurity [1]. It is of practical importance as a membrane-making polymer, and the PMP membranes are found to serve in many practical applications, such as gas separation [2] and some essential membrane materials applied in medical science, especially in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems [3,4], which are extracorporeal devices providing prolonged cardiac and respiratory support to persons whose heart and lungs are unable to provide an adequate amount of gas exchange or perfusion to sustain life [5]. At present, the PMP membranes applied in the ECMO systems are mainly prepared via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) [6,7], since the TIPS process has better controllability in the membrane preparation and excellent membrane performances such as high porosity and good mechanical property can be easily attained.
From 1990 to 2020, dozens of studies were conducted to prepare PMP membranes via the TIPS method and optimize the preparation conditions, the key results of which are summarized in Table 1.
According to these studies, it can be known that a suitable diluent was the most decisive factor for controlling the structure of the PMP membranes via the TIPS process. This is because that as the core materials to realize the gas exchange in the ECMO systems, the PMP membranes should be hydrophobic, and possess structures that consist of a uniform and bicontinuous porous cross-section, and a thin dense surface layer to ensur a high gas permeability and satisfy blood rejection [23,24]. Commonly, as the interaction between the polymer and the diluents is comparatively good, a solid-liquid (S-L) phase separation happens, resulting in crystalline structures with lower porosity, while as the interaction between the polymer and the diluents is comparatively weak, a liquid-liquid (L-L) phase separation may occur, resulting in a bicontinuous or cellular structure with a higher porosity [25,26]. Therefore as listed in Table 1, different organic solvents including dioctyl adipate (DOA), diphenyl ether (DPE), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), dioctyl phthalate (DOP) and mineral oil (MO), have all been chosen as the single diluent to prepare the PMP membranes for medical applications. Only the S-L phase separation occurred in the MO or DOA system and membranes with flaky crystal structures were normally obtained [6,13,14]; whereas the L-L phase separation could be found in the DOP, DPE, or DBP system and then the membranes with the bicontinuous structure would be obtained [7,15,16,17]. Also, it can be found that among the various diluent systems, only several single diluents were adopted while most of the systems used the diluent mixture to regulate the membrane structure, which is because that it is very hard to find an appropriate single diluent to prepare a PMP membrane with desirable structure via TIPS, although production and processing of the membrane with a single diluent are relatively simpler. Besides, considering the actual medical application, the PMP hollow fiber (HF) membranes were mainly prepared for the membrane performance tests. In order to improve the membrane performance, recently people have been paying more attention to studying and understanding the effects of different process factors, including the polymer chain conformation [18], polymer concentration [19], cooling rate [21,23], diluent extractant [18], coagulation medium [9,11], et al., on the membrane structures and performances including porosity [7], dense layer [17], and mechanical properties [8] in detail. A higher gas permeability, higher water resistance, and good mechanical strength were considered as the ultimate goal for these studies.
Although PMP membranes were primarily prepared for medical applications, the detrimental impact of these diluents on the environment and human health has not been considered in preparing membranes. Most of the diluents listed in Table 1 such as DOA, DOP, and DBP, were a little toxic and some were even known to be carcinogenic [27], which might lead to the resultant PMP membranes having a negative impact on the health of humans and the environment. Thus, in response to the national call of “green and pollution-free”, finding a green and safe diluent is an important topic in preparing the PMP membranes for the ECMO application [28,29]. In chemistry, particularly in biochemistry, a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated [30]. Fatty acids are a major component of the lipids (up to 70 wt%) in some species such as microalgae [31] although in some other organisms are not found in their standalone form, instead exist as three main classes of esters: triglycerides, phospholipids, and cholesteryl esters. In any of these forms, fatty acids are both important dietary sources of fuel for animals and important structural components for cells. Therefore, fatty acids obviously belong to non-toxic green solvents which have no harmful impact on the environment and human health [32].
In this manuscript, four nontoxic fatty acids that are extensively existed in nature, including lauric acid (LA), myristic acid (MA), palmitic acid (PA), and stearic acid (SA), were compared and studied to reveal their possibilities to be the diluents of PMP. Then considering the MA as the target green diluent, the phase diagram, the effect of the PMP concentration on the membrane structure as well as crystallization behavior were investigated to explore a suitable PMP concentration for the membrane preparation and performance characterization. Then, the PMP HF membranes were prepared with MA as the diluent and a PMP concentration of 30 wt% to study the membrane performances including porosity, tensile strength, and nitrogen flux. The nontoxic green diluent is conducive to the safety of membrane fabrication and subsequent medical applications.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

PMP (Mn = 87,200 g·mol−1, MFR = 26 g/10min, P = 5 kg, T = 260 °C) was provided by Mitsui Chemical (Tokyo, Japan). PA (Purity: AR) and SA (Purity: AR) were purchased from Meryer (Shanghai, China) Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). LA (Purity: AR) was purchased from Shanghai Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). (MA (Purity: AR) was purchased from Beijing Jinming Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Anhydrous ethanol was purchased from Shanghai Titan Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and used as the extractant. Isobutanol was purchased from Shanghai Titan Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and used as a liquid for the porosity measurement. All chemicals used in this study were not purified further. The chemical formulas, the molecular structures, and the basic physical properties of the PMP and fatty acids adopted in the work were listed in Table 2.

2.2. Preparation of the PMP Membranes

2.2.1. Preparation of the PMP-MA Mixture Samples

PMP and the MA were melt-mixed by using a mini twin-screw extruder (ULTnano TW05, Technovel Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and then quenched into a cooling liquid nitrogen bath to obtain the PMP-MA mixture samples. The rate and temperature of the extruder were set at 300 rpm and 240 °C, respectively.

2.2.2. Preparation of the PMP-Diluents Piece Membrane Samples

PMP and the diluents were melt-mixed by using a mini twin-screw extruder (ULTnano TW05, Technovel Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and then quenched into a cooling water bath. The membrane precursors were extracted with anhydrous ethanol to remove the diluents and obtain the piece membrane samples. The rate and temperature of the extruder were set at 300 rpm and 240 °C, respectively.

2.2.3. Preparation of the PMP HF Membranes

The PMP HF membranes were prepared via the TIPS method with a PMP concentration of 30 wt% by using a twin-screw extruder (KZW15TW, Technovel Corporation, Osaka, Japan), as shown in Figure 1. The casting solution formed from the PMP and MA was extruded from the spinneret, quenched into a cooling bath, and wound by a take-up roller. Bore fluid was introduced to the inner orifice to make the lumen of HFs. The cooling medium and bore fluids were water and glycerol, respectively. The temperatures of the spinneret, cooling bath, and bore fluid was set to be 240, 40, and 180 °C, respectively. The dope flow rate was 16.70 g/min−1. The air gap between the spinneret and the cooling bath was 40 mm. The fibers were extracted with anhydrous ethanol and the dry PMP HF membranes were obtained after the volatilization of ethanol.

2.3. Phase Diagram and Crystallization Kinetics

The cloud points of these PMP-MA mixture samples were detected visually by the appearance of turbidity under an optical microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan). The small pieces of the samples were placed between a pair of microscope coverslips. A hot stage (THMS600, Linkam, Epsom, UK) was adopted to heat the samples from the room temperature to 260 °C and then hold for 5 min and then cool to 50 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min.
The dynamic crystallization temperatures were measured by a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, TA Q200, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The PMP-MA mixture samples in an aluminum pan were kept at 260 °C for 5 min and cooled to 50 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The exothermic peak in the cooling was taken as the dynamic crystallization temperature of the sample.
The melting data were used to draw the DSC curves and calculate the PMP crystallinity X c by the following equation:
X c = H S X 100 × C × 100 %
where X 100 = 117.20 J/g was the melting enthalpy for a 100% crystalline sample of PMP, and H S was the melting enthalpy of the PMP-MA mixture samples measured by the DSC, C was the polymer concentration in unit 1.

2.4. Characterization of PMP Membranes

2.4.1. Crystalline Forms

X-ray diffractometer (XRD) analysis was conducted to determine phase identification and crystalline nature of prepared membranes [33]. The crystallization forms of the PMP-MA piece membrane samples were characterized by an XRD (D8, Bruker, Mannheim, Germany). The working electric current and voltage were set as 40 mA and 40 kV, respectively. The Cu: Kα radiation was employed on the samples. The scanning angle 2θ was from 5° to 50° with a step size of 0.02° and a time step of 0.10 s.

2.4.2. Morphology Study

The morphology of the PMP membrane was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-7401, Tokyo, Japan). It also gives information about structure i.e., porous or dense membrane [34]. The piece membrane samples were fractured in liquid nitrogen and coated with platinum. The SEM with the accelerating voltage of 3 kV was used to examine the cross-section and surface morphologies of the membranes.
The surface roughness of the PMP HF membranes was measured by an atomic force microscope (AFM, MultiMode 8HR, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).

2.4.3. Porosity

After measuring the dry weight M d of the PMP HF membranes, they were immersed in the isobutanol for 48 h to become wet. And then wiped off the isobutanol on the membrane surface, the wet weight M w of the PMP HF membranes was measured. The porosity of the PMP HF membranes was calculated according to the following equation:
ε = M w − M d ρ k M w − M d ρ k + M d ρ p
where M w and M d were the weights of the wet and dry membranes, respectively, ρ k and ρ p were the densities of the isobutanol and PMP (0.81 g/cm3 and 0.83 g/cm3), respectively.

2.4.4. Surface Contact Angle

The surface contact angle of water was defined as the angle between the tangent line of the membrane surface and the contact point of a water droplet on the membrane surface. Surface contact angle measurement at room temperature was made using a contact angle meter (OCA20, Dataphysics, Filderstadt, Germany). A one μL water droplet was placed on the membrane surface to capture the surface contact angle. Each membrane was measured at different locations at least five times and the average value was reported.

2.4.5. Nitrogen Flux of the Membrane

At room temperature, nitrogen was injected into the PMP HF membrane with a certain length at different pressures (0.10–0.90 bar), and the nitrogen flux F was measured with a soap film flowmeter. The nitrogen flux calculation formula was as follows:
F = V P × A × t
where V was the volume of a bubble flowing in the soap film flowmeter (unit is mL); and P was the pressure in the flow process, in-unit bar; A was the effective area of the PMP HF membrane, in cm2; t was the time for a bubble to flow through a certain volume of the soap film flowmeter, in the unit of a minute.

2.4.6. Mechanical Property

The mechanical property of the PMP HF membranes was evaluated using a universal testing machine (AGS-J 200 N, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at room temperature. The PMP HF membranes were vertically fixed between two pairs of tweezers at a length of 50 mm and extended at a constant elongation rate of 50 mm/min until the membranes were broken. Tensile strength was calculated using the unit cross-sectional areas of the HF membranes. At least five HF membranes were used to get a mean mechanical property.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Diluent Selection

This section studied the effect of different fatty acids on the cross-section structure of the PMP membranes prepared via TIPS to initially help to select a proper diluent. Figure 2 showed the cross-section membrane structures of the PMP piece membranes prepared by different fatty acids as the PMP concentration was set to be 30 wt%. As shown in Figure 2, the cross-section structure of the LA system was a typical flaky crystal, which was normally resulted from the S-L phase separation. This kind of structure always brings about a lower gas permeability that is not desirable. When the diluent was MA, PA, and SA, the membrane structure gradually changed to bicontinuous and cellular, which indicated the L-L phase separation should occur during the quenching process of the three diluent systems. As pointed by the literature [15,17], this phenomenon also signified that the compatibility between PMP and these fatty acids gradually became weaker in the order of LA, MA, PA, and SA. In addition, concerning the difference in the membrane structure, the compatibility between PMP and the three fatty acids should be distinguished from each other.
The interaction between the polymer and solvents could be quantitatively characterized by the Hansen solubility parameter δ (HSP), which is normally divided into three partial components: the dispersion part δ D , the polar part δ P , the hydrogen bonding part δ H [35]. Table 3 summarized the three HSP components, ‘Ra’ parameters, and the corresponding membrane structure of the PMP-diluents system based on the group contribution method [36,37] and the manual of Hansen solubility parameters [38,39]. Herein, the Ra parameter is normally called the solubility parameter ‘distance’ and calculated between two materials based on their respective partial solubility parameter components. It represents the compatibility of the two components and a higher Ra parameter often indicates weaker compatibility. The detailed information and calculation method about the Ra and the HSPs of the different components were listed in Appendix A. As listed in Table 3, the Ra parameter was increased from 2.60 to 3.70 in the order of LA, MA, PA, and SA, which meant the interaction between PMP and these fatty acids was getting worse, and the phenomena also agreed with the results of the evolution of the membrane structure: changing from flaky crystal to bicontinuous and cellular. Whereas it should be noted that the cross-section of the membranes that presents bicontinuous or cellular is more determined by the phase diagram of the system and the process condition, rather than the compatibility of the PMP-diluent system. As assistant evidence, Table 3 also listed the corresponding parameters and experimental results of the PMP-diluents systems reported by the related references, including DBP, DPE, DOP, and DOA. The results also showed that the Ra can help to predict the membrane structure change, which was also consistent with the results of this study. In addition, considering that the bicontinuous structure brought about higher porosity and a larger gas flux than the cellular or flaky crystal structure. In the following part, the MA was regarded as the target green diluent to prepare the PMP membranes.

3.2. Phase Diagram of the PMP-MA System

Thermodynamic phase diagrams had traditionally been the primary source of guidance for understanding the outcome of the TIPS process. Figure 3a displays the thermodynamic phase diagram of the PMP-MA system and Figure 3b presents the linear relationship between the interaction parameter χ of the PMP-MA system and the reciprocal of temperature. The calculation method of the interaction parameter χ and the phase diagram was listed in Appendix B. A linear relationship of Figure 3b signified that the phase diagram of Figure 3a was relatively reliable [40]. The phase diagram showed that the system had a monotectic point ( Φ m ) of approximately 34.89 wt%, indicating that when the PMP concentration was below 34.89 wt%, the L-L phase separation occurred before the polymer crystallization because the binodal curve was higher than the crystallization temperature curve. The L-L phase separation regions were mainly divided into the metastable region (the gap between the binodal curve and the spinodal curve) and the unstable region (below the spinodal curve). Based on the thermodynamics of the polymer-diluent system, if the system dropped into the metastable region during the quenching process, the cellular structure was easily formed due to nucleation-growth kinetics, and if the system dropped into the unstable region during the quenching process, the bicontinuous structure was normally formed due to spinodal decomposition kinetics [41,42]. Thus, the bicontinuous or cellular structure formation was expected when the PMP concentration was below 34.89 wt%.

3.3. The Effect of the PMP Concentration on the Crystallization Behavior and Morphologies of the Membranes

It has been demonstrated that the polymer concentration has a critical effect on the crystalline forms and morphology of the polymeric membranes prepared via the TIPS process [26]. As a result, this section mainly explored the effect of the PMP concentration on the membrane structure of the PMP-MA system to determine a suitable concentration for the following PMP membrane preparation and application. Table 4 and Figure 4 show the data of peak points, crystallinities, and the DSC curves of the PMP-MA system with different PMP concentrations.
Most of the data listed in Table 4 has been added into Figure 4 to make them more comprehensive. During the crystallization process, only one endothermic peak appeared. In addition, the peak shifted towards higher temperatures, and the melting enthalpies rose with the increase of the PMP concentration. This is because that more polymer chains would ask for more energy to be melt. Dual-melting peaks appeared in the melting process of the system. With the increase of the PMP concentration, the melting enthalpies gradually increased, and the dual-melting peaks moved towards higher temperatures and then overlapped until the PMP concentration was 100 wt%. The existence of dual-melting peaks in the melting process might be caused by partial melting of the original single crystals at lower temperatures (primary crystallization) followed by melting of the crystals with thicker lamellae by partial melting and recrystallization at higher temperatures (secondary crystallization) [14,15,43]. Thus, the reason why the melting enthalpies rose and the dual-melting peak finally overlapped with the increase of the PMP concentration could be attributed to the addition of diluent (MA). Because considering a comparatively strong interaction between the PMP and MA, as the composition of MA was decreased, the viscosity of the PMP casting solution should be increased obviously [16].
Figure 5a shows the X-ray diffractograms of the PMP-MA system prepared with different PMP concentrations, and Figure 5b presents a schematic diagram of the top and side views of the carbon chain conformation in the crystalline phase of PMP. According to the literature [44,45], there were at least five different crystalline forms of PMP: from I to V. The X-ray diffractograms of all the sample surfaces of Figure 5a were seen to have well-defined peaks at 2θ about 9.50°, 13.40°, 16.70°, 18.30°, 20.70°, and 21.60°, which corresponded to (200), (220), (212), (321), (113/411), and (203/322) crystal plane of the I-phase [46,47]. In addition, with the PMP concentration increased from 10 wt% to 40 wt%, the X-ray diffractograms were hardly influenced. Thus, by combining Figure 4b and Figure 5a, it can be speculated that no matter how the position of the dual-melting peak moved, the two crystals were of the same crystalline type. Medellin-Rodriguez attributed this phenomenon to the secondary crystallization which would not give rise to the diffraction, just giving place to perceptive X-ray scattering [48,49]. Therefore, the difference of the secondary crystallization resulting from different PMP concentrations affected the DSC melting curves and the overall crystallinities, but not the diffractograms. Besides, the polymer chains of the I crystalline phase were characterized by a 72 helical conformation and a chain packing in a tetragonal unit cell with a = 18.66Å and c = 13.80 Å (as shown in Figure 5b), and could be easily obtained from the melt or from crystallization in high boiling solvents, which was the most stable crystalline form [50]. Because of the rise in the viscosity of the system, the total crystallinities of Table 4 gradually increased as the PMP concentration increased via S-L phase separation; A higher crystallinity occasionally appeared in Table 4 when the PMP concentration was lower than 34.89 wt%, such as 20 wt%, which might denote that the mass exchange rate in dilute casting solutions when the PMP concentration was a little lower was higher than that in the higher concentration case, allowing the polymer chains could have more time and space to attain higher crystallinities [51].
The cross-section structures of the piece membranes that were obtained with different PMP concentrations are shown in Figure 6. According to the phase diagram of Figure 3a, since the PMP concentrations of 10 wt% and 20 wt% were located in the unstable region, the cross-section membrane structures presented a bicontinuous, and as the PMP concentration was increased to 30 wt%, a cellular structure could be found. Furthermore, when the PMP concentration was higher than 34.89 wt% (the monotectic point), the whole system should all undergo the S-L phase separation process to form a flaky crystal and change to a fuzzy crystal structure. The evolution of the membrane morphologies of Figure 6 indeed agreed with the phase diagram of Figure 3a. Figure 6 also shows that as the PMP concentration was increased, the porosity decreased gradually. Based on the previous research, the mechanical property was usually improved when the PMP concentration was higher [52]. Concerning that the membrane could possess high porosity and good mechanical property at the same time, 30 wt% was regarded as an appropriate concentration for the following PMP HF membrane preparation.

3.4. Morphology and Performance of the PMP HF Membranes

In this section, we wanted to characterize the performance of the PMP membranes. According to Table 1, the hollow fiber (HF) geometry was commonly adopted for ECMO systems [22,24]. Besides, the PMP piece membranes prepared in Section 3.3 were a little small and hard to obtain stable performance data. As a result, the PMP HF membranes were prepared for the performance characterization when the MA was chosen as the diluent and the PMP concentration was set to be 30 wt%.

3.4.1. Morphology of the PMP HF Membranes

The structure of the PMP HF membrane of the PMP-MA system is shown in Figure 7 as the PMP concentration was set to be 30 wt%. Figure 7b shows that there was an ultrathin and dense surface layer existing on the porous sublayer and the dense surface layer was estimated to be 0.21 μm, which would be conducive to keep a high gas permeability and a good liquid resistance; Figure 7a,c display the overall and partial cross-section structures of the membrane, and the membrane cross-section presented a uniform bicontinuous porous structure, which was resulted from the occurrence of the L-L separation during the quenching process, and also beneficial to obtain a higher gas permeability; Figure 7d obviously shows that the outer surface of the membrane was dense and nonporous, which could effectively reject liquid and big molecules. Figure 7e shows the roughness of the membrane surface which was obtained by the AFM testing. The arithmetic means roughness (Ra) and root-mean-square roughness (Rq) of the PMP HF membranes were 33.10 nm and 42.40 nm, respectively. In summary, the morphology of the PMP HF membranes possessed the bicontinuous cross-section structure beneath an ultrathin dense surface layer, which was significant for gas permeability applied in the ECMO system.

3.4.2. Performance of the PMP HF Membranes

Table 5 lists the configuration information and gas permeability performance of the PMP HF membranes. As reference evidence, Table 5 also summarizes some of the corresponding literature data from Table 1. As a whole, the PMP HF membrane was very thin due to the fact the outer and inner diameters of the fiber were only around 900 and 600 μm, which meant that the thickness of the fiber was only around 150 μm. The data was comparable to the literature results, which signified that the surface dense layer was thin enough to keep a high gas permeability. Also owing to the bicontinuous cross-section structure of the membrane, the porosity was as high as 70%, and the nitrogen flux was 8.20 ± 0.10 mL·(bar·cm2·min)−1. The surface contact angle was 105.8°, indicating that the PMP HF membrane can be regarded as hydrophobic membranes, and this should be attributed to the existence of methyl branches of the PMP molecules that reduced the ability to form hydrogen bonds in water. The tensile strength was 96 cN, which was only at an intermediate level of the reference data and may need further improvement. In general, Table 5 proves that the performances of the PMP HF membranes of this work basically exceeded or met the existing reference data. Therefore, MA was considered as a desirable green diluent to prepare the PMP HF membranes, and the resultant membranes could have ideal structures and gas permeability simultaneously. Although more studies need to be conducted to further promote the mechanical strength as well as improve the gas permeability.

4. Conclusions

A green diluent—MA—was successfully found to be a proper single diluent to prepare PMP HF membranes for the ECMO application via the TIPS process. Firstly, by combining the Hansen solubility parameter and the resultant membrane structure, MA was selected to be the optimal diluent among a series of natural green fatty acids. The phase diagram of the PMP-MA system showed that the monotectic point was 34.89 wt%, which meant with the increase of the PMP concentration, the phase separation process was gradually changed from the L-L to the S-L phase separation, and the membrane structure would change from bicontinuous to a cellular and crystal structure. Then, the effect of the PMP concentration on the morphologies and crystallization behavior was systematically investigated to determine that 30 wt% was an appropriate choice for the PMP membrane preparation. Because for the PMP-MA system, when the PMP concentration is 30 wt%, the bicontinuous cross-section could be obtained due to the L-L phase separation, and the mechanical strength can also be guaranteed since a higher polymer concentration results in a better mechanical strength. In consideration of the membrane performance tests and future applications, the PMP HF membranes were fabricated with a PMP concentration of 30 wt%. The resultant membranes presented that the porosity was 70%, the tensile strength was 96 cN, and the nitrogen flux was 8.20 ± 0.10 mL·(bar·cm2·min)−1, which are better or comparable to the results seen in previous research. The experimental data proved that MA can be regarded as a satisfactory diluent to prepare a PMP membrane with a bicontinuous cross-section structure beneath an ultra-thin dense surface layer. This work provided a successful way to select a green diluent—MA—and PMP HF membranes with desirable performance were also prepared. In the future, more detailed studies will be systematically conducted to optimize the system constituents, process parameters, and surface modification to realize advanced preparation of the hollow fiber PMP membranes that can be successfully applied in the medical field, especially for the ECMO application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.L.; methodology: Y.T.; investigation: M.L., L.W. and F.W.; writing–original draft: Y.T. and M.L.; resources and funding acquisition: X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (No. SKL-ChE-19A02), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2020YQHH05, 2021YJSHH25), Tsinghua University Spring Breeze Fund (2020Z99CFY041), and horizontal project of Tsinghua University and Sinopec Beijing Yanshan Company (20212000432 and 20212910094).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

According to the classic book ‘Hansen Solubility parameters: A User’s Handbook’ [35], the Hansen solubility parameter (HSP)   δ of one material can be divided into three parts: the dispersion part δ D , the polar part δ P , the hydrogen bonding part δ H . The relation between the total HSP δ and the three parts can be described by Equation (A1):
δ = δ D 2 + δ P 2 + δ H 2
Some researchers have developed the equation for the solubility parameter ’distance’, Ra, between two materials based on their respective partial solubility parameter components:
R a 2 = 4 ( δ D 1 − δ D 2 ) 2 + ( δ P 1 − δ P 2 ) 2 + ( δ H 1 − δ H 2 ) 2 .  
R a can be adopted to characterize the interaction and intermiscibility of a specific polymer-diluent system. A common conclusion is that the interaction is weaker as the R a is raised, resulting in incompatibility. Normally, people can look up the HSPs of a target component in the handbook mentioned above and the results are normally comparatively reliable. However, sometimes if the handbook doesn’t include the HSPs of a component, one can turn to the help of the group contribution method [36,37] to calculate the HSPs, which is also summarized by the handbook. The corresponding equations to calculate the HSPs based on the group contribution method are listed as follows:
δ D = ( ∑ i N i C i + W ∑ j M j D j + 17.3231 )
δ P = ( ∑ i N i C i + W ∑ j M j D j + 7.3548 )
δ H = ( ∑ i N i C i + W ∑ j M j D j + 7.9793 )
where N i is the number of the contribution of the first-order group in the compound, M j is the number of the contribution of the second-order group in the compound, C i is the contribution value of the corresponding first-order group, and D j is the contribution value of the corresponding second-order group. W is 0 for the first-order group, and 1 for the second-order group. W of this work is 0. The units of δ D , δ P , δ H are described in MPa1/2. Table A1 listed the group contributions adopted in the manuscript for the HSPs calculation of the four fatty acid diluents.
Table
Table A1. The group contributions to contribution values of the dispersion partial solubility parameter,   δ D , the polar partial solubility parameter, δ P , and the hydrogen-bonding partial solubility parameter, δ H .
Table A1. The group contributions to contribution values of the dispersion partial solubility parameter,   δ D , the polar partial solubility parameter, δ P , and the hydrogen-bonding partial solubility parameter, δ H .
Groups C i   ( δ D ) C i   ( δ P ) C i   ( δ H )
CCOOH−0.290.903.74
–CH3−0.97−1.64−0.78
–CH2−0.03−0.30−0.41
–CH<0.650.65−0.20

Appendix B

The fitting method of a binary polymer-diluent phase diagram:
Before getting a complete binary phase diagram, one should first measure the cloud points and the crystallization temperatures of a polymer-diluent system by different experimental methods. Then based on the cloud points, the binodal and spinodal curves can be fitted according to the following method.
(1)
The fitting method of the binodal curve: according to the Flory-Huggins theory, the binodal curve in a polymer-diluent system satisfies the following equations:
ln ( 1 − ϕ ) + ( 1 − 1 x ) ϕ + χ ϕ 2 = ln ( 1 − γ ϕ ) + ( 1 − 1 x ) γ ϕ + χ ( γ ϕ ) 2
ln ( ϕ ) + ( 1 − x ) ( 1 − ϕ ) + χ x ( 1 − ϕ ) 2 = ln ( γ ϕ ) + ( 1 − x ) ( 1 − γ ϕ ) + χ x ( 1 − γ ϕ ) 2
where ϕ is the polymer volume fraction of the polymer-rich continuous phase and   x is the volume ratio of the polymer to diluent. χ is the interaction parameter between the polymer and the diluent, meanwhile, γ is the polymer volume fraction ratio of the polymer-rich continuous phase to the polymer-lean phase. Combining the two equations and the experimental data, one should obtain the relationship of the interaction parameter χ and the temperature T . And the relationship should be linear if the experimental data are reliable [40]. Then based on the interaction parameter of different temperatures, it would not be hard to draw the binodal curve.
(2)
The fitting method of the spinodal curve: In the Flory-Huggins theory, the spinodal curve should satisfy:
1 1 − ϕ − 1 + 1 x − 2 χ ϕ = 0
this is a quadratic equation and two roots correspond to the polymer volume fractions of the polymer-rich continuous phase and the polymer-lean continuous phase. With the help of the relationship of the interaction parameter χ and the temperature T obtained above, it would be easy to fit the spinodal curve.

References

  1. Puleo, A.C.; Paul, D.R.; Wong, P.K. Gas sorption and transport in semicrystalline poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). Polymer 1989, 30, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Markova, S.; Shalygin, M.; Pelzer, M.; Gries, T.; Teplyakov, V. Application prospects of dense gas separation hollow fibers based on poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 1917–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Horton, S.; Thuys, C.; Bennett, M.; Augustin, S.; Rosenberg, M.; Brizard, C. Experience with the Jostra Rotaflow and Quad-rox(D) oxygenator for ECMO. Perfusion 2004, 19, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yeager, T.; Roy, S. Evolution of Gas Permeable Membranes for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Artif. Organs 2017, 41, 700–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lequier, L.; Horton, S.B.; McMullan, D.M.; Bartlett, R.H. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuitry. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 14, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lloyd, D.R.; Kinzer, K.E.; Tseng, H.S. Microporous membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. I. Solid-liquid phase separation. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 52, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Xia, D.W.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Y.Q.; Jiao, Q.Z. Preparation of a Porous Structure in a Poly(4-Methyl-1-Pentene)/Diphenyl Ether System with a Thermally Induced Phase-Separation Method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Müller, M.O.; Kessler, E.; Hornscheidt, R.R.; Frank, W.; Lang, A.J. Integrally asymmetrical polyolefin membrane for gas transfer. China Patent 1,121,896 C, 24 September 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kessler, E.; Batzilla, T.; Wechs, F.; Wiese, F. Integrally Asymmetrical Polyolefin Membrane. China Patent 1,141,169 C, 10 March 2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kessler, E.; Batzilla, T.; Wechs, F.; Wiese, F. Method for producing an integrally asymmetrical polyolefin membrane. China Patent 1,136,035 C, 28 January 2004. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kessler, E.; Batzilla, T.; Wechs, F.; Wiese, F. Polyolefin membrane with an integrally asymmetric structure and method for the production thereof. China Patent 1,301,149 C, 21 February 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tao, H.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.L.; Gao, J.L. Phase separation and polymer crystallization in a poly(4-methyl-1-pentene)–dioctylsebacate–dimethylphthalate system via thermally induced phase separation. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2007, 45, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tao, H.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.L. Effect of diluents on the crystallization behavior of poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) and membrane morphology via thermally induced phase separation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 108, 1348–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tao, H.J.; Xia, Q.; Chen, S.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.L. Solid-liquid phase separation of poly-4-methyl-1-pentene/diluent system via thermally induced phase separation. Desalination Water Treat. 2010, 17, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, X.; Wang, W.P.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, X.L.; Shi, J.L.; Fan, W.L.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.B. Dissipative particle dynamics study and experimental verification on the pore morphologies and diffusivity of the poly (4-methyl-1-pentene)-diluent system via thermally induced phase separation: The effect of diluent and polymer concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, X. Fabrication of poly (4-methyl-1-pentene) hollow fiber membrane via thermally induced phase separation and its surface hemocompatibility modification. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, T.Y.; Xu, M.F.; Ling, T.; Huang, X.; Huang, S.; Fan, W.L.; Li, L. Computer simulation and experimental verification of morphology and gas permeability of poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) membranes: Effects of polymer chain and diluent extractant. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 10784–10797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, Z. Study on Grafting Multi-Fluoro Molecules onto the Surface of Poly-4-Methyl-1-Pentene Hollow Fiber Membranes for Artificial Lungs. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Voigt, I.; Ansorge, W.; Wilfa, F. For the Hollow-Fibre Membrane in Anaesthetic Circuit. China Patent 109,475,821 A, 20 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jia, J.D.; Chen, M.Z. Preparation Method of Asymmetric Polyolefin Film. China Patent 110,548,411 A, 9 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jia, J.D.; Chen, M.Z. Preparation Method of Asymmetric Polyolefin Film. China Patent 110,538,682 A, 9 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jia, J.D.; Chen, M.Z.; Yu, J.D. Asymmetric Hydrophobic Polyolefin Hallow Fiber Membrane and Preparation Method and Application Thereof. China Patent 111,888,946 A, 17 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lim, M.W. The history of extracorporeal oxgenators. Anaesthesia 2006, 61, 984–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Breiter, S. Biomaterials for Artificial Organs; Woodhead Pub Ltd.: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lloyd, D.R.; Kim, S.S.; Kinzer, K.E. Microporous membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. II. Liquid—liquid phase separation. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 64, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.S.; Lloyd, D.R. Microporous membrane formation via thermally-induced phase separation. III. Effect of thermodynamic interactions on the structure of isotactic polypropylene membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 64, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. International agency for research on cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2012; Volume 101, 555p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jubeen, F.; Liaqat, A.; Sultan, M.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Sajid, I.; Sher, F. Green synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5-fluorouracil derivatives as potent anticancer agents. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 1164–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ali, M.; Jahan, Z.; Sher, F.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Kakar, S.J.; Gul, S. Nano architectured cues as sustainable membranes for ultra-filtration in blood hemodialysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Narinder, K.; Vishal, C.; Anil, K.G. Essential fatty acids as functional components of foods—A review. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2014, 51, 2289–2303. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, L.; Liu, T.Z.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.L.; Wang, J.F. Biodiesel production from algae oil high in free fatty acids by two-step catalytic conversion. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Florindo, C.; Romero, L.; Rintoul, I.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. From phase change materials to green solvents: Hydrophobic low viscous fatty acid–based deep eutectic solvents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3888–3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khan, N.A.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Sher, F.; Jahan, Z.; Noor, T.; Azhar, O.; Rashid, T.; Iqbal, N. Metal Organic Frameworks Derived Sustainable Polyvinyl Alcohol/Starch Nanocomposite Films as Robust Materials for Packaging Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Altaf, F.; Niazi, M.B.K.; Jahan, Z.; Ahmad, T.; Akram, M.A.; Safdar, A.; Butt, M.S.; Noor, T.; Sher, F. Synthesis and characterization of pva/starch hydrogel membranes incorporating essential oils aimed to be used in wound dressing applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 156–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hansen, C.M. Hansen Solubility Parameters. A User’s Handbook, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stefanis, E.; Constantinou, L.; Tsivintzelis, I.; Panayiotou, C. New group-contribution method for predicting temperature-dependent properties of pure organic compounds. Int. J. Thermophys. 2005, 26, 1369–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stefanis, E.; Panayiotou, C. Prediction of Hansen solubility parameters with a new group-contribution method. Int. J. Thermophys. 2008, 29, 568–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De La Peña-Gil, A.; Toro-Vazquez, J.F.; Rogers, M.A. Simplifying Hansen solubility parameters for complex edible fats and oils. Food Biophys. 2016, 11, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Venkatram, S.; Kim, C.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Ramprasad, R. Critical assessment of the Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters for polymers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 4188–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Olabisi, O.; Robeson, L.M.; Shaw, M.T. Polymer-Polymer Miscibility, 1st ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lim, G.B.A.; Kim, S.S.; Ye, Q.H.; Wang, Y.F.; Lloyd, D.R. Microporous membrane formation via thermally-induced phase separation. IV. Effect of isotactic polypropylene crystallization kinetics on membrane structure. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 64, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McGuire, K.S.; Lloyd, D.R.; Lim, G.B.A. Microporous membrane formation via thermally-induced phase separation. VII. Effect of dilution, cooling rate, and nucleating agent addition on morphology. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 79, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nakajima, A.; Hayashi, S.; Taka, T. Melting behavior of poly-4-methyl-pentene-1 single crystals. Kolloid Z. Z. Polym. 1969, 233, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nakajima, A.; Hayashi, S. Single crystals of polyvinyl chloride polymerized at various temperatures. Kolloid Z. Z. Polym. 1969, 229, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nakajima, A.; Hayashi, S.; Nishimura, H. Change in lamellar thickness of polyethylene single crystal during isothermal annealing in bulk. Kolloid Z. Z. Polym. 1969, 229, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Charlet, G.; Delmas, G.; Revol, J.F.; Manley, R.S. Effect of solvent on the polymorphism of poly(4-methylpentene-1): 1. Solution-grown single crystals. Polymer 1984, 25, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Charlet, G.; Delmas, G. Effect of solvent on the polymorphism of poly(4-methylpentene-1): 2. Crystallization in semi-dilute solutions. Polymer 1984, 25, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rodriguez, F.J.M.; Phillips, P.J.; Lin, J.S.; Campos, R. The triple melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate): Molecular weight effects. J. Polym. Sci. Part B. Polym. Phys. 1997, 35, 1757–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodriguez, F.J.M.; Phillips, P.J.; Lin, J.S.; Avila-Orta, C.A. Triple melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalateco-1,4-cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate) random copolyesters. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1998, 36, 763–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daniel, C.; Vitillo, J.G.; Fasano, G.; Guerra, G. Aerogels and polymorphism of isotactic poly(4-methyl-pentene-1). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akbari, A.; Hamadanian, M.; Jabbari, V.; Lehi, A.Y.; Bojaran, M. Influence of PVDF concentration on the morphology, surface roughness, crystalline structure, and filtration separation properties of semicrystalline phase inversion polymeric membranes. Desalination Water Treat 2012, 46, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Young, R.J.; Lovell, P.A. Introduction to Polymers, 2nd ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
Membranes 11 00622 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the preparation of the PMP HF membranes via the screw extruder system.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the preparation of the PMP HF membranes via the screw extruder system.
Membranes 11 00622 g001
Membranes 11 00622 g002 550
Figure 2. The cross-section structures of the PMP piece membranes prepared by different fatty acids with a PMP concentration of 30 wt%: (a–d) represent the fatty acid of LA, MA, PA and SA, respectively.
Figure 2. The cross-section structures of the PMP piece membranes prepared by different fatty acids with a PMP concentration of 30 wt%: (a–d) represent the fatty acid of LA, MA, PA and SA, respectively.
Membranes 11 00622 g002
Membranes 11 00622 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The phase diagram of the PMP-MA system, and (b) the χ versus 1 / T curve of the PMP-MA system.
Figure 3. (a) The phase diagram of the PMP-MA system, and (b) the χ versus 1 / T curve of the PMP-MA system.
Membranes 11 00622 g003
Membranes 11 00622 g004 550
Figure 4. The DSC curves of the PMP-MA system with different PMP concentrations: (a,b) represent the crystallization curves obtained during the cooling period and the melting curves obtained during the heating period, respectively.
Figure 4. The DSC curves of the PMP-MA system with different PMP concentrations: (a,b) represent the crystallization curves obtained during the cooling period and the melting curves obtained during the heating period, respectively.
Membranes 11 00622 g004
Membranes 11 00622 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) the X-ray diffractograms of the PMP-MA system prepared with different PMP concentrations; (b) a schematic diagram of the top and side views of the carbon chain conformation in the crystalline phase of PMP [50].
Figure 5. (a) the X-ray diffractograms of the PMP-MA system prepared with different PMP concentrations; (b) a schematic diagram of the top and side views of the carbon chain conformation in the crystalline phase of PMP [50].
Membranes 11 00622 g005
Membranes 11 00622 g006 550
Figure 6. The cross-section structure of the PMP-MA piece membranes with different PMP concentrations: (a–i) shows 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 wt%, respectively.
Figure 6. The cross-section structure of the PMP-MA piece membranes with different PMP concentrations: (a–i) shows 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 wt%, respectively.
Membranes 11 00622 g006
Membranes 11 00622 g007 550
Figure 7. The morphology of the PMP HF membrane: (a) the overall cross-section structure, (b) the cross-section near the outer surface, (c) the partial cross-section structure; (d) the outer surface of the membrane; (e) the surface roughness of the membrane.
Figure 7. The morphology of the PMP HF membrane: (a) the overall cross-section structure, (b) the cross-section near the outer surface, (c) the partial cross-section structure; (d) the outer surface of the membrane; (e) the surface roughness of the membrane.
Membranes 11 00622 g007
Table
Table 1. A summary of the key results of the previous research works related to the PMP membrane preparation via TIPS from 1990 to 2020.
Table 1. A summary of the key results of the previous research works related to the PMP membrane preparation via TIPS from 1990 to 2020.
YearMain Authors [References]Key DiluentsMembrane GeometryComments
1990Lloyd D.R. [6]mineral oil (MO) *Flat sheet (FS)Membranes prepared presented flaky crystal structures due to the solid-liquid phase separation.
2003Müller M.O. [8]dioctyl adipate (DOA) + glycerol triacetate (GTA); HFMembranes prepared presented bicontinuous cross-section structures beneath an ultrathin surface layer.
2004, 2007Kessler E. [9,10,11]dibutyl phthalate (DBP) *; diphenyl ether (DPE) *; DOA *; Palm kernel oil *; coconut oil *; dioctyl phthalate (DOP) + GTA; DOA + GTA; DBP + GTAHFMembranes prepared presented bicontinuous cross-section structures beneath ultrathin surface layers for all the diluent mixtures and some single diluent systems (such as DPE, Palm kernel oil, and coconut oil)
2007–2010Zhang J. [12,13,14]dioctyl sebacate (DOS) + dimethyl phthalate (DMP); DBP + DOP; DOP *; DOA *FSSpherulitic structures were formed when the DOP or DOA was the single diluent and could be replaced by cellular structure by adding a poor solvent; Membranes prepared presented bicontinuous structures as the weight ratio of DOS:DMP = 1:1
2009Xia D. [7]DPE *FSVariant pore structures were formed at different PMP concentrations and cooling rates; spinodal decomposition occurred and bicontinuous structure could be found as the PMP concentration was lower than 30 wt%.
2016Li L. [15,16,17,18]DOP *; DPE *; DBP *; DBP + DOP;HFDOP, as a good diluent, provided smaller and more inter-connected pores, with the highest porosity and gas permeation values; DPE and DBP, as relatively poor diluents, presented larger and less inter-connected pores, with lower porosity and gas permeation values.
2017Voigt I [19]DOA + GTAHFMembranes prepared presented bicontinuous cross-section structures beneath an ultrathin surface layer.
2019–2020Jia J. [20,21,22]dibutyl sebacate (DBS) + castor oil (CO); methyl 12-hydroxystearate (MHS) + DOA; MHS + dimethyl phthalate (DMP);HFMembranes prepared presented asymmetric bicontinuous cross-section structures beneath dense surface layers.
Note: The ‘*’ mark represents a single diluent component, and no ‘*’ mark represents a diluent mixture.
Table
Table 2. The chemical formulas, the molecular structures, and the basic physical properties of the PMP and fatty acids adopted in the work.
Table 2. The chemical formulas, the molecular structures, and the basic physical properties of the PMP and fatty acids adopted in the work.
Component NameChemical
Formula		StructureMelting Point/°CBoiling Point/°CThe Molecular Weight/Da
PMP[C6H12]n Membranes 11 00622 i001231.40-87,200
LAC12H24O2 Membranes 11 00622 i00244–46298.90200.36
MAC14H28O2 Membranes 11 00622 i00358.00250.50228.37
PAC16H32O2 Membranes 11 00622 i00463.10351.00256.42
SAC18H36O2 Membranes 11 00622 i00567.00
~69.00		361.00284.48
Table
Table 3. The Hansen solubility parameters and the membrane structures of the different PMP-diluents systems.
Table 3. The Hansen solubility parameters and the membrane structures of the different PMP-diluents systems.
Polymer or Diluent δ D (MPa1/2) δ P (MPa1/2) δ H (MPa1/2) RaMembrane Cross-Section Structure
PMP16.60 b4.80 b5.20 b--
LA15.80 b3.60 b6.80 b2.60Flaky crystal with a PMP concentration of 20–30 wt%.
MA15.70 b3.00 b6.00 b2.70Bicontinuous with a PMP concentration of 20–30 wt%.
PA15.70 b2.40 b5.20 b3.00Cellular with a PMP concentration of 20–30 wt%.
SA15.60 b1.70 b4.30 b3.70Cellular with a PMP concentration of 20-–30 wt%.
DBP17.80 a8.60 a4.10 a4.60Bicontinuous with a PMP concentration of 30–35 wt% [17,18].
DPE19.50 a3.40 a5.80 a6.00Bicontinuous with a PMP concentration of 30–35 wt% [7].
DOP16.60 a7.00 a3.10 a3.10Bicontinuous with a PMP concentration of 30–35 wt% [19].
DOA16.70 a2.00 a5.10 a2.60Flaky crystal with a PMP concentration of 20–60 wt% [16].
Note: The superscript ‘a’ presents that the values came from the manual of Hansen solubility parameters, and the superscript ‘b’ presents that the values were calculated by the group contribution method.
Table
Table 4. The melting enthalpy and crystallinity of the PMP-MA system with different PMP concentrations.
Table 4. The melting enthalpy and crystallinity of the PMP-MA system with different PMP concentrations.
PMP
Concentration/wt%		Melting
Enthalpy/J/g		Initial Crystallization Temperature/°CFinal Crystallization Temperature/
°C		Peak
Crystallization Temperature/
°C		Peak
Temperature Difference/°C		Crystallinity/%
101.27181.10185.90183.104.8510.80
203.98180.10189.20183.609.0716.96
305.20179.80191.00184.1011.1814.76
407.23180.70192.70186.4011.9715.86
509.22184.30194.30189.4010.0215.74
6011.10185.50195.50191.2010.0215.79
7013.40186.10199.40194.6013.2616.33
8017.16192.50205.70200.1013.2418.30
9019.41199.10216.00209.6016.8618.40
10023.56201.70218.90211.7017.2620.10
Table
Table 5. The configuration information and gas permeability performance of the PMP membranes and the corresponding values of the comparison obtained from the literature of Table 1.
Table 5. The configuration information and gas permeability performance of the PMP membranes and the corresponding values of the comparison obtained from the literature of Table 1.
PropertyValueLiterature Value
Outer diameter/μm900 ± 1001000 ± 200 [16,17]
Inner diameter/μm600 ± 100600 ± 200 [16,17]
The thickness of the dense surface layer/μm0.212–3 [17,19]
Porosity/%60–7040–70 [17,19]
Surface contact angle/°105.80-
Tensile strength/cN9640–180 [9]
Nitrogen flux/mL·(bar·cm2·min)−18.20 ± 0.100–1 [12]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, Y.; Li, M.; Lin, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, F.; Wang, X. A Novel Green Diluent for the Preparation of Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Membranes via a Thermally-Induced Phase Separation Method. Membranes 2021, 11, 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080622

AMA Style

Tang Y, Li M, Lin Y, Wang L, Wu F, Wang X. A Novel Green Diluent for the Preparation of Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Membranes via a Thermally-Induced Phase Separation Method. Membranes. 2021; 11(8):622. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Yuanhui, Mufei Li, Yakai Lin, Lin Wang, Fangyu Wu, and Xiaolin Wang. 2021. "A Novel Green Diluent for the Preparation of Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Membranes via a Thermally-Induced Phase Separation Method" Membranes 11, no. 8: 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080622

APA Style

Tang, Y., Li, M., Lin, Y., Wang, L., Wu, F., & Wang, X. (2021). A Novel Green Diluent for the Preparation of Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) Membranes via a Thermally-Induced Phase Separation Method. Membranes, 11(8), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop