Next Article in Journal
Dialysis Membranes for Acute Kidney Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
Protein Profiling of Malaria-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reveals Distinct Subtypes
Previous Article in Journal
Can Large-Scale Offshore Membrane Desalination Cost-Effectively and Ecologically Address Water Scarcity in the Middle East?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles by Utilizing Nanomaterials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/membranes12030324
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: A Scoping Review

by
Weifei Zhang
1,
Pengzhou Huang
2,
Jianjing Lin
3,4,* and
Hui Zeng
1,*
1
Department of Bone & Joint Surgery/National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Orthopaedic Biomaterials, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China
2
National Cancer Center & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China
3
Arthritis Clinical and Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
4
Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(3), 324; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030324
Submission received: 18 February 2022 / Revised: 3 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 14 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shedding New Light on the Cell Biology and Medicine of Extracellular Vesicles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As an insidious metabolic bone disease, osteoporosis plagues the world, with high incidence rates. Patients with osteoporosis are prone to falls and becoming disabled, and their cone fractures and hip fractures are very serious, so the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis is very urgent. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are particles secreted from cells to the outside of the cell and they are wrapped in a bilayer of phospholipids. According to the size of the particles, they can be divided into three categories, namely exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. The diameter of exosomes is 30–150 nm, the diameter of microvesicles is 100–1000 nm, and the diameter of apoptotic bodies is about 50–5000 nm. EVs play an important role in various biological process and diseases including osteoporosis. In this review, the role of EVs in osteoporosis is systematically reviewed and some insights for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis are provided.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic bone disease characterized by bone loss and bone microstructure destruction, and the diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis is a bone mineral density T score of less than −2.5 [1]. Osteoporosis is a common disease among the elderly, with high incidence and serious complications, and about 40% of 50-year-old female patients will have osteoporotic fractures for the rest of their life [2]. The most serious complication of osteoporosis is osteoporotic fractures, which reduces the quality of life of elderly patients with osteoporosis and increases their mortality [3]. RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in the maturation of osteoclasts and bone remodeling, and RANK/RANKL interaction allows osteoclast maturation, thereby promoting osteoporosis occurrence. In addition, the WNT signaling pathway and PTH signaling pathways are also involved in the occurrence of osteoporosis [4,5,6,7,8]. Bisphosphonates are widely used in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis. Although bisphosphonates have satisfactory therapeutic effects, they also have some side effects. Therefore, new prevention and treatment methods for osteoporosis are critical [9,10,11,12].
EVs are secreted by cells to exchange information between cells, and contain proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [13]. EVs can be divided into three types based on their diameter and biological behavior, namely exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. The diameter of exosomes is 30–150 nm, that of microvesicles is 100–1000 nm, and that of apoptotic bodies is about 50–5000 nm [14]. EVs play an important role in various biological processes, including cell communication, apoptosis, immune response, and tumor development [15]. For example, glioblastoma can promote the proliferation and treatment resistance of surviving tumor cells by secreting EVs [16]. EVs are also involved in the progression of various diseases, such as tumors and immune diseases. Some researchers have reported that CD8 T cells suppress the immune response by releasing EVs containing CD73 to promote adenosine production when being activated [17]
Similarly, EVs are also important in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Hui Xie et al. found that EVs play a key role in osteoporosis, and the EVs of human-urine-derived stem cells are enriched in CTHRC1 and OPG, which can effectively promote osteogenesis, inhibit osteoclasts, and prevent osteoporosis [18]. In addition, many researchers have discovered that EVs play a key role in the cause, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, and that engineered EVs also play an important role in the treatment of osteoporosis [19,20,21,22]. Given that EVs play a profound role in osteoporosis, we chose to systematically review their effects. The role of EVs in osteoporosis can be summarized by three aspects: the potential role of EVs in the etiology of osteoporosis, and their potential diagnostic and therapeutic effects. Some clues for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis were provided.

2. Production and Release of EVs

EVs can be divided into apoptotic bodies, microvesicles, and exosomes (Figure 1). Apoptotic bodies are produced by shedding cells during apoptosis, while microvesicles (MVs) are produced by the plasma membrane by budding—the production process of MVs is related to the increase of calcium ion concentration in the cytoplasm— and exosomes are secreted by polycysts and released mainly through exocytosis, which is associated with cytoskeleton activation and calcium ion concentration [14]. It is currently believed that the production of exosomes involves two pathways: the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-dependent pathway and the ESCRT-independent pathway. The specific mechanism of the ESCRT-dependent pathway is that the cell membrane invaginates to form early endosomes, and then multivesicular endosomes (MVBs) are formed. MVBs with high cholesterol content fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane and are released into the extracellular matrix to form exosomes, while MVBs with low cholesterol content are degraded by the lysosomal pathway. The ESCRT-independent pathway for exosome production mainly involves ceramides, ceramides induce the formation of luminal vesicles, and it promotes the entry of biomolecules rich in proteins and RNAs into luminal vesicles, and finally after the fusion of the luminal vesicles with the cell membrane, the exosomes release [23,24].

3. The Potential Role of EVs in the Etiology of Osteoporosis

EVs are secreted by cells to the outside of cells that are involved in the occurrence and development of many diseases. For example, a report from CELL pointed out that Bloodstream African trypanosomes can produce EVs to cause anemia [25]. EVs can also play a role in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Dawei Liu et al. proposed that the reduction in the formation of apoptotic bodies significantly impairs the self-renewal and osteogenic and adipose differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Specifically, the apoptotic bodies secreted by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells contain RNF146 and miR-328-3p, and the two molecules can inhibit Axin1, thereby activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Therefore, their study determined the previously unknown role of EVs in bone homeostasis, and the potential use of the EVs in the treatment of osteoporosis was found [21]. In addition, Rongyao Xu et al. concluded that the expression of miR-31a-5p in the exosomes of BMSCs of old rats was increased, and these BMSCs with high expression of miR-31a-5p showed increased adipogenic differentiation capacity and decreased osteogenic differentiation capacity. Moreover, the inhibition of exosomes miR-31a-5p can prevent bone loss and reduce osteoclast activity in old rats. Therefore, a conclusion was drawn that the exosomes of mesenchymal stem cells involved in the occurrence of osteoporosis and provided potential osteoporosis treatment value [26]. Many researchers have confirmed that EVs affect the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Sylvia Weilner et al. illustrated that senescent endothelial cells secreted microvesicle contaning miR-31 and that these vesicles inhibit the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, Perrine J Martin et al. demonstrated that adipogenic RNAs are transferred in osteoblasts via bone marrow adipocyte-derived EVs [27,28].

4. EVs as Potential Diagnostic Tool in Osteoporosis

EVs contain proteins, lipids, mRNA, and ncRNAs, and the characteristics of EVs determine that they are suitable as disease markers. According to Daniel Liu et al., plasma EVs contain unannotated small RNA clusters, so they are suitable to be biomarkers for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma. Likewise, the abnormal content of EVs may could be used as the markers of age-related osteoporosis [22,29,30,31] (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. EVs as potential diagnostic tool in osteoporosis.
Table 1. EVs as potential diagnostic tool in osteoporosis.
MolecularsRegulatedSamples (Experimental Group-Control Group)p ValueReference
Vinculin et al.upregulated28-28<0.05[32]
PSMB9 et al.upregulated60-60<0.001[33]
miR-4746-3p et al.down-regulated12-60.000487[34]
tRF-25 et al.upregulated40-40<0.05[35]
Chunhui Huo et al., analyzed different protein profiles of microvesicles in the serum of normal subjects, osteopenia patients, and osteoporosis patients. A total of about 200 differentially expressed proteins were identified and quantified from the serum. Compared with the normal group, in the osteopenia group and the osteoporosis group, 19 proteins were up-regulated and 5 proteins were down-regulated. Then, they selected three candidate proteins for preliminary verification, including Vinculin, Filamin A, and Profilin 1. Profilin 1 was further prevalidated in independent sample sets, which could be distinguished between the osteoporosis group, osteopenia group, and normal group (p < 0.05). Their data indicated that the serum microvesicles proteome can be used for evaluation and diagnosis as important indicators of bone-loss disease [32]. In addition, Ming Chen and others from China 301 Hospital compared the protein profiles of plasma exosomes from 60 patients with osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone mass, aiming to find potential new diagnoses. They found 45 differentially expressed proteins, four of which, namely PSMB9, AARS, PCBP2, and VSIR, were further verified. Based on these results, they constructed an exosomal protein index to compare individuals with osteoporosis for nonosteoporotic individual classification, and the AUC for classification performance evaluation is 0.805 [33].
Noncoding RNAs in EVs can also be used as potential markers of osteoporosis. In order to evaluate the EVs as potential diagnostic tool in osteoporosis of exosomal microRNA (miRNA) on osteoporosis in menopausal women, Jian-Li Shao and others recruited 6 menopausal women without osteoporosis and 12 menopausal women with osteoporosis, then isolated their serum exosomes, and detected their miRNA expression by miRNA high-throughput sequencing. The results revealed that 191 abnormal miRNAs were found in the osteoporosis group of menopausal women, of which 72 of them were up-regulated and 121 were down-regulated. They concluded that abnormal serum exosomal miRNAs are related to osteoporosis in menopausal women as a biomarker [34].
In addition, some researchers have discovered that transfer RNA-derived fragments (tRFs) are also abnormally expressed in the plasma of osteoporosis patients. Yan Zhang et al. used centrifugation to collect plasma-derived exosomes from 40 healthy controls and 40 osteoporosis patients, and detected tRF in plasma exosomes by small RNA sequencing, and finally found that 11 up-regulated tRF and 18 down-regulated tRF were identified in osteoporosis, compared with normal controls. Later, they further confirmed that the RF-25-R9ODMJ6B26 (tRF-25), tRF-38-QB1MK8YUBS68BFD2 (tRF-38) and tRF-18-BS68BFD2 (tRF-18) of plasma exosomes have higher expression level in osteoporosis, so plasma exosomes tRF-25, tRF-38 and tRF-18 may have satisfactory diagnostic value in osteoporosis [35].
In terms of diagnostic tools, because osteoporosis is caused by a variety of factors, it is difficult to think that a single component can predict osteoporosis. As a result, risk score systems that incorporate diverse proteins, lipids, mRNA, and ncRNAs found in EVs might be necessary to be used as potential diagnostic tool in osteoporosis, although there is currently no such risk score system, it is hoped that there will be a standard risk score system for EVs in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in the future, providing a new method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

5. The Potential Therapeutic Effects of EVs in Osteoporosis

Many researchers hold the view that proteins and nucleic acids in EVs have potential therapeutic value (Figure 2), including various diseases such as tumors, immune diseases, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases, etc. [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. For instance, Naohiro Seo et al. proposed that activated CD8+ T cells from healthy mice release cytotoxic EVs causing marked attenuation of tumor invasion and metastasis by apoptotic depletion of mesenchymal tumor stromal cells [46]. Lingling Jiang et al. supported EVs with TGF-β1-dependent immunosuppressive activity are produced by intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) under physiological conditions, they can decrease IBD severity [47].
Kian F Eichholz et al. demonstrated that osteocytes can be mechanically activated to secrete EVs to regulate mesenchymal stem cell differentiation [48]. EVs not only play a therapeutic role in other diseases, but also play an important role in osteoporosis [28,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Based on Xin Qi et al., exosomes secreted by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair critical-sized bone defects through enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in osteoporotic rats [57]. Lili Deng et al. provided the information that imipramine can prevent bone loss by inhibiting osteoblast-derived microvesicles [58]. Therefore, EVs have potential therapeutic value in osteoporosis. EVs contain protein and noncoding RNA, so the potential therapeutic effects of EVs in osteoporosis were introduced from four aspects: protein, miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA.
In addition, engineered EVs also play a potential role in the treatment of osteoporosis.

5.1. The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Proteins of EVs in Osteoporosis

As a very common component in EVs, protein has many functions, including promoting transcription and protein–protein interactions. Meanwhile, it also plays an important role in various life activities, and has potential therapeutic effects on osteoporosis (Table 2) [59,60,61].
Table
Table 2. The role of EV-associated proteins in osteoporosis.
Table 2. The role of EV-associated proteins in osteoporosis.
ProteinsSourceRegulatedFunctionsReference
CTHRC1/OPGEVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[9]
RNF146apoptotic bodyupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[21]
CLEC11AEVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[62]
NLRP3exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[63]
WNT1/WNT5A/WNT7A/WNT9AEVsdowninhibit osteoporosis[64]
OPGEVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[65]
Chun-Yuan Chen et al. collected EVs from human-urine-derived stem cells (USG), and then injected these EVs into a mouse model of osteoporosis, which proved that these EVs can enhance bone formation and inhibit osteoclast resorption; the specific mechanism is the enrichment of CTHRC1 and OPG proteins are necessary for inducing bone formation and inhibiting osteoclast resorption. Therefore, USC-EVs can be said to be a very promising method of treatment for osteoporosis [9]. Dawei Liu et al. demonstrated that RNF146 in circulating apoptotic bodies can treat osteoporosis [21]. In addition, Yin Hu et al. revealed that the increased expression of CLEC11A in EVs of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells can promote the transition from adipogenesis to osteogenic differentiation, thereby inhibiting osteoporosis, which may represent the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (Potential Drugs for Symptoms) [62]. Based on Lei Zhang et al., the NLRP3 inflammasome in the exosomes of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells can inhibit osteoporosis in rats [63]. According to Kyoung Soo Lee et al., the therapeutic effects of EVs were derived from the treatment of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASC-EVs) on osteoporosis. On the other hand, they found that osteoprotegerin is highly enriched in ASC-EV by transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, flow cytometry, cytokine arrays, enzyme-linked immunoassays and adsorption assays. The intravenous injection of ASC-EV can reduce bone loss in osteoporotic mice, while OPG-depleted ASC-EVs did not show anti-osteoclastogenesis effects, which indicated that OPG is very important for the therapeutic effect of ASC-EVs. Their research showed that ASC-EVs are very promising as acellular therapeutics for the treatment of osteoporosis. All in all, many studies have proved that the protein in EVs plays a significant role in the progress of osteoporosis with potential therapeutic value for osteoporosis [64,65].

5.2. MiRNA

MiRNAs in EVs play an important role in osteoporosis (Table 3). The mechanism of the action of miRNA is generally to inhibit the translation of the target genes or to degrade them by binding to them, and miRNAs in EVs have therapeutic potential for osteoporosis [22]. Sylvia Weilner et al. analyzed the plasma in osteoporosis and normal human plasma. The level of miR-31 in the plasma of the elderly and osteoporosis patients is elevated in microvesicles, which can inhibit osteogenic differentiation by targeting Frizzled-3. They knocked down miR-31 and found that the osteogenic ability of mesenchymal stem cells was enhanced and the phenotype of osteoporosis was reduced. Therefore, they discovered that miR-31 is a potential treatment for osteoporosis [27]. LB Jiang et al. extracted the exosomes of mesenchymal stem cells from healthy subjects and osteoporosis patients, and found that the expression of microRNA-21 in exosomes increased, which confirmed that microRNA-21 can bind to SMAD7, and the expression of SMAD7 decreased. MicroRNA-21 inhibits the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and promotes the occurrence and development of osteoporosis [66]. Hongyuan Song et al. performed miRNA sequencing on the vascular endothelial cell exosomes of normal mice and osteoporotic mice, and the sequencing results showed that the expression of miR-155 was much higher. The blockade of miR-155 level reversed the inhibition of EC-Exos on osteoclast induction, which confirmed that exosomal miR-155 may have the potential to treat osteoporosis [67].
Table
Table 3. The role of EV-associated miRNA in osteoporosis.
Table 3. The role of EV-associated miRNA in osteoporosis.
GeneSourceRegulatedFunctionsReference
miR-31microvesiclesupregulatedpromote osteoporosis[27]
miR-21exosomesupregulatedpromote osteoporosis[66]
miR-328-3Papoptotic bodiesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[21]
miR-155exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[67]
miR-3960EVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[20]
miR-22-3pEVsdownpromote osteoporosis[68]
miR-214-3pexosomesdownpromote osteoporosis[69]
miR-186exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[70]
miR-29b-3pEVsdowninhibit osteoporosis[71]
miR-143/145EVsupregulatedpromote osteoporosis[72]
miR-139-5pexosomesupregulatedpromote osteoporosis[73]
miR-935exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[74]
miR-424-5pexosomesupregulatedpromote osteoporosis[75]
miRNA-19b-3pexosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[76]
miR-27a-5pEVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[77]
miR-27aEVsupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[78]
Apoptotic bodies are also a type of EVs. Dawei Liu et al., concluded that miR-328-3p in the apoptotic bodies of mesenchymal stem cells inhibits Axin1, it activates the wnt/β-catenin pathway and promotes osteogenesis and inhibits osteoporosis, which implies the potential use of apoptotic bodies in the treatment of osteoporosis [21]. Xueliang Zhang et al., provided the information that in the ovariectomized mouse model, the expression of miR-22-3p in the exosomes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells was inhibited, and the overexpression of miR-22-3p increased the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and activity of matrix mineralization of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. The specific mechanism is that miR-22-3p targets fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) and inhibits the expression of FTO, and FTO inhibition inactivates the MYC/PI3K/AKT pathway, thereby enhancing the osteogenic differentiation in vivo and in vitro. The conclusion proved that the source of mesenchymal stem cells MiR-22-3p delivered by EVs can be used as a potential treatment for osteoporosis. In addition, there are many confirmations that miRNAs in EVs have therapeutic potential in osteoporosis [20,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78].
Therefore, we know that miRNAs of EVs play a huge role in the treatment of osteoporosis, and many core mechanisms of EVs for the treatment of osteoporosis are realized through miRNAs, they can change the direction of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to treat osteoporosis, and they can also directly change the pathological process of osteoporosis.

5.3. lncRNA and circRNA

The lncRNA and circRNA in EVs also play a role in the progression of osteoporosis (Table 4).
Recently, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that ncRNAs could be efficiently delivered to recipient cells using EVs as a carrier, and therefore can exert a critical role in musculoskeletal diseases including osteoporosis [79,80]. Xucheng Yang et al. tested the exosomes of mesenchymal stem cells, and found that the expression in the cells of MALAT1 increased in exosomes of mesenchymal stem cells, and MALAT1 cancer promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, because it can be used as a sponge of miR-34c to promote the expression of SATB2. The authors also conducted a rescue experiment: MiR -34c reversed the effects of MALAT1, and SATB2 reversed the effects of miR-34c in ovariectomized mice. Therefore, it can be concluded that MALAT1 in mesenchymal stem cell exosomes can promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells as a new method for the treatment of osteoporosis [81].
As a type of RNA molecule with a closed-loop structure, circular RNA plays an important role in various life activities, and it also contain circular RNA with potential therapeutic value for osteoporosis [79,82,83,84]. Guijun Cao et al. found that the expression of circ-Rtn4 in the exosomes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells increased, and the overexpression of circ-Rtn4 attenuated the cytotoxicity and apoptosis of MC3T3-E1 cells induced by TNF-α. The specific mechanism is the sponge molecule of miR-146a, and circ-Rtn4 relieves the effects of miR-146a. Circ-Rtn4 in the exosomes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes osteogenesis and inhibits osteoporosis as a treatment for osteoporosis method [85].
Table
Table 4. The role of EV-associated lncRNA and circRNA in osteoporosis.
Table 4. The role of EV-associated lncRNA and circRNA in osteoporosis.
GeneSourceRegulatedFunctionsReference
MALAT1exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[81]
circRNA Rtn4exosomesupregulatedinhibit osteoporosis[85]

5.4. The Role of Engineered EVs in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

Engineered EVs refer to the artificially modified EVs, with great potential in the treatment of various diseases, including tumors, spinal cord injury, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, etc. At present, there are two methods to achieve this: one is to modify the cells, co-incubate or transfect the genes or drugs so that the genes or drugs can enter into the cells, and then collect the EVs of the cells; and another is to directly add RNAs or drugs to the EVs to make the EVs have therapeutic effects [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96].
Similarly, engineered EVs also have potential therapeutic effects in osteoporosis (Table 5). Yue Zhu et al. revealed that the magnetic hydroxyapatite (MHA) scaffold can change the exosomal content of osteoclasts and promote the proliferation of osteoblasts in the osteoporosis model. The specific mechanism is that under the stimulation of the MHA scaffold, certain proteins (including ubiquitin, ATP, and reactive oxygen species) in cell-derived exosomes are reduced, while Rho kinase is increased. Rho signaling is an important regulator of osteoblast growth. Osteoblasts absorb exosomes that have a large amount of Rho signaling, and modified exosomes are beneficial to activate the Rho signaling pathway in osteoblasts, thus accelerating the proliferation of osteoblasts, and promoting osteogenesis to inhibit the occurrence and development of osteoporosis [97]. Yayu Wang et al. used click chemistry to combine EVs produced by stem cells with alendronate, and tested the hydroxyapatite affinity of Ale-EV by flow cytometry. It was obvious that Ale-EVs and hydroxyapatite have high affinity in vitro, and the bone targeting of Ale-EV was tested by fluorescence imaging in vitro. The in vitro data indicated that Ale-EVs-DiD-treated mice induced strong fluorescence in bone tissue, and the WST-8 assay reagent tested the function of Ale -EVs to promote the proliferation of mMSCs. The alkaline phosphatase test was used to detect the ability of Ale-EVs to promote the differentiation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. The results suggested that Ale-EVs promote the growth and differentiation of mouse MSCs. All in all, the conclusion is that Ale-EVs have high affinity to bones, with great clinical application potential in the treatment of osteoporosis and low systemic toxicity [98].
There are also the overexpression of genes into cells, which indirectly obtains the engineered EVs. Ba Huang et al. transfected GPNMB overexpressing lentiviral vector and control virus into bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, then extracted EVs rich in GPNMB to act on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and analyzed the effects of GPNMB-EVs on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by CCK8, cytochemical staining, western blotting and RT-qPCR analysis. The results were that GPNMB-EVs significantly promoted the bone marrow mesenchyme and the proliferation of stem cells, and GPNMB-EVs activated Wnt/β-catenin signals to stimulate the osteogenesis of BMSCs, which indicated that GPNMB-EVs have broad potential as a cell-free therapy for osteoporosis [99]. Wei Liu et al. overexpressed miR-20a in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and later discovered that miR-20a was successfully high expressed in exosomes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. These exosomes were co-cultured with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and then they detected the proliferation, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by CCK-8 determination, alkaline phosphatase staining, alizarin red staining, qRT-PCR and western blotting. The results proved that sEV-20a can promote the migration and osteogenesis of hBM-MSCs. In vivo, sEV-20a promotes the osseointegration in a rat model of osteoporosis, and the specific mechanism is that miR-20a can enhance osteogenesis by targeting BAMBI [100].
The engineered EVs of the above two pathways are the most common engineered EVs. Of course, there are other special ways of engineered EVs. Xiaoshan Yang et al. first produced T cell-depleting nanoparticles (TDNs) and then extracted their EVs. They discovered that these EVs can alleviate the osteogenic defects and osteopenic phenotypes of BMMSCs [101]. In addition, some researchers have revealed that many other engineered EVs have the potential value of osteoporosis [102].
Table
Table 5. The role of engineered EVs in osteoporosis.
Table 5. The role of engineered EVs in osteoporosis.
MaterialSourceAssembly MethodFunctionsReference
Magnetic hydroxyapatiteexosomesMHA stimulationinhibit osteoporosis[97]
alendronateEVsAssembly of drugs into EVsinhibit osteoporosis[98]
GPNMB-EVsEVsLentiviral transfected cellsinhibit osteoporosis[99]
sEV-20aEVsTransfection into EVsinhibit osteoporosis[100]
T cell-depleting nanoparticlesEVsExtract EVsinhibit osteoporosis[101]
alendronic acidEVsbiomimicking polymer vesicleinhibit osteoporosis[102]

6. Clinical Progress and Future Prospects of EVs in Osteoporosis

EVs also have clinical applications in osteoporosis, Bodo C Melnik et al. found that continuous exposure of humans to exosomes of pasteurized milk may confer a substantial risk for the development of chronic diseases of civilization including osteoporosis [103]. There are some clinical applications of extracellular vesicles in osteoporosis, it is believed that EVs will play a huge role in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in the near future.

7. Limitations and Coping Strategies of EVs

Although EVs show great potential in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, EVs also have certain limitations, these include large-scale production and isolation of EVs, long-term storage, in vivo stability, tissue-specific targeting and delivery strategies.
Since there are a little EVs produced by cells in the natural state, more EVs can be isolated by new high-efficiency separation methods. Traditional methods of EVs isolation include ultracentrifugation, gradient ultracentrifugation, co-precipitation, size-exclusion chromatography and field flow fractionation, of which ultracentrifugation is the most commonly used method, some new separation methods could improve the separation efficiency of EVs including microfluidic filtering, contact-free sorting, and immunoaffinity enrichment [14].
There are several ways to increase the large-scale production and isolation of engineered EVs. The first is to use plasmids or viruses with the gene to transfect cells and collect the EVs [104], the second method is to extrude the EVs in an extruder after mixing with the drug [105]. Although these methods can increase a certain amount of EVs, they are still far from large-scale production and isolation; it is hoped that there will be more methods of large-scale production and isolation in the future.
The long-term storage and in vivo stability of EVs has always been difficult issues for EVs. Temperature, storage time, and freeze–thaw cycles are important factors that affect the storage stability of EVs, storage of EVs at −80 °C is a good method, the longer the storage time and the more freeze–thaw cycles, the less stable of the EVs, so reducing the storage time of the extracellular vesicles and the number of freeze–thaw cycles are also very important, in addition, freeze-drying is a promising method for the storage of EVs, and is still under investigation [106].
The tissue-specific targeting and delivery of EVs are also limiting factors for the application of extracellular vesicles. Naturally occurring EVs can reach specific places to play their roles due to their unique cell surface molecules, but EVs are difficult to target to a certain tissue or organ [107].
For in vivo stability and strategies for tissue-specific targeting of EVs, there are three approaches. The first is mother cell transformation, the principle of which is to genetically transform parent cells with EVs secretion ability to express the target protein on the cell membrane surface, and then display the target protein on the surface of the EVs membrane [108]. The second is noncovalent binding, which is to bind specific substances to the EVs membrane through noncovalent bonds, including classical interactions and hydrophobic interactions [109]. The third is covalent bonding, which is to bind specific substances to the EVs membrane through covalent bonds. Compared to noncovalent bonds, covalent bonds have higher bond energy, for example, Gang Jia et al. conjugated the EVs membrane with neuropilin-1-targeted peptide (RGERPPR, RGE) by click chemistry [110].

8. Conclusions

EVs have potential roles in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, and may be the key to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in the future. Osteoporosis is a chronic disease affecting the world with high incidence, and cone fractures and hip fractures caused by osteoporosis seriously affect the life span and quality of life of patients. EVs are particles secreted by cells and wrapped in protein and nucleic acid in a layer of lipid molecules. They play a profound role in various life activities, and EVs also play a role in osteoporosis. In this review, the potential diagnostic and therapeutic effects of EVs on osteoporosis were systematically reviewed, as well as the role of engineered EVs in osteoporosis, and a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis was provided.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and J.L.; writing—review and editing—W.Z. and P.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Shenzhen Key Medical Subject (No. SZXK023), Shenzhen “San-Ming” Project of Medicine (No. SZSM201612092), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82001319), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2019A1515011290 and 2019A1515110983), Bethune Charitable Foundation and CSPC Osteoporosis Research Foundation Project (No. G-X-2020-1107-21), and Shenzhen Scientific Research Project of Health and Family Planning System (No. SZXJ2018077).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Compston, J.E.; McClung, M.R.; Leslie, W.D. Osteoporosis. Lancet 2019, 393, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, J.G.; Zeng, X.T.; Wang, J.; Liu, L. Association between Calcium or Vitamin D Supplementation and Fracture Incidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2017, 318, 2466–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cauley, J.A. Screening for Osteoporosis. JAMA 2018, 319, 2483–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, Y.; Wei, Q.; An, R.; Zhang, H.M.; Shen, J.Y.; Qin, X.Y.; Han, X.L.; Li, J.; Li, X.W.; Gao, X.M.; et al. Anti-osteoporosis effect of Semen Cuscutae in ovariectomized mice through inhibition of bone resorption by osteoclasts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 285, 114834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, C.; Yang, P.; Liu, P.; Wang, H.; Ke, E.; Li, K.; Yan, H. Targeting Filamin A alleviates ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice via the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell. Signal. 2022, 90, 110191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Z.; Lee, H.L.; Suh, J.S.; Deng, P.; Lee, C.R.; Bezouglaia, O.; Mirnia, M.; Chen, V.; Zhou, M.; Cui, Z.K.; et al. The ERα/KDM6B regulatory axis modulates osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone Res. 2022, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, S.; Gao, Y.; Shi, S.; Zhao, D.; Cao, H.; Fu, T.; Cai, X.; Xiao, J. LncRNA-AK137033 inhibits the osteogenic potential of adipose-derived stem cells in diabetic osteoporosis by regulating Wnt signaling pathway via DNA methylation. Cell Prolif. 2021, 55, e13174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, C.H.; Lü, Z.R.; Zhao, Z.D.; Wang, X.Y.; Leng, H.J.; Niu, Y.; Wang, M.P. Nitazoxanide, an Antiprotozoal Drug, Reduces Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Mice by Inhibition of RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 781640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hayes, K.N.; Baschant, U.; Hauser, B.; Burden, A.M.; Winter, E.M. When to Start and Stop Bone-Protecting Medication for Preventing Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 782118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van der Burgh, A.C.; de Keyser, C.E.; Zillikens, M.C.; Stricker, B.H. The Effects of Osteoporotic and Non-osteoporotic Medications on Fracture Risk and Bone Mineral Density. Drugs 2021, 81, 1831–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Roij van Zuijdewijn, C.; van Dorp, W.; Florquin, S.; Roelofs, J.; Verburgh, K. Bisphosphonate nephropathy: A case series and review of the literature. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 3485–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Villatoro-Villar, M.; Kwoh, C.K. Bisphosphonates, Bone and Joint Pain. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2021, 19, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tkach, M.; Théry, C. Communication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Cell 2016, 164, 1226–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Shao, H.; Im, H.; Castro, C.M.; Breakefield, X.; Weissleder, R.; Lee, H. New Technologies for Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 1917–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Théry, C. Cancer: Diagnosis by extracellular vesicles. Nature 2015, 523, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavlyukov, M.S.; Yu, H.; Bastola, S.; Minata, M.; Shender, V.O.; Lee, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Komarova, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Apoptotic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Malignancy of Glioblastoma via Intercellular Transfer of Splicing Factors. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 119–135.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Schneider, E.; Winzer, R.; Rissiek, A.; Ricklefs, I.; Meyer-Schwesinger, C.; Ricklefs, F.L.; Bauche, A.; Behrends, J.; Reimer, R.; Brenna, S.; et al. CD73-mediated adenosine production by CD8 T cell-derived extracellular vesicles constitutes an intrinsic mechanism of immune suppression. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, C.Y.; Rao, S.S.; Tan, Y.J.; Luo, M.J.; Hu, X.K.; Yin, H.; Huang, J.; Hu, Y.; Luo, Z.W.; Liu, Z.Z.; et al. Extracellular vesicles from human urine-derived stem cells prevent osteoporosis by transferring CTHRC1 and OPG. Bone Res. 2019, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lin, X.; Wang, Q.; Gu, C.; Li, M.; Chen, K.; Chen, P.; Tang, Z.; Liu, X.; Pan, H.; Liu, Z.; et al. Smart Nanosacrificial Layer on the Bone Surface Prevents Osteoporosis through Acid-Base Neutralization Regulated Biocascade Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 17543–17556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Y.; Xu, R.; Chen, C.Y.; Rao, S.S.; Xia, K.; Huang, J.; Yin, H.; Wang, Z.X.; Cao, J.; Liu, Z.Z.; et al. Extracellular vesicles from human umbilical cord blood ameliorate bone loss in senile osteoporotic mice. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2019, 95, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, D.; Kou, X.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yu, W.; Yu, T.; Yang, R.; Wang, R.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Circulating apoptotic bodies maintain mesenchymal stem cell homeostasis and ameliorate osteopenia via transferring multiple cellular factors. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 918–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Murphy, C.; Withrow, J.; Hunter, M.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Y.L.; Fulzele, S.; Hamrick, M.W. Emerging role of extracellular vesicles in musculoskeletal diseases. Mol. Asp. Med. 2018, 60, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vietri, M.; Radulovic, M.; Stenmark, H. The many functions of ESCRTs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Elsherbini, A.; Bieberich, E. Ceramide and Exosomes: A Novel Target in Cancer Biology and Therapy. Adv. Cancer Res. 2018, 140, 121–154. [Google Scholar]
  25. Szempruch, A.J.; Sykes, S.E.; Kieft, R.; Dennison, L.; Becker, A.C.; Gartrell, A.; Martin, W.J.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Almeida, I.C.; Hajduk, S.L.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles from Trypanosoma brucei Mediate Virulence Factor Transfer and Cause Host Anemia. Cell 2016, 164, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, R.; Shen, X.; Si, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Xiao, T.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, J.; Jiang, H. MicroRNA-31a-5p from aging BMSCs links bone formation and resorption in the aged bone marrow microenvironment. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weilner, S.; Schraml, E.; Wieser, M.; Messner, P.; Schneider, K.; Wassermann, K.; Micutkova, L.; Fortschegger, K.; Maier, A.B.; Westendorp, R.; et al. Secreted microvesicular miR-31 inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Aging Cell 2016, 15, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Martin, P.J.; Haren, N.; Ghali, O.; Clabaut, A.; Chauveau, C.; Hardouin, P.; Broux, O. Adipogenic RNAs are transferred in osteoblasts via bone marrow adipocytes-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). BMC Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, D.S.; Frampton, A.E. Plasma extracellular vesicles contain unannotated small RNA clusters suitable as biomarkers for detecting early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2021, 2021, 325798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Penders, J.; Nagelkerke, A.; Cunnane, E.M.; Pedersen, S.V.; Pence, I.J.; Coombes, R.C.; Stevens, M.M. Single Particle Automated Raman Trapping Analysis of Breast Cancer Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Cancer Biomarkers. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 18192–18205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fitz, N.F.; Wang, J.; Kamboh, M.I.; Koldamova, R.; Lefterov, I. Small nucleolar RNAs in plasma extracellular vesicles and their discriminatory power as diagnostic biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 159, 105481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huo, C.; Li, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Shang, Z.; Cao, C.; Hong, Y.; Xiao, H. Comparative proteomics analysis of microvesicles in human serum for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Electrophoresis 2019, 40, 1839–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Lv, H.; Yin, P.; Zhang, L.; Tang, P. Quantitative proteomics and reverse engineer analysis identified plasma exosome derived protein markers related to osteoporosis. J. Proteom. 2020, 228, 103940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shao, J.L.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.R.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.Z.; Jiao, G.L.; Sun, G.D. Identification of Serum Exosomal MicroRNA Expression Profiling in Menopausal Females with Osteoporosis by High-throughput Sequencing. Curr. Med. Sci. 2020, 40, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Cai, F.; Liu, J.; Chang, H.; Liu, L.; Yang, A.; Liu, X. Transfer RNA-derived fragments as potential exosome tRNA-derived fragment biomarkers for osteoporosis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 21, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tian, F.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Han, Z.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Cai, L.; Qin, L.; et al. Protein analysis of extracellular vesicles to monitor and predict therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Hu, S.; Li, J.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Z.; Cores, J.; Cheng, K.; Liu, G.; Huang, K. Extruded Mesenchymal Stem Cell Nanovesicles Are Equally Potent to Natural Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiac Repair. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 55767–55779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Crunkhorn, S. Extracellular vesicles target neuronal AMPK. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schatz, D.; Schleyer, G.; Saltvedt, M.R.; Sandaa, R.A.; Feldmesser, E.; Vardi, A. Ecological significance of extracellular vesicles in modulating host-virus interactions during algal blooms. ISME J. 2021, 15, 3714–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zeng, T.; Yuan, P.; Liang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, W. Cartilaginous Extracellular Matrix Enriched with Human Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived “Matrix Bound Extracellular Vesicles” Enabled Functional Reconstruction of Tracheal Defect. Adv. Sci. 2021, 9, e2102735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zuo, R.; Ye, L.F.; Huang, Y.; Song, Z.Q.; Wang, L.; Zhi, H.; Zhang, M.Y.; Li, J.Y.; Zhu, L.; Xiao, W.J.; et al. Hepatic small extracellular vesicles promote microvascular endothelial hyperpermeability during NAFLD via novel-miRNA-7. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Perluigi, M.; Picca, A.; Montanari, E.; Calvani, R.; Marini, F.; Matassa, R.; Tramutola, A.; Villani, A.; Familiari, G.; Domenico, F.D.; et al. Aberrant crosstalk between insulin signaling and mTOR in young Down syndrome individuals revealed by neuronal-derived extracellular vesicles. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ge, L.; Xun, C.; Li, W.; Jin, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Duan, D.; Hu, Z.; Chen, P.; Lu, M. Extracellular vesicles derived from hypoxia-preconditioned olfactory mucosa mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis via miR-612. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Casanova, M.R.; Osório, H.; Reis, R.L.; Martins, A.; Neves, N.M. Chondrogenic differentiation induced by extracellular vesicles bound to a nanofibrous substrate. NPJ Regen. Med. 2021, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tan, S.H.S.; Wong, J.R.Y.; Sim, S.J.Y.; Tjio, C.K.E.; Wong, K.L.; Chew, J.R.J.; Hui, J.H.P.; Toh, W.S. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes in bone regenerative strategies—A systematic review of preclinical studies. Mater. Today. Bio 2020, 7, 100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Seo, N.; Shirakura, Y.; Tahara, Y.; Momose, F.; Harada, N.; Ikeda, H.; Akiyoshi, K.; Shiku, H. Activated CD8(+) T cell extracellular vesicles prevent tumour progression by targeting of lesional mesenchymal cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Jiang, L.; Shen, Y.; Guo, D.; Yang, D.; Liu, J.; Fei, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Lin, Z.; Yang, F.; et al. EpCAM-dependent extracellular vesicles from intestinal epithelial cells maintain intestinal tract immune balance. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Eichholz, K.F.; Woods, I.; Riffault, M.; Johnson, G.P.; Corrigan, M.; Lowry, M.C.; Shen, N.; Labour, M.N.; Wynne, K.; O’Driscoll, L.; et al. Human bone marrow stem/stromal cell osteogenesis is regulated via mechanically activated osteocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 1431–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Negri, S.; Wang, Y.; Sono, T.; Lee, S.; Hsu, G.C.; Xu, J.; Meyers, C.A.; Qin, Q.; Broderick, K.; Witwer, K.W.; et al. Human perivascular stem cells prevent bone graft resorption in osteoporotic contexts by inhibiting osteoclast formation. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 1617–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gatti, M.; Beretti, F.; Zavatti, M.; Bertucci, E.; Ribeiro Luz, S.; Palumbo, C.; Maraldi, T. Amniotic Fluid Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Counteract Steroid-Induced Osteoporosis In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niedermair, T.; Lukas, C.; Li, S.; Stöckl, S.; Craiovan, B.; Brochhausen, C.; Federlin, M.; Herrmann, M.; Grässel, S. Influence of Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from Osteoblasts of Patients with Cox-Arthrosis and/or Osteoporosis on Metabolism and Osteogenic Differentiation of BMSCs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 615520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, J.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Liu, Z.Z.; Luo, Z.W.; Rao, S.S.; Jin, L.; Wan, T.F.; Yue, T.; Tan, Y.J.; Yin, H.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles from Child Gut Microbiota Enter into Bone to Preserve Bone Mass and Strength. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bei, H.P.; Hung, P.M.; Yeung, H.L.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X. Bone-a-Petite: Engineering Exosomes towards Bone, Osteochondral, and Cartilage Repair. Small 2021, 17, e2101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, R.Z.; Xu, W.N.; Zheng, H.L.; Zheng, X.F.; Li, B.; Jiang, L.S.; Jiang, S.D. Exosomes derived from vascular endothelial cells antagonize glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting ferritinophagy with resultant limited ferroptosis of osteoblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 6691–6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pinson, M.R.; Chung, D.D.; Adams, A.M.; Scopice, C.; Payne, E.A.; Sivakumar, M.; Miranda, R.C. Extracellular Vesicles in Premature Aging and Diseases in Adulthood Due to Developmental Exposures. Aging Dis. 2021, 12, 1516–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, M. Bone-Adipose Tissue Crosstalk: Role of Adipose Tissue Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Bone Diseases. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 7874–7886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qi, X.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Xu, Z.; Li, Q.; Niu, X.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Exosomes Secreted by Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Repair Critical-Sized Bone Defects through Enhanced Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis in Osteoporotic Rats. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 12, 836–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Deng, L.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Fu, Q. Imipramine Protects against Bone Loss by Inhibition of Osteoblast-Derived Microvesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Liu, M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q. Emerging Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Bone Remodeling. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xie, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Ge, W.; Tang, P. Involvement of serum-derived exosomes of elderly patients with bone loss in failure of bone remodeling via alteration of exosomal bone-related proteins. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wei, Y.; Tang, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Miron, R.J.; Zhang, Y. Extracellular vesicles derived from the mid-to-late stage of osteoblast differentiation markedly enhance osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 514, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ni, C.Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Rao, S.S.; Yin, H.; Huang, J.; Tan, Y.J.; Wang, Z.X.; Cao, J.; et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells-derived extracellular vesicles exert potent bone protective effects by CLEC11A-mediated regulation of bone metabolism. Theranostics 2020, 10, 2293–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Su, H.; Cheng, J. Exosomes from adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate diabetic osteoporosis in rats through suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation in osteoclasts. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2021, 131, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yu, D.; Zhang, L.; Dou, X.; Wu, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S. Evaluation of the cargo contents and potential role of extracellular vesicles in osteoporosis. Aging 2021, 13, 19282–19292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, K.S.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.K.; Yeom, S.H.; Woo, C.H.; Jung, Y.J.; Yun, Y.E.; Park, S.Y.; Han, J.; Kim, E.; et al. Extracellular vesicles from adipose tissue-derived stem cells alleviate osteoporosis through osteoprotegerin and miR-21-5p. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Jiang, L.B.; Tian, L.; Zhang, C.G. Bone marrow stem cells-derived exosomes extracted from osteoporosis patients inhibit osteogenesis via microRNA-21/SMAD7. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 6221–6229. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Song, H.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Qian, J.; Wang, Y.; Cui, J.; Weng, W.; Cao, L.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y.; et al. Reversal of Osteoporotic Activity by Endothelial Cell-Secreted Bone Targeting and Biocompatible Exosomes. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3040–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Han, X.; Zhao, T.; Qu, P.; Li, G.; Wang, W. Extracellular vesicle-encapsulated miR-22-3p from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell promotes osteogenic differentiation via FTO inhibition. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhai, L.; Liu, D.; Abdurahman, A.; Zhang, Y.; Yokota, H.; Zhang, P. Mechanical loading stimulates bone angiogenesis through enhancing type H vessel formation and downregulating exosomal miR-214-3p from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2021, 35, e21150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, L.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.T.; Liu, A.F.; Zhang, C.; Han, J.C.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X.Y.; Lv, F.Q. Exosomal miR-186 derived from BMSCs promote osteogenesis through hippo signaling pathway in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021, 16, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Han, X.; Zhao, T.; Qu, P. Extracellular Vesicle-Encapsulated miR-29b-3p Released from Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Underpins Osteogenic Differentiation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 581545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, R.; Shen, X.; Xie, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, D.; Chen, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, J.; et al. Identification of the canonical and noncanonical role of miR-143/145 in estrogen-deficient bone loss. Theranostics 2021, 11, 5491–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lu, Q.; Qin, H.; Tan, H.; Wei, C.; Yang, X.; He, J.; Liang, W.; Li, J. Senescence Osteoblast-Derived Exosome-Mediated miR-139-5p Regulates Endothelial Cell Functions. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5576023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, P.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ma, X.; Sun, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, W. microRNA-935-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes enhance osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in osteoporotic rats. Life Sci. 2021, 272, 119204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wei, Y.; Ma, H.; Zhou, H.; Yin, H.; Yang, J.; Song, Y.; Yang, B. miR-424-5p shuttled by bone marrow stem cells-derived exosomes attenuates osteogenesis via regulating WIF1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin axis. Aging 2021, 13, 17190–17201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xun, J.; Li, C.; Liu, M.; Mei, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, B.; Xie, F.; Liu, Y.; Dai, R. Serum exosomes from young rats improve the reduced osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in aged rats with osteoporosis after fatigue loading in vivo. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, X.; Chen, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Cui, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, R. miR-27a-5p-Abundant Small Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Epimedium-Preconditioned Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells Stimulate Osteogenesis by Targeting Atg4B-Mediated Autophagy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 642646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, D. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Inhibit Osteoporosis via MicroRNA-27a-Induced Inhibition of DKK2-Mediated Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Inflammation 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tu, C.; He, J.; Chen, R.; Li, Z. The Emerging Role of Exosomal Non-coding RNAs in Musculoskeletal Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 4523–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cao, Q.; Guo, Z.; Yan, Y.; Wu, J.; Song, C. Exosomal long noncoding RNAs in aging and age-related diseases. IUBMB Life 2019, 71, 1846–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Lei, P.; Wen, T. LncRNA MALAT1 shuttled by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-secreted exosomes alleviates osteoporosis through mediating microRNA-34c/SATB2 axis. Aging 2019, 11, 8777–8791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Liang, F.; Deng, C.; Seidi, F.; Xiao, H. Fluorescent paper-based analytical devices for ultra-sensitive dual-type RNA detections and accurate gastric cancer screening. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 197, 113781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhao, Q.; Liu, J.; Deng, H.; Ma, R.; Liao, J.Y.; Liang, H.; Hu, J.; Li, J.; Guo, Z.; Cai, J.; et al. Targeting Mitochondria-Located circRNA SCAR Alleviates NASH via Reducing mROS Output. Cell 2020, 183, 76–93.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Shan, S.K.; Lin, X.; Li, F.; Xu, F.; Zhong, J.Y.; Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, M.H.; Wu, F.; Yuan, L.Q. Exosomes and Bone Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 4536–4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cao, G.; Meng, X.; Han, X.; Li, J. Exosomes derived from circRNA Rtn4-modified BMSCs attenuate TNF-α-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in murine MC3T3-E1 cells by sponging miR-146a. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20193436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhan, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, S.; Qin, Q.; Wang, L.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Z. Organelle-inspired supramolecular nanomedicine to precisely abolish liver tumor growth and metastasis. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 9, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhu, C.; Wang, G.; Xia, Y.; Blumenthal, E.J.; Mao, W.; Wan, Y. Engineered extracellular vesicles for concurrent Anti-PDL1 immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 9, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, S.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Wei, M.; Yuan, L.; Yang, G. Selective Encapsulation of Therapeutic mRNA in Engineered Extracellular Vesicles by DNA Aptamer. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 8563–8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhai, X.; Chen, K.; Yang, H.; Li, B.; Zhou, T.; Wang, H.; Zhou, H.; Chen, S.; Zhou, X.; Wei, X.; et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from CD73 modified human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate inflammation after spinal cord injury. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Silva, A.M.; Lázaro-Ibáñez, E.; Gunnarsson, A.; Dhande, A.; Daaboul, G.; Peacock, B.; Osteikoetxea, X.; Salmond, N.; Friis, K.P.; Shatnyeva, O.; et al. Quantification of protein cargo loading into engineered extracellular vesicles at single-vesicle and single-molecule resolution. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xing, Z.; Zhao, C.; Wu, S.; Yang, D.; Zhang, C.; Wei, X.; Wei, X.; Su, H.; Liu, H.; Fan, Y. Hydrogel Loaded with VEGF/TFEB-Engineered Extracellular Vesicles for Rescuing Critical Limb Ischemia by a Dual-Pathway Activation Strategy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 11, e2100334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dooley, K.; McConnell, R.E.; Xu, K.; Lewis, N.D.; Haupt, S.; Youniss, M.R.; Martin, S.; Sia, C.L.; McCoy, C.; Moniz, R.J.; et al. A versatile platform for generating engineered extracellular vesicles with defined therapeutic properties. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2021, 29, 1729–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Gu, J.; Zhang, J.; Shi, H.; Qian, H.; Wang, D.; Xu, W.; Pan, J.; Santos, H.A. Engineered Extracellular Vesicles for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2005709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yao, X.; Lyu, P.; Yoo, K.; Yadav, M.K.; Singh, R.; Atala, A.; Lu, B. Engineered extracellular vesicles as versatile ribonucleoprotein delivery vehicles for efficient and safe CRISPR genome editing. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sheller-Miller, S.; Radnaa, E.; Yoo, J.K.; Kim, E.; Choi, K.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.N.; Richardson, L.; Choi, C.; Menon, R. Exosomal delivery of NF-κB inhibitor delays LPS-induced preterm birth and modulates fetal immune cell profile in mouse models. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabd3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, S.; Salazar-Puerta, A.; Richards, J.; Khan, S.; Hoyland, J.A.; Gallego-Perez, D.; Walter, B.; Higuita-Castro, N.; Purmessur, D. Non-viral reprogramming of human nucleus pulposus cells with FOXF1 via extracellular vesicle delivery: An in vitro and in vivo study. Eur. Cells Mater. 2021, 41, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lan, F.; He, J.; Wu, Y. The essential role of osteoclast-derived exosomes in magnetic nanoparticle-infiltrated hydroxyapatite scaffold modulated osteoblast proliferation in an osteoporosis model. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 8720–8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, Y.; Yao, J.; Cai, L.; Liu, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Li, T.; Liu, M.; Lai, R.; et al. Bone-Targeted Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteoporosis Therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7967–7977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Huang, B.; Su, Y.; Shen, E.; Song, M.; Liu, D.; Qi, H. Extracellular vesicles from GPNMB-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells attenuate bone loss in an ovariectomized rat model. Life Sci. 2021, 272, 119208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Liu, W.; Huang, J.; Chen, F.; Xie, D.; Wang, L.; Ye, C.; Zhu, Q.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Yang, L. MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles overexpressing miR-20a promoted the osteointegration of porous titanium alloy by enhancing osteogenesis via targeting BAMBI. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Yang, X.; Zhou, F.; Yuan, P.; Dou, G.; Liu, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Jin, R.; Dong, Y.; Zhou, J.; et al. T cell-depleting nanoparticles ameliorate bone loss by reducing activated T cells and regulating the Treg/Th17 balance. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 3150–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhou, X.; Cornel, E.J.; Fan, Z.; He, S.; Du, J. Bone-Targeting Polymer Vesicles for Effective Therapy of Osteoporosis. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 7998–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Melnik, B.C.; Schmitz, G. Exosomes of pasteurized milk: Potential pathogens of Western diseases. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Stickney, Z.; Losacco, J.; McDevitt, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, B. Development of exosome surface display technology in living human cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 472, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fuhrmann, G.; Serio, A.; Mazo, M.; Nair, R.; Stevens, M.M. Active loading into extracellular vesicles significantly improves the cellular uptake and photodynamic effect of porphyrins. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2015, 205, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yuan, F.; Li, Y.M.; Wang, Z. Preserving extracellular vesicles for biomedical applications: Consideration of storage stability before and after isolation. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Abhange, K.; Makler, A.; Wen, Y.; Ramnauth, N.; Mao, W.; Asghar, W.; Wan, Y. Small extracellular vesicles in cancer. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 3705–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cooper, J.M.; Wiklander, P.B.; Nordin, J.Z.; Al-Shawi, R.; Wood, M.J.; Vithlani, M.; Schapira, A.H.; Simons, J.P.; El-Andaloussi, S.; Alvarez-Erviti, L. Systemic exosomal siRNA delivery reduced alpha-synuclein aggregates in brains of transgenic mice. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2014, 29, 1476–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Cai, S.; Luo, B.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, X.; Lan, F.; Yi, Q.; Wu, Y. Immuno-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles via host-guest interactions for high-purity capture and mild release of exosomes. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 14280–14289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jia, G.; Han, Y.; An, Y.; Ding, Y.; He, C.; Wang, X.; Tang, Q. NRP-1 targeted and cargo-loaded exosomes facilitate simultaneous imaging and therapy of glioma in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 12 00324 g001 550
Figure 1. Biogenesis of different EV subtypes.
Figure 1. Biogenesis of different EV subtypes.
Membranes 12 00324 g001
Membranes 12 00324 g002 550
Figure 2. The potential therapeutic effects of EVs in osteoporosis.
Figure 2. The potential therapeutic effects of EVs in osteoporosis.
Membranes 12 00324 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Huang, P.; Lin, J.; Zeng, H. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: A Scoping Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030324

AMA Style

Zhang W, Huang P, Lin J, Zeng H. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: A Scoping Review. Membranes. 2022; 12(3):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030324

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Weifei, Pengzhou Huang, Jianjing Lin, and Hui Zeng. 2022. "The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: A Scoping Review" Membranes 12, no. 3: 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030324

APA Style

Zhang, W., Huang, P., Lin, J., & Zeng, H. (2022). The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoporosis: A Scoping Review. Membranes, 12(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030324

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop